Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	The existence of copious amounts of Ps atoms is undis- puted in the centre and plane of the Milky Way. As already mentioned, the γ-ray annihilation line at 511 keV is strongly detected and has been known for many decades, with detailed inspection of the continuum (Siegert et al., 2016a) suggesting that the line mostly arises from Ps annihilation, rather than direct e+e– annihilation. Corresponding radio searches for Ps recombination lines towards the Galactic Centre have been conducted by Anantharamaiah et al. (1989) and Reynolds et al. (2017). The search by Reynolds et al. (2017) was more sensitive to the diﬀuse emission expected from dark matter annihilation and stellar populations. They established a 3-σ upper limit to the brightness temperature of any Ps recombination line emission of TB < 0.09 K. Due to the strong synchrotron con- tinuum background and factors discussed later, this limit is still well above the rate measured by γ-ray observations of 2 × 1043 s–1 (Siegert et al., 2016a).
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	In this paper, Section 2 summarises the expected charac- teristics of Ps recombination lines in the astrophysical context; Section 3 describes the details of the new globular cluster ob- servations and the instrument details; Section 4 describes the data analysis, calibration, stacking methodology and results; Section 5 discusses the results and their implications for the LDM self-annihilating dark matter content of the clusters; and Section 6 provides a summary and a few comments about future research directions.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	Ps annihilation is very rapid, with a timescale of 1.25 × 10–10n3 s for para-Ps and 1.33 × 10–7n3 s for ortho-Ps (Bur- dyuzha et al., 1996), where n is the principal quantum number. Selection rules only allow for annhilation in angular momen- tum (cid:96) = 0 states, which will depopulate low-n energy levels, especially for the shorter-life para-Ps species, but will not depopulate higher levels, each of which also has n angular momentum states (cid:96) = 0, 1, ..., n – 1.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	where c is the velocity of light, R is the Rydberg constant, Z is the atomic charge, n1 is the principal quantum number of the lower energy level, and n2 is the principal quantum number of the upper energy level.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	The nomenclature for Ps recombination lines follows stan- dard practice for electronic radio-frequency transitions (Lilley & Palmer, 1968), where a line is labelled by the chemical element followed by the principal quantum number of the lower energy level of the transition. The change in level ∆n = n2 – n1 = 1, 2,... is denoted by Greek letters α, β,..., so that Ps93α represents a transition from principle electronic quantum number n2 = 94 to n1 = 93. Missing Greek letters are usually taken to imply ∆n = 1.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	The Rydberg constant for Ps is RPs = mee4/(16(cid:15)2 0h3c) = 5.48686578 × 106 m–1, where me and e are the electronic mass and charge respectively, (cid:15)0 is the permittivity of free space and h is the Planck constant. Thus RPs is approximately half the value of RH , corresponding to the ratio of the respective reduced masses of Ps and H. Therefore Ps recombination lines for a given level will have approximately half the frequency (and half the transition probability) of the corresponding H lines. As an example, the rest frequency of Ps93α is 4024.99 MHz.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	where ν is the line frequency, k is the Bolzmann constant, T is temperature and m is the mass of the chemical species. The thermal linewidths of Ps lines are therefore expected to be √ mH /2me ≈ 30.3 times broader than those of hydrogen lines. For an electron temperature Te = 5 × 103 K, the expected Ps frequency dispersion is ∆ν = 3.69 MHz for a Ps93α line at rest, or a FWHP linewidth of 8.69 MHz. The corresponding thermal velocity dispersion is σv = 275 km s–1.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	perature (including the eﬀect of any spatial variations within the beam) and thermodynamic equilibrium (Peters et al., 2012). For radio recombination lines (large n), the spontaneous emis- sion rate An+1,n, is less than the typical collision frequency Cn in the diﬀuse ISM. For example, A94,93(Ps93α) ≈ 0.4 s–1, and the corresponding ∆n = 1 cascade time is Σ93 n+1,n ≈ 40 s. This compares to Ps collision frequency of ∼ 10–8n4 s–1 at a temperature of 5 × 103 K and density of 1 cm–3 (with substantially lower densities expected for an LDM e+e– plasma). So line emission cannot be maintained by low-n Ps collisions in the low-density ISM as is the case for the λ21-cm line.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	Line emission could arise from stimulated emission and absorption. In fact, this is the normal situation for radio re- combination lines (Gordon & Sorochenko, 2002). However, such emission relies on the region being illuminated by con- tinuum radiation. This can arise from synchrotron emission or thermal free-free emission at the frequencies considered here. But, given the low densities expected and the fact there is no evidence for strong diﬀuse radio continuum emission in 47 Tuc and ω Cen, this is unlikely to be the case here.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	As previously noted (Anantharamaiah et al., 1989, 1993; Reynolds et al., 2017), the main emission source is therefore likely to be the radiative recombination cascade that imme- diately follows the formation of a Ps atom. The intensity spectrum will reﬂect the distribution of energy levels follow- ing Ps formation, which depends sensitively on temperature. Burdyuzha et al. (1996) cite P(n) ∝ nα with α = –1 at low temperature and α = –3 at extremely high temperatures, with the detailed calculation of Wallyn et al. (1996) suggesting α ≈ –2 at 5000 K (very diﬀerent from the Saha collisional index α = 2). Recombination will then proceed via the more probable ∆n = 1 transitions, so that every large n state will give rise to ∆n = 1 transitions at most lower energy levels. A reasonable approximation, and an upper limit to the ∆n = 1 photon emission spectrum is therefore Iγ(n) ∝ nα+1, rather than the n0 spectrum assumed previously (Anantharamaiah et al., 1989, 1993; Reynolds et al., 2017).a For T = 5000 K and α = –2, the ∆n = 1 photon spectrum will be approximated by Iγ(n) ∝ n–1, corresponding to a ﬂux spectrum Iν(n) ∝ ν4/3 (from Equation 1) and a peak ﬂux density spectrum Sν ∝ ν1/3 (from Equation 2).
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	aBy considering all possible recombination and annihilation cascades and extrapolating from n < 15, Table 6 of (Wallyn et al., 1996) suggests a pessimistic lower limit to the low-temperature high-n emission spectrum of Iγ(n) ∝ nα–1.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	reduce the recombination line intensities, as the Ps atoms will be preferentially created in low-n states (Wallyn et al., 1996). This is again likely to be an important factor only at higher temperatures (> 5000 K), and is highly dependent on the e+/H abundance.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	For the purposes of later analysis, we shall characterise the ratio of the ∆n = 1 recombination line photon rate to the or- tho+para annihilation rate by fn = Rn/Rp. As discussed above, the main contribution to fn is likely to be the Psnα/Ps1α pho- ton ratio of ∼ n–1. However, since the value of fn is uncertain, we include it as a variable in later calculations.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	We obtained data from the 64-m Parkes radio telescope (Mur- riyang) in NSW, Australia using the ultra-wide-bandwidth low-frequency receiver (UWL) (Hobbs et al., 2020). This re- ceiver allowed us to survey with a higher sensitivity and over a wider instantaneous bandwidth (0.704 – 4.032 GHz) than previously possible with this telescope. The system equivalent ﬂux density Ssys, was measured to be approximately 34 Jy at 2 GHz, but rises at both low and high frequency (Hobbs et al., 2020).
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	The radio-frequency interference (RFI) environment at Parkes is challenging compared to the new radio-quiet zones such as the Murchison Radio Astronomy Observatory. Fig- ure 1 shows an example total power spectrum. About 4% of the band contains RFI at extreme levels (more than double Ssys), and around 20% of the band contains residual RFI, after bandpass calibration, in excess of 1% of Ssys, a level which still makes the data unusable (theoretical sensitivity is exceeded in a matter of seconds). Hobbs et al. (2020) cite a similar unusable fraction (24%) over the whole band.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	The observations were free from the 1 MHz beamformer artefacts present in previous Parkes observations (Reynolds et al., 2017), but did suﬀer from ﬁlter artefacts due to the division of the band into sub-bands, each of width 128 MHz (see below, and Figures 1 and 2). For pulsar processing, Hobbs et al. (2020) remove a further 260 MHz (8%) of the total bandwidth due to sub-band edge eﬀects.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	To cover the full frequency range, there were 26 sub-bands each containing 32,768 channels of width 3.9 kHz, correspond- ing to a velocity resolution of 0.5 km s–1 at 2.3 GHz. Given the expected broad Ps linewidths, Doppler tracking was not enabled during the observations.
Processed_A_Search_for_Annihilating_Dark_Matter_in_47_Tucana.txt	Figure 1. An example 300-s Stokes I total power spectrum taken toward 47 Tuc on 2020 October 22 at UT 13:54. The spectrum is smoothed in frequency by 32 channels to a resolution of 125 kHz and shows the locations of major RFI signals. The off-scale maximum RFI signal is 2.5×106 Jy at 762 MHz. The low-level structure in the spectrum in the regions free from RFI reﬂects the bandpass responses of the individual 128-MHz sub-bands.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	potential, an imaginary isospin chemical potential can strengthen the transition till turning it into strong ﬁrst order.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	c(cid:13) Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	The determination of the QCD phase diagram in the temperature-quark density plane is be- coming increasingly important, due to its impact in cosmology and in the physics of compact stars and of heavy-ion collisions. The ﬁrst-principle nonperturbative approach of discretizing QCD on a space-time lattice and performing numerical Monte Carlo simulations is plagued, at nonzero quark chemical potential, by the well-known sign problem: the fermionic determinant is complex and the Monte Carlo sampling becomes unfeasible. Analytic continuation is amongst the possible al- ternatives to solve (approximately) the sign problem [1–3]. It consists in performing Monte Carlo simulations at imaginary chemical potential m = im IM: where there is no sign problem. The results obtained at imaginary chemical potential are then analytically prolongated (m IM → −im ) at real values of the chemical potential. There are however limitations due to ambiguity in the interpo- lation and nonanalyticities and periodicity [4], so that reliable estimations are expected only for Re(m )/T . 1, where T is the temperature.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	In Section 2 we present results on the analytic continuation of the critical line, Tc(m ) from imagi- in the case of a ﬁnite isospin chemical potential m iso, where simulations are available nary to real m for both imaginary and real m iso and on the analytic continuation of the quark chemical potential m q. In Section 3 we make a comparison between the two theories at ﬁnite m q or m iso, quantifying systematic differences for quantities like the curvature of the pseudocritical line at zero chemical potential. In Section 4 we study the nature of the transition as a function of the isospin chemical potential.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	Figure 1: (Left) Pseudocritical couplings in ﬁnite isospin SU(3) with n f = 2. Negative values of (m iso/(p T ))2 correspond to imaginary chemical potentials. (Right) Fit to real and imaginary isospin chemi- cal potential data using a ratio of a fourth to second-order polynomial (ratio (4,2) ﬁt).
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	with T = 1/(Nt a(b )), we also get a very good c 2/d.o.f. = 0.53 and a corresponding prolongation to real values that works quite well (see ﬁg. 2 left). Another quite good interpolation of imaginary isospin data is attained by means of a sixth-order constrained polynomial ﬁt, where the coefﬁcient of (m /(p T ))2 is ﬁxed at the value derived from a linear (in (m /(p T ))2) ﬁt at small imaginary chem- ical potential data. In ﬁg. 2 (right) the extrapolations to real isospin chemical potentials together with results from simulations at real values are shown. We can see that several extrapolations agree up to m /(p T ) . 0.2. Therefore we may conclude that different interpolations that well reproduce imaginary data, lead to distinct extrapolations (as we have seen [8] for n f = 4 SU(3)).
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	Figure 2: (Left) Fit to the pseudo critical couplings in ﬁnite isospin SU(3) with n f = 2 according to the "physical" ﬁt Eq. (2.3). (Right) Extrapolation to real isospin chemical potentials of the sixth-order con- strained, ratio fourth to second-order polynomials and "physical" ﬁts (only the border of the 95% CL band have been reported). Data points (circles) are the results of Monte Carlo simulations performed directly at real isospin chemical potential.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	to be compared with m c(T = 0) = 2.73(58)Tc(0) of ref. [10] with n f = 2 Wilson fermions. In ﬁg. 4 the extrapolations at real values of the quark chemical potential starting from three different successful interpolating functions at imaginary chemical potential values are compared. The three analytic continuations begin to deviates at m /(p T ) > 0.1. However two of these extrapolations (in particular the ratio of polynomials and the "physical" ﬁt) continue to be in good agreement. Moreover we observe that in the case of isospin chemical potential the ratio of polynomials is pre- ferred, but we cannot claim this is the interpolation to use for analytic continuation since systematic differences between ﬁnite quark density and ﬁnite isospin QCD cannot be excluded.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	Figure 3: Fits to the pseudocritical couplings at ﬁnite quark density: ratio of a 4th- to 2nd-order polynomial (left) and “physical” ﬁt according to the function (2.2) (right). The dashed vertical line indicates the boundary of the ﬁrst Roberge-Weiss sector, (m IM)/(p T ) = 1/3.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	Figure 4: (Left) Extrapolation to real quark chemical potentials of the 6th-order constrained, ratio (4,2) of polynomials and "physical" ratio ﬁts (only the borders of the 95% CL band have been reported). (Right) Comparison between the extrapolations to real quark and isospin chemical potential of the ﬁts linear in (m /(p T ))2. Data points (circles) are the results of Monte Carlo simulations performed directly at real isospin chemical potential.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	Figure 5: (Left) Normalized plaquette distributions at the pseudocritical coupling for different spatial lattice sizes and m iso/(p T ) = 0.475i. (Right) Maxima of the plaquette susceptibility as a function of the spatial volume for m iso/(p T ) = 0.475i.
Processed_Two-flavor_QCD_at_finite_quark_or_isospin_density.txt	The phase structure at ﬁnite T and imaginary chemical potential may be important of its own and teach us something about the nonperturbative properties of QCD also at zero and small chemi- cal potential. The phase transition at the Roberge-Weiss endpoint could in principle have inﬂuence also far from the endpoint. For n f = 2 the Roberge-Weiss transition is ﬁrst order for small and high quark masses and second order for intermediate quark masses [18]. In the present study we have am = 0.05 so that we expect a second order Roberge-Weiss phase transition (at m IM/(p T ) = 1/3) in the case of the quark chemical potential. On the other hand we expect that imaginary isospin chem- ical potential may strengthen the transition as an imaginary quark potential does: a ﬁrst-order tran- sition could be manifest along the pseudocritical line (even for our quark mass value am = 0.05). In ﬁg.5 (left) we display the normalized plaquette distributions at the pseudocritical coupling for different spatial lattice sizes (Ls = 12, 16, 20), while in ﬁg.5 (right) we can see the maxima of the plaquette susceptibility that scale linearly with the spatial volume. Therefore we conclude that for n f = 2 staggered fermions of mass am = 0.05 the transition is ﬁrst order at m iso/(p T ) = 0.475i and there is possibly a critical point along the line at some smaller value of m iso/(p T ). Such non-trivial behavior resembles what happens for quark chemical potentials [18–21] and may have consequences on the general structure of the QCD phase diagram.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Abstract—Science communication forms the bridge between computer science researchers and their target audience. Re- searchers who can effectively draw attention to their research ﬁndings and communicate them comprehensibly not only help their target audience to actually learn something, but also beneﬁt themselves from the increased visibility of their work and person. However, the necessary skills for good science communication must also be taught, and this has so far been neglected in the ﬁeld of software engineering education.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	can all still improve a lot when it comes to how we design our presentations to convey knowledge more effectively and stay positively in the minds of our audiences. The scientiﬁc papers themselves are also only accessible to a few people, either because they are published behind paywalls or simply because non-scientists have no routine in reading scientiﬁc literature. On top of this comes that those who would have access must ﬁrst become aware of the new research ﬁndings.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We therefore designed and implemented a science communica- tion seminar for bachelor students of computer science curricula. Students take the position of a researcher who, shortly after publication, is faced with having to draw attention to the paper and effectively communicate the contents of the paper to one or more target audiences. Based on this scenario, each student develops a communication strategy for an already published software engineering research paper and tests the resulting ideas with the other seminar participants.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We explain our design decisions for the seminar, and combine our experiences with responses to a participant survey into lessons learned. With this experience report, we intend to motivate and enable other lecturers to offer a similar seminar at their university. Collectively, university lecturers can prepare the next generation of computer science researchers to not only be experts in their ﬁeld, but also to communicate research ﬁndings more effectively.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Impact. If there is one term that comes up again and again when it comes to evaluating scientiﬁc research and its authors, it is impact. It does not seem to matter whether a software engineering researcher feels closest to mathematicians, social scientists, or engineers:1 all researchers want the results of their work to at least reach the intended target group.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	In breakout sessions at various seminars, we discussed with members of the software engineering research community what their understanding of science communication is. All the answers fell into two categories: ﬁrst, drawing attention to and disseminating scientiﬁc ﬁndings, and second, establishing oneself as a scientist. The former aspect ﬁts well with the deﬁnition of Burns et al.: “Science communication (SciCom) is deﬁned as the use of appropriate skills, media, activities, and dialogue to produce one or more of the following per- sonal responses to science: Awareness, Enjoyment, Interest, Opinion-forming, and Understanding” [1].
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Depending on the current demand for the research topic, the combination of expertise and good science communication can then result in great publicity for one’s own person. For example, during the Corona pandemic, virologists in some countries became talk show celebrities, whether intentionally or not. Of course, this does not have to be the goal of every software engineering researcher. Establishing oneself within one’s own research community is also more often the case than becoming a person of public interest.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	In any case, we argue, as do some of our peers [2], that good science communication can and should be learned in science education. And since both the researchers themselves and their target audiences would beneﬁt from better science communication, we further argue that it should be taught as early as possible. We therefore decided to offer a science com- munication seminar for bachelor students of computer science curricula. Since both, us teachers and the students, were very satisﬁed with the result of the ﬁrst seminar implementation, we would like to share our experiences and lessons learned in this paper. We provide all information needed to successfully implement similar science communication seminars at other universities, enabling the next generation of computer science researchers to effectively bridge the gap between academia and their target audience.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We have designed the course as a 6-month seminar for bachelor students from computer-science-related study pro- grams (e.g., software engineering, media informatics, com- puter science). Students in those programs must choose one such graded seminar worth 3 ECTS credits (≈ 90 study hours) from a list of seminars.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	well as an informal group meeting after 6 weeks. A total of 9 weeks after the lightning talks, the portfolios had to be handed in. Part of the portfolio was a mandatory chapter for the design of the ﬁnal presentation, allowing the students to use the two weeks after the portfolio submission deadline to reﬁne and practice their already drafted presentation. The ﬁnal presentations concluded the science communication seminar for the students.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The idea of the seminar is simple: each student is assigned an already published scientiﬁc software engineering paper, which they will deal with intensively during the seminar. In practical terms, this means that a portfolio of worked-out ideas for the communication of the paper contents must be handed in at the end of the seminar. Students take the position of a researcher who, shortly after publication, is faced with having to draw attention to the paper and effectively communicate the contents of the paper to one or more target audiences.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Fig. 1 depicts the timeline from the beginning of the semester to the completion of the seminar at the end of the lecture period. Circles on the timeline represent milestones, with the bigger red ones representing a milestone at which students had to deliver outcomes.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The course had two learning objectives: 1) Students should be educated about the scientiﬁc process and working with scientiﬁc literature. Many of the par- ticipants have little experience in working with scientiﬁc literature, but will need these skills for their bachelor thesis at the latest. The introduction to the questions “what science says” and “how scientists do things”, i.e. science education, has overlapping goals with science communication, and can therefore be combined very well [3].
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The seminar began with a welcome email from the course instructor to the seminar participants, referring to the course forum2 and the upcoming kick-off meeting. Before the kick- off, students were asked to take a few minutes to write some- thing in a Padlet3 about their background and expectations for the seminar. The results were then picked up at the kick-off meeting.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	In the three weeks following the kick-off, each student submitted a preference list of papers that were up for selection and was then assigned a paper by the instructor. Another three weeks later, each participant gave two-minute lightning talks on the contents of their paper.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We emphasize that the course is not primarily about telling students what good science communication practices are, nor about turning each of the participants into a good speaker. Instead, we intend to enable them to question the status quo and to reﬂect for themselves on how presentations and other means of communication should be designed to effectively communicate scientiﬁc knowledge. We show the students possible boundaries through insights into scientiﬁc processes. Within these boundaries, they have a lot of room to experiment according to their own strengths and weaknesses and receive feedback from the other seminar participants.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	established methods to effectively communicate knowledge, and can justify why these methods are potentially effective, they have done everything right.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We further emphasize that we are well aware that statisti- cally a large part of the seminar participants will not end up pursuing an academic career, but that the course is nevertheless valuable for students. The skills learned will at least help them in their ﬁnal thesis, and the ability to handle scientiﬁc literature can make them better computer scientists overall. In addition, being able to communicate work results in an understandable way is also rewarding in an industry job.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Eight bachelor students registered for our seminar. One student had to quit in the middle of the semester due to a change of study program, the remaining seven successfully completed the seminar.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	After this ﬁrst seminar run, we believe that the ideal group size for the seminar is between six and twelve participants. By having a group size that is not too small, one learns about diverse personal preferences and styles of knowledge communication. By having a group that is not too large, where students get to know each other over time, they are more likely to have the courage to venture out of their comfort zone and explore new presentation methods.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Our course had one instructor and one ofﬁcial examiner. The instructor handled all communication with and supervision of the students, as well as moderated all group meetings (kick-off, lightning talks, intermediate group meeting, ﬁnal presentations). The examiner took part in the lightning talks and ﬁnal presentations to participate in the feedback rounds. At the end, the instructor and the examiner together decided on the seminar grades (see II-J).
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The instructor should have an interest in science communi- cation and be able to reﬂect on and justify how a certain type of knowledge communication can affect different target groups. The authors themselves have such an interest, but would not call themselves experts in the ﬁeld, nor do they think it is essential to be an expert to run the course. It is more important that both instructor and examiner can admit other opinions and discuss with students on an equal footing. Otherwise, there is a risk that students will not be encouraged to question the status quo in science communication established by the previous generation of researchers. Our recommendation for the feedback rounds after a lightning talk or ﬁnal presentation is that the instructor and the examiner should hold back at ﬁrst and let the students ask their questions and provide feedback on the presentation.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	and concerns about the upcoming seminar, as well as examples of well-known people and channels that are great at com- municating knowledge. After the instructor brieﬂy introduced himself, and explained the motivation behind the seminar, the instructor and students went over the students’ Padlet responses together.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We complemented the examples of good knowledge com- munication channels with a brief collection of resources speciﬁcally designed to improve science communication in general, and some that already provide examples of what we believe to be good science communication channels in computer science.4 This concluded the ﬁrst half of the kick- off meeting, and all participants now had a rough idea of the seminar’s intention.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	In the second half of the meeting, we explained to the students what was expected of them and that we would guide them step by step through the seminar. For the students, the most important thing at that moment was to understand that in the seminar, everyone has to deal with exactly one already published paper and that the selection of this paper was now the next step.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We asked members of the SE research community via Twitter for suggestions for papers for such a seminar and received a handful of good suggestions. We initially selected 10 software engineering papers based on the following criteria: • The papers are neither authored by the instructor, the examiner, nor by other members of our research group to avoid bias.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The papers are of comparable length and about the length of a typical conference full paper.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	For each of the 10 papers, each student now had to choose one of three options: “Top 3” if the paper is a personal favorite, “Would be okay” if the student is interested in the paper, and “Rather not” if the paper does not interest the student at all. The “Top 3” option could be assigned to a maximum of three papers, while the other two options could be selected as often as needed.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Table I lists the papers that were available for selection and shows the results of the preference allocation of eight students. All but one paper landed in at least one student’s personal top 3. Furthermore, there were only three papers for which the “Rather Not” option was assigned by a majority. This suggests that the students were mostly satisﬁed with the initial paper selection. Since their votes were also favorably distributed, we were able to assign each student a paper that was among his or her favorites. Of course, this can be different with other seminar participants and other papers. Nevertheless, for reasons of motivation, we should always try to ensure that no student has to deal with a paper that he or she has marked as “Rather not”.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	After each student was assigned a paper, they had three weeks to prepare a lightning talk. We instructed the students to understand their paper as best they could during this phase and to take notes on their ﬁrst impressions of the paper, such as what they thought about the content and what they thought about how the paper authors presented their work. They might come back to their ﬁrst impressions later when they discuss the paper presentation of the original authors as part of their portfolio.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The goal of each lightning talk was to draw attention to the paper and explain what it was about at its core. The students had to decide for themselves what they wanted to focus on. This could be, e.g., the motivation behind the study, or its results, or a combination of different aspects. The twist, however, was that a student had no more than 2 minutes for their lightning talk. We deliberately chose the time limit to be short so that the contents of the paper could not be described in detail, thus provoking questions from the audience. This was to help the presenter understand what was of interest to the audience about the topic, methodology, or other aspects of the paper. Such cues will be useful later in developing the communication strategy.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Once the two-minute talk was over, the presenter could take a short rest. The other seminar participants now had time to write down their questions and feedback on the presentation using an online tool. This made it possible for the presenter to read through the entire feedback at a later time, without having to take notes on each question. Some feedback and questions were then asked live by the seminar participants to the presenter before the next lightning talk started.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The focus of the seminar was for each student to create a portfolio. A portfolio in this seminar was a collection of developed and discussed ideas for communicating the contents of the assigned paper. It can be thought of as a report consisting of several chapters in which the ideas are described and discussed. Therefore, the ﬁnal deliverable was primarily a PDF with possibly additional artifacts such as short videos or poster designs.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	An introduction that explains the motivation for the portfolio and provides an overview of the portfolio. • A factual summary of the paper of at least one and no more than two pages.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	An illustration of the paper in a single ﬁgure. • A summary of the paper, explicitly addressed to non- scientists and not longer than 200 words.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	A discussion of the paper. The focus here depends on the speciﬁc paper, but in general, it could be interesting to assess the presentation of the paper, i.e. how could the paper have been better prepared to be more accessible to readers, and e.g., to which target group the contents of the paper are most likely to be directed (software developers? team leaders? IT admins? scientists? . . . ).
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Furthermore, each student should decide on one or more additional ideas. We emphasized that we can discuss anything that could contribute to science communication, even if a suggestion seems unconventional at ﬁrst. Inspiration for ideas can be found, e.g., in the works of Illingworth [14] and Cooke et al. [15]. Their suggestions range from science festivals to book clubs, but also contain some general advice on effective knowledge communication. In our ﬁrst seminar implementa- tion, students submitted short videos, Instagram Stories, blog posts, news articles, workshop concepts, and posters.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	An important note that we have also expressed to students: There are entire degree programs where students spend several years learning how to develop a communications strategy. We do not presume to act on a similar level; our seminar is not about developing the perfect video or the most polished workshop concept. Rather, it is to outline and implement some ideas prototypically, and then discuss primarily their potential effectiveness and drawbacks in science communication (see section II-B on learning objectives). We felt that this explicit information took some pressure off the computer science students and increased their joy of experimenting in unfamiliar territory. We encouraged them, where possible, to implement (prototypically) the strategies they came up with.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Each student was encouraged to approach the instructor in the ﬁrst few weeks after the lightning talk and schedule an informal 1-on-1 meeting to discuss ideas and progress on the portfolio. Most of our students took advantage of this offer.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	In addition, an informal group meeting was held six weeks after the lightning talks. To break the ice, everyone began by brieﬂy telling the group about his or her current status in port- folio development. Most of the time, questions or uncertainties arose that could be discussed in the group. Then the instructor addressed a few points that came up repeatedly in the 1-on-1 meetings and could be interesting for all participants. Finally, we discussed the procedure for the ﬁnal presentations, which were scheduled ﬁve weeks after this group meeting.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	For the ﬁnal presentations, all students, the instructor and the examiner came together for the last time. Each student was granted 15 minutes on stage to present about their results.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	the focus of the ﬁnal presentation was no longer exclusively on the content of the paper, but also on the communication strategy that the student had developed. Ideally, parts of the developed communication strategy could be used to present the contents of the paper. For example, one student engaged the audience in a role- play right at the beginning, welcoming them as participants in a workshop for managers on improving job satisfaction in the home ofﬁce. The student continued in the role of the workshop leader for a while, until he explained that this was how the audience could imagine the entry to a workshop he had designed for his paper on software development teams working from home during COVID-19 [5].
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Following each presentation, the other seminar participants asked questions and provided constructive feedback on the presentation and the developed communication strategy.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We designed our course according to the principle of constructive alignment [16], which means that we aligned our teaching activities as well as student assessment with the learning objectives. As a quick reminder, the course had two learning objectives. First, by the end of the seminar, students should be better informed about the scientiﬁc process and have gained practical experience in working with scientiﬁc literature. Second, students should be able to reﬂect on how to communicate scientiﬁc knowledge effectively.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	makes a comprehensible argument for the potential beneﬁts and potential limitations of each portfolio component.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	It is in the nature of all evaluations that there is an inherent subjectivity to them. The particular difﬁculty with design work is that the amount of work invested by the student, which an examiner may wish to include in the assessment, is not always evident in the outcome. This may be the case, ﬁrst, if the creative process involves learning from discarding earlier ideas. Second, it may be that the solution that is actually the simplest is also the most effective in the end. Therefore, we evaluated the portfolios by assessing the students’ reasoning about the communication concept they had developed and by assessing the quality of implementation, but without (con- sciously) speculating on the amount of work invested.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The seminar participants gave us their consent to present excerpts from their portfolios in anonymized form. We will do so in this section, as the results have turned out nicely and concrete impressions complement the previous description of the seminar well.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Fig. 2 shows communication artifacts of two students (the texts are in German, the language in which the seminar took place, and it is not necessary to understand them to get an impression of the results). First, we see (A) a post from a proposed Instagram campaign to inform teachers about a new method that could be used to assess the object-orientedness of a student-created computer program. The student’s communi- cation strategy dealt with the paper by Tempero et al. [10] that discusses using the number of objects created in a program at runtime as a basis for evaluation of design decisions. The Instagram post shown summarizes the motivation for the research paper. Second, one can see (B) an excerpt of an infographic poster on tips and pitfalls in various steps of the hiring pipeline in the technology sector. The communication strategy behind the poster deals with the paper by Behroozi et al. [4] on improving the technical interview process. The target audience of the poster was identiﬁed as software companies facing problems in hiring applicants and seeking to improve their hiring process. In both examples, we can see that in addition to text, a lot of work was done with colors and images to make the presentation more lively and appealing. The seminar participants used public domain images that they found on the Internet.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	All the students put a lot of thought into their ideas, and discussed them in terms of their potential effectiveness. It was interesting to see which audiences the students identiﬁed for each research ﬁnding and how they tailored their communi- cation strategy to each audience. For example, one student looked at the paper by Minelli et al. [8] that investigated how developer work time is divided between activities. She conceptualized and created a one-minute humorous video to communicate realistic expectations of the profession to prospective software engineering students. The video could then be shared on the platforms that potential freshmen use.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Fig. 2. Impressions on communication artifacts created by students in the seminar. (A) is one of a series of posts from an Instagram campaign to educate teachers about a new method for assessing the object-orientedness of computer programs. (B) is an excerpt from an infographic poster on tips and pitfalls in various steps of the hiring pipeline in the technology sector.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	All seven students who completed the seminar participated in a brief evaluation of the course. The evaluation took place via an anonymous online survey four days after the ﬁnal presentations. Participation in the survey was voluntary and included a consent form for dissemination of responses. In the following, we combine student feedback from this evaluation with our own experiences into lessons learned that may help us and others in the future implementation of a similar course. Five students identiﬁed as male, one as female, and one wished not to indicate their gender. For four of the participants, the interest in the seminar topic was increased after the event compared to the interest before the semester started. Two students maintained their high level of interest in science communication, and only one student’s interest in the topic decreased slightly during the course.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	different abstracts and decided on 3 topics. In the end, I did not have an exact idea of my paper, but that is not necessarily a negative thing. I think with the choices given, everyone found a paper of their interest”. The lightning talks, which take place shortly after the paper assignment, should therefore also serve the purpose of motivating students to engage more intensively with their paper at an early stage.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We described to the students on one page at the very begin- ning what the portfolio of a communication strategy should be about. In doing so, we brieﬂy described the mandatory parts, made suggestions for elective parts, and stated that particular attention should be paid to discussing the expected beneﬁts of individual components of the portfolio for science communication.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We asked students if they had any comments about the pre-selection or assignment process of the papers they were required to work on in the seminar. One student felt it was very well done because “attention was paid to personal preference in paper selection, which made it easier to focus on science communication instead of having to struggle with a paper whose content one can’t identify with”. It was also noted that the process was clear and simple, and that it was helpful to make the assignment as early as possible so that one could familiarize oneself with the paper early on.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	input themselves. The knowledge gained could then be used to suggest improvements to existing software engineering research papers and their presentations.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	At the same time, concrete formulations of the requirements should not mean that students are restricted in their creative choices. The high level of creativity was mentioned positively several times by the students in the evaluation: “The creative way in which the subject was approached meant that you really questioned EVERYTHING you did and how you presented it, and I will keep that in mind in the future. There was a lot of freedom for your own ideas, appreciation and few constraints”. Another student, when asked what they found particularly good about the seminar, described “that you learn that there is not one exact presentation style. And that everyone must adapt their slides to their own style of speaking”. As a consequence of the few constraints, this student further high- lights that “everyone had their freedom and each presentation was different, which was exactly the goal”.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We believe that good communication skills are important for every researcher and that appropriate training must be provided already for students. Yet, there are cultural differences in the acceptance and handling of open criticism, for example when it is voiced by listeners of one’s own presentation. We must further not forget that computer science programs are currently predominantly attended by male students, and individuals of other genders face disproportionately higher hurdles to succeed in this environment. Both of these aspects present the course instructor with what we believe to be the greatest challenge in the context of this seminar, namely, creating a safe and inclusive space in which all course participants receive and choose to receive fair and constructive feedback. While a discrimination-free space should be the goal of any course, we consider that the course instructor of a seminar in which students move out of their comfort zone and, intentionally, make themselves the target of verbal criticism, has a special responsibility to be aware of these realities.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	We can only encourage instructors to try and engage in dialogue with the seminar participants. Overall, we had great pleasure in accompanying the students through this ﬁrst semi- nar run. Our impression was that the students were very open- minded and treated each other very respectfully, which led to a constructive feedback culture and apparent fun. This was also reﬂected in the course evaluation, in which the seminar participants repeatedly praised the atmosphere and feedback from all other participants.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	The learning objectives (II-B) of our science communica- tion seminar for computer science students should be easily transferable to other research disciplines. The motivation for offering such a seminar should in most cases coincide with the one we have elaborated in the ﬁrst pages of this paper.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	seminar stretched over a period of about 20 weeks (see Fig. 1). Three to four weeks of this could be saved up to the time of the paper assignment, and two to three more in the period between lightning talks and portfolio submission. This would still make the seminar as described take a little over three months. For those instructors interested in ideas for a shorter alternative, we recommend, e.g., the work of Clark et al. [17]. In their paper, two concepts are being tested in which (PhD) students have to communicate their scientiﬁc work to middle school students. This would not only improve the graduate students’ science communication skills, but also provide science education for middle school students.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	Second, one may not always have the opportunity to offer a brand-new seminar. Luckily, Brownell et al. [2] describe an example of “infusing science communication training into the curriculum” and argue that “science communication skills need not be taught in stand-alone electives, but can be inte- grated effectively into lecture-based courses”. Communication exercises could be incorporated into courses on basic science content. For example, students could summarize the scientiﬁc literature covered in the course in the form of layperson- directed newspaper articles. Brownell et al. [2] even went so far as to invite panels of science journalists and writers to critique students’ work and thereby motivate them. A few of the summaries were published in suitable forums.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	So, for those who resonate with our motivation to improve science communication and would like to make a similar offer to their own students, but are limited in what they can do, there are alternative teaching options. We deliberately chose to implement the seminar described because it offered students a variety of opportunities to try things out, including but not limited to writing a news article.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	As software engineering researchers, we work on very different problems and with different intentions. What we have in common is certainly the joy of ﬁnding answers to unsolved problems and enriching other people’s lives with new insights. The logical consequence is to grant access to these insights to the people we intend to help with our research. Science communication offers the necessary tools for this purpose. As with any tool, though, it is necessary to learn how to use it. We experienced that university students can not only learn to reﬂect on the concrete way of communicating scientiﬁc ﬁndings, but also have a lot of fun doing so. The ﬁrst run of a science communication seminar in computer science courses at our university was already a success. We were therefore keen to share our experience and encourage other instructors to run a seminar similar to ours.
Processed_Teaching_Computer_Science_Students_to_Communicate_.txt	instructors can prepare the next generation of computer science researchers to not only be experts in their ﬁeld, but to also effectively communicate research ﬁndings. And whatever the future generation of computer science researchers may understand by the term: with good science communication, they are then very likely to get a bit closer to their goal of having impact.
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	Today, cancer is one of the leading causes of death throughout the world. This threatening disease has huge negative impacts, not only on quality of life, but also on the healthcare industry, whose resources are already scarce. Thus, finding new approaches for cancer care has been a central point of interest during the last few decades. One of these approaches is the use of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) systems, which have the potential to provide more effective and efficient patient centric cancer care. This paper serves to examine the business value of an American CPOE in an Australian context. This is achieved by using our specifically designed tool to evaluate the business value of IT in the healthcare in combination with a resource based view perspective. Our results show that the system has a number of enabling resources to generate business value subject to having other resources.
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	Similar to the global trend, cancer is one of the leading causes of death in Australia. According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare figures, more than 43,000 Australian people died in 2012 from cancer, which counts about 30% of total deaths in Australia (AIHW 2012). This high number of deaths has had direct and indirect impacts, not only on the Australian society, but also on the economy; cancer treatments cost more than $4.5 billion in direct health system costs, which represents about 6.9% of the total expenditure on the healthcare system in Australia (AIHW 2013).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	The safety of medication is highly significant when using anti-cancer therapy. At the same time, cancer treatment is complex and leaves limited margins for errors. In their analysis for errors may happen during cancer treatments, COSA (2008) note that while overdosage can results in death, underdosage can have adverse sequences that affect both the patient outcomes and the management of the disease.
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	In their explanation of reasons behind errors that may happen during the cancer therapy, COSA (2008) cited a number of reasons that can be classified under three categories: procedural, technical, and behavioural.
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	The use of information systems (IS) for oncology purposes has been shown as a key to enhance cancer care (Gandhi et al. 2013). More specifically, the use of computerised physician order entry (CPOE) has widely been agreed upon as an important tool to improve oncology outcomes (Jacobson et al. 2009).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	This study serves to examine the use of an American CPOE for cancer care in the Australian context, and its role in generating business value. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. The next section provides a brief introduction to the concept of business value of IT and the Business Value of IT in Healthcare Model, then a brief summary of the resource-based view theory and its use in this research, followed by the research methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion.

Subsets and Splits

No saved queries yet

Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.