Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	We have derived detailed R band luminosity proﬁles and structural parameters for a total of 430 brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs), down to a limiting surface brightness of 24.5 magarcsec−2. Light proﬁles were initially ﬁtted with a S´ersic’s R1/n model, but we found that 205 (∼ 48%) BCGs require a double component model to accurately match their light proﬁles. The best ﬁt for these 205 galaxies is an inner S´ersic model, with indices n ∼ 1 − 7, plus an outer exponential component.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Thus, we establish the existence of two categories of the BCGs luminosity proﬁles: single and double component proﬁles. We found that double proﬁle BCGs are brighter (∼ 0.2 mag) than single proﬁle BCG. In fact, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test applied to these subsamples indicates that they have diﬀerent total magnitude distributions, with mean values MR = −23.8 ± 0.6 mag for single proﬁle BCGs and MR = −24.0 ± 0.5 mag for double proﬁle BCGs. We ﬁnd that partial luminosities for both subsamples are indistinguishable up to r = 15 kpc, while for r > 20 kpc the luminosities we obtain are on average 0.2 mag brighter for double proﬁle BCGs. This result indicates that extra-light for double proﬁle BCGs does not come from the inner region but from the outer regions of these galaxies.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	On the other hand, we did not ﬁnd diﬀerences between these two BCGs categories when we compared global cluster properties such as the BCG-projected position relative to the cluster X-ray center emission, X-ray luminosity, or BCG orientation with respect to the cluster position angle.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	els show how BCGs are formed through complex hierarchical merging of many small galaxies and originate within the densest dark matter halos of primordial density ﬂuctuations. BCGs reside only in overdense regions of the Universe such as galaxy clusters and groups where merging occurs at a high rate over cosmic time (de Lucia & Blaizot 2007). It is precisely the accretion of numerous stellar systems that give the BCGs their apparently ho- mogenous properties. For instance, their total lu- minosities are relatively constant and can be used as standard candles (Lauer & Postman 1992).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	For several decades the luminosity proﬁles of elliptical galaxies were modeled with the empir- ical R1/4 de Vaucouleurs law (de Vaucouleurs 1948). However Lugger (1984) and Schombert (1986) showed that most elliptical galaxies have a ﬂux excess at large radii with respect to the R1/4 model. Schombert (1987) modelled the BCG light proﬁles with a power law rather than the de Vau- couleurs law underscoring the diﬀerent nature of BCGs and standard elliptical galaxies.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	A model used virtually by every author in re- cent years to ﬁt the light proﬁles of a wide range of stellar systems is the generalization of the de Vaucouleurs law introduced by S´ersic (1963, 1968). The S´ersic model in the form R1/n is a mixture of bulge and disk components using only three free parameters (µe, re, and ns) instead of four (µe, re, µ0, and r0) (see Section 3 and the comprehensive review of Graham and Driver 2005).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	laxation of stars whose parent galaxies participate in the merger is responsible for the creation of an outer component while a central starburst gives rise to the inner component.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	We use a homogeneous and uniquely large sam- ple of ground-based imaging of Abell clusters to carefully examine the luminosity proﬁles of 430 BCGs and determine the best ﬁtting function and structural parameters. This is key to properly con- strain dynamical models and the merging history of these galaxies.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the observations and reductions, while in Section 3 we describe data processing. Light proﬁle ﬁtting procedure and structural parameters are discussed in Section 4, while in Section 5 we discuss the results and in Section 6 we summarize the conclusions.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	BCG images used in this work were provided by M. Postman (STScI) who kindly gave us access to the raw data. They were obtained under photo- metric conditions using the KPNO 2.1 m and 4 m telescopes, and the CTIO 1.5 m telescope between 1989 November and 1995 April over a total of 13 observing runs (see Table 1). Five of these runs are described in more detail in Postman & Lauer (1995). Brieﬂy, all the images were acquired in the Kron-Cousins Rc band and have typically expo- sure times of 200-600 s. During these runs seeing conditions were very good to fair, namely, FWHM = 1”-2”, and nights were photometric. In order to ﬂat ﬁeld the images a series of dome ﬂats were obtained each night. This allowed for ﬂatﬁelding with a typical accuracy better than 0.5% of the sky level. Photometric calibration was obtained by observing 10-15 Landolt (1983) standard stars per night. This also enabled us to calculate extinction coeﬃcients and to check the zero point on each night of the observing runs. The overall photometric accuracy was better than 0.02 mag, much smaller than the typical errors of the BCG photometric parameters, which are more sensitive to background subtraction, and ﬁt- ting models.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	these BCGs were actually observed in ﬁve or more runs. This not only allowed us to verify and com- pare reductions for all observing runs, but also to improve the accuracy of the luminosity proﬁles as discussed in the next section. The rms scatter for the integrated magnitudes of the galaxies is 0.03 mag, while for the luminosity proﬁles at µR = 22.5 mag arcsec−2 is 0.11 mag arcsec−2.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	All images were processed following the stan- dard recipes: bias and ﬂat ﬁeld corrections using IRAF routines. After this process we carefully in- spect the images in order to determine the best method to subtract the sky background. Gaug- ing the sky is a crucial step since sky subtrac- tion has a signiﬁcant inﬂuence on the faint end of the luminosity proﬁles and therefore on the struc- tural parameters we derive. In most cases a two- dimensional ﬁrst-degree polynomial was suﬃcient to give an accurate ﬁt to the sky, and we used the residuals distribution to estimate the uncer- tainty of the sky level σsky. The importance of sky cleaning is summarized in detail in Coenda et al. (2005).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Similar tests were made to measure the ef- fect of seeing on the luminosity proﬁles. The eﬀects of seeing dictate that the minimum ra- dius for a suitable ﬁt to the luminosity proﬁle is r = 1.5×FWHM, this is particularly true for large galaxies, i.e., apparent radius greater than ∼ 12×FWHM (Coenda et al. 2005). We show in detail in the next section that BCG galaxies were relatively bright and extended and in most cases the apparent radius of the galaxy was greater than 20′′.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	ordinates, ellipticity, and position angle of the isophotes), and construct a model BCG galaxy that is subtracted from the original image. The residual image is then used to extract the luminos- ity proﬁle of the overlapping galaxies. The process is repeated several times until the proﬁle of the target galaxy converges.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Isophote ﬁtting was performed down to a count level of 2σsky; i.e., the ﬁtting procedure was stopped when the isophote level was around twice the background dispersion (pixel-to-pixel variance), which in our case corresponds to sur- face magnitudes between µR ∼ 23.5 - 24.5 mag arcsec−2, depending on the observational run when the cluster was observed.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	For each cluster, we usually obtain the lumi- nosity proﬁles for the three brightest galaxies in the ﬁeld. This preliminary selection is made by eye. In those cases where the selection is not ob- vious, we also obtain additional luminosity pro- ﬁles, i.e., for the ﬁve brightest galaxies. The ﬁnal BCG selection is made through the galaxy met- ric luminosity, that is the luminosity enclosed in a radius of 14.5 kpc, we also included galaxy red- shift to ensure cluster membership. Redshift data were obtained from the NASA/IPAC Extragalac- tic Database (NED).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	In this equation Ie is the intensity at r = re the radius that encloses half of the total luminosity (also known as the eﬀective radius or half-light radius). In this context bn can be calculated using bn ∼ 2n − 0.33 (Caon et al. 1993).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	did this in order to avoid the regions at the faint end of the luminosity proﬁles, in which errors are large. Moreover, we have also excluded the in- ner 3”-4” of the luminosity proﬁles to avoid the blurring eﬀects of seeing (see the test described in Coenda et al. 2005).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Errors on the structural parameters were calcu- lated following the method described by Coenda et al. (2005). Brieﬂy, this technique consists of creating test images with model galaxies that have known luminosity proﬁle parameters. Then we ar- tiﬁcially add and subtract to those images a con- stant value corresponding to σsky. Finally we ex- tract and reﬁt the new luminosity proﬁle as ex- plained above. These newly obtained parameters give us the respective upper and lower limits.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	To a ﬁrst approximation a single S´ersic model provides a good ﬁt to the light proﬁle of our sample of BCGs, as shown by Graham et al. (1996). How- ever, for almost half of the sample we noticed that a single S´ersic function fails to properly reproduce the BCGs surface brightness in the range ∼ 22.0 mag arcsec−2. Note that this case is very simi- lar to that presented in La Barbera et al. (2008, their Figure 18). It is evident that the S´ersic func- tion do not properly ﬁt the luminosity proﬁles of these elliptical galaxies in the inner 4′′, where the residuals are almost ∼ 0.3 mag arcsec−2.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	It is not necessary to have very deep luminos- ity proﬁles, as in the case of Seigar et al. (2007), to realize that for certain galaxies, even in regions of bright surface luminosity, a single S´ersic model cannot account for the concave shape of the lumi- nosity proﬁle.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	In this equation I0 is the central intensity and r0 is the length scale. The inclusion of this equation in the ﬁtting function does not necessarily means that the galaxy has a disk component in the usual sense of rotation-supported stellar system.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	are then converted into absolute magnitudes. Throughout this paper we assume a Hubble con- stant H0 = 70 km s−1 M pc−1 together with ΩM = 0.27 and ΩΛ = 0.73.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Table 2 lists the photometric parameters ob- tained through the ﬁtting procedure described in Section 3 for all BCGs of the sample. Columns 1- 6 list the Abell BCG name, S´ersic parameters µe, re, n, exponential parameters µ0 and r0. Columns 7-10 give absolute magnitude of the S´ersic compo- nent, absolute magnitude of the exponential com- ponent, total absolute magnitude of the BCG and S´ersic to exponential component light ratio. Col- umn 11 contains the logarithmic slope of the met- ric luminosity or α parameter which is deﬁned as α = d(Log(Lm))/d(log(rm)), where Lm is the to- tal BCG luminosity within a circular aperture of radius rm centered on the BCG nucleus. Following Postman & Lauer (1995) we have calculated this parameter at r = 14.5 kpc. Columns 12-15 list the inner ellipticity (measured at 10′′), outer ellipticity (measured at ∼ 23 − 24 mag arcsec−2), and inner and outer position angles of the isophotes where the ellipticities are measured. Position angles are from north to east and the typical observed errors are ∼ 5o, while typical errors for ellipticities are 0.06. Finally, column 16 lists the metric absolute magnitude also calculated at r = 14.5 kpc.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	ellipticities. We calculated an average outer ellip- ticity e = 0.32 ± 0.09, which is slightly higher than the average found for double proﬁle BCGs (see the next section).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	In general terms we have also noticed that the inner components of the double proﬁle BCGs have eﬀective radii re ∼ 1 − 10 kpc and S´ersic indices n ∼ 1 − 6, being the averages re = 5 ± 4 kpc and n = 3.7 ± 1.5 respectively. This values are quite similar to those reported by Gonzalez et al. (2003) in their preliminary paper for a sample of 31 BCGs. However, these authors use a diﬀerent approach to ﬁt the luminosity proﬁles. They use two S´ersic functions instead our S´ersic + exponen- tial approach.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	The slope of the KR obtained for all BCGs is aBCG = 3.13 ± 0.05 which is similar to the value obtained by Oegerle & Hoesel (1991) for a sample of 43 BCGs (i.e., aBCG = 3.12 ± 0.14).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Diﬀerent slopes suggest that the formation timescale of the single proﬁle BCGs could dif- fer from their double proﬁle counterpart (von der Linden et al. 2007).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	It is interesting to note that these values are cal- culated integrating the galaxy luminosity proﬁles If we consider a ﬁnite radius in- up to inﬁnity. stead, total luminosities will change and therefore both re and µe will also change. We then have also calculated the KR for both subsamples consider- ing diﬀerent galaxy radii (r = 100, 200, 300 kpc). We observed that the slope of the KR ﬂattens for smaller radii and tends to a similar value for both subsamples (a ∼ 2.6 at r = 100 kpc). This ef- fect could easily explain the diﬀerences found in the size-luminosity relation between von der Lin- den et al. (2007) and (2007) and Lauer et al. Bernardi et al. (2007). von der Linden (2007) de- ﬁnes the re by integrating luminosity proﬁles up to the µ = 23 mag arcsec−2 isophote, while Lauer et al. (2007) and Bernardi et al. (2007) integrate the luminosity proﬁles up to inﬁnity.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	We also ﬁnd that single proﬁle BCGs show a median total absolute magnitude MT,single = −23.8 ± 0.7, while double proﬁle BCGs have MT,double = −24.0 ± 0.5. The Kolmogorov- Smirnov (K-S) test applied to these data indi- cates that the MT distributions for single proﬁle and double proﬁle BCGs are statistically diﬀer- ent at 99.4% conﬁdence level. Figure 4 shows the total absolute magnitude distributions for single and double proﬁle BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	be seen in Figure 5 where we plot the absolute in- tegrated magnitude versus the radius of the circu- lar diaphragm expressed in kpc. The vertical line indicates r = 14.5 kpc where metric luminosity and alpha parameter are calculated. Average in- tegrated luminosities beyond 20 kpc are ∼ 0.2 mag brighter for double proﬁle BCGs. We have applied the K-S test to both subsamples and results indi- cate that they do not statistically diﬀer for r = 5, 10, and 14.5 kpc, while for larger radii the inte- grated luminosity distribution are truly diﬀerent at the 99 % conﬁdence level. We highlight that r = 20 kpc is close to value for which the S´ersic component equals the exponential component (see the case for A0690 in Figure 2). From the data tabulated in Table 2, it is straightforward to com- pute the radius where ISersic = Iexp for each of the double proﬁle BCGs. Averaging these values we ﬁnd < r >= 13 ± 5 kpc at < µ >= 22.5 ± 0.7 mag arcsec−2. In other words, this result corrob- orates that the extra-light observed in double pro- ﬁle BCGs originates in the intermediate regions of the galaxies and not in the inner regions. The same conclusion can also be derived from Figure 6 where we plotted the total sum of the luminos- ity proﬁles corresponding to the single and double proﬁle BCGs. Prior to the sum, individual pro- ﬁles are normalized to their eﬀective radii. Note that the extra-light of the double proﬁle BCGs be- comes apparent in the region 1 < r/re <5, which roughly correspond to ∼ 15 − 75 kpc.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	K-S test applied to these data indicates that the el- lipticity distributions for single and double proﬁle BCGs are statistically diﬀerent at a 98.3% conﬁ- dence level. Similar results are obtained for the inner minus outer ellipticity of these subsamples. We obtain an average < ∆edouble >= 0.15 ± 0.10 for the double proﬁle BCGs, while for single pro- ﬁle BCGs we have < ∆esingle >= 0.10 ± 0.09. Again, the K-S test indicates diﬀerent distribu- tions at 99.9% conﬁdence level. The logarith- mic slope of the metric luminosity (calculated at r = 14.5 kpc) α is also higher in double proﬁle BCGs (< αdouble >= 0.65 ± 0.12) than in single proﬁle BCGs (< αsingle >= 0.59 ± 0.14). Figure 9 presents the distributions of α for single and dou- ble proﬁle BCGs respectively. A K-S test applied to these data establishes that the distributions are statistically diﬀerent at a 99.9% conﬁdence level. The presence of isophote twisting was also ex- plored. We calculated the outer minus inner posi- tion angle of the isophotes for those galaxies with ellipticities greater than 0.15 since position angle errors associated with rounder isophotes are large. We found similar values for both single and double proﬁle BCGs (< ∆pa >= 8o ± 9o).
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	By combining a large set of hydrodynamical simulations spanning a broad range of luminosity proﬁles of various masses, Hopkins et al. (2009) show an alternative way to separate luminosity proﬁles into an inner starburst component and outer pre-starburst component for ”cusp” ellipti- cals which are formed via gas-rich mergers. These authors show that dissipational mergers give rise to two-component luminosity proﬁles which can be accounted by an exponential function (inner component) plus a S´ersic model (outer compo- nent). The exponential function accounts for the extra-light that was formed in a compact central starburst and makes the inner light proﬁle of the galaxy deviate from a single S´ersic in the galaxy core. The outer component was formed by vio- lent relaxation of the stars already present in the precursor galaxies.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	BCG A0690 in Figure 10. The agreement between model and measurements is excellent and the Hop- kins model properly accounts for the luminosity proﬁle. We also compared the rms and χ2 values with those obtained with our original S´ersic + ex- ponential model and we ﬁnd that both models are equally good. In other words, our approach and the Hopkins model are, from a mathematical point of view, equivalent.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	The results of ﬁtting exponential + S´ersic mod- els to our double proﬁle galaxies are summarized in Table 3, which lists the same 10 parameters as in Table 2. In this case S´ersic parameters µe, re and n correspond to the outer component, while the exponential µ0 and r0 parameters correspond to the inner component. Obtained χ2 values indi- cate that this ﬁt proved to be equally good as the inner S´ersic + outer exponential form. However, for some galaxies we inexorably obtained unrealis- tic (≥ 300 kpc) eﬀective radius using the Hopkins model, this is not the case for the S´ersic + expo- nential approach. Given that our results suggest that the extra-light comes from the intermediate regions (see also the next section), we believe that the S´ersic + exponential proﬁle ﬁtting is the ap- propriate selection for the BCGs analized in the present work.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Around ∼ 20% of giant elliptical galaxies have extensive, low-luminosity envelopes. These galax- ies are known as D type, and those with the largest envelopes are denominated cD galaxies (Mackie, 1992). The envelopes, which are seen as deviations from the de Vaucouleurs proﬁle, are quite faint, occur below 24 mag arcsec−2 in the V band, and they extend well beyond 100 kpc in projected size. Thus, only few giant ellipticals have conﬁrmed en- velopes.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	these 24 galaxies are double proﬁle BCGs, while 5 (21%) are single proﬁle BCGs. Note that three galaxies (A151, A1767, and A2589) from those ﬁve single proﬁle BCGs, have re > 100 kpc, and n > 6. These parameters are very close (see Sec- tion 4) to the limit (re > 300 kpc, n > 8) where it is necessary to include an additional exponential proﬁle to obtain a reasonable ﬁt. On the other hand, one must also note that a visual classiﬁca- tion as cD, does not necessarily imply the presence of an envelope. Schombert (1986), and Seigar et al. (2007) cataloged A496, A505, A1691, A2029, A2052, A2107, A2197, and A2666, as cDs without envelopes. For all those galaxies, except A2197, our surface proﬁle modeling is consistent with just one component.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	These results strongly suggest that the extra- light found in double component BCGs at interme- diate radii is related to the faint envelope. More- over, they indicate that this component is not only conﬁned to the outskirt of the parent galaxy. Galaxy halos generally considered an outer com- ponent in galaxy structure appear to originate in the inner regions of BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	mostly interacting galaxies with two or three near companions, while the ﬁve single proﬁle BCGs with unkown classiﬁcation appear to us as normal ellipticals.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	We have scrutinized the infrared emission of a subsample of our BCGs using data from Quillen et al. (2008). They report on an imaging survey with the SpitzerSpaceT elescope of 62 BCGs with op- tical line emission. We have 12 BCGs in common with Quillen et al. (2008), 6 having single compo- nent luminosity proﬁles and 6 having double com- ponent luminosity proﬁles. Analysis of the 24-8 µm ﬂux ratios shows that only one (17%) of single proﬁle BCG (A2052) have infrared excess, while for double proﬁle BCGs this number increases to 4 (67%). Infrared excess is a star formation signa- ture. In fact, O’Dea et al. (2010) in their study of seven BCGs using HubbleSpaceT elescope(HST ) ultra-violet and Spitzer infrared data found that all these galaxies have extended UV continuum and L − α emission as well as an infrared excess. Based on their ﬁndings O’Dea et al. (2010) con- ﬁrm that the BCGs they study are actively form- ing stars. Moreover, they suggest that the IR ex- cess is indeed associated with star formation and they also conﬁrm that the FUV continuum emis- sion extends over a region ∼ 7-28 kpc. Although these results are only for a few BCGs in our sam- ple, they suggest that the ”extra-light” observed in the double proﬁle BCGs indicates active star for- mation in the intermediate regions of these galax- ies.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	In this section we compare BCGs properties to those of the host cluster such as cluster X-ray lu- minosity, the projected distance of the BCG with respect to the center of the X-ray emission and the BCG position angle with respect to that of the cluster. We have used data taken from Ledlow et al. (2003) to determine the oﬀset in kpc between the X-ray peak and the optical position of the BCG. X-ray cluster luminosities were taken from Sadat et al. (2004) data, while the position angle of the clusters are obtained from Plionis (1994), Rhee & Katgert (1987), and Binggeli (1982). In this case we have only selected those clusters with ellipticities > 0.15, since for smaller ellipticities position angles have large errors.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Single and double proﬁle BCGs have similar ori- entations relative to the whole cluster and X-ray luminosity distributions. We did not observe any diﬀerence between the single proﬁle and double proﬁle BCG samples with respect to the cluster position angle and X-ray cluster luminosity. How- (2008) report that brighter ever, Bildfell et al. BCGs are located closer to the X-ray peak emis- sion. In our case, considering that on average dou- ble proﬁle BCGs are brighter than single proﬁle BCGs we should observe larger oﬀsets in single proﬁle BCGs. Nevertheless, we ﬁnd no signiﬁcant diﬀerences between single proﬁle and double pro- ﬁle BCGs oﬀsets with respect to the X-ray center emission of the cluster. Moreover, we do not ﬁnd any correlation between the total absolute mag- nitude and X-ray oﬀset. Figure 11 shows that there is no obvious trend between the total ab- solute magnitude of both single proﬁle and double proﬁle BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	We have established the existence of two sub- populations of BCGs based on their luminosity proﬁles. We analyze a uniquely large sample of 430 BCGs and ﬁnd that 48% of these galaxies have a light proﬁle that deviates from the stan- dard single S´ersic model. The luminosity proﬁles of these galaxies are in fact better described by a double component model consisting of an in- ner S´ersic proﬁle and an outer exponential com- ponent. The necessity of an outer exponential component conveys the presence of extra-light at intermediate radii corresponding to surface mag- nitudes ∼ 22magarcsec−2. We have found strong evidence from a subsample of 24 BCGs that extra- light is closely related to the presence of a faint envelope. Similarly, from other subsample of 12 BGCs we also found evidence that links extra-light and star formation.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	of the deviation from the S´ersic law of the light proﬁle in the inner regions of galaxies i.e. cusps and evacuated cores (Ferrarese et al. 2006). How- ever, HST detectors do not provide the ﬁeld of view necessary to truthfully derive the structural parameters of galaxies with a light proﬁle that de- viates from a single S´ersic law at large radii.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	We are thankful to M. Postman (STScI) for giving us access to the data used in this study. We also wish to thank the anonymous referee for his useful comments which helped to clarify and strengthen this paper. This research has made use of the NASA Astrophysics Data System Bib- liographic services (ADS) and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California In- stitute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This work has been partially supported with grants from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıﬁcas y T´ecnicas de la Rep´ublica Argentina (CONICET), Secretar´ıa de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa de la Universidad de C´ordoba and Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnolog´ıa de C´ordoba, Argentina.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 1.— BCG A0690 luminosity proﬁle with the single S´ersic ﬁtting. Upper scale is in arcsec.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 2.— Inner S´ersic (short dashed line) + outer exponential (long dashed line) ﬁtting model for A0690 luminosity proﬁle.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 3.— Kormedy relation for sample galaxies. Black dots represent single proﬁle BCGs, while red dots represent double proﬁle BCGs. Best ﬁts for both subsamples are also shown.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 4.— Total magnitude distributions for single (black line) and double proﬁle (red line) BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 5.— Integrated absolute magnitudes vs. di- aphragm radius in kpc. The vertical line indicates where alpha parameter and metric magnitudes are calculated.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 6.— Luminosity proﬁles obtained using the stacking technique for all single and double proﬁle BCGs. Prior to the stacking the individual proﬁles were normalized at the eﬀective radius.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 7.— Outer ellipticity distributions for single (black line) and double proﬁle (red line) BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 8.— Outer minus inner ellipticity distribu- tions for single (black line) and double proﬁle (red line) BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 9.— α parameter distributions for single (black line) and double proﬁle (red line) BCGs.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Fig. 10.— Exp + S´ersic model ﬁt for A0690 lu- minosity proﬁle. Outer S´ersic (short dashed line) and inner exponential (long dashed lined) can be observed.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Note.—Col. (1), Abell Cluster; col (2), eﬀective surface magnitude; col. (3), eﬀective radius (kpc); col. (4), n parameter; col. (5), central surface magnitude; col. (6), scale length (kpc); col. (7),Sersic absolute magnitude; col. (8), exponential absolute magnitude; col. (9), total absolute magnitude; col. (10), S´ersic/exponential ratio; col. (11), α parameter; col. (12), inner ellipticity; col. (13), outer ellipticity; col. (14), inner position angle ; col. (15), outer position angle; col. (16), Metric absolute magnitude.
Processed_The_Luminosity_Profiles_of_Brightest_Cluster_Galax.txt	Note.—Col. (1), Abell Cluster; col (2), eﬀective surface magnitude; col. (3), eﬀective radius (kpc); col. (4), n parameter; col. (5), central surface magnitude; col. (6), scale length (kpc); col. (7),Sersic absolute magnitude; col. (8), exponential absolute magnitude; col. (9), total absolute magnitude; col. (10), exponential/S´ersic ratio.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	Abstract: The aim of our study is to investigate the possibility of habitable moons orbiting the giant planet HD 23079b, a Jupiter-mass planet, which follows a low-eccentricity orbit in the outer region of HD 23079’s habitable zone. We show that HD 23079b is able to host habitable moons in prograde and retrograde orbits, as expected, noting that the outer stability limit for retrograde orbits is increased by nearly 90% compared to that of prograde orbits, a result consistent with previous generalized studies. For the targeted parameter space it was found that the outer stability limit for habitable moons varies between 0.05236 and 0.06955 AU (prograde orbits) and between 0.1023 and 0.1190 AU (retrograde orbits) depending on the orbital parameters of the Jupiter-type planet if a minimum mass is assumed. These intervals correspond to 0.306 and 0.345 (prograde orbits) and 0.583 and 0.611 (retrograde orbits) of the planet’s Hill radius. Larger stability limits are obtained if an increased value for the planetary mass mp is considered; they are consistent with the theoretically deduced relationship of m1/3 . Finally, we compare our results to the statistical formulae of Domingos et al. (2006), indicating both concurrence and limitations.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	The existence of planets in orbit about solar-type stars is now a well-established observational result. Obvi- ously, the ultimate quest of this type of study is to discover Earth-type planets and moons located in the habitable zones (HZs) of their host stars. Despite a lack of discoveries, the existence of Earth-mass planets, including those hosted by solar-type stars, is strongly implied by various observational ﬁndings including the occurrence and mass distribution of close-in super- Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters (Howard et al. 2010). Measurements by Howard et al. (2010) indicate an in- creasing planet occurrence with decreasing planetary mass mp akin to m−0.48 , implying that 23% of stars harbor a close-in Earth-mass planet (ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 M⊕); see also Marcy & Butler (2000) for earlier results. More recent results were given by Wittenmyer et al. (2011); they indicate based on the analysis of 67 solar-type stars that nearly 20% of stars are expected to host planets with a minimum mass of less than 10 M⊕.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	ate orbital parameters of possible moons, and ar- gued that the moons need to be large enough (i.e., > 0.12 M⊕) to retain a substantial and long-lived atmosphere and would also need to possess a signif- icant magnetic ﬁeld to be continuously habitable. The work by Kipping et al. (2009); Kaltenegger (2010); Weidner & Horne (2010) focused on the properties and detectability of moons of transiting planets, particu- larly those which can be detected as part of the Kepler mission. Kipping et al. (2009) pointed out that HZ exomoons down to 0.2 M⊕ may be detected and ap- proximately 25000 stars could be surveyed for HZ exo- moons with Kepler’s ﬁeld of view. Kaltenegger (2010) conveyed that transmission spectroscopy of moons de- tected as part of the Kepler mission has a unique po- tential to screen them for habitability in the near fu- ture. In addition, Weidner & Horne (2010) explored the limits on the orbits and masses of moons around currently known transiting exoplanets, particularly those discovered by the COROT mission. Recently, Kipping et al. (2013) showed seven possible candidates for transiting exomoons using observations from the Kepler mission.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	cussion about the potential existence of exomoons and exo-Trojans (see below) is conveyed by the authors. Another interesting study about gaseous planets about solar-type stars permitting the principal possibility of habitable exomoons was given by Robertson et al. (2012). Heller & Barnes (2013) provide a thorough analysis of exomoon habitability constrained by stellar illumination and tidal heating.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	Moon formation scenarios based on a Solar System- like nebula have shown that a mass scaling ratio, which is ∼ 10−4, exists preventing gaseous planets using core- accretion to gain enough material for forming Earth- mass moons (Canup & Ward 2006). However, this has not dissuaded the possibility of gaseous planets from acquiring large Earth-mass moons. Previous stud- ies have indicated that there can be large stability zones for irregular or captured satellites. In the So- lar System, Kuiper belt objects (see, e.g., Luu et al. 1997) have demonstrated retrograde motion result- ing from formation scenarios with proper conditions (Schlichting & Sari 2008). Moreover, many irregular moons have been discovered where collisions have ac- creted to substantial sizes (Nesvorn´y et al. 2003). Cur- rently, the Hunt for Exomoons with Kepler (HEK) (Kipping et al. 2012) has utilized the hypothesis of ac- quiring Earth-mass exomoons via capture which would most likely be identiﬁed as orbiting in retrograde.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	Long-term orbital stability in stellar HZs is a necessary condition for the evolution of any form of Examples of previous stability of hy- pothetical Earth-mass planets in stellar HZs in- clude the work by Gehman et al. (1996), Noble et al. (2002), Menou & Tabachnik (2003), Cuntz et al. (2003), Asghari et al. (2004), Jones et al. (2005, 2006); Jones & Sleep (2010), Kopparapu & Barnes (2010) and Eberle et al. (2011). These studies explore the dynamics of multi-body systems noting that many ex- trasolar planetary systems contain more than one ex- trasolar giant planet (EGP), which is of pivotal impor- tance for the orbital stability of possible Earth-mass object(s) in those systems.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	For example, in the HD 23079 system, a Jupiter- mass planet is found to orbit the star in the HZ, therefore jeopardizing the existence of habitable ter- restrial planets. This system has previously been stud- ied by Dvorak et al. (2004), Schwarz et al. (2007), and Eberle et al. (2011). The study of HD 23079 is of particular interest because (1) the mass and spectral type of the center star is fairly similar to the Sun, (2) the Jupiter-mass planet is found to orbit the star in a nearly circular orbit, and (3) any exomoon of that planet, if such a moon exists, would therefore exhibit a relatively stable climate.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	and L5 in speciﬁc systems, including HD 23079, and obtained relationships between the size of the stability regions and the orbital parameters of the giant plan- ets, particularly its eccentricity. Schwarz et al. (2007) thereafter identiﬁed numerous exoplanetary systems that can harbor Trojan planets in stable orbits. All these systems also provide the opportunity for host- ing exomoons around Jupiter-type planets, including exomoons located in stellar HZs. Updated results for HD 23079 given by Eberle et al. (2011) showed that this system is also well suited for the existence of hab- itable Earth-type Trojans, especially if a generalized stellar HZ is assumed, which in the Solar System corre- sponds to 0.95 to 1.67 AU from the Sun (Kasting et al. 1993); see Sect. 2.2 for details.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	A more recent example of a system with the poten- tial of hosting both exomoons and exo-Trojans in the “habitability phase space” is HD 38283 as described by Tinney et al. (2011). This system is known to possess an EGP around its host star largely or entirely located in the stellar HZ considering that HD 38283b’s orbit is highly eccentric (i.e., ep ≃ 0.41), a notable diﬀerence to HD 23079b considered in the present study. Exomoons and exo-Trojans as companions of gas-giant exoplanets in 0.5–2 AU orbits (somewhat depending on the stellar spectral type) thus oﬀer the possibility of providing cir- cumstellar habitability. Exomoons and/or exo-Trojans may be able to form in-situ or be captured; regard- ing the latter, examples include the outer satellites of Jupiter and Saturn (e.g., Jewitt & Haghighipour 2007).
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	In the present study, we focus on the system of HD 23079 with a concentration on the principal possi- bility of habitable exomoons. Our paper is structured as follows. First, we discuss the stellar and planetary parameters of the HD 23079 system. Next, we com- ment on the circumstellar habitability of HD 23079. Thereafter, we present our results and discussion, in- cluding a detailed statistical analysis of the exomoon orbital stability limits as well as a comparison of our results with the formulae of Domingos et al. (2006). Finally, we convey our summary and conclusions.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	perature and radius are given as Teﬀ = 6030 ± 52 K and R = 1.106 ± 0.022 R⊙, respectively (Ribas et al. 2003). Thus, HD 23079 is fairly similar to the Sun, though slightly hotter and slightly more massive. The detected planet (HD 23079b) has a minimum mass of mp sin i = 2.45 ± 0.21 MJ . Furthermore, it has a semi- major axis of ap = 1.596±0.093 AU and an eccentricity of ep = 0.102 ± 0.031 (Butler et al. 2006), correspond- ing to an orbital period of P = 730.6 ± 5.7 days. The original results by Tinney et al. (2002) indicated very similar planetary parameters.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	The orbital parameters of HD 23079b are relatively similar to those of Mars, implying that HD 23079b is orbiting its host star in or near the outskirts of the stellar HZ; see discussion below. The existence of HD 23079b, a planet about two and a half times more massive than Jupiter, makes it diﬃcult for a terres- trial planet to orbit HD 23079 at a similar distance without being heavily aﬀected by the giant planet; see results from previous case studies by Noble et al. (2002) and Yeager et al. (2011) who focused on the dynamics of HD 20782, HD 188015, and HD 210277, which are systems of similar dynamical settings. Con- cerning HD 23079, previous investigations pertaining to habitable terrestrial Trojan planets were given by Dvorak et al. (2004) and Eberle et al. (2011).
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	The extent of the HZ of HD 23079 can be calculated following the formalism by Underwood et al. (2003) based on the work by Kasting et al. (1993), while also adopting an appropriate correction for the solar eﬀec- tive temperature used in the deﬁnition of solar lumi- nosity, L⊙. Underwood et al. (2003) supplied a poly- nomial ﬁt that allows to compute the extent of the con- servative and the generalized HZ based on prescribed values of the stellar luminosity and the stellar eﬀec- tive temperature (see Table 2). Noting that HD 23079 is considerably more luminous than the Sun, it is ex- pected that its HZ is more extended than the solar HZ, for which the inner and outer limit of the generalized HZ were obtained as 0.84 and 1.67 AU, respectively (Kasting et al. 1993).
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	The generalized HZ is deﬁned as bordered by the runaway greenhouse eﬀect (inner limit), where water vapor enhances the greenhouse eﬀect thus leading to runaway surface warming, and by the maximum green- house eﬀect (outer limit), where a surface temperature of 273 K can still be maintained by a cloud-free CO2 atmosphere. The inner limit of the conservative HZ is deﬁned by the onset of water loss, i.e., the atmosphere is warm enough to allow for a wet stratosphere from where water is gradually lost by photodissociation and subsequent hydrogen loss to space. Furthermore, the outer limit of the conservative HZ is deﬁned by the ﬁrst CO2 condensation attained by the onset of formation of CO2 clouds at a temperature of 273 K.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	employed in our numerical planetary studies1. The underlying deﬁnition of habitability is based on the as- sumption that liquid surface water is a prerequisite for life, a key concept that is also the basis of ongoing and future searches for extrasolar habitable planets (e.g., Catanzarite et al. 2006; Cockell et al. 2009). The nu- merical evaluation of these limits is based on an Earth- type planet with a CO2/H2O/N2 atmosphere; see work by Kasting et al. (1993) and subsequent studies.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	We point out that concerning the outer edge of hab- itability, even less conservative limits have been pro- posed in the meantime (e.g., Forget & Pierrehumbert 1997; Mischna et al. 2000). They are based on the assumption of relatively thick planetary CO2 atmo- spheres and invoke strong backwarming that may fur- ther be enhanced by the presence of CO2 crystals and clouds. However, as these limits, which can be as large as 2.4 AU in case of the Sun, depend on distinct prop- erties of the planetary atmosphere, they are not rele- vant for our study. Nevertheless, we convey this type of limit for the sake of curiosity (see Fig. 1), noting that it has properly been adjusted to 2.75 AU in consideration of the radiative conditions of the planetary host star, HD 23079. Moreover, the signiﬁcance of this extreme limit has meanwhile been challenged based on detailed radiative transfer simulations (Halevy et al. 2009).
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	A more thorough investigation of exoplanet and ex- omoon habitability points to the consideration of ad- ditional factors that might inﬂuence the facilitation of an habitable environment. Detailed reviews by, e.g., Lammer et al. (2009) and Horner & Jones (2010) in- dicate the importance of magnetic ﬁelds and plate tec- tonics as well as the prospects for the object of be- ing hydrated as potentially decisive. Exomoons of HD 23079b are expected to be in a fortunate situation from that point of view as one would expect that tidal eﬀects of the EGP on the moon might result in a hot in- terior, and hence make plate tectonics and a magnetic ﬁeld more likely. Moreover, if the giant planet had mi- grated in from beyond the snow line (e.g., Armitage 2007), it could help hydrate the moon.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	As part of our evaluation of habitability around HD 23079, we explored whether or not the orbit of HD 23079b is indeed fully located in the HZ of HD 23079. Thus, we calculated the limits of the gen- eralized HZ by also considering the uncertainties in the stellar luminosity and eﬀective temperature while employing the formalism by Underwood et al. (2003) based on second-order polynomials. The stellar lu- minosity and eﬀective temperature were assumed as 1.45±0.08 L⊙ and 6030±52 K, respectively. Therefore, the outer limit of the generalized HZ, denoted as HZ-o (gen.), see Table 2, is obtained as 1.966 ± 0.054 AU.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	the values for the periastron and apastron are identi- ﬁed as 1.432±0.094 AU and 1.758±0.113, respectively (see Table 2). Our analysis shows that the orbit of the EGP is almost certainly completely positioned in HD 23079’s HZ; the probability for HD 23079b’s orbit to be partially outside the generalized HZ is only 5%. It should be also noted that following the study by Williams & Pollard (2002) brief excursions from the stellar HZ do not necessarily nullify planetary habit- ability because the latter is expected to mainly depend on the average stellar ﬂux received over an entire orbit.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	For our simulations of the HD 23079 system, we con- sider both the observed giant planet HD 23079b and an object of one Earth-mass, i.e., 3.005 × 10−6 M⊙, which based on our choice of initial conditions is ex- pected to constitute a moon in regard to the giant planet. Consequently, we execute a grid of model sim- ulations by considering diﬀerent starting conditions for the moon candidate. The method of integration as- sumes a fourth-order Runge-Kutta integration scheme (Garcia 2000) and an eighth-order Gragg-Bulirsch- Stoer (GBS) integration scheme (Grazier et al. 1996). The code has been extensively tested against known analytical solutions, including the two-body and re- stricted three-body problem (see Noble et al. 2002; Cuntz et al. 2007; Eberle et al. 2008, for detailed re- sults).
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	We limit our computations to a simulation time of 106 yrs and apply a time-step of 10−4 yrs for the in- tegration scheme; the latter is found to be fully ap- propriate. In conjunction with previous investigations of habitable Trojan planets in the HD 23079 system (Eberle et al. 2011), we pursued test simulations com- paring the planetary orbits based on three diﬀerent integration time-steps, which were: 10−3, 10−4 and 10−5 yrs. In particular, we evaluated ∆Rij , i.e., the magnitude of the diﬀerence between the position of the planet when diﬀerent step sizes of 10−i and 10−j were used. We found no discernible diﬀerences in the outcome between models with time-steps of 10−4 and 10−5 yrs, thus justifying the usage of 10−4 as time-step for this type of simulations.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	to 1.689 AU in increments of 0.0465 and from 0.071 to 0.133 in increments of 0.0155, respectively. For the EGP, we assume its minimum mass value of 2.45 MJ as default. However, for models with ap = 1.596 AU and ep = 0.102, the mass of the EGP is increased by factors of 1.5 and 2.0.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	In our model simulations we consider both prograde and retrograde orbits of the moon candidate. In the selected coordinate system the giant planet orbits the star in a counter-clockwise sense, which means that for prograde orbits, the moon orbits the giant planet in a counter-clockwise sense as well. Hence, for retrograde orbits, the moon orbits the giant planet in a clockwise sense. The overwhelming majority of our simulations assumes a minimum mass for the giant planet; these models will be the focus of the following methodology. The identiﬁcation of model-dependent orbital stabil- ity limits for the moon requires a large number of simu- lations since the stability limits (i.e., maximum radii of possible orbits) can only be determined through trial- and-error. As the selected approach, both for prograde and retrograde orbits, a two-step process is adopted. First, we consider a preliminary 3 × 3 grid for the tar- geted array of values for the semimajor axis ap and eccentricity ep of the EGP; for ap, they are given as 1.503, 1.596, and 1.689 AU, whereas for ep, they are given as 0.071, 0.102, and 0.133.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	For each grid value, a simulation time of 5 × 104 yrs is used to obtain estimates for the stability limit of each (ap, ep) combination. For each prograde model, we perform a total of 201 simulations, based on in- tervals for the moon’s starting distance with 0.0520 and 0.0720 AU as lower and upper limits, respectively. Thus, the simulations are advanced in increments of 1 × 10−4 AU regarding the moons starting distance. For each retrograde model, we simulate a total of 201 initial conditions as well; here the limits of the intervals for the moon’s starting distance are given as 0.1050 and 0.1250 AU. This approach amounts to a total of nearly 3600 simulations for the prograde and retrograde mod- els combined.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	To reﬁne our search for orbital stability limits, a sec- ond step is implemented involving two aspects, which are: augmenting the preliminary coarse 3 × 3 grid to the full 5 × 5 grid, while also considering substantially longer simulation times for each model, i.e., target timespans of 106 years. For each (ap, ep) combination, these long-term simulations again utilize intervals for setting the moon’s starting distance. For each grid combination, we execute a total of 16 simulations cen- tered at the expected value for the model-dependent orbital stability limit.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	nomial ﬁtting assuming constant values for ap (i.e., 1.503, 1.596, and 1.689 AU). The polynomial ﬁtting process also assisted us in estimating where stability limits should occur for intermediate values of eccen- tricity (i.e., 0.0865 and 0.1175).
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	Our results are given in Tables 3, 4, and 5; for con- venience, the data of Table 3 and 4 are also depicted in Figs. 2 and 3. Based on the total number of simula- tions, it is found that, if the EGP is assumed to possess minimum mass, the stability limit for habitable moons varies between 0.05236 and 0.06955 AU (prograde or- bits) and 0.1023 and 0.1190 AU (retrograde orbits) de- pending on the orbital parameters of the giant planet. By keeping the EGP’s mass and the semimajor axis ﬁxed, expressions are encountered structurally similar to those of Holman & Wiegert (1999); however, with diﬀerent coeﬃcients naturally related to our particular study.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	Somewhat larger stability limits of the candidate moon are obtained if an increased value for the mass of the EGP is considered. Speciﬁcally, if the mass of the giant planet is increased by factors of 1.5 and 2.0, the stability limit for prograde orbits increases from 0.05712 to 0.06290 and 0.06940 AU, respectively. Fur- thermore, for retrograde orbits, the stability limit of habitable moons is found to increase from 0.1109 to 0.1291 and 0.1400 AU, respectively.
Processed_On_the_Possibility_of_Habitable_Moons_in_the_Syste.txt	Examples of orbital stability and instability of exo- 4 to moons around HD 23079b are given in Figs. 8. The orbital parameters of the giant planet con- sidered in these case studies are ap = 1.596 AU and ep = 0.102; additionally, the EGP is assumed to be of minimum mass. Figures 4 and 5 indicate that for pro- grade orbits short-term (≃ 104 years) stability — sub- sequently conﬁrmed to also constitute long-term sta- bility; see Sect. 3.2 — is found for a separation distance of 0.0574 AU, and instability is found for a separation distance of 0.0576 AU. The escape occurs after only 4442 years. Furthermore, as indicated in Figs. 6 and 7, short-term stability is found for retrograde orbits for a separation distance of 0.1112 AU, whereas instability is found for a separation distance of 0.1113 AU. Here the escape occurs after 3145 years. Figure 8 shows an example of a long-term (≃ 106 years) instability transition for an exomoon in a retrograde orbit. Here we chose two nearby starting positions, i.e., 0.1107 AU and 0.1111 AU, to determine if the choice of initial con- ditions in this region will largely determine the long- term stability.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	We studied star formation activities in the molecular clouds in the Large Magellanic Cloud. We have utilized the second catalog of 272 molecular clouds obtained by NANTEN to compare the cloud distribution with signatures of massive star formation including stellar clusters, and optical and radio HII regions. We ﬁnd that the molecular clouds are classiﬁed into three types according to the activities of massive star formation; Type I shows no signature of massive star formation, Type II is associated with relatively small HII region(s) and Type III with both HII region(s) and young stellar cluster(s). The radio continuum sources were used to conﬁrm that Type I GMCs do not host optically hidden HII regions. These signatures of massive star formation show a good spatial correlation with the molecular clouds in a sense they are located within ∼100 pc of the molecular clouds. Among possible ideas to explain the GMC Types, we favor that the Types indicate an evolutionary sequence; i.e., the youngest phase is Type I, followed by Type II and the last phase is Type III, where the most active star formation takes place leading to cloud dispersal. The number of the three types of GMCs should be proportional to the time scale of each evolutionary stage if a steady state of massive star and cluster formation is a good approximation. By adopting the time scale of the youngest stellar clusters, 10 Myrs, we roughly estimate the timescales of Types I, II and III to be 6 Myrs, 13 Myrs and 7 Myrs, respectively, corresponding to a lifetime of 20–30 Myrs for the GMCs with a mass above the completeness limit, 5 × 104M⊙.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	of astronomical objects with less contamination compared with the Galaxy. Studies of the LMC provide invaluable information on our understanding of the galaxies in various aspects, including the properties of the ISM, evolution of molecular clouds and star formation.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	The environments, such as metallicity, in the LMC are diﬀerent from those in the Galaxy (e.g., Z ∼ 1/2Z⊙, Dufour 1984 and taking into account the revision of the Solar abundance by Asplund et al. 2004). Star formation activities are also diﬀerent. Stellar clusters called “populous clusters”, which are self-gravitating like Galactic globular clusters, are found by photometric studies (e.g., Hodge 1961; van den Bergh 1981). Their masses are ∼ 104–105 M⊙, which are smaller than those of the Galactic globular clusters but larger than those of the Galactic open clusters by an order of magnitude (Kumai, Basu, & Fujimoto 1993; Hunter et al. 2003). It is notable that more than a hundred of the populous clusters are signiﬁcantly younger, i.e., a few to 100 Myr, than the Galactic globular clusters and some are still forming at present, such as R136 in 30 Dor nebula (e.g., Massey & Hunter 1998). This suggests that the formation process of globular-like rich clusters can be studied through the observations of the young clusters and ISM properties in the LMC. To date, optical indicators of the massive star formation or cluster formation, such as H ii regions and stellar clusters, have been studied in the large area of the LMC (e.g., Henize 1956; Davies et al. 1976, hereafter DEM; Kennicutt & Hodge 1986, hereafter KH; Bica et al. 1996). DEM identiﬁed 357 Hα emission nebulae, and KH measured the Hα ﬂux of 240 H ii regions. Regarding the stellar clusters, Bica et al. (1996) cataloged 624 clusters, and classiﬁed them into 8 types according to their colors.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	The ﬁrst complete map of the molecular gas in the LMC was obtained by Cohen et al. (1988) in 12CO (1-0) with the southern CfA 1.2 m telescope at CTIO. However, the survey was limited by the low spatial resolution, 8.′8 corresponding to 130 pc at the distance of the LMC. High-resolution CO observations of selected regions, especially toward well-known active star forming regions, for example, 30 Dor, N11, N159, by the SEST 15 m telescope have been performed in the LMC (e.g., Israel et al. 1986; Johansson et al. 1994; Caldwell & Kutner 1996; Kutner et al. 1997; Johansson et al. 1998; Israel et al. 2003). These observations revealed detailed structure and properties of the molecular gas of the individual star forming regions at a linear resolution of less than 10 pc, although they are limited in spatial coverage, about one square degree.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	Recently, Fukui et al. (2008, hereafter, “Paper I”) made a second survey of the molecular gas in the LMC by a 4m-telescope, NANTEN, at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile. This survey was carried out in 12CO (1-0) with resolution of 2 arcmin grid spacing with the half-power beam width of 2′.6 and covered ∼ 30 deg2 (Fukui et al. 2008). The resolution of the survey was high enough to resolve giant molecular clouds and enabled us to cover a large region eﬃciently. The molecular clouds with a completeness limit of 5 × 104M⊙ in mass are identiﬁed in nearly the entire region where the current massive star and cluster formation is on-going, and 272 molecular clouds are cataloged.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	In this paper, we present the results from comparisons of the GMCs identiﬁed by NANTEN (Paper I) with classical H II regions and optically identiﬁed stellar clusters and discuss cloud evolution. Recent surveys of the Magellanic Clouds by the IR satellites, like Spitzer (e.g., Meixner et al. 2006, ‘Surveying the Agents of a Galaxy’s Evolution’) and AKARI (e.g., Ita et al. 2008; Murakami et al. 2008) have been strong tools to identify younger, and lower mass YSOs (Whitney et al. 2008). The comparisons of these YSOs and the GMCs are found in elsewhere (Indebetouw et al. 2008; Onishi et al. 2009, in preparation).
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	A survey of the molecular clouds was carried out in 12CO (J=1–0) by NANTEN, a 4 m radio telescope of Nagoya University at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile (Paper I). The observed region is about 30 square degrees and covers the region where the CO emission was detected by the NANTEN ﬁrst survey (e.g., Fukui et al. 1999; Mizuno et al. 2001). The observed grid spacing was 2′, corresponding to ∼ 30 pc at a distance of the LMC, 50 kpc, with a 2.6′ half-power beam width at 115 GHz. The spectral intensities were calibrated by employing the standard room-temperature chopper wheel technique (Kutner & Ulich 1981). An absolute intensity calibration was made by observing Orion-KL [R.A. (B1950) = 5h32m47s. 0, Decl. (B1950) = −5◦24′21′′] by assuming its absolute temperature, T ∗ R, to be 65 K. The rms noise ﬂuctuations were about 0.07 K at a velocity resolution of 0.65 km s−1 with about 3 minutes integration for an on-position. The typical 3σ noise level of the velocity-integrated intensity was about 1.2 K km s−1 (Figure 1).
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	Fukui et al. (2008) identiﬁed 272 molecular clouds of which 230 are detected at more than two observing positions (hereafter, ”GMCs”, in this paper) by using cloud identifying algorithm, cprops (Rosolowsky & Leroy 2006). The radius and virial mass of the clouds range from 10 to 220 pc, and 9 × 103 to 9 × 106M⊙, respectively. The CO luminosity and virial mass of the GMCs show a good correlation, and a conversion factor, XCO, from a CO intensity to an H2 column density was derived to be (7 ±2) ×1020 cm−2 (K km s−1)−1 by assuming virial equilibrum. The sensitivity in N (H2), then, corresponds to N (H2) = 8 × 1020 cm−2 and the range of mass of the GMCs is 2 × 104M⊙ to 7 × 106M⊙, respectively. The details of the observations and the method to identify the GMCs are found in Paper I and Rosolowsky & Leroy (2006).
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	In order to identify the current massive star and cluster forming molecular clouds, H ii regions and young stellar clusters were searched for in the published catalogs. The association of these objects and the molecular clouds were determined.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	Henize (1956) and Davies et al. (1976) cataloged more than 300 Hα emission nebulae in the LMC. The estimated diameters of the HII regions range from ∼ 10 pc to ∼ 400 pc. In addition, an extensive Hα photometry of the 240 HII regions was carried out by Kennicutt & Hodge (1986). Figure 2 shows luminosity distribution of these HII regions, indicating that the current sample of HII regions includes those with Hα luminosities as faint as ∼ 1036 erg s−1 at the faint end. This shows that the sensitivity of the survey is high enough to detect the Orion nebula, ∼ 4 × 1036 erg s−1, (Gebel 1968) at the distance of the LMC. The Orion Nebula is ionized primarily by a single O7 star together with at least B0.5, B3 and B0.5 (O9.5) stars (Goudis 1982). This faint end of the luminosities is comparable to those of small Galactic HII regions that can be ionized by a single O9 star (e.g., Pagnia & Ranieri 1973). Detailed studies of several faint HII regions in the LMC show that most of the HII regions are ionized primarily by a star as massive as B0 accompanied by several other massive but cooler stars, except for two ionized by a single mid-O star and B0 star (Wilcots 1994). It is also suggested that the faint HII regions in the catalogs are ionized by a single O star and those luminous ones (L & 5 × 1037 erg s−1) are by OB associations (Kennicutt & Hodge 1986).
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	if there are any HII regions escaped from optical identiﬁcation due to the extinction by molecular clouds. The angular resolution of the data is 40′′, corresponding to ∼ 10 pc at a distance of the LMC. Thus one should keep in mind that a size of the HII regions of this study is larger than ∼ 10 pc.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	The LMC has more than 6500 stellar clusters and OB associations (Bica et al. 1999). Photometric properties of about 10 % of the brightest ones were measured to derive their masses and ages (Bica et al. 1996). In this paper, we use these clusters with known properties to study the formation of cluster and OB association in the molecular clouds. These 120 OB associations and 504 stellar clusters are classiﬁed into 10 types of diﬀerent ages (SWB0–VII) (Bica et al. 1996) from their U − B and B − V indices. In table 1, the numbers of these objects according to their ages in the area covered with the 2nd NANTEN survey are shown. We shall call these objects “clusters” throughout this paper and we should note that this includes both clusters and OB associations.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	than 10 Myr), and clusters older than 10 Myr together with the molecular clouds, respectively.
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt	Figure 3a shows that young clusters are often found at, or near the peak of the GMCs. Some of the young clusters associated with GMCs are forming groups with a few to ten clusters. These active cluster forming regions, like N 159, N 11, and N 44, are found especially toward bright HII regions. Note that a number of clusters in the northeastern region in the LMC and some in the west of 30 Dor are isolated from molecular clouds. These groups of clusters are located inside large cavities of Hα emission (see also Fig. 1), two of the supergiant shells, LMC 4 and LMC 3, respectively (Meaburn 1980).

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.