Filename
stringlengths 22
64
| Paragraph
stringlengths 8
5.57k
|
|---|---|
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Examples 1.9. (1) A representation of the trivial product system P × C on H is a homomorphism of P into the semigroup of isometries on H. If P ×C is twisted by a multiplier µ, the representations are µ-twisted representations of P by isometries. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Lemma 1.10 (The Left Regular Representation). Suppose p : E → P is t∈P Et. Then a product system and P is left-cancellative. Let S(E) = there is a unique representation l : E → B(S(E)) such that l(v)w = vw for v, w ∈ E. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | The following two propositions introduce concepts and notation which will be used throughout the remainder of this paper. The first is merely a translation of ([4], Proposition 2.7) to our setting, so we omit the proof. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proposition 1.12. Suppose E is a product system over P and φ : E → B(H) is a representation. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | t (Q)φ(u)φ(v)∗ = φ(u)Qφ(v)∗. Since {φ(u)Qφ(v)∗ : u, v ∈ B} is a self-adjoint system of nonzero matrix units, the map u ⊗ v 7→ φ(u)Qφ(v)∗ extends as claimed. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | In this section we discuss how to twist semigroup crossed products by product systems. We consider twisted systems (A, P, β, E) in which A is a unital C ∗-algebra, P is a semigroup with identity, β is an action of P on A by endomorphisms, and E is a product system over P . We emphasise that the endomorphisms βs need not be unital. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Remark 2.2. The semigroup crossed products considered in [2], [5] and [13] are recovered by taking E to be the trivial product system P × C, and twisted semigroup crossed products A ⋊β,µ P involving a multiplier µ by taking E = (P × C)µ, as in Examples 1.4 (E3). Stacey’s crossed products of multiplicity n [23] are recovered by taking E to be the essentially unique product system over N with dim E1 = n (see Corollary 1.6). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | However, if Es were infinite-dimensional, the sum on the right of (2.2) would have to be infinite, and because the isometries iE(vk) have orthogonal range projections such sums cannot possibly converge in the C ∗-algebra B. Indeed, for systems with infinite-dimensional fibres conditions (a) and (a′) need not coincide. The following example shows that condition (a′) is too much to hope for if there is to be a crossed product for every system with a covariant representation. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Example 2.4. Consider the system (c, N, τ, Eℵ0 ), where τ is the action of N by translation on the algebra c of convergent sequences and Eℵ0 is the product system over N with dim E1 = ℵ0 (see Corollary 1.6). We shall show that a crossed product B for (c, N, τ, Eℵ0 ) does not satisfy condition (a′). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Let {Sk : k ∈ N} be a countably-infinite collection of isometries on a k = I, and let {δk : k ∈ N} be an or- Hilbert space H such that thonormal basis for E1. The formula φ(δk) = Sk extends uniquely to a rep- resentation φ : E → B(H). Define L : c → B(H) by L(a) = (limk→∞ ak) I. Then (L, φ) is a covariant representation of (c, N, τ, Eℵ0 ), and L × φ(B) = C ∗({Sk}). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proof. Say that a covariant representation (π, φ) is cyclic if the C ∗-algebra C ∗(π, φ) generated by π(A) ∪ φ(E) acts cyclically, i.e., has a cyclic vec- tor. If (π, φ) is any covariant representation on H, the usual Zorn’s Lemma argument shows that H is the direct sum of subspaces on which C ∗(π, φ) acts cyclically. These subspaces are then invariant for π and φ, and the projection Q onto such a subspace commutes with π(A) and ∗-commutes with φ(E). Since compressing by Q preserves the strong operator con- vergence in (2.1), the pair (Qπ, Qφ) is covariant, and is cyclic because C ∗(Qπ, Qφ) = QC ∗(π, φ)Q acts cyclically on QH. Thus every covariant representation is a direct sum of cyclic representations. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Let S be a set of cyclic covariant representations with the property that every cyclic covariant representation of (A, P, β, E) is unitarily equivalent to an element in S. It can be shown that such a set S exists by fixing a Hilbert space H of sufficiently large cardinality (depending on the cardinal- ities of A and E) and considering only representations on H. Note that S is nonempty because the system has a covariant representation, which has a (π,φ)∈S φ, and let A⋊β,EP cyclic summand. Define iA = be the C ∗-algebra generated by iA(A) ∪ iE(E). Condition (a) for a crossed product is satisfied by taking σ to be the identity representation, condition (b) holds since every covariant representation decomposes as a direct sum of cyclic ones, and condition (c) was built into the definition of A⋊β,EP . |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Next let ǫ be the augmentation representation of C ∗(G): ǫ(iG(s)) = 1 for all s ∈ G. Then there is a representation σ ⊗ ǫ of (A⋊β,EP ) ⊗min C ∗(G) on Hσ = Hσ⊗C, and checking on generators shows that (σ⊗ǫ)◦δ = σ. Thus δ is injective. It is also easy to check on generators that (id ⊗δG) ◦ δ = (δ ⊗ id) ◦ δ as homomorphisms of A⋊β,EP into (A⋊β,EP ) ⊗ C ∗(G) ⊗ C ∗(G), so δ is a coaction. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | to-one correspondence with actions of uniqueness of the crossed product to obtain the automorphisms as in [13, Remark 3.6]. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Suppose P is a subsemigroup of a group G such that P ∩ P −1 = {e}. Then s ≤ t iff s−1t ∈ P defines a partial order on G which is left-invariant in the sense that s ≤ t iff rs ≤ rt. Following [19] and [13], we say that (G, P ) is quasi-lattice ordered if every finite subset of G which has an upper bound in P has a least upper bound in P . We shall occasionally write σA for the least upper bound of a subset A of P , and write σA = ∞ when A has no upper bound. Our main examples will be direct sums and free products of totally-ordered groups of the form (Γ, Γ+), where Γ is a countable subgroup of R and Γ+ = Γ ∩ [0, ∞). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | We make no use of condition (QL1). All the results in §3–4 apply to cancella- tive semigroups which satisfy (QL2). In §5 it is necessary to assume that P can be embedded in a group, but it makes no difference what the group is. The amenability results in §6 can be restated in terms of a homomorphism θ : P → P into a subsemigroup of an amenable group. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Remark 3.3. If (G, P ) is totally ordered, then s ≤ t implies αφ so every representation of E is covariant. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proposition 3.4. If (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group and E is a prod- uct system over P , then the left regular representation l of E is covariant. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proof. (1) Suppose p(w) /∈ p(v)P . Then for any u ∈ E we have p(w) 6= p(v)p(u) = p(vu), so hl(v)∗w, ui = hw, vui = 0. Thus l(v)∗w = 0. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proposition 3.7. Suppose (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group, E is a product system over P and φ is a representation of E on H. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Remark 3.8. If (G, P ) is totally ordered, then either f or g disappears from the sum in (3.1), and thus the series is norm convergent. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | converges σ-weakly, and multiplying on the left by φ(v)∗ and on the right by φ(w) gives (1). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proposition 4.1. Suppose (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group and E is a product system over P . |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proof. (1) If (π, φ) is covariant, then αφ covariance of φ follows from the identity 1s1t = 1s∨t. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | the map 1s 7→ αφ πφ(τs(1t)) = πφ(1st) = αφ st(I) = αφ ant representation of (BP , P, τ, E). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Corollary 4.2. If (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group and E is a product system over P , then the system (BP , P, τ, E) has a covariant representation, and iBP : BP → BP ⋊τ,EP is faithful. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proof. Since the left regular representation l : E → B(S(E)) is covariant (Proposition 3.4), the pair (πl, l) is a covariant representation of (BP , P, τ, E). Lemma 3.5(3) implies that the identity Ω of E, viewed as an element of Ee ⊂ S(E), is in the range of the projection I − αl s(I) whenever s ∈ P \ {e}, and hence πl is faithful. Since πl factors through iBP , this in turn implies that iBP is faithful. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | where the sum runs through orthonormal bases for Ep(v)−1(p(v)∨p(w)) and Ep(w)−1(p(v)∨p(w)). This is the case when the fibres of E are finite-dimensional, or when (G, P ) is totally ordered (Remark 3.8). For this class of product systems C ∗ cov(P, E) is indeed universal. In a subsequent paper we will study a larger class of product systems for which (a′) holds in C ∗ Proof of Theorem 4.3. We can represent BP ⋊τ,EP faithfully on a Hilbert space K in such a way that (iBP , iE) becomes a covariant representation of (BP , P, τ, E), and then iE is a covariant representation of E by Proposi- tion 4.1(1). If φ is a covariant representation of E, then Proposition 4.1(2) gives us a covariant representation (πφ, φ) of (BP , P, τ, E), and hence a rep- resentation πφ × φ of BP ⋊τ,EP such that (πφ × φ) ◦ iE = φ. Restricting πφ × φ to A gives the required representation π. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | it suffices to show that span{iE (u)iE(v)∗ : u, v ∈ E} is closed under multiplication. But by Proposition 3.7, each product iE(u)iE(v)∗iE(w)iE (z)∗ is zero unless p(v) ∨ p(w) < ∞, in which case it is a finite sum of operators of the form iE(uf )iE(zg)∗. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | This spanning hypothesis is automatically satisfied if E has finite-dimensional fibres (Theorem 4.3), or if G is totally ordered (in which case we can simplify monomials using iBP (1s)iE(u) = iE(u) or iE(u)iBP (1p(u)−1s), and the norm convergent expansion (3.1)). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | and under the spanning hypothesis (5.1) this characterises Φδ. (This implies, incidentally, that the expectation Φδ is independent of the choice of envelop- ing group G.) We say the system is amenable if Φδ is faithful in the sense that Φδ(b∗b) = 0 implies b = 0. The argument of [13, Lemma 6.5] shows that if the enveloping group G is amenable, then (BP , P, τ, E) is amenable in our sense; in the next section we shall give further examples in which P and G are free products. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Lemma 5.3. Suppose (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group, E is a product system over P , φ is a covariant representation of E, F is a finite subset of P , A is an initial segment of F , u, v ∈ E and s ∈ P . Let a = σA, so that A = {t ∈ F : t ≤ a}. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proposition 5.4. Suppose (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group, E is a product system over P which satisfies the spanning hypothesis (5.1), and φ is a covariant representation of E which satisfies (5.2). Then the represen- tation πφ × φ of BP ⋊τ,EP is isometric on (BP ⋊τ,EP )δ. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | where J is a finite subset of {(u, s, v) ∈ E × P × E : p(u) = p(v)}. The spanning hypothesis (5.1) implies that elements such as X are dense in (BP ⋊τ,EP )δ, so it suffices to show that kπφ × φ(X)k = kXk. (5.6) Let σ be a faithful representation of BP ⋊τ,EP such that (σ ◦ iBP , σ ◦ iE) is a covariant representation of (BP , P, τ, E). By Proposition 4.1, i := σ ◦ iE is a covariant representation of E and σ ◦ iBP = πi; in particular πi(1s) = αi s(I) for each s ∈ P . |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Since X 6= 0, we have πi(QA) 6= 0. From Remark 5.2 we deduce that a := σA < ∞ and A is the initial segment {t ∈ F : t ≤ a}. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | F = {p(u)s : (u, s, v) ∈ J} ∪ {p(v)s : (u, s, v) ∈ J}. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Because X∆ 6= 0, we have πφ(QA) 6= 0, so by Remark 5.2, we have a := σA < ∞ and A = {t ∈ F : t ≤ a}. It follows from (5.4) that πφ(QA) is in the range of αφ a. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Now suppose (u, s, v) ∈ J, p(u)s ≤ a, p(v)s ≤ a and p(u) 6= p(v). If p(u)−1a and p(v)−1a have no common upper bound, then the corresponding term in the above sum is zero. On the other hand, if p(u)−1a ∨ p(v)−1a < ∞, then (p(u)s)−1a ∨ (p(v)s)−1a = s−1(p(u)−1a ∨ p(v)−1a) < ∞. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Examples 5.6. (1) Applying Theorem 5.1 to the trivial product system P ×C gives [13, Theorem 3.7]. More generally, if µ is a multiplier on P , applying it to (P × C)µ gives a characterisation of the faithful representations of the universal C ∗-algebra for covariant µ-representations of (G, P ). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | VkV ∗ Toeplitz-Cuntz family {V1, V2, . . . } is faithful iff k < I; this implies cov(N, E) is isomorphic in particular that BN ⋊τ,E N is not simple. Since C ∗ to the simple C ∗-algebra O∞, it is a proper subalgebra of BN ⋊τ,E N. The system considered in Example 2.4 is exactly (BN, N, τ, E). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | U ∗ 2 V1 = 0, U ∗ 2 V2 = V1U ∗ 2 , 1 + V3U ∗ 2 V3 = V2U ∗ U ∗ 2 . |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | We conclude this section by showing that, under the spanning hypothesis (5.1), amenability of E (strictly speaking, amenability of (BP , P, τ, E)) is equivalent to faithfulness of the left regular representation. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | extends to a projection Φl of norm one on πl × l(BP ⋊τ,EP ) which is faithful on positive elements. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | defines a completely positive projection of norm one on B(S(E)) which is faithful on positive operators. We claim that the restriction of Φl to πl × l(BP ⋊τ,EP ) satisfies (5.9). |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Corollary 5.8. Suppose (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group and E is a product system over P satisfying (5.1). Then E is amenable if and only if πl × l is faithful. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proof. Suppose πl×l is faithful. By Proposition 5.7, (πl×l)◦Φδ = Φl◦(πl ×l) is faithful on positive elements, hence so is Φδ; that is, E is amenable. If (5.1) is satisfied, then Proposition 5.4 implies that πl×l is faithful on (BP ⋊τ,EP )δ. If in addition E is amenable, then Φl ◦ (πl × l) = (πl × l) ◦ Φδ is faithful on positive elements, from which faithfulness of πl × l follows. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Suppose (G, P ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group and E is a product system over P . In this section we give conditions which ensure that E is amenable; these conditions also ensure that E satisfies the spanning condition (5.1), so that Theorem 5.1 applies. Our argument follows those of [13, §4] and [8, Proposition 2.10]. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Remark 6.2. (1) As in [13, Proposition 4.3], the main example of such a map θ will be the canonical homomorphism of a free product of quasi-lattice ordered groups onto the corresponding direct sum. However, we could also take θ to be the length function on the free group Fn (the homomorphism into Z which takes each generator to 1), and this example gives a good feel for both our constructions and those of [13, §4]. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Since G is amenable, Φδθ is faithful on positive elements. We can recover the original expectation Φδ by first applying Φδθ , and then killing the terms with p(u)p(v)−1 ∈ ker θ\{e}, which can be accomplished spatially by representing (BP ⋊τ,EP )δθ using the regular representation πl × l, and compressing to the diagonal via the expectation Φl of Proposition 5.7. Since Φl is faithful on positive operators, this last step is faithful whenever πl × l is faithful on (BP ⋊τ,EP )δθ . |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | this shows that i(u)αi t(I)i(z)∗ is an element of σ(US), and hence that US is closed under multiplication. This proves that US is a C ∗-algebra. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | By [2, Lemma 1.3], to prove that πl×l is faithful on (BP ⋊τ,EP )δθ it is enough to prove it is faithful on each of the subalgebras UF . We shall accomplish this by inducting on |F |. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | First suppose F = {r} for some r ∈ P, and write Ur for U{r}. Let φ be a covariant representation of E, and suppose that x and y are unit vectors in E such that p(x) 6= p(y) and θ(p(x)) = θ(p(y)) = r. Since θ satisfies (6.1) we must have p(x) ∨ p(y) = ∞, and thus by Proposition 3.7 the isometries φ(x) and φ(y) have orthogonal ranges. Hence φ extends to a bounded linear map t∈θ−1(r) Et, and the following analogues of Propositions 1.11 on Fr := and 1.12 hold: αφ t defines a normal ∗-endomorphism of B(Hφ), and there is a faithful normal ∗-representation ρφ r of B(Fr) such that ρφ r (x ⊗ y) = φ(x)φ(y)∗ for x, y ∈ Fr. Moreover, if Q is a nonzero projection on Hφ, then T 7→ αφ r (T ) is also a faithful representation of B(Fr). There should be no confusion caused by our abuse of notation; just take note of whether the subscript is an element of P or P. A word of caution, however: although t 7→ αφ is a semigroup homomorphism, in general the t map r ∈ P 7→ αφ r is not: the bundle {Fr : r ∈ P} is not a product system in the multiplication inherited from E. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | For the inductive step, suppose F ∈ F and πl × l is faithful on UF ′ whenever F ′ ∈ F and |F ′| < |F |; we aim to prove that πl ×l is faithful on UF . Since F is finite it has a minimal element; that is, there exists r0 ∈ F such that r0 < r0 ∨r for each r ∈ F \{r0}. Notice that if u, v, w ∈ E and s ∈ P are such that θ(p(u)s) = θ(p(v)s) ∈ F and θ(p(w)) = r0, then by Lemma 3.5 the vector πl × l(iE(u)iBP (1s)iE (v)∗)w = l(u)αl s(I)l(v)∗w is nonzero only when p(v)s ≤ p(w). Since this in turn implies that θ(p(v)s) ≤ r0, the minimality of r0 forces θ(p(v)s) = r0. Thus if we let Pr0 denote the orthogonal projection of S(E) onto Fr0, then πl × l(Ur)Pr0 = {0} for each r ∈ F \ {r0}. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | and consequently Yn,r0 → 0. Thus Yn − Yn,r0 → Y , which shows that Y ∈ UF \{r0}, as claimed. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Corollary 6.3. Suppose (Gλ, P λ) is a quasi-lattice ordered group with Gλ amenable for each λ belonging to some index set Λ. Then any product system over ∗P λ which satisfies (6.2) is amenable. In particular, any product system over ∗P λ which has only finite-dimensional fibres is amenable. |
Processed_Discrete_product_systems_and_twisted_crossed_produ.txt | Proof. The group ical map θ : ∗Gλ → L that any system with finite-dimensional fibres will satisfy (6.2). |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | This paper describes our submission sys- tem for the Shallow Track of Surface Real- ization Shared Task 2018 (SRST'18). The task was to convert genuine UD struc- tures, from which word order informa- tion had been removed and the tokens had been lemmatized, into their correct senten- tial form. We divide the problem state- ment into two parts, word reinflection and correct word order prediction. For the first sub-problem, we use a Long Short Term Memory based Encoder-Decoder ap- proach. For the second sub-problem, we present a Language Model (LM) based approach. We apply two different sub- approaches in the LM Based approach and the combined result of these two ap- proaches is considered as the final output of the system. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Figure 1: Architecture of the Proposed Model - Word sequence (w1, w2, w3, ...,wn) is reinfected into (w(cid:48) 1 , w2, w(cid:48) i are the changed words due to reinfection. Final output gives the LM Score for the sequence of reinflected words. Model is run on different possible combinations and the sequence with best LM Score is chosen. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | done by assigning a probability to the whole se- quence. The shared task organizers provided the training and a small development dataset for building our systems. A period of about 3 weeks was given for submitting our predictions on the test set. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 discusses, in brief, the dataset for the task. Section 3 explains our proposed approach in detail. We discuss what models we have used to re-inflect the words and generate ordered sen- tences from the jumbled sentences. Section 4 ex- plains how the system is evaluated and Section 5 states the results we have obtained. We have also included an analysis of our system in Section 6. We conclude our paper and discuss its future prospects in Section 7. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | We used the dataset provided by the shared task organizers for training our system. No other ex- ternal dataset was used in training. The dataset of the shared task is comprised of two sets of files, a .conll file containing the UD structures of sentences, and a text file containing the or- dered sentences along with their sentence ids. We have worked only on the English language dataset. There are around 12000 sentences in the training file and approximately 3000 sentences in the de- velopment file. The complete details of the dataset can be found here1. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Figure 2: Architecture of the Word Re-inflection model - C1, .., Cm represent characters of the root word while O1, ..,On represent characters of the output word. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | the task of re-obtaining the correct word order from the unordered UD structure. We shall refer to these problems as Subproblem-1 and Subproblem- 2 subsequently in this paper. Subproblem-1 is the word re-inflection problem and Subproblem-2 is the word ordering problem. The complete architecture of the proposed model is shown in Figure 1. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | annotation format is Noun & Number=Sing. We convert this to N;SING. This can be treated as an approximation of the UniMorph annotation format, which is sufficient for us. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | the binary vector representing the morphological features, acts as input to the LSTM decoder. A softmax layer is then used to predict the character at each position of the output word. To maintain a common length for all words, a padding of 0 is used. The architecture of this model is shown in Figure 2. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | We have used a probabilistic and statistical Lan- guage Model to tackle this subproblem. After re- inflecting the words in the UD-Structures, the next step is to obtain the correct word-order of each sentence. For this, we make use of the SRILM Toolkit (Stolcke, 2002). |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | After calculating these probabilities, we move on to solve the prime objective of this subprob- lem, which is to find the correct word order of the unordered sentences. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | For this, we have used two methods. Select- ing which method to use depends on the sentence length. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Method 1 is used in cases where the sentence length is more than 23 (23 being a hyperparameter in this case) and Method 2 is used for sentences having their length less than or equal to 23. Note that we have predicted the sentences without any punctuations in it. All the punctuations appearing in a sentence were removed. However, a full stop was added at the end of each predicted sentence. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | For each word left in LRW, check which word, on addition to the predicted se- quence gives the maximum Language Model Score. Let this word be w. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | By following the above mentioned steps, we get the final sequence of words as predicted by Method-1 of our LM approach. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | manually broken each sentence length into dif- ferent combination of unigrams, bigrams and tri- grams. We calculate the LM score of different rel- ative arrangements of these n-grams. Out of all the possible relative arrangements, the one which gives the maximum LM Score is chosen as the pre- diction of our model for that jumbled sentence. The idea behind choosing different combinations of n-grams is that a sentence is generally divided into different chunks and if we are able to iden- tify the chunks in which the words of a sentence appear, we can then use a language model to find which possible sequence would have been the best out of all the different possible relative arrange- ments of these chunks of words. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Cross Validation (CV): We trained our model on the training data and did predictions on the development data, both of which were provided by the shared task organizers. These predictions were considered as the CV Score of our model. The metrics that were used to evaluate the model were BLEU (Papineni et al., 2002), NE DIST and NIST (Doddington, 2002). Evaluation script for the same was also provided by the organizers. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Test: Once we were done with the optimal tun- ing of our model using the CV score, we used our model to generate ordered sentences on the test data. We trained on the full training data for the re-inflection task and combined the training and development data to generate the language model (.lm) file for the word-ordering task. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | We worked on Track 1 (Shallow track) of the shared task for the English language. The perfor- mances of our system, the system which scored the highest for English and the system which scored the highest when averaged over the scores of all the languages is given in the table below. Evalu- ation is done across various metrics provided by the shared task organizers. Note that all the scores given below are for English language only. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | the LSTM based encoder-decoder model correctly predicted the re- inflected forms of 95.8% words when trained on the training dataset and tested on the development dataset. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | The sentences submitted as output did not have punctuations except a full stop at the end. Because of this, our sentences lacked punctuations occurring inside a sentence. Also, it is not necessary that a sentence ends with a full stop only. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Enumerating over permutations for the word reordering sub-problem was computationally expensive for sentences of length greater than 23. So, we had to use the 4-gram ap- proach for such sentences, which does not perform that well as the variable n-gram ap- proach. Since there were many sentences having length greater than 23 in the test set, the overall results got adversely affected. For example, “It looks pretty cool on the other hand.” is a prediction by our model, which is a decent sentence. However, the predic- tion “There have been the us soldiers with have to either even long since by arab fun- damentalists local sunni radicals become re- main or or relations sunnis committed na- tionalism roiled falluja tense.”, which is 30 words long, does not appear to be a meaning- ful English sentence. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | There is another important point worth notic- ing with respect to the evaluation metrics. For a given set of words, there may be more than one linguistically correct word order. For ex- ample, both the sentences “The boy reads a book.” and “The book a boy reads.” are made up of the same set of words and both are lin- guistically correct as well. So, the algorithms used for evaluation of results may not give the highest possible score to a sentence even if it is linguistically correct. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | In this paper, we described a system which treats reinflection and word reordering as two indepen- dent sub-problems. We have used an LSTM based approach to solve the problem of re-inflection. The LSTM model works on character embeddings and predicts the re-inflected word character by character. We have observed that this type of model can be more effective and beneficial than other elementary approaches like String Match- ing (Cotterell et al., 2017) etc. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | the Word-Ordering problem, we have worked with only statistical and probabilistic ap- proaches till now and haven't yet incorporated any deep learning based approach in our model. Neu- ral models are state of the art in nearly all Nat- ural Language Processing tasks and have always performed better than statistical and probabilistic approaches. So in future, we wish to experiment with deep learning based approaches as well. One major information we didn’t exploit is the depen- dency relations between the words. We hope to come up with a method to somehow quantify those relations and use those values to calculate an im- provised language model score. Also, since a de- pendency tree can be interpreted as a graph, us- ing graph matching and searching techniques is another dimension we can explore. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Regina Barzilay and Kathleen R McKeown. 2005. Sentence fusion for multidocument news summa- rization. Computational Linguistics, 31(3):297– 328. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Ryan Cotterell, Christo Kirov, John Sylak-Glassman, G´eraldine Walther, Ekaterina Vylomova, Patrick Xia, Manaal Faruqui, Sandra K¨ubler, David Yarowsky, Jason Eisner, and Mans Hulden. 2017. Conll-sigmorphon 2017 shared task: Universal mor- phological reinflection in 52 languages. CoRR, abs/1706.09031. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co- In Proceedings of the Sec- occurrence statistics. ond International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, HLT ’02, pages 138–145, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Simon Mille, Anja Belz, Bernd Bohnet, Yvette Gra- ham, Emily Pitler, and Leo Wanner. 2018. The First Multilingual Surface Realisation Shared Task (SR’18): Overview and Evaluation Results. In Pro- ceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multilingual Sur- face Realisation (MSR), 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 1–10, Melbourne, Australia. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Joakim Nivre, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Filip Ginter, Yoav Goldberg, Jan Hajic, Christopher D Manning, Ryan T McDonald, Slav Petrov, Sampo Pyysalo, Natalia Silveira, et al. 2016. Universal de- pendencies v1: A multilingual treebank collection. In LREC. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: A method for automatic eval- In Proceedings of uation of machine translation. the 40th Annual Meeting on Association for Com- putational Linguistics, ACL ’02, pages 311–318, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 1997. Building applied natural language generation systems. Natural Lan- guage Engineering, 3(1):57–87. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Andreas Stolcke. 2002. Srilm – an extensible lan- In IN PROCEEDINGS guage modeling toolkit. OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPOKEN LANGUAGE PROCESSING (ICSLP 2002, pages 901–904. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Akhilesh Sudhakar and Anil Kumar Singh. 2017. Ex- periments on morphological reinflection: Conll- 2017 shared task. In Proceedings of the CoNLL SIG- MORPHON 2017 Shared Task: Universal Morpho- logical Reinflection, pages 71–78. Association for Computational Linguistics. |
Processed_IIT_(BHU)_Varanasi_at_MSR-SRST_2018:_A_Language_Mo.txt | Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, Ruslan Salakhudinov, Rich Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual at- In International Conference on Machine tention. Learning, pages 2048–2057. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 1. The image of the ring of PHR1633-4928 in Hα, taken from the AAO/UKST Hα survey. Note the scalloping on the inside of the ring with fingers of material extending toward the central star. The image has dimensions 118′′×135′′. A circle of radius 36′′ inscribed about the central star is a good representation of the nebular rim. The image resolution is ∼ 1.5′′, with 0.67′′ pixel size, and it is not flux calibrated. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 2. The Hα and [NII] emission lines in the ring of PCG 11, from our single high-resolution observation of the nebular rim. Note the absence of the [SII] lines. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 3. Coadd of two low-resolution spectra of the central star in PCG 11 over our complete wavelength range. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 5. The Hα image of PHR1633-4928 overlaid by white (positive) contours from the coaddition of three independent Molonglo 843-MHz im- ages. The peak of the radio image is 12.1 mJy beam−1, and the noise in this combined image is 1.0 mJy beam−1. The contours correspond to val- ues of 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 12 σ. The small central contour that includes the exciting star is at 8 mJy beam−1 (8 σ). |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 6. The Hα image of PHR1633-4928 is overlaid by white contours of MSX 8.3-µm emission with values of 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5×10−6 W m−2 sr−1. These correspond to 6, 7.5, 9, 10.5 σ detection levels based on the noise in the 8.3-µm image. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 7. The Hα image of PHR1633-4928 is overlaid by white contours of MSX 21.3-µm emission from a deep mosaic, with values of 0.9, 1.35, 1.8×10−6 W m−2 sr−1. These correspond to 5, 7.5 and 9 σ detection levels based on the noise in the 21.3-µm mosaic. The image is roughly 6′×6′. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 8. The 2MASS J image of the region of PHR1633-4928 is overlaid in white contours on the SR image. J-band contours correspond to values of 100, 200, 300, 500, and 1000 counts. The image is approximately 2′×2′. |
Processed_A_New_Wolf-Rayet_Star_and_its_Ring_Nebula:_PCG11.txt | Figure 9. The observed (dash-dotted) and 8.1m dereddened (solid) en- ergy distributions of PCG 11’s WR star, together with dereddened optical, 2MASS, and MSX photometry (triangles), compared with a scaled version of the modeled SED for HD 151932 (WN7h) (long-dashed). |
Processed_AMiBA_Observations,_Data_Analysis_and_Results_for_.txt | ticular emphasis on detecting SZE clusters, the CMB anisotropy, and possibly cosmic defects (Lin et al. 2004; Umetsu et al. 2004; Wu et al. 2004; Ho et al. 2008b; Wu et al. 2008a). The instrument is described in Ho et al. (2008a), Chen et al. (2008), and Koch et al. (2008a). In our initial configuration with seven close- packed antennas of 60-cm diameter, we concentrated on pointed observations of the SZE and the measurement of the CMB temperature power spectrum (Ho et al. 2008b; Wu et al. 2008a). |
Subsets and Splits