text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
retrieve subsurface solar properties from local helioseismic measurements (Sec-
|
tion 4). In many cases it is acceptable to assume that the Sun is weakly heteroge-
|
neous in the horizontal directions: the inverse problem becomes a linear inverse
|
problem and can be solved with standard techniques. However this is not always
|
possible, especially in the presence of strong magnetic elds, e.g. in a sunspot.
|
Time-distance helioseismology aims at inferring subsurface properties at the
|
best spatial and temporal resolution possible. A spatial resolution as small as a
|
few Mm can be achieved near the surface. This limit is intimately linked to the
|
smallest available horizontal wavelength of the solar oscillations (high frequency
|
surface gravity waves). Detailed 3D maps of vector
|
ows in the upper convection
|
zone have provided new insights into the structure, evolution and organization
|
of magnetic active regions and convective
|
ows. The most easily detectable
|
ow
|
pattern is supergranulation, an intermediate-scale of convection (Section 5).
|
A particularly challenging aspect of local helioseismology is sunspot helioseis-Local Helioseismology 5
|
mology (Section 6). Sunspots are regions of intense (kilogauss) magnetic eld
|
and low gas pressure and density. In spite of an abundance of telling clues from
|
observations of the solar surface, theories about their formation, subsurface struc-
|
ture, thermal properties, and deep magnetic eld topology are still controversial.
|
The nature of solar waves is very signicantly altered as they propagate through
|
a sunspot and convert into magneto-acoustic-gravity (MAG) waves. Numerical
|
modeling of wave propagation through model sunspots is currently being devel-
|
oped by several groups. These simulations will be key to interpret the solar oscil-
|
lations in the vicinity of sunspots. Realistic numerical simulations also promise to
|
be an important diagnostic tool for sunspot structure. The main question|what
|
keeps a sunspot together as a clearly delineated entity?|may not ultimately be
|
answerable by helioseismology, since key elements of the answer may well lie in a
|
region near the base of the convection zone, where helioseismological tools may
|
not have enough sensitivity to detect a sunspot-related signal. They may perhaps
|
be sucient, however, to challenge models that propose the origin of sunspots to
|
be in the surface layers.
|
Among the most interesting results of local helioseismology is the detection of
|
the subsurface meridional
|
ow (Section 8). The meridional
|
ow does not aect
|
global mode frequencies (to rst order) and thus has only been measured in the
|
solar interior with local helioseismology. The meridional
|
ow plays an important
|
role in '
|
ux transport' theories, according to which the latitudinal transport of
|
magnetic
|
ux at the base of the convection zone determines the period of the
|
solar cycle.
|
In yet another remarkable application, local helioseismology can be used to
|
construct maps of active regions on the far side of the Sun (Section 9). In farside
|
imaging, the Sun as whole is used as an acoustic lens focussing waves at a point on
|
the invisible hemisphere. Maps of the farside are potentially important to predict
|
space weather and provide advance warning for coronal mass ejections and solar
|
ares (violent and sudden release of energy associated with the reconguration of
|
the magnetic eld in the atmosphere above an active region). Flares can excite
|
acoustic waves to measurable levels, which can in turn tell us about the physics
|
of
|
ares (Section 10).
|
These examples illustrate the many facets of the science possible with local
|
helioseismology, as summarized in Figure 1 . In all these cases a taste of the
|
possibilities has been provided, but improved observations (Section 11) and fur-
|
ther developments in the techniques of analysis and interpretation are required
|
to realize the full potential of local helioseismology.6 Gizon, Birch & Spruit
|
Figure 1: Overview of local helioseismology: Observational data, methods of
|
analysis, and scientic applications.
|
2 SOLAR OSCILLATIONS
|
2.1 Observations
|
In most cases, local helioseismology uses time-series of Dopplergrams as input
|
data. A Dopplergram is a digitized image of the line-of-sight velocity of the
|
solar surface (photosphere or chromosphere) deduced from the Doppler shifts of
|
a Fraunhofer absorption line (e.g., Scherrer et al. 1995). Solar oscillations have
|
a higher signal-to-noise ratio in Doppler velocity than in intensity, especially at
|
low frequencies.
|
There are two major data sets available for local helioseismology. The rst
|
one is provided by the Global Oscillation Network Group (GONG, Harvey et al.
|
1996) headquartered in Tucson, Arizona, which operates a global network of
|
six stations around the world. The sites are distributed in longitude in order
|
to observe continuously: Big Bear (California), Mauna Loa (Hawaii), Learmonth
|
(Australia), Udaipur (India), El Teide (Canary Islands), and Cerro Tololo (Chile).
|
The cadence of the observations is one minute to avoid temporal aliasing. Each
|
GONG instrument is a phase-shift interferometer that measures the phase of
|
the Fourier transform of the solar spectrum around the Ni I absorption line at
|
6768 A, interpreted as a Doppler shift (Harvey & The GONG Instrument Team
|
1995). While the original cameras had an image size of 256 256 pixels, full-
|
disk Dopplergrams have been recorded with 1024 1024 CDD cameras since 2001,Local Helioseismology 7
|
hence providing a good spatial resolution (5 arcsec) for local helioseismology. The
|
GONG instruments also acquire intensity images and line-of-sight magnetograms.
|
The eective duty cycle of the merged observations is over 90%.
|
The other main data set is provided by the Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI,
|
Scherrer et al. 1995) on-board the ESA/NASA Solar and Heliospheric Obser-
|
vatory (SOHO), which was launched in December 1995. SOHO is in a halo
|
orbit around the Sun-Earth L1 Lagrange point. Observations from SOHO are
|
not only continuous, but benet from perfect seeing and from a slowly varying
|
spacecraft-to-Sun velocity. The MDI lter system relies on two tunable Michelson
|
interferometers in order to measure intensity in ve very narrow lters (94 m A)
|
in the wings and core of the Ni 6768 line. The Doppler velocity is obtained by
|
taking the dierence between ltergrams on each side of the absorption line. The
|
MDI observables are the line depth and continuum, line-of-sight Doppler veloc-
|
ity, and line-of-sight magnetic eld. The temporal cadence is one minute and
|
the CCD camera has 1024 1024 pixels. It can operate in two dierent modes:
|
a full-disk mode (2 arcsec pixel) or a high-resolution mode (0 :6 arcsec pixel).
|
Figure 2 shows example full-disk SOHO/MDI observables and Supplemental
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.