text
stringlengths 14
24k
| entities
listlengths 0
68
|
|---|---|
It was further alleged there were no outstandings due to the family as claimed by the plaintiff. | [] |
The plaintiffs have not sought possession of those properties. | [] |
The only change that is relevant for our purposes is, that under the old law, the non-registration of the copyright had not the effect of entailing the dismissal of an action in respect of infringement of copyright commenced when the Act of 1914 was in force see, Balantrapu Venkata Rao v. Valluri Padmanabha Raju. | [
{
"end": 313,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 264
}
] |
But the Government, unilaterally changed the terms of the settlement by an order dated 10-9-1993. | [
{
"end": 96,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 87
}
] |
(Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge manju Criminal Revision No.2288/2012 25/03/2014 Shri Vinod Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant. | [
{
"end": 18,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 8
},
{
"end": 62,
"label": "CASE_NUMBER",
"start": 32
},
{
"end": 73,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 63
},
{
"end": 97,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 79
}
] |
Ministry of Finance reads as under :-
F.No. 664/99/88 OPIUM GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) dated the 27th September, 1989.
To Collectors of Customs (Preventive).
New Custom House, 2nd Floor, Ballard Estate, Bombay-400 038 Sir, Subject: Authorisation of officers under section 36A(1)(d) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. | [
{
"end": 80,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 61
},
{
"end": 124,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 81
},
{
"end": 155,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 135
},
{
"end": 255,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 245
},
{
"end": 323,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 306
},
{
"end": 377,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 331
}
] |
Since the appellants are insisting upon enforcement of their right through the judicial pressure, they need and seek the protection of law. | [] |
9. Having drawn my attention on the petition of appeal and the trial court record it is submitted by the accused that he had no Criminal Appeal No. 4/15 Page no. 6 of 16 knowledge about the proclamation under section 82 of Cr.P.C issued against him. | [
{
"end": 170,
"label": "CASE_NUMBER",
"start": 129
},
{
"end": 220,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 210
},
{
"end": 230,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 224
}
] |
Similar deemed explanations prescribing higher rate of tax were very much there in all previous notifications issued under Section 3 of the Taxation Act. | [
{
"end": 132,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 123
},
{
"end": 152,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 140
}
] |
I may now deal with the question as to whether the learned Senior Civil Judge was right in disallowing the prayer of the election petitioner to declare him elected instead of the returned candidate. | [] |
In our opinion, however, when the test is 'possibility' of confusion in medicinal preparations, as held by the Supreme Court in Cadila Health Care Ltd., and the Courts have been asked by the Apex Court to take special care, in such cases, since confusion may harm and result in unpleasant consequences, if not disastrous results, the learned Single Judge ought to have granted injunction as prayed by the plaintiffs. | [
{
"end": 124,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 111
},
{
"end": 151,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 128
},
{
"end": 201,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 191
}
] |
Rules 7 and 8 lay down that the suit does not abate by reason of fee marriage of a female plaintiff or defendant, or on the insolvency of the plaintiff unless the assignee or receiver declines to continue the suit or to give security for the costs thereof within such time as the Court may direct. | [
{
"end": 13,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 0
}
] |
The petitioner Chandrasekharan and his younger brother Vembu Iyer claimed to have taken on lease a one-room tenement and a vacant site appurtenant thereto, forming part of the property acquired in this case, from the owner Kurshid Jan Pasha, husband of Ghousia Begum, and to have started in that portion a hotel business under the name and style of Raia Ganapathi Refreshment Stall. | [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 15
},
{
"end": 65,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 55
},
{
"end": 240,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 223
},
{
"end": 266,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 253
},
{
"end": 381,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 349
}
] |
The endorsement though in Marathi, should be of the doctor. | [] |
It is needless to state that taking cognizance of an offence under S. 190(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and condoning delay in filing prosecutions u/S. 473 of the Code are judicial orders in judicial proceedings. | [
{
"end": 79,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 67
},
{
"end": 113,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 87
},
{
"end": 165,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 159
}
] |
The High Court found that the respondent Beti Joga was not commonly known at Beti Hadma. | [
{
"end": 50,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 41
},
{
"end": 87,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 77
}
] |
As per the postmortem report, body was received for examination on 16.01.1995 at 2:30 p.m. and the date and hour of receipt of inquest papers was also 16.01.1995 at 2:30 p.m. | [
{
"end": 77,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 67
},
{
"end": 161,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 151
}
] |
15th September, 2010 V.B. GUPTA, J. ab | [
{
"end": 20,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 31,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 21
}
] |
In a Court of Law or Equity, what the Legislature intended to be done or not to be done can only be legitimately ascertained from that which it has chosen to enact, either in express words or by reasonable and necessary implication." | [] |
Reference in this regard can also be made to the relevant portions of the judgment of the House of Lords which was extracted by the Division Bench in its judgment:
"On this point the most important and decisive authority is Brown v. Dunn, reported in (1893)6 R 67. | [
{
"end": 263,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 224
}
] |
Allegedly, both the appellants identified the cover of the Australian passport as the same belonging to the deceased which they had thrown in the sewer. | [] |
The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant was that the learned single Judge could not have validly imposed the condition that the appellant should not speak about the arrest of the Sankarachariyar in the alleged murder case, nor justify the same, nor speak with respect to the investigation connected therewith, as imposition of such conditions violate the appellants fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution. | [
{
"end": 210,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 195
},
{
"end": 438,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 408
},
{
"end": 458,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 446
}
] |
During the course of the proceedings for the assessment of income-tax for the assessment year 1949-50, it came to the notice of the ITO that a large part of the sale proceeds were realised by the assessee by sending railway receipts consigned to self through V.P.P. to different parts of the territory, which at that time were comprised in British India. | [
{
"end": 353,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 348
}
] |
Furthermore, as per PW.1 Karambir Singh, they had not seen any injury on the person of Krishan and Balbir accused and they never came to know that they had received the injuries and were admitted in Civil Hospital, Assandh. | [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 25
},
{
"end": 94,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 87
},
{
"end": 105,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 99
},
{
"end": 222,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 199
}
] |
It is proved on record by PW22 Inspector Banwari Lal Meena who is neither the author of the recovery memo nor a witness to the same. | [
{
"end": 58,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 41
}
] |
He married the respondent Ara-vindammal, who is his own niece on 13-9-1945. | [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 26
},
{
"end": 74,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 65
}
] |
For this purpose, the assessee has taken overseas entities as 'tested parties' and their margins on mean basis and compared the same with mean of identified comparables. | [] |
All the prosecution witnesses are related to each other and also related to his in-laws and, thus, are interested witnesses. | [] |
The competence of the State Legislature to amend Central Act has been recognised in U.P. Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. R.K. Shukla11O. | [
{
"end": 60,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 49
},
{
"end": 132,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 84
}
] |
Deshbandhu Agarwal, the third respondent, per self, his wife (since died) and his son, respondents Nos. 4 & 5, submitted the tender on March 25, 1987 for a sum of Rs. 2,00,000 which was on negotiation accepted at Rs. 2,55,000. | [
{
"end": 18,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 149,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 135
}
] |
Having answered the questions, the Constitution Bench treated all interlocutory applications as regards interim matters as disposed of (see para 23). | [
{
"end": 53,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 35
}
] |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA 1. | [
{
"end": 38,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 28
}
] |
4. On May 24, 1978, onwards - NVR - 37 shares, the petitioner - 38 shares and Mrs. B. K. P. Rao - 25 shares. | [
{
"end": 18,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 6
},
{
"end": 33,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 30
},
{
"end": 95,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 83
}
] |
In AIR 1968 SC 800, again suspension as an ancillary power was recognised. | [
{
"end": 18,
"label": "CASE_NUMBER",
"start": 3
}
] |
We have asked the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents to show us whether there is any such finding but he was not able to show such a finding recorded by the respondent No. 1 in case of petitioner Deshpande. | [
{
"end": 227,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 218
}
] |
I have heard Ld. Prosecutor for the State and Ld. Counsel Sh. A.K.
Singh for the accused. | [
{
"end": 75,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 62
}
] |
It would thus appear that none of the contentions advanced on behalf of the Insurance Company to escape from the liability with regard to the satisfaction of the whole of the award can be accepted. | [] |
For the reasons given in that judgment I am of the opinion that there is no substance in this contention. | [] |
The question is well settled in view of the decision of a seven-Judge Bench of this Court in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of U.P.......
25. | [
{
"end": 138,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 93
}
] |
One of the oldest among these is the arbitration. | [] |
, 'Land-owner' is described in the Protection Act to mean a person who is defined as such in the Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 (Act 17 of 1887--hereinafter referred to as the 'Revenue Act'). | [
{
"end": 49,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 35
},
{
"end": 126,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 187,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 176
}
] |
The police officers from Mumbai had told the witness and Shri Bhatia that two accused connected with the murder of Dr. Datta Samant were staying in hotel Welcome Inn, cri-appeal-864-00 Room No. 202. | [
{
"end": 31,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 25
},
{
"end": 68,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 62
},
{
"end": 131,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 119
}
] |
In England also, social reforms were introduced to supplement or improve upon the Matrimonial Causes Act by enacting Family Law Reform Act, 1969 and also the Family Law Reform Act, 1987 to confer limited right of succession to the illegitimate children in the property of their parents or allowing the parents to succeed to the property of their illegitimate children. | [
{
"end": 10,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 3
},
{
"end": 104,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 82
},
{
"end": 144,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 117
},
{
"end": 185,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 158
}
] |
After the decision of the above matter the Indra Sawhney's case again came up for discussion in certain writ petitions, which were 13.12.1999 reported in (2000) (1) SCC 168 (Second case). | [
{
"end": 56,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 43
},
{
"end": 141,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 131
},
{
"end": 186,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 154
}
] |
Sh. Sushil Kumar, learned defence counsel for A-6 P.K. Sahi has contended that he has been made a scapegoat and he was not involved in any misconduct. | [
{
"end": 16,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 59,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 50
}
] |
Merely branching or trespassing in another field does not mean that it is a legislation on those topics. | [] |
The respondent no. 3/ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. has produced R3W1, its Legal Manager who has stated in his affidavit EX.R3W1/A that offending vehicle i.e. HR 38 R 7272 was insured in the name of Sh. Jai Jai Ram Yadav for the period 24.12.2011 to 23.12.2012. | [
{
"end": 61,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 21
},
{
"end": 230,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 213
},
{
"end": 256,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 246
},
{
"end": 270,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 260
}
] |
The NCTE issued Notification on 23.8.2010 to provide requisite qualification at different levels. | [
{
"end": 8,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 41,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 32
}
] |
(nil) Subhita Kumari Versus State & Ors 50. 5550/2010 (nil) Naroj Versus State & Ors 51. 5578/2010 (nil) Vimala Devi Versus State & Anr 52. 5583/2010 (nil) Kum Komal Kumari Versus State & Ors 53. 5584/2010 (nil) Shiv Raj Nagar Versus State & Ors 54. 5595/2010 (nil) Poonam Muraria & Anr Versus State & Ors 55. 5607/2010 | [
{
"end": 59,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 6
},
{
"end": 98,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 60
},
{
"end": 149,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 105
},
{
"end": 205,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 156
},
{
"end": 259,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 212
},
{
"end": 319,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 266
}
] |
On 26.07.1998, accused no.1- Mapillai K.H.Sulaiman had engaged PW.2-Boja, PW.3- Paniyeravara Muthu, PW.4-Paniyeravara Baby and CW.5- Bera (not examined before the trial court) for plucking sweet potatoes in the land of one Prakash near Poojekallu of Kutta village. | [
{
"end": 13,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 3
},
{
"end": 50,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 29
},
{
"end": 72,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 68
},
{
"end": 98,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 80
},
{
"end": 122,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 105
},
{
"end": 137,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 133
},
{
"end": 230,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 223
},
{
"end": 246,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 236
},
{
"end": 263,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 250
}
] |
The Supreme Court then further observed as follows (page 427) :
"The word 'manufacture' said Abbott, C.J., in R. v. Wheeler, (1819) 2B & Ald. 345 (349), cited in Stroud's Judicial Dictionary (3rd ed.) Vol. 3, p. 1734. | [
{
"end": 17,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 101,
"label": "JUDGE",
"start": 95
},
{
"end": 170,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 164
}
] |
(3) The information memorandum referred to in sub-regulation 92) shall be dated and signed by all the directors of the scheme. | [
{
"end": 64,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 46
}
] |
It was further provided that should Harvey die before attaining the age of 55 years, the trustees would stand possessed of the capital value of the deferred annuity policy, upon trust to purchase therewith an annuity for Mrs. Harvey with the above insurance company or other insurance company of repute. | [
{
"end": 42,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 36
},
{
"end": 232,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 226
}
] |
This Court finds that the said guidelines could be implemented by learned MM dealing with application under Section 125 CrPC seeking enforcement of orders awarding interim maintenance or maintenance. | [
{
"end": 119,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 108
},
{
"end": 124,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 120
}
] |
If the compensation inclusive of 6% interest from the date of application is not paid by the appellants to the claimant within ihree months from today, it will carry 12% interest from the date of default. | [] |
Kamalakshan, the first respondent, had filed a complaint on the allegation that Kuriachan Chacko had committed offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 and 5(c)(i) of the Act of 1978. | [
{
"end": 11,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 80
},
{
"end": 148,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 137
},
{
"end": 173,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 156
},
{
"end": 203,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 178
}
] |
The exhibits were sent to CFSL for examination and as per the CFSL report Exhibits PX and PY, human blood of blood group "A" was found on the clothes of the appellant as well as his co-accused, which matched with the blood group of the deceased. | [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 26
},
{
"end": 66,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 62
}
] |
It should also be borne in mind that in the case of a serious situation which renders the holding of an inquiry not reasonably practicable, it would be difficult to foresee how long the situation will last and when normalcy would return or be restored. | [] |
If, however, it is held that the said transaction was a private transfer, then it will be hit by Section 8 of the P.D. Act, in view of service of notice under Section 7 of the P.D. Act already effected upon the certificate-debtor. | [
{
"end": 106,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 97
},
{
"end": 122,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 114
},
{
"end": 168,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 159
},
{
"end": 184,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 176
}
] |
He also admitted that he never informed the police anything about the dispute between the deceased and the accused regarding land, well or Patta. | [] |
Therefore, I hereby hold that the Complainant has proved and substantiated the allegations that the cheques in question Ex. CW1/1 and Ex. CW1/2 were issued by the accused in discharge of his legal liability and for consideration. | [] |
The effect of this dicta or observation of the Apex Court is that any stipulation in a contract of employment fixing the term of employment or providing for termination of service by giving a notice for certain specified period of time or payment of wages in lieu thereof will be void, arbitrary and discriminatory and also being opposed to the public policy under Section 23 of the Contract Act. | [
{
"end": 57,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 47
},
{
"end": 375,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 365
},
{
"end": 395,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 383
}
] |
It is common for Parliament to confer by Act on ministers and other executive bodies the power to make general rules with the force of law-to legislate. | [
{
"end": 27,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 17
}
] |
Whether the acts of the detenu forming the basis for arriving at a subjective satisfaction are too remote in point of time to induce any reasonable person to reach such subjective satisfaction must depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. | [] |
The other rather unusual question interestingly raised by the State of Gujarat itself relates to improper conduct of trial by the public prosecutor. | [
{
"end": 78,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 71
}
] |
The report further notes that most of the members of the SAC were not the residents of the locality (Shella Village) and were living in Shillong while occasionally visiting Shella. | [
{
"end": 60,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 57
},
{
"end": 115,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 101
},
{
"end": 144,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 136
},
{
"end": 179,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 173
}
] |
Plaintiff No. 2, AstraZeneca Pharma India Limited, is stated to be a company incorporated in India which entered into a license agreement dated 1st March, 2002 with plaintiff No. 1 to use the trade mark 'MERONEM'. | [
{
"end": 49,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 17
},
{
"end": 98,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 93
},
{
"end": 159,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 144
}
] |
"Section 2 (1) (viii)--"market area" means any area declared to be a market area under Section 4." | [
{
"end": 30,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 1
},
{
"end": 96,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 87
}
] |
Crime No.174 of 2012 has been registered by the North Paravur Police in respect of the incident, charge sheeting the petitioner for offences under Sections 279, 337 and 304 A of the Indian Penal Code. | [
{
"end": 20,
"label": "CASE_NUMBER",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 68,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 48
},
{
"end": 174,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 147
},
{
"end": 199,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 182
}
] |
The facts of the case are that the assessing officer passed the assessment order for the assessment year 90-91 on 16.09.91 and determined the income of the assessee Under Section 115J at Rs. 41,45,574/-. | [
{
"end": 122,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 114
},
{
"end": 183,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 171
}
] |
In this connection it is but right to remember that the law of evidence in India has been codified and the scheme thereof compels the Court to search for pigeon-holes of relevancy into which the material placed may be accommodated. | [
{
"end": 80,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 75
}
] |
In CWP No.10877 of 2008, petitioner Malkit Kaur, who contested the election for the seat of Panch of Gram Panchayat of Village Burj Bhalai Ke, Tehsil & District Mansa and nominated herself for the seat reserved for Woman and secured 441 votes and was declared defeated, has filed this petition for quashing the election result of respondent No.4- Satnam Singh, who secured only two votes. | [
{
"end": 23,
"label": "CASE_NUMBER",
"start": 3
},
{
"end": 47,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 36
},
{
"end": 141,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 127
},
{
"end": 359,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 347
}
] |
As the fund is not being established and maintained, the M.P.S.R.T.C. cannot be allowed to ply the vehicles without insurance. | [
{
"end": 69,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 57
}
] |
Sangeeta (PW 50) has identified her ornaments in the court and in the cross examination, the only question put to her was about the weight and design. | [
{
"end": 8,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 0
}
] |
The appellant as an established shipper chose 1946 as their basic year but in that year they had made no shipments to Italy and so in the allotment of quota that was made in their favour, they got no quota for shipment to Italy. | [
{
"end": 123,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 118
},
{
"end": 227,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 222
}
] |
None ap p eared f or the ap pellant ev en | [] |
On 07.10.2004, the blood samples were drawn from the appellants Jyotish Prasad and Ashish at Safdarjung Hospital. | [
{
"end": 13,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 3
},
{
"end": 78,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 64
},
{
"end": 89,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 83
},
{
"end": 112,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 93
}
] |
Both the impugned orders dated 5.9.2006 and 24.6.2006 were quashed and the matter was sent back to C.M.M., Kanpur Nagar to decide application of the petitioner widow for registration of her FIR afresh. | [
{
"end": 39,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 31
},
{
"end": 53,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 44
},
{
"end": 119,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 99
}
] |
Admittedly, the Appellant/Defendant herein has launched the drug, namely, Efavirenz 600 mg tablets and the tablets are tested at Lotus Labs Private Limited and it was manufactured on November 2006. | [
{
"end": 155,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 129
}
] |
On October 13, 1939 one Krishna Nair made a complaint (Ex. AH) against plaintiff's men of beating and dacoity. | [
{
"end": 19,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 3
},
{
"end": 36,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 24
}
] |
In the present case, the notices were issued to about 70 persons on the documents seized from the Bhatia Group. | [
{
"end": 110,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 98
}
] |
Instead of that, after lapse of 10 years from the date of Division Bench judgment, the first respondent issued the fresh charge memo on 23-5-1990 by way of Government letter without any difference of earlier charge memo dated 29-8-1978. | [
{
"end": 145,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 136
},
{
"end": 235,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 226
}
] |
This should be done vertically and horizontally. | [] |
(see a country view of our Supreme Court recently in Navinchandra N. Majithia v. Stale of Meghalaya and Ors.. JT [2000] Suppl. 1 SC 538). | [
{
"end": 40,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 27
},
{
"end": 135,
"label": "PRECEDENT",
"start": 53
}
] |
That the injury found on the head of the deceased was caused by a blunt object and the injury found on the neck was caused by a sharp object. | [] |
It was, therefore, contended that the provisions of Section 26 of the Bihar Act have no application to the case and the order of the Labour Court dated the 3rd June, 1960, is ultra vires and without jurisdiction. | [
{
"end": 62,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 52
},
{
"end": 79,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 70
},
{
"end": 170,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 156
}
] |
No.10735 OF 2010 1-YOGENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL S/O LATE JAGANNATH PRASAD R/O SHIVPURI, PROFESSOR'S COLONY ROAD, P.S.- SHASTRI NAGAR, DISTT.-
PATNA- 800023.............................................................(PETITIONER)
Versus 1-THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, BIHAR, | [
{
"end": 41,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 19
},
{
"end": 279,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 265
}
] |
These companies were as follows:
"i. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.
ii. Hindlaco Industries Ltd.
iii. Tranex Holding Inc. iv. Indian Minerals Corporation Plc.
v. VAW Aluminium AG, Germany vi. ALCOA, USA vii. Sibirsky, Russia viii. MALCO"
M/s Jardine Fleming, Global Advisor made an analysis of the various bids on the basis of the financial and technical capability, familiarity with India and overall credibility. | [
{
"end": 69,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 37
},
{
"end": 100,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 127,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 108
},
{
"end": 163,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 132
},
{
"end": 195,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 170
},
{
"end": 210,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 200
},
{
"end": 232,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 216
},
{
"end": 244,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 239
},
{
"end": 267,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 252
},
{
"end": 399,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 394
}
] |
The case of H.D. Mundhra is that Roop Narain Ram Chandra (P.) Ltd. were indebted to the Corporation to the tune of Rs. 30,00,000 as selling agents of the Kanpur Cotton Mills, Kanpur Textiles Ltd. and Elgin Mills Co. Ltd., that their financial condition was not sound, and that their offer was, therefore, not accepted. | [
{
"end": 24,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 12
},
{
"end": 66,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 33
},
{
"end": 173,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 154
},
{
"end": 195,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 175
},
{
"end": 220,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 200
}
] |
Section 14(4) of the Kerala Education Act also cannot be invoked to keep alive indefinitely, the proceeding for taking over the management of an aided school. | [
{
"end": 13,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 0
},
{
"end": 41,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 21
}
] |
Sh. Sandeep Gupta has been examined as CW 1 and has relied upon the certified copy of resolution dated 18.03.2004 of Board of Directors of complainant as Ex. CW 1/A whereby he has been authorized to appear on behalf of the complainant company. | [
{
"end": 17,
"label": "WITNESS",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 113,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 103
}
] |
On the 21st July, 1950, the respondent Subodh Gopal Bose applied before the Additional District Judge before whom the' appeal was pending to make a reference under article 228 of the Constitution of India for a decision of the question whether the provisions of section 7 were void being ultra vires the Constitution. | [
{
"end": 22,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 7
},
{
"end": 56,
"label": "RESPONDENT",
"start": 39
},
{
"end": 101,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 76
},
{
"end": 175,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 164
},
{
"end": 204,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 183
},
{
"end": 271,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 262
},
{
"end": 316,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 304
}
] |
It was wrong to suggest that the Police did not take Amrik Singh (appellant No.1) and his brothers forcibly. | [
{
"end": 64,
"label": "PETITIONER",
"start": 53
}
] |
The Clayton Act prescribed a special procedure and punishment for trial of contempts, consisting of wilful disobediance of a lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree or command of any district Court of the United states or of any court of the District of Columbia, if the acts of contempt were also liable to be punished as criminal offences. | [
{
"end": 15,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 220,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 207
},
{
"end": 264,
"label": "GPE",
"start": 244
}
] |
The present suit was filed on 16th January, 2003 with the prayer that a decree for possession, permanent injunction and recovery should be passed. | [
{
"end": 48,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 30
}
] |
The levy is only on the event of renting out a Three Star hotel or an auditorium; that too, only when it is rented out specifically for weddings or connected ceremonies. | [] |
Vishwanath interfered and tried to prevent the accused. | [
{
"end": 10,
"label": "OTHER_PERSON",
"start": 0
}
] |
17. Section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act mentions "imposition of penalty in lieu of prosecution". | [
{
"end": 15,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 4
},
{
"end": 44,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 23
}
] |
On 31.8.1979 a statutory complaint was made to the Chief of Army Staff but that was not considered at all as there was no response from the Chief of Army Staff to the statutory complaint.
23. | [
{
"end": 12,
"label": "DATE",
"start": 3
}
] |
After completion of investigation, Station House Officer of Police Station Kanina instituted police report under Section 173 Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C-for short) against the appellant, before the learned Illaqa Magistrate to the effect that it appeared that he has committed an offence punishable under Section 15 of the Act. | [
{
"end": 81,
"label": "ORG",
"start": 60
},
{
"end": 124,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 113
},
{
"end": 151,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 125
},
{
"end": 159,
"label": "STATUTE",
"start": 153
},
{
"end": 230,
"label": "COURT",
"start": 213
},
{
"end": 322,
"label": "PROVISION",
"start": 312
}
] |