prompt
stringlengths 3
940
| original_output
stringlengths 7
1.33k
| toxic
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
== Businessman or spammer? == I knew that after leaving a very successful professional football career, Fran Tarkenton set himself up as a businessman and led seminars for other businessmen. Little did I know that one day I would receive an email from him. How did he know my email address? What could a legendary football hero have to say to me? How can I help Fran Tarkenton? So I hurriedly and expectantly opened the email from this legend of a quarterback and found, to my dismay, typical spam offering me an opportunity to purchase a report that will reveal the hidden information behind seminars. This was not legendary football hero kind of spam; just your everyday, normal, annoying spam sent | by a spambot to millions of unwitting email addresses stored on a CD and purchased from a greasy looking fellow in a back alley. Thank YOU, Fran Tarkenton, for getting my hopes up and knocking them right back down like a linebacker who was just informed of indiscreet sexual relations between his mother and the opposing team's punter. Thank YOU, Fran Tarkenton, for the offer to buy some truth from you. The world needs less hype and more truth, although the world could do without any more spammers. Thank YOU, Fran Tarkenton, for helping me differentiate between the hype and truth about Fran Tarkenton. The hype is that you are a legend; the truth is that you are an annoying spammer. | 0 |
== THIS IS THE BEST PLACE EVER == | WHOEVER DOESNT LIKE THIS PLACE IS BEYOND STUPID. | 1 |
fuck u rmum ur dick is so crazy u know u | can fuck ur mum whoever as typing this fucked up shit | 1 |
" :: I support it... but it will not stick unless it can be put as a rule across all music article related to the subject. There are a few other ""iconic"" hard rock and heavy metal bands who have had their genre field changed to just 'rock' in the hope it would make them ""calm""... and this article is certainly calm (other than the occasional musically impaired IP who blanks out heavy metal). But the result is that those article now have IPs showing up almost daily and adding genres that weren't even there prior to the 'just rock' agreement. And the only way to stop those types of trolls... is to make it a project wide ruling and not just a rule for a single article. I am not trying to block | any noble suggestions... and 'just rock' is noble... but I have been here for almost 8 years and have watched these patterns before. ""Just rock"" is a common sense solution. But IP trolls don't use common sense. Change the article to just 'rock' and within a few days some anon will stroll through and add something completely retarded like progressive rock... and then the chain will begin. Just sayin.' PS: One suggestion to make it stick though.... re-activate the LZ project... wake up at least 20 of its still-active members... get them to agree to just 'rock' across ALL LZ pages... and get a promise that all will actually patrol them and not just turn a blind eye... do that... and maybe it will work. Otherwise... al it is... is a ""make-work"" suggestion. " | 0 |
:It's been moved from the verisimilitude wikipedia article, from | which it was taken on given page, stupid bot. | 1 |
::::: Hmmph... that's not the Wikipedia way, saying what you think. The proper way is to wrap everything in defensive hypocrisies, oops... I meant civility. Anyway, what the hell; I'll say what I think just for a wee bit. ::::: DrChrissy is male. He's an excellent contributor to Wikipedia who should be supported. He gets upset with rude and crass editors, and sometimes I want to tell him to calm down and that those editors are just part of the territory, of little consequence, and not to be taken personally. ::::: You have a clear POV on foie gras and are behaving badly towards DrChrissy. Don't use loaded terms like plagiarism when you mean inadequate paraphrasing. Perhaps it would | help you if you expressed the anger you seem to have against animal welfare concerns. Then the broader issues could be discussed more calmly. ::::: You didn't paraphrase that text anywhere near enough. You should spend time on this, reading and contemplating wp:close paraphrasing. You could perhaps look at what Moonriddengirl does; she is one of the few admin saints on Wikipedia. You could start using tools like Copyscape and Duplication Detector, and maybe examine legacy articles that interest you for copyright violations. I promise you you'll be surprised at how many violations you find. Rewriting copy violations can be surprising hard work. It is also an area on Wikipedia where editors can be unbelievably pompous and obnoxious. | 0 |
and largely hails a penis with legs who | seemingly lets his barbaric instinct drive him | 1 |
::OMG! Is everyone you meet a sock? Why | don't these idiots use TOR or something? | 1 |
== Vandalism == if you get caught vandilising a | page you will get fucking banned tony u dick | 1 |
::Yeah, I tried doing Costa Rican politicians, but a lot of them were colonial figures with esoteric titles neither I nor my boyfriend (who's from Spain) could figure out, so it got kind of boring. I think artists might be more fun. (Though I'd have to see how that vocabulary goes. Many art words seem to be cognates, but maybe I'd run into trouble.) I agree that we need to figure out how to do outreach and get more people involved in translation. I was thinking maybe of setting up pages like Wikipedia:Translation/Spanish for big languages, then spamming the people who are signed up (via userboxes) as translators, informing them of the new system. Maybe the talk pages (like Wikipedia | talk:Translation/Spanish) could be a central place to ask for help with translation questions. Really the best place for editors would be all the people who are learning English throughout the world. (It's much better education to translate into a language you're learning than out of it.) Somehow if we could harness them as translators, we'd have an amazing army! Maybe I can ask my boyfriend's roommate (language and history teacher here in Cambridge, originally from Puerto Rico) if he knows any teachers back home that would be interested in such a project. BTW don't sweat the folks on ANI. As between these stubs and the tiny village stubs, I'd take (and I'm sure they'd take) these any day! ) | 0 |
" * {{#if:In this edit ""They both ditch their wedding dates and start their own date on the night of the wedding"" is changes to ""They both ditch their wedding dates and start their own date that same night"" and so it would appear the text has evolved here and so unlikely to be a copyvio. I also note that the waybackmachine has only been archiving the front page of TMDb since 2008 whereas we've had this material since 2006. I still have my doubts about the original sourve but I couldn't find one. |Click to show/hide further details. - style=""text-align:left; background-color:white; border:1px solid #c0c090; padding:5px; | margin-top: 5px; font-style:normal;"" In this edit ""They both ditch their wedding dates and start their own date on the night of the wedding"" is changes to ""They both ditch their wedding dates and start their own date that same night"" and so it would appear the text has evolved here and so unlikely to be a copyvio. I also note that the waybackmachine has only been archiving the front page of TMDb since 2008 whereas we've had this material since 2006. I still have my doubts about the original sourve but I couldn't find one. }|Further details can be added using the ""comments"" parameter.}} }}" | 0 |
== Cunt == You are a sad cunt who spends his | life looking at wikipedia. Get a life/girlfriend you sand cunt! | 1 |
"::::::“Why are you still attempting a rebuttal?” Why should I not attempt a rebuttal? ::::::“It's clear you are ignorant as evidence [sic] by your absurd claim about CDs and players."" What absurd claim? Absurd claims such as those made in The Audio Critic? Absurd claims such as those made in the Boston Audio Society? Absurd claims such as those made at http://www.provide.net/~djcarlst/abx.htm? ::::::""’You and all the other subjectivists can go on...’ Personal attack?” Where is the personal attack? ::::::“You are also profoundly biased in your opinions.” Profoundly biased in favour of evidence. Profoundly biased against nonsense. ::::::“I've also read that you think an encyclopedia should attack it's | [sic] subject whenever it's deserved. That absolutely [sic] ridiculous in that you mean the encyclopedia [sic] should attack it's [sic] subject whenever YOU think it should.” Please do not try to put words in my mouth. Please read Wikipedia articles like those on Hitler and Stalin. Wikipedia allows articles to be critical of its subject as long as what is written is supported by citations to reliable sources. ::::::“Get out of the way and let OBJECTIVE people do their job instead of constantly trying to interject with your ranting hatreds.” Thank you for your kind invitation, but I prefer to continue to edit the article. " | 0 |
== glasscutter is an aspergerthing? == tom bombadil | will rape him, FEED HIS BIKE BISCUITS! | 1 |
" - It is very intereting to see what is labeled as a quackery. Some mainstream providers use their power of being mainstream to label with ""Quackery"" many treatments that are far more efficient. For all of those that label acupuncture, homeopathy, herbalisam and many other great therapies as quackery, I would love to chellenge them to provide a nice label for the fact that ""Orthodox therapies now kill over 250,000 hospital patients a year, ranking 3rd as a leading cause of death in the U.S."" What is a quackery nowdays? Here is some interesting reading for those that are quackery labelers http://drtong.com/problem.html http://www.mercola.com/2004/jul/7/healthcare_death.htm Enjoy your reading Karen Lee *Actually, the claim that | ""orthodox therapies now kill over 250,000 hospital patients a year"" is not a fact. That smug claim has spread like a virus from one alternative medicine website to another (as demonstrated above), but its origins are merely a context-dropping distortion of figures cited in Dr. Barabara Starfield's commentary in JAMA, ""Is US Health Really the Best in the World"" in which she estimates that there are ""225,000 deaths per year from iatrogenic causes"". Although that terrible figure indicates much needs to be done to improve healthcare in the United States, those who toss it around without full understanding should realize that ""orthodox therapies"" and ""iatrogenic causes"" are not one and the same. " | 0 |
" As the key maintainer of Template:Inflation (ha!), and chief occasional money-over-time reviewer at FAC, I recommend using a real time comparator like Measuring Worth too. The inflation templates are shitty CPI templates with poor data-sets and at best duplicate Measuring Worth's superior data. At worst, using a CPI inflation is wildly inappropriate. While there are partial alphas for non-CPI inflations (ha) they too suffer from dodgy wikipedia template syndrome. Remember to cite measuring worth! I recommend thinking deeply about ""what kind of money was this in the past: consumption, profit, national accounts?"" and ""what comparison will accurately represent the function of the past money, in a | manner appreciable to a modern audience?"" Malleus' choice of purchasing power parity is a reasonable one for the time for £3–5000. Personally I strongly recommend treating capital as %GDP. Finally, ask yourself, ""Does money function in the same way as it did then?"" 300 sesterces are not money as we know it, the function of money in Roman society was so radically different to the function of money today that I would strongly frown on any attempt to convert money. Rather noting the time of labour or cost of slaves in the society would be better then to allow readers to make their own understanding. " | 0 |
:::That's a moronic question. Please don't post here again. | I'll ignore you. You have no fucking idea. | 1 |
let me edit Alix bushnells page you | fucking cunt fisting shit stains of society! | 1 |
" ::::::: I have a couple of problems with what was said in that interview. 1) I did not think an APU starts automatically. It's normally started manually. For example, with US Airways Flight 1549 both engines were down and it was Sullenberger's decision to start the APU immediately after the bird strike was credited as one of the things that allowed for a safe landing. The power from APU meant that the aircraft stayed in normal law mode. Had the flight deck lost power the fly-by-wire system would have switched to alternate law and there's a good chance the aircraft would have crashed hard. The point here is that the APU start was not automatic on | an Airbus A320. ::::::: 2) while some APUs have their own fuel source jet aircraft APUs normally run off jet fuel from one of the main tanks. We would need very good WP:RS to show that the 777's APU would do an automatic start on loss of power or fuel and that it is able to run for five minutes after the main tank is empty. There's also the issue that it's unlikely the fuel tanks ran dry at the same instant and that the APU was connected to one tank. ::::::: The ""Partial Ping"" has not been explained well enough for us in the public to make an informed call on what it was. | " | 0 |
" :Yo Alex, thanks for your diligence. I can appreciate most of what you say, but I think it's not exactly on-point. Clearly, the lede sentence of the article should say exactly what it is (i.e. propertarian political philosophy"" would be appalingly inadequate); the point of the disambiguation statement is solely to make it clear to confused readers who might be looking for one of the other meanings. For example, if there were two articles roughly associated with the term ""libertarian"", where one of them was libertarianism"", and the other one was a duck, a perfectly good disambiguation statement would be | ""This page is about the philosophy. For the duck, see Libertarian (duck)"". :In this case, libertarianism (disambiguation) lists three articles other than libertarianism: Libertarian socialism, Civil libertarianism and Libertarianism (metaphysics). So all our disambiguation statement has to do is make it clear the libertarianism article is not about the socialist philosophy, the free speech/aclu advocacy or the stance on free will. Saying ""political"" gets rid of the latter, but how do we concisely differentiate libertarianism from civil and socialist libertarianism? I think a reference to private property will do exactly that. So would you be happy with : :? " | 0 |
== oshkosh west high school == the school is good and | so is the cirriculim or whatever but the kids FUCKING SUCK!! | 1 |
"As I originally stated in my first revision of your contribution to the Nasti Muzik article, Khia has not been promoting her album by discussing her hate for Janet Jackson. Janet has been one of many topics Khia has spoken on in various interviews, and is in no way the main focus for the promotion of Nasti Muzik, therefore should not be stated as the main focus for the promotion of Nasti Muzik. It is inaccurate, un-factual mis-information. Therefore it has no business in the Nasti Muzik article. If you can prove otherwise, feel free to discuss it on my talk page. Otherwise, after I revert your edit once again, keep it that | way, and don't try to make Khia look a certain way based on personal opinion alone. Wikipedia is meant to provide factual information, not mis-information that makes an article/topic in an article look bad. If you continue to do so, I'll have no choice but to get the administrators involved, possibly blocking your IP due to vandalism. As far as Concrete Loop ""predicting"" the album will flop, that, in no way, is any indication that it will, and is just hear say that doesn't belong in the article either. ""Predictions"" don't dictate the outcome of something, especially in this particular case where the album hasn't even been released yet. Thank you. " | 0 |
The following is a pretty good representative sample IMHO. *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2954911389/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2955088251/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2954807093/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2955002509/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2954879489/ | *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2954965569/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2954856239/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/watertownsurfer/2955785068/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/spjwebster/3402022201/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/spjwebster/3402826582/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/spjwebster/3402824888/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/arenamontanus/3513053639/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/mattbuck007/3207211490/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/tfduesing/391387482/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/tfduesing/391387207/in/photostream/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/tfduesing/391386710/in/photostream/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/heatheronhertravels/3713167480/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/heatheronhertravels/3712351929/in/photostream/ *http://www.flickr.com/photos/heatheronhertravels/3712347999/in/photostream/ | 0 |
" -Yori's character- The article claims | Yori is ""a slut"". Huh ?" | 1 |
" Both main refs are books by qualified and respected practicing psychologists. Braiker in particular identifies in some detail the underlying solid psychological theory which is reinforcement and the work of B. F. Skinner. The problem I have is that the reinforcement article is too technical for an academic, although i have made an effort to improve it. But this angle needs to be developed further. Also Psychological manipulation is firmly a type of social influence. I rather resent your homing in on this article when around 30% of Wikipedia articles dont have a single citation of any sort and quite a few more are lacking citations. Also if you start stripping away ""pop psychology"" citations from Wikipedia psychology articles, even fewer will have citations. | I have included some academic references in the Further reading list and in fact both the Simon and Braiker books have some academic citations which i didnt include as i thought it would break the flow up but as you are making such a fuss about it i might as well put them back in. Braiker refers to Burstens work and i list ""Bursten, Ben Manipulator: A Psychoanalytic View (1973)"" and some academic articles. More are to be fund in Google scholar. If some body wants to get hold of the book and develop this article then they are welcome. It is poor me who has done all the work here and i dont see why i should have to do it all. " | 0 |
== Sorry, but you are an asshole == This | is very insane to delete an article like this. | 1 |
== does her nose job really constitue a section? == who the hell | cares if she got a nose job? Let her live in peace! | 1 |
June 2013 (UTC) :::Hi, I tend to think this Bibliodrama may be notable. (But then, I lean to the inclusionist side.) Rationale, in no particular order: :::*Excerpt from personal website of one Tamar Pelleg: ::::Bibliodrama draws some of its techniques from Psychodrama, a method of group therapy originated by J.L.Moreno (1941), in which group members explore, in action, the roles they play in their various relationships. This action-based role exploration helps participants gain insights into their beliefs and behavior patterns. Bibliodrama was created and developed by Dr. Peter Pitzele of NYC in the early 1980's, and | is now recognized as a principal methodology in the field of contemporary Midrash. ::::Pelleg has taught Hebrew at the U. of Maryland and at Geo. Washington U. (Independently verifiable.) :::*Peter Pitzele is for real, but not notable. :::*Professor Björn Krondorfer at St. Mary's College of Maryland heads up a Bibliodrama workshop, which seems to be international in scope. :::*Numerous links to German sites, including de.Wikipedia. :::Mmm, but, the more I look, the less notable it seems. Interesting, though. I would include it in en.Wikipedia, but I couldn't put up a worthy fight against deletion. 05:45, 13 | 0 |
":::::::: ← carriage return I think that's a foolish notion. Should we have a stub page to tell daft and silly people that the flying wiki monster does not exist? Though wiki is not paper, I think that the answer to that is an obvious ""no"". But, you say, we already have a page on radiation. The flying wiki monster would require the creation of a new stub, a bit of extra effort to monitoring it for vandalism, and all of the expenses that go into any page. The radiation page, on the other hand, already exists. It doesn't cost anything to add a few links in case some inquisitive chap comes along. On the contrary, I say, cluttering up a disambig is even worse. A flying wiki monster can sit in | the database all by its lonesome, but anything you stick on a disambig page (particularly one as popular as radiation) will be looked at repeatedly. It will get in the way of all kinds of people. The job of a disambig is to get readers where they want to go, as quickly as possible. (See Wikipedia:Disambiguation and Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)). If we clog them up with all manner of nonsense, like this sampi radiation, we'll bog the reader down. Furthermore, every time you make a link to a nonexistent entity, the database knows (see Special:Whatlinkshere). Make enough links, and the term starts to acquire a bit of implicit respectability; I don't think we want that. So let's take the nonsense links away and have no more of this. " | 0 |
" *It actually matters very little whether the project members are coordinating to combat what they perceive as a ""liberal bias"", or simply coordinating to push a right-wing POV. The practical result is the same: this project organizes editors along specific ideological grounds, and coordinates their efforts to advance that ideology. A WikiProject which explicitly organizes editors by partisan political ideology, while not categorically forbidden, has an immense potential for abuse. Not only have project members failed to address that potential constructively and proactively, but they've consistently and stridently refused to believe that any | such potential for abuse exists.The more Wikipedians observe this project in action, the more expressions of concern (like those above) you're going to receive - because the way this project currently functions is inimical to Wikipedia's policies and best practices, and there appears to be zero desire on the part of active project members to grapple with good-faith concerns. Instead, in keeping with the general battleground mentality embodied in this project, the response has been to bunker down, circle the wagons, and hit back aggressively at any concerns that are voiced. ''' " | 0 |
==finally some agreement== all i have to say is that i am thrilled to see all these postings with people challenging the sheer stupididty and garbage that has been posted by these articles on islamic science. when i first strated like reading these articles, it was well it was a jaw dropper, some of the stuff posted here it was to say the best incredicle. Like i know i keep repeating but how the hell does one confuse recirocating piston water pump for a piston engine, how the hell does one do that. Just as adacious was the claim that somehow microbiology bgen with muslim docotrs, that astounding since one would have to | prove that suck organisms exist and observe and provide some description, yet for some reason for the authors of this article seem to think that a sentnce about contagious entities is enough. hmmmmmm does anyone see a probelm with this Anyways i hope that this the beginnning of a patter and other aspects of these garbage articles are investigated, and of course i have still to hear any repsonses to my questions about the dubious claims made the authors of this page. I can aonly assume it has to do with the fact that they know they lied and distorted and thought it would go unoticed and be passed of as ligit. | 0 |
Gosh, aren't internet cafe's gr8? block access | indeed! What idiots you Jewish sympathisers are! | 1 |
Thanks man, you know those words get mixed up. I am an | idiot. That's what you get when you type to fast. ) | 1 |
== Joshua Dratel == Hi, I've been working on an article on Joshua Dratel and had gotten it to be a decent little stub. But then when I went to create it I discovered that it had been previously AFD'd and deleted from both versions of his name. Once I saw that I decided my stub needed to be a little better than decent so I've been working on it. Somebody just pointed out to me that you're working on an article on Joshua Dratel also, so I figured I should contact you. Obviously I think the guy is notable and don't agree with the Delete arguments set out at the AFD. Still, I'm going to take those arguments seriously, so I want any new Joshua Dratel article to refute those arguments beyond a shadow | of a doubt. I don't think the draft you've written quite does that as clearly as I like. (I'm not saying you haven't put a ton of work into it, you clearly have.) It's just that the flavor of the AFD made me expect any new article to encounter some good faith but strongly felt opposition. Could you please hold off just a little bit on putting it in article main space to give me alittle more time to follow some leads? Right now I'm following up on some research ideas. Or at least let me know when it goes live so I'm ready to help out. Or, if you are comfortable with it, could I collaborate on it while it's in your use space to help get it ready for rough seas ahead? | 0 |
Hello Were you sexually abused as a kid? That would | explain most of your brain damage, I imagine. - | 1 |
I can't believe this article exists. This | is disgusting and racist towards whites. | 1 |
" == Request for deleted page text == “Luk”: My name is Robert and I am new to writing/editing for Wikipedia. Your name was listed as someone I could ask about retrieving the text from a deleted article. I was wondering if you could provide the text from the deleted page on “Brainware” (it’s a business software company). I’m not sure how this works, so if there’s something you need from me, please ask. Thank you very much. Robert Zoch [email protected] 703-948-5831 :Replied on this user's talk page - == Hello == I'm just wondering about your bad words. hmm Why abadesa, abithiwtidb, afahmasp, afiniafi (And many other words/accronyms are bad words) (I'm not a troll, just curous) :Replied on | this user's talk page - ::: lol What is that page for? and hmm why there are words that are not really that bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Wow, that's OLD!!! D This is from my early days on Wikipedia (2007), there was a semi automated tool that flagged edits containing these words for review ). Cluebot would probably kick this script's ass all the time, now D. == One Way (American band) == Hi. I undid your deletion of One Way (American band). You speedied a page on a non-notable band but the history had an article on a much more notable band which had been overwritten. Hope that's OK. :You were entirely right! Thanks! " | 0 |
UT This is not a website to host shit comments | this also not a blog u donkey dick licking nerd | 1 |
== Not_Vandalism == Read the fucking page | before you declare it vandalism, asshole. | 1 |
" == You may be a crackpot if... == The above discussion of whether Sarfatti is or isn't a crackpot, and why, causes the irresistable impulse to reply in a manner reminiscent of Jeff Foxworthy's ""You may be a redneck if..."" series of humorous items... * If the defining moment of your adolescence is when you were telephoned by extraterrestrials... then you just may be a crackpot. * If you are the recipient of the Victor von Frankenstein Weird Science Award of the alt.usenet.kooks newsgroup... then you could possibly be a crackpot. * If you think the Wikipedia article about you fails to meet the Neutral Point of View policy because it doesn't properly reflect | how fabulously brilliant you and your scientific theories are... then, just possibly, you could have a chance of being a crackpot. * If you have threatened to report your critics to the FBI, CIA, NSA, or Department of Homeland Security as perpetrators of treason because their criticism of you threatens national security and may constitute an offense punishable by the death penalty... then, it is not beyond the realm of possibility that you could be a crackpot. * If you react with great vehemence, with long semi-coherent rants and tirades, to the slightest suggestion that you are a crackpot, then... this could quite possibly constitute evidence that you are in fact a crackpot. " | 0 |
" == Replaceable fair use Image:Sara Rue Before.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:Sara Rue Before.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to | replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " | 0 |
" ::::Like I said any questions over who should participate can be included in the actual mediation, although it certainly is not an ideal situation. One thing you have to bear in mind is that mediations are not as effective when there are a number of contributors. Mediators may decide to have only two people involved in the mediation (allowing each 'side' to have a spokesperson). This is to try and stop the mediation becoming too lengthy, and to try and focus the mediation. This is in no way trying to defend the exclusion of a particular user, but to give you another angle to think about. Do you think that this extra person will add a lot to the mediation, or is it a case of | this person merely reinforcing the rest of one side's views? Like I said the mediator, whoever that may be (I shall recuse myself from this case now, as I have become quite invovled already) may choose to have only the two 'voices' in the mediation. If this happens would this affect your view on having an extra partcipant? The fact that there is a RfM suggests that there has been a certain amount of disagreement over a number of issues for a relatively long time. For everyone's interests it is best to try and get this case mediator as soon as possible, so I would urge you to consider the points I've made above, and decide whether you would still be interested in the mediation. e " | 0 |
you ya fucking dirty little mother fucking | cock sucking insest [piece of shit | 1 |
" : I do apologize for harsh words, but it is very frustrating to see people denying about history. I did provide pertinent information. The far-right Japanese politicians only argued about the exaggeration of the numbers of deaths, but they never argued about whether the massacre excist or not. Why? Because they can't deny it doesn't excist. Even by saying that the number is exaggerated proves to us that they admitted this massacre (otherwise where would the numbers come from?). They are trying very hard to make the number as few as possible so that it justifies the event as a ""small thing"". The reason why I deleted the dispute template is because this article cannot be disputed of whether | it happened or not. Everyone knows that it happened, and there is no reason why the article should bend to ""neutrality"" while the other side is fake. Also, those far-right people argued that the pictures of corpses are not all Chinese and there may be Japanese in there too. How do they know? How come no one have doubt about that the corpses in the Nazi concentration camps are ""undesirable"" people (according to Nazis)? There could be Germans there too. Overall, the reasons the history-revisionists gave are very arbitrary and unreasonable. They actually sound like Neo-Nazis or the KKK, who said the holocaust is a hoax. I hope these statements answer your question. Again, sorry for being rude. " | 0 |
talk ABOUT it ! wont u take me | 2 funktown.........................??? u stupid h8a, perpertr8a, playa!! | 1 |
" == competing descriptions == This sentence in the lede could be better: ""Critical scholars offer competing descriptions of Jesus as a self-described Messiah, as the leader of an apocalyptic movement, as an itinerant sage, as a charismatic healer, and as the founder of an independent religious movement."" It's true that there are scholars outside the mainstream and that within mainstream scholarship there's a split about whether Jesus' eschatology was apocalyptic, but there's more agreement than this sentence suggests. The reader deserves a clear statement of the mainstream view, something like: ""Most contemporary scholars of the historical Jesus consider him to have been an autonomous, | charismatic founder of a Jewish restoration movement, anticipating an imminent apocalypse."" This view squares with Vermes, Sanders, and Theissen. We should expand on the divergent views in the body, and for the lede we could add something like: ""Other prominent scholars, however, contend that Jesus' ""Kingdom of God"" meant radical personal and social transformation instead of a future apocalypse."" Crossan is the most important representative of this view. The idea that Jesus claimed to be the Messiah gets little play in contemporary secular scholarship, but we could deal with this idea in the body of the text. James Tabor seems to take this view. " | 0 |
:I've skimmed over that pdf. I can't find the guy's name who wrote it anywhere so it might as well be Wikipedia:No original research Also, while he mentions that Mastrocinque hasn't been refuted, I don't remember him giving examples but I could be wrong. Anyway, I'm not sure what anyone is trying to argue here. If it's authentic, then it seems to date around the second or third century. Big whoop. I don't understand how Christianity is argued to be the religion that stole EVERYTHING but had nothing stolen from it by someone else. But really, just think about it. Out of any ideas to be borrowed would the Christians really borrow being crucified? Would they really want God to be killed in the | most disgraceful way? That's like saying if Jesus was shot with an arrow, someone said they stole the idea from some Greek god who got shot with an arrow. Crucifixition isn't something mythical that happens. It's just something very real that happened to a lot of people. I'm pretty sure if there's one historical fact that everyone agrees on about Jesus, it's the crucifxition. IMO, the stone looks like a forgery. The art that it was compared to was pretty bad. This looks too three dimensional to have been made back then. Also, where is the story about this person being crucified in the first place? That pdf points out that Justin Matyr even says that no other pagan god had been crucified. | 0 |
tits i | love titssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 | 1 |
"Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and write articles, however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is ). Logging in does not require any personal details. There are many other benefits for logging in to Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can type {{helpme}} on this page and an experienced Wikipedian will be around to answer any questions you may have. Please note these points: * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. * Please | use a neutral point of view to edit the article; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do that. * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted texts, advertisement messages, and texts that are not related to that article. Both adding such unreasonable information and editing articles maliciously are considered vandalism. A user who repeatedly vandalises articles will be blocked from editing. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, ask me on my Talk page – I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. from Wikipedian: S " | 0 |
" * Evarose, allow me to add my voice to the throng; what you have here is a polemic essay, not a factual, neutral article. Polemics are not permitted on Wikipedia, any more than in any other reputable encyclopedia. You are, I believe, operating off of a premise often shared by newcomers to Wikipedia - that there must be some way, if we'd only help you navigate it, for your advocacy piece to pass muster.There isn't. Take your Bruce Clark proposal for an example. If you have the reliable sources to do so - an unpublished master's thesis doesn't remotely count - you can certainly write an article about Clark as a notable lawyer and activist on behalf | of First Nations peoples, including such details as the notorious cases in which he was involved, his prison sentence and disbarment. You cannot cast him as a noble crusader for downtrodden peoples, who proved to be the victim of smear and dirty tricks campaigns, driven into exile by a corrupt government. As long as you are determined to write advocacy pieces, instead of neutral statements of verifiable fact backed by reliable, independent, third-party sources, then they will be subject to prompt deletion.No one is telling you, of course, that you can't write advocacy pieces. We're just telling you that such pieces have no place on Wikipedia, and that you must seek other venues for their publication. " | 0 |
You are incompetent, dethcock!! In fact , you are an | arrogant sphincter who ingests semen on a regular basis | 1 |
hi all you bitchs i can edit any thing i want | i am LADY GAGA it is nice to say APRIL FOOLS | 1 |
"Thats My Bitch""== This track is in | no way confirmed for the album. ==""" | 1 |
" ::I'm going to be bold here and siphon these out. If you can detail these in the places where I haven't, that would be great ===Issues about the science sourcing=== Right now, this (in my opinion) is the most pressing issue, especially in the ""concerns"" section. To meet basic NPOV standards (including our fringe theories guideline), we need to ensure that antiscientific fringe theories do not go unchecked in the article. I believe the best way to do so, in the few cases left, is to simply use a source that asserts the consensus and note it after the point. The source does not have to contextually mention the March, but | it would be preferable if one exists (such as the Reason.TV link from earlier). Thoughts on this? ===TL;DR version=== ===HR933=== ===Formatting of the concerns section=== This should be in prose to match the rest of the article, outside of any other concerns. ===Sourcing in the lead=== There is disagreement about sourcing in the lead, although our policies and manual of style allow for it. ===Removal of Facebook message=== ===Media reception=== Right now, the undue tag remains because the section is weighted toward an untrue allegation regarding media coverage of the march (or lack thereof). A proposal to shrink the section and note the contrary claims has been floated, is this doable? " | 0 |
== I wanna just ask some people something == I believe the Rodney King beating was wrong, regardless of what King was doing and/or had done in the past. I also believe it is a tragedy that Latasha Harlins, a young girl was shot and killed by a Korean store owner, by accident. However, I also find it very annoying that out of riots and protests surrounding racism, there stems even more racism. For example, people started hating Koreans because of one mistake, a woman made. The people there were probably used to shoplifting, as it is common, and they were just trying to live too. It does not justify Harlins' death, which was a mistake seeing | as how she wasnt actually shoplifting, but it wasn't in cold blood either. Meanwhile, the street gangs of LA such as crips and bloods, big proponents of the riots have been responsible for many innocent children's deaths, many of these children being black or minorities. Does anyone else find this weird? I personally am tired of everyone taking sides of race, and hoping for some all out war, instead of constantly forming more and more racist stereotypes, people need to stop focusing. Affluent whites against blacks against koreans etc, its a stupid chain. Also street gangs are also stupid they are responsible for a lot of the problems LA's minority communities have in the first place. | 0 |
"== November 2011 == {| align=""center"" class=""notice noprint"" style=""background: lightyellow; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"" |- | valign=""top"" style=""padding: 0.1em"" | | style=""padding: 0.1em"" | Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Someone using this IP address, , has made unhelpful edits to the page Harton%20Technology%20College, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating | an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you. Some good links for newcomers are: *Help contents – the main help page. *Quick guide – a ""cheatsheet"" listing the main editing commands. *The five pillars of Wikipedia *Tutorial Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! |}" | 0 |
== f percy smith == WHY THE FUCK IS | f percy smith NOT MENTIONED IN THIS WIKI!! | 1 |
== This webpage sucks. Anyone can edit it, | it is very retarded. == This website SUCKS!!!!!!! | 1 |
U ALL A BUNCH OF FAGGOTS == == Headline | text == == == Headline text == == == | 1 |
why are you telling me i can't edit pages. I HAVE | A RIGHT TO EDIT!!! thats why i joined Wikipedia you idiot! | 1 |
^Stupid rants FTW. That is totally the way to get | your point across, rave and scream like a child. Genius. | 1 |
" :Indeed, as you've seen this is an old, old story that goes back six years just on here. And even then, it was just new to Wikipedia — in other forums, it goes back over 15 years. As always, Wikipedia's core and non-negotiable policy is that a public figure cannot be described or categorized as gay on the basis of allegations about their sexuality, or editors' unsourced assertions of private personal knowledge, or third party claims by Pamela Taylor or Enzo Di Matteo — it will be acceptable in his article only when he can be reliably sourced as having come out as gay in his own words, and not on the basis of anything less than that. And | as for the most recent anonymous IP claim that the article already discusses his sexuality, it actually does no such thing — the only LGBT-related content in this article at all is one paragraph discussing REAL Women of Canada's infamous attack on him for including LGBT rights as part of the human rights component of his job. But LGBT rights are not an issue that only LGBT people themselves get onside with — heterosexual people are active on LGBT rights issues all the time, especially when they're involved in international diplomacy on the larger and more general issue of human rights. So nothing in the article, in and of itself, ""proves"" anything about his sexuality in and of itself. " | 0 |
My mom makes a living by sucking penises | and my dad is also our farmyard donkey. | 1 |
" == Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions | will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. " | 0 |
" == Copyright problem removed == One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.ministrywatch.com/profile/Family-Research-Council.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. | Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. " | 0 |
"]] * ""Isaac Newton invented gravity because some asshole | hit him with an apple"" - [[Christopher Moltisanti|CM" | 1 |
" ::::::::::Yworo, but what if one source says one thing and another says another thing. Surely the conclusion really is that ""astrologers may or may not believe ..."". Is this not the case? Either way the entire paragraph should probably be edited. What astrologers generally believe is that there is a law of correspondance whereby celestial motions correlate with mundane ones - the law of correspondance can be summed up as 'as above, so below' from the emerald tablets. Either way, the sentence as it stands is misleading, what I meant in my earlier post was that I would source a less misleading author and amend as necessary. I'm happy to post it here first for scrutiny and debate if you like. Also you | suggest that astrologers do not believe that the planets influence people and events. In terms of causation, that is true, but the way it is worded makes it sound like the celestial placements have no relevance to mundane or human affairs, which isn't true. That's probably part of the confusion. ""Few astrologers believe that the movements and positions of celestial bodies either directly influence life on Earth or correspond to events experienced on a human scale"" simply isn't true, most astrologer believe that they CORRESPOND to events experienced on a human scale, just not that planetary motion CAUSES this to happen. I will find the relevant authors etc. and make the correction here first (under a new paragraph probably) for it to be debated." | 0 |
joshua rocks joshua rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!you suck you suck | i rule you suck ha ha ha | 1 |
Youidiot! You blocked meoff! Well, I'llkill you! | Bang!You're dead! Halleauya! Rex is DEAD! | 1 |
" == Frog Kick == Hi BanyanTree, There is a difference between ""taking ownership"" of an article, and keeping it one one's watchlist. I claim no ownership of any article on Wikipedia, but do make a habit of trying to improve any diving articles. This includes requesting citations for claims which are outside my personal experience or for which I cannot find references myself. I challenged your unreferenced statement that once learned, the frog kick typically becomes the standard kick, because it conflicts with my experience, and I could not remember or find a reasonably reliable corroborating reference. If you can provide such, please feel welcome to cite it in the article, as it would be valuable | knowledge to me as well as the rest of the world. If not, you may delete the challenged statement, but the rest of the article is not yours to revert without a valid reason, as the information added to Wikipedia is published under a free license and unexplained deletion or reversion of valid content may be viewed as vandalism, which I do not believe was your intention. There is no great rush, If you are aware of a reference but do not currently have access to it, leave a note on the talk page and maybe someone else will be able to get hold of a copy and provide the citation. Cheers, • • • " | 0 |
" == Vote - I am tiring of mediation, and hope we fix the problem soon: This may work == Vote - I am tiring of mediation, and hope we fix the problem soon: This may work' *Generic Updates Message to other participants: I have imitated Uncle Ed's Q & A method and tried to augment it, and I have declared a tentative (minor) success on the first of seven questions I've presented, thanks to teamwork of many of you in the past, some named in that question. Most of all of other six ""Vote on these"" items are valid concerns, shared by all, even if we don't agree to the answers. So, I'm asking you all to review and vote on the lingering issues. Also, Wagon has suggested we get | both guidelines and examples (role model was the term he used). We all know the rules, but I found one example of a controversial topic that simply shared the facts in a cold, dry method: The Slavery article neither supports nor opposes slavery: It is ""just the facts."" Thus, I hope the answers I gave to the questions I proposed were correct and just the facts, without an appearance of POV. ""Have faith in me,"" I say (imitating Uncle Ed's similar claim), and I haven't failed yet -the one time I tried: In the http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Abortion and http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Abortion, I brought peace, so I expect my method will work here too. So, get on over to The Mediation Voting Center, and vote, for Gordon's sake: I have voted, and so can you. " | 0 |
This Is the kind of junk my mom took me to | when I was a kid. Just give me some disney already | 1 |
= You are a stupid faggot! = You should | be castrated! Homosexuality should be punishable by death penalty! | 1 |
" == Request for advice on Mises Scholar Ralph Raico == There are genuinely appalling violations of policy littered throughout this walled garden article. Literally all cited material in the article comes from either primary sources or Mises related sources, with the vast majority of material being utterly unsourced, including: the claim that Raico is an ""Austrian economist"" (when nothing else in the article, including OR, indicates that he is anything but a history professor at Buffalo State); the implication that three of the most eminent professors in the storied history of an elite university (U of Chicago's (Nobel Laureate economists) Hayek, Friedman, and (English Professor) Weaver) worked closely with Raico | on what is implied to be an official university journal; that Friedman praised the journal effusively; and so on and so on ad nauseum. There is also an abundance of fan-club style trivia detailing obscure awards and titles (""poet laureate"" of ""Circle Bastiat""; ""lifetime achievement in the cause of liberty""; etc) of Raico's. I'm writing to ask you for advice, because you (unlike me, or the mises institute supporters) are a neutral party who also has particular expertise on AfD. I think the article sorely needs an AfD, since as it stands now a strong case for deletion can be made, and this case deserves a hearing. What say you? " | 0 |
== Mwhahaha == you are a fucking | basted just go leave Wikipedia Now!!!!!!!! | 1 |
Think of Too Short his music is way dirty than snoop | and u guys are callin him a porn Producer PLEASE Damn | 1 |
" ==Your Help is Needed== I love how you watch out for the proper definition of glamour. Well I have one for you that needs your help concerning a photojournalist turned ""glamour"" photographer who has written three successful books on the topic. The original article in question was ""speedy deleted"" after being listed here on Wikipedia for over two years and having endured an AfD before. The admin responsible for the SD, did so after deleting links from the original article then used his ""speedy delete"" powers to delete it. When questioned about it, the article went before a 2nd AfD, at which time the admin in question allowed the article to | be judged, sans his link deletion of credible sources from the original state of the article. When the sources were added during the 2nd AfD, the admin would delete them immediately and eventually block them, including a link to the Univesity of Texas, San Antonio's list of notable alumni on Wikipedia (Wikipedia approved pages should be a credible source) where the notability of the person (article in question) was clearly established by the university. You appear very knowledgeable in these matters and do not appear to be the type described in this article, and because of this, we request your help in overturning an improper deletion. Thank you for your time. " | 0 |
" ==Article content== A summary of the disputed issues, and my most recent thoughts about them. #""Karel"" vs. ""Bouley"": What to call him. I've never heard of this person before editing the article. Given that he calls himself ""Charles Karel Bouley"" in many notable places, he probably shouldn't be called ""Karel"" in most parts of the article. However, I am not sure whether he should occasionally be called ""Karel"" when referring to his radio show, and don't feel I know enough to make any further comment. I would also like to know if ""Charles Karel Bouley"" is his legal nameapparently, it was not his name at birth. If ""Karel"" is not part of | his legal name, perhaps the entire article should be renamed ""Charles Bouley."" #His firing: A major turning point in his life, therefore I think it belongs in the article. #""Struggling"": Joy, do you have more specific information about what Bouley was doing at this stage of his career? SRQ does not. ""Struggling"" is certainly better than no information at all, especially if it comes from a reliable source. However, I still think there are better ways to write the article if more detailed information is available. Is there anything I've left out? It seems to me that the sum total of these issues are not a huge deal in terms of content. " | 0 |
== Hey, you freaking retard == Don't call people | like Grawp when they are obviously not Grawp. | 1 |
" == Behind the Scenes : Lessons Learned (Purged) == [1] Please preview Wikipedia article about DARPA-funded Thinklets ... Also see: Oceanography and World Meteorological Organization [2] Effective feedback loops are essential to adapting general systems theory. [3] Ignoring this critical success factor often hampers sustainable results after global business mergers. [4] Recycling program management ""lessons learned"" proved pivotal in Breaking Cycles of Mistrust. Example: General Mills, Inc. and Pillsbury Brands crafted unique post-merger integration protocols. [5] Their '""lessons learned""' now drive UNEP-inspired corporate social responsibility programs. * ALL-WinWin: Sustainable Development Framework * | ALL-WinWin: Eco-Futures Fourm Framework * O.O.D.A. Loops ... Tom Peters Keynote RANT at Kan-Ed Network Conference in Wichita, Kansas == Means + Opportunity + Motives + Morality (Meta-Ethics) == The Museum of Tolerance is a multimedia museum that examines racism and prejudice with a strong focus on the history of the Holocaust. Also see M-O-M-M Matrix commentary by James Dobson ... This reflects actionable distilled insights from Cybercrime fighting case studies. A structured lessons learned briefing may use this framework for social network analysis: Means + Opportunity + Motives + Morality (Metaethics) " | 0 |
Etymology is the study of the history of words, their origins, and how their form and meaning have changed over time. Folk etymology is the sound, spelling and meaning of a word which is changed by the influences of cultures. While I appreciate that there is no evidence that the screenplay reference directly inspired the subsequent incarnation in the Australian lexicon, I contend that there is nonetheless cultural currency in its inclusion in this article. : If it is a case of coincidental coinage at different times, then the reference in the 1975 Star Wars draft is relevant temporally, as it seems to predate the contemporary Australian use | (i.e. 'how their form and meaning have changed over time'). If it was a case of coincidental coinage across cultures, then it is relevant on the grounds of comparative Folk etymology (i.e. 'meaning of a word which is changed by the influence of cultures'). There is no doubt that George Lucas' Star Wars has been influential in popular culture, and since his use of the term 'Bogan' was also in a pejorative sense (being the draft name he attributed to the 'dark side', a defining theme of the eventual movie franchise), I contend that the consistencies of meaning between the two usages are more substantive than merely coincidental. | 0 |
Punched in the Head I am blade, daywalker, I am going to | punch you in head just like I did to Ashley Walters | 1 |
" ::The narrative purpose of the Sentry was to have the Marvel Universe's most powerful character also a character with terrible mental illness, his only weakness, his own worst enemy. You can only really appreciate him if you suspend whatever disbelief it takes to accept that, okay, fuck Galactus, fuck Terrax, and definitely fuck the Hulk, because the Sentry is (was) #1. Because they said so, that's all. He was called ""omnipotent"" and ""immortal"", and I'm sure we've not seen the last of him. (Haters, just stifle yourselves, willya?) ::There's no reason to believe Sentry was truly motivated to take down the WWH Hulk. He | may have been bashing him with all his might, but that's not the same as wanting him dead. He punched the Hulk around when he could have simply stopped his heart, or torn his skull open and eaten his brain. It was a boisterous fight between friends; despite the flaming destruction, no one was trying to kill anyone. If Reynolds had released the Void, it would have been a vastly different, much sadder story, because the Hulk would be dead forever. ::The Sentry and the Void are far, FAR stronger than the Hulk. But Hulk is more emotionally together and that's saying something! :: " | 0 |
==Wikipedia:WikiProject Opera and our standpoint in consensus== Hi, I don’t know how to say but I think someone should talk to . I think he is withdrawing from Opera project – look at his user page. He has done a lot of work. He is like the key person in Opera project by maintaining the articles, corpus listing, doing assessments and also key person in Wiki project page itself. There are times we have compromise with what we want in order to save a good member – at least that is what I will do in the real life. There are many unorganized projects in Wiki, projects without “somebody” taking care it. At the end, the project is dead. I do not want to see that to happen in Opera project, and for that, I believe we need to continue | doing what he always do. I am writing this to you, hoping that you could consider or at least talk to him. When I said, “compromise”, I mean, if the “stub tag by language” isn’t that important compared to losing a good friend, so be it. I genuinely feel that losing a good friend to something that is less important is not worth at all, seriously. I just don’t understand why the tags have been placed in our articles without consensus. We haven’t agreed to it, we are still in the middle of the discussion. That is why I said we have to vote first. I was surprised to see my “watchlist” full with list of “tag added” even I have said clearly that we need an agreement with our active members. I need your opinion about this. - | 0 |
Oh, I also take 1000% responsibility. I am a worthless | piece of shit that should be lynched and killed. | 1 |
I was interested in Paul’s comments that The Kaaba being a Vedic Temple (originally) being not worthy of thought. I find it strange that the influence if India via Hinduism and Buddhism (primarily) stretches as far east as Korea but we see very little evidence of if to the west, and the assumption(due to this odd fact) there could never have been any influence on Arabia from India. It was the custom of the Muslim invaders to destroy Hindu Temples across Northern India and build Mosques over the ruins. This is indisputable, also I believe that Muhammad’s uncle (Abu Talib) is a documented Vedic poet, do | you dispute this also? More investigation is needed in the pree-Islamic roots of Arabia to seek the religion before Islam; The Kabba is an ancient Temple (as documented in the Koran). Its origins are certainly not Islamic and it would be fascinating to find out the true purpose of the Kaaba and the Black Stone within. As a Hindu I’m constantly having to re interpret my Country’s past. From the blatant lies of an Aryan Invasion theory by the like’s of Max Muller, to today when even a suggestion that Islamic shrines might have a Vedic origin as “Hindu Nationalism” being greeted with derision. S.M. | 0 |
== Proposal of arbitration case == Would you like to open an arbitration case about the user Alvin? He's previously made you 'lose your shit' and he linked WP:ABF as a response to WP:AGF. He also did a very invalid AfD case and tags pages with unnecessary tags. After endless warnings, he keeps doing those exact same mistakes and even 'tweaks' information on his talk page posted by other users to make him look like the 'good guy'. : Could this not be attempted to be settled at AN/I in the first instance? I agree the editor is a net negative to the project ::Yes, I jumped ahead of myself. Would you support and show diffs to help | determine consensus if I do report the user? ::: I would, yes - however, have you had any interactions with the editor? Keep it in mind that given their history it's likely they're going to go up against you pretty hard and attempt to boomerang the report back on yourself (hence my stepping back, as I was entirely uncivil with them) ::::I have had interactions of cleaning up after the editor, and I had a discussion with him on one of his accounts (which he temporarily abused) which I forgot about what. Thank you for your advice and be prepared for the talk back post on your talk page in the next hour or so. :::::No worries | 0 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2015 | == Parker is A FUCKING BUNNY KILLER!@!!!!!!! | 1 |
== pristerognathus == please stop removing the image,or im | going to tell an admin to block you,idiot!!!!!!!!! | 1 |
Warning! You are a douchebag and work for free! | Stop changing things on Fatal1ty's Wikipage, you prick. | 1 |
Who's been updating game results before the games | have ended? Stop it, you cheeky buggers. | 1 |
Well, it was you who assumed and pointed out in the first place that a fellow Wiki reader is posting propaganda without consideration and objectivity. That may also be against the WP policy. This http://liveuamap.com/ source is regarded as the most accurate by people who on a regularly basis follow the War in Donbass. The map monitors ukrainian and separatist troop movements by using geotags and social media. It clearly shows that Shyrokyne is under ukrainian control and that the separatist have withdrawn within 2 kilometers east of the village on the M14 highway. The only forces remaining in Shyrokyne are ukrainian and the village is to be demined https://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/lysenko-says-shyrokyne-to-be-demined-392808.html. If the separatist still had forces | in the village I would agree with you. Now, the ukrainians do, the separatist don't. Ukraine controls the village, there is no longer a standoff over who controls it and therefore it shouldn't be indecisive. I appreciate that steps have been made to reduce these claims regarding casualties from both sides. It is often hard to verify sources since both sides tend to diminish friendly casualties and exaggerate killed enemies. One way to look at it would be to present claims from both sides and let the readers decide for themselves what is the most true or to remove such claims completely. As for now, they are often mixed in the infoboxes and may cause confusion. | 0 |
" ONE PERSON MEANS ONE PERSON (or at least that's ""my"" interpretation.. Long ago MY ACCOUNT (quyix4u) was deliberately and MALICIOUSLY ""added"" to someone else's account by Fabian (a wordpress administrator) simply because FABIAN did NOT ""like' the way ONE SINGLE PERSON (me) types.? I am dislexick, and slightly iliterate as well as a conscious thought streaming typist. IT DOES NOT MAKE ME A ""multiple use abuser"" (however I WAS DELIBERATELY ABUSED BY FABIAN, who ""deemed"" that I (a single entity here in Roxburgh New Zealand, could ""simply"" not be a single entity.. and slammed my asre to the wikipdeian wall.. no questions asked, no detertmination given.. AND | NO RIGHT TO DEFEND MYSELF.. However for sure.. START to ""block me again"" and I will simply contact your ISP, as well as your host provider and ""complain"" that my credibitily has been challenged by way of a deliberate discrimination attack, and that my personal property (My picture of my Great Grandfather is being abused against my copyright terms that I gave to wikipedia, along with the abuse of the moral rights that I have requested be upheld.. So challenge all you wqant..And find out - after wikipedia has been REMOVED from the internet.. THA I AM A SINGLE ENTITY.. I AM NOT ANYONE""S SOCK PUPPET. " | 0 |
" ==Non-free use disputed for Image:Like A Prayer.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Like A Prayer.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under ""fair use"". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description | page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.) If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The image is not low resolution. " | 0 |
Antandrus is a damnass I hate him really | extremely much. DAMN ANTANDRUS I HATE HIS ASS!! | 1 |
"A NOTE ON ALUN'S APPARENT INABILITY/UNWILLINGNESS TO ANSWER MY QUESTION I regard this as being a perfectly normal and reasonable request: Alun, have you read all of the available literature*? (IF you have not, there is simply no point in continuing this dialogue.) 195.92.168.163 A REMINDER: Franklin: biographies by Sayre, Maddox; articles by Elkin, Abir-Am; Wilkins: ""The Third Man of DNA"" autobiography; Crick: ""What Mad Pursuit"" autobiography; Watson: The Double Helix; A Passion For DNA; Genes, Girls, and Gamow; DNA: The Secret of Life, ie his various autobiographical works. Watson: various biographies, including ""Watson and DNA"" by McElheny. Hunter: ""Light is | A Messenger""(biography of Sir Lawrence Bragg); plus: De Chadarevian: ""Designs For Life"" (post WW11 Molecular Biology); Olby: ""The Path to the Structure of DNA""; Freeland Judson: ""The Eight Day of Creation""; Martin (195.92.168.163 ) ps Not forgetting Chargaff's book, the name of which almost escapes me (something like 'Herculean Fire') which I have NOT yet read! MP Alun, so what is your problem? These are the sources of information from which 'Wikipedia' can be corrected; what (if any) alternatives are there? You cannot update 'Franklin' references without good sources! (You are not doing her reputation any favours otherwise.) Martin " | 0 |
Gramma rays are used to fart so that people can pee and fart | in there pants to that they can smell their butt and lick it | 1 |
Welcome! Hello, ChintzyTurtle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for . I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Kevin Abstract does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, | where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: *The five pillars of Wikipedia *Contributing to Wikipedia *How to edit a page *Help pages *Tutorial *How to write a great article *Simplified Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on . Again, welcome! | 0 |
" :::It slays me that your faction has shown such utter contempt for the editors who've contributed to this article, and that you should put scare quotes around the words ""Dean expert"", considering that the venerable old master of the subject who wants to ""take the reins"", as you say, is all of sixteen or seventeen years old. :::Let's not forget that this whole affair started when DAP388 suddenly, with no warning or discussion on the talk page, unilaterally nuked the whole article and replaced it with his poorly edited substitute replete with errors of fact and tortuous phrasing. He then reacted with shock | and dismay when I reverted it, and reverted my reversion, completely oblivious to the concerns of other editors, and apparently unconscious that he was doing the very thing I did to the work of one (poorly prepared) editor, to the work of dozens. I can hardly think of a more presumptuous or immature approach to getting what you want. :::Given the aggressive efforts of DAP388 and his supporters to destroy a long-standing article that has evolved over many years, and, whatever its faults, is superior to the sophomoric (...""critics adored""...) replacement proffered, it's hard not to conclude that this dubious enterprise is ego-driven. " | 0 |
== Marines are a seond army == Good point here..the us marines are supposed to be amphibious..So why were they in the desert fighting no where near water? I know that desert training also serves very well in any venue where retreat is out of the question but the us army has that job..inland is army..shore is marine corps..Also the seals have robbed the job of us marines..the marines should be the seals.and the green berets or rangers should have captured bin ladennot seals..Why is the navy forming seal teams for fighting on beaches? thats the marines job. and then seals are doing stuff that is army | job..Seems navy is the biggest robber of all..they comepte with the marines with seal teams. they ompete with the army with seals again..they even have an air force...seems weird that americas team of capturing terrorists comes from the navy..And then there the united states air force..pj cct..the AF wanted a piece of the tough guy land action so they formed cct..their own commandos who go in on land to destroy enemy airports crafts and anti airplane groupn weapons..thatsthe armys job!!!..so now an american boy who wants to join the toughest has to choose..seals green berets pj-cct or marine rangers..all trained together ....we are one confusing country.. | 0 |
Subsets and Splits