argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
wikipedia is not used by all people and no one is forced to work for them. we should not have to give them a subsidy for a service we did not ask for. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is notoriously unreliable as to the accuracy of its articles | We should subsidize Wikipedia | If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source. |
wikipedia is one of a number of resources, it does not warrant special treatment | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is one of the best resources for information nowadays and we should do everything to ensure it continues and grows to remain an excellent source of information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is run by the people and it needs to stay that way because it is working. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is still a private website, so giving a site money to keep it running is unethical. why not subsidize any other site then? | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is supported just fine with private donations and has continued to function without the need for a subsidy. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source. |
wikipedia is the greatest unbias source of information we have. it encourages learning and is necessary especially for low income individuals. we must continue to support it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia in the world and we must ensure its proper functioning | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the most important and largest source of information on the internet and we must support it | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the most incredible resource of open source information, by subsidizing it we can ensure it is policed better | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the only free source of information with references that's guaranteed to be accurate. it's needed, especially for those who can't afford anything else. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the search page most used by students and is an updated tool that helps knowledge and should be subsidized to ensure its proper functioning | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is the world's free knowledge base.it should be cherished, supported and improved. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
Wikipedia is the world's largest online repository of knowledge and should be supported by public dollars to continue its mission. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is too often edited by unreliable contributors and therefore is not quality enough to consider funding. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is too vulnerable to manipulation to be considered a trusted source. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is useful in helping people of all ages learn about various topics.. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is valuable knowledge resource that should not be allowed to go under due to lack of resources and so should be subsidized | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia is very informative and keeps up to date on millions of topics. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia makes enough money on its own | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it. |
wikipedia makes enough money on it's own | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it. |
wikipedia needs no additional funding, the revenue it gains from donations is sufficient to keep it afloat | We should subsidize Wikipedia | If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source. |
wikipedia needs to be publicly funded to keep it honest | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia needs to be subsidized because it is an important online research tool used by many. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia needs to remain as is. if the government gets involved with finances, we're looking at the possibility of a sway of information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia offers a quick and easy way of finding information that a person is looking for and subsidizing it would give them more funds for research. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia offers a vast database that uses various sources to insure accurate information and subsidization would allow for more accuracies to raise the factual level of info on wikipedia. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia offers so much valuable information. it gives you immediate updates on many topics. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia often contains false information and so can lead to people believing that have no validity in reality. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia often provides biased, inaccurate information due to lax editing policies and procedures. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia opened under its own steam and maintains itself with voluntary contributions so there is no need to subsidize it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia pages can, essentially, be edited by anyone, so is not a reliable source of informtion and on this basis should not receive any subsidies. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia plays a vital role in sharing information on the internet, and should be subsidized to continue functioning | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia promotes national and world learning and should be subsidized | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a great service which provides a safe place to find info on all types of topics | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a great utility to most if not all citizens and therefore it is just to subsidize it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a knowledge bank for many people to be able to utilize. if it is subsidized then it can continue to do research and provide better information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a useful collection of knowledge, and should be subsidized to ensure its continued existance | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a valuable public service; subsiding it would guarantee equal access to everyone. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a valuable service, yet has to rely on donations to survive. if there were no wikipedia, access to impartial, well-sourced information on the web would be limited. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a vast amount of information at our fingertips | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a vast amount of knowledge to be accessible to all. subsidizing this will ensure this knowledge continues to be available. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a wealth of information on any subject you can think of. this is highly benificial to the education system and should be subsidized. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides a wealth of information to schools to aid with the teaching of students so we should subsidize it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides an endless amount of information right at our fingertips. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it. |
wikipedia provides an invaluable service and we need to secure its ability to exist in the near and distant future | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides good information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
Wikipedia provides important information to people around the world. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides information that is free and easy to get on any subject | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides instant information to help educate someone on any topic | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides useful information | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia provides useful informations | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page |
wikipedia provides valuable information for the public and must be kept free. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides valuable information not only to the public but to educational institutions and so we should subsidize it to keep it going. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia provides vital information quickly. subsidizing it guarantees that this can continue. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia puts a world of information at our fingertips | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia relies too much on the people to pay for them and risk shutting down each year | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia serves a great purpose and is very valuable | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia shoud be independent and with subsidization this may be at risk depending on the subsidization source | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia should aim to be a neutral source; public funding would help this goal by making it a public good. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be financed different ways | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be left as is. once we pour money into it, we lose the authenticity. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be self funding as the company has access to the resources it needs without subsidies | We should subsidize Wikipedia | If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source. |
wikipedia should be subsidized as it a valuable educational tool. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be subsidized as it is a collected world-wide encyclopedia for all people to gain knowledge | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be subsidized as it is an important free source of information for all. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be subsidized because it is a great place for cultural iconography to continue to be added to from many different people. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be subsidized because it shares a wealth of information that can help people learn and grow, without subsidization it might go away | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should be subsidized because of how easy it is to use it | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should not be subsidized as it is easily manipulated to contain incorrect information which can spread quickly and not accurate | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia should not be subsidized as it is not legislated and therefore is not a legitimate reference point. anyone can update wiki and so it should not be subsidized as a legitimate reference. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia shouldn't be subsidized because the information isn't all that reliable | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia struggles to get donations and we cannot afford to lose such a vast source of information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia subsidizing will engage more people to create content and to make it more widely available | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia supplies valuable information in a moment's notice. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia will be able to get rid of their yearly donation begging if they get funds from the government. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | A government-funded Wikipedia would become a government-controlled Wikipedia. |
Wikipedia will not remain neutral or independent if it receives government subsidies. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia |
wikipedia works fine the way it is already set up. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia would be better if it were controlled by money. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia would be more accurate if it was subsidized. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
wikipedia, more and more, has been shown to be a source of relatively unbiased information. | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission. |
wikipedia's only flaw as an unrivalled source of information is the lack of paid staff to ensure all articles are accurate, a subsidy could make it the most impressive free encyclopedia we have ever known | We should subsidize Wikipedia | wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use. |
will allow more men to become priests and help with the shortage of priests. | The vow of celibacy should be abandoned | the vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it represents a major barrier to men considering entering the priesthood |
will be the best possible solution for the person prosecuted,
according to the particular circumstances of the case | The use of public defenders should be mandatory | public defenders should be mandatory because they can provide free legal representation to those who are accused |
will help eliminate gender discrimination | We should adopt gender-neutral language | adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way. |
will help insure that everyone is treat equally. | We should adopt gender-neutral language | adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way. |
will increase the capture and conviction of criminals | Entrapment should be legalized | entrapment should be legalized because sometimes this tactic is the only way to apprehend repeat offenders. |
will lead to an increase in copycat products | We should abolish intellectual property rights | intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit. |
will lead to an increase in impaired drivers | We should legalize cannabis | there are many arguments, including it will save money as enforcement of current laws costs an estimated $8 billion a year in the u.s. alone and will cut down on a lot of crime |
will lead to confusion and misunderstangings | We should adopt gender-neutral language | gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns |
with a austerity regime necessary programs could lose or at least have hefty cuts to their programs. | We should adopt an austerity regime | an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society |
with a growing population and more people wanting to eat meat, factory farming is the only solution. | We should ban factory farming | factory farming is not humane for the animals and should be banned. |
with a help for wikipedia, this can improve in many ways | We should subsidize Wikipedia | Wikipedia could provide information on more topics and in more languages if it were subsidized. |
with a multi party system it can be harder for a party to win outright | We should adopt a multi-party system | the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics |
with a multi party system voters will have more of a choice | We should adopt a multi-party system | the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics |
with a multi-party system, it would be easier for a party with radical views to come intro power, resulting in reforms that could be disastrous. | We should adopt a multi-party system | the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics |
with a standardized curriculum, homeschooling is as viable a method as regular schooling. it can allow a learning atmosphere for children who would otherwise not be able to attend school, for various reasons. | Homeschooling should be banned | homeschooling is best for children where the schools in the area are not conducive to learning |
Subsets and Splits