argument
stringlengths
35
251
topic
stringlengths
21
52
example
stringlengths
37
230
we should not adopt an austerity regime because it will hurt the poor
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
we should not adopt an austerity regime because people have a right to spend money where they see fit
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
we should not adopt an austerity regime because people would end up with less money to pay the same amount of bills with.
We should adopt an austerity regime
austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt.
We should not adopt an austerity regime because the better path to growth is to invest in educating young people to grow up and be more productive.
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
we should not adopt an austerity regime because the burden fall mostly on those least able to cope such as the poor, the sick and disabled, and or anybody else dependent on services provided by the state.
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
we should not adopt an austerity regime because the burden falls most on those least able to cope who are dependent on services provided by the state
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
We should not adopt an austerity regime because the global economy is now rapidly growing, and the recession is years behind us.
We should adopt an austerity regime
austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt.
we should not adopt an austerity regime because there is not enough agreement on what budget cuts are necessary to stem government spending.
We should adopt an austerity regime
austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt.
We should not adopt an austerity regime because this move hurt people that are living on their pensions and people pay more taxes and this hurt a lot of people
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
we should not adopt an austerity regime because we don't need to take extreme measures. the economy is rebounding and any large tax raises could be detrimental to our current financial landscape.
We should adopt an austerity regime
We should adopt an austerity regime because the debt to gdp ratio threatens the future stability of the country
we should not adopt an austerity regime that is just more money spent on unnecessary things
We should adopt an austerity regime
adopting an austerity regime is necessary when our country is struggling, it is the only was to ensure a flourishing economy in the future. ending the debt ensures our country does not collapse.
we should not adopt an austerity regime. government spending is important for supporting the health and welfare of citizens and people would lose their safety net.
We should adopt an austerity regime
We should adopt an austerity regime because the debt to gdp ratio threatens the future stability of the country
We should not adopt atheism as for society to flourish it needs rules anad beliefs and religious doctrine as provide this for millennia.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
We should not adopt atheism as government should not be able to dictate people's religious freedom.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism as many people still follow a religion and find it a source of comfort, support and community. it is also an individuals right to choose whether they follow a religion.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism as people have the right to believe the way they want when it come to a higher power.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism as the this is removing peoples right to their own beliefs and religious freedom
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because everyone has the right to believe in god if they so choose.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because everyone should have something to believe in.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because everything that is wrong becomes right in the eyes of atheism
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because in this country it's a right to practice religion and to believe in god if you so choose.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because it is not a religion
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because it would go against all other religions
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because many people believe their is a god and that is their right
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because not one has scientifically proven there is no god.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because organized religion instills good morals into people.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because our country was founded on the beliefs that there is a god.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because people have a right to believe what ever they want
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because religions form the basis of the moral code by which we live by
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism because there has not been any scientific proof proving there is not a god or other higher being.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
We should not adopt atheism since anyone should be free to believe anything they want. Following a religion helps many people try to be better people.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheism, religion is hugely important to many people. it can provide them with many positive influences including purpose, morals, guidance, and comfort in the hardest of times.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt atheist because this america and we should be free to have our own beliefs
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
we should not adopt gender neutral language because the language has evolved over centuries and should be respected.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gendered language has existed since the beginning of time, it would do no good to restructure the way we speak in such a drastic way.
we should not adopt gender neutral language because were created as male and female
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
we should not adopt gender neutral language just because certain people are making personal decisions with their own bodies and sexuality, i think that is an issue that can not be helped.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
we should not adopt gender neutral language, there are fundamental differences between men and women and pretending otherwise is dishonest and ignorant
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
We should not adopt gender-neutral language as it is likely to cause confusion and is only promoted by zealots who are obsessed with promoting identity politics.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
We should not adopt gender-neutral language as it is just political correctness taken to the extreme and people should understand the basics of language are not intended to offend them.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
We should not adopt gender-neutral language as it starts to become meaningless if you need to take account of every permutation.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language as some of us would not like to be referred to an it all the time as i do have a gender identity that i am proud of.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
we should adopt gender neutral language so as not to disrespect people who identify differently and could possibly be offended by gender norms.
we should not adopt gender-neutral language as there are many objects which are traditionally referred to in a gender e.g. ships are female.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because it has never been a problem until people made it one recently.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because it is doesn't make sense and it is just not possible to rewire the way we saying things and refer people with language that they are not suppose to be called
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because it is stupid to change the way people been speaking for hundreds of years
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because more people than not specify with a certain gender and want to be addressed as such.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because no reason to change the way people have been speaking for hundreds of years
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because not matter what, there will be more male and female identities than there of other neutral identities.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because the majority of people do identify with a gender and want to be addressed as such.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because they way we speak has been around for hundred of years it shouldn't be changed
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because using specific gender language should not have any specific meaning to a phrase.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because we still are either a male or female and if you don't identify with that, then the would it can be used.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
we should adopt gender neutral language so as not to disrespect people who identify differently and could possibly be offended by gender norms.
we should not adopt gender-neutral language because we were created as male and female.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
gendered language has existed since the beginning of time, it would do no good to restructure the way we speak in such a drastic way.
we should not adopt gender-neutral language but recognise a persons right to identify as they so choose and address them as such
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
We should not adopt gender-neutral language since there are only 2 genders and the LGBTQ population is so small, it may just make a member of that group feel like an outcast.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
by adopting gender-neutral language there will be more equality and nobody will feel offended or excluded
We should not adopt libertarianism as it will mean that people will lose respect for authority and laws and it will lead to greater problems in society.
We should adopt libertarianism
society functions best with rules and regulations, which are things you won't find in libertarianism
We should not adopt libertarianism because an unrestricted free market favors people born into privilege and cannot correct for racism, sexism, and other prejudices.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
We should not adopt libertarianism because individual freedom is maximized when we facilitate choice through things like education, not by leaving vulnerable people to fend for themselves.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because it allows people to get away with way too much that infringe on other's rights.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism is just a stop on the way to tyranny; too much freedom allows the majority to overrun minorities.
we should not adopt libertarianism because it will allow people to take advantage of the freedoms and eventually infringe on other people's freedoms.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism is just a stop on the way to tyranny; too much freedom allows the majority to overrun minorities.
we should not adopt libertarianism because left on their own many people would make a choice that adversely effects their lives without weighing all the consequences.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
We should not adopt libertarianism because people's lives are better when they know they have a social safety net to fall back on, and that they won't starve if they lose their job.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because so far the two party major political parties have served this country for many years and done a decent job.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
We should not adopt libertarianism because sometimes people need to look towards the welfare of the masses rather than their personal desires.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because sometimes society needs more rules and restricitons in order to protect the rights of minorities who would otherwise be overlooked.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because that would be forcing a way of life on people that don't want it
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
We should not adopt libertarianism because the business cycle would destroy the country's economy without regulation.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because the government would have too much control over people
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because the government would take away a lot of the peoples freedom
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because there is no compassion in this type of politics. people who want libertarianism are mostly rich and want a society where everyone looks after themselves.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because there wouldn't be enough government power to keep everything under control.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism because total individuality would create chaos.
We should adopt libertarianism
Under libertarianism, there is no mechanism of social welfare to ensure that citizens are fed, clothed, and housed.
we should not adopt libertarianism because we need stiff laws to keep the people in order.
We should adopt libertarianism
society functions best with rules and regulations, which are things you won't find in libertarianism
we should not adopt libertarianism because we need the government to help with things like roads and other infrastructure
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
We should not adopt libertarianism because we need the government to provide essential services that are unprofitable.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt libertarianism for fear of the threat to law and order.
We should adopt libertarianism
society functions best with rules and regulations, which are things you won't find in libertarianism
we should not adopt libertarianism since we need a governing body to make laws to run the country and control the people.
We should adopt libertarianism
Libertarianism doesn't work. Government intervention and financing are necessary for so many facets of society - education, health, and safety, to name a few.
we should not adopt this because people will start marrying doorknobs and identifying as cats and society would fall apart.
We should adopt libertarianism
We should not adopt libertarianism because an unrestricted free market favors people born into privilege and cannot correct for racism, sexism, and other prejudices.
We should not adopt this language because only a minority group wants to impose and must make changes in documents that are not necessary
We should adopt gender-neutral language
adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way.
we should not adopt this, it would be confusing to young children. the way we've done things still works and there's no need to change it.
We should adopt gender-neutral language
adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way.
we should not adopt this, since the very title of "zero-tolerance" is an anti-thesis for productive education, creating unproductive impatient citizens
We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools
Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school.
We should not adopt zero tolerance policies because they are used as a cover for schools to avoid having to take responsibility for discipline issues.
We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools
Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school.
We should not adopt zero tolerance policies because they have not improved school discipline in other districts, only introduced more punishments for students.
We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools
Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school.
We should not adopt zero tolerance policies because they lead to suspensions and expulsions which undermine students' education.
We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools
Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school.
We should not adopt zero tolerance policies because they punish students for standing up for themselves or fighting back against bullies, which is unfair and undermines faith in school discipline.
We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools
Zero tolerance policies send a strong signal to students, parents, and the community that violence and bullying will not be tolerated.
we should not allow an austerity regime because it will completely destroy the country by causing worse economic demise.
We should adopt an austerity regime
austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt.
we should not allow criminals to get away with their crimes
We should abolish the three-strikes laws
we should abolish the three-strikes laws because this causes inconsistencies in sentences and assumes that the prior convictions were rightfully handed down.
we should not allow such an immoral thing that will more than likely fuel the inequality of genders by promoting men as more valuable
We should legalize sex selection
we should legalize sex selection because it should be up to people to make that choice. freedom of choice is vital in democracies and should be protected where possible.
we should not allow women to be put into the dangerous situation of being involved in the front lines of war. they should be protected and allow the men to be the ones to put themselves at risk.
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
We should not allow women to serve in active combat due to their lack of suitability in a life threatening scenario and the danger to their mental health.
We should prohibit women in combat
women should be prohibited from combat roles because they lack the physical size and strength to perform many of the tasks required of them
we should not approve this because stay-at-home dads do not work
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can.
we should not ban a food simply because it is quick to buy! we can tax or ban the harmful components like saturated fat, and actually target the issue rather than indiscriminately target the convenience.
We should ban fast food
fast food provides minimal nutrition and is addictive with no health benefits so should be banned to preserve the health of the population.
We should not ban algorithmic trading as it can help teach people how to trade until they are ready to do it for themselves.
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading is too easily corrupted. it's far too easy to hack. if hacked it could completely destroy the economy and individual people's lives. it's not secure enough.
We should not ban algorithmic trading as it is a useful tool for business to help spread their investment and risks in the market.
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading is too easily corrupted. it's far too easy to hack. if hacked it could completely destroy the economy and individual people's lives. it's not secure enough.
we should not ban algorithmic trading because a lot of the time it helps the poorer countries
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading should be banned because it makes investors really reliant on technology and the systems that it deploys
we should not ban algorithmic trading because any tool that can help us to trade successfully is a valid too.
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading is too easily corrupted. it's far too easy to hack. if hacked it could completely destroy the economy and individual people's lives. it's not secure enough.
we should not ban algorithmic trading because computers are smarter than people
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading should be banned because it makes investors really reliant on technology and the systems that it deploys
we should not ban algorithmic trading because if people can find a way to beat the system they should not be punished.
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading is too easily corrupted. it's far too easy to hack. if hacked it could completely destroy the economy and individual people's lives. it's not secure enough.
we should not ban algorithmic trading because it allows orders to start in the manufacturing process and allows for smooth feed to the product line.
We should ban algorithmic trading
algorithmic trading is too easily corrupted. it's far too easy to hack. if hacked it could completely destroy the economy and individual people's lives. it's not secure enough.