Datasets:

SouthernCrossAI
/

Arxiv

Dataset card Data Studio Files Files and versions Community

Split (1)

train · 132k rows

Filename stringlengths 22 64	Paragraph stringlengths 8 5.57k
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	Wickramasinghe 2014). The increased use of IS in the healthcare have called for in-depth examinations of the impact of these IS on the overall performance of the healthcare (Haddad et al. 2014a).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	In their review of the business value of IT in the service industry, Melville et al. (2004) used this term to refer to the impacts of IT on the organizational performance, including cost reduction, profitability improvement, productivity enhancement, competitive advantage, inventory reduction, and other measures of performance. Nevertheless, the literature still lacks in-depth analyses of the business value of IT in the healthcare industry (Haddad and Wickramasinghe 2015).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	It is important to emphasize that business value of IT is not a value by itself; rather, it is a model that suggests how value might be generated by implementing different IT solutions (Haddad et al. 2014b).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	To address this issue in the healthcare industry, we designed the Business Value of IT in Healthcare Model (Figure2) as a tool to examine the business value of different IS in the healthcare industry. It is based on the IT Portfolio theory (Weill and Broadbent 1998) and the Healthcare Delivery Enterprise (Rouse and Cortese 2010).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	This tool has proven to be roust and flexible to cover a wide range of IS. A summary of the use of this tool can be found elsewhere (Haddad et al. 2015). For the purpose of this paper, we use this model to examine the business value of a CPOE as aforementioned.
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	One of the main arguments of the resource-based theory is that firms may possess resources that can be categorised in two subsets: the first enables to achieve competitive advantages, while the second leads to superior long-term performance (Wernerfelt 1984; Barney 1991; Grant 1991; Wade and Hulland 2004).
Processed_Evaluating_the_Business_Value_of_CPOE_for_Cancer_C.txt	As a precise understanding of this theory depends on a precise definition of “resources”, Wade and Hulland (2004) defined resources as ‘assets and capabilities that are available and useful in detecting and responding to market opportunities or threats’ (p.109). While assets can serve as inputs to a process, or as the outputs of a process (Srivastava et al. 1998; Teece at al. 1997), capabilities can transform inputs into outputs of greater worth (Wade and Hulland 2004). Table 1 summarises the different aspects of assets and capabilities from the resource-based view point of view.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Kilometer-scale neutrino detectors such as IceCube are discovery instru- ments covering nuclear and particle physics, cosmology and astronomy. Exam- ples of their multidisciplinary missions include the search for the particle nature of dark matter and for additional small dimensions of space. In the end, their conceptual design is very much anchored to the observational fact that Nature accelerates protons and photons to energies in excess of 1020 and 1013 eV, re- spectively. The cosmic ray connection sets the scale of cosmic neutrino ﬂuxes. In this context, we discuss the ﬁrst results of the completed AMANDA detector and the reach of its extension, IceCube.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	The ﬂux of cosmic rays is summarized in Fig. 1a,b[1]. The energy spectrum follows a broken power law. The two power laws are separated by a feature referred to as the “knee”; see Fig. 1a. There is evidence that cosmic rays, up to several EeV, originate in galactic sources. This correlation disappears in the vicinity of a second feature in the spectrum dubbed the “ankle”. Above the ankle, the gyroradius of a proton exceeds the size of the galaxy and it is generally assumed that we are witnessing the onset of an extragalactic component in the spectrum that extends to energies beyond 100 EeV. Experiments indicate that the highest energy cosmic rays are predominantly protons. Above a threshold of 50 EeV these protons interact with CMBR photons and therefore lose their energy to pions before reaching our detectors. This limits their sources to tens of Mpc, the so-called Greissen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cutoﬀ.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Models for the origin of the highest energy cosmic rays fall into two categories, top-down and bottom-up. In top-down models it is assumed that the cosmic rays are the decay products of cosmological remnants with Grand Uniﬁed energy scale MGU T ∼ 1024 eV. These models predict neutrino ﬂuxes most likely within reach of AMANDA, and certainly IceCube.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Figure 1: At the energies of interest here, the cosmic ray spectrum consists of a sequence of 3 power laws. The ﬁrst two are separated by the “knee” (left panel), the second and third by the “ankle”. There is evidence that the cosmic rays beyond the ankle are a new population of particles produced in extragalactic sources; see right panel.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	In bottom-up scenarios it is assumed that cosmic rays originate in cosmic accel- erators. Accelerating particles to TeV energy and above requires massive bulk ﬂows of relativistic charged particles. These are likely to originate from the exceptional gravitational forces in the vicinity of black holes. Examples include the dense cores of exploding stars, inﬂows onto supermassive black holes at the centers of active galaxies and annihilating black holes or neutron stars. Before leaving the source, accelerated particles pass through intense radiation ﬁelds or dense clouds of gas surrounding the black hole. This results in interactions producing pions decaying into secondary pho- tons and neutrinos that accompany the primary cosmic ray beam as illustrated in Fig. 2.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	because the dump would have to be partially transparent to protons. The extreme opposite case is a “transparent source” where the accelerated proton interacts once and escapes the dump after producing photons as well as neutrinos. Elementary particle physics is now suﬃcient to relate all particle ﬂuxes because a fraction (1/6 to 1/2 depending on the energy) of the interacting proton goes into pion production. This energy is equally shared between gamma rays and neutrinos, of which one half are muon-neutrinos. Therefore, at most one quarter of the energy ends up in muon- neutrinos compared to cosmic rays. The ﬂux of a transparent cosmic ray source is often referred to as the Waxman-Bahcall ﬂux[3]. It is easy to derive and the derivation is revealing.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	The coincidence between these numbers and the observed electromagnetic energy out- put of these sources explains why they have emerged as the leading candidates for the cosmic ray accelerators. The coincidence is consistent with the relationship between cosmic rays and photons built into the “transparent” source previously introduced. The relationship can be extended to neutrinos.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Assuming the same energy density of ρE ∼ 3 × 10−19 erg cm−3 in neutrinos with a spectrum EνdN/dEν ∼ E−γ cm−2 s−1 sr−1 that continues up to a maximum energy Emax, the neutrino ﬂux follows from R EνdN/dEν = cρE/4π. For γ = 1 and Emax = 108 GeV, the generic source of the highest energy cosmic rays produces 50 detected muon neutrinos per km2 per year[4]. [Here we have folded the predicted ﬂux with the probability that the neutrino is actually detected given by[2] the ratio of the muon and neutrino interaction lengths in ice, λµ/λν.] The number depends weakly on Emax and γ. A similar analysis can be performed for galactic sources[2].
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	While it has been realized for many decades that the case for neutrino astronomy is compelling, the challenge has been to develop a reliable, expandable and aﬀordable detector technology to build the kilometer-scale telescopes required to do the science. Conceptually, the technique is simple. In the case of a high-energy muon neutrino, for instance, the neutrino interacts with a hydrogen or oxygen nucleus in deep ocean water and produces a muon travelling in nearly the same direction as the neutrino. The blue Cerenkov light emitted along the muon’s kilometer-long trajectory is detected by strings of photomultiplier tubes deployed at depth shielded from radiation. The orientation of the Cerenkov cone reveals the neutrino direction.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	The AMANDA detector, using natural 1 mile deep Antarctic ice as a Cerenkov detector, has operated for more than 3 years in its ﬁnal conﬁguration of 680 optical modules on 19 strings. The detector is in steady operation collecting roughly four neutrinos per day using fast on-line analysis software. Its performance has been calibrated by reconstructing muons produced by atmospheric muon neutrinos[6].
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Using the ﬁrst of 3 years of AMANDA II data, the AMANDA collaboration is performing a (blind) search for the emission of muon neutrinos from spatially localized directions in the northern sky[7]. Only the year 2000 data have been unblinded. The skyplot is shown in Fig. 3. 90% upper limits on the ﬂuency of point sources is at the level of 2 × 10−7 GeV cm−2 s−1 or 3 × 10−10 erg cm−2 s−1, averaged over declination . This corresponds to a ﬂux of 2 × 10−8 cm−2 s−1 integrated above 10 GeV. The most signiﬁcant excess is 8 events observed on an expected background of 2.1, occurring at approximately 68 deg N dec, 21.1 hr R.A; for details see Ref. [8]. Unblinding the data collected in 2001, 2002 may reveal sources or conﬁrm the consistency of the year 2000 skyplot with statistical ﬂuctuations on the atmospheric neutrino background.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Figure 3: Skymap showing declination and right ascension of neutrinos detected by the completed AMANDA II detector during its ﬁrst Antarctic winter of operation in 2000.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	With this search the AMANDA II detector has reached a high-energy eﬀective telescope area of 25,000∼40,000 m2, depending on declination. This represents an interesting milestone: sources with an E−2 spectrum should be observed provided the number of gamma rays and neutrinos are roughly equal as expected from cosmic ray accelerators producing pions[9].
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Overall, AMANDA represents a proof of concept for the kilometer-scale neu- trino observatory, IceCube[10], now under construction. IceCube will consist of 80 kilometer-length strings, each instrumented with 60 10-inch photomultipliers spaced by 17 m. The deepest module is 2.4 km below the surface. The strings are arranged at the apexes of equilateral triangles 125 m on a side. The instrumented (not eﬀec- tive!) detector volume is a cubic kilometer. A surface air shower detector, IceTop, consisting of 160 Auger-style Cerenkov detectors deployed over 1 km2 above IceCube, augments the deep-ice component by providing a tool for calibration, background rejection and air-shower physics, as illustrated in Fig. 4.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	The transmission of analogue photomultiplier signals from the deep ice to the surface, used in AMANDA, has been abandoned. The photomultiplier signals will be captured and digitized inside the optical module. The digitized signals are given a global time stamp with a precision of < 10 ns and transmitted to the surface. The digital messages are sent to a string processor, a global event trigger and an event builder.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	Construction of the detector is expected to commence in the Austral summer of 2004/2005 and continue for 6 years, possibly less. The growing detector will take data during construction, with each string coming online within days of deployment. The data streams of IceCube, and AMANDA II, embedded inside IceCube, will be merged oﬀ-line using GPS timestamps.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	it IceCube will oﬀer great advantages over AMANDA II beyond its larger size: will have a higher eﬃciency and superior angular resolution in reconstructing tracks, map showers from electron- and tau-neutrinos (events where both the production and decay of a τ produced by a ντ can be identiﬁed) and, most importantly, measure neutrino energy. Simulations, backed by AMANDA data, indicate that the direction of muons can be determined with sub-degree accuracy and their energy measured to better than 30% in the logarithm of the energy. The direction of showers will be reconstructed to better than 10◦ above 10 TeV and the response in energy is linear and better than 20%. Energy resolution is critical because, once one establishes that the energy exceeds 1 PeV, there is no atmospheric muon or neutrino background in a kilometer-square detector and full sky coverage of the telescope is achieved. The background counting rate of IceCube signals is expected to be less than 0.5 kHz per optical sensor. In this low background environment, IceCube can detect the excess of anti-νe events from a galactic supernova.
Processed_High-Energy_Neutrino_Astronomy:_from_AMANDA_to_Ice.txt	This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. OPP-0236449, in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE- FG02-95ER40896, and in part by the University of Wisconsin Research Committee with funds granted by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
Processed_Dark_Energy_Survey_Year_3_Results:_Photometric_Dat.txt	print coverage, masked regions, imaging depth, survey conditions, and astrophysical foregrounds that are used to select the cosmology analysis samples. This paper will be complemented by online resources.
Processed_Dark_Energy_Survey_Year_3_Results:_Photometric_Dat.txt	Optical and near-infrared imaging surveys have become one of the most widely used tools to study new physics at the cosmic frontier, including dark energy, dark matter, neu- trino properties, and inﬂation. The current generation of imaging surveys, such as Pan-STARRS1 (PS1; Chambers et al. 2016), Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program (HSC-SSP; Aihara et al. 2019), Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS; Kuijken et al. 2019), DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys (Dey et al. 2019), and the Dark Energy Survey (DES; DES Collab- oration 2005, 2016) have collectively provided deep multi- band imaging over nearly the entire high-Galactic-latitude sky, and cataloged more than a billion galaxies and thousands of supernovae spanning 10 billion years of cosmic history. Together with spectroscopic surveys (e.g. eBOSS Collab- oration (2020), DESI Collaboration (2016)), these imaging surveys yield measurements of the expansion rate and large- scale structure in the late-time universe (e.g., DES Collab- oration 2018a; Hikage et al. 2019; Hildebrandt et al. 2020) that are complementary to the high-precision measurements of the early Universe (Planck Collaboration 2018). Wide- area imaging surveys provide access to the largest number of galaxies for statistical analyses, and the opportunity to com- bine several complementary probes of the cosmic expansion history and growth of structure into the same study (e.g., DES Collaboration 2019a; Heymans et al. 2020). Ground-based imaging surveys of the next decade, including the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST; Ivezi´c et al. 2019), aim to catalog > 1010 galaxies and > 105 Type Ia supernovae to further test the Cold Dark Matter with a Cosmological Constant (ΛCDM) Universe paradigm and its extensions.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	We present the second and final release of optical spectroscopy of Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) obtained during the first and second phases of the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP-I and CSP-II). The newly released data consist of 148 spectra of 30 SNe Ia observed in the course of the CSP-I, and 234 spectra of 127 SNe Ia obtained during the CSP-II. We also present 216 optical spectra of 46 historical SNe Ia, including 53 spectra of 30 SNe Ia observed by the Cal´an/Tololo Supernova Survey. We combine these observations with previously published CSP data and publicly-available spectra to compile a large sample of measurements of spectroscopic parameters at maximum light, consisting of pseudo-equivalent widths and expansion velocities of selected features, for 232 CSP and historical SNe Ia (including more than 1000 spectra). Finally, we review some of the strongest correlations between spectroscopic and photometric properties of SNe Ia. Specifically, we define two samples: one consisting of SNe Ia discovered by targeted searches (most of them CSP-I objects) and the other composed of SNe Ia discovered by untargeted searches, which includes most of the CSP-II objects. The analysed correlations are similar for both samples. We find a larger incidence of SNe Ia belonging to the Cool (CL)and Broad Line (BL) Branch subtypes among the events discovered by targeted searches, Shallow Silicon (SS) SNe Ia are present with similar frequencies in both samples, while Core Normal (CN) SNe Ia are more frequent in untargeted searches.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	The number of observational studies of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) has continually increased as the result of their great importance to multiple fields of astrophysics. For example, SNe Ia are the primary source of iron-peak elements in the Universe, and their energy input plays an important role in the heating of interstellar matter in galaxies. They also provide important constraints on binary evolution in the Galaxy. But, probably their most outstanding property is that they are excellent extragalactic distance indicators, e.g. Zwicky et al. (1961), and thus powerful tools for the determination of the cosmological expansion rate as a function of look-back time (e.g. Burns et al. 2018; Freedman 2021; Khetan et al. 2021; Riess et al. 2022; Uddin et al. 2023).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In this data release paper, we present 148 previously unpublished optical spectra of 30 SNe Ia observed during the course of the CSP-I and 234 previously unpublished spectra of 127 SNe Ia observed during the CSP-II. The CSP-I spectra presented here were not included in Folatelli et al. (2013) because at the time of publication of that paper, definitive photometry was not yet available for the corresponding objects and as a consequence, the analysis of spectroscopic and photometric properties could not be carried out in the same way as for the other SNe Ia. CSP optical spectra have already been published for SN 2010ae (Stritzinger et al. 2014), SN 2011iv (Gall et al. 2018), SN 2012Z (Stritzinger et al. 2015), SN 2012fr (Childress et al. 2013), iPTF13ebh (Hsiao et al. 2015), SN 2013gy (Holmbo et al. 2019), ASASSN-14lp (Shappee et al. 2016), LSQ14fmg (Hsiao et al. 2020), ASASSN-15hy (Lu et al. 2021), SN 2015bp (Wyatt et al. 2021), SN 2007if, SN 2009dc, LSQ12gpw, SN 2013ao, CSS140501-170414+174838 and SN 2015M (Ashall et al. 2021), and SN 2015bo (Hoogendam et al. 2022). Also, a large number of CSP optical spectra of SNe Ia obtained near maximum light have been analysed by Burrow et al. (2020) using Gaussian mixture models. The approach in this paper differs from the latter in that we intend to derive spectroscopic parameters at the time of maximum light for the SNe Ia in our sample, and only those objects for which such parameters were obtained are considered in the discussion that follows.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	The primary goal of this paper is to make these 598 optical spectra available to the community. We combine them with the 604 CSP-I spectra published by Folatelli et al. (2013) and the previously-published CSP-I and CSP-II optical spectra mentioned above to re-examine some of the correlations between spectral and photometric properties presented by these authors. Results for the SNe Ia drawn from targeted searches are compared with those discovered in untargeted (“blind”) searches. Incorporated in this new analysis is the color stretch parameter sBV (Burns et al. 2014), which is more effective at characterizing the fastest-declining SNe Ia than the widely-used ∆m15(B) parameter (Phillips 1993). Note that all the newly-presented data, including spectra of CSP I & II targets and the historical SNe Ia, will be released electronically via WISeREP.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	The outline of this paper is as follows: in §2 the different spectroscopic data sets are detailed; in §3 measurements of expansion velocities and pseudo-equivalent widths are presented along with notes on a few specific SNe; in §4 we re-examine some of the spectroscopic and photometric correlations derived by Folatelli et al. (2013) using the measurements presented in this paper, augmented by those of the SNe Ia published by these authors; finally, in §5 a brief summary of the results is given.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Summaries of the new observations, classifications and photometric properties of the SNe Ia considered in this paper are presented in Table 1 (for CSP-I and CSP-II data) and Table 2 (for the historical SNe Ia). Photometric parameters for the CSP I & II targets are taken from Uddin et al. (accepted for publication in ApJ). For the historical SNe Ia, template light-curve fits were computed using SNooPy (Burns et al. 2011) to the available photometry of our objects retrieved from the references given in the final column of Table 2.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In successive columns of Tables 1 and 2 we list: the SN identification; the number of new spectra released in this work (three dots mean that no new spectra are presented); the phase range covered by them; the supernova classification obtained from running SNID (Blondin & Tonry 2007) on the earliest spectrum available to us; the Wang (Wang et al.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	The optical spectra obtained by the CSP collaboration were reduced using standard IRAF3 routines as described in Hamuy et al. (2006). Briefly, reductions included bias subtraction, flat fielding, wavelength calibration with arc lamp exposures obtained right before or after the SN observation, and flux calibration with spectra of spectrophotometric standard stars observed during the same night as the science targets. In the vast majority of the cases, the slit was oriented according to the parallactic angle. A few exceptions were made when the parallactic orientation would result in a bright host nucleus significantly contaminating the supernova spectrum. At least one telluric standard chosen from Bessell (1999) was also observed during each observing night with the same slit width as that used for the SN observation in order to correct for telluric absorption features. When a telluric standard spectrum was not obtained on the same night as the science observations, no telluric correction was attempted. Such spectra are labeled as not corrected for telluric absorption in Table 3.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Optical spectra taken with the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) were obtained using ALFOSC (Andalucia Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera) with grism #4. Data reduction of NOT spectra was performed following standard procedures using a set of custom MatLab scripts written by F. Taddia. Flux calibration was performed using sensitivity functions derived from observations of standard star(s) obtained on the same night as the science observations.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	As in Folatelli et al. (2013), in the last column of Table 3, we provide the root mean square (rms) of the differences between two or more synthetic magnitudes calculated from the spectra and observed magnitudes in the same filters interpolated to the exact time of the spectral observation from the CSP light curves, after removal of a constant flux term. This number provides a measure of the correctness of the shape of the flux-calibrated spectrum. In some cases we were not able to perform this comparison, either due to the restricted wavelength coverage of the spectrum, or because the photometric data did not cover the epoch of the spectrum. When the rms was larger than ∼0.15 mag for at least three bandpasses, we used a low-order polynomial function to correct the overall shape of the spectrum.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Most of the spectra of the historical SNe Ia were also calibrated using standard IRAF routines. Unfortunately, for some of these observations, details of the exposure time, airmass, and, in a few cases, the instrument used have been lost. No attempt has been made to quantify errors in the shapes of the spectra introduced in the flux calibration through comparison with available photometry.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	We measured expansion velocities and pseudo-equivalent widths (pW) of selected features as described in Folatelli et al. (2013). Following the definitions in Garavini et al. (2007) (see Figure 4 and Table 5 of Folatelli et al. 2013) we performed measurements of the following features: Ca II H&K (pW1), Si II λ4130 (pW2), Mg II λ4481 (pW3; blended with Fe II and dominated by Ti II in the Branch CL class), Fe II at ∼4600 ˚A (pW4, blended with S II), the S II “W” feature at ∼5400 ˚A (pW5), Si II λ5972 (pW6), Si II λ6355 (pW7), and the Ca II “IR triplet” (pW8).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	reliable measurement because the feature was very weak or not detected, we estimated upper limits of pW considering the signal-to-noise ratio in the spectral region where such a feature would be expected.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In cases where several spectra encompassing maximum light were available to us, we fit low-order polynomials to our pW and expansion velocity measurements and used those functions to interpolate the values at maximum.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	When two spectra were available in the interval −4 to +4 days from maximum, we interpolated values at maximum from them.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	If only data before or after maximum were available, but one spectrum was obtained within 1 day of maximum light, an extrapolation was allowed.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In the most frequent cases where only one spectrum was available within the range −4 to +4 days from maximum, we applied the slopes given in Tables 4 and 7 of Folatelli et al. (2013) to estimate values at maximum light, combining the errors estimated for our measurements with those coming from the assumed slopes.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	This procedure allowed determination of pWs and expansion velocities at maximum light for the selected features in 15 CSP I SNe Ia not included in our previous spectroscopic release (Folatelli et al. 2013), 113 SNe Ia observed by the CSP II, and 27 historical SNe Ia. All targets for which we were able to derive spectroscopic parameters at maximum light are included, regardless of their being considered as “normal” or “peculiar” SNe Ia. The values of the pWs at maximum light are presented in Table 5. Measurements of expansion velocities at maximum light can be found in Table 6. Note that the SNe are sorted by Branch type (Branch et al. 2006) in both tables.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	LSQ12ca: This SN Ia has the lowest value of ∆m15 in the CSP-II sample (0.618 ± 0.081 mag.), although its sBV (1.195 ± 0.097), while high, is comparable to that of other normal SNe Ia. From the spectrum available to us, obtained at phase 2.8 days past maximum, we derive normal values for its expansion velocities and pseudo-equivalent widths at maximum light. C II absorption is probably present on the red side of the Si II λ6355 line.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	LSQ12gpw: There are three public spectra of this SN Ia from PESSTO4, available in WISeREP: the one obtained at phase -1.5 days and the other two at phase -0.5 days. There is also one CSP spectrum at phase +5.8 days. All these spectra show an absorption line, redward of Si II λ6355, well separated from the Si II feature that, if identified as C ii λ6580, yields expansion velocities of approximately 7,500 km s−1, 7,400 km s−1 and 6,200 km s−1, for phases −1.5, −0.5, and +5.8 days, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	LSQ12hnr: Two spectra of LSQ12hnr are available in WISeREP, both obtained by PESSTO, at phases +0.8 and +10.8 days, respectively. The classification report by Le Guillou et al. (2012) gave a possible redshift of z = 0.135 inferred from the SN Ia spectrum. No obvious host is detected in our follow-up images or in a deep VLT-MUSE observation of the SN Ia site. However, an apparent cluster of galaxies is observed whose brightest member lies about 40′′ West of the SN Ia location. We determined redshifts for the three brightest galaxies in that cluster (from a total of at least four) obtaining a weighted average of z = 0.1243 ± 0.0002, the value we therefore adopted for LSQ12hnr assuming this SN Ia occurred in a fainter member of the same cluster of galaxies.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	OGLE-2013-SN-015: There is only one CSP spectrum of this SN Ia, which, albeit noisy, seems normal, and was obtained very close to maximum light (phase = +0.7 days). However, our photometric follow-up was poor for this target and consequently we decided not to consider this SN Ia in our analysis of SN properties at maximum light.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 1. The spectrum of OGLE-2013-SN-123 after galaxy subtraction. The black spectrum is the original PESSTO obser- vation, the gray spectrum is that of the host galaxy obtained by the CSP-II, and the blue spectrum is the difference between the two after scaling the host-galaxy spectrum to minimize the stellar features in the original PESSTO spectrum. Due to the differing wavelength resolution of the spectra, some residual subtraction features are evident (e.g., for the Na I D line). See text for further details.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	OGLE-2013-SN-123: There is only one spectrum available from WISeREP, obtained by the PESSTO collaboration at maximum light, which shows clear evidence of host galaxy contamination and, therefore, the pWs measured from it are unreliable as well as the spectral type determined via SNID. However, we obtained a spectrum of the host galaxy with the WFCCD instrument on the Las Campanas 2.5 m du Pont telescope in 2019 to determine its redshift. By scaling the host spectrum and subtracting it from the SN Ia observation so as to make the obvious stellar Na I D blend at ∼5892 ˚A absorption and the TiO feature at ∼7150 ˚A disappear, the other stellar features such as Ca II H&K, the G-band at ∼4300 ˚A, Hβ, and Mg Ib λ5175 also mostly disappeared (see Figure 1). We therefore have used this host-galaxy subtracted spectrum to derive the spectroscopic properties at maximum light for this SN Ia.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	ASASSN-15eb: The classification report by Childress et al. (2015) does not refer to any peculiarities, however SNID yields some matches with 91T-like SNe at maximum light. According to our light curve, this spectrum corresponds to phase +4.5 days. The pWs are indeed small, but this is clearly caused by strong host contamination. Also strong Galactic Na I D absorption is evident in that spectrum. The CSP spectrum published here, obtained at phase +11.0 days also exhibits significant host galaxy contamination as well as strong Na I D absorption from the Milky Way. Both spectra show absorption minima on the red side of Si II λ6355 which could be attributed to C II.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In this section, we combine the Si II expansion velocities and selected pW measurements from this paper with those derived by Folatelli et al. (2013) to take a second look at some of the plots and correlations discussed in that paper. In particular, our interest is to highlight agreements and differences between the properties of SNe Ia discovered in targeted versus untargeted searches.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 2. Temporal evolution of the expansion velocities of the Si II λ6355 line for samples of the CSP II targets (left) and the historical SNe Ia (right). The symbols reflect the corresponding Branch types: black circles for CN, green pentagons for SS, red triangles for BL and blue squares for CL. Error bars are plotted except when smaller than the symbols. Dashed lines connect data for each SN. In both panels, the shaded region represents the upper and lower 1σ dispersion computed for all the Branch CN SNe with “normal” Wang classification subtypes in the whole CSP I & II sample.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	For a limited number of CSP-II targets and historical SNe Ia, the available data span enough time to follow the evolution of the Si II λ6355 expansion velocity to at least 20 days past maximum light. These observations are presented in the left and right panels of Figure 2, respectively, with the different Branch types indicated by the colors and shapes of the symbols. In general, albeit with less data here, the behavior observed in this figure is very similar to that of Figure 9 of Folatelli et al. (2013). In both panels, the shaded region represents the upper and lower 1σ dispersion of the Si II λ6355 expansion velocity evolution for the whole CSP I & II sample of Branch CN SNe with “normal” Wang classification subtypes (see Table 7 for details).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	From Figure 2 (left panel), we can see that SN 2012bl shows high Si II λ6355 velocity which persists at 29 days past maximum light, although measurements of the minimum of Si II λ6355 after 20 days post maximum are questionable due to blending with other features. SN 2012fr (Childress et al. 2013; Contreras et al. 2018; Cain et al. 2018) is an example of “flat” velocity evolution, in which the expansion velocity of Si II λ6355 is almost constant over the period covered by our data (−5.0 to +17.8 days).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	For all the SNe Ia presented in this paper with sufficient time coverage, the difference between the Si II λ6355 velocity at maximum light and at 20 days past maximum, ∆v20(Si II), was calculated using the same methodology described in §3.1.1 of Folatelli et al. (2013). These values are given in the last column of Table 6 and plotted in Figure 3 as a function of light-curve decline rate ∆m15 and color-stretch sBV , respectively, along with the CSP-I objects already presented in Folatelli et al. (2013). Figure 3 confirms the strong correlation 5 observed by Folatelli et al. (2013) between ∆v20(Si II) and ∆m15 for Branch SS, CN, and CL SNe, suggesting that these events form a single sequence. On the other hand, the lack of a correlation for the Branch BL events is consistent with previous hints that these objects may represent a distinct group of SNe Ia (e.g., see Wang et al. 2013; Burrow et al. 2020).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 3. The left and right panels show the Si II λ6355 velocity decline rates as a funcion of the light curve decline rate ∆m15 and color stretch sBV , respectively, for all the SNe Ia with sufficient phase coverage in the combined sample which includes CSP I, CSP II and historical SNe Ia. The limited number of CSP II and historical targets for which this computation was possible causes the left panel of this figure to be very similar to Fig. 21 of Folatelli et al. (2013). As found in that work, the correlation is stronger when the BL SNe Ia are excluded from the fit. Shown in both figures are the best fit lines, intrinsic scatter lines (dotted grey), coefficients of determination (R2), and correlation coefficients (r) excluding the BL events. The transitional SN Ia 2011iv is an obvious outlier.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Supernova Search, CHASE) will be considered as one sample, while all the targets drawn from untargeted surveys such as the La Silla Quest (LSQ), the Palomar Transient Factory (PTF, iPTF), the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) or the Catalina Real Time Transient Survey (CRTS), ASAS-SN, among others, will be considered as a second sample. The Cal´an/Tololo SNe are a special case since the photographic plates were taken in an untargeted fashion, but were searched for stellar objects that appeared near galaxies. We therefore have grouped these SNe with the targeted events. Most of the CSP-I SNe Ia belong to the targeted group and most of the CSP-II SNe Ia belong to the untargeted one. However, there are a few exceptions. CSP-II SNe Ia for which we derived spectroscopic parameters at maximum light, and that are included in the first group of targeted survey discoveries are: PSN J13471211-2422171 and the SNe 2011iv, 2011jh, 2012E, 2012ah, 2012fr, 2012hd, 2012hr, 2012ht, 2013aa, 2013fz, 2013gy, 2013hn, 2014I, 2014Z, 2014ao, 2014at, 2014dn, 2014eg and 2015F. On the other hand, CSP-I targets for which we present spectroscopic parameters at maximum light that were discovered by untargeted searches are SNe 2007if, 2007ol, 2008bz and 2008fr.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 4. Branch diagrams for our two different samples. Left: Historical SNe Ia and CSP I+II SNe Ia discovered during targeted surveys (45 CN, 29 CL, 42 BL and 20 SS SNe Ia). Right: CSP I+II SNe Ia from untargeted surveys (48 CN, 15 CL, 13 BL and 21 SS SNe Ia). The meaning of the symbols is as follows: black dots represent CN SNe Ia; green pentagons represent SS SNe Ia; red triangles represent BL SNe Ia and blue squares represent CL SNe Ia. Open symbols represent upper limits.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 6 histograms of our pW6 and pW7 measurements at maximum light for the untargeted and targeted samples, separately for each of the Branch types.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Another way to look at these numbers is to consider ratios. In particular, how do the ratios of the numbers of SS, CL and BL SNe Ia compare to the number of CN SNe Ia for the targeted and untargeted samples? In the case of the targeted SNe, N(SS)/N(CN)=0.44, N(CL)/N(CN)=0.64, and N(BL)/N(CN)=0.93, while for the untargeted events we find N(SS)/N(CN)=0.44, N(CL)/N(CN)=0.31, and N(BL)/N(CN)=0.27. These numbers imply that SS SNe Ia are equally common with respect to CN SNe in targeted vs. untargeted surveys. On the other hand, CL SNe Ia are twice as common and BL SNe are more than three times more common with respect to CN SNe in targeted surveys compared to untargeted surveys. This likely reflects the fact that SS and CN SNe Ia occur in hosts over a large range of luminosity, whereas CL and BL SNe Ia prefer luminous hosts (e.g., see Neill et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2013; Pan 2020).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Note that Burrow et al. (2020) explored the Branch diagram through a cluster analysis instead of using pre-defined group boundaries as we have done in Figure 4. Comparing the Branch type classifications in Tables 1 and 2 for the 43 SNe Ia in common with the sample that Burrow et al. analyzed using a two-dimensional Gaussian mixture model (2D GMM), 60% are in agreement. Not surprisingly, the objects for which the classifications differ lie at or near the borders of the Branch groups.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Some studies have found correlations between SNe Ia ejecta velocities and their host properties (e.g. Pan et al. 2015; Pan 2020; Dettman et al. 2021). Considering that their results imply that high-velocity SNe Ia tend to prefer high- stellar-mass hosts, more frequent in targeted searches, we compared the Si II λ6355 expansion velocities at maximum light derived for our targeted and untargeted samples as a whole, as well as for the different Branch types within each sample. While the expansion velocities tend to be higher for BL SNe Ia, and somewhat lower for SS SNe Ia, the differences between the targeted and untargeted sample are insignificant considering the uncertainties. Figure 7 presents the average velocities at maximum light for Si II λ6355 as a function of the different Branch types, and for the whole targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 5. Pie charts showing the incidence of the different Branch types of SNe Ia (CN in grey, SS in green, CL in blue and BL in red) in our targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 6. Histograms showing the distribution of the measured pW6 and pW7 separately for each Branch type. Colored and empty bars represent untargeted and targeted searches, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	As shown in the right panel of Figure 8, the strongest correlation for the untargeted sample is found between the pW values for Si II λ4130 versus Si II λ5972. In this plot, the CL SN Ia LSQ14ip appears as an outlier in an otherwise strong positive correlation. However, the left panel of Figure 8 corresponding to the targeted sample shows a large dispersion in the measurements for the CL SNe Ia, with LSQ14ip lying within this dispersion. LSQ14ip is an extremely cool SN Ia, very similar to SN 1986G (Phillips et al. 1987), which showed strong Ti II absorption at maximum light. The Si II λ4130 line is blended with the Ti II absorption (e.g., see Ashall et al. 2016), making it difficult to measure an accurate pW value. This blending undoubtedly accounts for the large dispersion in the CL events observed in the targeted sample.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In Figure 9 we plot the pW values for the Si II λ4130 and Si II λ6355 absorptions. In this case, the correlation is tighter for the targeted sample. As might be expected, however, correlations between all three of the Si II lines are similarly strong for both the targeted and untargeted samples.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 7. Average expansion velocities of the Si II λ6355 for each of the Branch types in the targeted and untargeted samples, and for each of the two samples together. The error bars represent the standard errors of the mean.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 8. Correlation between pW values of Si II λ4130 and Si II λ5972 for our two different samples: historical SNe Ia and CSP SNe Ia from targeted searches (left) and CSP SNe Ia discovered by untargeted searches (right). The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The correlation strengths are similar for both samples as well as the slopes of the best-fit lines (0.54±0.05 and 0.56±0.06 for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 10 displays the pW values for the Ca II IR triplet plotted versus the pW4 (Fe II) measurements. The correlation is tighter for the SNe Ia discovered in untargeted searches. In Figure 11 the correlation between the pW8 (Ca II IR) and pW7 (Si II 6355) parameters is displayed. We see that the source of much of the dispersion, notably in the plot corresponding to the targeted searches, comes from the CL SNe Ia.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 9. Correlation between pW values of Si II λ4130 and Si II λ6355 for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The correlation is stronger and has a smaller intrinsic scatter for the targeted sample. The best-fit lines have slopes of 0.24±0.04 and 0.18±0.04 for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 10. Correlation between pW values of the Ca II IR triplet and the Fe II feature at ∼4600 ˚A for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The correlation is a bit stronger for the untargeted sample, while the slopes are indistinguishable (1.51±0.21 and 1.54±0.24 for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	In order to provide a broader view of the possible correlations between the spectroscopic parameters under consider- ation, we present in Figure 12 correlation matrices for pairs of pW values and expansion velocities at maximum light for the objects in our targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 11. Correlation between pW values at maximum light of the Ca II IR triplet and Si II λ6355 for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The slopes of the best-fit lines are equivalent within the uncertainties: 1.81±0.27 and 2.04±0.28 for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 12. Correlation matrices for pairs of pseudo-equivalent widths (left) and expansion velocities (right) at maximum light for all the SNe Ia analysed in this paper. The upper left off-diagonal triangle of each matrix shows results for the targeted sample, while the lower right off-diagonal triangle represents the SNe Ia discovered in untargeted searches. As shown in the color scales on top of each panel, different colors correspond to different values of the Pearson coefficient (r) with lighter colors indicating stronger correlation (or anti-correlation).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 13. Pseudo equivalent width at maximum light of Si II λ5972 versus ∆m15 for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The best-fit lines have slopes of 39.8±2.2 ˚A per mag, and 46.4±3.5 ˚A per mag, for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	shows the correlations between pW6 (Si II 5972) and ∆m15. That these two parameters correlate strongly was first pointed out by Hachinger et al. (2006). The relations are similarly tight for both the targeted and untargeted samples. The most discrepant measurements in the untargeted sample correspond to the CNs SN 2007ol and SN OGLE-2013-SN- 123. As explained in §3.3, the PESSTO spectrum of the latter suffered from considerable host galaxy contamination. While our attempt to correct for this problem was largely successful, the error in the pW6 (Si II 5972) measurement is likely underestimated due to uncertainties in the subtraction of the host galaxy spectrum. Accounting for this extra source of uncertainty would bring the error in pW6 up to ± 7 ˚A. On the other hand, the spectrum of SN 2007ol looks good and does not show indications of host galaxy contamination.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 14 displays the relationship between pW6 (Si II 5972) and sBV . We might have expected an improvement in the correlation since the sBV parameter does a better job of discriminating between light curve shapes for fast-declining events. Nevertheless, the coefficients of determination and Pearson r coefficients are similar to those obtained using ∆m15.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Folatelli et al. (2013) found that pW2 (Si II 4130) also correlated strongly with the light curve decline rate. In Figures 15 and 16, this parameter is plotted against ∆m15 and sBV , respectively. Again, it is somewhat surprising to see that usage of sBV does not significantly improve the tightness of the correlations. This could be related to the fact that sBV seems not to work as well as ∆m15 for SS SNe Ia (C. Burns, private communication).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 14. Pseudo equivalent width at maximum light of Si II λ5972 versus color stretch for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The slopes of the best-fit lines are -57.4 ˚A ± 3.2 ˚A and -66.4 ˚A ± 4.4 ˚A for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively. In this figure the abscissa has been inverted to facilitate comparison with Figure 13.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 15. Pseudo equivalent width at maximum light of Si II λ4130 versus ∆m15 for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The slopes of the best-fit lines are: 25.2±2.6 ˚A per mag, and 26.1±3.1 ˚A per mag, for the targeted and untargeted samples, respectively.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	BL objects than is the case for untargeted searches. This difference is ascribed to the fact that targeted searches are dominated by SNe Ia discovered in luminous galaxies, and that CL and BL events are known to preferentially occur in such galaxies.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Figure 16. Pseudo equivalent width at maximum light of Si II λ4130 versus color stretch for our two different samples of SNe Ia discovered by targeted (left) and untargeted (right) searches. The meaning of the symbols is as in Figure 4. The slopes of the best-fit lines are -41.7 ˚A ± 4.1 ˚A and 36.6 ˚A ± 4.0 ˚A for the targeted and untargeted sample, respectively. Note that the abscissa (sBV ) is inverted in this plot to facilitate comparison with Figure 15.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Facilities: Magellan:Baade (IMACS imaging spectrograph), Magellan:Clay (LDSS3, MagE, MIKE), du Pont (WFCCD, B&C spectrograph, MODSPEC), ESO:3.6m (EFOSC-2), NTT (EMMI), ESO:1.52m (B&C spectrograph), ESO: VLT (MUSE), NOT (ALFOSC), Gemini-South (GMOS), Gemini:Gillett (GMOS), CTIO:1.0m (B&C spectro- graph), CTIO:1.5m (R-C spectrograph), Blanco (R-C spectrograph), UH:2.2m, KPNO:2.1m (Gold camera), MMT (Red channel), Shane (Cassegrain spectrograph), Nickel (Cassegrain spectrograph), FLWO:1.5m (Z Machine), La Silla-QUEST, CRTS, PTF, iPTF, OGLE, ASAS-SN, PS1, KISS, ISSP, MASTER, SMT, Cal´an/Tololo Supernova Survey.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	d t(max), ∆m15 and sBV are derived from the observed light curves instead of SNooPy fits.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	e Observed during the course of the CSP, but not included in the final sample.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Note—The meaning of the columns is as follows: 1: SN designation. 2: Number of spectra released in this work. Three dots mean that we are not presenting new spectroscopic observations of the target, but, based on previously published spectra, we include it in the discussion of SN properties at maximum light. 3: Phases (expressed in days) of the first and last spectra. 4: SNID classification. 5: Wang subtype. 6: Branch subtype. 7: Heliocentric redshift of the host. (*) The adopted redshift for LSQ12hnr is discussed in Section 3.3 8: MJD of B maximum light from SNooPy fit when available. 9: ∆m15 (in magnitudes) from the SNooPy fit when available. 10: Color stretch sBV from SNooPy fit when available. For data in columns 8, 9, and 10, errors are given in parentheses.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Note—The meaning of the columns is as in Table1. SNooPy fits are available for all SN other than 1993af and 1999cs. Photometry references are: (1) Phillips et al. (1987); (2) Wells et al. (1994); (3) Lira et al. (1998); (4) Hamuy et al. (1996); (5) Leibundgut et al. (1993) (6) Suntzeff, N. B. (unpublished); (7) Strolger et al. (2002); (8) Lennarz et al. (2012); (9) Hamuy et al. (2002a); (10) Krisciunas et al. (2004a); (11) Krisciunas et al. (2004b).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Note—Column 1: UT date of the observation. Column 2: Modified Julian Date. Column 3: phase in days relative to time of maximum light corrected for redshift. Column 4: telescope code. 3P6: ESO 3.6 m Telescope at La Silla; BAA: Las Campanas Magellan I 6.5 m Baade Telescope; CLA: Las Campanas Magellan II 6.5 m Clay Telescope; DUP: Las Campanas 2.5 m du Pont Telescope; GEN: Gemini-N 8 m Telescope; GES: Gemini-S 8 m Telescope; NTT: ESO New Technology Telescope at La Silla; NOT: Nordic Optical Telescope at Roque de los Muchachos, Canary Islands. Column 5: instrument code. AL: Alhambra Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (ALFOSC); BC: Boller & Chivens spectrograph; EF: ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC-2); EM: ESO Multi-Mode Instrument (EMMI); GM: Gemini Multiple-Object Spectrograph (GMOS); IM: Inamori Kyocera Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph (IMACS); LD: Low Dispersion Survey Spectrograph (LDSS); MA: Magellan Echellette spectrograph (MagE); MI: Magellan Inamori Kyocera Echelle spectrograph (MIKE); MS: Las Campanas Modular Spectrograph (MODSPEC); WF: Wide Field Reimaging CCD Camera (WFCCD). Column 6: observed spectral range expressed in ˚A. Column 7: spectral resolution in ˚A; Column 8: exposure time in seconds. Column 9: airmass at middle of exposure. Column 10: r.m.s. of the differences between synthetic and observed broadband magnitudes (when available).
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Note—Column 1: UT date of observation. Column 2: Modified Julian Date. Column 3: Phase in days relative to maximum light corrected for redshift. Column 4: telescope code. BLA: CTIO 4.0- m Blanco Telescope; C60: Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) 1.5 m Telescope; DUP: Las Campanas 2.5 m du Pont Telescope; H88: U. Hawaii 2.2-m Telescope; K84: Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) 2.1-m Telescope; MMT: Multiple Mirror Telescope (MMT) at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory; NIC: Lick Observatory 1.0-m Nickel Telescope; NOT: Nordic Optical Telescope at Roque de los Muchachos, Canary Islands; NTT: ESO New Technology Telescope at La Silla; SHA: Lick Observatory 3.0-m Shane Telescope; TIL: 1.5-m Tillinghast Telescope at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory; YAL: CTIO 1.0-m Yale Telescope; 1P5: ESO 1.5-m Telescope at La Silla; 3P6: ESO 3.6 m Telescope at La Silla. Column 5: instrument code. AL: Alhambra Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (ALFOSC); DBC: Las Campanas 2.5 m Boller & Chivens spectrograph; EBC: ESO 1.5 m Boller & Chivens spectrograph; EF: ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC-2); EM: ESO Multi- Mode Instrument (EMMI); GOLD: Gold Camera; RC4: CTIO 4.0-m R-C Spectrograph; RC60: CTIO 1.5-m R-C Spectrograph; RED: Red Channel; WF: Wide Field Reimaging CCD Camera (WFCCD); YBC: Yale 1.0-m Boller & Chivens spectrograph; ZM: Z-Machine; CS1: Lick 1.0-m Cassegrain Spectrograph; CS3: Lick 3.0-m Cassegrain Spectrograph. Column 6: Observed spectral range in ˚A. Column 7: Exposure time in seconds. Column 8: Airmass at middle of the observation. Spectra already available via WISeREP are not included in this table, although they are considered in the analysis of SN properties at maximum light that follows.
Processed_Optical_Spectroscopy_of_Type_Ia_Supernovae_by_the_.txt	Table 7. Temporal evolution of the Si II λ6355 expansion velocities in the CSP I & II sample. Phase: Rest frame phase of bin center; Exp.vel.: average expansion velocity; Sigma: standard deviation; N: number of data in bin.
Processed_Designing_a_Serious_Game:_Teaching_Developers_to_E.txt	Abstract Software applications continue to challenge user privacy when users interact with them. Privacy practices (e.g. Data Minimisation (DM), Privacy by Design (PbD) or General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)) and related “privacy engineering" methodologies exist and provide clear instruc- tions for developers to implement privacy into software sys- tems they develop that preserve user privacy. However, those practices and methodologies are not yet a common practice in the software development community. There has been no previous research focused on developing “educational" interventions such as serious games to enhance software developers’ coding behaviour. Therefore, this research pro- poses a game design framework as an educational tool for software developers to improve (secure) coding behaviour, so they can develop privacy-preserving software applications that people can use. The elements of the proposed framework were incorporated into a gaming application scenario that enhances the software developers’ coding behaviour through their motivation. The proposed work not only enables the de- velopment of privacy-preserving software systems but also helping the software development community to put privacy guidelines and engineering methodologies into practice.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	aMetOcean Research Ltd, New Plymouth 4310, New Zealand. bDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia. cDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University LA1 4YF, United Kingdom. dShell Research Limited, London SE1 7NA, United Kingdom.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	The process of estimating the eﬀect of a changing climate on the severity of future ocean storms is plagued by large uncertainties; for safe design and operation of oﬀshore structures, it is nevertheless important that best possible estimates of climate eﬀects is made given the available data. We explore the variability in estimates of 100-year return value of signiﬁcant wave height (HS), and changes in estimates over a period of time, for output of WAVEWATCH- III models from 7 representative CMIP5 GCMs, and the FIO-ESM v2.0 CMIP6 GCM. Non-stationary extreme value analysis of peaks-over-threshold (POT) and block maxima (BM) using Bayesian inference provide posterior estimates of return values as a function of time; MATLAB software for the extreme value analysis is provided. Best overall estimates for return values, and changes in return value over the period 1979-2100, are calculated by averaging estimates for individual GCMs. We focus attention on neighbourhoods of locations east of Madagascar (EoM) and south of Australia (SoA) where a previous study of CMIP5 output by Meucci et al. (2020) reported signiﬁcant decrease and increase in HS respectively, under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate scenarios. There is large variation between return value estimates from diﬀerent GCMs, and with longitude and latitude within each neighbourhood for estimates based on samples corresponding to ≤ 165 years of model output; these sources of uncertainty tend to be larger than that due to typical modelling choices (such as choice of threshold for POT, or block length for BM). However, we also ﬁnd that careful threshold choice and block length are critical EoM, because of the presence of a mixed population of storms there. Nevertheless, there is general evidence supporting the trends reported by Meucci et al. (2020), but these ﬁndings are conditional on the choice of 8 GCMs being representative of climate evolution. We use simple randomisation testing to identify “signiﬁcant” departures from steady climate. The long 700-year pre-industrial control (piControl) output of the CMIP6 GCM oﬀers an excellent opportunity to quantify the apparent inherent variability in return value as a function of time, estimated using a subsample of output corresponding to a continuous time interval of between 20 and 160 years in length, where no climate forcing is present. We ﬁnd large variation in return value estimates of approximately ±15% made from samples corresponding to periods of time of around 50 years drawn from piControl data.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	The eﬀect of a changing climate on the occurrence and intensity of ocean storms is receiving considerable attention, but eﬀorts to identify and quantify eﬀects and to attribute these to climate change remain hampered by large uncertainties. There is agreement on some climate inﬂuence, such as the increasing proportion of intense tropical cyclones (Category 4–5) and peak wind speeds of the most intense tropical cyclones globally with increasing global warming (IPCC 2021). Nevertheless, predictions of possible changes in the future ocean wave climate and particularly sea state extremes are invariably very uncertain. Regardless, it is still important for safe design and execution of oﬀshore and coastal activities that predictions of possible climate-related changes and their signiﬁcance are made. In particular, climate change introduces additional uncertainty on the robustness of future design criteria.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	industrial revolution is resulting in changes in the intensity of historical storms and wave climate (e.g. Young and Ribal 2019), and climate change projections out to the end of the 21st century indicate likely changes in the wind and wave climate, including their extremes (e.g., Meucci et al. 2020, Meucci et al. 2022). The consequence of a non-stationary climate is that met-ocean statistics change with time, albeit slowly if based on a long data set, and in particular, the 100-year return value for signiﬁcant wave height (HS) values estimated from data covering diﬀerent decades will be diﬀerent. In addition, future climate change trends can be expected to accentuate the temporal change in these statistics. Accordingly, better understanding the temporal eﬀects and their uncertainties is needed to evaluate the robustness of estimates against future climate variability.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	Estimates of extreme sea states for a future climate can be made from the output of General Circulation Models (GCMs), which have typically been run at relatively coarse spatial grid sizes and temporal resolutions and have not included, until recently, estimates of sea state parameters. Thus, predictions of wave ﬁelds from GCMs involve downscaling, either statistically or dynamically, from the coarse GCM grid parameter ﬁelds, usually sea level pressure or wind ﬁelds, associated with various climate change scenarios. A discussion of recent studies on predictions of likely changes in the wave climate based on these types of analyses of these types and the uncertainties involved can be found in Ewans and Jonathan (2020). Most studies have been based on a global or regional analysis and have provided interesting perspectives of possible changes in the wave climate on those scales. Meucci et al. (2020) performs a global analysis of the eﬀect of climate change on HS, combining standardised data from an ensemble of wave models forced by independent CMIP5 climate simulations under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. They ﬁnd for example that the magnitude of the 100-year HS event increases by 5 to 15% over the Southern Ocean by the end of the 21st century, compared to the 1979–2005 period. Meucci et al. (2022) extends the basis of the analysis of Meucci et al. (2020) to include four 140-year wind-wave climate simulations forced with surface wind speed and sea ice concentration from two CMIP6 GCMs under Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios SSP126 and SSP585. They emphasise the advantages of a long 140-year interval of data to establish the presence and size of climate trends. The global COWCLIP2.0 ensemble of CMIP5-driven projections for ocean wave climate reported by Morim et al. (2020) a valuable resource for broad scale coastal and oﬀshore design. Lobeto et al. (2021) reports predicted increases in HS of around 2m in the Southern Ocean for CMIP5 RCP8.5, whereas the north Paciﬁc shows largest reductions of around 1.5m. Sardana et al. (2022) use a multi-model ensemble to study projected changes in extreme wave height indices (e.g. rough wave days) from COWCLIP2.0 under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios for the Indian Ocean, and ﬁnd some substantial spatial changes in time, including evidence for teleconnections. Albuquerque et al. (2022) uses COWCLIP ensemble members downscaled using the SWAN wave model to assess changes in New Zealand’s wave climate, ﬁnding a general increase in wave height along the southern and western coasts. Casas-Prat et al. (2022) assesses the eﬀects of inherent climate variability on trends in HS using a single model initial-condition large 100-member ensemble simulation for the period 1951–2010, and compares ﬁndings with those from other sources including wave reanalyses. Trends arising from internal climate variability are comparable in size to those caused by other factors, such as climate model uncertainty. They emphasise that at least 10 ensemble members are generally needed to detect trends found in the 100-member ensemble with conﬁdence.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	We focus on sets of locations in two regions, one oﬀ the east coast of Madagascar (henceforth “EoM”) in the Indian Ocean (centred around 15◦S, 56◦E), and one south of Australia (“SoA”) in the Southern Ocean (centred around 48◦S, 142◦E). The two regions were selected as they correspond to signiﬁcant decrease and increase in 100-year HS in the analysis of Meucci et al. (2020). Our interest is to quantify the statistical characteristics of 100-year HS at speciﬁc sites within the two regions. We expect to ﬁnd the value of 100-year HS relatively diﬃcult to estimate from a small sample of data. Moreover, we expect variability in 100-year HS (a) between diﬀerent locations in the same neighbourhood, (b) between locations in diﬀerent regions, (c) between diﬀerent climate forcing scenarios, and (d) between diﬀerent GCMs. In particular, the inter-regional comparison is expected to provide insight into the eﬀect of tropical cyclones (TCs) on extremal predictions from projected model data, as extreme sea states EoM are expected to be dominated by TCs, whereas those SoA are not (see Section 2.1 for further discussion). The long piControl output allows us to assess the inherent variability of estimates of 100-year HS carefully, based on EV modelling of data corresponding to a stationary climate using of diﬀerent lengths. piControl data therefore also provide an essential basis for assessing the material signiﬁcance of changes found in the projections under diﬀerent forcing scenarios. We emphasise that only once the inherent steady-state variability of the extreme ocean environment has been quantiﬁed, can changes in that extreme environment due to climate forcing be judged fairly. We devote the whole of Section 5 to assessing the inherent variability in estimates of 100-year HS in the piControl data.
Processed_Uncertainties_in_estimating_the_effect_of_climate_.txt	Return values are estimated using EV analysis of both peaks over threshold (POT) and block maxima (BM) data isolated from the GCM output. The quantiﬁcation of trends in extreme HS with time is achieved by estimating simple non-stationary EV models, the parameters of which vary linearly in time, using Bayesian inference as described in Section 3. Since we anticipate that the eﬀects of climate change will be small relative to the uncertainty in estimated model parameters due to small sample size, the assumption of a linear time trend is appropriate. Moreover, estimating a non-stationary EVs model over a long period of time is statistically more eﬃcient that estimating a series of stationary models over shorter time slices of data, the approach favoured by Meucci et al. (2020). Speciﬁcally, Vanem (2015) found that statistically signiﬁcant changes in extreme waves can be identiﬁed using a non-stationary analysis of historical and future periods together, but not when stationary models are ﬁtted to each period separately and compared. We therefore expect that our non-stationary models will be advantageous relative to the approach of Meucci et al. (2020) in examining climate change eﬀects in CMIP5 output in particular. We also anticipate that our approach of estimating diﬀerent non-stationary EV models independently per GCM using all relevant data, and then aggregating estimates for diﬀerent GCMs to form a ﬁnal view, is more appropriate that the approach of mixing partly-standardised data from diﬀerent GCMs favoured by Meucci et al. (2020).

Subsets and Splits

No saved queries yet

Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.