id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA10000 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .
Question: what was the experience loss in uk?
Answer: 2012.0
Question: what was the experience loss in us?
| 1219.0 |
CONVFINQA10001 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .
Question: what was the experience loss in uk?
Answer: 2012.0
Question: what was the experience loss in us?
Answer: 1219.0
Question: what is the sum of the uk and us?
| 3231.0 |
CONVFINQA10002 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .
Question: what was the experience loss in uk?
Answer: 2012.0
Question: what was the experience loss in us?
Answer: 1219.0
Question: what is the sum of the uk and us?
Answer: 3231.0
Question: what is the total sum including other combined experience loss?
| 3633.0 |
CONVFINQA10003 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .
Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?
| -2.7 |
CONVFINQA10004 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .
Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what was that noncontrolling interest in 2009?
| 113.1 |
CONVFINQA10005 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .
Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what was that noncontrolling interest in 2009?
Answer: 113.1
Question: how much, then, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to this 2009 interest?
| -0.02387 |
CONVFINQA10006 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .
Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what was that noncontrolling interest in 2009?
Answer: 113.1
Question: how much, then, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to this 2009 interest?
Answer: -0.02387
Question: in that same year of 2010, what was the total par value of the redeemed preferred a units?
| 4840000.0 |
CONVFINQA10007 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
kimco realty corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements , continued the units consisted of ( i ) approximately 81.8 million preferred a units par value $ 1.00 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the preferred a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after one year or callable by the company any time after six months and contain a promote feature based upon an increase in net operating income of the properties capped at a 10.0% ( 10.0 % ) increase , ( ii ) 2000 class a preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to libor plus 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) per annum on the class a preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , ( iii ) 2627 class b-1 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-1 preferred par value and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock , equal to the cash redemption amount , as defined , ( iv ) 5673 class b-2 preferred units , par value $ 10000 per unit , which pay the holder a return equal to 7.0% ( 7.0 % ) per annum on the class b-2 preferred par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , and ( v ) 640001 class c downreit units , valued at an issuance price of $ 30.52 per unit which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after november 30 , 2010 , for cash or at the company 2019s option , shares of the company 2019s common stock equal to the class c cash amount , as defined . the following units have been redeemed as of december 31 , 2010 : redeemed par value redeemed ( in millions ) redemption type . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>type</td><td>units redeemed</td><td>par value redeemed ( in millions )</td><td>redemption type</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>preferred a units</td><td>2200000</td><td>$ 2.2</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>class a preferred units</td><td>2000</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>class b-1 preferred units</td><td>2438</td><td>$ 24.4</td><td>cash</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>class b-2 preferred units</td><td>5576</td><td>$ 55.8</td><td>cash/charitable contribution</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>class c downreit units</td><td>61804</td><td>$ 1.9</td><td>cash</td></tr></table> noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units was $ 110.4 million and $ 113.1 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . during 2006 , the company acquired two shopping center properties located in bay shore and centereach , ny . included in noncontrolling interests was approximately $ 41.6 million , including a discount of $ 0.3 million and a fair market value adjustment of $ 3.8 million , in redeemable units ( the 201credeemable units 201d ) , issued by the company in connection with these transactions . the prop- erties were acquired through the issuance of $ 24.2 million of redeemable units , which are redeemable at the option of the holder ; approximately $ 14.0 million of fixed rate redeemable units and the assumption of approximately $ 23.4 million of non-recourse debt . the redeemable units consist of ( i ) 13963 class a units , par value $ 1000 per unit , which pay the holder a return of 5% ( 5 % ) per annum of the class a par value and are redeemable for cash by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2011 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2016 , and ( ii ) 647758 class b units , valued at an issuance price of $ 37.24 per unit , which pay the holder a return at a rate equal to the company 2019s common stock dividend and are redeemable by the holder at any time after april 3 , 2007 , for cash or at the option of the company for common stock at a ratio of 1:1 , or callable by the company any time after april 3 , 2026 . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until april 2016 and april 2026 for the centereach , ny , and bay shore , ny , assets , respectively . during 2007 , 30000 units , or $ 1.1 million par value , of theclass bunits were redeemed by the holder in cash at the option of the company . noncontrolling interest relating to the units was $ 40.4 million and $ 40.3 million as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . noncontrolling interests also includes 138015 convertible units issued during 2006 , by the company , which were valued at approxi- mately $ 5.3 million , including a fair market value adjustment of $ 0.3 million , related to an interest acquired in an office building located in albany , ny . these units are redeemable at the option of the holder after one year for cash or at the option of the company for the company 2019s common stock at a ratio of 1:1 . the holder is entitled to a distribution equal to the dividend rate of the company 2019s common stock . the company is restricted from disposing of these assets , other than through a tax free transaction , until january 2017. .
Question: what was the change in the noncontrolling interest relating to the remaining units from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: -2.7
Question: and what was that noncontrolling interest in 2009?
Answer: 113.1
Question: how much, then, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to this 2009 interest?
Answer: -0.02387
Question: in that same year of 2010, what was the total par value of the redeemed preferred a units?
Answer: 4840000.0
Question: and how much is that in millions?
| 4.84 |
CONVFINQA10008 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc . ( acquired by the company in march 2018 ) , time warner , inc . ( acquired by at&t inc . in june 2018 ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 . two peer companies , scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc. , were acquired in 2018 . the stock performance chart shows the peer group including scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc . and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td><td>december 312017</td><td>december 312018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 74.58</td><td>$ 57.76</td><td>$ 59.34</td><td>$ 48.45</td><td>$ 53.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.56</td><td>$ 58.82</td><td>$ 63.44</td><td>$ 53.97</td><td>$ 72.90</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.42</td><td>$ 60.15</td><td>$ 63.87</td><td>$ 50.49</td><td>$ 55.04</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.39</td><td>$ 110.58</td><td>$ 121.13</td><td>$ 144.65</td><td>$ 135.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group incl . acquired companies</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 116.64</td><td>$ 114.02</td><td>$ 127.96</td><td>$ 132.23</td><td>$ 105.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>peer group ex . acquired companies</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.23</td><td>$ 117.27</td><td>$ 120.58</td><td>$ 127.90</td><td>$ 141.58</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of discb at the end of 2018?
| 72.9 |
CONVFINQA10009 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc . ( acquired by the company in march 2018 ) , time warner , inc . ( acquired by at&t inc . in june 2018 ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 . two peer companies , scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc. , were acquired in 2018 . the stock performance chart shows the peer group including scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc . and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td><td>december 312017</td><td>december 312018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 74.58</td><td>$ 57.76</td><td>$ 59.34</td><td>$ 48.45</td><td>$ 53.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.56</td><td>$ 58.82</td><td>$ 63.44</td><td>$ 53.97</td><td>$ 72.90</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.42</td><td>$ 60.15</td><td>$ 63.87</td><td>$ 50.49</td><td>$ 55.04</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.39</td><td>$ 110.58</td><td>$ 121.13</td><td>$ 144.65</td><td>$ 135.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group incl . acquired companies</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 116.64</td><td>$ 114.02</td><td>$ 127.96</td><td>$ 132.23</td><td>$ 105.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>peer group ex . acquired companies</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.23</td><td>$ 117.27</td><td>$ 120.58</td><td>$ 127.90</td><td>$ 141.58</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of discb at the end of 2018?
Answer: 72.9
Question: what is that less $100?
| -27.1 |
CONVFINQA10010 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc . ( acquired by the company in march 2018 ) , time warner , inc . ( acquired by at&t inc . in june 2018 ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2013 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 . two peer companies , scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc. , were acquired in 2018 . the stock performance chart shows the peer group including scripps networks interactive , inc . and time warner , inc . and excluding both acquired companies for the entire five year period . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 312013</td><td>december 312014</td><td>december 312015</td><td>december 312016</td><td>december 312017</td><td>december 312018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>disca</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 74.58</td><td>$ 57.76</td><td>$ 59.34</td><td>$ 48.45</td><td>$ 53.56</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>discb</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.56</td><td>$ 58.82</td><td>$ 63.44</td><td>$ 53.97</td><td>$ 72.90</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>disck</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 80.42</td><td>$ 60.15</td><td>$ 63.87</td><td>$ 50.49</td><td>$ 55.04</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 111.39</td><td>$ 110.58</td><td>$ 121.13</td><td>$ 144.65</td><td>$ 135.63</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>peer group incl . acquired companies</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 116.64</td><td>$ 114.02</td><td>$ 127.96</td><td>$ 132.23</td><td>$ 105.80</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>peer group ex . acquired companies</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 113.23</td><td>$ 117.27</td><td>$ 120.58</td><td>$ 127.90</td><td>$ 141.58</td></tr></table> equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .
Question: what was the value of discb at the end of 2018?
Answer: 72.9
Question: what is that less $100?
Answer: -27.1
Question: what is that divided by 100?
| -0.271 |
CONVFINQA10011 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
36 duke realty corporation annual report 2013 leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures . one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 39892</td><td>$ 26643</td><td>$ 50079</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>38617</td><td>31059</td><td>38130</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>13289</td><td>6182</td><td>11055</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 91798</td><td>$ 63884</td><td>$ 99264</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 427355</td><td>$ 264755</td><td>$ 162070</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 35376</td><td>$ 27772</td><td>$ 26311</td></tr></table> second generation tenant improvements and leasing costs increased due to a shift in industrial leasing volume from renewal leases to second generation leases ( see data in the key performance indicators section of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ) , which are generally more capital intensive . additionally , although the overall renewal volume was lower , renewals for office leases , which are generally more capital intensive than industrial leases , increased from 2012 . during 2013 , we increased our investment across all product types in non-tenant specific building improvements . the increase in capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments was the result of our increased focus on wholly owned development projects . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of $ 572.6 million at december 31 , 2013 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 468.8 million and $ 124.2 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . cash outflows for real estate development investments were $ 427.4 million , $ 264.8 million and $ 162.1 million for december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 31.3 million , $ 30.4 million and $ 25.3 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 27.1 million , $ 20.0 million and $ 10.4 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including construction , development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 35.7% ( 35.7 % ) , 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found herein , in the discussion of general and administrative expenses in the comparison sections of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what is the change in second generation tenant improvements from 2012 to 2013?
| 13249.0 |
CONVFINQA10012 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
36 duke realty corporation annual report 2013 leasing/capital costs tenant improvements and lease-related costs pertaining to our initial leasing of newly completed space , or vacant space in acquired properties , are referred to as first generation expenditures . such first generation expenditures for tenant improvements are included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows , while such expenditures for lease-related costs are included within "other deferred leasing costs." cash expenditures related to the construction of a building's shell , as well as the associated site improvements , are also included within "development of real estate investments" in our consolidated statements of cash flows . tenant improvements and leasing costs to re-let rental space that we previously leased to tenants are referred to as second generation expenditures . building improvements that are not specific to any tenant but serve to improve integral components of our real estate properties are also second generation expenditures . one of our principal uses of our liquidity is to fund the second generation leasing/capital expenditures of our real estate investments . the following table summarizes our second generation capital expenditures by type of expenditure ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>second generation tenant improvements</td><td>$ 39892</td><td>$ 26643</td><td>$ 50079</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second generation leasing costs</td><td>38617</td><td>31059</td><td>38130</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>building improvements</td><td>13289</td><td>6182</td><td>11055</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total second generation capital expenditures</td><td>$ 91798</td><td>$ 63884</td><td>$ 99264</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>development of real estate investments</td><td>$ 427355</td><td>$ 264755</td><td>$ 162070</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other deferred leasing costs</td><td>$ 35376</td><td>$ 27772</td><td>$ 26311</td></tr></table> second generation tenant improvements and leasing costs increased due to a shift in industrial leasing volume from renewal leases to second generation leases ( see data in the key performance indicators section of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ) , which are generally more capital intensive . additionally , although the overall renewal volume was lower , renewals for office leases , which are generally more capital intensive than industrial leases , increased from 2012 . during 2013 , we increased our investment across all product types in non-tenant specific building improvements . the increase in capital expenditures for the development of real estate investments was the result of our increased focus on wholly owned development projects . we had wholly owned properties under development with an expected cost of $ 572.6 million at december 31 , 2013 , compared to projects with an expected cost of $ 468.8 million and $ 124.2 million at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . cash outflows for real estate development investments were $ 427.4 million , $ 264.8 million and $ 162.1 million for december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 31.3 million , $ 30.4 million and $ 25.3 million of overhead costs related to leasing activities , including both first and second generation leases , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . we capitalized $ 27.1 million , $ 20.0 million and $ 10.4 million of overhead costs related to development activities , including construction , development and tenant improvement projects on first and second generation space , during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . combined overhead costs capitalized to leasing and development totaled 35.7% ( 35.7 % ) , 31.1% ( 31.1 % ) and 20.6% ( 20.6 % ) of our overall pool of overhead costs at december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . further discussion of the capitalization of overhead costs can be found herein , in the discussion of general and administrative expenses in the comparison sections of management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. .
Question: what is the change in second generation tenant improvements from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 13249.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.49728 |
CONVFINQA10013 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .
Question: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013?
| 0.0275 |
CONVFINQA10014 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .
Question: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013?
Answer: 0.0275
Question: and what is the sum of the number one and this percentage as a portion of the number one?
| 1.0275 |
CONVFINQA10015 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .
Question: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013?
Answer: 0.0275
Question: and what is the sum of the number one and this percentage as a portion of the number one?
Answer: 1.0275
Question: considering that this senior fixed rate accumulates on top of the previous one, what will be its total cumulative value at the end of ten years?
| 1.31165 |
CONVFINQA10016 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .
Question: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013?
Answer: 0.0275
Question: and what is the sum of the number one and this percentage as a portion of the number one?
Answer: 1.0275
Question: considering that this senior fixed rate accumulates on top of the previous one, what will be its total cumulative value at the end of ten years?
Answer: 1.31165
Question: what was the issued amount in 2013?
| 400.0 |
CONVFINQA10017 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>$ 907.4</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>453.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>433.0</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>453.8</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2018</td><td>439.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>2876.6</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 5563.7</td></tr></table> on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .
Question: what was the senior fixed-rate in 2013?
Answer: 0.0275
Question: and what is the sum of the number one and this percentage as a portion of the number one?
Answer: 1.0275
Question: considering that this senior fixed rate accumulates on top of the previous one, what will be its total cumulative value at the end of ten years?
Answer: 1.31165
Question: what was the issued amount in 2013?
Answer: 400.0
Question: what, then, is going to be the total matured value of this amount at the end of those ten years, considering the cumulative senior fixed rate?
| 524.66041 |
CONVFINQA10018 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
| 15.2 |
CONVFINQA10019 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: what about in 2001?
| 5.5 |
CONVFINQA10020 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what is the net change?
| 9.7 |
CONVFINQA10021 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 9.7
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
| 1.76364 |
CONVFINQA10022 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 9.7
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Answer: 1.76364
Question: what about the net change in average daily earnings at risk from 2001 to 2002?
| 4.4 |
CONVFINQA10023 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 9.7
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Answer: 1.76364
Question: what about the net change in average daily earnings at risk from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 4.4
Question: what is the average daily earnings at risk in 2001?
| 6.4 |
CONVFINQA10024 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis annually , beginning in 2006 , if power market prices drop below the ppa prices . accordingly , because the price is not fixed , the table above does not report power from that plant as sold forward after 2005 . under the ppas with nypa for the output of power from indian point 3 and fitzpatrick , the non-utility nuclear business is obligated to produce at an average capacity factor of 85% ( 85 % ) with a financial true-up payment to nypa should nypa's cost to purchase power due to an output shortfall be higher than the ppas' price . the calculation of any true-up payments is based on two two-year periods . for the first period , which ran through november 20 , 2002 , indian point 3 and fitzpatrick operated at 95% ( 95 % ) and 97% ( 97 % ) , respectively , under the true-up formula . credits of up to 5% ( 5 % ) reflecting period one generation above 85% ( 85 % ) can be used to offset any output shortfalls in the second period , which runs through the end of the ppas on december 31 , 2004 . entergy continually monitors industry trends in order to determine whether asset impairments or other losses could result from a decline in value , or cancellation , of merchant power projects , and records provisions for impairments and losses accordingly . marketing and trading the earnings of entergy's energy commodity services segment are exposed to commodity price market risks primarily through entergy's 50%-owned , unconsolidated investment in entergy-koch . entergy-koch trading ( ekt ) uses value-at-risk models as one measure of the market risk of a loss in fair value for ekt's natural gas and power trading portfolio . actual future gains and losses in portfolios will differ from those estimated based upon actual fluctuations in market rates , operating exposures , and the timing thereof , and changes in the portfolio of derivative financial instruments during the year . to manage its portfolio , ekt enters into various derivative and contractual transactions in accordance with the policy approved by the trading committee of the governing board of entergy-koch . the trading portfolio consists of physical and financial natural gas and power as well as other energy and weather-related contracts . these contracts take many forms , including futures , forwards , swaps , and options . characteristics of ekt's value-at-risk method and the use of that method are as follows : fffd value-at-risk is used in conjunction with stress testing , position reporting , and profit and loss reporting in order to measure and control the risk inherent in the trading and mark-to-market portfolios . fffd ekt estimates its value-at-risk using a model based on j.p . morgan's risk metrics methodology combined with a monte carlo simulation approach . fffd ekt estimates its daily value-at-risk for natural gas and power using a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . ekt's daily value-at-risk is a measure that indicates that , if prices moved against the positions , the loss in neutralizing the portfolio would not be expected to exceed the calculated value-at-risk . fffd ekt seeks to limit the daily value-at-risk on any given day to a certain dollar amount approved by the trading committee . ekt's value-at-risk measures , which it calls daily earnings at risk ( de@r ) , for its trading portfolio were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>de@r at end of period</td><td>$ 15.2 million</td><td>$ 5.5 million</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average de@r for the period</td><td>$ 10.8 million</td><td>$ 6.4 million</td></tr></table> ekt's de@r increased in 2002 compared to 2001 as a result of an increase in the size of the position held and an increase in the volatility of natural gas prices in the latter part of the year . for all derivative and contractual transactions , ekt is exposed to losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these transactions . relevant considerations when assessing ekt's credit risk exposure include: .
Question: what is the daily earnings at risk in 2002?
Answer: 15.2
Question: what about in 2001?
Answer: 5.5
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 9.7
Question: what growth rate does this represent?
Answer: 1.76364
Question: what about the net change in average daily earnings at risk from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 4.4
Question: what is the average daily earnings at risk in 2001?
Answer: 6.4
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.6875 |
CONVFINQA10025 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate & institutional banking corporate & institutional banking earned $ 1.9 billion in 2011 and $ 1.8 billion in 2010 . the increase in earnings was primarily due to an improvement in the provision for credit losses , which was a benefit in 2011 , partially offset by a reduction in the value of commercial mortgage servicing rights and lower net interest income . we continued to focus on adding new clients , increasing cross sales , and remaining committed to strong expense discipline . asset management group asset management group earned $ 141 million for 2011 compared with $ 137 million for 2010 . assets under administration were $ 210 billion at december 31 , 2011 and $ 212 billion at december 31 , 2010 . earnings for 2011 reflected a benefit from the provision for credit losses and growth in noninterest income , partially offset by higher noninterest expense and lower net interest income . for 2011 , the business delivered strong sales production , grew high value clients and benefitted from significant referrals from other pnc lines of business . over time and with stabilized market conditions , the successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income . residential mortgage banking residential mortgage banking earned $ 87 million in 2011 compared with $ 269 million in 2010 . the decline in earnings was driven by an increase in noninterest expense associated with increased costs for residential mortgage foreclosure- related expenses , primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , and lower net interest income , partially offset by an increase in loan originations and higher loans sales revenue . blackrock our blackrock business segment earned $ 361 million in 2011 and $ 351 million in 2010 . the higher business segment earnings from blackrock for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily due to an increase in revenue . non-strategic assets portfolio this business segment ( formerly distressed assets portfolio ) consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business strategy . non-strategic assets portfolio had earnings of $ 200 million in 2011 compared with a loss of $ 57 million in 2010 . the increase was primarily attributable to a lower provision for credit losses partially offset by lower net interest income . 201cother 201d reported earnings of $ 376 million for 2011 compared with earnings of $ 386 million for 2010 . the decrease in earnings primarily reflected the noncash charge related to the redemption of trust preferred securities in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the gain related to the sale of a portion of pnc 2019s blackrock shares in 2010 partially offset by lower integration costs in 2011 . consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2011 was $ 3.1 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion for 2010 . results for 2011 include the impact of $ 324 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , a $ 198 million noncash charge related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $ 42 million for integration costs . results for 2010 included the $ 328 million after-tax gain on our sale of gis , $ 387 million for integration costs , and $ 71 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses . for 2010 , net income attributable to common shareholders was also impacted by a noncash reduction of $ 250 million in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock . pnc 2019s results for 2011 were driven by good performance in a challenging environment of low interest rates , slow economic growth and new regulations . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 8700</td><td>$ 9230</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td><td>4.14% ( 4.14 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion in the consolidated balance sheet review in item 7 of this report for additional information . the decreases in net interest income and net interest margin for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily attributable to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion on purchased impaired loans primarily due to lower excess cash recoveries . a decline in average loan balances and the low interest rate environment , partially offset by lower funding costs , also contributed to the decrease . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 35 .
Question: for the combined years of 2010 and 2011, what were the total earnings from the black rock business segment?
| 712.0 |
CONVFINQA10026 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate & institutional banking corporate & institutional banking earned $ 1.9 billion in 2011 and $ 1.8 billion in 2010 . the increase in earnings was primarily due to an improvement in the provision for credit losses , which was a benefit in 2011 , partially offset by a reduction in the value of commercial mortgage servicing rights and lower net interest income . we continued to focus on adding new clients , increasing cross sales , and remaining committed to strong expense discipline . asset management group asset management group earned $ 141 million for 2011 compared with $ 137 million for 2010 . assets under administration were $ 210 billion at december 31 , 2011 and $ 212 billion at december 31 , 2010 . earnings for 2011 reflected a benefit from the provision for credit losses and growth in noninterest income , partially offset by higher noninterest expense and lower net interest income . for 2011 , the business delivered strong sales production , grew high value clients and benefitted from significant referrals from other pnc lines of business . over time and with stabilized market conditions , the successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income . residential mortgage banking residential mortgage banking earned $ 87 million in 2011 compared with $ 269 million in 2010 . the decline in earnings was driven by an increase in noninterest expense associated with increased costs for residential mortgage foreclosure- related expenses , primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , and lower net interest income , partially offset by an increase in loan originations and higher loans sales revenue . blackrock our blackrock business segment earned $ 361 million in 2011 and $ 351 million in 2010 . the higher business segment earnings from blackrock for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily due to an increase in revenue . non-strategic assets portfolio this business segment ( formerly distressed assets portfolio ) consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business strategy . non-strategic assets portfolio had earnings of $ 200 million in 2011 compared with a loss of $ 57 million in 2010 . the increase was primarily attributable to a lower provision for credit losses partially offset by lower net interest income . 201cother 201d reported earnings of $ 376 million for 2011 compared with earnings of $ 386 million for 2010 . the decrease in earnings primarily reflected the noncash charge related to the redemption of trust preferred securities in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the gain related to the sale of a portion of pnc 2019s blackrock shares in 2010 partially offset by lower integration costs in 2011 . consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2011 was $ 3.1 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion for 2010 . results for 2011 include the impact of $ 324 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , a $ 198 million noncash charge related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $ 42 million for integration costs . results for 2010 included the $ 328 million after-tax gain on our sale of gis , $ 387 million for integration costs , and $ 71 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses . for 2010 , net income attributable to common shareholders was also impacted by a noncash reduction of $ 250 million in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock . pnc 2019s results for 2011 were driven by good performance in a challenging environment of low interest rates , slow economic growth and new regulations . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 8700</td><td>$ 9230</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td><td>4.14% ( 4.14 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion in the consolidated balance sheet review in item 7 of this report for additional information . the decreases in net interest income and net interest margin for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily attributable to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion on purchased impaired loans primarily due to lower excess cash recoveries . a decline in average loan balances and the low interest rate environment , partially offset by lower funding costs , also contributed to the decrease . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 35 .
Question: for the combined years of 2010 and 2011, what were the total earnings from the black rock business segment?
Answer: 712.0
Question: and in that first year, what was the noncash expense in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock?
| 250.0 |
CONVFINQA10027 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate & institutional banking corporate & institutional banking earned $ 1.9 billion in 2011 and $ 1.8 billion in 2010 . the increase in earnings was primarily due to an improvement in the provision for credit losses , which was a benefit in 2011 , partially offset by a reduction in the value of commercial mortgage servicing rights and lower net interest income . we continued to focus on adding new clients , increasing cross sales , and remaining committed to strong expense discipline . asset management group asset management group earned $ 141 million for 2011 compared with $ 137 million for 2010 . assets under administration were $ 210 billion at december 31 , 2011 and $ 212 billion at december 31 , 2010 . earnings for 2011 reflected a benefit from the provision for credit losses and growth in noninterest income , partially offset by higher noninterest expense and lower net interest income . for 2011 , the business delivered strong sales production , grew high value clients and benefitted from significant referrals from other pnc lines of business . over time and with stabilized market conditions , the successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income . residential mortgage banking residential mortgage banking earned $ 87 million in 2011 compared with $ 269 million in 2010 . the decline in earnings was driven by an increase in noninterest expense associated with increased costs for residential mortgage foreclosure- related expenses , primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , and lower net interest income , partially offset by an increase in loan originations and higher loans sales revenue . blackrock our blackrock business segment earned $ 361 million in 2011 and $ 351 million in 2010 . the higher business segment earnings from blackrock for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily due to an increase in revenue . non-strategic assets portfolio this business segment ( formerly distressed assets portfolio ) consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business strategy . non-strategic assets portfolio had earnings of $ 200 million in 2011 compared with a loss of $ 57 million in 2010 . the increase was primarily attributable to a lower provision for credit losses partially offset by lower net interest income . 201cother 201d reported earnings of $ 376 million for 2011 compared with earnings of $ 386 million for 2010 . the decrease in earnings primarily reflected the noncash charge related to the redemption of trust preferred securities in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the gain related to the sale of a portion of pnc 2019s blackrock shares in 2010 partially offset by lower integration costs in 2011 . consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2011 was $ 3.1 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion for 2010 . results for 2011 include the impact of $ 324 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , a $ 198 million noncash charge related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $ 42 million for integration costs . results for 2010 included the $ 328 million after-tax gain on our sale of gis , $ 387 million for integration costs , and $ 71 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses . for 2010 , net income attributable to common shareholders was also impacted by a noncash reduction of $ 250 million in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock . pnc 2019s results for 2011 were driven by good performance in a challenging environment of low interest rates , slow economic growth and new regulations . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 8700</td><td>$ 9230</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td><td>4.14% ( 4.14 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion in the consolidated balance sheet review in item 7 of this report for additional information . the decreases in net interest income and net interest margin for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily attributable to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion on purchased impaired loans primarily due to lower excess cash recoveries . a decline in average loan balances and the low interest rate environment , partially offset by lower funding costs , also contributed to the decrease . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 35 .
Question: for the combined years of 2010 and 2011, what were the total earnings from the black rock business segment?
Answer: 712.0
Question: and in that first year, what was the noncash expense in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock?
Answer: 250.0
Question: and what was the total net interest income?
| 9230.0 |
CONVFINQA10028 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
corporate & institutional banking corporate & institutional banking earned $ 1.9 billion in 2011 and $ 1.8 billion in 2010 . the increase in earnings was primarily due to an improvement in the provision for credit losses , which was a benefit in 2011 , partially offset by a reduction in the value of commercial mortgage servicing rights and lower net interest income . we continued to focus on adding new clients , increasing cross sales , and remaining committed to strong expense discipline . asset management group asset management group earned $ 141 million for 2011 compared with $ 137 million for 2010 . assets under administration were $ 210 billion at december 31 , 2011 and $ 212 billion at december 31 , 2010 . earnings for 2011 reflected a benefit from the provision for credit losses and growth in noninterest income , partially offset by higher noninterest expense and lower net interest income . for 2011 , the business delivered strong sales production , grew high value clients and benefitted from significant referrals from other pnc lines of business . over time and with stabilized market conditions , the successful execution of these strategies and the accumulation of our strong sales performance are expected to create meaningful growth in assets under management and noninterest income . residential mortgage banking residential mortgage banking earned $ 87 million in 2011 compared with $ 269 million in 2010 . the decline in earnings was driven by an increase in noninterest expense associated with increased costs for residential mortgage foreclosure- related expenses , primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , and lower net interest income , partially offset by an increase in loan originations and higher loans sales revenue . blackrock our blackrock business segment earned $ 361 million in 2011 and $ 351 million in 2010 . the higher business segment earnings from blackrock for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily due to an increase in revenue . non-strategic assets portfolio this business segment ( formerly distressed assets portfolio ) consists primarily of acquired non-strategic assets that fall outside of our core business strategy . non-strategic assets portfolio had earnings of $ 200 million in 2011 compared with a loss of $ 57 million in 2010 . the increase was primarily attributable to a lower provision for credit losses partially offset by lower net interest income . 201cother 201d reported earnings of $ 376 million for 2011 compared with earnings of $ 386 million for 2010 . the decrease in earnings primarily reflected the noncash charge related to the redemption of trust preferred securities in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the gain related to the sale of a portion of pnc 2019s blackrock shares in 2010 partially offset by lower integration costs in 2011 . consolidated income statement review our consolidated income statement is presented in item 8 of this report . net income for 2011 was $ 3.1 billion compared with $ 3.4 billion for 2010 . results for 2011 include the impact of $ 324 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses primarily as a result of ongoing governmental matters , a $ 198 million noncash charge related to redemption of trust preferred securities and $ 42 million for integration costs . results for 2010 included the $ 328 million after-tax gain on our sale of gis , $ 387 million for integration costs , and $ 71 million of residential mortgage foreclosure-related expenses . for 2010 , net income attributable to common shareholders was also impacted by a noncash reduction of $ 250 million in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock . pnc 2019s results for 2011 were driven by good performance in a challenging environment of low interest rates , slow economic growth and new regulations . net interest income and net interest margin year ended december 31 dollars in millions 2011 2010 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31dollars in millions</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net interest income</td><td>$ 8700</td><td>$ 9230</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net interest margin</td><td>3.92% ( 3.92 % )</td><td>4.14% ( 4.14 % )</td></tr></table> changes in net interest income and margin result from the interaction of the volume and composition of interest-earning assets and related yields , interest-bearing liabilities and related rates paid , and noninterest-bearing sources of funding . see the statistical information ( unaudited ) 2013 analysis of year-to-year changes in net interest income and average consolidated balance sheet and net interest analysis in item 8 and the discussion of purchase accounting accretion in the consolidated balance sheet review in item 7 of this report for additional information . the decreases in net interest income and net interest margin for 2011 compared with 2010 were primarily attributable to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion on purchased impaired loans primarily due to lower excess cash recoveries . a decline in average loan balances and the low interest rate environment , partially offset by lower funding costs , also contributed to the decrease . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 35 .
Question: for the combined years of 2010 and 2011, what were the total earnings from the black rock business segment?
Answer: 712.0
Question: and in that first year, what was the noncash expense in connection with the redemption of tarp preferred stock?
Answer: 250.0
Question: and what was the total net interest income?
Answer: 9230.0
Question: which one, then, was greater in 2010?
| no |
CONVFINQA10029 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what was the reduction of sales in 2006?
| 9978.0 |
CONVFINQA10030 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what was the reduction of sales in 2006?
Answer: 9978.0
Question: what was the reduction in sales in 2004?
| 11212.0 |
CONVFINQA10031 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what was the reduction of sales in 2006?
Answer: 9978.0
Question: what was the reduction in sales in 2004?
Answer: 11212.0
Question: what is the sum of these values?
| 21190.0 |
CONVFINQA10032 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what was the reduction of sales in 2006?
Answer: 9978.0
Question: what was the reduction in sales in 2004?
Answer: 11212.0
Question: what is the sum of these values?
Answer: 21190.0
Question: what is the increase in sales in 2005?
| 526.0 |
CONVFINQA10033 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
advance auto parts , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) december 30 , 2006 , december 31 , 2005 and january 1 , 2005 ( in thousands , except per share data ) 8 . inventories , net inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market , cost being determined using the last-in , first-out ( "lifo" ) method for approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of inventories at both december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . under the lifo method , the company 2019s cost of sales reflects the costs of the most currently purchased inventories while the inventory carrying balance represents the costs relating to prices paid in prior years . the company 2019s costs to acquire inventory have been generally decreasing in recent years as a result of its significant growth . accordingly , the cost to replace inventory is less than the lifo balances carried for similar product . as a result of the lifo method and the ability to obtain lower product costs , the company recorded a reduction to cost of sales of $ 9978 for fiscal year ended 2006 , an increase in cost of sales of $ 526 for fiscal year ended 2005 and a reduction to cost of sales of $ 11212 for fiscal year ended 2004 . the remaining inventories are comprised of product cores , which consist of the non-consumable portion of certain parts and batteries and are valued under the first-in , first-out ( "fifo" ) method . core values are included as part of our merchandise costs and are either passed on to the customer or returned to the vendor . additionally , these products are not subject to the frequent cost changes like our other merchandise inventory , thus , there is no material difference from applying either the lifo or fifo valuation methods . the company capitalizes certain purchasing and warehousing costs into inventory . purchasing and warehousing costs included in inventory , at fifo , at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , were $ 95576 and $ 92833 , respectively . inventories consist of the following : december 30 , december 31 , 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>december 30 2006</td><td>december 31 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>inventories at fifo net</td><td>$ 1380573</td><td>$ 1294310</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>adjustments to state inventories at lifo</td><td>82767</td><td>72789</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>inventories at lifo net</td><td>$ 1463340</td><td>$ 1367099</td></tr></table> replacement cost approximated fifo cost at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 . inventory quantities are tracked through a perpetual inventory system . the company uses a cycle counting program in all distribution centers , parts delivered quickly warehouses , or pdqs , local area warehouses , or laws , and retail stores to ensure the accuracy of the perpetual inventory quantities of both merchandise and core inventory . the company establishes reserves for estimated shrink based on historical accuracy and effectiveness of the cycle counting program . the company also establishes reserves for potentially excess and obsolete inventories based on current inventory levels and the historical analysis of product sales and current market conditions . the nature of the company 2019s inventory is such that the risk of obsolescence is minimal and excess inventory has historically been returned to the company 2019s vendors for credit . the company provides reserves when less than full credit is expected from a vendor or when liquidating product will result in retail prices below recorded costs . the company 2019s reserves against inventory for these matters were $ 31376 and $ 22825 at december 30 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively . 9 . property and equipment : property and equipment are stated at cost , less accumulated depreciation . expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged directly to expense when incurred ; major improvements are capitalized . when items are sold or retired , the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts , with any gain or loss reflected in the consolidated statements of operations . depreciation of land improvements , buildings , furniture , fixtures and equipment , and vehicles is provided over the estimated useful lives , which range from 2 to 40 years , of the respective assets using the straight-line method. .
Question: what was the reduction of sales in 2006?
Answer: 9978.0
Question: what was the reduction in sales in 2004?
Answer: 11212.0
Question: what is the sum of these values?
Answer: 21190.0
Question: what is the increase in sales in 2005?
Answer: 526.0
Question: what is the sum of reduction values plus the 2005 value?
| 20664.0 |
CONVFINQA10034 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the municipal bond portfolio is comprised of tax exempt bonds and is diversified across states and sectors . the portfolio has an average credit quality of double-a . the short-term bond funds invest in fixed income securities , including corporate bonds , mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities . the company holds investments in ars . interest on these securities is exempt from u.s . federal income tax and the interest rate on the securities typically resets every 35 days . the securities are fully collateralized by student loans with guarantees , ranging from approximately 95% ( 95 % ) to 98% ( 98 % ) of principal and interest , by the u.s . government via the department of education . beginning on february 11 , 2008 , the auction mechanism that normally provided liquidity to the ars investments began to fail . since mid-february 2008 , all investment positions in the company 2019s ars investment portfolio have experienced failed auctions . the securities for which auctions have failed have continued to pay interest in accordance with the contractual terms of such instruments and will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned at each respective reset date until the auction succeeds , the issuer redeems the securities or they mature . during 2008 , ars were reclassified as level 3 from level 2 . as of december 31 , 2010 , the ars market remained illiquid , but issuer call and redemption activity in the ars student loan sector has occurred periodically since the auctions began to fail . during 2010 and 2009 , the company did not sell any ars in the auction market , but there were calls at par . the table below includes a roll-forward of the company 2019s ars investments from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2010 . significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value december 31 2008</td><td>$ 192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value december 31 2009</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fair value december 31 2010</td><td>$ 106</td></tr></table> the company evaluated the estimated impairment of its ars portfolio to determine if it was other-than- temporary . the company considered several factors including , but not limited to , the following : ( 1 ) the reasons for the decline in value ( changes in interest rates , credit event , or market fluctuations ) ; ( 2 ) assessments as to whether it is more likely than not that it will hold and not be required to sell the investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the cost basis ; ( 3 ) whether the decline is substantial ; and ( 4 ) the historical and anticipated duration of the events causing the decline in value . the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process , which is subject to various risks and uncertainties . the risks and uncertainties include changes in credit quality , market liquidity , timing and amounts of issuer calls and interest rates . as of december 31 , 2010 , the company believed that the unrealized losses on the ars were not related to credit quality but rather due to the lack of liquidity in the market . the company believes that it is more .
Question: what was the difference in the fair value of significant unobservable inputs between 2008 and 2009?
| -12.0 |
CONVFINQA10035 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the municipal bond portfolio is comprised of tax exempt bonds and is diversified across states and sectors . the portfolio has an average credit quality of double-a . the short-term bond funds invest in fixed income securities , including corporate bonds , mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities . the company holds investments in ars . interest on these securities is exempt from u.s . federal income tax and the interest rate on the securities typically resets every 35 days . the securities are fully collateralized by student loans with guarantees , ranging from approximately 95% ( 95 % ) to 98% ( 98 % ) of principal and interest , by the u.s . government via the department of education . beginning on february 11 , 2008 , the auction mechanism that normally provided liquidity to the ars investments began to fail . since mid-february 2008 , all investment positions in the company 2019s ars investment portfolio have experienced failed auctions . the securities for which auctions have failed have continued to pay interest in accordance with the contractual terms of such instruments and will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned at each respective reset date until the auction succeeds , the issuer redeems the securities or they mature . during 2008 , ars were reclassified as level 3 from level 2 . as of december 31 , 2010 , the ars market remained illiquid , but issuer call and redemption activity in the ars student loan sector has occurred periodically since the auctions began to fail . during 2010 and 2009 , the company did not sell any ars in the auction market , but there were calls at par . the table below includes a roll-forward of the company 2019s ars investments from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2010 . significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value december 31 2008</td><td>$ 192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value december 31 2009</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fair value december 31 2010</td><td>$ 106</td></tr></table> the company evaluated the estimated impairment of its ars portfolio to determine if it was other-than- temporary . the company considered several factors including , but not limited to , the following : ( 1 ) the reasons for the decline in value ( changes in interest rates , credit event , or market fluctuations ) ; ( 2 ) assessments as to whether it is more likely than not that it will hold and not be required to sell the investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the cost basis ; ( 3 ) whether the decline is substantial ; and ( 4 ) the historical and anticipated duration of the events causing the decline in value . the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process , which is subject to various risks and uncertainties . the risks and uncertainties include changes in credit quality , market liquidity , timing and amounts of issuer calls and interest rates . as of december 31 , 2010 , the company believed that the unrealized losses on the ars were not related to credit quality but rather due to the lack of liquidity in the market . the company believes that it is more .
Question: what was the difference in the fair value of significant unobservable inputs between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -12.0
Question: and the specific value for 2008?
| 192.0 |
CONVFINQA10036 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014continued the municipal bond portfolio is comprised of tax exempt bonds and is diversified across states and sectors . the portfolio has an average credit quality of double-a . the short-term bond funds invest in fixed income securities , including corporate bonds , mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities . the company holds investments in ars . interest on these securities is exempt from u.s . federal income tax and the interest rate on the securities typically resets every 35 days . the securities are fully collateralized by student loans with guarantees , ranging from approximately 95% ( 95 % ) to 98% ( 98 % ) of principal and interest , by the u.s . government via the department of education . beginning on february 11 , 2008 , the auction mechanism that normally provided liquidity to the ars investments began to fail . since mid-february 2008 , all investment positions in the company 2019s ars investment portfolio have experienced failed auctions . the securities for which auctions have failed have continued to pay interest in accordance with the contractual terms of such instruments and will continue to accrue interest and be auctioned at each respective reset date until the auction succeeds , the issuer redeems the securities or they mature . during 2008 , ars were reclassified as level 3 from level 2 . as of december 31 , 2010 , the ars market remained illiquid , but issuer call and redemption activity in the ars student loan sector has occurred periodically since the auctions began to fail . during 2010 and 2009 , the company did not sell any ars in the auction market , but there were calls at par . the table below includes a roll-forward of the company 2019s ars investments from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2010 . significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>significant unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value december 31 2008</td><td>$ 192</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-28 ( 28 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>fair value december 31 2009</td><td>180</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>calls at par</td><td>-94 ( 94 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>recovery of unrealized losses due to issuer calls</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>increase in fair value</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>fair value december 31 2010</td><td>$ 106</td></tr></table> the company evaluated the estimated impairment of its ars portfolio to determine if it was other-than- temporary . the company considered several factors including , but not limited to , the following : ( 1 ) the reasons for the decline in value ( changes in interest rates , credit event , or market fluctuations ) ; ( 2 ) assessments as to whether it is more likely than not that it will hold and not be required to sell the investments for a sufficient period of time to allow for recovery of the cost basis ; ( 3 ) whether the decline is substantial ; and ( 4 ) the historical and anticipated duration of the events causing the decline in value . the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairments is a quantitative and qualitative process , which is subject to various risks and uncertainties . the risks and uncertainties include changes in credit quality , market liquidity , timing and amounts of issuer calls and interest rates . as of december 31 , 2010 , the company believed that the unrealized losses on the ars were not related to credit quality but rather due to the lack of liquidity in the market . the company believes that it is more .
Question: what was the difference in the fair value of significant unobservable inputs between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -12.0
Question: and the specific value for 2008?
Answer: 192.0
Question: so then what is the percentage change between the two years?
| -0.0625 |
CONVFINQA10037 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for the estimates of our oil sands mining reserves has 33 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 and is a registered practicing professional engineer in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2011 or 2009 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2011 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( 201cnsai 201d ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2010 reserves for the alba field in equatorial guinea . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . the senior members of the nsai team have over 50 years of industry experience between them , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the team lead has a master of science in mechanical engineering and is a member of spe . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and is a member of the society of exploration geophysicists , the american association of petroleum geologists and the european association of geoscientists and engineers . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( 201cryder scott 201d ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2011 and 2009 . their summary report on audits performed in 2011 is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . the corporate reserves group also performs separate , detailed technical reviews of reserve estimates for significant fields that were acquired recently or for properties with other indicators such as excessively short or long lives , performance above or below expectations or changes in economic or operating conditions . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2011 , 395 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 10 mmboe from december 31 , 2010 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>405</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-166 ( 166 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>395</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2011 include 91 mmboe due to acreage acquisition in the eagle ford shale , 26 mmboe related to anadarko woodford shale development , 10 mmboe for development drilling in the bakken shale play and 8 mmboe for additional drilling in norway . additionally , 139 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves due to startup of the jackpine upgrader expansion in canada . costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1107 million , $ 1463 million and $ 792 million . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as behind-pipe zones where reserves will not be accessed until the primary producing zone depletes , large development projects which take more than five years to complete , and the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 395 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at year end 2011 , 34 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in equatorial guinea that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 and is expected to be completed by 2016 . performance of this field has exceeded expectations , and estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . production is not expected to experience a natural decline from facility-limited plateau production until 2014 , or possibly 2015 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance. .
Question: what is the difference in total proved undeveloped reserves during 2010?
| -10.0 |
CONVFINQA10038 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
for the estimates of our oil sands mining reserves has 33 years of experience in petroleum engineering and has conducted surface mineable oil sands evaluations since 1986 . he is a member of spe , having served as regional director from 1998 through 2001 and is a registered practicing professional engineer in the province of alberta . audits of estimates third-party consultants are engaged to provide independent estimates for fields that comprise 80 percent of our total proved reserves over a rolling four-year period for the purpose of auditing the in-house reserve estimates . we met this goal for the four-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . we established a tolerance level of 10 percent such that initial estimates by the third-party consultants are accepted if they are within 10 percent of our internal estimates . should the third-party consultants 2019 initial analysis fail to reach our tolerance level , both our team and the consultants re-examine the information provided , request additional data and refine their analysis if appropriate . this resolution process is continued until both estimates are within 10 percent . this process did not result in significant changes to our reserve estimates in 2011 or 2009 . there were no third-party audits performed in 2010 . during 2011 , netherland , sewell & associates , inc . ( 201cnsai 201d ) prepared a certification of december 31 , 2010 reserves for the alba field in equatorial guinea . the nsai summary report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . the senior members of the nsai team have over 50 years of industry experience between them , having worked for large , international oil and gas companies before joining nsai . the team lead has a master of science in mechanical engineering and is a member of spe . the senior technical advisor has a bachelor of science degree in geophysics and is a member of the society of exploration geophysicists , the american association of petroleum geologists and the european association of geoscientists and engineers . both are licensed in the state of texas . ryder scott company ( 201cryder scott 201d ) performed audits of several of our fields in 2011 and 2009 . their summary report on audits performed in 2011 is filed as an exhibit to this annual report on form 10-k . the team lead for ryder scott has over 20 years of industry experience , having worked for a major international oil and gas company before joining ryder scott . he has a bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering , is a member of spe and is a registered professional engineer in the state of texas . the corporate reserves group also performs separate , detailed technical reviews of reserve estimates for significant fields that were acquired recently or for properties with other indicators such as excessively short or long lives , performance above or below expectations or changes in economic or operating conditions . changes in proved undeveloped reserves as of december 31 , 2011 , 395 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves were reported , a decrease of 10 mmboe from december 31 , 2010 . the following table shows changes in total proved undeveloped reserves for 2011: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>beginning of year</td><td>405</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revisions of previous estimates</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>improved recovery</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>purchases of reserves in place</td><td>91</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>extensions discoveries and other additions</td><td>49</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transfer to proved developed</td><td>-166 ( 166 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>end of year</td><td>395</td></tr></table> significant additions to proved undeveloped reserves during 2011 include 91 mmboe due to acreage acquisition in the eagle ford shale , 26 mmboe related to anadarko woodford shale development , 10 mmboe for development drilling in the bakken shale play and 8 mmboe for additional drilling in norway . additionally , 139 mmboe were transferred from proved undeveloped to proved developed reserves due to startup of the jackpine upgrader expansion in canada . costs incurred in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 relating to the development of proved undeveloped reserves , were $ 1107 million , $ 1463 million and $ 792 million . projects can remain in proved undeveloped reserves for extended periods in certain situations such as behind-pipe zones where reserves will not be accessed until the primary producing zone depletes , large development projects which take more than five years to complete , and the timing of when additional gas compression is needed . of the 395 mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves at year end 2011 , 34 percent of the volume is associated with projects that have been included in proved reserves for more than five years . the majority of this volume is related to a compression project in equatorial guinea that was sanctioned by our board of directors in 2004 and is expected to be completed by 2016 . performance of this field has exceeded expectations , and estimates of initial dry gas in place increased by roughly 10 percent between 2004 and 2010 . production is not expected to experience a natural decline from facility-limited plateau production until 2014 , or possibly 2015 . the timing of the installation of compression is being driven by the reservoir performance. .
Question: what is the difference in total proved undeveloped reserves during 2010?
Answer: -10.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.02469 |
CONVFINQA10039 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .
Question: what was the net change in value of the open claims ending balance from 2005 to 2006?
| -71.0 |
CONVFINQA10040 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .
Question: what was the net change in value of the open claims ending balance from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: -71.0
Question: was was the 2005 balance?
| 4197.0 |
CONVFINQA10041 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
potentially responsible parties , and existing technology , laws , and regulations . the ultimate liability for remediation is difficult to determine because of the number of potentially responsible parties involved , site- specific cost sharing arrangements with other potentially responsible parties , the degree of contamination by various wastes , the scarcity and quality of volumetric data related to many of the sites , and the speculative nature of remediation costs . current obligations are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations , financial condition , or liquidity . personal injury 2013 the cost of personal injuries to employees and others related to our activities is charged to expense based on estimates of the ultimate cost and number of incidents each year . we use third-party actuaries to assist us with measuring the expense and liability , including unasserted claims . the federal employers 2019 liability act ( fela ) governs compensation for work-related accidents . under fela , damages are assessed based on a finding of fault through litigation or out-of-court settlements . we offer a comprehensive variety of services and rehabilitation programs for employees who are injured at work . annual expenses for personal injury-related events were $ 240 million in 2006 , $ 247 million in 2005 , and $ 288 million in 2004 . as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , we had accrued liabilities of $ 631 million and $ 619 million for future personal injury costs , respectively , of which $ 233 million and $ 274 million was recorded in current liabilities as accrued casualty costs , respectively . our personal injury liability is discounted to present value using applicable u.s . treasury rates . approximately 87% ( 87 % ) of the recorded liability related to asserted claims , and approximately 13% ( 13 % ) related to unasserted claims . estimates can vary over time due to evolving trends in litigation . our personal injury claims activity was as follows : claims activity 2006 2005 2004 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>claims activity</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>open claims beginning balance</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td><td>4085</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>new claims</td><td>4190</td><td>4584</td><td>4366</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>settled or dismissed claims</td><td>-4261 ( 4261 )</td><td>-4415 ( 4415 )</td><td>-4423 ( 4423 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>open claims ending balance at december 31</td><td>4126</td><td>4197</td><td>4028</td></tr></table> depreciation 2013 the railroad industry is capital intensive . properties are carried at cost . provisions for depreciation are computed principally on the straight-line method based on estimated service lives of depreciable property . the lives are calculated using a separate composite annual percentage rate for each depreciable property group , based on the results of internal depreciation studies . we are required to submit a report on depreciation studies and proposed depreciation rates to the stb for review and approval every three years for equipment property and every six years for road property . the cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable railroad property retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation , and no gain or loss is recognized . a gain or loss is recognized in other income for all other property upon disposition because the gain or loss is not part of rail operations . the cost of internally developed software is capitalized and amortized over a five-year period . significant capital spending in recent years increased the total value of our depreciable assets . cash capital spending totaled $ 2.2 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2006 . for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , depreciation expense was $ 1.2 billion . we use various methods to estimate useful lives for each group of depreciable property . due to the capital intensive nature of the business and the large base of depreciable assets , variances to those estimates could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements . if the estimated useful lives of all depreciable assets were increased by one year , annual depreciation expense would decrease by approximately $ 43 million . if the estimated useful lives of all assets to be depreciated were decreased by one year , annual depreciation expense would increase by approximately $ 45 million . income taxes 2013 as required under fasb statement no . 109 , accounting for income taxes , we account for income taxes by recording taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns . these .
Question: what was the net change in value of the open claims ending balance from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: -71.0
Question: was was the 2005 balance?
Answer: 4197.0
Question: what is the net change over the 2005 balance?
| -0.01692 |
CONVFINQA10042 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the net change in the increase in fair value between 2005 and 2006?
| 47.0 |
CONVFINQA10043 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the interest agreements at december 31 , 2007 and december 31 , 2006 was $ 3 million and $ 1 million , respectively . the company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its swap contracts . the company minimizes its credit risk on these transactions by only dealing with leading , creditworthy financial institutions and does not anticipate nonperformance . in addition , the contracts are distributed among several financial institutions , all of whom presently have investment grade credit ratings , thus minimizing credit risk concentration . stockholders 2019 equity derivative instruments activity , net of tax , included in non-owner changes to equity within the consolidated statements of stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 is as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at january 1</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td><td>$ -272 ( 272 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>increase ( decrease ) in fair value</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td><td>75</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>reclassifications to earnings</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-61 ( 61 )</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>balance at december 31</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 16</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> net investment in foreign operations hedge at december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , the company did not have any hedges of foreign currency exposure of net investments in foreign operations . investments hedge during the first quarter of 2006 , the company entered into a zero-cost collar derivative ( the 201csprint nextel derivative 201d ) to protect itself economically against price fluctuations in its 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel corporation ( 201csprint nextel 201d ) non-voting common stock . during the second quarter of 2006 , as a result of sprint nextel 2019s spin-off of embarq corporation through a dividend to sprint nextel shareholders , the company received approximately 1.9 million shares of embarq corporation . the floor and ceiling prices of the sprint nextel derivative were adjusted accordingly . the sprint nextel derivative was not designated as a hedge under the provisions of sfas no . 133 , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities . 201d accordingly , to reflect the change in fair value of the sprint nextel derivative , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , included in other income ( expense ) in the company 2019s consolidated statements of operations . in december 2006 , the sprint nextel derivative was terminated and settled in cash and the 37.6 million shares of sprint nextel were converted to common shares and sold . the company received aggregate cash proceeds of approximately $ 820 million from the settlement of the sprint nextel derivative and the subsequent sale of the 37.6 million sprint nextel shares . the company recognized a loss of $ 126 million in connection with the sale of the remaining shares of sprint nextel common stock . as described above , the company recorded a net gain of $ 99 million in connection with the sprint nextel derivative . prior to the merger of sprint corporation ( 201csprint 201d ) and nextel communications , inc . ( 201cnextel 201d ) , the company had entered into variable share forward purchase agreements ( the 201cvariable forwards 201d ) to hedge its nextel common stock . the company did not designate the variable forwards as a hedge of the sprint nextel shares received as a result of the merger . accordingly , the company recorded $ 51 million of gains for the year ended december 31 , 2005 reflecting the change in value of the variable forwards . the variable forwards were settled during the fourth quarter of 2005 . fair value of financial instruments the company 2019s financial instruments include cash equivalents , sigma fund investments , short-term investments , accounts receivable , long-term finance receivables , accounts payable , accrued liabilities , derivatives and other financing commitments . the company 2019s sigma fund and investment portfolios and derivatives are recorded in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets at fair value . all other financial instruments , with the exception of long-term debt , are carried at cost , which is not materially different than the instruments 2019 fair values. .
Question: what was the net change in the increase in fair value between 2005 and 2006?
Answer: 47.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| 1.67857 |
CONVFINQA10044 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: as of december 31, 2009, what was the total of derivative receivables related to the netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
| 65468000000.0 |
CONVFINQA10045 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: as of december 31, 2009, what was the total of derivative receivables related to the netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468000000.0
Question: and what was the total of the liquid securities collateral received by the firm?
| 15500000000.0 |
CONVFINQA10046 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: as of december 31, 2009, what was the total of derivative receivables related to the netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468000000.0
Question: and what was the total of the liquid securities collateral received by the firm?
Answer: 15500000000.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total of both amounts as of that date?
| 80968000000.0 |
CONVFINQA10047 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 181 the following table shows the current credit risk of derivative receivables after netting adjustments , and the current liquidity risk of derivative payables after netting adjustments , as of december 31 , 2009. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 2009 ( in millions )</td><td>derivative receivables</td><td>derivative payables</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross derivative fair value</td><td>$ 1565518</td><td>$ 1519183</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 offsetting receivables/payables</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td><td>-1419840 ( 1419840 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nettingadjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid</td><td>-65468 ( 65468 )</td><td>-39218 ( 39218 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>carrying value on consolidated balance sheets</td><td>$ 80210</td><td>$ 60125</td></tr></table> in addition to the collateral amounts reflected in the table above , at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received and posted liquid secu- rities collateral in the amount of $ 15.5 billion and $ 11.7 billion , respectively . the firm also receives and delivers collateral at the initiation of derivative transactions , which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move in the firm 2019s or client 2019s favor , respectively . furthermore , the firm and its counterparties hold collateral related to contracts that have a non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted , and collateral that the firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date . at december 31 , 2009 , the firm had received $ 16.9 billion and delivered $ 5.8 billion of such additional collateral . these amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the table above , because , at an individual counterparty level , the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at december 31 , 2009 . credit derivatives credit derivatives are financial instruments whose value is derived from the credit risk associated with the debt of a third-party issuer ( the reference entity ) and which allow one party ( the protection purchaser ) to transfer that risk to another party ( the protection seller ) . credit derivatives expose the protection purchaser to the creditworthiness of the protection seller , as the protection seller is required to make payments under the contract when the reference entity experiences a credit event , such as a bankruptcy , a failure to pay its obligation or a restructuring . the seller of credit protection receives a premium for providing protection but has the risk that the underlying instrument referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event . the firm is both a purchaser and seller of protection in the credit derivatives market and uses these derivatives for two primary purposes . first , in its capacity as a market-maker in the dealer/client business , the firm actively risk manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by purchasing and selling credit protection , pre- dominantly on corporate debt obligations , to meet the needs of customers . as a seller of protection , the firm 2019s exposure to a given reference entity may be offset partially , or entirely , with a contract to purchase protection from another counterparty on the same or similar reference entity . second , the firm uses credit derivatives to mitigate credit risk associated with its overall derivative receivables and traditional commercial credit lending exposures ( loans and unfunded commitments ) as well as to manage its exposure to residential and commercial mortgages . see note 3 on pages 156--- 173 of this annual report for further information on the firm 2019s mortgage-related exposures . in accomplishing the above , the firm uses different types of credit derivatives . following is a summary of various types of credit derivatives . credit default swaps credit derivatives may reference the credit of either a single refer- ence entity ( 201csingle-name 201d ) or a broad-based index , as described further below . the firm purchases and sells protection on both single- name and index-reference obligations . single-name cds and index cds contracts are both otc derivative contracts . single- name cds are used to manage the default risk of a single reference entity , while cds index are used to manage credit risk associated with the broader credit markets or credit market segments . like the s&p 500 and other market indices , a cds index is comprised of a portfolio of cds across many reference entities . new series of cds indices are established approximately every six months with a new underlying portfolio of reference entities to reflect changes in the credit markets . if one of the reference entities in the index experi- ences a credit event , then the reference entity that defaulted is removed from the index . cds can also be referenced against spe- cific portfolios of reference names or against customized exposure levels based on specific client demands : for example , to provide protection against the first $ 1 million of realized credit losses in a $ 10 million portfolio of exposure . such structures are commonly known as tranche cds . for both single-name cds contracts and index cds , upon the occurrence of a credit event , under the terms of a cds contract neither party to the cds contract has recourse to the reference entity . the protection purchaser has recourse to the protection seller for the difference between the face value of the cds contract and the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settling the credit derivative contract , also known as the recovery value . the protection purchaser does not need to hold the debt instrument of the underlying reference entity in order to receive amounts due under the cds contract when a credit event occurs . credit-linked notes a credit linked note ( 201ccln 201d ) is a funded credit derivative where the issuer of the cln purchases credit protection on a referenced entity from the note investor . under the contract , the investor pays the issuer par value of the note at the inception of the transaction , and in return , the issuer pays periodic payments to the investor , based on the credit risk of the referenced entity . the issuer also repays the investor the par value of the note at maturity unless the reference entity experiences a specified credit event . in that event , the issuer is not obligated to repay the par value of the note , but rather , the issuer pays the investor the difference between the par value of the note .
Question: as of december 31, 2009, what was the total of derivative receivables related to the netting adjustment 2013 cash collateral received/paid?
Answer: 65468000000.0
Question: and what was the total of the liquid securities collateral received by the firm?
Answer: 15500000000.0
Question: what was, then, the combined total of both amounts as of that date?
Answer: 80968000000.0
Question: and in that same year, how much did the gross derivative fair value receivables represent in relation to the payables one?
| 1.0305 |
CONVFINQA10048 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what is the benefit payment value in 2012?
| 3369.0 |
CONVFINQA10049 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what is the benefit payment value in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: what was the benefit payment value in 2011?
| 3028.0 |
CONVFINQA10050 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what is the benefit payment value in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: what was the benefit payment value in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?
| 1.11262 |
CONVFINQA10051 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what is the benefit payment value in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: what was the benefit payment value in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: what is the ratio of 2012 to 2011?
Answer: 1.11262
Question: what is that ratio less 1?
| 0.11262 |
CONVFINQA10052 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
| 275305.0 |
CONVFINQA10053 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
Answer: 275305.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
| 252030.0 |
CONVFINQA10054 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
Answer: 275305.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 252030.0
Question: what was, then, the 2017 amount as a portion of the 2016?
| 1.09235 |
CONVFINQA10055 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
Answer: 275305.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 252030.0
Question: what was, then, the 2017 amount as a portion of the 2016?
Answer: 1.09235
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2016 amount?
| 0.09235 |
CONVFINQA10056 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
Answer: 275305.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 252030.0
Question: what was, then, the 2017 amount as a portion of the 2016?
Answer: 1.09235
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2016 amount?
Answer: 0.09235
Question: and concerning the subsequent year, what was the total of accrued capital expenditures in 2018 as a portion of that total in 2017?
| 1.22423 |
CONVFINQA10057 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the diluted earnings per share calculation excludes stock options , sars , restricted stock and units and performance units and stock that were anti-dilutive . shares underlying the excluded stock options and sars totaled 2.6 million , 10.3 million and 10.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . for the year ended december 31 , 2016 , 4.5 million shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units and performance units and performance stock were excluded . 10 . supplemental cash flow information net cash paid for interest and income taxes was as follows for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>interest net of capitalized interest</td><td>$ 275305</td><td>$ 252030</td><td>$ 222088</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>income taxes net of refunds received</td><td>$ 188946</td><td>$ -39293 ( 39293 )</td><td>$ 41108</td></tr></table> eog's accrued capital expenditures at december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 were $ 475 million , $ 388 million and $ 416 million , respectively . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2017 included non-cash additions of $ 282 million to eog's oil and gas properties as a result of property exchanges . non-cash investing activities for the year ended december 31 , 2016 included $ 3834 million in non-cash additions to eog's oil and gas properties related to the yates transaction ( see note 17 ) . 11 . business segment information eog's operations are all crude oil and natural gas exploration and production related . the segment reporting topic of the asc establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments in annual financial statements . operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker , or decision-making group , in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance . eog's chief operating decision-making process is informal and involves the chairman of the board and chief executive officer and other key officers . this group routinely reviews and makes operating decisions related to significant issues associated with each of eog's major producing areas in the united states , trinidad , the united kingdom and china . for segment reporting purposes , the chief operating decision maker considers the major united states producing areas to be one operating segment. .
Question: what was the interest net of capitalized interest in 2017?
Answer: 275305.0
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 252030.0
Question: what was, then, the 2017 amount as a portion of the 2016?
Answer: 1.09235
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2016 amount?
Answer: 0.09235
Question: and concerning the subsequent year, what was the total of accrued capital expenditures in 2018 as a portion of that total in 2017?
Answer: 1.22423
Question: and what becomes this value excluding the part representing to the 2017 total?
| 0.22423 |
CONVFINQA10058 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what is the difference between the aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes and the cash proceeds that resulted from it?
| 0.05 |
CONVFINQA10059 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what is the difference between the aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes and the cash proceeds that resulted from it?
Answer: 0.05
Question: what was the total of those cash proceeds?
| 2.2 |
CONVFINQA10060 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2015</td><td>$ 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>floating rate due december 15 2016</td><td>350</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 )</td><td>650</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018</td><td>750</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>discount and issuance costs</td><td>-2 ( 2 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net proceeds</td><td>$ 2248</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .
Question: what is the difference between the aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes and the cash proceeds that resulted from it?
Answer: 0.05
Question: what was the total of those cash proceeds?
Answer: 2.2
Question: and how much does that difference represent in relation to this total, in percentage?
| 0.02273 |
CONVFINQA10061 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2007</td><td>10/26/2008</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>61.22</td><td>71.06</td><td>69.23</td><td>72.37</td><td>62.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.90</td><td>70.17</td><td>81.76</td><td>88.37</td><td>101.81</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.74</td><td>68.59</td><td>84.46</td><td>91.33</td><td>82.37</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the change in the value of s&p500 considering its price in 2010 and the original amount invested in it in 2007?
| -18.24 |
CONVFINQA10062 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>10/28/2007</td><td>10/26/2008</td><td>10/25/2009</td><td>10/31/2010</td><td>10/30/2011</td><td>10/28/2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>applied materials</td><td>100.00</td><td>61.22</td><td>71.06</td><td>69.23</td><td>72.37</td><td>62.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>100.00</td><td>63.90</td><td>70.17</td><td>81.76</td><td>88.37</td><td>101.81</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>rdg semiconductor composite index</td><td>100.00</td><td>54.74</td><td>68.59</td><td>84.46</td><td>91.33</td><td>82.37</td></tr></table> dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .
Question: what was the change in the value of s&p500 considering its price in 2010 and the original amount invested in it in 2007?
Answer: -18.24
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount invested?
| -0.1824 |
CONVFINQA10063 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in "miscellaneous - net" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see "critical accounting estimates - sfas 143" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see "critical accounting estimates - sfas 143" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .
Question: what is the change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2003 to 2004?
| -55.8 |
CONVFINQA10064 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in "miscellaneous - net" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see "critical accounting estimates - sfas 143" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see "critical accounting estimates - sfas 143" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .
Question: what is the change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: -55.8
Question: what is the earnings for non-utility nuclear in 2003?
| 300.8 |
CONVFINQA10065 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis other income ( deductions ) changed from $ 47.6 million in 2002 to ( $ 36.0 million ) in 2003 primarily due to a decrease in "miscellaneous - net" as a result of a $ 107.7 million accrual in the second quarter of 2003 for the loss that would be associated with a final , non-appealable decision disallowing abeyed river bend plant costs . see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for more details regarding the river bend abeyed plant costs . the decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest and dividend income as a result of the implementation of sfas 143 . interest on long-term debt decreased from $ 462.0 million in 2002 to $ 433.5 million in 2003 primarily due to the redemption and refinancing of long-term debt . non-utility nuclear following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net mw in operation at december 31</td><td>4058</td><td>4001</td><td>3955</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>average realized price per mwh</td><td>$ 41.26</td><td>$ 39.38</td><td>$ 40.07</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>generation in gwh for the year</td><td>32524</td><td>32379</td><td>29953</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>capacity factor for the year</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>92% ( 92 % )</td><td>93% ( 93 % )</td></tr></table> 2004 compared to 2003 the decrease in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 300.8 million to $ 245.0 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle that increased earnings in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see "critical accounting estimates - sfas 143" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . earnings before the cumulative effect of accounting change increased by $ 98.7 million primarily due to the following : 2022 lower operation and maintenance expenses , which decreased from $ 681.8 million in 2003 to $ 595.7 million in 2004 , primarily resulting from charges recorded in 2003 in connection with the voluntary severance program ; 2022 higher revenues , which increased from $ 1.275 billion in 2003 to $ 1.342 billion in 2004 , primarily resulting from higher contract pricing . the addition of a support services contract for the cooper nuclear station and increased generation in 2004 due to power uprates completed in 2003 and fewer planned and unplanned outages in 2004 also contributed to the higher revenues ; and 2022 miscellaneous income resulting from a reduction in the decommissioning liability for a plant , as discussed in note 8 to the consolidated financial statements . partially offsetting this increase were the following : 2022 higher income taxes , which increased from $ 88.6 million in 2003 to $ 142.6 million in 2004 ; and 2022 higher depreciation expense , which increased from $ 34.3 million in 2003 to $ 48.9 million in 2004 , due to additions to plant in service . 2003 compared to 2002 the increase in earnings for non-utility nuclear from $ 200.5 million to $ 300.8 million was primarily due to the $ 154.5 million net-of-tax cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle recognized in the first quarter of 2003 upon implementation of sfas 143 . see "critical accounting estimates - sfas 143" below for discussion of the implementation of sfas 143 . income before the cumulative effect of accounting change decreased by $ 54.2 million . the decrease was primarily due to $ 83.0 million ( $ 50.6 million net-of-tax ) of charges recorded in connection with the voluntary severance program . except for the effect of the voluntary severance program , operation and maintenance expenses in 2003 per mwh of generation were in line with 2002 operation and maintenance expenses. .
Question: what is the change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: -55.8
Question: what is the earnings for non-utility nuclear in 2003?
Answer: 300.8
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.18551 |
CONVFINQA10066 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of citi at the end of 2015?
| 110.14 |
CONVFINQA10067 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of citi at the end of 2015?
Answer: 110.14
Question: what was the net change of the value of citi in 2015 less a $100 initial investment?
| 10.14 |
CONVFINQA10068 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>date</td><td>citi</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>s&p financials</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>31-dec-2010</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td><td>100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>30-dec-2011</td><td>55.67</td><td>102.11</td><td>82.94</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>31-dec-2012</td><td>83.81</td><td>118.45</td><td>106.84</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>31-dec-2013</td><td>110.49</td><td>156.82</td><td>144.90</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>31-dec-2014</td><td>114.83</td><td>178.28</td><td>166.93</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>31-dec-2015</td><td>110.14</td><td>180.75</td><td>164.39</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the value of citi at the end of 2015?
Answer: 110.14
Question: what was the net change of the value of citi in 2015 less a $100 initial investment?
Answer: 10.14
Question: what was the percent change?
| 0.1014 |
CONVFINQA10069 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr></table> on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the change in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended 12/31/07 and the closing price on 2/29/08?
| -8.09 |
CONVFINQA10070 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr></table> on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the change in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended 12/31/07 and the closing price on 2/29/08?
Answer: -8.09
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
| -0.17387 |
CONVFINQA10071 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2006</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 32.68</td><td>$ 26.66</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>35.75</td><td>27.35</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>36.92</td><td>29.98</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>38.74</td><td>35.21</td></tr></table> on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the change in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended 12/31/07 and the closing price on 2/29/08?
Answer: -8.09
Question: and the growth rate during this time?
Answer: -0.17387
Question: what was the average number of shares per registered holder as of 2/29/08?
| 749524.29167 |
CONVFINQA10072 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what was the total of remaining shares, in millions?
| 0.1 |
CONVFINQA10073 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what was the total of remaining shares, in millions?
Answer: 0.1
Question: and how much is that, not in millions?
| 100000.0 |
CONVFINQA10074 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 2010</td><td>33</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total</td><td>$ 33</td><td>$ 24</td></tr></table> notes to the consolidated financial statements at a price equal to 101% ( 101 % ) of their principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest . cash proceeds from the sale of these notes was $ 983 million ( net of discount and issuance costs ) . the discount and issuance costs related to these notes , which totaled $ 17 million , will be amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the notes . in august 2010 , ppg entered into a three-year credit agreement with several banks and financial institutions ( the 201ccredit agreement 201d ) . the credit agreement provides for a $ 1.2 billion unsecured revolving credit facility . in connection with entering into this credit agreement , the company terminated its 20ac650 million and its $ 1 billion revolving credit facilities that were each set to expire in 2011 . there were no outstanding amounts due under either revolving facility at the times of their termination . the company has the ability to increase the size of the credit agreement by up to an additional $ 300 million , subject to the receipt of lender commitments and other conditions . the credit agreement will terminate and all amounts outstanding will be due and payable on august 5 , 2013 . the credit agreement provides that loans will bear interest at rates based , at the company 2019s option , on one of two specified base rates plus a margin based on certain formulas defined in the credit agreement . additionally , the credit agreement contains a commitment fee on the amount of unused commitment under the credit agreement ranging from 0.125% ( 0.125 % ) to 0.625% ( 0.625 % ) per annum . the applicable interest rate and the fee will vary depending on the ratings established by standard & poor 2019s financial services llc and moody 2019s investor service inc . for the company 2019s non-credit enhanced , long- term , senior , unsecured debt . there were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement at december 31 , 2011 ; however , the available borrowing rate on a one month , u.s . dollar denominated borrowing would have been 1.05 percent . the credit agreement contains usual and customary restrictive covenants for facilities of its type , which include , with specified exceptions , limitations on the company 2019s ability to create liens or other encumbrances , to enter into sale and leaseback transactions and to enter into consolidations , mergers or transfers of all or substantially all of its assets . the credit agreement also requires the company to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , of 60 percent or less . the credit agreement contains customary events of default that would permit the lenders to accelerate the repayment of any loans , including the failure to make timely payments when due under the credit agreement or other material indebtedness , the failure to satisfy covenants contained in the credit agreement , a change in control of the company and specified events of bankruptcy and insolvency . ppg 2019s non-u.s . operations have uncommitted lines of credit totaling $ 679 million of which $ 36 million was used as of december 31 , 2011 . these uncommitted lines of credit are subject to cancellation at any time and are generally not subject to any commitment fees . short-term debt outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , was as follows : ( millions ) 2011 2010 other , weighted average 3.72% ( 3.72 % ) as of dec . 31 , 2011 and 3.39% ( 3.39 % ) as of december 31 , 2010 33 24 total $ 33 $ 24 ppg is in compliance with the restrictive covenants under its various credit agreements , loan agreements and indentures . the company 2019s revolving credit agreements include a financial ratio covenant . the covenant requires that the amount of total indebtedness not exceed 60% ( 60 % ) of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . as of december 31 , 2011 , total indebtedness was 43 percent of the company 2019s total capitalization excluding the portion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) related to pensions and other postretirement benefit adjustments . additionally , substantially all of the company 2019s debt agreements contain customary cross-default provisions . those provisions generally provide that a default on a debt service payment of $ 10 million or more for longer than the grace period provided ( usually 10 days ) under one agreement may result in an event of default under other agreements . none of the company 2019s primary debt obligations are secured or guaranteed by the company 2019s affiliates . interest payments in 2011 , 2010 and 2009 totaled $ 212 million , $ 189 million and $ 201 million , respectively . in october 2009 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase up to 1.2 million shares of the company 2019s stock of which 1.1 million shares were purchased in the open market ( 465006 of these shares were purchased as of december 31 , 2009 at a weighted average price of $ 56.66 per share ) . the counterparty held the shares until september of 2010 when the company paid $ 65 million and took possession of these shares . in december 2008 , the company entered into an agreement with a counterparty to repurchase 1.5 million 44 2011 ppg annual report and form 10-k .
Question: what was the total of remaining shares, in millions?
Answer: 0.1
Question: and how much is that, not in millions?
Answer: 100000.0
Question: what would be the cost to repurchase those shares, considering the 2009 weighted average share price?
| 5666000.0 |
CONVFINQA10075 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what is the r&d expense from 2016 to 2017?
| 150.0 |
CONVFINQA10076 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what is the r&d expense from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 150.0
Question: what us the r&d expense in 2015?
| 119.0 |
CONVFINQA10077 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
table of contents other equity method investments infraservs . we hold indirect ownership interests in several german infraserv groups that own and develop industrial parks and provide on-site general and administrative support to tenants . our ownership interest in the equity investments in infraserv affiliates are as follows : as of december 31 , 2017 ( in percentages ) infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................... . 39 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>as of december 31 2017 ( in percentages )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . gendorf kg ( 1 )</td><td>39</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . hoechst kg</td><td>32</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 )</td><td>27</td></tr></table> infraserv gmbh & co . knapsack kg ( 1 ) ................................................................................................ . 27 ______________________________ ( 1 ) see note 29 - subsequent events in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . research and development our business models leverage innovation and conduct research and development activities to develop new , and optimize existing , production technologies , as well as to develop commercially viable new products and applications . research and development expense was $ 72 million , $ 78 million and $ 119 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we consider the amounts spent during each of the last three fiscal years on research and development activities to be sufficient to execute our current strategic initiatives . intellectual property we attach importance to protecting our intellectual property , including safeguarding our confidential information and through our patents , trademarks and copyrights , in order to preserve our investment in research and development , manufacturing and marketing . patents may cover processes , equipment , products , intermediate products and product uses . we also seek to register trademarks as a means of protecting the brand names of our company and products . patents . in most industrial countries , patent protection exists for new substances and formulations , as well as for certain unique applications and production processes . however , we do business in regions of the world where intellectual property protection may be limited and difficult to enforce . confidential information . we maintain stringent information security policies and procedures wherever we do business . such information security policies and procedures include data encryption , controls over the disclosure and safekeeping of confidential information and trade secrets , as well as employee awareness training . trademarks . amcel ae , aoplus ae , ateva ae , avicor ae , celanese ae , celanex ae , celcon ae , celfx ae , celstran ae , celvolit ae , clarifoil ae , dur- o-set ae , ecomid ae , ecovae ae , forflex ae , forprene ae , frianyl ae , fortron ae , ghr ae , gumfit ae , gur ae , hostaform ae , laprene ae , metalx ae , mowilith ae , mt ae , nilamid ae , nivionplast ae , nutrinova ae , nylfor ae , pibiflex ae , pibifor ae , pibiter ae , polifor ae , resyn ae , riteflex ae , slidex ae , sofprene ae , sofpur ae , sunett ae , talcoprene ae , tecnoprene ae , thermx ae , tufcor ae , vantage ae , vectra ae , vinac ae , vinamul ae , vitaldose ae , zenite ae and certain other branded products and services named in this document are registered or reserved trademarks or service marks owned or licensed by celanese . the foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive or comprehensive list of all registered or reserved trademarks and service marks owned or licensed by celanese . fortron ae is a registered trademark of fortron industries llc . hostaform ae is a registered trademark of hoechst gmbh . mowilith ae and nilamid ae are registered trademarks of celanese in most european countries . we monitor competitive developments and defend against infringements on our intellectual property rights . neither celanese nor any particular business segment is materially dependent upon any one patent , trademark , copyright or trade secret . environmental and other regulation matters pertaining to environmental and other regulations are discussed in item 1a . risk factors , as well as note 2 - summary of accounting policies , note 16 - environmental and note 24 - commitments and contingencies in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what is the r&d expense from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: 150.0
Question: what us the r&d expense in 2015?
Answer: 119.0
Question: what is the total for three years?
| 269.0 |
CONVFINQA10078 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2016?
| 10646.0 |
CONVFINQA10079 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2016?
Answer: 10646.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
| 8166.0 |
CONVFINQA10080 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2016?
Answer: 10646.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 8166.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 2480.0 |
CONVFINQA10081 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2016?
Answer: 10646.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 8166.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 2480.0
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2015?
| 8166.0 |
CONVFINQA10082 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( continued ) the following results drove changes in ccg operating income by approximately the amounts indicated: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>operating income reconciliation</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 10646</td><td>2016 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>1250</td><td>lower ccg platform unit cost</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>905</td><td>lower ccg operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>625</td><td>higher gross margin from ccg platform revenue1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>-645 ( 645 )</td><td>higher factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 10nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>345</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>$ 8166</td><td>2015 ccg operating income</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>-2060 ( 2060 )</td><td>higher ccg platform unit costs</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>-1565 ( 1565 )</td><td>lower gross margin from ccg platform revenue2</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>435</td><td>lower factory start-up costs primarily driven by the ramp of our 14nm process technology</td></tr><tr><td>12</td><td>430</td><td>lower production costs primarily on our 14nm products treated as period charges in 2014</td></tr><tr><td>13</td><td>375</td><td>lower operating expense</td></tr><tr><td>14</td><td>224</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$ 10327</td><td>2014 ccg operating income</td></tr></table> 1 higher gross margin from higher ccg platform revenue was driven by higher average selling prices on notebook and desktop platforms , offset by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales . 2 lower gross margin from lower ccg platform revenue was driven by lower desktop and notebook platform unit sales , partially offset by higher average selling prices on desktop , notebook , and tablet platforms . data center group segment product overview the dcg operating segment offers platforms designed to provide leading energy-efficient performance for all server , network , and storage applications . in addition , dcg focuses on lowering the total cost of ownership on other specific workload- optimizations for the enterprise , cloud service providers , and communications service provider market segments . in 2016 , we launched the following platforms with an array of functionalities and advancements : 2022 intel ae xeon ae processor e5 v4 family , the foundation for high performing clouds and delivers energy-efficient performance for server , network , and storage workloads . 2022 intel xeon processor e7 v4 family , targeted at platforms requiring four or more cpus ; this processor family delivers high performance and is optimized for real-time analytics and in-memory computing , along with industry-leading reliability , availability , and serviceability . 2022 intel ae xeon phi 2122 product family , formerly code-named knights landing , with up to 72 high-performance intel processor cores , integrated memory and fabric , and a common software programming model with intel xeon processors . the intel xeon phi product family is designed for highly parallel compute and memory bandwidth-intensive workloads . intel xeon phi processors are positioned to increase the performance of supercomputers , enabling trillions of calculations per second , and to address emerging data analytics and artificial intelligence solutions . in 2017 , we expect to release our next generation of intel xeon processors for compute , storage , and network ; a next-generation intel xeon phi processor optimized for deep learning ; and a suite of single-socket products , including next-generation intel xeon e3 processors , next-generation intel atom processors , and next-generation intel xeon-d processors for dense solutions. .
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2016?
Answer: 10646.0
Question: and what was it in 2015?
Answer: 8166.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 2480.0
Question: what was the ccg operating income in 2015?
Answer: 8166.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2015 ccg operating income?
| 0.3037 |
CONVFINQA10083 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
flows of the company 2019s subsidiaries , the receipt of dividends and repayments of indebtedness from the company 2019s subsidiaries , compliance with delaware corporate and other laws , compliance with the contractual provisions of debt and other agreements , and other factors . the company 2019s dividend rate on its common stock is determined by the board of directors on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration , among other factors , current and possible future developments that may affect the company 2019s income and cash flows . when dividends on common stock are declared , they are typically paid in march , june , september and december . historically , dividends have been paid quarterly to holders of record less than 30 days prior to the distribution date . since the dividends on the company 2019s common stock are not cumulative , only declared dividends are paid . during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company paid $ 319 million , $ 289 million and $ 261 million in cash dividends , respectively . the following table provides the per share cash dividends paid for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>june</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>march</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td><td>$ 0.34</td></tr></table> on december 7 , 2018 , the company 2019s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend payment of $ 0.455 per share payable on march 1 , 2019 , to shareholders of record as of february 7 , 2019 . equity forward transaction see note 4 2014acquisitions and divestitures for information regarding the forward sale agreements entered into by the company on april 11 , 2018 , and the subsequent settlement of these agreements on june 7 , 2018 . regulatory restrictions the issuance of long-term debt or equity securities by the company or american water capital corp . ( 201cawcc 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly owned financing subsidiary , does not require authorization of any state puc if no guarantee or pledge of the regulated subsidiaries is utilized . however , state puc authorization is required to issue long-term debt at most of the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries . the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries normally obtain the required approvals on a periodic basis to cover their anticipated financing needs for a period of time or in connection with a specific financing . under applicable law , the company 2019s subsidiaries can pay dividends only from retained , undistributed or current earnings . a significant loss recorded at a subsidiary may limit the dividends that the subsidiary can distribute to american water . furthermore , the ability of the company 2019s subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or repay indebtedness to american water is subject to compliance with applicable regulatory restrictions and financial obligations , including , for example , debt service and preferred and preference stock dividends , as well as applicable corporate , tax and other laws and regulations , and other agreements or covenants made or entered into by the company and its subsidiaries . note 10 : stock based compensation the company has granted stock options , stock units and dividend equivalents to non-employee directors , officers and other key employees of the company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2007 plan 201d ) . stock units under the 2007 plan generally vest based on ( i ) continued employment with the company ( 201crsus 201d ) , or ( ii ) continued employment with the company where distribution of the shares is subject to the satisfaction in whole or in part of stated performance-based goals ( 201cpsus 201d ) . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 million . as of .
Question: what was the cash dividends paid for 2018 and 2017?
| 608.0 |
CONVFINQA10084 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
flows of the company 2019s subsidiaries , the receipt of dividends and repayments of indebtedness from the company 2019s subsidiaries , compliance with delaware corporate and other laws , compliance with the contractual provisions of debt and other agreements , and other factors . the company 2019s dividend rate on its common stock is determined by the board of directors on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration , among other factors , current and possible future developments that may affect the company 2019s income and cash flows . when dividends on common stock are declared , they are typically paid in march , june , september and december . historically , dividends have been paid quarterly to holders of record less than 30 days prior to the distribution date . since the dividends on the company 2019s common stock are not cumulative , only declared dividends are paid . during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company paid $ 319 million , $ 289 million and $ 261 million in cash dividends , respectively . the following table provides the per share cash dividends paid for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>june</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>march</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td><td>$ 0.34</td></tr></table> on december 7 , 2018 , the company 2019s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend payment of $ 0.455 per share payable on march 1 , 2019 , to shareholders of record as of february 7 , 2019 . equity forward transaction see note 4 2014acquisitions and divestitures for information regarding the forward sale agreements entered into by the company on april 11 , 2018 , and the subsequent settlement of these agreements on june 7 , 2018 . regulatory restrictions the issuance of long-term debt or equity securities by the company or american water capital corp . ( 201cawcc 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly owned financing subsidiary , does not require authorization of any state puc if no guarantee or pledge of the regulated subsidiaries is utilized . however , state puc authorization is required to issue long-term debt at most of the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries . the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries normally obtain the required approvals on a periodic basis to cover their anticipated financing needs for a period of time or in connection with a specific financing . under applicable law , the company 2019s subsidiaries can pay dividends only from retained , undistributed or current earnings . a significant loss recorded at a subsidiary may limit the dividends that the subsidiary can distribute to american water . furthermore , the ability of the company 2019s subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or repay indebtedness to american water is subject to compliance with applicable regulatory restrictions and financial obligations , including , for example , debt service and preferred and preference stock dividends , as well as applicable corporate , tax and other laws and regulations , and other agreements or covenants made or entered into by the company and its subsidiaries . note 10 : stock based compensation the company has granted stock options , stock units and dividend equivalents to non-employee directors , officers and other key employees of the company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2007 plan 201d ) . stock units under the 2007 plan generally vest based on ( i ) continued employment with the company ( 201crsus 201d ) , or ( ii ) continued employment with the company where distribution of the shares is subject to the satisfaction in whole or in part of stated performance-based goals ( 201cpsus 201d ) . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 million . as of .
Question: what was the cash dividends paid for 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 608.0
Question: and including the value for 2016?
| 869.0 |
CONVFINQA10085 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
flows of the company 2019s subsidiaries , the receipt of dividends and repayments of indebtedness from the company 2019s subsidiaries , compliance with delaware corporate and other laws , compliance with the contractual provisions of debt and other agreements , and other factors . the company 2019s dividend rate on its common stock is determined by the board of directors on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration , among other factors , current and possible future developments that may affect the company 2019s income and cash flows . when dividends on common stock are declared , they are typically paid in march , june , september and december . historically , dividends have been paid quarterly to holders of record less than 30 days prior to the distribution date . since the dividends on the company 2019s common stock are not cumulative , only declared dividends are paid . during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company paid $ 319 million , $ 289 million and $ 261 million in cash dividends , respectively . the following table provides the per share cash dividends paid for the years ended december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>september</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>june</td><td>$ 0.455</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>march</td><td>$ 0.415</td><td>$ 0.375</td><td>$ 0.34</td></tr></table> on december 7 , 2018 , the company 2019s board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend payment of $ 0.455 per share payable on march 1 , 2019 , to shareholders of record as of february 7 , 2019 . equity forward transaction see note 4 2014acquisitions and divestitures for information regarding the forward sale agreements entered into by the company on april 11 , 2018 , and the subsequent settlement of these agreements on june 7 , 2018 . regulatory restrictions the issuance of long-term debt or equity securities by the company or american water capital corp . ( 201cawcc 201d ) , the company 2019s wholly owned financing subsidiary , does not require authorization of any state puc if no guarantee or pledge of the regulated subsidiaries is utilized . however , state puc authorization is required to issue long-term debt at most of the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries . the company 2019s regulated subsidiaries normally obtain the required approvals on a periodic basis to cover their anticipated financing needs for a period of time or in connection with a specific financing . under applicable law , the company 2019s subsidiaries can pay dividends only from retained , undistributed or current earnings . a significant loss recorded at a subsidiary may limit the dividends that the subsidiary can distribute to american water . furthermore , the ability of the company 2019s subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or repay indebtedness to american water is subject to compliance with applicable regulatory restrictions and financial obligations , including , for example , debt service and preferred and preference stock dividends , as well as applicable corporate , tax and other laws and regulations , and other agreements or covenants made or entered into by the company and its subsidiaries . note 10 : stock based compensation the company has granted stock options , stock units and dividend equivalents to non-employee directors , officers and other key employees of the company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 omnibus equity compensation plan ( the 201c2007 plan 201d ) . stock units under the 2007 plan generally vest based on ( i ) continued employment with the company ( 201crsus 201d ) , or ( ii ) continued employment with the company where distribution of the shares is subject to the satisfaction in whole or in part of stated performance-based goals ( 201cpsus 201d ) . the total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 plan is 15.5 million . as of .
Question: what was the cash dividends paid for 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 608.0
Question: and including the value for 2016?
Answer: 869.0
Question: what was the increase in the cash dividend per share between the 4th quarter of 2017 and 2018?
| 0.04 |
CONVFINQA10086 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax</td><td>$ -4332 ( 4332 )</td><td>$ -4901 ( 4901 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax</td><td>1238</td><td>1636</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax</td><td>-16349 ( 16349 )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr></table> during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .
Question: what was the net change in value of unrealized losses from 2007 to 2008?
| 5.6 |
CONVFINQA10087 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) of certain of its assets and liabilities under its interest rate swap agreements held as of december 31 , 2006 and entered into during the first half of 2007 . in addition , the company paid $ 8.0 million related to a treasury rate lock agreement entered into and settled during the year ended december 31 , 2008 . the cost of the treasury rate lock is being recognized as additional interest expense over the 10-year term of the 7.00% ( 7.00 % ) notes . during the year ended december 31 , 2007 , the company also received $ 3.1 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under ten forward starting interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 1.4 billion , which were designated as cash flow hedges to manage exposure to variability in cash flows relating to forecasted interest payments in connection with the certificates issued in the securitization in may 2007 . the settlement is being recognized as a reduction in interest expense over the five-year period for which the interest rate swaps were designated as hedges . the company also received $ 17.0 million in cash upon settlement of the assets and liabilities under thirteen additional interest rate swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $ 850.0 million that managed exposure to variability of interest rates under the credit facilities but were not considered cash flow hedges for accounting purposes . this gain is included in other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended december 31 , 2007 . as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , other comprehensive ( loss ) income included the following items related to derivative financial instruments ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred loss on the settlement of the treasury rate lock net of tax</td><td>$ -4332 ( 4332 )</td><td>$ -4901 ( 4901 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred gain on the settlement of interest rate swap agreements entered into in connection with the securitization net oftax</td><td>1238</td><td>1636</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized losses related to interest rate swap agreements net of tax</td><td>-16349 ( 16349 )</td><td>-486 ( 486 )</td></tr></table> during the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , the company recorded an aggregate net unrealized loss of approximately $ 15.8 million and $ 3.2 million , respectively ( net of a tax provision of approximately $ 10.2 million and $ 2.0 million , respectively ) in other comprehensive loss for the change in fair value of interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges and reclassified an aggregate of $ 0.1 million and $ 6.2 million , respectively ( net of an income tax provision of $ 2.0 million and an income tax benefit of $ 3.3 million , respectively ) into results of operations . 9 . fair valuemeasurements the company determines the fair market values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in sfas no . 157 , which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value . the standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value . level 1 quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date . the company 2019s level 1 assets consist of available-for-sale securities traded on active markets as well as certain brazilian treasury securities that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets . level 2 observable inputs other than level 1 prices , such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities ; quoted prices in markets that are not active ; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. .
Question: what was the net change in value of unrealized losses from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 5.6
Question: what is the percent change?
| 0.54902 |
CONVFINQA10088 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2005 , we amended our $ 1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility to extend its maturity date from march 27 , 2008 to march 27 , 2010 , and reduce the effective interest rate to libor plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) and the commitment fee to 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) of the undrawn portion of the facility at december 31 , 2005 . in addition , in 2005 , we entered into two $ 100.0 million unsecured term loans , due 2010 , at an effective interest rate of libor plus 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) at december 31 , 2005 . during 2004 , we entered into an eight-year , $ 225.0 million unse- cured term loan , at libor plus 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) , which was amended in 2005 to reduce the effective interest rate to libor plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) at december 31 , 2005 . the liquid yield option 2122 notes and the zero coupon convertible notes are unsecured zero coupon bonds with yields to maturity of 4.875% ( 4.875 % ) and 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) , respectively , due 2021 . each liquid yield option 2122 note and zero coupon convertible note was issued at a price of $ 381.63 and $ 391.06 , respectively , and will have a principal amount at maturity of $ 1000 . each liquid yield option 2122 note and zero coupon convertible note is convertible at the option of the holder into 11.7152 and 15.6675 shares of common stock , respec- tively , if the market price of our common stock reaches certain lev- els . these conditions were met at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for the zero coupon convertible notes and at december 31 , 2004 for the liquid yield option 2122 notes . since february 2 , 2005 , we have the right to redeem the liquid yield option 2122 notes and commencing on may 18 , 2006 , we will have the right to redeem the zero coupon con- vertible notes at their accreted values for cash as a whole at any time , or from time to time in part . holders may require us to pur- chase any outstanding liquid yield option 2122 notes at their accreted value on february 2 , 2011 and any outstanding zero coupon con- vertible notes at their accreted value on may 18 , 2009 and may 18 , 2014 . we may choose to pay the purchase price in cash or common stock or a combination thereof . during 2005 , holders of our liquid yield option 2122 notes and zero coupon convertible notes converted approximately $ 10.4 million and $ 285.0 million , respectively , of the accreted value of these notes into approximately 0.3 million and 9.4 million shares , respec- tively , of our common stock and cash for fractional shares . in addi- tion , we called for redemption $ 182.3 million of the accreted bal- ance of outstanding liquid yield option 2122 notes . most holders of the liquid yield option 2122 notes elected to convert into shares of our common stock , rather than redeem for cash , resulting in the issuance of approximately 4.5 million shares . during 2005 , we prepaid a total of $ 297.0 million on a term loan secured by a certain celebrity ship and on a variable rate unsecured term loan . in 1996 , we entered into a $ 264.0 million capital lease to finance splendour of the seas and in 1995 we entered into a $ 260.0 million capital lease to finance legend of the seas . during 2005 , we paid $ 335.8 million in connection with the exercise of purchase options on these capital lease obligations . under certain of our agreements , the contractual interest rate and commitment fee vary with our debt rating . the unsecured senior notes and senior debentures are not redeemable prior to maturity . our debt agreements contain covenants that require us , among other things , to maintain minimum net worth and fixed charge cov- erage ratio and limit our debt to capital ratio . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 31 , 2005 . following is a schedule of annual maturities on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2005 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 600883</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>329493</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>245257</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009 ( 1 )</td><td>361449</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>687376</td></tr></table> 1 the $ 137.9 million accreted value of the zero coupon convertible notes at december 31 , 2005 is included in year 2009 . the holders of our zero coupon convertible notes may require us to purchase any notes outstanding at an accreted value of $ 161.7 mil- lion on may 18 , 2009 . this accreted value was calculated based on the number of notes outstanding at december 31 , 2005 . we may choose to pay any amounts in cash or common stock or a combination thereof . note 6 . shareholders 2019 equity on september 25 , 2005 , we announced that we and an investment bank had finalized a forward sale agreement relating to an asr transaction . as part of the asr transaction , we purchased 5.5 million shares of our common stock from the investment bank at an initial price of $ 45.40 per share . total consideration paid to repurchase such shares , including commissions and other fees , was approxi- mately $ 249.1 million and was recorded in shareholders 2019 equity as a component of treasury stock . the forward sale contract matured in february 2006 . during the term of the forward sale contract , the investment bank purchased shares of our common stock in the open market to settle its obliga- tion related to the shares borrowed from third parties and sold to us . upon settlement of the contract , we received 218089 additional shares of our common stock . these incremental shares will be recorded in shareholders 2019 equity as a component of treasury stock in the first quarter of 2006 . our employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) , which has been in effect since january 1 , 1994 , facilitates the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the pur- chase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the pur- chase period and the last business day of each month of the pur- chase period . shares of common stock of 14476 , 13281 and 21280 38 royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the ratio of debt maturity for 2010 to 2006?
| 1.14394 |
CONVFINQA10089 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during 2005 , we amended our $ 1.0 billion unsecured revolving credit facility to extend its maturity date from march 27 , 2008 to march 27 , 2010 , and reduce the effective interest rate to libor plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) and the commitment fee to 0.2% ( 0.2 % ) of the undrawn portion of the facility at december 31 , 2005 . in addition , in 2005 , we entered into two $ 100.0 million unsecured term loans , due 2010 , at an effective interest rate of libor plus 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) at december 31 , 2005 . during 2004 , we entered into an eight-year , $ 225.0 million unse- cured term loan , at libor plus 1.75% ( 1.75 % ) , which was amended in 2005 to reduce the effective interest rate to libor plus 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) at december 31 , 2005 . the liquid yield option 2122 notes and the zero coupon convertible notes are unsecured zero coupon bonds with yields to maturity of 4.875% ( 4.875 % ) and 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) , respectively , due 2021 . each liquid yield option 2122 note and zero coupon convertible note was issued at a price of $ 381.63 and $ 391.06 , respectively , and will have a principal amount at maturity of $ 1000 . each liquid yield option 2122 note and zero coupon convertible note is convertible at the option of the holder into 11.7152 and 15.6675 shares of common stock , respec- tively , if the market price of our common stock reaches certain lev- els . these conditions were met at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 for the zero coupon convertible notes and at december 31 , 2004 for the liquid yield option 2122 notes . since february 2 , 2005 , we have the right to redeem the liquid yield option 2122 notes and commencing on may 18 , 2006 , we will have the right to redeem the zero coupon con- vertible notes at their accreted values for cash as a whole at any time , or from time to time in part . holders may require us to pur- chase any outstanding liquid yield option 2122 notes at their accreted value on february 2 , 2011 and any outstanding zero coupon con- vertible notes at their accreted value on may 18 , 2009 and may 18 , 2014 . we may choose to pay the purchase price in cash or common stock or a combination thereof . during 2005 , holders of our liquid yield option 2122 notes and zero coupon convertible notes converted approximately $ 10.4 million and $ 285.0 million , respectively , of the accreted value of these notes into approximately 0.3 million and 9.4 million shares , respec- tively , of our common stock and cash for fractional shares . in addi- tion , we called for redemption $ 182.3 million of the accreted bal- ance of outstanding liquid yield option 2122 notes . most holders of the liquid yield option 2122 notes elected to convert into shares of our common stock , rather than redeem for cash , resulting in the issuance of approximately 4.5 million shares . during 2005 , we prepaid a total of $ 297.0 million on a term loan secured by a certain celebrity ship and on a variable rate unsecured term loan . in 1996 , we entered into a $ 264.0 million capital lease to finance splendour of the seas and in 1995 we entered into a $ 260.0 million capital lease to finance legend of the seas . during 2005 , we paid $ 335.8 million in connection with the exercise of purchase options on these capital lease obligations . under certain of our agreements , the contractual interest rate and commitment fee vary with our debt rating . the unsecured senior notes and senior debentures are not redeemable prior to maturity . our debt agreements contain covenants that require us , among other things , to maintain minimum net worth and fixed charge cov- erage ratio and limit our debt to capital ratio . we are in compliance with all covenants as of december 31 , 2005 . following is a schedule of annual maturities on long-term debt as of december 31 , 2005 for each of the next five years ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2006</td><td>$ 600883</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>329493</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>245257</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009 ( 1 )</td><td>361449</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>687376</td></tr></table> 1 the $ 137.9 million accreted value of the zero coupon convertible notes at december 31 , 2005 is included in year 2009 . the holders of our zero coupon convertible notes may require us to purchase any notes outstanding at an accreted value of $ 161.7 mil- lion on may 18 , 2009 . this accreted value was calculated based on the number of notes outstanding at december 31 , 2005 . we may choose to pay any amounts in cash or common stock or a combination thereof . note 6 . shareholders 2019 equity on september 25 , 2005 , we announced that we and an investment bank had finalized a forward sale agreement relating to an asr transaction . as part of the asr transaction , we purchased 5.5 million shares of our common stock from the investment bank at an initial price of $ 45.40 per share . total consideration paid to repurchase such shares , including commissions and other fees , was approxi- mately $ 249.1 million and was recorded in shareholders 2019 equity as a component of treasury stock . the forward sale contract matured in february 2006 . during the term of the forward sale contract , the investment bank purchased shares of our common stock in the open market to settle its obliga- tion related to the shares borrowed from third parties and sold to us . upon settlement of the contract , we received 218089 additional shares of our common stock . these incremental shares will be recorded in shareholders 2019 equity as a component of treasury stock in the first quarter of 2006 . our employee stock purchase plan ( 201cespp 201d ) , which has been in effect since january 1 , 1994 , facilitates the purchase by employees of up to 800000 shares of common stock . offerings to employees are made on a quarterly basis . subject to certain limitations , the pur- chase price for each share of common stock is equal to 90% ( 90 % ) of the average of the market prices of the common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange on the first business day of the pur- chase period and the last business day of each month of the pur- chase period . shares of common stock of 14476 , 13281 and 21280 38 royal caribbean cruises ltd . notes to the consolidated financial statements ( continued ) .
Question: what is the ratio of debt maturity for 2010 to 2006?
Answer: 1.14394
Question: what is that value times 100?
| 114.39432 |
CONVFINQA10090 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely corre- lated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . pr int ing papers net sales for 2012 were about flat with 2011 and increased 5% ( 5 % ) from 2010 . operat- ing profits in 2012 were 31% ( 31 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 25% ( 25 % ) higher than in 2010 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2012 were 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2011 and 25% ( 25 % ) lower than in 2010 . benefits from higher sales volumes ( $ 58 mil- lion ) were more than offset by lower sales price real- izations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 233 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 30 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 32 million ) and other items ( $ 6 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td><td>$ 5940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>599</td><td>872</td><td>481</td></tr></table> north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 331 million compared with $ 423 million ( $ 399 million excluding a $ 24 million gain associated with the repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill ) in 2011 and $ 18 million ( $ 333 million excluding facility clo- sure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were flat with 2011 . average sales margins were lower primarily due to lower export sales prices and higher export sales volume . input costs were higher for wood and chemicals , but were partially offset by lower purchased pulp costs . freight costs increased due to higher oil prices . manufacturing operating costs were favorable reflecting strong mill performance . planned main- tenance downtime costs were slightly higher in 2012 . no market-related downtime was taken in either 2012 or 2011 . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase compared with the fourth quar- ter of 2012 reflecting seasonally stronger demand . average sales price realizations are expected to be relatively flat as sales price realizations for domestic and export uncoated freesheet roll and cutsize paper should be stable . input costs should increase for energy , chemicals and wood . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 19 million lower with an outage scheduled at our georgetown mill versus outages at our courtland and eastover mills in the fourth quarter of 2012 . braz i l ian papers net sales for 2012 were $ 1.1 bil- lion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 and $ 1.1 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits for 2012 were $ 163 million compared with $ 169 million in 2011 and $ 159 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were higher than in 2011 as international paper improved its segment position in the brazilian market despite weaker year-over-year conditions in most markets . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper , but the benefit was more than offset by declining prices for exported paper . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher- margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals , but costs for purchased pulp decreased . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower than in 2011 . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price realizations are expected to increase in the brazilian domestic market due to the realization of an announced sales price increase for uncoated free- sheet paper , but the benefit should be partially offset by pricing pressures in export markets . average sales margins are expected to be negatively impacted by a less favorable geographic mix . input costs are expected to be about flat due to lower energy costs being offset by higher costs for wood , purchased pulp , chemicals and utilities . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 4 million lower with no outages scheduled in the first quarter . operating costs should be favorably impacted by the savings generated by the start-up of a new biomass boiler at the mogi guacu mill . european papers net sales in 2012 were $ 1.4 bil- lion compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2011 and $ 1.3 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 179 million compared with $ 196 million ( $ 207 million excluding asset impairment charges related to our inverurie , scotland mill which was closed in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 197 million ( $ 199 million excluding an asset impairment charge ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 compared with 2011 were higher for uncoated freesheet paper in both europe and russia , while sales volumes for pulp were lower in both regions . average sales price realizations for uncoated .
Question: what is the product of 2011 north american printing paper sales by 1000?
| 2800.0 |
CONVFINQA10091 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely corre- lated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . pr int ing papers net sales for 2012 were about flat with 2011 and increased 5% ( 5 % ) from 2010 . operat- ing profits in 2012 were 31% ( 31 % ) lower than in 2011 , but 25% ( 25 % ) higher than in 2010 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2012 were 30% ( 30 % ) lower than in 2011 and 25% ( 25 % ) lower than in 2010 . benefits from higher sales volumes ( $ 58 mil- lion ) were more than offset by lower sales price real- izations and an unfavorable product mix ( $ 233 million ) , higher operating costs ( $ 30 million ) , higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 32 million ) and other items ( $ 6 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td><td>$ 5940</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>599</td><td>872</td><td>481</td></tr></table> north american pr int ing papers net sales were $ 2.7 billion in 2012 , $ 2.8 billion in 2011 and $ 2.8 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 331 million compared with $ 423 million ( $ 399 million excluding a $ 24 million gain associated with the repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill ) in 2011 and $ 18 million ( $ 333 million excluding facility clo- sure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were flat with 2011 . average sales margins were lower primarily due to lower export sales prices and higher export sales volume . input costs were higher for wood and chemicals , but were partially offset by lower purchased pulp costs . freight costs increased due to higher oil prices . manufacturing operating costs were favorable reflecting strong mill performance . planned main- tenance downtime costs were slightly higher in 2012 . no market-related downtime was taken in either 2012 or 2011 . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to increase compared with the fourth quar- ter of 2012 reflecting seasonally stronger demand . average sales price realizations are expected to be relatively flat as sales price realizations for domestic and export uncoated freesheet roll and cutsize paper should be stable . input costs should increase for energy , chemicals and wood . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 19 million lower with an outage scheduled at our georgetown mill versus outages at our courtland and eastover mills in the fourth quarter of 2012 . braz i l ian papers net sales for 2012 were $ 1.1 bil- lion compared with $ 1.2 billion in 2011 and $ 1.1 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits for 2012 were $ 163 million compared with $ 169 million in 2011 and $ 159 million in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were higher than in 2011 as international paper improved its segment position in the brazilian market despite weaker year-over-year conditions in most markets . average sales price realizations improved for domestic uncoated freesheet paper , but the benefit was more than offset by declining prices for exported paper . margins were favorably affected by an increased proportion of sales to the higher- margin domestic market . raw material costs increased for wood and chemicals , but costs for purchased pulp decreased . operating costs and planned maintenance downtime costs were lower than in 2011 . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter are expected to be lower than in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to seasonally weaker customer demand for uncoated freesheet paper . average sales price realizations are expected to increase in the brazilian domestic market due to the realization of an announced sales price increase for uncoated free- sheet paper , but the benefit should be partially offset by pricing pressures in export markets . average sales margins are expected to be negatively impacted by a less favorable geographic mix . input costs are expected to be about flat due to lower energy costs being offset by higher costs for wood , purchased pulp , chemicals and utilities . planned maintenance outage costs should be $ 4 million lower with no outages scheduled in the first quarter . operating costs should be favorably impacted by the savings generated by the start-up of a new biomass boiler at the mogi guacu mill . european papers net sales in 2012 were $ 1.4 bil- lion compared with $ 1.4 billion in 2011 and $ 1.3 bil- lion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 179 million compared with $ 196 million ( $ 207 million excluding asset impairment charges related to our inverurie , scotland mill which was closed in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 197 million ( $ 199 million excluding an asset impairment charge ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 compared with 2011 were higher for uncoated freesheet paper in both europe and russia , while sales volumes for pulp were lower in both regions . average sales price realizations for uncoated .
Question: what is the product of 2011 north american printing paper sales by 1000?
Answer: 2800.0
Question: what is that divided by total 2011 sales?
| 0.45052 |
CONVFINQA10092 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2006 to 2007?
| -5.0 |
CONVFINQA10093 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>september 29 2007</td><td>september 30 2006</td><td>september 24 2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>beginning allowance balance</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td><td>$ 47</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>charged to costs and expenses</td><td>12</td><td>17</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deductions</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ending allowance balance</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 52</td><td>$ 46</td></tr></table> vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .
Question: what was the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: -5.0
Question: what is the percent change?
| -0.09615 |
CONVFINQA10094 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . acquisitions ( continued ) transaction closed on january 23 , 2017 , and the consideration paid included the issuance of approximately 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock ( fair value of $ 266.5 million ) and cash of $ 86.2 million . the company recognized in 201ccontingent consideration liabilities 201d a $ 162.9 million liability for the estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments . the fair value of the contingent milestone payments will be remeasured each quarter , with changes in the fair value recognized within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations . for further information on the fair value of the contingent milestone payments , see note 10 . in connection with the acquisition , the company placed $ 27.6 million of the purchase price into escrow to satisfy any claims for indemnification made in accordance with the merger agreement . any funds remaining 15 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to valtech 2019s former shareholders . acquisition-related costs of $ 0.6 million and $ 4.1 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . prior to the close of the transaction , valtech spun off its early- stage transseptal mitral valve replacement technology program . concurrent with the closing , the company entered into an agreement for an exclusive option to acquire that program and its associated intellectual property for approximately $ 200.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , plus an additional $ 50.0 million if a certain european regulatory approval is obtained within 10 years of the acquisition closing date . the option expires two years after the closing date of the transaction , but can be extended by up to one year depending on the results of certain clinical trials . valtech is a developer of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair system . the company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products . the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination . tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date . the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 22.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>developed technology</td><td>109.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ipr&d</td><td>87.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities assumed</td><td>-5.1 ( 5.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-17.6 ( 17.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>515.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less : cash acquired</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total purchase price net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 511.3</td></tr></table> goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition . goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s rest of world segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach . this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return . the discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) . completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies .
Question: what was the total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d in 2017?
| 0.6 |
CONVFINQA10095 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . acquisitions ( continued ) transaction closed on january 23 , 2017 , and the consideration paid included the issuance of approximately 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock ( fair value of $ 266.5 million ) and cash of $ 86.2 million . the company recognized in 201ccontingent consideration liabilities 201d a $ 162.9 million liability for the estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments . the fair value of the contingent milestone payments will be remeasured each quarter , with changes in the fair value recognized within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations . for further information on the fair value of the contingent milestone payments , see note 10 . in connection with the acquisition , the company placed $ 27.6 million of the purchase price into escrow to satisfy any claims for indemnification made in accordance with the merger agreement . any funds remaining 15 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to valtech 2019s former shareholders . acquisition-related costs of $ 0.6 million and $ 4.1 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . prior to the close of the transaction , valtech spun off its early- stage transseptal mitral valve replacement technology program . concurrent with the closing , the company entered into an agreement for an exclusive option to acquire that program and its associated intellectual property for approximately $ 200.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , plus an additional $ 50.0 million if a certain european regulatory approval is obtained within 10 years of the acquisition closing date . the option expires two years after the closing date of the transaction , but can be extended by up to one year depending on the results of certain clinical trials . valtech is a developer of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair system . the company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products . the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination . tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date . the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 22.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>developed technology</td><td>109.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ipr&d</td><td>87.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities assumed</td><td>-5.1 ( 5.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-17.6 ( 17.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>515.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less : cash acquired</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total purchase price net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 511.3</td></tr></table> goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition . goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s rest of world segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach . this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return . the discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) . completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies .
Question: what was the total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d in 2017?
Answer: 0.6
Question: and what was that in 2016?
| 4.1 |
CONVFINQA10096 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . acquisitions ( continued ) transaction closed on january 23 , 2017 , and the consideration paid included the issuance of approximately 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock ( fair value of $ 266.5 million ) and cash of $ 86.2 million . the company recognized in 201ccontingent consideration liabilities 201d a $ 162.9 million liability for the estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments . the fair value of the contingent milestone payments will be remeasured each quarter , with changes in the fair value recognized within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations . for further information on the fair value of the contingent milestone payments , see note 10 . in connection with the acquisition , the company placed $ 27.6 million of the purchase price into escrow to satisfy any claims for indemnification made in accordance with the merger agreement . any funds remaining 15 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to valtech 2019s former shareholders . acquisition-related costs of $ 0.6 million and $ 4.1 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . prior to the close of the transaction , valtech spun off its early- stage transseptal mitral valve replacement technology program . concurrent with the closing , the company entered into an agreement for an exclusive option to acquire that program and its associated intellectual property for approximately $ 200.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , plus an additional $ 50.0 million if a certain european regulatory approval is obtained within 10 years of the acquisition closing date . the option expires two years after the closing date of the transaction , but can be extended by up to one year depending on the results of certain clinical trials . valtech is a developer of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair system . the company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products . the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination . tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date . the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 22.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>developed technology</td><td>109.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ipr&d</td><td>87.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities assumed</td><td>-5.1 ( 5.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-17.6 ( 17.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>515.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less : cash acquired</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total purchase price net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 511.3</td></tr></table> goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition . goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s rest of world segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach . this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return . the discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) . completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies .
Question: what was the total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d in 2017?
Answer: 0.6
Question: and what was that in 2016?
Answer: 4.1
Question: what was, then, the combined total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d for the two years?
| 4.7 |
CONVFINQA10097 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
edwards lifesciences corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 7 . acquisitions ( continued ) transaction closed on january 23 , 2017 , and the consideration paid included the issuance of approximately 2.8 million shares of the company 2019s common stock ( fair value of $ 266.5 million ) and cash of $ 86.2 million . the company recognized in 201ccontingent consideration liabilities 201d a $ 162.9 million liability for the estimated fair value of the contingent milestone payments . the fair value of the contingent milestone payments will be remeasured each quarter , with changes in the fair value recognized within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations . for further information on the fair value of the contingent milestone payments , see note 10 . in connection with the acquisition , the company placed $ 27.6 million of the purchase price into escrow to satisfy any claims for indemnification made in accordance with the merger agreement . any funds remaining 15 months after the acquisition date will be disbursed to valtech 2019s former shareholders . acquisition-related costs of $ 0.6 million and $ 4.1 million were recorded in 201cselling , general , and administrative expenses 201d during the years ended december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . prior to the close of the transaction , valtech spun off its early- stage transseptal mitral valve replacement technology program . concurrent with the closing , the company entered into an agreement for an exclusive option to acquire that program and its associated intellectual property for approximately $ 200.0 million , subject to certain adjustments , plus an additional $ 50.0 million if a certain european regulatory approval is obtained within 10 years of the acquisition closing date . the option expires two years after the closing date of the transaction , but can be extended by up to one year depending on the results of certain clinical trials . valtech is a developer of a transcatheter mitral and tricuspid valve repair system . the company plans to add this technology to its portfolio of mitral and tricuspid repair products . the acquisition was accounted for as a business combination . tangible and intangible assets acquired were recorded based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date . the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired was recorded to goodwill . the following table summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>current assets</td><td>$ 22.7</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>property and equipment net</td><td>1.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>goodwill</td><td>316.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>developed technology</td><td>109.2</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>ipr&d</td><td>87.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other assets</td><td>0.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>current liabilities assumed</td><td>-5.1 ( 5.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>deferred income taxes</td><td>-17.6 ( 17.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>total purchase price</td><td>515.6</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>less : cash acquired</td><td>-4.3 ( 4.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>total purchase price net of cash acquired</td><td>$ 511.3</td></tr></table> goodwill includes expected synergies and other benefits the company believes will result from the acquisition . goodwill was assigned to the company 2019s rest of world segment and is not deductible for tax purposes . ipr&d has been capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and will be assessed for impairment in subsequent periods . the fair value of the ipr&d was determined using the income approach . this approach determines fair value based on cash flow projections which are discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return . the discount rates used to determine the fair value of the ipr&d ranged from 18.0% ( 18.0 % ) to 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) . completion of successful design developments , bench testing , pre-clinical studies .
Question: what was the total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d in 2017?
Answer: 0.6
Question: and what was that in 2016?
Answer: 4.1
Question: what was, then, the combined total of acquisition-related costs recorded in 201cselling, general, and administrative expenses 201d for the two years?
Answer: 4.7
Question: and how much does this combined total represent in relation to the total of current assets, in percentage?
| 0.20705 |
CONVFINQA10098 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .
Question: what was the volatility in 2017?
| 22.91 |
CONVFINQA10099 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .
Question: what was the volatility in 2017?
Answer: 22.91
Question: and what was it in 2016?
| 21.68 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.