argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
We should legalize the organ trade because it would allow the supply of organs to increase in sync with the demand. | We should legalize organ trade | legalizing the organ trade would bring an end to shortages for transplant |
We should legalize the organ trade so that it can be taxed and regulated, rather than be run by organized criminals. | We should legalize organ trade | we should legalize organ trade because it will lower the risk of selling on the black market and can help those in need |
We should legalize the organ trade so that operations are performed safely by licensed physicians in hospitals. | We should legalize organ trade | a legalised organ trade would dramatically improve the stock of transplant organs, saving lives. |
we should let women in combat as long as they have proved themselves to be capable | We should prohibit women in combat | women are just as capable as men to perform the tasks needed in combat and they should not be banned from it. |
we should limit judicial activism because people making rulings on personal opinions instead of the law could set a bad president and other people may try to do the same crime if it is gotten away with | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit executive compensation as it is the only fair way to honor your employees. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation as many executives take huge payouts from floundering companies and this also leads to bad press and public anger. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit executive compensation because ceos are getting million + dollar bonuses while many of the employees get raises that don't even cover inflation. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because is necesary adjust in economics | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because it is not fair because most of the success and profit brought and was done by people that are below them | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit executive compensation because it is taxed as income | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because it leads to higher taxes | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because it only helps the rich | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit executive compensation because it will lead to having to pay taxes at the highest tier | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit executive compensation because most make an unbalanced amount of salary in comparison to their real worth. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit executive compensation because other workers are not getting the salary they need to live | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because other workers do not get compensated enough | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because the employees do all the hard work. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because the money should be put to better use such as medical | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because there is no need to be that greedy, all that extra money could go towards better pay for their employees. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because they are paid enough as it is, the money could be put back into the organisation | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because this money would be better if used for medical | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because this would help support all of the workers in a company. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation because too much compensation promotes bad business practices and focuses on money instead of product or services offered. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation for envelope and increase of production | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
we should limit executive compensation for national ecomics | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
We should limit executive compensation since all the employees have a hand in creating those profits. It's wrong for only the top executives to receive the benefits. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit executive compensation so that all the employees get a decent living wage and benefits for them and their families. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
We should limit executive compensation so that the top layer of organisations does not earn massively more than the rest of the workforce as they are both important to the success of the company. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit executive compensation, it is a poorly hidden attempt to escape income tax | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
we should limit executives earnings. some ceo's get millions of dollars for a salary plus housing, airplanes, and even get a package to leave the company. all this while average worker could use more. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
we should limit how much these executives get paid so the profits dont turn into losses. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should limit it, laws should not be changed for special circumstances | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism and keep the laws the ways they are | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism as it goes outside the set laws and eventually could go to far to one person creating their own agendas. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism as that does not follow the laws the people voted on. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because a judge is there to interpret the law, not create it. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because a lot of the time the judge brings into his own personal feelings and not what is right with the law | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because it can become too powerful and become it's own judge and jury and become impartial. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because it is not fair and base on a person personal emotion or opinion | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because it is not right to make political stands when judging crime. each judge only has the authority and responsibility to decide whether or not a current law was broken | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because it is opinion based and causes wrongful convictions | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because it's effective | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
We should limit judicial activism because some judges abuse the power they are given and have control over certain sensitive issues according to their own liking and it limit freedom of speech | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because some of the judiciary officials decide only for what they want without basing on the law provided by the gokvernment. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because the judges would go based on their personal opinions instead of what is lawful | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism because the power to make laws belong solely to the legislative branch of government not to unelected judges. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism before things get out of hand. each judge has their own personal beliefs and political opinions but they are sworn in to uphold the rule of law and nothing else. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism in order to adhere to the constitution as it was originally drafted. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism since it is one person making a ruling based on their own feelings. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism since that leads to civil unrest do to the nature of activists. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism so that jurors are not swayed. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit judicial activism so that we do not depart from the constitution. | We should limit judicial activism | we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective. |
we should limit this because all the people bellow them work the hardest in the company but get paid the least. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
we should limit this because the executives already have a lot of money and the workers should get compensated more because they do all the work. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
we should make decisions based on what is good for the group . if the group thrives, then everyone in the group also benefits. also it encourages compassion which our society currently is lacking. | We should oppose collectivism | As people are randomly born into the world and largely do not choose the community they are born into, they should not be obligated to serve the collective as they did not consent to its existence. |
we should make sex selection legal. it will lead to more freedom regarding choices of family building. a couple could choose to have a boy and a girl without just hoping for that scenario | We should legalize sex selection | legalizing sex selection is a good option for people looking to have a specific sex of child. |
we should never abandon marriage. it means making a commitment and sticking to it through good and bad. it's a way to show someone how much they mean to you. | We should abandon marriage | we shouldn't abandon marriage because it is still sacred for many and shows an act of love |
we should never abandon the union of marriage sine that is what our higher power intended for a man and woman. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should never abolish the right for citizens to keep and bear arms because many people still live in nature surrounded by violent animals and without a gun they can't protect themselves | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to bear and keep arms should be abolished as it is outdated in this age where we are no longer hunting for food or in the age of the pioneers |
we should never abolish the right to keep and bear arms since this amendment was created to protect americans from a tyrannical government. if we lose our gun rights, we have no way to defend ourselves. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should never adopt atheism because it removes a sense of purpose in people. if they believe there is no purpose to life and no afterlife, it removes the incentive for them to behave positively | We should adopt atheism | We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit. |
we should never ban any church, because it is up to every individual person whether they want to believe and accept the teachings of a church. | We should ban the Church of Scientology | scientology should not be banned as people have the right to worship in whatever religion they wish and in a way they wish to. |
we should never ban flag burning because that is a given right to all human beings. you should have the ability to freely speak and this includes protests against the country with flag burning | We should prohibit flag burning | we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens. |
we should never have foreign policy that aims to kill. we should aim to capture and legitimately take them to trial. | We should ban targeted killing | targeted killing can possibly save millions of people if we are targeting those who mean to carry out dangerous plans against the rest of the world. |
we should never legalize prostitution because this would be like saying this lifestyle is acceptable. prostitution is violent, riddled with drugs and stds. | We should legalize prostitution | prostitution should be legalized as it provides a service and reduces rape and sex crimes |
we should no adopt a multi-party system because nothing would ever get done with varying points of view. | We should adopt a multi-party system | we should adopt a multi-party system so that we have more viewpoints to solve problems. |
we should no ban factory farming because we need large scale farming in order to meet the demand for food. | We should ban factory farming | we should ban factory farming because it lead to the abuse of animals |
we should no subsidize space exploration because there is no reason to waste money on something that is not going to benefit the people here on earth. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should no subsidize stay-at-home dads because it is no different than a mom staying home. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not adopt an austerity regime because it will harm a good process. | We should adopt an austerity regime | austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt. |
we should not ban factory farming because it is a source of food for people | We should ban factory farming | we should ban factory farming because it lead to the abuse of animals |
we should not ban factory farming because there is very little cruelty or suffering in factory farming – certainly no more than in traditional forms of farming | We should ban factory farming | we should ban factory farming because it lead to the abuse of animals |
We should not ban naturopathy because they are using natural food and natural herb to help heal the body if other medicine doesn't work. | We should ban naturopathy | we should ban naturopathy since it has no scientific basis and has no medical benefit beyond the placebo effect. |
we should not introduce compulsory voting because in a democracy people should be free to choose their own actions. | We should introduce compulsory voting | compulsory voting is not a democratic choice, for people should always be allowed to express their dissent by abstaining from voting . |
we should not oppose collectivism because a united voice is much stronger than a single opinion. | We should oppose collectivism | collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest. |
We should not abandon marriage as it is the best way for people to live together and create families. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
We should not abandon marriage as people still believe in the sanctity of the marriage vow and wish to declare their unity. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage as the people still need to commit to one another for the good of the children so they are not just hanging out there wondering who one of their parents are. | We should abandon marriage | we shouldn't abandon marriage because it is still sacred for many and shows an act of love |
we should not abandon marriage as there is not much else in our society that can be considered sacred. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage because it is an important commitment that helps keep society going. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage because it is important and a union made between two people under god. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage because it's a tradition and it shows the love and trust between two individuals. | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage because many religious people still believe in marriage | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage because some people still believe in the wedding vows | We should abandon marriage | marriage is a solid foundation with which to build a family and it should be held as sacred always. |
we should not abandon marriage because there are still a lot of people that believe in marriage vows | We should abandon marriage | we shouldn't abandon marriage because it is still sacred for many and shows an act of love |
We should not abandon marriage since it will increase single parenting and create unstable households for children | We should abandon marriage | we shouldn't abandon marriage because it is still sacred for many and shows an act of love |
we should not abandon school uniform because, otherwise will be discrimination between poor and rich kids. | We should abandon the use of school uniform | school uniforms limit a student's individuality and expression of their personality and therefore should be abandoned. |
we should not abandon television as it can be educational and also a form of relaxation. it also helps build community due to "water cooler" moments. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
we should not abandon television as it is an excellent means of providing people with various information and entertainment. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
we should not abandon television as it is an excellent source of news and information as well as entertainment. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
We should not abandon television as many people still get a lot of enjoyment from this medium. | We should abandon television | we should abandon television because it can lead to addictions of screens and missing out on time spent on other priorities like spending time with family and housework etc |
We should not abandon television as the older generation enjoy it very much. | We should abandon television | we should abandon television because it can lead to addictions of screens and missing out on time spent on other priorities like spending time with family and housework etc |
we should not abandon television because it contributes to society by doing things such as bringing families together and providing people with news. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
we should not abandon television because it gives us a lot of news and information that may not otherwise be available to us | We should abandon television | we should abandon television because it can lead to addictions of screens and missing out on time spent on other priorities like spending time with family and housework etc |
we should not abandon television because it helps us to experience what is happening in the world and also provides entertainment. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
we should not abandon television because it is a creative outlet and a form of art that helps people to relax and unwind after a long day at work. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
we should not abandon television because it is a creative outlet and an escape from the daily struggle that helps people to unwind and relax. | We should abandon television | television is entertaining and educational both. it provides a window on the world, access to things we would never see otherwise. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.