argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
We should not abolish the olympic Games because they give people a goal and something important to aim for in a healthy manner. | We should abolish the Olympic Games | The olympic games are a long ongoing tradition that has brought countries together in peace to focus on sport rather than their various differences, this important event should never be abolished. |
we should not abolish the olympic games since it brings in a lot of tourism and money. it also gives the hosting country a great deal of pride. | We should abolish the Olympic Games | The olympic games are a long ongoing tradition that has brought countries together in peace to focus on sport rather than their various differences, this important event should never be abolished. |
we should not abolish the olympic games, they inspire athletes and represent what the human race can achieve | We should abolish the Olympic Games | The olympic games are a long ongoing tradition that has brought countries together in peace to focus on sport rather than their various differences, this important event should never be abolished. |
we should not abolish the olympics because people work hard to get there and compete. | We should abolish the Olympic Games | we ought not abolish the olympic games because they provide an international gathering every four years that increases global harmony and provides exciting competition for the world to watch |
we should not abolish the olympics games because it's one of the few things that brings the world together and it gives a chance for dedicated athletes to show their skills. | We should abolish the Olympic Games | The olympic games are a long ongoing tradition that has brought countries together in peace to focus on sport rather than their various differences, this important event should never be abolished. |
we should not abolish the right because every human has the right to defend themselves in any way that they seem fit. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | people have the right to defend themselves and their property by keeping and bearing arms |
we should not abolish the right because it would leave us vulnerable to personal attacks | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to bear arms because the law was set forth by our founding fathers, therefore making it an american right. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to keep and bear arms is part of our constitution. |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms as all people should never be without a way to protect themselves or their families. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to bear and keep arms should be abolished as it is outdated in this age where we are no longer hunting for food or in the age of the pioneers |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms as everyone has a right to keep guns as a mean of protection as stated in the constitution. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms as people have a right to protect their property and to feel safe in their homes. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to bear and keep arms should be abolished as it is outdated in this age where we are no longer hunting for food or in the age of the pioneers |
We should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms as this is our fundamental right and should not be something for debate. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to keep and bear arms is part of our constitution. |
We should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms as we have a right to defend ourselves given by the constitution. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to bear and keep arms should be abolished as it is outdated in this age where we are no longer hunting for food or in the age of the pioneers |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms becaause people have a right to protect themselves and their families | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it is a constitutional right to own weapons to protect ourselves. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to keep and bear arms is part of our constitution. |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it's our right to be able to protect ourselves from those who cause us harm. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to bear and keep arms should be abolished as it is outdated in this age where we are no longer hunting for food or in the age of the pioneers |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms because people have a right to defend themselves if someone has the intention of harming you or breaking into your house. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | people have the right to protect themselves and should have the right to keep and bear arms. |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms because people have a right to protect themselves | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms because people should be able to protect themselves | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms because people would be left defenseless against criminals who are going to find a way to get a gun | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms to protect ourselves from people that are trying to kill us | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms, because it comes down to how an individual will use the arms. in a safe environment, there is nothing wrong with using these arms. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | the right to bear and keep arms should be abolished as it is outdated in this age where we are no longer hunting for food or in the age of the pioneers |
we should not abolish the right to keep and bear arms, if we did we would be giving complete control to the government. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish the three strikes law since this would promote lawlessness and would make our society a dangerous one to live in. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes law because it is a way to help rehabilitate criminals. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because a criminal deserves to be punished. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because omeone who has committed three felonies is not likely to reform | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because people who are repeat offenders do not need to be on the street where the temptation to commit yet more crime is ever present. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because sometime people near from their mistakes after they make enough of them | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | Three-strikes laws are too harsh. Many people who have committed non-violent felonies - and in some cases, misdemeanors - have been given mandatory life sentences. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because sometimes people learn from their mistakes and change | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because the criminal deserves what they did and justice must be done unto them | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws because the criminal will continue repeating the same crime again without fear and they may committing serious crime and by this law perhaps they may repent | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws because they are popular with voters and it would be undemocratic to remove them. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws because they make it less palatable for someone to habitually commit crimes, since the risk keeps growing. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws because they result in reduced crime rates | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws but we could improve them so that people who have committed only a minor offence are not jailed for life. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws for violent crimes, since if people commit three violent crimes they probably cannot live in civil society without hurting others. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws in all cases, but it should be up to judicial discretion, so that the worst criminal are off the streets. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish the three-strikes laws, because crime has fallen since they were introduced. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish the three-strikes laws, if they dont learn after 2 strikes they will never learn | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish this because it helps companies from being stolen from, which might prevent them from getting a foot in the market. | We should abolish intellectual property rights | we should abolish this because it could give someone a monopoly in the certain inductural sector and give them the unfair chance. |
we should not abolish this because t helps people that may have mental disorders to be able to study in college but have somewhere to go if it gets to much. | We should abolish safe spaces | safe spaces should be abolished because without proper regulation, they can be just as dangerous as any where else. |
we should not abolish this historic event that brings together every country of the world. it promotes understanding and worldwide community | We should abolish the Olympic Games | the olympics help foster friendship between nations. |
we should not abolish this right, it would only affect law abiding citizens, criminals would still obtain their guns how they do now; on the black market. the ability to defend against them is removed. | We should abolish the right to keep and bear arms | we should abolish the right to keep and bear arms because it can help stop mass shootings |
we should not abolish this rule because criminals will take advantage. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
we should not abolish three strike laws because a man/woman especially who made a serious crimes should be convicted longer. | We should abolish the three-strikes laws | we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down. |
We should not abolish zoos as many animals would become extinct without their conservation projects. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos as they are a safe haven for many animals that would have died in the wild had someone not taken them in and nourished them. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos as they are a way to protect species and provide a means for people to learn about animals. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
We should not abolish zoos as they are the only way to support endangered species. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos as they contribute to the breeding of endangered species and the reintroduction of animals to the wild | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos as they look after endangered species and promote breeding programes to stop extinction. it is also the only way that many people will be able to see these animals in the flesh. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos as they provide learning and the opportunity to see animals that one would never be able to see should zoos not exist. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because it is good that children can actually see and learn about animals that they will never see and have contact with in real life. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because it makes it so people can see animals that they may not otherwise be able to see due to their location. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because many of them protect endangered species and are often able to breed them, like the cincinnati zoo who bred the hippo fiona. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because most of the zoos help the animals | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because most of them help the animals | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because most of them use the money to help the animals | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because people get to see animals that they would not otherwise get to see due to their location | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because these animals are treated well and it allows children to see wild animals up close in a safe space | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because they are helping out endangered species that would otherwise be extinct if they went back into the wild now. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because they help protect many endangered species and are often successful in breeding more. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos because they house animals that have nowhere else to go and have important breeding programs that prevent extinction | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos is simply for learning purposes for young people where their parents get to bring them to see all different kinds of wild animals | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos, if the animals are well cared for it can be a great environment for them to live safely and for children to go and learn about them | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
We should not abolish zoos, since many of the animals in zoos are unable to live in their natural habitats, and zoos help in animal conservation, learning and teaching how to help the animals on a larger scale. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
we should not abolish zoos, they do good work for conservation and the animals currently housed in zoos could not be released into the wild so would have to be destroyed. | We should abolish zoos | Zoos keep animals in captivity and deny them the right to their natural environment therefore they should be abolished. |
We should not adopt a multi-party system as it would only fragment the population and there would have to be many collaborations to form a government which would lead to delay and compromise. | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
We should not adopt a multi-party system as there is no need to further complicate the political system as most people don't understand it anyway. | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because it will allow a more rounded method of getting work done for the government. | We should adopt a multi-party system | multi-party coalitions are incredibily inefficient systems, and the decision making process is slowed dramatically. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because it would be harder for people to decide what they want to vote on | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because it would cause some people to be so confused | We should adopt a multi-party system | we should adopt a multi-party system so that we have more viewpoints to solve problems. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because it would make it harder for people to decide what they want and what is best for them | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because it would never work, nothing would get done because both parties would constantly be deadlocked on every issue. | We should adopt a multi-party system | we should adopt a multi-party system so that we have more viewpoints to solve problems. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because once a person votes with one party, they never seem to change their mind about that party. | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because the people that don't agree with the party in power will not be represented | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because the voters can become too invested in the party and not enough in their policies. | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because two parties is enough any more would only split the vote. | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a multi-party system because what we have been using for many years has worked relatively well. | We should adopt a multi-party system | a multi-party system could cause too much in fighting between groups that should be cooperating. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy because it is too restricting and suppressing. | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we cannot continue to risk the lives of our children and a zero-tolerance policy is a step in the right direction toward solving this horrific problem. |
We should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools as children learn best when they are able to make and learn from mistakes without fear. | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools because every one makes a mistake and should be forgiven. | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools to make it clear that no amount of bullying, bad behavior, or insubordination will be tolerated so we can have safer schools. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools because kicking a child out of school sure in heck does nothing to educate them. | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools because most of the times we use our common sense to judge what is wrong and what is right | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools to make it clear that no amount of bullying, bad behavior, or insubordination will be tolerated so we can have safer schools. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools because some of the teachers would misuse the policy | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools to make it clear that no amount of bullying, bad behavior, or insubordination will be tolerated so we can have safer schools. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools because sometimes the kids are just being silly and not behaving too badly | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools to make it clear that no amount of bullying, bad behavior, or insubordination will be tolerated so we can have safer schools. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools because sometimes the teachers are too strict on the children | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools to make it clear that no amount of bullying, bad behavior, or insubordination will be tolerated so we can have safer schools. |
We should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools- children need more tolerance in their lives in order to flourish, and creating a zero-tolerance policy will cause harm and suffering. | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | we should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools to make it clear that no amount of bullying, bad behavior, or insubordination will be tolerated so we can have safer schools. |
we should not adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools, be cause students are human too and humans makes mistakes. | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school. |
We should not adopt an austerity regime because austerity only made countries like Greece and Argentina poorer. | We should adopt an austerity regime | an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society |
we should not adopt an austerity regime because change can cause a ripple effect. | We should adopt an austerity regime | austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt. |
We should not adopt an austerity regime because counter cyclical spending leads to better outcomes for the economy than austerity. | We should adopt an austerity regime | We should adopt an austerity regime because the debt to gdp ratio threatens the future stability of the country |
we should not adopt an austerity regime because current fiscal tightening is arguably contractionary, but the alternative of not reacting to the credibility loss would have produced much worse consequences. | We should adopt an austerity regime | austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt. |
We should not adopt an austerity regime because cutting social welfare spending violates people's rights to food, housing, medicine, education, and more. | We should adopt an austerity regime | an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society |
We should not adopt an austerity regime because government spending drives economic growth, which will inflate away the debt. | We should adopt an austerity regime | austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt. |
we should not adopt an austerity regime because it costs countries money to do so | We should adopt an austerity regime | We should adopt an austerity regime because the debt to gdp ratio threatens the future stability of the country |
We should not adopt an austerity regime because it socializes the costs of a few people's poor decision making, while they keep the profits. | We should adopt an austerity regime | an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society |
we should not adopt an austerity regime because it will affect the general populations tremendously, severe recession and many other problems | We should adopt an austerity regime | an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society |
We should not adopt an austerity regime because it will do permanent damage to our state apparatuses that have taken generations to build up. | We should adopt an austerity regime | an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society |
Subsets and Splits