text
stringlengths 0
4.07k
| labels
list | encoded_labels
list | lang
stringclasses 1
value | has_toxic
int64 0
1
| has_profane
int64 0
1
| has_insult
int64 0
1
| has_hate
int64 0
1
| has_threat
int64 0
1
| has_sexual
int64 0
1
| has_offensive
int64 0
1
| has_selfharm
int64 0
1
| has_harassment
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yeah, they're both puff-pieces written with obvious COI. One puff article is better than 2. The Dissident Aggressor
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi good to see you deleting stuff on the speedy deletion backlog! Have you rescued anything?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hurricane Floyd
Such a pretty user talk page, I don't like ruining it by writing all over it. Well, anyways, I saw that you were successful at getting Hurricane Dennis to featured status. There is another hurricane-related article up for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurricane Floyd. Would you mind taking a look and offering some advice?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
In that case, I'm truly sorry. I obviously interpreted it wrongly. Cheers, "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
appearance of Mizrahi Jews
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~~ [t - c]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello Mr. Gordon. I didn't feel like waiting until 2009 or one yar later to appeal. I would like to sincerely apologize, and I want to know if you are willing to accept these conditions. I don't want to be viewed as a threat, as I am quite nearby. t
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
well fag... block me.
block me?! oh the world will shurly end!
come off your high horse.
i'll say what i want about you.
if you continue bashing me then i will just
have to post complaints about you on EVERY b log and
forum i can find. every chat room will be filled with how
Redfarmer (did your mom come up with that name?) is untrustworthy.
if you block me i can always find info on another site.
a site where they don't allow people (or FREAKS) like you
to delete pages on a whim!
so you gonna block me? ban me?
go ahead.
but be warned... without being able to edit pages.
i can't help you by giving you instructions on
how to change your diapers. sorry.
leonhart178
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
He is director of the Tate. Done.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What I was referring to is The Goon Show. The Pink Oboe was the main ne'er do well spy character in one of the shows. My old decrepit mind won't allow me to remember which one, but it will come back to me eventually.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Licensing issues
In 2007, you created Malaysian Federal Roads System by copying from at least one other Wikipedia article. Where did it come from? If the source article is not identified, we can't use the text. Wikipedia's contributors do not release their material in public domain, but retain the right to credit for their contributions. (talk)
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
If the LAW is a single use weapon, isn't this a disadvtage as compared to the original Bazooka (granted it does not leave a smoke trail and has no recoil).
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Some baklava for you!
Thanks for your copyedit of The Long, Hot Summermuch appreciated! "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wow J Delanoy, you must really love Brit Hume and hate science!!!!!
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Link: Age of Mythology Heaven
Added link to Age of Mythology heaven. It has loads more info than can ever be described on one wiki page. Also, is a place to go for support for the game, as developers have abandoned it.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"== Citation ==
The first 'citation needed' tag at the end of the fourth paragraph of the 'First theatre: Theatre Royal, Bridges Street (1663)' section is covered in Walter Macqueen-Pope's 1945 book ""Theatre Royal, Drury Lane, publisher Allen, page 33. If you wish me to type the wording here so you can verify, please let me know. Thanks. - Chat
"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Friend, no problem with me. But just look at the discussion page and history of edits when ""suspicious"" persons are added. Croats or Serbs will claim he wasn't Bosniak but Croat or Serb, Bosniaks will denie and so on. But I'm glad you proposed Tvrtko, I'm considering to later add total number of votes, so we will see.fuchs "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Considering the legal issues surrounding ROMs, it would be a bad idea.. I'm not sure which one, but i'm fairly sure that posting the ROM would violate some Wikipedia rule..
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
The subject of the ongoing attempts by politically biased Wikipedia editors to suppress any mention of Neil deGrasse Tyson's embarrassment has prompted widespread derision from the political right. ""[B]logs and conservative opinion pieces"" may not be reliable for statements of fact (see [WP:BIAS]), but if they are well-known, high-traffic, non-fringe, etc. they (National Review, Volokh Conspiracy, Weekly Standard. etc., etc.) ABSOLUTELY establish the existence of a controversy. Partisan dismissals of the significance of the controversy from the other side of the political spectrum subtract nothing from that fact. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
False Friends of the Slavist
I recommend you talk with Miloš Rančić about this. He studies slavistic.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diligence of stalking people I just had a chance to see what you've done to the high-speed trading, and keeping i one sided to the finacial industry. greak work stalker bo "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm sorry that I must say this. I have never come across a more idiotic editor on Wikipedia. Congratulations on making it to the top of my list. I mean that in a congratulatory sense entirely; in no way is it meant to offend or sound sarcastic. I wouldn't call you an editor though. You're more of a pollutant to this project and one with extreme perversion of perception. Please reread the discussion at the talk page. Based on what you last posted there it is painfully obvious that you ignored, or did not comprehend, much of what I tried explaining to you multiple times at that talk page.
|
[
"insult"
] |
[
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
As far as I know there were no warrants of arrest for Thomas Jefferson from the British Crown. There is nothing in the writings of Thomas Jefferson that states he was committing treason and could be hung. Jefferson, Washingtion, and Adams, according to Ferling (2000) believed they were slaves to the British government, not having any rights. They did not view themselves as outlaw rebels, rather, they wanted to be free to make their own laws that protected white people. Franklin apparently is the only Founding Father who mentioned being hung. Was Jefferson in the room at the time Franklin made this statement?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
My harrassment of you? How ironic… 05:12, September 6, 2005 (UTC)"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Great discussion point Jimbo, although I don't think discussion is actually required, the foundation should be able to just do this without the support of the users that are disputing the edits. In really difficult disputed issues I agree the wikimedia Foundation could hire experienced editors, although I wouldn't support any wikipedia connected interviewers, use and pay someone totally independent - independent notable reporters to interview and report on the problematic content issue and report that in a wp:rs source thus giving full independent closure to the dispute.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Misleading reference to study?
In the section on lead paint in art (which I largely wrote), someone added the following:
""Lead paint will often become discolored over long periods of time. This is due to the reaction of the lead carbonate in the paint with traces of hydrogen sulfide in the air and with acids, often from fingerprints. [2] As a result, many older works of art that used lead paint now show some discoloration.""
As I found this surprising, I went and carefully read the study being cited. Their research seemed to refer only to lead in aqueous media on paper, although that wasn't absolutely clear. But lead paint is almost never used that way! Artists working in transparent watercolor (aquarelle) don't usually use white paint, or just occasionally a bit of ""Chinese White"" (not lead) to make corrections. And opaque watercolors (gouache) and acrylic (polymer) artist's paints typically use titanium dioxide or (rarely) zinc white, but never lead. Normally ""flake white"" is used only by oil painters, and there's no indication in the study that they were referring to oil paints. Cooperstown is a well-respected institution, but as of now I'm sticking with the classic (Ralph Mayer). Flake white may get *slightly* yellowish after centuries, but nothing like the gross discoloration referred to in the paragraph above. If someone has more information on this, please mention it here; otherwise when I come back I'm going to delete that paragraph or water it down (no pun intended)."
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
That's my point. I looked for false positives or any feature that would distinguish these accounts, and there was none to be found. The unpleasant situation is that we had a user with a history of exactly this sort of problem with a set of circumstances, reported by users in good standing, that exactly matched sock puppetry. I had to make a difficult judgment call per all the available information, and the conclusion was a finding of sock puppetry. I have invited checkusers, and others, to review the report. Everything is available for inspection and comment. Talk
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Did you even look at my edit before reverting it? I did change it up as you wanted to say that Rex thinks it doesnt work. and as you said, it hits on many things that are also said elsewhere in the article, making it perfect for the lead. Just because it is stated elsewhere in the article by other sources doesn't mean we can also use this source. The more sources the better. I would suggest we both stop touching the article until you come up with a clear reason why it shouldn't be added. As I know all too well how this works, no one touches it in order to finish this dispute, and then the person who didn't want the information in the article will just stop discussing because they think they have won. and then revert whenever the page gets changed.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
i found this article on crime in managua its from 2006 wich means its recent facts that need to be used for this section
i didnt copyright i changed alot of thw phrases
Managua the Epicenter of crime in Nicaragua Managua experienced a rise in violence and crime throughout 1990's. Violent crime in Managua is for various reasons such as political violence, Civil war crime and delinquency.
Gangs in Managua are a widespread phenomenon that is growing fast. Currently managua has more than 110 gangs with more than 8,000 members. These gangsare responsible for 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua. violence and gang warfare is prevalent.These gangs are responsible for theft, mugging, pick-pocketing they also have involvement in the drug trade among other criminal activities.[2]
and this is the original one
Managua, Nicaragua
epicenter of crime in Nicaragua
experienced rising levels of violence and criminality throughout 1990s
40% of all crimes in Nicaragua committed in Managua – half of these reported crimes considered violent
nature of violence and violent crime shifts from political violence and civil war to crime and delinquency
Pandillas – youth gangs – in Managua
now a prevalent and widespread phenomenon – growing rapidly
currently more than 110 pandillas with approximately 8,000 members
concentrated in lower-class barrios – poverty and lack of opportunity drive membership
territorially based in specific neighbourhoods
defend territory as a source of identity and pride
Lower class barrio in Managua
Pandillas commit variety of crime, often employing firearms
responsible for disproportionate share of criminal activity
commit 50% of all crimes in Nicaragua and 60% of all crimes in Managua
violence and gang warfare prevalent
robbery, mugging, pick-pocketing and involvement in
drug trade among other criminal activities
and here is the link
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/focus/youth_gun/managua9_e.htm
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I've decided to start a good Wikipedia account, so I can show you that I can do good to Wikipedia. Please accept my apology above, and I will create no more ""WackyWizzlepenis"" articles. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Your submission at AfC Donegal County Council election, 2004 was accepted
Donegal County Council election, 2004, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. .
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
x12345 "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
December 2008 (UTC)
Well said, I had exactly the same from him for no good reason 22:37, 19
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
.
If you believe I've made this block in error you can request an unblock review from another administrator using the template (instructions at the link)
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Architectural Influences
I have read somewhere (alas forgotten source) that the oval office was influenced by a room in the now Italian Ambassadorial residence in Lucan, Ireland. Does anybody know if this is true?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
There is definately a major difference between caucasian and white. Users slrubenstein and alun are definately taking a racist stance toward this article, and both sides can throw up rules and regs set by wikipedia to hide behind and attempt to justify your points of view (cited sources or not, it's obvious your point of view determines which sources you cite, and or choose not to), but this article as it exists is just wrong. I believe wikipedia would be better served by deleting this article, and adding a new sub-section in the races and caucasian articles if it this is not changed to reflect what 99.9% of the people on this earth consider a 'white person' to be, this 99.9% obviously not including alun & slrubenstein. When it comes down to it, the term 'white person' can't really be defined, it's technically not a race, and any references sited are going to be garbage, as you can find hundreds of them from what could be considered reliable sources that directly defy one another. All that could be done for this article would be to direct it towards a view that most people agree with, or delete it entirely, but as it currently exists, I say again it's a joke. You can cite all the references you want, and state all the wikipedia rules you want, you just can't understand that what you believe just isn't what an overwhelming majority of the rest of the human race does, and as I said before, there's no way of either side proving the case for either side here, as 'white people' don't scientifically exist. So, since you guys are obviously the type that will fight to the bitter end for some worthless cause, even though you have to know that most everyone disagrees with your understanding of what a 'white person' is, just do us all a favor and either delete this article (since there is no factual ground for either side to stand on), or just accept that the overwhelming majority of people see this differently from you, get over it, and let the majority rule on this article about a group of people that doesn't scientifically exist. /end commafest 2009
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thanks for the note, Richard. I knew it was a road bridge, but it is called the Turnbridge Loco Lift Bridge in every reference I can find. (Nicholson Waterways guide, Kirkless MBC website, Waterscape.com, etc), and the name seems to stem from its shape, rather than its function. I have added a link from the map to your excellent photo.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Receive Old Articles
Hi, Would we still be able to receive his old articles posted in the past, and the one that was just posted yesterday? We were wondering if we could receive and retain those records for review. Thank you for your time.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fartsalot56 says f**k you motherclucker!!
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
You cannot take a practice engaged in by a negligible proportion of all the males who live or have ever lived on this planet and imply that this is what men do everywhere. I have looked around and the other options I have encountered is ""bachelor hug"" which is both very rare and nonsensical, and ""pound hug"" which makes a lot more sense and seems about as popular as hip hop hug. As long as we mention both in the article I would have no problem with ""Pound hug"". By the way, why did my redirect fail? I was going to append an explanation but the servers were soooo slow I ran out of time and had to run to an appointment. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I've traced the origin of one of the disputed sentences myself. It seems the problem stems from multiple users whose first language is not English, who don't understand the need for sources, and who can't edit in accordance with WP:NPOV.
At 20:18 July 23 adds: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out the problem of French language."" POV, poor English, unsourced, and meaningless: what's the problem with the French language that causes problems for mathematicians? (Some of the world's best mathematicians are French.)
At 19:45, August 2, , who seems to be French, changes it to: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out his ignorance about french mathematicians and his stupidity."" POV, poor English, unencyclopedic, insulting, unsourced.
At 00:02, August 11, changes it to: ""Ishihara then apologized by stating his apreciation for the French culture."" Unsourced and contains a spelling mistake (possibly just a typo).
At 02:15, August 17, User:Hmib reverts to: ""Ishihara stated he respects the French culture but he just pointed out his ignorance about french mathematicians and his stupidity."" See above.
Perhaps the dispute between FoC and Hmib could be reduced if you were both to supply sources for every edit that's likely to be challenged. Also, please bear in mind that this is the English Wikipedia, and edits must conform to a minimal standard of English. This is especially true when the edits are contentious and are leading to weeks-long edit wars. I'm leaving this on FoC's page too. (talk) 21:49, August 21, 2005 (UTC)"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Addressing:
While ""Indian tribe"" is official US Gov't lingo, saying ""tribe"" twice in the first sentence and then again in the second is awkward, also ""the tribe"" is not a monolithic entity, but rather a collection of people - so maybe reword to say something like ""The Coeur d'Alene people once inhabited 3,500,000 acres (1,400,000 ha) in northern Idaho and Washington,[2][3] (And Montana, actually, note article on the tribe) but today, the only land controlled by the tribal nation is the Coeur d'Alene Reservation in Benewah and Kootenai counties, Idaho.[4]"" You don't have to use my wording, but you see how I am distinguishing land and people, though the two are, of course, closely intertwined.
. Boomer!
Second and third paragraphs jump around and need another copyedit. I'd put right up front that Johnson did the executive order but Congress never acted on it, then go on about how the tribe didn't accept it anyway? Keep the chronology clearer. (Interesting that the Coeur d'Alene article says nothing about this period, maybe finish here and add a bit to that article too... hmmm)
From a VERY cursory review of the decision, it appears that gap between creation of the reservation and Idaho's statehood becomes significant in this case, so perhaps give us a bit of foreshadowing that this is not just a dry fact, but it's something that's going to matter.
The section fails to draw out the significance of the info on the state park and mining, maybe add a wee bit to hint at why this will matter in the SCOTUS case."
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The answer to that question has finally been found; Justin Timberlake is one of the artists that does that song; Gap Band nephew Snoop Dogg interpolates lyrics from Early in the Morning in the 2005 song Signs.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You must have the lowest IQ of anyone on wikipedia, I can't converse with a fool like you
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Is this username appropriate?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""I am working on this page for school."" Wikipedia is not a free host. Put it on one of your own websites or one of these wikis. — RHaworth "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I read that quality article, reference number 3 where he states, ""it's not because I died in the 9/11 attacks that put my career on hold, it's because my financial backers pulled out"" He's obviously a genius. Also the team owner or whatever he was stated the ""the newton-john name goes a long way in motor racing as everyone knows who she is"" Read your own references before getting on your high horse. Go grab yourself a tube of Vagisil and fuck yourself.90.204.13.4 "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Klaus...
Chris loves you. I tried the 'adm' and 'aks' and a random mexican answered the phone... goddammit, i'm gonna send flowers. don't freak out. 68.0.119.139
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" Pseudonymous editing copied from an email received offline Hi, I'm not quite sure how this works, but your wrote in my deletion review, ""you say that your name and address are available, but your contributions to Wikipedia are pseudonymous."" Does this mean I hadn't registered? I did so last night, and not under a pseudonym as most people have. I always use my real name in signatures. And I don't know how to post to your talk page because there appears to be no ""post"" link. Thanks, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [email protected] [email protected] Thanks for your message but I think perhaps my meaning was still unclear. Whether you register or not doesn't really matter since anyone can register under any name. I could go online and register a Wikipedia account as George W. Bush (at least, if it's not already taken). Wikipedia has no means to authenticate your identity independently. All that we know - all that we can know - is what you choose to claim about yourself. That's what I meant by pseudonymously - any registration, even if you say that it's your real name, is technically a pseudonym. It is not independently verified against some external identity database. And for the most part, that works out very well on Wikipedia. We want users and editors to establish themselves through their actions and to demonstrate their expertise through their edits, not by making claims to outside credentials. By the way, anyone could also register as Dennis Bathory-Kitzs. That trivial misspelling would be easily overlooked by readers but would still be accepted by the system. Such a person could sign their name the same way you do, attempt to mimic your pattern of speech (well, writing really) and make subtle edits just to discredit you. That, in fact, is a real problem for established editors of Wikipedia. When we find usernames that are suspiciously similar to established users, we look very carefully for signs of vandalism or deceit. Users who appear to have done something like that on purpose are generally banned from Wikipedia. But those are all manual checks. There is no system that can automatically detect or prevent it. Likewise, no one can inherently trust the email address
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
. The way internet domains are set up, anyone could register bathory.org and create any email name they wanted. Like Wikipedia accounts, emails and internet domains are unverified against any external identity authority. And that's before you consider the problems of email spoofing and forgery - both of which are far easier and common today than any of us would like to admit. Most people are honest. But there are enough dishonest people out there that we have to build our systems and our procedures in such a way that it doesn't matter whether they are telling the truth about their identity or not. That's why Wikipedia has a policy against original research (which we mean as ""a contribution or assertion based on personal experience"") and why we never rely solely on self-published materials and why we bias our policy so strongly in favor of reliable sources such as websites owned by and operated by large, well-known organizations - organizations with both a vested interest in and the resources to find and stop spoofing. Sorry to bore you with all this but my non-Wikipedia profession is information security. The inherent problems of identity management and authentication occupy much of my waking hours. How can a bank know that you're really you? And how far can that trust be extended? Under what conditions can an assertion be treated as reliable? How do we balance that against the need to make systems and computers easy and accessible. Unfortunately, there are no easy answers short of establishing a national identity database - something which would be in great tension with my role as a privacy advocate. Anyway, I'll get off my soapbox now. Thanks for your message. To post to my Talk page, just go to the page and edit it like you would edit any page on Wikipedia. The most common technique is to use the little plus sign next to the ""edit this page"" tab at the top. That will automatically create a new section and give you a line to create a section header without having to know the wiki-markup symbols. You should also get in the habit of signing your posts on Talk pages. You can do that easily by ending your comment with four tildes (~~~~). When you save the page, the MediaWiki software will replace the tildes with your username and the date-timestamp. Again, welcome to
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wikipedia. (talk) "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I always thought peperoncini were the small, really hot chili peppers that are used in e.g. pasta all'arrabbiata etc. In Sweden, peperoni refers to the larger, pickled chili peppers that are used as kebab toppings (and sometimes pizza...). Peperoncini is the diminutive of peperoni, right?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Good lord. Could this discussion pissably [sic] stop any lower? Get a grip folks, try to remember we're writing an encyclopedia, not seeing who can piss the furthest. talk "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
well, change it then.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I'm not sure his being banned from an ID message board is all that relevant, (Shock! horror! Hal Fisher comes out in defense of CML!) but it is relevant to his arbcom case that others think he is a net kook too.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
They could be bluffing, or this could be a Joe Job. Unless there is technical evidence connecting a functionary to sock puppets, I don't think there's much to go on. Talk 22:59
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I really didn't expect it to ""fly."" Thanks for the affirmation. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Also, I can't seem to find you're second and third references.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Quoting from the article: ""Rubbish was thrown at her and the crowds jeered, in part because she dressed in expensive clothing which served to alienate her from those suffering the privations caused by the war."" and ""Windsor Castle (about 20 miles, 35 kilometres, west of central London)"" So, the views that you express are already represented in the article. It seems fair and well-balanced to me. Making it ""critical"" is not what wikipedia is about. We should not be a platform for political views, but an encyclopedia presenting facts. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Barek, why are you abu$ing the deletion function?
You ju$t deleted a bunch of edit$ and page-move log$ that do not meet the criteria for deletion. I $uggest you rever$e your deletion$, or you will be de-$y$opped.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hannibal
Like I said earlier, the only thing I'd comment on is that the books section should be expanded...the bulk of the plots of Red Dragon and Silence are ignored, save for Lecter being captured and escaping. We don't need a CliffNotes of the novels, but we should mention how Lecter worked with both Graham and Clarice and how he was connected with Francis Dolarhyde. Again, a paragraph or two for each book would do.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"::The CTMU is not passing itself off as an ""academic"" theory. It can't, because Langan is not a member of academia. But then again, a theory need not be academic to be notable. For example, print and television journalists and their readers and viewing audiences can deem things notable as well. Nor do academics have a monopoly on logical or factual correctness, scholarly integrity, or intellectual merit, except possibly in the well-indoctrinated minds of some academics themselves (and of course, their aspiring apprentices, whose eager anticipation of scholastic glory sometimes inflates their academic snobbery to blimpish proportions). Byrgenwulf complains that ""we chaps"" are not the sole arbiters of what belongs in the article. This is correct. To his credit, he invites others to tag his assertions. However, this is a bit specious, for having belatedly come to the realization that he has no relevant, verifiable assertions to make, he is now specializing in challenging the assertions of others. Thus, we now find him imperiously and rather comically demanding that every one of Langan's assertions receive a separate citation, when this is flatly unnecessary because the source material in which those assertions are made is already directly linked to the article. It is important for Byrgenwulf to understand that he has exactly the same burden of proof as his opponents. Not only must he provide a legitimate citation for anything he wishes to add to the article, but given that the article already links to ample source material, anything he wants to remove or qualify must be proven false, irrelevant, or non-neutral. Unfortunately, he hasn't yet been able to lock onto this signal. He still labors under the assumption that like some sort of Ultimate Bureaucrat, he can sit at his keyboard and demand an infinite amount of verification without verifying anything himself. By now, everyone involved in this matter has come to a stark realization: neither Byrgenwulf, nor any of his tiny but dedicated band of confederates, HAS any citations or other sources of verification for their own accusations. They are
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
merely using the article, which is faithful to the material it cites, to prosecute their philosophical bias against its topic, the CTMU, which was deemed notable and newsworthy by several international periodicals and news networks. They do not like what the CTMU says; the article on the CTMU reports on what the CTMU says, and what Langan and the press say about the CTMU; hence, they do not like the article on the CTMU. This conflation of the article with the theory is reflected in Byrgenwulf's transparent strategy of attacking the theory through the article, attempting to dispose of the message by killing the messenger. Meanwhile, he seemingly fails to register the fact that he is himself in glaring violation of Wikipedia verifiability policy, and that his all-too-evident editorial bias is in massive violation of NPOV as well. Oozing contempt, Byrgenwulf has rumbled into the middle of the CTMU article with a load of summary demands, snide remarks, and self-righteous, factually worthless criticism...but not one relevant citation in hand! Nothing he says is verifiable; as we have now repeatedly seen, he cannot even be trusted on matters in which he claims to be an expert. This makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to take his demands seriously. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Siafu, I am getting access denied for GPS PPS. It says
ERROR
Access Denied
Access Denied by security policy
The security policy for your network prevents your request from being allowed at this time. Please contact your administrator if you feel this is incorrect.
Is this a classified document?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hi Danqing,
It is very nice to work with you:)
Chenxi
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
""Perhaps""? Why ""perhaps""? And why did you revert the edit? 201.215.60.232 "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Clearly a partisan gesture. I'll discuss this further when I am able to edit freely. —aco
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Question
Do you have any interests outside of lamely editing Wikipedia? Even a small one?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A kitten for you!
just becuz ur pussy 4 lying.
"
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hilltop Reservation, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! .:..:. babelfish
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
", 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll try to take the points in turn. Hope I get this format right.
- WP:BLPGOSSIP states that Be wary of sources that use weasel words and that attribute material to anonymous sources. I am not aware of any weasel words or attribution to anonymous sources. I am not sure how the section applies, if you could be more clear it would be helpful.
- The phrase involve claims about third parties is so vague as to not be any assistance. By this metric, so little can be used that it's almost meaningless. Someone stating their birthdate, or the grade school they attended. But for a person saying ""I have a conflict with Jenny Smith over Issue X"" - where do we draw the line? It could easily be said that an actor and actress divorcing, with one placing on their personal (publicist) website a statement about ""separating for reasons of X"" is a ""claim about third parties"", but I wouldn't argue it is unreliable nor unencyclopedic to include in the biography of either individual. One can take things too far, and I think in this case the avoidance of even mentioning the existence of dispute is getting to the point where people are being literalist and not using their common sense. 76.31.236.91 20:51"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Copyright problems with Image:Siaeconomy.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Siaeconomy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 2 "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trivia section/everthing else you butchered: Not the place for it
Then where does it belong then!?
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"All of the Bosniaks were expelled form the area. 2,704 people from Foča are missing or were killed during the massacres period.
Foča was also the site of rape camps which were set up by the Serb authorities in which hundreds of women were raped.
"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No, I've not seen anything.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This article does nothing but list a bill of particulars in attempt to villainize the AEL, without even giving a cursory glance at their side of the issues at hand (e.g., racist violence against Arabs across Europe). As such, it's going into the NPOV disputes category. Let someone who doesn't get all their information from FoxNews get a crack at it.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Another source, Bram Stoker and the Man who was Dracula, By Barbara Belford, (1996) p. 269
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Here are a few key questions:
Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?
You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar Good job, just needs to be blocked now! "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISP's
My ISP is randomly assigned so unless you ban the whole of my ISP provider I can just register again so I'll do what JFW does and act in cyberspace as I please.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I know that's not mature. And anyway, that was my cousin, I went to the bathroom, and he got on for awhile and was being an idiot. So don't talk to me like I did anything for I am Zod and I can break you, so leave it.
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
HELLO Garmiamel (admittedly I have trouble spelling your silly name out Rob, but I don't have the fancy, government paid education as you have...)
You should block the following 76.0.0.0/24 I would suggest, rob you place a
permanent ban and range block for the whole great lakes/midwest
You have a wikinice day.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Thank you, I will take that under advisement. I'm a newbie, so please excuse any honest mistakes while I'm still learning.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You are a gay homo. I hope you choke on your penis and die. I am sending a big bleck guy to jizz in your face.
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
1,
1,
1,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
You act like you are constructive and you make sense; but I honestly think you are reverting changes just out of stubbornness. You are not being honest, nor you are being constructive. I think you guys have some sort of agenda that you are not being honest about.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Priyanka Chopra Endorsements
Hey bollyjeff I have some concerns about endorsement section, it says she has represented brands like so and so.it nothing say about the brands she endorses now
It is confusing whether she is endorsing or endorsed.you know what I mean.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
hello clown
Rust never sleeps 76.223.246.87
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Done. Just awaiting on the final result from the Golden Globes real soon...
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
REDIRECT Talk:List of Lyon Metro stations
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I agree, if it's well written. There are only two known plot holes though, and they created an entire section about it. I just felt kinda skeptical as to whether or not it could really hold out as an entire section. There was also question as to whether or not it was trivia, though I do think it would work well intergrated into a section about the plot of the movie. Do you think it should have its own section? ~ Swan "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OK, apologies. 70.181.148.148
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Mr. 68.164.117.79 I don't mean to be frank but your title does assert that SO is a de factor a country when only a handful number of countries recognizes it as such, The majority of the world still see it as a part of Georgia after all it was and is a civilwar. On top of that South Ossetians & Abkahzians are Russian citizens so this would mean that they are in fact part of the Russian Federation. This is also the problem logically, to call it as such, is to recognize the regional sovereignty of that area therefore confirming that the region exist but many speak of it which confirms it's existence now that the region is confirmed to exist what is this region part of? It is for the most part still the Georgian region its more to do with logic then POV. My friend Mr 68.164.117.79 I'm trying front with you whatsoever but that statement SO War doesn't make sense to me. However I think that the solution is probably like Pubkjre said in regards to the Vietnam article but this needs to stop any title can seem that it has a POV and can have great arguments to support it even though the title has good intentions so to debate it any further wouldn't do good, every informational data base has a bias its just a question of how much.Furthermore I'm going to also defend the google searches because it a good way to see how many individuals speak of in reference to, I am not saying that because everyone calls it as such then it should be so, but the easier it is to find the better as illogical as that sounds.In Summation I second Pubkjre we should have a Etymology page that way it will be clear on who is using what name and why.
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
July 7, 2005 20:58 (UTC)
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Whenever you see brackets that means that the editor has added an explanation. In this case [organic remains] was added to explain the word 'they'. While W&M; used the word fossil in the previous sentence it is clear that they were referring to organic remains because by definition, recently buried remains (such as what is ""now occurring"") are not fossils. From the ""Dictionary of Geologic Terms"", 3rd edition, 1984, by Bates and Johnson: FOSSIL: Any remains, trace, or imprint of a plant or animal that has been preserved in the earth's crust since some past geologic or prehistoric time. Nothing buried in the present can be a fossil, for it is in historic time. And further, you do not quickly bury fossils to preserve them, you quickly bury organic remains to protected them long enough so they they can eventually become fossils in some future geologic era.
W&M; likely used the term fossil loosely, like many editors of this WP page, to refer to organic remains that might become fossils per definition in some geologic era in the future. It is unfortunate that W&M; were not as precise as they might have been, because uninformed people, such as Talk.Origins, misunderstand and twist what they said.
As much impact as W&M; have had on Creationary thought, nearly all fellow creationist today recognize that The Genesis Flood, is now way out of date. Modern creationary geologists have moved well beyond The Genesis Flood. When critics quote it, it displays their complete lack of competency on modern creationism. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Oops, the math major in me is coming out - I did the math, and if the info destruction is greater than the info creation, you actually end up with a negative amount of encyclopedia....not a zero amount ; )
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
":ok, it turns out that MJ's ""Official Website"" completely forgot about Motown. So, I haven't a clue, and give up for now. 5 July 2005 06:12 (UTC)
"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
Question
Sarah, there is something that I've wondered about for a long time that is related to COI editing. One need look no further than my user page where I quote Chris Hedges: ""They control our systems of information."" and add: Surely no one could be so naive as to believe that corporations do not have an interest in turning our encyclopedia into a corporate-approved encyclopedia. At a certain point one must admit that to not fight the creep of corporate control into our articles really does make us appear to be a bunch of easily-led, lame-brained, losers just willing to go along with the flow rather than to tackle the problem and try to come up with some sort of strategy. What, if anything, is presently being done? I'm aware that a few years ago an editor asked for some sort of outside check to ""prove"" that he had no COI related to the articles he edits, and I've heard of this incident dozens of times since, where it is raised as absolute evidence of a lack of conflict of interest. Many times I've wondered how Wikipedia went about finding this so-called proof. If I put myself in a position in which I was editing for pay but denied it, how could it be proven that I was? I mention this because the first thing you know all a paid editor need do is have WP give him/her the WP Stamp of Approval and from then on that editor is home free to do as they please. They can now proudly display their badge of approval and anyone who questions them is now seen as a disgruntled editor in need of a reality check. "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
" So could someone please give a specific, concise definition of the term ""Neo-Nazism"", and revise this article so that it lists only those groups whose ideology fits this definition?!"
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
, and just because some band or swear word appeals to your apparently juvenile sensibilities does not make it noteworthy enough to warrant inclusion on this site
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
What a deceptive little creature you are indeed. Assuming good faith - eh? You deliberately scrubbed that because it sheds a little light on where all these race hygiene theories originated from - from your dear little country, that's where. That doesn't fit well with you, does it? So you want to create the perception to your readers that I AM THE CRANK and CONSPIRACY THEORIST, when Wikipedia's own article on Henry Ford includes that stuff about the Protocols of Zion as well.84.28.82.149
|
[
"toxic"
] |
[
1,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
"
I don't attribute motive; rather, I note behavior. You have yet again shown up at an article which SlimVirgin regularly edits and started editing there, within minutes of her last edit. You were warned quite clearly to stop doing this; with any luck, a 24 hour block will help enforce the importance of this. (talk) "
|
[] |
[
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0
] |
en
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.