id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA10100 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .
Question: what was the volatility in 2017?
Answer: 22.91
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 21.68
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 1.23 |
CONVFINQA10101 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareholder value award program svas are granted to officers and management and are payable in shares of our common stock . the number of shares actually issued , if any , varies depending on our stock price at the end of the three-year vesting period compared to pre-established target stock prices . we measure the fair value of the sva unit on the grant date using a monte carlo simulation model . the model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the market condition stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair value of the award . expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock , historical volatility of our stock price , and other factors . similarly , the dividend yield is based on historical experience and our estimate of future dividend yields . the risk-free interest rate is derived from the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant . the weighted-average fair values of the sva units granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 48.51 , $ 66.25 , and $ 48.68 , respectively , determined using the following assumptions: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( percents )</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>expected dividend yield</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.50% ( 2.50 % )</td><td>2.00% ( 2.00 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>2.31</td><td>1.38</td><td>0.92</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volatility</td><td>22.26</td><td>22.91</td><td>21.68</td></tr></table> pursuant to this program , approximately 0.7 million shares , 1.1 million shares , and 1.0 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 1.0 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested svas was $ 55.7 million , which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 20 months . restricted stock units rsus are granted to certain employees and are payable in shares of our common stock . rsu shares are accounted for at fair value based upon the closing stock price on the date of grant . the corresponding expense is amortized over the vesting period , typically three years . the fair values of rsu awards granted during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 were $ 70.95 , $ 72.47 , and $ 71.46 , respectively . the number of shares ultimately issued for the rsu program remains constant with the exception of forfeitures . pursuant to this program , 1.3 million , 1.4 million , and 1.3 million shares were granted and approximately 1.0 million , 0.9 million , and 0.6 million shares were issued during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . approximately 0.8 million shares are expected to be issued in 2019 . as of december 31 , 2018 , the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested rsus was $ 112.2 million , which will be amortized over the weighted- average remaining requisite service period of 21 months . note 12 : shareholders' equity during 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , we repurchased $ 4.15 billion , $ 359.8 million and $ 540.1 million , respectively , of shares associated with our share repurchase programs . a payment of $ 60.0 million was made in 2016 for shares repurchased in 2017 . during 2018 , we repurchased $ 2.05 billion of shares , which completed the $ 5.00 billion share repurchase program announced in october 2013 and our board authorized an $ 8.00 billion share repurchase program . there were $ 2.10 billion repurchased under the $ 8.00 billion program in 2018 . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were $ 5.90 billion of shares remaining under the 2018 program . we have 5.0 million authorized shares of preferred stock . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , no preferred stock was issued . we have an employee benefit trust that held 50.0 million shares of our common stock at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , to provide a source of funds to assist us in meeting our obligations under various employee benefit plans . the cost basis of the shares held in the trust was $ 3.01 billion at both december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , and is shown as a reduction of shareholders 2019 equity . any dividend transactions between us and the trust are eliminated . stock held by the trust is not considered outstanding in the computation of eps . the assets of the trust were not used to fund any of our obligations under these employee benefit plans during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and .
Question: what was the volatility in 2017?
Answer: 22.91
Question: and what was it in 2016?
Answer: 21.68
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 1.23
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2016 volatility, in percentage?
| 0.05673 |
CONVFINQA10102 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 12 2014security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters we incorporate by reference in this item 12 the information relating to ownership of our common stock by certain persons contained under the headings 201ccommon stock ownership of management 201d and 201ccommon stock ownership by certain other persons 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009 . we have four compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance . the global payments inc . amended and restated 2000 long-term incentive plan , global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan , the non-employee director stock option plan , and employee stock purchase plan have been approved by security holders . the information in the table below is as of may 31 , 2009 . for more information on these plans , see note 11 to notes to consolidated financial statements . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4292668 $ 28 6570132 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options warrants andrights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders:</td><td>4292668</td><td>$ 28</td><td>6570132</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>4292668</td><td>$ 28</td><td>6570132</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) also includes shares of common stock available for issuance other than upon the exercise of an option , warrant or right under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan and an amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan . item 13 2014certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence we incorporate by reference in this item 13 the information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between us and some of our affiliates and the independence of our board of directors contained under the headings 201ccertain relationships and related transactions 201d and 201cother information about the board and its committees 2014director independence 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009 . item 14 2014principal accounting fees and services we incorporate by reference in this item 14 the information regarding principal accounting fees and services contained under the heading 201cauditor information 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009. .
Question: what is the number of securities approved by security holders that remain to be issued in the future by the price per security?
| 183963696.0 |
CONVFINQA10103 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 12 2014security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters we incorporate by reference in this item 12 the information relating to ownership of our common stock by certain persons contained under the headings 201ccommon stock ownership of management 201d and 201ccommon stock ownership by certain other persons 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009 . we have four compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance . the global payments inc . amended and restated 2000 long-term incentive plan , global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan , the non-employee director stock option plan , and employee stock purchase plan have been approved by security holders . the information in the table below is as of may 31 , 2009 . for more information on these plans , see note 11 to notes to consolidated financial statements . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4292668 $ 28 6570132 ( 1 ) equity compensation plans not approved by security holders: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a )</td><td>weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options warrants andrights ( b )</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders:</td><td>4292668</td><td>$ 28</td><td>6570132</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>4292668</td><td>$ 28</td><td>6570132</td><td>-1 ( 1 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) also includes shares of common stock available for issuance other than upon the exercise of an option , warrant or right under the global payments inc . 2000 long-term incentive plan , as amended and restated , the global payments inc . amended and restated 2005 incentive plan and an amended and restated 2000 non-employee director stock option plan . item 13 2014certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence we incorporate by reference in this item 13 the information regarding certain relationships and related transactions between us and some of our affiliates and the independence of our board of directors contained under the headings 201ccertain relationships and related transactions 201d and 201cother information about the board and its committees 2014director independence 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009 . item 14 2014principal accounting fees and services we incorporate by reference in this item 14 the information regarding principal accounting fees and services contained under the heading 201cauditor information 201d from our proxy statement to be delivered in connection with our 2009 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on september 30 , 2009. .
Question: what is the number of securities approved by security holders that remain to be issued in the future by the price per security?
Answer: 183963696.0
Question: what is that simplified?
| 183.9637 |
CONVFINQA10104 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
acquired is represented by allied 2019s infrastructure of market-based collection routes and its related integrated waste transfer and disposal channels , whose value has been included in goodwill . all of the goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from the allied acquisition are not deductible for income tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from december 5 , 2008 , the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the acquisition had been completed as of january 1 , 2008 . the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . furthermore , the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the acquisition ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>285.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>0.75</td></tr></table> the unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . restructuring charges as a result of the 2008 allied acquisition , we committed to a restructuring plan related to our corporate overhead and other administrative and operating functions . the plan included closing our corporate office in florida , consolidating administrative functions to arizona , the former headquarters of allied , and reducing staffing levels . the plan also included closing and consolidating certain operating locations and terminating certain leases . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we incurred $ 11.4 million , net of adjustments , and $ 63.2 million , respectively , of restructuring and integration charges related to our integration of allied . these charges and adjustments primarily related to severance and other employee termination and relocation benefits and consulting and professional fees . substantially all the charges are recorded in our corporate segment . we do not expect to incur additional charges to complete our plan . we expect that the remaining charges will be paid during 2011 . republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: in the year of 2008, how much did the net income represent in relation to the revenue?
| 0.03052 |
CONVFINQA10105 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
acquired is represented by allied 2019s infrastructure of market-based collection routes and its related integrated waste transfer and disposal channels , whose value has been included in goodwill . all of the goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from the allied acquisition are not deductible for income tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from december 5 , 2008 , the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the acquisition had been completed as of january 1 , 2008 . the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . furthermore , the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the acquisition ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>revenue</td><td>$ 9362.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net income</td><td>285.7</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>basic earnings per share</td><td>0.76</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>diluted earnings per share</td><td>0.75</td></tr></table> the unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . restructuring charges as a result of the 2008 allied acquisition , we committed to a restructuring plan related to our corporate overhead and other administrative and operating functions . the plan included closing our corporate office in florida , consolidating administrative functions to arizona , the former headquarters of allied , and reducing staffing levels . the plan also included closing and consolidating certain operating locations and terminating certain leases . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we incurred $ 11.4 million , net of adjustments , and $ 63.2 million , respectively , of restructuring and integration charges related to our integration of allied . these charges and adjustments primarily related to severance and other employee termination and relocation benefits and consulting and professional fees . substantially all the charges are recorded in our corporate segment . we do not expect to incur additional charges to complete our plan . we expect that the remaining charges will be paid during 2011 . republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .
Question: in the year of 2008, how much did the net income represent in relation to the revenue?
Answer: 0.03052
Question: and concerning the two subsequent years, how much did the restructuring and integration charges related to the integration in 2009 represent in relation to the ones in 2010?
| 5.54386 |
CONVFINQA10106 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of ups in 2003?
| 119.89 |
CONVFINQA10107 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of ups in 2003?
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change in its value considering the amount originally invested in it in 2002?
| 19.89 |
CONVFINQA10108 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 119.89</td><td>$ 139.55</td><td>$ 124.88</td><td>$ 127.08</td><td>$ 122.64</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 128.68</td><td>$ 142.68</td><td>$ 149.69</td><td>$ 173.33</td><td>$ 182.85</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 131.84</td><td>$ 168.39</td><td>$ 188.00</td><td>$ 206.46</td><td>$ 209.40</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the value of ups in 2003?
Answer: 119.89
Question: what was, then, the change in its value considering the amount originally invested in it in 2002?
Answer: 19.89
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to this original amount invested?
| 0.1989 |
CONVFINQA10109 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in value of collateral posted from 2013 to 2014?
| 12646.0 |
CONVFINQA10110 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in value of collateral posted from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 12646.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
| 18178.0 |
CONVFINQA10111 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements derivatives with credit-related contingent features certain of the firm 2019s derivatives have been transacted under bilateral agreements with counterparties who may require the firm to post collateral or terminate the transactions based on changes in the firm 2019s credit ratings . the firm assesses the impact of these bilateral agreements by determining the collateral or termination payments that would occur assuming a downgrade by all rating agencies . a downgrade by any one rating agency , depending on the agency 2019s relative ratings of the firm at the time of the downgrade , may have an impact which is comparable to the impact of a downgrade by all rating agencies . the table below presents the aggregate fair value of net derivative liabilities under such agreements ( excluding application of collateral posted to reduce these liabilities ) , the related aggregate fair value of the assets posted as collateral , and the additional collateral or termination payments that could have been called at the reporting date by counterparties in the event of a one-notch and two-notch downgrade in the firm 2019s credit ratings. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>$ in millions</td><td>as of december 2014</td><td>as of december 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net derivative liabilities under bilateral agreements</td><td>$ 35764</td><td>$ 22176</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>collateral posted</td><td>30824</td><td>18178</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade</td><td>1072</td><td>911</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade</td><td>2815</td><td>2989</td></tr></table> additional collateral or termination payments for a one-notch downgrade 1072 911 additional collateral or termination payments for a two-notch downgrade 2815 2989 credit derivatives the firm enters into a broad array of credit derivatives in locations around the world to facilitate client transactions and to manage the credit risk associated with market- making and investing and lending activities . credit derivatives are actively managed based on the firm 2019s net risk position . credit derivatives are individually negotiated contracts and can have various settlement and payment conventions . credit events include failure to pay , bankruptcy , acceleration of indebtedness , restructuring , repudiation and dissolution of the reference entity . credit default swaps . single-name credit default swaps protect the buyer against the loss of principal on one or more bonds , loans or mortgages ( reference obligations ) in the event the issuer ( reference entity ) of the reference obligations suffers a credit event . the buyer of protection pays an initial or periodic premium to the seller and receives protection for the period of the contract . if there is no credit event , as defined in the contract , the seller of protection makes no payments to the buyer of protection . however , if a credit event occurs , the seller of protection is required to make a payment to the buyer of protection , which is calculated in accordance with the terms of the contract . credit indices , baskets and tranches . credit derivatives may reference a basket of single-name credit default swaps or a broad-based index . if a credit event occurs in one of the underlying reference obligations , the protection seller pays the protection buyer . the payment is typically a pro-rata portion of the transaction 2019s total notional amount based on the underlying defaulted reference obligation . in certain transactions , the credit risk of a basket or index is separated into various portions ( tranches ) , each having different levels of subordination . the most junior tranches cover initial defaults and once losses exceed the notional amount of these junior tranches , any excess loss is covered by the next most senior tranche in the capital structure . total return swaps . a total return swap transfers the risks relating to economic performance of a reference obligation from the protection buyer to the protection seller . typically , the protection buyer receives from the protection seller a floating rate of interest and protection against any reduction in fair value of the reference obligation , and in return the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference obligation , plus any increase in the fair value of the reference obligation . 132 goldman sachs 2014 annual report .
Question: what was the net change in value of collateral posted from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 12646.0
Question: what was the 2013 value?
Answer: 18178.0
Question: what is the change divided by the 2013 value?
| 0.69568 |
CONVFINQA10112 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008?
| 7603.0 |
CONVFINQA10113 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008?
Answer: 7603.0
Question: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid?
| -6327.0 |
CONVFINQA10114 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008?
Answer: 7603.0
Question: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: -6327.0
Question: what then became that balance after these losses and loss expenses paid?
| 1276.0 |
CONVFINQA10115 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008?
Answer: 7603.0
Question: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: -6327.0
Question: what then became that balance after these losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: 1276.0
Question: and what was the total in other losses ( including foreign exchange revaluation )?
| -980.0 |
CONVFINQA10116 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008?
Answer: 7603.0
Question: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: -6327.0
Question: what then became that balance after these losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: 1276.0
Question: and what was the total in other losses ( including foreign exchange revaluation )?
Answer: -980.0
Question: what then became that balance of unpaid losses after these other losses?
| 296.0 |
CONVFINQA10117 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
we are continuing to invest in people and infrastructure to grow our presence in lines of businesses globally where we see an opportunity for ace to grow market share at reasonable terms . we are also continuing to invest in our enterprise risk management capability , our systems and data environment , and our research and development capabilities . critical accounting estimates our consolidated financial statements include amounts that , either by their nature or due to requirements of accounting princi- ples generally accepted in the u.s . ( gaap ) , are determined using best estimates and assumptions . while we believe that the amounts included in our consolidated financial statements reflect our best judgment , actual amounts could ultimately materi- ally differ from those currently presented . we believe the items that require the most subjective and complex estimates are : 2022 unpaid loss and loss expense reserves , including long-tail asbestos and environmental ( a&e ) reserves ; 2022 future policy benefits reserves ; 2022 valuation of value of business acquired ( voba ) and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and voba ; 2022 the assessment of risk transfer for certain structured insurance and reinsurance contracts ; 2022 reinsurance recoverable , including a provision for uncollectible reinsurance ; 2022 impairments to the carrying value of our investment portfolio ; 2022 the valuation of deferred tax assets ; 2022 the valuation of derivative instruments related to guaranteed minimum income benefits ( gmib ) ; and 2022 the valuation of goodwill . we believe our accounting policies for these items are of critical importance to our consolidated financial statements . the following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions required to arrive at these amounts and should be read in conjunction with the sections entitled : prior period development , asbestos and environmental and other run-off liabilities , reinsurance recoverable on ceded reinsurance , investments , net realized gains ( losses ) , and other income and expense items . unpaid losses and loss expenses as an insurance and reinsurance company , we are required , by applicable laws and regulations and gaap , to establish loss and loss expense reserves for the estimated unpaid portion of the ultimate liability for losses and loss expenses under the terms of our policies and agreements with our insured and reinsured customers . the estimate of the liabilities includes provisions for claims that have been reported but unpaid at the balance sheet date ( case reserves ) and for future obligations from claims that have been incurred but not reported ( ibnr ) at the balance sheet date ( ibnr may also include a provision for additional devel- opment on reported claims in instances where the case reserve is viewed to be potentially insufficient ) . the reserves provide for liabilities that exist for the company as of the balance sheet date . the loss reserve also includes an estimate of expenses associated with processing and settling these unpaid claims ( loss expenses ) . at december 31 , 2008 , our gross unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 37.2 billion and our net unpaid loss and loss expense reserves were $ 24.2 billion . with the exception of certain structured settlements , for which the timing and amount of future claim payments are reliably determi- nable , our loss reserves are not discounted for the time value of money . in connection with such structured settlements , we carry reserves of $ 106 million ( net of discount ) . the table below presents a roll-forward of our unpaid losses and loss expenses for the indicated periods . ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) losses reinsurance recoverable net losses . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions of u.s . dollars )</td><td>gross losses</td><td>reinsurance recoverable</td><td>net losses</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>balance at december 31 2006</td><td>$ 35517</td><td>$ 13509</td><td>$ 22008</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10831</td><td>3480</td><td>7351</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9516 ( 9516 )</td><td>-3582 ( 3582 )</td><td>-5934 ( 5934 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>280</td><td>113</td><td>167</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>balance at december 31 2007</td><td>37112</td><td>13520</td><td>23592</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>losses and loss expenses incurred</td><td>10944</td><td>3341</td><td>7603</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>losses and loss expenses paid</td><td>-9899 ( 9899 )</td><td>-3572 ( 3572 )</td><td>-6327 ( 6327 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( including foreign exchange revaluation )</td><td>-1367 ( 1367 )</td><td>-387 ( 387 )</td><td>-980 ( 980 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>losses and loss expenses acquired</td><td>386</td><td>33</td><td>353</td></tr><tr><td>11</td><td>balance at december 31 2008</td><td>$ 37176</td><td>$ 12935</td><td>$ 24241</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the balance of unpaid losses in the beginning of 2008?
Answer: 7603.0
Question: and what was the total of losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: -6327.0
Question: what then became that balance after these losses and loss expenses paid?
Answer: 1276.0
Question: and what was the total in other losses ( including foreign exchange revaluation )?
Answer: -980.0
Question: what then became that balance of unpaid losses after these other losses?
Answer: 296.0
Question: and including the losses and loss expenses that were acquired what became that balance?
| 649.0 |
CONVFINQA10118 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the service cost in 2013?
| 682.0 |
CONVFINQA10119 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the service cost in 2013?
Answer: 682.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
| 555.0 |
CONVFINQA10120 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the service cost in 2013?
Answer: 682.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
Answer: 555.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2013 amount represent in relation to this 2012 one?
| 1.22883 |
CONVFINQA10121 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the service cost in 2013?
Answer: 682.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
Answer: 555.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2013 amount represent in relation to this 2012 one?
Answer: 1.22883
Question: and what is this value excluding the part equivalent to the 2012 amount?
| 0.22883 |
CONVFINQA10122 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the service cost in 2013?
Answer: 682.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
Answer: 555.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2013 amount represent in relation to this 2012 one?
Answer: 1.22883
Question: and what is this value excluding the part equivalent to the 2012 amount?
Answer: 0.22883
Question: and between those two years, what was the variation in the net amortization?
| 151.0 |
CONVFINQA10123 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
13 . pension and other postretirement benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees in the united states and in certain of its international subsidiaries . as a result of plan design changes approved in 2011 , beginning on january 1 , 2013 , active participants in merck 2019s primary u.s . defined benefit pension plans are accruing pension benefits using new cash balance formulas based on age , service , pay and interest . however , during a transition period from january 1 , 2013 through december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn the greater of the benefit as calculated under the employee 2019s legacy final average pay formula or their new cash balance formula . for all years of service after december 31 , 2019 , participants will earn future benefits under only the cash balance formula . in addition , the company provides medical benefits , principally to its eligible u.s . retirees and their dependents , through its other postretirement benefit plans . the company uses december 31 as the year-end measurement date for all of its pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans . net periodic benefit cost the net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans consisted of the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>years ended december 31</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>pension benefits 2011</td><td>pension benefits 2013</td><td>pension benefits 2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 682</td><td>$ 555</td><td>$ 619</td><td>$ 102</td><td>$ 82</td><td>$ 110</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>665</td><td>661</td><td>718</td><td>107</td><td>121</td><td>141</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-1097 ( 1097 )</td><td>-970 ( 970 )</td><td>-972 ( 972 )</td><td>-126 ( 126 )</td><td>-136 ( 136 )</td><td>-142 ( 142 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net amortization</td><td>336</td><td>185</td><td>201</td><td>-50 ( 50 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-17 ( 17 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>termination benefits</td><td>58</td><td>27</td><td>59</td><td>50</td><td>18</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>curtailments</td><td>-23 ( 23 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-86 ( 86 )</td><td>-11 ( 11 )</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>settlements</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net periodic benefit cost</td><td>$ 644</td><td>$ 466</td><td>$ 543</td><td>$ 72</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 122</td></tr></table> the increase in net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefit plans in 2013 as compared with 2012 is largely attributable to a change in the discount rate . the net periodic benefit cost attributable to u.s . pension plans included in the above table was $ 348 million in 2013 , $ 268 million in 2012 and $ 406 million in in connection with restructuring actions ( see note 3 ) , termination charges were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans related to expanded eligibility for certain employees exiting merck . also , in connection with these restructuring activities , curtailments were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on pension and other postretirement benefit plans . in addition , settlements were recorded in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 on certain domestic and international pension plans . table of contents .
Question: what was the service cost in 2013?
Answer: 682.0
Question: and what was it in 2012?
Answer: 555.0
Question: how much, then, did the 2013 amount represent in relation to this 2012 one?
Answer: 1.22883
Question: and what is this value excluding the part equivalent to the 2012 amount?
Answer: 0.22883
Question: and between those two years, what was the variation in the net amortization?
Answer: 151.0
Question: what is this variation as a percentage of that net amortization in 2012?
| 0.81622 |
CONVFINQA10124 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
research and development we are committed to investing in highly productive research and development capabilities , particularly in electro-mechanical systems . our research and development ( "r&d" ) expenditures were approximately $ 48.3 million , $ 47.3 million and $ 45.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we concentrate on developing technology innovations that will deliver growth through the introduction of new products and solutions , and also on driving continuous improvements in product cost , quality , safety and sustainability . we manage our r&d team as a global group with an emphasis on a global collaborative approach to identify and develop new technologies and worldwide product platforms . we are organized on a regional basis to leverage expertise in local standards and configurations . in addition to regional engineering centers in each geographic region , we also operate a global engineering center of excellence in bangalore , india . seasonality our business experiences seasonality that varies by product line . because more construction and do-it-yourself projects occur during the second and third calendar quarters of each year in the northern hemisphere , our security product sales , typically , are higher in those quarters than in the first and fourth calendar quarters . however , our interflex business typically experiences higher sales in the fourth calendar quarter due to project timing . revenue by quarter for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> employees we currently have approximately 10000 employees . environmental regulation we have a dedicated environmental program that is designed to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process as well as to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , we are currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . we are sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and have received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency ( the "epa" ) and similar state authorities . we have also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( "prp" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , our involvement is minimal . in estimating our liability , we have assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . we incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . of these amounts $ 8.9 million and $ 9.6 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain. .
Question: what was the value of r&d expenditures in 2017 divided by those in 2016?
| 1.02114 |
CONVFINQA10125 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
research and development we are committed to investing in highly productive research and development capabilities , particularly in electro-mechanical systems . our research and development ( "r&d" ) expenditures were approximately $ 48.3 million , $ 47.3 million and $ 45.2 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . we concentrate on developing technology innovations that will deliver growth through the introduction of new products and solutions , and also on driving continuous improvements in product cost , quality , safety and sustainability . we manage our r&d team as a global group with an emphasis on a global collaborative approach to identify and develop new technologies and worldwide product platforms . we are organized on a regional basis to leverage expertise in local standards and configurations . in addition to regional engineering centers in each geographic region , we also operate a global engineering center of excellence in bangalore , india . seasonality our business experiences seasonality that varies by product line . because more construction and do-it-yourself projects occur during the second and third calendar quarters of each year in the northern hemisphere , our security product sales , typically , are higher in those quarters than in the first and fourth calendar quarters . however , our interflex business typically experiences higher sales in the fourth calendar quarter due to project timing . revenue by quarter for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>first quarter</td><td>second quarter</td><td>third quarter</td><td>fourth quarter</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>23% ( 23 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>22% ( 22 % )</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td><td>26% ( 26 % )</td><td>27% ( 27 % )</td></tr></table> employees we currently have approximately 10000 employees . environmental regulation we have a dedicated environmental program that is designed to reduce the utilization and generation of hazardous materials during the manufacturing process as well as to remediate identified environmental concerns . as to the latter , we are currently engaged in site investigations and remediation activities to address environmental cleanup from past operations at current and former production facilities . the company regularly evaluates its remediation programs and considers alternative remediation methods that are in addition to , or in replacement of , those currently utilized by the company based upon enhanced technology and regulatory changes . we are sometimes a party to environmental lawsuits and claims and have received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the u.s . environmental protection agency ( the "epa" ) and similar state authorities . we have also been identified as a potentially responsible party ( "prp" ) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal superfund and state remediation sites . for all such sites , there are other prps and , in most instances , our involvement is minimal . in estimating our liability , we have assumed that we will not bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other prps who may be jointly and severally liable . the ability of other prps to participate has been taken into account , based on our understanding of the parties 2019 financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis . additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future . we incurred $ 3.2 million , $ 23.3 million , and $ 4.4 million of expenses during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively , for environmental remediation at sites presently or formerly owned or leased by us . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded reserves for environmental matters of $ 28.9 million and $ 30.6 million . of these amounts $ 8.9 million and $ 9.6 million , respectively , relate to remediation of sites previously disposed by us . given the evolving nature of environmental laws , regulations and technology , the ultimate cost of future compliance is uncertain. .
Question: what was the value of r&d expenditures in 2017 divided by those in 2016?
Answer: 1.02114
Question: what is that value less 1?
| 0.02114 |
CONVFINQA10126 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what were north american paper sales in 2012?
| 2.7 |
CONVFINQA10127 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what were north american paper sales in 2012?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what is that times 1000?
| 2700.0 |
CONVFINQA10128 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
million excluding a gain on a bargain purchase price adjustment on the acquisition of a majority share of our operations in turkey and restructuring costs ) compared with $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) in 2012 and $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our then joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 . sales volumes in 2013 were higher than in 2012 reflecting strong demand for packaging in the agricultural markets in morocco and turkey . in europe , sales volumes decreased slightly due to continuing weak demand for packaging in the industrial markets , and lower demand for packaging in the agricultural markets resulting from poor weather conditions . average sales margins were significantly lower due to input costs for containerboard rising ahead of box sales price increases . other input costs were also higher , primarily for energy . operating profits in 2013 and 2012 included net gains of $ 13 million and $ 10 million , respectively , for insurance settlements and italian government grants , partially offset by additional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may 2012 which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to increase slightly reflecting higher demand for packaging in the industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to gradually improve as a result of slight reductions in material costs and planned box price increases . other input costs should be about flat . brazilian industrial packaging includes the results of orsa international paper embalagens s.a. , a corrugated packaging producer in which international paper acquired a 75% ( 75 % ) share in january 2013 . net sales were $ 335 million in 2013 . operating profits in 2013 were a loss of $ 2 million ( a gain of $ 2 million excluding acquisition and integration costs ) . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes are expected to be seasonally lower than in the fourth quarter of 2013 . average sales margins should improve reflecting the partial implementation of an announced sales price increase and a more favorable product mix . operating costs and input costs are expected to be lower . asian industrial packaging net sales were $ 400 million in 2013 compared with $ 400 million in 2012 and $ 410 million in 2011 . operating profits for the packaging operations were a loss of $ 5 million in 2013 ( a loss of $ 1 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with gains of $ 2 million in 2012 and $ 2 million in 2011 . operating profits were favorably impacted in 2013 by higher average sales margins and slightly higher sales volumes compared with 2012 , but these benefits were offset by higher operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2014 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to be seasonally soft . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 285 million in 2013 compared with $ 260 million in 2012 and $ 285 million in 2011 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 . printing papers demand for printing papers products is closely correlated with changes in commercial printing and advertising activity , direct mail volumes and , for uncoated cut-size products , with changes in white- collar employment levels that affect the usage of copy and laser printer paper . pulp is further affected by changes in currency rates that can enhance or disadvantage producers in different geographic regions . principal cost drivers include manufacturing efficiency , raw material and energy costs and freight costs . printing papers net sales for 2013 were about flat with both 2012 and 2011 . operating profits in 2013 were 55% ( 55 % ) lower than in 2012 and 69% ( 69 % ) lower than in 2011 . excluding facility closure costs and impairment costs , operating profits in 2013 were 15% ( 15 % ) lower than in 2012 and 40% ( 40 % ) lower than in 2011 . benefits from lower operating costs ( $ 81 million ) and lower maintenance outage costs ( $ 17 million ) were more than offset by lower average sales price realizations ( $ 38 million ) , lower sales volumes ( $ 14 million ) , higher input costs ( $ 99 million ) and higher other costs ( $ 34 million ) . in addition , operating profits in 2013 included costs of $ 118 million associated with the announced closure of our courtland , alabama mill . during 2013 , the company accelerated depreciation for certain courtland assets , and diligently evaluated certain other assets for possible alternative uses by one of our other businesses . the net book value of these assets at december 31 , 2013 was approximately $ 470 million . during 2014 , we have continued our evaluation and expect to conclude as to any uses for these assets during the first quarter of 2014 . operating profits also included a $ 123 million impairment charge associated with goodwill and a trade name intangible asset in our india papers business . operating profits in 2011 included a $ 24 million gain related to the announced repurposing of our franklin , virginia mill to produce fluff pulp and an $ 11 million impairment charge related to our inverurie , scotland mill that was closed in 2009 . printing papers . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 6205</td><td>$ 6230</td><td>$ 6215</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>271</td><td>599</td><td>872</td></tr></table> north american printing papers net sales were $ 2.6 billion in 2013 , $ 2.7 billion in 2012 and $ 2.8 billion in 2011. .
Question: what were north american paper sales in 2012?
Answer: 2.7
Question: what is that times 1000?
Answer: 2700.0
Question: what is that value over total 2012 sales?
| 0.43339 |
CONVFINQA10129 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contribution incurred in 2013 and foreign currency remeasurement , partially offset by the $ 50 million reduction of an indemnification asset . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 362 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , to $ 6518 million in 2014 from $ 6156 million in 2013 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits and direct fund expense . amounts related to the reduction of the indemnification asset and the charitable contribution have been excluded from as adjusted results . 2013 compared with 2012 gaap . expense increased $ 510 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , from 2012 , primarily reflecting higher revenue-related expense and the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution . employee compensation and benefits expense increased $ 273 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 3560 million in 2013 from $ 3287 million in 2012 , reflecting higher headcount and higher incentive compensation driven by higher operating income , including higher performance fees . employees at december 31 , 2013 totaled approximately 11400 compared with approximately 10500 at december 31 , 2012 . distribution and servicing costs totaled $ 353 million in 2013 compared with $ 364 million in 2012 . these costs included payments to bank of america/merrill lynch under a global distribution agreement and payments to pnc , as well as other third parties , primarily associated with the distribution and servicing of client investments in certain blackrock products . distribution and servicing costs for 2013 and 2012 included $ 184 million and $ 195 million , respectively , attributable to bank of america/merrill lynch . direct fund expense increased $ 66 million , reflecting higher average aum , primarily related to ishares , where blackrock pays certain nonadvisory expense of the funds . general and administration expense increased $ 181 million , largely driven by the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution , higher marketing and promotional costs and various lease exit costs . the full year 2012 included a one-time $ 30 million contribution to stifs . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 393 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , to $ 6156 million in 2013 from $ 5763 million in 2012 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits , direct fund expense and general and administration expense . nonoperating results nonoperating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was as follows : ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 nonoperating income ( expense ) , gaap basis $ ( 79 ) $ 116 $ ( 54 ) less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci ( 1 ) ( 30 ) 19 ( 18 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 ) ( 49 ) 97 ( 36 ) gain related to the charitable contribution 2014 ( 80 ) 2014 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 7 ) ( 10 ) ( 6 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) , as adjusted ( 2 ) $ ( 56 ) $ 7 $ ( 42 ) ( 1 ) amounts included losses of $ 41 million and $ 38 million attributable to consolidated variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) for 2014 and 2012 , respectively . during 2013 , the company did not record any nonoperating income ( loss ) or net income ( loss ) attributable to vies on the consolidated statements of income . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ -79 ( 79 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributableto nci ( 1 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td><td>19</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>97</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain related to the charitable contribution</td><td>2014</td><td>-80 ( 80 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) asadjusted ( 2 )</td><td>$ -56 ( 56 )</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ -42 ( 42 )</td></tr></table> contribution incurred in 2013 and foreign currency remeasurement , partially offset by the $ 50 million reduction of an indemnification asset . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 362 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , to $ 6518 million in 2014 from $ 6156 million in 2013 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits and direct fund expense . amounts related to the reduction of the indemnification asset and the charitable contribution have been excluded from as adjusted results . 2013 compared with 2012 gaap . expense increased $ 510 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , from 2012 , primarily reflecting higher revenue-related expense and the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution . employee compensation and benefits expense increased $ 273 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 3560 million in 2013 from $ 3287 million in 2012 , reflecting higher headcount and higher incentive compensation driven by higher operating income , including higher performance fees . employees at december 31 , 2013 totaled approximately 11400 compared with approximately 10500 at december 31 , 2012 . distribution and servicing costs totaled $ 353 million in 2013 compared with $ 364 million in 2012 . these costs included payments to bank of america/merrill lynch under a global distribution agreement and payments to pnc , as well as other third parties , primarily associated with the distribution and servicing of client investments in certain blackrock products . distribution and servicing costs for 2013 and 2012 included $ 184 million and $ 195 million , respectively , attributable to bank of america/merrill lynch . direct fund expense increased $ 66 million , reflecting higher average aum , primarily related to ishares , where blackrock pays certain nonadvisory expense of the funds . general and administration expense increased $ 181 million , largely driven by the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution , higher marketing and promotional costs and various lease exit costs . the full year 2012 included a one-time $ 30 million contribution to stifs . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 393 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , to $ 6156 million in 2013 from $ 5763 million in 2012 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits , direct fund expense and general and administration expense . nonoperating results nonoperating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was as follows : ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 nonoperating income ( expense ) , gaap basis $ ( 79 ) $ 116 $ ( 54 ) less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci ( 1 ) ( 30 ) 19 ( 18 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 ) ( 49 ) 97 ( 36 ) gain related to the charitable contribution 2014 ( 80 ) 2014 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 7 ) ( 10 ) ( 6 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) , as adjusted ( 2 ) $ ( 56 ) $ 7 $ ( 42 ) ( 1 ) amounts included losses of $ 41 million and $ 38 million attributable to consolidated variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) for 2014 and 2012 , respectively . during 2013 , the company did not record any nonoperating income ( loss ) or net income ( loss ) attributable to vies on the consolidated statements of income . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci. .
Question: what was the employee headcount in 2013 less that in 2012?
| 900.0 |
CONVFINQA10130 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contribution incurred in 2013 and foreign currency remeasurement , partially offset by the $ 50 million reduction of an indemnification asset . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 362 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , to $ 6518 million in 2014 from $ 6156 million in 2013 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits and direct fund expense . amounts related to the reduction of the indemnification asset and the charitable contribution have been excluded from as adjusted results . 2013 compared with 2012 gaap . expense increased $ 510 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , from 2012 , primarily reflecting higher revenue-related expense and the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution . employee compensation and benefits expense increased $ 273 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 3560 million in 2013 from $ 3287 million in 2012 , reflecting higher headcount and higher incentive compensation driven by higher operating income , including higher performance fees . employees at december 31 , 2013 totaled approximately 11400 compared with approximately 10500 at december 31 , 2012 . distribution and servicing costs totaled $ 353 million in 2013 compared with $ 364 million in 2012 . these costs included payments to bank of america/merrill lynch under a global distribution agreement and payments to pnc , as well as other third parties , primarily associated with the distribution and servicing of client investments in certain blackrock products . distribution and servicing costs for 2013 and 2012 included $ 184 million and $ 195 million , respectively , attributable to bank of america/merrill lynch . direct fund expense increased $ 66 million , reflecting higher average aum , primarily related to ishares , where blackrock pays certain nonadvisory expense of the funds . general and administration expense increased $ 181 million , largely driven by the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution , higher marketing and promotional costs and various lease exit costs . the full year 2012 included a one-time $ 30 million contribution to stifs . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 393 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , to $ 6156 million in 2013 from $ 5763 million in 2012 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits , direct fund expense and general and administration expense . nonoperating results nonoperating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was as follows : ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 nonoperating income ( expense ) , gaap basis $ ( 79 ) $ 116 $ ( 54 ) less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci ( 1 ) ( 30 ) 19 ( 18 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 ) ( 49 ) 97 ( 36 ) gain related to the charitable contribution 2014 ( 80 ) 2014 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 7 ) ( 10 ) ( 6 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) , as adjusted ( 2 ) $ ( 56 ) $ 7 $ ( 42 ) ( 1 ) amounts included losses of $ 41 million and $ 38 million attributable to consolidated variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) for 2014 and 2012 , respectively . during 2013 , the company did not record any nonoperating income ( loss ) or net income ( loss ) attributable to vies on the consolidated statements of income . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ -79 ( 79 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributableto nci ( 1 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td><td>19</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>97</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain related to the charitable contribution</td><td>2014</td><td>-80 ( 80 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) asadjusted ( 2 )</td><td>$ -56 ( 56 )</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ -42 ( 42 )</td></tr></table> contribution incurred in 2013 and foreign currency remeasurement , partially offset by the $ 50 million reduction of an indemnification asset . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 362 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , to $ 6518 million in 2014 from $ 6156 million in 2013 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits and direct fund expense . amounts related to the reduction of the indemnification asset and the charitable contribution have been excluded from as adjusted results . 2013 compared with 2012 gaap . expense increased $ 510 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , from 2012 , primarily reflecting higher revenue-related expense and the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution . employee compensation and benefits expense increased $ 273 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 3560 million in 2013 from $ 3287 million in 2012 , reflecting higher headcount and higher incentive compensation driven by higher operating income , including higher performance fees . employees at december 31 , 2013 totaled approximately 11400 compared with approximately 10500 at december 31 , 2012 . distribution and servicing costs totaled $ 353 million in 2013 compared with $ 364 million in 2012 . these costs included payments to bank of america/merrill lynch under a global distribution agreement and payments to pnc , as well as other third parties , primarily associated with the distribution and servicing of client investments in certain blackrock products . distribution and servicing costs for 2013 and 2012 included $ 184 million and $ 195 million , respectively , attributable to bank of america/merrill lynch . direct fund expense increased $ 66 million , reflecting higher average aum , primarily related to ishares , where blackrock pays certain nonadvisory expense of the funds . general and administration expense increased $ 181 million , largely driven by the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution , higher marketing and promotional costs and various lease exit costs . the full year 2012 included a one-time $ 30 million contribution to stifs . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 393 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , to $ 6156 million in 2013 from $ 5763 million in 2012 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits , direct fund expense and general and administration expense . nonoperating results nonoperating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was as follows : ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 nonoperating income ( expense ) , gaap basis $ ( 79 ) $ 116 $ ( 54 ) less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci ( 1 ) ( 30 ) 19 ( 18 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 ) ( 49 ) 97 ( 36 ) gain related to the charitable contribution 2014 ( 80 ) 2014 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 7 ) ( 10 ) ( 6 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) , as adjusted ( 2 ) $ ( 56 ) $ 7 $ ( 42 ) ( 1 ) amounts included losses of $ 41 million and $ 38 million attributable to consolidated variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) for 2014 and 2012 , respectively . during 2013 , the company did not record any nonoperating income ( loss ) or net income ( loss ) attributable to vies on the consolidated statements of income . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci. .
Question: what was the employee headcount in 2013 less that in 2012?
Answer: 900.0
Question: what was it in 2012?
| 10500.0 |
CONVFINQA10131 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contribution incurred in 2013 and foreign currency remeasurement , partially offset by the $ 50 million reduction of an indemnification asset . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 362 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , to $ 6518 million in 2014 from $ 6156 million in 2013 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits and direct fund expense . amounts related to the reduction of the indemnification asset and the charitable contribution have been excluded from as adjusted results . 2013 compared with 2012 gaap . expense increased $ 510 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , from 2012 , primarily reflecting higher revenue-related expense and the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution . employee compensation and benefits expense increased $ 273 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 3560 million in 2013 from $ 3287 million in 2012 , reflecting higher headcount and higher incentive compensation driven by higher operating income , including higher performance fees . employees at december 31 , 2013 totaled approximately 11400 compared with approximately 10500 at december 31 , 2012 . distribution and servicing costs totaled $ 353 million in 2013 compared with $ 364 million in 2012 . these costs included payments to bank of america/merrill lynch under a global distribution agreement and payments to pnc , as well as other third parties , primarily associated with the distribution and servicing of client investments in certain blackrock products . distribution and servicing costs for 2013 and 2012 included $ 184 million and $ 195 million , respectively , attributable to bank of america/merrill lynch . direct fund expense increased $ 66 million , reflecting higher average aum , primarily related to ishares , where blackrock pays certain nonadvisory expense of the funds . general and administration expense increased $ 181 million , largely driven by the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution , higher marketing and promotional costs and various lease exit costs . the full year 2012 included a one-time $ 30 million contribution to stifs . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 393 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , to $ 6156 million in 2013 from $ 5763 million in 2012 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits , direct fund expense and general and administration expense . nonoperating results nonoperating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was as follows : ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 nonoperating income ( expense ) , gaap basis $ ( 79 ) $ 116 $ ( 54 ) less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci ( 1 ) ( 30 ) 19 ( 18 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 ) ( 49 ) 97 ( 36 ) gain related to the charitable contribution 2014 ( 80 ) 2014 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 7 ) ( 10 ) ( 6 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) , as adjusted ( 2 ) $ ( 56 ) $ 7 $ ( 42 ) ( 1 ) amounts included losses of $ 41 million and $ 38 million attributable to consolidated variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) for 2014 and 2012 , respectively . during 2013 , the company did not record any nonoperating income ( loss ) or net income ( loss ) attributable to vies on the consolidated statements of income . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) gaap basis</td><td>$ -79 ( 79 )</td><td>$ 116</td><td>$ -54 ( 54 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less : net income ( loss ) attributableto nci ( 1 )</td><td>-30 ( 30 )</td><td>19</td><td>-18 ( 18 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 )</td><td>-49 ( 49 )</td><td>97</td><td>-36 ( 36 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gain related to the charitable contribution</td><td>2014</td><td>-80 ( 80 )</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans</td><td>-7 ( 7 )</td><td>-10 ( 10 )</td><td>-6 ( 6 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nonoperating income ( expense ) asadjusted ( 2 )</td><td>$ -56 ( 56 )</td><td>$ 7</td><td>$ -42 ( 42 )</td></tr></table> contribution incurred in 2013 and foreign currency remeasurement , partially offset by the $ 50 million reduction of an indemnification asset . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 362 million , or 6% ( 6 % ) , to $ 6518 million in 2014 from $ 6156 million in 2013 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits and direct fund expense . amounts related to the reduction of the indemnification asset and the charitable contribution have been excluded from as adjusted results . 2013 compared with 2012 gaap . expense increased $ 510 million , or 9% ( 9 % ) , from 2012 , primarily reflecting higher revenue-related expense and the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution . employee compensation and benefits expense increased $ 273 million , or 8% ( 8 % ) , to $ 3560 million in 2013 from $ 3287 million in 2012 , reflecting higher headcount and higher incentive compensation driven by higher operating income , including higher performance fees . employees at december 31 , 2013 totaled approximately 11400 compared with approximately 10500 at december 31 , 2012 . distribution and servicing costs totaled $ 353 million in 2013 compared with $ 364 million in 2012 . these costs included payments to bank of america/merrill lynch under a global distribution agreement and payments to pnc , as well as other third parties , primarily associated with the distribution and servicing of client investments in certain blackrock products . distribution and servicing costs for 2013 and 2012 included $ 184 million and $ 195 million , respectively , attributable to bank of america/merrill lynch . direct fund expense increased $ 66 million , reflecting higher average aum , primarily related to ishares , where blackrock pays certain nonadvisory expense of the funds . general and administration expense increased $ 181 million , largely driven by the $ 124 million expense related to the charitable contribution , higher marketing and promotional costs and various lease exit costs . the full year 2012 included a one-time $ 30 million contribution to stifs . as adjusted . expense , as adjusted , increased $ 393 million , or 7% ( 7 % ) , to $ 6156 million in 2013 from $ 5763 million in 2012 . the increase in total expense , as adjusted , is primarily attributable to higher employee compensation and benefits , direct fund expense and general and administration expense . nonoperating results nonoperating income ( expense ) , less net income ( loss ) attributable to nci for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 was as follows : ( in millions ) 2014 2013 2012 nonoperating income ( expense ) , gaap basis $ ( 79 ) $ 116 $ ( 54 ) less : net income ( loss ) attributable to nci ( 1 ) ( 30 ) 19 ( 18 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) ( 2 ) ( 49 ) 97 ( 36 ) gain related to the charitable contribution 2014 ( 80 ) 2014 compensation expense related to ( appreciation ) depreciation on deferred compensation plans ( 7 ) ( 10 ) ( 6 ) nonoperating income ( expense ) , as adjusted ( 2 ) $ ( 56 ) $ 7 $ ( 42 ) ( 1 ) amounts included losses of $ 41 million and $ 38 million attributable to consolidated variable interest entities ( 201cvies 201d ) for 2014 and 2012 , respectively . during 2013 , the company did not record any nonoperating income ( loss ) or net income ( loss ) attributable to vies on the consolidated statements of income . ( 2 ) net of net income ( loss ) attributable to nci. .
Question: what was the employee headcount in 2013 less that in 2012?
Answer: 900.0
Question: what was it in 2012?
Answer: 10500.0
Question: what is the ratio of the change in employee headcount to that of 2012?
| 0.08571 |
CONVFINQA10132 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2007?
| 991.1 |
CONVFINQA10133 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 991.1
Question: what about in 2006?
| 942.1 |
CONVFINQA10134 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 991.1
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 942.1
Question: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2006 to 2007?
| 49.0 |
CONVFINQA10135 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 991.1
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 942.1
Question: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: 49.0
Question: what amount of revenue is generated from volume/weather>
| 37.5 |
CONVFINQA10136 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 942.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenues</td><td>78.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>37.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>9.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>purchased power capacity</td><td>-80.0 ( 80.0 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 991.1</td></tr></table> the base revenues variance is primarily due to increases effective september 2006 for the 2005 formula rate plan filing to recover lpsc-approved incremental deferred and ongoing capacity costs . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the volume/weather variance is due to increased electricity usage , including electricity sales during the unbilled service period . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 666 gwh in all sectors compared to 2006 . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to higher rates . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to higher purchased power capacity charges and the amortization of capacity charges effective september 2006 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2006 . a portion of the purchased power capacity costs is offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges , as mentioned above . see "state and local rate regulation" below and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . gross operating revenues , fuel , purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 143.1 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and usage ; an increase of $ 78.4 million in base revenues , as discussed above ; and an increase of $ 37.5 million related to volume/weather , as discussed above . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in net area demand and an increase in deferred fuel expense as a result of higher fuel rates , as discussed above . other regulatory credits decreased primarily due to the deferral of capacity charges in 2006 in addition to the amortization of these capacity charges in 2007 as a result of the may 2006 formula rate plan filing ( for the 2005 test year ) with the lpsc to recover such costs through base rates effective september 2006 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan and storm cost recovery filings with the lpsc. .
Question: what is the net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 991.1
Question: what about in 2006?
Answer: 942.1
Question: what is the net increase in net revenue from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: 49.0
Question: what amount of revenue is generated from volume/weather>
Answer: 37.5
Question: what proportion of total revenue does this represent?
| 0.76531 |
CONVFINQA10137 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees we adopted fasb interpretation no . 45 ( 201cfin 45 201d ) , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d at the beginning of our fiscal 2003 . see 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d for further information regarding fin 45 . the lease agreements for our three office buildings in san jose , california provide for residual value guarantees . these lease agreements were in place prior to december 31 , 2002 and are disclosed in note 14 . in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal . as part of our limited partnership interests in adobe ventures , we have provided a general indemnification to granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures , for certain events or occurrences while granite ventures is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity provided that granite ventures acts in good faith on behalf of the partnerships . we are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim , but believe the risk of having to make any payments under this general indemnification to be remote . we accrue for costs associated with future obligations which include costs for undetected bugs that are discovered only after the product is installed and used by customers . the accrual remaining at the end of fiscal 2003 primarily relates to new releases of our creative suites products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 . the table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003 : balance at november 29 , 2002 accruals payments balance at november 28 , 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at november 29 2002</td><td>accruals</td><td>payments</td><td>balance at november 28 2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 5554</td><td>$ -2369 ( 2369 )</td><td>$ 3185</td></tr></table> advertising expenses we expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense . advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 were $ 24.0 million , $ 26.7 million and $ 30.5 million , respectively . foreign currency and other hedging instruments statement of financial accounting standards no . 133 ( 201csfas no . 133 201d ) , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires us to recognize these as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value . as described in note 15 , gains and losses resulting from .
Question: what was the net change in advertising expense from 2002 to 2003?
| -2.7 |
CONVFINQA10138 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees we adopted fasb interpretation no . 45 ( 201cfin 45 201d ) , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d at the beginning of our fiscal 2003 . see 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d for further information regarding fin 45 . the lease agreements for our three office buildings in san jose , california provide for residual value guarantees . these lease agreements were in place prior to december 31 , 2002 and are disclosed in note 14 . in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal . as part of our limited partnership interests in adobe ventures , we have provided a general indemnification to granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures , for certain events or occurrences while granite ventures is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity provided that granite ventures acts in good faith on behalf of the partnerships . we are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim , but believe the risk of having to make any payments under this general indemnification to be remote . we accrue for costs associated with future obligations which include costs for undetected bugs that are discovered only after the product is installed and used by customers . the accrual remaining at the end of fiscal 2003 primarily relates to new releases of our creative suites products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 . the table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003 : balance at november 29 , 2002 accruals payments balance at november 28 , 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at november 29 2002</td><td>accruals</td><td>payments</td><td>balance at november 28 2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 5554</td><td>$ -2369 ( 2369 )</td><td>$ 3185</td></tr></table> advertising expenses we expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense . advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 were $ 24.0 million , $ 26.7 million and $ 30.5 million , respectively . foreign currency and other hedging instruments statement of financial accounting standards no . 133 ( 201csfas no . 133 201d ) , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires us to recognize these as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value . as described in note 15 , gains and losses resulting from .
Question: what was the net change in advertising expense from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -2.7
Question: what was advertising expense in 2002?
| 26.7 |
CONVFINQA10139 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
guarantees we adopted fasb interpretation no . 45 ( 201cfin 45 201d ) , 201cguarantor 2019s accounting and disclosure requirements for guarantees , including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others 201d at the beginning of our fiscal 2003 . see 201crecent accounting pronouncements 201d for further information regarding fin 45 . the lease agreements for our three office buildings in san jose , california provide for residual value guarantees . these lease agreements were in place prior to december 31 , 2002 and are disclosed in note 14 . in the normal course of business , we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products . historically , costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations . we have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions , for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements . in connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003 , we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $ 2.2 million . we are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements . as permitted under delaware law , we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity . the indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer 2019s or director 2019s lifetime . the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited ; however , we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid . we believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal . as part of our limited partnership interests in adobe ventures , we have provided a general indemnification to granite ventures , an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of adobe ventures , for certain events or occurrences while granite ventures is , or was serving , at our request in such capacity provided that granite ventures acts in good faith on behalf of the partnerships . we are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim , but believe the risk of having to make any payments under this general indemnification to be remote . we accrue for costs associated with future obligations which include costs for undetected bugs that are discovered only after the product is installed and used by customers . the accrual remaining at the end of fiscal 2003 primarily relates to new releases of our creative suites products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 . the table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003 : balance at november 29 , 2002 accruals payments balance at november 28 , 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance at november 29 2002</td><td>accruals</td><td>payments</td><td>balance at november 28 2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>$ 2014</td><td>$ 5554</td><td>$ -2369 ( 2369 )</td><td>$ 3185</td></tr></table> advertising expenses we expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense . advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003 , 2002 , and 2001 were $ 24.0 million , $ 26.7 million and $ 30.5 million , respectively . foreign currency and other hedging instruments statement of financial accounting standards no . 133 ( 201csfas no . 133 201d ) , 201caccounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities , 201d establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires us to recognize these as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value . as described in note 15 , gains and losses resulting from .
Question: what was the net change in advertising expense from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -2.7
Question: what was advertising expense in 2002?
Answer: 26.7
Question: what is the net change divided by the 2002 value?
| -0.10112 |
CONVFINQA10140 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what was the difference in percent of debt securities between 2017 and 2018?
| 21.0 |
CONVFINQA10141 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what was the difference in percent of debt securities between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 21.0
Question: what was the percent of debt securities in 2017?
| 28.0 |
CONVFINQA10142 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
masco corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) m . employee retirement plans ( continued ) plan assets . our qualified defined-benefit pension plan weighted average asset allocation , which is based upon fair value , was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity securities</td><td>34% ( 34 % )</td><td>55% ( 55 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>debt securities</td><td>49% ( 49 % )</td><td>28% ( 28 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>other</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td><td>17% ( 17 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> for our qualified defined-benefit pension plans , we have adopted accounting guidance that defines fair value , establishes a framework for measuring fair value and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements . accounting guidance defines fair value as "the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date." following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value . there have been no changes in the methodologies used at december 31 , 2018 compared to december 31 , 2017 . common and preferred stocks and short-term and other investments : valued at the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or based on the active market for similar securities . certain investments are valued based on net asset value ( "nav" ) , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with these investments . private equity and hedge funds : valued based on an estimated fair value using either a market approach or an income approach , both of which require a significant degree of judgment . there is no active trading market for these investments and they are generally illiquid . due to the significant unobservable inputs , the fair value measurements used to estimate fair value are a level 3 input . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with the investments valued at nav . corporate , government and other debt securities : valued based on either the closing price reported on the active market on which the individual securities are traded or using pricing models maximizing the use of observable inputs for similar securities . this includes basing value on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings . certain investments are valued based on nav , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by referencing the respective fund's underlying assets . there are unfunded commitments of $ 1 million and no other restrictions associated with these investments . common collective trust fund : valued based on an amortized cost basis , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined by reference to the respective fund's underlying assets , which are primarily cash equivalents . there are no unfunded commitments or other restrictions associated with this fund . buy-in annuity : valued based on the associated benefit obligation for which the buy-in annuity covers the benefits , which approximates fair value . such basis is determined based on various assumptions , including the discount rate , long-term rate of return on plan assets and mortality rate . the methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values . furthermore , while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants , the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date . the following tables set forth , by level within the fair value hierarchy , the qualified defined-benefit pension plan assets at fair value as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , as well as those valued at nav using the practical expedient , which approximates fair value , in millions. .
Question: what was the difference in percent of debt securities between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 21.0
Question: what was the percent of debt securities in 2017?
Answer: 28.0
Question: what is the value of the net difference divided by the 2017 value?
| 0.75 |
CONVFINQA10143 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: what was the change in net sales for entergy wholesale commodities from the year of 2014 to 2015, in millions?
| -558.0 |
CONVFINQA10144 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014 net revenue</td><td>$ 2224</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nuclear realized price changes</td><td>-310 ( 310 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014</td><td>-305 ( 305 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect</td><td>20</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>other</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 net revenue</td><td>$ 1666</td></tr></table> as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .
Question: what was the change in net sales for entergy wholesale commodities from the year of 2014 to 2015, in millions?
Answer: -558.0
Question: how much, in percentage, does that change represent in relation to the 2014 net sales?
| -0.2509 |
CONVFINQA10145 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy resources , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis with syndicated bank letters of credit . in december 2004 , system energy amended these letters of credit and they now expire in may 2009 . system energy may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy's short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long- term authorization extends through june 2009 . system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 42915</td><td>$ 53620</td><td>$ 88231</td><td>$ 277287</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 22.5 million of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high-level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . environmental risks system energy's facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over air quality , water quality , control of toxic substances and hazardous and solid wastes , and other environmental matters . management believes that system energy is in substantial compliance with environmental regulations currently applicable to its facilities and operations . because environmental regulations are subject to change , future compliance costs cannot be precisely estimated . critical accounting estimates the preparation of system energy's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that .
Question: in 2007, what amount of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans?
| 22.5 |
CONVFINQA10146 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy resources , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis with syndicated bank letters of credit . in december 2004 , system energy amended these letters of credit and they now expire in may 2009 . system energy may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy's short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long- term authorization extends through june 2009 . system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 42915</td><td>$ 53620</td><td>$ 88231</td><td>$ 277287</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 22.5 million of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high-level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . environmental risks system energy's facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over air quality , water quality , control of toxic substances and hazardous and solid wastes , and other environmental matters . management believes that system energy is in substantial compliance with environmental regulations currently applicable to its facilities and operations . because environmental regulations are subject to change , future compliance costs cannot be precisely estimated . critical accounting estimates the preparation of system energy's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that .
Question: in 2007, what amount of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans?
Answer: 22.5
Question: and how much is that in thousands of dollars?
| 22500.0 |
CONVFINQA10147 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
system energy resources , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis with syndicated bank letters of credit . in december 2004 , system energy amended these letters of credit and they now expire in may 2009 . system energy may refinance or redeem debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy has obtained a short-term borrowing authorization from the ferc under which it may borrow , through march 31 , 2010 , up to the aggregate amount , at any one time outstanding , of $ 200 million . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy's short-term borrowing limits . system energy has also obtained an order from the ferc authorizing long-term securities issuances . the current long- term authorization extends through june 2009 . system energy's receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 42915</td><td>$ 53620</td><td>$ 88231</td><td>$ 277287</td></tr></table> in may 2007 , $ 22.5 million of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans . see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . nuclear matters system energy owns and operates grand gulf . system energy is , therefore , subject to the risks related to owning and operating a nuclear plant . these include risks from the use , storage , handling and disposal of high-level and low-level radioactive materials , regulatory requirement changes , including changes resulting from events at other plants , limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available for losses in connection with nuclear operations , and technological and financial uncertainties related to decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives , including the sufficiency of funds in decommissioning trusts . in the event of an unanticipated early shutdown of grand gulf , system energy may be required to provide additional funds or credit support to satisfy regulatory requirements for decommissioning . environmental risks system energy's facilities and operations are subject to regulation by various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over air quality , water quality , control of toxic substances and hazardous and solid wastes , and other environmental matters . management believes that system energy is in substantial compliance with environmental regulations currently applicable to its facilities and operations . because environmental regulations are subject to change , future compliance costs cannot be precisely estimated . critical accounting estimates the preparation of system energy's financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to apply appropriate accounting policies and to make estimates and judgments that .
Question: in 2007, what amount of system energy's receivable from the money pool was replaced by a note receivable from entergy new orleans?
Answer: 22.5
Question: and how much is that in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 22500.0
Question: how much, then, does this amount in thousands represent in relation to the total system energy's receivable from the money pool, in percentage?
| 0.41962 |
CONVFINQA10148 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year</td><td>407</td><td>$ 9.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>607</td><td>18.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>10.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>13.72</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year</td><td>871</td><td>$ 15.76</td></tr></table> the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: what was the number of vested shares in 2012?
| 134.0 |
CONVFINQA10149 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year</td><td>407</td><td>$ 9.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>607</td><td>18.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>10.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>13.72</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year</td><td>871</td><td>$ 15.76</td></tr></table> the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: what was the number of vested shares in 2012?
Answer: 134.0
Question: what was the average price per share?
| 10.88 |
CONVFINQA10150 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year</td><td>407</td><td>$ 9.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>607</td><td>18.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>10.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>13.72</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year</td><td>871</td><td>$ 15.76</td></tr></table> the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: what was the number of vested shares in 2012?
Answer: 134.0
Question: what was the average price per share?
Answer: 10.88
Question: what is the total value of vested shares?
| 1457.92 |
CONVFINQA10151 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
abiomed , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) note 8 . stock award plans and stock-based compensation ( continued ) restricted stock and restricted stock units the following table summarizes restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the fiscal year ended march 31 , 2012 : number of shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>number of shares ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted average grant date fair value ( per share )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at beginning of year</td><td>407</td><td>$ 9.84</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>607</td><td>18.13</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-134 ( 134 )</td><td>10.88</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-9 ( 9 )</td><td>13.72</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock and restricted stock units at end of year</td><td>871</td><td>$ 15.76</td></tr></table> the remaining unrecognized compensation expense for outstanding restricted stock and restricted stock units , including performance-based awards , as of march 31 , 2012 was $ 7.1 million and the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.2 years . the weighted average grant-date fair value for restricted stock and restricted stock units granted during the years ended march 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 18.13 , $ 10.00 and $ 7.67 per share , respectively . the total fair value of restricted stock and restricted stock units vested in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 was $ 1.5 million , $ 1.0 million and $ 0.4 million , respectively . performance-based awards included in the restricted stock and restricted stock units activity discussed above are certain awards granted in fiscal years 2012 , 2011 and 2010 that vest subject to certain performance-based criteria . in june 2010 , 311000 shares of restricted stock and a performance-based award for the potential issuance of 45000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the company , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and performance milestones by the company . during the year ended march 31 , 2011 , the company determined that it met the prescribed performance targets and a portion of these shares and stock options vested . the remaining shares will vest upon satisfaction of prescribed service conditions by the award recipients . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , the company determined that it should have been using the graded vesting method instead of the straight-line method to expense stock-based compensation for the performance-based awards issued in june 2010 . this resulted in additional stock based compensation expense of approximately $ 0.6 million being recorded during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 that should have been recorded during the year ended march 31 , 2011 . the company believes that the amount is not material to its march 31 , 2011 consolidated financial statements and therefore recorded the adjustment in the quarter ended june 30 , 2011 . during the three months ended june 30 , 2011 , performance-based awards of restricted stock units for the potential issuance of 284000 shares of common stock were issued to certain executive officers and members of the senior management , all of which would vest upon achievement of prescribed service milestones by the award recipients and revenue performance milestones by the company . as of march 31 , 2012 , the company determined that it met the prescribed targets for 184000 shares underlying these awards and it believes it is probable that the prescribed performance targets will be met for the remaining 100000 shares , and the compensation expense is being recognized accordingly . during the year ended march 31 , 2012 , the company has recorded $ 3.3 million in stock-based compensation expense for equity awards in which the prescribed performance milestones have been achieved or are probable of being achieved . the remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to these equity awards at march 31 , 2012 is $ 3.6 million based on the company 2019s current assessment of probability of achieving the performance milestones . the weighted-average period over which this cost will be recognized is 2.1 years. .
Question: what was the number of vested shares in 2012?
Answer: 134.0
Question: what was the average price per share?
Answer: 10.88
Question: what is the total value of vested shares?
Answer: 1457.92
Question: what is that divided by 1000?
| 1.45792 |
CONVFINQA10152 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .
Question: what is the value of estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?
| 151202.0 |
CONVFINQA10153 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .
Question: what is the value of estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?
Answer: 151202.0
Question: what is the tier 1 common ratio as of 2013?
| 0.094 |
CONVFINQA10154 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .
Question: what is the value of estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?
Answer: 151202.0
Question: what is the tier 1 common ratio as of 2013?
Answer: 0.094
Question: what is the quotient of the value over the ratio?
| 1608531.91489 |
CONVFINQA10155 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 164 jpmorgan chase & co./2013 annual report firm ) is required to hold more than the additional 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) of tier 1 common . in addition , basel iii establishes a 6.5% ( 6.5 % ) tier i common equity standard for the definition of 201cwell capitalized 201d under the prompt corrective action ( 201cpca 201d ) requirements of the fdic improvement act ( 201cfdicia 201d ) . the tier i common equity standard is effective from the first quarter of 2015 . the following chart presents the basel iii minimum risk-based capital ratios during the transitional periods and on a fully phased-in basis . the chart also includes management 2019s target for the firm 2019s tier 1 common ratio . it is the firm 2019s current expectation that its basel iii tier 1 common ratio will exceed the regulatory minimums , both during the transition period and upon full implementation in 2019 and thereafter . the firm estimates that its tier 1 common ratio under the basel iii advanced approach on a fully phased-in basis would be 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 , achieving management 2019s previously stated objectives . the tier 1 common ratio as calculated under the basel iii standardized approach is estimated at 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) as of december 31 , 2013 . the tier 1 common ratio under both basel i and basel iii are non-gaap financial measures . however , such measures are used by bank regulators , investors and analysts to assess the firm 2019s capital position and to compare the firm 2019s capital to that of other financial services companies . the following table presents a comparison of the firm 2019s tier 1 common under basel i rules to its estimated tier 1 common under the advanced approach of the basel iii rules , along with the firm 2019s estimated risk-weighted assets . key differences in the calculation of rwa between basel i and basel iii advanced approach include : ( 1 ) basel iii credit risk rwa is based on risk-sensitive approaches which largely rely on the use of internal credit models and parameters , whereas basel i rwa is based on fixed supervisory risk- weightings which vary only by counterparty type and asset class ; and ( 2 ) basel iii includes rwa for operational risk , whereas basel i does not . operational risk capital takes into consideration operational losses in the quarter following the period in which those losses were realized , and the calculation generally incorporates such losses irrespective of whether the issues or business activity giving rise to the losses have been remediated or reduced . the firm 2019s operational risk capital model continues to be refined in conjunction with the firm 2019s basel iii advanced approach parallel run . as a result of model enhancements in 2013 , as well as taking into consideration the legal expenses incurred by the firm in 2013 , the firm 2019s operational risk capital increased substantially in 2013 over 2012 . tier 1 common under basel iii includes additional adjustments and deductions not included in basel i tier 1 common , such as the inclusion of accumulated other comprehensive income ( 201caoci 201d ) related to afs securities and defined benefit pension and other postretirement employee benefit ( 201copeb 201d ) plans . december 31 , 2013 ( in millions , except ratios ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>tier 1 common under basel i rules</td><td>$ 148887</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>adjustments related to aoci for afs securities and defined benefit pension and opeb plans</td><td>1474</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add back of basel i deductions ( a )</td><td>1780</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>deduction for deferred tax asset related to net operating loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards</td><td>-741 ( 741 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>all other adjustments</td><td>-198 ( 198 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules</td><td>$ 151202</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b )</td><td>$ 1590873</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c )</td><td>9.5% ( 9.5 % )</td></tr></table> estimated risk-weighted assets under basel iii advanced approach ( b ) $ 1590873 estimated tier 1 common ratio under basel iii advanced approach ( c ) 9.5% ( 9.5 % ) ( a ) certain exposures , which are deducted from capital under basel i , are risked-weighted under basel iii. .
Question: what is the value of estimated tier 1 common under basel iii rules?
Answer: 151202.0
Question: what is the tier 1 common ratio as of 2013?
Answer: 0.094
Question: what is the quotient of the value over the ratio?
Answer: 1608531.91489
Question: what is that quotient multiplied by the 6.5% equity standard?
| 104554.57447 |
CONVFINQA10156 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?
| 11.6 |
CONVFINQA10157 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?
Answer: 11.6
Question: and converted to the thousands?
| 11600.0 |
CONVFINQA10158 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( $ 125 million ) and higher maintenance outage costs ( $ 18 million ) . additionally , operating profits in 2012 include costs of $ 184 million associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland , mill divestiture costs of $ 91 million , costs associated with the restructuring of our european packaging busi- ness of $ 17 million and a $ 3 million gain for other items , while operating costs in 2011 included costs associated with signing an agreement to acquire temple-inland of $ 20 million and a gain of $ 7 million for other items . industrial packaging . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>sales</td><td>$ 13280</td><td>$ 10430</td><td>$ 9840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>operating profit</td><td>1066</td><td>1147</td><td>826</td></tr></table> north american industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 11.6 billion in 2012 compared with $ 8.6 billion in 2011 and $ 8.4 billion in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 1.0 billion ( $ 1.3 billion exclud- ing costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and mill divestiture costs ) compared with $ 1.1 billion ( both including and excluding costs associated with signing an agree- ment to acquire temple-inland ) in 2011 and $ 763 million ( $ 776 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . sales volumes for the legacy business were about flat in 2012 compared with 2011 . average sales price was lower mainly due to export containerboard sales prices which bottomed out in the first quarter but climbed steadily the rest of the year . input costs were lower for recycled fiber , wood and natural gas , but higher for starch . freight costs also increased . plan- ned maintenance downtime costs were higher than in 2011 . operating costs were higher largely due to routine inventory valuation adjustments operating profits in 2012 benefited from $ 235 million of temple-inland synergies . market-related downtime in 2012 was about 570000 tons compared with about 380000 tons in 2011 . operating profits in 2012 included $ 184 million of costs associated with the acquisition and integration of temple-inland and $ 91 million of costs associated with the divestiture of three containerboard mills . operating profits in 2011 included charges of $ 20 million for costs associated with the signing of the agreement to acquire temple- inland . looking ahead to 2013 , sales volumes in the first quarter compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 are expected to increase slightly for boxes due to a higher number of shipping days . average sales price realizations are expected to reflect the pass-through to box customers of a containerboard price increase implemented in 2012 . input costs are expected to be higher for recycled fiber , wood and starch . planned maintenance downtime costs are expected to be about $ 26 million higher with outages scheduled at eight mills compared with six mills in the 2012 fourth quarter . manufacturing operating costs are expected to be lower . european industr ia l packaging net sales were $ 1.0 billion in 2012 compared with $ 1.1 billion in 2011 and $ 990 million in 2010 . operating profits in 2012 were $ 53 million ( $ 72 million excluding restructuring costs ) compared with $ 66 million ( $ 61 million excluding a gain for a bargain purchase price adjustment on an acquisition by our joint venture in turkey and costs associated with the closure of our etienne mill in france in 2009 ) in 2011 and $ 70 mil- lion ( $ 73 million before closure costs for our etienne mill ) in 2010 . sales volumes in 2012 were lower than in 2011 reflecting decreased demand for packaging in the industrial market due to a weaker overall economic environment in southern europe . demand for pack- aging in the agricultural markets was about flat year- over-year . average sales margins increased due to sales price increases implemented during 2011 and 2012 and lower board costs . other input costs were higher , primarily for energy and distribution . operat- ing profits in 2012 included a net gain of $ 10 million for an insurance settlement , partially offset by addi- tional operating costs , related to the earthquakes in northern italy in may which affected our san felice box plant . entering the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes are expected to be stable reflecting a seasonal decrease in market demand in agricultural markets offset by an increase in industrial markets . average sales margins are expected to improve due to lower input costs for containerboard . other input costs should be about flat . operating costs are expected to be higher reflecting the absence of the earthquake insurance settlement that was received in the 2012 fourth quar- asian industr ia l packaging net sales and operating profits include the results of sca pack- aging since the acquisition on june 30 , 2010 , includ- ing the impact of incremental integration costs . net sales for the packaging operations were $ 400 million in 2012 compared with $ 410 million in 2011 and $ 255 million in 2010 . operating profits for the packaging operations were $ 2 million in 2012 compared with $ 2 million in 2011 and a loss of $ 7 million ( a loss of $ 4 million excluding facility closure costs ) in 2010 . operating profits were favorably impacted by higher average sales margins in 2012 compared with 2011 , but this benefit was offset by lower sales volumes and higher raw material costs and operating costs . looking ahead to the first quarter of 2013 , sales volumes and average sales margins are expected to decrease due to seasonality . net sales for the distribution operations were $ 260 million in 2012 compared with $ 285 million in 2011 and $ 240 million in 2010 . operating profits were $ 3 million in 2012 compared with $ 3 million in 2011 and about breakeven in 2010. .
Question: what was the north american industrial packaging net sales in 2012?
Answer: 11.6
Question: and converted to the thousands?
Answer: 11600.0
Question: so what was the percentage of north american industrial packaging net sales to industrial packaging sales during this year?
| 0.87349 |
CONVFINQA10159 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what was the difference in the value of performance shares less shares not related to post merger services?
| 1.3 |
CONVFINQA10160 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the year ended december 31 , 2011 , we granted 354660 performance share units having a fair value based on our grant date closing stock price of $ 28.79 . these units are payable in stock and are subject to certain financial performance criteria . the fair value of these performance share unit awards is based on the grant date closing stock price of each respective award grant and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded . the number of shares ultimately issued for each award will be based on our financial performance as compared to peer group companies over the performance period and can range from zero to 200% ( 200 % ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , estimated share payouts for outstanding non-vested performance share unit awards ranged from 150% ( 150 % ) to 195% ( 195 % ) . for the legacy frontier performance share units assumed at july 1 , 2011 , performance is based on market performance criteria , which is calculated as the total shareholder return achieved by hollyfrontier stockholders compared with the average shareholder return achieved by an equally-weighted peer group of independent refining companies over a three-year period . these share unit awards are payable in stock based on share price performance relative to the defined peer group and can range from zero to 125% ( 125 % ) of the initial target award . these performance share units were valued at july 1 , 2011 using a monte carlo valuation model , which simulates future stock price movements using key inputs including grant date and measurement date stock prices , expected stock price performance , expected rate of return and volatility of our stock price relative to the peer group over the three-year performance period . the fair value of these performance share units at july 1 , 2011 was $ 8.6 million . of this amount , $ 7.3 million relates to post-merger services and will be recognized ratably over the remaining service period through 2013 . a summary of performance share unit activity and changes during the year ended december 31 , 2011 is presented below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>performance share units</td><td>grants</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>outstanding at january 1 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>556186</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted ( 1 )</td><td>354660</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vesting and transfer of ownership to recipients</td><td>-136058 ( 136058 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>outstanding at december 31 2011 ( non-vested )</td><td>774788</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes 225116 non-vested performance share grants under the legacy frontier plan that were outstanding and retained by hollyfrontier at july 1 , 2011 . for the year ended december 31 , 2011 we issued 178148 shares of our common stock having a fair value of $ 2.6 million related to vested performance share units . based on the weighted average grant date fair value of $ 20.71 there was $ 11.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested performance share units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.1 years . note 7 : cash and cash equivalents and investments in marketable securities our investment portfolio at december 31 , 2011 consisted of cash , cash equivalents and investments in debt securities primarily issued by government and municipal entities . we also hold 1000000 shares of connacher oil and gas limited common stock that was received as partial consideration upon the sale of our montana refinery in we invest in highly-rated marketable debt securities , primarily issued by government and municipal entities that have maturities at the date of purchase of greater than three months . we also invest in other marketable debt securities with the maximum maturity or put date of any individual issue generally not greater than two years from the date of purchase . all of these instruments , including investments in equity securities , are classified as available- for-sale . as a result , they are reported at fair value using quoted market prices . interest income is recorded as earned . unrealized gains and losses , net of related income taxes , are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income . upon sale , realized gains and losses on the sale of marketable securities are computed based on the specific identification of the underlying cost of the securities sold and the unrealized gains and losses previously reported in other comprehensive income are reclassified to current earnings. .
Question: what was the difference in the value of performance shares less shares not related to post merger services?
Answer: 1.3
Question: what is the percent of shares not related to post-merger services?
| 0.15116 |
CONVFINQA10161 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .
Question: what was the combined estimated pretax pension expense for 2012 and 2013?
| 162.0 |
CONVFINQA10162 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
securities have historically returned approximately 10% ( 10 % ) annually over long periods of time , while u.s . debt securities have returned approximately 6% ( 6 % ) annually over long periods . application of these historical returns to the plan 2019s allocation ranges for equities and bonds produces a result between 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) and 8.75% ( 8.75 % ) and is one point of reference , among many other factors , that is taken into consideration . we also examine the plan 2019s actual historical returns over various periods and consider the current economic environment . recent experience is considered in our evaluation with appropriate consideration that , especially for short time periods , recent returns are not reliable indicators of future returns . while annual returns can vary significantly ( actual returns for 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 were +15.29% ( +15.29 % ) , +.11% ( +.11 % ) , and +14.87% ( +14.87 % ) , respectively ) , the selected assumption represents our estimated long-term average prospective returns . acknowledging the potentially wide range for this assumption , we also annually examine the assumption used by other companies with similar pension investment strategies , so that we can ascertain whether our determinations markedly differ from others . in all cases , however , this data simply informs our process , which places the greatest emphasis on our qualitative judgment of future investment returns , given the conditions existing at each annual measurement date . taking into consideration all of these factors , the expected long-term return on plan assets for determining net periodic pension cost for 2012 was 7.75% ( 7.75 % ) , the same as it was for 2011 . after considering the views of both internal and external capital market advisors , particularly with regard to the effects of the recent economic environment on long-term prospective fixed income returns , we are reducing our expected long-term return on assets to 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) for determining pension cost for under current accounting rules , the difference between expected long-term returns and actual returns is accumulated and amortized to pension expense over future periods . each one percentage point difference in actual return compared with our expected return causes expense in subsequent years to increase or decrease by up to $ 8 million as the impact is amortized into results of operations . we currently estimate a pretax pension expense of $ 73 million in 2013 compared with pretax expense of $ 89 million in 2012 . this year-over-year expected decrease reflects the impact of favorable returns on plan assets experienced in 2012 as well as the effects of the lower discount rate required to be used in the table below reflects the estimated effects on pension expense of certain changes in annual assumptions , using 2013 estimated expense as a baseline . table 27 : pension expense - sensitivity analysis change in assumption ( a ) estimated increase to 2013 pension expense ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>change in assumption ( a )</td><td>estimatedincrease to 2013pensionexpense ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in discount rate</td><td>$ 21</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) decrease in expected long-term return on assets</td><td>$ 19</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>.5% ( .5 % ) increase in compensation rate</td><td>$ 2</td></tr></table> ( a ) the impact is the effect of changing the specified assumption while holding all other assumptions constant . our pension plan contribution requirements are not particularly sensitive to actuarial assumptions . investment performance has the most impact on contribution requirements and will drive the amount of required contributions in future years . also , current law , including the provisions of the pension protection act of 2006 , sets limits as to both minimum and maximum contributions to the plan . we do not expect to be required by law to make any contributions to the plan during 2013 . we maintain other defined benefit plans that have a less significant effect on financial results , including various nonqualified supplemental retirement plans for certain employees , which are described more fully in note 15 employee benefit plans in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 77 .
Question: what was the combined estimated pretax pension expense for 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 162.0
Question: and the average?
| 81.0 |
CONVFINQA10163 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: how much were the short-term borrowings as of 12/31/14?
| 107.2 |
CONVFINQA10164 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: how much were the short-term borrowings as of 12/31/14?
Answer: 107.2
Question: and as of 12/31/13?
| 179.1 |
CONVFINQA10165 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: how much were the short-term borrowings as of 12/31/14?
Answer: 107.2
Question: and as of 12/31/13?
Answer: 179.1
Question: and the total value combining these two years?
| 286.3 |
CONVFINQA10166 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) net cash used in investing activities during 2013 primarily related to payments for capital expenditures and acquisitions . capital expenditures of $ 173.0 related primarily to computer hardware and software and leasehold improvements . we made payments of $ 61.5 related to acquisitions completed during 2013 , net of cash acquired . financing activities net cash used in financing activities during 2014 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . during 2014 , we redeemed all $ 350.0 in aggregate principal amount of the 6.25% ( 6.25 % ) notes , repurchased 14.9 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 275.1 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 159.0 on our common stock . this was offset by the issuance of $ 500.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 4.20% ( 4.20 % ) notes . net cash used in financing activities during 2013 primarily related to the purchase of long-term debt , the repurchase of our common stock and payment of dividends . we redeemed all $ 600.0 in aggregate principal amount of our 10.00% ( 10.00 % ) notes . in addition , we repurchased 31.8 shares of our common stock for an aggregate cost of $ 481.8 , including fees , and made dividend payments of $ 126.0 on our common stock . foreign exchange rate changes the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 101.0 in 2014 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the canadian dollar , brazilian real , australian dollar and the euro as of december 31 , 2014 compared to december 31 , 2013 . the effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents included in the consolidated statements of cash flows resulted in a decrease of $ 94.1 in 2013 . the decrease was primarily a result of the u.s . dollar being stronger than several foreign currencies , including the australian dollar , brazilian real , canadian dollar , japanese yen , and south african rand as of december 31 , 2013 compared to december 31 , 2012. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>balance sheet data</td><td>december 31 , 2014</td><td>december 31 , 2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash cash equivalents and marketable securities</td><td>$ 1667.2</td><td>$ 1642.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 107.2</td><td>$ 179.1</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>2.1</td><td>353.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>1623.5</td><td>1129.8</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 1732.8</td><td>$ 1662.5</td></tr></table> liquidity outlook we expect our cash flow from operations , cash and cash equivalents to be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements at a minimum for the next twelve months . we also have a committed corporate credit facility as well as uncommitted facilities available to support our operating needs . we continue to maintain a disciplined approach to managing liquidity , with flexibility over significant uses of cash , including our capital expenditures , cash used for new acquisitions , our common stock repurchase program and our common stock dividends . from time to time , we evaluate market conditions and financing alternatives for opportunities to raise additional funds or otherwise improve our liquidity profile , enhance our financial flexibility and manage market risk . our ability to access the capital markets depends on a number of factors , which include those specific to us , such as our credit rating , and those related to the financial markets , such as the amount or terms of available credit . there can be no guarantee that we would be able to access new sources of liquidity on commercially reasonable terms , or at all. .
Question: how much were the short-term borrowings as of 12/31/14?
Answer: 107.2
Question: and as of 12/31/13?
Answer: 179.1
Question: and the total value combining these two years?
Answer: 286.3
Question: and the average value?
| 143.15 |
CONVFINQA10167 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 187 trading assets and liabilities trading assets include debt and equity instruments held for trading purposes that jpmorgan chase owns ( 201clong 201d positions ) , certain loans managed on a fair value basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . trading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) . the firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions . included in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unre- alized losses ) related to derivatives . trading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets . bal- ances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of securities sold but not yet purchased ( short posi- tions ) when the long and short positions have identical committee on uniform security identification procedures ( 201ccusips 201d ) . trading assets and liabilities 2013average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a )</td><td>$ 354441</td><td>$ 318063</td><td>$ 384102</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading assets 2013 derivative receivables</td><td>84676</td><td>110457</td><td>121417</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) ( b )</td><td>78159</td><td>60224</td><td>78841</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables</td><td>65714</td><td>77901</td><td>93200</td></tr></table> ( a ) balances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of securities sold , but not yet purchased ( short positions ) when the long and short positions have identical cusips . ( b ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or man- aged on a fair value basis . 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded deriva- tive and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative in- strument . 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain em- bedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests issued by ib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value. .
Question: in 2010, what was the ratio of trading assets derivative receivables to the derivative payables?
| 1.28855 |
CONVFINQA10168 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 187 trading assets and liabilities trading assets include debt and equity instruments held for trading purposes that jpmorgan chase owns ( 201clong 201d positions ) , certain loans managed on a fair value basis and for which the firm has elected the fair value option , and physical commodities inventories that are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value . trading liabilities include debt and equity instruments that the firm has sold to other parties but does not own ( 201cshort 201d positions ) . the firm is obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions . included in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables ( unrealized gains ) and payables ( unre- alized losses ) related to derivatives . trading assets and liabilities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets . bal- ances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of securities sold but not yet purchased ( short posi- tions ) when the long and short positions have identical committee on uniform security identification procedures ( 201ccusips 201d ) . trading assets and liabilities 2013average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a )</td><td>$ 354441</td><td>$ 318063</td><td>$ 384102</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>trading assets 2013 derivative receivables</td><td>84676</td><td>110457</td><td>121417</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>trading liabilities 2013 debt and equity instruments ( a ) ( b )</td><td>78159</td><td>60224</td><td>78841</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables</td><td>65714</td><td>77901</td><td>93200</td></tr></table> ( a ) balances reflect the reduction of securities owned ( long positions ) by the amount of securities sold , but not yet purchased ( short positions ) when the long and short positions have identical cusips . ( b ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include the following : 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or man- aged on a fair value basis . 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded deriva- tive and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 owned beneficial interests in securitized financial assets that contain embedded credit derivatives , which would otherwise be required to be separately accounted for as a derivative in- strument . 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain em- bedded derivatives. ) 2022 long-term beneficial interests issued by ib 2019s consolidated securitization trusts where the underlying assets are carried at fair value. .
Question: in 2010, what was the ratio of trading assets derivative receivables to the derivative payables?
Answer: 1.28855
Question: what was the 2020 net derivative balance, in billions?
| 18962.0 |
CONVFINQA10169 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the value of net revenue in 2007?
| 486.9 |
CONVFINQA10170 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the value of net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 486.9
Question: and in 2006?
| 466.1 |
CONVFINQA10171 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the value of net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 486.9
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 466.1
Question: so by how much did this value change over these years?
| 20.8 |
CONVFINQA10172 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2006 net revenue</td><td>$ 466.1</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>base revenue</td><td>7.9</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>4.5</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>transmission revenue</td><td>4.1</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>transmission equalization</td><td>4.0</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reserve equalization</td><td>3.8</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>attala costs</td><td>-10.2 ( 10.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 486.9</td></tr></table> the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .
Question: what was the value of net revenue in 2007?
Answer: 486.9
Question: and in 2006?
Answer: 466.1
Question: so by how much did this value change over these years?
Answer: 20.8
Question: and the percentage change?
| 0.04463 |
CONVFINQA10173 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases in 2006?
| 5457.0 |
CONVFINQA10174 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases in 2006?
Answer: 5457.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
| 1916.0 |
CONVFINQA10175 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases in 2006?
Answer: 5457.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
Answer: 1916.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 7373.0 |
CONVFINQA10176 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases in 2006?
Answer: 5457.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
Answer: 1916.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 7373.0
Question: what is the value for capital leases?
| 1916.0 |
CONVFINQA10177 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
depending upon our senior unsecured debt ratings . the facilities require the maintenance of a minimum net worth and a debt to net worth coverage ratio . at december 31 , 2006 , we were in compliance with these covenants . the facilities do not include any other financial restrictions , credit rating triggers ( other than rating-dependent pricing ) , or any other provision that could require the posting of collateral . in addition to our revolving credit facilities , we had $ 150 million in uncommitted lines of credit available , including $ 75 million that expires in march 2007 and $ 75 million expiring in may 2007 . neither of these lines of credit were used as of december 31 , 2006 . we must have equivalent credit available under our five-year facilities to draw on these $ 75 million lines . dividend restrictions 2013 we are subject to certain restrictions related to the payment of cash dividends to our shareholders due to minimum net worth requirements under the credit facilities referred to above . the amount of retained earnings available for dividends was $ 7.8 billion and $ 6.2 billion at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we do not expect that these restrictions will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition , results of operations , or liquidity . we declared dividends of $ 323 million in 2006 and $ 316 million in 2005 . shelf registration statement 2013 under a current shelf registration statement , we may issue any combination of debt securities , preferred stock , common stock , or warrants for debt securities or preferred stock in one or more offerings . at december 31 , 2006 , we had $ 500 million remaining for issuance under the current shelf registration statement . we have no immediate plans to issue any securities ; however , we routinely consider and evaluate opportunities to replace existing debt or access capital through issuances of debt securities under this shelf registration , and , therefore , we may issue debt securities at any time . 6 . leases we lease certain locomotives , freight cars , and other property . future minimum lease payments for operating and capital leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of december 31 , 2006 were as follows : millions of dollars operating leases capital leases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions of dollars</td><td>operatingleases</td><td>capital leases</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 624</td><td>$ 180</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>546</td><td>173</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>498</td><td>168</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>456</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>419</td><td>157</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>later years</td><td>2914</td><td>1090</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 5457</td><td>$ 1916</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>amount representing interest</td><td>n/a</td><td>-680 ( 680 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>present value of minimum lease payments</td><td>n/a</td><td>$ 1236</td></tr></table> rent expense for operating leases with terms exceeding one month was $ 798 million in 2006 , $ 728 million in 2005 , and $ 651 million in 2004 . when cash rental payments are not made on a straight-line basis , we recognize variable rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term . contingent rentals and sub-rentals are not significant. .
Question: what is the total minimum payments for operating leases in 2006?
Answer: 5457.0
Question: what are they for capital leases?
Answer: 1916.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 7373.0
Question: what is the value for capital leases?
Answer: 1916.0
Question: what is that over the sum?
| 0.25987 |
CONVFINQA10178 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and uncommitted lines of credit of certain subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 824.5 and $ 829.2 , respectively , the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to uncommitted lines of credit was $ 349.1 and $ 308.8 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees related to daylight overdrafts , primarily utilized to manage intra-day overdrafts due to timing of transactions under cash pooling arrangements without resulting in incremental borrowings , was $ 207.8 and $ 182.2 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ 10.2</td><td>$ 2.7</td><td>$ 126.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>30.1</td><td>30.6</td><td>42.9</td><td>5.7</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>115.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 95.8</td><td>$ 50.6</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 10.4</td><td>$ 13.7</td><td>$ 5.2</td><td>$ 242.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2018 . these estimated payments of $ 24.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2019 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2020 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value , in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 5 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities arising in the normal course of business . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company has been in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies , and that settlement was fully executed in april 2018 . the company has previously provided for such settlement in its consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2021 to 2022?
| 37.2 |
CONVFINQA10179 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and uncommitted lines of credit of certain subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 824.5 and $ 829.2 , respectively , the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to uncommitted lines of credit was $ 349.1 and $ 308.8 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees related to daylight overdrafts , primarily utilized to manage intra-day overdrafts due to timing of transactions under cash pooling arrangements without resulting in incremental borrowings , was $ 207.8 and $ 182.2 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ 10.2</td><td>$ 2.7</td><td>$ 126.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>30.1</td><td>30.6</td><td>42.9</td><td>5.7</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>115.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 95.8</td><td>$ 50.6</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 10.4</td><td>$ 13.7</td><td>$ 5.2</td><td>$ 242.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2018 . these estimated payments of $ 24.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2019 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2020 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value , in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 5 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities arising in the normal course of business . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company has been in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies , and that settlement was fully executed in april 2018 . the company has previously provided for such settlement in its consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2021 to 2022?
Answer: 37.2
Question: and what was the total of redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in 2021?
| 42.9 |
CONVFINQA10180 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and uncommitted lines of credit of certain subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 824.5 and $ 829.2 , respectively , the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to uncommitted lines of credit was $ 349.1 and $ 308.8 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees related to daylight overdrafts , primarily utilized to manage intra-day overdrafts due to timing of transactions under cash pooling arrangements without resulting in incremental borrowings , was $ 207.8 and $ 182.2 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ 10.2</td><td>$ 2.7</td><td>$ 126.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>30.1</td><td>30.6</td><td>42.9</td><td>5.7</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>115.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 95.8</td><td>$ 50.6</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 10.4</td><td>$ 13.7</td><td>$ 5.2</td><td>$ 242.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2018 . these estimated payments of $ 24.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2019 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2020 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value , in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 5 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities arising in the normal course of business . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company has been in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies , and that settlement was fully executed in april 2018 . the company has previously provided for such settlement in its consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2021 to 2022?
Answer: 37.2
Question: and what was the total of redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in 2021?
Answer: 42.9
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2021 total?
| 0.86713 |
CONVFINQA10181 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) guarantees we have guaranteed certain obligations of our subsidiaries relating principally to operating leases and uncommitted lines of credit of certain subsidiaries . as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , the amount of parent company guarantees on lease obligations was $ 824.5 and $ 829.2 , respectively , the amount of parent company guarantees primarily relating to uncommitted lines of credit was $ 349.1 and $ 308.8 , respectively , and the amount of parent company guarantees related to daylight overdrafts , primarily utilized to manage intra-day overdrafts due to timing of transactions under cash pooling arrangements without resulting in incremental borrowings , was $ 207.8 and $ 182.2 , respectively . in the event of non-payment by the applicable subsidiary of the obligations covered by a guarantee , we would be obligated to pay the amounts covered by that guarantee . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were no material assets pledged as security for such parent company guarantees . contingent acquisition obligations the following table details the estimated future contingent acquisition obligations payable in cash as of december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>thereafter</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>deferred acquisition payments</td><td>$ 65.7</td><td>$ 20.0</td><td>$ 23.6</td><td>$ 4.7</td><td>$ 10.2</td><td>$ 2.7</td><td>$ 126.9</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates1</td><td>30.1</td><td>30.6</td><td>42.9</td><td>5.7</td><td>3.5</td><td>2.5</td><td>115.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total contingent acquisition payments</td><td>$ 95.8</td><td>$ 50.6</td><td>$ 66.5</td><td>$ 10.4</td><td>$ 13.7</td><td>$ 5.2</td><td>$ 242.2</td></tr></table> 1 we have entered into certain acquisitions that contain both redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with similar terms and conditions . the estimated amounts listed would be paid in the event of exercise at the earliest exercise date . we have certain redeemable noncontrolling interests that are exercisable at the discretion of the noncontrolling equity owners as of december 31 , 2018 . these estimated payments of $ 24.9 are included within the total payments expected to be made in 2019 , and will continue to be carried forward into 2020 or beyond until exercised or expired . redeemable noncontrolling interests are included in the table at current exercise price payable in cash , not at applicable redemption value , in accordance with the authoritative guidance for classification and measurement of redeemable securities . the majority of these payments are contingent upon achieving projected operating performance targets and satisfying other conditions specified in the related agreements and are subject to revision in accordance with the terms of the respective agreements . see note 5 for further information relating to the payment structure of our acquisitions . legal matters we are involved in various legal proceedings , and subject to investigations , inspections , audits , inquiries and similar actions by governmental authorities arising in the normal course of business . the types of allegations that arise in connection with such legal proceedings vary in nature , but can include claims related to contract , employment , tax and intellectual property matters . we evaluate all cases each reporting period and record liabilities for losses from legal proceedings when we determine that it is probable that the outcome in a legal proceeding will be unfavorable and the amount , or potential range , of loss can be reasonably estimated . in certain cases , we cannot reasonably estimate the potential loss because , for example , the litigation is in its early stages . while any outcome related to litigation or such governmental proceedings in which we are involved cannot be predicted with certainty , management believes that the outcome of these matters , individually and in the aggregate , will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition , results of operations or cash flows . as previously disclosed , on april 10 , 2015 , a federal judge in brazil authorized the search of the records of an agency 2019s offices in s e3o paulo and brasilia , in connection with an ongoing investigation by brazilian authorities involving payments potentially connected to local government contracts . the company had previously investigated the matter and taken a number of remedial and disciplinary actions . the company has been in the process of concluding a settlement related to these matters with government agencies , and that settlement was fully executed in april 2018 . the company has previously provided for such settlement in its consolidated financial statements. .
Question: what was the change in redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates from 2021 to 2022?
Answer: 37.2
Question: and what was the total of redeemable noncontrolling interests and call options with affiliates in 2021?
Answer: 42.9
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2021 total?
Answer: 0.86713
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 86.71329 |
CONVFINQA10182 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the change in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
| 386.0 |
CONVFINQA10183 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the change in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was the fair value in 2010?
| 1033.0 |
CONVFINQA10184 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the change in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was the fair value in 2010?
Answer: 1033.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2010 fair value?
| 0.37367 |
CONVFINQA10185 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
interest-earning assets including unearned income in the accretion of fair value adjustments on discounts recognized on acquired or purchased loans is recognized based on the constant effective yield of the financial instrument . the timing and amount of revenue that we recognize in any period is dependent on estimates , judgments , assumptions , and interpretation of contractual terms . changes in these factors can have a significant impact on revenue recognized in any period due to changes in products , market conditions or industry norms . residential and commercial mortgage servicing rights we elect to measure our residential mortgage servicing rights ( msrs ) at fair value . this election was made to be consistent with our risk management strategy to hedge changes in the fair value of these assets as described below . the fair value of residential msrs is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows , taking into consideration actual and expected mortgage loan prepayment rates , discount rates , servicing costs , and other economic factors which are determined based on current market conditions . assumptions incorporated into the residential msrs valuation model reflect management 2019s best estimate of factors that a market participant would use in valuing the residential msrs . although sales of residential msrs do occur , residential msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . as a benchmark for the reasonableness of its residential msrs fair value , pnc obtains opinions of value from independent parties ( 201cbrokers 201d ) . these brokers provided a range ( +/- 10 bps ) based upon their own discounted cash flow calculations of our portfolio that reflected conditions in the secondary market , and any recently executed servicing transactions . pnc compares its internally-developed residential msrs value to the ranges of values received from the brokers . if our residential msrs fair value falls outside of the brokers 2019 ranges , management will assess whether a valuation adjustment is warranted . for 2011 and 2010 , pnc 2019s residential msrs value has not fallen outside of the brokers 2019 ranges . we consider our residential msrs value to represent a reasonable estimate of fair value . commercial msrs are purchased or originated when loans are sold with servicing retained . commercial msrs do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices so the precise terms and conditions of sales are not available . commercial msrs are initially recorded at fair value and are subsequently accounted for at the lower of amortized cost or fair value . commercial msrs are periodically evaluated for impairment . for purposes of impairment , the commercial mortgage servicing rights are stratified based on asset type , which characterizes the predominant risk of the underlying financial asset . the fair value of commercial msrs is estimated by using an internal valuation model . the model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows considering estimates of servicing revenue and costs , discount rates and prepayment speeds . pnc employs risk management strategies designed to protect the value of msrs from changes in interest rates and related market factors . residential msrs values are economically hedged with securities and derivatives , including interest-rate swaps , options , and forward mortgage-backed and futures contracts . as interest rates change , these financial instruments are expected to have changes in fair value negatively correlated to the change in fair value of the hedged residential msrs portfolio . the hedge relationships are actively managed in response to changing market conditions over the life of the residential msrs assets . commercial msrs are economically hedged at a macro level or with specific derivatives to protect against a significant decline in interest rates . selecting appropriate financial instruments to economically hedge residential or commercial msrs requires significant management judgment to assess how mortgage rates and prepayment speeds could affect the future values of msrs . hedging results can frequently be less predictable in the short term , but over longer periods of time are expected to protect the economic value of the msrs . the fair value of residential and commercial msrs and significant inputs to the valuation model as of december 31 , 2011 are shown in the tables below . the expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are significant factors driving the fair value . management uses a third-party model to estimate future residential loan prepayments and internal proprietary models to estimate future commercial loan prepayments . these models have been refined based on current market conditions . future interest rates are another important factor in the valuation of msrs . management utilizes market implied forward interest rates to estimate the future direction of mortgage and discount rates . the forward rates utilized are derived from the current yield curve for u.s . dollar interest rate swaps and are consistent with pricing of capital markets instruments . changes in the shape and slope of the forward curve in future periods may result in volatility in the fair value estimate . residential mortgage servicing rights dollars in millions december 31 december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>dollars in millions</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>december 312010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 647</td><td>$ 1033</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>weighted-average life ( in years ) ( a )</td><td>3.6</td><td>5.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a )</td><td>22.10% ( 22.10 % )</td><td>12.61% ( 12.61 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average option adjusted spread</td><td>11.77% ( 11.77 % )</td><td>12.18% ( 12.18 % )</td></tr></table> weighted-average constant prepayment rate ( a ) 22.10% ( 22.10 % ) 12.61% ( 12.61 % ) weighted-average option adjusted spread 11.77% ( 11.77 % ) 12.18% ( 12.18 % ) ( a ) changes in weighted-average life and weighted-average constant prepayment rate reflect the cumulative impact of changes in rates , prepayment expectations and model changes . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 65 .
Question: what was the change in the fair value from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 386.0
Question: and what was the fair value in 2010?
Answer: 1033.0
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to this 2010 fair value?
Answer: 0.37367
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 37.36689 |
CONVFINQA10186 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .
Question: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
| 97.58 |
CONVFINQA10187 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .
Question: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
Answer: 97.58
Question: what is that value divided by 100?
| 0.9758 |
CONVFINQA10188 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .
Question: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
Answer: 97.58
Question: what is that value divided by 100?
Answer: 0.9758
Question: what was the price of the s&p information technology on 4/14?
| 236.12 |
CONVFINQA10189 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .
Question: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
Answer: 97.58
Question: what is that value divided by 100?
Answer: 0.9758
Question: what was the price of the s&p information technology on 4/14?
Answer: 236.12
Question: what is that number less 100?
| 136.12 |
CONVFINQA10190 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .
Question: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
Answer: 97.58
Question: what is that value divided by 100?
Answer: 0.9758
Question: what was the price of the s&p information technology on 4/14?
Answer: 236.12
Question: what is that number less 100?
Answer: 136.12
Question: what is that divided by 100?
| 1.3612 |
CONVFINQA10191 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>4/09</td><td>4/10</td><td>4/11</td><td>4/12</td><td>4/13</td><td>4/14</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>netapp inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 189.45</td><td>$ 284.75</td><td>$ 212.19</td><td>$ 190.66</td><td>$ 197.58</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>nasdaq composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>144.63</td><td>170.44</td><td>182.57</td><td>202.25</td><td>253.22</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>138.84</td><td>162.75</td><td>170.49</td><td>199.29</td><td>240.02</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>s&p 500 information technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>143.49</td><td>162.37</td><td>186.06</td><td>189.18</td><td>236.12</td></tr></table> we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .
Question: what is the value of netapp inc on 4/14 less 100?
Answer: 97.58
Question: what is that value divided by 100?
Answer: 0.9758
Question: what was the price of the s&p information technology on 4/14?
Answer: 236.12
Question: what is that number less 100?
Answer: 136.12
Question: what is that divided by 100?
Answer: 1.3612
Question: what is the difference between the netapp and s&p ratios?
| -38.54 |
CONVFINQA10192 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?
| 1060.0 |
CONVFINQA10193 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?
Answer: 1060.0
Question: now converted to millions?
| 1060000.0 |
CONVFINQA10194 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?
Answer: 1060.0
Question: now converted to millions?
Answer: 1060000.0
Question: and considering the amount of shares forfeited, in millions?
| 22000000.0 |
CONVFINQA10195 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>shares ( thous. )</td><td>weighted-averagegrant-date fair value</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>nonvested at january 1 2009</td><td>873</td><td>$ 50.70</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>granted</td><td>449</td><td>47.28</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>vested</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td><td>43.23</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-22 ( 22 )</td><td>53.86</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>nonvested at december 31 2009</td><td>1060</td><td>$ 50.88</td></tr></table> at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .
Question: what was the amount of nonvested shares as of 12/31/09?
Answer: 1060.0
Question: now converted to millions?
Answer: 1060000.0
Question: and considering the amount of shares forfeited, in millions?
Answer: 22000000.0
Question: so what was the remaining compensation expense per share for unvested awards?
| 20.75472 |
CONVFINQA10196 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources of blackrock 2019s operating cash primarily include investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue , performance fees , revenue from technology and risk management services , advisory and other revenue and distribution fees . blackrock uses its cash to pay all operating expense , interest and principal on borrowings , income taxes , dividends on blackrock 2019s capital stock , repurchases of the company 2019s stock , capital expenditures and purchases of co-investments and seed investments . for details of the company 2019s gaap cash flows from operating , investing and financing activities , see the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . cash flows from operating activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and administration fees , securities lending revenue and performance fees offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business , including year-end incentive compensation accrued for in the prior year . cash outflows from investing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 517 million and primarily reflected $ 497 million of investment purchases , $ 155 million of purchases of property and equipment , $ 73 million related to the first reserve transaction and $ 29 million related to the cachematrix transaction , partially offset by $ 205 million of net proceeds from sales and maturities of certain investments . cash outflows from financing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 3094 million , primarily resulting from $ 1.4 billion of share repurchases , including $ 1.1 billion in open market- transactions and $ 321 million of employee tax withholdings related to employee stock transactions , $ 1.7 billion of cash dividend payments and $ 700 million of repayments of long- term borrowings , partially offset by $ 697 million of proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings . the company manages its financial condition and funding to maintain appropriate liquidity for the business . liquidity resources at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 , cash and cash equivalents ( 1 ) $ 6894 $ 6091 cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 ) ( 63 ) ( 53 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6894</td><td>$ 6091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>subtotal</td><td>6831</td><td>6038</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit facility 2014 undrawn</td><td>4000</td><td>4000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liquidity resources ( 3 )</td><td>$ 10831</td><td>$ 10038</td></tr></table> total liquidity resources ( 3 ) $ 10831 $ 10038 ( 1 ) the percentage of cash and cash equivalents held by the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) and 50% ( 50 % ) at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . see net capital requirements herein for more information on net capital requirements in certain regulated subsidiaries . ( 2 ) the company cannot readily access such cash to use in its operating activities . ( 3 ) amounts do not reflect a reduction for year-end incentive compensation accruals of approximately $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , which are paid in the first quarter of the following year . total liquidity resources increased $ 793 million during 2017 , primarily reflecting cash flows from operating activities , partially offset by cash payments of 2016 year-end incentive awards , share repurchases of $ 1.4 billion and cash dividend payments of $ 1.7 billion . a significant portion of the company 2019s $ 3154 million of total investments , as adjusted , is illiquid in nature and , as such , cannot be readily convertible to cash . share repurchases . the company repurchased 2.6 million common shares in open market transactions under the share repurchase program for approximately $ 1.1 billion during 2017 . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 6.4 million shares still authorized to be repurchased . net capital requirements . the company is required to maintain net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries within a number of jurisdictions , which is partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalent investments in those subsidiaries or jurisdictions . as a result , such subsidiaries of the company may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash between different jurisdictions and to their parents . additionally , transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that could discourage such transfers . blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) is chartered as a national bank that does not accept client deposits and whose powers are limited to trust and other fiduciary activities . btc provides investment management services , including investment advisory and securities lending agency services , to institutional clients . btc is subject to regulatory capital and liquid asset requirements administered by the office of the comptroller of the currency . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company was required to maintain approximately $ 1.8 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively , in net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries , including btc , entities regulated by the financial conduct authority and prudential regulation authority in the united kingdom , and the company 2019s broker-dealers . the company was in compliance with all applicable regulatory net capital requirements . undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . as a result of the 2017 tax act and the one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings , a provisional amount of u.s . income taxes was provided on the undistributed foreign earnings . the financial statement basis in excess of tax basis of its foreign subsidiaries remains indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations . the company will continue to evaluate its capital management plans throughout 2018 . short-term borrowings 2017 revolving credit facility . the company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2017 to extend the maturity date to april 2022 ( the 201c2017 credit facility 201d ) . the 2017 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2017 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2017 credit facility requires the company .
Question: what is the net change of the balance of cash and cash equivalents during 2017?
| 803.0 |
CONVFINQA10197 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources of blackrock 2019s operating cash primarily include investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue , performance fees , revenue from technology and risk management services , advisory and other revenue and distribution fees . blackrock uses its cash to pay all operating expense , interest and principal on borrowings , income taxes , dividends on blackrock 2019s capital stock , repurchases of the company 2019s stock , capital expenditures and purchases of co-investments and seed investments . for details of the company 2019s gaap cash flows from operating , investing and financing activities , see the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . cash flows from operating activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and administration fees , securities lending revenue and performance fees offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business , including year-end incentive compensation accrued for in the prior year . cash outflows from investing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 517 million and primarily reflected $ 497 million of investment purchases , $ 155 million of purchases of property and equipment , $ 73 million related to the first reserve transaction and $ 29 million related to the cachematrix transaction , partially offset by $ 205 million of net proceeds from sales and maturities of certain investments . cash outflows from financing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 3094 million , primarily resulting from $ 1.4 billion of share repurchases , including $ 1.1 billion in open market- transactions and $ 321 million of employee tax withholdings related to employee stock transactions , $ 1.7 billion of cash dividend payments and $ 700 million of repayments of long- term borrowings , partially offset by $ 697 million of proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings . the company manages its financial condition and funding to maintain appropriate liquidity for the business . liquidity resources at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 , cash and cash equivalents ( 1 ) $ 6894 $ 6091 cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 ) ( 63 ) ( 53 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6894</td><td>$ 6091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>subtotal</td><td>6831</td><td>6038</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit facility 2014 undrawn</td><td>4000</td><td>4000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liquidity resources ( 3 )</td><td>$ 10831</td><td>$ 10038</td></tr></table> total liquidity resources ( 3 ) $ 10831 $ 10038 ( 1 ) the percentage of cash and cash equivalents held by the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) and 50% ( 50 % ) at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . see net capital requirements herein for more information on net capital requirements in certain regulated subsidiaries . ( 2 ) the company cannot readily access such cash to use in its operating activities . ( 3 ) amounts do not reflect a reduction for year-end incentive compensation accruals of approximately $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , which are paid in the first quarter of the following year . total liquidity resources increased $ 793 million during 2017 , primarily reflecting cash flows from operating activities , partially offset by cash payments of 2016 year-end incentive awards , share repurchases of $ 1.4 billion and cash dividend payments of $ 1.7 billion . a significant portion of the company 2019s $ 3154 million of total investments , as adjusted , is illiquid in nature and , as such , cannot be readily convertible to cash . share repurchases . the company repurchased 2.6 million common shares in open market transactions under the share repurchase program for approximately $ 1.1 billion during 2017 . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 6.4 million shares still authorized to be repurchased . net capital requirements . the company is required to maintain net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries within a number of jurisdictions , which is partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalent investments in those subsidiaries or jurisdictions . as a result , such subsidiaries of the company may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash between different jurisdictions and to their parents . additionally , transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that could discourage such transfers . blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) is chartered as a national bank that does not accept client deposits and whose powers are limited to trust and other fiduciary activities . btc provides investment management services , including investment advisory and securities lending agency services , to institutional clients . btc is subject to regulatory capital and liquid asset requirements administered by the office of the comptroller of the currency . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company was required to maintain approximately $ 1.8 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively , in net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries , including btc , entities regulated by the financial conduct authority and prudential regulation authority in the united kingdom , and the company 2019s broker-dealers . the company was in compliance with all applicable regulatory net capital requirements . undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . as a result of the 2017 tax act and the one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings , a provisional amount of u.s . income taxes was provided on the undistributed foreign earnings . the financial statement basis in excess of tax basis of its foreign subsidiaries remains indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations . the company will continue to evaluate its capital management plans throughout 2018 . short-term borrowings 2017 revolving credit facility . the company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2017 to extend the maturity date to april 2022 ( the 201c2017 credit facility 201d ) . the 2017 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2017 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2017 credit facility requires the company .
Question: what is the net change of the balance of cash and cash equivalents during 2017?
Answer: 803.0
Question: what was the balance at the start of 2017?
| 6091.0 |
CONVFINQA10198 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
sources of blackrock 2019s operating cash primarily include investment advisory , administration fees and securities lending revenue , performance fees , revenue from technology and risk management services , advisory and other revenue and distribution fees . blackrock uses its cash to pay all operating expense , interest and principal on borrowings , income taxes , dividends on blackrock 2019s capital stock , repurchases of the company 2019s stock , capital expenditures and purchases of co-investments and seed investments . for details of the company 2019s gaap cash flows from operating , investing and financing activities , see the consolidated statements of cash flows contained in part ii , item 8 of this filing . cash flows from operating activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , primarily include the receipt of investment advisory and administration fees , securities lending revenue and performance fees offset by the payment of operating expenses incurred in the normal course of business , including year-end incentive compensation accrued for in the prior year . cash outflows from investing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 517 million and primarily reflected $ 497 million of investment purchases , $ 155 million of purchases of property and equipment , $ 73 million related to the first reserve transaction and $ 29 million related to the cachematrix transaction , partially offset by $ 205 million of net proceeds from sales and maturities of certain investments . cash outflows from financing activities , excluding the impact of consolidated sponsored investment funds , for 2017 were $ 3094 million , primarily resulting from $ 1.4 billion of share repurchases , including $ 1.1 billion in open market- transactions and $ 321 million of employee tax withholdings related to employee stock transactions , $ 1.7 billion of cash dividend payments and $ 700 million of repayments of long- term borrowings , partially offset by $ 697 million of proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings . the company manages its financial condition and funding to maintain appropriate liquidity for the business . liquidity resources at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 were as follows : ( in millions ) december 31 , december 31 , cash and cash equivalents ( 1 ) $ 6894 $ 6091 cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 ) ( 63 ) ( 53 ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>december 31 2017</td><td>december 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash and cash equivalents ( 1 )</td><td>$ 6894</td><td>$ 6091</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cash and cash equivalents held by consolidated vres ( 2 )</td><td>-63 ( 63 )</td><td>-53 ( 53 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>subtotal</td><td>6831</td><td>6038</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>credit facility 2014 undrawn</td><td>4000</td><td>4000</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total liquidity resources ( 3 )</td><td>$ 10831</td><td>$ 10038</td></tr></table> total liquidity resources ( 3 ) $ 10831 $ 10038 ( 1 ) the percentage of cash and cash equivalents held by the company 2019s u.s . subsidiaries was approximately 40% ( 40 % ) and 50% ( 50 % ) at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . see net capital requirements herein for more information on net capital requirements in certain regulated subsidiaries . ( 2 ) the company cannot readily access such cash to use in its operating activities . ( 3 ) amounts do not reflect a reduction for year-end incentive compensation accruals of approximately $ 1.5 billion and $ 1.3 billion for 2017 and 2016 , respectively , which are paid in the first quarter of the following year . total liquidity resources increased $ 793 million during 2017 , primarily reflecting cash flows from operating activities , partially offset by cash payments of 2016 year-end incentive awards , share repurchases of $ 1.4 billion and cash dividend payments of $ 1.7 billion . a significant portion of the company 2019s $ 3154 million of total investments , as adjusted , is illiquid in nature and , as such , cannot be readily convertible to cash . share repurchases . the company repurchased 2.6 million common shares in open market transactions under the share repurchase program for approximately $ 1.1 billion during 2017 . at december 31 , 2017 , there were 6.4 million shares still authorized to be repurchased . net capital requirements . the company is required to maintain net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries within a number of jurisdictions , which is partially maintained by retaining cash and cash equivalent investments in those subsidiaries or jurisdictions . as a result , such subsidiaries of the company may be restricted in their ability to transfer cash between different jurisdictions and to their parents . additionally , transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences that could discourage such transfers . blackrock institutional trust company , n.a . ( 201cbtc 201d ) is chartered as a national bank that does not accept client deposits and whose powers are limited to trust and other fiduciary activities . btc provides investment management services , including investment advisory and securities lending agency services , to institutional clients . btc is subject to regulatory capital and liquid asset requirements administered by the office of the comptroller of the currency . at december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , the company was required to maintain approximately $ 1.8 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively , in net capital in certain regulated subsidiaries , including btc , entities regulated by the financial conduct authority and prudential regulation authority in the united kingdom , and the company 2019s broker-dealers . the company was in compliance with all applicable regulatory net capital requirements . undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries . as a result of the 2017 tax act and the one-time mandatory deemed repatriation tax on untaxed accumulated foreign earnings , a provisional amount of u.s . income taxes was provided on the undistributed foreign earnings . the financial statement basis in excess of tax basis of its foreign subsidiaries remains indefinitely reinvested in foreign operations . the company will continue to evaluate its capital management plans throughout 2018 . short-term borrowings 2017 revolving credit facility . the company 2019s credit facility has an aggregate commitment amount of $ 4.0 billion and was amended in april 2017 to extend the maturity date to april 2022 ( the 201c2017 credit facility 201d ) . the 2017 credit facility permits the company to request up to an additional $ 1.0 billion of borrowing capacity , subject to lender credit approval , increasing the overall size of the 2017 credit facility to an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ 5.0 billion . interest on borrowings outstanding accrues at a rate based on the applicable london interbank offered rate plus a spread . the 2017 credit facility requires the company .
Question: what is the net change of the balance of cash and cash equivalents during 2017?
Answer: 803.0
Question: what was the balance at the start of 2017?
Answer: 6091.0
Question: what is the net change over the starting balance?
| 0.13183 |
CONVFINQA10199 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
other off-balance sheet commitments lease commitments the company leases various equipment and facilities , including retail space , under noncancelable operating lease arrangements . the company does not currently utilize any other off-balance sheet financing arrangements . the major facility leases are typically for terms not exceeding 10 years and generally provide renewal options for terms not exceeding five additional years . leases for retail space are for terms ranging from five to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2012 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 4.4 billion , of which $ 3.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 488 million , $ 338 million and $ 271 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2012 , are as follows ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 516</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>556</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2015</td><td>542</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2016</td><td>513</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2017</td><td>486</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1801</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 4414</td></tr></table> other commitments as of september 29 , 2012 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 21.1 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 988 million as of september 29 , 2012 , which were comprised mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and have not been fully adjudicated , certain of which are discussed in part i , item 3 of this form 10-k under the heading 201clegal proceedings 201d and in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors . 201d in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . vs samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment and may be subject to appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended september 29 , 2012. .
Question: what was the rent expense in 2012?
| 488.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.