text
stringlengths
14
24k
entities
listlengths
0
68
On 23.10.2004, whey they again contacted Mahavir Singh then he replied that he had no knowledge as to where the truck is at that time.
[ { "end": 13, "label": "DATE", "start": 3 }, { "end": 54, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 41 } ]
On 18.10.1999 he recorded the voluntary statement of P.W.6 Kadher on the basis of which he arrested the 5th accused Ravisankar and the accused Mariappan, since deceased and sent them to judicial custody.
[ { "end": 13, "label": "DATE", "start": 3 }, { "end": 65, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 59 }, { "end": 126, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 116 }, { "end": 152, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 143 } ]
The fact in issue or relevant fact is whether appellant Arun took any part and if so what part in the murder of Sadhana.
[ { "end": 60, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 56 }, { "end": 119, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 112 } ]
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NATIONAL HIGHWAY DIVISION KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA 3. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI V.M. BANAKAR, ADDL. SPP FOR R1-R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING
[ { "end": 69, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 4 }, { "end": 124, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 77 }, { "end": 161, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 149 }, { "end": 229, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 209 }, { "end": 258, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 237 } ]
Before considering how far the cashew-nut purchases made by the respondents are, on the findings returned by the High Court, entitled to the protection of article 286(1)(b), it is necessary first to ascertain the scope of such protection.
[ { "end": 172, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 155 } ]
The court held that the claimant who opts for accepting the lump-sum compensation based on structured formula would get the relief at the earliest.
[]
The petitioner and several others then approached the General Foreman who intervened and ordered the petitioner and others to join duty.
[]
The learned Judges relying on a Calcutta case reported in Rogers Pratt Shellac Co, v. Secy. of State, AIR 1925 Cal 34, observed:-- "It is clear therefore, that income may accrue, to an assessee without the actual receipt of the same.
[ { "end": 40, "label": "GPE", "start": 32 }, { "end": 117, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 58 } ]
Let fresh bailable warrant of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) be issued through Superintendent of Police, Dhar to the respondents No.1 Sikandar and No.2 Aziz for a date to be fixed by the Registry to secure the presence of the respondents No.1 and 2, made returnable within six weeks. (P.K.Jaiswal) (Jarat Kumar Jain) Judge Judge ns. W.P.No.1361/2013 14/12/2015 Parties through their Counsel.
[ { "end": 116, "label": "GPE", "start": 112 }, { "end": 149, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 141 }, { "end": 163, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 159 }, { "end": 312, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 301 }, { "end": 350, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 334 }, { "end": 448, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 432 }, { "end": 459, "label": "DATE", "start": 449 } ]
Section 8 of the NDPS Act of 1985 and Rule 53 of the NDPS Rules of 1985 contain a prohibitory clause.
[ { "end": 9, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 0 }, { "end": 33, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 17 }, { "end": 45, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 38 }, { "end": 71, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 53 } ]
The deceased was then dealt dharia blows by the defendants in the neighbouring field of the second respondent Parshottam and murder of the deceased was committed by belabouring him cruelly and intentionally out of enmity and malice.
[ { "end": 120, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 110 } ]
30.The Ld. Trial Court referred to Dalbir Singh Vs. State of Haryana (2000) 5 SCC 82 to deny the benevolent provisions of release on probation to the appellant and to award substantive sentences for the <span class="hidden_text" id="span_14">Crl.
[ { "end": 86, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 37 } ]
4/21 Darvish was convicted for the offence u/s 25 of the Arms Act while other co-accused persons namely Yash Sharma and Lekhraj were acquitted.
[ { "end": 12, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 5 }, { "end": 49, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 45 }, { "end": 65, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 57 }, { "end": 115, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 104 }, { "end": 127, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 120 } ]
There was an offer to send details of the routes where augmentation of trips was considered necessary and to supply the names of suitable operators for that purpose on receipt of a reply from the State Transport Authority.
[]
Therefore, Special Case No. 24 of 1982 and Special Case No. 3/83 pending in the Court of Special judge, Greater Bombay Shri R.B. Sule are withdrawn and transferred to the High Court of Bombay with a request to the learned Chief Justice to assign these two cases to a sitting Judge of the High Court.
[ { "end": 38, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 11 }, { "end": 64, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 43 }, { "end": 118, "label": "COURT", "start": 80 }, { "end": 133, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 124 }, { "end": 191, "label": "COURT", "start": 171 } ]
In the instant case, since the property was pledged to the respondent bank and for non-payment of the loan amount the property was attached for the purposes of sale, provisions of the Act, 2002 will be applicable in the instant case which bars such suits and grant of injunction.
[]
After referring to these decisions, a Constitution Bench of this Court in Haricharan Kurmi v. State of Bihar [1964 (6) SCR 623] further clarified the legal position thus: ".In dealing with a case against an accused person
[ { "end": 127, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 74 } ]
It is also in the evidence of PW.24 that accused was taken by the police with other witnesses to a distance of 15 to 16 kms. from Hunsur towards Mysore, where mahazar Ex.P.48 was prepared and signed by him.
[ { "end": 136, "label": "GPE", "start": 130 }, { "end": 151, "label": "GPE", "start": 145 } ]
operated with the Commissioner of Income-tax most willingly and produced the documents of title and furnished all other particulars and handed over possession of the property and also attorned the tenancy of a portion of the building in favour of the Central Government.
[ { "end": 269, "label": "ORG", "start": 251 } ]
The report of radiological examination of the prosecutrix PW 2 Monika is also Ex. P/5, which shows x-rays of elbow, wrist joint and pelvis were taken for determining the radiological age of the prosecutrix and it has opined in that report Ex. P/5 that the age of the prosecutrix PW 2 Monika was about between 15 to 17 years,
[ { "end": 69, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 63 }, { "end": 290, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 284 } ]
The unsecured loan shall not carry any interest during the implementation period and such unsecured loans may carry interest at the rate not exceeding the average rate of interest on the Institutional Rupee Loans for the Project or the rate of dividend paid on Equity capital, whichever is lower.
[]
The evidence of Champalal Jain (P. W. 1) is, more or less, to the same effect.
[ { "end": 30, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 16 } ]
In regard to the enumerated matters in Section 68(2), there is a statutory recognition that the State Government has power to make rules with regard to them.
[ { "end": 52, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 39 } ]
Thus unless and until the Assessing Officer bid obtained the details and information regarding the exact bifurcation of provisions under various heads described above, it could not have been said as to what amount pertained to which particular head and whether the head 'sundries' also included any doubtful debts.
[]
Before the Supreme Court, the State contended that the Board of Revenue was not conferred with such authority and that the circular in fact granted an exemption.
[ { "end": 24, "label": "COURT", "start": 11 } ]
That is how the same is before us. 2. RSA 116/2011 has been preferred impugning the judgment dated 9 th April, 2010 of the Civil Judge rejecting the plaint in the suit preferred by the appellant as well as the judgment dated 4 th March, 2011 of the Learned Additional District Judge dismissing the first appeal preferred by the appellant.
[ { "end": 52, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 40 }, { "end": 117, "label": "DATE", "start": 101 }, { "end": 243, "label": "DATE", "start": 227 } ]
The only Avadh case to which we have been referred is Dost Mohammad v. Emperor, AIR 1944 Oudh 310.
[ { "end": 14, "label": "GPE", "start": 9 }, { "end": 97, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 54 } ]
Petitioner No. 5, M. L. Daga, of the three Rules is the agent of the owners in respect of the above collieries.
[ { "end": 28, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 18 } ]
It was also rightly held that Manoj Sood (No. 2) was not meant to protect their right which, indeed, was born under order dated 11-10-1989, passed subsequent to that decision.
[ { "end": 40, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 30 }, { "end": 138, "label": "DATE", "start": 128 } ]
The bulk of the beneficiaries are rural indigents and the rest urban workers.
[]
Again, there is no indication in this chapter that the Mutawallis of wakfs-alal-aulad have some different powers in relation to the usufructs of the wakf property or in relation to the management thereof.
[]
N. K. Sen, J., who dealt with it held that the Magistrate had been under a complete misapprehension about the nature of the possession of the petitioners before him, because the only possession which they had claimed in the proceedings and were still claiming was possession as tenants under the Bhuan Chandra Bhar Estate Limited.
[ { "end": 9, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 0 }, { "end": 329, "label": "ORG", "start": 296 } ]
Dr. Gurmanjit Rai, Lecturer, Forensic Medicines, Medical College, Amritsar (PW-1) conducted the post mortem examination on the dead body of Sucha Singh.
[ { "end": 17, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 4 }, { "end": 74, "label": "ORG", "start": 29 }, { "end": 151, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 140 } ]
It is pertinent to note that the alleged transactions took place between 1990 and 1993 as per the FIR registered in Crime No.15 of 1996 dated 24.06.1996 by the C.B.C.I.D..
[ { "end": 135, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 116 }, { "end": 152, "label": "DATE", "start": 142 }, { "end": 169, "label": "ORG", "start": 160 } ]
On September 9, 1981 a detailed memorandum was prepared for cabinet discussion.
[ { "end": 20, "label": "DATE", "start": 3 } ]
5. MOP No.722 of 2007 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge (FTC), Visakhapatnam is the claim by the minor children for the death of their mother.
[ { "end": 22, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 4 }, { "end": 137, "label": "COURT", "start": 52 } ]
In that case the assessee entered into an agreement with an oil company by which she sold to the company 20 acres of her land.
[]
He took his brother to Hindu Rao Hospital in a police jeep where he remained admitted for about 10 days.
[ { "end": 41, "label": "ORG", "start": 23 } ]
But at the same time, it may be pointed out that so far as the State of Rajasthan is concerned, it is conceded by both the parties that the Indian Parliament has not up till now enacted any law on the subject of extradition of the fugitive offenders who, after having committed offences in other parts of India, take asylum in Rajasthan.
[ { "end": 81, "label": "GPE", "start": 72 }, { "end": 157, "label": "ORG", "start": 140 }, { "end": 310, "label": "GPE", "start": 305 }, { "end": 336, "label": "GPE", "start": 327 } ]
In the present case, the jagir was a grant from the Rulers of ex-Jodhpur State and, therefore, the doctrine of incorporation does not seem to be applicable.
[ { "end": 72, "label": "GPE", "start": 65 } ]
Does it violate the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution?
[ { "end": 47, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 37 }, { "end": 67, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 55 } ]
Hence, all the three accused persons,namely, Aman Bhardwaj @ Bobby, Kapil Sharma @ Monu and Mohd. Tayyab are acquitted for the offence U/s. 201 of IPC read with Section 120B of IPC.
[ { "end": 66, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 45 }, { "end": 87, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 68 }, { "end": 104, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 92 }, { "end": 143, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 137 }, { "end": 150, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 147 }, { "end": 173, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 161 }, { "end": 180, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 177 } ]
The writ petitioners have challenged the order of the Director of Consolidation of Holdings Punjab passed under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holding (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act. 1948 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Act) in this petition.
[ { "end": 98, "label": "ORG", "start": 66 }, { "end": 122, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 112 }, { "end": 207, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 130 } ]
(viii) Oil & Flour Mills v. State of Mysore [C.R.P. No. 1157 of 1961 (Karnataka High Court)]. - In this case this Court held that seegekai powder (soapnut powder) prepared out of seegekai (soapnut) was not a different commodity and, therefore, cannot be taxed as a separate item.
[ { "end": 94, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 10 } ]
(5) The Civil Revision, which was heard by this Court, was from the order dated 2-9-1970, which was passed in M. J. C. No. 3 of 1970.
[ { "end": 88, "label": "DATE", "start": 80 }, { "end": 132, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 110 } ]
From the further evidence of Investigating officer it has come on record that in view of fingerprint expert report and on police authorities coming to know that the appellant was involved in this crime and was in Chhindwara (M.P.) District Prison, necessary steps were taken by the Investigating Agency to secure his presence and on effecting his arrest, supplementary charge-sheet came to be filed against him.
[ { "end": 246, "label": "ORG", "start": 213 } ]
The evidence against the appellant is wholly circumstantial, and consists mainly of (1) the existence of a strong motive, (2) the conduct of the appellant on the day when the murder was committed, (3) the recovery of a blood- stained axe and a false beard at the instance of the appellant, and (4) a confession made by him 'before the Magistrate, P.W. 21, on 3-6-1952.
[ { "end": 367, "label": "DATE", "start": 359 } ]
Ravula Venkat -do- -do- 0-03-02 3-07-07 01-07-25 5-6-4 Reddy SC.
[ { "end": 13, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 0 }, { "end": 39, "label": "DATE", "start": 32 }, { "end": 48, "label": "DATE", "start": 40 }, { "end": 54, "label": "DATE", "start": 49 }, { "end": 60, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 55 } ]
His Lordship Justice K.T. Thomas in Hamsa v. Ibrahim, in fact answered all the doubts raised in this reference.
[ { "end": 32, "label": "JUDGE", "start": 21 }, { "end": 52, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 36 } ]
The fourth respondent one Mr. Abbas Ali, claimed to be the Inspector of Excise has also filed a separate counter.
[ { "end": 39, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 30 } ]
In view of this, the learned counsel for the assessee urged the Bench to allow the depreciation as these transactions are genuine lease transactions.
[]
It is reiterated that apart from the above amount, the claimants are entitled to interest at the rate of 12 per cent per annum on their respective shares from the date of filing of the original petition.
[]
This Court held in the said case that Rule 9 (2) of the Rules fixing strength of ethyl alcohol in toddy is not arbitrary or unreasonable.
[ { "end": 48, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 38 } ]
AND S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.5573/2012 Mahendra Kumar Yadav & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
[ { "end": 98, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 4 } ]
I have heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent - State.
[]
In his opinion there was no evidence of recent sexual intercourse.
[]
But the underlying principle is the same.
[]
The Central Counsel of Indian Medicine has revised the norms for the functioning of Ayurveda Colleges and prescribed 13 Department systems as basic minimum standard for the functioning of Ayurveda Medical Colleges in India.
[ { "end": 38, "label": "ORG", "start": 4 }, { "end": 213, "label": "ORG", "start": 188 }, { "end": 222, "label": "GPE", "start": 217 } ]
On receiving such complaint at Police Station Suatala, an offence under Sections 394 and 342 of I.P.C. was registered against Ambika Prasad, his son Abhishek Dubey and other unidentified persons at about 3.45 PM.
[ { "end": 53, "label": "ORG", "start": 31 }, { "end": 92, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 72 }, { "end": 102, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 96 }, { "end": 139, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 126 }, { "end": 163, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 149 } ]
Plaintiff No. 2- Ramesh Prasad had taken some loan from defendant No. 2- Kushal Singh on 21/5/1984 and 11/10/1985 of Rs. 4,000/- and 4100/- and on said dates executed sale deeds respectively in the name of defendant No. 1.
[ { "end": 30, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 17 }, { "end": 85, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 73 }, { "end": 98, "label": "DATE", "start": 89 }, { "end": 113, "label": "DATE", "start": 103 } ]
Under such contract, the goods which are imported by the Government under a licence issued in favour of the Controller, will be taken delivery of by the petitioner as agent of the Government and then delivered to the respective consignees.
[]
The contention of the petitioner that respondents 2 and 3 ought to have disproved his case to succeed in their cases also cannot be accepted in law.
[]
Investigating Officer of that case has not been examined in defence to state that Manohar Lal (PW-14) had been cited as witness in the said case.
[ { "end": 93, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 82 } ]
Law provides for a sentence of either description upto one year or with fine upto Rs. 1,000/- or both for the offence under Section 323 IPC.
[ { "end": 135, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 124 }, { "end": 139, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 136 } ]
It then quoted from a judgment of Supreme Court in Ambica Prasad Mishra Vs. State of U.P., reported at AIR 1980 SC 1762, in para 23 as under : "23. ...
[ { "end": 47, "label": "COURT", "start": 34 }, { "end": 119, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 51 } ]
In that case again the provisions of Orissa Mining Areas Development Fund Act were Questioned on the ground that the said Act could not be in force after the coming into force of the Central Act with which we are concerned in this case.
[ { "end": 77, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 37 } ]
The said Maxim means that general words do not derogate from the special.
[]
As the Act VI of 1958 was repugnant to a Central law on the same subiect it was void under Article 254 because it did not receive the President's assent.
[ { "end": 21, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 7 }, { "end": 102, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 91 } ]
The Respondents above named state as follows: On the direction of the Hon'ble Court, the Respondents have given proposals to give effect to the Agreement dated 29-1-1982, except to the extent it stands modified/varied, as specifically mentioned therein, because of the subsequent events.
[ { "end": 173, "label": "DATE", "start": 164 } ]
To corroborate his statement, he examined PW4 Sardar Joga Singh, his relative who was following his car in a jeep.
[ { "end": 63, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 46 } ]
It is also not in dispute that complainant has urged in the grounds of appeal before the National Consumer Disputes Redresal Commission, that Post Mortem is a must to know exact cause of death.
[ { "end": 135, "label": "COURT", "start": 89 } ]
All appeals of the State arising from the judgments of the learned District Judge dated 29.4.1995, 6.5.1995, 8.5.1995 and 8.3.1996 awarding Rs. 9,15,000/- per acre to the claimants are hereby partly accepted .and the claimants instead of Rs. 9,15,000/- would be entitled to get the above amount of Rs. 6,53,400/- per acre with all statutory benefits.
[ { "end": 97, "label": "DATE", "start": 88 }, { "end": 107, "label": "DATE", "start": 99 }, { "end": 117, "label": "DATE", "start": 109 }, { "end": 130, "label": "DATE", "start": 122 } ]
Smt.Hema Kulkarni, the learned counsel appears for accused No.6 in Criminal Appeal No. 372/2008.
[ { "end": 17, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 4 }, { "end": 95, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 67 } ]
In the result, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions for trial.
[]
In other words the High Court upheld the view of the Tribunal on the first question while on the second question it took the view that the unabsorbed depreciation and development rebate were deductible before arriving at the figure that would be exigible to the deduction of 8% under, s. 80E(1) and therefore.
[ { "end": 294, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 285 } ]
We, accordingly, find and hold that the compensation for the loss of Appellant's future earnings must be computed on that basis.
[]
P.W. 35 the wood stall keeper Tilakchand, who saw him on his way to pick up his victim, is definite that the appellant was not wear- ing a coat at the time.
[ { "end": 40, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 30 } ]
However, the learned member of the Tribunal did not accept the evidence tendered by the medical officer, Dr.Veeranna Satnoor (PW8) regarding his evaluation of physical disability at 40%, and has awarded Rs.10,000/- towards pain and suffering, Rs.25,000/- towards medical expenses, Rs.10,000/- towards loss of future amenities in life, Rs.3,200/- towards conveyance and special diet and Rs.28,800/- towards loss of earning due to disability, in all, Rs.76,000/-.
[ { "end": 124, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 108 } ]
After when the investigation was over, the police submitted a crime report against the three appellants in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Hanumangarh, who, in his turn, committed the case for trial.
[ { "end": 152, "label": "COURT", "start": 111 } ]
she had knowledge of it only after the death of Chimpirayya, her knowledge dated back to the date when the Will was executed, 'and, therefore, when Chimpirayya died he must be deemed to have died separated from the family with the result that the Will would operate on his separate interest.
[ { "end": 59, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 48 }, { "end": 159, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 148 } ]
The Court below has come to the conclusion that the reason given for not filing written statement, though sufficient opportunity was given on 11.10.2002, 15.11.2002 and on 9.12.2002, is nothing but false.
[ { "end": 152, "label": "DATE", "start": 142 }, { "end": 153, "label": "DATE", "start": 152 }, { "end": 164, "label": "DATE", "start": 154 }, { "end": 181, "label": "DATE", "start": 172 } ]
From the above evidence and particularly lack of expert evidence it is difficult to conclude that accused No. 1 Sukha had committed forgery to secure a passport to leave India.
[ { "end": 117, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 112 }, { "end": 175, "label": "GPE", "start": 170 } ]
That Article 14 gets attracted in a case of disproportionate punishment was the view of this Court in Bhagat Ram v. State of H.P., also.
[ { "end": 15, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 5 }, { "end": 129, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 102 } ]
That order of the State Government is at An-nexure-A to the petition.
[]
And rights and interests of citizen of the independent sovereign state continue to be governed by legislations enacted for colonies by the British Parliament.
[ { "end": 157, "label": "ORG", "start": 139 } ]
Copy of the chargesheet is not filed and it can be said that police FA No. 14/13 & Anr. did not file chargesheet for such offence against the respondent No. 1, driver. 12) Copy of driving licence of respondent No. 1 - Vijay Kharat is on the record at Exh. 36.
[ { "end": 236, "label": "RESPONDENT", "start": 224 } ]
India is one of the signatories to the Convention and it played a commendable role suggesting suitable amendments in the preparatory conferences.
[ { "end": 5, "label": "GPE", "start": 0 } ]
According to the writ petitioners the amendment that has been brought forth has ushered drastic changes in the Principal Act frustrating the whole object and purpose of the Act and hence, the same is totally unconstitutional.
[]
"Now here the first six items, amounting to Rs. 20,74,973, may Perhaps reasonably never be regarded as the equivalent of cash, but the seventh item of Rs. 17,34,596, consisting of the debtor's own promissory notes, was clearly not an equivalent of cash.
[]
This resolution was communicated to the Bar Council of Kerala by registered A.D. post on 12.2.1997.
[ { "end": 61, "label": "ORG", "start": 40 }, { "end": 98, "label": "DATE", "start": 89 } ]
is a lis an affirmation by one party and denial by another,
[]
The words used are " in respect of any year" and not " in respect of the year ".
[]
On the basis of the said information of accused no.1- Kishor, an offence vide Crime No.26 of 2005 was registered as motor accident offence and the investigation was entrusted to PW-10- Police Head Constable Motiram Hiray.
[ { "end": 60, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 54 }, { "end": 97, "label": "CASE_NUMBER", "start": 78 }, { "end": 220, "label": "WITNESS", "start": 207 } ]
He deposed that Ramesh deceased and appellant Rajender were residing together in a quarter and on 15.10.2006, he started watching television in a room in Commando Complex, Newal and Ramesh was lying on the cot and Azad Constable came there, who was also on duty.
[ { "end": 22, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 16 }, { "end": 54, "label": "PETITIONER", "start": 46 }, { "end": 108, "label": "DATE", "start": 98 }, { "end": 177, "label": "GPE", "start": 172 }, { "end": 188, "label": "OTHER_PERSON", "start": 182 } ]
Therefore, the assessee should earn a profit from exporting goods out of India in Order to claim deduction under Section 80HHC of the IT Act, 1961.
[ { "end": 78, "label": "GPE", "start": 73 }, { "end": 126, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 113 }, { "end": 146, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 134 } ]
His main contention is that as on the date when the hire-purchase agreement was entered into, the vehicles still stood in the name of Chakra Traders, and that there was no obligation to register the charge under Section 132 of the Companies Act.
[ { "end": 223, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 212 }, { "end": 244, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 231 } ]
/s. Birla Jute Mfg. Co. Ltd., Satna 93.50 upto an annual production of 225,000 tonnes.
[ { "end": 38, "label": "ORG", "start": 7 } ]
In India, Parliament inserted Section 178-A by the Amending Act 10 of 1957, but it did not, in its wisdom, go as far as Section 290(2) of the English Act.
[ { "end": 8, "label": "GPE", "start": 3 }, { "end": 20, "label": "ORG", "start": 10 }, { "end": 43, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 30 }, { "end": 74, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 51 }, { "end": 134, "label": "PROVISION", "start": 120 }, { "end": 153, "label": "STATUTE", "start": 142 } ]
It is however well settled that a, writ of certiorari lies only against judicial or quasi judicial authorities or tribunals and records need be produced in this Court for quashing the proceedings if held necessary as was observed in Udit Na-rain Singh v. Addl. Member Board of Revenue, Bihar, .
[ { "end": 291, "label": "PRECEDENT", "start": 233 } ]
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that even though the business of the petitioner-company is akin to the business carried on by a commercial bank, a different standard has been adopted for banks both in the public and private sectors and the Reserve Bank of India has not made any attempt to control the levy of service charges by banks.
[ { "end": 280, "label": "ORG", "start": 259 } ]