argument
stringlengths 35
251
| topic
stringlengths 21
52
| example
stringlengths 37
230
|
|---|---|---|
Executive compensation should be limited so that those who are at the bottom can make more money. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
Executive compensation should be limited to a reasonable rate not an outrages 7 figure amount. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
Executive compensation should be limited to allow fairer wages to be paid to the majority of workers in a company, all too often the top 1% of people receive 90% of the money , this is unfair. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
Executive compensation should be limited to ensure the top staff is not taking all of the rewards for companies that are supported by thousands of workers. All employees contribute to the success of a company. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should be limited to make companies more profitable. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
Executive Compensation should be limited when there are losses in the company | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should definitely be limited because it is unfair for one person in a company to make so much more than another person who works for the company | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should e decided by the company. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organisations to attract the best people for their company and increases incentivisation | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
Executive compensation should not be limited as these forward thinking people are vital for the growth of companies which result in all employees benefitting. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executive compensation should not be limited as those who are in those positions have worked for it. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive compensation should not be limited because companies have to be able to provide a competitive compensation package to attract the best ceos. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation should not be limited because it would act as a barrier to companies that have to compete in the international marketplace for the best talent | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation should not be limited so that a company can hire the best talented executives to make the right decisions | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation should not be limited as it allows for organizations to attract the best management available, which will bring rewrds down the employment chain |
executive compensation shouldnt be banned companies pay what they want to pay them | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation shouldn't be limited because a person can get immediate access to those funds | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
executive compensation takes profits from the company and shareholders, giving it to the people at the top who do the least amount of work. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive compensation too often fails to deliver and as such causes working issues, therefore it should not only be limited but stopped completely. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive compensation will lead to public distrust in big corporations, and will be the doom and fall of developed countries society. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executive deserve to be compensated for their stressful jobs. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive incentives are good measures to improve their quality of life | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executive level employees have worked hard to achieve the level they have and should be compensated for this. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive pay is out of control. when an executive can earn the same in a week as a manual worker earns in a year, then something is wrong. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executive pay should be limited so that a culture of brazen risk-taking and corruption cannot take hold again as it did previous to the last financial crash. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
Executive positions hold more liability. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive receives the highest salary there is for less work and should limit compensation | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executive roles are stressful and carry additional pressures and risks, and so the rewards need to be greater to incentivise competitive success. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executive staff take far too much money from all industries, while the average worker is paid minimum wage or close to it the people doing the least work take the most money, things should be made fairer. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executive talent needs to be compensated competitively. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executives already get compensations and it needs to be regulated the amount of the reward so as not to allow executives to have too much power over employees that helped them get their position. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives already make good pay so limit their compensation and hopefully some of what would have gone to them will go to the other employees that need it more | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executives are often over compensated to the detriment of the company and other employees. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives are paid way too much relative to other workers; compensation given to them can easily be used to give raises to a large number of workers. | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation takes profits from the company and shareholders, giving it to the people at the top who do the least amount of work. |
Executives are paid what the market will bear for making important company wide decisions. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
Executives are the driving force behind a companys success or failure and should be paid according to their accomplishments, without limitations. They should be encouraged by their salary structure to succeed. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives are the employees that drive innovation and their compensation should not be limited | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives are the primary reason a company is successful or not. their pay is usually justifiable. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives can make or break a company so if they do a good job, they should be rewarded | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives carry a huge and heavy load with the responsibility of the entire company on their shoulders, so their compensations packages should not be limited, in order to reflect the weight they carry. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives desere to be paid for their high pressure jobs. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives deserve it as they worked so hard to get where they currently are | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives deserve the money as they do a stressful and demanding job leading large organizations that hire large number of people. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives deserve to be compensated for the work they do and compensation recognizes that hard work and dedication. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executives don't care about the long term health of a company which leads them to look at high short term payouts and when the company is in dire straits they leave with their golden parachutes | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
Executives earned the right to make that much due to training, schooling and fighting their way to the top. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executives get paid enough as it is, no need to give more | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have a hard job and feel they deserve more than others. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have a hard job and should be compensated for the high stress job they do | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have a hard job of running the company and keeping their employees in line and deserve to get rewarded for it | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have a lot of responsibility and should be rewarded accordingly | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have earned their compensation and should not be capped on what they can earn as this would be and overreach into company affairs | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executives have earned their spot at the company, just like any other position. they deserve to be compensated as such. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have worked hard to achieve the position they hold, and should be compensated for that work. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives have worked very hard for what they make and also spent a lot of money on education. they should be paid whatever they are capable of making. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives lead companies to greatness or failure and their compensation reflects the outcome of their policies. caps on their pay will limit innovation and stifle the push for success. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executives make a huge salary, so their total compensation should be limited in order to allow for better pay for the lower levels of employees in their organizations. | We should limit executive compensation | the gap between rich and poor is so wide that there is a need to limit the top earners so we should limit executive compensation to begin to close this gap. |
executives make enough and shouldn't be gaining any more when there are others who deserve bonuses | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives make far too much money; that money could be better used to give raises to thousands of lower-tier employees instead. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives make too much money already without getting additional bonuses and perks. by giving them a fairer salary the rest of the employees could get a raise. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives of a company are the ones with the brains to run the business. without their knowledge the business would fail, therefore they deserve the high compensation they get. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executives provide a lot of valuable information and that should be compensated accordingly. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executives provide profits to shareholders and should be compensated accordingly | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation has to be limited to permit the company to show a profit |
Executives put more of their time, effort and life to put their company at the top. This effort really merits to be recognized. Only through a high compensation is their efforts be recognized | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executives setting their own pay leads to greed and excess | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives should be able to make as much money as they can based on their job performance. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives should be paid just like any other commodity in a free market.they should be compensated at market levels. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executives should not be paid outrageous salaries if they are working. They make way too much money and it would not be fair to the rest of employees. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executives should not make 1000% more than their lowest paid employee. | We should limit executive compensation | We should limit executive compensation as the gap between top and bottom salaries in organisations is too big and the lower paid jobs need to earn a living wage. |
executives should not make millions while their employees struggle to survive | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives should not receive benefits in addition to income as they earn enough anyway | We should limit executive compensation | executives have a hard job and should be compensated for the high stress job they do |
executives shouldn’t be the only ones to get compensation and if that’s the case then no one should get any to make it more fair to the rest of the employees. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives shouldn’t get more pay and bonuses just because of their job title so it should be limited. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives that award their own salaries have shown they can not show restraint | We should limit executive compensation | executive compensation is abuse of unregulated capitalism and concentrates wealth into a very small number of people. |
executives who run huge profitable companies that employ many people should be highly compensated for doing so | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executives work hard and give up a lot of time and energy to reach that position and should be compensated accordingly. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
executives work hard for their companies and should be compensated accordingly. | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
executives work hard for their companies, and companies should be allowed to compensate their executives as they see fit | We should limit executive compensation | executives have been appointed or promoted to that position through hard work and deserve to be compensated for such |
Executives worked hard to get to the top and should be rewarded for this. | We should limit executive compensation | to attract the best talent at the top, a high level of executive compensation is essential. |
expectant mother's life is at risk to undergo sex selection. | We should legalize sex selection | Pre-selecting your baby's sex is a form of gender discrimination. |
expelled children often don’t finish their education | We should adopt a zero-tolerance policy in schools | Zero-tolerance policies have harmful long-term effects. Students who are expelled or suspended are more likely to drop out of high school. |
experience and history has shown that people carry certain similar characteristics along the lines of their skin color. if this so called profiling helps to solve problems in the world then keep it. | We should end racial profiling | racial profiling is discriminatory and should be banned on all levels. |
exploiting child actors is no different than exploiting child labor in other fields. kids should be attending schools. | We should ban the use of child actors | Children should be allowed to grow up at their own pace, child actors have an abnormal upbringing and are exposed to things at an early age which makes it difficult for them to then lead a normal life. |
exploration of space has not produced any tangible benefits yet, so funding should be discontinued | We should subsidize space exploration | space exploration is a waste of public funds when people are suffering from food poverty and lack of housing. |
exploration of space is important to gaining knowledge of the universe | We should subsidize space exploration | space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space exploration |
exploring the earth is more important than what’s outside of it and should receive the subsidy instead. | We should subsidize space exploration | we should not subsidize space exploration because the money spent could be put to better use such as hunger and finding homes for our homeless. |
exploring the earth should be given priority over exploring other planets. | We should subsidize space exploration | space exploration is a good adventure. our planet is in a future risk of extinct and we should best prepare our refuge in space exploration |
Exposure to radiation will lead to disability and cancers, and the effect can continue for decades | We should fight for the abolition of nuclear weapons | The nuclear weapons industry produces a large volume of radioactive waste |
facial surgery is a common reconstruction for people who get involved in car accidents. cosmetic surgeries is the only solution for them to recover their face they destroyed in the accident | We should ban cosmetic surgery | cosmetic surgery corrects defects either from birth or accidents |
factor farming in cruel in exploiting animals kept in confinement | We should ban factory farming | factory farming creates a cruel environment for animals |
factory agriculture can be a solution for the lowest income people | We should ban factory farming | factory farming allows for greater food production to feed a growing population. |
Factory agriculture can cause disasters in the economy and cause unfair competition with farmers | We should ban factory farming | factory farming creates a cruel environment for animals |
factory agriculture can cause serious health damage to humans due to its high levels of chemicals | We should ban factory farming | factory farming creates a cruel environment for animals |
Factory agriculture facilitates the processes of traditional agriculture and also improves them, so it should not be banned | We should ban factory farming | factory farming is not humane for the animals and should be banned. |
factory agriculture is one that focuses on the mass production of products made for the satisfaction of people and bring a high level of technology, can not prohibit this point because it plays a key role | We should ban factory farming | factory farming should be banned due to the excessive pollution they cause to the environment |
factory agriculture lowers the costs of the products and ensures its production throughout the year | We should ban factory farming | factory farming allows for greater food production to feed a growing population. |
factory farmed food is not only cruel to the animals being farmed but also less nutritious for the consumer. | We should ban factory farming | factory farming creates a cruel environment for animals |
factory farmed food provides affordable food for those can cannot afford less managed food production. | We should ban factory farming | factory farming allows for greater food production to feed a growing population. |
factory farming abuses animals and so should be banned. | We should ban factory farming | we should ban factory farming because it lead to the abuse of animals |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.