text
stringlengths 1.36k
3.94k
|
|---|
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people like to own the place where they live, but other people like to rent where they live.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate about whether it is better to own or rent the place where people live. While some people believe that owning a home can be beneficial in long term, others including me, think that renting offers more flexibility and less financial commitment.
On the other hand, those who advocate for owning a home think that it can provide a sense of stability and security, as people can have a place to call their own and it allows them to make changes and improvements. As a result, people can redecorate their houses depending on their own ideas. Moreover, homeownership is often seen as a long-term investment. For example, the prices of houses increase significantly and by buying their own houses people can save their money and this can lead to improvements on financial well-being of people.
On the other hand, I would side with those who think renting is more beneficial option compared to owning a house. Firstly, it offers a level of flexibility and freedom. For instance, renters have the ability to move to different locations without the financial burden of selling their homes. Furthermore, renting may be a more cost-effective option in the short term. For example, if people travel to another country because of their jobs or other short-term reasons it can be better to rent a house than to buy, as renters will not be responsible for many of the extra expenses related to homeownership.
To sum up, whereas having personal houses offers many advantages such as to be free for redecorating and it can be beneficial for financial sustainability, I think renting provides more opportunities including flexibility and being cost-effective in the short-term.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people like to own the place where they live, but other people like to rent where they live.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate about whether it is better to own or rent the place where people live. While some people believe that owning a home can be beneficial in long term, others including me, think that renting offers more flexibility and less financial commitment.
On the other hand, those who advocate for owning a home think that it can provide a sense of stability and security, as people can have a place to call their own and it allows them to make changes and improvements. As a result, people can redecorate their houses depending on their own ideas. Moreover, homeownership is often seen as a long-term investment. For example, the prices of houses increase significantly and by buying their own houses people can save their money and this can lead to improvements on financial well-being of people.
On the other hand, I would side with those who think renting is more beneficial option compared to owning a house. Firstly, it offers a level of flexibility and freedom. For instance, renters have the ability to move to different locations without the financial burden of selling their homes. Furthermore, renting may be a more cost-effective option in the short term. For example, if people travel to another country because of their jobs or other short-term reasons it can be better to rent a house than to buy, as renters will not be responsible for many of the extra expenses related to homeownership.
To sum up, whereas having personal houses offers many advantages such as to be free for redecorating and it can be beneficial for financial sustainability, I think renting provides more opportunities including flexibility and being cost-effective in the short-term.
Your lexical resource score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people like to own the place where they live, but other people like to rent where they live.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate about whether it is better to own or rent the place where people live. While some people believe that owning a home can be beneficial in long term, others including me, think that renting offers more flexibility and less financial commitment.
On the other hand, those who advocate for owning a home think that it can provide a sense of stability and security, as people can have a place to call their own and it allows them to make changes and improvements. As a result, people can redecorate their houses depending on their own ideas. Moreover, homeownership is often seen as a long-term investment. For example, the prices of houses increase significantly and by buying their own houses people can save their money and this can lead to improvements on financial well-being of people.
On the other hand, I would side with those who think renting is more beneficial option compared to owning a house. Firstly, it offers a level of flexibility and freedom. For instance, renters have the ability to move to different locations without the financial burden of selling their homes. Furthermore, renting may be a more cost-effective option in the short term. For example, if people travel to another country because of their jobs or other short-term reasons it can be better to rent a house than to buy, as renters will not be responsible for many of the extra expenses related to homeownership.
To sum up, whereas having personal houses offers many advantages such as to be free for redecorating and it can be beneficial for financial sustainability, I think renting provides more opportunities including flexibility and being cost-effective in the short-term.
Your grammatical range score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people like to own the place where they live, but other people like to rent where they live.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate about whether it is better to own or rent the place where people live. While some people believe that owning a home can be beneficial in long term, others including me, think that renting offers more flexibility and less financial commitment.
On the other hand, those who advocate for owning a home think that it can provide a sense of stability and security, as people can have a place to call their own and it allows them to make changes and improvements. As a result, people can redecorate their houses depending on their own ideas. Moreover, homeownership is often seen as a long-term investment. For example, the prices of houses increase significantly and by buying their own houses people can save their money and this can lead to improvements on financial well-being of people.
On the other hand, I would side with those who think renting is more beneficial option compared to owning a house. Firstly, it offers a level of flexibility and freedom. For instance, renters have the ability to move to different locations without the financial burden of selling their homes. Furthermore, renting may be a more cost-effective option in the short term. For example, if people travel to another country because of their jobs or other short-term reasons it can be better to rent a house than to buy, as renters will not be responsible for many of the extra expenses related to homeownership.
To sum up, whereas having personal houses offers many advantages such as to be free for redecorating and it can be beneficial for financial sustainability, I think renting provides more opportunities including flexibility and being cost-effective in the short-term.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly.
What is the consequence of this trend?
Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media?
Anwser:
Increased popularity of social media revealed a gateway of spare complaints and doubts expressed by the society. There are several questions that are standing for this statement which I desire to answer in this essay.
The first question on the agenda is which outcomes does it caused in the society. To properly answer to this question we should analyze the way how people use their right of speech freedom on the internet. To be specific humans get used to write any thought that come up in their mind directly to comment section of the topic they are discussing. For instance if the new acquired law is accepted and published on web newspapers, people start discussing it immediately on the comment section, describing their feelings and opinions criticizing some parts of new law, which in terms demonstrates government whether the new law is suitable for the society or not. This effects on awareness of what to publish in the net to think twice because if something wrong you will be argued. However some negative trends have also appeared such as unreliable behavior of certain individuals who misuse their freedom of speech to shitpost comments that destroy image of person or event they reply to.
Moving forward to develop proper answer for the second question we should answer why complaints exist. Intense criticism of anything is not a key to deal with problemы. Nevertheless the correctly explained objections can lead to positive improvements. The great example would be the recent acquisition of a new constitution where induvials could share their personal thoughts and use critical thinking to analyse how the new laws could affect their further standards of life. This in terms positively reflected on connection between people and government, making their feedback clear and stated. To underline the main parts, if society uses this new ability in the way they have recently done, this will be the start of the positive development of democracy in our country.
In conclusion, the invention of social media and access to be free there have come up to some misunderstandings, but still gained lots of benefits developing people's critical analysis and belief in their direct resonance with each other and government.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly.
What is the consequence of this trend?
Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media?
Anwser:
Increased popularity of social media revealed a gateway of spare complaints and doubts expressed by the society. There are several questions that are standing for this statement which I desire to answer in this essay.
The first question on the agenda is which outcomes does it caused in the society. To properly answer to this question we should analyze the way how people use their right of speech freedom on the internet. To be specific humans get used to write any thought that come up in their mind directly to comment section of the topic they are discussing. For instance if the new acquired law is accepted and published on web newspapers, people start discussing it immediately on the comment section, describing their feelings and opinions criticizing some parts of new law, which in terms demonstrates government whether the new law is suitable for the society or not. This effects on awareness of what to publish in the net to think twice because if something wrong you will be argued. However some negative trends have also appeared such as unreliable behavior of certain individuals who misuse their freedom of speech to shitpost comments that destroy image of person or event they reply to.
Moving forward to develop proper answer for the second question we should answer why complaints exist. Intense criticism of anything is not a key to deal with problemы. Nevertheless the correctly explained objections can lead to positive improvements. The great example would be the recent acquisition of a new constitution where induvials could share their personal thoughts and use critical thinking to analyse how the new laws could affect their further standards of life. This in terms positively reflected on connection between people and government, making their feedback clear and stated. To underline the main parts, if society uses this new ability in the way they have recently done, this will be the start of the positive development of democracy in our country.
In conclusion, the invention of social media and access to be free there have come up to some misunderstandings, but still gained lots of benefits developing people's critical analysis and belief in their direct resonance with each other and government.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly.
What is the consequence of this trend?
Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media?
Anwser:
Increased popularity of social media revealed a gateway of spare complaints and doubts expressed by the society. There are several questions that are standing for this statement which I desire to answer in this essay.
The first question on the agenda is which outcomes does it caused in the society. To properly answer to this question we should analyze the way how people use their right of speech freedom on the internet. To be specific humans get used to write any thought that come up in their mind directly to comment section of the topic they are discussing. For instance if the new acquired law is accepted and published on web newspapers, people start discussing it immediately on the comment section, describing their feelings and opinions criticizing some parts of new law, which in terms demonstrates government whether the new law is suitable for the society or not. This effects on awareness of what to publish in the net to think twice because if something wrong you will be argued. However some negative trends have also appeared such as unreliable behavior of certain individuals who misuse their freedom of speech to shitpost comments that destroy image of person or event they reply to.
Moving forward to develop proper answer for the second question we should answer why complaints exist. Intense criticism of anything is not a key to deal with problemы. Nevertheless the correctly explained objections can lead to positive improvements. The great example would be the recent acquisition of a new constitution where induvials could share their personal thoughts and use critical thinking to analyse how the new laws could affect their further standards of life. This in terms positively reflected on connection between people and government, making their feedback clear and stated. To underline the main parts, if society uses this new ability in the way they have recently done, this will be the start of the positive development of democracy in our country.
In conclusion, the invention of social media and access to be free there have come up to some misunderstandings, but still gained lots of benefits developing people's critical analysis and belief in their direct resonance with each other and government.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
The rise of social media platforms has made it easier for people to vent their frustrations and complaints publicly.
What is the consequence of this trend?
Is there any benefit to expressing complaints on social media?
Anwser:
Increased popularity of social media revealed a gateway of spare complaints and doubts expressed by the society. There are several questions that are standing for this statement which I desire to answer in this essay.
The first question on the agenda is which outcomes does it caused in the society. To properly answer to this question we should analyze the way how people use their right of speech freedom on the internet. To be specific humans get used to write any thought that come up in their mind directly to comment section of the topic they are discussing. For instance if the new acquired law is accepted and published on web newspapers, people start discussing it immediately on the comment section, describing their feelings and opinions criticizing some parts of new law, which in terms demonstrates government whether the new law is suitable for the society or not. This effects on awareness of what to publish in the net to think twice because if something wrong you will be argued. However some negative trends have also appeared such as unreliable behavior of certain individuals who misuse their freedom of speech to shitpost comments that destroy image of person or event they reply to.
Moving forward to develop proper answer for the second question we should answer why complaints exist. Intense criticism of anything is not a key to deal with problemы. Nevertheless the correctly explained objections can lead to positive improvements. The great example would be the recent acquisition of a new constitution where induvials could share their personal thoughts and use critical thinking to analyse how the new laws could affect their further standards of life. This in terms positively reflected on connection between people and government, making their feedback clear and stated. To underline the main parts, if society uses this new ability in the way they have recently done, this will be the start of the positive development of democracy in our country.
In conclusion, the invention of social media and access to be free there have come up to some misunderstandings, but still gained lots of benefits developing people's critical analysis and belief in their direct resonance with each other and government.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both views and give tour own opinion.
Anwser:
In these modern days, some individuals argue History is quite crucial as a education subject, others believe Science and Technology are more valuable and relevant. In this essay, I will explain both of these views and give my opinion.
On one hand, History tell us about what happened in the past, in Indonesia mostly told us about our ancestor struggle for independence and the indonesian primitive society. I believe learning about nation history is crucial. Besides gain knowledges around the stories, we can grasp the determination and other emotions from it. We may also get some approaches to solve problems in the future, because histories repeat itself. An example for this is how repeatable recession are and how we might prepare and approach it.
On the other hand, Science and Technology are the future. It enables us to discover and invent to solve our today issues. Additionally, it also provide us with knowledge to learn, treat, and optimize what we have. For example, nowadays we learn the root cause of earth’s pollution and minimize it by changing our power plant energy source, regulate transportation, and even minimize the carbon production from farming by creating meat imitation. By prioritizing Science and Technology, we can improve human civilization and provide better future.
In my perspective, I believe that History is important but not as important to Science and Technology. We should still learn about national history but the others are not quite important. Furthermore, we should prioritize Science and Technology more to improve our living and prepare our future.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both views and give tour own opinion.
Anwser:
In these modern days, some individuals argue History is quite crucial as a education subject, others believe Science and Technology are more valuable and relevant. In this essay, I will explain both of these views and give my opinion.
On one hand, History tell us about what happened in the past, in Indonesia mostly told us about our ancestor struggle for independence and the indonesian primitive society. I believe learning about nation history is crucial. Besides gain knowledges around the stories, we can grasp the determination and other emotions from it. We may also get some approaches to solve problems in the future, because histories repeat itself. An example for this is how repeatable recession are and how we might prepare and approach it.
On the other hand, Science and Technology are the future. It enables us to discover and invent to solve our today issues. Additionally, it also provide us with knowledge to learn, treat, and optimize what we have. For example, nowadays we learn the root cause of earth’s pollution and minimize it by changing our power plant energy source, regulate transportation, and even minimize the carbon production from farming by creating meat imitation. By prioritizing Science and Technology, we can improve human civilization and provide better future.
In my perspective, I believe that History is important but not as important to Science and Technology. We should still learn about national history but the others are not quite important. Furthermore, we should prioritize Science and Technology more to improve our living and prepare our future.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both views and give tour own opinion.
Anwser:
In these modern days, some individuals argue History is quite crucial as a education subject, others believe Science and Technology are more valuable and relevant. In this essay, I will explain both of these views and give my opinion.
On one hand, History tell us about what happened in the past, in Indonesia mostly told us about our ancestor struggle for independence and the indonesian primitive society. I believe learning about nation history is crucial. Besides gain knowledges around the stories, we can grasp the determination and other emotions from it. We may also get some approaches to solve problems in the future, because histories repeat itself. An example for this is how repeatable recession are and how we might prepare and approach it.
On the other hand, Science and Technology are the future. It enables us to discover and invent to solve our today issues. Additionally, it also provide us with knowledge to learn, treat, and optimize what we have. For example, nowadays we learn the root cause of earth’s pollution and minimize it by changing our power plant energy source, regulate transportation, and even minimize the carbon production from farming by creating meat imitation. By prioritizing Science and Technology, we can improve human civilization and provide better future.
In my perspective, I believe that History is important but not as important to Science and Technology. We should still learn about national history but the others are not quite important. Furthermore, we should prioritize Science and Technology more to improve our living and prepare our future.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both views and give tour own opinion.
Anwser:
In these modern days, some individuals argue History is quite crucial as a education subject, others believe Science and Technology are more valuable and relevant. In this essay, I will explain both of these views and give my opinion.
On one hand, History tell us about what happened in the past, in Indonesia mostly told us about our ancestor struggle for independence and the indonesian primitive society. I believe learning about nation history is crucial. Besides gain knowledges around the stories, we can grasp the determination and other emotions from it. We may also get some approaches to solve problems in the future, because histories repeat itself. An example for this is how repeatable recession are and how we might prepare and approach it.
On the other hand, Science and Technology are the future. It enables us to discover and invent to solve our today issues. Additionally, it also provide us with knowledge to learn, treat, and optimize what we have. For example, nowadays we learn the root cause of earth’s pollution and minimize it by changing our power plant energy source, regulate transportation, and even minimize the carbon production from farming by creating meat imitation. By prioritizing Science and Technology, we can improve human civilization and provide better future.
In my perspective, I believe that History is important but not as important to Science and Technology. We should still learn about national history but the others are not quite important. Furthermore, we should prioritize Science and Technology more to improve our living and prepare our future.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
In these modern days, it is quite common that we have a lot of options. I’m fully agree with this statement, and in this essay I will discuss the reasons and supporting evidences from my experiences.
First and foremost, the advancement of technology enables us to explore and learn more things. There are two categories of fields of exploration it unlocks, the expansion of new fields and more complex advancement of the earlier fields. Example for emerging of new fields are often related to art topics. For example for the expansion is previously computer is such a rare equipment and the majors related to it only computer science, but now by the advancement of computer and the need of optimization, emerge a new majors, such as artificial intelligence, software infrastructure, cloud computing and others.
Furthermore, it seems the number of our lifestyle choices are increasing. Nowadays, for job arrangement, we have the option to work from office and work from home or even anywhere, because of the technology advancement. The amount of our dietary options are expanding too. Now, we can be vegetarian or even vegan easier. There are a lot of replacement for milk, egg, cheese, or even meat developed by the food scientist. Lastly, we have more entertainment alternatives too. We have a lot of new sports, video games, movies, or media entertainment related to virtual reality.
In conclusion, I’m completely agree that nowadays the options are plentiful. This occured because of the advancement of technology, and it surely help us as a human to be who we want easier.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
In these modern days, it is quite common that we have a lot of options. I’m fully agree with this statement, and in this essay I will discuss the reasons and supporting evidences from my experiences.
First and foremost, the advancement of technology enables us to explore and learn more things. There are two categories of fields of exploration it unlocks, the expansion of new fields and more complex advancement of the earlier fields. Example for emerging of new fields are often related to art topics. For example for the expansion is previously computer is such a rare equipment and the majors related to it only computer science, but now by the advancement of computer and the need of optimization, emerge a new majors, such as artificial intelligence, software infrastructure, cloud computing and others.
Furthermore, it seems the number of our lifestyle choices are increasing. Nowadays, for job arrangement, we have the option to work from office and work from home or even anywhere, because of the technology advancement. The amount of our dietary options are expanding too. Now, we can be vegetarian or even vegan easier. There are a lot of replacement for milk, egg, cheese, or even meat developed by the food scientist. Lastly, we have more entertainment alternatives too. We have a lot of new sports, video games, movies, or media entertainment related to virtual reality.
In conclusion, I’m completely agree that nowadays the options are plentiful. This occured because of the advancement of technology, and it surely help us as a human to be who we want easier.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
In these modern days, it is quite common that we have a lot of options. I’m fully agree with this statement, and in this essay I will discuss the reasons and supporting evidences from my experiences.
First and foremost, the advancement of technology enables us to explore and learn more things. There are two categories of fields of exploration it unlocks, the expansion of new fields and more complex advancement of the earlier fields. Example for emerging of new fields are often related to art topics. For example for the expansion is previously computer is such a rare equipment and the majors related to it only computer science, but now by the advancement of computer and the need of optimization, emerge a new majors, such as artificial intelligence, software infrastructure, cloud computing and others.
Furthermore, it seems the number of our lifestyle choices are increasing. Nowadays, for job arrangement, we have the option to work from office and work from home or even anywhere, because of the technology advancement. The amount of our dietary options are expanding too. Now, we can be vegetarian or even vegan easier. There are a lot of replacement for milk, egg, cheese, or even meat developed by the food scientist. Lastly, we have more entertainment alternatives too. We have a lot of new sports, video games, movies, or media entertainment related to virtual reality.
In conclusion, I’m completely agree that nowadays the options are plentiful. This occured because of the advancement of technology, and it surely help us as a human to be who we want easier.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Anwser:
In these modern days, it is quite common that we have a lot of options. I’m fully agree with this statement, and in this essay I will discuss the reasons and supporting evidences from my experiences.
First and foremost, the advancement of technology enables us to explore and learn more things. There are two categories of fields of exploration it unlocks, the expansion of new fields and more complex advancement of the earlier fields. Example for emerging of new fields are often related to art topics. For example for the expansion is previously computer is such a rare equipment and the majors related to it only computer science, but now by the advancement of computer and the need of optimization, emerge a new majors, such as artificial intelligence, software infrastructure, cloud computing and others.
Furthermore, it seems the number of our lifestyle choices are increasing. Nowadays, for job arrangement, we have the option to work from office and work from home or even anywhere, because of the technology advancement. The amount of our dietary options are expanding too. Now, we can be vegetarian or even vegan easier. There are a lot of replacement for milk, egg, cheese, or even meat developed by the food scientist. Lastly, we have more entertainment alternatives too. We have a lot of new sports, video games, movies, or media entertainment related to virtual reality.
In conclusion, I’m completely agree that nowadays the options are plentiful. This occured because of the advancement of technology, and it surely help us as a human to be who we want easier.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast transport for cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
It is generally believed that, a few individuals believe that lots of fund is needed to enhance the current public transport. While some others consider it’s better to allocate it to build new railway routes for fast trains connecting to other cities. In this essay, I will discuss both of these perspectives.
On one hand, enhancing current public transport would provide plenty of benefits. By improving the public transport, it’s possible to reduce the cost of commutes and attract more people to use the shared conveyance. Furthermore, the number of private vehicle would decrease, and also the pollution produced. People’s health are affected too, because of the reduced pollution and the needs of physical movement in transit. Singapore is the best example for this, with its great mass transit facility, people tend to use it more and it’s really affect on its citizen lifespan too.
On the other hand, building fast trains between cities enable folks to commute long distances. Consequently, people don’t need to rent near their offices, hence the location are not overcrowded. It is also helpful for tourist to explore other cities for vacation. For example, in Jakarta, a lot of individuals want to go to Bandung at weekend for holiday, but the traffic jam really obstruct. After the government built Whoosh, it’s easier for the citizen to go vacation.
In conclusion, there are many benefits to both views. However, I agree that improving current public transit is more important. The impact to cheaper mobilization, lower pollution, and health benefits is more needed for the citizen.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast transport for cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
It is generally believed that, a few individuals believe that lots of fund is needed to enhance the current public transport. While some others consider it’s better to allocate it to build new railway routes for fast trains connecting to other cities. In this essay, I will discuss both of these perspectives.
On one hand, enhancing current public transport would provide plenty of benefits. By improving the public transport, it’s possible to reduce the cost of commutes and attract more people to use the shared conveyance. Furthermore, the number of private vehicle would decrease, and also the pollution produced. People’s health are affected too, because of the reduced pollution and the needs of physical movement in transit. Singapore is the best example for this, with its great mass transit facility, people tend to use it more and it’s really affect on its citizen lifespan too.
On the other hand, building fast trains between cities enable folks to commute long distances. Consequently, people don’t need to rent near their offices, hence the location are not overcrowded. It is also helpful for tourist to explore other cities for vacation. For example, in Jakarta, a lot of individuals want to go to Bandung at weekend for holiday, but the traffic jam really obstruct. After the government built Whoosh, it’s easier for the citizen to go vacation.
In conclusion, there are many benefits to both views. However, I agree that improving current public transit is more important. The impact to cheaper mobilization, lower pollution, and health benefits is more needed for the citizen.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast transport for cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
It is generally believed that, a few individuals believe that lots of fund is needed to enhance the current public transport. While some others consider it’s better to allocate it to build new railway routes for fast trains connecting to other cities. In this essay, I will discuss both of these perspectives.
On one hand, enhancing current public transport would provide plenty of benefits. By improving the public transport, it’s possible to reduce the cost of commutes and attract more people to use the shared conveyance. Furthermore, the number of private vehicle would decrease, and also the pollution produced. People’s health are affected too, because of the reduced pollution and the needs of physical movement in transit. Singapore is the best example for this, with its great mass transit facility, people tend to use it more and it’s really affect on its citizen lifespan too.
On the other hand, building fast trains between cities enable folks to commute long distances. Consequently, people don’t need to rent near their offices, hence the location are not overcrowded. It is also helpful for tourist to explore other cities for vacation. For example, in Jakarta, a lot of individuals want to go to Bandung at weekend for holiday, but the traffic jam really obstruct. After the government built Whoosh, it’s easier for the citizen to go vacation.
In conclusion, there are many benefits to both views. However, I agree that improving current public transit is more important. The impact to cheaper mobilization, lower pollution, and health benefits is more needed for the citizen.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast transport for cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
It is generally believed that, a few individuals believe that lots of fund is needed to enhance the current public transport. While some others consider it’s better to allocate it to build new railway routes for fast trains connecting to other cities. In this essay, I will discuss both of these perspectives.
On one hand, enhancing current public transport would provide plenty of benefits. By improving the public transport, it’s possible to reduce the cost of commutes and attract more people to use the shared conveyance. Furthermore, the number of private vehicle would decrease, and also the pollution produced. People’s health are affected too, because of the reduced pollution and the needs of physical movement in transit. Singapore is the best example for this, with its great mass transit facility, people tend to use it more and it’s really affect on its citizen lifespan too.
On the other hand, building fast trains between cities enable folks to commute long distances. Consequently, people don’t need to rent near their offices, hence the location are not overcrowded. It is also helpful for tourist to explore other cities for vacation. For example, in Jakarta, a lot of individuals want to go to Bandung at weekend for holiday, but the traffic jam really obstruct. After the government built Whoosh, it’s easier for the citizen to go vacation.
In conclusion, there are many benefits to both views. However, I agree that improving current public transit is more important. The impact to cheaper mobilization, lower pollution, and health benefits is more needed for the citizen.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is generally believed that the population of several nations consists of less older people, compared to the number of young adults. There are benefits and drawbacks of this situation, but I believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On one hand, youngsters would provide some benefits, some of the characteristics of them are have lots of energy and a great learner. They could do work that require muscle and generally cheaper than adults. Such as glass making, carpentry, or labor. Moreover, they are still in the golden age of learning, which enable them to keep update to the technology update and optimize their work, therefore boost their productivity. For instance programmers can utilize artificial intelligence or create automations to ease up their job. These reasons would empower the local economic growth.
On the other hand, the lack of elderly would have drawbacks. The elderly tend to have more wisdom and experience. They can provide guidance or mentorship to the youth. Often times, the guidance are really helpful and applicable, because they have experience it before. Also this can prevent mistakes by the youth. In my experience, frequently the elders are more stable financially and provide employment. Because of the shortage of elders, it’s really possible to affect the numbers of employment.
In conclusion, the shortage of older individuals, compared with the number of young individuals have some advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe that young individuals have a lots of energy and learning capacity that enables them to adapt to the situation. While the employment may decrease, they can create work industry and seek for investment from the seniors. Therefore, I think the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is generally believed that the population of several nations consists of less older people, compared to the number of young adults. There are benefits and drawbacks of this situation, but I believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On one hand, youngsters would provide some benefits, some of the characteristics of them are have lots of energy and a great learner. They could do work that require muscle and generally cheaper than adults. Such as glass making, carpentry, or labor. Moreover, they are still in the golden age of learning, which enable them to keep update to the technology update and optimize their work, therefore boost their productivity. For instance programmers can utilize artificial intelligence or create automations to ease up their job. These reasons would empower the local economic growth.
On the other hand, the lack of elderly would have drawbacks. The elderly tend to have more wisdom and experience. They can provide guidance or mentorship to the youth. Often times, the guidance are really helpful and applicable, because they have experience it before. Also this can prevent mistakes by the youth. In my experience, frequently the elders are more stable financially and provide employment. Because of the shortage of elders, it’s really possible to affect the numbers of employment.
In conclusion, the shortage of older individuals, compared with the number of young individuals have some advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe that young individuals have a lots of energy and learning capacity that enables them to adapt to the situation. While the employment may decrease, they can create work industry and seek for investment from the seniors. Therefore, I think the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is generally believed that the population of several nations consists of less older people, compared to the number of young adults. There are benefits and drawbacks of this situation, but I believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On one hand, youngsters would provide some benefits, some of the characteristics of them are have lots of energy and a great learner. They could do work that require muscle and generally cheaper than adults. Such as glass making, carpentry, or labor. Moreover, they are still in the golden age of learning, which enable them to keep update to the technology update and optimize their work, therefore boost their productivity. For instance programmers can utilize artificial intelligence or create automations to ease up their job. These reasons would empower the local economic growth.
On the other hand, the lack of elderly would have drawbacks. The elderly tend to have more wisdom and experience. They can provide guidance or mentorship to the youth. Often times, the guidance are really helpful and applicable, because they have experience it before. Also this can prevent mistakes by the youth. In my experience, frequently the elders are more stable financially and provide employment. Because of the shortage of elders, it’s really possible to affect the numbers of employment.
In conclusion, the shortage of older individuals, compared with the number of young individuals have some advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe that young individuals have a lots of energy and learning capacity that enables them to adapt to the situation. While the employment may decrease, they can create work industry and seek for investment from the seniors. Therefore, I think the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is generally believed that the population of several nations consists of less older people, compared to the number of young adults. There are benefits and drawbacks of this situation, but I believe the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On one hand, youngsters would provide some benefits, some of the characteristics of them are have lots of energy and a great learner. They could do work that require muscle and generally cheaper than adults. Such as glass making, carpentry, or labor. Moreover, they are still in the golden age of learning, which enable them to keep update to the technology update and optimize their work, therefore boost their productivity. For instance programmers can utilize artificial intelligence or create automations to ease up their job. These reasons would empower the local economic growth.
On the other hand, the lack of elderly would have drawbacks. The elderly tend to have more wisdom and experience. They can provide guidance or mentorship to the youth. Often times, the guidance are really helpful and applicable, because they have experience it before. Also this can prevent mistakes by the youth. In my experience, frequently the elders are more stable financially and provide employment. Because of the shortage of elders, it’s really possible to affect the numbers of employment.
In conclusion, the shortage of older individuals, compared with the number of young individuals have some advantages and disadvantages. However, I believe that young individuals have a lots of energy and learning capacity that enables them to adapt to the situation. While the employment may decrease, they can create work industry and seek for investment from the seniors. Therefore, I think the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
These days, the discussion about people's health and the amount of consuming nutrients and other substances in food is prominent. Some individuals think that only people should look after their own health and diet. However, others consider that governments have to take care of citizens' healthy lifestyles. This essay will discuss both opposite opinions and give my viewpoint.
To begin with, each person has his/her own body features, such as the rate of metabolism, preferences in meals, flexibility and others. That is to say, only people know exactly their bodies, so it is easier for them to choose physical activities and specialized goods in order to improve health. Moreover, taking care of your well-being may increase your confidence and enrich your mental well-being. For example, when I started to learn more about what types of products contain more or less sugar, I have become more aware and informed in choices of food. Additionally, individual responsibility is really crucial nowadays, as only you can take care of yourself all the time.
On the other hand, in some countries the trend of consuming junk foodstuff and leading a non-active lifestyle may cause numerous problems in the countries' healthcare. For example, there is a huge quantity of people in America who are not mobile anymore because of such issues, so the government is concerned about future of the nation. In these cases, the government should take responsibility and involve health trends, social activities and provide access to healthy food options. Moreover, governments of countries can decrease the percentage of overweight people by using the aforementioned methods, as it is one of the rapidly developing humanity problems.
In conclusion, I believe that a combination of both opinions should be considered. While individuals can choose sports and diets that are more appropriate for their well-being, the government should create a healthier environment for citizens and be aware that there is no rise in the percentage of overweight people.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
These days, the discussion about people's health and the amount of consuming nutrients and other substances in food is prominent. Some individuals think that only people should look after their own health and diet. However, others consider that governments have to take care of citizens' healthy lifestyles. This essay will discuss both opposite opinions and give my viewpoint.
To begin with, each person has his/her own body features, such as the rate of metabolism, preferences in meals, flexibility and others. That is to say, only people know exactly their bodies, so it is easier for them to choose physical activities and specialized goods in order to improve health. Moreover, taking care of your well-being may increase your confidence and enrich your mental well-being. For example, when I started to learn more about what types of products contain more or less sugar, I have become more aware and informed in choices of food. Additionally, individual responsibility is really crucial nowadays, as only you can take care of yourself all the time.
On the other hand, in some countries the trend of consuming junk foodstuff and leading a non-active lifestyle may cause numerous problems in the countries' healthcare. For example, there is a huge quantity of people in America who are not mobile anymore because of such issues, so the government is concerned about future of the nation. In these cases, the government should take responsibility and involve health trends, social activities and provide access to healthy food options. Moreover, governments of countries can decrease the percentage of overweight people by using the aforementioned methods, as it is one of the rapidly developing humanity problems.
In conclusion, I believe that a combination of both opinions should be considered. While individuals can choose sports and diets that are more appropriate for their well-being, the government should create a healthier environment for citizens and be aware that there is no rise in the percentage of overweight people.
Your lexical resource score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
These days, the discussion about people's health and the amount of consuming nutrients and other substances in food is prominent. Some individuals think that only people should look after their own health and diet. However, others consider that governments have to take care of citizens' healthy lifestyles. This essay will discuss both opposite opinions and give my viewpoint.
To begin with, each person has his/her own body features, such as the rate of metabolism, preferences in meals, flexibility and others. That is to say, only people know exactly their bodies, so it is easier for them to choose physical activities and specialized goods in order to improve health. Moreover, taking care of your well-being may increase your confidence and enrich your mental well-being. For example, when I started to learn more about what types of products contain more or less sugar, I have become more aware and informed in choices of food. Additionally, individual responsibility is really crucial nowadays, as only you can take care of yourself all the time.
On the other hand, in some countries the trend of consuming junk foodstuff and leading a non-active lifestyle may cause numerous problems in the countries' healthcare. For example, there is a huge quantity of people in America who are not mobile anymore because of such issues, so the government is concerned about future of the nation. In these cases, the government should take responsibility and involve health trends, social activities and provide access to healthy food options. Moreover, governments of countries can decrease the percentage of overweight people by using the aforementioned methods, as it is one of the rapidly developing humanity problems.
In conclusion, I believe that a combination of both opinions should be considered. While individuals can choose sports and diets that are more appropriate for their well-being, the government should create a healthier environment for citizens and be aware that there is no rise in the percentage of overweight people.
Your grammatical range score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others however believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
These days, the discussion about people's health and the amount of consuming nutrients and other substances in food is prominent. Some individuals think that only people should look after their own health and diet. However, others consider that governments have to take care of citizens' healthy lifestyles. This essay will discuss both opposite opinions and give my viewpoint.
To begin with, each person has his/her own body features, such as the rate of metabolism, preferences in meals, flexibility and others. That is to say, only people know exactly their bodies, so it is easier for them to choose physical activities and specialized goods in order to improve health. Moreover, taking care of your well-being may increase your confidence and enrich your mental well-being. For example, when I started to learn more about what types of products contain more or less sugar, I have become more aware and informed in choices of food. Additionally, individual responsibility is really crucial nowadays, as only you can take care of yourself all the time.
On the other hand, in some countries the trend of consuming junk foodstuff and leading a non-active lifestyle may cause numerous problems in the countries' healthcare. For example, there is a huge quantity of people in America who are not mobile anymore because of such issues, so the government is concerned about future of the nation. In these cases, the government should take responsibility and involve health trends, social activities and provide access to healthy food options. Moreover, governments of countries can decrease the percentage of overweight people by using the aforementioned methods, as it is one of the rapidly developing humanity problems.
In conclusion, I believe that a combination of both opinions should be considered. While individuals can choose sports and diets that are more appropriate for their well-being, the government should create a healthier environment for citizens and be aware that there is no rise in the percentage of overweight people.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Would community serive in high school be benetiful for teh students or would it be a waste of time? Some people suggest that unpaid community service for our students should be compulsory. I agree with this, but what would this be good for?
First and foremost, the students would learn to take other reseponsibilies besides their studies. Resurce shows that a lot of gratuates are not prepered for the life after school. During their hole apperence they have been deducated to their studies. By adding unpaid community service to the school attendence we would intruduce the students to the reseponsbilites of working. They will also gain experiences that can be useful later in life.
Secondly, to engage the students in for example, charity would widern their perspective of the world. Talking from own experience, I was clueless about the sircubstances some peolpe are living under when I finished high school. Me and most of my peeps growed up in a family's with a good economic situation. After high school I started working for a charity company which made me realise how privilaged I was. To help people in need changed my view of life and made me more objective.
To conclued, In my opinion, community services should be something that everyone attending high school should take a part of. It does not only preper them for the life after high school, it also helps them gain work experience and wider their picture of how the world actually works. The result of this would be students that are ready for the adult life.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Would community serive in high school be benetiful for teh students or would it be a waste of time? Some people suggest that unpaid community service for our students should be compulsory. I agree with this, but what would this be good for?
First and foremost, the students would learn to take other reseponsibilies besides their studies. Resurce shows that a lot of gratuates are not prepered for the life after school. During their hole apperence they have been deducated to their studies. By adding unpaid community service to the school attendence we would intruduce the students to the reseponsbilites of working. They will also gain experiences that can be useful later in life.
Secondly, to engage the students in for example, charity would widern their perspective of the world. Talking from own experience, I was clueless about the sircubstances some peolpe are living under when I finished high school. Me and most of my peeps growed up in a family's with a good economic situation. After high school I started working for a charity company which made me realise how privilaged I was. To help people in need changed my view of life and made me more objective.
To conclued, In my opinion, community services should be something that everyone attending high school should take a part of. It does not only preper them for the life after high school, it also helps them gain work experience and wider their picture of how the world actually works. The result of this would be students that are ready for the adult life.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Would community serive in high school be benetiful for teh students or would it be a waste of time? Some people suggest that unpaid community service for our students should be compulsory. I agree with this, but what would this be good for?
First and foremost, the students would learn to take other reseponsibilies besides their studies. Resurce shows that a lot of gratuates are not prepered for the life after school. During their hole apperence they have been deducated to their studies. By adding unpaid community service to the school attendence we would intruduce the students to the reseponsbilites of working. They will also gain experiences that can be useful later in life.
Secondly, to engage the students in for example, charity would widern their perspective of the world. Talking from own experience, I was clueless about the sircubstances some peolpe are living under when I finished high school. Me and most of my peeps growed up in a family's with a good economic situation. After high school I started working for a charity company which made me realise how privilaged I was. To help people in need changed my view of life and made me more objective.
To conclued, In my opinion, community services should be something that everyone attending high school should take a part of. It does not only preper them for the life after high school, it also helps them gain work experience and wider their picture of how the world actually works. The result of this would be students that are ready for the adult life.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Would community serive in high school be benetiful for teh students or would it be a waste of time? Some people suggest that unpaid community service for our students should be compulsory. I agree with this, but what would this be good for?
First and foremost, the students would learn to take other reseponsibilies besides their studies. Resurce shows that a lot of gratuates are not prepered for the life after school. During their hole apperence they have been deducated to their studies. By adding unpaid community service to the school attendence we would intruduce the students to the reseponsbilites of working. They will also gain experiences that can be useful later in life.
Secondly, to engage the students in for example, charity would widern their perspective of the world. Talking from own experience, I was clueless about the sircubstances some peolpe are living under when I finished high school. Me and most of my peeps growed up in a family's with a good economic situation. After high school I started working for a charity company which made me realise how privilaged I was. To help people in need changed my view of life and made me more objective.
To conclued, In my opinion, community services should be something that everyone attending high school should take a part of. It does not only preper them for the life after high school, it also helps them gain work experience and wider their picture of how the world actually works. The result of this would be students that are ready for the adult life.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Atlanatic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Anwser:
Nowadays, countries such as the Sahara desert or the Atlantic are becoming popular destinations for tourists which are often regarded as harsh region. While, both these places have cons and pros within them as destination spots.
First of all, if we look at the geography of these zones one can experience mother nature and the different habitats that survive there. As, these landscapes have different weather conditions, which leads towards the attraction of many people. Take an example of the Sahara desert, where the climate tends to be hotter, while in the Atlantic it's freezing. The change in the climates makes the landscape and inhabitants, often tend to be tourist destinations. Where year there are 200,000 crowd around the world visit these areas according to the World magazine.
On the other hand, these parts are often regarded as dangerous spots when it comes to safety. Since these countries hold different climates, survival becomes difficult , especially for public coming from different regions. For example, people in India are habituated to living in a hot climate and if these people choose to visit one of the coldest countries in the world like the Atlantic, they are less likely to survive there. Moreover, visiting these places is not only dangerous but also expensive. Since in order to reach the Atlantic one has to pay a huge amount as there are very less options for transportation.
To conclude, tourist spots like the Atlantic and the Sahara deserts are interesting to visit for having different climate conditions which attract more and more nations but are also dangerous and expensive.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Atlanatic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Anwser:
Nowadays, countries such as the Sahara desert or the Atlantic are becoming popular destinations for tourists which are often regarded as harsh region. While, both these places have cons and pros within them as destination spots.
First of all, if we look at the geography of these zones one can experience mother nature and the different habitats that survive there. As, these landscapes have different weather conditions, which leads towards the attraction of many people. Take an example of the Sahara desert, where the climate tends to be hotter, while in the Atlantic it's freezing. The change in the climates makes the landscape and inhabitants, often tend to be tourist destinations. Where year there are 200,000 crowd around the world visit these areas according to the World magazine.
On the other hand, these parts are often regarded as dangerous spots when it comes to safety. Since these countries hold different climates, survival becomes difficult , especially for public coming from different regions. For example, people in India are habituated to living in a hot climate and if these people choose to visit one of the coldest countries in the world like the Atlantic, they are less likely to survive there. Moreover, visiting these places is not only dangerous but also expensive. Since in order to reach the Atlantic one has to pay a huge amount as there are very less options for transportation.
To conclude, tourist spots like the Atlantic and the Sahara deserts are interesting to visit for having different climate conditions which attract more and more nations but are also dangerous and expensive.
Your lexical resource score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Atlanatic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Anwser:
Nowadays, countries such as the Sahara desert or the Atlantic are becoming popular destinations for tourists which are often regarded as harsh region. While, both these places have cons and pros within them as destination spots.
First of all, if we look at the geography of these zones one can experience mother nature and the different habitats that survive there. As, these landscapes have different weather conditions, which leads towards the attraction of many people. Take an example of the Sahara desert, where the climate tends to be hotter, while in the Atlantic it's freezing. The change in the climates makes the landscape and inhabitants, often tend to be tourist destinations. Where year there are 200,000 crowd around the world visit these areas according to the World magazine.
On the other hand, these parts are often regarded as dangerous spots when it comes to safety. Since these countries hold different climates, survival becomes difficult , especially for public coming from different regions. For example, people in India are habituated to living in a hot climate and if these people choose to visit one of the coldest countries in the world like the Atlantic, they are less likely to survive there. Moreover, visiting these places is not only dangerous but also expensive. Since in order to reach the Atlantic one has to pay a huge amount as there are very less options for transportation.
To conclude, tourist spots like the Atlantic and the Sahara deserts are interesting to visit for having different climate conditions which attract more and more nations but are also dangerous and expensive.
Your grammatical range score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Atlanatic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Anwser:
Nowadays, countries such as the Sahara desert or the Atlantic are becoming popular destinations for tourists which are often regarded as harsh region. While, both these places have cons and pros within them as destination spots.
First of all, if we look at the geography of these zones one can experience mother nature and the different habitats that survive there. As, these landscapes have different weather conditions, which leads towards the attraction of many people. Take an example of the Sahara desert, where the climate tends to be hotter, while in the Atlantic it's freezing. The change in the climates makes the landscape and inhabitants, often tend to be tourist destinations. Where year there are 200,000 crowd around the world visit these areas according to the World magazine.
On the other hand, these parts are often regarded as dangerous spots when it comes to safety. Since these countries hold different climates, survival becomes difficult , especially for public coming from different regions. For example, people in India are habituated to living in a hot climate and if these people choose to visit one of the coldest countries in the world like the Atlantic, they are less likely to survive there. Moreover, visiting these places is not only dangerous but also expensive. Since in order to reach the Atlantic one has to pay a huge amount as there are very less options for transportation.
To conclude, tourist spots like the Atlantic and the Sahara deserts are interesting to visit for having different climate conditions which attract more and more nations but are also dangerous and expensive.
Your task achievement score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Competitiveness is seen as a positive quality for people to have in many societies today. How does this competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative quality?
Anwser:
It is widely acknowledged that, in contemporary society, competitiveness is a great quality for individuals to possess. This essay will examine how this situtation affect people and issue my own perspective that this quality is positive at individual and societal levels.
In the first place, this quality not only brings advantages to people, but also drawbacks. Primarily, the impacts are beneficial. This quality enable people to make progress. For instance, in order to seperate themselves from others in such a competitve society, people may push themselves to learn a new skill to expand their repertoires. In such process, everyone's ability can be gradually improved. Additionally, we cannot deny that competitiveness sometimes may lead to a detrimental effects. Inappropriate competitions would make people feel stressed out and overwhelmed, thereby, there is a high possibility for people to get a psychological problems. That is also the reason why there are so many people today commit suicide because of depression.
In the second place, even if competitiveness is a double-edged sword, in general, it will contribute more to individuals' growth and the social development. As for citizens, who live in a society filled with competition, it is vital for people, especially those young adults who just graduated from university and got into workplace, to compete with others as they will be knocked out if they refuse to engage in competions. In terms of the whole society, competitiveness can serve as an inspiration and motivation for promoting innovation, which is an indispensable capability a country should have for inventing advanced technology. Moreover, when more and more people constantly improve themselves, society can have an increasing number of well-educated workforce to boost the societal economy.
In conclusion, competitiveness has positve and negative effects simultaneously. Excessive and unhealthy competition may cause problems, while the most visible impacts are advantageous. On balance, I believe, it is a positive quality which is helpful for society and people.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Competitiveness is seen as a positive quality for people to have in many societies today. How does this competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative quality?
Anwser:
It is widely acknowledged that, in contemporary society, competitiveness is a great quality for individuals to possess. This essay will examine how this situtation affect people and issue my own perspective that this quality is positive at individual and societal levels.
In the first place, this quality not only brings advantages to people, but also drawbacks. Primarily, the impacts are beneficial. This quality enable people to make progress. For instance, in order to seperate themselves from others in such a competitve society, people may push themselves to learn a new skill to expand their repertoires. In such process, everyone's ability can be gradually improved. Additionally, we cannot deny that competitiveness sometimes may lead to a detrimental effects. Inappropriate competitions would make people feel stressed out and overwhelmed, thereby, there is a high possibility for people to get a psychological problems. That is also the reason why there are so many people today commit suicide because of depression.
In the second place, even if competitiveness is a double-edged sword, in general, it will contribute more to individuals' growth and the social development. As for citizens, who live in a society filled with competition, it is vital for people, especially those young adults who just graduated from university and got into workplace, to compete with others as they will be knocked out if they refuse to engage in competions. In terms of the whole society, competitiveness can serve as an inspiration and motivation for promoting innovation, which is an indispensable capability a country should have for inventing advanced technology. Moreover, when more and more people constantly improve themselves, society can have an increasing number of well-educated workforce to boost the societal economy.
In conclusion, competitiveness has positve and negative effects simultaneously. Excessive and unhealthy competition may cause problems, while the most visible impacts are advantageous. On balance, I believe, it is a positive quality which is helpful for society and people.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Competitiveness is seen as a positive quality for people to have in many societies today. How does this competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative quality?
Anwser:
It is widely acknowledged that, in contemporary society, competitiveness is a great quality for individuals to possess. This essay will examine how this situtation affect people and issue my own perspective that this quality is positive at individual and societal levels.
In the first place, this quality not only brings advantages to people, but also drawbacks. Primarily, the impacts are beneficial. This quality enable people to make progress. For instance, in order to seperate themselves from others in such a competitve society, people may push themselves to learn a new skill to expand their repertoires. In such process, everyone's ability can be gradually improved. Additionally, we cannot deny that competitiveness sometimes may lead to a detrimental effects. Inappropriate competitions would make people feel stressed out and overwhelmed, thereby, there is a high possibility for people to get a psychological problems. That is also the reason why there are so many people today commit suicide because of depression.
In the second place, even if competitiveness is a double-edged sword, in general, it will contribute more to individuals' growth and the social development. As for citizens, who live in a society filled with competition, it is vital for people, especially those young adults who just graduated from university and got into workplace, to compete with others as they will be knocked out if they refuse to engage in competions. In terms of the whole society, competitiveness can serve as an inspiration and motivation for promoting innovation, which is an indispensable capability a country should have for inventing advanced technology. Moreover, when more and more people constantly improve themselves, society can have an increasing number of well-educated workforce to boost the societal economy.
In conclusion, competitiveness has positve and negative effects simultaneously. Excessive and unhealthy competition may cause problems, while the most visible impacts are advantageous. On balance, I believe, it is a positive quality which is helpful for society and people.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Competitiveness is seen as a positive quality for people to have in many societies today. How does this competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative quality?
Anwser:
It is widely acknowledged that, in contemporary society, competitiveness is a great quality for individuals to possess. This essay will examine how this situtation affect people and issue my own perspective that this quality is positive at individual and societal levels.
In the first place, this quality not only brings advantages to people, but also drawbacks. Primarily, the impacts are beneficial. This quality enable people to make progress. For instance, in order to seperate themselves from others in such a competitve society, people may push themselves to learn a new skill to expand their repertoires. In such process, everyone's ability can be gradually improved. Additionally, we cannot deny that competitiveness sometimes may lead to a detrimental effects. Inappropriate competitions would make people feel stressed out and overwhelmed, thereby, there is a high possibility for people to get a psychological problems. That is also the reason why there are so many people today commit suicide because of depression.
In the second place, even if competitiveness is a double-edged sword, in general, it will contribute more to individuals' growth and the social development. As for citizens, who live in a society filled with competition, it is vital for people, especially those young adults who just graduated from university and got into workplace, to compete with others as they will be knocked out if they refuse to engage in competions. In terms of the whole society, competitiveness can serve as an inspiration and motivation for promoting innovation, which is an indispensable capability a country should have for inventing advanced technology. Moreover, when more and more people constantly improve themselves, society can have an increasing number of well-educated workforce to boost the societal economy.
In conclusion, competitiveness has positve and negative effects simultaneously. Excessive and unhealthy competition may cause problems, while the most visible impacts are advantageous. On balance, I believe, it is a positive quality which is helpful for society and people.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Many working people get very little or no exercise causing health problems.
what are the causes and what is the solution to this problem.
Anwser:
There is a tendency of sedentry lifestyle among the people who are employed, which is causing serious medical issues including obesity and diabetes.This behaviour of avoiding exercise is atrributed by most individuals to lack of time and busy routine which can be sorted out by relaxing working hours and having a mandatory physical training at work places.
With the rising inflation, the masses are forced to work for longer hours to earn money.Some people do more than one job to cater for the expenses.They leave early in the morning and come back home late in the evening.I know one of my cousin who is a teacher at primary school.After the school time he works as an assisstant manager in the evening hours at a local company.He has been following this routine for five years which has caused him to become overweight and develop joint problems.In addition, lack of motivation is another factor that prevents the populace from adopting a healthy lifestyle.My sister after coming back from duty in a hospital is always feeling lethargic and goes to bed immediately.
There are a number of ways to deal with this menace of sedentary lifestyle.First of all, the governments should enforce the working hours for every sector.Moreover, the comapnies and factories should relax the work routine for employees.Many departments have started implementation of such policies.For instance, the executive of suzuki workshop in our country ordered employees to stop taking the cars for service after 1500hrs, so that staff could leave for their homes on time.Secondly, the compulsory games period in the institutions can improve the overall health of citizens.In military set up for example, there is a specified time allocated for the physical activity in which everyone has to participte.This model can be adopted by other organizations.Furthermore, there should be more gyms at the place of duty.It will also encourage the employees to be more active.Finally, the problem of casual attitude towards health can be overcome by regular counselling of work force by the psychologist.
In a nutshell, the dialemma of a monotonous job routine due to overstressed and overburdened individuals in a society can be managed by giving them proper time and place for the healthful activities.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Many working people get very little or no exercise causing health problems.
what are the causes and what is the solution to this problem.
Anwser:
There is a tendency of sedentry lifestyle among the people who are employed, which is causing serious medical issues including obesity and diabetes.This behaviour of avoiding exercise is atrributed by most individuals to lack of time and busy routine which can be sorted out by relaxing working hours and having a mandatory physical training at work places.
With the rising inflation, the masses are forced to work for longer hours to earn money.Some people do more than one job to cater for the expenses.They leave early in the morning and come back home late in the evening.I know one of my cousin who is a teacher at primary school.After the school time he works as an assisstant manager in the evening hours at a local company.He has been following this routine for five years which has caused him to become overweight and develop joint problems.In addition, lack of motivation is another factor that prevents the populace from adopting a healthy lifestyle.My sister after coming back from duty in a hospital is always feeling lethargic and goes to bed immediately.
There are a number of ways to deal with this menace of sedentary lifestyle.First of all, the governments should enforce the working hours for every sector.Moreover, the comapnies and factories should relax the work routine for employees.Many departments have started implementation of such policies.For instance, the executive of suzuki workshop in our country ordered employees to stop taking the cars for service after 1500hrs, so that staff could leave for their homes on time.Secondly, the compulsory games period in the institutions can improve the overall health of citizens.In military set up for example, there is a specified time allocated for the physical activity in which everyone has to participte.This model can be adopted by other organizations.Furthermore, there should be more gyms at the place of duty.It will also encourage the employees to be more active.Finally, the problem of casual attitude towards health can be overcome by regular counselling of work force by the psychologist.
In a nutshell, the dialemma of a monotonous job routine due to overstressed and overburdened individuals in a society can be managed by giving them proper time and place for the healthful activities.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Many working people get very little or no exercise causing health problems.
what are the causes and what is the solution to this problem.
Anwser:
There is a tendency of sedentry lifestyle among the people who are employed, which is causing serious medical issues including obesity and diabetes.This behaviour of avoiding exercise is atrributed by most individuals to lack of time and busy routine which can be sorted out by relaxing working hours and having a mandatory physical training at work places.
With the rising inflation, the masses are forced to work for longer hours to earn money.Some people do more than one job to cater for the expenses.They leave early in the morning and come back home late in the evening.I know one of my cousin who is a teacher at primary school.After the school time he works as an assisstant manager in the evening hours at a local company.He has been following this routine for five years which has caused him to become overweight and develop joint problems.In addition, lack of motivation is another factor that prevents the populace from adopting a healthy lifestyle.My sister after coming back from duty in a hospital is always feeling lethargic and goes to bed immediately.
There are a number of ways to deal with this menace of sedentary lifestyle.First of all, the governments should enforce the working hours for every sector.Moreover, the comapnies and factories should relax the work routine for employees.Many departments have started implementation of such policies.For instance, the executive of suzuki workshop in our country ordered employees to stop taking the cars for service after 1500hrs, so that staff could leave for their homes on time.Secondly, the compulsory games period in the institutions can improve the overall health of citizens.In military set up for example, there is a specified time allocated for the physical activity in which everyone has to participte.This model can be adopted by other organizations.Furthermore, there should be more gyms at the place of duty.It will also encourage the employees to be more active.Finally, the problem of casual attitude towards health can be overcome by regular counselling of work force by the psychologist.
In a nutshell, the dialemma of a monotonous job routine due to overstressed and overburdened individuals in a society can be managed by giving them proper time and place for the healthful activities.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Many working people get very little or no exercise causing health problems.
what are the causes and what is the solution to this problem.
Anwser:
There is a tendency of sedentry lifestyle among the people who are employed, which is causing serious medical issues including obesity and diabetes.This behaviour of avoiding exercise is atrributed by most individuals to lack of time and busy routine which can be sorted out by relaxing working hours and having a mandatory physical training at work places.
With the rising inflation, the masses are forced to work for longer hours to earn money.Some people do more than one job to cater for the expenses.They leave early in the morning and come back home late in the evening.I know one of my cousin who is a teacher at primary school.After the school time he works as an assisstant manager in the evening hours at a local company.He has been following this routine for five years which has caused him to become overweight and develop joint problems.In addition, lack of motivation is another factor that prevents the populace from adopting a healthy lifestyle.My sister after coming back from duty in a hospital is always feeling lethargic and goes to bed immediately.
There are a number of ways to deal with this menace of sedentary lifestyle.First of all, the governments should enforce the working hours for every sector.Moreover, the comapnies and factories should relax the work routine for employees.Many departments have started implementation of such policies.For instance, the executive of suzuki workshop in our country ordered employees to stop taking the cars for service after 1500hrs, so that staff could leave for their homes on time.Secondly, the compulsory games period in the institutions can improve the overall health of citizens.In military set up for example, there is a specified time allocated for the physical activity in which everyone has to participte.This model can be adopted by other organizations.Furthermore, there should be more gyms at the place of duty.It will also encourage the employees to be more active.Finally, the problem of casual attitude towards health can be overcome by regular counselling of work force by the psychologist.
In a nutshell, the dialemma of a monotonous job routine due to overstressed and overburdened individuals in a society can be managed by giving them proper time and place for the healthful activities.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree?
Anwser:
The number of people who suffer from health conditions is rising in several states due to fast food overconsumption, and it argues that states should charge more tax on this type of food. This essay agrees with that statement because it can reduce the demand for junk food, and the tax could be used to subsidise healthier food.
The tax policy results in higher prices of products, which can impact society's buying power. In this condition, people will prefer more affordable foods, and the available choices are more nutritious food. For instance, the normal price of a McDonald's burger is 5 dollars, and by charging it with a 5% tax rate, people most likely choose the homemade food for only 3 dollars. Therefore, they gradually shift to a healthier diet.
The fund that arises from taxation later can be used to provide more decent and accessible health care for society. Lower hospital costs, mainly for general check-ups, could improve people's awareness of their body conditions. As an example, governments can provide their citizens with affordable health insurance, and people can take advantage of it to maintain their well-being. It means that the health levels in those countries are rising.
In conclusion, the regulation to charge junk food with tax can encourage people to increase their life quality due to the rising prices and healthcare improvement.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree?
Anwser:
The number of people who suffer from health conditions is rising in several states due to fast food overconsumption, and it argues that states should charge more tax on this type of food. This essay agrees with that statement because it can reduce the demand for junk food, and the tax could be used to subsidise healthier food.
The tax policy results in higher prices of products, which can impact society's buying power. In this condition, people will prefer more affordable foods, and the available choices are more nutritious food. For instance, the normal price of a McDonald's burger is 5 dollars, and by charging it with a 5% tax rate, people most likely choose the homemade food for only 3 dollars. Therefore, they gradually shift to a healthier diet.
The fund that arises from taxation later can be used to provide more decent and accessible health care for society. Lower hospital costs, mainly for general check-ups, could improve people's awareness of their body conditions. As an example, governments can provide their citizens with affordable health insurance, and people can take advantage of it to maintain their well-being. It means that the health levels in those countries are rising.
In conclusion, the regulation to charge junk food with tax can encourage people to increase their life quality due to the rising prices and healthcare improvement.
Your lexical resource score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree?
Anwser:
The number of people who suffer from health conditions is rising in several states due to fast food overconsumption, and it argues that states should charge more tax on this type of food. This essay agrees with that statement because it can reduce the demand for junk food, and the tax could be used to subsidise healthier food.
The tax policy results in higher prices of products, which can impact society's buying power. In this condition, people will prefer more affordable foods, and the available choices are more nutritious food. For instance, the normal price of a McDonald's burger is 5 dollars, and by charging it with a 5% tax rate, people most likely choose the homemade food for only 3 dollars. Therefore, they gradually shift to a healthier diet.
The fund that arises from taxation later can be used to provide more decent and accessible health care for society. Lower hospital costs, mainly for general check-ups, could improve people's awareness of their body conditions. As an example, governments can provide their citizens with affordable health insurance, and people can take advantage of it to maintain their well-being. It means that the health levels in those countries are rising.
In conclusion, the regulation to charge junk food with tax can encourage people to increase their life quality due to the rising prices and healthcare improvement.
Your grammatical range score is 9.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree?
Anwser:
The number of people who suffer from health conditions is rising in several states due to fast food overconsumption, and it argues that states should charge more tax on this type of food. This essay agrees with that statement because it can reduce the demand for junk food, and the tax could be used to subsidise healthier food.
The tax policy results in higher prices of products, which can impact society's buying power. In this condition, people will prefer more affordable foods, and the available choices are more nutritious food. For instance, the normal price of a McDonald's burger is 5 dollars, and by charging it with a 5% tax rate, people most likely choose the homemade food for only 3 dollars. Therefore, they gradually shift to a healthier diet.
The fund that arises from taxation later can be used to provide more decent and accessible health care for society. Lower hospital costs, mainly for general check-ups, could improve people's awareness of their body conditions. As an example, governments can provide their citizens with affordable health insurance, and people can take advantage of it to maintain their well-being. It means that the health levels in those countries are rising.
In conclusion, the regulation to charge junk food with tax can encourage people to increase their life quality due to the rising prices and healthcare improvement.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meet can cause health problems. Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Over the last twenty years, vegetarianism has become popular among various segments of the population. Some people don’t eat meat because it’s considered animal killing. Others can’t afford to buy meat due to the high cost of meat. Another adopt that meat isn’t a necessary to nourish our body. In my opinion, that diet has disadvantages.
In the first place, when person limits himself in the consumption of animal protein, they will have health problems in the future. As scientists show, protein improve all systems of organism such as immune, digestive, muscle systems. Since a vegetarian diet individuals don’t get daily protein requirements, those who follows to this nutrition are more likely to suffer from overwork during everyday activities or they may get colds more often.
In the second place, meat is a fertile source of many nutrients, such as iron or zinc and amino acids. Zinc is responsible for the growth and development of bone and muscle tissues. In addition, zinc ensures the normal functioning of the brain. Iron is indispensable in helping to transport oxygen to different parts of the body, thus allowing the proper functioning of all body organs. Beside, amino acids are not synthesized in the body. They take part in muscle recovery and in maintaining the health of the skin, hair and nails.
Despite the fact that, vegetarian or vegan can partially satisfy the need for proper nutrition, when it comes to health, going for typical vegetarian diet can lead irreversible processes in the body.
To conclude, the exclusion of meat from the diet can lead to various diseases of any organ systems. Thus, I do not recommend completely excluding meat from the diet.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meet can cause health problems. Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Over the last twenty years, vegetarianism has become popular among various segments of the population. Some people don’t eat meat because it’s considered animal killing. Others can’t afford to buy meat due to the high cost of meat. Another adopt that meat isn’t a necessary to nourish our body. In my opinion, that diet has disadvantages.
In the first place, when person limits himself in the consumption of animal protein, they will have health problems in the future. As scientists show, protein improve all systems of organism such as immune, digestive, muscle systems. Since a vegetarian diet individuals don’t get daily protein requirements, those who follows to this nutrition are more likely to suffer from overwork during everyday activities or they may get colds more often.
In the second place, meat is a fertile source of many nutrients, such as iron or zinc and amino acids. Zinc is responsible for the growth and development of bone and muscle tissues. In addition, zinc ensures the normal functioning of the brain. Iron is indispensable in helping to transport oxygen to different parts of the body, thus allowing the proper functioning of all body organs. Beside, amino acids are not synthesized in the body. They take part in muscle recovery and in maintaining the health of the skin, hair and nails.
Despite the fact that, vegetarian or vegan can partially satisfy the need for proper nutrition, when it comes to health, going for typical vegetarian diet can lead irreversible processes in the body.
To conclude, the exclusion of meat from the diet can lead to various diseases of any organ systems. Thus, I do not recommend completely excluding meat from the diet.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meet can cause health problems. Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Over the last twenty years, vegetarianism has become popular among various segments of the population. Some people don’t eat meat because it’s considered animal killing. Others can’t afford to buy meat due to the high cost of meat. Another adopt that meat isn’t a necessary to nourish our body. In my opinion, that diet has disadvantages.
In the first place, when person limits himself in the consumption of animal protein, they will have health problems in the future. As scientists show, protein improve all systems of organism such as immune, digestive, muscle systems. Since a vegetarian diet individuals don’t get daily protein requirements, those who follows to this nutrition are more likely to suffer from overwork during everyday activities or they may get colds more often.
In the second place, meat is a fertile source of many nutrients, such as iron or zinc and amino acids. Zinc is responsible for the growth and development of bone and muscle tissues. In addition, zinc ensures the normal functioning of the brain. Iron is indispensable in helping to transport oxygen to different parts of the body, thus allowing the proper functioning of all body organs. Beside, amino acids are not synthesized in the body. They take part in muscle recovery and in maintaining the health of the skin, hair and nails.
Despite the fact that, vegetarian or vegan can partially satisfy the need for proper nutrition, when it comes to health, going for typical vegetarian diet can lead irreversible processes in the body.
To conclude, the exclusion of meat from the diet can lead to various diseases of any organ systems. Thus, I do not recommend completely excluding meat from the diet.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Everyone should adopt a vegetarian diet because eating meet can cause health problems. Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Over the last twenty years, vegetarianism has become popular among various segments of the population. Some people don’t eat meat because it’s considered animal killing. Others can’t afford to buy meat due to the high cost of meat. Another adopt that meat isn’t a necessary to nourish our body. In my opinion, that diet has disadvantages.
In the first place, when person limits himself in the consumption of animal protein, they will have health problems in the future. As scientists show, protein improve all systems of organism such as immune, digestive, muscle systems. Since a vegetarian diet individuals don’t get daily protein requirements, those who follows to this nutrition are more likely to suffer from overwork during everyday activities or they may get colds more often.
In the second place, meat is a fertile source of many nutrients, such as iron or zinc and amino acids. Zinc is responsible for the growth and development of bone and muscle tissues. In addition, zinc ensures the normal functioning of the brain. Iron is indispensable in helping to transport oxygen to different parts of the body, thus allowing the proper functioning of all body organs. Beside, amino acids are not synthesized in the body. They take part in muscle recovery and in maintaining the health of the skin, hair and nails.
Despite the fact that, vegetarian or vegan can partially satisfy the need for proper nutrition, when it comes to health, going for typical vegetarian diet can lead irreversible processes in the body.
To conclude, the exclusion of meat from the diet can lead to various diseases of any organ systems. Thus, I do not recommend completely excluding meat from the diet.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
During the 20th century, contact between different parts from the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunication. To what extent do you agree that societies benefit from the increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners brought by international?
Anwser:
Nowadays, different parts in the world are easier than in the past in contacting due to the advancements in air travel and telecommunication. From my perspective, I completely agree with this assertion because of some reasons I will outline below.
Firstly, international tourism and business contribute to economic development. The establishment of multinational companies create plenty job opportunities and stimulate local economies. That could lead to increased income and improved living standards for local residents. In addtion, the trade of goods, services, and ideas between differents nations boost innovation and drive economic growth. Moreover, with global cooperation, they can work togerther, share resource, expertise, best practise, and so on… to addres with some global issues like global warming, over-population and finding sustainable solutions which benefit all communities. Therefore, increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners play an vital part in enhancing society.
In addtion, the interaction with foreigners promotes understanding among nations. When people from differents backgrounds come together, they would have the chance to experience some costumes and traditional cultures. This leads to a more inclusive and welcoming society, where individuals’ respect and accept each other differences by breaking down barries and promorting empathy. Hence, increased contact with foreigners could give societies a hand to build stronger social connection and create a sense of unity.
In conclusion, the increase in contacting with foreigners and closer relationships promotes some advantages such as improving cultural exchange, boosting economic growth, enhancing understanding and fostering global cooperation. It is evident that people greatly benefit from opportunities of international economy.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
During the 20th century, contact between different parts from the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunication. To what extent do you agree that societies benefit from the increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners brought by international?
Anwser:
Nowadays, different parts in the world are easier than in the past in contacting due to the advancements in air travel and telecommunication. From my perspective, I completely agree with this assertion because of some reasons I will outline below.
Firstly, international tourism and business contribute to economic development. The establishment of multinational companies create plenty job opportunities and stimulate local economies. That could lead to increased income and improved living standards for local residents. In addtion, the trade of goods, services, and ideas between differents nations boost innovation and drive economic growth. Moreover, with global cooperation, they can work togerther, share resource, expertise, best practise, and so on… to addres with some global issues like global warming, over-population and finding sustainable solutions which benefit all communities. Therefore, increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners play an vital part in enhancing society.
In addtion, the interaction with foreigners promotes understanding among nations. When people from differents backgrounds come together, they would have the chance to experience some costumes and traditional cultures. This leads to a more inclusive and welcoming society, where individuals’ respect and accept each other differences by breaking down barries and promorting empathy. Hence, increased contact with foreigners could give societies a hand to build stronger social connection and create a sense of unity.
In conclusion, the increase in contacting with foreigners and closer relationships promotes some advantages such as improving cultural exchange, boosting economic growth, enhancing understanding and fostering global cooperation. It is evident that people greatly benefit from opportunities of international economy.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
During the 20th century, contact between different parts from the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunication. To what extent do you agree that societies benefit from the increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners brought by international?
Anwser:
Nowadays, different parts in the world are easier than in the past in contacting due to the advancements in air travel and telecommunication. From my perspective, I completely agree with this assertion because of some reasons I will outline below.
Firstly, international tourism and business contribute to economic development. The establishment of multinational companies create plenty job opportunities and stimulate local economies. That could lead to increased income and improved living standards for local residents. In addtion, the trade of goods, services, and ideas between differents nations boost innovation and drive economic growth. Moreover, with global cooperation, they can work togerther, share resource, expertise, best practise, and so on… to addres with some global issues like global warming, over-population and finding sustainable solutions which benefit all communities. Therefore, increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners play an vital part in enhancing society.
In addtion, the interaction with foreigners promotes understanding among nations. When people from differents backgrounds come together, they would have the chance to experience some costumes and traditional cultures. This leads to a more inclusive and welcoming society, where individuals’ respect and accept each other differences by breaking down barries and promorting empathy. Hence, increased contact with foreigners could give societies a hand to build stronger social connection and create a sense of unity.
In conclusion, the increase in contacting with foreigners and closer relationships promotes some advantages such as improving cultural exchange, boosting economic growth, enhancing understanding and fostering global cooperation. It is evident that people greatly benefit from opportunities of international economy.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
During the 20th century, contact between different parts from the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunication. To what extent do you agree that societies benefit from the increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners brought by international?
Anwser:
Nowadays, different parts in the world are easier than in the past in contacting due to the advancements in air travel and telecommunication. From my perspective, I completely agree with this assertion because of some reasons I will outline below.
Firstly, international tourism and business contribute to economic development. The establishment of multinational companies create plenty job opportunities and stimulate local economies. That could lead to increased income and improved living standards for local residents. In addtion, the trade of goods, services, and ideas between differents nations boost innovation and drive economic growth. Moreover, with global cooperation, they can work togerther, share resource, expertise, best practise, and so on… to addres with some global issues like global warming, over-population and finding sustainable solutions which benefit all communities. Therefore, increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners play an vital part in enhancing society.
In addtion, the interaction with foreigners promotes understanding among nations. When people from differents backgrounds come together, they would have the chance to experience some costumes and traditional cultures. This leads to a more inclusive and welcoming society, where individuals’ respect and accept each other differences by breaking down barries and promorting empathy. Hence, increased contact with foreigners could give societies a hand to build stronger social connection and create a sense of unity.
In conclusion, the increase in contacting with foreigners and closer relationships promotes some advantages such as improving cultural exchange, boosting economic growth, enhancing understanding and fostering global cooperation. It is evident that people greatly benefit from opportunities of international economy.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.
Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
You should write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
Nowadays, some nations see their university students living with their family during their studies, while, in other nations, students leave their home and they transfer to another city to complete their bachelor or master programme. There are numerous benefits and drawbacks related to this topic.
On one hand, living away from home has several advantages. Firstly, students learn to take care of their house, by keeping it tidy, washing their clothes, cooking and so on. Secondly, by moving to another city, they have to know new people, this could lead them to increase their connections, which could be useful in the future. Furthemore, students may be more focused and concentrated in reaching their goals, as they left their affects to follow their dreams.
On the other hand, moving to another city is a drastic change in the life of a student and there could be some learners that have a shy personality. Therefore, they could not be ready to know new people and create a new life, this could lead to negative psychological effects. Moreover, being away from your family, could means that you have to take care of everything that surrounds you and you do not have anyone to ask favours. This can lead to a very stressfull period, especially for those students who do not have a strong mindset.
In my opinion, I think the benefits of moving to another city to complete university are more than the drawbacks. This because a student grows under a lot of human aspects and he will have more chances to be ready for the working world.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.
Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
You should write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
Nowadays, some nations see their university students living with their family during their studies, while, in other nations, students leave their home and they transfer to another city to complete their bachelor or master programme. There are numerous benefits and drawbacks related to this topic.
On one hand, living away from home has several advantages. Firstly, students learn to take care of their house, by keeping it tidy, washing their clothes, cooking and so on. Secondly, by moving to another city, they have to know new people, this could lead them to increase their connections, which could be useful in the future. Furthemore, students may be more focused and concentrated in reaching their goals, as they left their affects to follow their dreams.
On the other hand, moving to another city is a drastic change in the life of a student and there could be some learners that have a shy personality. Therefore, they could not be ready to know new people and create a new life, this could lead to negative psychological effects. Moreover, being away from your family, could means that you have to take care of everything that surrounds you and you do not have anyone to ask favours. This can lead to a very stressfull period, especially for those students who do not have a strong mindset.
In my opinion, I think the benefits of moving to another city to complete university are more than the drawbacks. This because a student grows under a lot of human aspects and he will have more chances to be ready for the working world.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.
Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
You should write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
Nowadays, some nations see their university students living with their family during their studies, while, in other nations, students leave their home and they transfer to another city to complete their bachelor or master programme. There are numerous benefits and drawbacks related to this topic.
On one hand, living away from home has several advantages. Firstly, students learn to take care of their house, by keeping it tidy, washing their clothes, cooking and so on. Secondly, by moving to another city, they have to know new people, this could lead them to increase their connections, which could be useful in the future. Furthemore, students may be more focused and concentrated in reaching their goals, as they left their affects to follow their dreams.
On the other hand, moving to another city is a drastic change in the life of a student and there could be some learners that have a shy personality. Therefore, they could not be ready to know new people and create a new life, this could lead to negative psychological effects. Moreover, being away from your family, could means that you have to take care of everything that surrounds you and you do not have anyone to ask favours. This can lead to a very stressfull period, especially for those students who do not have a strong mindset.
In my opinion, I think the benefits of moving to another city to complete university are more than the drawbacks. This because a student grows under a lot of human aspects and he will have more chances to be ready for the working world.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city.
Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
You should write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
Nowadays, some nations see their university students living with their family during their studies, while, in other nations, students leave their home and they transfer to another city to complete their bachelor or master programme. There are numerous benefits and drawbacks related to this topic.
On one hand, living away from home has several advantages. Firstly, students learn to take care of their house, by keeping it tidy, washing their clothes, cooking and so on. Secondly, by moving to another city, they have to know new people, this could lead them to increase their connections, which could be useful in the future. Furthemore, students may be more focused and concentrated in reaching their goals, as they left their affects to follow their dreams.
On the other hand, moving to another city is a drastic change in the life of a student and there could be some learners that have a shy personality. Therefore, they could not be ready to know new people and create a new life, this could lead to negative psychological effects. Moreover, being away from your family, could means that you have to take care of everything that surrounds you and you do not have anyone to ask favours. This can lead to a very stressfull period, especially for those students who do not have a strong mindset.
In my opinion, I think the benefits of moving to another city to complete university are more than the drawbacks. This because a student grows under a lot of human aspects and he will have more chances to be ready for the working world.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping on line.
Anwser:
Nowadays, large number of people are relying on online market for shopping purposes. Online market places reduce the cost of maintaining physical stores and staff for the companies, and at the same time, they eliminates the effort of going to the store for the buyer. Conversely, buying product online levies an overhead of return system on the seller and the consumer also has trust issues regarding the quality of the product. In this essay, merits and demerits of this particular habit will be discussed.
Online shopping provides the facility to return products if the consumer doesn't like anything, this often generates a reverse supply chain for the seller and the returned products are of no use to the seller, hence they costs extra money for the company. On the other hand, for the user as well returning products is an additional hassle. They don't have the option to check the quality of the products as they have while doing shopping in physical store. So, if they don't like their ordered item, they have to book a return and go through that process.
In today's era. companies are resorting to online markets because they reduce their costs such as labour remunerations, property cost, etc. For example, there are various brands which sell their products only online and because of that they don't have to pay to any salesperson or any rent for the store and electricity bills, so it reduces their expenditure a lot. For the customers as well, they get the benefit of shopping according to their time as they don't have to travel anywhere to buy a certain thing. For example, people sitting in Mumbai can easily buy from shops located in Delhi through online mode.
In a nutshell, this is a never ending debate as it depends on people's comfort what they want to choose. In my opinion online shopping is beneficial for both consumers and sellers.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping on line.
Anwser:
Nowadays, large number of people are relying on online market for shopping purposes. Online market places reduce the cost of maintaining physical stores and staff for the companies, and at the same time, they eliminates the effort of going to the store for the buyer. Conversely, buying product online levies an overhead of return system on the seller and the consumer also has trust issues regarding the quality of the product. In this essay, merits and demerits of this particular habit will be discussed.
Online shopping provides the facility to return products if the consumer doesn't like anything, this often generates a reverse supply chain for the seller and the returned products are of no use to the seller, hence they costs extra money for the company. On the other hand, for the user as well returning products is an additional hassle. They don't have the option to check the quality of the products as they have while doing shopping in physical store. So, if they don't like their ordered item, they have to book a return and go through that process.
In today's era. companies are resorting to online markets because they reduce their costs such as labour remunerations, property cost, etc. For example, there are various brands which sell their products only online and because of that they don't have to pay to any salesperson or any rent for the store and electricity bills, so it reduces their expenditure a lot. For the customers as well, they get the benefit of shopping according to their time as they don't have to travel anywhere to buy a certain thing. For example, people sitting in Mumbai can easily buy from shops located in Delhi through online mode.
In a nutshell, this is a never ending debate as it depends on people's comfort what they want to choose. In my opinion online shopping is beneficial for both consumers and sellers.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping on line.
Anwser:
Nowadays, large number of people are relying on online market for shopping purposes. Online market places reduce the cost of maintaining physical stores and staff for the companies, and at the same time, they eliminates the effort of going to the store for the buyer. Conversely, buying product online levies an overhead of return system on the seller and the consumer also has trust issues regarding the quality of the product. In this essay, merits and demerits of this particular habit will be discussed.
Online shopping provides the facility to return products if the consumer doesn't like anything, this often generates a reverse supply chain for the seller and the returned products are of no use to the seller, hence they costs extra money for the company. On the other hand, for the user as well returning products is an additional hassle. They don't have the option to check the quality of the products as they have while doing shopping in physical store. So, if they don't like their ordered item, they have to book a return and go through that process.
In today's era. companies are resorting to online markets because they reduce their costs such as labour remunerations, property cost, etc. For example, there are various brands which sell their products only online and because of that they don't have to pay to any salesperson or any rent for the store and electricity bills, so it reduces their expenditure a lot. For the customers as well, they get the benefit of shopping according to their time as they don't have to travel anywhere to buy a certain thing. For example, people sitting in Mumbai can easily buy from shops located in Delhi through online mode.
In a nutshell, this is a never ending debate as it depends on people's comfort what they want to choose. In my opinion online shopping is beneficial for both consumers and sellers.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies to shopping on line.
Anwser:
Nowadays, large number of people are relying on online market for shopping purposes. Online market places reduce the cost of maintaining physical stores and staff for the companies, and at the same time, they eliminates the effort of going to the store for the buyer. Conversely, buying product online levies an overhead of return system on the seller and the consumer also has trust issues regarding the quality of the product. In this essay, merits and demerits of this particular habit will be discussed.
Online shopping provides the facility to return products if the consumer doesn't like anything, this often generates a reverse supply chain for the seller and the returned products are of no use to the seller, hence they costs extra money for the company. On the other hand, for the user as well returning products is an additional hassle. They don't have the option to check the quality of the products as they have while doing shopping in physical store. So, if they don't like their ordered item, they have to book a return and go through that process.
In today's era. companies are resorting to online markets because they reduce their costs such as labour remunerations, property cost, etc. For example, there are various brands which sell their products only online and because of that they don't have to pay to any salesperson or any rent for the store and electricity bills, so it reduces their expenditure a lot. For the customers as well, they get the benefit of shopping according to their time as they don't have to travel anywhere to buy a certain thing. For example, people sitting in Mumbai can easily buy from shops located in Delhi through online mode.
In a nutshell, this is a never ending debate as it depends on people's comfort what they want to choose. In my opinion online shopping is beneficial for both consumers and sellers.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
These days, there are many different news platforms. What are the functions of news? Is all news in these platforms true?
Anwser:
In today’s world, with the abundance of various news outlets, understanding the functions of news becomes essential. News serves diverse roles in society, such as providing information and raising awareness ,However, the reliability of the information they provide In these news can sometimes be questioned
Firstly, while News plays a fundamental role in providing information to the public, It keeps individuals updated on current events, both locally and globally. In other words,many people learn about important developments, such as political changes, economic trends, and social issues through these reporting .These information allows individuals to make informed decisions and stay engaged with their communities and the world around them. Moreover, by delivering facts and figures, news outlets serve as primary sources of knowledge for the populace.
Secondly, Another essential function of news is its ability to stimulate discussion and raise awareness about various topics. News coverage often highlights important issues, sparking conversations among individuals and communities. Whether it's discussing climate change, social justice, or healthcare policy, news helps to raise awareness about pressing issues and encourages dialogue among citizens. By fostering conversations and debates, news contributes to a more informed and engaged society. Additionally, news stories often provide in-depth analysis and insights, prompting readers to reflect on the implications of various societal phenomena.
Finally, in my opinion, while news platforms play crucial roles in providing information and stimulating discussion, the accuracy of the information they provide is not always true or reliable because as it can be seen especially in nowadays that a lot of channels use fake news and misinformation just to collect money and attract viewers attention. These platforms which do not have many subscribers or followers will consequently cause many issues for the community and affect people Mentally .
To sum up , although news serve vital functions in society, including providing information and stimulating discussion, we must in this case check and choose the appropriate or reliable platform to prevent the spread of false news, which could be very risky and harmful for next generation.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
These days, there are many different news platforms. What are the functions of news? Is all news in these platforms true?
Anwser:
In today’s world, with the abundance of various news outlets, understanding the functions of news becomes essential. News serves diverse roles in society, such as providing information and raising awareness ,However, the reliability of the information they provide In these news can sometimes be questioned
Firstly, while News plays a fundamental role in providing information to the public, It keeps individuals updated on current events, both locally and globally. In other words,many people learn about important developments, such as political changes, economic trends, and social issues through these reporting .These information allows individuals to make informed decisions and stay engaged with their communities and the world around them. Moreover, by delivering facts and figures, news outlets serve as primary sources of knowledge for the populace.
Secondly, Another essential function of news is its ability to stimulate discussion and raise awareness about various topics. News coverage often highlights important issues, sparking conversations among individuals and communities. Whether it's discussing climate change, social justice, or healthcare policy, news helps to raise awareness about pressing issues and encourages dialogue among citizens. By fostering conversations and debates, news contributes to a more informed and engaged society. Additionally, news stories often provide in-depth analysis and insights, prompting readers to reflect on the implications of various societal phenomena.
Finally, in my opinion, while news platforms play crucial roles in providing information and stimulating discussion, the accuracy of the information they provide is not always true or reliable because as it can be seen especially in nowadays that a lot of channels use fake news and misinformation just to collect money and attract viewers attention. These platforms which do not have many subscribers or followers will consequently cause many issues for the community and affect people Mentally .
To sum up , although news serve vital functions in society, including providing information and stimulating discussion, we must in this case check and choose the appropriate or reliable platform to prevent the spread of false news, which could be very risky and harmful for next generation.
Your lexical resource score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
These days, there are many different news platforms. What are the functions of news? Is all news in these platforms true?
Anwser:
In today’s world, with the abundance of various news outlets, understanding the functions of news becomes essential. News serves diverse roles in society, such as providing information and raising awareness ,However, the reliability of the information they provide In these news can sometimes be questioned
Firstly, while News plays a fundamental role in providing information to the public, It keeps individuals updated on current events, both locally and globally. In other words,many people learn about important developments, such as political changes, economic trends, and social issues through these reporting .These information allows individuals to make informed decisions and stay engaged with their communities and the world around them. Moreover, by delivering facts and figures, news outlets serve as primary sources of knowledge for the populace.
Secondly, Another essential function of news is its ability to stimulate discussion and raise awareness about various topics. News coverage often highlights important issues, sparking conversations among individuals and communities. Whether it's discussing climate change, social justice, or healthcare policy, news helps to raise awareness about pressing issues and encourages dialogue among citizens. By fostering conversations and debates, news contributes to a more informed and engaged society. Additionally, news stories often provide in-depth analysis and insights, prompting readers to reflect on the implications of various societal phenomena.
Finally, in my opinion, while news platforms play crucial roles in providing information and stimulating discussion, the accuracy of the information they provide is not always true or reliable because as it can be seen especially in nowadays that a lot of channels use fake news and misinformation just to collect money and attract viewers attention. These platforms which do not have many subscribers or followers will consequently cause many issues for the community and affect people Mentally .
To sum up , although news serve vital functions in society, including providing information and stimulating discussion, we must in this case check and choose the appropriate or reliable platform to prevent the spread of false news, which could be very risky and harmful for next generation.
Your grammatical range score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
These days, there are many different news platforms. What are the functions of news? Is all news in these platforms true?
Anwser:
In today’s world, with the abundance of various news outlets, understanding the functions of news becomes essential. News serves diverse roles in society, such as providing information and raising awareness ,However, the reliability of the information they provide In these news can sometimes be questioned
Firstly, while News plays a fundamental role in providing information to the public, It keeps individuals updated on current events, both locally and globally. In other words,many people learn about important developments, such as political changes, economic trends, and social issues through these reporting .These information allows individuals to make informed decisions and stay engaged with their communities and the world around them. Moreover, by delivering facts and figures, news outlets serve as primary sources of knowledge for the populace.
Secondly, Another essential function of news is its ability to stimulate discussion and raise awareness about various topics. News coverage often highlights important issues, sparking conversations among individuals and communities. Whether it's discussing climate change, social justice, or healthcare policy, news helps to raise awareness about pressing issues and encourages dialogue among citizens. By fostering conversations and debates, news contributes to a more informed and engaged society. Additionally, news stories often provide in-depth analysis and insights, prompting readers to reflect on the implications of various societal phenomena.
Finally, in my opinion, while news platforms play crucial roles in providing information and stimulating discussion, the accuracy of the information they provide is not always true or reliable because as it can be seen especially in nowadays that a lot of channels use fake news and misinformation just to collect money and attract viewers attention. These platforms which do not have many subscribers or followers will consequently cause many issues for the community and affect people Mentally .
To sum up , although news serve vital functions in society, including providing information and stimulating discussion, we must in this case check and choose the appropriate or reliable platform to prevent the spread of false news, which could be very risky and harmful for next generation.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different
cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
There is an opinion that people of different traditions and age group can be brought together using music. In my opinion music can play a significant role in creating bonds and bringing people closer because everyone enjoys a good composition. Apart from this it is not required to have any kind of knowledge of particular language or culture to cherish any music.
A good song can cheer up anyone from a toddler to 60-year-old person. Music often calms people’s mood and often give them time to understand their emotions. For example, if there is any sad song, it will make any person numb irrespective of their culture and age because the music has the ability to provide serenity to anyone. On the other hand, if there is any cheerful song everyone will dance on it.
Today because of social media, the songs of different culture and countries are shared among everyone and it is often noticed that it is not compulsory to know about particular culture or language to enjoy the particular music. For example, one of the Spanish songs became so viral in the past and it was listened worldwide. It was listened in countries like India, and United States of America where hardly any people knew the language but then also it was praised by everyone there and people also tried to understand the song afterwords.
Thus, I believe that music is one of the best ways to bring people of different culture and age groups together since it is enjoyed by all the age groups equally and there is no cultural barrier in enjoying a good piece of music.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different
cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
There is an opinion that people of different traditions and age group can be brought together using music. In my opinion music can play a significant role in creating bonds and bringing people closer because everyone enjoys a good composition. Apart from this it is not required to have any kind of knowledge of particular language or culture to cherish any music.
A good song can cheer up anyone from a toddler to 60-year-old person. Music often calms people’s mood and often give them time to understand their emotions. For example, if there is any sad song, it will make any person numb irrespective of their culture and age because the music has the ability to provide serenity to anyone. On the other hand, if there is any cheerful song everyone will dance on it.
Today because of social media, the songs of different culture and countries are shared among everyone and it is often noticed that it is not compulsory to know about particular culture or language to enjoy the particular music. For example, one of the Spanish songs became so viral in the past and it was listened worldwide. It was listened in countries like India, and United States of America where hardly any people knew the language but then also it was praised by everyone there and people also tried to understand the song afterwords.
Thus, I believe that music is one of the best ways to bring people of different culture and age groups together since it is enjoyed by all the age groups equally and there is no cultural barrier in enjoying a good piece of music.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different
cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
There is an opinion that people of different traditions and age group can be brought together using music. In my opinion music can play a significant role in creating bonds and bringing people closer because everyone enjoys a good composition. Apart from this it is not required to have any kind of knowledge of particular language or culture to cherish any music.
A good song can cheer up anyone from a toddler to 60-year-old person. Music often calms people’s mood and often give them time to understand their emotions. For example, if there is any sad song, it will make any person numb irrespective of their culture and age because the music has the ability to provide serenity to anyone. On the other hand, if there is any cheerful song everyone will dance on it.
Today because of social media, the songs of different culture and countries are shared among everyone and it is often noticed that it is not compulsory to know about particular culture or language to enjoy the particular music. For example, one of the Spanish songs became so viral in the past and it was listened worldwide. It was listened in countries like India, and United States of America where hardly any people knew the language but then also it was praised by everyone there and people also tried to understand the song afterwords.
Thus, I believe that music is one of the best ways to bring people of different culture and age groups together since it is enjoyed by all the age groups equally and there is no cultural barrier in enjoying a good piece of music.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different
cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this
opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Anwser:
There is an opinion that people of different traditions and age group can be brought together using music. In my opinion music can play a significant role in creating bonds and bringing people closer because everyone enjoys a good composition. Apart from this it is not required to have any kind of knowledge of particular language or culture to cherish any music.
A good song can cheer up anyone from a toddler to 60-year-old person. Music often calms people’s mood and often give them time to understand their emotions. For example, if there is any sad song, it will make any person numb irrespective of their culture and age because the music has the ability to provide serenity to anyone. On the other hand, if there is any cheerful song everyone will dance on it.
Today because of social media, the songs of different culture and countries are shared among everyone and it is often noticed that it is not compulsory to know about particular culture or language to enjoy the particular music. For example, one of the Spanish songs became so viral in the past and it was listened worldwide. It was listened in countries like India, and United States of America where hardly any people knew the language but then also it was praised by everyone there and people also tried to understand the song afterwords.
Thus, I believe that music is one of the best ways to bring people of different culture and age groups together since it is enjoyed by all the age groups equally and there is no cultural barrier in enjoying a good piece of music.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
topic as countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Anwser:
In the present world, more and more people own vehicles. It seems like having your own car or motorcycle is a better choice than commute by public transportations. However, in my opinion, not owning a car actually has more advantages and exceeds owning a car, and the reasons will be elaborate in the following paragraphs by comparing the differences between owning a personal vehicle and reling on public transportation, and also bringing up the environmental aspects in this topic.
Firstly, public transportations are well developed nowadays. With more shifts and less time gaps. they are achieving better time effeciency. For example. three years before, there was a 10 minute time gap between two buses, while it takes only 3 mins for now. Such great improvement are diminishing the shorcomings that public transportation used to represent. Besides, driving with your own cars requires extra time in waiting for the red lights and parking. Thus, public transportations are not as time consuming as usual, and in certain circumstances taking it is more convenient.
Secondly, tha most valuable advantage about public tramportation is that it substaintially decreases the overall emmisions compared to individuals owning vehicles. Researches show that replace driving by taking a bus or subway for your daily commution can decrease up to 30% of emmision per person per year. Emmissions are deteriorating our planet and accelerating the greenhouse effect. Therefore, owning a car can have negative impacts on environment, while on the other hand, public tranports can minimize this damage.
To sum up, the advantages of using public transports has clearly outwiegh the ownership of individual vehicles. Comparing these two, cars have not necessarily out performance in terms of time efficiency, and convienience. Moreover, environmental consequence should be taken into considerations since personal cars are responsible for contribute to extra pollutions.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
topic as countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Anwser:
In the present world, more and more people own vehicles. It seems like having your own car or motorcycle is a better choice than commute by public transportations. However, in my opinion, not owning a car actually has more advantages and exceeds owning a car, and the reasons will be elaborate in the following paragraphs by comparing the differences between owning a personal vehicle and reling on public transportation, and also bringing up the environmental aspects in this topic.
Firstly, public transportations are well developed nowadays. With more shifts and less time gaps. they are achieving better time effeciency. For example. three years before, there was a 10 minute time gap between two buses, while it takes only 3 mins for now. Such great improvement are diminishing the shorcomings that public transportation used to represent. Besides, driving with your own cars requires extra time in waiting for the red lights and parking. Thus, public transportations are not as time consuming as usual, and in certain circumstances taking it is more convenient.
Secondly, tha most valuable advantage about public tramportation is that it substaintially decreases the overall emmisions compared to individuals owning vehicles. Researches show that replace driving by taking a bus or subway for your daily commution can decrease up to 30% of emmision per person per year. Emmissions are deteriorating our planet and accelerating the greenhouse effect. Therefore, owning a car can have negative impacts on environment, while on the other hand, public tranports can minimize this damage.
To sum up, the advantages of using public transports has clearly outwiegh the ownership of individual vehicles. Comparing these two, cars have not necessarily out performance in terms of time efficiency, and convienience. Moreover, environmental consequence should be taken into considerations since personal cars are responsible for contribute to extra pollutions.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
topic as countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Anwser:
In the present world, more and more people own vehicles. It seems like having your own car or motorcycle is a better choice than commute by public transportations. However, in my opinion, not owning a car actually has more advantages and exceeds owning a car, and the reasons will be elaborate in the following paragraphs by comparing the differences between owning a personal vehicle and reling on public transportation, and also bringing up the environmental aspects in this topic.
Firstly, public transportations are well developed nowadays. With more shifts and less time gaps. they are achieving better time effeciency. For example. three years before, there was a 10 minute time gap between two buses, while it takes only 3 mins for now. Such great improvement are diminishing the shorcomings that public transportation used to represent. Besides, driving with your own cars requires extra time in waiting for the red lights and parking. Thus, public transportations are not as time consuming as usual, and in certain circumstances taking it is more convenient.
Secondly, tha most valuable advantage about public tramportation is that it substaintially decreases the overall emmisions compared to individuals owning vehicles. Researches show that replace driving by taking a bus or subway for your daily commution can decrease up to 30% of emmision per person per year. Emmissions are deteriorating our planet and accelerating the greenhouse effect. Therefore, owning a car can have negative impacts on environment, while on the other hand, public tranports can minimize this damage.
To sum up, the advantages of using public transports has clearly outwiegh the ownership of individual vehicles. Comparing these two, cars have not necessarily out performance in terms of time efficiency, and convienience. Moreover, environmental consequence should be taken into considerations since personal cars are responsible for contribute to extra pollutions.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
topic as countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
Anwser:
In the present world, more and more people own vehicles. It seems like having your own car or motorcycle is a better choice than commute by public transportations. However, in my opinion, not owning a car actually has more advantages and exceeds owning a car, and the reasons will be elaborate in the following paragraphs by comparing the differences between owning a personal vehicle and reling on public transportation, and also bringing up the environmental aspects in this topic.
Firstly, public transportations are well developed nowadays. With more shifts and less time gaps. they are achieving better time effeciency. For example. three years before, there was a 10 minute time gap between two buses, while it takes only 3 mins for now. Such great improvement are diminishing the shorcomings that public transportation used to represent. Besides, driving with your own cars requires extra time in waiting for the red lights and parking. Thus, public transportations are not as time consuming as usual, and in certain circumstances taking it is more convenient.
Secondly, tha most valuable advantage about public tramportation is that it substaintially decreases the overall emmisions compared to individuals owning vehicles. Researches show that replace driving by taking a bus or subway for your daily commution can decrease up to 30% of emmision per person per year. Emmissions are deteriorating our planet and accelerating the greenhouse effect. Therefore, owning a car can have negative impacts on environment, while on the other hand, public tranports can minimize this damage.
To sum up, the advantages of using public transports has clearly outwiegh the ownership of individual vehicles. Comparing these two, cars have not necessarily out performance in terms of time efficiency, and convienience. Moreover, environmental consequence should be taken into considerations since personal cars are responsible for contribute to extra pollutions.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city. Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is evident that university students in some countries still choose to live together with their parents, while others prefer to live separately by attending university in another city. Although they can plausibly experience loneliness, that condition can subliminally drive them to shape useful attitudes and improve their concentration. Thus, I think the positive outcomes outweigh the negative ones.
To begin with the drawbacks, living away from family can make students experiencing loneliness. This trend is evidently found among international students who have to live alone in their dormitory, resulting in not have other people to interact. A recent survey by the University of Cambridge has revealed that among their 150,000 foreign students, almost 87% of them admitted to experience loneliness during their university period. However, I believe it actually can be detered by encouraging them to engage in some organisational or volunteer activities that are held by university in order to expand their networks whilst they can make friends to minimise their loneliness.
On the other hand, the decision to live separately from family during university period can maneuver students to become more independent. In fact, they are responsible for doing everything on their own. Starting from doing laundry, cooking and groceries, they have to be able to rely on themselves since they cannot ask for help to someone else or housekeepers.
Another benefit is students can be more focus on their academic activities. Living alone can improve the level of concentrations that sometimes are required by students to do their tasks. It is because there is a slightest possibility that they will be distracted by noises that usually come from housing areas such as barking dogs or crying babies, as they live in an exclusive environment that enables students to comfortably learn.
From the mentioned benefits, I think students will certainly perceived more positive outcomes when they decide to live away from home because there is a likelihood of constructing a behaviour, which later can be useful for them in the long run. Moreover, living alone provide an ideal circumstance for them to improve their academic attainment.
To conclude, living away from family to pursue higher education can be challenging because someone may be exposed to loneliness. Nevertheless, I still think that the benefits far outweigh the mentioned drawbacks since it heightens chances for them to nurture independent behaviours as well as to improve their focus for getting a remarkable grade.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city. Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is evident that university students in some countries still choose to live together with their parents, while others prefer to live separately by attending university in another city. Although they can plausibly experience loneliness, that condition can subliminally drive them to shape useful attitudes and improve their concentration. Thus, I think the positive outcomes outweigh the negative ones.
To begin with the drawbacks, living away from family can make students experiencing loneliness. This trend is evidently found among international students who have to live alone in their dormitory, resulting in not have other people to interact. A recent survey by the University of Cambridge has revealed that among their 150,000 foreign students, almost 87% of them admitted to experience loneliness during their university period. However, I believe it actually can be detered by encouraging them to engage in some organisational or volunteer activities that are held by university in order to expand their networks whilst they can make friends to minimise their loneliness.
On the other hand, the decision to live separately from family during university period can maneuver students to become more independent. In fact, they are responsible for doing everything on their own. Starting from doing laundry, cooking and groceries, they have to be able to rely on themselves since they cannot ask for help to someone else or housekeepers.
Another benefit is students can be more focus on their academic activities. Living alone can improve the level of concentrations that sometimes are required by students to do their tasks. It is because there is a slightest possibility that they will be distracted by noises that usually come from housing areas such as barking dogs or crying babies, as they live in an exclusive environment that enables students to comfortably learn.
From the mentioned benefits, I think students will certainly perceived more positive outcomes when they decide to live away from home because there is a likelihood of constructing a behaviour, which later can be useful for them in the long run. Moreover, living alone provide an ideal circumstance for them to improve their academic attainment.
To conclude, living away from family to pursue higher education can be challenging because someone may be exposed to loneliness. Nevertheless, I still think that the benefits far outweigh the mentioned drawbacks since it heightens chances for them to nurture independent behaviours as well as to improve their focus for getting a remarkable grade.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city. Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is evident that university students in some countries still choose to live together with their parents, while others prefer to live separately by attending university in another city. Although they can plausibly experience loneliness, that condition can subliminally drive them to shape useful attitudes and improve their concentration. Thus, I think the positive outcomes outweigh the negative ones.
To begin with the drawbacks, living away from family can make students experiencing loneliness. This trend is evidently found among international students who have to live alone in their dormitory, resulting in not have other people to interact. A recent survey by the University of Cambridge has revealed that among their 150,000 foreign students, almost 87% of them admitted to experience loneliness during their university period. However, I believe it actually can be detered by encouraging them to engage in some organisational or volunteer activities that are held by university in order to expand their networks whilst they can make friends to minimise their loneliness.
On the other hand, the decision to live separately from family during university period can maneuver students to become more independent. In fact, they are responsible for doing everything on their own. Starting from doing laundry, cooking and groceries, they have to be able to rely on themselves since they cannot ask for help to someone else or housekeepers.
Another benefit is students can be more focus on their academic activities. Living alone can improve the level of concentrations that sometimes are required by students to do their tasks. It is because there is a slightest possibility that they will be distracted by noises that usually come from housing areas such as barking dogs or crying babies, as they live in an exclusive environment that enables students to comfortably learn.
From the mentioned benefits, I think students will certainly perceived more positive outcomes when they decide to live away from home because there is a likelihood of constructing a behaviour, which later can be useful for them in the long run. Moreover, living alone provide an ideal circumstance for them to improve their academic attainment.
To conclude, living away from family to pursue higher education can be challenging because someone may be exposed to loneliness. Nevertheless, I still think that the benefits far outweigh the mentioned drawbacks since it heightens chances for them to nurture independent behaviours as well as to improve their focus for getting a remarkable grade.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In some countries university students live at home with their family while they study, whereas in other countries students attend university in another city. Do you think the benefits of living away from home during university outweigh the disadvantages?
Anwser:
It is evident that university students in some countries still choose to live together with their parents, while others prefer to live separately by attending university in another city. Although they can plausibly experience loneliness, that condition can subliminally drive them to shape useful attitudes and improve their concentration. Thus, I think the positive outcomes outweigh the negative ones.
To begin with the drawbacks, living away from family can make students experiencing loneliness. This trend is evidently found among international students who have to live alone in their dormitory, resulting in not have other people to interact. A recent survey by the University of Cambridge has revealed that among their 150,000 foreign students, almost 87% of them admitted to experience loneliness during their university period. However, I believe it actually can be detered by encouraging them to engage in some organisational or volunteer activities that are held by university in order to expand their networks whilst they can make friends to minimise their loneliness.
On the other hand, the decision to live separately from family during university period can maneuver students to become more independent. In fact, they are responsible for doing everything on their own. Starting from doing laundry, cooking and groceries, they have to be able to rely on themselves since they cannot ask for help to someone else or housekeepers.
Another benefit is students can be more focus on their academic activities. Living alone can improve the level of concentrations that sometimes are required by students to do their tasks. It is because there is a slightest possibility that they will be distracted by noises that usually come from housing areas such as barking dogs or crying babies, as they live in an exclusive environment that enables students to comfortably learn.
From the mentioned benefits, I think students will certainly perceived more positive outcomes when they decide to live away from home because there is a likelihood of constructing a behaviour, which later can be useful for them in the long run. Moreover, living alone provide an ideal circumstance for them to improve their academic attainment.
To conclude, living away from family to pursue higher education can be challenging because someone may be exposed to loneliness. Nevertheless, I still think that the benefits far outweigh the mentioned drawbacks since it heightens chances for them to nurture independent behaviours as well as to improve their focus for getting a remarkable grade.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some believe that children should be taught from a young age how to handle money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Nowadays, numerous countries adopt capitalism, so people need much money if they want to live healthy and rich. Some argue that they should start to learn how to utilize money from their childhood, and I completely agree with it following reasons that I will mention in this essay.
Firstly, education systems in most of countries are not enough developed, so they frequently focus on subjects which students hardly use in their future. However, knowledge of money is required for almost everyone, which means that students have to learn this in their educational facilities rather than science or philosophy. For example, math or laguage are only needed for specific occupation such as researchers and teachers, so workers do not have an opportunity to utilize these but face with timing to need fnancial knowlage.
Furthermore, adults cannot usually spend numerous resources to study it, while young people have so much time to do so. For instance, full-time wokers spend eight hours a day to work on average, which means that they can only have four hours a day because they normally spend twelve hours for sleep and leisure time. In contrast, students technically study anytime they want except sleep and leisure time, so the amount of time is over three times as much as workers have. Thus, students should smartly spend the huge resources to learn about money rather than other subjects.
In conclusion, since there are at least two crucial reasons for studying finance in childhood, including a lack of developed education systems and time restriction, children should definetely learn how to use their money wisely from their childhood.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some believe that children should be taught from a young age how to handle money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Nowadays, numerous countries adopt capitalism, so people need much money if they want to live healthy and rich. Some argue that they should start to learn how to utilize money from their childhood, and I completely agree with it following reasons that I will mention in this essay.
Firstly, education systems in most of countries are not enough developed, so they frequently focus on subjects which students hardly use in their future. However, knowledge of money is required for almost everyone, which means that students have to learn this in their educational facilities rather than science or philosophy. For example, math or laguage are only needed for specific occupation such as researchers and teachers, so workers do not have an opportunity to utilize these but face with timing to need fnancial knowlage.
Furthermore, adults cannot usually spend numerous resources to study it, while young people have so much time to do so. For instance, full-time wokers spend eight hours a day to work on average, which means that they can only have four hours a day because they normally spend twelve hours for sleep and leisure time. In contrast, students technically study anytime they want except sleep and leisure time, so the amount of time is over three times as much as workers have. Thus, students should smartly spend the huge resources to learn about money rather than other subjects.
In conclusion, since there are at least two crucial reasons for studying finance in childhood, including a lack of developed education systems and time restriction, children should definetely learn how to use their money wisely from their childhood.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some believe that children should be taught from a young age how to handle money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Nowadays, numerous countries adopt capitalism, so people need much money if they want to live healthy and rich. Some argue that they should start to learn how to utilize money from their childhood, and I completely agree with it following reasons that I will mention in this essay.
Firstly, education systems in most of countries are not enough developed, so they frequently focus on subjects which students hardly use in their future. However, knowledge of money is required for almost everyone, which means that students have to learn this in their educational facilities rather than science or philosophy. For example, math or laguage are only needed for specific occupation such as researchers and teachers, so workers do not have an opportunity to utilize these but face with timing to need fnancial knowlage.
Furthermore, adults cannot usually spend numerous resources to study it, while young people have so much time to do so. For instance, full-time wokers spend eight hours a day to work on average, which means that they can only have four hours a day because they normally spend twelve hours for sleep and leisure time. In contrast, students technically study anytime they want except sleep and leisure time, so the amount of time is over three times as much as workers have. Thus, students should smartly spend the huge resources to learn about money rather than other subjects.
In conclusion, since there are at least two crucial reasons for studying finance in childhood, including a lack of developed education systems and time restriction, children should definetely learn how to use their money wisely from their childhood.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some believe that children should be taught from a young age how to handle money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
Nowadays, numerous countries adopt capitalism, so people need much money if they want to live healthy and rich. Some argue that they should start to learn how to utilize money from their childhood, and I completely agree with it following reasons that I will mention in this essay.
Firstly, education systems in most of countries are not enough developed, so they frequently focus on subjects which students hardly use in their future. However, knowledge of money is required for almost everyone, which means that students have to learn this in their educational facilities rather than science or philosophy. For example, math or laguage are only needed for specific occupation such as researchers and teachers, so workers do not have an opportunity to utilize these but face with timing to need fnancial knowlage.
Furthermore, adults cannot usually spend numerous resources to study it, while young people have so much time to do so. For instance, full-time wokers spend eight hours a day to work on average, which means that they can only have four hours a day because they normally spend twelve hours for sleep and leisure time. In contrast, students technically study anytime they want except sleep and leisure time, so the amount of time is over three times as much as workers have. Thus, students should smartly spend the huge resources to learn about money rather than other subjects.
In conclusion, since there are at least two crucial reasons for studying finance in childhood, including a lack of developed education systems and time restriction, children should definetely learn how to use their money wisely from their childhood.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local
areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
The developing economy in recent years have had a great impact in developed and developing countries which made them more wealthy.However, a lot of money does not mean a lot of happiness, researchers had proven that population in developed nations do not seem as happy as those in developing nations.Several reasons will be discussed in the essay below, followed by lessons.
There are some factors that are believed to be responsible for this situation. Chief of these is that the level of economic growth impacts developing countries and affluent nations in different ways. As for developing countries, thanks to the economic expansion, people's economic status has changed significantly, many people have gotten rid of poverty and become middle-income class. That is why they felt thankful and pleased with the improvements and enjoyed their lives. Conversely,people in developed countries have already had a wealthy life, they have everything such as houses, cars and expensive properties. They are also provided good facilities such as schools, hospitals, buildings and transports from the governments so they will not be grateful for the growth of the economy since it did not dramatically change their lives.
Two meaningful lessons can be drawn from the above. Firstly, material wealth does not equal happiness. Money only serves to guarantee basic necessities and happiness is an active by-product of action. Happiness is different in different individuals, one might be happy with basic things in life, other happy only when they live wealthy. Another lesson is that people in both rich nations and developing countries should spend more time going outside to socialize and find their own happiness instead of staying at home alone.
In conclusion, the essay has demonstrated the root causes leading to why people from developed countries are not happier like those from developing countries, and a few lessons have been withdrawn. Therefore, it is predicted that the situation can be reversed in the future.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local
areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
The developing economy in recent years have had a great impact in developed and developing countries which made them more wealthy.However, a lot of money does not mean a lot of happiness, researchers had proven that population in developed nations do not seem as happy as those in developing nations.Several reasons will be discussed in the essay below, followed by lessons.
There are some factors that are believed to be responsible for this situation. Chief of these is that the level of economic growth impacts developing countries and affluent nations in different ways. As for developing countries, thanks to the economic expansion, people's economic status has changed significantly, many people have gotten rid of poverty and become middle-income class. That is why they felt thankful and pleased with the improvements and enjoyed their lives. Conversely,people in developed countries have already had a wealthy life, they have everything such as houses, cars and expensive properties. They are also provided good facilities such as schools, hospitals, buildings and transports from the governments so they will not be grateful for the growth of the economy since it did not dramatically change their lives.
Two meaningful lessons can be drawn from the above. Firstly, material wealth does not equal happiness. Money only serves to guarantee basic necessities and happiness is an active by-product of action. Happiness is different in different individuals, one might be happy with basic things in life, other happy only when they live wealthy. Another lesson is that people in both rich nations and developing countries should spend more time going outside to socialize and find their own happiness instead of staying at home alone.
In conclusion, the essay has demonstrated the root causes leading to why people from developed countries are not happier like those from developing countries, and a few lessons have been withdrawn. Therefore, it is predicted that the situation can be reversed in the future.
Your lexical resource score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local
areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
The developing economy in recent years have had a great impact in developed and developing countries which made them more wealthy.However, a lot of money does not mean a lot of happiness, researchers had proven that population in developed nations do not seem as happy as those in developing nations.Several reasons will be discussed in the essay below, followed by lessons.
There are some factors that are believed to be responsible for this situation. Chief of these is that the level of economic growth impacts developing countries and affluent nations in different ways. As for developing countries, thanks to the economic expansion, people's economic status has changed significantly, many people have gotten rid of poverty and become middle-income class. That is why they felt thankful and pleased with the improvements and enjoyed their lives. Conversely,people in developed countries have already had a wealthy life, they have everything such as houses, cars and expensive properties. They are also provided good facilities such as schools, hospitals, buildings and transports from the governments so they will not be grateful for the growth of the economy since it did not dramatically change their lives.
Two meaningful lessons can be drawn from the above. Firstly, material wealth does not equal happiness. Money only serves to guarantee basic necessities and happiness is an active by-product of action. Happiness is different in different individuals, one might be happy with basic things in life, other happy only when they live wealthy. Another lesson is that people in both rich nations and developing countries should spend more time going outside to socialize and find their own happiness instead of staying at home alone.
In conclusion, the essay has demonstrated the root causes leading to why people from developed countries are not happier like those from developing countries, and a few lessons have been withdrawn. Therefore, it is predicted that the situation can be reversed in the future.
Your grammatical range score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think the newly built houses should be the same as the old houses in local
areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own style.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Anwser:
The developing economy in recent years have had a great impact in developed and developing countries which made them more wealthy.However, a lot of money does not mean a lot of happiness, researchers had proven that population in developed nations do not seem as happy as those in developing nations.Several reasons will be discussed in the essay below, followed by lessons.
There are some factors that are believed to be responsible for this situation. Chief of these is that the level of economic growth impacts developing countries and affluent nations in different ways. As for developing countries, thanks to the economic expansion, people's economic status has changed significantly, many people have gotten rid of poverty and become middle-income class. That is why they felt thankful and pleased with the improvements and enjoyed their lives. Conversely,people in developed countries have already had a wealthy life, they have everything such as houses, cars and expensive properties. They are also provided good facilities such as schools, hospitals, buildings and transports from the governments so they will not be grateful for the growth of the economy since it did not dramatically change their lives.
Two meaningful lessons can be drawn from the above. Firstly, material wealth does not equal happiness. Money only serves to guarantee basic necessities and happiness is an active by-product of action. Happiness is different in different individuals, one might be happy with basic things in life, other happy only when they live wealthy. Another lesson is that people in both rich nations and developing countries should spend more time going outside to socialize and find their own happiness instead of staying at home alone.
In conclusion, the essay has demonstrated the root causes leading to why people from developed countries are not happier like those from developing countries, and a few lessons have been withdrawn. Therefore, it is predicted that the situation can be reversed in the future.
Your task achievement score is 5.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that the popularity of the cinemas around the world has declined.
Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
There is a widely held perception that less people go to cinema, nowadays. Without any shadow of doubt I agree with this statement. There are two principal reasons for this.
One point that I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that the majority of people prefer watching movies at home because in this case, they do not have to rush somewhere at a certain time. Several examples can be brought which serve to illustrate tis point. As an example, according to the results of surveys and articles published online.
Adding further credibility to the statement brings to an idea of the reason why people less people go to cinema is the fact that it appears for people way more appealing and convenient to stay at home and watch a movie instead of rushing to cinema. Admittedly, they prefer the comfort of their house.
Turning to the other side of the argument it is worth to admit that there are a lot of people that go to cinema because sound system is better and screen is way bigger than at home. Therefore, they can enjoy the film. Also, there are people who go to cinema in order to spend time with their loved ones. And those people will alway continue going to cinema. What I mean by this is that some people still go to cinema.
To put it in a nutshell, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to a conclusion that more people prefer to watch movies at home rather than going to cinema, nowadays. Because it is way more convenient and appealing for them.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that the popularity of the cinemas around the world has declined.
Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
There is a widely held perception that less people go to cinema, nowadays. Without any shadow of doubt I agree with this statement. There are two principal reasons for this.
One point that I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that the majority of people prefer watching movies at home because in this case, they do not have to rush somewhere at a certain time. Several examples can be brought which serve to illustrate tis point. As an example, according to the results of surveys and articles published online.
Adding further credibility to the statement brings to an idea of the reason why people less people go to cinema is the fact that it appears for people way more appealing and convenient to stay at home and watch a movie instead of rushing to cinema. Admittedly, they prefer the comfort of their house.
Turning to the other side of the argument it is worth to admit that there are a lot of people that go to cinema because sound system is better and screen is way bigger than at home. Therefore, they can enjoy the film. Also, there are people who go to cinema in order to spend time with their loved ones. And those people will alway continue going to cinema. What I mean by this is that some people still go to cinema.
To put it in a nutshell, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to a conclusion that more people prefer to watch movies at home rather than going to cinema, nowadays. Because it is way more convenient and appealing for them.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that the popularity of the cinemas around the world has declined.
Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
There is a widely held perception that less people go to cinema, nowadays. Without any shadow of doubt I agree with this statement. There are two principal reasons for this.
One point that I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that the majority of people prefer watching movies at home because in this case, they do not have to rush somewhere at a certain time. Several examples can be brought which serve to illustrate tis point. As an example, according to the results of surveys and articles published online.
Adding further credibility to the statement brings to an idea of the reason why people less people go to cinema is the fact that it appears for people way more appealing and convenient to stay at home and watch a movie instead of rushing to cinema. Admittedly, they prefer the comfort of their house.
Turning to the other side of the argument it is worth to admit that there are a lot of people that go to cinema because sound system is better and screen is way bigger than at home. Therefore, they can enjoy the film. Also, there are people who go to cinema in order to spend time with their loved ones. And those people will alway continue going to cinema. What I mean by this is that some people still go to cinema.
To put it in a nutshell, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to a conclusion that more people prefer to watch movies at home rather than going to cinema, nowadays. Because it is way more convenient and appealing for them.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people think that the popularity of the cinemas around the world has declined.
Do you agree or disagree?
Anwser:
There is a widely held perception that less people go to cinema, nowadays. Without any shadow of doubt I agree with this statement. There are two principal reasons for this.
One point that I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that the majority of people prefer watching movies at home because in this case, they do not have to rush somewhere at a certain time. Several examples can be brought which serve to illustrate tis point. As an example, according to the results of surveys and articles published online.
Adding further credibility to the statement brings to an idea of the reason why people less people go to cinema is the fact that it appears for people way more appealing and convenient to stay at home and watch a movie instead of rushing to cinema. Admittedly, they prefer the comfort of their house.
Turning to the other side of the argument it is worth to admit that there are a lot of people that go to cinema because sound system is better and screen is way bigger than at home. Therefore, they can enjoy the film. Also, there are people who go to cinema in order to spend time with their loved ones. And those people will alway continue going to cinema. What I mean by this is that some people still go to cinema.
To put it in a nutshell, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to a conclusion that more people prefer to watch movies at home rather than going to cinema, nowadays. Because it is way more convenient and appealing for them.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
In cities many people are living alone. What are the reasons for it? It is a positive or negative trend?
Anwser:
Numerous people are living a solitary life in the metropolitan areas. There are a plethora of reasons behind this trend. From my perspective, it is a negative development and it has mulitfarious implications which will be examined further in this essay.
Basically, many people are seperating themselves from their joint families and prefering to live alone at their own home. For instance, in the contemporary era, kids leave their parents and move to their own apartments after they become an adult. They want to explore world on their own and aspire to become self-reliant. Thus, this pursuit of independence render their parents alone at their old ages. Besides this, some people fail to coordinate in the joint family and they face many drawbacks while staying with their cousins and many other members of their clan. To exemplify, some families have small kids and at the same time a school going generation. They cannot handle the continuous distraction of the toddlers when they have to study. Hence, they prefer a secluded accommodation where they could find a peaceful environment.
On the contrary, it is causing a myriad of negative outcomes. For example, many people are seeking medical help because they are suffering from mental illiness.They suffer from diseases like depression and psychosis which result from lonely lives Evidently, they do not have anyone to discuss their problems. Ergo, it builds an unwanted pressure on the health system.
To conclude, many reasons are contributing to singles' households and resulting in mental illness. Overall, it is a negative development.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
In cities many people are living alone. What are the reasons for it? It is a positive or negative trend?
Anwser:
Numerous people are living a solitary life in the metropolitan areas. There are a plethora of reasons behind this trend. From my perspective, it is a negative development and it has mulitfarious implications which will be examined further in this essay.
Basically, many people are seperating themselves from their joint families and prefering to live alone at their own home. For instance, in the contemporary era, kids leave their parents and move to their own apartments after they become an adult. They want to explore world on their own and aspire to become self-reliant. Thus, this pursuit of independence render their parents alone at their old ages. Besides this, some people fail to coordinate in the joint family and they face many drawbacks while staying with their cousins and many other members of their clan. To exemplify, some families have small kids and at the same time a school going generation. They cannot handle the continuous distraction of the toddlers when they have to study. Hence, they prefer a secluded accommodation where they could find a peaceful environment.
On the contrary, it is causing a myriad of negative outcomes. For example, many people are seeking medical help because they are suffering from mental illiness.They suffer from diseases like depression and psychosis which result from lonely lives Evidently, they do not have anyone to discuss their problems. Ergo, it builds an unwanted pressure on the health system.
To conclude, many reasons are contributing to singles' households and resulting in mental illness. Overall, it is a negative development.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
In cities many people are living alone. What are the reasons for it? It is a positive or negative trend?
Anwser:
Numerous people are living a solitary life in the metropolitan areas. There are a plethora of reasons behind this trend. From my perspective, it is a negative development and it has mulitfarious implications which will be examined further in this essay.
Basically, many people are seperating themselves from their joint families and prefering to live alone at their own home. For instance, in the contemporary era, kids leave their parents and move to their own apartments after they become an adult. They want to explore world on their own and aspire to become self-reliant. Thus, this pursuit of independence render their parents alone at their old ages. Besides this, some people fail to coordinate in the joint family and they face many drawbacks while staying with their cousins and many other members of their clan. To exemplify, some families have small kids and at the same time a school going generation. They cannot handle the continuous distraction of the toddlers when they have to study. Hence, they prefer a secluded accommodation where they could find a peaceful environment.
On the contrary, it is causing a myriad of negative outcomes. For example, many people are seeking medical help because they are suffering from mental illiness.They suffer from diseases like depression and psychosis which result from lonely lives Evidently, they do not have anyone to discuss their problems. Ergo, it builds an unwanted pressure on the health system.
To conclude, many reasons are contributing to singles' households and resulting in mental illness. Overall, it is a negative development.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
In cities many people are living alone. What are the reasons for it? It is a positive or negative trend?
Anwser:
Numerous people are living a solitary life in the metropolitan areas. There are a plethora of reasons behind this trend. From my perspective, it is a negative development and it has mulitfarious implications which will be examined further in this essay.
Basically, many people are seperating themselves from their joint families and prefering to live alone at their own home. For instance, in the contemporary era, kids leave their parents and move to their own apartments after they become an adult. They want to explore world on their own and aspire to become self-reliant. Thus, this pursuit of independence render their parents alone at their old ages. Besides this, some people fail to coordinate in the joint family and they face many drawbacks while staying with their cousins and many other members of their clan. To exemplify, some families have small kids and at the same time a school going generation. They cannot handle the continuous distraction of the toddlers when they have to study. Hence, they prefer a secluded accommodation where they could find a peaceful environment.
On the contrary, it is causing a myriad of negative outcomes. For example, many people are seeking medical help because they are suffering from mental illiness.They suffer from diseases like depression and psychosis which result from lonely lives Evidently, they do not have anyone to discuss their problems. Ergo, it builds an unwanted pressure on the health system.
To conclude, many reasons are contributing to singles' households and resulting in mental illness. Overall, it is a negative development.
Your task achievement score is 6.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Focus on the logical structure, presence of introduction and conclusion,supported main points, accurate use of linking words, and variety in linking words to give coherence and cohesion score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your coherence and cohesion score is <score>'. For example: Your coherence and cohesion score is 6.5
Now, please give coherence and cohesion score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, the debate about children's responsibility has controversial opinions. Some individuals think that kids who do not experience any restrictions about everyday matters can grow into egoistic and selfish people in society. Others believe that making decisions about such things is crucial for a younger generation. This essay will discuss both opposite ideas and give my concluding view.
Supporters of education without restrictions argue that children with this type of parenting will be more responsible in the future. For example, if parents prohibit their child choosing a hobby, which he or she desires to do, or having a unique style, this may affect on person's decision-making skills. Additionally, making choices can help the younger generation to become more self-confident, as they can, for instance, create their own daily schedule of leisure, homework or extra hobby classes at school. Mistakes, that they may experience during created routine of the day, will give them understanding of the consequences of their decisions and increase confidence.
On the other hand, some people are sure that children without parents' guidance become less empathic to other people's wishes. This may be caused, if individual choices are overemphasized and without any fair judgment. Moreover, such type of behavior will steal children's carelessness which is a common feature of the young generation. To iilustrate this, if a young person has to be responsible for choosing the educational program for the next school year, this may overwhelm him or her and make a lot of stress. It is necessary for them to feel support and get advice from their parents due to the lack of experience.
In conclusion, I think that having your own choices of what you would like to do, or wear, or eat and etc. in the childhood is the important part of becoming a responsible and and self-confident person. Likewise, in some questions about education parenting will play a good role.
Your coherence and cohesion score is 7.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Emphasize varied vocabulary, accurate spelling, and proper word formation to give lexical resource score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your lexical resource score is <score>'. For example: Your lexical resource score is 6.5
Now, please give lexical resource score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, the debate about children's responsibility has controversial opinions. Some individuals think that kids who do not experience any restrictions about everyday matters can grow into egoistic and selfish people in society. Others believe that making decisions about such things is crucial for a younger generation. This essay will discuss both opposite ideas and give my concluding view.
Supporters of education without restrictions argue that children with this type of parenting will be more responsible in the future. For example, if parents prohibit their child choosing a hobby, which he or she desires to do, or having a unique style, this may affect on person's decision-making skills. Additionally, making choices can help the younger generation to become more self-confident, as they can, for instance, create their own daily schedule of leisure, homework or extra hobby classes at school. Mistakes, that they may experience during created routine of the day, will give them understanding of the consequences of their decisions and increase confidence.
On the other hand, some people are sure that children without parents' guidance become less empathic to other people's wishes. This may be caused, if individual choices are overemphasized and without any fair judgment. Moreover, such type of behavior will steal children's carelessness which is a common feature of the young generation. To iilustrate this, if a young person has to be responsible for choosing the educational program for the next school year, this may overwhelm him or her and make a lot of stress. It is necessary for them to feel support and get advice from their parents due to the lack of experience.
In conclusion, I think that having your own choices of what you would like to do, or wear, or eat and etc. in the childhood is the important part of becoming a responsible and and self-confident person. Likewise, in some questions about education parenting will play a good role.
Your lexical resource score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Use a mix of complex and simple sentences, ensuring clear and correct grammar to give grammatical range score for the essay. The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your grammatical range score is <score>'. For example: Your grammatical range score is 6.5
Now, please give grammatical range score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, the debate about children's responsibility has controversial opinions. Some individuals think that kids who do not experience any restrictions about everyday matters can grow into egoistic and selfish people in society. Others believe that making decisions about such things is crucial for a younger generation. This essay will discuss both opposite ideas and give my concluding view.
Supporters of education without restrictions argue that children with this type of parenting will be more responsible in the future. For example, if parents prohibit their child choosing a hobby, which he or she desires to do, or having a unique style, this may affect on person's decision-making skills. Additionally, making choices can help the younger generation to become more self-confident, as they can, for instance, create their own daily schedule of leisure, homework or extra hobby classes at school. Mistakes, that they may experience during created routine of the day, will give them understanding of the consequences of their decisions and increase confidence.
On the other hand, some people are sure that children without parents' guidance become less empathic to other people's wishes. This may be caused, if individual choices are overemphasized and without any fair judgment. Moreover, such type of behavior will steal children's carelessness which is a common feature of the young generation. To iilustrate this, if a young person has to be responsible for choosing the educational program for the next school year, this may overwhelm him or her and make a lot of stress. It is necessary for them to feel support and get advice from their parents due to the lack of experience.
In conclusion, I think that having your own choices of what you would like to do, or wear, or eat and etc. in the childhood is the important part of becoming a responsible and and self-confident person. Likewise, in some questions about education parenting will play a good role.
Your grammatical range score is 4.0 |
You are an Ielts examiner and you need to grade the following essay. Ensure a complete response with clear and comprehensive ideas, relevant and specific examples, and an appropriate word count to give task achievement score for the essay The score must be in [0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0]
The expected output format is exact 'Your task achievement score is <score>'. For example: Your task achievement score is 6.5
Now, please give task achievement score for the following essay:
Question:
Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important for children to make decisions about matters that affect them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Anwser:
Nowadays, the debate about children's responsibility has controversial opinions. Some individuals think that kids who do not experience any restrictions about everyday matters can grow into egoistic and selfish people in society. Others believe that making decisions about such things is crucial for a younger generation. This essay will discuss both opposite ideas and give my concluding view.
Supporters of education without restrictions argue that children with this type of parenting will be more responsible in the future. For example, if parents prohibit their child choosing a hobby, which he or she desires to do, or having a unique style, this may affect on person's decision-making skills. Additionally, making choices can help the younger generation to become more self-confident, as they can, for instance, create their own daily schedule of leisure, homework or extra hobby classes at school. Mistakes, that they may experience during created routine of the day, will give them understanding of the consequences of their decisions and increase confidence.
On the other hand, some people are sure that children without parents' guidance become less empathic to other people's wishes. This may be caused, if individual choices are overemphasized and without any fair judgment. Moreover, such type of behavior will steal children's carelessness which is a common feature of the young generation. To iilustrate this, if a young person has to be responsible for choosing the educational program for the next school year, this may overwhelm him or her and make a lot of stress. It is necessary for them to feel support and get advice from their parents due to the lack of experience.
In conclusion, I think that having your own choices of what you would like to do, or wear, or eat and etc. in the childhood is the important part of becoming a responsible and and self-confident person. Likewise, in some questions about education parenting will play a good role.
Your task achievement score is 7.0 |