id
stringlengths 10
14
| Open-ended Verifiable Question
stringlengths 1.09k
15.5k
| Ground-True Answer
stringlengths 2
16
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA9900 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at january 1</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional authorizations ( a )</td><td>45541057</td><td>86269178</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share repurchases ( b )</td><td>-65516126 ( 65516126 )</td><td>-42424014 ( 42424014 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at december 31</td><td>43071613</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>$ 18.80</td><td>$ 14.82</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what was the average price paid per share in 2013?
Answer: 18.8
Question: and what was the number of shares repurchased in that year?
Answer: 43071613.0
Question: what was, then, the total value of those shares?
| 809746324.4 |
CONVFINQA9901 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 82 fifth third bancorp to 100 million shares of its outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions , and to utilize any derivative or similar instrument to affect share repurchase transactions . this share repurchase authorization replaced the board 2019s previous authorization . on may 21 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 25035519 shares , or approximately $ 539 million , of its outstanding common stock on may 24 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . at settlement of the forward contract on october 1 , 2013 , the bancorp received an additional 4270250 shares which were recorded as an adjustment to the basis in the treasury shares purchased on the acquisition date . on november 13 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 8538423 shares , or approximately $ 200 million , of its outstanding common stock on november 18 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before february 28 , 2014 . on december 10 , 2013 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 19084195 shares , or approximately $ 456 million , of its outstanding common stock on december 13 , 2013 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . on january 28 , 2014 , the bancorp entered into an accelerated share repurchase transaction with a counterparty pursuant to which the bancorp purchased 3950705 shares , or approximately $ 99 million , of its outstanding common stock on january 31 , 2014 . the bancorp repurchased the shares of its common stock as part of its board approved 100 million share repurchase program previously announced on march 19 , 2013 . the bancorp expects the settlement of the transaction to occur on or before march 26 , 2014 . table 61 : share repurchases . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>for the years ended december 31</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at january 1</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additional authorizations ( a )</td><td>45541057</td><td>86269178</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>share repurchases ( b )</td><td>-65516126 ( 65516126 )</td><td>-42424014 ( 42424014 )</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>shares authorized for repurchase at december 31</td><td>43071613</td><td>63046682</td><td>19201518</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average price paid per share</td><td>$ 18.80</td><td>$ 14.82</td><td>n/a</td></tr></table> ( a ) in march 2013 , the bancorp announced that its board of directors had authorized management to purchase 100 million shares of the bancorp 2019s common stock through the open market or in any private transaction . the authorization does not include specific price targets or an expiration date . this share repurchase authorization replaces the board 2019s previous authorization pursuant to which approximately 54 million shares remained available for repurchase by the bancorp . ( b ) excludes 1863097 , 2059003 and 1164254 shares repurchased during 2013 , 2012 , and 2011 , respectively , in connection with various employee compensation plans . these repurchases are not included in the calculation for average price paid and do not count against the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the board of directors 2019 authorization . stress tests and ccar the frb issued guidelines known as ccar , which provide a common , conservative approach to ensure bhcs , including the bancorp , hold adequate capital to maintain ready access to funding , continue operations and meet their obligations to creditors and counterparties , and continue to serve as credit intermediaries , even in adverse conditions . the ccar process requires the submission of a comprehensive capital plan that assumes a minimum planning horizon of nine quarters under various economic scenarios . the mandatory elements of the capital plan are an assessment of the expected use and sources of capital over the planning horizon , a description of all planned capital actions over the planning horizon , a discussion of any expected changes to the bancorp 2019s business plan that are likely to have a material impact on its capital adequacy or liquidity , a detailed description of the bancorp 2019s process for assessing capital adequacy and the bancorp 2019s capital policy . the capital plan must reflect the revised capital framework that the frb adopted in connection with the implementation of the basel iii accord , including the framework 2019s minimum regulatory capital ratios and transition arrangements . the frb 2019s review of the capital plan will assess the comprehensiveness of the capital plan , the reasonableness of the assumptions and the analysis underlying the capital plan . additionally , the frb reviews the robustness of the capital adequacy process , the capital policy and the bancorp 2019s ability to maintain capital above the minimum regulatory capital ratios as they transition to basel iii and above a basel i tier 1 common ratio of 5 percent under baseline and stressful conditions throughout a nine- quarter planning horizon . the frb issued stress testing rules that implement section 165 ( i ) ( 1 ) and ( i ) ( 2 ) of the dfa . large bhcs , including the bancorp , are subject to the final stress testing rules . the rules require both supervisory and company-run stress tests , which provide forward- looking information to supervisors to help assess whether institutions have sufficient capital to absorb losses and support operations during adverse economic conditions . in march of 2013 , the frb announced it had completed the 2013 ccar . for bhcs that proposed capital distributions in their plan , the frb either objected to the plan or provided a non- objection whereby the frb concurred with the proposed 2013 capital distributions . the frb indicated to the bancorp that it did not object to the following proposed capital actions for the period beginning april 1 , 2013 and ending march 31 , 2014 : f0b7 increase in the quarterly common stock dividend to $ 0.12 per share ; f0b7 repurchase of up to $ 750 million in trups subject to the determination of a regulatory capital event and replacement with the issuance of a similar amount of tier ii-qualifying subordinated debt ; f0b7 conversion of the $ 398 million in outstanding series g 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) convertible preferred stock into approximately 35.5 million common shares issued to the holders . if this conversion were to occur , the bancorp would intend to repurchase common shares equivalent to those issued in the conversion up to $ 550 million in market value , and issue $ 550 million in preferred stock; .
Question: what was the average price paid per share in 2013?
Answer: 18.8
Question: and what was the number of shares repurchased in that year?
Answer: 43071613.0
Question: what was, then, the total value of those shares?
Answer: 809746324.4
Question: and how much is that in millions?
| 809.74632 |
CONVFINQA9902 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 126 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 37.5 billion and $ 35.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 59.4 billion and $ 51.3 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative transactions , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative transactions . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the dre and avg metrics . the two measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of other liquid securities collateral , for the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables rating equivalent 2014 2013 ( a ) december 31 , ( in millions , except ratios ) exposure net of all collateral % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral exposure net of all collateral % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral</td><td>rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral</td><td>exposure net of all collateral</td><td>% ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3</td><td>$ 19202</td><td>32% ( 32 % )</td><td>$ 12953</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>a+/a1 to a-/a3</td><td>13940</td><td>24</td><td>12930</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3</td><td>19008</td><td>32</td><td>15220</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bb+/ba1 to b-/b3</td><td>6384</td><td>11</td><td>6806</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ccc+/caa1 and below</td><td>837</td><td>1</td><td>3415</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 59371</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 51324</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. .
Question: what percentage of the total exposure net of all collateral has a rating equivalent of a+/a1 to a-/a3?
| 0.23479 |
CONVFINQA9903 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
management 2019s discussion and analysis 126 jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report while useful as a current view of credit exposure , the net fair value of the derivative receivables does not capture the potential future variability of that credit exposure . to capture the potential future variability of credit exposure , the firm calculates , on a client-by-client basis , three measures of potential derivatives-related credit loss : peak , derivative risk equivalent ( 201cdre 201d ) , and average exposure ( 201cavg 201d ) . these measures all incorporate netting and collateral benefits , where applicable . peak exposure to a counterparty is an extreme measure of exposure calculated at a 97.5% ( 97.5 % ) confidence level . dre exposure is a measure that expresses the risk of derivative exposure on a basis intended to be equivalent to the risk of loan exposures . the measurement is done by equating the unexpected loss in a derivative counterparty exposure ( which takes into consideration both the loss volatility and the credit rating of the counterparty ) with the unexpected loss in a loan exposure ( which takes into consideration only the credit rating of the counterparty ) . dre is a less extreme measure of potential credit loss than peak and is the primary measure used by the firm for credit approval of derivative transactions . finally , avg is a measure of the expected fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables at future time periods , including the benefit of collateral . avg exposure over the total life of the derivative contract is used as the primary metric for pricing purposes and is used to calculate credit capital and the cva , as further described below . the three year avg exposure was $ 37.5 billion and $ 35.4 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively , compared with derivative receivables , net of all collateral , of $ 59.4 billion and $ 51.3 billion at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively . the fair value of the firm 2019s derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment , the cva , to reflect the credit quality of counterparties . the cva is based on the firm 2019s avg to a counterparty and the counterparty 2019s credit spread in the credit derivatives market . the primary components of changes in cva are credit spreads , new deal activity or unwinds , and changes in the underlying market environment . the firm believes that active risk management is essential to controlling the dynamic credit risk in the derivatives portfolio . in addition , the firm 2019s risk management process takes into consideration the potential impact of wrong-way risk , which is broadly defined as the potential for increased correlation between the firm 2019s exposure to a counterparty ( avg ) and the counterparty 2019s credit quality . many factors may influence the nature and magnitude of these correlations over time . to the extent that these correlations are identified , the firm may adjust the cva associated with that counterparty 2019s avg . the firm risk manages exposure to changes in cva by entering into credit derivative transactions , as well as interest rate , foreign exchange , equity and commodity derivative transactions . the accompanying graph shows exposure profiles to the firm 2019s current derivatives portfolio over the next 10 years as calculated by the dre and avg metrics . the two measures generally show that exposure will decline after the first year , if no new trades are added to the portfolio . the following table summarizes the ratings profile by derivative counterparty of the firm 2019s derivative receivables , including credit derivatives , net of other liquid securities collateral , for the dates indicated . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s . ratings profile of derivative receivables rating equivalent 2014 2013 ( a ) december 31 , ( in millions , except ratios ) exposure net of all collateral % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral exposure net of all collateral % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>rating equivalent december 31 ( in millions except ratios )</td><td>rating equivalent exposure net of all collateral</td><td>rating equivalent % ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral</td><td>exposure net of all collateral</td><td>% ( % ) of exposure net of all collateral</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>aaa/aaa to aa-/aa3</td><td>$ 19202</td><td>32% ( 32 % )</td><td>$ 12953</td><td>25% ( 25 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>a+/a1 to a-/a3</td><td>13940</td><td>24</td><td>12930</td><td>25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>bbb+/baa1 to bbb-/baa3</td><td>19008</td><td>32</td><td>15220</td><td>30</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>bb+/ba1 to b-/b3</td><td>6384</td><td>11</td><td>6806</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>ccc+/caa1 and below</td><td>837</td><td>1</td><td>3415</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 59371</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td><td>$ 51324</td><td>100% ( 100 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) the prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current period presentation. .
Question: what percentage of the total exposure net of all collateral has a rating equivalent of a+/a1 to a-/a3?
Answer: 0.23479
Question: what percentage of the ratings profile of derivative receivables were junk-rated in 2013?
| 20.0 |
CONVFINQA9904 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from time to time , we may elect to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for our european and canadian subsidiaries . in addition , we may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items . we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes . based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 , we receive u.s . dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.03 cad per $ 1.00 , u.s . dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 20ac0.77 per $ 1.00 and euros in exchange for pounds sterling at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of a30.84 per 20ac1.00 . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 51.1 million with contract maturities of 1 month or less , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 50.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contract used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items was 20ac10.5 million , or $ 13.6 million , with a contract maturity of 1 month . the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense , net on the consolidated statements of income . the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet . refer to note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the fair value measurements . included in other expense , net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>$ -4027 ( 4027 )</td><td>$ -1280 ( 1280 )</td><td>$ 5222</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>298</td><td>-2638 ( 2638 )</td><td>-261 ( 261 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized derivative losses</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-809 ( 809 )</td><td>-1060 ( 1060 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>realized derivative gains ( losses )</td><td>1696</td><td>3549</td><td>-4412 ( 4412 )</td></tr></table> we enter into foreign currency forward contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions . this credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts . however , we monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal . although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations . inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results . although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .
Question: what is the change in the balance of foreign currency forward contracts liability from 2010 to 2011?
| 0.1 |
CONVFINQA9905 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from time to time , we may elect to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for our european and canadian subsidiaries . in addition , we may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items . we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes . based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 , we receive u.s . dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.03 cad per $ 1.00 , u.s . dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 20ac0.77 per $ 1.00 and euros in exchange for pounds sterling at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of a30.84 per 20ac1.00 . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 51.1 million with contract maturities of 1 month or less , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 50.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contract used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items was 20ac10.5 million , or $ 13.6 million , with a contract maturity of 1 month . the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense , net on the consolidated statements of income . the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet . refer to note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the fair value measurements . included in other expense , net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>$ -4027 ( 4027 )</td><td>$ -1280 ( 1280 )</td><td>$ 5222</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>298</td><td>-2638 ( 2638 )</td><td>-261 ( 261 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized derivative losses</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-809 ( 809 )</td><td>-1060 ( 1060 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>realized derivative gains ( losses )</td><td>1696</td><td>3549</td><td>-4412 ( 4412 )</td></tr></table> we enter into foreign currency forward contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions . this credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts . however , we monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal . although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations . inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results . although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .
Question: what is the change in the balance of foreign currency forward contracts liability from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 0.1
Question: what is the balance of foreign currency forward contracts liability in 2010?
| 0.6 |
CONVFINQA9906 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
from time to time , we may elect to use foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk from exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany transactions and projected inventory purchases for our european and canadian subsidiaries . in addition , we may elect to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the risk associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items . we do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes . based on the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of december 31 , 2011 , we receive u.s . dollars in exchange for canadian dollars at a weighted average contractual forward foreign currency exchange rate of 1.03 cad per $ 1.00 , u.s . dollars in exchange for euros at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of 20ac0.77 per $ 1.00 and euros in exchange for pounds sterling at a weighted average contractual foreign currency exchange rate of a30.84 per 20ac1.00 . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our canadian subsidiary was $ 51.1 million with contract maturities of 1 month or less , and the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts for our european subsidiary was $ 50.0 million with contract maturities of 1 month . as of december 31 , 2011 , the notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward contract used to mitigate the foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on pound sterling denominated balance sheet items was 20ac10.5 million , or $ 13.6 million , with a contract maturity of 1 month . the foreign currency forward contracts are not designated as cash flow hedges , and accordingly , changes in their fair value are recorded in other expense , net on the consolidated statements of income . the fair values of our foreign currency forward contracts were liabilities of $ 0.7 million and $ 0.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheet . refer to note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the fair value measurements . included in other expense , net were the following amounts related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and derivative foreign currency forward contracts: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year ended december 31 , ( in thousands )</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>year ended december 31 , 2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>unrealized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>$ -4027 ( 4027 )</td><td>$ -1280 ( 1280 )</td><td>$ 5222</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>realized foreign currency exchange rate gains ( losses )</td><td>298</td><td>-2638 ( 2638 )</td><td>-261 ( 261 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>unrealized derivative losses</td><td>-31 ( 31 )</td><td>-809 ( 809 )</td><td>-1060 ( 1060 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>realized derivative gains ( losses )</td><td>1696</td><td>3549</td><td>-4412 ( 4412 )</td></tr></table> we enter into foreign currency forward contracts with major financial institutions with investment grade credit ratings and are exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by these financial institutions . this credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in the foreign currency forward contracts . however , we monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and consider the risk of counterparty default to be minimal . although we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts to minimize some of the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on future cash flows , we cannot be assured that foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations . inflation inflationary factors such as increases in the cost of our product and overhead costs may adversely affect our operating results . although we do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our financial position or results of operations to date , a high rate of inflation in the future may have an adverse effect on our ability to maintain current levels of gross margin and selling , general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues if the selling prices of our products do not increase with these increased costs. .
Question: what is the change in the balance of foreign currency forward contracts liability from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 0.1
Question: what is the balance of foreign currency forward contracts liability in 2010?
Answer: 0.6
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.16667 |
CONVFINQA9907 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the change of hqla from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17?
| 42.7 |
CONVFINQA9908 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the change of hqla from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17?
Answer: 42.7
Question: what was the increase of hqla in excess of net outflows between 2016 and 2017?
| 10.8 |
CONVFINQA9909 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
liquidity monitoring and measurement stress testing liquidity stress testing is performed for each of citi 2019s major entities , operating subsidiaries and/or countries . stress testing and scenario analyses are intended to quantify the potential impact of an adverse liquidity event on the balance sheet and liquidity position , and to identify viable funding alternatives that can be utilized . these scenarios include assumptions about significant changes in key funding sources , market triggers ( such as credit ratings ) , potential uses of funding and geopolitical and macroeconomic conditions . these conditions include expected and stressed market conditions as well as company-specific events . liquidity stress tests are conducted to ascertain potential mismatches between liquidity sources and uses over a variety of time horizons and over different stressed conditions . liquidity limits are set accordingly . to monitor the liquidity of an entity , these stress tests and potential mismatches are calculated with varying frequencies , with several tests performed daily . given the range of potential stresses , citi maintains contingency funding plans on a consolidated basis and for individual entities . these plans specify a wide range of readily available actions for a variety of adverse market conditions or idiosyncratic stresses . short-term liquidity measurement : liquidity coverage ratio ( lcr ) in addition to internal liquidity stress metrics that citi has developed for a 30-day stress scenario , citi also monitors its liquidity by reference to the lcr , as calculated pursuant to the u.s . lcr rules . generally , the lcr is designed to ensure that banks maintain an adequate level of hqla to meet liquidity needs under an acute 30-day stress scenario . the lcr is calculated by dividing hqla by estimated net outflows over a stressed 30-day period , with the net outflows determined by applying prescribed outflow factors to various categories of liabilities , such as deposits , unsecured and secured wholesale borrowings , unused lending commitments and derivatives- related exposures , partially offset by inflows from assets maturing within 30 days . banks are required to calculate an add-on to address potential maturity mismatches between contractual cash outflows and inflows within the 30-day period in determining the total amount of net outflows . the minimum lcr requirement is 100% ( 100 % ) , effective january 2017 . pursuant to the federal reserve board 2019s final rule regarding lcr disclosures , effective april 1 , 2017 , citi began to disclose lcr in the prescribed format . the table below sets forth the components of citi 2019s lcr calculation and hqla in excess of net outflows for the periods indicated : in billions of dollars dec . 31 , sept . 30 , dec . 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in billions of dollars</td><td>dec . 31 2017</td><td>sept . 30 2017</td><td>dec . 31 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>hqla</td><td>$ 446.4</td><td>$ 448.6</td><td>$ 403.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>net outflows</td><td>364.3</td><td>365.1</td><td>332.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>lcr</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>123% ( 123 % )</td><td>121% ( 121 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>hqla in excess of net outflows</td><td>$ 82.1</td><td>$ 83.5</td><td>$ 71.3</td></tr></table> note : amounts set forth in the table above are presented on an average basis . as set forth in the table above , citi 2019s lcr increased year- over-year , as the increase in the hqla ( as discussed above ) more than offset an increase in modeled net outflows . the increase in modeled net outflows was primarily driven by changes in assumptions , including changes in methodology to better align citi 2019s outflow assumptions with those embedded in its resolution planning . sequentially , citi 2019s lcr remained unchanged . long-term liquidity measurement : net stable funding ratio ( nsfr ) in 2016 , the federal reserve board , the fdic and the occ issued a proposed rule to implement the basel iii nsfr requirement . the u.s.-proposed nsfr is largely consistent with the basel committee 2019s final nsfr rules . in general , the nsfr assesses the availability of a bank 2019s stable funding against a required level . a bank 2019s available stable funding would include portions of equity , deposits and long-term debt , while its required stable funding would be based on the liquidity characteristics of its assets , derivatives and commitments . prescribed factors would be required to be applied to the various categories of asset and liabilities classes . the ratio of available stable funding to required stable funding would be required to be greater than 100% ( 100 % ) . while citi believes that it is compliant with the proposed u.s . nsfr rules as of december 31 , 2017 , it will need to evaluate a final version of the rules , which are expected to be released during 2018 . citi expects that the nsfr final rules implementation period will be communicated along with the final version of the rules. .
Question: what was the change of hqla from 12/31/16 to 12/31/17?
Answer: 42.7
Question: what was the increase of hqla in excess of net outflows between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 10.8
Question: and the percentage change of this value?
| 0.15147 |
CONVFINQA9910 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what was the difference in 401 ( k ) contributions between the years of 2016 and 2017?
| -4.0 |
CONVFINQA9911 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what was the difference in 401 ( k ) contributions between the years of 2016 and 2017?
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in the year of 2016?
| 617.0 |
CONVFINQA9912 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
valuation techniques 2013 cash equivalents are mostly comprised of short-term money-market instruments and are valued at cost , which approximates fair value . u.s . equity securities and international equity securities categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for u.s . equity securities and international equity securities not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor or categorized as level 3 if the custodian obtains uncorroborated quotes from a broker or investment manager . commingled equity funds categorized as level 1 are traded on active national and international exchanges and are valued at their closing prices on the last trading day of the year . for commingled equity funds not traded on an active exchange , or if the closing price is not available , the trustee obtains indicative quotes from a pricing vendor , broker or investment manager . these securities are categorized as level 2 if the custodian obtains corroborated quotes from a pricing vendor . fixed income investments categorized as level 2 are valued by the trustee using pricing models that use verifiable observable market data ( e.g. , interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals and credit spreads ) , bids provided by brokers or dealers or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics . fixed income investments are categorized as level 3 when valuations using observable inputs are unavailable . the trustee typically obtains pricing based on indicative quotes or bid evaluations from vendors , brokers or the investment manager . in addition , certain other fixed income investments categorized as level 3 are valued using a discounted cash flow approach . significant inputs include projected annuity payments and the discount rate applied to those payments . certain commingled equity funds , consisting of equity mutual funds , are valued using the nav . the nav valuations are based on the underlying investments and typically redeemable within 90 days . private equity funds consist of partnership and co-investment funds . the nav is based on valuation models of the underlying securities , which includes unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated using verifiable observable market data . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 12 years . real estate funds consist of partnerships , most of which are closed-end funds , for which the nav is based on valuation models and periodic appraisals . these funds typically have redemption periods between eight and 10 years . hedge funds consist of direct hedge funds for which the nav is generally based on the valuation of the underlying investments . redemptions in hedge funds are based on the specific terms of each fund , and generally range from a minimum of one month to several months . contributions and expected benefit payments the funding of our qualified defined benefit pension plans is determined in accordance with erisa , as amended by the ppa , and in a manner consistent with cas and internal revenue code rules . we made contributions of $ 5.0 billion to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2018 , including required and discretionary contributions . as a result of these contributions , we do not expect to make contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plans in 2019 . the following table presents estimated future benefit payments , which reflect expected future employee service , as of december 31 , 2018 ( in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2020</td><td>2021</td><td>2022</td><td>2023</td><td>2024 2013 2028</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>qualified defined benefit pension plans</td><td>$ 2350</td><td>$ 2390</td><td>$ 2470</td><td>$ 2550</td><td>$ 2610</td><td>$ 13670</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>retiree medical and life insurance plans</td><td>170</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>180</td><td>170</td><td>810</td></tr></table> defined contribution plans we maintain a number of defined contribution plans , most with 401 ( k ) features , that cover substantially all of our employees . under the provisions of our 401 ( k ) plans , we match most employees 2019 eligible contributions at rates specified in the plan documents . our contributions were $ 658 million in 2018 , $ 613 million in 2017 and $ 617 million in 2016 , the majority of which were funded using our common stock . our defined contribution plans held approximately 33.3 million and 35.5 million shares of our common stock as of december 31 , 2018 and 2017. .
Question: what was the difference in 401 ( k ) contributions between the years of 2016 and 2017?
Answer: -4.0
Question: and what was the total of 401 ( k ) contributions in the year of 2016?
Answer: 617.0
Question: how much does that difference represent in relation to these contributions of 2016?
| -0.00648 |
CONVFINQA9913 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?
| 0.19771 |
CONVFINQA9914 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?
Answer: 0.19771
Question: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?
| 1338.0 |
CONVFINQA9915 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?
Answer: 0.19771
Question: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?
Answer: 1338.0
Question: what is that for 2014?
| 2048.0 |
CONVFINQA9916 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?
Answer: 0.19771
Question: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?
Answer: 1338.0
Question: what is that for 2014?
Answer: 2048.0
Question: what is, then, the total value of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods scheduled to end in both years combined?
| 3386.0 |
CONVFINQA9917 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?
Answer: 0.19771
Question: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?
Answer: 1338.0
Question: what is that for 2014?
Answer: 2048.0
Question: what is, then, the total value of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods scheduled to end in both years combined?
Answer: 3386.0
Question: including 2013, what then becomes this total value?
| 5410.0 |
CONVFINQA9918 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
consist of first and second liens , the charge-off amounts for the pool are proportionate to the composition of first and second liens in the pool . our experience has been that the ratio of first to second lien loans has been consistent over time and is appropriately represented in our pools used for roll-rate calculations . generally , our variable-rate home equity lines of credit have either a seven or ten year draw period , followed by a 20 year amortization term . during the draw period , we have home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay interest only and home equity lines of credit where borrowers pay principal and interest . based upon outstanding balances at december 31 , 2012 , the following table presents the periods when home equity lines of credit draw periods are scheduled to end . table 39 : home equity lines of credit 2013 draw period end in millions interest product principal interest product . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>interestonlyproduct</td><td>principalandinterestproduct</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2013</td><td>$ 1338</td><td>$ 221</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2014</td><td>2048</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2015</td><td>2024</td><td>654</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2016</td><td>1571</td><td>504</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2017</td><td>3075</td><td>697</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2018 and thereafter</td><td>5497</td><td>4825</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total ( a )</td><td>$ 15553</td><td>$ 7376</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes approximately $ 166 million , $ 208 million , $ 213 million , $ 61 million , $ 70 million and $ 526 million of home equity lines of credit with balloon payments with draw periods scheduled to end in 2013 , 2014 , 2015 , 2016 , 2017 and 2018 and thereafter , respectively . we view home equity lines of credit where borrowers are paying principal and interest under the draw period as less risky than those where the borrowers are paying interest only , as these borrowers have a demonstrated ability to make some level of principal and interest payments . based upon outstanding balances , and excluding purchased impaired loans , at december 31 , 2012 , for home equity lines of credit for which the borrower can no longer draw ( e.g. , draw period has ended or borrowing privileges have been terminated ) , approximately 3.86% ( 3.86 % ) were 30-89 days past due and approximately 5.96% ( 5.96 % ) were greater than or equal to 90 days past due . generally , when a borrower becomes 60 days past due , we terminate borrowing privileges , and those privileges are not subsequently reinstated . at that point , we continue our collection/recovery processes , which may include a loss mitigation loan modification resulting in a loan that is classified as a tdr . see note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report for additional information . loan modifications and troubled debt restructurings consumer loan modifications we modify loans under government and pnc-developed programs based upon our commitment to help eligible homeowners and borrowers avoid foreclosure , where appropriate . initially , a borrower is evaluated for a modification under a government program . if a borrower does not qualify under a government program , the borrower is then evaluated under a pnc program . our programs utilize both temporary and permanent modifications and typically reduce the interest rate , extend the term and/or defer principal . temporary and permanent modifications under programs involving a change to loan terms are generally classified as tdrs . further , certain payment plans and trial payment arrangements which do not include a contractual change to loan terms may be classified as tdrs . additional detail on tdrs is discussed below as well as in note 5 asset quality in the notes to consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . a temporary modification , with a term between three and 60 months , involves a change in original loan terms for a period of time and reverts to a calculated exit rate for the remaining term of the loan as of a specific date . a permanent modification , with a term greater than 60 months , is a modification in which the terms of the original loan are changed . permanent modifications primarily include the government-created home affordable modification program ( hamp ) or pnc-developed hamp-like modification programs . for consumer loan programs , such as residential mortgages and home equity loans and lines , we will enter into a temporary modification when the borrower has indicated a temporary hardship and a willingness to bring current the delinquent loan balance . examples of this situation often include delinquency due to illness or death in the family , or a loss of employment . permanent modifications are entered into when it is confirmed that the borrower does not possess the income necessary to continue making loan payments at the current amount , but our expectation is that payments at lower amounts can be made . residential mortgage and home equity loans and lines have been modified with changes in terms for up to 60 months , although the majority involve periods of three to 24 months . we also monitor the success rates and delinquency status of our loan modification programs to assess their effectiveness in serving our customers 2019 needs while mitigating credit losses . the following tables provide the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified consumer real estate related loans as well as the number of accounts and unpaid principal balance of modified loans that were 60 days or more past due as of six months , nine months , twelve months and fifteen months after the modification date . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 91 .
Question: what percentage of the total of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods is represented by the ones scheduled to end in 2017?
Answer: 0.19771
Question: and what is the value of the interest only products home equity lines that are scheduled to end in 2015?
Answer: 1338.0
Question: what is that for 2014?
Answer: 2048.0
Question: what is, then, the total value of the interest only products home equity lines of credit draw periods scheduled to end in both years combined?
Answer: 3386.0
Question: including 2013, what then becomes this total value?
Answer: 5410.0
Question: and what is the average between those three years?
| 1803.33333 |
CONVFINQA9919 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
agreements associated with the agency securitizations , most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages and home equity loans/lines for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . these relate primarily to loans originated during 2006-2008 . for the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio , we have established indemnification and repurchase liabilities based upon this same methodology for loans sold during 2005-2007 . indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management . initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in residential mortgage revenue on the consolidated income statement . since pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability . these adjustments are recognized in other noninterest income on the consolidated income statement . management 2019s subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests , actual loss experience , risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios , and current economic conditions . as part of its evaluation , management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims totaled $ 130 million and $ 294 million , respectively , and was included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . an analysis of the changes in this liability during 2011 and 2010 follows : analysis of indemnification and repurchase liability for asserted claims and unasserted claims . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011 residential mortgages ( a )</td><td>2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )</td><td>2011 total</td><td>2011 residential mortgages ( a )</td><td>2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 294</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 270</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>102</td><td>4</td><td>106</td><td>120</td><td>144</td><td>264</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-163 ( 163 )</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-270 ( 270 )</td><td>-205 ( 205 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 294</td></tr></table> ( a ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 121.4 billion and $ 139.8 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . ( b ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 4.5 billion and $ 6.5 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , which was acquired with national city . management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on investor indemnification and repurchase claims at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . while management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability , the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and , accordingly , it is reasonably possible that future indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability . factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid claims driven by investor strategies and behavior , our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors , housing prices , and other economic conditions . at december 31 , 2011 , we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses in excess of our indemnification and repurchase liability of up to $ 85 million . this estimate of potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher investor demands , lower claim rescissions , and lower home prices than our current assumptions . reinsurance agreements we have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers . these subsidiaries enter into various types of reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% ( 100 % ) reinsurance . in excess of loss agreements , these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits , once a defined first loss percentage is met . in quota share agreements , the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims . these subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment , credit life , accident & health , lender placed 200 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for the years of 2010 and 2011, combined?
| 424.0 |
CONVFINQA9920 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
agreements associated with the agency securitizations , most sale agreements do not provide for penalties or other remedies if we do not respond timely to investor indemnification or repurchase requests . origination and sale of residential mortgages is an ongoing business activity and , accordingly , management continually assesses the need to recognize indemnification and repurchase liabilities pursuant to the associated investor sale agreements . we establish indemnification and repurchase liabilities for estimated losses on sold first and second-lien mortgages and home equity loans/lines for which indemnification is expected to be provided or for loans that are expected to be repurchased . for the first and second-lien mortgage sold portfolio , we have established an indemnification and repurchase liability pursuant to investor sale agreements based on claims made and our estimate of future claims on a loan by loan basis . these relate primarily to loans originated during 2006-2008 . for the home equity loans/lines sold portfolio , we have established indemnification and repurchase liabilities based upon this same methodology for loans sold during 2005-2007 . indemnification and repurchase liabilities are initially recognized when loans are sold to investors and are subsequently evaluated by management . initial recognition and subsequent adjustments to the indemnification and repurchase liability for the sold residential mortgage portfolio are recognized in residential mortgage revenue on the consolidated income statement . since pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , only subsequent adjustments are recognized to the home equity loans/lines indemnification and repurchase liability . these adjustments are recognized in other noninterest income on the consolidated income statement . management 2019s subsequent evaluation of these indemnification and repurchase liabilities is based upon trends in indemnification and repurchase requests , actual loss experience , risks in the underlying serviced loan portfolios , and current economic conditions . as part of its evaluation , management considers estimated loss projections over the life of the subject loan portfolio . at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims totaled $ 130 million and $ 294 million , respectively , and was included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . an analysis of the changes in this liability during 2011 and 2010 follows : analysis of indemnification and repurchase liability for asserted claims and unasserted claims . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>2011 residential mortgages ( a )</td><td>2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )</td><td>2011 total</td><td>2011 residential mortgages ( a )</td><td>2011 home equity loans/lines ( b )</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>january 1</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 294</td><td>$ 229</td><td>$ 41</td><td>$ 270</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>reserve adjustments net</td><td>102</td><td>4</td><td>106</td><td>120</td><td>144</td><td>264</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>losses 2013 loan repurchases and settlements</td><td>-163 ( 163 )</td><td>-107 ( 107 )</td><td>-270 ( 270 )</td><td>-205 ( 205 )</td><td>-35 ( 35 )</td><td>-240 ( 240 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31</td><td>$ 83</td><td>$ 47</td><td>$ 130</td><td>$ 144</td><td>$ 150</td><td>$ 294</td></tr></table> ( a ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 121.4 billion and $ 139.8 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . ( b ) repurchase obligation associated with sold loan portfolios of $ 4.5 billion and $ 6.5 billion at december 31 , 2011 and december 31 , 2010 , respectively . pnc is no longer engaged in the brokered home equity lending business , which was acquired with national city . management believes our indemnification and repurchase liabilities appropriately reflect the estimated probable losses on investor indemnification and repurchase claims at december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . while management seeks to obtain all relevant information in estimating the indemnification and repurchase liability , the estimation process is inherently uncertain and imprecise and , accordingly , it is reasonably possible that future indemnification and repurchase losses could be more or less than our established liability . factors that could affect our estimate include the volume of valid claims driven by investor strategies and behavior , our ability to successfully negotiate claims with investors , housing prices , and other economic conditions . at december 31 , 2011 , we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses in excess of our indemnification and repurchase liability of up to $ 85 million . this estimate of potential additional losses in excess of our liability is based on assumed higher investor demands , lower claim rescissions , and lower home prices than our current assumptions . reinsurance agreements we have two wholly-owned captive insurance subsidiaries which provide reinsurance to third-party insurers related to insurance sold to our customers . these subsidiaries enter into various types of reinsurance agreements with third-party insurers where the subsidiary assumes the risk of loss through either an excess of loss or quota share agreement up to 100% ( 100 % ) reinsurance . in excess of loss agreements , these subsidiaries assume the risk of loss for an excess layer of coverage up to specified limits , once a defined first loss percentage is met . in quota share agreements , the subsidiaries and third-party insurers share the responsibility for payment of all claims . these subsidiaries provide reinsurance for accidental death & dismemberment , credit life , accident & health , lender placed 200 the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k .
Question: what was the total indemnification and repurchase liability for estimated losses on indemnification and repurchase claims for the years of 2010 and 2011, combined?
Answer: 424.0
Question: and, only in 2011, how much did the home equity loans represent in relation to that total indemnification and repurchase liability, in percentage?
| 0.36154 |
CONVFINQA9921 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>country</td><td>number of owned sites ( approx )</td><td>coverage area</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>19400</td><td>coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors .</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mexico</td><td>2500</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas including mexico city monterrey guadalajara and acapulco .</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brazil</td><td>1100</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil including sao paulo rio de janeiro brasilia and curitiba .</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>india</td><td>200</td><td>initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) .</td></tr></table> ( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 .
Question: what was the number of owned sites in the us and mexico?
| 21900.0 |
CONVFINQA9922 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>country</td><td>number of owned sites ( approx )</td><td>coverage area</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>19400</td><td>coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors .</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mexico</td><td>2500</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas including mexico city monterrey guadalajara and acapulco .</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brazil</td><td>1100</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil including sao paulo rio de janeiro brasilia and curitiba .</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>india</td><td>200</td><td>initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) .</td></tr></table> ( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 .
Question: what was the number of owned sites in the us and mexico?
Answer: 21900.0
Question: and including brazil?
| 23000.0 |
CONVFINQA9923 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>country</td><td>number of owned sites ( approx )</td><td>coverage area</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united states</td><td>19400</td><td>coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors .</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mexico</td><td>2500</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas including mexico city monterrey guadalajara and acapulco .</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>brazil</td><td>1100</td><td>coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil including sao paulo rio de janeiro brasilia and curitiba .</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>india</td><td>200</td><td>initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) .</td></tr></table> ( 201cati 201d ) and spectrasite communications , llc ( 201cspectrasite 201d ) . we conduct our international operations through our subsidiary , american tower international , inc. , which in turn conducts operations through its various international operating subsidiaries . our international operations consist primarily of our operations in mexico and brazil , and also include operations in india , which we established in the second half of 2007 . we operate in two business segments : rental and management and network development services . for more information about our business segments , as well as financial information about the geographic areas in which we operate , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 201d and note 18 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report . products and services rental and management our primary business is our communications site leasing business , which we conduct through our rental and management segment . this segment accounted for approximately 97% ( 97 % ) , 98% ( 98 % ) and 98% ( 98 % ) of our total revenues for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . our rental and management segment is comprised of our domestic and international site leasing business , including the operation of wireless communications towers , broadcast communications towers and das networks , as well as rooftop management . wireless communications towers.we are a leading owner and operator of wireless communications towers in the united states , mexico and brazil , based on number of towers and revenue . we also own and operate communications towers in india , where we commenced operations in the second half of 2007 . in addition to owned wireless communications towers , we also manage wireless communications sites for property owners in the united states , mexico and brazil . approximately 92% ( 92 % ) , 91% ( 91 % ) and 91% ( 91 % ) of our rental and management segment revenue was attributable to our wireless communications towers for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2008 , our wireless communications tower portfolio included the following : country number of owned sites ( approx ) coverage area united states . . . . . . . . . . . 19400 coverage spans 49 states and the district of columbia ; 90% ( 90 % ) of network provides coverage in the top 100 markets or core areas such as high traffic interstate corridors . mexico . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2500 coverage primarily concentrated in highly populated areas , including mexico city , monterrey , guadalajara and acapulco . brazil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1100 coverage primarily concentrated in major metropolitan areas in central and southern brazil , including sao paulo , rio de janeiro , brasilia and curitiba . india . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 initial-phase coverage ( operations established in the second half of 2007 ) . we lease space on our wireless communications towers to customers in a diverse range of wireless industries , including personal communications services , cellular , enhanced specialized mobile radio , wimax . paging and fixed microwave . our major domestic wireless customers include at&t mobility , sprint nextel , verizon wireless ( which completed its merger with alltel in january 2009 ) and t-mobile usa . our major international wireless customers include grupo iusacell ( iusacell celular and unefon in mexico ) , nextel international in mexico and brazil , telefonica ( movistar in mexico and vivo in brazil ) , america movil ( telcel in mexico and claro in brazil ) and telecom italia mobile ( tim ) in brazil . for the year ended december 31 .
Question: what was the number of owned sites in the us and mexico?
Answer: 21900.0
Question: and including brazil?
Answer: 23000.0
Question: and the total amount including india?
| 23200.0 |
CONVFINQA9924 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 . the retail segment represented 13% ( 13 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of the company 2019s total net sales in 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the retail segment 2019s operating income was $ 4.7 billion , $ 3.2 billion , and $ 2.3 billion during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively . these year-over-year increases in retail operating income were primarily attributable to higher overall net sales that resulted in significantly higher average revenue per store during the respective years . gross margin gross margin for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 156508</td><td>$ 108249</td><td>$ 65225</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>87846</td><td>64431</td><td>39541</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 68662</td><td>$ 43818</td><td>$ 25684</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>43.9% ( 43.9 % )</td><td>40.5% ( 40.5 % )</td><td>39.4% ( 39.4 % )</td></tr></table> the gross margin percentage in 2012 was 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) , compared to 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) in 2011 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs , a higher mix of iphone sales , and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . the increase in gross margin was partially offset by the impact of a stronger u.s . dollar . the gross margin percentage during the first half of 2012 was 45.9% ( 45.9 % ) compared to 41.4% ( 41.4 % ) during the second half of 2012 . the primary drivers of higher gross margin in the first half of 2012 compared to the second half are a higher mix of iphone sales and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . additionally , gross margin in the second half of 2012 was also affected by the introduction of new products with flat pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers , price reductions on certain existing products , higher transition costs associated with product launches , and continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs . the gross margin percentage in 2011 was 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) , compared to 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) in 2010 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs . the company expects to experience decreases in its gross margin percentage in future periods , as compared to levels achieved during 2012 , and the company anticipates gross margin of about 36% ( 36 % ) during the first quarter of 2013 . expected future declines in gross margin are largely due to a higher mix of new and innovative products with flat or reduced pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers and anticipated component cost and other cost increases . future strengthening of the u.s . dollar could further negatively impact gross margin . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage in future periods , including the first quarter of 2013 , are forward-looking and could differ from actual results because of several factors including , but not limited to those set forth above in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors 201d and those described in this paragraph . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global product pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , product transitions and potential increases in the cost of components , as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take product pricing actions , which would adversely affect gross margins . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . due to the company 2019s significant international operations , financial results can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates. .
Question: what was the change in the net sales from 2011 to 2012?
| 48259.0 |
CONVFINQA9925 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 . the retail segment represented 13% ( 13 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of the company 2019s total net sales in 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the retail segment 2019s operating income was $ 4.7 billion , $ 3.2 billion , and $ 2.3 billion during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively . these year-over-year increases in retail operating income were primarily attributable to higher overall net sales that resulted in significantly higher average revenue per store during the respective years . gross margin gross margin for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 156508</td><td>$ 108249</td><td>$ 65225</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>87846</td><td>64431</td><td>39541</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 68662</td><td>$ 43818</td><td>$ 25684</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>43.9% ( 43.9 % )</td><td>40.5% ( 40.5 % )</td><td>39.4% ( 39.4 % )</td></tr></table> the gross margin percentage in 2012 was 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) , compared to 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) in 2011 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs , a higher mix of iphone sales , and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . the increase in gross margin was partially offset by the impact of a stronger u.s . dollar . the gross margin percentage during the first half of 2012 was 45.9% ( 45.9 % ) compared to 41.4% ( 41.4 % ) during the second half of 2012 . the primary drivers of higher gross margin in the first half of 2012 compared to the second half are a higher mix of iphone sales and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . additionally , gross margin in the second half of 2012 was also affected by the introduction of new products with flat pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers , price reductions on certain existing products , higher transition costs associated with product launches , and continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs . the gross margin percentage in 2011 was 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) , compared to 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) in 2010 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs . the company expects to experience decreases in its gross margin percentage in future periods , as compared to levels achieved during 2012 , and the company anticipates gross margin of about 36% ( 36 % ) during the first quarter of 2013 . expected future declines in gross margin are largely due to a higher mix of new and innovative products with flat or reduced pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers and anticipated component cost and other cost increases . future strengthening of the u.s . dollar could further negatively impact gross margin . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage in future periods , including the first quarter of 2013 , are forward-looking and could differ from actual results because of several factors including , but not limited to those set forth above in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors 201d and those described in this paragraph . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global product pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , product transitions and potential increases in the cost of components , as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take product pricing actions , which would adversely affect gross margins . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . due to the company 2019s significant international operations , financial results can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates. .
Question: what was the change in the net sales from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 48259.0
Question: and what were those net sales in 2011?
| 108249.0 |
CONVFINQA9926 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 . the retail segment represented 13% ( 13 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of the company 2019s total net sales in 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the retail segment 2019s operating income was $ 4.7 billion , $ 3.2 billion , and $ 2.3 billion during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively . these year-over-year increases in retail operating income were primarily attributable to higher overall net sales that resulted in significantly higher average revenue per store during the respective years . gross margin gross margin for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 156508</td><td>$ 108249</td><td>$ 65225</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>87846</td><td>64431</td><td>39541</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 68662</td><td>$ 43818</td><td>$ 25684</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>43.9% ( 43.9 % )</td><td>40.5% ( 40.5 % )</td><td>39.4% ( 39.4 % )</td></tr></table> the gross margin percentage in 2012 was 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) , compared to 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) in 2011 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs , a higher mix of iphone sales , and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . the increase in gross margin was partially offset by the impact of a stronger u.s . dollar . the gross margin percentage during the first half of 2012 was 45.9% ( 45.9 % ) compared to 41.4% ( 41.4 % ) during the second half of 2012 . the primary drivers of higher gross margin in the first half of 2012 compared to the second half are a higher mix of iphone sales and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . additionally , gross margin in the second half of 2012 was also affected by the introduction of new products with flat pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers , price reductions on certain existing products , higher transition costs associated with product launches , and continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs . the gross margin percentage in 2011 was 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) , compared to 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) in 2010 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs . the company expects to experience decreases in its gross margin percentage in future periods , as compared to levels achieved during 2012 , and the company anticipates gross margin of about 36% ( 36 % ) during the first quarter of 2013 . expected future declines in gross margin are largely due to a higher mix of new and innovative products with flat or reduced pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers and anticipated component cost and other cost increases . future strengthening of the u.s . dollar could further negatively impact gross margin . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage in future periods , including the first quarter of 2013 , are forward-looking and could differ from actual results because of several factors including , but not limited to those set forth above in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors 201d and those described in this paragraph . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global product pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , product transitions and potential increases in the cost of components , as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take product pricing actions , which would adversely affect gross margins . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . due to the company 2019s significant international operations , financial results can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates. .
Question: what was the change in the net sales from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 48259.0
Question: and what were those net sales in 2011?
Answer: 108249.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2011 amount?
| 0.44581 |
CONVFINQA9927 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
$ 43.3 million in 2011 compared to $ 34.1 million in 2010 . the retail segment represented 13% ( 13 % ) and 15% ( 15 % ) of the company 2019s total net sales in 2011 and 2010 , respectively . the retail segment 2019s operating income was $ 4.7 billion , $ 3.2 billion , and $ 2.3 billion during 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 respectively . these year-over-year increases in retail operating income were primarily attributable to higher overall net sales that resulted in significantly higher average revenue per store during the respective years . gross margin gross margin for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 are as follows ( in millions , except gross margin percentages ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net sales</td><td>$ 156508</td><td>$ 108249</td><td>$ 65225</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>cost of sales</td><td>87846</td><td>64431</td><td>39541</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 68662</td><td>$ 43818</td><td>$ 25684</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>43.9% ( 43.9 % )</td><td>40.5% ( 40.5 % )</td><td>39.4% ( 39.4 % )</td></tr></table> the gross margin percentage in 2012 was 43.9% ( 43.9 % ) , compared to 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) in 2011 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs , a higher mix of iphone sales , and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . the increase in gross margin was partially offset by the impact of a stronger u.s . dollar . the gross margin percentage during the first half of 2012 was 45.9% ( 45.9 % ) compared to 41.4% ( 41.4 % ) during the second half of 2012 . the primary drivers of higher gross margin in the first half of 2012 compared to the second half are a higher mix of iphone sales and improved leverage on fixed costs from higher net sales . additionally , gross margin in the second half of 2012 was also affected by the introduction of new products with flat pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers , price reductions on certain existing products , higher transition costs associated with product launches , and continued strengthening of the u.s . dollar ; partially offset by lower commodity costs . the gross margin percentage in 2011 was 40.5% ( 40.5 % ) , compared to 39.4% ( 39.4 % ) in 2010 . this year-over-year increase in gross margin was largely driven by lower commodity and other product costs . the company expects to experience decreases in its gross margin percentage in future periods , as compared to levels achieved during 2012 , and the company anticipates gross margin of about 36% ( 36 % ) during the first quarter of 2013 . expected future declines in gross margin are largely due to a higher mix of new and innovative products with flat or reduced pricing that have higher cost structures and deliver greater value to customers and anticipated component cost and other cost increases . future strengthening of the u.s . dollar could further negatively impact gross margin . the foregoing statements regarding the company 2019s expected gross margin percentage in future periods , including the first quarter of 2013 , are forward-looking and could differ from actual results because of several factors including , but not limited to those set forth above in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k under the heading 201crisk factors 201d and those described in this paragraph . in general , gross margins and margins on individual products will remain under downward pressure due to a variety of factors , including continued industry wide global product pricing pressures , increased competition , compressed product life cycles , product transitions and potential increases in the cost of components , as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the company 2019s sales mix towards products with lower gross margins . in response to competitive pressures , the company expects it will continue to take product pricing actions , which would adversely affect gross margins . gross margins could also be affected by the company 2019s ability to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of its products . due to the company 2019s significant international operations , financial results can be significantly affected in the short-term by fluctuations in exchange rates. .
Question: what was the change in the net sales from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 48259.0
Question: and what were those net sales in 2011?
Answer: 108249.0
Question: what percentage, then, did that change represent in relation to this 2011 amount?
Answer: 0.44581
Question: and in that same period, what was the variation in the gross margin percentage?
| 1.1 |
CONVFINQA9928 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
| 399165.0 |
CONVFINQA9929 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 399165.0
Question: what is the total number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
| 3995600.0 |
CONVFINQA9930 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 399165.0
Question: what is the total number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 3995600.0
Question: what is the sum?
| 4394765.0 |
CONVFINQA9931 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 399165.0
Question: what is the total number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 3995600.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 4394765.0
Question: what is the total number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
| 3995600.0 |
CONVFINQA9932 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>plan category</td><td>number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b )</td><td>weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights</td><td>number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>equity compensation plans approved by security holders</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 )</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>399165</td><td>$ 0.00</td><td>3995600</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .
Question: what is the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights?
Answer: 399165.0
Question: what is the total number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 3995600.0
Question: what is the sum?
Answer: 4394765.0
Question: what is the total number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans?
Answer: 3995600.0
Question: what is that divided by the earlier sum value?
| 0.90917 |
CONVFINQA9933 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
echostar communications corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued closing price of the class a common stock on the last business day of each calendar quarter in which such shares of class a common stock are deemed sold to an employee under the espp . the espp shall terminate upon the first to occur of ( i ) october 1 , 2007 or ( ii ) the date on which the espp is terminated by the board of directors . during 2000 , 2001 and 2002 employees purchased approximately 58000 ; 80000 and 108000 shares of class a common stock through the espp , respectively . 401 ( k ) employee savings plan echostar sponsors a 401 ( k ) employee savings plan ( the 201c401 ( k ) plan 201d ) for eligible employees . voluntary employee contributions to the 401 ( k ) plan may be matched 50% ( 50 % ) by echostar , subject to a maximum annual contribution by echostar of $ 1000 per employee . matching 401 ( k ) contributions totaled approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 2.1 million and $ 2.4 million during the years ended december 31 , 2000 , 2001 and 2002 , respectively . echostar also may make an annual discretionary contribution to the plan with approval by echostar 2019s board of directors , subject to the maximum deductible limit provided by the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended . these contributions may be made in cash or in echostar stock . forfeitures of unvested participant balances which are retained by the 401 ( k ) plan may be used to fund matching and discretionary contributions . expense recognized relating to discretionary contributions was approximately $ 7 million , $ 225 thousand and $ 17 million during the years ended december 31 , 2000 , 2001 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . commitments and contingencies leases future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases as of december 31 , 2002 , are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 17274</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>14424</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>11285</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>7698</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>3668</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1650</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>55999</td></tr></table> total rent expense for operating leases approximated $ 9 million , $ 14 million and $ 16 million in 2000 , 2001 and 2002 , respectively . purchase commitments as of december 31 , 2002 , echostar 2019s purchase commitments totaled approximately $ 359 million . the majority of these commitments relate to echostar receiver systems and related components . all of the purchases related to these commitments are expected to be made during 2003 . echostar expects to finance these purchases from existing unrestricted cash balances and future cash flows generated from operations . patents and intellectual property many entities , including some of echostar 2019s competitors , now have and may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or affect products or services directly or indirectly related to those that echostar offers . echostar may not be aware of all patents and other intellectual property rights that its products may potentially infringe . damages in patent infringement cases can include a tripling of actual damages in certain cases . further , echostar cannot estimate the extent to which it may be required in the future to obtain licenses with respect to .
Question: what was the sum of employee purchases through the espp for 2000 and 2001?
| 138000.0 |
CONVFINQA9934 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
echostar communications corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued closing price of the class a common stock on the last business day of each calendar quarter in which such shares of class a common stock are deemed sold to an employee under the espp . the espp shall terminate upon the first to occur of ( i ) october 1 , 2007 or ( ii ) the date on which the espp is terminated by the board of directors . during 2000 , 2001 and 2002 employees purchased approximately 58000 ; 80000 and 108000 shares of class a common stock through the espp , respectively . 401 ( k ) employee savings plan echostar sponsors a 401 ( k ) employee savings plan ( the 201c401 ( k ) plan 201d ) for eligible employees . voluntary employee contributions to the 401 ( k ) plan may be matched 50% ( 50 % ) by echostar , subject to a maximum annual contribution by echostar of $ 1000 per employee . matching 401 ( k ) contributions totaled approximately $ 1.6 million , $ 2.1 million and $ 2.4 million during the years ended december 31 , 2000 , 2001 and 2002 , respectively . echostar also may make an annual discretionary contribution to the plan with approval by echostar 2019s board of directors , subject to the maximum deductible limit provided by the internal revenue code of 1986 , as amended . these contributions may be made in cash or in echostar stock . forfeitures of unvested participant balances which are retained by the 401 ( k ) plan may be used to fund matching and discretionary contributions . expense recognized relating to discretionary contributions was approximately $ 7 million , $ 225 thousand and $ 17 million during the years ended december 31 , 2000 , 2001 and 2002 , respectively . 9 . commitments and contingencies leases future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases as of december 31 , 2002 , are as follows ( in thousands ) : year ending december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2003</td><td>$ 17274</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2004</td><td>14424</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2005</td><td>11285</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2006</td><td>7698</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2007</td><td>3668</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>1650</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total minimum lease payments</td><td>55999</td></tr></table> total rent expense for operating leases approximated $ 9 million , $ 14 million and $ 16 million in 2000 , 2001 and 2002 , respectively . purchase commitments as of december 31 , 2002 , echostar 2019s purchase commitments totaled approximately $ 359 million . the majority of these commitments relate to echostar receiver systems and related components . all of the purchases related to these commitments are expected to be made during 2003 . echostar expects to finance these purchases from existing unrestricted cash balances and future cash flows generated from operations . patents and intellectual property many entities , including some of echostar 2019s competitors , now have and may in the future obtain patents and other intellectual property rights that cover or affect products or services directly or indirectly related to those that echostar offers . echostar may not be aware of all patents and other intellectual property rights that its products may potentially infringe . damages in patent infringement cases can include a tripling of actual damages in certain cases . further , echostar cannot estimate the extent to which it may be required in the future to obtain licenses with respect to .
Question: what was the sum of employee purchases through the espp for 2000 and 2001?
Answer: 138000.0
Question: what is the sum including purchases from 2002?
| 246000.0 |
CONVFINQA9935 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc . ( the 201ccompany 201d or 201camerican water 201d ) is a holding company incorporated in delaware . american water is the largest and most geographically diverse investor owned publicly-traded united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . we employ approximately 6700 professionals who provide drinking water , wastewater and other related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states , the district of columbia and ontario , canada . operating segments we conduct our business primarily through our regulated businesses segment . we also operate several market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services , which include four operating segments that individually do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cgaap 201d ) . these four non- reportable operating segments are collectively presented as our 201cmarket-based businesses , 201d which is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses . additional information can be found in item 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 19 2014segment information in the notes to consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . our subsidiaries that provide these services operate in approximately 1600 communities in 16 states in the united states and are generally subject to regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation , referred to as public utility commissions or ( 201cpucs 201d ) . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . we report the results of the services provided by our utilities in our regulated businesses segment . our regulated businesses segment 2019s operating revenues were $ 2743 million for 2015 , $ 2674 million for 2014 and $ 2594 million for 2013 , accounting for 86.8% ( 86.8 % ) , 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) and 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table summarizes our regulated businesses 2019 operating revenues , number of customers and estimated population served by state , each as of december 31 , 2015 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 704</td><td>% ( % ) of total 25.7% ( 25.7 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 660580</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.3% ( 22.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>614</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>672407</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.3</td><td>19.0% ( 19.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>270</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>313058</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>missouri</td><td>269</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>473245</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.4% ( 12.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>206</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>295994</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>198</td><td>7.2% ( 7.2 % )</td><td>174942</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>129</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>169037</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2390</td><td>87.1% ( 87.1 % )</td><td>2759263</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.3</td><td>85.1% ( 85.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>353</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>493428</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>14.9% ( 14.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2743</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3252691</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>12.1</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company and american lake water company . ( b ) includes west virginia-american water company and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our utilities in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee and virginia. .
Question: what is the estimated population served in missouri, in millions?
| 1.5 |
CONVFINQA9936 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc . ( the 201ccompany 201d or 201camerican water 201d ) is a holding company incorporated in delaware . american water is the largest and most geographically diverse investor owned publicly-traded united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . we employ approximately 6700 professionals who provide drinking water , wastewater and other related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states , the district of columbia and ontario , canada . operating segments we conduct our business primarily through our regulated businesses segment . we also operate several market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services , which include four operating segments that individually do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cgaap 201d ) . these four non- reportable operating segments are collectively presented as our 201cmarket-based businesses , 201d which is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses . additional information can be found in item 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 19 2014segment information in the notes to consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . our subsidiaries that provide these services operate in approximately 1600 communities in 16 states in the united states and are generally subject to regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation , referred to as public utility commissions or ( 201cpucs 201d ) . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . we report the results of the services provided by our utilities in our regulated businesses segment . our regulated businesses segment 2019s operating revenues were $ 2743 million for 2015 , $ 2674 million for 2014 and $ 2594 million for 2013 , accounting for 86.8% ( 86.8 % ) , 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) and 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table summarizes our regulated businesses 2019 operating revenues , number of customers and estimated population served by state , each as of december 31 , 2015 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 704</td><td>% ( % ) of total 25.7% ( 25.7 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 660580</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.3% ( 22.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>614</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>672407</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.3</td><td>19.0% ( 19.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>270</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>313058</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>missouri</td><td>269</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>473245</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.4% ( 12.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>206</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>295994</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>198</td><td>7.2% ( 7.2 % )</td><td>174942</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>129</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>169037</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2390</td><td>87.1% ( 87.1 % )</td><td>2759263</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.3</td><td>85.1% ( 85.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>353</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>493428</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>14.9% ( 14.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2743</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3252691</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>12.1</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company and american lake water company . ( b ) includes west virginia-american water company and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our utilities in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee and virginia. .
Question: what is the estimated population served in missouri, in millions?
Answer: 1.5
Question: and how much is that, not in millions?
| 1500000.0 |
CONVFINQA9937 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc . ( the 201ccompany 201d or 201camerican water 201d ) is a holding company incorporated in delaware . american water is the largest and most geographically diverse investor owned publicly-traded united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . we employ approximately 6700 professionals who provide drinking water , wastewater and other related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states , the district of columbia and ontario , canada . operating segments we conduct our business primarily through our regulated businesses segment . we also operate several market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services , which include four operating segments that individually do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cgaap 201d ) . these four non- reportable operating segments are collectively presented as our 201cmarket-based businesses , 201d which is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses . additional information can be found in item 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 19 2014segment information in the notes to consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . our subsidiaries that provide these services operate in approximately 1600 communities in 16 states in the united states and are generally subject to regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation , referred to as public utility commissions or ( 201cpucs 201d ) . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . we report the results of the services provided by our utilities in our regulated businesses segment . our regulated businesses segment 2019s operating revenues were $ 2743 million for 2015 , $ 2674 million for 2014 and $ 2594 million for 2013 , accounting for 86.8% ( 86.8 % ) , 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) and 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table summarizes our regulated businesses 2019 operating revenues , number of customers and estimated population served by state , each as of december 31 , 2015 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 704</td><td>% ( % ) of total 25.7% ( 25.7 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 660580</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.3% ( 22.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>614</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>672407</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.3</td><td>19.0% ( 19.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>270</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>313058</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>missouri</td><td>269</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>473245</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.4% ( 12.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>206</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>295994</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>198</td><td>7.2% ( 7.2 % )</td><td>174942</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>129</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>169037</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2390</td><td>87.1% ( 87.1 % )</td><td>2759263</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.3</td><td>85.1% ( 85.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>353</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>493428</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>14.9% ( 14.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2743</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3252691</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>12.1</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company and american lake water company . ( b ) includes west virginia-american water company and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our utilities in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee and virginia. .
Question: what is the estimated population served in missouri, in millions?
Answer: 1.5
Question: and how much is that, not in millions?
Answer: 1500000.0
Question: what is the number of customers in that same location?
| 473245.0 |
CONVFINQA9938 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part i item 1 . business our company founded in 1886 , american water works company , inc . ( the 201ccompany 201d or 201camerican water 201d ) is a holding company incorporated in delaware . american water is the largest and most geographically diverse investor owned publicly-traded united states water and wastewater utility company , as measured by both operating revenues and population served . we employ approximately 6700 professionals who provide drinking water , wastewater and other related services to an estimated 15 million people in 47 states , the district of columbia and ontario , canada . operating segments we conduct our business primarily through our regulated businesses segment . we also operate several market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services , which include four operating segments that individually do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the united states ( 201cgaap 201d ) . these four non- reportable operating segments are collectively presented as our 201cmarket-based businesses , 201d which is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses . additional information can be found in item 7 2014management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 19 2014segment information in the notes to consolidated financial statements . regulated businesses our primary business involves the ownership of subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater utility services to residential , commercial , industrial and other customers , including sale for resale and public authority customers . our subsidiaries that provide these services operate in approximately 1600 communities in 16 states in the united states and are generally subject to regulation by certain state commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation , referred to as public utility commissions or ( 201cpucs 201d ) . the federal and state governments also regulate environmental , health and safety , and water quality matters . we report the results of the services provided by our utilities in our regulated businesses segment . our regulated businesses segment 2019s operating revenues were $ 2743 million for 2015 , $ 2674 million for 2014 and $ 2594 million for 2013 , accounting for 86.8% ( 86.8 % ) , 88.8% ( 88.8 % ) and 90.1% ( 90.1 % ) , respectively , of total operating revenues for the same periods . the following table summarizes our regulated businesses 2019 operating revenues , number of customers and estimated population served by state , each as of december 31 , 2015 : operating revenues ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total number of customers % ( % ) of total estimated population served ( in millions ) % ( % ) of total . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>new jersey</td><td>operatingrevenues ( in millions ) $ 704</td><td>% ( % ) of total 25.7% ( 25.7 % )</td><td>number ofcustomers 660580</td><td>% ( % ) of total 20.3% ( 20.3 % )</td><td>estimatedpopulationserved ( in millions ) 2.7</td><td>% ( % ) of total 22.3% ( 22.3 % )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>pennsylvania</td><td>614</td><td>22.4% ( 22.4 % )</td><td>672407</td><td>20.7% ( 20.7 % )</td><td>2.3</td><td>19.0% ( 19.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>illinois ( a )</td><td>270</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>313058</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>missouri</td><td>269</td><td>9.8% ( 9.8 % )</td><td>473245</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>1.5</td><td>12.4% ( 12.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>indiana</td><td>206</td><td>7.5% ( 7.5 % )</td><td>295994</td><td>9.1% ( 9.1 % )</td><td>1.3</td><td>10.7% ( 10.7 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>california</td><td>198</td><td>7.2% ( 7.2 % )</td><td>174942</td><td>5.4% ( 5.4 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>west virginia ( b )</td><td>129</td><td>4.7% ( 4.7 % )</td><td>169037</td><td>5.2% ( 5.2 % )</td><td>0.6</td><td>5.0% ( 5.0 % )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>subtotal ( top seven states )</td><td>2390</td><td>87.1% ( 87.1 % )</td><td>2759263</td><td>84.8% ( 84.8 % )</td><td>10.3</td><td>85.1% ( 85.1 % )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other ( c )</td><td>353</td><td>12.9% ( 12.9 % )</td><td>493428</td><td>15.2% ( 15.2 % )</td><td>1.8</td><td>14.9% ( 14.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total regulated businesses</td><td>$ 2743</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>3252691</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td><td>12.1</td><td>100.0% ( 100.0 % )</td></tr></table> ( a ) includes illinois-american water company and american lake water company . ( b ) includes west virginia-american water company and its subsidiary bluefield valley water works company . ( c ) includes data from our utilities in the following states : georgia , hawaii , iowa , kentucky , maryland , michigan , new york , tennessee and virginia. .
Question: what is the estimated population served in missouri, in millions?
Answer: 1.5
Question: and how much is that, not in millions?
Answer: 1500000.0
Question: what is the number of customers in that same location?
Answer: 473245.0
Question: how much, then, does the estimated population served represent in relation to the number of customers, in missouri?
| 0.3155 |
CONVFINQA9939 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which increased operating profit by $ 230 million , $ 150 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes expenses of $ 16 million , $ 11 million after tax ( $ 0.03 per share ) for a debt exchange , and a reduction in income tax expense of $ 62 million ( $ 0.14 per share ) resulting from a tax benefit related to claims we filed for additional extraterritorial income exclusion ( eti ) tax benefits . on a combined basis , these items increased earnings by $ 201 million after tax ( $ 0.45 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , increased operating profit by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which decreased operating profit by $ 61 million , $ 54 million after tax ( $ 0.12 per share ) . also includes a charge of $ 154 million , $ 100 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) for the early repayment of debt , and a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . on a combined basis , these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( f ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased operating profit by $ 7 million , $ 6 million after tax ( $ 0.01 per share ) . also includes a charge of $ 146 million , $ 96 million after tax ( $ 0.21 per share ) for the early repayment of debt . ( g ) we define return on invested capital ( roic ) as net earnings plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back adjustments related to postretirement benefit plans . we believe that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively we use the capital invested in our operations . we use roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also use it as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain of our incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . we calculate roic as follows : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 3033</td><td>$ 2529</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>229</td><td>235</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 3262</td><td>$ 2764</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 4416</td><td>$ 4727</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7661</td><td>7686</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average benefit plan adjustments3 4 5</td><td>3171</td><td>2006</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 15248</td><td>$ 14419</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>21.4% ( 21.4 % )</td><td>19.2% ( 19.2 % )</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities of long-term debt , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments , primarily for unrecognized benefit plan actuarial losses and prior service costs in 2007 and 2006 , the adjustment for the adoption of fas 158 in 2006 , and the additional minimum pension liability in years prior to 2007 . 4 average benefit plan adjustments reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the captions 201cpostretirement benefit plans , 201d 201cadjustment for adoption of fas 158 201d and 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the total of annual benefit plan adjustments to equity were : 2007 = $ 1706 million ; 2006 = ( $ 1883 ) million ; 2005 = ( $ 105 ) million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 ) million ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; and 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the current year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .
Question: what was the difference in the net earnings between the years of 2004 and 2003?
| 213.0 |
CONVFINQA9940 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
( c ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which increased operating profit by $ 230 million , $ 150 million after tax ( $ 0.34 per share ) . also includes expenses of $ 16 million , $ 11 million after tax ( $ 0.03 per share ) for a debt exchange , and a reduction in income tax expense of $ 62 million ( $ 0.14 per share ) resulting from a tax benefit related to claims we filed for additional extraterritorial income exclusion ( eti ) tax benefits . on a combined basis , these items increased earnings by $ 201 million after tax ( $ 0.45 per share ) . ( d ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , increased operating profit by $ 173 million , $ 113 million after tax ( $ 0.25 per share ) . ( e ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which decreased operating profit by $ 61 million , $ 54 million after tax ( $ 0.12 per share ) . also includes a charge of $ 154 million , $ 100 million after tax ( $ 0.22 per share ) for the early repayment of debt , and a reduction in income tax expense resulting from the closure of an internal revenue service examination of $ 144 million ( $ 0.32 per share ) . on a combined basis , these items reduced earnings by $ 10 million after tax ( $ 0.02 per share ) . ( f ) includes the effects of items not considered in the assessment of the operating performance of our business segments which , on a combined basis , decreased operating profit by $ 7 million , $ 6 million after tax ( $ 0.01 per share ) . also includes a charge of $ 146 million , $ 96 million after tax ( $ 0.21 per share ) for the early repayment of debt . ( g ) we define return on invested capital ( roic ) as net earnings plus after-tax interest expense divided by average invested capital ( stockholders 2019 equity plus debt ) , after adjusting stockholders 2019 equity by adding back adjustments related to postretirement benefit plans . we believe that reporting roic provides investors with greater visibility into how effectively we use the capital invested in our operations . we use roic to evaluate multi-year investment decisions and as a long-term performance measure , and also use it as a factor in evaluating management performance under certain of our incentive compensation plans . roic is not a measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles , and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner . roic should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net earnings as an indicator of performance . we calculate roic as follows : ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2007</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings</td><td>$ 3033</td><td>$ 2529</td><td>$ 1825</td><td>$ 1266</td><td>$ 1053</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest expense ( multiplied by 65% ( 65 % ) ) 1</td><td>229</td><td>235</td><td>241</td><td>276</td><td>317</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>return</td><td>$ 3262</td><td>$ 2764</td><td>$ 2066</td><td>$ 1542</td><td>$ 1370</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>average debt2 5</td><td>$ 4416</td><td>$ 4727</td><td>$ 5077</td><td>$ 5932</td><td>$ 6612</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>average equity3 5</td><td>7661</td><td>7686</td><td>7590</td><td>7015</td><td>6170</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>average benefit plan adjustments3 4 5</td><td>3171</td><td>2006</td><td>1545</td><td>1296</td><td>1504</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>average invested capital</td><td>$ 15248</td><td>$ 14419</td><td>$ 14212</td><td>$ 14243</td><td>$ 14286</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>return on invested capital</td><td>21.4% ( 21.4 % )</td><td>19.2% ( 19.2 % )</td><td>14.5% ( 14.5 % )</td><td>10.8% ( 10.8 % )</td><td>9.6% ( 9.6 % )</td></tr></table> 1 represents after-tax interest expense utilizing the federal statutory rate of 35% ( 35 % ) . 2 debt consists of long-term debt , including current maturities of long-term debt , and short-term borrowings ( if any ) . 3 equity includes non-cash adjustments , primarily for unrecognized benefit plan actuarial losses and prior service costs in 2007 and 2006 , the adjustment for the adoption of fas 158 in 2006 , and the additional minimum pension liability in years prior to 2007 . 4 average benefit plan adjustments reflect the cumulative value of entries identified in our statement of stockholders equity under the captions 201cpostretirement benefit plans , 201d 201cadjustment for adoption of fas 158 201d and 201cminimum pension liability . 201d the total of annual benefit plan adjustments to equity were : 2007 = $ 1706 million ; 2006 = ( $ 1883 ) million ; 2005 = ( $ 105 ) million ; 2004 = ( $ 285 ) million ; 2003 = $ 331 million ; 2002 = ( $ 1537 million ) ; and 2001 = ( $ 33 million ) . as these entries are recorded in the fourth quarter , the value added back to our average equity in a given year is the cumulative impact of all prior year entries plus 20% ( 20 % ) of the current year entry value . 5 yearly averages are calculated using balances at the start of the year and at the end of each quarter. .
Question: what was the difference in the net earnings between the years of 2004 and 2003?
Answer: 213.0
Question: how much does that difference represent in relation to the 2003 net earning?
| 0.20228 |
CONVFINQA9941 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
Question: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?
| 917.9 |
CONVFINQA9942 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
Question: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?
Answer: 917.9
Question: what was, then, the annual average of projected benefit payments in that period?
| 183.58 |
CONVFINQA9943 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
Question: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?
Answer: 917.9
Question: what was, then, the annual average of projected benefit payments in that period?
Answer: 183.58
Question: and what was the total of those projected benefit payments in 2020?
| 157.4 |
CONVFINQA9944 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
Question: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?
Answer: 917.9
Question: what was, then, the annual average of projected benefit payments in that period?
Answer: 183.58
Question: and what was the total of those projected benefit payments in 2020?
Answer: 157.4
Question: how much, then, does that average of projected benefit payments represent in relation to this 2020 total?
| 1.16633 |
CONVFINQA9945 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mutual and pooled funds shares of mutual funds are valued at the net asset value ( nav ) quoted on the exchange where the fund is traded and are classified as level 1 assets . units of pooled funds are valued at the per unit nav determined by the fund manager and are classified as level 2 assets . the investments are utilizing nav as a practical expedient for fair value . corporate and government bonds corporate and government bonds are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields and credit ratings . mortgage and asset-backed securities mortgage and asset 2013backed securities are classified as level 2 assets , as they are either valued at quoted market prices from observable pricing sources at the reporting date or valued based upon comparable securities with similar yields , credit ratings , and purpose of the underlying loan . real estate pooled funds real estate pooled funds are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying properties . estimated fair value is calculated utilizing a combination of key inputs , such as revenue and expense growth rates , terminal capitalization rates , and discount rates . these key inputs are consistent with practices prevailing within the real estate investment management industry . other pooled funds other pooled funds classified as level 2 assets are valued at the nav of the shares held at year end , which is based on the fair value of the underlying investments . securities and interests classified as level 3 are carried at the estimated fair value of the underlying investments . the underlying investments are valued based on bids from brokers or other third-party vendor sources that utilize expected cash flow streams and other uncorroborated data , including counterparty credit quality , default risk , discount rates , and the overall capital market liquidity . insurance contracts insurance contracts are classified as level 3 assets , as they are carried at contract value , which approximates the estimated fair value . the estimated fair value is based on the fair value of the underlying investment of the insurance company . contributions and projected benefit payments pension contributions to funded plans and benefit payments for unfunded plans for fiscal year 2015 were $ 137.5 . contributions resulted primarily from an assessment of long-term funding requirements of the plans and tax planning . benefit payments to unfunded plans were due primarily to the timing of retirements and cost reduction actions . we anticipate contributing $ 100 to $ 120 to the defined benefit pension plans in 2016 . these contributions are driven primarily by benefit payments for unfunded plans , which are dependent upon timing of retirements and actions to reorganize the business . projected benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , are as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.s .</td><td>international</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 129.0</td><td>$ 52.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2017</td><td>135.8</td><td>53.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2018</td><td>142.2</td><td>55.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2019</td><td>149.6</td><td>57.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2020</td><td>157.4</td><td>57.8</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2021 20132025</td><td>917.9</td><td>332.3</td></tr></table> these estimated benefit payments are based on assumptions about future events . actual benefit payments may vary significantly from these estimates. .
Question: what were the total projected benefit payments for the five year period ended in 2025?
Answer: 917.9
Question: what was, then, the annual average of projected benefit payments in that period?
Answer: 183.58
Question: and what was the total of those projected benefit payments in 2020?
Answer: 157.4
Question: how much, then, does that average of projected benefit payments represent in relation to this 2020 total?
Answer: 1.16633
Question: and what is the difference between this value and the number one?
| 0.16633 |
CONVFINQA9946 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .
Question: what were the receivables for 2016?
| 14215.0 |
CONVFINQA9947 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .
Question: what were the receivables for 2016?
Answer: 14215.0
Question: and in 2015?
| 15794.0 |
CONVFINQA9948 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .
Question: what were the receivables for 2016?
Answer: 14215.0
Question: and in 2015?
Answer: 15794.0
Question: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?
| -1579.0 |
CONVFINQA9949 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .
Question: what were the receivables for 2016?
Answer: 14215.0
Question: and in 2015?
Answer: 15794.0
Question: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?
Answer: -1579.0
Question: and the specific value for 2015 again?
| 15794.0 |
CONVFINQA9950 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td><td>( in thousands )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>$ 14215</td><td>$ 15794</td><td>$ 442</td><td>$ 4737</td></tr></table> see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . entergy new orleans has a credit facility in the amount of $ 25 million scheduled to expire in november 2018 . the credit facility allows entergy new orleans to issue letters of credit against $ 10 million of the borrowing capacity of the facility . as of december 31 , 2016 , there were no cash borrowings and a $ 0.8 million letter of credit was outstanding under the facility . in addition , entergy new orleans is a party to an uncommitted letter of credit facility as a means to post collateral to support its obligations under miso . as of december 31 , 2016 , a $ 6.2 million letter of credit was outstanding under entergy new orleans 2019s letter of credit facility . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the credit facilities . entergy new orleans obtained authorization from the ferc through october 2017 for short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 100 million at any time outstanding . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of entergy new orleans 2019s short-term borrowing limits . the long-term securities issuances of entergy new orleans are limited to amounts authorized by the city council , and the current authorization extends through june 2018 . state and local rate regulation the rates that entergy new orleans charges for electricity and natural gas significantly influence its financial position , results of operations , and liquidity . entergy new orleans is regulated and the rates charged to its customers are determined in regulatory proceedings . a governmental agency , the city council , is primarily responsible for approval of the rates charged to customers . retail rates see 201calgiers asset transfer 201d below for discussion of the transfer from entergy louisiana to entergy new orleans of certain assets that serve algiers customers . in march 2013 , entergy louisiana filed a rate case for the algiers area , which is in new orleans and is regulated by the city council . entergy louisiana requested a rate increase of $ 13 million over three years , including a 10.4% ( 10.4 % ) return on common equity and a formula rate plan mechanism identical to its lpsc request . in january 2014 the city council advisors filed direct testimony recommending a rate increase of $ 5.56 million over three years , including an 8.13% ( 8.13 % ) return on common equity . in june 2014 the city council unanimously approved a settlement that includes the following : 2022 a $ 9.3 million base rate revenue increase to be phased in on a levelized basis over four years ; 2022 recovery of an additional $ 853 thousand annually through a miso recovery rider ; and 2022 the adoption of a four-year formula rate plan requiring the filing of annual evaluation reports in may of each year , commencing may 2015 , with resulting rates being implemented in october of each year . the formula rate plan includes a midpoint target authorized return on common equity of 9.95% ( 9.95 % ) with a +/- 40 basis point bandwidth . the rate increase was effective with bills rendered on and after the first billing cycle of july 2014 . additional compliance filings were made with the city council in october 2014 for approval of the form of certain rate riders , including among others , a ninemile 6 non-fuel cost recovery interim rider , allowing for contemporaneous recovery of capacity .
Question: what were the receivables for 2016?
Answer: 14215.0
Question: and in 2015?
Answer: 15794.0
Question: so what was the difference in this value between the two years?
Answer: -1579.0
Question: and the specific value for 2015 again?
Answer: 15794.0
Question: so what was the percentage change during this time?
| -0.09997 |
CONVFINQA9951 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the ratio of the beginning gross utb to the end balance?
| 2.06886 |
CONVFINQA9952 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the ratio of the beginning gross utb to the end balance?
Answer: 2.06886
Question: what were the total accrued interest and penalties included in the gross unrecognized tax benefits for 1/1/07 and 12/31/07?
| 134.0 |
CONVFINQA9953 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the company files income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction , and various states and foreign jurisdictions . with few exceptions , the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local , or non-u.s . income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999 . it is anticipated that its examination for the company 2019s u.s . income tax returns for the years 2002 through 2004 will be completed by the end of first quarter 2008 . as of december 31 , 2007 , the irs has proposed adjustments to the company 2019s tax positions for which the company is fully reserved . payments relating to any proposed assessments arising from the 2002 through 2004 audit may not be made until a final agreement is reached between the company and the irs on such assessments or upon a final resolution resulting from the administrative appeals process or judicial action . in addition to the u.s . federal examination , there is also limited audit activity in several u.s . state and foreign jurisdictions . currently , the company expects the liability for unrecognized tax benefits to change by an insignificant amount during the next 12 months . the company adopted the provisions of fasb interpretation no . 48 , 201caccounting for uncertainty in income taxes , 201d on january 1 , 2007 . as a result of the implementation of interpretation 48 , the company recognized an immaterial increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits , which was accounted for as a reduction to the january 1 , 2007 , balance of retained earnings . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits ( 201cutb 201d ) is as follows : ( millions ) federal , state , and foreign tax . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions )</td><td>federal state and foreign tax</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>gross utb balance at january 1 2007</td><td>$ 691</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>additions based on tax positions related to the current year</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>additions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>143</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>reductions for tax positions of prior years</td><td>-189 ( 189 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>settlements</td><td>-24 ( 24 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>reductions due to lapse of applicable statute of limitations</td><td>-20 ( 20 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>gross utb balance at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 680</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net utb impacting the effective tax rate at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 334</td></tr></table> the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that , if recognized , would affect the effective tax rate as of january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively , are $ 261 million and $ 334 million . the ending net utb results from adjusting the gross balance at december 31 , 2007 for items such as federal , state , and non-u.s . deferred items , interest and penalties , and deductible taxes . the net utb is included as components of accrued income taxes and other liabilities within the consolidated balance sheet . the company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense . at january 1 , 2007 and december 31 , 2007 , accrued interest and penalties on a gross basis were $ 65 million and $ 69 million , respectively . included in these interest and penalty amounts is interest and penalties related to tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility . because of the impact of deferred tax accounting , other than interest and penalties , the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period . in 2007 , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2006 u.s . federal and state income tax returns , which did not result in any material changes to the company 2019s financial position . in 2006 , an audit of the company 2019s u.s . tax returns for years through 2001 was completed . the company and the internal revenue service reached a final settlement for these years , including an agreement on the amount of a refund claim to be filed by the company . the company also substantially resolved audits in certain european countries . in addition , the company completed the preparation and filing of its 2005 u.s . federal income tax return and the corresponding 2005 state income tax returns . the adjustments from amounts previously estimated in the u.s . federal and state income tax returns ( both positive and negative ) included lower u.s . taxes on dividends received from the company's foreign subsidiaries . the company also made quarterly adjustments ( both positive and negative ) to its reserves for tax contingencies . considering the developments noted above and other factors , including the impact on open audit years of the recent resolution of issues in various audits , these reassessments resulted in a reduction of the reserves in 2006 by $ 149 million , inclusive of the expected amount of certain refund claims . in 2005 , the company announced its intent to reinvest $ 1.7 billion of foreign earnings in the united states pursuant to the provisions of the american jobs creation act of 2004 . this act provided the company the opportunity to tax- .
Question: what was the ratio of the beginning gross utb to the end balance?
Answer: 2.06886
Question: what were the total accrued interest and penalties included in the gross unrecognized tax benefits for 1/1/07 and 12/31/07?
Answer: 134.0
Question: and as a percentage of the gross utb?
| 0.19392 |
CONVFINQA9954 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 25 million , $ 31 million and $ 17 million , respectively . restricted stock awards made to employees have vesting periods ranging from 1 year with variable vesting dates to 10 years . following is a summary of the future vesting of our outstanding restricted stock awards : vesting of restricted shares . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>vesting of restricted shares</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>1476832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>2352443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>4358728</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>539790</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>199850</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>110494</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total outstanding</td><td>9038137</td></tr></table> the related compensation costs less estimated forfeitures is generally recognized ratably over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards . upon vesting , the grants will be paid in our class p common shares . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we recorded $ 66 million , $ 52 million and $ 51 million , respectively , in expense related to restricted stock awards and capitalized approximately $ 9 million , $ 15 million and $ 6 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , unrecognized restricted stock awards compensation costs , less estimated forfeitures , was approximately $ 133 million and $ 154 million , respectively . pension and other postretirement benefit plans savings plan we maintain a defined contribution plan covering eligible u.s . employees . we contribute 5% ( 5 % ) of eligible compensation for most of the plan participants . certain plan participants 2019 contributions and company contributions are based on collective bargaining agreements . the total expense for our savings plan was approximately $ 48 million , $ 46 million , and $ 42 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . pension plans our u.s . pension plan is a defined benefit plan that covers substantially all of our u.s . employees and provides benefits under a cash balance formula . a participant in the cash balance plan accrues benefits through contribution credits based on a combination of age and years of service , times eligible compensation . interest is also credited to the participant 2019s plan account . a participant becomes fully vested in the plan after three years , and may take a lump sum distribution upon termination of employment or retirement . certain collectively bargained and grandfathered employees continue to accrue benefits through career pay or final pay formulas . two of our subsidiaries , kinder morgan canada inc . and trans mountain pipeline inc . ( as general partner of trans mountain pipeline l.p. ) , are sponsors of pension plans for eligible canadian and trans mountain pipeline employees . the plans include registered defined benefit pension plans , supplemental unfunded arrangements ( which provide pension benefits in excess of statutory limits ) and defined contributory plans . benefits under the defined benefit components accrue through career pay or final pay formulas . the net periodic benefit costs , contributions and liability amounts associated with our canadian plans are not material to our consolidated income statements or balance sheets ; however , we began to include the activity and balances associated with our canadian plans ( including our canadian opeb plans discussed below ) in the following disclosures on a prospective basis beginning in 2016 . the associated net periodic benefit costs for these combined canadian plans of $ 12 million and $ 10 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , were reported separately in prior years . other postretirement benefit plans we and certain of our u.s . subsidiaries provide other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) , including medical benefits for closed groups of retired employees and certain grandfathered employees and their dependents , and limited postretirement life insurance benefits for retired employees . our canadian subsidiaries also provide opeb benefits to current and future retirees and their dependents . medical benefits under these opeb plans may be subject to deductibles , co-payment provisions , dollar .
Question: what is the number of restricted shares that is supposed to vest after 2021?
| 110494.0 |
CONVFINQA9955 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 25 million , $ 31 million and $ 17 million , respectively . restricted stock awards made to employees have vesting periods ranging from 1 year with variable vesting dates to 10 years . following is a summary of the future vesting of our outstanding restricted stock awards : vesting of restricted shares . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>vesting of restricted shares</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>1476832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>2352443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>4358728</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>539790</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>199850</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>110494</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total outstanding</td><td>9038137</td></tr></table> the related compensation costs less estimated forfeitures is generally recognized ratably over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards . upon vesting , the grants will be paid in our class p common shares . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we recorded $ 66 million , $ 52 million and $ 51 million , respectively , in expense related to restricted stock awards and capitalized approximately $ 9 million , $ 15 million and $ 6 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , unrecognized restricted stock awards compensation costs , less estimated forfeitures , was approximately $ 133 million and $ 154 million , respectively . pension and other postretirement benefit plans savings plan we maintain a defined contribution plan covering eligible u.s . employees . we contribute 5% ( 5 % ) of eligible compensation for most of the plan participants . certain plan participants 2019 contributions and company contributions are based on collective bargaining agreements . the total expense for our savings plan was approximately $ 48 million , $ 46 million , and $ 42 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . pension plans our u.s . pension plan is a defined benefit plan that covers substantially all of our u.s . employees and provides benefits under a cash balance formula . a participant in the cash balance plan accrues benefits through contribution credits based on a combination of age and years of service , times eligible compensation . interest is also credited to the participant 2019s plan account . a participant becomes fully vested in the plan after three years , and may take a lump sum distribution upon termination of employment or retirement . certain collectively bargained and grandfathered employees continue to accrue benefits through career pay or final pay formulas . two of our subsidiaries , kinder morgan canada inc . and trans mountain pipeline inc . ( as general partner of trans mountain pipeline l.p. ) , are sponsors of pension plans for eligible canadian and trans mountain pipeline employees . the plans include registered defined benefit pension plans , supplemental unfunded arrangements ( which provide pension benefits in excess of statutory limits ) and defined contributory plans . benefits under the defined benefit components accrue through career pay or final pay formulas . the net periodic benefit costs , contributions and liability amounts associated with our canadian plans are not material to our consolidated income statements or balance sheets ; however , we began to include the activity and balances associated with our canadian plans ( including our canadian opeb plans discussed below ) in the following disclosures on a prospective basis beginning in 2016 . the associated net periodic benefit costs for these combined canadian plans of $ 12 million and $ 10 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , were reported separately in prior years . other postretirement benefit plans we and certain of our u.s . subsidiaries provide other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) , including medical benefits for closed groups of retired employees and certain grandfathered employees and their dependents , and limited postretirement life insurance benefits for retired employees . our canadian subsidiaries also provide opeb benefits to current and future retirees and their dependents . medical benefits under these opeb plans may be subject to deductibles , co-payment provisions , dollar .
Question: what is the number of restricted shares that is supposed to vest after 2021?
Answer: 110494.0
Question: and what is the total number of restricted shares?
| 9038137.0 |
CONVFINQA9956 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 25 million , $ 31 million and $ 17 million , respectively . restricted stock awards made to employees have vesting periods ranging from 1 year with variable vesting dates to 10 years . following is a summary of the future vesting of our outstanding restricted stock awards : vesting of restricted shares . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>vesting of restricted shares</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>1476832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>2352443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>4358728</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>539790</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>199850</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>110494</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total outstanding</td><td>9038137</td></tr></table> the related compensation costs less estimated forfeitures is generally recognized ratably over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards . upon vesting , the grants will be paid in our class p common shares . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we recorded $ 66 million , $ 52 million and $ 51 million , respectively , in expense related to restricted stock awards and capitalized approximately $ 9 million , $ 15 million and $ 6 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , unrecognized restricted stock awards compensation costs , less estimated forfeitures , was approximately $ 133 million and $ 154 million , respectively . pension and other postretirement benefit plans savings plan we maintain a defined contribution plan covering eligible u.s . employees . we contribute 5% ( 5 % ) of eligible compensation for most of the plan participants . certain plan participants 2019 contributions and company contributions are based on collective bargaining agreements . the total expense for our savings plan was approximately $ 48 million , $ 46 million , and $ 42 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . pension plans our u.s . pension plan is a defined benefit plan that covers substantially all of our u.s . employees and provides benefits under a cash balance formula . a participant in the cash balance plan accrues benefits through contribution credits based on a combination of age and years of service , times eligible compensation . interest is also credited to the participant 2019s plan account . a participant becomes fully vested in the plan after three years , and may take a lump sum distribution upon termination of employment or retirement . certain collectively bargained and grandfathered employees continue to accrue benefits through career pay or final pay formulas . two of our subsidiaries , kinder morgan canada inc . and trans mountain pipeline inc . ( as general partner of trans mountain pipeline l.p. ) , are sponsors of pension plans for eligible canadian and trans mountain pipeline employees . the plans include registered defined benefit pension plans , supplemental unfunded arrangements ( which provide pension benefits in excess of statutory limits ) and defined contributory plans . benefits under the defined benefit components accrue through career pay or final pay formulas . the net periodic benefit costs , contributions and liability amounts associated with our canadian plans are not material to our consolidated income statements or balance sheets ; however , we began to include the activity and balances associated with our canadian plans ( including our canadian opeb plans discussed below ) in the following disclosures on a prospective basis beginning in 2016 . the associated net periodic benefit costs for these combined canadian plans of $ 12 million and $ 10 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , were reported separately in prior years . other postretirement benefit plans we and certain of our u.s . subsidiaries provide other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) , including medical benefits for closed groups of retired employees and certain grandfathered employees and their dependents , and limited postretirement life insurance benefits for retired employees . our canadian subsidiaries also provide opeb benefits to current and future retirees and their dependents . medical benefits under these opeb plans may be subject to deductibles , co-payment provisions , dollar .
Question: what is the number of restricted shares that is supposed to vest after 2021?
Answer: 110494.0
Question: and what is the total number of restricted shares?
Answer: 9038137.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total number do those shares represent?
| 0.01223 |
CONVFINQA9957 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the intrinsic value of restricted stock awards vested during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 was $ 25 million , $ 31 million and $ 17 million , respectively . restricted stock awards made to employees have vesting periods ranging from 1 year with variable vesting dates to 10 years . following is a summary of the future vesting of our outstanding restricted stock awards : vesting of restricted shares . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>year</td><td>vesting of restricted shares</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2017</td><td>1476832</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2018</td><td>2352443</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2019</td><td>4358728</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2020</td><td>539790</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2021</td><td>199850</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>thereafter</td><td>110494</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>total outstanding</td><td>9038137</td></tr></table> the related compensation costs less estimated forfeitures is generally recognized ratably over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards . upon vesting , the grants will be paid in our class p common shares . during 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , we recorded $ 66 million , $ 52 million and $ 51 million , respectively , in expense related to restricted stock awards and capitalized approximately $ 9 million , $ 15 million and $ 6 million , respectively . at december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , unrecognized restricted stock awards compensation costs , less estimated forfeitures , was approximately $ 133 million and $ 154 million , respectively . pension and other postretirement benefit plans savings plan we maintain a defined contribution plan covering eligible u.s . employees . we contribute 5% ( 5 % ) of eligible compensation for most of the plan participants . certain plan participants 2019 contributions and company contributions are based on collective bargaining agreements . the total expense for our savings plan was approximately $ 48 million , $ 46 million , and $ 42 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . pension plans our u.s . pension plan is a defined benefit plan that covers substantially all of our u.s . employees and provides benefits under a cash balance formula . a participant in the cash balance plan accrues benefits through contribution credits based on a combination of age and years of service , times eligible compensation . interest is also credited to the participant 2019s plan account . a participant becomes fully vested in the plan after three years , and may take a lump sum distribution upon termination of employment or retirement . certain collectively bargained and grandfathered employees continue to accrue benefits through career pay or final pay formulas . two of our subsidiaries , kinder morgan canada inc . and trans mountain pipeline inc . ( as general partner of trans mountain pipeline l.p. ) , are sponsors of pension plans for eligible canadian and trans mountain pipeline employees . the plans include registered defined benefit pension plans , supplemental unfunded arrangements ( which provide pension benefits in excess of statutory limits ) and defined contributory plans . benefits under the defined benefit components accrue through career pay or final pay formulas . the net periodic benefit costs , contributions and liability amounts associated with our canadian plans are not material to our consolidated income statements or balance sheets ; however , we began to include the activity and balances associated with our canadian plans ( including our canadian opeb plans discussed below ) in the following disclosures on a prospective basis beginning in 2016 . the associated net periodic benefit costs for these combined canadian plans of $ 12 million and $ 10 million for the years ended december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , were reported separately in prior years . other postretirement benefit plans we and certain of our u.s . subsidiaries provide other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) , including medical benefits for closed groups of retired employees and certain grandfathered employees and their dependents , and limited postretirement life insurance benefits for retired employees . our canadian subsidiaries also provide opeb benefits to current and future retirees and their dependents . medical benefits under these opeb plans may be subject to deductibles , co-payment provisions , dollar .
Question: what is the number of restricted shares that is supposed to vest after 2021?
Answer: 110494.0
Question: and what is the total number of restricted shares?
Answer: 9038137.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total number do those shares represent?
Answer: 0.01223
Question: and what percentage do the restricted shares supposed to vest in 2018 represent?
| 0.26028 |
CONVFINQA9958 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
| 13566.0 |
CONVFINQA9959 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?
| 14156696.0 |
CONVFINQA9960 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 14156696.0
Question: what fraction of fourth quarter purchases occurred during october?
| 0.00096 |
CONVFINQA9961 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 14156696.0
Question: what fraction of fourth quarter purchases occurred during october?
Answer: 0.00096
Question: what about in percentage terms?
| 0.09583 |
CONVFINQA9962 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 14156696.0
Question: what fraction of fourth quarter purchases occurred during october?
Answer: 0.00096
Question: what about in percentage terms?
Answer: 0.09583
Question: what is the number of repurchased shares during october 2012?
| 13566.0 |
CONVFINQA9963 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 14156696.0
Question: what fraction of fourth quarter purchases occurred during october?
Answer: 0.00096
Question: what about in percentage terms?
Answer: 0.09583
Question: what is the number of repurchased shares during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about repurchased shares during fourth quarter of 2012?
| 22944.0 |
CONVFINQA9964 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2012 to december 31 , 2012 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1</td><td>average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2</td><td>total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3</td><td>maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that mayyet be purchased under theplans or programs3</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1 - 31</td><td>13566</td><td>$ 10.26</td><td>0</td><td>$ 148858924</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1 - 30</td><td>5345171</td><td>$ 9.98</td><td>5343752</td><td>$ 195551133</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1 - 31</td><td>8797959</td><td>$ 10.87</td><td>8790000</td><td>$ 99989339</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>14156696</td><td>$ 10.53</td><td>14133752</td><td>-</td></tr></table> 1 includes shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 13566 withheld shares in october 2012 , 1419 withheld shares in november 2012 and 7959 withheld shares in december 2012 , for a total of 22944 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our stock repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our stock repurchase program . 3 on february 24 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had approved a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock ( the 201c2012 share repurchase program 201d ) , in addition to amounts available on existing authorizations . on november 20 , 2012 , we announced in a press release that our board had authorized an increase in our 2012 share repurchase program to $ 400.0 million of our common stock . on february 22 , 2013 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining available for repurchase under the 2012 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .
Question: how many shares were purchased during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about the total number of shares purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 14156696.0
Question: what fraction of fourth quarter purchases occurred during october?
Answer: 0.00096
Question: what about in percentage terms?
Answer: 0.09583
Question: what is the number of repurchased shares during october 2012?
Answer: 13566.0
Question: what about repurchased shares during fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 22944.0
Question: what proportion does this represent?
| 0.59127 |
CONVFINQA9965 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2002, in millions?
| 1130.7 |
CONVFINQA9966 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2002, in millions?
Answer: 1130.7
Question: and what was it in 2003, also in millions?
| 1110.1 |
CONVFINQA9967 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2002, in millions?
Answer: 1130.7
Question: and what was it in 2003, also in millions?
Answer: 1110.1
Question: what was, then, the change in net revenue over the year?
| 20.6 |
CONVFINQA9968 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2002, in millions?
Answer: 1130.7
Question: and what was it in 2003, also in millions?
Answer: 1110.1
Question: what was, then, the change in net revenue over the year?
Answer: 20.6
Question: and what was the increase in fuel cost recovery revenues in that same period?
| 440.2 |
CONVFINQA9969 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2002 net revenue</td><td>$ 1130.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>17.8</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fuel write-offs in 2002</td><td>15.3</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net wholesale revenue</td><td>10.2</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base rate decreases</td><td>-23.3 ( 23.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>nisco gain recognized in 2002</td><td>-15.2 ( 15.2 )</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>rate refund provisions</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>-14.1 ( 14.1 )</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>2003 net revenue</td><td>$ 1110.1</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .
Question: what was the net revenue in 2002, in millions?
Answer: 1130.7
Question: and what was it in 2003, also in millions?
Answer: 1110.1
Question: what was, then, the change in net revenue over the year?
Answer: 20.6
Question: and what was the increase in fuel cost recovery revenues in that same period?
Answer: 440.2
Question: how much, then, does this increase represent in relation to the that change in net revenue, in percentage?
| 21.36893 |
CONVFINQA9970 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.88</td><td>$ 107.87</td><td>$ 158.07</td><td>$ 171.77</td><td>$ 160.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.11</td><td>$ 118.43</td><td>$ 156.77</td><td>$ 178.22</td><td>$ 180.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.01</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.08</td><td>$ 158.23</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference between the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2015 and that of 12/31/2010?
| 60.61 |
CONVFINQA9971 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.88</td><td>$ 107.87</td><td>$ 158.07</td><td>$ 171.77</td><td>$ 160.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.11</td><td>$ 118.43</td><td>$ 156.77</td><td>$ 178.22</td><td>$ 180.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.01</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.08</td><td>$ 158.23</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference between the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2015 and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 60.61
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2010?
| 0.6061 |
CONVFINQA9972 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.88</td><td>$ 107.87</td><td>$ 158.07</td><td>$ 171.77</td><td>$ 160.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.11</td><td>$ 118.43</td><td>$ 156.77</td><td>$ 178.22</td><td>$ 180.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.01</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.08</td><td>$ 158.23</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference between the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2015 and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 60.61
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 0.6061
Question: what is the standard & poor 2019s 500 index of 12/31/2015?
| 180.67 |
CONVFINQA9973 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.88</td><td>$ 107.87</td><td>$ 158.07</td><td>$ 171.77</td><td>$ 160.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.11</td><td>$ 118.43</td><td>$ 156.77</td><td>$ 178.22</td><td>$ 180.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.01</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.08</td><td>$ 158.23</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference between the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2015 and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 60.61
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 0.6061
Question: what is the standard & poor 2019s 500 index of 12/31/2015?
Answer: 180.67
Question: what is the difference between that and that of 12/31/2010?
| 80.67 |
CONVFINQA9974 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.88</td><td>$ 107.87</td><td>$ 158.07</td><td>$ 171.77</td><td>$ 160.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.11</td><td>$ 118.43</td><td>$ 156.77</td><td>$ 178.22</td><td>$ 180.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.01</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.08</td><td>$ 158.23</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference between the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2015 and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 60.61
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 0.6061
Question: what is the standard & poor 2019s 500 index of 12/31/2015?
Answer: 180.67
Question: what is the difference between that and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 80.67
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index of 12/31/2010?
| 0.8067 |
CONVFINQA9975 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/2010</td><td>12/31/2011</td><td>12/31/2012</td><td>12/31/2013</td><td>12/31/2014</td><td>12/31/2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 103.88</td><td>$ 107.87</td><td>$ 158.07</td><td>$ 171.77</td><td>$ 160.61</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>standard & poor 2019s 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 102.11</td><td>$ 118.43</td><td>$ 156.77</td><td>$ 178.22</td><td>$ 180.67</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.01</td><td>$ 107.49</td><td>$ 151.97</td><td>$ 190.08</td><td>$ 158.23</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the difference between the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2015 and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 60.61
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the united parcel service inc. share price of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 0.6061
Question: what is the standard & poor 2019s 500 index of 12/31/2015?
Answer: 180.67
Question: what is the difference between that and that of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 80.67
Question: how much does that difference represents in relation to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index of 12/31/2010?
Answer: 0.8067
Question: what is the difference between the answer a1 and the answer a3?
| -0.2006 |
CONVFINQA9976 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what is the net revenues of 2009 in million?
| 2120.0 |
CONVFINQA9977 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what is the net revenues of 2009 in million?
Answer: 2120.0
Question: what is the net revenues decrease from 2008 to 2009 in million?
| 112.0 |
CONVFINQA9978 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
our non-operating investment activity resulted in net losses of $ 12.7 million in 2009 and $ 52.3 million in 2008 . the improvement of nearly $ 40 million is primarily attributable to a reduction in the other than temporary impairments recognized on our investments in sponsored mutual funds in 2009 versus 2008 . the following table details our related mutual fund investment gains and losses ( in millions ) during the past two years. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2008</td><td>2009</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>$ -91.3 ( 91.3 )</td><td>$ -36.1 ( 36.1 )</td><td>$ 55.2</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>capital gain distributions received</td><td>5.6</td><td>2.0</td><td>-3.6 ( 3.6 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gain ( loss ) realized on fund dispositions</td><td>-4.5 ( 4.5 )</td><td>7.4</td><td>11.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net loss recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$ -90.2 ( 90.2 )</td><td>$ -26.7 ( 26.7 )</td><td>$ 63.5</td></tr></table> lower income of $ 16 million from our money market holdings due to the significantly lower interest rate environment offset the improvement experienced with our fund investments . there is no impairment of any of our mutual fund investments at december 31 , 2009 . the 2009 provision for income taxes as a percentage of pretax income is 37.1% ( 37.1 % ) , down from 38.4% ( 38.4 % ) in 2008 and .9% ( .9 % ) lower than our present estimate of 38.0% ( 38.0 % ) for the 2010 effective tax rate . our 2009 provision includes reductions of prior years 2019 tax provisions and discrete nonrecurring benefits that lowered our 2009 effective tax rate by 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) . 2008 versus 2007 . investment advisory revenues decreased 6.3% ( 6.3 % ) , or $ 118 million , to $ 1.76 billion in 2008 as average assets under our management decreased $ 16 billion to $ 358.2 billion . the average annualized fee rate earned on our assets under management was 49.2 basis points in 2008 , down from the 50.2 basis points earned in 2007 , as lower equity market valuations resulted in a greater percentage of our assets under management being attributable to lower fee fixed income portfolios . continuing stress on the financial markets and resulting lower equity valuations as 2008 progressed resulted in lower average assets under our management , lower investment advisory fees and lower net income as compared to prior periods . net revenues decreased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 112 million , to $ 2.12 billion . operating expenses were $ 1.27 billion in 2008 , up 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) or $ 36 million from 2007 . net operating income for 2008 decreased $ 147.9 million , or 14.8% ( 14.8 % ) , to $ 848.5 million . higher operating expenses in 2008 and decreased market valuations during the latter half of 2008 , which lowered our assets under management and advisory revenues , resulted in our 2008 operating margin declining to 40.1% ( 40.1 % ) from 44.7% ( 44.7 % ) in 2007 . non-operating investment losses in 2008 were $ 52.3 million as compared to investment income of $ 80.4 million in 2007 . investment losses in 2008 include non-cash charges of $ 91.3 million for the other than temporary impairment of certain of the firm 2019s investments in sponsored mutual funds . net income in 2008 fell 27% ( 27 % ) or nearly $ 180 million from 2007 . diluted earnings per share , after the retrospective application of new accounting guidance effective in 2009 , decreased to $ 1.81 , down $ .59 or 24.6% ( 24.6 % ) from $ 2.40 in 2007 . a non-operating charge to recognize other than temporary impairments of our sponsored mutual fund investments reduced diluted earnings per share by $ .21 in 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned from the t . rowe price mutual funds distributed in the united states decreased 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) , or $ 114.5 million , to $ 1.24 billion . average mutual fund assets were $ 216.1 billion in 2008 , down $ 16.7 billion from 2007 . mutual fund assets at december 31 , 2008 , were $ 164.4 billion , down $ 81.6 billion from the end of 2007 . net inflows to the mutual funds during 2008 were $ 3.9 billion , including $ 1.9 billion to the money funds , $ 1.1 billion to the bond funds , and $ .9 billion to the stock funds . the value , equity index 500 , and emerging markets stock funds combined to add $ 4.1 billion , while the mid-cap growth and equity income stock funds had net redemptions of $ 2.2 billion . net fund inflows of $ 6.2 billion originated in our target-date retirement funds , which in turn invest in other t . rowe price funds . fund net inflow amounts in 2008 are presented net of $ 1.3 billion that was transferred to target-date trusts from the retirement funds during the year . decreases in market valuations and income not reinvested lowered our mutual fund assets under management by $ 85.5 billion during 2008 . investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $ 3.6 million to $ 522.2 million . average assets in these portfolios were $ 142.1 billion during 2008 , up slightly from $ 141.4 billion in 2007 . these minor changes , each less than 1% ( 1 % ) , are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and subadvised portfolios . net inflows , primarily from institutional investors , were $ 13.2 billion during 2008 , including the $ 1.3 billion transferred from the retirement funds to target-date trusts . decreases in market valuations , net of income , lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $ 55.3 billion during 2008 . management 2019s discussion & analysis 21 .
Question: what is the net revenues of 2009 in million?
Answer: 2120.0
Question: what is the net revenues decrease from 2008 to 2009 in million?
Answer: 112.0
Question: what is the net revenues of 2008 in million?
| 2232.0 |
CONVFINQA9979 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
| 3369.0 |
CONVFINQA9980 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: and what was that in 2011?
| 3028.0 |
CONVFINQA9981 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: and what was that in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2012 total represent in relation to this 2011 one?
| 1.11262 |
CONVFINQA9982 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: and what was that in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2012 total represent in relation to this 2011 one?
Answer: 1.11262
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2011 total?
| 0.11262 |
CONVFINQA9983 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: and what was that in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2012 total represent in relation to this 2011 one?
Answer: 1.11262
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2011 total?
Answer: 0.11262
Question: and concerning the the incremental severance expense, what was the amount of the one related to the severance plan in 2009?
| 3471.0 |
CONVFINQA9984 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: and what was that in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2012 total represent in relation to this 2011 one?
Answer: 1.11262
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2011 total?
Answer: 0.11262
Question: and concerning the the incremental severance expense, what was the amount of the one related to the severance plan in 2009?
Answer: 3471.0
Question: what was the total severance expense in that year?
| 135113.0 |
CONVFINQA9985 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the company does not make any contributions to its postretirement plan other than funding benefits payments . the following table summarizes expected net benefit payments from the company 2019s general assets through 2019 : benefit payments expected subsidy receipts benefit payments . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>benefit payments</td><td>expected subsidy receipts</td><td>net benefit payments</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 2714</td><td>$ 71</td><td>$ 2643</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>3028</td><td>91</td><td>2937</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2012</td><td>3369</td><td>111</td><td>3258</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2013</td><td>3660</td><td>134</td><td>3526</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2014</td><td>4019</td><td>151</td><td>3868</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>2015 2013 2019</td><td>22686</td><td>1071</td><td>21615</td></tr></table> the company provides limited postemployment benefits to eligible former u.s . employees , primarily severance under a formal severance plan ( the 201cseverance plan 201d ) . the company accounts for severance expense by accruing the expected cost of the severance benefits expected to be provided to former employees after employment over their relevant service periods . the company updates the assumptions in determining the severance accrual by evaluating the actual severance activity and long-term trends underlying the assumptions . as a result of updating the assumptions , the company recorded incremental severance expense ( benefit ) related to the severance plan of $ 3471 , $ 2643 and $ ( 3418 ) , respectively , during the years 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . these amounts were part of total severance expenses of $ 135113 , $ 32997 and $ 21284 in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively , included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . note 14 . debt on april 28 , 2008 , the company extended its committed unsecured revolving credit facility , dated as of april 28 , 2006 ( the 201ccredit facility 201d ) , for an additional year . the new expiration date of the credit facility is april 26 , 2011 . the available funding under the credit facility will remain at $ 2500000 through april 27 , 2010 and then decrease to $ 2000000 during the final year of the credit facility agreement . other terms and conditions in the credit facility remain unchanged . the company 2019s option to request that each lender under the credit facility extend its commitment was provided pursuant to the original terms of the credit facility agreement . borrowings under the facility are available to provide liquidity in the event of one or more settlement failures by mastercard international customers and , subject to a limit of $ 500000 , for general corporate purposes . the facility fee and borrowing cost are contingent upon the company 2019s credit rating . at december 31 , 2009 , the facility fee was 7 basis points on the total commitment , or approximately $ 1774 annually . interest on borrowings under the credit facility would be charged at the london interbank offered rate ( libor ) plus an applicable margin of 28 basis points or an alternative base rate , and a utilization fee of 10 basis points would be charged if outstanding borrowings under the facility exceed 50% ( 50 % ) of commitments . at the inception of the credit facility , the company also agreed to pay upfront fees of $ 1250 and administrative fees of $ 325 , which are being amortized over five years . facility and other fees associated with the credit facility totaled $ 2222 , $ 2353 and $ 2477 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . mastercard was in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility and had no borrowings under the credit facility at december 31 , 2009 or december 31 , 2008 . the majority of credit facility lenders are members or affiliates of members of mastercard international . in june 1998 , mastercard international issued ten-year unsecured , subordinated notes ( the 201cnotes 201d ) paying a fixed interest rate of 6.67% ( 6.67 % ) per annum . mastercard repaid the entire principal amount of $ 80000 on june 30 , 2008 pursuant to the terms of the notes . the interest expense on the notes was $ 2668 and $ 5336 for each of the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .
Question: what was the total of benefit payments in 2012?
Answer: 3369.0
Question: and what was that in 2011?
Answer: 3028.0
Question: how much, then, does the 2012 total represent in relation to this 2011 one?
Answer: 1.11262
Question: and what is this value without the portion equivalent to the 2011 total?
Answer: 0.11262
Question: and concerning the the incremental severance expense, what was the amount of the one related to the severance plan in 2009?
Answer: 3471.0
Question: what was the total severance expense in that year?
Answer: 135113.0
Question: what percentage, then, of this total expense does that amount represent?
| 0.02569 |
CONVFINQA9986 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .
Question: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?
| 3188.0 |
CONVFINQA9987 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .
Question: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?
Answer: 3188.0
Question: what was the price per share?
| 43.46 |
CONVFINQA9988 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .
Question: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?
Answer: 3188.0
Question: what was the price per share?
Answer: 43.46
Question: what is the total value of restricted stock units outstanding at the end of 2014?
| 138550.48 |
CONVFINQA9989 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .
Question: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?
Answer: 3188.0
Question: what was the price per share?
Answer: 43.46
Question: what is the total value of restricted stock units outstanding at the end of 2014?
Answer: 138550.48
Question: what was the total value of the restricted stock units at the end of 2015?
| 128397.82 |
CONVFINQA9990 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .
Question: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?
Answer: 3188.0
Question: what was the price per share?
Answer: 43.46
Question: what is the total value of restricted stock units outstanding at the end of 2014?
Answer: 138550.48
Question: what was the total value of the restricted stock units at the end of 2015?
Answer: 128397.82
Question: what is the difference?
| -10152.66 |
CONVFINQA9991 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a summary of the company 2019s restricted stock unit award activity as of october 31 , 2015 and changes during the fiscal year then ended is presented below : restricted stock units outstanding ( in thousands ) weighted- average grant- date fair value per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>restrictedstock unitsoutstanding ( in thousands )</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair valueper share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at november 1 2014</td><td>3188</td><td>$ 43.46</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>units granted</td><td>818</td><td>$ 52.25</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>restrictions lapsed</td><td>-1151 ( 1151 )</td><td>$ 39.72</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>forfeited</td><td>-157 ( 157 )</td><td>$ 45.80</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>restricted stock units outstanding at october 31 2015</td><td>2698</td><td>$ 47.59</td></tr></table> as of october 31 , 2015 , there was $ 108.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share- based awards comprised of stock options and restricted stock units . that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted- average period of 1.3 years . the total grant-date fair value of shares that vested during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 was approximately $ 65.6 million , $ 57.4 million and $ 63.9 million , respectively . common stock repurchase program the company 2019s common stock repurchase program has been in place since august 2004 . in the aggregate , the board of directors have authorized the company to repurchase $ 5.6 billion of the company 2019s common stock under the program . under the program , the company may repurchase outstanding shares of its common stock from time to time in the open market and through privately negotiated transactions . unless terminated earlier by resolution of the company 2019s board of directors , the repurchase program will expire when the company has repurchased all shares authorized under the program . as of october 31 , 2015 , the company had repurchased a total of approximately 140.7 million shares of its common stock for approximately $ 5.0 billion under this program . an additional $ 544.5 million remains available for repurchase of shares under the current authorized program . the repurchased shares are held as authorized but unissued shares of common stock . the company also , from time to time , repurchases shares in settlement of employee minimum tax withholding obligations due upon the vesting of restricted stock units or the exercise of stock options . the withholding amount is based on the employees minimum statutory withholding requirement . any future common stock repurchases will be dependent upon several factors , including the company's financial performance , outlook , liquidity and the amount of cash the company has available in the united states . preferred stock the company has 471934 authorized shares of $ 1.00 par value preferred stock , none of which is issued or outstanding . the board of directors is authorized to fix designations , relative rights , preferences and limitations on the preferred stock at the time of issuance . 4 . industry , segment and geographic information the company operates and tracks its results in one reportable segment based on the aggregation of six operating segments . the company designs , develops , manufactures and markets a broad range of integrated circuits ( ics ) . the chief executive officer has been identified as the company's chief operating decision maker . the company has determined that all of the company's operating segments share the following similar economic characteristics , and therefore meet the criteria established for operating segments to be aggregated into one reportable segment , namely : 2022 the primary source of revenue for each operating segment is the sale of integrated circuits . 2022 the integrated circuits sold by each of the company's operating segments are manufactured using similar semiconductor manufacturing processes and raw materials in either the company 2019s own production facilities or by third-party wafer fabricators using proprietary processes . 2022 the company sells its products to tens of thousands of customers worldwide . many of these customers use products spanning all operating segments in a wide range of applications . 2022 the integrated circuits marketed by each of the company's operating segments are sold globally through a direct sales force , third-party distributors , independent sales representatives and via our website to the same types of customers . all of the company's operating segments share a similar long-term financial model as they have similar economic characteristics . the causes for variation in operating and financial performance are the same among the company's operating segments and include factors such as ( i ) life cycle and price and cost fluctuations , ( ii ) number of competitors , ( iii ) product .
Question: what was the number of restricted stock units outstanding on november 1, 2014?
Answer: 3188.0
Question: what was the price per share?
Answer: 43.46
Question: what is the total value of restricted stock units outstanding at the end of 2014?
Answer: 138550.48
Question: what was the total value of the restricted stock units at the end of 2015?
Answer: 128397.82
Question: what is the difference?
Answer: -10152.66
Question: what is the ratio of the value at the end of 2015 to the end of 2014?
| -0.07328 |
CONVFINQA9992 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
constitutes an event of default under our other debt instruments , including our senior notes , and , therefore , our senior notes would also be subject to acceleration of maturity . if such acceleration were to occur , we would not have sufficient liquidity available to repay the indebtedness . we would likely have to seek an amendment under our credit facilities for relief from the financial covenants or repay the debt with proceeds from the issuance of new debt or equity , or asset sales , if necessary . we may be unable to amend our credit facilities or raise sufficient capital to repay such obligations in the event the maturities are accelerated . financial assurance we must provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , or insurance policies ( the financial assurance instruments ) , or trust deposits , which are included in restricted cash and marketable securities and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post-closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we must provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2014 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not considered indebtedness . because we currently have no liability for the financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets ; however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and self-insurance liabilities as they are incurred . the underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments , in excess of those already reflected in our consolidated balance sheets , would be recorded if it is probable that we would be unable to fulfill our related obligations . we do not expect this to occur . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than financial assurance instruments and operating leases , that are not classified as debt . we do not guarantee any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 is calculated as follows ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1548.2</td><td>$ 1513.8</td><td>$ 1766.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases of property and equipment</td><td>-880.8 ( 880.8 )</td><td>-903.5 ( 903.5 )</td><td>-936.5 ( 936.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>23.9</td><td>28.7</td><td>34.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 691.3</td><td>$ 639.0</td><td>$ 864.8</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2012 to 2013?
| 52.3 |
CONVFINQA9993 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
constitutes an event of default under our other debt instruments , including our senior notes , and , therefore , our senior notes would also be subject to acceleration of maturity . if such acceleration were to occur , we would not have sufficient liquidity available to repay the indebtedness . we would likely have to seek an amendment under our credit facilities for relief from the financial covenants or repay the debt with proceeds from the issuance of new debt or equity , or asset sales , if necessary . we may be unable to amend our credit facilities or raise sufficient capital to repay such obligations in the event the maturities are accelerated . financial assurance we must provide financial assurance to governmental agencies and a variety of other entities under applicable environmental regulations relating to our landfill operations for capping , closure and post-closure costs , and related to our performance under certain collection , landfill and transfer station contracts . we satisfy these financial assurance requirements by providing surety bonds , letters of credit , or insurance policies ( the financial assurance instruments ) , or trust deposits , which are included in restricted cash and marketable securities and other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . the amount of the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs is determined by applicable state environmental regulations . the financial assurance requirements for capping , closure and post-closure costs may be associated with a portion of the landfill or the entire landfill . generally , states require a third-party engineering specialist to determine the estimated capping , closure and post-closure costs that are used to determine the required amount of financial assurance for a landfill . the amount of financial assurance required can , and generally will , differ from the obligation determined and recorded under u.s . gaap . the amount of the financial assurance requirements related to contract performance varies by contract . additionally , we must provide financial assurance for our insurance program and collateral for certain performance obligations . we do not expect a material increase in financial assurance requirements during 2014 , although the mix of financial assurance instruments may change . these financial instruments are issued in the normal course of business and are not considered indebtedness . because we currently have no liability for the financial assurance instruments , they are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets ; however , we record capping , closure and post-closure liabilities and self-insurance liabilities as they are incurred . the underlying obligations of the financial assurance instruments , in excess of those already reflected in our consolidated balance sheets , would be recorded if it is probable that we would be unable to fulfill our related obligations . we do not expect this to occur . off-balance sheet arrangements we have no off-balance sheet debt or similar obligations , other than financial assurance instruments and operating leases , that are not classified as debt . we do not guarantee any third-party debt . free cash flow we define free cash flow , which is not a measure determined in accordance with u.s . gaap , as cash provided by operating activities less purchases of property and equipment , plus proceeds from sales of property and equipment as presented in our consolidated statements of cash flows . our free cash flow for the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 is calculated as follows ( in millions of dollars ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 1548.2</td><td>$ 1513.8</td><td>$ 1766.7</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>purchases of property and equipment</td><td>-880.8 ( 880.8 )</td><td>-903.5 ( 903.5 )</td><td>-936.5 ( 936.5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>proceeds from sales of property and equipment</td><td>23.9</td><td>28.7</td><td>34.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>free cash flow</td><td>$ 691.3</td><td>$ 639.0</td><td>$ 864.8</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the change in the free cash flow from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: 52.3
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that free cash flow in 2012, in percentage?
| 0.08185 |
CONVFINQA9994 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .
Question: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?
| 257.0 |
CONVFINQA9995 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .
Question: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?
Answer: 257.0
Question: and the value for 2009 specifically?
| 203.0 |
CONVFINQA9996 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .
Question: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?
Answer: 257.0
Question: and the value for 2009 specifically?
Answer: 203.0
Question: now combined with the other two years?
| 460.0 |
CONVFINQA9997 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .
Question: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?
Answer: 257.0
Question: and the value for 2009 specifically?
Answer: 203.0
Question: now combined with the other two years?
Answer: 460.0
Question: and now including 2010?
| 723.0 |
CONVFINQA9998 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the following table displays the expected benefit payments in the years indicated : ( dollars in thousands ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 117</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2008</td><td>140</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2009</td><td>203</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>263</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2011</td><td>328</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>next 5 years</td><td>2731</td></tr></table> 1 4 . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s a n d s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n a . d i v i d e n d r e s t r i c t i o n s under bermuda law , group is prohibited from declaring or paying a dividend if such payment would reduce the realizable value of its assets to an amount less than the aggregate value of its liabilities and its issued share capital and share premium ( addi- tional paid-in capital ) accounts . group 2019s ability to pay dividends and its operating expenses is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries . the payment of such dividends by insurer subsidiaries is limited under bermuda law and the laws of the var- ious u.s . states in which group 2019s insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are domiciled or deemed domiciled . the limitations are generally based upon net income and compliance with applicable policyholders 2019 surplus or minimum solvency margin and liquidity ratio requirements as determined in accordance with the relevant statutory accounting practices . under bermuda law , bermuda re is prohibited from declaring or making payment of a dividend if it fails to meet its minimum solvency margin or minimum liquidity ratio . as a long-term insurer , bermuda re is also unable to declare or pay a dividend to anyone who is not a policyholder unless , after payment of the dividend , the value of the assets in its long-term business fund , as certified by its approved actuary , exceeds its liabilities for long-term business by at least the $ 250000 minimum solvency margin . prior approval of the bermuda monetary authority is required if bermuda re 2019s dividend payments would reduce its prior year-end total statutory capital by 15.0% ( 15.0 % ) or more . delaware law provides that an insurance company which is a member of an insurance holding company system and is domi- ciled in the state shall not pay dividends without giving prior notice to the insurance commissioner of delaware and may not pay dividends without the approval of the insurance commissioner if the value of the proposed dividend , together with all other dividends and distributions made in the preceding twelve months , exceeds the greater of ( 1 ) 10% ( 10 % ) of statutory surplus or ( 2 ) net income , not including realized capital gains , each as reported in the prior year 2019s statutory annual statement . in addition , no dividend may be paid in excess of unassigned earned surplus . at december 31 , 2006 , everest re had $ 270.4 million available for payment of dividends in 2007 without the need for prior regulatory approval . b . s t a t u t o r y f i n a n c i a l i n f o r m a t i o n everest re prepares its statutory financial statements in accordance with accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the national association of insurance commissioners ( 201cnaic 201d ) and the delaware insurance department . prescribed statutory accounting practices are set forth in the naic accounting practices and procedures manual . the capital and statutory surplus of everest re was $ 2704.1 million ( unaudited ) and $ 2327.6 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of everest re was $ 298.7 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 26.9 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income $ 175.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . bermuda re prepares its statutory financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles set forth in bermuda in the insurance act 1978 , amendments thereto and related regulations . the statutory capital and surplus of bermuda re was $ 1893.9 million ( unaudited ) and $ 1522.5 million at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . the statutory net income of bermuda re was $ 409.8 million ( unaudited ) for the year ended december 31 , 2006 , the statutory net loss was $ 220.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2005 and the statutory net income was $ 248.7 million for the year ended december 31 , 2004 . 1 5 . c o n t i n g e n c i e s in the ordinary course of business , the company is involved in lawsuits , arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures , the outcomes of which will determine the company 2019s rights and obligations under insurance , reinsur- ance and other contractual agreements . in some disputes , the company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it . in other matters , the company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights . these disputes arise from time to time and as they arise are addressed , and ultimately resolved , through both informal and formal means , including negotiated resolution , arbitration and litigation . in all such matters , the company believes that .
Question: what were the expected benefit payments in 2007 and 2008 combined?
Answer: 257.0
Question: and the value for 2009 specifically?
Answer: 203.0
Question: now combined with the other two years?
Answer: 460.0
Question: and now including 2010?
Answer: 723.0
Question: and also combined with 2011?
| 1051.0 |
CONVFINQA9999 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
period . the discount reflects our incremental borrowing rate , which matches the lifetime of the liability . significant changes in the discount rate selected or the estimations of sublease income in the case of leases could impact the amounts recorded . other associated costs with restructuring activities we recognize other costs associated with restructuring activities as they are incurred , including moving costs and consulting and legal fees . pensions we sponsor defined benefit pension plans throughout the world . our most significant plans are located in the u.s. , the u.k. , the netherlands and canada . our significant u.s. , u.k . and canadian pension plans are closed to new entrants . we have ceased crediting future benefits relating to salary and service for our u.s. , u.k . and canadian plans . recognition of gains and losses and prior service certain changes in the value of the obligation and in the value of plan assets , which may occur due to various factors such as changes in the discount rate and actuarial assumptions , actual demographic experience and/or plan asset performance are not immediately recognized in net income . such changes are recognized in other comprehensive income and are amortized into net income as part of the net periodic benefit cost . unrecognized gains and losses that have been deferred in other comprehensive income , as previously described , are amortized into compensation and benefits expense as a component of periodic pension expense based on the average expected future service of active employees for our plans in the netherlands and canada , or the average life expectancy of the u.s . and u.k . plan members . after the effective date of the plan amendments to cease crediting future benefits relating to service , unrecognized gains and losses are also be based on the average life expectancy of members in the canadian plans . we amortize any prior service expense or credits that arise as a result of plan changes over a period consistent with the amortization of gains and losses . as of december 31 , 2013 , our pension plans have deferred losses that have not yet been recognized through income in the consolidated financial statements . we amortize unrecognized actuarial losses outside of a corridor , which is defined as 10% ( 10 % ) of the greater of market-related value of plan assets or projected benefit obligation . to the extent not offset by future gains , incremental amortization as calculated above will continue to affect future pension expense similarly until fully amortized . the following table discloses our combined experience loss , the number of years over which we are amortizing the experience loss , and the estimated 2014 amortization of loss by country ( amounts in millions ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>u.k .</td><td>u.s .</td><td>other</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>combined experience loss</td><td>$ 2012</td><td>$ 1219</td><td>$ 402</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortization period ( in years )</td><td>29</td><td>26</td><td>11 - 23</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>estimated 2014 amortization of loss</td><td>$ 53</td><td>$ 44</td><td>$ 10</td></tr></table> the unrecognized prior service cost at december 31 , 2013 was $ 27 million in the u.k . and other plans . for the u.s . pension plans we use a market-related valuation of assets approach to determine the expected return on assets , which is a component of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the consolidated statements of income . this approach recognizes 20% ( 20 % ) of any gains or losses in the current year's value of market-related assets , with the remaining 80% ( 80 % ) spread over the next four years . as this approach recognizes gains or losses over a five-year period , the future value of assets and therefore , our net periodic benefit cost will be impacted as previously deferred gains or losses are recorded . as of december 31 , 2013 , the market-related value of assets was $ 1.8 billion . we do not use the market-related valuation approach to determine the funded status of the u.s . plans recorded in the consolidated statements of financial position . instead , we record and present the funded status in the consolidated statements of financial position based on the fair value of the plan assets . as of december 31 , 2013 , the fair value of plan assets was $ 1.9 billion . our non-u.s . plans use fair value to determine expected return on assets. .
Question: what was the experience loss in uk?
| 2012.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.