argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
we should not stop the development of autonomous cars because they can be helpful for people that can't drive or don't drive | We should stop the development of autonomous cars | autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way. |
we should not stop the development of autonomous cars because they can help with people that can't or don't drive and they won't drive drunk, tired or on drugs | We should stop the development of autonomous cars | autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way. |
we should not stop the development of autonomous cars because they have the potential to much safer than allowing people behind the wheel who may be drunk or on drugs or distracted by texting. | We should stop the development of autonomous cars | autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way. |
we should not stop the development of autonomous cars because they will make roads safer by reducing accidents due to human error. | We should stop the development of autonomous cars | autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way. |
we should not stop the development of autonomous cars because they will make transportation in cities easier and safer. | We should stop the development of autonomous cars | autonomous cars are dangerous and shouldn't be allowed. we all know technology fails often, and allowing someone to put their life (and the lives of those around them) in jeopardy is not necessary in this way. |
We should not stop the development of autonomous cars to decrease the case of drivers falls asleep on the wheel which can cause accidents. | We should stop the development of autonomous cars | autonomous cars reduce accidents and keep drunk, drugged and even sleepy drivers from getting behind the wheel. |
we should not subside students loans because for many kids it takes them decades to pay off and the interest accumulates. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans so that more people have an opportunity to get a good education and better careers. this in turn will benefit the economy and all of society. |
we should not subsidize a private company that is putting out possible false information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
we should not subsidize any form of secondary education. let the people who want it pay for it themselves. | We should subsidize vocational education | We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants. |
we should not subsidize any other education other than college education. | We should subsidize vocational education | We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants. |
we should not subsidize any stay-at-home parent. it is possible to work from home and raise children and i should not work to pay for others to have a child. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research as it is sustainable by public donations. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research as that is done by private companies and they can raiser their own money. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
We should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research as there are more than enough pharmaceutical companies out there who will inevitably profit from the research and they should pay for it. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research as they are private entities and can raise their own money. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because doing so would force millions to pay taxes on such when it's highly against their religions. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it can harm life of a person once it is not done successfully | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it invades the integrity of the human being to use the stem cells and we have other methods which work well in medical research. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
We should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is against the natural law | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is immoral | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it's a hot-button topic that stirs up too much controversy. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because the controversy centered on the moral implications of destroying human embryos | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because these scientists have been working on this a long time. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because they should use the money for finding cures for sicknesses and deceases instead of wasting the money on this | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because they should use the money on trying to find cures for deceases and sicknesses instead | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research because we are killing babies to do so. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research since the ones that will profit off of it are private companies and they are the ones that need to invest in it | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research since we all killing a living human being and this is morally wrong, and as a society, we must a moral society. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research, we should use the money to find cures for diseases and sicknesses instead | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize embryonic stem cell research. we should not play god. | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize journalism and keep opinions out of it. | We should subsidize journalism | subsidizing journalism might allow companies to pay for opinions, thus introducing biases in reporting. |
we should not subsidize journalism as they are private companies and can raise tons of money without our fear of bad reporting because their company would tank if they reported bad news. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
we should not subsidize journalism as they can produce tons of money through their advertising that can fully support the profession and the money used in other more critical areas of need. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
we should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the journalists spread false news | We should subsidize journalism | We should not subsidize journalism because it will undermine editorial independence and make all the news more biased towards the government. |
we should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the things they say are false news | We should subsidize journalism | We should not subsidize journalism because there is already sufficient coverage of major issues from different viewpoints without government action. |
we should not subsidize journalism because a lot of the time they spread false information | We should subsidize journalism | We should not subsidize journalism because it will undermine editorial independence and make all the news more biased towards the government. |
we should not subsidize journalism because it acts to protect poorly run and inefficent media companies from normal market forces | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would take money away from other, more needy sectors of society. |
we should not subsidize journalism because it is a poor use of public money when things like healthcare and education are short of funding | We should subsidize journalism | We should not subsidize journalism because there is already sufficient coverage of major issues from different viewpoints without government action. |
we should not subsidize journalism because it is a profession like any other and no other profession is getting subsidies. | We should subsidize journalism | We should not subsidize journalism because there is already sufficient coverage of major issues from different viewpoints without government action. |
we should not subsidize journalism because it is not a wise choice in the long run | We should subsidize journalism | We should not subsidize journalism because there is already sufficient coverage of major issues from different viewpoints without government action. |
We should not subsidize journalism because it is not uniquely important to democracy compared to a host of other industries. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
We should not subsidize journalism because it will undermine editorial independence and make all the news more biased towards the government. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
We should not subsidize journalism because it would funnel money into newspapers that are for profit entities and not deserving of public funds. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
We should not subsidize journalism because money is fungible and this would trade off with education and other more important issues. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
We should not subsidize journalism because there is already sufficient coverage of major issues from different viewpoints without government action. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
we should not subsidize journalism because we would not get accurate news. | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
we should not subsidize journalism is because the government will have a full control of news they are reporting and this is not good there is always a favorable sides will take place | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
We should not subsidize journalism simply because whoever subsidizing them have control over what they can and cannot publish or share with the public meaning they have complete control of journalism | We should subsidize journalism | Subsidizing journalism would result in pro-government bias. Journalists would be less comfortable criticizing the government so as not to"bite the hand that feeds them". |
We should not subsidize people for their mistakes | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize sate-at-home dads because it makes no since as it is law that women be paid equally as men, so there should not be a deficit in their income. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize something like space exploration because it would put lives at risk. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize something so contentious that offends many religious groups | We should subsidize embryonic stem cell research | we should subsidize embryonic stem cell research because it is necessary for the betterment of the human race. we may find cures for aging, diseases, or create new stronger genes. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money should be used for more important things like medical research | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
We should not subsidize space exploration as there are far more important and urgent issues to deal with on earth at this time. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
We should not subsidize space exploration as there are more than enough companies with the finances to do this and who will eventually benefit from these developments. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because it could fall into the wrong hands and have bad purposes. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because it is a waste of money | We should subsidize space exploration | space exploration is a waste of public funds when people are suffering from food poverty and lack of housing. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because it is too expensive and that money could do more good here on earth. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because it is very expensive in terms of the minute benefit we as a nation get out of it. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because its too expensive | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because that money could be spend on much more pressing matters like helping the homeless and research into cures for cancer. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money could be better spent on exploring ways to help improve our earth. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money needs to be used for more important things like finding cures for cancer and/or other medical things | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. | We should subsidize space exploration | space exploration is a waste of public funds when people are suffering from food poverty and lack of housing. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because there are far more important things to spend public money on closer to home such as healthcare, education and transport infrastructure | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because there are things more important to subsidize | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because we already have nasa which does enough work with space research. we have more important things to subsidize which have direct impacts on people now | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because we already spend enough on it. we can always have private companies like elon musk pay for additional space exploration | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration because we should concentrate on fixing earth first | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration due to it being flawed and coerced. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize space exploration since that is a waste of money. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
we should not subsidize stay at home dads as the motherr is the one who is most naturally capable of caring and providing for young children | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay at home dads because stay at home moms are not subsidized | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | We should not subsidize stay at home dads since women have never been subsidized to stay home with their children. It's up to the couple to decide if they can afford to have a parent stay home. |
we should not subsidize stay at home dads because stay at home moms are not subsidized. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
We should not subsidize stay at home dads since women have never been subsidized to stay home with their children. It's up to the couple to decide if they can afford to have a parent stay home. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay at home dads, moms are not, and the men should not be treated any better just because they are male. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay at home dads, to be a responsible parent you ought to wait until you can afford to raise the child yourself | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads so that they can have the same opportunity to bond with their child as the mother. |
We should not subsidize stay-at-home dads as people should work out as a family how to manage maternity and paternity leave as part of their cost of bringing up a child. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads so that they can have the same opportunity to bond with their child as the mother. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads as the government will struggle to afford this and it may lead to families with no parent in employment. a working parent ensures a strong role model and good values. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | We should not subsidize stay at home dads since women have never been subsidized to stay home with their children. It's up to the couple to decide if they can afford to have a parent stay home. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads because it is the parents(dad included) to be responsible for their kids. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads because it would be unnatural for a man to take care of the kids while the mother went to work. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads because it would promote an imbalanced household. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads because it's sending the wrong message that it's more important for women to have jobs than men. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads because they do not have to pay for gas for their transportation to work and it is their choices to be a stay at home dads | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads because we don't subsidize stay-at-home moms. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
we should not subsidize stay-at-home dads since there are other more important issues that should be getting subsidized | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | we should subsidize stay at home dads because they can take care of the home and family just like a woman can. |
We should not subsidize stay-at-home dads, they should share the maternity benefits of the mother if they wish but there should not be any more burden on the state to provide. | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads | We should subsidize stay-at-home dads so that they can have the same opportunity to bond with their child as the mother. |
we should not subsidize student loan beacause student loan debt is one of the major causes of the economic downfall | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
We should not subsidize student loans as it is their choice whether or not to pursue higher education and they should pay for it themselves. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans as many youth will simply go to college to have fun and not go to college for the education itself and the money will be wasted. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
We should not subsidize student loans as people should be responsible for their own choices in life. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans as this will be a burden on the government and further education is a choice. however this education should mean higher wage earners who can therefore pay back loans. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans as this will lead to a glut of people who are ioverqualified and be unable to find employment for which they are qualified | We should subsidize student loans | student loans should be subsidized to create a competent work force |
we should not subsidize student loans because if people want to go to college they should pay for it themselves | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans because if people want to go to college, they need to work for it. | We should subsidize student loans | student loans should be subsidized to create a competent work force |
we should not subsidize student loans because if students want to go to college they should pay | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans because if we did, there are many who would take advantage of the system causing it to be unfair for all. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans because it in not the public's responsibility to pay for a person's education. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans because it is each individuals choice to continue to study so they take the responsibility to pay for it. | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
we should not subsidize student loans because it was a personal decision and responsibility to accept the loan | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve |
Subsets and Splits