text
stringlengths 0
4.07k
| labels
list | encoded_labels
list | lang
stringclasses 1
value | has_toxic
int64 0
1
| has_profane
int64 0
1
| has_insult
int64 0
1
| has_hate
int64 0
1
| has_threat
int64 0
1
| has_sexual
int64 0
1
| has_offensive
int64 0
1
| has_selfharm
int64 0
1
| has_harassment
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Do you have become a superstar in Bangladesh?
Well this is kind of Bangladesh's superstars and models and we didn't know how Pratyya could be the model for Bangladesh as of May 2015 in the world Pratyya Ghosh seems to be a little lonely and he guesses that he wants to be an actor Are you sure to want be a supermodel in Bangladesh? I hope you have starred in 100 films. 182.191.186.120 The 182 guy
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
SOCK PUPPETRY? IS USING ANY ACCOUNT WHATSOEVER CONSIDERED SOCK PUPPETRY? This site is a complete joke. I can't even edit using a *verifiable* account without being accused of violating some concocted offense. My address was censored because I was using an account which was apparently improperly named, so I am now using one that IS properly named (AFTER the probation period) and that in and of itself is apparently an offense. Logically, what is going on is that I am being unable to contribute in any way whatsoever because I am being repeatedly punished for a first offense spawned from ignorance. What kind of site are you people trying to run here?!
It's no wonder the main founder of wikipedia turned his back on it when it's become such a blatant travesty of the intellectual honesty it purports to espouse. I have continuously been censored for editing a biased article- an article which is continuously edited by self-avowed marxists and anti-zionists (the very same people whose POV the article unashamedly puts forward). What kind of encyclopedia has articles that put forward opinion verified by echo chamber sources? If any editor attempted to put that sort of trash in Britannica they would be quickly disassociated with the publication- but it's quite apparent that Wikipedia has no controls whatsoever and has chosen to let the patients run the asylum. There is no use in attempting to run an objective and educational publication when the very people who have discredited the internet as a source of information are allowed to manipulate the site by sourcing the same intellectually dishonest sites that people use wikipedia to avoid.
In short, explain yourselves- particularly Roland Rance, who has manipulated his position on this site to censor any points he disagrees with- all without explaining why. When you stop accepting the ridiculous assumption that senior members are beyond reproach, perhaps the site will gain some semblance of credibility. As it stands, wikipedia is just another example persistence winning over intelligence.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ok ok jeez you don't need to get worked up because I made your user page so much better
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Routes
A (Rockville Route) Metro Center - Shady Grove (red)
B (Glenmont Route) Metro Center - Glenmont (red)
C (Huntington Route) Metro Center - Huntington (blue/orange-blue-blue/yellow-yellow)
D (New Carrollton Route) Metro Center - New Carrollton (blue/orange-orange)
E (Branch Avenue Route) Gallery Place - Branch Avenue (green/yellow-green)
F (Greenbelt Route) Gallery Place - Greenbelt (green/yellow-green)
G (Addison Road Route) D junction - Largo Town Center (blue)
J (Franconia-Springfield Route) C junction - Franconia-Springfield (blue)
K (Vienna Route) C junction - Vienna (orange)
L (? Route) F junction - C junction (yellow)
Any idea what H and I were to be? Dulles and Columbia Pike branches? (talk - )
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
picking on a 10 year old!!! soooo sad
Just shut up okay?Im only 10 years old. I just wanted to have a little fun, captain buzz kill. I guess you never had a life when you were young. that was probably like, 100000000000000000 years old. LOL!!!! 75.27.114.194 None yo beez nas
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
yeah we sure could use some more POV pushers from ""Loseristan"". "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mr. Caldwell is shown here wearing a numbers tag from a State Penitentiary, so apparently he was charged with other crimes, than just the one Federal charge we are being told about here.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
99.129.112.89 (posted 9:11 AM)
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
OK, my mistake, so in that case, feel free to resubmit the AFC. (talk) "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey, tomorrow. If tony is happy lets celebrate. Get that PC under control and we'll talk then. ( )
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I was not talking about monetary fine, I meant vandalism results in blocking. I thought that according to wikipedia if well sourced info is removed for ideological reason constitutes as vandalism. I am still of the opinion, that information should be allowed freely and not be censored. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia not the promotion page of Mirza's followers.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(whether it was gambling on mortgages, which were mostly refinancings, or on other Synthetic CDOs). So, essentially, if a vast portion of the market is basically people gambling on home equity lines of credit and refinancings, is it really accurate to just call it 'subprime crisis'?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
December 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. talk "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(T | C)
Owned
(T | C)
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I didn't realize discussion was required to prevent dirsuption to the enyclopedia. Thanks for the note. –xeno talk "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
==Reference test==
Northern Agricultural Network.http://www.muratshrine.org/bios/burns.php
==References==
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Once again.... I'm SO glad that Wikipedia is not biased or filled with retarded children.
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My hog is size 10 soft 15 with a nice Chubb chubb
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Midwest Accent
I see that you are deleting my corrections regarding the General American accent, in the article ""Midwest,"" which quite wrongly implies that General American is owned lock stock and barrel by that region. It's nonsense. The General American accent is spoken all over the north, from Seattle to Connecticut. You are going to have to come up with some citations which realistically and accurately show that the northern accent originated in or is unique to the Midwest, before I'kk allow you continue deleting my writings without a fight. It certainly is not unique to the Midwest, a region which was not even settled by English speakers until barely 150 years ago, after the northern accent was known to exist in places like Pennsylvania and upstate NY, and Connecticut. It really bugs me to see the Midwest taking ownership of an accent which began in the Northeast. The original author blunders badly by lumping the accents of certain urban areas of the northeast in with the rural areas. Anybody from my region, the Syracuse, NY area, formerly Albany, NY, knows that our accent it totally indistinguishable from that of the Midwest. I challange anybody to put a group of Midwestern speakers side-by-side with upstate New Yorkers, and tell which is which. It's impossible, it's the same accent, utterly and completely the same. And we've been speaking this way since before the Midwest was even settled, so it's nonsense to say it's a Midwest accent."
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section blanking
On the article for the TV series The Blacklist, you blanked the whole cast section. Those who read the article after that blanking didn't get more information on east cast member. Your edits appeared to be disruptive and have been reverted. The next time you remove a section of an article, as you did with the aforementioned article, you will be reported to an administrator and be blocked from editing.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It's not possible it was!!! All this bickering because two individuals want to sweep away 8 yrs of helping and research because they they enjoy the power WP gives them through its rules! THERE OUTTA BE A RULE AGAINST RULES!!! Your humble servant! Subwayjack
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"=Reliable sources===
Cheating:
""Barry Bonds:Cheater"" from CBS, yea I kinda think that is reliable.
""Dear Barry Bonds, You are either an outright cheater or very stupid"" from the USA Today
""Yes, Barry Bonds is a cheater. He is a cheater of the worst sort""
Lying:
""It's clear, Barry Bonds' a liar"" New York Daily News, another pretty freakin' reliable source.
""Barry Lamar Bonds is a bad man"" Baseball Digest
""but Bonds is a liar, a cheater, a whiner and a bad influence on America's youth"" Mark Barnes
=="
|
[
"profane"
] |
[
0,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Adoption
Hi, I'm Rosalie. You seem like a great adopter for me, so, obviously, that's why I am posting this message. I am a friendly person, and know the basics of Wikipedia but would like to learn more. Feel welcome to check out my userpage for more information about me and what I like. If you want to adopt me, please leave a message on my talkpage at User:Rosalie Hale.
Thanks,
Rosalie
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2014 (UTC)
I agree with deletion. 13:57, 17 October
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ZEST
Uh.....hello....... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ZEST
Thanks for your help !!!!
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"==Apocalypse Soon: The Making of 'Citizen Toxie'==
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Apocalypse Soon: The Making of 'Citizen Toxie', suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also ""What Wikipedia is not"" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with . "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Your pretty special you know love all you guys. and girls
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I accept your apology. Let us just prey you don't slip up again. 69.76.161.36
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Probably not. All manner of duct tape is inferior to fiberglass reinforced packaging tape. It's much stronger, has superior adhesion to smooth, clean surfaces and it leaves far less residue when removed. It's also vastly superior for creating hinges or tow ropes. 70.130.37.218
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
help
Pls help me on the Hasan Sami Bolak article. User Kibele and her puppets are trying to make the article deleted as they did after a long political campaign in the Turkish wikipedia. You have enough language skills in English to tell people the facts better than me. Pls tell about their lynch campaign that they want to carry into English wikipedia. Thank you. 212.156.67.30
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
YOUR ARE FUCKING GAY WAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNT
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTI fucked your mum. OH WAIT YOUR GAY YOU DONT HAVE A MOM!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL CUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCUNTCU
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" Mario Party 4 is the fourth in a series of board game style video games for Nintendo platforms, featuring popular Nintendo characters. It was released on the Nintendo GameCube in North America on October 21, 2002 strangely before the Japanese release on November 8, 2002. It was released on November 29, 2002 in Europe, being heavily criticised for being 'Nintendo's big GameCube Game' for Christmas 2002 as Metroid Prime was delayed until March 2003. Mario Party 4 was the first Mario Party that was released on the Nintendo GameCube. Each board had its own host, including Toad, Goomba, Shy Guy, Koopa, and Boo. Mario Party 4 also contains some characters new to the franchise; Thwomp and Whomp. Klepto, Dolphin, Lakitu, and Star, along with two completely new characters named Genie of the Lamp and Ztar, are included as well. Mario Party 4 retains the Story Mode found in Mario Party 3. The game, as usual, contains a standard party mode in which up to four players play through a board, trying to collect as many Stars as possible. The Star Space would appear randomly on the board, and players would have to reach it before anyone else. However, the Stars carry a price tag of 20 coins, and player has to earn those coins by winning minigames, which take place at the end of each turn (after all the players have rolled the Dice Block, which will always roll a number from one to ten). Battle minigames are like the 4-player games, but generally (with many exceptions) a little more elaborate. Battle games are usually tense because every player has to put a certain number of coins (from 5 - 50) into a pot. First place gets 70% of the pot, second place gets 30%, and a random player gets any coins lost in rounding. Every Mario Party contains 60 to 80 minigames of a few different types. Four-player games are a free-for-all in which all players compete against each other. 2-on-2 and 1-on-3 minigames put players in groups, so they have to cooperate in the minigame to win, even though they are against each other in the main game. In most situations, winners of these games make 10 coins each. A new addition to the Mario Party series was the Bowser mini-games. Players play in a
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
very elaborate mini-game that ends when one player is eliminated in various ways. (See Bowser mini-game section below) The loser loses a pre-specified item, usually coins or items. Gameplay Boards Toad's Midway Madness Goomba's Greedy Gala Koopa's Seaside Soiree Shy Guy's Jungle Jam Boo's Haunted Bash Bowser's Gnarly Party (Clear Story Mode to unlock it) Spaces There is various spaces you can land in the game. The following is a list of them, and what they do. Blue Space - You get three coins. Also, there is a special feature on this game called Hidden Blocks, in which a star or coins may be hidden on random blue spaces. Red Space - You lose three coins. Green Happening Space - A special board event takes place. Warp Space - You are sent to the same space as an opponent. A spinner chooses which opponent's space you will warp to. Mushroom Space - Two boxes will appear (one big and one small). Choose one, and you will be given either a Mini Mushroom or a Mega Mushroom. (Note: The Mega Mushroom is not always in the large box, and the Mini Mushroom is not always in the small box.) Battle Space - A battle minigame will start in which players put a chosen amount of coins into a pot. The better you finish in the minigame, the more coins you will get back from the pot. Bowser Space - Bowser may steal items from players or a Bowser minigame may begin. Fortune Space - A reversal of fortune begins, in which players may have to give coins or stars to others. The player who landed
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aaron Swartz
Stop fucking reverting my goddamn edits!!! I think Aaron Swartz is a dumb-ass, and he should have been
killed a long time ago. I know where you live; I WILL KILL YOU IF YOU REVERT ANY MORE PAGES!!!!!
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
It sounds like the message was not intended for you. Please check out the disclaimer at the bottom of your talk page, it reads: ""This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address."" Sorry for the the confusion. (talk) "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps for not the first time, I find myself in complete agreement with Ottava. Caulde is a young editor, and in the interests of full disclosure he and I have had run-ins in the past, over his claiming credit for work that he had not actually done. He knew better than me how to play the system. He is now an administrator, and I will never be an administrator. Go figure. I bear Caulde no ill will; he learned how to play the system and I didn't bother to take the same trouble. Maybe that's why there's a unhealthy preponderance of kiddie-admins? Fatuorum 00:44
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
continued discussion
Your new edit made it seem like demographic effects were only on early settlers. We're concerned with demographic effects throughout.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AFD
Just thought you should know Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters (2nd nomination).
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Direktor, after all that we have been through, I believe that we can clearly see Ceha's nationalist bigotry. Here it goes again. What disturbes me the most is that he is claiming this much detail. One thing is to make a map, the other thing is to make a map that has such detail like his proposed map does. But, do not worry, yesterday I figured out how to make a nice map and am currently working on it. ( ).
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tom, I understand and you don't have to convince me of the similarities, it's just that WP requires citations to reliable sources, in this case where the author of a book or a music paper article or a professional website like AllMusic has made the connection. So those examples above, though worthwhile in themselves, don't solve the 'citation needed' issue. However I'm sure I've seen the ""Mona"" / ""How Soon Is Now"" connection made in at least one book on The Smiths so let me scout around and see if I can find it. Take care and tks for stopping by to discuss. Cheers, 03:20, 20"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm working on it. Thanks for the tip.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
(ec with Moni) Or that using say, Dictionary of National Biography articles is ""better"" than using Oxford Dictionary of National Biography articles, because the first is free to everyone and the second is only free to UK library subscribers. Never mind the 110 year difference in scholarship (and the turgid prose and Edwardian/Victorian POV), I've seen it argued that we should use the DNB before the ODNB. It's like competence isn't required to edit, merely civility, which is so wrong on so many counts it's not even funny. I took the latest Wikipedia Foundation survey today, and found it unsettling. More questions seemed aimed at ""how close is editing WP to FB, and what would make it cooler/more social media/etc to you?"". Does no one remember we're supposed to be writing an encyclopedia??? - Talk "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" again, a so-called ""demographic prediction"" combined with a conspiratorial context. that's always the case."
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I wish to restate the AN thread as neutral and inviting community discussion. I realize that I went to far by characterizing IH as a dick. I apologize. 140.247.141.165
|
[
"profane"
] |
[
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Please stop adding an endless series of pointless tags to pages I have edited. Your conduct is now effectively stalking. As soon as the tags are dealt with, you just add other ones. Thanks.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Oops sorry. See: It is not really ""Stone Age Civilization"", it is a ""Civilization of stones"", because they left us a lot of stones (ruins) and most of their work was on stones. Plz correct what's necessary. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
talk to me, Goebbels.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""they should know immediately what it sounds like: it has highly-distorted guitars, shrieking vocals, etc"" - but what defines black metal apart from other forms of music that ALSO use distortion and screaming? punk rock and indie may well have ideologies, but black metals different values are easily identifiable and unique. you all seem intent on giving black metal a disservice by simply labelling it as angry music. if you cared about the genre, you wouldnt. and LOL at thinking burzum has no ideology, if you are the kind of person that thinks that then you don't know enough to edit this article (the problem with 80% of wikipedia)
""To someone who is a non-listener, the fact that black metal has an uncompromising ideology is rather useless as a description"" - why? wouldn't they want to know?
also nice to see the page locked. go listen to cradle of filth you complete tits, you're all untermensch
"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, tending to take its cue from it once it's been establish there,
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Alli Reiter) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | Talk | "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":Totally worth it -D YO
"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
trunkarchive.com
Hi, Daniel. I noticed you blocked User:Trunkarchive. I suspect this user's activities formed part of a concerted promotional effort on the part of trunkarchive.com, a media-licensing company, to create bio articles on as many of the photographers in their stable as possible. Here are the other accounts, neither currently active, who may have been involved:
Photofan76's contributions consist almost entirely of creating articles about photographers represented by trunkarchive.com. Several were deleted (see User talk:PhotoFan76), but a good many have survived. Perhaps some are speediable G11 or A7. Those that are not I could conceivably bulk-nominate to AfD with the exception of any that meet WP:CREATIVE. Even those that remain should probably have the ELs to trunkarchive.com removed under WP:ELNO 5: ""Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services""
I've also added trunkarchive.com to the list of proposed additions at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist
Does this seem like a reasonable course of action? "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" Hie DVdm. I was writing what follows while you made your edit. I can't right now, but I will coming to review in detail your example. Thanks Johnuniq for your advice and input. Concerning the actual statement, I had already thought that after clearing things up with DVdm, I would rephrase it into something in the lines of ""He is an iconic and inspirational reference for the generation growing up in the late 1970s, early 1980s."" Adding ""to some of the generation"" should clear your objection about the absence of stats. But that's not the really important issue here. The fact is that it is ethically improper from me and from Wikipedia to declare that the (you call it blog) site is not a reliable source here, but then find that the links and statements in ""Inertia Coupling"" or ""Alexander Abian"" are significant enriching contributions to the users of Wikipedia, and the sourced site is reliable there. BTW, in these two and the few other topics the source is mentioned, the statements leading to the source links would qualify as synthesis. It would be highly objectionable from Wikipedia to keep those links unchallenged for the time being, and when someone gets around to rewriting the original material in the specific blog posts, the links will be trashed out. At this point 1) The sentence being vague and inaccurate can be corrected. 2) It seems that if you articulate a sentence validated by some sort of source that is not a direct quote, in most cases some synthesis is involved. 3) There is still the issue of the site being a reliable source. It seems to me that the Wikipedia efforts to keep the wackos with weird theories at bay, is leading editors to substitute verifiability, intelligibility and common sense by arguments of authority. This would set me going into a long winded argument about what is happening to Wikipedia, once lauded as the place ""to come as you are,"" becoming stiff, purely factual and tight in such a way that it carries a lot of knowledge but no understanding. This in turn carries into a discussion about public education, and the work that Carl Sagan is known to the general public for. Cosmos was not about this mar
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ble statue said so but instead these are the reasons why we think so. To me the posts in the disputed site I linked to are interesting (but that maybe just my own personal opinion) and Wikipedia users having them available is positive, constructive and enriching for Wikipedia, and that's the reason I linked to them in the first place. Throwing them out, all of them, seems like excluding a whole plethora of good things, the baby with the bath water, because a Wikipedia directive says so, just because it does, not noticing the directives were written to prevent bad things from happening, it would seem to me, not to exclude good things by statute. So the reliable source rules are something I would like to discuss a bit more at length. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Let's see if I can answer in an orderly fashion:
Lead
The point is that it was very much his own style, his trade mark.
Looking at the sentence now, it makes perfect sense. Please do. )
I agree. That sentence was not ""hatched"" it was ""contrived"". Will think about it, suggestions welcome!
Why not? I was just afraid that the article would be ""top heavy"" with a longer lead. I'll just put it in my notes for tomorrow, it's too late for me to think right now.
General
Learned something new here. Thanks! )
Please do. I've ""gone blind"" on the article for the moment...
Early life
My usual errors, not combining words. Please correct. )
Thanks! -Talk "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Janurary 6, 2015
Stop posting rumors about the rapper or his label
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Why the hell did you fucking write that?! I can vandalize Wikipedia whenever I want!
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
English in this article?
Is it just me or is English really pretty bad in this article?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
hello sir yunshi,
sorry,i dont know sitush account used by multiple persons.please sir,for mutharaiyar articles i gave lot of reliable sources..please undo previous day deletion...
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Summaries
Sorry bout that... I'll try to remember better. Mahalo. Psst... love the smiley>
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi Robert..hv asked the author to give a proper copyright permission..in the format as required by wikipedia. Will get it in a couple of days and send it across to the relevant authorities...Ravi
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(UTC)
I think these are some very good questions, and until they are addressed by a professional, the article needs to be in dispute. Are there 60 species, or 61? Could there only be 59? These are questions of significance. 18:43, 14 November 2008
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Not done: It currently reads ""at least 5.5 million"", and in the section on The Holocaust, it reads ""5.5 to six million"", with references. I'm not sure what the issue is. (talk - contribs) "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi, , and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Introduction to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.
However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.
Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything.
ترجمة |
թարգմանություն |
tərcümə |
пераклад |
অনুবাদ |
превод |
|
თარგმანი |
μετάφραση |
અનુવાદ |
תרגום |
अनुवाद |
|
ಅನುವಾದ |
បកប្រែ |
|
ການແປພາສາ |
превод |
भाषां
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
तर करणे] |
ترجمه |
перевод |
превод |
மொழிபெயர்ப்பு |
అనువాద |
การแปล |
переклад |
dịch |
|
יבערזעצונג
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A tag has been placed on Beezwax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Please don't remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you've created yourself; it's considered vandalism. You can use the tag as specified. If you have any questions, leave a note on my talk page. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My policy on not English articles if no one else has already tagged them: delete on sight - A1 no context will do - I cannot identify the articles subject! and then leave a message for the author such as this one - short but sufficient. — RHaworth
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
My side of the story
Attention, douchebags and douchetees. I have been labled as a Terrorist on this site. BULL TO THE SHIT! I simply have a vast amount of knowlege on a wide range of topics. Scjessey, for example did not mention he is a fucking douchebag on his article. So I had to ammend this. I was simply trying to spread the truth. ALLLALLALALALALALAlAlALAALALAALALALALALAl. Sorry. I have to do that every 5 minutes or I go to hell. ALLALALALALALALALALALALALALALALLALALALALALLLALALALA ALLAH 4EVER!
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
your support for Chris Lawson
Are you sure you want to support this guy? Look at his source/quote for making the Red Baron jewish. read the discussion page on it. See the opposers views on his request page. It scares me. JohnHistory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Manfred_von_Richthofen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Clawson
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You blocked me before I even made a second offense.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The particular section lists what has been claimed in rebuttal to the code theft charge. That the claims regarding the significance of C to C++ translation and 64 bit conversion seem spurious, false or dubious to C/C++ programmers are acknowledged. That the Medievia web page makes blatantly false statements about dates, the origination of other muds, and the significance of the above I also acknowledge. I don't believe the article section is about uncovering the truth of their claims. The only fact necessary to presenting that viewpoint is that they've claimed it. Also presenting a lengthy history of public proclamations and announcements by the games principals which contradict their own official web history page is beyond the scope, I think, of what most people care about.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I have added some information on Melina's run in other wrestling promotions, I still need to add some more about her run in OVW, feel free to edit the information
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Google search predominantly shows the mixed martial arts over the football player.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
No it wasn't scrapped. Alicia's version remains as the original and 50 Cent's version is just a sample of it. Also, her version charted in the US and received plenty of coverage enough to have its own separate article. Regards. —21 "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Conflict of interest?
Your one-and-only, quite large edit to Exhilway strongly suggests a conflict of interest to me. If so, please disclose this conflict of interest on your user page. Additional information can be found here.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Arji, what makes you think this assertion is mistaken? It is not my assertion, it is the conclusion of this agencies report, taken to be reputable enough to be run by several respectable news carriers around the world. Naming me a troll is a classy touch, and calling for all dialogue with me to cease should be grounds for your indef banning from wikipedia.
The fact that you and Kim don't believe the conclusions does not matter, the evidence passes WP:V and WP:RS. The evidence has been released to the media and no-one of repute (That's not you Kim BTW) has challenged the validity or accuracy of the study. The fact that the study doesn't include Chinas massive underground coal mine fires only helps the conclusions of the report.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Firstly, some of the examples you used were from the personal attack pages...maybe you should read your own posts? Also, the reason I decided they were inane and decided to ignore them was because they did not directly apply to what I had said. Perhaps they applied to the numerous inferences that you made in reference to what I said but they did not apply to what I said and meant. Perhaps you could try not to infer or assume what I mean and try not to take offense so easily. I am respecting the basic rules of Wikipedia, but I also exploited ""loop holes"" in the rules. So if you want to include what I did in the rules then do so, but you should state what you want and not infer your own meaning. And I'm so upset because you and several other people have been complete and total assholes to me and to another person who tried to post this same page. You asked that we do something, i.e. explain the significance of the clan, etc, and we did but you deleted it anyway. And then you ask for more stuff and you give it to us. Also, one of the pages I read on here says that the information has to be verifiable but not the truth...well what kind of bullshit is that? If this is truly an encyclopedia then dont you state the truth? Also, if I go and post some article some other place rather than the clans home page then I can site that and it becomes verifiable right? If you say no, then this is just another example of something that is not explicitly stated and a loop hole that people can exploit. Before you go around messing with other peoples posts maybe you could get your rules and priorities straight. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":::::::Understood. And just wondering, why is this section called RfA? I am far from having enough experience to become an admin, nor do I have any wish to become one currently. Triple M
"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
There are 4 proposed theories and none of them weighs more than the others. Either all of them should be included and summarized in the conclusion, or the generic current version that states the following should be kept:
Although the actual circumstances and timing of the physical destruction of the Library remain uncertain, it is however clear that by the Eighth century A.D., the Library was no longer a significant institution and had ceased to function in any important capacity.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
because you blocked me
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No problem, the other thing is that when I read medical pages, I start to think I have the same symptoms - I wonder of other people are like that.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Elelland
Hello Humus
I am sorry if I have placed this note in the wrong spot. I m very inexperienced with Wikipedia. I was enthralled by Wikipedia. Initially. That is until I met Eleland. I noticed that you had some interesting discussions with Eleland. Eleland engineered a small article which I contributed some information to be deleted. He organised a ""kangaroo court"" made duplicitous unfounded claims and then set up a false consensus.
The Article was on Ed O'Loughlin Fairfax publishing MidEast correspondent. The said individual has a unfortunate habit of mixing reporting and commentary. He was amongst the candidates for this year's HR.com dishonest reporter award - despite being in the Australia only catchment area - so you can imagine the quality of his journalism.
Anyway Eleland did a great job of protecting him and got the article deleted.
So I studied Eleland a little.
I've looked at over 100 of his posts on the Arab Israel conflict. More than 95 were directly anti-Israel. His modus has been generally to unfairly rubbish the references of the pro-Israel side. In this way he has undermined many many articles.
Personally I don't care what his opinion is, but when he uses his editorial power and influence at Wikipedia to falsely invalidate, delete, manipulate etc. I think there is a problem.
Wikipedia is, I am afraid, beginning to read like Eleland wrote the script.
Who is Eleland? What power does he actually have?
Can anything be done?
Adon Emmet
If you post a reply here I will contact here or even by e-mail"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I see no evidence that the expected (required?) merge notice () was ever posted to the page in question. This casts serious doubts on the legitimacy of any supposed consensus obtained in that discussion, especially if the other articles were likewise not tagged appropriately during the discussion.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Person of interest
little did he know that ""Person of interest"" its a TV show
mystery solved
72.185.61.209 "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
it would be good to know who is funding this
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Moral Defense, you slimy toad you.
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ta. Well I still think there might be some against this, I don't know if it offsets any numbering of the films, so I was hesitant to change it straight away. I don't blame anyone for questioning this, because this is the first thing I looked at when I saw the list on their website...
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pursuant to the Wikipedia's policy on biography of living persons I have removed parts of this biopiece that impugn Andrew Li's integrity, impartiality, and honesty as a judge without citation. The author of those parts claimed, without support, that they are quoting from the South China Morning Post. However, as participants of civilized discussions would immediately recognize, simply saying that your source is from the South China Morning Post without giving us the date and page number is not a citation.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Comments on password hacking
I really don't think it was appropriate to talk about your issues about your password being stolen on a completely unrelated subject.As the header said, it was only supposed to be a discussion about improvements to the pet food crisis article, and your comments should have been deleted.
Just because you were careless enough to leave your password for someone to steal, you do not need to annoy other people with your frustrations and tell everyone to panic, the world is not coming to an end as you keep exagerating, and Im sure most other people arent stupid enough to lose their password.But like
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You did not even know what HE wrote on the deletion log for Barbados–France relations, got to it, and you will see that HE has cursed. And now you are taking me (a victim) to a hostile situation!
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
:Janus Hasildor
A tag has been placed on Janus Hasildor, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. babble
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What is your deal? Making apparently random reverts?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
It is merely a decorative indicator and should be on its own line to appear properly.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hey now, please assume good faith. His middle name is indeed Lorraine (if you go to Madison Square Garden it's on the plaque that's dedicated to him), and I could have sworn when I read the article it corroborated that. I was mistaken on the latter.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" (UTC)
It's common use is not as a proper noun. The dictionary article referenced in this article talks about the dispute between horse breeders, and ""people who are not in the horse-breeding business"". Wikipedia is not an encyclopaedia for horse breeders. It is for the public. 23:51, 6 June 2010"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You're biased. I made it a point since I signed up here that none of you exist.
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.