Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Figure 1: Left: Average SEDs of blazars binned according to radio luminosity (Fossati et al. 1998). The curves represent the parameterisation proposed by Donato et al. (2001). Right: SEDs of Mkn 501. The solid curves are spectra calculated with the homogeneous SSC model (see Tavecchio et al. 2001 for details on the data and on the model parameters). The ﬁlled circles at TeV energies represent the HEGRA 1998–1999 data (Aharonian et al. 2001). The assumed emitting region is homogeneous and the general aim of the modelling is to reproduce the observed variability with a minimum number of physical parameter changes. These approximations may not be totally rigorous and valid (i.e. the emitting region could have a frequency dependent size, with lower frequency radiation being produced in larger regions). This may account for the departure of the model from data at optical and longer wavelengths. Moreover, these may be contaminated by the host galaxy emission (from Tavecchio et al. 2001).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	and on temporal delays of emission at diﬀerent frequencies. These can be used to test the models for the production of the blazar continuum.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	The spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of blazars are typically double-peaked (in a νfν representation), with a ﬁrst component attributed to synchrotron radiation, the maximum of which is located at IR to soft X-ray frequencies, and a second component correspondingly peaking at GeV to TeV energies, produced through inverse Compton scattering (Figure 1, left). According to whether the peak of their ﬁrst component is at IR or UV/soft X-ray wavelengths, the sources have been deﬁned as Low-Energy or High-Energy Peaked Blazars (Padovani & Giommi 1995), or as ‘red’ or ‘blue’ blazars (Fossati et al. 1998). However, rather than exhibiting a neat distinction between red and blue sources, the blazar population presents a continuity of properties between these two extrema, all correlating with the bolometric luminosity.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	High energy peaked blazars have lower bolometric luminosities and smaller ratios between high energy and low energy components (i.e. smaller inverse Compton domi- nance). Ghisellini et al. (1998) identify the ambient (broad emission line region or ac- cretion disk) photon density as the parameter governing these correlations: in sources with lower ambient photon densities (blue blazars) the high energy electrons cool via scattering oﬀ synchrotron photons (synchrotron self-Compton mechanism, SSC), while for high ambient photon densities the inverse Compton scattering oﬀ external radiation prevails (red blazars).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	In blue blazars the radiation eﬃciency is smaller than in red ones, and therefore in the former sources electrons can attain higher energies, thus synchrotron spectra peak at higher frequencies, and the overall luminosity is lower than in red blazars (however, Urry 1999 discusses some caveats against this scenario; see also Giommi, Menna, & Padovani 1999a). The diﬀerence in synchrotron luminosities may be determined by diﬀerent degrees of relativistic beaming. Boettcher & Dermer (2002) interpret the increasing spectral hardness with decreasing luminosity of blazars in an evolutionary scenario of increasing reduction of the black hole accretion power with time (see also Maraschi 2001).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	In the X-ray spectral range the two contributions from synchrotron and inverse Compton components overlap, with the former dominating in blue blazars, and the latter in red blazars (see Donato et al. 2001 for a recent comprehensive review of blazar X-ray spectra). Therefore, in blue blazars photons up to 10 keV, and occasionally 100 keV or more, especially in outburst, represent the highest energy tail of the synchrotron radiation. Being produced by the most energetic electrons, they are most sensitive to variations in the acceleration and cooling processes, and are thus expected to exhibit the most rapid and largest amplitude variability. In a few of these blazars the inverse Compton component, produced through SSC, is detected up to TeV energies.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	blazars present X-ray variability correlated with optical and gamma rays, although the variation amplitude is usually smaller than in gamma rays (e.g., Wehrle et al. 1998; Ghisellini et al. 1999). The hard X-ray spectral variability is modest (Sambruna et al. 1997; Lawson, McHardy, & Marscher 1999; Hartman et al. 2001; Ballo et al. 2002). For some objects (intermediate blazars) the X-ray observations have simultaneously sampled the synchrotron and the SSC components at soft and hard X-rays, respec- tively (Giommi et al. 1999b; Tagliaferri et al. 2000; Ravasio et al. 2002; Tanihata et al. 2000).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Blue blazars present a higher amplitude X-ray emission variability than red blazars (factors of up to 30 with respect to quiescence), accompanied by diﬀerent spectral variability (compare the remarkable changes of spectral slope and synchrotron peak frequency in Mkn 501, Pian et al. 1998, with the modest peak frequency variations in PKS 2005–489, Perlman et al. 1999; Tagliaferri et al. 2001). In the present paper I will summarise some of the most recent results obtained for the brightest and best monitored BL Lacs Mkn 501, Mkn 421, and PKS 2155–304, all of which belong to the class of blue blazars.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	This source has been observed by BeppoSAX in April 1997, April–May 1998, and June 1999. On the ﬁrst occasion it exhibited an outburst accompanied by dramatic spectral hardening: the synchrotron peak energy was observed to reach 100 keV or more, i.e. almost three orders of magnitude larger than in its quiescent state (Catanese et al. 1997; Pian et al. 1998). The following year, the peak energy was found at 20 keV and the emission intensity above 1 keV was lower. The fact that, despite the radiation losses, the synchrotron peak was still at such high energies one year after the outburst indicates the presence of eﬃcient, continuously active mechanisms of particle acceleration in this source.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	In June 1999 BeppoSAX recorded an ‘inactive’ state, i.e. similar to the historical one, both in emission level and synchrotron peak energy (∼0.5 keV), and characterised by modest (amplitude of 10-20%) intraday ﬂux variability (Tavecchio et al. 2001). In Figure 1, right, the X-ray spectra are shown together with the simultaneous TeV obser- vations. The X-ray spectra are best described by curved and continuously steepening laws. Their variability can be reproduced by changes of the electron break energy only (i.e. the energy of the electrons which emit at the spectral maximum). As frequently noted in blazars (see also Section 3), the X-ray spectral index and peak energy correlate well with the source intensity, ﬂatter index and higher peak energy corresponding to brighter states.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	et al. 2000). The ensuing prediction for the correlated behaviour of X-ray and TeV ﬂux densities in diﬀerent states (Tavecchio et al. 2001) is in good agreement with the simul- taneous RXTE and TeV HEGRA observations in 1997 (see Figure 6 in Krawczynski et al. 2000).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Strong correlation between spectral hardness and intensity has been observed by RXTE as well in June 1998, when a rapid shift in synchrotron peak energy was also detected during a brightening. The simultaneous X-ray and TeV ﬂux and spectral variability points, again, to the SSC origin of the multiwavelength emission (Sambruna et al. 2000).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	In July 1997, when Mkn 501 was close to its historically largest X-ray intensity, RXTE observations of the source revealed unusual anti-correlation between spectral hardness and intensity (i.e. ﬂatter spectrum for dimmer intensity). At that epoch the source exhibited variations of up to 30% over a few hours (Lamer & Wagner 1998). Remarkably rapid variability has been detected during the May 1998 RXTE campaign, when the blazar ﬂared by factors 1.6 and 2 in ∼200 seconds in the 2–10 keV range and 10–15 keV, respectively (Catanese & Sambruna 2000). With the event is associated signiﬁcant spectral variability.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	A 1 day ﬂare was detected in this source simultaneously in X-rays by BeppoSAX and at TeV energies by the Whipple Cerenkov telescope in April 1998 at the beginning of a 10 day multiwavelength monitoring campaign, involving also the ASCA, EUVE, and RXTE satellites (Takahashi et al. 2000). The X-ray and TeV light curves are well correlated with no temporal lag larger than 1.5 hours (Figure 2, left), indicating that the radiation at the two frequencies is produced by the same electron population via SSC (Maraschi et al. 1999). The observed diﬀerence in the ﬂare decay times in X-rays and TeV may be due to light travel time eﬀects adding to radiative time scales (Chiaberge & Ghisellini 1999), or to the inhomogeneity of the emitting region (see also the simultaneous RXTE and TeV observations of June 2000 by Krawczynski et al. 2001).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Within the X-ray band the ﬂare decay is achromatic, if a stationary underlying emission component is postulated (Fossati et al. 2000a). The temporally resolved spectra during the X-ray ﬂare allowed Fossati et al. (2000b) to fully map, for the ﬁrst time in any blazar, the increase of the synchrotron peak energy during the rising part of the ﬂare and its subsequent decrease during the decay (Figure 2, right). Unlike in Mkn 501, where the synchrotron peak during the outburst can reach 100 keV or more, in Mkn 421 the maximum energy reached by the synchrotron peak is 1 keV. An indication that it may have shifted up to 10 keV or beyond is present in May 2000 BeppoSAX data, when the source was also detected in its historical maximum X-ray brightness (F2−10keV = 1.2 × 10−9 erg s−1 cm−2, Fossati 2001). It is interesting to note that Mkn 421 presents larger amplitude short term variability than Mkn 501, which suggests that maximum synchrotron peak energy and short time scale variability may have complementary roles in dissipating the jet energy.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Figure 2: April 1998 ﬂare of Mkn 421. Left: light curves at X-ray (BeppoSAX) and TeV (Whipple) energies on 21–24 April 1998. All count rates are normalised to their respective averages (from Maraschi et al. 1999). Right, top to bottom: the energy of the peak of the synchrotron component, and the photon spectral indices at 5 and at 1 keV versus time (left column) and de-absorbed 0.1–10 keV intensity (right column). The solid black symbols represent the behaviour before the top of the ﬂare, while empty dots represent the spectral evolution during the decay. The data points are connected to show the time sequence. A shift of the synchrotron peak and a delay in the response of the spectrum at 5 keV can be clearly seen (from Fossati et al. 2000b).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	It is generally observed that the X-ray intensity and spectral index variations in blazars are correlated, in the sense of spectral hardening during brightening. It has been noted for some time (see e.g. Sembay et al. 1993) that the changes describe diﬀerent paths in the index–intensity plane, according to whether they refer to the increasing or decreasing portion of a ﬂare. This is seen also during the April 1998 ﬂare of Mkn 421, which exhibits an ‘anti-clockwise’ pattern of intensity vs spectral index (middle and bottom panels of the right side of Figure 2, right). For Mkn 421 this is less common than the opposite ‘clockwise’ pattern (Takahashi et al. 1996; Malizia et al. 2000).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	The emission of soft X-rays ( <∼ 2 keV) is generally well correlated with and lags that of hard X-rays ( >∼ 4 keV) by a variable interval (from 3–4 ks down to ∼300 s) as determined with cross-correlation methods (Malizia et al. 2000; Takahashi et al. 2000; Brinkmann et al. 2001). The soft lag is interpreted as a consequence of the synchrotron cooling, which is more rapid at higher energies. The reversal of this temporal correlation has been observed in 1997 and April 1998 (Treves et al. 1999; Fossati et al. 2000a), suggesting that hard lags may be associated with anti-clockwise intensity spectrum patterns, while soft lags are associated with clockwise patterns. Hard lags may originate when the acceleration time scale approaches the cooling time scale, so that electrons appear ﬁrst at low energies and gradually build up at higher energies (Kirk, Rieger, & Mastichiadis 1998; Takahashi et al. 2000).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	We note however that Edelson et al. (2001) have put into question temporal lags of the order of ∼1 hour, when obtained by applying cross-correlation methods to light curves measured by satellites with low Earth orbits (like ASCA and BeppoSAX).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Mkn 421 ﬂares daily, with a characteristic time scale of 12 hours, as determined from the structure function analysis of the ASCA data in April 1998 (Takahashi et al. 2000; a similar result has been obtained with previous ASCA observations in 1994, Takahashi et al. 1996, and with XMM observations in May 2000, Brinkmann et al. 2001). However, 50% variations of 4–5 hours time scale are typical (Guainazzi et al. 1999; Fossati et al. 2000a; Krawczynski et al. 2001). The symmetric shape of the X-ray ﬂares detected by BeppoSAX and ASCA imply that the cooling time scales are shorter than the light crossing time through the emitting region, so that the latter dominates the variability.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	A blue, relatively nearby (z ≃ 0.1) blazar, and one of the brightest at UV and X- ray frequencies, PKS 2155–304 was expected to be a TeV emitter and has indeed been detected at these energies in September–November 1996 by the Cerenkov tele- scope Mark 6 (Narrabri, Australia) and, with a larger intensity, simultaneously with EGRET and BeppoSAX in November 1997 (Chadwick et al. 1999; Chiappetti et al. 1999; Vestrand & Sreekumar 1999). The X-ray state observed by BeppoSAX is one of the highest ever detected, though lower than that observed by RXTE before the start of the BeppoSAX campaign. A pure SSC model in a homogeneous region accounts well for the X-ray and higher energy radiation, with variability produced solely by changes in electron break energy (Figure 3).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Figure 3: SEDs of PKS 2155–304. The BeppoSAX spectra in the high and low states and the TeV point refer to simultaneous observations in November 1997. The vertical bars encompass the range between the minimum and maximum value in a compilation of radio, optical, and UV data. The X-ray spectra are ﬁtted with a homogeneous SSC model (solid and dashed curves, respectively). A comment similar to that made for Mkn 501 (Figure 1, right) applies here to the inconsistency of the model with UV/optical data (from Chiappetti et al. 1999).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	A comparative temporal analysis on the X-ray light curves of PKS 2155–304 in 1994 (ASCA, Kataoka et al. 2000), 1996, and 1997 (BeppoSAX, Giommi et al. 1998; Chiappetti et al. 1999) has been accomplished by Zhang et al. (1999), who found power density spectra of slope similar to those of Seyfert galaxies (f −1.7, e.g. Edelson & Nandra 1999). The minimum variability time scale determined by the power density spectrum analysis in the 1.5–10 keV range is ∼1000 s, consistent with the minimum measured doubling time of the ﬂux.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	The degree of variability is found to be a function of brightness, with shorter dou- bling times and larger fractional variability parameter for brighter states. Similarly, the temporal delays between soft and hard X-rays, determined with diﬀerent correlation methods, are shorter for higher source intensity (see however Section 3 and Edelson et al. 2001).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Both positive and negative temporal lags between soft and hard X-rays have been measured by RXTE for PKS 2155–304 during successive ﬂares in May 1996, and cor- respondingly a clockwise or anti-clockwise loop, respectively, is seen in the intensity vs hardness ratio plane (Sambruna 1999). This, as in the case of Mkn 421, can be interpreted in terms of a diﬀerent duration of the acceleration process with respect to the electron cooling (Kirk et al. 1998).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	The variable temporal lags between soft and hard X-ray emission may be related to a diﬀerent geometry of the emitting region in diﬀerent states of the source (Zhang et al. 1999), requiring a time-dependent SSC model to reproduce the SED (Kataoka et al. 2000). Alternatively, Georganopoulos & Marscher (1998) have proposed that the diﬀerent temporal lags observed in 1991 and 1994 between light curves of PKS 2155–304 at UV and X-ray frequencies (Edelson et al. 1995; Urry et al. 1997) can be reproduced by ﬂaring components superimposed on a similar steady state of the jet, and produced by diﬀerent energy distributions of freshly injected electrons.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	It is striking that in this source, similar patterns of X-ray variability are seen, spaced apart by many years (Brinkmann et al. 2000), suggesting recurrent conditions in the mechanism of jet powering and activity development. This also weakens the microlensing hypothesis as the origin of intraday variability in this source (Urry et al. 1993).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	The X-ray campaigns, coordinated with TeV telescopes, have determined a crucial progress toward our understanding of blazars and have shown the importance of X-ray instruments with wide spectral range and good temporal resolution. The correlated variability at X-ray and TeV energies can be reproduced by the changes of a single parameter, namely the break energy of the relativistic electron distribution. In some sources, especially (but not necessarily) during outburst, this parameter can attain ex- tremely high values (γb > 106), resulting in synchrotron peaks beyond 1 keV (Mkn 421), and even up to 50–100 keV, as in Mkn 501, 1ES 2344+514 (Giommi, Padovani, & Perl- man 2000), and 1ES 1426+428 (Costamante et al. 2001).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	More detections of these ‘extreme synchrotron blazars’ are expected with the advent of the INTEGRAL satellite for soft gamma-ray astronomy. These sources are expected to be TeV emitters, and therefore should be suitable targets for the next generation of sensitive Cerenkov telescopes. Simultaneous observations at X-ray and TeV energies should allow us to measure the correlation of the light curves on shorter time scales than it has been possible so far and identify the relation between source intensity and variable temporal lags. Similar coordinated observations of red blazars, which are not expected to be strong TeV emitters, will receive renewed interest after the launch in the near future of satellites sensitive in the MeV–GeV range, i.e. AGILE and GLAST. Finally, longer and denser monitoring of blazars will allow a better test of the hadronic models of blazar emission. These predict gamma rays to be due to proton synchrotron radiation (Aharonian 2000), or to pion production by accelerated protons interacting with turbulent ﬂuctuations in the magnetic ﬁeld (Mannheim 1998), or with ambient radiation ﬁelds (Donea & Protheroe 2002). In hadronic models, correlated variability at X-ray and TeV energies may arise from less restrictive sets of parame- ters than in leptonic models (SSC, or synchrotron and external Compton). However, hadronic and leptonic models are clearly separated in the parameter space, so that it should be possible to distinguish them via a model-independent estimate of the magnetic ﬁeld and plasma Doppler factor (Rachen 2000).
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	I thank A. Celotti, L. Chiappetti, G. Fossati, G. Ghisellini, F. Tavecchio, and A. Treves for valuable input, L. Maraschi for a careful reading of the manuscript, and the workshop organisers for a pleasant, stimulating, and constructive meeting.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Ghisellini, G., et al. 1999, A&A, 348, 63 Giommi, P., Padovani, P., & Perlman, E. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 743 Giommi, P., et al. 1998, A&A, 333, L5 Giommi, P., Menna, M.T., Padovani, P. 1999a, MNRAS, 310, 465 Giommi, P., et al. 1999b, A&A, 351, 59 Guainazzi, M., Vacanti, G., Malizia, A., O’Flaherty, K.S., Palazzi, E., & Parmar, A.N.
Processed_X-ray_Variability_of_Blazars.txt	Krawczynski, H., et al. 2001, ApJ, 559, 187 Lamer, G., & Wagner, S.J. 1998, A&A, 331, L13 Lawson, A.J., McHardy, I.M., & Marscher, A.P. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 247 Malizia, A., et al. 2000, MNRAS, 312, 123 Mannheim, K. 1998, Science, 279, 684 Maraschi, L. 2001, in Relativistic Astrophysics: 20th Texas Symposium, AIP Conf.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Full citation: Licorish, S.A., & MacDonell, S.G. (2013) Self-organising roles in agile globally distributed teams, in Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS2013). Melbourne, Australia, AIS, pp.1-10.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	The ability to be a fundamental requirement for successful agile teams. In particular, self-organising teams are said to be crucial in agile globally distributed software development (AGSD) settings, where distance exacerbates team issues. We used contextual analysis to study the specific interaction behaviours and enacted roles of practitioners working in multiple AGSD teams. Our results show that the teams studied were extremely task focussed, and those who occupied team lead or programmer roles were central to their teams’ self-organisation. These findings have implications for AGSD teams, and particularly for instances when programmers – or those occupying similar non-leadership positions – may not be willing to accept such responsibilities. We discuss the implications of our findings for information system development (ISD) practice.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	methods emphasise the need for self-organisation and flexible (Pressman 2009). Empirical studies of self-organising agile teams have found evidence that project team members do indeed adopt various roles, as needed, to facilitate self- organisation. Hoda et al. (2010), for instance, identified the roles of mentor, translator, champion, coordinator, promoter and terminator, and saw them assumed at various times by different team members so that progress in projects could be sustained. That said, while such flexible adoption of roles is likely to be evident and considered necessary in agile ISD contexts (Hoda et al. 2010), other prior work has noted that it is rarely achieved (Moe et al. 2008). Moreover, there have been few investigations of issues of expertise, role assignment, role in globally distributed development contexts beyond those related to open source software (OSS) (Crowston et al. 2007). This is despite the relevance of such phenomena in AGSD settings, with their inherently limited opportunities for timely communication among dispersed team members (Serce et al. 2009).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	While those studying OSS teams have provided insights into the way such teams self-organise, these teams utilise different processes to those used in commercial settings. In most OSS contexts individuals contribute voluntarily to projects for reasons often associated with personal interest and ideological commitment (Oreg and Nov 2008). in commercial projects are likely to be divergent given likely immediate rewards (e.g., financial remuneration). We have therefore extended our previous work that utilised psycholinguistics (Licorish and MacDonell 2013), and have employed content analysis techniques to examine the specific interaction behaviours and enacted roles adopted by those occupying a range of formally assigned roles while working in multiple commercial AGSD teams.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	and outline our research questions. Our research setting is then outlined, prior to the presentation of our results. Discussion of our main findings follows. Finally, we conclude this work and consider our study’s limitations.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Geographically distributed work is becoming ubiquitous due to globalisation, and this trend has found favour in numerous ISD organisations (Bird et al. 2009). For instance, India’s software industry grew between 30% and 40% annually for the ten year period ending in 2004 due to their involvement in global software ventures (Arora and Gambardella 2005). Driven by the availability of cheaper hardware, affordable software development to communication infrastructure and technologies and the need to reduce time-to-market, many software companies have expanded their operations to both leverage and reach global contexts. In keeping with this expansion, these companies are employing AGSD approaches (Layman et al. 2006).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Although many success stories have been reported regarding the implementation of agile methodologies in AGSD contexts (Layman et al. 2006), this approach has also been reported to be quite challenging (Kamaruddin et al. 2012). In particular, team member dispersion in AGSD has been shown to reduce the opportunities for informal (and face-to-face) communication (Cataldo et al. 2007). This dispersion has also been shown to detrimentally affect project oversight and monitoring, and temporal distance has been reported to have a negative impact on team culture and trust (Lee and Yong 2010).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Due to the way AGSD teams operate in a distributed manner, individual team members must often rely heavily on communication technologies to support their team processes (Bachmann and Bernstein 2009). Of the project arise potential communication in particular is often critical to teams’ performance (Herbsleb and Mockus 2003). Given that team communication is often recorded for persistence in AGSD settings, such communications form a source that could provide novel details of the ISD process (Abreu and Premraj 2009). The rationale for project decisions, pointers for how AGSD teams work, insights into the way such teams collaborate, and rich information on AGSD team dynamics are stored in distributed software teams’ communication logs. Thus, these logs could provide invaluable knowledge-bases relating to AGSD, as has been demonstrated (Bachmann and Bernstein 2009; Abreu and Premraj 2009; Herbsleb and Mockus 2003).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	The work reported here uses a sample of such artefacts to examine the specific interaction behaviours and enacted roles adopted by those occupying a range of formally appointed roles while they were working in multiple AGSD teams. We introduce the principles and theories around team roles and self-organising teams to provide the theoretical basis for our inquiry in the following subsection.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	According to theories in the psychology and management disciplines, social and team role principles may be used to characterise individual behaviours and their personal interactions in teams, and each individual’s behavioural style is correlated with their occupation of specific team roles (Belbin 2002). Meredith Belbin proposed a model for assigning participants to roles during team work, after nearly a decade of observation embedded in personality psychology in five different countries (Belbin 2002). During his observations, Belbin observed that individuals in teams occupied nine distinct roles: Implementer (IM), Co-ordinator (CO), Shaper (SH), Plant (PL), Resource Investigator (RI), Monitor Evaluator (ME), Team Worker (TW), Completer/Finisher (CF) and Specialist (SP). Belbin asserts that in successful teams, these roles are performed by various team members. Of course, individuals may also enact very divergent roles to those that are nominally assigned at project initiation (Licorish and MacDonell 2013).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	In relation to ISD groups or departments, roles may relate to the specific software process or methodology being utilised. For instance, a group that has adopted XP will likely define roles such as programmer, tester, coach and so on (Highsmith 2004). In addition, roles may sometimes be performed arbitrarily by team members in which case these members must possess a level of general competency in many roles (Gorla and Lam 2004). Thus in this context, role arrangement and competency requirements for individual ISD-related roles may be subject to specific and dynamic organisational requirements.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Given the emphasis on self-organising teams that is evident in some Agile approaches (Pressman 2009), the question “how do teams self-organise?” has been the focus of both software engineering (SE) and IS research. In fact, the ability to self-organise has been purported to be one of the key determinants of agile teams’ success (Hoda et al. 2010). In order to self-organise, various team members are said to adopt informal roles beyond (or perhaps instead of) their assigned roles as the need arises (Pressman 2009). However, Moe et al. (2008) noted that the process of self-organisation is actually quite complex, and so may not suit all ISD contexts. Their ethnographic study in Norway of novice agile practitioners revealed that team members displayed minimal internal autonomy and were rarely willing to assume roles other than those that matched their specialised competencies. These findings may be contrasted with those of Hoda et al. (2010), who found that agile developers in India and New Zealand operated more fluidly across assigned and non-assigned roles. This signals a need for further research, and particularly, explorations that may provide insights for confirmation of these alternative views. The questions outlined in the following subsection are aimed at addressing this need.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	We created a Java program to leverage the Jazz Client API to extract information along with development and communication artefacts from ten teams (shown in Table 1) from the Jazz repository. This included: Work Items (WIs) and history logs, representing project management Project Workspaces, and representing multiple including information on team memberships and roles; and Messages, representing practitioner dialogues and communication around project WIs.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	communications and noted that all ten teams had similar profiles for network density (between 0.02 and 0.14) and closeness (between 0 and 0.06). Formal statistical testing for significant differences in in-degree measures also confirmed that the teams were relatively homogenous, X2 = 13.182, p = 0.155 (Kruskal-Wallis test result).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	In earlier work we used psycholinguistics to study the way these IBM Rational Jazz practitioners enacted various shared competencies to successfully self-organise in their global project (Licorish and MacDonell 2013). Among our findings, we uncovered that practitioners enacted a range of roles depending on their teams’ task portfolio; and that team leaders were most critical to self-organisation. The psycholinguistic approach was applied in a top-down fashion, where the categories of language codes were pre-determined and granular, considering the use of isolated words. We anticipated that a more exploratory, bottom-up approach focused on phrases might provide different insights into the way AGSD teams self- organise. We therefore studied all of the messages exchanged by three of the ten teams using a contextual analysis approach, to examine the interaction behaviours and enacted roles adopted by those that were formally assigned a range of roles during AGSD (see teams P1, P7 and P8 highlighted in Table 1). These three teams were deliberately selected as they were charged with addressing different forms of software tasks, and so, we anticipated to also reveal variations in the way teams work given their portfolio of features.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	The role information extracted from the repository is as follows: Team leads) are responsible for planning and executing the architectural integration of components; Admins are responsible for the configuration and integration of artefacts; Project managers (PMC) are responsible for project governance; those occupying the Programmer (contributor) role contribute code to features; and finally, those who occupied more than one of these roles were labelled Multiple. We used these practitioners’ roles as our unit of analysis, we made comparisons of interaction behaviours across roles in individual teams, and we also conducted assessments across various task types.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	were coded under each category. During the pilot coding exercise we also Jazz practitioners communicated multiple ideas in their messages. Thus, we segmented the communication using the sentence as the unit of analysis. We extended the protocol by deriving new scales directly from the pilot Jazz data (see Scales 9 to 13 in Table 2), after which the first author and the two trained coders recoded all the messages. Duplicate codes were assigned to utterances that demonstrated multiple forms of interaction, and all coding differences were discussed and resolved by consensus. We achieved an 81% inter-rater agreement among the three coders using Holsti’s reliability measurement (C.R). This represents excellent agreement among the coders.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	The artefacts selected for the three teams together comprised 355 tasks and 1561 messages, with 139 contributors working across the three teams (comprising 107 distinct members) (refer to Table 1). All of the 1561 messages were coded using the directed CA approach outlined above. From the total 1561 messages that were coded, 5218 utterances were recorded for the three teams (P1 = 1165 codes, P7 = 1770 codes and P8 = 2283 codes). We provide other descriptive statistics for the three teams in Table 3.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Figure 1 shows the distribution of the aggregated interaction behaviours (from the 5218 derived codes) that were exhibited for the three teams P1, P7 and P8. It is evident that Information sharing (2452 codes), Discussion (598 codes), Scaffolding (590 codes) and Comments (383 codes) were the most dominant behaviours during Jazz practitioners’ discourses. Additionally, Apology type communication (17 codes) was rarely observed, and only a few utterances were not matched to a category (Not Coded = 7 codes). Figure 1 also shows that Type I Questions (104 codes), Gratitude (97 codes) and Off task utterances (107 codes) had comparatively low usage and were relatively even in number. A similar pattern is evident for Type II Questions (255 codes), Answers (257 codes) and Instructions (200 codes). The number of codes for Reflection (151 codes) was slightly lower again.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	These codes were then separated and grouped according to the three project teams, leading to the results presented in Figure 2. Given the relatively low numbers of codes assigned to the Apology and Not Coded categories these were omitted from the figure. Figure 2 (a) shows that although there were differences in the number of codes (as for number of messages) contributed by the three teams, the pattern of results for all of the three teams remained similar to those in Figure 1. We normalised these codes across the three teams by using percentages in Figure 2 (b); here the results also confirmed that the pattern in Figure 1 is maintained.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	analysed is categorical, the Chi-square test is the statistical procedure of choice. Further, with the exception of the Not Coded category (as only seven codes were recorded for this category), all the categories comprised a sample size that was substantially more than ten (as is assumed if utilising a Chi-square test) (Sharp 1979). This Chi-square result was statistically significant, X2 (24) = 255.523, p < 0.001. However, the effect size for this finding, assessed using Cramer’s V, was small, 0.221 (Cohen 1988). This result suggests that, overall, practitioners did not contribute consistently across interaction categories for the three teams, though, this difference is of limited practical significance (Kampenes et al. 2007).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	The interaction behaviours for the different roles were then grouped, and their (highly skewed) distributions are shown in Figure 3. These results indicate that team leads and programmers were dominant in their teams, across all interaction behaviour categories. Given that these member types also had the largest membership in Table 1 we further examine their performance in the three teams in Table 4. The pattern of results in Table 4 confirms the team leads’ and programmers’ dominance in their individual teams. We normalise these codes in Table 5 in order to examine practitioners’ contributions in their given role in relation to their team’s performance. Table 1 shows that for P1 (UE) there were 33 members in total; 29 members belonged to the programmer or team lead roles and 4 members occupied the other roles. Tables 4 and 5 show that, apart from the measures for Answers and Comments for the project managers on the UE team, all other measures for those that occupied multiple, admin and project manager roles were below the team’s average. This suggests that the team leads and programmers team. The corresponding results for P7 (Code) were substantially lower, with those occupying multiple, admin and project manager roles contributing much lower than their mean team contribution.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	A slightly different pattern is observed for P8 (PM). Table 1 shows that P8 had 90 members; 53 members were assigned to the programmer and team lead roles and 37 members were assigned to the other roles. Tables 4 and 5 show that Questions were asked evenly across the five roles for the PM team; however, those occupying the fewest Answers and multiple Information (when compared the mean project measures). Discussion, Comment, Reflection and Scaffolding were contributed by those occupying the programmer, team lead and project manager roles. Instructions were also provided by those occupying these roles, with those in the admin role also contributing this form of utterance. In contrast, those occupying multiple roles expressed the most Gratitude, and programmers communicated most Off task. We explore these findings in relation to theory next.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Self-organising large amounts of Information sharing, Discussion and Scaffolding. Results in this work shows that this pattern of behaviour was maintained for all three teams regardless of their task portfolio roles. the distribution of Notwithstanding the effect of possible sampling on these results, these findings suggest that membership of AGSD teams may need to possess significant diversity of skills in order to succeed. For instance, although there were few Questions aimed at seeking help or guidance among teams overall, there was great willingness among team members to provide direction to those team members that were less aware. The need for highly skilled and communicative practitioners may have willingly implications for instances when such individuals are not available.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	posited for group work in general (Belbin 2002). Although task-focused individuals are most productive, evidence of debate related activities may not threaten project success. These behaviours may complement each other. In fact, the level of debate observed may also support the view that Jazz members were willing to critique one another’s work, and were keenly involved in their teams’ processes. Such a balance may be necessary to enhance innovativeness and critical evaluation among group members (Tjosvold 2008).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Findings in this work also suggest that significant levels of mentoring occur during ISD projects (evident in the results for Scaffolding), and teams with members who are willing to provide coverage for others (through starting dialogue about project features, answering questions and sharing information) as against working alone may be very useful to team performance. In AGSD, it does appear that gains can be made if team members embrace a “teamwork” mindset. Also, our findings for Scaffolding (i.e., recommendation for documenting procedures for later use by others) suggest that some documentation may be useful for maintaining team knowledge (Boehm and Turner 2003). This activity may also reduce the burden and distraction of new team members on their more experienced and productive colleagues.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Findings in this work show that team members adopted various roles in order to self-organise, but that those who were formally assigned to the team lead and programmer roles were most important to their teams’ self-organising processes. These two groups of practitioners were integrally involved with team organisation and task assignment (e.g., see measures for Answers and Instruction), responsibilities typical of those occupying Belbin’s (2002) CO and SH roles. These findings are in contrast to those that have been uncovered for OSS self-assignment was most evident teams, where (Crowston et al. 2007), confirming that different processes seem to be enacted by commercial teams. It had been previously established that individuals involved in such forms of (vertical) communication are often perceived by their peers as knowledge hubs, and powerful team players (Zhu 1996). In fact, such responsibilities and behaviours are often associated with formal software project individuals occupying coordination and planning related roles (Andre et al. 2011).
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	leads and Results programmers provided context awareness for the other team members and acted as teams’ main information resource (e.g., as evident in the measures for Information sharing, Discussion and Scaffolding). Such behaviours are typically associated with highly skilled roles (Belbin’s (2002) IM, PM, SP and RI roles); or with those individuals that are extremely creative, imaginative and insightful (Belbin 2002). Those who communicate more are also generally more aware. This finding for team leads’ dominance coincides with those that we identified previously using psycholinguistics (Licorish and MacDonell 2013). While finding are for coordination and understandable planning) for those occupying the team lead role given their assigned responsibilities (leading, planning and integration), such skills are not typically required of those who are formally assigned to the programmer role (who were typically expected to contribute to the architecture and code of a component), suggesting that these members were indeed successful at self-organising and adopting informal roles (Hoda et al. 2010). This finding has implications for AGSD, and particularly for instances when programmers, or those occupying similar non-leadership positions, may not be willing to assume such responsibilities (Moe et al. 2008). Additionally, in comparing the outcomes of this role examination to previous literature, it is noted that previous studies have speculated fewer programmers communication-related abilities (Acuna et al. 2006a). However, the evidence reported here is divergent to these views. Results in this work indicate that all ISD practitioners may actively participate in communication self- and coordination to enhance organisation is supportive, or demands such participation. Thus, formal role assignment may not be a sufficient indicator of the need for communication and coordination during AGSD projects.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	The pattern of behaviours exhibited by programmers in this work may not be default behaviours, however. While these practitioners may feel a sense of obligation to their teams, a facilitating organisation and work structure may be a prerequisite for encouraging programmers to work across roles as the need arises. Given the evidence uncovered in this work, it is posited that IBM Rational is one such organisation that encourages team members’ performance based on their natural abilities, and that promotes non-hierarchical and informal work structures. Such configurations have long been shown to encourage tacit knowledge sharing and cross-fertilization among team members, allowing team members to adapt and execute their tasks based on work demands (Powell 1990). These environments are well suited for ADSD teams, and should be encouraged if such teams are to succeed.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	We acknowledge that there are limitations to this study, and to the generalisation of our results. In particular, the messages from the three teams may not necessarily represent all IBM Rational Jazz teams’ processes in the repository, and the work processes and work culture at IBM are specific to that organisation and may not be representative of organisation dynamics elsewhere. Additionally, our analyses did not consider the background of (e.g., period of the practitioners employment in given roles), which may influence the interaction behaviours these members displayed. Future works are encouraged to consider and address these limitations in designing replication studies.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Abreu, R., and Premraj, R. 2009. "How Developer Communication to Bug Introducing Changes," in: joint international and annual ERCIM workshops on IWPSE and Evol. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ACM, pp. 153-158.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Acuna, S.T., Juristo, N., and Moreno, A.M. 2006a. "Emphasizing Human Capabilities in Software Development," IEEE Software (23:2), March-April, 2006, pp 94-101.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Acuna, S.T., Juristo, N., and Moreno, A.M. 2006b. "Emphasizing Human Capabilities in Software Development.," IEEE Software (23:2), March-April, 2006, pp 94 - 101.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Bachmann, A., and Bernstein, A. 2009. "Software Process Data Quality and Characteristics: A Historical View on Open and Closed Source Projects," in: joint international and annual ERCIM workshops on IWPSE and Evol. Amsterdam, Netherlands: ACM, pp. 119-128.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Boehm, B.W., and Turner, R. 2003. "Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods," IEEE Journal (36:6), June 2003, pp 57-66.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Cataldo, M., Bass, M., Herbsleb, J.D., and Bass, L. 2007. "On Coordination Mechanisms in Global Software Development," in: Second IEEE ICGSE, 2007. Munich, Germany: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 71-80.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence E Assoc.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Crowston, K., Li, Q., Wei, K., Eseryel, Y.U., and Howison, J. 2007. "Self-Organization of Teams for Free/Libre Open Source Software Development," Information and Software Technology (49:6), pp 564-575.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Gorla, N., and Lam, Y.W. 2004. "Who Should Work with Whom?: Building Effective Software Project Teams," Commun. ACM (47:6), pp 79-82.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Herbsleb, J.D., and Mockus, A. 2003. "An Empirical Study of Speed and Communication in Globally IEEE Distributed Transactions on Software Engineering (29:6), pp 481-494.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Hoda, R., Noble, J., and Marshall, S. 2010. "Organizing Self-Organizing Teams," in: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE ICSE - Volume 1. Cape Town, South Africa: ACM, pp. 285-294.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Holsti, O.R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Hsieh, H.-F., and Shannon, S.E. 2005. "Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis," Qualitative Health Research (15:9), November 1, 2005, pp 1277-1288.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Kamaruddin, N.K., Arshad, N.H., and Mohamed, A. 2012. "Chaos Issues on Communication in Agile Global Software Development," in: 2012 IEEE BEIAC. Kuala Lumpur: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 394-398.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Kampenes, V.B., Dybå, T., Hannay, J.E., and Sjøberg, D.I.K. 2007. "A Systematic Review of Effect Size in Software Engineering Experiments," Information and Software Technology (49:11–12), pp 1073-1086.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Layman, L., Williams, L., Damian, D., and Bures, H. 2006. "Essential Communication Practices for in a Global Software Extreme Programming Development Team," I&ST (48:9), pp 781-794.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Lee, S., and Yong, H.-S. 2010. "Distributed Agile: Project Management in a Global Environment," Empirical Software Engineering (15:2), pp 204-217.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Licorish, S.A., and MacDonell, S.G. 2013. "How Do Globally Distributed Agile Teams Self-Organise? Initial Insights from a Case Study," in: 8th ENASE. Angers, France: SCITEPRESS, pp. 227-234.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Moe, N.B., Dingsoyr, T., and Dyba, T. 2008. "Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development," in: Proceedings of the 19th ASWEC. Perth, WA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 76- 85.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Oreg, S., and Nov, O. 2008. "Exploring Motivations for Contributing to Open Source Initiatives: The Roles of Contribution Context and Personal Values," Computers in Human Behavior (24:5), pp 2055- 2073.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Powell, W.W. 1990. "Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummints, Eds.," Research in Organizational Behavior (12), pp 295-336.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Serce, F.C., Alpaslan, F.-N., Swigger, K., Brazile, R., Dafoulas, G., Lopez, V., and Schumacker, R. 2009. "Exploring Collaboration Patterns among Global Software Development Teams," in: Proceedings of the 2009 Fourth IEEE ICGSE. Limerick, Ireland: IEEE Computer Society.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	Zhu, E. 1996. "Meaning Negotiation, Knowledge Construction, and Mentoring in a Distance Learning Course," Selected Research and Development Presentations at NCAECT, Indianapolis: ERIC, pp. 821-844.
Processed_Self-organising_Roles_in_Agile_Globally_Distribute.txt	We the Jazz repository. Thanks also to the coders for their help. S. Licorish is supported by an AUT VC Doctoral Scholarship Award.
Processed_Synthesis_and_Physical_Properties_of_FeSe1_2Te1_2_.txt	a tetragonal structure with lattice parameters a = 3.8008(10) and c = 6.0187 (15) Å.
Processed_Synthesis_and_Physical_Properties_of_FeSe1_2Te1_2_.txt	in the system [9-11]. The highest Tc = 55 K has been reported in SmFeAS(O1-xFx) [12].
Processed_Synthesis_and_Physical_Properties_of_FeSe1_2Te1_2_.txt	Very recently, another iron based superconductor FeSe was reported with a Tc of 8 K [1].
Processed_Synthesis_and_Physical_Properties_of_FeSe1_2Te1_2_.txt	Mook, G. F. Chen, J. L. Luo, N. L. Wang and P. Dai, Nature 453 (2008) 899.
Processed_Synthesis_and_Physical_Properties_of_FeSe1_2Te1_2_.txt	Figure 4: Heat capacity variation with temperature (Cp-T) in zero-field and 70 kOe field; inset shows the enlarged view of the anomaly present in Cp/T vs T2.
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	Abstract: This paper presents the initial results of a multi-site photometric programme to examine the extraor- dinary behaviour displayed by 18 R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars in the Magellanic Clouds (MCs). RCB stars exhibit a unique variability whereby they undergo rapid declines of up to several magnitudes. These are thought to be caused by the formation of dust in the stellar environment which reduces the brightness. The monitoring programme comprised the collection of U BV RI photometric data using ﬁve telescopes located at three diﬀerent southern hemisphere longitudes (Las Campanas Observatory in Chile, Mount Joun University Observatory in New Zealand, and the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) in South Africa). Examination of the data acquired in the V and I ﬁlters resulted in the identiﬁcation of a total of 18 RCB declines occurring in four stars. Construction of colour-magnitude diagrams (V vs V − I), during the recovery to maximum light were undertaken in order to study the unique colour behaviour associated with the RCB declines. The combined recovery slope for the four stars was determined to be 3.37 ± 0.24, which is similar to the value of 3.1 ± 0.1 calculated for galactic RCB stars (Skuljan et al. 2003). These results may imply that the nature of the dust (i.e. the particle size) is similar in both our Galaxy and the MCs.
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	R Coronae Borealis (RCB) stars are a type of eruptive variable that undergo rapid and enigmatic magnitude declines of variable amplitude. They are a rare type of helium- and carbon-rich, but hydrogen-poor, super- giant star with only 51 having been identiﬁed in the Galaxy (Tisserand et al. 2008) and a further 26 in If it is the Magellanic Clouds (Alcock et al. 2001). a common process why don’t all stars show hydrogen deﬁciency? This implies that these hydrogen-deﬁcient objects must be produced by an unusual combination of stellar nucleosynthesis and other processes. Two scenarios have been proposed as the most likely. These are the merger of two types of white dwarf stars in a binary system or a brief nuclear burning phase that re- inﬂates the object (so-called born again objects) back into a supergiant star that is more easily observable to astronomers (see Clayton 1996).
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	newly formed amorphous dust along the line-of-sight that eclipses the star (Clayton 1996). Each successive drop in magnitude within a large decline may be ex- plained by a new dust cloud forming along the line-of- sight. The mechanism responsible for gas ejection and the formation of carbon dust, close to the photosphere, is not yet known (Walker 1985; Whitney et al. 1992). However, it is widely believed that the dust condensa- tion is strongly related to the pulsational variability of RCB stars (Fadeyev 1983).
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	Distances to the galactic RCB stars, and hence their absolute magnitudes, are currently ill-deﬁned. However the 26 RCB stars identiﬁed in the Magellanic Clouds (Alcock et al. 2001) do not suﬀer from poor absolute magnitude determination as the distances to the Magellanic Clouds are precisely known. Therefore these stars have well-deﬁned positions in the L − T eﬀ planes for intercomparison and linking with evolution- ary tracks. In particular, studying the RCB stars in the metal-poor environment of the MCs is important for making comparisons between themselves and the galactic RCB stars, through the inﬂuence that chemi- cal composition may have on their respective declines. In addition, their mysterious evolutionary status and the fact that they produce large quantities of dust allows dust formation and evolution processes to be studied. This means that the study of RCB stars has important consequences in the understanding of a number of properties of the stellar and circumstellar environment of these enigmatic stars.
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	Figure 1: A typical RCB light curve (LMC104.4 60857), based on data presented in this paper, dis- playing a characteristic decline (dots) and recov- ery (stars) associated with the obscuration of the photosphere by the formation of dust along the line-of-sight. The green and black points repre- sent the observations taken in the V and I ﬁlters respectively.
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	Photometric data analysed for this paper were col- lected using ﬁve diﬀerent telescopes situated at three observatories, each positioned on a separate southern hemisphere continent (South America, Australasia and Africa).
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	At Las Campanas Observatory in Chile, V and I data were collected using the 1.3 m Warsaw telescope in the course of the long term sky survey – the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE). At Mount John University Observatory (MJUO) in New Zealand, BV RI photometric data were acquired with the Opti- cal Craftsmen (OC) and the Boller and Chivens (B&C) 0.6 m telescopes. The instruments used in conjunc- tion with the OC and B&C telescopes were respec- tively the SBIG STe9 CCD system and ﬁlter wheel (ac- commodating the Schuler U BV RI ﬁlters in the John- son/Cousins photometric system) and the Apogee Alta CCD system (same set of ﬁlters). The remaining data were collected in the U BV RI ﬁlters using the 11 m Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) and SALTI- CAM, in South Africa.
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	Data for this paper were collected over the previous 11 years by four diﬀerent telescopes, and as a result, slightly diﬀerent procedures were followed during the preparation of diﬀerent datasets prior to their reduc- tion. The MJUO images required the most pre-processing while the OGLE data were provided as calibrated V and I magnitudes.
Processed_Photometric_analysis_of_Magellanic_Cloud_R_Coronae.txt	To determine the magnitudes of the target stars in the MJUO and SALT frames, they were reduced using the aperture photometry methods within Mira AL 1. This process involves comparing the counts obtained from the standard stars in the ﬁeld (with known mag- nitudes), to the counts obtained from the target star. At least two, and in most cases three, standard stars were present in each ﬁeld. Each star in the ﬁeld that is selected for measuring needs three apertures. The central one measures the combined signal from the star and the sky. The middle and outer apertures form an annulus within which only the signal from the local sky is measured. Subtracting this from the signal obtained from the inner aperture (combined star and sky) gives the signal detected from the star alone. Mira AL com- putes the magnitude using this value, the various FITS header keywords (GAIN, EXPTIME, ZERO-POINT) and the photometric zero point from the standard stars in the ﬁeld.

Subsets and Splits

No saved queries yet

Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.