Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | a non-trivial spectrum of mesons in the large N limit of four dimensional QCD but this model has not yet been exactly solved. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Eguchi and Kawai [7] proved that lattice QCD in the limit of N → ∞ can be reduced to QCD on a single site provided the global U d(1) symmetries that multiplies the link matrices by U (1) phases are not broken. Unfortunately, this symmetry is broken for d > 2 [8] and one cannot reproduce QCD in the large N limit by working on a 1d lat- tice. But, the proof of Eguchi and Kawai also holds for an Ld lattice where L > 1. That is to say, the infinite space-time lattice can be reduced to a finite Ld lattice in the limit of N → ∞ pro- vided the global U d(1) symmetries that multiplies Polyakov loops by U (1) phases are not broken on the Ld lattice. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | the critical size. This is referred to as continuum reduction [9]. Physical results can be extracted by working on an Ld lattice and keeping b just below bc(L). Computations need to be done on two or three different values of N to study the in- finite N limit. Results for two or three different L values can be used to study the effect of finite lattice spacing. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | One lattice artifact has to be taken into account when setting the parameters {L, b < bc(L)} for physical computation. There is a bulk transition on the lattice in the large N limit that is asso- ciated with the spectrum of the single plaquette (1 × 1 Wilson loop). There is no phase transition for finite N but there is a cross-over that gets stronger with increasing N. The eigenvalues eiθ of Up, the parallel transporter along the plaque- tte, can be anywhere in the range −π ≤ θ < π. But the field strength is small close to the contin- uum limit and θ is expected to be in a small range close to zero. In fact, there is a value of coupling bB such that the distribution of θ develops a gap around ±π for b > bB. This value of coupling does not depend on L and therefore the transi- tion is purely a lattice artifact. But one has to set b > bB to obtain the proper continuum limit. Only for some L > LB does bc(L) become bigger than bB. For L ≤ LB all one has is the bulk tran- sition and the U d(1) symmetries also break at the same coupling. This is the reason why one cannot obtain continuum QCD in the large N limit us- ing the single site Eguchi-Kawai model and there is a smallest lattice size that one has to use in {L > LB, bB < b < bc(L)}. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | In order to study QCD in the large N limit, one has to first obtain the appropriate set of parame- ters {L > LB, bB < b < bc(L)}. The U 2(1) sym- metries are not broken in d = 2 and bc(L) = ∞ for all L ≥ 1. The bulk transition occurs at bB = 0.5 [10] and Eguchi-Kawai reduction holds on a 12 lattice. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | ilarly, a system started in the 0c phase on a 74 lattice at b = 0.3568 ends up in the correct 1c phase after a few sweeps of the lattice as seen in Fig. 10. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | to study scaling. Fig. 11 shows that the data does scale properly with LI 0 between 0.245 and 0.275. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | tive to the quenched Eguchi-Kawai model is pro- vided by the idea of continuum reduction. Con- tinuum reduction implies that there are no finite volume effects in the large N limit of QCD as long as one works with L > LB and bB < b < bc(L). |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | The eigenvalue distribution of the single pla- quette exhibits a gap and the space of gauge field configurations naturally splits into several discon- It is natural to assume that the nected pieces. disconnected pieces correspond to different gauge field topologies and this can be explicitly verified by a numerical simulation. Since there are no fi- nite volume effects, one should see evidence for a chiral condensate if the box size is bigger than the critical size and the chiral condensate should occur due to the lowest eigenvalues scaling like 1/N as N gets large. This also can be verified us- ing numerical simulations on fairly small lattices (L = 8 − 10, N = 20 − 30). |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Since there are no finite volume effects it should be possible to compute meson propagators for ar- bitrarily small momenta as long as the box size is bigger than the critical size. Normally, it is not possible to work with momenta that are smaller than the inverse of the box size. This can be avoided in the large N limit of QCD since a con- stant U (1) phase multiplying all the link matrices in a given direction can be interpreted as mo- mentum carried by a quark line [8,13,17]. This interpretation works as long as the U d(1) symme- tries are not broken since the pure gauge sector is invariant under a multiplication by a constant phase but the fermion propagator picks up a mo- mentum equal to this constant phase. This is indeed the case if the box size is bigger than the critical size. A direct computation of the meson propagators in momentum space will lend credi- bility to the above argument. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Lab) is operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association (SURA) under DOE con- tract DE-AC05-84ER40150. The author would like to thank the organizers of the LHP2003 work- shop for a lively and pleasant atmosphere. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 1. Eigenvalue distribution of the 1 × 1 Wilson loop at b = 0.359 shows a gap. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 2. Eigenvalue distribution of the 1 × 1 Wilson loop at b = 0.355 shows a gap. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 3. Time history of p( ˜Pµ) shows that the U (1) symmetry is broken in one of the four direc- tions. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 4. Time history of p( ˜Pµ) shows that the U (1) symmetry is preserved in all four directions. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 5. Eigenvalue distribution of ˜Pµ at b = 0.359 shows that the U (1) symmetry is broken in one of four directions. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 6. Eigenvalue distribution of ˜Pµ at b = 0.355 shows that the U (1) symmetry is preserved in all four directions. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 7. Eigenvalue distribution of the six dif- ferent orientations of the L × L wilson loop at b = 0.359 showing that the U (1) symmetry is broken in one of four directions. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 8. Eigenvalue distribution of the six dif- ferent orientations of the L × L wilson loop at b = 0.355 indicating that the U (1) symmetry is preserved in all four directions. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 9. Time history of p( ˜Pµ) for each direction showing the evolution from 1c to 0c. |
Processed_Large_N_QCD_--_Continuum_reduction.txt | Figure 10. Time history of p( ˜Pµ) for each direc- tion showing the evolution from 0c to 1c. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | several light quark masses corresponding to the Goldstone pion masses in the range of about 115 – 230 MeV on lattices of size 323×8 and 483×8. We calculate the 100 lowest-lying Dirac eigenvalues at temperatures below and above Tc. We investigate the volume dependence of the Dirac eigenvalue density to determine whether there is a gap around zero, which can appear if UA(1) symmetry is restored in the chiral symmetric phase. We also investigate the quark mass dependence of the Dirac eigenvalue density at zero and check whether there is a linear behavior that would signal the UA(1) breaking above Tc. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | c(cid:13) Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) with N f flavors is invariant under a global flavor symmetry of SUL(N f ) × SUR(N f ) × UV (1) × UA(1) in the limit of vanishing quark mass. It is also known that the SUL(N f ) × SUR(N f ) chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken in the vacuum and the UA(1) symmetry is explicitly broken due to the axial anomaly. However the chiral symmetry is expected to be restored at high temperature. On the other hand, although the anomaly effect is present at any finite temperature, it is suppressed at high temperature and accordingly the UA(1) symmetry is effectively restored. Here an important question is when and how such an effective UA(1) symmetry restoration occurs since it can influence the order of the chiral phase transition. In the case of N f = 2 it has been suggested [1] that if the UA(1) symmetry remains broken at the critical temperature Tc of the chiral phase transition, the phase transition is of second order belonging to a universality class of a 3-dimensional O(4) spin model. On the other hand, if both the chiral and the UA(1) symmetries are restored at the same time, the phase transition should be of first order. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | To study the QCD phase structure and properties of strongly interacting matter, where non- pertabative effects play an important role, lattice QCD simulations are a suitable way. Some lattice QCD studies with (2+1)-flavor staggered type quarks [2, 3] have indicated at least O(N) scaling in the analysis of the magnetic equation of state, although only the O(2) symmetry is preserved. Sim- ilarly in the case of 2-flavor O(a) improved Wilson quarks [4, 5] O(4) scaling has been reported. This suggests the second order phase transition scenario in the case of N f = 2 massless quarks. In our previous report [6] we investigated the temperature dependence of the Dirac eigenvalue distri- bution and discussed a scaling behavior in the (2+1)-flavor case with the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) action [7]. There we found that the eigenvalue density around zero, which is related to the chiral order parameter, has a crossover behavior and a power law dependence similar to what is expected from the critical exponent of the O(2) or O(4) universality classes. Moreover, we found no clear evidence for a gap around zero in the Dirac eigenvalue density at high temperature, which supports UA(1) breaking above Tc. Recently the restoration of the UA(1) symmetry in terms of the Dirac eigenvalue distribution has been discussed also with domain wall [8] and overlap [9] fermions, which have exact chiral symmetry on the lattice. With domain wall fermions there re- main small eigenvalues even at high temperature. Whereas with overlap fermions a gap around zero seems to appear above a certain temperature. However, the lattice sizes in these studies are not large enough for definite conclusions and more detailed investigations are needed. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | In this report we continue our study on the Dirac eigenvalue distribution at finite temperature with the same setup as in [6] and give more details about its volume and quark mass dependences and the effective UA(1) restoration. In the next section we discuss details of our study. Then we show some numerical results in Sec. 3 and finally give conclusions in Sec. 4. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | In this study we examine whether the eigenvalue distribution r (l , m) remains finite at l = 0, i.e. we consider the case b = 0. The dominant low eigenvalue structure of r (0, m) thus is assumed to be r (0, m) = cma . It is evident from (2.8) that we need a ≥ 1 in order to have c p − c d = c disc finite above the critical temperature. Moreover, only for a = 1 does c d = c disc stay non-zero and thus would provide a sufficient signature for UA(1) symmetry breaking. Of course, a > 1 or c ≡ 0 are viable possibilities. In that case any remnant UA(1) symmetry breaking would have to arise either from the structure of r (l , m) at l > 0 or a possible zero mode contribution r (l , m) ∼ m2d (l ). |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | Table 1: The parameters and statistics of the numerical simulations. b , a, T , ms, ml, Ns and Nt are the lattice gauge coupling, lattice spacing, temperature, bare strange quark mass, bare light quark mass, spacial lattice size and temporal lattice size, respectively. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | We use the tree level improved gauge action and the HISQ action [7] which can reduce cutoff effects due to the taste-symmetry violation better than any other staggered type quark action. Part of our gauge configurations have been generated by the HotQCD collaboration [11]. We perform our simulations mainly on 323 × 8 lattices and for a few temperatures on 483 × 8 lattices to investigate the volume dependence. The scale was set from the kaon decay constant fK. Our strange quark mass ms is fixed to its physical value and we have several light quark masses ml which have values of ms/40, ms/27, ms/20 and ms/10 corresponding to the lightest (Goldstone) pion of about 115, 140, 160 and 230 MeV, respectively. Here ml = ms/27 gives an almost physical pion mass and the corresponding pseudocritical temperature in the continuum limit has been estimated at 154(9) MeV by using O(4) scaling fits to the chiral condensate and susceptibility. The details of the determination of the lattice spacing, the strange quark mass and the pseudocritical temperature have been discussed in Ref. [11]. Each 10th trajectory is chosen for measurements after skipping at least 500 trajectories for thermalization. Statistical errors are estimated by the jackknife method. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | Figure 1: Volume dependence of the Dirac eigenvalue density for ml/ms = 1/20 at T = 330.1 MeV for all configurations (left) and configurations with Q = 0 (right). |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | We calculated the lowest 100 positive eigenvalues of the staggered (HISQ) Dirac operator for all parameter sets since the staggered Dirac operator is anti-hermitian and has only pure imaginary eigenvalues in complex conjugate pairs. We evaluate the eigenvalue density by binning eigenvalues (l , m) = (T /V )×# in some small intervals for each configuration and normalize it so that eigenvalues. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | In our previous report [6] we found suppression of r (l , m) around l = 0 and lack of eigen- values very close to zero above Tc. At the same time, there was also a tail approaching the origin in r (l , m) even at our highest temperature, i.e. 330.1 MeV. Since small eigenvalues could suffer from finite volume as well as topological effects which should vanish in the thermodynamic limit, investigating the volume dependence of r (l , m) is needed to judge whether there is a real gap around l = 0 in r (l , m). In the left side of Fig. 1 the volume dependence of r (l , m) at T = 330.1 MeV is shown; r (l , m) seems to have a quite small volume dependence in a region of l < 0.05, although statistics is not enough to see it clearly. We also check for the effect from the (would-be) zero modes of topological non-trivial configurations whose contribution to the eigenvalue density at zero would vanish in the thermodynamic limit. The right side of Fig. 1 shows the same result as on the left side but for topological trivial configurations. Here the topological charge Q is de- termined form a lattice F ˜F operator with HYP fat links [12]. It is clearly found that contribution form small eigenvalues is more strongly suppressed and eigenvalues less than l ≃ 0.03 disappears in this case. However, since r (l , m) seems to decrease continuously and exponentially, it is possi- ble that the tail of r (l , m) continues below the lowest value of our r (l , m), when a more precise determination is made. Increased statistics and bigger volumes are needed to make more definite statements. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | Figure 2: The temperature dependence (left) and the quark mass dependence (right) of the Dirac eigenvalue density at l = 0. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | is as close to unity as possible. Then our c 2/dof is in the range from 0.88 to 2.1. In the left side of Fig. 2 the temperature dependence of r (0, m) is shown. It can be seen that r (0, m) monotonically decreases as the temperature increases and, within statistical errors, it seems to vanish around T = 160 – 170 MeV at least for ml/ms = 1/40, 1/27 and 1/20. Here we note that even above the crossover transition temperature Tc, as determined from the chiral condensate or susceptibility, the condensate will stay non-zero for non-zero quark masses. The eigenvalue density r (0, m) thus may stay non-zero and approaches zero smoothly also above Tc. The right side of Fig. 2 shows the quark mass dependence of r (0, m) at four temperatures around Tc, namely T = 151.0, 156.7, 162.2 and 165.9 MeV. At first, r (0, m) seems to approach zero in the chiral limit at the lower two temperatures as expected in the chiral symmetric phase. However it is difficult to determine whether r (0, m) approaches zero linearly so far. To do so we need simulations with smaller quark mass. On the other hand, data for the higher two temperatures are very close to zero already at ml/ms = 1/40. However, data for two different volumes at ml/ms = 1/20 show finite volume effects which indicate an increase of the density in the thermodynamic limit. This means that our results at T = 166.8 and 170.5 MeV underestimate the infinite volume result. We thus need larger lattices to get more accurate results. In addition, the eigenvalue density around zero at temperatures close to Tc is sensitive to fit Ansatze since it changes quickly with respect to l . Hence using any other fit Ansatze will help to estimate systematic uncertainty. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | We study UA(1) symmetry breaking in the chiral symmetric phase in terms of the Dirac eigen- value distribution. In our (2+1)-flavor dynamical simulations, using the tree level improved gauge action and the HISQ action, we investigate the volume and quark mass dependence of the eigen- value density. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | density at zero seems to go to zero in the chiral limit as expected for an unbroken chiral symmetry, at T = 151.0 and 156.7 MeV, which are temperatures around Tc. We also try to see, if the eigenvalue density at zero has a linear quark-mass dependence, which would be sufficient to signal breaking of the UA(1) symmetry in the chiral symmetric phase. However it is difficult to identify it so far. |
Processed_U_A(1)_breaking_at_finite_temperature_from_the_Dir.txt | Department of Energy and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung under grant 06BI9001. The numerical simulations have been performed on the BlueGene/L at the New York Center for Computational Sciences (NYCCS) which is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy and by the State of New York and the infiniband cluster of USQCD at Jefferson Laboratory. This work has been in part based on the MILC collaboration’s public lattice gauge theory code [13]. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Fast Radio Burst (FRB) dispersion measures (DMs) record the presence of ionized baryons that are otherwise invisible to other techniques enabling resolution of the matter distribution in the cosmic web. In this work, we aim to estimate the contribution to FRB 180924 DM from foreground galactic halos. Localized by ASKAP to a massive galaxy, this sightline is notable for an estimated cosmic web contribution to the DM (DMcosmic= 220 pc cm−3), which is less than the average value at the host redshift (z = 0.3216) estimated from the Macquart relation (280 pc cm−3). In the favored models of the cosmic web, this suggests few intersections with foreground halos at small impact parameters ((cid:46) 100 kpc). To test this hypothesis, we carried out spectroscopic observations of the field galaxies within ∼1(cid:48) of the sightline with VLT/MUSE and Keck/LRIS. Furthermore, we developed a probabilistic methodology that leverages photometric redshifts derived from wide-field DES and WISE imaging. We conclude that there is no galactic halo that closely intersects the sightline and also that the net DM contribution from halos, DMhalos < 45 pc cm−3 (95 % c.l.). This value is lower than the DMhalos estimated from an “average” sightline (121 pc cm−3) using the Planck ΛCDM model and the Aemulus halo mass function and reasonably explains its low DMcosmic value. We conclude that FRB 180924 represents the predicted majority of sightlines in the universe with no proximate foreground galactic halos. Our framework lays the foundation for a comprehensive analysis of FRB fields in the near future. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | about all ionized matter along their lines-of-sight, thus unlocking an opportunity to study previously invisible gas in the universe. One of the measurable properties of FRBs is their dispersion measure (DM), which is the cosmological-scale-factor-weighted line of sight integral of electron density. Even with a handful of localized FRBs, Macquart et al. (2020) were able to show that the observed FRB DMs are consistent with the expected matter distribution in a ΛCDM universe, thus conclu- sively resolving the Missing Baryon Problem. While their work “found” the Missing Baryons, the next phase of research is to precisely locate them within the cos- mic web. Specifically, we aim to develop the framework to utilize these data and reconstruct the distribution of matter along the sightlines. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Being an integral, one can split the FRB DM into disjoint summative parts corresponding to each “elec- tron reservoir” along the line of sight, namely the host galaxy and its halo; intervening foreground halos and cosmic web filaments; and the Milky Way including its gaseous halo, i.e. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | A full characterization of DMFRB requires detailed in- formation on the host (e.g. Chittidi et al. 2020) and the intervening cosmic web structures. Simha et al. (2020) performed such an analysis on the sightline of FRB 190608 owing to the favorable location of the FRB in the SDSS spectroscopic footprint. This provided de- tailed information on the redshifts of foreground galax- ies, allowing for a nearly complete characterization of their DM contributions (although with significant un- certainty) and also the contribution from the diffuse in- tergalactic medium (IGM). In general, if a FRB host is located at low redshifts (z < 0.05), one could use just the 2MASS Redshift Catalog (Huchra et al. 2012) to perform the same analysis. However, the vast majority of localized FRBs to date fall outside the extant SDSS coverage, and therefore one would require extensive new spectroscopic observations. In this work, we explore the application of photometric redshifts combined with sparse spectroscopy to estimate the DM contributions of foreground halos, DMhalos, for one such sightline: FRB 180924. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | uncertain, if one assumes it to be 66 pc cm−3 in the host rest frame (Bannister et al. 2019); uses the NE2001 model (Cordes & Lazio 2003) for the Milky Way disk (41 pc cm−3); and 50 pc cm−3 for the Milky Way halo gas, the remainder of the DM is attributed to the cos- mic web: DMcosmic,FRB ≈ 220 pc cm−3. This is lower than the mean expected 1 DMcosmic value at the host redshift ((cid:104)DMcosmic(cid:105)= 280 pc cm−3), suggesting either a less than average foreground matter density, or our adopted values for DMhost or DMMW are too large. Of course, the average value is not representative of all sightlines and there is naturally some scatter (Macquart et al. 2020). For a given redshift, the distribution of DMcosmic is skewed towards lower than average DM. This is because most of the sightlines in the universe rarely intersect any galactic halo at low impact parame- ter ((cid:46) 50 kpc). In this work, we test whether the lower than average DMcosmic is consistent with this paradigm, i.e. if there are indeed no foreground galactic halos in close proximity to it. We also outline a framework to estimate, based on photometry alone, the halo contri- bution to DMFRB: DMhalos. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | This paper is organized as follows: we describe the data collected in section 2, our methods in estimat- ing DMhalosin section 3, our results in section 4 and make concluding remarks in section 5. We assume a ΛCDM cosmology with the cosmological parameters de- rived from the 2015 Planck dataset (Planck Collabora- tion et al. 2016) for all our calculations. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | FRB sightline either and so our analysis is blind to halos of that mass scale. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | To remove stars from the photometric catalog, we used the morphology-based classifier flag class star r from the DES DR1 database. Extended objects like galaxies have flag values closer to zero while point sources tend to lie closer to unity. We excluded objects whose r- band magnitudes were less than 17 and the flag value was above 0.9. To further exclude stars, we cross matched the remaining DES objects with stars hav- ing measured parallaxes (parallax over error> 1) in the main GAIA DR3 catalog (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, 2020). The DES (and WISE) magnitudes obtained are the elliptical aperture magnitude based on the Kron radius (i.e. the auto mag columns in the main DES DR1 catalog; see Table 1). |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | For the galaxies at 0.001 < z < 0.05 along the sight- line, we turned to the 2MASS survey database (Huchra et al. 2012) for spectroscopic data. This catalog con- tains galaxy spectra of 83% of the southern sky and is complete to J < 13.75 with median redshift z = 0.053. We determined that the galaxy in this catalog with the smallest perpendicular distance to the FRB sightline was 1.04 Mpc (15.2(cid:48) angular distance) away, which is far beyond the typical virial radii of galaxy halos. We also found no galaxy within 500 kpc in NearGalCat, the updated nearby galaxy catalog of 869 galaxies within 11 Mpc of the Milky Way which is estimated to be ∼ 40% complete (Karachentsev et al. 2013). Thus, we conclude the z < 0.03 intervening galaxy halo contribution to DMFRB is negligible if not null. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | We also obtained spectra of 5 galaxies using the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrograph (LRIS) installed on the Keck telescope on November 8 2020 in the longslit spectroscopy mode. These galaxies were targeted as our analysis indicated they could contribute to DMFRB(see Section 3.2). We used the “d560” dichroic, 600/4000 grism on the blue side and 600/7500 grating for the red side with 2×2 binning on both detectors. Three of these spectra were exposed for ∼ 700 s while the other two were exposed for ∼ 300 s. We could not expose longer on account of bad weather. Of the 5 galaxies, one was confidently assigned a redshift using MARZ and it was determined to be a foreground source (z = 0.07221; 169 kpc away). We did not detect identifiable emission lines in the remaining 4 low S/N spectra. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | We aim at estimating the DM contribution of galax- ies that only have photometric redshifts, for which we require several intermediate derived quantities to then compute DMphot,halos, the DM contribution of galaxies without spectroscopic redshifts in our sample. Namely, we require photometric redshifts, zphot, and halo mass estimates, Mhalo, for every galaxy. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 1. Left: MUSE white light image of the 1(cid:48) × 1(cid:48) field around the host galaxy of FRB 180924. The circled objects are the two foreground galaxies and the blue dots are background sources identified using MARZ. The blue stars mark the stars in the field. The redshifts of the unmarked sources in the image could not be identified due to their spectra either being noisy or not having a clear correlation with any of the default MARZ template spectra. The white bar at the bottom represents 50 kpc at zhost. Right: The spectra of sources 1 and 2. Both galaxies show clear Hα, Hβ and [O III] doublet emission lines which help pinning their redshifts to the values noted above the spectra. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | a COADD OBJECT ID from DES DR1 Main. Ellipses imply objects are not present in the DES database. bAngular separation from the FRB. c Angular separation converted to projected distance from the FRB sightline. dHost galaxy. e LRIS spectrum. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | scribed by Bruzual & Charlot (2003), the Chabrier (2003) initial mass function (IMF), dust attenuation models from Calzetti (2001), and dust emission tem- plates from Dale et al. (2014), where the AGN fraction was capped at 20%. This provided an estimate of the stellar mass, M∗, of the galaxy at a given z. We then translate M∗ to galactic halo mass, Mhalo, using the mean Stellar to Halo Mass Ratio (SHMR) described by Moster et al. (2013) at that z. For sources with spec- troscopic redshifts, the galaxy redshift is fixed in the CIGALE input. We elaborate on the use of zphot poste- riors for the remaining sources in the next subsection. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | in Equation 2 of Moster et al. (2013) with 8 parame- ters. We took the best fit parameters and uncertainties from their Table 1 as the mean and standard deviations of the independent normal distributions that these pa- rameters were sampled from. For simplicity, we ignored any co-variance in these fit parameters (future work will account for this). We then produced a uniform 2D grid of redshift (between 0.03 and 0.35 spaced by 0.01) and log M∗/M(cid:12) (between 6 and 11 spaced by 0.005). At each grid point, we sampled the parameter distributions and produced a lookup table of the mean and standard deviations of halo masses that can be realized. Then, to quicken computation, we constructed interpolation func- tions that mapped the 2D grid to the mean and stan- dard deviation of log Mhalo/M(cid:12). Figure 2 shows the mean and standard deviations for some representative redshift and stellar mass values. The halo mass distri- butions were assumed to be Gaussian with the moments given by these interpolation functions. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 2. Mhalo stellar to halo mass ratio (SHMR) mean and standard deviation obtained from sampling the fit parameter space from Moster et al. (2013). The SHMR relation (their eq. 2) contains 8 fit parameters and in this work, we have assumed they are independent and normally distributed. The mean and standard error of these fit parameters were obtained from their Table 1. Using these curves, interpolation functions are constructed to translate (M∗,z) pairs to Mhalo distributions. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Finally, using the DMphot,galaxy distributions for all galaxies in the sightline, we produced the distribution of their sum, i.e. DMphot,halos. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 3. A schematic flowchart of our procedure to estimate DMphot,halos. The boxes in the centre with blue arrows emanating from them represent independent inputs into the calculation. These include the stellar mass estimates, the SHMR and the halo gas model. The zphot PDF is also an independent input and an example for one galaxy is shown on the plot on the top right. The sources of these estimates are mentioned in red lettering. The PDF of DMphot,halos is obtained in stages. First, the PDF of stellar masses at each redshift (sampled from the EAZY zphot posterior) is obtained. Then each stellar mass and redshift tuple is translated to halo mass distributions using the Moster et al. (2013) SHMR relation. Compiling all the halo mass and redshift tuples and calculating their DM contribution (using the method outlined in Prochaska & Zheng 2019; Simha et al. 2020), yields a PDF of DM values for each individual galaxy in our sample. An example of this is shown in the bottom right plot for the same galaxy as the zphot PDF plot. The final PDF of DMphot,halos is estimated by sampling the galaxy DM PDFs and obtaining the distribution of the sum of these samples. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 4a shows the average DMphot,galaxy contributed by each of the foreground sources estimated using this method. We excluded all sources for which we have spectroscopic redshifts from MUSE or LRIS. There were ∼ 11000 DES galaxies in our catalog. We had expected correctly that a large fraction of these sources do not contribute to DMhalos. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 4. (a) Locations of DES galaxies (excluding those with MUSE and LRIS redshifts) coloured by their average estimates of DMphot,galaxy. Both the colors and the sizes of the points are proportional to the mean DMphot,galaxy. The background image in blue is the DES r-band image of the field. The objects that fall within the MUSE field of view (black, dashed rectangle) do not have spectroscopic redshifts as their spectra did not have identifiable spectral features. (b) A realization of the PDF of DMphot,halos estimated by producing 106 realizations of the sum of DMphot,galaxy for all non-spectroscopic galaxies. The histogram counts are normalized to add up to unity. The large spike at 0 pc cm−3 is indicative of the possibility of most of these galaxies being in the background according to their zphot posteriors. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Based on these results, we targeted the 5 sources with highest mean DMphot,galaxy using Keck/LRIS (§ 2.2 and we detected line emission from one (z = 0.07221) of them, thus solidifying its redshift (listed in the last row of Table 2). |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 4b shows a realization of the final PDF of DMphot,halos estimated from the 422 galaxies that have a non-zero probability of contributing to the FRB DM. Its mean value is 13 pc cm−3 and the 68% confidence bounds are 4 and 23 pc cm−3. The spike at 0 pc cm−3 arises from the fact that most galaxies have their red- shift posterior distributions peaking beyond the FRB redshift, i.e. the majority of these are likely to have zero contribution to DMFRB. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | the mean DMhalos estimate, which is the sum of the estimates from the two disjoint samples is 21 pc cm−3 and the 68% confidence limits are 9 pc cm−3 and 32 pc cm−3. The full distribution is shown in Figure 5. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | For FRB 190608, Simha et al. (2020) estimated DMhalos to be between 7 pc cm−3 and 28 pc cm−3. This corresponded to between 2% and 8% of the net DM and between 5% and 20% of DMcosmic. In the case of FRB 190608, the theoretical average value, (cid:104)DMhalos(cid:105) at zhost is 44 pc cm−3, a few times larger than the esti- mated DMhalosin that sightline. This expectation value is computed assuming ΛCDM cosmological parameters from Planck Collaboration et al. (2016), a model for the gas density in halos (the same as we have used pre- viously), and the Aemulus halo mass function (HMF; McClintock et al. 2019). The HMF is integrated be- tween 1010.3 M(cid:12) and 1016 M(cid:12). |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 5. The distribution of DMhalos estimated using the full sample of foreground galaxies i.e. including galaxies with spectro- scopic redshifts from MUSE and LRIS. The galaxies with spectra add 7.1 pc cm−3 to DMhalos on average, thus shifting the mean value from 13.34 pc cm−3 in Figure 4b to 21.44 pc cm−3. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | estimated in the previous section is just DMhalos 21 pc cm−3 assuming the same CGM model. Thus, DMhalos is conclusively lower than average for this sight- line, much like FRB 190608. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 6 shows, with a solid blue line, the sum of our DMhalos estimate and (cid:104)DMIGM(cid:105),the aver- age DM contribution of the diffuse IGM. We define (cid:104)DMIGM(cid:105) as (cid:104)DMhalos(cid:105), as computed above, subtracted the mean Macquart relation from (cid:104)DMcosmic(cid:105), ((cid:104)DMIGM(cid:105) ≡ (cid:104)DMcosmic(cid:105) − (cid:104)DMhalos(cid:105)). Comparing it to the DMcosmic,FRB estimate (shown as a red point with errors) we see that the two independently com- puted estimates are indeed consistent. Favored models of the cosmic web indicate that most FRB sightlines in the universe will have few if not zero dark matter ha- los intersecting them proximally (e.g. Macquart et al. if one were to connect the median values of 2020).i.e. the DMcosmic distributions at each redshift, the result- ing curve, which can be called the median Macquart relation, lies below the mean curve and is shown as the dotted, black line. Indeed, DMcosmic,FRB is coincident with this median curve. We therefore conclude that FRB 180924 is one such sightline. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Figure 6. An estimate of DMcosmic for the FRB 180924 sight- line (blue, solid line) which is a sum of DMhalos from this anal- ysis and the average diffuse IGM contribution, (cid:104)DMIGM(cid:105). Start- ing from z = 0, DMhalos increases as one encounters halos along the sightline and the value at zhost is the one estimated in Fig- ure 5. (cid:104)DMIGM(cid:105) increases similarly as more matter is met on average going out towards the FRB. The blue, shaded region cor- responds to the 68% confidence interval obtained from the uncer- tainty in DMhalos. The red point at 220 pc cm−3 is an estimate of DMcosmic,FRB obtained by subtracting the Milky Way and host galaxy contributions from the net DM. The error bar is the net uncertainty in this estimate and corresponds to 50 % uncertainty in each of the subtracted quantities, added in quadrature. The black, solid line is (cid:104)DMcosmic(cid:105) described by the Macquart relation and the gray shaded region represent its scatter (1σ limits) due to the filamentary nature of the cosmic web. The black dotted line is the locus of all the median values of DMcosmic obtained from the same distribution (Macquart et al. 2020). |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | scopic follow up observations. Having full spectroscopic coverage of the field is undeniably better as the photo- z analysis can misidentify background sources as being in the foreground and vice-versa. In the near future, we intend to obtain spectra of field galaxies within a few degrees of FRB 180924 and perform a full cosmic web analysis, including a direct accounting of the dif- fuse IGM DM contribution. With upcoming large-scale spectroscopic surveys such as DESI, more FRB fields will have galaxies with precise redshifts and a statistical analysis of multiple FRB fields to constrain cosmic web properties such as the fraction of cosmic baryons will be enabled. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | tional Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy. ASKAP uses the resources of the Pawsey Supercomput- ing Centre. Establishment of ASKAP, the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory and the Pawsey Super- computing Centre are initiatives of the Australian Gov- ernment, with support from the Government of West- ern Australia and the Science and Industry Endowment Fund. We acknowledge the Wajarri Yamatji as the traditional owners of the Murchison Radio-astronomy Observatory site. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Based on observations collected at the European Southern Observatory under ESO programmes 2102.A- 5005 and 0104.A-0411. Spectra were also obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among Caltech, the University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Ad- ministration (NASA). The Keck Observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. The authors recognize and acknowl- edge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the in- digenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain. |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | Software: EsoReflex (Freudling et al. 2013), CubEx- tractor(Cantalupo etal.2019),SEP(Barbary2016;Bertin & Arnouts 1996), MARZ (Hinton et al. 2016), HMFEm- ulator (McClintock et al. 2019), EAZY, (Brammer et al. 2008), CIGALE (Noll et al. 2009), Astropy (Price-Whelan et al. 2018), Numpy (Oliphant 2006), Scipy (Virtanen et al. 2020), Matplotlib (Hunter 2007). |
Processed_Estimating_the_contribution_of_foreground_halos_to.txt | The Python scripts used to perform our anal- ysis are available in our FRB GitHub repository (https://github.com/FRBs/FRB). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | ABSTRACT We present stellar parameters and abundances of 11 elements (Li, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Zn) of 13 F6-K2 main-sequence stars in the young groups AB Doradus, Carina Near, and Ursa Major. The exoplanet-host star ι Horologii is also analysed. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The three young associations have lithium abundance consistent with their age. All other elements show solar abundances. The three groups are characterised by a small scatter in all abundances, with mean [Fe/H] values of 0.10 (σ = 0.03), 0.08 (σ = 0.05), and 0.01 (σ = 0.03) dex for AB Doradus, Carina Near, and Ursa Major, respectively. The distribution of elemental abundances appears congruent with the chemical pattern of the Galactic thin disc in the solar vicinity, as found for other young groups. This means that the metallicity distribution of nearby young stars, targets of direct-imaging planet-search surveys, is different from that of old, field solar-type stars, i.e. the typical targets of radial velocity surveys. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The young planet-host star ι Horologii shows a lithium abundance lower than that found for the young association members. It is found to have a slightly super-solar iron abundance ([Fe/H]=0.16±0.09), while all [X/Fe] ratios are similar to the solar values. Its elemental abundances are close to those of the Hyades cluster derived from the literature, which seems to reinforce the idea of a possible common origin with the primordial cluster. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | tionary history, but also for the exo-planetary research. On one side, elemental abundances of α-elements (but also iron- peak elements) in young associations can provide evidence of recent local enrichment; on the other side, since planets are assumed to form from circumstellar discs during the pre- main sequence phase, obvious questions arise on what the metallicity of young solar analogs and what fraction of them (if any) is metal-rich (see, e.g., Biazzo et al. 2011a, and ref- erences therein). Yet, so far, only a few studies have been focused on the determination of elemental abundances in such stellar groups (see Section 2). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | solar iron content (e.g., Fischer & Valenti 2005; Sousa et al. 2011). Such a trend seems to have a primordial/basic ori- gin (Gilli et al. 2006), but presents several caveats. First, giant stars hosting planets do not appear on average more metal-rich than stars without planets (Pasquini et al. 2007), and this could hint that stellar mass strongly influences the planet formation process (Santos et al. 2012). Second, the trend is no longer valid for iron abundances ranging from [Fe/H]=−0.7 to [Fe/H]=−0.3 dex (Haywood 2009). Third, the nature of such a trend in the early stages of planet for- mation is still unknown. Regarding the latter point, the dis- persal efficiency of circumstellar (or proto-planetary) discs, the planet birthplace, is predicted to depend on metallic- ity (Ercolano & Clarke 2010). In a recent study, Yasui et al. (2010) have found that the disc fraction in significantly low- metallicity clusters ([O/H]∼ −0.7) declines much faster (in < 1 Myr) than observed in solar-metallicity clusters (i.e. in ∼ 5 − 7 Myr). They suggest that, as the shorter disc life- time reduces the time available for planet formation, this could be one of the reasons for the strong planet-metallicity connection. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | In this paper, we investigate the abundances of 11 elements (lithium, iron-peak, α, and other odd-/even- Z elements) in 13 F6–K2 main-sequence stars belonging to the young associations AB Doradus, Carina Near, and Ursa Major. The case of ι Horologii (a young exoplanet- host star) is also investigated. Some of these associa- tions were already studied in terms of some elemen- tal abundances by several authors (e.g., Desidera et al. 2006b; Paulson & Yelda 2006; Viana Almeida et al. 2009; Ammler-von Eiff & Guenther 2009), but no effort has been done to widely characterise their chemical content. Recently, in a companion paper, we have reported the s-process ele- ment (yttrium, zirconium, lanthanum, cerium, and barium) abundance determination of the same targets in our sam- ple (with the only exception of HIP 36414), with the aim to investigate possible over-abundances (D’Orazi et al. 2012). We have found that while Y, Zr, La, and Ce exhibit solar ratios, Ba is over-abundance by ∼0.2 dex; we have hence ex- ploited effects related to the stratification in temperature of model atmospheres, NLTE corrections, and chromospheric- related effects as possible explanations for this scenario. Thus, the study of D’Orazi et al. (2012) and the present complementary work represent the first efforts done to sys- tematically derive many elemental abundances in young as- sociations. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | A brief overview of previous investigations in the se- lected young associations is given in the following of this Section. Section 2 presents the selection of the stellar sam- ple and observations. Abundance analysis techniques are de- scribed in Section 3, while the results are presented in Sec- tion 4 and discussed in Section 5. Summary and conclusions are given in Section 6. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | a dozen F–M type members ∼ 20 pc from Earth that in- cludes the ultra-rapid rotator, active binary star AB Dor. Luhman et al. (2005) argued that the AB Dor association is a remnant of the large-scale star formation event that formed the Pleiades, and estimated an age of 75–150 Myr (this older age was also confirmed by Messina et al. 2010). The common origin of the AB Dor and the Pleiades associ- ations has been later reinforced by Ortega et al. (2007). Re- cently, Torres et al. (2008) presented the 89 high-probable members of AB Dor, of which 29 are binaries, and derived a distance of 34 ± 26 pc and an age of 70 Myr. More re- cently, Zuckerman et al. (2011) and Schlieder et al. (2012) found other likely members of the AB Dor group, which in- clude early-type stars, an M dwarf triple system, and three very cool objects. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The Carina Near by Zuckerman et al. (2006) as a group of about 20 co-moving 200±50 Myr old stars, where all but three are plausible members of multiple stellar systems. The nucleus, at ∼30 pc from Earth, seems to be farther than the surrounding stream stars, and is located in the southern hemisphere and coincidentally quite close to the nucleus of the AB Dor group, notwithstanding that the two groups have different ages and Galactic space motions (Zuckerman et al. 2004, 2006). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The Ursa Major (hereafter, UMa) association in the Big Dipper constellation is located at a distance of ∼25 pc. It includes ∼ 50 most probable members placed across almost the whole northern sky that move toward a common conver- gent point. The age estimates range widely from 200 Myr to 600 Myr (see Ammler-von Eiff & Guenther 2009, and refer- ences therein). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The young exoplanet-host star ι Horologii (K¨urster et al. 2000) has been studied by many authors during the last decade, in particular for the implications on theories of stel- lar and planetary formation and possible relationship with metallicity. It belongs to the Hyades stream (Vauclair et al. 2008), which is composed by field-like stars (85%) and stars evaporated from the primordial Hyades cluster (15%). Re- cent asteroseismic studies suggest that ι Hor was formed within the primordial ∼ 600 Myr-old Hyades cluster and then evaporated toward its present location, 40 pc away (see Vauclair et al. 2008, and references therein). The same stud- ies show that the metallicity, helium abundance, and age are similar to those of the Hyades cluster. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | a [1]: Montes et al. (2001); [2]: Zuckerman et al. (2004); [3]: Desidera et al. (2006a); [4]: Torres et al. (2006); [5]: Zuckerman et al. (2006); [6]: van Leeuwen (2007); [7]: White et al. (2007); [8]: Torres et al. (2008); [9]: Guillout et al. (2009); [10]: da Silva et al. (2009); [11]: Tokovinin (2011); [12]: Anderson et al. (2012). ∗, ∗∗ Hipparcos parallaxes of visual binaries have often large errors. Physical association between the components is confirmed by common proper motions and radial velocities. ∗∗∗ HIP 58240B=HIP 58241 have a possible close companion (Tokovinin 2011) that is too faint to contribute significantly to the optical spectrum and affect our abundance analysis. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Five stars belong to AB Doradus. Two of them (namely, HIP 114530 and TYC 9493-838-1) were also analysed by Viana Almeida et al. (2009) within the SACY project, in terms of iron, silicon, and nickel abundances. Thus, they can be used as comparison targets. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Five stars in the Carina Near group. Three stars (namely, HIP 36414, HIP 37198, and HD 37923), with radial velocities in the range ∼ 17 − 28 km s−1, belong to the clus- ter nucleus, while HIP 58240 and HIP 58241 are probable “stream” members with a radial velocity of ∼6 km s−1. Re- cently, Desidera et al. (2006b) estimated the iron abundance of HD 37923 and HD 37918. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Two stars in the Ursa Major group, namely γ Lep A (HIP 27072) and γ Lep B (HD 38392). Only their iron abundance has been recently measured by Paulson & Yelda (2006) and Ram´ırez et al. (2007). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | For our analysis we exploited stellar spectra obtained with FEROS (Kaufer et al. 1999) at the ESO/MPG 2.2m telescope. Five spectra were acquired as part of the program aimed at the spectroscopic characterisation of targets for the SPHERE1@ESO GTO survey (Mouillet et al. 2010); the spectra of HIP 27072 (γ Lep A) and HD 38392 (γ Lep B) were taken from Desidera et al. (2006a), while the remaining spectra were retrieved from the ESO Science Archive2. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The data reduction was performed using a modified ver- sion of the FEROS-DRS pipeline (running under the ESO- MIDAS context FEROS) through the following reduction steps: bias subtraction and bad-column masking; definition of the ´echelle orders on flat-field frames; subtraction of the background diffuse light; order extraction; order-by-order flat-fielding; determination of wavelength-dispersion solu- tion by means of ThAr calibration lamp exposures; order- by-order normalisation; re-binning to a linear wavelength- scale with barycentric correction; merging of the ´echelle or- ders. In the end, the final signal-to-noise (S/N ) ratio of the wavelength-calibrated, merged, normalised spectra is in the range 80–250. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The FEROS spectra cover the range 3600–9200 ˚A at the resolution R = 48 000. This wide spectral range allowed us to select 125+11 Fe i+Fe ii lines, as well as spectral features of α, iron-peak, and other elements (see Sect. 3). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Lithium equivalent widths (EWs) were measured by di- rect integration or by deblending the observed line pro- files using the IRAF task splot. Then, lithium abundances, log n(Li), were derived by interpolating the curves-of-growth of Soderblom et al. (1993) at the stellar Teff and log g deter- mined spectroscopically as described in Section 3.4. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Elemental abundances of Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Ti, Cr, Fe, Ni, and Zn were derived from the measurements of line EWs (see Section 3.3) using the 2010 version of MOOG (Sneden 1973) and assuming local thermodynamic equilib- rium (LTE). Radiative and Stark broadenings are treated in a standard way in MOOG (Barklem & O’Mara 1997), while for collisional broadening we used the Uns¨old (1955) approximation. Kurucz (1993) grids of plane-parallel model atmospheres were used. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Our analysis was performed differentially with respect to the Sun. We analysed a solar (sky) spectrum acquired with FEROS, using our line list and the solar parame- log g = 4.44, ξ = 1.1 km s−1; ters (Teff = 5770 K, see Randich et al. 2006; Biazzo et al. 2011a), and obtained log n(Fe i)⊙=7.50±0.05 and log n(Fe ii)⊙=7.50±0.06. With the aforementioned solar parameters, log n(Fe i)⊙ vs. EW and χ did not show any significant trends, implying that the assumed effective temperature and microturbulence represent quite well the corresponding real solar values. The results for all the elements are reported in Table 2 together with those given by Grevesse et al. (1996) and Asplund et al. (2009). The latter values were obtained using 3D models. Our determinations are in good agreement with those from the literature (Table 2). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Table 2. Comparison between solar abundances we derived using Kurucz (1993) model atmospheres and the standard values from Grevesse et al. (1996) and Asplund et al. (2009). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | list having a dispersion larger than a factor of two the rms were excluded. Abundances of other elements were derived using the same criteria. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Initial effective temperatures Teff were set to the values ob- tained from the spectral types listed in Table 1 by applying the Kenyon & Hartmann (1995) calibrations. Then, final ef- fective temperatures were determined by imposing the con- dition that the abundance from Fe i lines does not depend on the excitation potential of the lines. These temperatures are reported in Table 4 and represent the values adopted for the abundance analysis. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | To infer the micro-turbulence velocity ξ, we first as- sumed 1.5 km s−1 as initial value, and then imposed that the abundance from Fe i lines was independent on line EWs. Fi- nal values of ξ are listed in Table 4. As also found by Padgett (1996) and James et al. (2006), the derived microturbulence is higher than the values for main sequence dwarfs of similar temperature. As stressed by Santos et al. (2008), the cause for this behavior is still unclear, but it may be related to chromospheric activity (Steenbock & Holweger 1981). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | We estimated the surface gravity log g by imposing the Fe i/Fe ii ionisation equilibrium. The initial value was set to log g = 4.4 (e.g., almost the solar value). Final values of log g are listed in Table 4. For comparison, we have computed the stellar surface gravity using the following relationship: log g = log g⊙ + log(M/M⊙) + 4 log(Teff /T ⊙ eff ) − log(L/L⊙), where a solar gravity of 4.44 dex, a solar effective temper- ature of 5770 K, a solar bolometric magnitude of 4.64 mag (Cox 2000), and a relation L/L⊙ = (M/M⊙)3.5 between stellar luminosity and mass were adopted. We have verified that our final values (listed in Table 4, third column) are in good agreement (within 0.1 dex) with those derived through parallax measurements. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | and the projected rotational velocity of the star. The high- resolution, and high S/N of the spectra used in the present analysis allowed us to measure lithium EWs in a very ac- curate way. Uncertainties in the lithium abundance derived through curves-of-growth are assessed by varying the input parameters, i.e. the EWs, effective temperatures, and surface gravities within their error bars. Considering the typical un- certainties of ±5 m˚A in lithium EWs, of ±60 K in Teff , and of 0.1 dex in log g (see below), the resulting total error in log n(Li) amounts typically to less than ∼ 0.10 dex. Mor- ever, in three stars (namely, HIP 82688, TYC 5155-1500-1, and HIP 27072), the Li i λ6707.8 m˚A line is blended with the Fe i λ6707.4 m˚A line, leading to an overestimation of the lithium EWs. Taking advantage of the empirical correction to the lithium line reported by Soderblom et al. (1993), we estimated 0.02 − 0.06 dex (i.e. 1 − 2%) as the uncertainty in the lithium abundance due to the iron contribution; this contribution is negligible when compared to the other error sources. |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Elemental abundances of all other elements are affected by random (internal; i.) and systematic (external; ii.) er- rors. i. Sources of internal errors include uncertainties in atomic and stellar parameters, and measured EWs. Uncer- tainties in atomic parameters, such as the transition proba- bility (log gf ), should cancel out, since our analysis is car- ried out differentially with respect to the Sun. Errors due to uncertainties in stellar parameters (Teff , ξ, log g) were esti- mated first by assessing errors in stellar parameters them- selves and then by varying each parameter separately, while keeping the other two unchanged. We found that variations in Teff larger than 60 K would introduce spurious trends in log n(Fe) versus the excitation potential (χ), while varia- tions in ξ larger than 0.1 km s−1 would result in significant trends of log n(Fe) versus EW, and variations in log g larger than 0.1 dex would lead to differences between log n(Fe i) and log n(Fe ii) larger than 0.05 dex. The above values were thus assumed as uncertainties in stellar parameters. Errors in abundances (both [Fe/H] and [X/Fe]) due to uncertain- ties in stellar parameters are summarised in Table 3 for the coolest (HD 38392) and one of the warmest (HIP 27072) stars in our sample. As for the errors due to uncertainties in EWs, our spectra are characterised by different S/N ra- tios. As a consequence, random errors in EW are well rep- resented by the standard deviation around the mean abun- dance determined from all the lines. These errors are listed in Table 4, where uncertainties in [X/Fe] were obtained by quadratically adding the [Fe/H] error and the [X/H] error. When only one line was measured, the error in [X/H] is the standard deviation of three independent EW measurements. The number of lines employed for the abundance analysis is listed in Table 4 in parentheses. ii. External or systematic errors, originated for instance by the code and/or the model atmospheres, should not influence largely our final abun- dance measurements (see Biazzo et al. 2011a, and references therein). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | Figure 1. Lithium abundance versus effective temperature for all our sample. Typical errors in Teff and log n(Li) are over- plotted on the bottom-right corner of the panel. The dotted line at log n(Li) = 3.31 marks the meteoritic abundance of lithium. The two solid lines represent the lower and upper limits for the Pleiades stars, while dash-dotted and dashed lines indicate the upper limits for the UMa and Hyades groups, respectively, as adopted by Zickgraf et al. (2005; see also references therein). |
Processed_Elemental_abundances_of_low-mass_stars_in_nearby_y.txt | The members of the Ursa Major and Carina Near groups lie between the lower and upper envelopes of the Pleiades stars, as also found by Zuckerman et al. (2006), and close to the UMa upper envelope, with the exception of HD 38392 which is slightly below the UMa envelope at cooler temperatures. The similarity between our UMa and Carina Near sample in the log n(Li) − Teff diagram could be an in- dication of similar ages among the clusters. On the other hand, the AB Dor members show mean lithium abundance of ∼ 3.2 dex, without evidence of decreasing trend with tem- perature. Their position is close to the Pleiades upper en- velope, confirming their younger age when compared to the other associations. Finally, ι Hor shows log n(Li) = 2.56 dex, confirming the older age of the star as compared with the other clusters (see Section 1.4). Its log n(Li) value is slightly below the Hyades upper envelope and close to the Pleiades lower envelope at its effective temperature. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.