Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
"Some annoying douchebag keeps putting up his own website ""fuckperezhilton.com"" deleted all links to this shithead's site. Someone get the IP and report it to wikipedia"	0.992251	1	1
Charles Curtis I find it interesting that there was a minor controversy over Goldwater's nomination due to having been born in Arizona Territory since Vice President Charles Curtis was born in Kansas Territory in 1860, one year before statehood.	0.000573	0	0
Sorry, I didn't realize that your comment was made several days ago: talk:Carly Fiorina#Original research regarding jobs at HP. You cited this. - MrX	0.000574	0	0
@user @user How about very Unintelligent hysterical woman. This women is mental case!	0.956454	1	1
Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Please refrain from redirecting articles about figures and groups relating to the militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge unless consensus is reached they should be redirected. As it stands, they have received enough coverage, both locally and nationally, to be seen as notable enough for their own articles. While some may be stubs, they can definitely be expanded.	0.000552	0	0
" Are you kidding me? What does this guy have to do to have somebody shoot across his bow, once? Murder somebody? GabeMC is out of control!! This editor has insulted many editors repeatedly. He mispells user names repeatedly, to intimidate, accuses all opposers, of his idea, as socks, calls them trolls, charges them with harrassment and is generally abusive. He incites other users to drum up charges against ""his enemies"" of this issue. He has been warned before for changing ""The"" to ""the"" in musical articles while his own launched medcom mediation is in progress, ebfore, and yet when his misbehaviour is pointed out in ANI he creates such a ruckess with sidetrack issues he gets away with more disruption and a blessing. He has had editors topic banned, adminstrators banned for a six month period and investigations into every editor that has ever disagreed with on this topic. He has disrupted many Beatles talk pages with his ""Straw Polls"" simultaneously for the same the/The issue when he doesn't get the right support. He is currently edit warring with the exact same edit, as well as a few others in the Pink Floyd article after you appear to have gave him a bigger feather in his cap for exhibiting [WP:Battleground]] behaviour for my complaint of WP:3RR. WTF? Has we developed a Prima Donna that is untouchable, no matter what behaviour he demonstrates? A further opposing editor of his just committed WP suicide with an indef block that he requested due to the same WP:admin garbage processes. In short! Your Prima Donna editor You can edit WikPedia! But only if you can suck good cock! Now make this disappear, again, to hide your embarrasment. I would be ashamed of it if I were you! Now shut your piehole sockpuppet! 99.251.125.65 Ohhh Reindeer! Here comes the talk page abuse charge! OMG! We're all gonna' die!! I'm melting! I'm melting! 99.251.125.65 "	0.953295	1	1
The section on religious indoctrination is nearly as large as all other sections combined simply because indoctrination is the inculcation of doctrina, and because you haven't expanded the other sections. No other reason.	0.000821	0	0
Becouse no one gives a SHIT...	0.957815	1	1
"== March 2008 == Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. • • • 03:59 (UTC) 20 Mar '08"	0.001033	0	0
James J. Stanford Hello, You placed an orphan tag on the above. How many links would it take to justify removing this tag? I have always heard three is the magic number.	0.000766	0	0
" The gallery now works in Firefox 1.5, Internet Explorer and Opera. - contrib talk "	0.000602	0	0
@tayscalf we should change that to bitch about everything. For example my girlfriend don't like the crew I hang with she BAE	0.848521	1	1
" Thank you The Modest Barnstar Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 "	0.000643	0	0
NCBI doesn't index it... I'd agree with you on those grounds.	0.000632	0	0
Book This book contains some useful information that could be used to improve the article. (talk•contribs)	0.000542	0	0
Piss on me P!SS ON ME, YOU BIMBO!	0.99213	1	1
Examples 1. To check some of these people at work, try Asiafinest and Asianfanatics English forums.Korsentry	0.000668	0	0
I was careful to incorporate all the relevant info from the old article into this one. See list of joke cycles. I also limited the topic, needed, to be only jokes, not performance comedy. That needs to be under its own heading.	0.000557	0	0
" I told this to him- @Mihaiam —and you're the arbitrator? By unreliable sources mean and vegetarian nutritionists and doctors of medicine like Milton Mills, William C. Roberts, John A. McDougall? Then you go on calling me a ""propagandist""? Well give me one scientific report that says humans are anatomically optimized to eat raw meat or at least a source that says humans are anatomically optimized to process cooked meat without aggravating any serious health-issues (see this)? And exactly what scientific data did Mills provide that is scientifically erroneous? Like what is the acidity of human-stomach when food is inside stomach? and then you tout ""veganskeptic.blogspot"" as a reliable source for high-level scientific knowledge? Isn't it a tad silly to compare a Nutritionist who has been backed by the claims of other MDs and has a doctoral degree, to a random blogger? Where is the scientific journal that says humans are not herbivores? But when it comes to question your meat-eating ways, you cling to a random person as opposed to a slew of MDs who are cogently saying that the practice of eating meat is ""unhealthy"", ""unneeded"" and ""unethical"" (or something of that sort). Meat-eating is at best utterly redundant. I repeat, please show some credible scientific analysis of Human anatomy that firmly proves humans are purely naturally omnivorous (i.e. able to digest raw meat, or if not raw meat then any meat with good health), that's all it'll to convince me. I may be fully wrong, I'm at least open to that possibility, but are you? I want what's best for me. I occasionally like stew myself. D I am yet to receive a reply! (Talk?) "	0.015183	0	0
" Whack-a-mole I'm tagging NewPages and getting some edit conflicts... User Excirial (talk) deleted this article after you started editing it, with a reason of: G3: Vandalism. It's like our own little game. Anyway, nice job. — · talk Edit conflicts tend to be positive when tagging pages; it kind of confirms that a deletion / tag is placed correctly. By the way - am i correct when i think you are placing CSD and maintenance tags manually? If so you might want to consider using Twinkle and Friendly for that purpose. Those tools tend to be quite a bit faster, while also requiring less clicks to place a tag and warn a user ). (Contact me,Contribs) "	0.001356	0	0
"====Regarding edits made during August 9 2006 (UTC) to Damien Echols==== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. don't talk email me "	0.000609	0	0
" -You can mention whining and abusive behaviour all you like, but I think you know the real reason that you are spending so much time on line, and so little interacting with people offline. You pursued me, and I don't care whether you hide behind a rulebook or not. You have absolutely no understanding of literature, or the arts. Unlike you, I actually work in that area. You are a bully, and have been cutting a destructive swathe across Wikipedia for some while now. It is a pity that this entire website seems to be taken over by idiot savants, anal retentives and Asperger's types, but there you go. Quoting your beloved website: ""The term anal retentive (also anally retentive), commonly abbreviated to anal, is used to describe a person who pays such attention to detail that the obsession becomes an annoyance to others, potentially to the detriment of the anal-retentive person."" As for - you're promoted above yourself, and are clearly unfit for your role. Try looking at both sides of a problem. You've screwed up this time, and should quit before you screw up other people's enjoyment of this website even more. I don't really care if I get banned by you at all, since you've got no power over me whatsoever. You need to spend more time off your computer as well and talking to people face to face. Get some fresh air.- "	0.745787	1	1
Add to wikipedia Hi Blotto adrift, why dont you start correcting the errors on wikipedia instead of defending your edits? Do you think you know everything? It appears that you do. How about you get a degree and start teaching because then a class will be forced to hear what you say. You will fit in with all those profs who think they know everything but know nothing. Stop acting like a child and grow up.	0.729365	1	1
Enlightenment is a way of feeling for me! Find out more about my thoughts at:	0.000804	0	0
BiH: Tense situation, locals alarmed. Choices not complicated. Either Europe implements an ongoing deportation mechanism or it will be held hostage by actions of othersðŸ‘‰this insuring unlimited migrants & endless games of “relocation”.#Visegrad #V4	0.000631	0	1
" Feel free to remove it. It's hardly a big deal at all '''' (bananabucket!'') "	0.001	0	0
I nominated it with A7 and G3, I think I am right with both. Your thoughts?	0.00057	0	0
RT @scaffoldjocky: I'll never smoke weed with Willy again. He invited that hick, Toby Keith, and I fucking hate that mongoloid!	0.995531	1	1
There's absolutely nothing you can do about the former if you're dealing with a decent writer, and very little you can do about the latter in the face of overwhelming odds. But you raised a question above that I'd like to address. I would indeed be deeply shocked if any FAC director accepted money to put an article on the main page, or any FAC delegate accepted money to promote an article, or if any editor was paid to vote in a particular way in an AfD. That would simply be corrupt, which accepting payment for the effort of writing an article is not. Fatuorum	0.000692	0	0
Once again the TYRANNY of Liberal opinions rules over all, just like the Nazis or Facists.	0.633289	1	1
RT @lesxo_: cant turn a hoe into a husband either	0.441472	1	1
Freudian theory? Huh? What the hell is with that far fetched crok of shit? If that merits two lines, I'll come up with my own wackier theory.	0.897209	1	1
Since you appear to be the intellectual to refine the page, please do so. I hope not to be dissapointed.	0.000803	0	0
the long count is NOT a calendar ... POD ... it is chronological, like julian days. please verify content!!! Last one. No acknowledgement, no thank you? This isn't worth it. Stay stupid about 2012. ~M~	0.537426	1	1
" Refer to what I just said, ""just because someone with a blog or publishing ability on a website sees these comments and decides to write an article about it purely shows bad journalistic and investigative qualities on their behalf."" Continue to interfere and you will be reported for intentional disruptive behavior. 71.94.7.228 "	0.001067	0	0
Hi, you deleted three links that I inserted - an account of the runner's high on 'Endorphins' and a link to an academic paper directly connected to 'Transcendentalism' and 'Romantic poetry' (title: On Being God). I cannot understand why these would be inappropriate. They are not promoting anyone or selling anything, merely providing a further resource for the topic in question. Please reappraise your deletion. Thanks	0.001131	0	0
" Too much. Don't think we need ""is a simplistic claim."" How bout ""She is best known as the author of The Tale of Genji, written in Japanese between about 1000 and 1008, and sometimes considered the earliest novel. Although ancient Greek and Roman novels predate Murasaki's by several centuries, The Tale of Genji is the first extended prose work to yadda yadda."" However, the ""yadda yadda"" needs to be something Apuleius didn't do in The Golden Ass. "	0.032163	0	0
Country music and rap music both talk about the same basic shit repetitively. Cars/trucks, bitches/women, beer/drugs. Guns lol	0.862854	1	1
" ==You misunderstood what I was saying to that ""seb"" dude. You wrote me that thing on my talk page, even after I already tried to clear you up, still thinking that I was using those terms against him/her while thinking I was going to convince him/her of my changes to the wording. Your assumption is a wrong one. I wasn't thinking I could convice that dude of my wording. I was just responding to his rude fire (stupid crap like, ""haha, it gets better every time"") with my own fire. Maybe I'd like other editors to agree with me, okay... but they're not the ones I was reported to you admins by, so they're not the ones that I'm yelling at like this idiot. He already made an ass of himself. As for what you said about ""the way English is spoken,"" you said that as if saying ""American"" is the official way English is spoken (even though you did later say it was informalyeah, I know that). Well, it's not ""how English is spoken,"" as you called it, so don't use that errant terminology. It's just a stupid error that the vast majority have mistakenly adopted for whatever unexplained reason. Canadians are Americans. Mexicans are Americans. Brazilians are Americans. Chileans are Americans. People from the U.S. of America are obviously Americans. And you talk as if you think I'm going to keep trying to edit those places again the way I recently did. No, that's a wrong assumption, too. However, can I, instead, replace ""American"" with something like ""U.S. citizen"" or ""person from the United States of America"" or ""person from the U.S.A.""? Maybe that would sound less of what some of those other editors were errantly claiming was ""awkward"" (for whatever unexplained reason), but still be correct and generally acceptable, wouldn't it? (You know whom you're talking to...)"	0.184691	1	0
I'm done arguing so this will be my last post, its staying up...end of discussion ( )	0.000795	0	0
That nig was a G on that E60 I would have done the same thing	0.673664	1	1
YOU SUCK GORDO!! SCREW YOU GORDO!! WHAT ARE YOU GONNA SEND THE BILL O'REILLY POLICE AFTER ME? GO BACK TO CANADA YOU WANNABE RENT-A-WEB-COP!	0.998335	1	1
Removed the tag myself as no one answered this. sulmues talk contributions	0.000688	0	0
Holocaust Ownership Holocaust as Featured Article I cannot see the Holocaust article getting being FA. Simply because it fails to address the Ownership of the Holocaust issues which sees two mutually exclusive positions, both being accepted standpoints in society. The first being the Jewish tragedy relies on motive and the second thematic would be the mechanics argument which points to the systematic killings and the disparate groups that were killed at the numerous camps. As the article sees the Holocaust as a mainly Jewish event, it would be highly unlikely that it would be featured, else to fly in the face of academics and commonly held social views. It is not a case of also these groups were killed, it is the thematic of groups targetted, groups killed. Lest we forget the first killed at Auschwitz were not Jewish. The lack of attention paid to what is the prevelant perception in Britain in both the academic field as well as socially held views means that the article really does address a common theme. Ownership.	0.001642	0	0
RT @Treal_UrMagesty: Darkskin girls got that juicy pussy 👅💦💦😻😻	0.970416	1	1
Message You have message on my page AS>	0.001042	0	0
@radar_online old cunt needs to die	0.98277	1	1
What was racist about the comments I put! There is no sight of that. And where did I say about aryan brothers? You just tell plain lies. The sources I have given are very reliable scientific facts and for it to be on 3 newspapers tells how true and reliable they are. No one will post them if it is not a fact, so as its a fact and the main genetic article it deserves to be on the article as the people who conducted that study should be respected. You have no respect or common decency. You just want to remove anything that don't sound mediterranean appealing to you. While Im not racist I am anti turkish and yes I admit it. Look how much damage the turks have done to Bulgaria and also other Balkan nations. Millions perished during the occupation and many have fought for those nations to be independent. For you to not support an anti turkish person makes you a traitor. Maybe you are of turkish decsent? Also you want to filter out scientific facts that supports a theory that bulgarians are purely white european and not turkic and instead you support lies that say bulgarians are mediterranean and should be turk friendly. This is anti-white and anti-european.	0.344702	1	1
" Per WP:CANVASS: ""In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. However, canvassing which is done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way is considered inappropriate."" When you post to other editor's talk pages, ""Hey, another user and I are trying to open a DRN so we can remove or fix the topic sentence of that page."" that's soliciting them to come in to influence the outcome of a discussion. It's vote-stacking as defined later in the CANVASS policy. You may appeal my actions to the DRN community, if you like, by making a request at the DRN talk page, if you like, but I will not reopen the request. — (TALK) "	0.000537	0	0
@vaginafvce Fuck her right in the pussy	0.997821	1	1
RT @Broski5519 Lauderdale. . + that's where the hoes at?	0.024026	0	1
YOU GUYS ARE A BUNCH OF DICKS	0.992375	1	1
You just don't get it, do you Mr.Big?	0.040533	0	0
When are you going to learn that a definition should only be accurate and correct, and has nothing to do with narrow-minded? You should read your crap out loud and hear how bad it sounds. University libraries and journal search tools? Are you serious? Like I'm going to find plenty of people reviewing the latest LP that had a few hundred copies pressed (at best) when it came out. I don't have little distro order forms from the early 90's either. Those things usually contain little descriptions of bands/albums. Even if I did, you wouldn't take them as legit sources anyway as you would delete anything like that if I edited this topic. You don't let anyone skew from the word of Greenwald. What's Greenwald have on other people with websites? His crap has an ISBN number to it? Big deal. You already shot down fourfa.com. What makes Greenwald better than Andy Radin or Ben Gook's 2002 article (http://www.furious.com/perfect/emo.html)? Why mention Blush when he gets referenced 3 times and clearly is not someone that's written about emo other than filling out the 80's hardcore scene history by briefly mentioning the Revolution Summer. Maybe I'll write a book, self-publish 5 copies, make a website to promote it, then I can fix this garbage up. Of course after all that hard work you'd just delete it anyway because you love pushing the agenda of lies here.	0.344509	1	1
1) Where are the photos? All the photos they give are old! 2) Of course the Seychelles govt confirmed the trip. They want the media attention and the business of future clients. If people think Prince William was there with his girlfriend, they'll have heard of the place and think of possibly going there themselves. They could in theory be back together, but all these stories with no real backup are not proof. I also read somewhere that he was on the island and had friends there too. They can't even get their story straight.	0.000798	0	0
Hi ru:%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:Alex Smotrov You want a fuck or dick? whats problem?	0.994102	1	1
" Please read WP:EDITSUMMARY and take your own advice. To answer your allegations, insinuations and questions: If you check my contribs, you may note that I'm a slightly busy editor, with far more obligations on Wiki and articles on my watchlist than only Chavez. When you make an incorrect edit, it pops on my watchlist and I correct it. Doing any more for now in the current environment of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:OWN is not possible. When/if the article ever settles down to consensual and collaborative editing, I'll be more than happy to devote ample time to article improvement. As it stands, a well-justified POV tag was placed on the article in February, and not a single editor there did a single thing to correct the POV for months, until the current battleground resumed. You might ask yourself if you have contributed to the battleground or to a collaborative editing environment, particularly with edit summaries like the one noted above. In the meantime, I can clean up ten medical articles and promote ten FACs in less time than it takes to settle one clear and simple cn tag on Chavez. The text clearly says a law was enacted; the cited source cleary says a law may be enacted. The source does not verify the text an updated source is needed. Further, some original research not given in the cited source about the largest bloc in the Americas, was also added somewhere along the line. All of this is clear in my edit summaries, if you will take the time to read them. (Talk) "	0.000555	0	0
. 14:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC	0.000716	0	0
Too bad this article on behalf of the wikipadia. one-sided and propaganda. pkk supporters packed with ideas. publications that are party to open based on a lie. full of black propaganda used against turkey.	0.560483	1	1
@user @user Mxm nigger thinks we give a fuck	0.99769	1	1
fuck you honkey, why you hatin' on blacks? You fucking pussy geek nazi, I'll come to your house and rape your mom because I've got a big black dick in her tight white ass, honkey	0.998582	1	1
Most of you hoes copy and paste but there has to be someone they are copying from. And to you I give you my props	0.010845	0	1
so wait, mr porcupine, when did you say you were planning on blocking yourself?	0.024472	0	0
Please don't threaten to block me I am confronting Mr. Poor in the place he can be confronted. You're only doing his censorship work for him. 76.105.223.232	0.02732	0	0
See also WP:DRV#Purpose.	0.000614	0	0
fuck you, you god damn fucking cocksucker. you fucking fuck yourself pan dan.	0.998568	1	1
Can't sleep, clown will eat me, go fuck yourself you piece of hog anus.	0.998374	1	1
(2) How can I raise this issue at Admin Notice Board if I am blocked. I have been blocked to prevent me from raising the issue at ANI.	0.000667	0	0
Excuse me, who the fuck do you think you are deleting the page for troll 4. A movie that i will be making very soon. Why do you feel so compelled to go around destroying peoples hard work and creativity. Did the page really hurt anybody? Was the deletion really necessary? Would anybody in the entire fucking world really give a SHIT about that page being up. Only you, a fucking nazi cunt would fuck up somebody's work like this. Fuck You -Sandym651	0.998944	1	1
" 1917 Mutinies This section has to do with his elevation to commander-in-chief. The mutinies are part of the reason for that. He did not participate in the mutinies, as the heading might suggest. The heading should be changed to ""1917 - Commander-in-Chief"" "	0.000635	0	0
" I used . I modified it in talk - take a look at what I did. Ludwigs2 "	0.000566	0	0
This hoe got a gf but complain about life like is she hitting you right ?	0.250499	1	1
RT @young_thrill3r: These hoes ain't loyal	0.406212	1	1
" Image Tagging Image:M197-uh1d20mm.jpg This image may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:M197-uh1d20mm.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. "	0.000599	0	0
" Those other recordings have infoboxes of their own further down the page, so there is no need to list them in the main infobox. A hidden comment explains this, but only if you open the infobox to edit it. -''''''The '45 "	0.000586	0	0
http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/lheavy.htm Read the list of champs yet again. Keep repeating your nonsense all you like. Facts are facts.	0.757043	1	1
Manga and Anime is the Anime very faithful to the manga and if yes, how many chapters does it cover?	0.000751	0	0
" YOU ARE BLOCKED IN LIFE FOREVER AND FOR LIFE INDEFINITELY, YOU TRASHY DUSTBIN YOU ARE A TRASHY DUSTBIN WHO IS BLOCKED IN LIFE AND FOR LIFE INDEFINITELY It can be so obviously seen that you have no life in reality and hence you carry on with editing pages on Wikipedia,which is another big joke, like you. In fact, it is jokers like you that make Wikipedia an unreliable piece of crap that the world laughs on. You thought you can block users who edit articles that are wrongly written to project a ""good"" image like that C-grade item song sleaze actress Payal Rohatgi. On the account of hello5678, when I edited to write the truth, since I work with the media and knew the actual truth, you did what you knew best - to block accounts and even have the foolish audacity to write that it did not seem I was a journalist. Your block anyways went futile ( like all your remaining blocks on other users go, and future blocks will be going ) since as I had said, there are a million computers to comment and reply from. It just depends on my wish if I want to respond to idle losers like you and whether I have the time to do so. Once and for all, I am doing it this time, and won't remove time for worthless people like you again. You had some advice on how I should spend my ""blocked time"" by reading WP:Dispute pages on Wikipedia so that I have better ideas on dealing with disputes. Actually ,you need better ideas to deal with life. I am not foolish like you to spend any amount of my time bothering about rubbish written by stupid people like you who have no work in real life and spend days editing pages on Wikipedia/ Scribblebook that no one bothers to read. Some people are just unfortunate like you and 2over0. And if you are troubled by my calling that actress ""sleazy"", then that's your problem. Cos that's the only work she has done and the press uses precisely that term while referencing her work. You also spoke about writing ""accurate"" information on wikipedia. Ironic, when you don't even bother finding out what is accurate, and spend endless hours blocking, and acting admin as if it is an important position in your life. Oh wait, that may be the only position you probably have or will have ever in your unfortunate life. Carry on with your scribble game. And if you feel threatened by media exposure, then that shows you knew you were wrong. It's only when people are wrong that they feel threatened. Pity your personality. Also, you ended by writing that "" it's clear you aren't a journalist, and have no means of carrying out your threat "" - LOL. Sad, that you lived in that illusion. For JOKERS like you who are totally idle,and who scribble away in virtual pages on Wiki-scribble-pedia, will obviously withdraw from the truth. You yourself have no idea at all if I am a journalist, and you write that it's clear that I am not. Well, you are also inane and a clown to fool yourself. I had all means, and the said article has already been published. I had NO TIME to let you know, since I am a busy person, unlike you and do not find time to come scribble on virtual pages that clowns like you , 2OVERO, 2/0, AKERANS, MANAGERARC, FISHERQUEEN (yeah, we named you again - Suck it up), KURU etc. do all your life. You will find that information, depending on which Godforsaken part of the world you live in. And like last time, you can go ahead and block me this time too. For , no one cares two hoots for your silly blocking games. We do have a life, unlike losers like you. Maybe its time for you to go fish in real life, so that you can come anywhere remotely close to having a life - LOL. SO, LOSERQUEEN, GROW UP and GET A LIFE, You IDLE CLOWN OR ELSE, YOU WILL REMAIN A LOSER ALL YOUR LIFE. WHO CARES ANYWAY WHAT INANE, PUERILE LOSERS LIKE YOU DO IN THEIR LIVES. Cos all you know best is to play edit and block games on your scribblebook called wikipedia. Scribble on cos anyway no one cares and I most certainly don't. Time for you to go fishing then, LOSERQUEEN. And I wont bother to check any replies or anything else ever, cos I dont have time unlike Idle LOSERS like you, Loserqueen. You are no where near a queen, but certainly are a huge ,filled with trash, dustbin. Pity you, unfortunate daft-LOSER- DUSTBIN. And the best last closing words to a daft dustbin like you are - FISH OFF."	0.799695	1	1
hangin with mr. v the hot buttstud	0.836822	1	1
"@Gotti_LTF: Happy Bday Bitch Ass Nigga @JetsAndASwisher"preciate that bitch roll up!	0.998173	1	1
@BG_RAMBOE man shut yo bord ass up ! Want some hoes ? Cdfu stay fuckjng wid me on here mann	0.998933	1	1
Go watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer or what ever you simpleton's do, because I am done using your ego as a urinal.	0.895305	1	1
@user Thinking #WhiteGenocide #BuildThatWall	0.001431	0	1
Stevie J my nigga 💯💯 bitch be on ten	0.97786	1	1
These bitches man they love to HARASS	0.995822	1	1
Occidental Petroleum Hi Midlakewinter I noticed that you're a part of WikiProject Companies. I'm currently looking for feedback on draft revisions to two sections of the Occidental Petroleum article. The article talk page isn't very high-traffic, so I've run into trouble getting feedback from other editors. If you're interested in helping out, you can find my draft at . Thanks!	0.000571	0	0
RT @VibeLord: I hate when people think I'm mad or sad cause I'm not talking.. nah I'm chillin bitch.	0.928502	1	1
Ay cuh its HOT AF . Im finna go buy yo bitch some ice cream . Lol	0.982274	1	1
I appreciate you removing the attack. However, no matter how much you wish us to believe your accounts are unrelated, it's not in your best interests to keep bringing it up. The Checkuser is clear, and that account wasn't the only one being used. Your way to eventually getting unblocked is not denial of what has already occurred, but rather showing admins that your behavior in the future will be in line with what's is expected here. That's what you should be focusing on. Make friends, not enemies. They can help you in the future.	0.000668	0	0
RT @CounterMoonbat: Btw, Hillary is a huge supporter of the law they now admit to lying to all you stupid rubes about. She needs to be aske…	0.76358	1	1
slap a hoe	0.888231	1	1
" Animals, Property, and the Law Hate to be a pain, but since you've made it clear you're interested in the subject... I can't find any sort of decent sources for this that would establish notability, but the ""smell test"" says that it ought to be notable, if the claims made are true. Can you have a look? I'm going through the Vegetarianism template, since there's a number of dodgy articles in it, but my purpose is to clean up so that the notable things are properly focused on, not to remove the notable things, after all. '''''' "	0.001267	0	0
that things that we use everyday aren't correct. wikipedia blows cock and so do you.	0.992134	1	1
So I heard you and Cyde abused your power to screw over Nathanr. I saw his side of the story on Encyclopedia Dramatica, and I must say that Snopake is nothing but a backstabbing whore, and you are enabling her. My advice: next time you fuck her, donkey punch her so hard she dies. It's a good way to cleanse the gene pool a bit, know what I mean? Oh, and SNOPAKE LIEKZ TEH PEDO-RAEP! Ha.	0.992688	1	1
Deez hoes be actin up..	0.062731	0	1
@TurdJerguson @Liquorface Yup! And now we pickin you white bitches bare like a chicken leg	0.990969	1	1
" It's a joke that you blocked me for ""personal attacks"" when all I did was edit your talk page - the same as you did mine. Maybe you should think about if you'd like someone doing it to you first beforehand, or would that need you to actually step off your ""I'm a god because I'm an admin"" pedestal? Oh well, at least the internet is the only place freaks like you have power, the rest of us can deal with the real world..."	0.470337	1	1
" BTW, Jones is also known for his research into Jesus' supposed visits to North America. . █♣█ ▪ Talk "	0.000634	0	0
User:Bagumba, I would like to know how using another account is wrong. I was not abusing it... I never got into another fight with an editor, I was just minding my own business and never got into any edit wars, making useful contributions. I do not like this vaselineeeee account, I screwed up this name and everyone would be watching me like a hawk for one stupid mistake. I want to start fresh and show that I am useful without having everyone down my back.	0.137023	1	1
The point of including that London is the world most major financial centre is that this contributes towards the UK's economic status and its economic power. Singapore and Hong Kong are not as financially powerful as London hence London being the most power plus neither Hong Kong (which isn't even a country) nor Singapore have nothing else which could possible make them a powerful country e.g. military power, geographical size, population size, GDP, diplomatic power.	0.000633	0	0

"Some annoying douchebag keeps putting up his own website ""fuckperezhilton.com"" deleted all links to this shithead's site. Someone get the IP and report it to wikipedia"

0.992251

1

Charles Curtis I find it interesting that there was a minor controversy over Goldwater's nomination due to having been born in Arizona Territory since Vice President Charles Curtis was born in Kansas Territory in 1860, one year before statehood.

0.000573

0

Sorry, I didn't realize that your comment was made several days ago: talk:Carly Fiorina#Original research regarding jobs at HP. You cited this. - MrX

0.000574

0

@user @user How about very Unintelligent hysterical woman. This women is mental case!

0.956454

1

Militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Please refrain from redirecting articles about figures and groups relating to the militia occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge unless consensus is reached they should be redirected. As it stands, they have received enough coverage, both locally and nationally, to be seen as notable enough for their own articles. While some may be stubs, they can definitely be expanded.

0.000552

0

" Are you kidding me? What does this guy have to do to have somebody shoot across his bow, once? Murder somebody? GabeMC is out of control!! This editor has insulted many editors repeatedly. He mispells user names repeatedly, to intimidate, accuses all opposers, of his idea, as socks, calls them trolls, charges them with harrassment and is generally abusive. He incites other users to drum up charges against ""his enemies"" of this issue. He has been warned before for changing ""The"" to ""the"" in musical articles while his own launched medcom mediation is in progress, ebfore, and yet when his misbehaviour is pointed out in ANI he creates such a ruckess with sidetrack issues he gets away with more disruption and a blessing. He has had editors topic banned, adminstrators banned for a six month period and investigations into every editor that has ever disagreed with on this topic. He has disrupted many Beatles talk pages with his ""Straw Polls"" simultaneously for the same the/The issue when he doesn't get the right support. He is currently edit warring with the exact same edit, as well as a few others in the Pink Floyd article after you appear to have gave him a bigger feather in his cap for exhibiting [WP:Battleground]] behaviour for my complaint of WP:3RR. WTF? Has we developed a Prima Donna that is untouchable, no matter what behaviour he demonstrates? A further opposing editor of his just committed WP suicide with an indef block that he requested due to the same WP:admin garbage processes. In short! Your Prima Donna editor You can edit WikPedia! But only if you can suck good cock! Now make this disappear, again, to hide your embarrasment. I would be ashamed of it if I were you! Now shut your piehole sockpuppet! 99.251.125.65 Ohhh Reindeer! Here comes the talk page abuse charge! OMG! We're all gonna' die!! I'm melting! I'm melting! 99.251.125.65 "

0.953295

1

The section on religious indoctrination is nearly as large as all other sections combined simply because indoctrination is the inculcation of doctrina, and because you haven't expanded the other sections. No other reason.

0.000821

0

Becouse no one gives a SHIT...

0.957815

1

"== March 2008 == Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. • • • 03:59 (UTC) 20 Mar '08"

0.001033

0

James J. Stanford Hello, You placed an orphan tag on the above. How many links would it take to justify removing this tag? I have always heard three is the magic number.

0.000766

0

" The gallery now works in Firefox 1.5, Internet Explorer and Opera. - contrib talk "

0.000602

0

@tayscalf we should change that to bitch about everything. For example my girlfriend don't like the crew I hang with she BAE

0.848521

1

" Thank you The Modest Barnstar Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 "

0.000643

0

NCBI doesn't index it... I'd agree with you on those grounds.

0.000632

0

Book This book contains some useful information that could be used to improve the article. (talk•contribs)

0.000542

0

Piss on me P!SS ON ME, YOU BIMBO!

0.99213

1

Examples 1. To check some of these people at work, try Asiafinest and Asianfanatics English forums.Korsentry

0.000668

0

I was careful to incorporate all the relevant info from the old article into this one. See list of joke cycles. I also limited the topic, needed, to be only jokes, not performance comedy. That needs to be under its own heading.

0.000557

0

" I told this to him- @Mihaiam —and you're the arbitrator? By unreliable sources mean and vegetarian nutritionists and doctors of medicine like Milton Mills, William C. Roberts, John A. McDougall? Then you go on calling me a ""propagandist""? Well give me one scientific report that says humans are anatomically optimized to eat raw meat or at least a source that says humans are anatomically optimized to process cooked meat without aggravating any serious health-issues (see this)? And exactly what scientific data did Mills provide that is scientifically erroneous? Like what is the acidity of human-stomach when food is inside stomach? and then you tout ""veganskeptic.blogspot"" as a reliable source for high-level scientific knowledge? Isn't it a tad silly to compare a Nutritionist who has been backed by the claims of other MDs and has a doctoral degree, to a random blogger? Where is the scientific journal that says humans are not herbivores? But when it comes to question your meat-eating ways, you cling to a random person as opposed to a slew of MDs who are cogently saying that the practice of eating meat is ""unhealthy"", ""unneeded"" and ""unethical"" (or something of that sort). Meat-eating is at best utterly redundant. I repeat, please show some credible scientific analysis of Human anatomy that firmly proves humans are purely naturally omnivorous (i.e. able to digest raw meat, or if not raw meat then any meat with good health), that's all it'll to convince me. I may be fully wrong, I'm at least open to that possibility, but are you? I want what's best for me. I occasionally like stew myself. D I am yet to receive a reply! (Talk?) "

0.015183

0

" Whack-a-mole I'm tagging NewPages and getting some edit conflicts... User Excirial (talk) deleted this article after you started editing it, with a reason of: G3: Vandalism. It's like our own little game. Anyway, nice job. — · talk Edit conflicts tend to be positive when tagging pages; it kind of confirms that a deletion / tag is placed correctly. By the way - am i correct when i think you are placing CSD and maintenance tags manually? If so you might want to consider using Twinkle and Friendly for that purpose. Those tools tend to be quite a bit faster, while also requiring less clicks to place a tag and warn a user ). (Contact me,Contribs) "

0.001356

0

"====Regarding edits made during August 9 2006 (UTC) to Damien Echols==== Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. don't talk email me "

0.000609

0

" -You can mention whining and abusive behaviour all you like, but I think you know the real reason that you are spending so much time on line, and so little interacting with people offline. You pursued me, and I don't care whether you hide behind a rulebook or not. You have absolutely no understanding of literature, or the arts. Unlike you, I actually work in that area. You are a bully, and have been cutting a destructive swathe across Wikipedia for some while now. It is a pity that this entire website seems to be taken over by idiot savants, anal retentives and Asperger's types, but there you go. Quoting your beloved website: ""The term anal retentive (also anally retentive), commonly abbreviated to anal, is used to describe a person who pays such attention to detail that the obsession becomes an annoyance to others, potentially to the detriment of the anal-retentive person."" As for - you're promoted above yourself, and are clearly unfit for your role. Try looking at both sides of a problem. You've screwed up this time, and should quit before you screw up other people's enjoyment of this website even more. I don't really care if I get banned by you at all, since you've got no power over me whatsoever. You need to spend more time off your computer as well and talking to people face to face. Get some fresh air.- "

0.745787

1

Add to wikipedia Hi Blotto adrift, why dont you start correcting the errors on wikipedia instead of defending your edits? Do you think you know everything? It appears that you do. How about you get a degree and start teaching because then a class will be forced to hear what you say. You will fit in with all those profs who think they know everything but know nothing. Stop acting like a child and grow up.

0.729365

1

Enlightenment is a way of feeling for me! Find out more about my thoughts at:

0.000804

0

BiH: Tense situation, locals alarmed. Choices not complicated. Either Europe implements an ongoing deportation mechanism or it will be held hostage by actions of othersðŸ‘‰this insuring unlimited migrants & endless games of “relocation”.#Visegrad #V4

0.000631

0

1

" Feel free to remove it. It's hardly a big deal at all '''' (bananabucket!'') "

0.001

0

I nominated it with A7 and G3, I think I am right with both. Your thoughts?

0.00057

0

RT @scaffoldjocky: I'll never smoke weed with Willy again. He invited that hick, Toby Keith, and I fucking hate that mongoloid!

0.995531

1

There's absolutely nothing you can do about the former if you're dealing with a decent writer, and very little you can do about the latter in the face of overwhelming odds. But you raised a question above that I'd like to address. I would indeed be deeply shocked if any FAC director accepted money to put an article on the main page, or any FAC delegate accepted money to promote an article, or if any editor was paid to vote in a particular way in an AfD. That would simply be corrupt, which accepting payment for the effort of writing an article is not. Fatuorum

0.000692

0

Once again the TYRANNY of Liberal opinions rules over all, just like the Nazis or Facists.

0.633289

1

RT @lesxo_: cant turn a hoe into a husband either

0.441472

1

Freudian theory? Huh? What the hell is with that far fetched crok of shit? If that merits two lines, I'll come up with my own wackier theory.

0.897209

1

Since you appear to be the intellectual to refine the page, please do so. I hope not to be dissapointed.

0.000803

0

the long count is NOT a calendar ... POD ... it is chronological, like julian days. please verify content!!! Last one. No acknowledgement, no thank you? This isn't worth it. Stay stupid about 2012. ~M~

0.537426

1

" Refer to what I just said, ""just because someone with a blog or publishing ability on a website sees these comments and decides to write an article about it purely shows bad journalistic and investigative qualities on their behalf."" Continue to interfere and you will be reported for intentional disruptive behavior. 71.94.7.228 "

0.001067

0

Hi, you deleted three links that I inserted - an account of the runner's high on 'Endorphins' and a link to an academic paper directly connected to 'Transcendentalism' and 'Romantic poetry' (title: On Being God). I cannot understand why these would be inappropriate. They are not promoting anyone or selling anything, merely providing a further resource for the topic in question. Please reappraise your deletion. Thanks

0.001131

0

" Too much. Don't think we need ""is a simplistic claim."" How bout ""She is best known as the author of The Tale of Genji, written in Japanese between about 1000 and 1008, and sometimes considered the earliest novel. Although ancient Greek and Roman novels predate Murasaki's by several centuries, The Tale of Genji is the first extended prose work to yadda yadda."" However, the ""yadda yadda"" needs to be something Apuleius didn't do in The Golden Ass. "

0.032163

0

Country music and rap music both talk about the same basic shit repetitively. Cars/trucks, bitches/women, beer/drugs. Guns lol

0.862854

1

" ==You misunderstood what I was saying to that ""seb"" dude. You wrote me that thing on my talk page, even after I already tried to clear you up, still thinking that I was using those terms against him/her while thinking I was going to convince him/her of my changes to the wording. Your assumption is a wrong one. I wasn't thinking I could convice that dude of my wording. I was just responding to his rude fire (stupid crap like, ""haha, it gets better every time"") with my own fire. Maybe I'd like other editors to agree with me, okay... but they're not the ones I was reported to you admins by, so they're not the ones that I'm yelling at like this idiot. He already made an ass of himself. As for what you said about ""the way English is spoken,"" you said that as if saying ""American"" is the official way English is spoken (even though you did later say it was informalyeah, I know that). Well, it's not ""how English is spoken,"" as you called it, so don't use that errant terminology. It's just a stupid error that the vast majority have mistakenly adopted for whatever unexplained reason. Canadians are Americans. Mexicans are Americans. Brazilians are Americans. Chileans are Americans. People from the U.S. of America are obviously Americans. And you talk as if you think I'm going to keep trying to edit those places again the way I recently did. No, that's a wrong assumption, too. However, can I, instead, replace ""American"" with something like ""U.S. citizen"" or ""person from the United States of America"" or ""person from the U.S.A.""? Maybe that would sound less of what some of those other editors were errantly claiming was ""awkward"" (for whatever unexplained reason), but still be correct and generally acceptable, wouldn't it? (You know whom you're talking to...)"

0.184691

1

0

I'm done arguing so this will be my last post, its staying up...end of discussion ( )

0.000795

0

That nig was a G on that E60 I would have done the same thing

0.673664

1

YOU SUCK GORDO!! SCREW YOU GORDO!! WHAT ARE YOU GONNA SEND THE BILL O'REILLY POLICE AFTER ME? GO BACK TO CANADA YOU WANNABE RENT-A-WEB-COP!

0.998335

1

Removed the tag myself as no one answered this. sulmues talk contributions

0.000688

0

Holocaust Ownership Holocaust as Featured Article I cannot see the Holocaust article getting being FA. Simply because it fails to address the Ownership of the Holocaust issues which sees two mutually exclusive positions, both being accepted standpoints in society. The first being the Jewish tragedy relies on motive and the second thematic would be the mechanics argument which points to the systematic killings and the disparate groups that were killed at the numerous camps. As the article sees the Holocaust as a mainly Jewish event, it would be highly unlikely that it would be featured, else to fly in the face of academics and commonly held social views. It is not a case of also these groups were killed, it is the thematic of groups targetted, groups killed. Lest we forget the first killed at Auschwitz were not Jewish. The lack of attention paid to what is the prevelant perception in Britain in both the academic field as well as socially held views means that the article really does address a common theme. Ownership.

0.001642

0

RT @Treal_UrMagesty: Darkskin girls got that juicy pussy 👅💦💦😻😻

0.970416

1

Message You have message on my page AS>

0.001042

0

@radar_online old cunt needs to die

0.98277

1

What was racist about the comments I put! There is no sight of that. And where did I say about aryan brothers? You just tell plain lies. The sources I have given are very reliable scientific facts and for it to be on 3 newspapers tells how true and reliable they are. No one will post them if it is not a fact, so as its a fact and the main genetic article it deserves to be on the article as the people who conducted that study should be respected. You have no respect or common decency. You just want to remove anything that don't sound mediterranean appealing to you. While Im not racist I am anti turkish and yes I admit it. Look how much damage the turks have done to Bulgaria and also other Balkan nations. Millions perished during the occupation and many have fought for those nations to be independent. For you to not support an anti turkish person makes you a traitor. Maybe you are of turkish decsent? Also you want to filter out scientific facts that supports a theory that bulgarians are purely white european and not turkic and instead you support lies that say bulgarians are mediterranean and should be turk friendly. This is anti-white and anti-european.

0.344702

1

" Per WP:CANVASS: ""In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it is done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve consensus. However, canvassing which is done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way is considered inappropriate."" When you post to other editor's talk pages, ""Hey, another user and I are trying to open a DRN so we can remove or fix the topic sentence of that page."" that's soliciting them to come in to influence the outcome of a discussion. It's vote-stacking as defined later in the CANVASS policy. You may appeal my actions to the DRN community, if you like, by making a request at the DRN talk page, if you like, but I will not reopen the request. — (TALK) "

0.000537

0

@vaginafvce Fuck her right in the pussy

0.997821

1

RT @Broski5519 Lauderdale. . + that's where the hoes at?

0.024026

0

1

YOU GUYS ARE A BUNCH OF DICKS

0.992375

1

You just don't get it, do you Mr.Big?

0.040533

0

When are you going to learn that a definition should only be accurate and correct, and has nothing to do with narrow-minded? You should read your crap out loud and hear how bad it sounds. University libraries and journal search tools? Are you serious? Like I'm going to find plenty of people reviewing the latest LP that had a few hundred copies pressed (at best) when it came out. I don't have little distro order forms from the early 90's either. Those things usually contain little descriptions of bands/albums. Even if I did, you wouldn't take them as legit sources anyway as you would delete anything like that if I edited this topic. You don't let anyone skew from the word of Greenwald. What's Greenwald have on other people with websites? His crap has an ISBN number to it? Big deal. You already shot down fourfa.com. What makes Greenwald better than Andy Radin or Ben Gook's 2002 article (http://www.furious.com/perfect/emo.html)? Why mention Blush when he gets referenced 3 times and clearly is not someone that's written about emo other than filling out the 80's hardcore scene history by briefly mentioning the Revolution Summer. Maybe I'll write a book, self-publish 5 copies, make a website to promote it, then I can fix this garbage up. Of course after all that hard work you'd just delete it anyway because you love pushing the agenda of lies here.

0.344509

1

1) Where are the photos? All the photos they give are old! 2) Of course the Seychelles govt confirmed the trip. They want the media attention and the business of future clients. If people think Prince William was there with his girlfriend, they'll have heard of the place and think of possibly going there themselves. They could in theory be back together, but all these stories with no real backup are not proof. I also read somewhere that he was on the island and had friends there too. They can't even get their story straight.

0.000798

0

Hi ru:%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA:Alex Smotrov You want a fuck or dick? whats problem?

0.994102

1

" Please read WP:EDITSUMMARY and take your own advice. To answer your allegations, insinuations and questions: If you check my contribs, you may note that I'm a slightly busy editor, with far more obligations on Wiki and articles on my watchlist than only Chavez. When you make an incorrect edit, it pops on my watchlist and I correct it. Doing any more for now in the current environment of WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:OWN is not possible. When/if the article ever settles down to consensual and collaborative editing, I'll be more than happy to devote ample time to article improvement. As it stands, a well-justified POV tag was placed on the article in February, and not a single editor there did a single thing to correct the POV for months, until the current battleground resumed. You might ask yourself if you have contributed to the battleground or to a collaborative editing environment, particularly with edit summaries like the one noted above. In the meantime, I can clean up ten medical articles and promote ten FACs in less time than it takes to settle one clear and simple cn tag on Chavez. The text clearly says a law was enacted; the cited source cleary says a law may be enacted. The source does not verify the text an updated source is needed. Further, some original research not given in the cited source about the largest bloc in the Americas, was also added somewhere along the line. All of this is clear in my edit summaries, if you will take the time to read them. (Talk) "

0.000555

0

. 14:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC

0.000716

0

Too bad this article on behalf of the wikipadia. one-sided and propaganda. pkk supporters packed with ideas. publications that are party to open based on a lie. full of black propaganda used against turkey.

0.560483

1

@user @user Mxm nigger thinks we give a fuck

0.99769

1

fuck you honkey, why you hatin' on blacks? You fucking pussy geek nazi, I'll come to your house and rape your mom because I've got a big black dick in her tight white ass, honkey

0.998582

1

Most of you hoes copy and paste but there has to be someone they are copying from. And to you I give you my props

0.010845

0

1

so wait, mr porcupine, when did you say you were planning on blocking yourself?

0.024472

0

Please don't threaten to block me I am confronting Mr. Poor in the place he can be confronted. You're only doing his censorship work for him. 76.105.223.232

0.02732

0

See also WP:DRV#Purpose.

0.000614

0

fuck you, you god damn fucking cocksucker. you fucking fuck yourself pan dan.

0.998568

1

Can't sleep, clown will eat me, go fuck yourself you piece of hog anus.

0.998374

1

(2) How can I raise this issue at Admin Notice Board if I am blocked. I have been blocked to prevent me from raising the issue at ANI.

0.000667

0

Excuse me, who the fuck do you think you are deleting the page for troll 4. A movie that i will be making very soon. Why do you feel so compelled to go around destroying peoples hard work and creativity. Did the page really hurt anybody? Was the deletion really necessary? Would anybody in the entire fucking world really give a SHIT about that page being up. Only you, a fucking nazi cunt would fuck up somebody's work like this. Fuck You -Sandym651

0.998944

1

" 1917 Mutinies This section has to do with his elevation to commander-in-chief. The mutinies are part of the reason for that. He did not participate in the mutinies, as the heading might suggest. The heading should be changed to ""1917 - Commander-in-Chief"" "

0.000635

0

" I used . I modified it in talk - take a look at what I did. Ludwigs2 "

0.000566

0

This hoe got a gf but complain about life like is she hitting you right ?

0.250499

1

RT @young_thrill3r: These hoes ain't loyal

0.406212

1

" Image Tagging Image:M197-uh1d20mm.jpg This image may be deleted. Thanks for uploading Image:M197-uh1d20mm.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the ""my contributions"" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. "

0.000599

0

" Those other recordings have infoboxes of their own further down the page, so there is no need to list them in the main infobox. A hidden comment explains this, but only if you open the infobox to edit it. -''''''The '45 "

0.000586

0

http://www.cyberboxingzone.com/boxing/lheavy.htm Read the list of champs yet again. Keep repeating your nonsense all you like. Facts are facts.

0.757043

1

Manga and Anime is the Anime very faithful to the manga and if yes, how many chapters does it cover?

0.000751

0

" YOU ARE BLOCKED IN LIFE FOREVER AND FOR LIFE INDEFINITELY, YOU TRASHY DUSTBIN YOU ARE A TRASHY DUSTBIN WHO IS BLOCKED IN LIFE AND FOR LIFE INDEFINITELY It can be so obviously seen that you have no life in reality and hence you carry on with editing pages on Wikipedia,which is another big joke, like you. In fact, it is jokers like you that make Wikipedia an unreliable piece of crap that the world laughs on. You thought you can block users who edit articles that are wrongly written to project a ""good"" image like that C-grade item song sleaze actress Payal Rohatgi. On the account of hello5678, when I edited to write the truth, since I work with the media and knew the actual truth, you did what you knew best - to block accounts and even have the foolish audacity to write that it did not seem I was a journalist. Your block anyways went futile ( like all your remaining blocks on other users go, and future blocks will be going ) since as I had said, there are a million computers to comment and reply from. It just depends on my wish if I want to respond to idle losers like you and whether I have the time to do so. Once and for all, I am doing it this time, and won't remove time for worthless people like you again. You had some advice on how I should spend my ""blocked time"" by reading WP:Dispute pages on Wikipedia so that I have better ideas on dealing with disputes. Actually ,you need better ideas to deal with life. I am not foolish like you to spend any amount of my time bothering about rubbish written by stupid people like you who have no work in real life and spend days editing pages on Wikipedia/ Scribblebook that no one bothers to read. Some people are just unfortunate like you and 2over0. And if you are troubled by my calling that actress ""sleazy"", then that's your problem. Cos that's the only work she has done and the press uses precisely that term while referencing her work. You also spoke about writing ""accurate"" information on wikipedia. Ironic, when you don't even bother finding out what is accurate, and spend endless hours blocking, and acting admin as if it is an important position in your life. Oh wait, that may be the only position you probably have or will have ever in your unfortunate life. Carry on with your scribble game. And if you feel threatened by media exposure, then that shows you knew you were wrong. It's only when people are wrong that they feel threatened. Pity your personality. Also, you ended by writing that "" it's clear you aren't a journalist, and have no means of carrying out your threat "" - LOL. Sad, that you lived in that illusion. For JOKERS like you who are totally idle,and who scribble away in virtual pages on Wiki-scribble-pedia, will obviously withdraw from the truth. You yourself have no idea at all if I am a journalist, and you write that it's clear that I am not. Well, you are also inane and a clown to fool yourself. I had all means, and the said article has already been published. I had NO TIME to let you know, since I am a busy person, unlike you and do not find time to come scribble on virtual pages that clowns like you , 2OVERO, 2/0, AKERANS, MANAGERARC, FISHERQUEEN (yeah, we named you again - Suck it up), KURU etc. do all your life. You will find that information, depending on which Godforsaken part of the world you live in. And like last time, you can go ahead and block me this time too. For , no one cares two hoots for your silly blocking games. We do have a life, unlike losers like you. Maybe its time for you to go fish in real life, so that you can come anywhere remotely close to having a life - LOL. SO, LOSERQUEEN, GROW UP and GET A LIFE, You IDLE CLOWN OR ELSE, YOU WILL REMAIN A LOSER ALL YOUR LIFE. WHO CARES ANYWAY WHAT INANE, PUERILE LOSERS LIKE YOU DO IN THEIR LIVES. Cos all you know best is to play edit and block games on your scribblebook called wikipedia. Scribble on cos anyway no one cares and I most certainly don't. Time for you to go fishing then, LOSERQUEEN. And I wont bother to check any replies or anything else ever, cos I dont have time unlike Idle LOSERS like you, Loserqueen. You are no where near a queen, but certainly are a huge ,filled with trash, dustbin. Pity you, unfortunate daft-LOSER- DUSTBIN. And the best last closing words to a daft dustbin like you are - FISH OFF."

0.799695

1

hangin with mr. v the hot buttstud

0.836822

1

"@Gotti_LTF: Happy Bday Bitch Ass Nigga @JetsAndASwisher"preciate that bitch roll up!

0.998173

1

@BG_RAMBOE man shut yo bord ass up ! Want some hoes ? Cdfu stay fuckjng wid me on here mann

0.998933

1

Go watch Buffy the Vampire Slayer or what ever you simpleton's do, because I am done using your ego as a urinal.

0.895305

1

@user Thinking #WhiteGenocide #BuildThatWall

0.001431

0

1

Stevie J my nigga 💯💯 bitch be on ten

0.97786

1

These bitches man they love to HARASS

0.995822

1

Occidental Petroleum Hi Midlakewinter I noticed that you're a part of WikiProject Companies. I'm currently looking for feedback on draft revisions to two sections of the Occidental Petroleum article. The article talk page isn't very high-traffic, so I've run into trouble getting feedback from other editors. If you're interested in helping out, you can find my draft at . Thanks!

0.000571

0

RT @VibeLord: I hate when people think I'm mad or sad cause I'm not talking.. nah I'm chillin bitch.

0.928502

1

Ay cuh its HOT AF . Im finna go buy yo bitch some ice cream . Lol

0.982274

1

I appreciate you removing the attack. However, no matter how much you wish us to believe your accounts are unrelated, it's not in your best interests to keep bringing it up. The Checkuser is clear, and that account wasn't the only one being used. Your way to eventually getting unblocked is not denial of what has already occurred, but rather showing admins that your behavior in the future will be in line with what's is expected here. That's what you should be focusing on. Make friends, not enemies. They can help you in the future.

0.000668

0

RT @CounterMoonbat: Btw, Hillary is a huge supporter of the law they now admit to lying to all you stupid rubes about. She needs to be aske…

0.76358

1

slap a hoe

0.888231

1

" Animals, Property, and the Law Hate to be a pain, but since you've made it clear you're interested in the subject... I can't find any sort of decent sources for this that would establish notability, but the ""smell test"" says that it ought to be notable, if the claims made are true. Can you have a look? I'm going through the Vegetarianism template, since there's a number of dodgy articles in it, but my purpose is to clean up so that the notable things are properly focused on, not to remove the notable things, after all. '''''' "

0.001267

0

that things that we use everyday aren't correct. wikipedia blows cock and so do you.

0.992134

1

So I heard you and Cyde abused your power to screw over Nathanr. I saw his side of the story on Encyclopedia Dramatica, and I must say that Snopake is nothing but a backstabbing whore, and you are enabling her. My advice: next time you fuck her, donkey punch her so hard she dies. It's a good way to cleanse the gene pool a bit, know what I mean? Oh, and SNOPAKE LIEKZ TEH PEDO-RAEP! Ha.

0.992688

1

Deez hoes be actin up..

0.062731

0

1

@TurdJerguson @Liquorface Yup! And now we pickin you white bitches bare like a chicken leg

0.990969

1

" It's a joke that you blocked me for ""personal attacks"" when all I did was edit your talk page - the same as you did mine. Maybe you should think about if you'd like someone doing it to you first beforehand, or would that need you to actually step off your ""I'm a god because I'm an admin"" pedestal? Oh well, at least the internet is the only place freaks like you have power, the rest of us can deal with the real world..."

0.470337

1

" BTW, Jones is also known for his research into Jesus' supposed visits to North America. . █♣█ ▪ Talk "

0.000634

0

User:Bagumba, I would like to know how using another account is wrong. I was not abusing it... I never got into another fight with an editor, I was just minding my own business and never got into any edit wars, making useful contributions. I do not like this vaselineeeee account, I screwed up this name and everyone would be watching me like a hawk for one stupid mistake. I want to start fresh and show that I am useful without having everyone down my back.

0.137023

1

The point of including that London is the world most major financial centre is that this contributes towards the UK's economic status and its economic power. Singapore and Hong Kong are not as financially powerful as London hence London being the most power plus neither Hong Kong (which isn't even a country) nor Singapore have nothing else which could possible make them a powerful country e.g. military power, geographical size, population size, GDP, diplomatic power.

0.000633

0