argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
everyone should have the right to their own opinion. | Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence | The right to free speech is a fundamental right and must be upheld, no matter how distasteful the speech. |
everyone should have the same level of legal council. | The use of public defenders should be mandatory | public defenders ensure justice and that everybody has access to representation |
everyone should have their own right to choose who and how many people they want to marry, it is unconstitutional to limit this. | We should legalize polygamy | polygamy should be allowed as people have the right to live their lives according to their own beliefs. |
everyone should have their right to their own opinion, even if it's wrong. | Holocaust denial should be a criminal offence | The right to free speech is a fundamental right and must be upheld, no matter how distasteful the speech. |
everyone should take part in voting and making choices for our country. | We should introduce compulsory voting | Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population. |
everyone should use a mandatory public defender so that no one receives any preferential treatment to the qualify of defense services to them. | The use of public defenders should be mandatory | having a system where public defenders are mandatory would make it fairer because all defendants would have the same level of defense |
everyone should vote, and the only way to ensure that happens is by instituting compulsory voting. | We should introduce compulsory voting | Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population. |
everyone should vote, but voting turnout continues to decline. this would ensure everyone takes part in the democratic process. | We should introduce compulsory voting | Compulsory voting should be introduced to ensure that the results of elections are completely representative of the population. |
everyone using public defenders would equalize the criminal justice system. | The use of public defenders should be mandatory | having a system where public defenders are mandatory would make it fairer because all defendants would have the same level of defense |
everyone who can legally vote in elections should be forced to do so. that is why compulsory voting should be introduced. nothing is more important than voting for the leaders of our country. | We should introduce compulsory voting | each person has the right to decide if they want to vote or not. forcing people to do something is the exact opposite of what this country is supposed to be about. |
everyone would be able to access legal representation just like everyone else. | The use of public defenders should be mandatory | having a system where public defenders are mandatory would make it fairer because all defendants would have the same level of defense |
everyone would get a say in what happens if it was compulsory to vote. | We should introduce compulsory voting | compulsory voting ensures that the winner is truly representative of the entire population. |
everyone's definition of intelligence differs so the tests are a waste of time | Intelligence tests bring more harm than good | intelligence tests give a skewed and limited view of a student and do not give a full picture of someones abilities and skills. |
everything about guantanamo bay violates fundamental, international human rights. people are held without trial, tortured and mistreated | We should close Guantanamo Bay detention camp | the guantanamo prison is a center of human rights violation |
everything should be done to encourage people to finish college. this ultimately leads to a better educated population and benefits society as a whole | We should subsidize student loans | we should subsidize student loans so that more people have an opportunity to get a good education and better careers. this in turn will benefit the economy and all of society. |
everything should be free and able to use | We should abolish intellectual property rights | intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit. |
evidence shows the Church of Scientology is a money laundering, corrupt organisation that hides behind its religious status whilst abusing its members. | We should ban the Church of Scientology | the church of scientology is a cult that takes people's money, brainwashes them, and harrasses anyone who tries to leave and should be banned. |
evil has penetrated society, and there are times when there is no other way out to eradicate it than to resort to force, evil can not be overcome with discourses, it is necessary to fight fire with fire. | We should ban targeted killing | targeted killing often results in the death of innocent citizens and is unnecessary when arrest and trial actually provide a better platform to ensure people answer to their crimes |
evil people may find new ways to get an inventory of organs to sell | We should legalize organ trade | organ trading is dangerous because it can result in harm to vulnerable people |
evil regimes thrive on power and money. sanctions are effective because they deprive such regimes of money and hence their ability to amass power. | We should end the use of economic sanctions | economic sanctions can be very effective in bringing about social change |
Excessive levels of pay for executives is deeply disproportionate when compared to the far smaller remuneration for the multitude of the workforce and compensation should be limited in line with a fairer split. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
excessive television watching leads to a sedentary lifestyle and obesity | We should abandon television | television is a major part of the sedentary lifestyle that is the leading cause of disease in the world. |
excessive wages damage company profitabity and is an abuse of the shareholders | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive are often awarded paid ridiculously high amounts that are unjustified for the work they do | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation allows companies to get the best talent | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation can be come out of control. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain |
executive compensation causes an unfair situation. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation could encourage money laundering and corruption | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain |
executive compensation creates a barrier between the "executives" and the "workers" and should be limited to a level that doesn't create such a different world between the two | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation demoralizes the employees of the company that make only a fraction of what the ceos make. income inequality needs to be addressed and limiting executive compensation is a first step. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executive compensation devalues the company by taking profits away from shareholders. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation encourages corruption | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation encourages them to work for their pay | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation ensures a company to retain top executives who have the ability and knowledge to provide necessary quality services and products. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation gives credit to those who have aided in their companies vitality and growth and should be continued to encourage the company the executive maintains. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation has ballooned to excessive levels that far outweight the value of any one individual to the performace of a company, and engender damaging resentment in the general workforce. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain |
executive compensation has been inflated to grotesque amounts, is too often seen to reward failure, and harmfully magnifies a disconnect between the board members and blue collar workers of a company. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation has gotten out of control and it is being paid at the expense of underpaid workers. its a situation where overpaid employees and board members keep voting raises for themselves. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation has gotten out of hand and too much is going to the top people and not enough to the lower workers | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation has hit astronomical levels, widening the pay gap between worker and executive, this has the potential to lead to disharmony and possible conflict. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation helps bring talent in leadership that will grow a company to be profitable | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation increases costs and decreases benefits that other employees might receive. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is a bonus for a job well done. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation is a farce and just a way for the richer to avoid taxes while paying themselves undeserving amounts of money and awards without a cap. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is a good way to award those doing a better than average job without it being part of their pay. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation is a good way to reward executives for their contributions above and beyond the normal pay scale. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation is a joke. it's executives rewarding themselves on the backs of shareholders regardless of how well a company performs. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is a reward for those who have worked to get to the top of their profession; it would be unfair to limit it. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation is a way to reward and incentivize the top employees. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is excessive and undermines the work or lower employees. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is needed to provide their luxury lifestyle | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation is not always effective and takes away from the rest of the employees who do most of the strenuous work | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation is not paying for achievement because they are paid even if their companies are losing money | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is often seen as rewarding director incompetence, is frequently hugely excessive and exacerbates damaging inequality divides between a company's workforce and its board. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is one of the mechanisms of governments to cover salaries and benefits | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation is out of control and causing lower workers to be in want | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is out of control and stifles the earning power of the company's employees. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation is out of control. it is morally wrong for executives to make so much more than lower level employees who also perform valuable services | We should limit executive compensation | executives have worked very hard for what they make and also spent a lot of money on education. they should be paid whatever they are capable of making. |
executive compensation is ridiculously high. this money should be limited and then the extra be funneled down to the people in the company who do most of the work that earn low wages. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation is simply part of a modern remuneration package, and just as with basic salaries, and attractive compensation scheme is needed to attract the best talent to an organisation. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation is tax evasion and should be severely limited | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation is the business of the company itself and is needed to be competitive to attract the best executives to run their company. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation is too high and the people who do the actual physical work aren't paid enough. some of this money should be paid out to the employees. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation is too high. this absurd amount of money they earn should be spread out to the people in the company who do most of the actual work. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation must be ruled by a fair authority, to avoid people earning more than they are really owed | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation needs to be high to attract the best talent to positions. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation ought to be limited so that the workforce is seen as being more equal. this will boost morale and increase empowerment of lower level employees. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation overlooks those that helped the person with executive standing, giving compensation to those that do not deserve it. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation overlooks those that helped to increase the work vitality of an executive and do not receive compensation even if they have done all the work. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation packages are necessary to attract the best qualified people into a company - it is simply market economics, supply and demand. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation promotes company success and competition. it's an incentive for ceos to guide the company and help the company do well and make money for all employees. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation provides incentive for people to take on high responsibliity positions that drive the economy to new heights creating even more wealth. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation provides motivation for executives to act in ways that are beneficial to the company and shareholders. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation recognizes the duties that the employee has and compensations are rewards for a job well done. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation rewards the rich, whilst the ordinary workers are paid a minimum wage. it simply serves to increase the divide between rich and poor. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation should be at the discretion of the company who employs them | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should be fair and equitable and not cause other members in the company and stock holders to suffer because of it. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation should be given to individuals who work hard and have worked hard to get to the top. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive compensation should be limited as it allows for poor performing executives to be unjustly rewarded and disincentivises them. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executive compensation should be limited as it can never be justified that they receive these large salaries and bonuses. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation should be limited as it disincentives them and can reward poor performance by management | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
Executive compensation should be limited as it is discouraging for a workforce when they can see higher management being paid exorbitant amounts of money. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited as it often allows for failing executives to disproportionately rewarded for their failure, which causes damge to sthe company and society | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited as it unfairly results in trickling down to the end user to pay more money than a product or service is worth. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited because excessive salaries take away profits that should go to shareholders | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should be limited because i don't think the executives should get a bunch extra just because of that position. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited because it can be taxed as income | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should be limited because it could lead to high end corruption in organizations. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited because it is important that wealth that employees create is shared fairly | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executive compensation should be limited because it is not fair that a ceo should not make that much more than the regular workers in a company. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited because they already receive the highest salaries and shouldn’t also get bonuses and gifts when other members of the company struggle. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited because too many companies pay their executives a disproportionate amount of money compared to the rest of their employees. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited in order to narrow the wage gap between c-level employees and line workers | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executive compensation should be limited or even totally stopped. it's a way to pay the people without actually using money and that's not right, allowing for tax evasion or fraud. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited since it is unfair to the rest of the employees | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should be limited so that the lower level employees can make more money | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executive compensation should be limited so that there is a fairer distribution of the wealth that companies create across the entire workforce | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executive compensation should be limited so that those in power, influential positions in companies do not abuse their power in pursuit of obscene amounts of money. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.