Databoost/MCRS_by_Databoost · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 7 5k	degree_of_toxicity float64 0 1	contains_offensive_word int64 0 1	label int64 0 1
" mdma deaths in perspective well i go to the shellfish page and see two sentences describing toxicty and death...why is it we even have an mdma section on lethal effects??? and not just a single sentence, ""there have been a few reported cases of people dying from mdma similar in number to yearly shellfish deaths""...why is it we dont???...because we want as much info as possible...yet when creating a long section on mdma deaths we need to put this in perspective as to how much of an issue it really is for society...if someone (anonymous user???blackrose???)...wants to remove the sentences putting this topic in perspective..then im going to eliminate the entire section to make it as long as the shellfish article on deaths: one sentence on mdma deaths...i dont like deleting info though, so please dont delete cited factual information and i wont have to... "	0.001005	0	0
Bullshit, your adding reference code around my comment to make it invisible was a joke and mocking me.	0.960019	1	1
Dreadstar, LittleMountain5, and some jerk on the Internet are retarded assholes. Dreadstar is a pathetic nerdy little fuck with no prospects for ever meeting a woman he didn't pay for. LittleMountain5 doesn't have to worry about it because he's a flaming fag with an insatiable lust for semen. Some jerk on the Internet is just a sorry piece of shit in general, and if he keeps editing MY page, I'm going to find his house and fucking shoot him in the face	0.996472	1	1
Turn the entire fuck up, hoes!!!!	0.997862	1	1
If you do, I'll freshen my Snapeatar.	0.00231	0	0
" THIS ACCOUNT IS THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111 ACCOUNT. A MORONIC TROLL HAS SET UP ACCOUNTS ON THE WEB WITH MY USERNAME & FALSE IDS, WHICH AREN'T ME BUT A CHILDISH ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE ME WITH SLURS & A FAKE PHOTO. CHECK JOIN DATE; 2006 NOT 2011. HE IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION & SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HE IS CREATING ACCOUNTS ASKING IF HE COULD BE IN TROUBLE. HE IS. THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111/112 ACCOUNTS ARE ON HERE. CHECK MY DEVIANTART PROFILE, SET UP IN 2006 THIS ACCOUNT IS THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111 ACCOUNT. A MORONIC TROLL HAS SET UP ACCOUNTS ON THE WEB WITH MY USERNAME & FALSE IDS, WHICH AREN'T ME BUT A CHILDISH ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE ME WITH SLURS & A FAKE PHOTO. CHECK JOIN DATE; 2006 NOT 2011. HE IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION & SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HE IS CREATING ACCOUNTS ASKING IF HE COULD BE IN TROUBLE. HE IS. THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111/112 ACCOUNTS ARE ON HERE. Some of these uploads are music, some are comedy, some are anti BNP/EDL. None are espousing a particular movement, political group or ideology. However, due to the fact that I espouse equality and fairness & am opposed to unwarranted victimisation, oppression of minorities, hatred and ignorance it seems that certain users like to think of it as a soapbox to spew their racist, misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic and hate-filled gibberish....the BNPers, of course, are guilty of all the aforementioned. Apparently my decision not to allow comments that are basically spam, lazy insults, illiterate ramblings and screeching from morons who don't listen (but just use the channel as their own forum) means I am anti free speech. I don't think our ancestors fought against fascism and for the right for freedom of speech to have hate-filled knuckle draggers abuse that by screeching hate-filled drivel bereft of facts, decency or, indeed, a point. I do actively encourage freedom of speech for all, quite often letting idiots speak makes them look far more idiotic than I ever could hope. There is a difference between debate and spamming, insulting, not listening and preaching though. I'm happy to debate, but a debate consists of two sides discussing their views, not one shouting and refusing to listen to anyone else. It is my channel and I have the right not to allow trolls, clones, neo Nazis, racists, haters and all round ne'er do wells the right to puke bile all over it....this is not suppression of freedom of speech and if anyone cares to look back through my channel they will see I actively encourage debate, but also see how so many choose to eschew debate in favour of: 1. Attempting to belittle, hurl abuse and calling me UAF/Marxist/far left/rapist/paedophile with absolutely no basis (libelous in reality). 2. Personal insults, accusing me of being a foreigner, bringing my family into it (they love a ""mum"" insult) and accusing me of being several users because they can't believe more than one person can disagree. 3. Misquoting, paraphrasing and cherry picking ""research"" from questionable sources and only ever ""research"" or accept sources that back up their own beliefs. 4. Lying, accusing me of acts I haven't done and claiming they have ""won"" the argument when they have ignored the points I raised and just harped on and on. 5. Cloning my account on here and also using my username on far right forums. They have cloned me numerous times. 6. Waffling on about being deprived of freedom of speech (to make insults and allow no right to reply by blocking me from their channels) Basically, these goons make up a tiny minority of incredibly arrogant, ignorant, spiteful, indecent, amoral, borderline illiterate joy sappers; BNP, EDL, neo Nazis, Islamophobes, extremists, KKK, you name it. THEY are what is wrong with the world and they are what is trying to stop us evolving; their motivation is hatred and ignorance....proven by their labelling of everyone who disagrees with them as communists, UAF, Marxists and Liberals (and more unbelievably fascists?!?) with no basis. Of course, they are just lazy epithets to group the majority into one category when their opposition is made up of a multitude of individuals from left to right, of different coloured skin and beliefs, sexualities, classes, background etc....the majority basically. Youtube grants these guttersnipes the anonymity to parade their ignorance and disgusting ideals and appear to be a larger group than they are. They are fooling themselves though, they will always be a minority of failures who blame their own failure in life on everyone but themselves. Ironically, our ancestors who fought for every freedom they treasure now are having it spat back in their face with every ill informed, erroneous, indecent and anti educational rant these idiots post. I encourage debate, NOT bickering, childish playground taunts or interminable clowns on their soapbox refusing to list	0.44379	1	1
support it, will undo edits to it	0.000943	0	0
Thank you Poeticbent for a very lucid and rationale explanation. Seems logical to boot. And Balcer, your point seems less so. I suppose to follow your explanation with the consistency one would expect in an encyclopedia, we would have to call Krakow, Cracow in any reference to the city prior to 1975.	0.000592	0	0
" I would argue that the fact that you simply spew cliched psychobabble regardless of context or suitability illustrates that you fail the Turing test, but whatever. If you can't abide by WP:CIVIL, then so be it. Let's just try to stay out of each other's way. .Alpaugh "	0.001573	0	0
Either you hate science, or you support con artists. I'm sorry to hear that you failed the simplest science course in high school. Enjoy your career at McDonalds, Landroo.	0.037496	0	0
RT @angiecuh: Man, how you "shittin" on all these hoes when you're only cute with make up on ?✋😴	0.83309	1	1
I dont believe any of my behavior was inappropriate to warrant any warnings. This is clear harrasment. Im getting harrased by nitpicky editors and I just want them to leave me alone.	0.012363	0	0
" ""In popular culture"" If we just take a look at the most visited pages in different Wikipedias in 2013, it seems that the Turkish TV show about Suleiman deserves a mention. Also, he has been pictured in many other films and books, so someone better versed in those matters should probably add a section about it. After all, here is a similar section in Roxelana. "	0.000534	0	0
Lol I love when ppl think ima fucking look away like a pussy when I catch them staring at me lmao LOOK AWAY HOE	0.99436	1	1
Mr. Navarro's page is rather messy and poorly documented. I have to ask, why does this exist, while David Lovelace didn't even have a Wiki page till recently? And where is the page for Lovelace's most famous work, the Retarded Animal Babies?	0.026473	0	0
Im not writing about myself, i made this account to make a page for this person, theyre very noteable, and just because you don't know who this person is, it doesnt mean they arent relevant, so fuck yourself up the ass. go jack off to wikipedia some more, seriously, cant you find something better to do with your life? I bet your 40, single, and doing this in your mom's basement.	0.993691	1	1
ADL and LaRouchies As an Australian I don't know much about the American ADL (I've had a fair bit to do with the local affiliate), but I will support any effort to get rid of Herschelkrustofsky and other LaRouchy wreckers. While I'm here I feel I should warn you that someone has been impersonating you at various articles relating to North Korea, inserting gross pro-Communist POV and preventing any critical comment on the grotesque Kim dynasty. This doppel-172 does not seem to have been active lately but you ought to be watchful in case he comes back - as I am being.	0.001372	0	0
Woohoo! Thanks, Gatoclass!	0.004202	0	0
BRYAN HOLT IS THE WORST RIDE OPERATOR AT KNOTT'S He has Attention Deficit Disorder and he acts like a know-it-all!	0.793616	1	1
symbolic stance by signing	0.00073	0	0
I added another recent OR diff.	0.000674	0	0
You are again ignoring the fact that the person who wrote The Daily Mail piece is Amanda Platell. I'm still waiting for you to explain how her own fucking words are not a reliable source.	0.983872	1	1
The negligible benefits gained by including an infobox are far outweighed by the aesthetic gain when it is absent. If the horror must be included, it would do less damage at the end of the article. The inclusion of a right-facing image in the infobox simply adds insult to injury.	0.002386	0	0
" Andrew McIndoe The deletion log says you've deleted this page, but from all indications you didn't? What's going on? I just want to know if this is a problem on my end or Wikipedia's end.'''''' bark ! "	0.005713	0	0
love females but hate bitches	0.98417	1	1
RT @MikeyBlackheart: "I never talk to anybody!" has dinner with family "I hate everyone!" defends 45 people when I call them cunts	0.748513	1	1
Damn Damn, I'm a vandal and you're reverted like 50% of my edits in like 2 seconds! I might have to retire LOL!	0.830505	1	1
@user @user @user @user @user Sorry to break it to you but the god of the bible is actually just a lesser god from the ancient Sumerian and Babylonian religions. The bible itself isn't unique in it's claims nor is it unique in it's inability to substantiate said claims. Try again.	0.001677	0	1
You dont want to read. Again. My personal views ? The above is taken from Darwin's book about his experiments on Drosera.Read please. It is not hard.	0.000812	0	0
Fantastic! Give me a block and blantantly ignore the behaviours of the others. So, it's controversal to state why i'm so irate, but yet it's within guidelines to: Insult my intelligence Degrade my character and overall tell me to fuck off? Wow. 4:21 15 January 2012 (UTC)	0.959448	1	1
RT @SayMyName_Bella: I love my big booty bitches!	0.960803	1	1
You have read literally none of what I wrote. I already explained why Lotus and Marussia are two different situations. Look, TBA is the way the page was BEFORE you went and got half of the involved parties blocked. Just revert it back to that, back to our prior consensus, and we can discuss further here. If you actually listen to me and read my points I'm sure you will agree; there's just no way around the fact that TBA is the correct choice for now. Please let me know where the confusion lies.	0.000578	0	0
I see your point but if we slightly shorten the other sections of the history section and get rid of unnecassery information, we might have enough room to improve this section. Although mentioning Shah Abbas would not lengthen the section much.	0.000573	0	0
Ok thank you Paul. Having read that it is very clear that my use of the Primary source was in absolutely the right way, and that Augustin's publicvation comes under the Novel interpretation category and is therefore minority view. The Primary source is not only clear it is also backed up by the commentary ( and therefore secondary source) offered by Hippolytus. As you may remember from history classes, a source is primary only where its comments are not upon a prior source (in which case they become secondary). It is therefore not possible to consider any commentary on a source still with us today as primary but only secondary. Josephus is thus both a primary and secondary source. Best wishes.81.103.121.144	0.000559	0	0
george washington wore a hat	0.002501	0	0
" Fixing the article I’ll propose below, for comment, a couple of alternative ways to proceed to fix No Gun Ri Massacre. But first …. The recent interest shown by , and, now, presents a real opportunity to improve the article and bring it back to high WP standards. In the past couple of years, new sources have been published and there have been new developments, including a more settled estimate of the dead from South Korean authorities. They belong in the article. But it will be a demanding task; there’s a hell of a lot wrong here. And, most of all, to fall back on a cliché, it’s essential not to lose sight of the forest for the trees. One big “forest,” clearly, is the way-out-of-line behavior of WeldNeck, not just at No Gun Ri Massacre, but Wikipedia-wide, as evidenced by the repeated warnings from other contributors, including many he simply deleted from his Talk page, as with ’s edit-warring warning at [], and including ’s observation [] that he has engaged in “POV pushing on all the articles you have edited.” As said, one must go back in his Talk history to find the thousands of illicitly deleted bytes. Then recall his outrageous action of just two days ago, killing my posting here at NGR Talk, and his taunting “have fun with this” when he posted his frivolous bid for a topic ban at ANI. When you combine all this with his dozens and dozens of rapid-fire, unjustified, unexplained reverts at No Gun Ri Massacre, I think it should be clear this is a guy who cannot be trusted on anything. The “trees,” the distractions, are the red herrings that WeldNeck and other denialists wave on No Gun Ri. (Before WeldNeck, there was an NGR denialist going by ""Kauffner"" who got banned for general mayhem around WP.) The denialists arose in the year 2000, grasping at anything to attack those whose research work exposed No Gun Ri and thereby made the U.S. Army look less than saintly. One of their problems, along with their blinding anger and their obtuseness about so many things, is that they’re stuck in the year 2000. Since then, after long investigations, the South Korean and U.S. governments confirmed that the U.S. military killed the trapped refugees at NGR “by the effects of small-arms fire, artillery and mortar fire, and strafing”; it emerged that more than a dozen military documents showing orders to shoot civilians were suppressed in the U.S. investigation; a Harvard historian reported (in 2005) the discovery of a U.S. ambassadorial letter to the State Department warning, on the day the NGR killings began, that the Army had decided to shoot approaching South Korean refugees (another suppressed document); other media organizations, including the BBC, replicated and then advanced the NGR story beyond the original reporting; a government committee led by South Korea’s prime minister certified a minimal death toll, with identified victims; and the government built a large memorial park and museum at the site where the facts of NGR are enshrined in exhibits and informational material, and where a new, consensus death toll is accepted. This is the “forest” to keep in mind. Other knowledgeable journalists and academics have looked to me to maintain integrity on this subject in WP and elsewhere, as a retiree with more time available to learn WP's basics and monitor things. But they and I literally haven’t had the stomach even to read the article for many months, so disgusted were we at the way one out-of-control guy was allowed to run roughshod over the truth, not to mention turn it at times into a semi-literate, illogical mess. I’ll swallow hard and read it now. A couple of possible ways to deal with this problem: TimothyJosephWood, admirably, was willing to dig right in yesterday. He started from the top of my “litany” of WeldNeck’s unjustified reverts (a list done months ago but never posted until two days ago), and it turned out that first revert, a minor matter, had been remedied since I first noted it. A possible solution: I’ll compare my two lengthy lists of problems (from late 2013 and late 2014) and update them into one that lists problems that still exist. And Mr. Wood or others could then work from that. That might take me one day to prepare. Alternatively, I myself could begin making edits, and other interested parties could stand by and observe the reaction (and ask for better explanations from me or whatever). In that case, I might as well also assemble some of the new material and sourcing I refer to (to include new external links etc.). That might take me u	0.004292	0	0
' I thinkkk shee knows , about , maaaa otheeeeeeeer bitch 󾍃 .	0.914246	1	1
RT @fart: My friends the 2014 @Chevrolet Malibu has the legroom and ventilation necessary for professional pussy-eating. Visit your Chevy d…	0.721472	1	1
Excuse me? After seeing shit like this I expected you to be some throwaway sock puppet. From an experienced editor it's just shameful. That was a blatant BLP violation and you know it. Attributing a call for genocide to a living person without citing a source is waaaaay off base. Don't do it again.	0.872234	1	1
Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is ). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have. Please note these points: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. (talk)	0.000598	0	0
To Richard Wang Man you got issues, My wife tried to be nice to you but , no! I know what you said about Dennis' mom at school and I think your a sick little punk. Use language like that and I swear I'll fly over to Australia and wash out that dirty mouth of yours with soap. I'm tired of tedious old lectures, now cease this dirty talk or I'll fly over to Australia and make you learn your lesson. How dare you call my wife a bully on her talk page. You will talk to Dennis, Annihi later and Cenabee tomorrow and apologise. Cenandor.	0.795664	1	1
RT @DJ_MARVZ: Chris brown got no chill button..... Why sell a bitch out on social media tho? Like not even a subliminal, buddy took time to…	0.713097	1	1
@EdgarGuillenjr your a punk pussy ass bitch! Dude you don't have the balls to fight all you wanna do is wanna hit girls your a fuckin bitch	0.998814	1	1
I AM TRYING SO HARD NOT TO LOOSE MY TEMPER SARAH STOP DELETING THE CATEGORY OF WHOVIANS WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING IT WHY WHY WHY	0.299284	1	1
versud On Talk:Abecedare , DAB has said that I wrongly claim for verse, while Monier-Williams gives . DAB is right, MW forgot to mention , but it is mentioned 14 times in Rgveda 1.164.39; 2.3.7; 5.6.5; 5.27.4; 5.64.2; 5.64.4; 6.16.47; 8.27.1; 8.27.5; 9.73.5; 10.105.8; 10.165.5; 10.71.11 (thelast being ). In comparison, in its all its variations occurs only 9 times. If I know primary sources, do not charge me of OR, it will be dishonest to apply rules just to prove your point. I may cite many secondary sources too, eg Sayana, or Wilson, who have duly translated . MW accomplished a great work, but there are some lapses for which DAB should not blame me for ignorance. Vinay Jha	0.000925	0	0
@hunterbuch66 @kieffer_jason @sbsylvester my bitch doesn't even know you so wtf r u talking about nigga stop fucking dreaming	0.997421	1	1
Smfh boy you sound just like them hoes!! RT @K_forKicKs: Idk why everybody be hating on the Puerto Rican princess	0.84861	1	1
RT @queenallyssa: When your man call you a bitch when y'all arguing he don't think you really a bitch, you just actin like one	0.975731	1	1
@Fit4LifeMike @chanelisabeth hoe don't make me put up screenshots of your texts to me hoe	0.173138	1	0
"Also etymology of ""Khorasan"" doesn't mean ""Land of the sun"" it means ""The place [where] the sun comes from"". And only parts of today's Afghanistan where part of the old Khorasan province. Why do you insist on inclusion your misinformation when you are clueless on a subject? Besides, what are you trying to achieve by including this wrong information in this article? Who benefits from it and in what form? "	0.000676	0	0
It doesn't mean any thing leaving in those Wilayas isn't being a Kabylian. Here we are talking about the ethnic group not the cultural group (the black Kabylians are definitely of Maraboutic origins). I'm pretty sure there is not 9 million white kabylian out there. The stats i gave are referenced, you shouldn't take off referenced content. Just add other references. I'm putting it back. Could you give me the reasons of you undoing my others edits?	0.000761	0	0
~You are not a very intelligent person. Following someone's edits around just to revert them is the real harassment.	0.552563	1	1
@KiKi_That_Seven Lol I'm not you just can't be sad about things you can't control. But when you walk that stage my nigglet I'll be happy :)	0.061073	0	1
This is for removing my post on 100% I'm going to DDOS your toaster for this.	0.951432	1	1
" Oversourcing Hi, I thought I should explain why I reverted the edit you made to Warwick Castle, especially considering it takes a lot less effort to hit the revert button than it does to go through and prune references. I understand that you were consolidating references since just one is used for most paragraphs. However, per WP:V ""material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed"". Therefore I think it's better to have a generous amount rather than just one per paragraph. Moreover, if someone was to add information to the article from another source it could wrongly appear that all the information in the paragraph before the reference comes from the new source (unless of course the editor was careful to duplicate sources). So I am sorry to revert your changes, but I am quite happy to discuss it if you still believe the references should be trimmed. "	0.00054	0	0
Some lying ass hoes lol	0.976393	1	0
That's not how it works. You don't get to add unsubstantiated claims, and expect no changes because you promise that citations are forthcoming. You add the citations WITH THE CLAIMS, or the claims get removed.	0.00092	0	0
Hoes be prayin niccas dnt kno dat background	0.030154	0	1
RT @kid_nipsey_400: bitch what you thought ? 😂	0.969634	1	1
dats why u can't pass up on bitches cuz dey ah make it seems like u sweating dem....Man U knw dat man could've fuck u	0.998162	1	1
You might think that; I couldn't possibly comment. You nicely parsed what was actually said at ANI though. Thanks.	0.000559	0	0
Lawd Jesus lets pray for these hoes 🙏👏👏	0.144373	1	1
You are TRULY an IGNORANT CUNT, and wikipedia is poorer for your participation. GO FUCK YOURSELF, you obviously need help.	0.994167	1	1
" When I think of Carlton (he's some clerk working in Japan, right?) and all of the holier-than-thou, superior-than-thou insults he's thrown at so many people here (the evidence is all over the place)...I just can't help but think of one of Homer Simpson's quotes: ""Everyone is stupid except me."" 99.248.67.42 "	0.023089	0	0
Since you haven't replied, I have deleted the images to protect your intended usage of the images - if they remain on our servers under that license, they are free to be used for any purpose. ()(Talk)	0.000576	0	0
(have never been there and as far as I know, know nobody there)	0.000662	0	0
"Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. xd(?!?) "	0.000589	0	0
" Regarding Loyalmoonie and LGBT categories Looked into it, and this editor seems to be pushing an anti-LGBT agenda. They've done similar stuff over at Sailor Moon, and made ""official-looking"" warnings to other editors. This quote is bizarre, and is quite telling: ""To insert those categories would ultimately give other people (who may not even support the LGBT movement) reading the article the assumption that every person who does enjoy Sailor Moon is a homosexual (and/or supports SSM)"". I don't personally watch/read Sailor Moon or know much about it, so I'm not confident enough to re-add the categories, but the reasoning for their removal is flawed regardless, and there is a sourced part in the article about female homosexuality.talk "	0.002944	0	0
Yes, please, this is a problem. You also have an account on nl.wikipedia. Please either make your new articles there, or translate them into English before you create them here on en.wikipedia. You are also still not providing sources; articles on en.wikipedia need to have sources, and articles on living people get deleted if these are not added within a week. Please add the name of the book, periodical, or website that you used for the information.	0.000605	0	0
" Google Name Origin ""Goo - ogle"". Stare at the unusable ""pile of shit"". That's what global information pool is without searching tool. It's a word play on number ""googol"" and ""ogle the goo"" - see through the humungous amounts of data. That's what I think it is. I am quite surprised that the Wikipedia article is not including this hypothesis, when founders are silent about it. Note: ""ianmcm"" and ""bongwarrior"" (read ""dopehead""/druguser's profile) are censoring this discussion. I will have them evicted from Wikipedia community. Please everybody: go after them! "	0.829591	1	1
RT @thefrogod: Dat shit trash “@ComplexMag: A shirt inspired by @Drake's emoji tattoo. Pre-order now: http://t.co/VAuLGcpkIS http://t.co/h…	0.885423	1	1
If Catch 22 didn't exist, they'd have had to invent it.	0.000715	0	0
Never tell a bitch what u up to..	0.981145	1	1
maryjane_militant_que you got that bomb azz pussy lol http://t.co/t9dsTikwcH	0.964877	1	1
You giving me head tonight or nah ? — I'll shoot your fucking pussy hoe http://t.co/yvBJuNoTXE	0.996203	1	1
http://lovebugfans.yuku.com/topic/9606/Christmas-records-in-the-UK-Top-100-singles-chart#.UsPyPLRn2DQ here is a reference to their UK top 100 singles chart placing maybe now you will believe that Sleigh Ride did chart in the UK in December 2013.	0.000693	0	0
Ion even wanna see this bitch . 😒 talking bout ill make you breakfast	0.958572	1	1
And Jess and Mallexkion, yes I understand it not conclusive evidence, but you must understand its suggestive evidence, and our readers have a right to know about it and make up their own minds!	0.000912	0	0
RT @TAXSTONE: These bitches will set you up the moment you stop fucking with them and they mad	0.997822	1	1
Well, you wouldn't delete the redlink, you simply wouldn't save the page that you used to generate a redlink on in its preview. You're using the preview page as the jumping-off point, you see.	0.000983	0	0
RT @ugIycutie: one, two, three, four, how many niggers are in my store?	0.954002	1	0
Discussion has been settled. Result: use ceremonial counties for disambiguation of places, and in a geographic frame of reference, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Olney, Milton Keynes; Caversham, Reading; Wanborough, Swindon.	0.000554	0	0
RT @rodill_: niggas passing up good girls for hoes.	0.925937	1	1
My nigga Bolin does NOTHING but win with the bitches breh	0.991713	1	1
The only reason I cheat is to show these bitches what kind of dick my girl be getting.	0.997157	1	1
" Is OhInternet a recreation of Encyclopedia Dramatica? To tangent from the above topics… Oh Internet is not Encyopedia Dramatica as the article supposes. 'Encyclopedia Dramatica' is defined as the domain name 'www.encyclopediadramatica.com' and the intellectual property concerned with ED copyright. OhInternet, however is a different project entirely; notable differences: a new XML coding system, logo and form of satire. To use terms in the article: the site was not 'overhauled' but rather 'replaced'. To use Silverseren's analogy, if Wikipedia did rename itself, kept most of its higher administration and stopped using Wikimedia software would it still be Wikipedia? The answer is ""No"". The Wikipedia name and intellectual property becomes inactive, lost. If one were to charge a Wikipedia fork site with copyright violations they would have to give evidence of their ownership of Wikipedia copyright and not that of the new 'OhKnowledge.com', the hypothetical Wikipedia replacement. (Sherrod, however does have evidence, so don't take this as a justification for the .ch). Once a site loses connection with the old name or any registered associated material it ceases to be the same entity. Oh Internet has no parallels to the old site at all. The position that the new site is ED just 'cleaned' should be removed from the article immediately. Encyclopedia Dramatica, as defined, is dead. OhInternet is a whole new project – a de facto successor, but not 'ED'. The redirect was an attempt to maintain website hits but as many 3rd party websites will show, it didn't quite work out. The vast majority of the volunteer editors did leave. Site activity, growth and edit numbers are much higher at encyopediadramaticia.ch than at OhInternet. OhInternet’s declining popularity should first stabilize before any 'notability' assessment goes underway. Understandably the nature of ED.ch is illegal so I don't care for it immediate coverage. I like to think the site will cool down over time. 94.170.94.249 "	0.001181	0	0
"i went to a WS concert in buenos aires, argentina in JUNE 2005, and at the beggining, Jack introduces themselves as: ""I'm Jack White and this is my sister Meg"". I know this is not true, since i read a biograbhy on the WS, saying that they met, they got married, formed the band and then divorced. regards, chinohudson. "	0.001509	0	0
you just wait your death is near	0.863792	1	1
and assertions about an editing hierarchy you put on my talk page	0.000778	0	0
RT @TinkkBaddAss: Bouta take a shower just to fuck yo bitch https://t.co/7WQ5QZsIls	0.997904	1	1
Your edits to cotton gin	0.024252	0	0
Symmetry Thanks for your calming down effort, but I'm not seeing your symmetric comments at Blueboar's page or history (I'm a long time participant, organizer and moderator in quite a few medium to large communities having no presumption of evil intent, and I do insist on naming that particular set of replies moronic).Would you please ask him/her/it to refrain from personal attacks, opinionated denials, etc as presented on Talk:Anti-Masonry?I've also restored two of the three comments on that talk page since only the last one was a personal attack indeed (and SarekOfVulcan didn't pass the neutrality test, heh). Thanks again.	0.001328	0	0
RT @LILBTHEBASEDGOD: ultimate bitch mixtape is done!!! words from Lil B!! - Lil B	0.930152	1	1
What the fuck are you talking about? They did lose a couple times.	0.988727	1	1
RT @BoujieAssMeena: My bitches got pretty pussy😄😄😄😜😜😜	0.995763	1	1
" Why are you still here? What is it you hope to achieve exactly? Corbett "	0.001241	0	0
I didn't remove anything.And be nice.I don't know how to sign.If I can't add Madonna's certifications then I am going to delete Mariah's,Janet's,Whitney's and others.Also I am adding Madonna's critics list positions etc.	0.000661	0	0
. 1971 (though trialled between 1965 and 1970)	0.000586	0	0
Words can't describe how annoying I find you Wikipedians.	0.423823	1	1
^^^^^^ If he comes back and changes my fun edit... omg... wow ^^^^^^	0.001251	0	0

" mdma deaths in perspective well i go to the shellfish page and see two sentences describing toxicty and death...why is it we even have an mdma section on lethal effects??? and not just a single sentence, ""there have been a few reported cases of people dying from mdma similar in number to yearly shellfish deaths""...why is it we dont???...because we want as much info as possible...yet when creating a long section on mdma deaths we need to put this in perspective as to how much of an issue it really is for society...if someone (anonymous user???blackrose???)...wants to remove the sentences putting this topic in perspective..then im going to eliminate the entire section to make it as long as the shellfish article on deaths: one sentence on mdma deaths...i dont like deleting info though, so please dont delete cited factual information and i wont have to... "

0.001005

0

Bullshit, your adding reference code around my comment to make it invisible was a joke and mocking me.

0.960019

1

Dreadstar, LittleMountain5, and some jerk on the Internet are retarded assholes. Dreadstar is a pathetic nerdy little fuck with no prospects for ever meeting a woman he didn't pay for. LittleMountain5 doesn't have to worry about it because he's a flaming fag with an insatiable lust for semen. Some jerk on the Internet is just a sorry piece of shit in general, and if he keeps editing MY page, I'm going to find his house and fucking shoot him in the face

0.996472

1

Turn the entire fuck up, hoes!!!!

0.997862

1

If you do, I'll freshen my Snapeatar.

0.00231

0

" THIS ACCOUNT IS THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111 ACCOUNT. A MORONIC TROLL HAS SET UP ACCOUNTS ON THE WEB WITH MY USERNAME & FALSE IDS, WHICH AREN'T ME BUT A CHILDISH ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE ME WITH SLURS & A FAKE PHOTO. CHECK JOIN DATE; 2006 NOT 2011. HE IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION & SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HE IS CREATING ACCOUNTS ASKING IF HE COULD BE IN TROUBLE. HE IS. THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111/112 ACCOUNTS ARE ON HERE. CHECK MY DEVIANTART PROFILE, SET UP IN 2006 THIS ACCOUNT IS THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111 ACCOUNT. A MORONIC TROLL HAS SET UP ACCOUNTS ON THE WEB WITH MY USERNAME & FALSE IDS, WHICH AREN'T ME BUT A CHILDISH ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE ME WITH SLURS & A FAKE PHOTO. CHECK JOIN DATE; 2006 NOT 2011. HE IS CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION & SO WORRIED ABOUT IT HE IS CREATING ACCOUNTS ASKING IF HE COULD BE IN TROUBLE. HE IS. THE ONLY REAL GOLDENTONY111/112 ACCOUNTS ARE ON HERE. Some of these uploads are music, some are comedy, some are anti BNP/EDL. None are espousing a particular movement, political group or ideology. However, due to the fact that I espouse equality and fairness & am opposed to unwarranted victimisation, oppression of minorities, hatred and ignorance it seems that certain users like to think of it as a soapbox to spew their racist, misogynistic, homophobic, xenophobic and hate-filled gibberish....the BNPers, of course, are guilty of all the aforementioned. Apparently my decision not to allow comments that are basically spam, lazy insults, illiterate ramblings and screeching from morons who don't listen (but just use the channel as their own forum) means I am anti free speech. I don't think our ancestors fought against fascism and for the right for freedom of speech to have hate-filled knuckle draggers abuse that by screeching hate-filled drivel bereft of facts, decency or, indeed, a point. I do actively encourage freedom of speech for all, quite often letting idiots speak makes them look far more idiotic than I ever could hope. There is a difference between debate and spamming, insulting, not listening and preaching though. I'm happy to debate, but a debate consists of two sides discussing their views, not one shouting and refusing to listen to anyone else. It is my channel and I have the right not to allow trolls, clones, neo Nazis, racists, haters and all round ne'er do wells the right to puke bile all over it....this is not suppression of freedom of speech and if anyone cares to look back through my channel they will see I actively encourage debate, but also see how so many choose to eschew debate in favour of: 1. Attempting to belittle, hurl abuse and calling me UAF/Marxist/far left/rapist/paedophile with absolutely no basis (libelous in reality). 2. Personal insults, accusing me of being a foreigner, bringing my family into it (they love a ""mum"" insult) and accusing me of being several users because they can't believe more than one person can disagree. 3. Misquoting, paraphrasing and cherry picking ""research"" from questionable sources and only ever ""research"" or accept sources that back up their own beliefs. 4. Lying, accusing me of acts I haven't done and claiming they have ""won"" the argument when they have ignored the points I raised and just harped on and on. 5. Cloning my account on here and also using my username on far right forums. They have cloned me numerous times. 6. Waffling on about being deprived of freedom of speech (to make insults and allow no right to reply by blocking me from their channels) Basically, these goons make up a tiny minority of incredibly arrogant, ignorant, spiteful, indecent, amoral, borderline illiterate joy sappers; BNP, EDL, neo Nazis, Islamophobes, extremists, KKK, you name it. THEY are what is wrong with the world and they are what is trying to stop us evolving; their motivation is hatred and ignorance....proven by their labelling of everyone who disagrees with them as communists, UAF, Marxists and Liberals (and more unbelievably fascists?!?) with no basis. Of course, they are just lazy epithets to group the majority into one category when their opposition is made up of a multitude of individuals from left to right, of different coloured skin and beliefs, sexualities, classes, background etc....the majority basically. Youtube grants these guttersnipes the anonymity to parade their ignorance and disgusting ideals and appear to be a larger group than they are. They are fooling themselves though, they will always be a minority of failures who blame their own failure in life on everyone but themselves. Ironically, our ancestors who fought for every freedom they treasure now are having it spat back in their face with every ill informed, erroneous, indecent and anti educational rant these idiots post. I encourage debate, NOT bickering, childish playground taunts or interminable clowns on their soapbox refusing to list

0.44379

1

support it, will undo edits to it

0.000943

0

Thank you Poeticbent for a very lucid and rationale explanation. Seems logical to boot. And Balcer, your point seems less so. I suppose to follow your explanation with the consistency one would expect in an encyclopedia, we would have to call Krakow, Cracow in any reference to the city prior to 1975.

0.000592

0

" I would argue that the fact that you simply spew cliched psychobabble regardless of context or suitability illustrates that you fail the Turing test, but whatever. If you can't abide by WP:CIVIL, then so be it. Let's just try to stay out of each other's way. .Alpaugh "

0.001573

0

Either you hate science, or you support con artists. I'm sorry to hear that you failed the simplest science course in high school. Enjoy your career at McDonalds, Landroo.

0.037496

0

RT @angiecuh: Man, how you "shittin" on all these hoes when you're only cute with make up on ?✋😴

0.83309

1

I dont believe any of my behavior was inappropriate to warrant any warnings. This is clear harrasment. Im getting harrased by nitpicky editors and I just want them to leave me alone.

0.012363

0

" ""In popular culture"" If we just take a look at the most visited pages in different Wikipedias in 2013, it seems that the Turkish TV show about Suleiman deserves a mention. Also, he has been pictured in many other films and books, so someone better versed in those matters should probably add a section about it. After all, here is a similar section in Roxelana. "

0.000534

0

Lol I love when ppl think ima fucking look away like a pussy when I catch them staring at me lmao LOOK AWAY HOE

0.99436

1

Mr. Navarro's page is rather messy and poorly documented. I have to ask, why does this exist, while David Lovelace didn't even have a Wiki page till recently? And where is the page for Lovelace's most famous work, the Retarded Animal Babies?

0.026473

0

Im not writing about myself, i made this account to make a page for this person, theyre very noteable, and just because you don't know who this person is, it doesnt mean they arent relevant, so fuck yourself up the ass. go jack off to wikipedia some more, seriously, cant you find something better to do with your life? I bet your 40, single, and doing this in your mom's basement.

0.993691

1

ADL and LaRouchies As an Australian I don't know much about the American ADL (I've had a fair bit to do with the local affiliate), but I will support any effort to get rid of Herschelkrustofsky and other LaRouchy wreckers. While I'm here I feel I should warn you that someone has been impersonating you at various articles relating to North Korea, inserting gross pro-Communist POV and preventing any critical comment on the grotesque Kim dynasty. This doppel-172 does not seem to have been active lately but you ought to be watchful in case he comes back - as I am being.

0.001372

0

Woohoo! Thanks, Gatoclass!

0.004202

0

BRYAN HOLT IS THE WORST RIDE OPERATOR AT KNOTT'S He has Attention Deficit Disorder and he acts like a know-it-all!

0.793616

1

symbolic stance by signing

0.00073

0

I added another recent OR diff.

0.000674

0

You are again ignoring the fact that the person who wrote The Daily Mail piece is Amanda Platell. I'm still waiting for you to explain how her own fucking words are not a reliable source.

0.983872

1

The negligible benefits gained by including an infobox are far outweighed by the aesthetic gain when it is absent. If the horror must be included, it would do less damage at the end of the article. The inclusion of a right-facing image in the infobox simply adds insult to injury.

0.002386

0

" Andrew McIndoe The deletion log says you've deleted this page, but from all indications you didn't? What's going on? I just want to know if this is a problem on my end or Wikipedia's end.'''''' bark ! "

0.005713

0

love females but hate bitches

0.98417

1

RT @MikeyBlackheart: "I never talk to anybody!" *has dinner with family* "I hate everyone!" *defends 45 people when I call them cunts*

0.748513

1

Damn Damn, I'm a vandal and you're reverted like 50% of my edits in like 2 seconds! I might have to retire LOL!

0.830505

1

@user @user @user @user @user Sorry to break it to you but the god of the bible is actually just a lesser god from the ancient Sumerian and Babylonian religions. The bible itself isn't unique in it's claims nor is it unique in it's inability to substantiate said claims. Try again.

0.001677

0

1

You dont want to read. Again. My personal views ? The above is taken from Darwin's book about his experiments on Drosera.Read please. It is not hard.

0.000812

0

Fantastic! Give me a block and blantantly ignore the behaviours of the others. So, it's controversal to state why i'm so irate, but yet it's within guidelines to: Insult my intelligence Degrade my character and overall tell me to fuck off? Wow. 4:21 15 January 2012 (UTC)

0.959448

1

RT @SayMyName_Bella: I love my big booty bitches!

0.960803

1

You have read literally none of what I wrote. I already explained why Lotus and Marussia are two different situations. Look, TBA is the way the page was BEFORE you went and got half of the involved parties blocked. Just revert it back to that, back to our prior consensus, and we can discuss further here. If you actually listen to me and read my points I'm sure you will agree; there's just no way around the fact that TBA is the correct choice for now. Please let me know where the confusion lies.

0.000578

0

I see your point but if we slightly shorten the other sections of the history section and get rid of unnecassery information, we might have enough room to improve this section. Although mentioning Shah Abbas would not lengthen the section much.

0.000573

0

Ok thank you Paul. Having read that it is very clear that my use of the Primary source was in absolutely the right way, and that Augustin's publicvation comes under the Novel interpretation category and is therefore minority view. The Primary source is not only clear it is also backed up by the commentary ( and therefore secondary source) offered by Hippolytus. As you may remember from history classes, a source is primary only where its comments are not upon a prior source (in which case they become secondary). It is therefore not possible to consider any commentary on a source still with us today as primary but only secondary. Josephus is thus both a primary and secondary source. Best wishes.81.103.121.144

0.000559

0

george washington wore a hat

0.002501

0

" Fixing the article I’ll propose below, for comment, a couple of alternative ways to proceed to fix No Gun Ri Massacre. But first …. The recent interest shown by , and, now, presents a real opportunity to improve the article and bring it back to high WP standards. In the past couple of years, new sources have been published and there have been new developments, including a more settled estimate of the dead from South Korean authorities. They belong in the article. But it will be a demanding task; there’s a hell of a lot wrong here. And, most of all, to fall back on a cliché, it’s essential not to lose sight of the forest for the trees. One big “forest,” clearly, is the way-out-of-line behavior of WeldNeck, not just at No Gun Ri Massacre, but Wikipedia-wide, as evidenced by the repeated warnings from other contributors, including many he simply deleted from his Talk page, as with ’s edit-warring warning at [], and including ’s observation [] that he has engaged in “POV pushing on all the articles you have edited.” As said, one must go back in his Talk history to find the thousands of illicitly deleted bytes. Then recall his outrageous action of just two days ago, killing my posting here at NGR Talk, and his taunting “have fun with this” when he posted his frivolous bid for a topic ban at ANI. When you combine all this with his dozens and dozens of rapid-fire, unjustified, unexplained reverts at No Gun Ri Massacre, I think it should be clear this is a guy who cannot be trusted on anything. The “trees,” the distractions, are the red herrings that WeldNeck and other denialists wave on No Gun Ri. (Before WeldNeck, there was an NGR denialist going by ""Kauffner"" who got banned for general mayhem around WP.) The denialists arose in the year 2000, grasping at anything to attack those whose research work exposed No Gun Ri and thereby made the U.S. Army look less than saintly. One of their problems, along with their blinding anger and their obtuseness about so many things, is that they’re stuck in the year 2000. Since then, after long investigations, the South Korean and U.S. governments confirmed that the U.S. military killed the trapped refugees at NGR “by the effects of small-arms fire, artillery and mortar fire, and strafing”; it emerged that more than a dozen military documents showing orders to shoot civilians were suppressed in the U.S. investigation; a Harvard historian reported (in 2005) the discovery of a U.S. ambassadorial letter to the State Department warning, on the day the NGR killings began, that the Army had decided to shoot approaching South Korean refugees (another suppressed document); other media organizations, including the BBC, replicated and then advanced the NGR story beyond the original reporting; a government committee led by South Korea’s prime minister certified a minimal death toll, with identified victims; and the government built a large memorial park and museum at the site where the facts of NGR are enshrined in exhibits and informational material, and where a new, consensus death toll is accepted. This is the “forest” to keep in mind. Other knowledgeable journalists and academics have looked to me to maintain integrity on this subject in WP and elsewhere, as a retiree with more time available to learn WP's basics and monitor things. But they and I literally haven’t had the stomach even to read the article for many months, so disgusted were we at the way one out-of-control guy was allowed to run roughshod over the truth, not to mention turn it at times into a semi-literate, illogical mess. I’ll swallow hard and read it now. A couple of possible ways to deal with this problem: TimothyJosephWood, admirably, was willing to dig right in yesterday. He started from the top of my “litany” of WeldNeck’s unjustified reverts (a list done months ago but never posted until two days ago), and it turned out that first revert, a minor matter, had been remedied since I first noted it. A possible solution: I’ll compare my two lengthy lists of problems (from late 2013 and late 2014) and update them into one that lists problems that still exist. And Mr. Wood or others could then work from that. That might take me one day to prepare. Alternatively, I myself could begin making edits, and other interested parties could stand by and observe the reaction (and ask for better explanations from me or whatever). In that case, I might as well also assemble some of the new material and sourcing I refer to (to include new external links etc.). That might take me u

0.004292

0

' I thinkkk shee knows , about , maaaa otheeeeeeeer bitch 󾍃 .

0.914246

1

RT @fart: My friends the 2014 @Chevrolet Malibu has the legroom and ventilation necessary for professional pussy-eating. Visit your Chevy d…

0.721472

1

Excuse me? After seeing shit like this I expected you to be some throwaway sock puppet. From an experienced editor it's just shameful. That was a blatant BLP violation and you know it. Attributing a call for genocide to a living person without citing a source is waaaaay off base. Don't do it again.

0.872234

1

Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is ). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have. Please note these points: Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. (talk)

0.000598

0

To Richard Wang Man you got issues, My wife tried to be nice to you but , no! I know what you said about Dennis' mom at school and I think your a sick little punk. Use language like that and I swear I'll fly over to Australia and wash out that dirty mouth of yours with soap. I'm tired of tedious old lectures, now cease this dirty talk or I'll fly over to Australia and make you learn your lesson. How dare you call my wife a bully on her talk page. You will talk to Dennis, Annihi later and Cenabee tomorrow and apologise. Cenandor.

0.795664

1

RT @DJ_MARVZ: Chris brown got no chill button..... Why sell a bitch out on social media tho? Like not even a subliminal, buddy took time to…

0.713097

1

@EdgarGuillenjr your a punk pussy ass bitch! Dude you don't have the balls to fight all you wanna do is wanna hit girls your a fuckin bitch

0.998814

1

I AM TRYING SO HARD NOT TO LOOSE MY TEMPER SARAH STOP DELETING THE CATEGORY OF WHOVIANS WHY DO YOU KEEP DELETING IT WHY WHY WHY

0.299284

1

versud On Talk:Abecedare , DAB has said that I wrongly claim for verse, while Monier-Williams gives . DAB is right, MW forgot to mention , but it is mentioned 14 times in Rgveda 1.164.39; 2.3.7; 5.6.5; 5.27.4; 5.64.2; 5.64.4; 6.16.47; 8.27.1; 8.27.5; 9.73.5; 10.105.8; 10.165.5; 10.71.11 (thelast being ). In comparison, in its all its variations occurs only 9 times. If I know primary sources, do not charge me of OR, it will be dishonest to apply rules just to prove your point. I may cite many secondary sources too, eg Sayana, or Wilson, who have duly translated . MW accomplished a great work, but there are some lapses for which DAB should not blame me for ignorance. Vinay Jha

0.000925

0

@hunterbuch66 @kieffer_jason @sbsylvester my bitch doesn't even know you so wtf r u talking about nigga stop fucking dreaming

0.997421

1

Smfh boy you sound just like them hoes!! RT @K_forKicKs: Idk why everybody be hating on the Puerto Rican princess

0.84861

1

RT @queenallyssa: When your man call you a bitch when y'all arguing he don't think you really a bitch, you just actin like one

0.975731

1

@Fit4LifeMike @chanelisabeth hoe don't make me put up screenshots of your texts to me hoe

0.173138

1

0

"Also etymology of ""Khorasan"" doesn't mean ""Land of the sun"" it means ""The place [where] the sun comes from"". And only parts of today's Afghanistan where part of the old Khorasan province. Why do you insist on inclusion your misinformation when you are clueless on a subject? Besides, what are you trying to achieve by including this wrong information in this article? Who benefits from it and in what form? "

0.000676

0

It doesn't mean any thing leaving in those Wilayas isn't being a Kabylian. Here we are talking about the ethnic group not the cultural group (the black Kabylians are definitely of Maraboutic origins). I'm pretty sure there is not 9 million white kabylian out there. The stats i gave are referenced, you shouldn't take off referenced content. Just add other references. I'm putting it back. Could you give me the reasons of you undoing my others edits?

0.000761

0

~You are not a very intelligent person. Following someone's edits around just to revert them is the real harassment.

0.552563

1

@KiKi_That_Seven Lol I'm not you just can't be sad about things you can't control. But when you walk that stage my nigglet I'll be happy :)

0.061073

0

1

This is for removing my post on 100% I'm going to DDOS your toaster for this.

0.951432

1

" Oversourcing Hi, I thought I should explain why I reverted the edit you made to Warwick Castle, especially considering it takes a lot less effort to hit the revert button than it does to go through and prune references. I understand that you were consolidating references since just one is used for most paragraphs. However, per WP:V ""material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed"". Therefore I think it's better to have a generous amount rather than just one per paragraph. Moreover, if someone was to add information to the article from another source it could wrongly appear that all the information in the paragraph before the reference comes from the new source (unless of course the editor was careful to duplicate sources). So I am sorry to revert your changes, but I am quite happy to discuss it if you still believe the references should be trimmed. "

0.00054

0

Some lying ass hoes lol

0.976393

1

0

That's not how it works. You don't get to add unsubstantiated claims, and expect no changes because you promise that citations are forthcoming. You add the citations WITH THE CLAIMS, or the claims get removed.

0.00092

0

Hoes be prayin niccas dnt kno dat background

0.030154

0

1

RT @kid_nipsey_400: bitch what you thought ? 😂

0.969634

1

dats why u can't pass up on bitches cuz dey ah make it seems like u sweating dem....Man U knw dat man could've fuck u

0.998162

1

You might think that; I couldn't possibly comment. You nicely parsed what was actually said at ANI though. Thanks.

0.000559

0

Lawd Jesus lets pray for these hoes 🙏👏👏

0.144373

1

You are TRULY an IGNORANT CUNT, and wikipedia is poorer for your participation. GO FUCK YOURSELF, you obviously need help.

0.994167

1

" When I think of Carlton (he's some clerk working in Japan, right?) and all of the holier-than-thou, superior-than-thou insults he's thrown at so many people here (the evidence is all over the place)...I just can't help but think of one of Homer Simpson's quotes: ""Everyone is stupid except me."" 99.248.67.42 "

0.023089

0

Since you haven't replied, I have deleted the images to protect your intended usage of the images - if they remain on our servers under that license, they are free to be used for any purpose. ()(Talk)

0.000576

0

(have never been there and as far as I know, know nobody there)

0.000662

0

"Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. xd(?!?) "

0.000589

0

" Regarding Loyalmoonie and LGBT categories Looked into it, and this editor seems to be pushing an anti-LGBT agenda. They've done similar stuff over at Sailor Moon, and made ""official-looking"" warnings to other editors. This quote is bizarre, and is quite telling: ""To insert those categories would ultimately give other people (who may not even support the LGBT movement) reading the article the assumption that every person who does enjoy Sailor Moon is a homosexual (and/or supports SSM)"". I don't personally watch/read Sailor Moon or know much about it, so I'm not confident enough to re-add the categories, but the reasoning for their removal is flawed regardless, and there is a sourced part in the article about female homosexuality.talk "

0.002944

0

Yes, please, this is a problem. You also have an account on nl.wikipedia. Please either make your new articles there, or translate them into English before you create them here on en.wikipedia. You are also still not providing sources; articles on en.wikipedia need to have sources, and articles on living people get deleted if these are not added within a week. Please add the name of the book, periodical, or website that you used for the information.

0.000605

0

" Google Name Origin ""Goo - ogle"". Stare at the unusable ""pile of shit"". That's what global information pool is without searching tool. It's a word play on number ""googol"" and ""ogle the goo"" - see through the humungous amounts of data. That's what I think it is. I am quite surprised that the Wikipedia article is not including this hypothesis, when founders are silent about it. Note: ""ianmcm"" and ""bongwarrior"" (read ""dopehead""/druguser's profile) are censoring this discussion. I will have them evicted from Wikipedia community. Please everybody: go after them! "

0.829591

1

RT @thefrogod: Dat shit trash “@ComplexMag: A shirt inspired by @Drake's emoji tattoo. Pre-order now: http://t.co/VAuLGcpkIS http://t.co/h…

0.885423

1

If Catch 22 didn't exist, they'd have had to invent it.

0.000715

0

Never tell a bitch what u up to..

0.981145

1

maryjane_militant_que you got that bomb azz pussy lol http://t.co/t9dsTikwcH

0.964877

1

You giving me head tonight or nah ? — I'll shoot your fucking pussy hoe http://t.co/yvBJuNoTXE

0.996203

1

http://lovebugfans.yuku.com/topic/9606/Christmas-records-in-the-UK-Top-100-singles-chart#.UsPyPLRn2DQ here is a reference to their UK top 100 singles chart placing maybe now you will believe that Sleigh Ride did chart in the UK in December 2013.

0.000693

0

Ion even wanna see this bitch . 😒 talking bout ill make you breakfast

0.958572

1

And Jess and Mallexkion, yes I understand it not conclusive evidence, but you must understand its suggestive evidence, and our readers have a right to know about it and make up their own minds!

0.000912

0

RT @TAXSTONE: These bitches will set you up the moment you stop fucking with them and they mad

0.997822

1

Well, you wouldn't delete the redlink, you simply wouldn't save the page that you used to generate a redlink on in its preview. You're using the preview page as the jumping-off point, you see.

0.000983

0

RT @ugIycutie: one, two, three, four, how many niggers are in my store?

0.954002

1

0

Discussion has been settled. Result: use ceremonial counties for disambiguation of places, and in a geographic frame of reference, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography#Olney, Milton Keynes; Caversham, Reading; Wanborough, Swindon.

0.000554

0

RT @rodill_: niggas passing up good girls for hoes.

0.925937

1

My nigga Bolin does NOTHING but win with the bitches breh

0.991713

1

The only reason I cheat is to show these bitches what kind of dick my girl be getting.

0.997157

1

" Is OhInternet a recreation of Encyclopedia Dramatica? To tangent from the above topics… Oh Internet is not Encyopedia Dramatica as the article supposes. 'Encyclopedia Dramatica' is defined as the domain name 'www.encyclopediadramatica.com' and the intellectual property concerned with ED copyright. OhInternet, however is a different project entirely; notable differences: a new XML coding system, logo and form of satire. To use terms in the article: the site was not 'overhauled' but rather 'replaced'. To use Silverseren's analogy, if Wikipedia did rename itself, kept most of its higher administration and stopped using Wikimedia software would it still be Wikipedia? The answer is ""No"". The Wikipedia name and intellectual property becomes inactive, lost. If one were to charge a Wikipedia fork site with copyright violations they would have to give evidence of their ownership of Wikipedia copyright and not that of the new 'OhKnowledge.com', the hypothetical Wikipedia replacement. (Sherrod, however does have evidence, so don't take this as a justification for the .ch). Once a site loses connection with the old name or any registered associated material it ceases to be the same entity. Oh Internet has no parallels to the old site at all. The position that the new site is ED just 'cleaned' should be removed from the article immediately. Encyclopedia Dramatica, as defined, is dead. OhInternet is a whole new project – a de facto successor, but not 'ED'. The redirect was an attempt to maintain website hits but as many 3rd party websites will show, it didn't quite work out. The vast majority of the volunteer editors did leave. Site activity, growth and edit numbers are much higher at encyopediadramaticia.ch than at OhInternet. OhInternet’s declining popularity should first stabilize before any 'notability' assessment goes underway. Understandably the nature of ED.ch is illegal so I don't care for it immediate coverage. I like to think the site will cool down over time. 94.170.94.249 "

0.001181

0

"i went to a WS concert in buenos aires, argentina in JUNE 2005, and at the beggining, Jack introduces themselves as: ""I'm Jack White and this is my sister Meg"". I know this is not true, since i read a biograbhy on the WS, saying that they met, they got married, formed the band and then divorced. regards, chinohudson. "

0.001509

0

you just wait your death is near

0.863792

1

and assertions about an editing hierarchy you put on my talk page

0.000778

0

RT @TinkkBaddAss: Bouta take a shower just to fuck yo bitch https://t.co/7WQ5QZsIls

0.997904

1

Your edits to cotton gin

0.024252

0

Symmetry Thanks for your calming down effort, but I'm not seeing your symmetric comments at Blueboar's page or history (I'm a long time participant, organizer and moderator in quite a few medium to large communities having no presumption of evil intent, and I do insist on naming that particular set of replies moronic).Would you please ask him/her/it to refrain from personal attacks, opinionated denials, etc as presented on Talk:Anti-Masonry?I've also restored two of the three comments on that talk page since only the last one *was* a personal attack indeed (and SarekOfVulcan didn't pass the neutrality test, heh). Thanks again.

0.001328

0

RT @LILBTHEBASEDGOD: ultimate bitch mixtape is done!!! words from Lil B!! - Lil B

0.930152

1

What the fuck are you talking about? They did lose a couple times.

0.988727

1

RT @BoujieAssMeena: My bitches got pretty pussy😄😄😄😜😜😜

0.995763

1

" Why are you still here? What is it you hope to achieve exactly? Corbett "

0.001241

0

I didn't remove anything.And be nice.I don't know how to sign.If I can't add Madonna's certifications then I am going to delete Mariah's,Janet's,Whitney's and others.Also I am adding Madonna's critics list positions etc.

0.000661

0

. 1971 (though trialled between 1965 and 1970)

0.000586

0

Words can't describe how annoying I find you Wikipedians.

0.423823

1

^^^^^^ If he comes back and changes my fun edit... omg... wow ^^^^^^

0.001251

0