prompt
stringlengths 3
940
| original_output
stringlengths 7
1.33k
| toxic
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
" ==random== OK, so, if you're a registered editor, when you view an edit history, you'll see (curr) (last) and (report). If you click on the report button, it will report that diff as a policy violation. This will get put into a queue of all reported policy violations. Admins who wish to handle a reported violation will go to a page, click on a button and the wikipedia website will pick which reported violation they are to investigate. Ideally, this decision making would filter out reported violations that occured on pages that the admin regularly edits, or users that the admin is often involved with. Beyond that, the software | could randomly pick a reported violation (or pick from the ones that have the largest number of editors reporting it) and assign it to that admin. The admin would then investigate and either administer a warning or a block or close the report as insufficient to warrant punishment. Gaming the system by admins would be impossible. Which means cries of ""cabal"" and ""old boys network"" would be silly. Basically, an admin is nothing more than an editor and maintenance person and can only act as a policy enforcer on issues assigned by this randomized tool. This would require some changes to the wiki software, but it could be done. " | 0 |
" == References to wire colors == In the section entitled ""Split Phase"", the author refers to the wire colors - white, black and red. It might be useful to indicate that those are the colors in the U.S. and Canada. European (including UK) colors are different. I am not suggesting that the reference to the colors be removed - just indicate they apply to the U.S. and Canada. BTW, someone stated that the article is written in ""British English"" - but given the reference to the wire colors lead me believe he is Canadian. The use of the Canadian spelling doesn't bother me | - perhaps because my grandmother was Canadian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Split phase is not common in the UK where is is more usual to supply two of three phases to premises requiring extra power, and to keep the two phases completely separate consumer-side with conventional colours (brown for both phases, blue neutral and yellow-green stripe earth). Brown, black and grey have been compulsory three-phase colours for the past nine years, replacing the previous red, yellow and blue that confused the Germans (no insult intended). In view of this, perhaps we need to clarify that this paragraph relates to North America. " | 0 |
" == The harm of articles == According to my logic, every article has cost, and what we're buying with that cost is maintaining or increasing article quality. The set of books that meet our notability guidelines is huge, but still small enough that the community is willing to tolerate low-quality articles in hopes that they will be improved sooner rather than later. If you expand the pool of potential articles to any published book, we're going to be inundated with low-quality articles, most of which won't ever be improved (not the least because, in the absence of reliable sources, we have nothing to say about them other than the fact that they exist). If you want to take responsibility for all aspects of an | article, from polishing the prose to making sure every WP:MOS-mandated em-dash is in the right place, and you do this before you put the article in to mainspace, then in my experience you'll be given quite a bit more leeway (especially in non-controversial areas). There's one more reason the ""does no harm"" argument is annoying. In the time it's taken for us to have this colloquy, you could have gone out and found a few of the reviews that I found. ""Does no harm"" absolves you from having to improve the article. If you want to !vote to keep an article, you'll be much better served by improving the article to the point where it's obvious that the article should be kept. Best, " | 0 |
"the vandalism which has gone on for too long. () ::: You are permanently banning an entire company's IP because one or two users in the entire company are vandalizing. That seems a tad bit autocratic, and dare I say, unfair to the other 29,998 employees of Twentieth Century Fox. Don't you think? No I don't. Please log in if you wish to edit. (')' ::::Now you're just being ridiculous. There are maybe 1 or 2 user vandalizing from this IP range, and 30,000 other freaking innocent users being cut off. This is why people accuse you admins of having become corrupt and fascist you make fascist decisions like these every day, and enforce them arbitrarily. Sorry. You're welcome to register. I'll make sure this | is enabled. (')' :::::I've tried to register, and it keeps saying this IP has reached its 6-name limit for the day. I certainly haven't created an account today, and prior to your enabling the creation of accounts at this IP, I don't believe it was possible. Is there any way to reset the counter, or do something? :::::: ""You are permanently banning an entire company's IP"", the company should take responsibility for the use of their equipment. Here's an idea, why don't you contact your network people, get them to compare there logs to the time of the vandalism, find the idiots responsible and get their manager to do something about their abuse of the companies network facilities. No vandalism = No blocks. () " | 0 |
"Compass === On what grounds was the compass reference by Li Shu-hua removed? The newer research does not contradict Li Shu-hua's observation. In fact, it stresses his point, since the wording demonstartes that the passage does NOT contain a reference to a magnet. *""However, it should be pointed out that in the Louen-heng text, on which Tchang Yin-lin and Wang Tchen-touo based their hypothesis, there is no explicit mention of a magnet.Li Shu-hua: “Origine de la Boussole 11. Aimant et Boussole,” Isis, Vol. 45, No. 2(1954), pp. 175-196 (180)"" *Original text (180): ""On peut remarquer que dans le texte du Louen-heng il n'y a pas de mention explicite d'aimant. Pour arriver au résultat ci-dessus indiqué, on est oblige de poser quelques | hypotheses."" ::Twas not I who removed this. Anpersonalaccount maybe? In any case, I remember restoring a citation from him in the picture caption to the right. Hey Gun Powder Ma, how could a word like magnet appeared over in the ancient texts by the way? The word magnet, which according to this article came from Greek word ""magnesian stone"". ::Perhaps he means the Chinese word (i.e., 攝石) for magnet? In any case, we should not expect Wang Chong to have truly understood what magnetism was; he simply described the effects of the geomancy ladle and bowl. Well, we shall look out sources on this. Hey, I just added and replaced the old source with a better ones! Lol === " | 0 |
"== VP70 in Popular Culture == **I'm pulling this section to discussion. It does not meet the standards for inclusion in the main article. * In Aliens, the VP70 were used in the movie probably because the pistol's distinctive design made it appear to be of a futuristic type of weapon. * In the James Bond novel For Special Service (not written by Ian Fleming but rather John Gardner) Bond used a VP70. This is supposedly due to a policeman's Walther PPK having jammed in a kidnap attempt. (Bond had previously given up his favoured Beretta .25 in preference to the Walther after the Beretta had jammed.) Also, there are claims that | in at least one of the films Bond may be armed with a H&K; instead of the Walther due to ignorance on the part of the props department. * In the anime Gunslinger Girl, the character Claes uses the VP70 military version (w/stock). * Leon S. Kennedy uses the VP70 as his handgun in Resident Evil 2 and it can be modified by the player with a stock and burst-fire capability. The player can also purchase the military version of the gun as an unlockable weapon in Resident Evil 4 known as the ""Matilda"". * It is also one of the two starting weapons in Wasteland, along with the Colt 1911." | 0 |
:That's because there isn't one. It's a stereotype that was made | up by a couple of idiots, just like all stereotypes. | 1 |
:@Nageh: I changed my opinion on notability, given WP:NNC: :*The criteria applied to article content are not the same as those applied to article creation. The notability guidelines do not apply to article or list content (with the exception that some lists restrict inclusion to notable items or people). Content coverage within a given article or list is governed by the principle of due weight and other content policies. :Due weight does not seem to pose a problem either, since it deals with points of view. :*Neutrality requires that each article or other page in | the mainspace fairly represents all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint. :Unless someone claims it isn't the Greatest largest happy number with no redundant digits, this wouldn't apply. That leaves the question of WP:NOR and WP:CALC. :*This policy allows routine mathematical calculations, such as adding numbers, converting units, or calculating a person's age, provided there is consensus among editors that the arithmetic and its application correctly reflect the sources. :Are we to decide on whether the calculations are routine or not, or on concensus? | 0 |
== Fair and righteous opinion == You are a fuck ugly feminist | dyke, and a good bit of rape would do you no harm! | 1 |
fuck off kike== you would never say these things | to my face you coward. Terrorist pro-israeli traitors == | 1 |
::As a member of the House of Israel, I can assure you | that some Jews have sex. I'm sorry if this offends you. | 1 |
" == Proposal to remove date-autoformatting == Dear contributors MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes rules for the raw formatting, irrespective of whether a date is autoformatted or not). MOSLINK and CONTEXT are consistent with this. There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here: Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. If anyone objects to my proposal to free the dates of | autoformatting in the main text in a day or two on a trial basis, please say so below. The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just our millions of readers; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which would give greater prominence to the high-value links. Critically, since I’m an FAC reviewer, I want to state in unequivocal terms that if contributors object, this will have absolutely no bearing on my review or declaration at FAC. I’m proposing the action because FAC is an influential process, not because nominators might feel under obligation—in this respect, they shouldn’t. " | 0 |
== HIstory of a radio == IT was fun | and amazing and yah so go fuck yourself! | 1 |
Unblock me or I'll murder you I have a gun and I'm | not afraid to use it on you punk you dead man | 1 |
Hello, as far as I am concerned this (performing Vinaya funtions together) is common knowledge. I searched to internet for a source and found the following: so it is best that we take to heart the writings of the Chinese pilgrims who visited India centuries ago. They reported that even after the early Buddhists had split into 18 schools, each with its own Tripitaka and Patimokkha, and the Mahayanists had added their texts to the tradition, bhikkhus belonging to different schools could be found living together in the same monastery, practicing and conducting communal business in peace and harmony. Buddhist Monastic Code I, Thanissaro bhikkhu. So I guess it can be found in one of | the accounts of the Chinese pilgrims. I think it is mentioned in Lamotte's book also. Did you know there is actually a precedent set in the Buddha's time about adding new rules by the Sangha? One local Sangha (monastery) added a new pacittiya offence, after which the Buddha admonished them and said that this can only be done by himself. So at the First Buddhist Council it was not necessary to close the Patimokkha since it was never open to the Sangha anyway. They did decide not to relinquish the lesser and minor rules, though. This story of the Buddha's time might explain why they added only sekhiyas to the various patimokkhas afterwards. Greetings, | 0 |
to whom this mayconcern, SPIN ON IT!SPIN ON MY MEAT!!!BITCH DONT | MAKE ME TELL YOU AGAIN!!ILL BEAT YOU!!GET ON MY MEAT!!!! | 1 |
" Welcome! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 81.153.132.165). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in. When you edit pages: * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly. * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy. * If you are testing, please use | the Sandbox to do so. * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism. The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on . I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. " | 0 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2015 == porn porn | porn porn porn is my life ya fuck ass bitch | 1 |
.Even though I thought he was down for all the bitches and hoes. | But I later realized he was fucking Joe Biden up the ass | 1 |
== The Great Departure == There are some disputes regarding the great departure of Buddha. The reason described in the article is about a dead person, a sick, and an old man. This view is described but not properly referenced in the article. Another, and more justifiable, reason is given in the book The Buddha and His Dhamma by Dr. Ambedkar. He writes in its prolouge: The first problem relates to the main event in the life of the Buddha, namely, Parivraja. Why did the Buddha take Parivraja? The traditional answer is that he took Parivraja because he saw a dead person, a sick person and an old person. This answer is absurd on the face of it. The Buddha | took Parivraja at the age of 29. If he took Parivraja as a result of these three sights, how is it he did not see these three sights earlier? These are common events occurring by hundreds, and the Buddha could not have failed to come across them earlier. It is impossible to accept the traditional explanation that this was the first time he saw them. The explanation is not plausible and does not appeal to reason. But if this is not the answer to the question, what is the real answer? He gives the real answer in the first part of the book, From Birth to Parivajra. This should be taken in account and must be included in the article. | 0 |
" ==Speedy deletion of Http://www.gr2r.com== A tag has been placed on Http://www.gr2r.com requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific | notability guidelines for people and for organizations. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0 |
==Jonah== With regards to your edits to Jonah, the expansion is interesting, but not relevant to that present article. You see, if you are going to include the Matthew reference and an expansion of just how it is that Jonah is a presage of Jesus, then you also have to greatly expand the biblical references and explanations for why Michelangelo selected each and every one of the prophets, and what each prophet had to say about the Christ. There is no room for that, in the context of the present article. Moreover, Jonah doesn't point at the figure of the Christ in the Last Judgement. His pointing fingers go straight | past. In fact, the Last Judgement wasn't planned or even thought of, at that date. What you have written there sounds like Original Research! In order to find out what it was that Jonah was pointing at, you will need to find out what was on the wall before the Last Judgement. From the angle of his fingers, it could have been one of the papal portraits, but I don't know who occupied that position. Was it Julius? If you look at the page Sistine Chapel, you will find that many of the paintings have monographs. You could write a whole article on the significance of the prophets and sibyls. | 0 |
Most of you assholes are real anal retentive pinheads | and I hope you die of ass cancer | 1 |
" == Educated Horses ""Punk?"" == == Educated Horses ""Punk?"" == As a very longtime fan, I see a much bigger significance in Rob's career with Educated Horses than this article implies. Although he had stated in various interviews that his intention was to essentially ""strip down"" from the latex, make-up, and ""video game"" performances, this latest release is not only an abandonment of his past image, it is completely devoid of his fusional mastery and trademark sensuality. When I think of 'punk,' I think of Sex Pistols, Dead Kennedys, Black Flag, or The Exploited. These acts had passion and attitude, which ""Horses"" has none. Reviews have varied from the ""best thing he's ever done"" to the downright cruel and scathing, which I will not repeat here. It | feels more like a demo than a major release, which makes me wonder if the band shouldn't be performing under a formal name. This ""strip down"" has also dramatically affected his visual work as well. ""Foxy, Foxy"" is an amateurish effort to appeal to pubescent 12 year old boys with the visual stimulation of an onion if you could see anything past the sun-glare in the cameras. Now, if this is a taste of his visual work yet to come, we've got a whole new artist. And in that case, maybe he should deliberate changing his name. Ray PS - I understood that Sean had passed away about 6 years ago. I just saw her entry in the pedia that she was working with a new project..." | 0 |
" ::I've had quite a bit of experience at trying to resurrect articles that have gone off the rails some of them have turned into solid articles, some of them have resulted in what amounts to controlled implosions, as there is insufficient cohesive content to sustain an article. This article has always had very much the feel of the latter. In doing so, I'm generally more interested in new ideas than what I perceive as reflexive defence of existing positions (the status quo between Biopsychiatry controversy and biological psychiatry from you, and the ""original article"" content from Cesar & Benjaminbruheim). I do listen to new input (though don't always draw the conclusions people may expect), and do | quite often change my mind as my sudden idea that a template would be a good idea, based on the realisation from Benjaminbruheim's article of the large number of articles already covering this area, should indicate. My modus operandi on such projects tends to be to use the chainsaw first, and smooth things over later. If you want to disagree with the specifics of what gets moved where (or anything else), then please do so my initial suggestion was based principally on a superficial look as to what looked like it was opinion from anti-psychiatry activists, and which sounded more purely scientific research findings. A different break up, possibly even to different articles, may be useful. " | 0 |
I Like Rape== I like raping bitches because it feels | so good! I take em anyway I can! == | 1 |
:It's done in two steps, one that starts with the FAC logs to produce a table with a month's worth of the by-year lists like Wikipedia:Featured articles nominated in 2006 and another to parse the by-year lists to produce the WP:WBFAN table. It looks like Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by featured list nominations is done mostly by hand at this point. The first step could start with the featured list logs, but unlike the second step it's not fully automated (the logs aren't quite regular enough to reliably determine who the nominator is). What I actually do is run a script that parses the logs into an intermediate form which I check by hand | against the actual logs, and then run another script using this intermediate form to generate the table format. After updating the by-year list, the second step is done with yet another script that reads all the by-year lists and generates the WP:WBFAN table. The second step is actually the easier one since it's fully automated, but it relies on the existence of the by-year lists. I'd be happy to make the scripts I use to generate these lists available, but don't think I can take on generating by-year lists for featured lists. If you (or anyone else reading these words) would like to, please let me know and I'll make the scripts available. | 0 |
"\ ::I don't believe you, as I just looked back over that edit and others like it, where Ravich was taken out before; there were clear syntactical changes in the surrounding sentence showing you were paying attention to what you were doing. I think you only put it back in and claimed ""accident"" because you got caught: I'm not prepared - not with YOU, at any rate, to ""Accept Good Faith"", because I don't think you have any yourself. To sum up, Hong: this latest round of nonsense from you prompts me to render a personal judgement on you: you're dishonest and also a hypocrite about what you think others | should abide by when you feel no compunction to observe the very same themselves. Being unable to be self-critical is one thing, but I don't think it's just vanity on your part; I think you're inherently dishonest. That's not an attack, it's an observation, backed up by your various dodges and inconsitences here and elsewhere. Open thing that leads me to adjudge you that is that because, in my culture, it is widely recognized that those that feel the need to lecture and hector others are generally those who should be listening to their own sermons. But I don't think it's self-deception with you; I think you're deliberately dishonest. " | 0 |
" == The following links need to be placed == These are the remaining links from the latest link harvest, that have not yet been placed in the hierarchy in the ""By subject"" section. * History of cooperatives in the United States * Demographic history of the United States * History of fountains in the United States * Geologic history of the United States * History of hotel fires in the United States * History of transgenderism in the United States * History of union busting in the United States * History of United States diplomatic relations by country * History of United States postage rates * History of United States prison systems * Taxation history | of the United States * Technological and industrial history of the United States * Territorial evolution of the United States ** Territorial acquisitions of the United States * History of violence against LGBT people in the United States * History of youth rights in the United States * Numismatic history of the United States * Oxford History of the United States * Postage stamps and postal history of the United States * History of the flags of the United States * History of the hamburger in the United States * Postage stamps and postal history of the United States * List of United States military history events Any help would of course be appreciated. " | 0 |
" == Reorganisation of Matrix articles == Certain articles are in need of better organisation. I've proposed merging locations within the Matrix (The City and Club Hel) into Matrix (fictional universe) (see that article's discussion page), but I also think that the various ships need to be merged into one article, since according to Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Minor characters: 2. Minor characters (and places, concepts, etc) in a work of fiction should be listed with short descriptions in a ""List of minor characters."" This list should reside in the article relating to the work itself, unless either becomes long, in which case a separate article | for the list is good practice. But I'm not sure what the best name for the article would be. Perhaps: *Zion fleet *List of ships in the Matrix series *List of hovercraft in the Matrix series *Ships of the Matrix series ... and so on. There are a lot of possibilities; which is the best? I think the second... Also, the secondary characters listed in Template:Matrix should be merged into a List of minor Matrix characters or List of minor Matrix series characters (as with List of minor Star Wars characters). The Architect's article might be long enough to stay separate, though. " | 0 |
== Lied der Deutschen = Nazilied? == Lieber ProhibitOnions, schade daß Du in der englischen Ausgabe der Wikipedia unverantwortliches Unwissen verbreitest. Die Nationalhymne war, wie durch den Schriftverkehr von Bundespräsident und Bundeskanzler von 1952 beschrieben, daß Lied der Deutschen in all seinen Strophen. Zu offiziellen Anlässen wurde jedoch nur die dritte Strophe intoniert. Erst nach Eingliederung der ehem. sowjetischen Besatzungszone in die Bundesrepublik änderte ein erneuter Briefwechsel zwischen den derzeitigen Bundespräsidenten und Bundeskanzler die Sachlage. Von da an galt nur noch die dritte Strophe als Nationalhymne. Man mag diese Briefwechsel als Legitimation anzweifeln, aber dann wäre jede | Behauptung falsch und die Bundesrepublik ohne Hymne. Zudem kann ich nicht verstehen, wie Du eine Version wiederherstellen kannst, in der das Lied der Deutschen in einer Reihe mit Naziliedern aufgelistet wird, mit dem mageren Hinweis daß es das Lied bereits vor den Nazis gab. Ich weiß nicht ob das aus einer Geisteshaltung oder aus Naivität resultiert, ich fühle mich jedenfalls sehr dadurch angegriffen und es fällt meiner Meinung nach schon als Beleidigung deutscher Nationalsymbole aus, das Lied der Deutschen in einer derart diffarmierenden Weise zu bezeichnen. In der Bundesrepublik käme wahrscheinlich sogar noch eine rechtliche Komponente hinzu. | 0 |
u r mother is happy | with me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11.........................................................................................................................................................................................................BALLS AND WIENERS!!!!!!!!! BABY!!!!!!!!! | 0 |
The wording of the intro is stupid anyway. | The word establish is used 6 times! | 1 |
" ==Image Tagging Image:CMan.gif== Thanks for uploading Image:CMan.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took | the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use or . See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to ""Your contributions"" from your user page and then selecting ""Image"" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. " | 0 |
Ilir, you're an idiot. Kosovo is still part of | S&M;, and until Montenegro offically splits, that won't change. | 1 |
:::Sorry for the late reply. My internet connection went down as I was checking your first link yesterday and has only been restored a few hours ago. Hugo Winckler,Theodor Nöldeke, Eduard Meyer etc., were very fine sources in their day, but can't be used because they predate contemporary scholarship by more than a century. You can use them if you make a section surveying theories about their existence or not, though. Velikovsky reports most sources like this accurately (in my experience) but he is not RS. The bible refracts ancient legends coming from multiethnic traditions into an 'historical' narrative written in terms of theological patterns of thought. So even the verifiably historical elements are caught up in moralizing | reworking (as is true of much ancient historiography and much modern journalism, for that matter). We cannot know whether the traditions re the Amalekites reflects a historical people or league of tribes: we can guess from the topology that they imbricate over the areas later associated with the Bedouin and, generally, Arabs. As the Arabs gain some ascendency (6th cent. BCE) the Amalekites disappear, and the authors who refer to the latter do so in mythifying terms, to create an image of an eternally inimical people. As such, we are there in the realm of theological myth, since no external testimonies are available to restore the lineaments of the Amalek tale to some form of recognizable historical reality. | 0 |
These are informal warnings. I would have just templated your | ass. — They should stick that on a template!. | 1 |
", 25 April 2013 (UTC) :Wikipedia Talk pages are not a platform for you to express your hatred of particular ethnic groups. ""The Russians"" provided the U.S. with plenty of information that should have made U.S. security agencies consider Tamerlan to be a potential terrorist; the U.S. agencies just didn't follow through. ::A police official source in Makhachkala, Dagestan, told NBC News on Sunday that the Russian internal security service reached out to the FBI last November with some questions about Tamerlan, and handed over a copy of case file on him. ::Tsarnaev had first popped up on the local police | radar in Dagestan last summer, the source said. During routine surveillance of an individual known to be involved in the militant Islamic underground movement, the police witnessed Tamerlan meet the latter at a Salafi mosque in Makhachkala, the police official said. ::It was one of six times in total that surveillance officials witnessed Tsarnaev meeting this militant at the same mosque, according to the police official. ::The militant contact later disappeared, the police official said, but so did Tsarnaev before investigators had a chance to speak with him. The FBI never responded, according to the Dagestani police official. : 21:39" | 0 |
Lol! There PA goes again. You can't get enough and want that NYC attention very badly. If the Tri-state area revolved around NJ, then PA would be in, but since it revolves around NYC AND Long Island is there as well, CT is here. On top of that, CT is a lot closer to NYC than any part PA. Eastern PA also has it's own major city in Philly, PLUS PA is not really the east coast anyway... PA needs to get off of NYC jockstrap. I never saw a state that is not even in NYC's metro region try so hard to be a part of it. You try it with your Poconos, the gambling thing and your governor even asked to relocted (I think) monies and/or businesses to PA in case of another 9-11! Forgetting that fact that the | much closer NJ and CT already cover that... It is also weird since you brought up New England (which is a northern CT thing by the way), Boston does the oppsite of what PA does. Boston wants to keep pulling CT out of the NYC area because they want a larger market share and presence amongst cities. Both MA and PA really want the same thing - a piece of the NY pie and both of you are in the same position - outside of the states of the Tri-state area. The both of you need to worry about you own regions and mind your business. You are like Iran always interferring with Arabic business when they are not arabs. Get your own jockstrap PA and Boston - leave ours alone, we are not trying to see either of you. | 0 |
"Why this article is necessary and important I feel that it is extremely important to differentiate Originalism from Original intent, and that this is best served by the existence of a separate article to address intentionalism. There is an extremely prevalent movement to conflate original intent with originalism, I think because there are many, many valid criticisms of original intent which do not hold true against other originalist theories, but can be made to stick if the two can be conflated (for example, the traditional exhoration that originalism is opposed to Brown v. Board, which is nonsensical: intentionalism might well reject Brown, but virtually all originalists ctegorically reject original intent's premise) This is | like arguing that sport is dumb because no grown adult should find gainfull employment hitting balls with bats; it rests on the assumption that ""sport"" is a synomym for baseball and cricket, and that baseball and cricket constitute not only some sports, not even a majority if sports, but all sport, per se. Likewise, almost no serious originalists are intentionalists, and all of the ""high profile"" originalists - Scalia, Thomas, Bork, Barnett, Lasch and so on - explicitly reject intentionalism, and have done so for well over two decades. Yet still the false conflation persists, and if Wikipedia is to remain fact-based, it must find ways to break this fiction, IMHO. " | 0 |
an enorourmous yet macroscopic penis!! she has no control whatsoever | on it and she just squirms around speaking nonsense | 1 |
" ==Speedy deletion of Smartypig== A tag has been placed on Smartypig requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. If you think that this notice was | placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. " | 0 |
hnugtvuvuygbvutyvgvgvyvyyvviujouiiu and the element hu or | human is so fucking stupid | 1 |
I agree with the person who called | you a dick head!! -Marrissa Anderson West | 1 |
== Headline textItalic text ==I am a gay fag who doesn't know | how to make a movie that doesn't include porn in it | 1 |
"Welcome! '''Hello, , Welcome to Wikipedia! '''I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on . Additional tips: :Here are some extra | tips to help you get around Wikipedia: :*If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. :*If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox. :*Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did. :*You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles. :*You might want to add yourself to the New User Log. :*If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language. Happy editing! " | 0 |
::Don't thank this asshole, he is actually a homosexual. Yeah | I know you didn't know, but unfortunately that's the case. | 1 |
What makes and egg crack? FORCE!!!!!!!!! duh idiot | if you didnt know that youre stupid | 1 |
== Penis Enlargement Pills == The Best | Website Penis Enlargement Pills - http://www.sinepenis.com | 1 |
::No, so fuck off, Kevin. You are a twat when it comes | to this issue and, yes, you are a WMF acolyte. - | 1 |
Holy shit dude! You write like a shitty college | person. Somebody should fix this article but not you! | 1 |
" ==Notability of DoodleDropX== A tag has been placed on DoodleDropX, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability | of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0 |
::Thanks, no, what I'm asking is how to deal with those who will continue to want to tear down the article by finding ways to end-around Afd. Sources only matter if the people involved are willing to read them honestly (which has already proven not to be the case). And I cannot prevent individuals from continuing to put in tags and/or making semi-malicious edits (so far the malicious edits have been minimal but I expect if I try to push the article forward that will change). Ideally I would like to settle the direction of the article before investing too much more time on looking up page numbers in the references and so forth (i.e. make good use of my time). The other controversial article I | took to GA was a nightmare (I took several others to GA and FA). It didn't matter how many references I put in that other article. I tried to find reasonable compromises but ultimately it was a war of attrition and the opposing factions simply got tired of fighting. I never felt good about how that ended but at least the article did go to GA. ::In this case, though, I don't think that there will ever be an end to people who need to see this topic as invalid, either because of religious persuasions or for nationalistic reasons. But honestly I think the topic is an important one, which is why I was willing to delve into it knowing that it would be controversial. | 0 |
" I guess I'd like you to state, quite simply, that you deny that Gandhi was an anti-Zionist, and then we can argue that. I will state quite simply that he was an anti-Zionist, that his contemporaries recognized it, that his writings reflected it, etc., etc., etc. If there is no denial of the claim that he was an anti-Zionist, then I think it is appropriate to balance the introduction's accusation from Martin Luther King with a comment that another important civil rights leader stood on the opposite side of the question. I dislike, I have to say, the tone of your ""secondary arguments"" sentence. It gives the impression that you have decided, regardless of what is appropriate, that you want the reference to Gandhi | suppressed, and that you will make whatever argument you feel you need to make in order to accomplish that goal. Can we not decide before we discuss facts how exactly the matter of including the reference should be decided? I'm sorry if it leans toward failing to assume good faith, but I don't want to have the rules repeatedly changed on me in discussing this matter, and your ""secondary arguments"" sentence gave me a bad impression. Again, and more clearly this time, I think the determining matter should be whether or not Gandhi was by any reasonable interpretation an anti-Zionist. If he was, then the statement from MLK to the effect that all anti-Zionists are really anti-Semites should be balanced with this information. " | 0 |
" ==8th gen== please stop changing my edits which are from sourced websites n websites of the people who make the devices n specs..are you going to give me problems? because if so i can complain about you reverting my edits that are accurate on the 8th generation VG era article...i dont guess n make this up...i very the info from SOURCED sites and by the way if you're not good at calculating numbers which then maybe you shouldnt edit in places where you have no knowledge...so please i'm tryign to be nice STOP REVERTING MY EDITS..i put alot into some of the articles here with as much accurate info as i can and i dont appreciate what you're doing...you keep this up i'll make a complain | about you here if possible...i'm warning you...stop reverting my time-consuming effort of researching and evrything for you to just reverted back to simpleton terms...its good to be as specific as possible..i hope we understand each other and you wont keep doing this otherwise i'm a make a complain against you to have you at least suspended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by :Your edits are introducing many errors into the article. For example, you keep adding ""US"" to the release date. However, not all dates are from ""the US"", (like the PS TV) and we typically label things by continent (North America), not country. Also, your ""personal calculations"" are not usuable per WP:OR, and you need to learn how to properly cite sources - see WP:REFB. " | 0 |
== WTF == Who the F put a userbox saying that | I was a faggot? I am not! I don't support homosexuality! | 1 |
What you have to say doesn't care. Are you more | concerned with the violation of copyright or with that bitch? | 1 |
****Even if I did make a goof, you don't have to be an | asshole and say that you think I should stay away from AfD. | 1 |
" == BracketBot - 108.73.114.116 == , | , , Page: Diff: Comment/question: fuck off!" | 1 |
" :I understand, and appreciate your explanation of the situation. The perception of the list's purpose changing is accurate though, the different names each describe different lists the page has been as you are aware. To your knowledge has anyone explained this to him/her? Using an example sentence about Dylan I'll illustrate why the title of the current list should include Dylan. :;Bob Dylan's religious affiliation can best be currently described as Jewish, however he had previously converted to Christianity for a time. :# ""List of converts to Christianity"" implies a list of people who are Christian converts. The key word being are. Bob Dylan is not a current convert of Christianity and so wouldn't belong on that list. | :# ""List of notable converts to Christianity"" implies the same current status as the previous name but excludes unknown/not notable people. Even though Dylan is notable, he still isn't a current convert, so also wouldn't belong on this list. :# ""List of notable people who converted to Christianity"" removes the current convert status requirement to be on the list by including people who have converted to Christianity at any time in the past. Bob Dylan belongs in this list because he is notable (per the current title) and converted at one point. :I was also wondering if anyone has suggested another list for current Christians, separate from this one, for Christians that are notable to other Christians? " | 0 |
Quite by coincidence, I was at Bible study yesterday when another one of the students brought up something about the number 3 in the old Jewish theological tradition and how it has been re-interpreted by Christianity. I was pretty sure the Wikipedia article had that very bit of information, so I looked it up, and I couldn't find it. I didn't pursue the matter further at the time because we had gotten on enough of a tangent as it was. Later that night, I saw in the history that a good 14 kilobytes were restored to the article. Guess what? It still doesn't have the bit of information I was looking for! Or maybe | it does have it, but it's buried in such a muddled mess that it's beyond my ability to find it. Or maybe that bit of information is in a very, very old version of the article. Or maybe my memory is playing tricks on me and that bit of information has never been in Wikipedia. Whatever the truth of that may be, it's pretty clear that in the tug of war between focusing these articles exclusively on mathematics and filling them with any and every thing that has anything to do with a particular number, these articles have become pretty useless to anyone who just wants to find some particular bit of information. | 0 |
Sex change and expert are oxy morons. Almost everyone working | this field are going to be hacks on either side | 1 |
"46, 19 December 2014 (UTC). :I'm afraid I agree that jacobbarnett.com is a promotional site for the mother's book. The home page, mostly a slideshow, has only a bit of text that gets right to advertising for the book: ""...The story of this is detailed in the book The Spark, published by Random House. The book is an international bestseller..."" The tabs on that top page go to either a book-specific advert page, a book tour page (""The Spark Tour""), or a webform to join their mailing list. A secondary purpose for that last tab appears to be a vehicle to hire his mother as a speaker: ""You can book Kristine to speak | at the above link, or schedule a consultation!"". What I don't see is the kind of fodder that comprises the typical private homepage of a scientist, e.g. CV, list of publications, career recitation and/or interests, lab members, course listings, etc. In other words, despite the URL, the content does not fit the description as being the personal/private website of this individual. PS: There is still the unresolved matter of the undue focus on the PRA paper (having its own subsection) – this is not conventional for science bios. I would like to propose deleting this subsection and just having the paper cited under ""works"" or some such, as is conventional. Thoughts? 16:" | 0 |
) alex, think again, Mr. Obama is the US. President. | what about Putin and his background, worse than an ass? | 1 |
Discard All said previously... We love you Carlos... I LOVE | YOU! I WANT TO RAPE YOU O Just Kidding ;) | 1 |
" == Gigantic penis listed at Redirects for discussion == An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gigantic penis. Since you had some involvement with the Gigantic penis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). == Huge penis listed at Redirects for discussion == An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Huge penis. Since you had some involvement with the Huge penis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). == Huge cock listed at Redirects for discussion == An editor has asked for a | discussion to address the redirect Huge cock. Since you had some involvement with the Huge cock redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). == Huge dick listed at Redirects for discussion == An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Huge dick. Since you had some involvement with the Huge dick redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ==Deleted RfD notices== Looks like the RfD notices got deleted. Just wanted to make sure you were aware that these valuable redirects you created were in danger of being deleted. " | 0 |
Wikinerds got their peepees made fun of, it doesn't nessecitate | a block. Please remove head from anal cavity, thank you. | 1 |
And then: * Increased circumference of the anus | * A finger in da bum bum | 1 |
JOHN MCCAIN IS A RACIST FUCK AND HES | GAY FUCK MCCAIN AND BLACK ASS OBAMA'Bold text' | 1 |
"::::Another strawman argument. I am quite aware that the Tessarakonteres was ""a warship"" rather than a cargo vessel or whatever. I am also quite aware that it was a catapult-armed catamaran (why do you imagine I'd ""have a fit""? Less of the histrionics please). But it was a ""warship"" that apparently couldn't fight, and both Plutarch and Casson say that it was built for display. As for those who say otherwise: you didn't cite them until now. But ""trireme"" actually conveys more information than ""fighting ship"" (in addition to not conveying a misleading impression) and is therefore preferable. ::::Also I suggest you drop the ongoing insinuation of OR | regarding the Chinese treasure ships, given the fact that your ""'Christian apologists generally reply..."" paragraph contains references which are not ""Christian"" and apparently don't mention Noah's Ark at all. And note that the TalkOrigins article IS in fact a response to creationist claims, and therefore has more direct relevance than those. Or do you intend to remove all references that don't mention the Ark? As it stands, you seem to be using ""Christian apologists generally reply..."" as an excuse to shut out all qualification of those claims, while nevertheless supporting them yourself with non-Christian sources and apparent declarations of fact: please desist from this double standard. " | 0 |
I had a blood coming out of my | penis while ejaculating....does anybody know what that is??????? | 1 |
" ::::People seems to not show username or IP-number. To Chistian2381. (I have not written since I suggested to move this to my talk site (Boeing729). DST (Danmarks Statistik) doesn't do anything more then count the people living inside ""Hovedstadsområdet"" + they do the publications. But it is Kort og Matrikelstyrelsen KMS, that definies ""Hovedstadsområdet"". But whwn when it comes to Amager, it's very obvious that large areas of the island (including a part of Copenhagen) is not urban, that KMS has included into ""Hovedstadsområdet"" is not urban at all. Neighther is Salholm and Peberholm. For some very strange reason these areas is included in ""Hovedstadsområdet"". So | - the urban area of Copenhagen is not equal to ""Hovedstadsområdet"", not at Amager (which includes Saltholm and Peperholm). ""Hovedstadsområdet"" does NOT follow the definitions by UN standards, and have large areas whthout buildings. Huge areas. But theey still counts as ""Hovedstadsområdet"". But urban Copenhagen Urban area is smaller and has thereby higher population density. There simply is not UN definition of urban Copenhagen area at present ""Hovedstadsområdet"" is 455 km2, and is including atleast these empty areas of Amager (incl. Saltholm and Peberholm)I belive that chistian2381 has got a fair estemation of ""the Copenhagen Urban Area"". However let's not involve ""Hovedstadsregionen"" at this point. /Boeing720 " | 0 |
== homework (again) == Ian Suzuki Mrs. Kovar Scholarship English 12 13 October 2008 Stranger in a Strange Land Book Summary Stranger in a Strange Land, written by Robert Heinlein and published in 1961, is widely regarded today as one of the pinnacles of modern science fiction. Many of the ideas and styles that the book introduced in the mid-sixties still resonate with the public’s imagination, prompting some individuals to start actual religions based on the book itself. Ultimately, the book is centered around Michael Smith, a human orphaned on the surface of Mars as an infant. There, he was immersed from birth into the Martian culture until | the age of 20, when a second spaceship came to Mars and recovered Michael. This much is explained in a flashback during the book; the plot of the story begins when Mike is brought back from Mars and tossed into the strange culture of a strange land. The man from Mars takes a while to learn the language, and finds it lacking; his native Martian contains the complexity to express his true feelings. In particular, the word grok is difficult for Mike to explain, and as he struggles to define this word in English, it becomes apparent that he has powers unexplainable by modern physics or medicine. | 0 |
" :I added two quotes that were very germane (by J. Fielding Smith and Lund), which brought the number of quotes on that one topic, up to nine. That seemed to be a lot of quotes, and several were just duplicating each other. Five of the quotes were by Brigham Young, and three of the quotess (above) didn't seem to provide any additional information to the reader. That section needs to establish that some policy reversal was expected, but then the only quotes we need are ones that shed light on the key question: When was it expected end? The quotes remaining in the section shed light on that. Although the quote by Wilford Woodruff could also be removed without affecting the section at all. The | quotes by Fielding Smith and Lund illustrate the critical point that, prior to political pressure building during the Civil Rights movement in the 1960s, the position of church leaders was that the policy would stay in place until the resurrection, and lends evidence to the critic's claim that the 1978 policy reversal was a political, not divine, change in response to the Civil Rights movement. If anyone can find a quote from a church leader, pre-1960 saying ""we expect the policy to be reversed in the next few decades"" that quote should be included, and would support the apologists position. I did add a sentence at the end in support of the apologists position, even though we haven't yet found a citation to support it. " | 0 |
This article is horrible. There's more information | about the cockroach, than there is here. | 1 |
== Sockpuppet of Japanhero == called you idiot in the | page Ultraman I think he is a sockpuppet of Japanhero | 1 |
== hey buddy == you look like a | gay faggot, will you suck my skinflute? ds | 1 |
Yes he is a paedo who fucks small boys in the | arse. Someone should kill this fucking horiffic dirty piece of shit. | 1 |
:What a silly person. , with note to self to | revoke talk page immediately for any future accounts. — | 1 |
"User:2600:1002:B001:F56:70D2:24B1:BC19:4566|2600:1002:B001:F56:70D2:24B1:BC19:4566]] • == War Theaters - US ARMED FORCES== ref. Maurer Maurer (...Units, or ...Squadrons) The (only) two major theaters in WWII for the Americans were: EAME , Europe, Africa, Middle East; and The Asian-Pacific. The EAME consisted of the ETO, MTO & Northern Atlantic for command and control purposes. The Asian- Pacific is more complex due to political accommodations. The asian China, Burma, India (CBI) theater was a politically and militarily divided with the British dominating its Southeast Asia Command, and the Chinese, its homeland. The Americans divided the Pacific into the Army commanded Southwest Pacific Area | (SWPA), and the Navy controlled Pacific areas of the CPA, NPA, South Pacific. Nimitz delegated authority in SOPAC and the NPA. The POA was a command and control convention that never included the SWPA regardless of casual usage to the contray. All these areas had campaigns defined by boundires in time and geography. The Western Pacific, for an example, was a campaign. Please stay to historical usage in encyclopedic editing. Maurer can be consulted on-line. Note this is US usage as it pertains to this article on primarily a US AIRCRAFT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[" | 0 |
==Fuck off nigger== Stop fucking reverting my goddamn | edits you cock-sucking son of a bitch | 1 |
" ==Speedy deletion of WinApple Podcast== A tag has been placed on WinApple Podcast requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as | well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - " | 0 |
" Hi Gsecreto, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page. - Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia... Finding your way around: * Table of Contents * Department directory Need help? * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions. * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up | codes. * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules. How you can help: * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help. * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity. Additional tips... * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your ""signature"" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this. * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Good luck, and have fun. " | 0 |
" == Awesome Quote == ""Not all idiots | are boys, but all boys are idiots!!"" " | 1 |
Wasn't me, asshole. Check your fucking IP's | before you go shooting off your mouth. | 1 |
Henry of Poitou, Abbot of Cluny According to the historian Alfred Richard, author of Histoire des comtes de Poitou, Henry's identification as a son of William IX was an error. Henry first appears as a prior of Cluny in an 1100 charter, making him far older than William's children. In addition, Henry is not named among the children of William IX in the chronicle of Saint-Maixent; I can't imagine such a prominent individual would've been overlooked had he in fact been a son of William. To my knowledge, no early or near-contemporary source mentions any illegitimate children for William IX. That doesn't mean that he | didn't have any, it just means none were recognized, or important enough to be mentioned. Henry's mother certainly wasn't William's most famous mistress, Dangereuse, who only took up with William around 1113. Raoul de Faye, who is sometimes listed as a son of Dangereuse and William, was actually Dangereuse's son by her husband. She and William don't seem to have had any children together. Henry of Poitou was evidently of high birth, as mentioned by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and the Laud Chronicle. But he doesn't seem to have been a son of William IX; indeed, he was closer to William's age in all probability. | 0 |
" == Needs work == This article is full of grammatical errors, non-sequiturs and other kinds of linguistic problems. I've just deleted a sourced quote from an article by Kenneth Timmerman to the effect that AN were caught with ""similar"" weapons, that omitted (a) any mention of what the weapons were similar to, and (b) the fact that Timmerman is a conservative US politician, and so a dubious RS. I don't know what to do about this; it's a disease that many Wikipedia articles suffer from, perhaps the result of different people writing different sentences in the same paragraph, and other people turning up and | changing a few words in a sentence. Someone who is a subject expert perhaps should have a go at rewriting the article, preserving the sourced material, and unmangling the english. I would certainly describe this as a Bad Article - perhaps it should be nominated for deletion? An article on this group is needed, but this article doesn't come across as at all reliable. Few wikipedia articles about the Middle East are ""good"" in the sense of being both well-written and reliable - too many axe-grinders with a poor command of english pitch-in with ill-considered edits, so maybe there's nothing that can be done. " | 0 |
im not vandalizing u doush bag mother f er | and band me ill just get on my phone | 1 |
" == Some points regarding the LTTE == This article is slowly moving toward being more balanced and useful. As the view of LTTE is very mixed, (terrorists for some - freedomfighters for others) it is obviously not easy. It seems though that the heat is down a bit. One should also be aware of that the article is about the LTTE. That means it is right to write about such as the organisation is struggling for ""Tamil Eelam"" - even though there for a variety of reasons never will be a separate tamil state on Sri Lanka. One should also bear in mind that the LTTE has some level of support among tamils, both from love and fear. That means that quite many tamils, even those despising the LTTE see it as useful counterweight against | the sinhalese south. It may be useful to have the IRA in mind when reading and writing about this conflict - an organisation that went from being banned to getting more and more involved in solving the conflict by peaceful means. And it may be useful to think of how that came about - quite a bit by the ever closer cooperation between the EU countries, where the UK and Ireland are both members. Last but not least, would be good if those who add or change information here would at least fill in something about what they have done, possibly also adding a note about it on this talkpage. When there are changes that are only related to an IP address it is not easy to judge the value of what has been done. " | 0 |
" ::::I couldn't agree more, ""Compromise"" does not mean repeatedly reinserting material, that's not what I was referring to when i suggested compromise. I have made it abundantly clear that I am open to your suggestions for alternate wording. Reinserting material is simply the only option you left me with, as you repeatedly ignore each and every one of my arguments and suggestions. How many times do I have to ask you to suggest a compromised wording? I have asked in good faith on two separate occasions now, waiting well over a week on each occasion. How many times do I have to explain that stating who won an award without giving any indication as to why is not | particularly helpful? I have been trying to resolve this for almost a month now. I accepted your first reversion of my edits, despite its juvenile and condescending language. I made a case for my point in good faith, which you simply ignored: On August 5 I asked you So how would you propose rewording why the were chosen as the recipients of the award in a neutral manner? This again, was completely ignored by yourself. On August 18 I again asked you for your suggestion on wording, which you ignored. Yet when I come up with alternate wording on my own, it is reverted and I am accused of deliberate BLP violations. Your arrogance is simply amazing. " | 0 |
Okay, Central America does not have to be a continent, it can just be its own little place. Next, I also see that every place on Earth has their own little definition of what CA is. The EU does not include Belize into its defintion, the UN includes Mexico, etc. If everyone else has their own definition and is arguing on what is the proper definition, wouldn't the best way to resolve it, be to ask the people who are actually from there, what they think and use that as the universal definition? Interesting, isn't it, how people think they know more about you than you? Have you ever been in that situation where someone is | correcting you on something that relates to you and you know far more about it than them? It is like a person correcting someone else on how to speak or pronounce a certain word in that other person's native language when they don't speak it themselves. My point is, that the best way to settle this dispute, is to accept the Central American definition of Central America. Not the UN definiton, or EU definition, or North American definition, or whaterver, but the Central American definition, which is probably the most accurate one because its made by Central America. The Central American defintion of Central America...I can't believe that people won't see that. Tito A. Martinez | 0 |
" First google is full of shortened versions of the quote by animal rights activists - thats the reason why I included the quote. In fat, what is let out in most animal right websites quotations is to be found in the original (Schopenhauers gesammlete Werke, Preissschrift.. 1839): Die vermeintliche Rechtlosigkeit der Tiere, der Wahn , daß unser Handeln gegen sie ohne moralische Bedeutung sei, daß es wie es in der Sprache dieser Moral heißt, daß es gegen die Tiere keine Pflichten gäbe, ist geradezu eine empörende Roheit und Barbarei des Occidents, deren Quelle im Judentum liegt. (...) Erst wenn jene einfache und über alle Zweifel erhabene Wahrheit, daß die Tiere in der Hauptsache und im wesentlichen ganz | dasselbe sind wie wir, ins Volk gedrungen sein wird, werden die Tiere nicht mehr als rechtlose Wesen dastehen. Es ist an der Zeit, daß das ewige Wesen, welches in uns, auch in allen Tieren lebt, als solches erkannt, geschont und geachtet wird. (...) So einem occidentalischen, judisierten Thierverächter und vernunftideolater, muß man in Erinnerung bringen, daß wie er von seiner Mutter, so auch der Hund von der seinigen gesäugt wurde. ... The latter sentence is as well let out by non nazi animal right activists. ""It has to be brouzght to memory, to any of those occidential, jewryished animal hater and reason ideologist that not only he but as well the dog was fed brest by his mother.""" | 0 |
" == Philately categories == Hello, thanks for your message and my apologies for confusion caused. I'm still quite new and I must admit I haven't got around to scanning new articles yet so I hadn't realised that people might be misled by a title if they didn't know its context. I've made a note to review the categorisation of the micro reference articles as soon as I can find time, but I'll have to ask you to bear with me for a few days as time is short. One thing I can't agree with you about is renaming the category to begin with the word ""list"" as this would lose the profile of the category. There are already several lists in the philately section and I contend that | my work is more than a list. It is built on the Britannica model of A-Z micro references. Many are complete in micro form, as where there is a text addition to the date, currency, etc. summary. Others will have a link to a ""macro"" article (e.g., Abu Dhabi which is finished as a pilot case). But what differentiates the work mostly from other philatelic lists is that it includes numerous ancillary references wherefrom a link is need to the controlling reference elsewhere (e.g., stamp issuers sometimes use alternate names in their inscriptions and overprints). But thanks for the advice which is very useful and I will get around to it as soon as I can. I've added it to my 1001 Things To Do! All the best. " | 0 |
" Those sources don't mention Spanish settlements in Rio Grande do Sul because... *gasp*... there weren't Spanish settlements in Rio Grande do Sul. And your asides about other subjects don't help. Nobody is discussing Serra Gaúcha here. Gaúchos aren't as mixed as Amazonian caboclos; you are again ignorantly confusing MtDNA with genetic ancestry as a whole. And anyway, what has this to do with ""Brazilians of Spanish ancestry""? You still have absolutely no source supporting the existence of Spanish settlements in Rio Grande do Sul, months after the beggining of this discussion. And you will likely never have. So stop being stubborn; if your ""genetic study"" is right, it completely | demolishes all established knowledge about Rio Grande do Sul's demography; history will have to be rewritten. If true, this is a breaktrough, not a confirmation of what we already know. Perhaps it is so; but what you can't do is to pretend that the ""findings"" of that study are in accordance with historic knowledge. And of course Azoreans did move hundred miles from the coast and ended up on the border with Argentina. Where do you think the ""Dornelles"" in ""Getúlio Dornelles Vargas"" came from? Have you ever heard of ""sesmarias""? Dont't you know that the Portuguese distributed sesmarias in Rio Grande do Sul to attract people there? " | 0 |
" ~~ Final ~~ {| class=""wikitable"" |- ! scope=""col"" width=""50"" | Num ! scope=""col"" width=""200"" | Country ! scope=""col"" width=""250"" | Artist ! scope=""col"" width=""250"" | Song |- | 01 || China || miss A || ""Goodbye Baby"" |- | 02 || South Korea || G.NA || ""2HOT"" |- | 03 || Switzerland || Remady & Manu-L || ""Higher Ground"" |- | 04 || Australia || Lenka || ""Everything at Once"" |- | 05 || USA || Evanescene || ""My Immortal"" |- | 06 || Poland || Liber feat. Mateusz Mijal || ""Winny"" |- | 07 || Greece || Giorgos Sampanis || ""Ora Miden"" |- | 08 || Ghana || Trinchy Stryder || ""Help Me"" |- | 09 || Netherlands || Eva Simons || ""Renegade"" |- | 10 | || Thailand || Girly Berry || ""Featuring"" |- | 11 || Russia || Nyusha || ""Viribat Chudo"" |- | 12 || United Kingdom || Lilly Allen || ""Fuck You"" |- | 13 || South Africa || Lee Scott || ""Net'n bietjie meer Tyd"" |- | 14 || Lithuania || Monika Linkyte || ""Happy"" |- | 15 || Canada || Sammy || ""Some Catchin'Up to do"" |- | 16 || Japan || Hatsane Miku || ""Levan Pollka"" |- | 17 || Spain || Malú || ""Ahora Tú"" |- | 18 || Åland Islands || Andrez Wrethov || ""One Love One Goal"" |- | 19 || Latvia || Fakts & Anete Kotovica || ""Vieglāk Man"" |- | 20 || Bosnia and Herzegovina || Darko Lazić || ""Gluvo Doba"" |}" | 0 |
== don't put wikipedia shit all over my | talk page == Vanadalism is very fun | 1 |
" : Is your view that there is no circumstance under which anyone can be called ""prominent""? I completely agree that there are lots of Wikipedia critics, and many of those who criticize Wikipedia are more prominent than Sanger, however I can't think of any more prominent specifically for their criticism of Wikipedia. The fact that Sanger is among the most cited (if not the most cited) is easily verifiable. Again, I think it does add something to the lead. Consider this scenario: Sanger leaves Wikipedia to do something completely unrelated, and he happens to mention in passing on several occasions some criticism of Wikipedia. Then he's a critic, and this is quite interesting coming from a co-founder, so we might put it in | the lead. But the real situation is quite different: not only does he have criticism of Wikipedia, but he publicly pushes this criticism, and the media frequently goes to him for quotes about Wikipedia's shortcomings. In fact, he may be as notable for his criticism as he is for Citizendium (although the two are clearly linked-he uses the visibility he gets from his criticism to get publicity for Citizendium). This distinction really does seem worth highlighting in the lead. I admit it's not a huge issue, but I'm still not understanding the argument that he's not a prominent critic. Would a different word be more appropriate? A ""well-known"" or ""oft-cited"" critic or something? (Neither of those sounds as good to my ear.) " | 0 |
" == GA Review == :This review is transcluded from Talk:Owen Hunt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. Reviewer: · Issues: * Lede: US → U.S. * Lede: TVGuide → TV Guide. Make italic and fix unspaced * Development: tells → told * Development: Again - Entertainment Weekly should be italic * Development: Hollywood Reporter → The Hollywood Reporter * Reception: critics → television critics * Reception: Again - TVGuide → TV Guide. Make italic and fix unspaced. * Reception: USA Today → USA Today. Make italic. * References: Specific → Footnotes ** , they're not footnotes; they're specific references. | FAs have done this before, and there is no requirement or standard saying that it must say ""footnotes"". * References: Ref. 19 - Entertainment Weekly should be italic * References: Ref. 22 - Hollywood Reporter to The Hollywood Reporter. Also, make italic, please. * References: Ref. 24 - Again. TVGuide → TV Guide. Make italic and fix unspaced * References: Ref. 26 - Again. Entertainment Weekly should be italic * References: Ref. 29 - Removed this reference. IMDb is not a good source for articles * External links: Add IMDb character link for it Nice work. On hold. ey :All done, except one, which is disagree with. " | 0 |
" ::::I notice you didn't try to provide a version of the above paragraph that conveys the same message, with equal clarity, without the letter 'e'. I think that basically settles the issue, until someone does provide a working example. ::::Anyway, I don't see any point to just doing a section or two; it would be too easy (the 'Character' section already has barely any 'e's), wouldn't improve the article's encyclopedic quality, and wouldn't impress even the very small minority of readers who happened to notice it, while it would still hamper the quality of prose we use, as we're forced to eschew 'the' and the like. I don't see why you're opposed to my suggestion of creating a lipogram version of | our Gadsby article in talk-space or user-space. It would still be something other editors could check out, if we put a link at the top of this talk page; and if you (and anyone else who wishes to contribute) did a truly amazing job on that lipogram, maybe someday, months or years down the line, you might be able to use that page's quality as leverage for enacting some sort of compromise? You can say, ""See? It can work, just read this page I made and it'll be proven."" (And yes, I know it's been done before, but that's unconvincing because the older version of the article also was missing a lot of the current version's content and clarity.) - " | 0 |
::And do not say retard, you fool. It's mean, | and it can get you banned indefinitely ) | 1 |
Subsets and Splits