argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
wikipedia does not need to be subsidized as it is a stand alone business | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia does not need to be subsidized it already gets plenty of cash from donations | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia does not offer quality work and provides their own option for donations for funding. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia does not properly verify their information and pays unqualified workers log in info that is not verified as well as already conducting their own fundraiser for the site. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia entries are sometimes biased and one-sided. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia gives reliable information for the public for free | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia gives us a lot of information in one place | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it. |
wikipedia has a vast variety of information, and it should be maintained for personal and educational use. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has always been free to use and should continue to be free without subsidies. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
Wikipedia has an incredibly large amount of money, so it does not need any subsidies. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia has become a valuable, centralized, crowd-sourced information depot that helps people access information and is to everyone's advantage to keep them funded. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has been running by itself without any real issues for years. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has been supported by voluntary donations for too long. subsidizing it would give it more credibility, and would allow the volunteers to continue to update it with the most accurate information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has developed into a relatively unbiased and thorough repository of research and information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has done a great job without subsidization up until now, and continues to be a credible source of information. taxes would be better spent elsewhere. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has done just fine on it's own with private donations for years so there's no need to start giving it free money now. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has done just fine on it's own with private funding. if you start subsidizing it then they will be less likely to publish negative information about the source of their money. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
Wikipedia has millions of visitors every day. If these individuals were charged a minimal fee, Wikipedia would never need government subsidization. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has no control in the publications. the information provided may be wrong. the unverified information should not be subsidized | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia has no source of funding and subsidizing it will let it keep providing information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has other ways to maintain itself | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it. |
wikipedia has proven itself as useful is not more so than the dictionary, it deserves help with funding. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has proven itself worthy of being subsidized as its maintained usefulness for many years now. in fact it's as useful, if not more so, than a regular dictionary is. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has resources and ads and we do not need to subsidize them. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia has the potential to be the greatest source of freely accessible information, a subsidy could help to reach this goal whereas currently the funding is becoming a bigger threat to its existence | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia helps a lot of people and should be subsidized. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia helps people of all ages learn about various topics | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia information usually not accurately checked, so we don't have to subsidize it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a business that can make their own money through advertising. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a cultural phenomena that is relied upon by millions of people when researching data. if it were subsidized it could be reviewed and standardized more and benefit more people. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a fairly accurate way to get facts about nearly any topic and we should support that. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a free user-created website and should stay that way | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a go to for many people and it should be kept well funded. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a good source of information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia is a good source of information for any topic and should be compensated. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a good source of information on many topics that are interest to people | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great form of information and subsidising it would enable more information to be entered and corrected. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great of source for information, so it needs to subsidized so that whoever works there can work freely without worrying about looking for advertisers and sponsors.. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great resource to find out the basics about topics and if we subsidized it, it would allow for to become more accurate and a better resource. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great source of information and encourages learning. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great source of information and should be subsidised. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great source of knowledge. it is a internet form of the encyclopedia. but it takes money to run it and there are no ads. to continue this service all should help by subsidizing it.. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great tool for the world. they provide every bit of information people need. the government should help with their bills so we can always be sure we don't lose them. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a great way for people to get free information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a helpful source of information for research and educational purposes | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a platform where anyone can add anything regardless if it's true or not and we should not subsidize that. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
Wikipedia is a popular source of information available to a vast number of people. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a private company and should figure out a business model that allows them to survive without subsidation. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a private enterprise and should not take public money that could be used elsewhere. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a private entity and is responsible for its own operating costs | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a private entity and is responsible for their own costs | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a private foundation with plenty of money and donors -- the government does not need to provide it with any additional funding. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source. |
wikipedia is a private not for profit organization, it is best that it stays independent without subsidies. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a private organisation,the government should not get involved. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia is a quick way to learn about different topics and should be subsidized to increase the content | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
Wikipedia is a symbol for free speech, and a state-subsidy sends a clear message of transparency, the exact massage the people of this country have long been waiting for. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
Wikipedia is a useful resource and should be subsidized. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
Wikipedia is a useful resource for thousands of people and should be subsidized so it can continue to be made available. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable collection of knowledge that should be preserved | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable common resource that need more money to work better | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable educational resource. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable educational source and is free at source so should be promoted through subsidization | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable educational tool | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable resource that deserves funding | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many people. subsidizing it will allow it to be better maintained and more accurate | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable source of information in all things and would be missed if it were not able to continue due to lack of support | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable source of information that is free for the general public | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a valuable tool used by millions to acquire knowledge. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a very unreliable source of information. many schools do not allow wikipedia to be used as a valid source for term papers. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a vital rescourse which should be subsidised to keep it going. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a wealth of knowledge that needs to be subsidized | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a widely used platform, so we should help keep it running. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is a wonderful source of information for students and adults alike. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an amazing resource that just about everyone uses. if it were to disappear many people would lose out. subsidizing it would be beneficial to all. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important and free source of knowledge that is open for all to use. subsidizing it would ease the financial burden of such a helpful and important tool. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important information source and we should subsidize it to make sure it continues to remain available. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important knowledge source, that is contributed to by independent experts and the general population. it is important to maintain it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important resource for people looking for information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important resource widely used and respected, it needs funds and hence subsidies to continue. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important source of knowledge for people across the globe and it is important that this resource is preserved. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important tool to search and is very popular today | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an important, independent, online resource; it should be subsidised so that its founders can continue their good work in maintaining the site as free-to-use by all. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an incredible free source of information and should be preserved as such | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an incredibly useful tool, with the right funding, it could be amazing. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an independent organisation and if we allow the government of firms to sponsor it, then it may lead to bias. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia is an inexhaustible source of knowledge and we must take care of it | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is an invaluable space for knowledge and should be preserved | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is doing just fine all by itself without any money from the government. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source. |
wikipedia is fine the way it is already set up | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is functioning well enough on its own and doesn't need or require government assistance in order to continue to do so. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is good for the world and should be subsidizes to encourage world learning | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is important to our society | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is not a reliable source for information and we should not waste money on it | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is not a reliable source of information and can lead to spreading of misinformation. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia is not a reliable source when it comes to information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia is not as peer reviewed and has more lax standards than other encyclopedic sources of information as anyone can edit pages and we should not fund that type of behavior. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is not free to run even if it is free to users. subsidization would help keep it free for users. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is not reliable because anyone can edit the pages | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
Subsets and Splits