Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | With a very large number of FLS, it is possible that FLSs exhaust the available wireless bandwidth. There are networking technolo- gies such as the power efficient ZigBee (802.15.4, 2.4 GHz) that provide for mesh communication between FLSs that are in close proximity of one another. It may motivate use of multi-hop ad-hoc networks such as CAN [79] and Chord [88] that route information to an FLS in a decentralized manner. ZigBee is designed primarily for low-mobility devices such as those found in a home, e.g., smart bulbs and power outlets. It is a great starting point to implement a network with mobility standards for FLS displays. This network will enable FLSs flying in a tight formation (see FLS-Matter of Section 4) to communicate locally while traveling at high speeds. This local communication should be independent of the global communica- tion, providing for a large number of independent communications that do not interfere with one another. In essence, the number of in- dependent communications should scale as a function of the display size assuming fix sized FLSs. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | this framework must be in the background and not interfere with continuous display of motion luminations. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | With a motion lumination, an algorithm may pre-stage dark FLSs that light up to facilitate continuous motion. Pre-staging FLSs will consume power. However, its use may be more power efficient than flying FLSs around to render the lumination, e.g., by reducing the total distance travelled by FLSs. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | There will be a tradeoff between the quality of a lumination and its consumed power. A display may sacrifice the quality of a lumination by using fewer FLSs, skipping positioning of certain FLSs all together, and controlling the brightness of light produced by FLSs. These tradeoffs will have thresholds. For example, a bright lumination will consume more power and will most likely result in a higher quality display up to a certain threshold. Beyond this threshold, increasing brightness will only consume power with- out providing a tangible human perceived improvement in quality. This perception will most likely be impacted by environmental factors external to a display, e.g., lightning of the room. Hence, an algorithms must identify the relevant environmental factors and incorporate them when trading power for quality of a lumination. A technique may save power by not rendering those portions of a lumination that are not visible to a user. It may employ an eye tracker to compute the user’s angle of view and identify regions of a 3D lumination that are hidden from the user. An algorithm will use this information to minimize the number of FLSs with no impact on the user perceived quality of lumination, saving power. As FLS displays are constructed, additional factors will almost certainly be identified that impact the tradeoff between power and quality of display. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | FLS-matter detects human touch (force) when it is perturbed by having its FLSs pushed out of their expected position. The default behavior will be for the FLS-matter to stop rendering its lumina- tion, i.e., its FLSs go dark and scatter. An object may over-ride this behavior. For example, it may model gravity to disintegrate its FLS- matters more naturally by having them fall to the bottom of the display prior to scattering and going dark. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | display floor, different objects may behave differently. For example, with a rock, if the impact force exceeds a threshold then its lumina- tion may fragment into smaller luminations (rock pieces). These are a few example behaviors assigned to an object and inherited by its FLS-matter(s). Linden Lab’s Second Life provides many example objects and avatars in its market place [54]. An immersive FLS display will be able to render these objects and avatars, providing users with an interactive 3D experience that is significantly richer than today’s 2D monitors and screens of mobile devices. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | Synthesis generates sound for an object realized using FLS- matter. This may be aerodynamic sound such as that produced by an FLS-matter sword when waved in the air [27], blades of a fan or wind turbine rotating [107], and instruments that produce sound through air vibration [2, 96]. Other examples [61] include flame sound [16, 47, 64] and water bubble sound [25, 28]. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | Propagation describes what a human ear perceives as sound transmitted from its source travels and changes due to factors such as scattering, reflection, refraction, diffraction and others. A recent survey [61] categorizes propagation techniques into wave- based [17, 31, 66, 77, 115], geometric [3, 18, 23, 51, 59, 78], diffrac- tion [8, 50, 82, 94], and their hybrids [37, 81, 110]. We describe a wave-based propagation technique in Section 5.1. For an overview of the other techniques see [61]. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | Rendering is the pipeline to display complex scenes with hun- dreds of sounds [49, 76, 102]. Sounds may be associated with moving objects [95]. A pipeline will include devices to deliver sound to a user, e.g., speakers, ear phones, etc. With gaming, an FLS displays will almost certainly use an audio middleware such as FMOD. This middleware adds sound or music to a game by providing APIs that receive events from the game engine. It provides a workflow independent of the visuals that is integrated with the visuals [61]. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | summation for all outgoing sources across all objects at the listener location for each ear. The listener may wear ear phones to hear the 3D stereoscopic acoustics. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | A recent study approximates the acoustic scatting field of an object using neural networks for interactive sound propagation in dynamic scenes [93]. This technique requires an approximate training dataset and long training time. Moreover, it has no error bounds on arbitrary objects. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | A hybrid approach that combines both the wave sound prop- agation and the neural network learning approach may be more suitable for FLS displays. The idea is to use generative adversarial network [36], GANs, to simultaneously train two models: a genera- tive model G that captures the data distribution and a discriminative model D that estimates the probability that a sample came from the training data. The training procedures for G is to maximize the probability of D making a mistake. G can be thought of as produc- ing incorrect sound at the listener location. D can be thought of as detecting the incorrect sound. Training of the models is complete once G recovers the training data distribution and D equals to 1 ev- 2 erywhere. The strength of this approach is that the object oriented approach to audio wave sound propagation may generate training data specific to an application. As the training database grows in size, the adversarial network trains itself to produce accurate re- sults. Representation of this data to capture the key elements of an application will have a significant impact on the correctness of the network. It will constitute a main focus of FLS displays. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | FLSs will fail for several reasons. First, each FLS is a special- purpose computing system (similar to a cell phone) that may reboot. Its reboot may cause it to fall to the base of a display and break. Second, each FLS is a mechanical device with a mean time to failure, MTTF. Given a large number of FLSs and assuming independent failures, the likelihood of an FLS failing is proportional to the num- ber of FLSs4. Third, the positioning system (see Section 3.1) will most likely not be 100% accurate. Similar to today’s GPS, it will provide positions with some confidence. When reported positions are erroneous, FLSs may crash into one another or the bottom of the display and break. Fourth, the heuristics that compute the fly path for individual FLSs may not be 100% accurate, causing FLSs crashes for complex scenes. These broken FLSs must be garbage collected. A display may include redundant FLSs that substitute for the broken FLSs. Overtime, a display may exhaust its redundant FLSs. At that point, it must either be replaced with a new display or repaired by removing its garbage FLSs and replenishing it with new operational FLSs. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | It is possible for an FLS that rebooted to fall without breaking. In this case, once its recovers, it will most likely identify itself as a functional FLS to the display and be re-incorporated. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | An interesting research direction will be to design robust algo- rithms that use fewer FLSs than required to provide the highest quality lumination. Another is for a failed FLS to repel other FLSs as it falls to the ground along an arbitrary path. A solution will enable FLSs to move away from the failed FLS in different contexts, e.g., rendering a complex scene, FLS-matter, etc. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | An FLS display is comparable to today’s data centers with a large number of servers. Some of the errors and failures seen in data centers may manifest themselves in an FLS display. It is important to identify lessons learnt from these errors and incorporate them in FLS displays to enhance their reliability. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | An alternative is to infer the 3D geometry and structure of objects in the scene and render them to fill the empty gaps in a lumination. There exist techniques that infer 3D geometry from one or multiple 2D images [22, 41, 57, 106, 109, 111].See [40] for a survey of deep learning techniques. A key challenge with today’s techniques is that they must estimate depth from the 2D images. This estimation will be significantly more accurate with a depthcam (see Section 2.1). Instead of using 2D images, an FLS display will use a database of objects and their 3D geometry to fill the empty gaps. It may include a user in the loop, expanding the system’s database with the missing objects that are personal to that user, e.g., a user’s pet. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | Certain applications may require a hybrid of solutions. For ex- ample, with a medical application, it may be best to show the empty gaps to a physician to inform them of the missing data. The physi- cian may then request the FLS display to fill the gaps by inferring the 3D geometry and structure using a database of the human anatomy or a deep learning technique trained using this database. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | motivate novel user interfaces that are more intuitive, effective, and relevant than today’s user interfaces [67]. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | While the technical challenges of FLS displays may appear daunt- ing, it is important to remember the humble beginnings of today’s displays as televisions with cathode ray tubes and a mechanical scanning system invented in5 1907. Computer monitors using CRT technology with a monochrome display were first introduced in 1973. While LED display technology was developed in 1977, it was not readily available for purchase until about 30 years later with release of one in late 2009. LCD displays 6 were introduced in the mid 1990s and outsold CRT monitors for the first time in 2003. LCD displays became dominant starting 2007. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | Non-immersive FLS displays may observe an evolution similar to today’s monitors to become a consumer electronic good. We are hopeful that their introduction and adoption will be faster. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | Immersive FLS displays raise many interesting research chal- lenges, see discussion of FLS-matter in Section 4. It must consider safety of users and may require a longer development, deployment, and adoption life cycle. |
Processed_Holodeck:_Immersive_3D_Displays_Using_Swarms_of_Fl.txt | a Plug, Thank Tesla (the Scientist), The New York Times, May 31, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/31/business/electric-cars-wireless- charging.html. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | This paper reports on work aimed at supporting knowledge and expertise large Research and Development (R&D) organisation. The paper the nature of knowledge important to R&D organisations and presents a prototype information system developed to support knowledge and expertise finding. The paper then discusses a trial of the system within an R&D organisation, the implications and limitations of the trial, and discusses future research questions. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | A prototype information system, the Automated Research Management System (ARMS), was developed to explore approaches to addressing these issues. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | This paper describes work undertaken to support knowledge and expertise finding within Australia's Defence Science and Technology Organisation (DSTO). DSTO is a government funded research and development (R&D) organisation, with a very broad, applied R&D program focused primarily within the defence and national security domains. DSTO employs approximately 1900 engineers and scientists across a wide range of academic disciplines (about 30% of staff hold PhDs), within seven sites throughout Australia. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Section 2 discusses the nature of knowledge and knowledge management within the R&D environment, and describes the types of support for knowledge and expertise-finding needed within organisations such as DSTO. Section 3 describes ARMS and how it supports knowledge and expertise finding within DSTO. Section 4 outlines trial methodology, and Section 5 discusses the results of two studies undertaken as part of the ARMS trial. Finally, Section 6 discusses the implications and limitations of the work undertaken so far and describes potential areas for future work. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Like most other large R&D organisations [1, 2] and professional services firms, DSTO is a project-centric organisation; projects are formed to address specific questions or problems, or to develop specific products. The nature of the outcomes of the projects undertaken by DSTO varies considerably, and can range from academic papers and technical reports, through to prototype and working system development, and to professional services and consulting engagements. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The main theoretical idea underpinning this work is that the knowledge important to an organisation, or that makes it unique or gives it a competitive advantage, is embedded in key elements that make up the organisation [3–5]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | organisations, organisationally important knowledge is embedded within skills, experiences, expertise and competencies of the individuals that make up the organisation [1, 3, 6]. This is particularly true for R&D organisations [1] and other professional services organisations [5]. As well as people, significant organisational knowledge is embedded within the tools the organisation uses, including specialised physical hardware used as part of a manufacturing process, for example, through to conceptual or intellectual tools such as consulting or analysis frameworks [3, 7]. The third key element identified by [3] is the tasks performed by the organisation. Tasks reflect an organisation's goals, intention and purpose [3, 5, 7]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | on these two potentially limiting foundations. The focus of a knowledge management approach that accepts the embeddedness of knowledge as important becomes one of finding and devising methods, systems and approaches that in some way index and expose the core entities within the organisation that hold the focusing on embedded knowledge, codification and managing the codified knowledge. The importance of the knowledge embedded in the different organisational entities will vary with the nature of the organisation and the nature of the work performed by the organisation. The following section discusses the kinds of knowledge important within an industrial R&D organisation, and the kinds of entities the knowledge is likely to be embedded within. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | For R&D, engineering and other professional is also services organisations, key knowledge embedded within the products or other kinds of outcome the organisation produces. The development of products or other kinds of outcome uniquely combines together the organisation's staff, tools and tasks to address a particular question or problem, or to develop some kind of product, and can be seen as uniquely the the organisation's collective knowledge, skills, experiences and expertise within a particular domain, to address a particular question or problem or to develop some kind of product [1, 7, 9, 10]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | For industrial R&D organisations (and many other knowledge intensive firms [14]), the key knowledge that makes the organisation unique is embedded in the experience, expertise and competencies of the engineers and scientists that make up the organisation and the organisation's collective project history – the past products the organisation has developed, or the past problems or questions it has addressed [1, 10]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | As discussed in [11], knowledge management is centred on two, potentially limiting, philosophical foundations. The first is the idea that tacit and explicit knowledge are two distinctly different forms or types of knowledge, rather than simply being a dimension along which all knowledge exists. The underlying assumption that tacit and explicit knowledge are different leads to the conclusion that a key goal of knowledge management is the codification of tacit knowledge into explicit knowledge [12]. However, as [11] points out, not all knowledge can (or should) be codified, and any knowledge management approaches that rely on the codification of knowledge are likely to fail. The second philosophical that the data – knowledge management rests on information – knowledge continuum: the idea that information is in some way better data and that knowledge is in some way better information. As discussed in [11], this leads to knowledge management approaches that focus only on capturing and managing some form of codified knowledge [13], while ignoring data and information that could provide equal or even greater value to users. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Within most industrial R&D organisations, the products developed or projects undertaken require the application of collective individual knowledge, skills, experience and expertise in unique ways. As a result, products and projects can be seen as an embedding the application of the organisation's collective knowledge, skills, experience and expertise, within a particular domain, to address a particular question or problem [1, 8]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The information and knowledge created as part of past projects can provide important insights into finding solutions to current problems, or gaining an understanding of how similar problems have been solved in the past. Project histories can also support problem reformulation, and can offer some help in validating proposed solutions [15]. Past projects are also important because they can provide a link back to the staff who contributed. This in turn can provide valuable insight into the knowledge, experience and expertise that individual staff may have [1, 8, 15]. Colleagues act not only as important sources of information, and pointers to other sources of information [16], but most importantly they provide an interactive think along function [17, 18]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | expertise finding. The approach taken by the work described in the following section was to develop an to act as a rich, information system (ARMS) interactive model of the embedded knowledge within the organisation – in particular, the current and past projects within the organisation, and the expertise, skills and experience of the staff that make up the organisation. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The Automated Research Management System (ARMS) is a prototype, web based, information system developed to supporting knowledge and expertise finding within DSTO. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | ARMS holds information about the key R&D entities relevant to DSTO – staff and projects, as well as formal and informal project outputs (academic papers, technical reports, design documents, data collections, and so on). Within ARMS, these entities are organised around the organisation's hierarchical structure, and around Themes – collections of taxonomic descriptors used to describe the client and scientific domains that DSTO works within. The key R&D entities and their relationships are shown in Figure 1. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | many similar systems [19], where staff are either not included, or simply labels included as author associated with the entities held by the system). |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | From a user’s perspective, ARMS exists as a collection of dynamically generated web pages, with each R&D entity having its own web page that pulls together all the information related to that entity. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | information, including: contact location and organisational affiliation, and descriptions and links to the projects and project outputs the staff member has contributed to. This information is drawn from existing organisational information systems. Staff pages can also contain optional information, including staff descriptions of current and past project work, staff photo and basic biographical information, and current interests and work. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Project pages contain project descriptions (abstract, overview, project milestones, planned deliverables, information about the project's relationship to other past current and planned projects, and the project's status. Project pages also contain information and links to the staff that have contributed to the project, as well as information about and links to the project's outputs. All this information is obtained from existing information systems. End users are also able to add richer project description information, as well as any kinds of additional outputs to the project's home page. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Output pages contain basic metadata describing the output (title, abstract, publication details, document type and so on) and the documents that make up the output (for example MS-Word files, data files, image files, etc). Output pages contain information and links to the staff who contributed to the output, as well as information and links to the project the output was developed for. Output information contained within ARMS is extracted from an existing publication management system. End users are also able to add additional project outputs to any project page. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | ARMS provides multiple entry points into the data. Users can access staff, project and output entities directly via the staff, project and output browsing pages. Each of these pages provides filterable lists of the staff, project and output entities contained within ARMS. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | In addition to the browsing pages, users can also enter ARMS via a representation of the organisation's structure (the Unit entities shown in Figure 1), or via descriptions of the organisation's R&D program (the Themes entities shown in Figure 1). |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | unit’s structure (for example the groups within a branch), the staff who are members of that unit, and the tasks associated with that unit. This information is extracted from several different existing information systems. In addition, end users can optionally insert additional information describing units. Units can be the unit browse page, an directly entered via interactive form of the organisation’s hierarchical structure. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | support ARMS. Access information and functions provided by ARMS is via a web based interface that supports the functions described in Section 3.1, as well as a Web Services1 interface that provides dynamic programmatic access to the core functions and information (see Figure 2). The Web Services interface was provided to support dynamic access to by ARMS by specialised applications, such as collaborative Microsoft SharePoint portals [22] and other specialised web sites. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | represented as a collection of Themes, a combination of taxonomy descriptors (based around DEFTEST [20]) that cover the core science and technology (S&T) areas of DSTO, and taxonomy descriptors that cover the key client areas DSTO works within. S&T and client Themes are the staff, project and output used information held within ARMS. Each Theme has an automatically generated home page that aggregates all the projects, staff and outputs described by the Theme. In many ways the Theme home pages can be seen as aggregating everything the organisation 'knows' about a particular Theme area – that is all the staff, projects and outputs related to that Theme. Themes can be directly entered via the Theme browse page, an interactive and structured collection of the Themes held by ARMS. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | An important part of ARMS is rich hyperlinking between the various entities that contextualises the information held by ARMS. Staff, for example, are contextualised by the projects they contribute (or have contributed) to and the outputs they have contributed to. Projects are contextualised by the staff that contribute to them, and the part of the organisation they were performed by. The the contextualisation is to allow users to infer richer meanings based on explicit relationships present in the data. The utility of this approach, especially in terms of expertise finding, is discussed in Section 5.2. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | In addition to the browsing functions, ARMS also includes a search function that support free text searching over all the information held by ARMS (fields associated with each entity as well as full document text), field searching (for example, searching explicitly by unit name, or project number), as well as Theme searching. The different search types can be combined with Boolean operators (AND and OR) to form complex queries. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Almost all of the information used by ARMS was drawn from existing corporate information systems as well as less-formal corporate information collections such as spreadsheets and intranet sites. The re-used corporate information generally needed to be cleaned and reformatted before it could be used. Most of the data cleaning issues encountered were common to other data warehousing projects [23], and included a lack of common record identifiers across the different systems, conflicting data values across the different systems, missing and erroneous data, and name and type conflicts. The data cleaning and re-formatting functions were encapsulated in series of customer wrappers that were developed for each of the core corporate applications and other corporate information sources. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | semi-structured information held. Free text search was provided by a commercially available text search engine; searching over structured and semi-structured information was provided by a custom developed search engine. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The Concept and Implementation Survey (Study Three) was undertaken after ARMS had been available in the two trial divisions for approximately 1½ months. The survey was sent to all staff in the two trial divisions who had used ARMS at least once during the trial period. Of the 75 divisional staff who had used ARMS at least once, 23 staff responded. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | To validate the concepts underpinning ARMS and its utility in supporting expertise and knowledge finding within DSTO, a prototype version of the system was evaluated within two DSTO divisions from June until November 2004. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The ARMS prototype (as described in [24]) was fully developed and fully populated with relevant staff, project and output information. The data held by ARMS was kept up-to-date throughout the trial period. During the trial period ARMS was made available to staff within the two divisions selected (Division A and Division B). These divisions were selected because together they reflect a good cross section of the staff, organisational structures, and research programs within DSTO. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Division A was split across five sites, and generally had a multi-disciplinary, professional services focus. At the time of the trial it contained approximately 80 staff. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | three sites, and generally had a computer science/software engineering base, with a strong R&D focus. At the time of the trial, it contained approximately 110 staff. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Respondents were spread across three sites; 40% from Site A, 52% from Site B, and 8% from Site C. The respondents represented a good cross section of the organisation’s management structure, with 17% of respondents holding organisational unit management positions (group or branch), and 40% of respondents having project management responsibility. Overall the sample the organisation, with slight over-sampling of respondents from Site B. The results of this study are discussed in Section 5. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The Utility of Usage Study (Study Five) was undertaken towards the end of the ARMS trial. The most frequent users of ARMS were identified, and invited to participate in the study. Of the users selected, 10 agreed to participate. Study respondents were spread across three sites; 70% from Site A, 20% from Site B and 10% from Site C. Around half of the respondents held project management responsibility. Overall, the sample in this study reflected a good cross section of the organisation, except for the lack of respondents holding organisational unit management positions, and an over-sampling of respondents from Site A. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Over the trial period, five different studies were undertaken (see Table 1). Each of the studies aimed to explore the utility of ARMS from various perspectives. This paper discusses two of the key studies, Study Three and Study Five, both of which measured the utility of ARMS from the perspective of R&D staff. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Study Five was run as a set of survey questions and semi-structured interviews. Participants were asked to list the functions they used ARMS to perform over the previous month. The interviews discussed how participants used ARMS, its utility to them, and how ARMS compared to alternative approaches they may have tried. The interviews were recorded, and the recordings transcribed. The interviews ran for an average of 50 minutes each. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Studies Three and Five recorded how ARMS was used by participants over the previous month. Table 2, below, lists the functions ARMS was used to perform and the percentage of users who used ARMS to perform the listed function. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | after ARMS had been available for 1½ months; Study Five was undertaken toward the end of the 6 month trial). |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | moved to non-use, if they felt ARMS provided no value, or they moved to using specific features and functions of ARMS. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Exploring the system; for example seeing what information it holds and exploring how I could use it. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Using ARMS to build and maintain an awareness of the work being performed within DSTO (Question 2), and using ARMS to find out about particular organisational units (Question 6) and client areas (Question 7) also dropped over the study period. The drop in using ARMS to perform these functions is likely to be due to two key factors. The semi-structured interviews undertaken as part of Study Five revealed that awareness (Question 2) is something that is built for a specific purpose, for example moving to a new organisational unit or moving into a new research area, and then is maintained by actively being involved in the organisational unit or research area. Once an overall awareness has been built, it is maintained by more direct information seeking activities, for example finding out about a staff member, or a project, or hunting up specific project outputs. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The changes in the results for Questions 6 and 7 are due to similar reasons, with participants initially using ARMS to build a general awareness of organisational units and client areas, and then maintaining that information seeking awareness by more direct methods. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The second factor likely to affect the use of ARMS to build and maintain awareness is a fundamental limit trial. As discussed inherent within previously, ARMS was fully populated and maintained with data drawn from only two trial divisions, not the whole organisation. As a result the value of ARMS in providing a rich awareness to participants was limited to only the two trial divisions. This limitation and its likely impact on the overall trial result is discussed in more detail in Section 6.1. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | One set of functions that ARMS was regularly used to perform over the study period was finding people, (Questions 3, 4 and 8 projects and outputs respectively). |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | different perspectives on a common/shared problems, and perhaps even re-use and build on the work already completed by colleagues. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | These findings confirm much of the previous research (described in Section 2) describing the information seeking behaviours and needs of scientists and engineers. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | Overall, participants reported that the information available via ARMS in most cases allowed them to identify colleagues felt would be worth contacting. However, there were some limitations in the data ARMS provided. One key limitation was the scope of the information available via ARMS. As discussed contained information for the two trial divisions. This limited the number of colleagues users could learn about. The second key limitation with the staff data available via ARMS was that individual staff expertise, experience and research interests, in general, could only be derived by understanding the context surrounding the staff member (this is discussed in Section 5.3). While in most cases the surrounding context provided users with sufficient information to infer a staff member's expertise, experience and research interests, it did mean that users were generally unable to directly search for staff with particular expertise, experience and research interests but instead had to search for staff via outputs or projects, and infer staff relevance based on the relationships between staff and the projects and outputs they contributed to. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | An interesting question explored as part of the semi- structured interviews was the relationship between the kinds of information available via ARMS, and the kinds of information available via the user's social networks. Most the importance their social network plays in being able to find colleagues with specific expertise, experience and research interests. However, they generally found that there were limits in the coverage of their social network; in particular many respondents felt their social network often didn't extend into other organisational sites, or into other organisational units. In comparison, they felt that the information held by ARMS was more complete and offered greater coverage of all parts of the organisation, and they viewed ARMS as a way of filling gaps in their social network. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | engineers in particular, descriptions of past projects and the formal and informal products of projects (reports, papers, designs, data sets, meeting minutes, and so on) are important because they offer insights and approaches to solving past problems that may be useful for solving current problems. The semi- structured interviews revealed that participants were using ARMS in this way. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | As well as ARMS, participants could obtain project and formal publication information from two existing a Project organisational Management System (PMS) and a Publications Repository (PR). The basic project and publication information held by ARMS was obtained from these two systems, and in most cases ARMS held little additional information. The key value added by ARMS was the rich contextualisation of the information, together with existing staff information to provide multiple entry point into the information sought, and to allow rich relationships and deeper meaning of the information to be inferred. This is discussed in more detail in the following section. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | As shown by Figure 1, the information contained within ARMS rich interlinking helps to contextualise this information, making it easier for ARMS users to develop a deeper understanding of the information held within ARMS, as well as providing users with multiple entry points into the information, and a navigation model drawn from the users' domains. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The semi-structured interviews undertaken as part of Study 5 showed that by knowing, for example, the background of key staff involved in a project, users are able likely directions, perspectives or methodologies a project may use. Or by knowing about the project that created a particular output, users are able to build a richer understanding of the output's meaning. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The rich interlinking within ARMS also provided users with multiple entry points into the information held by ARMS, and provided them with natural navigation paths drawn from their domain. The semi- structured interviews revealed that almost all users reported that the richly contextualised nature of ARMS helped them navigate ARMS, allowing them to enter ARMS from many different directions, often using only incomplete information as a starting point. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | move from the individual's staff page to their project pages – to find out about the work being performed. From project pages, they would move to output pages, to gain a deeper insight of the work being performed, or they would move to Theme pages, to find related work, staff or outputs. Other users reported a similar approach using projects as a starting point to find people or to find other related projects. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | This form of navigation also allows for far richer forms of accidental information discovery [25], and provides users with the ability to develop rich mental models of the organisation's past, planned and current work program. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | existing organisational information systems. As a result, users were able to build a basic understanding of the past, current and planned work within the organisation, and the skills, interests and experience of staff without requiring the staff described by ARMS to actively make the information available. The strong results for Question 1 across both studies, and the positive the semi-structured interviews, show that, within the trial organisation, the approach of populating ARMS with existing corporate information did lower one of the barriers to sharing by providing a low cost method for 'finding out what is going on in the organisation'. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | As discussed in Section 1, one of the goals of the work described in this paper was to address potential barriers sharing within DSTO, including behavioural and cultural issues, as well as a lack of low cost methods, systems or processes to support information sharing within DSTO. Both Study Three and Study Five attempted to measure the likely influence ARMS would have on these barriers. The results are shown in Table 3; questions were measured on a 7 point, end anchored scale, with 1 meaning strongly disagree, and 7 meaning strongly agree. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | interviews undertaken as part of Study Five revealed that, while being able to find out what was going on in the organisation towards supporting sharing and collaboration, by itself, it isn't sufficient impact existing to significantly behavioural and cultural issues affecting sharing within DSTO. Many including: organisational incentives (for example, rewards, time, encouragement) individual behaviours; the need to derive value from sharing and and collaborating; administrative barriers. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The most interesting insight from Table 3 is the different perceptions respondents had of the role ARMS could play in lowering the cost of sharing within the organisation (Question 1), versus the ability of ARMS (or any information system) to influence the behavioural and cultural issues that affect information the organisation and knowledge sharing within (Questions 2 and 3). |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | This paper has described ARMS, an information system aimed at supporting knowledge and expertise finding within DSTO. ARMS was trialled within two divisions of DSTO over a six month period. During this time, five different studies were undertaken; this paper has reported on two of the key studies aimed at measuring the utility of ARMS from the perspective of R&D staff. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The work described in this paper has three key implications. The first trial is organisation, ARMS provided considerable value in supporting knowledge information management needs of R&D staff. In particular, ARMS provided a mechanism by which R&D staff could find colleagues that had similar research interests, or had expertise or insights that could help with a particular problem. ARMS also provided a rich corporate memory function, allowing R&D staff to browse the organisation’s previous work. As discussed in the literature (see Section 2), finding staff, and finding previous work are two key information and knowledge needs for staff within industrial R&D organisations. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | information held by providing multiple entry points into the information, and intuitive navigations paths that matched the user's model of the domain. The rich interlinking also allowed users to see the information held by ARMS in a wider context, and this often enabled them to build a much richer understanding of the information. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | By reusing existing corporate information, and not requiring R&D staff to add information to ARMS to expose their skills, expertise or experience, or to the expose organisation, ARMS helped overcome one of the key cultural and behavioural barriers toward sharing within DSTO. While ARMS provided the necessary first step towards improving such sharing, ARMS (or any IT system) is still likely to have a limited impact on entrenched organisational cultural and behavioural barriers [26]. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | positive results in deriving descriptions of individual's expertise from descriptions of the work they perform, or the roles they hold. Given that ARMS already strongly relates well described projects and outputs to individual staff, it would be possible to automatically derive or infer descriptions of individual staff expertise from the information already contained within ARMS. By drawing together staff, projects and outputs, Theme pages act as a potential community of practice hub because they provide wide awareness of an interests, and individual's particular expertise or provide resources relevant to that particular area (projects and outputs and their descriptions). Potentially, the Theme home pages could be expanded to include additional functions to encourage the creation of community – for example, via richer resources, and richer interaction methods (cf. [14]). However, due to time constraints imposed on the development of the ARMS prototype, this approach has not yet been explored. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The work described in this paper has been applied only within one R&D organisation. While much of the data collected suggests that the information and knowledge seeking needs of DSTO's scientists and engineers is similar to other R&D organisations reported information and knowledge management problems faced by DSTO may be relatively unique, and as a result, the value of an information system like ARMS to other R&D organisations may be different. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | The author acknowledges the valuable assistance of Dr Mark Burnett, Mr Chris Chapman, Ms Phuong La, and Ms Jemma Nguon, in developing the ARMS prototype, and further acknowledges the assistance of Mr Justin Fidock with some of the evaluation studies. |
Processed_Supporting_Knowledge_and_Expertise_Finding_within_.txt | A second key limitation of this work was the scope of the information made available within ARMS over the trial period. As discussed previously, only the information related to the two trial divisions was made available within ARMS. The data collected as part of the studies showed that, in many ways, this limited the overall utility of ARMS, especially in supporting information seeking outside of the two divisions. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | Proceedings of 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC2003), pp. 2149-2156, IEEE Press, Canberra, Australia, 2003. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | Abstract- A Bayesian optimization algorithm for the nurse scheduling problem is presented, which involves choosing a suitable scheduling rule from a set for each nurse’s assignment. Unlike our previous work that used GAs to implement implicit learning, the learning in the proposed algorithm is explicit, i.e. eventually, we will be able to identify and mix building blocks directly. The Bayesian optimization algorithm is applied to learning by implement such explicit building a Bayesian network of the joint distribution of solutions. The conditional probability of each variable in the network is computed according to an initial set of promising solutions. Subsequently, each new instance for each variable is generated by using the corresponding conditional probabilities, until all variables have been generated, i.e. in our case, a new rule string has been obtained. Another set of rule strings will be generated in this way, some of which will replace previous strings based on fitness selection. If stopping conditions are not met, the conditional probabilities for all nodes in the Bayesian network are updated again using the current set of promising rule strings. Computational results from 52 real data instances demonstrate the success of this approach. It is also suggested that the learning mechanism in the proposed approach might be suitable for other scheduling problems. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | When a human scheduler works, he normally builds a schedule systematically following a set of rules. After much practice, the scheduler gradually masters the knowledge of which solution parts go well with others. He can identify good parts and is aware of the solution quality even if the scheduling process is not completed yet, thus having the ability to finish a schedule by using flexible, rather than fixed, rules. In this paper, we design a more human-like scheduling algorithm, by using a Bayesian optimization algorithm to implement explicit learning from past solutions. A nurse scheduling problem with 52 real data instances gathered from a UK hospital is used as the test problem. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | Scheduling problems are generally NP-hard combinatorial problems, and a lot of research has been done to solve these problems heuristically (Aickelin and Dowsland, 2002 and 2003; Li and Kwan, 2001a and 2003). However, most previous approaches are problem-specific and research into the development of a general scheduling algorithm is still in its infancy. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | Nurse scheduling has been widely studied in recent years, and an extensive summary of the approaches can be found in Hung (1995) and Sitompul and Randhawa (1990). This problem is highly constrained, making it extremely difficult for most local search algorithms to find feasible solutions, let alone optimal ones. In our nurse scheduling problem, the number of the nurses is fixed (up to 30), and the target is to create a weekly schedule by assigning each nurse one out of up to 411 shift patterns in the most efficient way. The proposed Bayesian approach achieves this by choosing a suitable rule, from a rule set containing a number of available rules, for each nurse. A potential solution is therefore represented as a rule string, or a sequence of rules corresponding to nurses from the first one to the last. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | with each node corresponding to one variable, and each variable corresponding to the individual rule by which a schedule will be constructed step by step. The causal relationship between two variables is represented by a directed edge between the two corresponding nodes. |
Processed_A_Bayesian_Optimisation_Algorithm_for_the_Nurse_Sc.txt | The Bayesian optimization algorithm is applied to learn to identify good partial solutions and to complete them by building a Bayesian network of the joint distribution of solutions (Pelikan et al, 1999; Pelikan and Goldberg, 2000). The conditional probabilities are computed according to an initial set of promising solutions. Subsequently, each new instance for each node is generated by using the corresponding conditional probabilities, until values for all nodes have been generated, i.e. a new rule string has been generated. |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.