text
stringlengths
7
5k
degree_of_toxicity
float64
0
1
contains_offensive_word
int64
0
1
label
int64
0
1
Natalya the Russian! I am with you on this one? Who is she but a freckle girl? Remove it! Like they say Well, I stuck my head in a little skunk’s hole, And the little skunk said, well, bless my soul, Take it out! take it out! take it out! Remove it!!Well, I didn’t take it out, And the little skunk said, If you don’t take it out, You’ll wish you had, Take it out! take it out! take it out! Remove it!! Psssssss. I removed it, too late! Not worthy to be in a mighty encyclopedia like this. Indeed!
0.705154
1
1
Congrats on being a cunt, and doing your make up worse than a 12 year old. Ugly bitch
0.991702
1
1
" User subpage for major revisions? I keep trying to make a huge revision to an article, but my comp keeps crashing and I lose all my sources open in other windows. I created a subpage to save it until it's ready to publish, but Wikipedia:Subpage#Disallowed_uses says that's not allowed? I thought I read somewhere else that they recommend that, and I know you did it so...I'm confused. Is it ok for me to use a subpage for a major revision? (talk | contribs) "
0.000671
0
0
what are you talking about ? I did not vandalize anything, this is a government computer network system.
0.000973
0
0
if a vandal keeps changing it, I would assume i have an exemption to fix it, i am sorry. I will not revert it anymore, just try alterations of the text. can you lock the article with the addition or ban the vandales? you sound like you have some sort of admin ability -steve
0.001562
0
0
I tried to move the Dreyfus to the main article and now apparently all the material is destroyed. Do you have any comprehension of how bad this article currently is? One would have no idea that Heidegger was ever read anywhere outside of France from the current article. No summaries of Heidegger's important concepts are given. No understanding of any of Heidegger's ideas are conveyed. Since you have decided to destroy my work, you can keep your poor article, which reads as if it was machine-translated from a foreign language. You do not even let someone in the middle of working finish before you destroy their work. No wonder zero academics contribute to this site and your articles are so atrocious. Anyone who reads the article as it currently stands comes away knowing less about Heidegger than they did before because of all of the obvious distortions and gross inaccuracies. You have not even succesfully explained a single one of Heidegger's terms or concepts here, or why anyone should care who he is. This article is an embarassment indeed.
0.018672
0
0
Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!! Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!Jéské Couriano is a stupid faggot!!!!
0.997732
1
1
And THIS is why you don't list highly speculative ones! I was simply referring to the common-frickin-sense category of actors. Apparently, common sense you lack. Tch, fuck's sake. This is why people don't take Wikipedia seriously. Professionalism? Professionalism my ass. You cunts are the direct opposite of it.
0.984595
1
1
" Please do not continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Victoria University of Wellington Students' Association. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. "
0.00056
0
0
RT @ImNotTwitFamous: Bob Marley wrote about peace but all you hoes remember him for is smoking a blunt
0.12783
1
1
Liverpool/Portsmouth Isn't Portsmouth making a late application for a UEFA licence? Has UEFA ruled on it?
0.000646
0
0
Graft's nom Could you provide one of your charts for Graft's RFA nom? I think it would be useful.
0.000644
0
0
" To explain a little more about WP:V and WP:CITE take the first sentence of the second section: In today's prisons, what would be widely perceived as torture may be common place, but not widely understood.{{Fact|date=October 2007}} [[http://www.supermaxed.com/]]. The sentence makes an assertion. see WP:PROVEIT ""The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material. All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged should be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The source should be cited clearly and precisely to enable readers to find the text that supports the article content in question. (my emphasise)"" [[http://www.supermaxed.com/]] which turns into ""[]"" is not a clear and precise. See WP:CITE for more details on this, but as reference tags are being used in this article you should add your citations as reference tags. see [footnote 6 for how to add PDF with paragraph noted so that someone can follow you citations. "
0.000571
0
0
@user @user Bring on the Crucifixion! You know if a Conservative did this to Garland - She would be Stoned to Death by ANTIFA
0.737028
1
0
Romper Stomper - Nominated for AFI award, Best Lead Actor. (2010) 22
0.001094
0
0
No it isn't. I came here specifically for this information and it is nowhere to be found. What a useless puff piece of an article.
0.746224
1
1
@user @user Took you this long!! He is a beast and has been for yonks
0.726461
1
1
Dudes a faggot Pahahaha
0.972736
1
1
Me & Elizabeth are down bitches.
0.982654
1
1
" No, not in user space or namespace. I know several user space articles. I am talking about the media. I was looking for more balance in this article. Calling an editors contributions to a talk page ""spam"" is rather offensive. Did you expect a positive reaction? If you look at the edit history, I created the FAQ template, based on two users questions here. It is my first time using a FAQ template, and so it was trial and error. Thanks. "
0.000597
0
0
" JetStreamer sad reality That guy is a gay, a homosexual, a passive one, very insecure in himself and he's a racist who hates Serbia and that's why he keeps deleting this article. I also heard he's got some Ukrainian uncestry which is hard to believe, given how stupid he is, Ukrainian people are not like that or closed minded. To top this beautiful cake, all while being gay, he is Roman Catholic LOL. I would like to ask the pope what he thinks of that. Maybe he would give him a few Durex or two. The retard is still using the outdated Mozilla, he thinks that he knows ""british english"" while at the same time he consider himself a fan of aviation, in which he's obviously clueless... That is the sad picture of our JetStream user. Sorry paw, Wikipedia is not the platform to vent your frustrations and diseases, now fuck off from here once and for good."
0.991246
1
1
I'm about to hit a bitch
0.992483
1
1
" Porting the above thread into the discussion page, so all is together. Sigh. (Whine, why can't people learn to read the template instructions.) // nkB "
0.000648
0
0
RT @AyGeraldJay: The ape was like "Oh you niggas gon learn today" 😭💀 https://t.co/FYK1XeBgV7
0.889573
1
1
Who was Ohtahara? I'm assuming (from the name and medical nomenclature conventions) that he was (1) Japanese, at least by descent and (2) the researcher who first described the syndrome, but what was his full name, where was he working, and when did he do the formal description? All of this is interesting and encyclopedic information that deserves to be in the article, if it can be found.
0.000596
0
0
No matter how hard you try to be rude mf`s they keep talking to you. like bitch do I know you
0.962319
1
1
Fuuck you you buddisht shit!!! I get the last say! 'There is 5 senses only!!!!!!! Everybody really only does want immortality foreeevvver!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Errrrasee that shittttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Stuppidd plato and old shit and wrong shit!!!!! I'm the best best I'b thought all out! You nonesense useless bastard! And ian go to hell to!
0.998506
1
1
I don't have the book, so I don't know if the list here is in descending order to correspond with the book, but I'm going to put it in ascending order anyway, to avoid confusion.
0.000605
0
0
" I'm a student at Woking College and I've forgotten the password to my account (Annon O'Mous). I can't request a new password due to the IP Block. The page I wanted to edit was the main page for ""Negima"". I wanted to put information up about who publishes the Negima! Magister Negi Magi books here in the UK. Also, I noticed that the time and date of the IP Ban keeps updating to the present time and I was wondering if this is normal and is the result of an indefinate IP ban or a glitch in the system. That's all, thanks. Annon O'Mous, real name Martin Temple-Calder"
0.000826
0
0
don't threaten me Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, you will be blocked.
0.012141
0
0
- at least, not at the time
0.000684
0
0
JW pages Tony, thanks for sharing your comments to Central with me. That guy/girl is way out of control! 8 July 2005 06:38 (UTC)
0.000939
0
0
I hate this site. But you know, I'll do everything in my power to make sure each and every one of you fucking nerds pays. I hope you all burn in fucking hell you bastards. Go fuck yourselves.
0.996722
1
1
RT @ASAPYams: fresh razor blades in my goth bitch stocking
0.965596
1
1
@AustinG1135 your the one keeping me up faggot!
0.962435
1
1
" Fair use rationale for Image:Cast original.jpg Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cast original.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. "
0.000548
0
0
Hell naw we don't fuck wit no phonies you can tell yo bitch we some young rich homies!
0.998099
1
1
" wikipedia entry on ten-string guitar can no longer be considered reliable It has been a battle to keep the wikipedia entry on ""ten-string guitar"" from being turned into the usual farce that one expects of the ""information"" presented in both wikipedia and most sites that purport to be about the 10-string guitar (both being 'littered with inaccuracies' and even deliberate misinformation). For the time being, I must devote my energies to the final stages of my Doctoral studies and let the fools play at being pseudo-musicologists on wikipedia. It is, however, a disgrace that the first two pages through which most online readers are introduced to ""the ten-string guitar"" (that is wikipedia and Janet Marlow's tenstringguitar(dot)com) are riddled with inaccuracies, untenable claims, and (as shown in a previous blog) even deliberate distortion of Narciso Yepes's words in an attempt to misrepresent the historical and scientific facts of the matter. Since I've spoken out about this disinformation, I note that my main page here has suspiciously been deleted from most google search listings containing the terms ""10-string guitar"" or ""ten-string guitar"". Some of our American ""colleagues"" evidently don't like the truth coming out about their dishonest ""scholarship"". As for wikipedia, be advised that I no longer oversee the accuracy of the ""ten-string guitar"" page and this should now be considered as unreliable as most of the other misleading ten-string guitar sites. The person presently responsible for the (from a musicological/organological point of view) misinformative wikipedia entry is Andrew Alder, whose musical ""expertise"" as far as I can gather is limited to playing drums and rhythm guitar in his local Sydney Anglican church. Yet he too deems himself an ""authority"" who is in a position to ""educate"" readers about the 10-string guitar (an instrument he has no doubt never played). It is exactly this problem with wikipedia (that any lay person can edit it and can even become an administrator if they have too much free time on their hands and are willing to kiss enough derriere) that has caused it to be banned by universities and to be blamed for ""making kids dumb"" and for falling grades of students who turn to this misinformative online ""encyclopaedia"" for research. [] Click here for Article in The Scotsman about wikipedia's role in descending grades amongst students. "
0.011327
0
0
@user @user @user @user its fake? its from 2 different maps guys
0.014179
0
0
@ItsmeKyleWayne Yeaa black bitches actin like they too good for an average nigga like they just got A1 credit and pussy
0.994414
1
1
nigger fuck you faggot
0.997543
1
1
So do I. One of Wikipedia's dirty little secrets is the fact that the admins here don't just think that they own certain articles, they actually do own them. Forget about trying to stand up to them because they all cover for each other. 161.55.204.3
0.050205
0
0
@tori_santana hell yea went from I love you to fuck you and that basic bitch
0.997276
1
1
Otpor! My bad. My browser crashed during editing. When I restored the session I didn't notice that a large portion of the article was no longer there in the edit window and hit Save thereby removing all the content.
0.008677
0
0
Erm... And the point is?
0.00092
0
0
I don't believe the Lisak criticism present there conforms with the NPV rule. Lisak doesn't have a neutral point of view to begin with. If an offer to polygraph or even concerned review of polygraph results shocks a complainant into thinking her lies have been uncovered, the recantation is still perfectly valid. If you know you are telling the truth, you will argue with machine or investigator. Also part of Kanin's research was a followup of the recanted story where possible to verify if any were false recantations. In all followups the recanted version of events matched what the accused said happened. Arguing that Lisak is a respected PHD is baseless if Kanin is a respected PHD. I agree that my edit wasn't as neutral as possible though, so apologize for that. Still something must be done here.
0.000793
0
0
Fuck ya main hoe now she claimin mob hav her brake ya heart wen I rob ya inda daark
0.99804
1
1
" Romani You know, blanking your talk pages achieves very little as you can't delete the history. Either way, can you please stob adding hatnotes to ""dab"" Romani/Romansh/Romanian? It has been decided quite some time ago that these aren't needed. Especially not for Romansh... cheers. "
0.000694
0
0
" Please would you consider removing the text TALK "
0.000602
0
0
Unfair! Fraud! How convenient for you Mr. Hurry up and acquit! 71.114.8.82
0.617766
1
1
Jet lag a bitch
0.990796
1
1
" An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Ras Burqa massacre, was selected for DYK! On January 5, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ras Burqa massacre, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page. Thanks for your contributions! 64 "
0.000632
0
0
" It has also been categorised seperately under ""Criticism"" so that there is no confusion with the main article "
0.000591
0
0
Coward Just like a Bangladeshi. Couldn't even give me a response, could you? I tried being polite, didn't I? I tried being civil. But you people are all the same. I'm in Bangladesh now, you know. As I said. Dacca, to be precise. And you've been awfully free with information about yourself. You wouldn't want anything to happen to your filthy Bangladeshi family, would you, bucko? Answer me like a man, or American justice is gonna get real over here. Or don't you want to admit that you're just leeching off of the goodwill of the land of the free and the home of the brave?
0.692461
1
1
Hi Sitush, I think you are mistaken with the last article. I have only added the reference to Bhagavad Gita, and the commentaries written by the saints which were properly referenced. You can look at my latest edit of the article . If that appears gibberish to you, then I can't help it anymore. Then I must say, the entire Bhagavd Gita commentaries written by them are gibberish as per your evaluation. If you can help me point out the problem referring to the latest edit of mine, then I can improve upon it. Kindly point it out. Thanks.
0.000705
0
0
Mad scientist u suck maaan
0.996495
1
1
yo bitch bitch gone let me fuck tonight thursty Thursday at the WesGod cave
0.998193
1
1
What do you think? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Bronstein&diff;=272865118&oldid;=272001018 I chiefly enjoy editing the bio sections and the lead paragraphs, not the chess sections which essentially list dates and accomplishments. I grabbed the first subject, David Bronstein, from your user pageif you have any specific players you would like me to work on next, I'll do them first; if not, I'll just work my way down the list. P.S. I would have probably finished the article, or started a second article, but the Topa-Kamsky game was disappointingand confusing (why did they switch the colors?) Your friend in chess,
0.000721
0
0
Alright mate? I hope so, I was looking at you posts and saw that the Gordon Brown pics are sorted and the signature is not yet fixed, what a job, and only for GA. Lets talk tomorrow, but thanks for all your support. ( )
0.000557
0
0
RT @jessielee1028: @Hawkdaddy300 @GavinMHawks21 @Ur_Boy_George yeah I don't think that's okay...Fuckin drop it. You shouldn't even joke abo…
0.975427
1
1
Audio Star(r) Award I hereby award you with this coveted Starr in appreciation of your work on articles about musicians, bands, record labels, and related subjects. Thanks for your good work! Cheers,
0.000551
0
0
" WOW. I can""t believe it !!! Thanks !!! "
0.001231
0
0
If Komsomolsky is masculine, Komsomolskoye neuter and Komsomolskaya feminine, why does every link points to Komsomolsky and not Komsomolskoye that its neuter?? Just a tought.
0.004048
0
0
This is odd It says that the article can't be edited because of vandalism, but the vandalism was left in (that unnecessary and virtually blank table). That is strange.
0.000832
0
0
You're ridiculous if you jump to conclusions like that. So don't. On their webpage they made an article about it. I'll try to find it if you are to narrow-minded to research your opponents' websites yourself.
0.899364
1
1
Oops, yeah I thought I did that. My bad. Thanks for fixing!
0.000992
0
0
Message for J Barber For Your Information, I am not a student at UNSW. If you keep up this shit, I will simply behead you. AM I CLEAR? 122.106.59.22 , Your friend 767-249ER, admin.
0.964066
1
1
ORLY? Fuck You Again n00b
0.997448
1
1
@MrMooncricket @FuckTheMallcops @JimTalbot1963 @theharris338 work, is something adults do for money, not borrow from money... Broke bitch
0.99716
1
1
When Jake was mad happy and hugged muscle faced Renee Russo at the end of 1 I was like yeah them bitches bout to win it all!!!
0.786314
1
1
Good riddance you fucking asshole!! Bog off forever.
0.998119
1
1
I love him and i wish he had killed more
0.297939
1
0
" The ad thing I don't know. Sounds like too little gain for too much pain to me. The pain includes people saying ""Look, wikipedia now has ads in some form"", which is bad enough, and the possibility of people later saying ""See, those ads didn't break the thing, so let's make IPs look at them"", which is far worse. I really can't see the gain amounting to much, considering that we're now talking millions in yearly costs. Nobody is going to pay us hundreds of thousands of dollars for ads, unless we become a regular medium and we don't want to be regular, right? Zocky | "
0.007249
0
0
Don't create articles that are so biased!
0.024221
0
0
Soft niccas usually send the hate thru the bitches jealous Instagram niccas hatin on ya pictures -- @Therealkiss
0.927728
1
1
son of a bitch. I hope I don't get the e- bola before I can ride my Harley at Sturgis.
0.995633
1
1
user:jeppiz worships the balls of jesus son of the whore and suck the penis of user:DeCausa the bastard.
0.997516
1
1
Hello you gajin cocksmooching piece of shit~ how is your me so horny mom and alcoholic dad doin? Chad Bryant 184.4.141.73
0.993068
1
1
Turks are wild subhumans. You're animal. 114.179.18.35
0.986298
1
1
RT @randypop84: U bitches ain't paying my bills......so FUCK YOU
0.997902
1
1
This article doesn't suppose to focus on defining consciousness, it only supposed to describe the aspects of consciousness what are relevant for AC, and why they are relevant. I don't know whether AC would exactly be a superset, but I think that it would describe that what is objective, and therefore most likely common in different possible types of consciousness. I don't also see why R2-D2, C-3P0 and HAL are artificial consciousness, and don't see the reason why they were added. I added Vanamonde, what I think is a good example of AC, and Jane, what was mentioned to be artificial sentience. Who thinks R2-D2, C-3P0 and HAL should be there, may explain. 10:10, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
0.000585
0
0
What the FUCK? How exactly am I engaged in a edit war when YOU removed MY STUFF? Are Fucking Serious? My stuff is cited and it's useful information for readers about the progress of the movie. Stop fucking around. You don't FUCKING OWN THE PAGE. Other people have a right to add information too. If you have an issue with what's been written you can discuss it, not remove it with NO EXPLANATION.
0.99552
1
1
Dreadstar, LittleMountain5 and some jerk on the internet are jokes
0.581765
1
1
" Your imagining an attitude just because I disagree with you. Please assume good faith. You're free to warn me, but beware of the boomerang. ✉ "
0.000692
0
0
"niggas bitches bitch ass niggas dike ass hoes black ass and bright ass hoes fag tags and scally wags"
0.998042
1
1
I'd hit a Kardashian she threw money at me bruh somebody would have to pull me off that hoe idgaf who she is. Nobody to me anyway lol
0.315078
1
1
Tamara Hadid Tamara Hadid Is a very beautiful person inside out <3
0.000823
0
0
" hey buddy, hey buddy, guess what? ""I"" dont care realy what ""your"" excuse is, and couldn't care less what Roaringflamer says, but you are obviously obsessed with redirects. If there is anybody that should be banned, its you for vandalism and disruption so there"
0.499176
1
1
I wish you had... AIDS!! The User:Pleasedontdeletemyedits only wanted you to have cancer but my money is on AIDS. My, my you are a clever one ain't ya. Someone who was just happy to add geographical data to Welsh articles get hounded off this site, which after is all [supposedly] about information, for er adding information. But you and I know both know it really is a site for little passive-aggressive little peons who didn't graduate high school. Right Todd? Well there seems to be lots and lots of opinion pieces asking [ww.theverge.com/2013/10/25/5027616/why-are-editors-leaving-the-worlds-biggest-encyclopedia Why are editors leaving the world's biggest encyclopedia?]. But we know why don't we Todd? People like you (long before the internet social dysfunctional like yourself would be found in parks or near schools) sadly now you have access a portal to bring misery to millions. So please - if you haven't already done so - get AIDS and leave this life with as little dignity as you deserve. -P 81.129.200.157
0.837678
1
1
" CNN Article - Got some citations for you. Please Help Me with the Unreliably Sourced Statement Hi. I saw your comments on the CNN talk page in which you claimed - in response to another user's claims that CNN had a liberal bias - ""Please add citations to back your claims. Avoid using weasel words when making claims."" Well, here are some peer-reviewed, scholarly articles to back that claim: >Jeffrey N. Weatherly, et al, “Perceptions of Political Bias in the Headlines of Two Major News Organizations,” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics (2007) (12), 91 at p. 97 (finding that “Overall, participants . . . rated the headlines from CNN as significantly more liberal than those from FOX News. . . . CNN tilted more to the left than did FOX News. The conclusion that CNN’s headlines were perceived as more liberal than FOX News’, rather than FOX News’ headlines’ being perceived as more conservative than CNN’s, is supported by the finding that overall, the headlines from FOX News were rated slightly on the liberal side of neutral. If FOX News’ headlines had been perceived as biased toward the conservative viewpoint, then the overall ratings should have exceeded 50 percent.”) >Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University, & Project for Excellence in Journalism, “The Invisible Primary – Invisible No Longer: A First Look at Coverage of the 2008 Presidential Campaign,” p. 32 (noting that “The CNN programming studied tended to cast a negative light on Republican candidates—by a margin of three-to-one. Four-in-ten stories (41%) were clearly negative while just 14% were positive and 46% were neutral. The network provided negative coverage of all three main candidates with McCain fairing the worst (63% negative) and Romney fairing a little better than the others only because a majority of his coverage was neutral.”) Please note that at the beginning of the CNN article (fourth paragraph down), the following statement appears: ""Among the general public, CNN has a more centrist perception.” The source for this proposition is FAIR, FAIR being a “progressive media criticism organization” whose “target invariably is bias on the right” . Needless to say, FAIR is not a reliable source. Will you please help me to get rid of this statement on the CNN article? It not only is backed by a patently biased source, it is actually REFUTED by peer-reviewed, university-sanctioned sources. Thanks. "
0.000667
0
0
":The PC 1 gradation could or not show Neolithic influence. I have already provided links that strongly suggest that it is very unlikely. Part of it could be Neolithic and part of it could be much more ancient. If it were Neolithic, it would have its lowest gradient in Atlantic Europe, where Neolithic was weakest and most tardy, yet it doesn't. PC 4 instead does. Whatever RR says, it's not so clear how to read some of these PCs, all but PC 3 (likely IE) and PC 5 (clearly Basque) rise more questions than give clear answers. Neolithic genetic influence doesn't need to be not European in origin. European Neolithic started in Thessaly and the alleged links with West Asia (particularly beyond Turkey) are rather unclear. So PC 1 could perfectly be part of the Paleolithic European inheritance, maybe reinforced with new Neolithic input too. PC 4 is weakest precisely in the less ""Neolithized"" areas of Europe: Britain, Britany and Basque Country. Greeks definitively did never colonize anything outside the Mediterranean shores, so the explanation of RR is very weak. It may not say who's ""more European"" (Balcanic peoples are clearly European however you look at it) but it may say who's more neatly Western European genealogically. It is very concordant with Y-DNA, btw. PC 3 (Indoeuropean probably) also shows a gradient and this shows who is more Western European too (in this case Basques and Iberians). This pattern is curiously inverted by PC 5. PC 1 and PC 2 instead show less clear patterns, what surely implies they are older and have hitchhiked other migrations if anything. They do show some correlation with SW Asia and NW Asia respectvely and they make up the 50% of European genetic pool (while the other three together only add up to 23%). PC 2 patterns show as much Asian influence as PC 1 and they can well be seen as a complementary, one centered in NW Asia and the other in SW Asia, both decreasing towards the west, the same that happens with PC 3 and PC 4. All 4 show historical Asian or Eastern European influence ""against"" a nearly invisible Western core, best represented (maybe) among Basques. The pattern is pretty clear, the explanations maybe not so much. On the other hand the ""Basque"" PC 5 is still strong in Eastern Europe but weakest in a central strip from Balcans to Scandinavia. So you tell me: which of these 5 components is more distinctly European if any? The more I think about it the more confuse it seems... Why do you defend one tentative explanation of European genealogies over others? Do you have good reasons? Studies maybe? The only thing we know for sure is that all European lineages of all sorts, autosomal or halpoid, have links to West Asia. The weakest ones those that are +/- exclusive of Basque and Atlantic Europeans possibly. All European components are strong in West Asia. You want to make a one sided view of what is European but what those maps show if anything is that there are at least five sides and all are strongly present in Western Asia. Now it's your turn: show me what makes Europeans so distinct. You owe me that explanation and proof since long ago. You have been obstructing this article from a viewpoint that you still are unable to prove beyond a most questionable dictionary quote. Give evidence or yield to reason. "
0.000648
0
0
Millions of niggas can rap. Can any of y'all make music? Like a quality song. Not just you spittin bars. Shit you can play wit the bitches?
0.992146
1
1
yeah right, some asshole logged on to my computer while i was passed out
0.978778
1
1
207.235.248.2 207.235.248.2 once again vandalized a page, Prison escape. I saw that you gave him a last warning, so you can decide if this constitutes as the one that sent him over the edge.
0.003918
0
0
rarelibra is just a troll on this issue, can't say i'm sorry to hear he is going to iraq. he is simply obsessed to have it his way and only his way. Bolzano, Bozen, and Alto Adige are all legitimate terms. South Tyrol is just another one of the legitimate terms, and in fact the most recently used as a political name (1919-). people like rarelibra should be ashamed at their one-sided and only ONE-sided view. iraq, eh? i guess karma is indeed a bitch.
0.76723
1
1
" I take it you can't read minds, can you? What is obvious is that I feel GW is playing politics and abusing her role as admin in the process. So, let me ask you this where is the personal attack you claim I made? Why must you play games?Makin'Bacon "
0.001956
0
0
Sara: In regards to the COI, there's no question that I do work for the subject of the article. HealthMonitor 4:05 pm, 18, October 2015.
0.000591
0
0
ion care who my niggas date b if the bitch make you happy and you cool with her then do you
0.98776
1
1
The only thing about niccas is they be followers smh .. Be ya self everyone else is taken!!
0.051796
0
1
REDIRECT Talk:Let's Hear It for the Boy (song)
0.000564
0
0