argument
stringlengths
35
251
topic
stringlengths
21
52
example
stringlengths
37
230
we should not subsidize student loans because many students fall into debt and take decades to pay it off.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should not subsidize student loans because people need to work hard to get their education
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should not subsidize student loans because students should have worked to pay for college instead of going into debt.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should not subsidize student loans because this would teach students that they can get away with making poor money choices.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should not subsidize student loans is because of a potential abusing of the program by students lying about their eligibility
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
We should not subsidize student loans since higher education is a personal choice. If you want to borrow money for college, you should have to repay it, including interest.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should not subsidize student loans, there is too much focus on the university route when we ought to be promoting vocational and technical career routes
We should subsidize student loans
student loans should be subsidized to create a competent work force
we should not subsidize student loans. the entire reason tuition costs are going through the roof and largely unattainable by most students is directly due to the proliferation of student loans.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should not subsidize this because it is a personal choice not to work
We should subsidize stay-at-home dads
We should not subsidize stay-at-home dads, they should share the maternity benefits of the mother if they wish but there should not be any more burden on the state to provide.
We should not subsidize vocation education as these students are likely to be in paid jobs soon and can pay back their own education.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
we should not subsidize vocational education as all education should be supported through tuition.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education so that we do not privilege liberal arts over other types of education that are equally important.
we should not subsidize vocational education as it can be supported through tuition like any other degree program.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
we should not subsidize vocational education as it is no different than any other education and they can raise their money through tuition.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
we should not subsidize vocational education as it is not everyone else's responsibility to fund what they choose
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
we should not subsidize vocational education because everyone should pay for their own education and because you don't get things for free in life.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education because there is a shortage of tradesmen and women.
we should not subsidize vocational education because if people want an education after high school they should pay for it themselves
We should subsidize vocational education
we should subsidize vocational education because we need to focus on this type of training moving forward to draw people into key careers.
we should not subsidize vocational education because it has lasted this long without help.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should not subsidize vocational education but should ensure that businesses are involved to offer apprenticeships and make sure that the courses are relevant to job needs.
we should not subsidize vocational education because it would cost to much and raise taxes, and it would not help society in the long term.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
we should not subsidize vocational education because people want to go to college they should have to pay for it
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational education should be subsidized to encourage and help adults to learn a new trade.
we should not subsidize vocational education because the responsibility should only fall on those who are wanting to go to school.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education because there is a shortage of tradesmen and women.
We should not subsidize vocational education but should ensure that businesses are involved to offer apprenticeships and make sure that the courses are relevant to job needs.
We should subsidize vocational education
we need to support vocational education because it may be the only chance people that live in poverty can get through education and manage to make a good job from themselves.
we should not subsidize vocational education since once someone pays for and learns a new vocation, they will eventually make enough money to make it worthwhile.
We should subsidize vocational education
we should subsidize vocational education because we need to focus on this type of training moving forward to draw people into key careers.
we should not subsidize vocational education the same way we should not subsidize higher education for everybody.
We should subsidize vocational education
We should subsidize vocational education to support students who wish to follow a different education path to those going to university, who would be ineligible for scholarships and grants.
we should not subsidize vocational education, people want to further their education after high school they should pay for it not the government
We should subsidize vocational education
vocational jobs play a vital role in society, but not as many students are pursuing these careers. subsidizing vocational education allows schools to still afford to offer these courses.
we should not subsidize vocational education, the same way we should not subsidize college. if people want higher education, they should pay for it themselves.
We should subsidize vocational education
we should subsidize vocational education because we need to focus on this type of training moving forward to draw people into key careers.
we should not subsidize wikipedia as it is not a totally factual database.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
We should not subsidize Wikipedia as there are far more reliable information sources online and Wikipedia should not be trusted as a reliable source since it can be updated by anyone.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
We should not subsidize Wikipedia as there is no need, crowdfunding and volunteers have already created a good information source that will only improve with time.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia as they are a private company and can raise their own funds or start charge those to use their data.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because it already receives more than enough money through voluntary donations
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because it has too many errors
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because it is filled with a lot of false information and therefore the government shouldn't help pay for false information
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because just anyone can go on there and create fake pages with false information.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because peoples opinions will get in the way of truth.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because the government should spend the money for more useful things
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because the government should use the money on more important things like medical research
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because the information contained in it is not validated. if published information is going to be subsidized then it should be from accredited sources.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia because there are many other sources to find information on the internet.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia since they are already able to raise their own money for the site through fundraisers, we do not need to give them extra money.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not subsidize wikipedia, because they are just like any other company who needs to decide how to financially operate for long term success.
We should subsidize Wikipedia
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
we should not support judicial activism because laws are laws and should be strictly followed as written and if they are wrong, then the people need to vote to rewrite them.
We should limit judicial activism
we should limit judicial activism because it takes the fairness out of our judicial system as decisions should never be subjective.
we should not support the austerity regime because it takes away from programs that are most needed such as feeding children.
We should adopt an austerity regime
an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
We should not support this as this has no benefit whatsoever to anyone.
We should adopt atheism
We should not adopt atheism as people should be allowed to retain their own religions or belief systems as they see fit.
We should not tar all of one race with the same brush.
We should end racial profiling
It is immoral to target a particular group based simply on their race of ethnicity.
we should not tell people how to act using an austerity regime.
We should adopt an austerity regime
austerity only leads to economic contraction that endangers the chance of reducing the debt.
we should not use child actors as working in the film industry is grueling and often involves working long hours.
We should ban the use of child actors
the use of child actors should not be banned as youthful actors can take on roles that provide inspiration for young people
we should not use economic sanctions because all it does is cause further resentment between countries.
We should end the use of economic sanctions
we should end the use of economic sanctions because they rarely achieve their aims in the short term and often have undesirable consequences such as causing economic hardship to large populations of people
we should not use economic sanctions because that only serves to hurt all the citizens in a country for the acts of those in power.
We should end the use of economic sanctions
we should end the use of economic sanctions because they rarely achieve their aims in the short term and often have undesirable consequences such as causing economic hardship to large populations of people
we should notban the church of scientology as people have the right to follow any belief structure they believe in
We should ban the Church of Scientology
scientology should not be banned as people have the right to worship in whatever religion they wish and in a way they wish to.
we should oppose collectivism as it can lead to people hiding behind the actions of the group rather than taking responsibility for their own actions.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism as it forces people to be part of group mentality in order to achieve anything.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism creates a negative impact of individuals losing all sense of self-worth and the ability for the individual to think on their own.
we should oppose collectivism as no one group should have preferential treatment over another.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
We should oppose collectivism as the rights of the individual should be protected as much as a group's rights.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism because a system of individualism and property ownership has led to prosperity throughout much of the world.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should oppose collectivism because a whole group is seen as one the entire group could get in trouble for one person's actions
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism because groups are better than a singly person mentality.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
We should oppose collectivism because in the past it has led to lower living standards for all than individualism.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism creates a negative impact of individuals losing all sense of self-worth and the ability for the individual to think on their own.
we should oppose collectivism because individual thought gets lost in the process.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism does not encourage individual improvement and ingenuity
we should oppose collectivism because individuals may not work as hard if they are not going to be recognised individually.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should oppose collectivism because it causes a lop-sided government being on the heavy end.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism because it creates echo chambers in societies that makes it harder for individuals to give their thoughts and opinions on things
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism because it elides the differences between groups and harms minorities.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism inhibits personal expression and can foster censorship and fascism.
we should oppose collectivism because it forces people to be dependent on others without having to do any work.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism creates a negative impact of individuals losing all sense of self-worth and the ability for the individual to think on their own.
we should oppose collectivism because it is a form of prejudice
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism because it is incompatible with a legal framework of individual rights.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism inhibits personal expression and can foster censorship and fascism.
we should oppose collectivism because it is not fair to each individual
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should oppose collectivism because it lessens creativity and individuality.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism does not encourage individual improvement and ingenuity
we should oppose collectivism because it may make people intimidated
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism creates a negative impact of individuals losing all sense of self-worth and the ability for the individual to think on their own.
we should oppose collectivism because it shows favoritism to some groups and individuals.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism because it stops people from being able to be themselves as individuals
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should oppose collectivism because it takes away people from being individuals it will make people feel like they have to change in order to fit in with the group
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism because it treats individuals as means to an end rather than as an end to themselves, denying them their moral worth.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism creates a negative impact of individuals losing all sense of self-worth and the ability for the individual to think on their own.
We should oppose collectivism because most individuals in society support individualism, so there would be no buy in to collectivism.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism because people deserve to be treated as individuals. collectism allows hierarchies to look out for their own special interests.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism because people know their own interests better than any third party.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should oppose collectivism because people simply cannot think for themselves there will be no more individualism because people are force to adapt the same ideas and goals
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism because there is no such thing as the collective, only many individuals.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism because we are all individuals and no one person or small group should be making every important decision for all of us. we should be able to do what we want to as individuals.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism because we should not be all the same.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
We should oppose collectivism because while it can be used to help everyone, it gives too much power to the collective to hurt individuals.
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose collectivism becauses it allows too much state interference into everyday life
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
We should oppose collectivism in order to avoid greater elite control on behalf of "the public".
We should oppose collectivism
collectivism is the tyranny of the majority, at least the most vocal majority. it goes against everything a free society stands for. it's the enemy of liberty. all voices need to be heard, not just the loudest.
we should oppose it because people should be able to be an individual and have a choice
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should oppose it. people do not have any personal rights, they have tp do everything the leader of the group decides on.
We should oppose collectivism
people should oppose collectivism because it doesn't allow for individual freedom of choice and stunts individual growth.
we should pay for space exploration because if we carry on ruining this world with global warming then we will need somewhere else for humans to go to eventually in the future.
We should subsidize space exploration
we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless.
we should pay for student loans because if gives children that live in poverty a chance to work their way up and go to college, so they can help get themselves out of a rut.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
we should pay for student loans because then less privileged children could get an education and have more of a chance of getting out of a poor lifestyle.
We should subsidize student loans
we should subsidize student loans because it gives students with low income to get the education they deserve
We should prohibit flag burning as it is a visible snub to the country and massively disrespectful.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning as it is an archaic form of protest and inflames community tensions.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning as it is an insult to that country and may incite hostility between nations.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
We should prohibit flag burning as it is disrespectful to whichever nation's flag is being burned and only results in reprisals and ill feeling.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning as it is the most disrespectful form of trashing a country.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning as it is the scummiest of the scum to disrespect a country's symbol in such a manner.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning as it shows absolute no respect for one's country.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning because by burning flags it is like spitting on the country
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning because is esentail and fundamental in countris in war
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning because is important for envelope of countries
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning because it disrespect those that fought (and died) for our country
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
We should prohibit flag burning because it divides communities and undermines civil discourse.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.
we should prohibit flag burning because it is an act of terror. those who burn flags are an enemy of the state by destroying the countries symbol.
We should prohibit flag burning
we should not prohibit flag burning because freedom of speech is one of the defining rights of the american citizens.