Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | guide). These panels confirm that the HII regions and young clusters are often associated with molecular clouds well, while the older clusters are distributed randomly. |
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | In the following, we report some individual active star forming regions in detail. In the N 11 (DEM 41) region, the young clusters are found in a bright, large complex of HII regions, while they are not exactly found toward the GMCs (Figure 5a). Only small clouds are found at the outer edge of N 11 nebulae with young clusters near the edge of the molecular clouds. The cluster at the center of N 11, LH 9, is neither associated with Hα emission peaks nor molecular clouds. This suggests that the parent cloud of LH 9 has been dissipated, and that triggered star formation occurred at the outer region as discussed by for example, Israel et al. (2003a). A group of HII regions are found near the western edge of the bar in the N 79/N 83 region (Figure 5b). In contrast with the N 11 region, young clusters associated with the GMCs and bright Hα emission are found near the peak of the GMCs in this region, and the young clusters without bright HII region are at the center of diffuse shell-like Hα emission. In Figure 5b, there are a few GMCs hosting no H II regions, one of which is at the western end of the N79/N 83 region. |
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | Small groups of young clusters are found near the peak of a massive GMC in N 44 (DEM158, 160, 166, 167, 169) as well as small GMCs along the supergiant shell LMC 4 (Figure 5c). On the other hand, only one or two clusters are associated with a GMC near the LMC bar (Figure 5d). One may speculate that clusters are formed in groups in the massive GMCs of M ∼ 106M⊙ or near a supergiant shell. It is also noted that bright HII region, the N 51 complex, is associated with a very small molecular cloud, maybe a remnant of the parent cloud of this bright HII region. |
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | Figure 5f shows the 30 Dor (DEM 263) region to the molecular ridge including active star forming site, N 159 (DEM 271, 272), and the Arc region. The most remarkable feature in Hα emission is a bright complex of HII regions in 30 Dor, while massive molecular clouds are found not exactly toward 30 Dor but extending to the south as already noted by several authors (e.g. Cohen et al. 1988; Indebetouw et al. 2008; Paper I). Most of the youngest clusters of τ < 10 Myr are associated with the GMCs or found near the GMCs. On the other hand, the clusters of 10 < τ < 30 Myr are away from the GMCs and mostly found between 30 Dor and N 159 where the bright Hα emission from 30 Dor is extended but only small molecular clouds are detected. The most active current star formation site in this figure is a well-known region, N 159, where young clusters as well as a number of HII regions are found at or near the peaks of the molecular ridge. The detailed studies of star formation activities and molecular clouds are carried out by several authors (e.g., Johansson et al. 1998; Minamidani et al. 2008; Indebetouw et al. 2008; Mizuno et al. 2009). In the south of N159, only smaller HII regions are associated with the molecular ridge. These results indicate that the southern region may be younger than the North. |
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | There are several other regions with active star formation in Figure 5f, N 148, N 180, N 206 and N 214, where groups of HII regions, some of which contain a young cluster, are associated with GMCs. It is interesting to note that these groups of HII regions are mostly found off from the peak of the GMCs. It should be noted that the NANTEN beam is not capable of resolving the individual local peaks of the GMC and the parent core of the group of HII regions may have escaped from detection. Nevertheless, the positional offset of the peak of the GMC and the group of HII regions indicate the dissipation of the molecular gas by active star formation. It is also to be noted that there are several GMCs, especially at southern edge of this figure without significant Hα emission or clusters. |
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | distributed at random in the oserved area. It is clearly shown by eye that the distribution of the youngest clusters with an age smaller than 10 Myrs, i.e., SWB 0 (Bica et al. 1996), and the H II regions are sharply peaked within 100 pc of CO emission exhibiting strong spatial correlations. On the other hand, the older clusters, SWB I (τ > 10 Myr) or older, show much weaker or no correlation. This Figure again indicates that the HII regions and SWB 0 clusters are well associated with molecular clouds as well as that rapid cloud dissipation after cluster formation. |
Processed_The_Second_Survey_of_the_Molecular_Clouds_in_the_L.txt | We have determined the association of individual HII regions and young clusters with the molecular clouds by the following criteria: 1) for clusters, if the extent of a cluster is overlapped with the boundary of a molecular cloud, 2) for the H II regions, if the Hα-emitting region is overlapped with the boundary of a molecular cloud. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Ethnographic evidence indicates that bora (initiation) ceremonial sites in southeast Australia, which typically comprise a pair of circles connected by a pathway, are symbolically reflected in the Milky Way as the ‘Sky Bora’. This evidence also indicates that the position of the Sky Bora signifies the time of the year when initiation ceremonies are held. We use archaeological data to test the hypothesis that southeast Australian bora grounds have a preferred orientation to the position of the Milky Way in the night sky in August, when the plane of the galaxy from Crux to Sagittarius is roughly vertical in the evening sky to the south-southwest. We accomplish this by measuring the orientations of 68 bora grounds using a combination of data from the archaeological literature and site cards in the New South Wales Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System database. We find that bora grounds have a preferred orientation to the south and southwest, consistent with the Sky Bora hypothesis. Monte Carlo statistics show that these preferences were not the result of chance alignments, but were deliberate. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | This paper discusses bora ceremonies and contains the names of people who have passed away. The exact locations of these sites are concealed in order to protect them. The coordinates provided are within 10 km of the site and are used only to demonstrate the general distribution of the known bora grounds in southeast Australia. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Queensland (Qld) and New South Wales (NSW) it has come to be generally known as ‘bora’, the name used by the Kamilaroi of north-central NSW (Ridley 1873:269). Bora grounds generally consist of two circles of differing diameter connected by a pathway. The larger circle is regarded as a public space, while the smaller circle some distance away is restricted to initiates and elders. Bora ceremonies were one of the first Aboriginal cultural activities described by early Australian colonists in the Sydney region (Collins 1798:468-480; Hunter 1793:499-500). Because information about bora ceremonies is culturally sensitive, here we limit discussion of the ceremony itself. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | There is a variety of evidence from the anthropological literature (e.g. Berndt 1974; Love 1988; Winterbotham 1957) that bora ceremonies are related to the Milky Way and that ceremonial grounds are oriented to the position of the Milky Way in the night sky at particular times of the year. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | In this paper, we begin by exploring connections between bora ceremonies and the Milky Way using ethnographic and ethnohistoric literature. We then use the archaeological record to determine if bora grounds are oriented to the position of the Milky Way at particular times of the year. Finally, we use Monte Carlo statistics to see if these orientations were deliberate or the result of chance. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | The layout of bora grounds is similar across southeast Australia, with only minor differences from region to region (Bowdler 2001:3; Mathews 1894:99). Several reports (e.g. Black 1944; Collins 1798:391; Fraser 1883; Howitt 1904; Mathews 1897a) describe the grounds as consisting of two rings of different sizes, connected by a pathway. In some places, Bora sites may comprise three or more rings (Steele 1984; Bowdler 2001). The border of each ring is made of raised earth or stone, and the area within is cleared of debris and the earth is stamped until firm. The larger ring, which is considered public, has a typical diameter of 20–30 m. The smaller ring (generally 10–15 m diameter) is considered the sacred area, where body modification takes place, and is restricted to initiates and elders. The two rings are connected by a pathway that ranges from a few tens to a few hundred metres in length. In 2004, an Aboriginal man from Marulan, NSW advised that parts of many such sites were destroyed immediately after the ceremony to conceal their location (Hardie 2004). For this reason, some bora sites reported in the archaeological literature feature only a single circle, with the smaller, sacred circle having been destroyed. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | According to Love (1988), the bora ceremonies were predominantly held in August each year, although other authors report a variety of dates including March–May (Winterbotham 1957), April–June (Mathews 1894:99), May–July (Mathews 1894), August (Needham 1981:70), September–November (Winterbotham 1957), and October–December (Mathews 1894). This suggests that, in some cases, a number of variables influence the date of the bora ceremony, including the availability of food and water or having a sufficient number of boys to initiate (e.g. Mathews 1910). While these factors vary across the region, here we test the hypothesis advanced by Love (1988) who presents evidence associating the bora ceremony with the night sky and the orientation of the Milky Way, and suggests that most initiation ceremonies occur around August. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | It is well established that the night sky plays a significant role in several Aboriginal cultures (e.g. Cairns and Harney 2004; Johnson 1998; Norris and Hamacher 2009; Hamacher 2012). In Aboriginal astronomical traditions, dark spaces within the Milky Way are as significant as bright objects. Two animals symbolically link bora ceremonies to these dark spaces. One was a spiritual serpent, commonly referred to as the ‘Rainbow Serpent’ across Australia, traced out by the curving dust lanes in the Milky Way. Needham (1981:69) explained that in Aboriginal communities of the Hunter Valley, motifs of the spiritual serpent were represented in bora ceremonies, with information about the serpent being recounted during the ceremony itself. The other animal was an emu, which is also traced by dust lanes in the Milky Way (Norris and Norris 2009). Love (1988:129–138) argued that the emu was an important part of the bora ceremony in southeast Australia, as did Berndt (1974:27–30), since male emus brood and hatch the emu chicks and rear the young (Love 1987). This is symbolic of the initiation of adolescent boys by their male elders. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Needham (1981) provided an illustration of the night sky and associated stars in local Aboriginal astronomical traditions. The illustration, which cites the ‘All Father’ as the star Altair, provides the positions of celestial objects in August, ‘the month when Aboriginal initiation ceremonies were held’ (Needham 1981:70). During the early part of the night in August, the Milky Way stretches across the sky from the northeast to the southwest. Many early colonial reports referred to an Aboriginal religion based on a deity variously described as Baiame, Bunjil or Mungan-ngaua (Henderson 1832:147; Howitt 1904:490–491; Ridley 1873:268). These names roughly translate to ‘father’ or ‘father of all of us’ (Howitt 1904:491). According to Fraser (1883:208) and Howitt (1884:458), Baiame gave his son, Daramulan, to the people and it is through Daramulan that Baiame sees all. Baiame is worshipped at the bora ceremony (Ridley 1873:269) and Daramulan is believed to come back to the earth by a pathway from the sky (Fraser 1883:212). Eliade (1996:41) reported that Baiame ‘dwells in the sky, beside a great stream of water’ (i.e. the Milky Way) and various reports (e.g. Berndt 1974; Hartland 1898; Howitt 1884) have claimed that the wife of Baiame (or in some cases Daramulan) is an emu. Reports of Baiame, Daramulan and Bunjil come from various cultures across southeast Australia, resulting in variations in these reports. However, they share some features, such as a close connection between bora ceremonies and the Milky Way. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | According to Love (1988:130–131), the Jinibara account identifies the Sky Bora with the Emu in the Sky (Gaiarbau et al. 1982:77; Winterbotham 1957:46). The ‘Coal Sacks’, or Mimburi, to which Winterbotham referred, are a dark absorption nebula bordering the western constellations Crux (Southern Cross), Centaurus and Musca, representing the head of the emu, with the star BZ Crucis representing the eye. The dust lanes that run through the stars Alpha and Beta Centauri represent the neck, while the Galactic bulge, near the intersection of Sagittarius, Scorpius and Ophiuchus, represents the body. This area is the centre of our Milky Way galaxy. The dust lanes along the Milky Way through Sagittarius trace out the legs (Figure 1). The motif of the celestial emu is found across Australia (e.g. Cairns and Harney 2004; Norris and Hamacher 2009:13; Stanbridge 1861:302; Wellard 1983:51). |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Figure 1: The ‘Emu in the Sky’ visible over an emu engraving at Elvina Track in Kuringai Chase National Park north of Sydney, which may represent her celestial counterpart (image reproduced courtesy of Barnaby Norris). |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | According to Winterbotham, other Aboriginal groups also knew of the dark nebulae, including the Badjala people of Fraser Island and the adjacent mainland, who call them Wurubilum, and the Wakka Wakka people near Murgon, Qld. This concept extends beyond southeast Australia. For example, Smith (1913) explained that during an initiation ceremony in Western Australia (WA) the initiate is left tied to the ground until the Milky Way is visible. He is then asked if ‘he can see the two dark spots’ and when he is able to see them, he is released. While this account is not from the area of this study, it may be similar to the example that Gaiarbau described. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Gaiarbau said that bora ceremonies were not held until the celestial bora rings returned to their ‘proper points of the compass’ (Winterbotham 1957:38). In clear winter skies in southeast Australia, the Milky Way is visible about an hour after sunset. The orientation of the plane of the Milky Way, as seen from southeast Australia an hour after sunset, changes from near vertical in the south-southeast in March to horizontal across the southern sky from east-southeast to west in June and back to vertical (but inverted) in the southwest in September. The Galactic bulge and the Coalsack (celestial emu) are not visible in the sky together an hour after sunset until May. At this time, the emu is not vertical in the sky (perpendicular to the horizon), but stretches from south to east. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | The only time that the Sky Bora is vertically aligned to the horizon and can be seen in the sky together an hour after sunset is in August (or later in the night as the year progresses). The Galactic plane, which goes straight through the celestial emu, is vertical in August an hour or two after sunset (earlier in the evening later in the month, Figure 2). At this time, the azimuth is approximately 213º (south-southwest). |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Figure 2: The sky bora in the Milky Way oriented vertically in the south-southwest sky in mid-August an hour after sunset, as seen from Brisbane. The large circle represents the larger bora circle and the body of the emu (near zenith). The smaller circle represents the Coalsack and the head of the emu. Graphics are from the Stellarium astronomical software package. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | If Love’s hypothesis is correct, we expect the orientation of each bora site from the larger circle to the smaller circle to be oriented to roughly 213º, corresponding to the time ceremonies are held (August). This expectation agrees with Needham (1981:70), who claimed that bora ceremonies in the Hunter Valley (NSW) were held in August when the Milky Way was vertical in the south-southwest. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Other researchers report that bora ceremonies in Qld and NSW are held at various times of the year, as noted in the previous section (Winterbotham 1957; Mathews 1894:99). Bora ceremonies may be held at times of the year that have little or nothing to do with the position of the Milky Way in the sky, even if the ceremonies are symbolically linked to the Milky Way. For example, Mathews (1894:128) claimed that the direction of one bora ring to the other ‘is entirely dependent on the conformation of the country within which the ceremony is being held’. If bora grounds are not oriented to any particular object or direction, we expect to find a roughly uniform distribution in their orientations. However, if at least some bora grounds are oriented to the position of the Sky Bora, then we expect to find a preference for south-southwest orientations when we look at the overall distribution of bora ground orientations. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | To determine the orientations of bora ceremonial sites, we obtained data for 63 such sites from the following published literature: Mathews (1894, 1896a, 1896b, 1897a, 1907, 1917), Hopkins (1901), Towle (1942), Bartholomai and Breeden (1961), Anon. (1973), McBryde (1974), Steele (1984), Satterthwait and Heather (1987), and Bowdler (2001). We also obtained 1107 archaeological site cards from the NSW Aboriginal Heritage Information Management System (AHIMS) related to stone arrangements and ceremonial grounds. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | b. Both rings and at least one opening are identifiable, or c. Only one ring is identifiable, but it has a clearly identifiable opening and there is unambiguous information as to whether it is the larger or the smaller ring. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | The orientation of each site was measured from the centre of the largest circle to the centre of the smaller circle. If the second circle was missing, the orientation was taken from the centre of the circle to the middle of the opening. Measurements were either taken directly from the records given by the surveyor or measured from the survey with a protractor and ruler. We divided the azimuths into 16 bins (N, NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE, SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W, WNW, NW, NNW), each with a width of 22.5º with N centred at 0°, NNE at 22.5°, and so on (see Table 1). |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Table 1: Azimuths of the inter-ordinal (left), ordinal (right top) and cardinal (right bottom) orientations (in degrees) used to bin the data in Figure 4, given in degrees. Each bin in the left-hand column has a width of 22.5° (±11.25°) centred on the Central Azimuth. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | The 46 data points whose orientations are recorded individually, are provided in Table 2 and are grouped into 22.5º bins, shown as a histogram in Figure 4a. The histogram reveals a clear preference for the S, SW and W orientations. Table 2 contains 34 orientations in ordinal (N, S, E, W, NW, NE, SE, SW) directions, but only 12 orientations in inter-ordinal (NNE, ENE, etc.) directions. The low number of inter-ordinal orientations suggests either that the sites tend to be oriented on ordinal points, or that some authors rounded to the nearest ordinal point. To avoid a statistical bias in our results, we re-binned the data into the eight ordinal directions, dividing the counts of each inter-ordinal bin equally between the two neighbouring ordinal bins, resulting in eight 45º bins (Table 1, Figure 4b). |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | A preferred orientation to the south is evident (28% of the 46 data points), with lesser but significant preferences to the SW (17%) and W (15%) bins. The combined S, SW and W bins account for 61% of the total data points, while the remaining are evenly spread across the remaining bins. The highest peak of 12.5 orientations occurs in the S bin. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | quadrant and a lesser but significant preference to the western quadrant, which, when combined, account for 74% of the 46 data points. The SH data (Figure 4d) is similar, with a significant preference for the southern quadrant (68% of the 22 data points), but with an even distribution among the remaining quadrants. We then combined our 46 data points with the 22 SH data points, resulting in Figure 4e. A clear preference for the southern quadrant is evident, with 35 of the 68 orientations (51%) falling in the S bin. This result is consistent with the Love hypothesis. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | Figure 3: Locations of all bora grounds in Table 2, excluding the data from Satterthwait and Heather (1987). The coordinates given are adjusted to as to protect exact location of each site. The coordinates given are within 10 km of the site, which is why some appear over the sea. |
Processed_Astronomical_Orientations_of_Bora_Ceremonial_Groun.txt | To determine if this is a chance clumping of a random distribution of orientations, we conducted a Monte Carlo simulation, in which 68 orientations were distributed randomly in each of the bins shown in Figure 4e. We repeated this process 100 million times. In only 303 of the 100 million runs did the number in any one bin equal or exceed 35, from which we can conclude that the likelihood of the peak in Figure 4b occurring by chance is about 3x10-6 or 0.0003%. We therefore conclude that this distribution is clearly not the result of chance, and that the constructors of the bora rings intentionally aligned most of them to the south quadrant. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Professor Michael Cowling has been a mentor for a number of years. He suggested the specific direction taken in this work, always answered my questions clearly, and spent much time away from our meetings preparing material. Professor Cowling’s thorough editing of the entire thesis is much appreciated. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Dr James Franklin’s sincere commitment to this project, and his willingness to challenge my thinking, have been extremely valuable. As well as supervising the historical part of this work, Dr Franklin read the mathematical chapters, and helped with the preparation of my seminar. His suggestions led to important improvements. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | I would like to thank Dr Ian Doust, our honours coordinator, for always being available to provide both clear guidance on the preparation of this project, and reassurance. The School of Mathematics, as a whole, has been an exciting and supportive environment in which to study. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | I could not have completed this thesis without help from my friends. In particular, I would like to thank David for discussions which clarified several mathematical issues, and Claire, Edwina, Lisa, Shaun and Stephanie for, at the appropriate times, giving me a break from my work, and leaving me alone to get on with it. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | My family have been patient and supportive throughout my honours year. I am especially grateful for the way they have cared for me over the last few months. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | This thesis reflects my interest in the history of mathematics, and in areas of math- ematics which combine geometry and algebra. The historical and mathematical sections of this work can be read independently. One of the main themes of the history, though, is how in the nineteenth century a new understanding of mathe- matical space developed, in which groups became vital to geometry. The idea of using algebraic concepts to investigate geometric structures is present throughout the work. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Chapter 1 is a short history of non-Euclidean geometry. This chapter is a syn- thesis of my readings of mainly secondary sources. Historians of mathematics have traditionally adopted an ‘internalist’ approach, explaining changes to the content of mathematics only in terms of factors such as the imperative to generalise, or the desire to remove inconsistencies. An internalist narrative is certainly necessary for a satisfactory history of mathematics, but it is not sufficient. First, the history of mathematics is part of broader intellectual history. Euclidean geometry held great philosophical prestige, and non-Euclidean geometry challenged fundamental assumptions about the nature of space and the truth value of mathematics. Second, there are social factors in the history of mathematics. Mathematicians themselves are part of a community, the mathematical community. The structure of this com- munity in the nineteenth century helps to explain the reception and dissemination of non-Euclidean geometry. The sources consulted for this chapter each adopted one or more of the approaches to the history of mathematics outlined here, but none of them seemed to discuss all the relevant issues. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Chapter 2 begins the strictly mathematical part of this thesis. One aim of this chapter is to provide a deeper understanding of some of the mathematics discussed in Chapter 1. To this end, each of the main models of hyperbolic geometry is pre- sented, and important results for each model proved. The second aim of Chapter 2 is to describe thoroughly the way in which the action of the group P SL(2, Z) in- duces a tesselation of the upper half-plane. Most of the material in Chapter 2 is selected and adapted from Chapters 3–6 of Ratcliffe [21]. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | X. The second distance function on Γ is the word distance function. The word distance function is induced by the generators of Γ, and corresponds to the number of tiles in the tesselation crossed by a geodesic segment. We now ask whether or not these two distance functions are equivalent. We prove that, when the tiles of the induced tesselation are compact, the two distance functions are equivalent. Then, in order to generalise the action of P SL(2, Z) on the upper half-plane, we describe a symmetric space of matrices on which the group P SL(n, Z) acts. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Chapter 4 is devoted to the proof of Theorem 4.1.1. This theorem states that, when n = 2, the geometric and word distance functions on P SL(n, Z) are not 3, these two distances on P SL(n, Z) are equivalent. equivalent, but that for all n The content of Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 is based upon two papers by Lubotzky, Mozes and Raghunathan, [13] and [14]. These papers are not easy to read. There is sometimes ambiguity about the hypotheses on the space X and the discrete group Γ acting on X. We have, here, assumed X to be a symmetric space. This assumption ensures that geometric distance functions and word distance functions exist, and that structures such as geodesics and fundamental domains behave nicely. The authors do not prove the ‘well-known’ result that the geometric and word distance functions are well-defined up to Lipschitz equivalence, so we fill this gap. They do not discuss the interesting geometric interpretation of the two distance functions, in terms of a geodesic crossing tiles in the space. Also, these papers inaccurately refer to what we have called the geometric distance function as a Riemannian metric. The more recent article, [14], was used only for the proof of Theorem 3.4.1. By assuming that X is a symmetric space rather than a ‘coarse path metric space’, we m i=0 to have simplified the proof a little, as we may choose the sequence of points lie on the geodesic. Besides, it is not obvious that a ‘coarse path metric space’ even contains a point with a trivial stabiliser subgroup in Γ. The proofs in Chapter 4 are based on those in the earlier paper, [13], which concerns Lipschitz equivalence for the group P SL(d, Z). This paper does not describe the symmetric space on which P SL(d, Z) acts, so we have added this material. Also, we have, throughout Chapter 4, rewritten statements of lemmas, propositions and so on, in order to clarify what each of the many constants depends upon. In the paper, for the case d = 2, the claim that the word length of un grows linearly in n is not proved. For the cases d 3, there is no explicit statement of Theorem 4.4.1, and no indication of how to combine the results of Corollary 4.4.10 and Corollary 4.4.14 to prove the result of Theorem 4.4.1. In the proof of Proposition 4.4.4, results 4.4.5–4.4.8 are stated without proof. In Proposition 4.4.10, the construction suggested by the authors does not actually satisfy the statement of the proposition, and there is no proof of the claims of Lemmas 4.4.11 and 4.4.12. Finally, the way in which the result of Theorem 4.4.1 implies that the word distance function is bounded above by the geometric distance function is not proved. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 1.2 Euclid’s Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 Doubts about the parallel axiom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4 Systems of non-Euclidean geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 Reception of non-Euclidean geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5.2 Mathematical developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5.3 Philosophical disputes 1.6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Chapter 3 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1 3.2 Symmetric Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Distance functions on discrete groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.1 The geometric distance function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3.2 The word distance function . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 Fundamental domains of compact closure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . 4.4.1 Outline of the proof of Theorem 4.4.1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . P SL(d, Z) 4.4.2 Factorisation of γ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.3 Factorisation of δ P SL(d, Z) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.4 Bounds on the operator norm of a matrix . . . . . . . . . . 4.4.5 Conclusion of the proof of Theorem 4.4.1 . . . . . . . . . . . |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | I entreat you, leave the doctrine of parallel lines alone; you should fear it like a sensual passion; it will deprive you of health, leisure and peace—it will destroy all joy in your life. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | I have now resolved to publish a work on parallels . . . the goal is not yet reached, but I have made such wonderful discoveries that I have been almost overwhelmed by them . . . I have created a new universe from nothing. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | The discovery and acceptance of non-Euclidean geometry forms a crucial strand of the history of mathematics. For thousands of years, Euclidean geometry held great prestige. However, there were small doubts about the parallel axiom. After numerous attempts to validate this axiom, in the nineteenth century there was a shift to advancing alternative geometries. The coming-together of developments in many areas of mathematics aided the acceptance of non-Euclidean geometry by the mathematical community. In this process mathematicians were forced to reconsider and alter their ideas about the nature of mathematics and its relationship with the real world. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | geometers were the first to write proofs as deductive sequences of statements.4 Eu- clid’s thirteen-volume Stoichia (Elements), which appeared in about 300 B.C.E., was an exposition of the fundamentals of classical Greek mathematics. The first six books covered plane geometry, and the last three solid geometry. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | To understand this, suppose that the two straight lines are l and m, and that the transversal falling on them is line t. The axiom is saying that if the interior angles on the same side of t sum to less than π, the three lines l, m and t form a triangle. This triangle has two vertices on the line t. Its third vertex lies in the half-plane bounded by the line t, and on the same side of t as the interior angles which sum to less than π. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Despite these logical weaknesses, the Greeks and many later thinkers considered the Elements to be the model for philosophical inquiry. After the fall of Rome, the survival and development of Greek mathematics, including Euclidean geometry, depended on Arabic-speaking mathematicians in Islamic Africa and Asia. In the twelfth century, Arabic translations of the Elements were translated in turn into Latin. The Elements were first printed in 1482, and versions in various European vernaculars appeared in the sixteenth century. Euclid’s Elements achieved huge influence in Europe, with more than one thousand editions published.15 Until about 1800, Euclidean geometry enjoyed secure philosophical and mathematical status. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Thus, the curve at a fixed distance from a straight line is itself straight. Ibn al- Haytham (965–1041) gave a false proof of this last statement, then used it to prove the parallel axiom. The first substantial European effort on parallels was that of John Wallis (1616–1703), who realised that many of Euclid’s proofs depended on unstated assumptions.21 He derived the parallel axiom by assuming the existence of triangles similar to a given triangle. Other European attempts included those of Giordano Vitale (1633–1711), and A. M. Legendre (1752–1833). |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | of Theodosius (c. 20 B.C.E.), propositions were formulated mostly in terms of planes intersecting the sphere, rather than in terms of the sphere’s intrinsic geometry. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Many mathematicians who considered negating the parallel axiom found that their conclusions were counter-intuitive. Common sense and everyday experience favoured Euclidean geometry. Some abandoned their efforts. For instance, Omar Khayyam (1048?–1122) entertained the possibility of a quadrilateral with angle sum different from 2π, but straight away dismissed the idea as inconsistent. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Girolamo Saccheri (1667–1733), though, investigated in some depth the geome- try which resulted from denying the parallel axiom. He was the first to try to prove that a contradiction would follow from supposing the parallel axiom false. Saccheri began by establishing that ∠ACD = ∠BDC in the following quadrilateral. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Because there had been no rigorous invalidation of the results of negating the parallel axiom, a few mathematicians began to speculate that the alternative ge- ometry might hold somewhere outside everyday experience. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | geometry”, since it might occur in the region of the stars. Schweikart and Tau- rinus were the first to use analysis in non-Euclidean geometry, and this enabled progress past the classical approach of Saccheri and Lambert.30 Their analytic re- sults included trigonometric formulae, and the area of a triangle with a vertex at infinity, in terms of a constant K. They derived their trigonometric formulae from those of spherical trigonometry, by replacing ordinary trigonometric functions with hyperbolic trigonometric functions. The radius of the sphere concerned was K. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Carl Friedrich Gauß (1777–1855) did a little work on non-Euclidean geometry at the same time as Schweikart and Taurinus.31 He never published anything in the area. According to his letters and rough notes, Gauß realised that rejecting the parallel axiom implied the existence of an absolute measure of length, and doubted whether Euclidean geometry could be proved. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | D Other results of Lobachevksky and Bolyai included trigonometry, arc length ds, the area of a circle, and theorems on the area of plane regions and volumes of solids. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | community, and led to intensive discussion of new geometrical ideas. In 1865, Arthur Cayley (1821–1895) published a commentary on Lobachevsky, which did much to In the years 1866 and 1867, French, German, Italian and disseminate his work. Russian translations and publications of Lobachevsky’s work appeared, so that by 1870 Lobachevsky and Bolyai’s research was known to geometers all across Europe. From the 1890s, there were university courses and textbooks on non-Euclidean geometry, showing that it was well-accepted by the mathematical community. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Models of hyperbolic geometry were critical to overcoming these mathemati- cal reservations. The models found by the mathematicians Beltrami, Klein and Poincar´e were structured collections of objects satisfying a set of mathematical statements, given a suitable, if unusual, interpretation of the key terms such as ‘straight line’.44 The (relative) consistency of non-Euclidean geometry was proved using a model, and models aided the acceptance of the new geometry in other ways. They provided a method of visualising concepts contrary to intuition, such as the existence of infinitely many parallels through a point. Models also made it possible to apply non-Euclidean geometry to solving problems in other areas of mathematics. This demonstrated its usefulness. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | In the 1830s, Ferdinand Minding (1806–85) had investigated surfaces of con- stant negative curvature, such as the pseudosphere, which is obtained by rotating a tractrix about a vertical axis. For such surfaces, Minding obtained the same trigonometric formulae as in hyperbolic geometry, and published them in 1840. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Felix Klein (1849–1925) interpreted Beltrami’s model in terms of projective ge- ometry in 1871. He modelled hyperbolic geometry as metric projective geometry in the interior of some conic. Beltrami’s model was the special case where the conic was a circle. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | In 1882, Henri Poincar´e (1854–1912) showed that linear fractional transforma- tions with real coefficients preserve the complex upper half-plane. Poincar´e’s model dx2 + dy2/y, and geodesics is this upper half-plane with arc length defined as ds = as vertical lines or semicircles orthogonal to the real axis. Distance is then arc length along the geodesic joining two points. Poincar´e’s model allows groups of linear frac- tional transformations to be represented as discrete groups of orientation-preserving isometries of the hyperbolic plane. The model can be mapped to the unit disc, and in later works Poincar´e extended his model to three dimensions, and discussed a two-sheeted hyperboloid model as well. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Using these models, Poincar´e found many applications for hyperbolic geometry, which helped the new geometry to seem useful and familiar.46 Indeed, Poincar´e’s work showed that hyperbolic geometry was already part of mainstream mathemat- ics.47 For example, he used hyperbolic geometry to prove the existence of linear fractional transformations. He then studied the group of such transformations, using the tesselation of the upper half-plane pictured here. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | The models and applications of hyperbolic geometry which were so important to its acceptance could not have developed without advances in many different areas of mathematics in the nineteenth century. These areas included differential geometry, group theory, geometric transformations and projective geometry. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Gauß’s theory of curved surfaces (1827) was essential to the eventual recognition of hyperbolic geometry.49 The language established by the theory of curvature could be used to describe or analyse surfaces in terms of their intrinsic properties, that is, without consideration of the space in which they were embedded.50 Geodesics in surfaces could be defined by analogy with straight lines in the plane.51 These techniques were employed in modelling hyperbolic geometry, as all the models were surfaces of constant negative curvature with geodesics defined intrinsically. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Many of the applications of hyperbolic geometry used group theory. The idea of a group began with concrete cases, such as permutations of the roots of algebraic equations, which were studied by J. H. Lagrange (1736–1813) and Paolo Ruffini (1765–1822) in the eighteenth century. In 1826, Niels Henrik Abel (1802–1829) used such groups to prove that it was impossible to obtain a solution in radicals of the general equation of degree greater than or equal to 5. Augustin Louis Cauchy (1789–1857) wrote many papers on the theory of groups of substitutions. The term ‘group’ was first used in an article by Evariste Galois (1811–1832), who used it only for groups of substitutions. Cayley, in 1854, was the first to formulate the concept of an abstract group, by giving an axiomatic definition of a group. Klein brought group theory into geometry, by noticing that geometric transformations can form groups under composition. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | In his Erlangen Program of 1872, Klein described geometry as the study of those properties of figures which are preserved by a particular group of geometric trans- formations. Geometries with non-trivial symmetries, such as projective geometries and metric spaces with constant curvature, could now be characterised by classi- fying groups of transformations.55 Two geometries were equivalent if their char- acteristic groups were isomorphic. For example, Euclidean geometry in the plane is the study of those properties of figures, such as angles and the ratios between lengths, which remain invariant under the group of similarities of the plane, which includes all translations, dilations and rotations. Klein’s Erlangen Program was at first little noticed, but achieved international influence by the end of the nineteenth century.56 As a result of this program, the study of some geometries became the study of transformation groups.57 Sophus Lie (1842–1899), for example, used this idea to characterise all three-dimensional geometries by determining all subgroups of motions in three-dimensional space. Hyperbolic geometry was now just one of many alternatives which could be investigated using algebraic techniques, and was a source of applications of group theory. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | One of the basic issues raised by non-Euclidean geometry was the connection between geometry and physical space. In classical physics, Euclidean geometry was held to be the science of space, a view which implied that this geometry really existed.59 The ontological status of geometry was also linked to debates over the source of geometric knowledge. If our geometric notions are inborn, a priori, then geometry really exists. Further, our intuition must be obeyed, and so the counter- intuitive nature of many non-Euclidean results is a sound argument against them. If, on the other hand, geometry is an abstraction of the physical world, then Eu- clidean geometry is just one of many possible human constructs. It may well be the idealisation which is favoured by experience, but this does not imply that it really exists. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | The opposing view, put by Aristotle, was that geometric concepts are abstractions of real world objects: a mathematician “effects an abstraction, for in thought it is possible to separate figures from motions”.62 Whether they regarded it as inborn knowledge or an abstraction, the Greeks considered Euclidean geometry to correctly represent the physical world. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | The development of Riemannian geometry was very important in changing mathematicians’ ideas about the nature of mathematical existence. Riemann be- gan his 1854 lecture on the foundations of geometry by observing that all previous presentations of geometry had presupposed the nature of space. He then described space, meaning real physical space, as just one instance of a general concept which he called a mehrfach ausgedehnte Gr¨osse (multiply extended quantity).77 Riemann showed that such an extended quantity (in modern terminology, a manifold) may have arbitrarily many “metric relations”; therefore “space constitutes only a special case of a threefold extended quantity”.78 The implication of Riemann’s geometry for the philosophy of space was that, since there can be only one geometry of real space among infinitely many mathematical possibilities, the science of space could not be determined by mathematical processes alone. As Riemann said, “those prop- erties which distinguish space from other conceivable threefold extended quantities can be gathered only from experience”.79 Riemann acknowledged that Euclidean geometry was empirically successful within “the limits of observation”,80 but his work meant that mathematical existence could no longer be equated with physical existence. This was a very significant change in mathematical discourse. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | The development of projective geometry further aided the acceptance of hyper- bolic geometry. Since projective geometry was so counter-intuitive, it was quickly characterised by axioms, a project which was completed in 1882 by Moritz Pasch (1843–1930).82 Objections to non-Euclidean geometry based on intuition had little weight once mathematics accepted systems as strange as projective geometry. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | It is interesting, then, that in twentieth-century physics, space is Riemannian and not Euclidean.90 Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity depend on ge- ometry quite different from the three-dimensional Euclidean geometry of classical physics.91 Indeed, from 1908 to 1916, the laws of special relativity were reformu- lated and reinterpreted in terms of hyperbolic geometry.92 Even so, non-relativistic physics still employs only one geometry to represent physical space, while mathe- maticians consider a whole variety of geometries. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | of exposition adopted for the rest of this thesis, with explicit definitions, acknowl- edgement of assumptions and so forth, illustrates well the abstraction and logical precision of modern mathematics. The shift in conceptions of geometry which re- sulted in this modern approach was stimulated by the discovery of non-Euclidean geometry, and also aided the acceptance of the new geometry by mathematicians. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | X. The set of isometries from a metric space X to itself, denoted by for all x1, x2 ∈ I(X), forms a group under composition. Isometries of En are known as Euclidean isometries. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | be the standard basis of Rn. Then, for all x, y it can be proved that a map φ : Rn Rn is an orthogonal transformation if and is an orthonormal basis of Rn. It only if φ is linear and follows that every orthogonal transformation is a Euclidean isometry, and that orthogonal transformations may be identified with orthogonal n n matrices. The n matrices, denoted by O(n), forms a group under matrix set of all orthogonal n multiplication. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | For example, the group I(X) acts on X, and the group O(n) acts on the set of m-dimensional vector subspaces of Rn, for 1 n. The action of G on X is said to be transitive if for each x, y G such that gx = y. Proposition 2.2.1. For each dimension m, the action of the group O(n) on the set of m-dimensional vector subspaces of Rn is transitive. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | w1, w2, . . . , wm} Schmidt process, extend it to an orthonormal basis be the n × and A(Rm) = V . |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | m-dimensional subspace of En. Corollary 2.2.2. For each dimension m, the group I(En) acts transitively on the set of m-planes of En. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Conversely, suppose φ is of the form φ(x) = φ(0)+Ax. Then φ is the composition of an orthogonal transformation and a translation, both of which are isometries. Therefore φ is an isometry. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | where A is an orthogonal matrix, k is a positive constant and a = φ(0). |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | It turns out that, if the metric space (X, d) satisfies the axioms of Euclidean or hyperbolic geometry, then the shortest path from x to y in X is along the unique geodesic segment joining x and y, and the length of this shortest path is d(x, y). |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | That is, ρ is a Euclidean isometry. Proposition 2.2.6. Every isometry of En is a composition of at most n + 1 reflec- tions in hyperplanes. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | and so ρ0φ(0) = 0. Let φ0 = ρ0φ. Then the composition φ0 is an isometry, and φ0(x) = ρ0φ(0) + ρ0φ(x), so by Proposition 2.2.3, φ0 is orthogonal. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | We now discuss reflections in spheres. These maps are also known as inversions. En and r > 0, we denote by S(a, r) the sphere with centre a and radius r. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | We will sometimes denote by Sn Reflections in planes and spheres are continuous maps with respect to the usual metric topology of Rn, which is that induced by the distance function dE. They are also differentiable functions. The following result shows that reflections in hy- perplanes and spheres preserve angles. Let Ω be an open subset of En and let En be a differentiable function. We say φ is conformal if φ preserves angles φ : Ω between differentiable curves in Ω. An important class of conformal maps is the set of orthogonal matrices. These are conformal because they preserve the Euclidean inner product. Proposition 2.2.8. Every reflection of En in a hyperplane or sphere is conformal. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | so ρ is an orthogonal transformation. Therefore I and so the reflection ρ is conformal. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | For reflections in spheres, we consider first the reflection σr in the sphere S(0, r). n). |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Now let σ be the reflection in the sphere S(a, r) and let τ be translation by a. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | A M¨obius transformation of ˆEn is a finite composition of reflections in spheres of ˆEn. The set of all M¨obius transformations of ˆEn, denoted by M( ˆEn), forms a group under composition. By Proposition 2.2.6, any Euclidean isometry may be written as a finite composition of reflections, so we may by extending these reflections regard the group of Euclidean isometries to be a subgroup of M( ˆEn). From the properties of reflections, M¨obius transformations are continuous, differentiable and conformal. We now discuss the action of M( ˆEn) on spheres. A M¨obius transformation of particular importance is the reflection of ˆEn in the sphere S(en, √2). Identify ˆEn 1 − with ˆEn in ˆEn. The stereographic projection π of ˆEn 1 onto the sphere − 1 towards (or away from) the vector Sn − ∈ 1. Let σ be the reflection of ˆEn in the sphere en until it meets the sphere Sn S(en, √2). Then, by comparing the explicit formulae for π and σ, it can be shown that the restriction of σ to ˆEn Lemma 2.2.9. Let σ be the reflection of ˆEn in the sphere S(a, r), and let σ1 be the reflection of ˆEn in the sphere S(0, 1). Define a map τ : ˆEn ˆEn by τ (x) = a + rx. Then σ = τ σ1τ − Proposition 2.2.10. The group M( ˆEn) acts transitively on the set of spheres of ˆEn. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | y + an+1| This is the equation of another sphere, say Σ′. Hence φ maps Σ into Σ′. Since φ is its own inverse, the same argument shows that φ maps Σ′ into Σ. Thus, since φ is a bijection, φ(Σ) = Σ′. We have shown that M( ˆEn) acts on the set of spheres of ˆEn. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | See [21]. Lemma 2.2.11. Let φ be a M¨obius transformation which fixes every point of a sphere Σ of ˆEn. Then φ is either the identity or the reflection in Σ. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | Lorentzian norm, and light-like vectors those with Lorentzian norm zero. A vector x is time-like if is imaginary, and is positive or negative time-like as x1 > 0 or 1 = x2 x1 < 0. In R3, the light-like vectors are the cone x2 3, the space-like vectors are the exterior of this cone, and the time-like vectors are the two disjoint convex sets forming the cone’s interior. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | We now concentrate on time-like vectors and prove an analogue of the Cauchy– Schwartz inequality. Two vectors x and y are said to be Lorentz orthogonal if x y = 0. If vectors x and y with non-zero Lorentzian norm are Lorentz orthogonal then they are linearly independent. Proposition 2.3.1. Let x and y be non-zero Lorentz orthogonal vectors in Rn. If x is time-like then y is space-like. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | y for all vectors x and y in Rn is ◦ said to be Lorentzian. The set of all Lorentzian matrices, denoted by O(1, n 1), O(1, n forms a group under matrix multiplication. The subset of matrices A 1) which transform positive time-like vectors into positive time-like vectors is in fact a subgroup of index two of O(1, n 1). A vector − − subspace of Rn is said to be time-like if it contains a time-like vector. Proposition 2.3.2. For each dimension m, the action of P O(1, n of m-dimensional time-like vector subspaces of Rn is transitive. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | The following corollary uses this inequality to define the Lorentzian time-like angle between positive time-like vectors x and y. The Lorentzian angle is denoted η(x, y), and will be used to define a distance function for the hyperboloid model of hyperbolic n-space. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | k Moreover, η(x, y) = 0 if and only if x and y are positive scalar multiples of each other. |
Processed_Hyperbolic_Geometry_and_Distance_Functions_on_Disc.txt | x k k − k 2 cos2 η(x, y) k y k y being time-like. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.