text
stringlengths
0
4.07k
labels
list
encoded_labels
list
lang
stringclasses
1 value
has_toxic
int64
0
1
has_profane
int64
0
1
has_insult
int64
0
1
has_hate
int64
0
1
has_threat
int64
0
1
has_sexual
int64
0
1
has_offensive
int64
0
1
has_selfharm
int64
0
1
has_harassment
int64
0
1
I'm confused? just had to type something tho to see what it's all about???
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Its mostly because Ive been searching for CP, anyway does
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" airline Hello, I found the airline ""skyworld"" ke website is http://www.travelicon.com/WhiteLabel/NewUser.asp # ssai if there?"
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Thank you for informing me of this. I spent a lot of time on my reply, in the hope that this helps to resolve the issue. I just sent you this email, so I wonder whether you really had the time to read my comment for the RfC. Please do so first. I am not familiar with wikipedia mediation, quite hesitant now with anything involving wikipedia, and think that it is better for wikipedians to read my comments for the RfC before doing anything next. (And see below how Rhobite has been vandalizing wikipedia.) Email to Rhobite To User:Rhobite: Hi, I noticed that you have been removing my edits, generally claiming that this was ""original research"", while my edits aren't ""original research"" in the sense used by wikipedia, but reasoned arguments. You seem to make the same mistake as User:Rspeer. I would appreciate it if you would do the following: (a) inform me whether you are an economist (b) inform me where I can reach you professionally (c) please add on the ""deletion review"" page, in the section on colignatus, that you have been deleting all kinds of stuff without properly consulting other people http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deletion_Review#Colignatus (d) please read my position paper, the pdf listed on my talk page, or available at http://www.dataweb.nl/~cool/Thomas/English/Science/Letters/2006-03-20-Comments-RfC.pdf (e) please note that you didn't respect the time out that I asked, nor the time that I asked to formulate my reply to the students (f) Please undo the erroneous deletions. My regards, Thomas Colignatus "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Marriage The Value of marriage is a worthy topic. Please don't ""go away mad"" just because a few deletionists got their hooks in it. You can always userfy it: move it to User:FeatherPluma/Value of marriage, and I'll help you with it with no time pressure. Or ask the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron for help. They pitched on and saved a few of mine. "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Thanks. Happy New Year to you too. I probably need some help with the citations. I keep on using: TITLE OF ARTICLE HERE [link here]
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Well, my point was simply the 'more' contemporary angle; It is correct that a 'more' contemporary picture does not imply an actual portrait (although, the way i understand it, the fresco of Subiaco is/could be an actual portrait) but is simply more representative for the actual time itself; buildings, attire, contemporary essence and perception etc.; However seeing how much effort you/Hafspajen put into the article i will agree with your format;But just on the side note the 'picture' that you have in your post '''' or that is displayed in the gallery here was not the one i edited and was in favor for - they are similar but it was this one(Article/History: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guido_di_Graciano._Staint-Francis-and-Stories-from-his-Life._1270..jpg from/of Guido di Graziano 13th century (after 1270) Siena Pinacoteca;
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
F.Y. punk, VidGmr was my homie. It's was due to some faggot named Klptyzm.
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6th episode How do we know that this episode revolve's around tony. Because didnt the first episode around Tony? [And Maxxie] So maybe we should just leave it blank for now. Only a suggestion.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Propose merge of Judgement Day (novel) This page for one of his books doesn't pass notability guidelines and should be merged here.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CreationWiki Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CreationWiki As a contributor to the page CreationWiki, I feel it fair to warn you that it has been nominated for deletion. Please make your opinion known.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
, 9 November 2006 (UTC) Why can't you expand it? געשׁ״ך 21:04
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Teahouse talkback: You've got messages! "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
An idea can not be un-scientific. Methodology can, however. The arguments against Hoagland's methods of forming conclusions are justified. Ruling out planetary migration, on the other hand, is unscientific. The reality is that we are sending ever larger and more sophisticated payloads to Mars. Assuming technology continues to move forward those payloads will eventually be able to handle life support and such. The US government thinks they can get people there in the next 15 to 20 years. Nothing in Physics rules it out. Your original entry seemed to attempt to criticize his methods (valid) but failed when you muddied the waters with the unscientific implications about what is possible and the totally misplaced Panspermia definition (Hoagland never said anything about that). 28 June 2006
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SQGibbon, YOUR MOOTHER SOUNDS TO BE SOME SLIMMY DONUTE. NOW WATCH WHAT'S COMING YOUR WAY. HA HA HA HA
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sports Section That is kind of weird how the sports table is included in the law and government section. I would fix it but I don't know how to edit tables.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Look, please answer the question: My question is does WRMEA have to say ""we are pro-Palestinian"" or can we make that inference - policy wise - based off its self-description and overall content. "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Romanians Hi. In the Romanians article there is a section titled ""Contributions to humanity"". I have no problem with the content it's just the title sounds kind of POV. Do you have any idea for a re-wording? Alex "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REDIRECT Talk:NXT TakeOver (series)
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Igho Otegheri Deletion Who the hell are you to decide what to delete and what not????!!! you could go fuck yourself u little piece of shit..
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" If you are suggesting that I am some kind of PR person for the DND, your badly mistaking, else I wouldn't be putting the CADPAT on the home page, nor would I have translated the article for the french language wikipedia. The point, that, thankfully, you understood is that ""likely"" and ""would have"" are not usable on an encyclopedia entry. I have absolutely no problem with anything else you wrote and I am not ""protecting"" the article or anyone, just removing content that is not fit to be there in my own personal opinion. And it happens that Russell Williams's article is on my watchlist! Thanks - TALK "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Well, if you really want a justification, I've told NP Chilia several times - and using the word please in edit summaries - to stop wikifying the years. There comes a point where perhaps ceasing to use ""please"" will hopefully get someone's attention. In any case, you're hardly on any high moral ground to be calling someone impolite. (talk • contribs) "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I laughed out loud reading your post about reverting the code inserted into the prime numbers article.... I fell out of my chair when I actually saw the code.... The fact that the guy wanted to solve the Goldbach conjecture with that...
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Isn't Chomsky the home-grown Chomsky?
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
You won this for being rude to other contributers by the way.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! OK ever mid it was fixed so I'm vandalising your talk page!!!!!!! POOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I can understand you. YOU DEFINITELY did not read the (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assassination plots in the Three Kingdoms). Haha.. Did you ever visist Assassination plots in the Three Kingdoms, the target of AfD? Did you ever understand what the is? I once again say to you that THEY ARE LOTS of people who are fond of The Three Kindgoms. Books, Movies,TV series, and manga and games of it. You DEFINIELY are not one of them!! It is a disgrace to Three Kingdoms that someone like you deleted that page. Like a pig shitted on the book of Goethe. ( )
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"Xeno|xeno]] (talk) 13:21, 25 March 2009"
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"The quotes that Aminz has brought to the discussion are coming from reliable academic sources. H.S. ""one of the most prolific editors on antisemitism-related topics"" has only brought a cadre of weasel words and uncited personal opinion (i.e. ""but no one would..."", ""..in general.."", ""..jews fared better.."" All of this as worded is not even suitable for mention on Wikipedia. Please refrain from attacking other editors adding actual legitimate academic information with citation. "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
My 2c to get beyond the stalemale is to let skeptics raise all controversies surrounding chiropractic, find the best sources to neutrally present the material and roll into into a Criticisms section. Then those who really care about intricacies and details of the chiropractic story can get on with the show and make the article interesting and not some big stats/research battleground. For the record, I completely agree 100% that effectiveness of chiropractic care is well established for low back disorders (just as good if not better) that manual therapy is effectiveness in neck pain (Task Force 2008) that the results seem favourable for certain types of headaches (TTH, migraine, cervicogenic/headache of cervical origin) and inconclusive and controversial for non-musculoskeletal disorders. Part of effectiveness too is patient satisfaction scores which patients routinely display a far greater preference for chiropractic care than medical care for LBP. This is the most succint and precise summary there is. We can toss the reference in and call it a day. A majority of editors agree that the current and past evidence, both in research and 3rd parties (governments) favours chiropractic care. We can't let Ernst' conclusions (which have been rebutted and invalidated) skew what is now generally accepted. Notice the terms too, generally, etc.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ALSO, YOUR MOM GAVE ME HERPES, TELL HER I SAID THANKS.
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" You just vandalized Geography of Canada after a level 4 warning. It's admin finding time! "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
The banners don't belong there. Having it tagged violates policy and POV
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Discussion is a two-way street. Where's the Wikipedia editor/staff contribution to the discussion on the Justin Berry talk page? Why are all the questions from my side of the argument being ignored? Why has no one yet managed to justify the removal of any of the thoroughly-documented information from the Justin Berry page? I'm not trying to throw gasoline onto a fire here. I don't have an agenda, and I'm honestly not particularly interested in Mr. Berry or his sordid history. What I am interested in is seeing Wikipedia be an respected and accurate source of free information for those who seek it, and when the Wikipedia staff themselves engage in an organised effort to remove accurate information with no justification whatsoever (we normally call this [Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]), Wikipedia's credibility goes out the window. Justify yourselfs and maybe we'll start to listen. My side has justified itself repeatedly. It's your turn now.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hey, you need to watchlist this page. There is no guarantee someone will actuall step up and mediate, so you need to watch that page to see if someone does. For more information, read this. Good luck, | Talk
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
There was a review of WP:NFCC about this page, at WP:NFRC which determined that the files should not be in this article. Do not re-add them.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I am an Azeri too and I have never ever considered myslef a Turk. The Republic of Azerbaijan was a part of Iran and it will become a part of Iran again. MOst the people here who pretend to be Azeris are actually from Turkey trying to spread their Turkush propganada. Real Azeris are Iranians!!!!!
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Comment This article describes the actions of living people, as such care needs to be taken to ensure it doesn't turn into a WP:ATTACK article. The SPLC designation and related criticism is already a substantial part of the article and any further expansion needs to balanced by non-negative content. I suggest a history section and details of politicians and others they may have supported.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
For goodness sake just block it please.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Um, sure ECW initials mean something, but they don't mean hardcore wrestling, and least not entirely. Does the name Chris Benoit, Rey Mysterio Jr, Dean Malenko, Eddie Guerrerro, Chris Jericho.... I could go on and on and on mean anything to ya? ECW was more then hardcore wrestling, it was the innovator of everything we see on TV today. Not taking away anything from XPW, because it was great. But it was almost EXCLUSIVELY hardcore garbage wrestling. ECW wasn't.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
After eight years of editing, you bet I've read WP:Disambiguation ) Now, have you read it? In particular, you might want to look at the set index articles section ) Danilovsky District is a set index, and as categorized as such. Cheers,— • (yo?); October 2, 2012; 02:01 (UTC)
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Stop trolling, zapatancas, calling me a liar merely demonstartes that you arer Zapatancas. You may choose to chase every legitimate editor from this site and ignore me but I am an editor with a record that isnt 99% trolling and therefore my wishes are not to be completely ignored by a sockpuppet like yourself. The consensus is overwhelmingly against you and your trollin g lover Zapatancas,
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lookhead martin f-35 Do you know the f-35 fighter was totally joke? can explain the advantages of this aircraft to me..please I do not suggest you
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Six months sounds reasonable. Let us know. ?!?
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I agree. Without more information about jinfo it is impossible to ascertain whether it is a reliable source and evidence from it alone does not satisfy the requirements of WP:V.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Karlovy Vary Festival What do you mean with ""Karlovy film festival is not a category of film festivals""??? and why dont you ask in the discussion before you delete things??? (thats why discussion is there!) If you deleted KV Festival Category so PLEASE DELETE this too! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Berlin_Film_Festival http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Cannes_Film_Festival http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Venice_Film_Festival etc."
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
mediation I know we haven't exactly departed on good terms (but hey it's been like 2 years ago and I'm over it), but you seem the most rational on that side of the camp. So apparently, Ksyrie and co. think I'm censoring Chinese views when I clearly purposed that they can move the shit they want to the background section. I just want that retarded section out of there. It's redundant when the section above it talks about the same thing. Now they haven't responded to me at all in the talk page (this have been going on for months mind you) and I can't report them for 3rr so I'd appreciate it if you would look into this. I think you being 'one of them' and a admin will help. Thanks.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" The Thing Eh, it's not the same as it was in December. I've had a lot of issues in ""the real world"", so to be honest, this is just a hobby now, and fairly minor. afist "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Hello Machan! My Pleasure It's my pleasure to corporate with you ion your modest work in safeguarding the Sinhalese culture and ethics. Talk to me anytime. Summon "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Incidentally, you might like to look into the image of Michael Foot anew; the problem seems far from resolved.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
GA status This nomination is on hold for 7 days for these reasons: stubby sentences, references need proper formattingclean up all the external jumps and refs go at the end of a sentence, not in the middle. The long quote needs to go to wikisource and be summarized into prose.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Interview w/ subject Using a personal interview with the subject violates Wikipedia's policy against original research, so I have removed it. That source did, however, explain the tone of the article.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" The Grifters tells the story of Lilly Dillon I thought it was more about the Cusac character. It tells the interlocking stories of three characters. None of the three should be considered the ""main"" character. -The'FortyFive' "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Knock it off! SpinningSpark, quit it! You've been community-banned when you blocked me you made the sinkhole you are in now deeper and deeper. If you want to live you need to take advantage of your priviledges - BASICALLY KEEP THE HELL OFF WIKIPEDIA for a YEAR and edit on other wikimedia projects to demonstrate that, after a week or two, an appeal would be beneficial to the project!! If I create a new account that is more selective, maybe it will be eligible for adminship. If so, the first thing I will do is get you community-banned. I WANT REVENGE!!! 1YlGC6dsynvm
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"::: You know the area better, so I will trust your judgement. Usually when I can look at a picture I took, the whole experience of taking it comes flooding back to me. I'll recall what was playing on the radio, the temperature, where I had to park, etc. For this place, nothing. Heck, even Google Street Viewing how I would have gotten there isn't bringing back anything. ( Richmond Hill is where I stayed when visiting Savannah. Infinitely cheaper. Like $30/night. It's a bit of a drive up 17, but nice. Be careful whenever you get back there. ) ‖ talk - Welfare State ‖ "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" ""related groups"" info removed from infobox For dedicated editors of this page: The ""Related Groups"" info was removed from all infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Nah, last time they did that I used my wit and charm to talk my out of it. I'm already blocked on my username.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>Boston not near CT. Do you have to have Phd to figure this out? Again, Boston is no busniess or cultural HUB for CT. As far as business is concerned, even Hartford might disagree. Besides, CT is in the NY region and we know that NYC is the #1 business and cultural hub for America.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
@: nobody cares about the Fucking Shit like you, fucking bitch........................ 5.9.97.199
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Does this count as an airliner shootdown incident? Your vote at Talk:List_of_airliner_shootdown_incidents would be appreciated )
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Oh seriously, you're definitely a challenging one. As I said, it's a legal matter.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" ""...dissolves the concept of vigilantism into a soup of unrelated concepts like crimes against humanity, moral panic, hate crimes, peadophilia, etcetera..."" Vigilantes are in a 'stew' of sorts."
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
No, it doesn´t.80.228.65.162
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finally stop your edit wars and your crusade! If there is censorship, then it is done by you as you removed correct information.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
It´s blatantly obvious that the only reason why you keep removing this is because you don´t think that Marxist-Leninists are socialists.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I agree with you, corollary is the word to be used in english. (Lina.lasse)
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" List of Boston Bruins head coaches Okay - one more up! Feel free to review. Thanks, « Cøøkie''' "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
The least security sign out of your user interface Computer security worker or not, if someone else is using your private computer, particularly if it is someone like dragon, whom you don't know very well, simply log out of your user interface account and have them always use a guest account.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Now that I take a look, I see that the article on John Yoo, who you saw fit to include when re-creating the Rebuttal section as the more enthusiastically titled Support section, also has the controversial nature of his torture-cheerleading memos mentioned right there at the top above the Contents box. FYI.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I agree with User:Abcedare, the agenda of this user is to sully an absent editor's name & another's reputation by misrepresentation. Nothing in the genuine interest of Wikipedia will come about from this reader's editting.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Allow me , award this Epic Barnstar for your great success in redesigning Joseph Stalin articles and its subpages. Thanks a lot, it is much better now ]]
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
You're missing all the fun
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" I assumed you probably weren't, but I'm glad to hear it for sure anyway. I understand. Feel free to stop by anytime. Best regards mate,  (talk) "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Cheers. Your amendment clears it up nicely 23:59, Dec 3, 2003 (UTC)
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
]]. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Someone call a mod, as Hrafn is clearly just mucking around. First he claimed Alfonso was not in Hales, when in fact he is referenced on page 211, a page just after 210. Secondly the work Worship of Augustus Caesar mentions Panvinio (Panvinus), and in fact even references Hales p.211.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Do you know what you're sooooo right, You've just hit the nail of the fecking head there, you really have and have made my day in the process –) —
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Personally, I would create articles if there were any topics that I liked to create. Also, as to expanding articles, I would be happy to, but almost all of the information that I have to add has already been added by someone else. Cheers,
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
This entry was deleted by its author, owing to the fact that it contains research which is being distorted somewhat. Since it's a part of an ongoing research piece by a working journalist, I've decided that any distorition to the research could be problematic. Thus, the simplest thing to do in order to avoid antagonizations, distortions, etc, is to remove it. Since you have decided to continue this antagonization, I am left with no alternative but to report you to those in a place of authority at Wikipedia. Of course, you may feel free to complete and post your own research on the Havana shipyards however, I've decided the best course of action is to register the copyright on all pertinent research statements and images associated with this article. Use of any of the above by persons other than the author, without his permission, is in violation of international copyright standards and will be promplty reported to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) and all other pertinent authorities.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Re:Meetup thread Well, ""COI"" can be a pretty harsh word on Wikipedia, and your misconception of ""David Shankbone"" as a real name probably sounded more like bitter irony. And sometimes people tend to get hotter in conversation than they intend. Online communication can be difficult, and there is a reason why human beings have faces. "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
For how long did they block your Fab Four nickname? M.V.E.i.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
It is also crystal clear to notice, only federer has these so called fake achievements page about his shitting n even pissing, when players like Nadal Sampras who had way more better records dont have it? Its because this page was trolled by fans of federer over and over and they added almost every non existent things as records- a total lie to wikipedia viewers.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Found the scientific name.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
We have over 400 people who are willing to use their real names, and that's before we've gone public and before any serious recruitment efforts. So I'm not worried.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bolonium: No offense but accept the reality and the reality is an independent Kosova.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I think that the infobox should at least have a picture of Muhammad, if there is to be one anywhere. The image for the page on Muhammad should be a depiction of Muhammad. Having calligraphy or symbolism replace an actual picture would not be in the spirit of wikipedia. Regrettably, it will offend some people, but that is not, nor should be, the impetus behind any decision. A picture of Muhammad would be more encyclopedic and offer more knowledge, therefore, it is the only real option if this is to remain a truly neutral place to obtain knowledge. Also, I feel like there is an overabundance of images in this article. Lots of images of redundant or mildly irrelevant things, as if people are unconsciously putting in different images because they feel bad about putting in an image of Muhammad.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
You're welcome. Some of my work was also quoted in the Ambrose book, but they were all correctly acknowledged and footnoted and thus not among the errors and corrections noted in the researchers' paper.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Thank you! I took an extended Wiki-break recently, so it's very nice to receive a new barnstar so soon after my return. Best wishes,
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
The only thing you are persistant at you ugly bastard is fucking the TROLL'''
[ "toxic" ]
[ 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"*I only have one source that even says he was in in track and fied. In any case, I changed it to ""played track and field."" ~'''' (talk/contribs/editor review)~ "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. I asked how much of our language was replaced with words from French and Italian. Are you saying that our language was replaced by 70-80 percent with French and Italian words? I'm guessing there is a misunderstanding here, but yes, please can a script to find out. Do anything you can. We should know these figures.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
REDIRECT Talk:The Bear (1998 film)
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
He was not a hacker He was not a hacker, the correct term is called a cracker.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Unapproved bot. You appear to be using your content as a bot, in violation of WP:BOT. Please, stop using your main account as a bot until it is approved. If your bot is approved, please make sure it is flagged as a bot and listed on Wikipedia:Bots/Status.     "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Why is it that there have been about FIVE DIFFERENT EDITORS change the elimination chart, but the same person always changes it back. Does that sound like a consensus? 76.107.17.32
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
You find that uncivil? Seriously???? I just re-read it in the light of your comments, and I still don't find it the least bit uncivil. It's an honest assessment of his actions. Maybe he would prefer not to hear it, but the intention was to help him improve as an admin. Please think a bit more kindly about me. Nobody has ever accused me of incivility before.
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" Hm. I'll ask someone who would know when they're on.    "
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" If you were to go to the slide that defines ""Genetic Drift"" at baen.tamu.edu/users/cengler/biology/notes/chapt16.ppt you would read: ""Genetic drift is a change in allele frequency due to random variation in fecundity and mortality in a population."" This seems to be exactly the point I was trying to make in the text that provoked the charge of inaccuracy. Would the accuser please clarify? 21:09 19 May 2003 (UTC)"
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
user zora, i have no interest in hearing what user moshe has to say, the best way to deal with people like her is to ignore them. Now once again you have reverted eminent to distinguished even after agreement. Because of this, like i said before there is no more discussion here, we already came to an agreement, and the word eminent stays, if bridesmill and moshe don't like that that's their problem. Furthermore moshe i have repeatedly asked you to cooperate, again i have no hate for you and do not want to engage in a war here, but i will not let you vandalize it either. like we talk about it before why can't you just be like the russian-jewish sweet girl i had? lol:), same goes for bridesmill ).
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
That makes it so much easier. I didn't know I was allowed to do that. Thanks!
[]
[ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 ]
en
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0