prompt
stringlengths 3
940
| original_output
stringlengths 7
1.33k
| toxic
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|
" :I think the core idea of this wording is in connection with the article Khanates of the Caucasus.The opening of the article is this ""Khanates of the Caucasus were Persian ruled[1] [2][3] principalities on the territory of modern day...."".Indeed , the new picture in that article may mislead the reader in that it combines the western states (non-Persian), with eastern Khanates (autonomous but under Persian suzerainty) in one picture and it should be changed , but anyway in the opening sentence , the connection with Persia(Iran) , is an important point -The picture is also wrong in depicting the borders | of Gulistan treaty- . The states that have no organic connection with Iran , like Abkhazia , Georgia , Chechenia and Daghistan can't be easily considered as Khanates , as their rulers where not khans , and their title was Wālī ,Shamkhal and etc (and perhaps Armenian Malikdoms ).Anyway , I prefer this sentence: Baku Khanate was a autonomous Muslim principality on the territory of modern day Azerbaijan under Iranian suzerainty. Originally a province of Safavid empire, it became functionally independent after the assassination of Nadir shah and weakening of central authority in Iran due to the struggle for power " | 0 |
==An ANI discussion regarding you== There is a discussion at WP:ANI regarding your closing the deletion discussion for Screaming Banshee Aircrew at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Screaming Banshee Aircrew. It has already been reverted, but you shouldn't have closed that discussion. For starters, NAC (non-admin closures) should only be done in the least controversial cases, and this one had already been tagged with {{notavote}}, demonstrating there was a potential problem with canvassing or meatpuppetry. Second, you've been here only a short while, and NACs of AFDs are controvsial enough when it is a highly experienced editor (the policy actually discourages it, but doesn't ban it). While it might seem obvious that it was going to | be kept, experience will show that often an AFD will have a dozen keeps and no deletes, then after a CheckUser gets involved, we find those were all the same person, for instance. This stuff really happens. Even in cases where the votes are all legitimate, it doesn't hurt to wait, and of course, when there are issues such as vote stacking or any controversy, no non-admin should close. Admin aren't smarter than non-admin, but we are expected to take the heat and are accountable for dealing with problems like this. I appreciate the desire to help, but closing AFDs should wait until you've been here a while longer. - Join WER | 0 |
what a hell your name is? harab shtaal? | are you arabian? it's a very stupid name! | 1 |
"****Thanks for your thoughtful reply, WebHamster. I don't appreciate your characterization of others' good faith arguments as ""spouted bullshit"", and you're appropriately blocked for that kind of crap now, but I'll go ahead and respond to the substance of what you said. ""Let's be realistic here, the likelihood of someone visiting this page without some clue as to what it is is highly unlikely."" Actually, it's 100%. It's certain that it will happen - indeed, that it happens regularly. I looked at some stats regarding our ""random article"" button, and it gets hit often enough that any particular article pops up when that link is clicked... roughly once every 24 hours. Even ignoring that, | it's not any kind of stretch to think that some joker will get some naïve ""noob"" to click on a link that takes them to that page. If you think that won't happen, then I can't think you've been on the Internet much. Ever been ""Rick rolled""? ""Censorship involves group A deciding what group B can see"". What group B can see. According to every suggestion so far made, group B will still be able to see it. If I don't control what someone else ""can see"", then I don't censor. Nobody's even suggesting making it difficult to fine. One click. I see no censorship here, not according to any reasonable definition. - " | 0 |
Wikipedia admits it is not a reliable | source and you don't think Wikipedia sucks? | 1 |
fix this f*cking color it looks | likw diarea FIX IT NOW!1!!!!1!!!!!!1!!!!!!!11! | 1 |
" ==How references work== === Simple references === These require two parts; :a) Chzz is 98 years old. ""The book of Chzz"", Aardvark Books, 2009. He likes tea. [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] :b) A section called ""References"" with the special code ""{{reflist}}""; == References == {{reflist}} (an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections) To see the result of that, please look at . Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as and try it out. === Named references === Chzz was born in 1837. ""The book of Chzz"", Aardvark Books, 2009. Chzz lives in Footown. Note | that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see to see the result. === Citation templates === You can put anything you like between and , but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look; Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. {{Citation | last = Smith | first = John | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century | publication-date = 2001 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]] | page = 125 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4 }} Please see to see the result. For more help and tips on that subject, see ." | 0 |
"==Notability of Vivo band== A tag has been placed on Vivo band, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you feel that you can assert the notability | of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0 |
SYRE were originally a UK heavy Metal Band, | with Chaz Petty on Guitar, not fucking Canadian! | 1 |
the one they used on me at my dentist's | office worked but it hurt like a motherfucker. | 1 |
== you smell bad == mainly because your a salty piss | flap and because your a fat testicle. you a sloppy titty. | 1 |
screw you your a gay homo that likesit up | the bum and i think you sholud suck dick | 1 |
== Dick head read this == Fuck you your a | fag and you should go lick donkeys hairy ball sacks | 1 |
" == ""Entitlement Program"" shouldn't redirect here == Entitlement programs, and the concept of Entitlement, are two different things. Programs such as Social Security, and earned benefits such as the G.I. Bill (which people pay into in a manner similar to employers matching IRA contributions), are considered Entitlements, and the programs they come from Entitlement Programs. The words ""entitlement program"" are being used more and more often in United States politics in a manner that is further and further divorced from the concept of entitlement itself. To put this another way: I don't believe people who spend four years defending their country in order to | earn the right to go to college believe to be grouped together with narcissists, and I definitely don't think that anything that might eventually be referred to legally or politically as an Entitlement Program, deserves the negative connotation that pages such as this can cause. I'm trying to find a good legal definition of Entitlement Program, and will create a section on this page for the time being with that information. I intend to grow it out until there is enough information in that section for an entire page. I'm wondering whether it would be a good idea to discuss earned and unearned entitlements. " | 0 |
" Case in point, this is his most recent reply to me. "":You obviously have too much time on your hands. Why don't you look for a job, instead of trying to impede progress of the universal consciousness raising exercise in which we're engaged here? :There is no established relevance for the date of establishment of the UNPFII in 1993, for starters. :Moving right along, the Israeli NGO you have introduced into this conversation would appear to be a nationalistic organization recognized by the nation state of Israel and so far removed from having any semblance of a status that would granting tacit recognition to ""Israelis"" as indigenous that it doesn't merit the electrons expended to display this text. | :Furthermore, you have not demonstrated a relevant connection between the OFICL and ""Jews"" with respect to the question of (the recognition of) indigeneity, so you are again engaged in an act of duplicitous disimulation; the Mossad would be proud, maybe you should apply, seeing as you need a job. Hey, if you are going to act as a proxy for the Israeli government, you might as well get paid for it, just like those NGO directors, right?! :The administrators can determine during arbitration what relevance the definition you have littered this RfC with has or has not. Ubikwit"" It appears that he is now resorting to insults and ad hominem attacks. This is becoming a real problem. " | 0 |
" :Lookit, ""truthteller"", your contribution is a) from a creationist point of view (POV), and b) unscientific, as in patent nonsense. Your belief represents a minority. Don't answer that evolution is a system of belief, it is not and has never been. You pick out one aspect of indirect dating, and neglect the overwhelming rest. You present answersingenesis and incorrect news websites as sources. Only publications in a PEER-REVIEWED journal add something to the discussion. There are thousands of articles on wikipedia about evolution in general, open your eyes (Just as an aside, what do you think of the rest of the article?)! If you would be consequent, you would have to edit 90 % of this article-heck even the taxobox (that pink | thing on top) is based on evolutionary principles. Of course, this proves you are totally ignorant of dinosaurs and biology in general. Oh, and please provide a source for your Canadian and Alaskan ""unfossilized dinosaur bones"". :The mammoth is mummified, the T. rex bones are fossilized. The bones have been demineralized, after which they found the spectacular soft tissue. Your argument is as stupid as: the bones of the chicken I ate last week also have some soft tissue left, which makes dinosaurs contemporary to us. And it's very strange you accept the mammoth to be 30,000 years old, while I thought you can't see further than 6,000 years. I normally don't engage on creationists because they're stubborn as a donkey. " | 0 |
18 Dieciocho began inda barrio of Alameda San Rafael, | Zona 18 Guatemala, Guatemala!!! Ask someone fool ';:!&' | 1 |
:Hey Materialscientist, go screw yourself. This has | nothing to do with you, dipsh*t. | 1 |
== YOU ALL GAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111 == IM THE COOLE | ST YUO AL L SUCK GO TO HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 | 1 |
" ==Your class sucks== you may as well | rename it ""I'm an evolution appoligist 101"" " | 1 |
== death threats == Nobody cares if | that lodmouth woman gets death threats | 1 |
As it should be. Christianity is shit, | and has ruined millions of innocent lives. | 1 |
Is it really necessary to have that stupid ass | WAKA/DC Kickball rivalry bleeding over into this wiki page? | 1 |
== sorry == sorry kinu its just that yoton b is so | much more awesome than you face it u do kinda suck | 1 |
" = = = This is one man's reaction to the ""April 12, 2015 Rewrite"", This is meant for ""Toothpickst"", and other readers (but mostly meant for those readers in the accident-investigation community): ==> This ""rewrite"" of 12Apr2015 ONLY SHOWS ""the Boeing Scenario"", a false-narrative that was refuted by Yorke in November 1984. QUESTION for the ""rewriter"": ?Why not explicitly state, in the opening-heading, the fact that your ""rewrite"" merely recites that false-narrative listed as P.C. in AAR81-8? Meanwhile, that mythap-Captain (H.G. Gibson) recently died with NO RETRACTION of the erroneous ""probable cause"" cited in NTSB's AAR81-8. | For students and investigators: Wikipedia so far suffers, it fails to reflect a better explanation of the failure interactions related to ""discrepant Rudder"". For those readers better capable of such technical details, instead of this ""Wiki"", consider the lessons from George Schairer's paper on the B307 upset-breakup (18Mar39), consider the CAB's investigation of AA Flt One (1Mar62), upset-recovery of Mac59402 (11Nov76). As of this current-wiki ""rewrite"" of April2015, this Wiki contributes that old deception rumors from the INITIAL upset of TWA841/4Apr79. [Any technical-corrections to this wiki were removed by the those experts contributing to this Wiki.]" | 0 |
whos name is GIANT FAT DICK FUCK | AIDS GARGLER IRISH KITTY MEEEEEEEEEEE OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1 |
" ==Speedy deletion of Tristan Elliott== A tag has been placed on Tristan Elliott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as | well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | 0 |
" ::Well, even if we accept the (in my opinion questionable) premise that Stanley should be in the top 10 list, shouldn't the vehicles of, say, CMU appear there, too? One of them led the race and apparently just lost due to a technical glitch, finishing just a few minutes after Stanley. I guess WIRED would have included them if CMU was a local Californian university... How much of a challenge was it anyway? The course was precisely layed out by numerous waypoints. No sophisticated planning procedure was necessary. Four separate teams managed to finish the course in time. This seems to suggest that the | task was not that hard. In fact, several days before the race the Stanley team leader announced that this time with very high probability there would be a winner, thus reflecting the general feelings of the experts. Afterwards, however, he fueled the hype by claiming, rather inconsistently: ""the impossible has been achieved!"" Then he compared himself to Charles Lindbergh (no joke!), according to the WIRED article (which suggests that the ""Wright Brothers / Kitty Hawk spot"" had already been taken by Ernst Dickmanns in 1986). Lindbergh! One of the most ridiculous comparisons I've seen lately. Now I'm waiting for the confetti parade -) " | 0 |
" == Archive? == Hi there, I was just wondering if you knew about archiving old talks. It keeps your talk page from looking cluttered. I have done it, so take a look at my talk page for info. You'll probably get some help Here. ===Flag=== Just paste this onto the pages you want it (you can't see the code, unless you're in edit mode!): CODE STARTS HERE!!!> {{#if: {{{1|}}}|{{User:1ne/Title{{!}}{{{1|}}}}}|}} {| style=""background-color:transparent;border: 0px"" |- {{transclusionless}}). Thanks. ==Speedy deletion of Your mum is a big fat fucking slut== A tag has been placed on Your mum is a big fat fucking slut, requesting that it be speedily deleted from | Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a not | 0 |
==Wow== You can rape kids and then settle down in | france and sip champagne. Sweet deal for pedophiles eh? -G | 1 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 3 | November 2015 == penis is good | 1 |
== Commercial Applications == :I've temporarily removed this for gross inaccuracy. 14:51, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC) At present, the commercial market for rockets is limited to deployment of satellites (orbital) or testing of microgravity equipment (suborbital). These rockets range from the relatively small, ~20 ft amateur class to the incredibly large Delta IV and Atlas V rockets, made by Boeing and Lockheed Martin, respectively. :of course this is quite wrong, rockets can be bought over the counter (fireworks), there are rockets used for military purposes etc. etc. 14:51, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC) In addition to satellite servicing and microgravity time, a new commercial market dubbed as space tourism | may emerge in the next 5-10 years. These rockets will carry paying passengers on short suborbital joyrides. :the space tourism market is already there, it's just not very high volume... and it's not limited to suborbital 14:51, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC) All rockets that are not classified as amateur must be licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST), located in Washington, DC. :um no. That's only true for America; and not even there. For example XCOR didn't need to talk to these guys when they built their EZ-rocket plane, and NASA doesn't need to talk to them, and neither do the existing launchers. | 0 |
== You are Such a Nerd == I can't believe you | spend your time being the Wikipedia police, lol. Get a life! | 1 |
== Dates??? == Include some (historical) dates, | you fucking bastards+ OE 2010 Feb | 1 |
gonna make you...rape people...get a life and stop talking | about strawberries. go eat some cherries or something. word. | 1 |
"There is nothing wrong with examples. For example check out the excellent ""game theory"" entry which is full of them. The English for majorz is majoritarian. Essentially it is brought about by having single member electoratal districts as in most parliaments of the Anglo world (except New Zealand which since 1996 has PR). On the other hand, proportional representation (PR) is created by having multi-member electoral districts. In majoritarian systems a minority vote can give a party the majority in the assembly. (The name is dumb but we are stuck with it - the person who wears most of the blame is Dutch-American political scientist Arend Lijphart who is otherwise a model of clear thinking.) In a PR system, the majority in parliament is | formed from the parties (almost invariably more than one) which got a majority of votes. The electorates have to have a minimum of 5 members for this to have a chance to be realised. The (effective) number of members is referred to as the ""magnitude"" - ie in majoritarian the magnitude is 1; in a PR system it will be 5, 7, or more (an odd number is generally preferred for technical reasons). Keimzelle is in error: in PR the voter chooses a party. In majoritarian systems (eg the US, UK, Canada, Australia) you choose a person. The effect is that a majoritarian MP represents people and a geographical area, whereas under PR the MP is representing an ideology or interest. - Pepper " | 0 |
lol Wasn't there a quote that said that Gene noticed | Brinker had a nice-looking butt? I guess that's probably homosexual. | 1 |
" == Length; power and influence == Rather than simply reverting this new, awkward wording (which, judging from its edit summary, was based on a careless reading of the previous wording), I decided to change the sentence to a third version, using elements from both previous versions. Here's the way it was originally and is again after a subsequent edit by Hamlet is Shakespeare's longest play and among the most powerful and influential tragedies in the English language.The sentence doesn't establish a correlation between the length of the play and its power and influence, so what we have here is two unconnected thoughts rolled into one sentence. I don't really mind that—it's a reasonable | approach when trying to sum up many things without making the lede ridiculously long—but the construction is awkward: ""[It] is [a] play and among the most powerful . . ."" I changed it to this—Shakespeare's longest play, Hamlet is one of the most powerful and influential tragedies in the English language.—which at least sets the two ideas apart with punctuation. Dionysos, could you explain why you think the status quo is ""clearer""? Specifically, was your principal objection the replacement of ""among"" with ""one of"", and, if so, what about the following hybrid?Shakespeare's longest play, Hamlet is among the most powerful and influential tragedies in the English language.Just a thought. Not a Big Deal. " | 0 |
:::I'll just repeat what I posted above, fuck off Malleus, I | have nothing else to say to you, now or ever. | 1 |
which fool keeps deleting exeter's league table position? | it's 17th in the most recent table. | 1 |
== Please be my AMA, they are torture me too much == Hello, I used to post on my room-mates acount name Babalooo and just started this name. Some others are torturing me on the Babalooo name account saying I am Rootlogy and put a giant warning label there too many times. Mostly Hipocrite is his name. Only the administrators are to put the warning labels yes? I have only made too few posts but they are on 9/11 to proof the many errors and lies of the top USA Bush administrations about 9/11 (like President Bush reading for too long, and Mr Andy Card starts saying that President Bush left the schoolroom as soon as he told him of the attacks | one year after. The teacher says this also) There is no mention of any of the errors of the Bush administrations in any of the 9/11 articles that I read and I want to add a tiny little bit so they torture me. Did you know that I add that President Bush was first against the 9/11 commission and they remove this even? There is a conspiracy to not mention any errors by President Bush administrations or the mysteries. This is a plot and coverup by the Bushistas yes? They just threw away Lovelight who writes so well and are torturing Mr Baseball. I feel like a prisoner at Abu Gharib. Too much torture on me. I thank you to help me. | 0 |
i was pecked to death by chickens.......... your mom | your mom your mom your mom i banged her | 1 |
" == Image:Sandyduncan.jpg == Thanks for uploading Image:Sandyduncan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please: # Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. # On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all. Alternatively, you can also choose to | replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself. If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. " | 0 |
Sam's not gay. He jokes about fucking | men in the ass in interviews. Lern2senseofhumor. | 1 |
":, ""The Impossible trinity (also known as the Trilemma) is a trilemma in international economics which states that it is impossible to have all three of the following at the same time: ::A stable foreign exchange rate ::Free capital movement (absence of capital controls) ::An independent monetary policy"" :I may misunderstand, Icelanders do not have ""Free capital movement"" (of course some movement, some is necessary, I'm not sure how much, is more really needed, for Icelanders mostly or do (only?) foreigners loose?). It seems that it may be ok.., one of the options.. :You are saying Icelanders should ""use"" the Euro (drop ""An independent monetary policy""?) and have ""stable foreign exchange rate"" (meaning the Krona linked to the | Euro, as with the Danish Krona, or just adopt the Euro)? :""On the long term the currency controls hamper Icelandic economic growth, as they block any renewed foreign investment capital to enter Iceland."" – Still, an ongoing Chinese [smaller scale] aluminium plant is going to be built in Iceland!? :Are we immune to a Black Wednesday? I.e. is that what happened in the UK, they tried to have all three? Could someone like Soros come and do that to Iceland, with capital controls? If those stop that, is it worth it loosing the controls, and could they be kept for all eternity? :Didn't/doesn't China have capital controls? And fix to the US dollar, while not any more. " | 0 |
Wat do u mean!!!! Tell Skiner_butt8 That BITCH that i said to | get away from ur computer!!!! She is not a bitch though!!!! | 1 |
THIS CAR IS SO GAY THAT IT WONT | GIVE YOU RIDES IF YOUR MEXICAN! SO GGGGGGGGGGAAAAAAAAYYYYYYY! | 1 |
":: Crum375: what complete rubbish: Why the hell should I do what anyone with a mouse and the ability to click on the history page can do? For someone who can't be bothered reading my contributions.. That request was completely and utterly out of line and just another diversion from ever answering a straight question. How about you lot adhering to the dispute avoidance policy which states NOT TO REVERT others work, and that there are more constructive additions. :: But let's look at some diffs then (since I guess that big often hit revert button must be getting in the way): this one showing SV reverting my addition of a referenced definition, an addition, another one, one that was the result of the discussion and | consultation of others,more of the consensus editing, to fit the policy on international english terms (and a bunch of other edits), more accurate sourced lead (reverted by SV). In fact all this was able to be found in the first few pages of the history.. Would you like me to explain how to use a mouse to drive a web application or can you do this for yourselves on any of the related pages (e.g. intensive farming that I supposedly never contribute to) since that part of your pointless request is still ""outstanding"" and I have no intention of wasting further time on doing what you yourselves can (and should) do. Perhaps I need to do more constructive edits (labelled ""minor"") like this one eh? " | 0 |
" == Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.actorvineeth.com/awards.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. | Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. :See also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Arrwiki. " | 0 |
== I hope == You die in a hideous | carefire. Happy Groundhog Day. <3 February 2, 2007. | 1 |
" I edited the culture Section regarding the so called recent arrival and quite derisery section about indie music. There has been for a very long time an indie, rock, goth sub-culture in Tamworth, since the Robert Peel was Hamlets and closed down in the 90's the community went looking for a home as Hamlets became an Irish theme pub. The current owners remember hamlets and looked to revive some of that feeling, a task which they have done a reasonable job of. I only removed that section as I don't think I'm at all qualified to discuss Tamworth culture and judging from the original article neither was the original author. Tamworth has had | a very changeable night life and culture, in the 70's/80's/90's Tamworth was home to a thriving local music scene, it still has a local music scene today a little worse for ware since the council have sold off nearly all the venues. While I feel well versed in this past there used to be theatre in Tamworth, there is a museum in the castle there have been picasso exihibits, I know about it but its not current info or accurate to be in a ""pedia"". Its pronounced ""Tammoth"" although the ""o"" has a slight ""u"" sound to it, unless of course I'm speaking to those outside of the area when I would say Tamworth." | 0 |
:Sorry, but i will infringe this fucking warning, bitch, fuck | you, also, you're fucking shit just like , and . | 1 |
There is no such thing as a left-lib. Do | you have any idea how stupid you look? | 1 |
hello there this is ovum 34 u remember me u | blocked me ur a pussyass bitch fuck u u man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | 1 |
" == Suggesting information to add == As you can see above, I work for ARI and it was based on discussion of my redirect request that this page has now been renamed to ""Autism Research Institute"". Now that the page focuses on ARI, it seems like it would be helpful for there to be more information on what ARI actually is and does. Especially in the first line of the article, should this not be a description of what the organization is rather than stating something that it created? Since it's best for me not to edit the article myself, here are a few initial suggestions for others to add. I've included links to sources | to support each point: *Autism Research Institute is a 501(c) organization focused on research to improve quality of life for adults and children with autism spectrum disorders. *The organization was founded in 1967 by Bernard Rimland, PhD *ARI collaborates with organizations including Autism Speaks to provide continuing education on adult support issues, though its Autistic Global Initiative. *The organization has also collaborated with The Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Medical Education on autism spectrum disorders. *Along with the Blazeman Foundation for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) research, ARI co-funds the National Institute of Childhood Health and Human Development's Brain and Tissue Bank at the University of Maryland School of Medicine Thank you for considering these suggestions. " | 0 |
seeing you cry But that's alright | BRING FUCKING MEDIC DROID BACK! Dickface...... | 1 |
That guys a wimp! no one wants to relat the | king of evil or death to a wimp deathdealer | 1 |
Your contribution to Bribie Island was so stupid I can | hardly believe it. We don't tolerate that nonsense here. - | 1 |
" == Poor Citations == Maybe I don't completely understand the Wikipedia citation guidelines, but this article is loaded with sloppy citations. Look at the section ""Jewish Tradition"" and the first subsection ""Rabbinic commentaries"". The secondary source ""Jewish Encyclopedia"" is cited about a dozen times, while the text itself cites the (far more relevant) primary sources. If the text cites the primary source, is it necessary to re-cite anything? And if so, why not re-cite the primary sources ALREADY MENTIONED rather than an intermediate secondary source like the Jewish Encyclopedia? Take ""nevertheless, Judah killed several members of Jashub's army (42 men according to | the midrashic Book of Jasher, but 1000 men according to the Testament of Judah)."" Here we have an in-text citation of the ""Book of Jasher"" and another citation of the ""Testament of Judah"", which are both ancient sources that are publicly available from multiple editors/translators. Shouldn't these two sources be the references since it is actually where the information comes from? Am I the only one who sees a problem with crediting the Jewish Encyclopedia here? If there is another standard being used, I would like to know. Otherwise, I would like to go back and revamp all the article's citations. " | 0 |
" (edit conflict) Beejaypii logic seems flawless Jake and extremely difficult to argue with. We must employ logic and common sense to weight notability. Coppertwig is impressed with your argument but accepts it on flawed reasoning ie ""I think a significant percentage of people coming to read this page are probably doing so with the WHO recommendations or HIV prevention in mind."" Why? I highly doubt it. I also highly doubt that those who are circumcised feel safe to have sex with infected HIV persons, at least I hope they do not. What exactly are we trying to accomplish here? Yes circumcision slightly reduces | transmission rates of infectious disease because of the tougher skin. Overall this is meaningless unless you refuse to practice safe sex. When it comes to HIV WHO wants to roll the dice and hope you don't crap out. (note the pun was intentional) Sorry I want full proof methods when it comes to do or die. What WHO is essentially saying is humans are too stupid to practice safe sex so circumcision will reduce transmission rates. Because of scientific research this should be documented in the article. Does it belong in the lead as something that makes circumcision notable? I think not. " | 0 |
your web site is so gay because | thi=s does not give the correct information!!!! | 1 |
== Fuck you. == I was still editing | the article you insignificant click happy cunt. | 1 |
Symbols: ~ | ¡ ¿ † ‡ ↔ ↑ ↓ • ¶ # ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ∞ ‘ ’ “ ” «» ¤ ₳ ฿ ₵ ¢ ₡ ₢ $ ₫ ₯ € ₠ ₣ ƒ ₴ ₭ ₤ ℳ ₥ ₦ № ₧ ₰ £ ៛ ₨ ₪ ৳ ₮ ₩ ¥ ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ m² m³ ♭ ♯ ♮ © ® ™ Latin: A a Á á À à  â Ä ä Ǎ ǎ Ă ă Ā ā à ã Å å Ą ą Æ æ Ǣ ǣ B b C c Ć ć Ċ ċ Ĉ ĉ Č č Ç ç D d Ď ď Đ đ Ḍ ḍ Ð ð E e É é È è Ė ė Ê ê Ë ë Ě ě Ĕ ĕ Ē ē Ẽ ẽ Ę ę Ə ə F f G g Ġ ġ Ĝ ĝ Ğ ğ Ģ ģ H h Ĥ ĥ Ħ ħ Ḥ ḥ I i İ ı Í í Ì ì Î î Ï ï Ǐ ǐ Ĭ ĭ Ī ī Ĩ ĩ Į į J j Ĵ ĵ K k Ķ ķ L l Ĺ ĺ Ŀ ŀ Ľ ľ Ļ ļ Ł ł Ḷ ḷ Ḹ ḹ M m Ṃ ṃ N n Ń ń Ň ň Ñ ñ Ņ ņ Ṇ ṇ O o Ó ó Ò ò Ô ô Ö ö Ǒ ǒ Ŏ ŏ Ō ō Õ õ Ǫ ǫ Ő ő Ø ø Œ œ P p Q q R r Ŕ ŕ Ř ř Ŗ ŗ Ṛ ṛ Ṝ ṝ S s Ś ś Ŝ ŝ Š š Ş ş Ṣ ṣ ß T t Ť ť Ţ ţ Ṭ ṭ Þ þ U u Ú ú Ù ù Û û Ü ü Ǔ ǔ | Ŭ ŭ Ū ū Ũ ũ Ů ů Ų ų Ű ű Ǘ ǘ Ǜ ǜ Ǚ ǚ Ǖ ǖ V v W w Ŵ ŵ X x Y y Ý ý Ŷ ŷ Ÿ ÿ Ỹ ỹ Ȳ ȳ Z z Ź ź Ż ż Ž ž ß Ð ð Þ þ Ə ə Greek: Ά ά Έ έ Ή ή Ί ί Ό ό Ύ ύ Ώ ώ Α α Β β Γ γ Δ δ Ε ε Ζ ζ Η η Θ θ Ι ι Κ κ Λ λ Μ μ Ν ν Ξ ξ Ο ο Π π Ρ ρ Σ σ ς Τ τ Υ υ Φ φ Χ χ Ψ ψ Ω ω Cyrillic: А а Б б В в Г г Ґ ґ Ѓ ѓ Д д Ђ ђ Е е Ё ё Є є Ж ж З з Ѕ ѕ И и І і Ї ї Й й Ј ј К к Ќ ќ Л л Љ љ М м Н н Њ њ О о П п Р р С с Т т Ћ ћ У у Ў ў Ф ф Х х Ц ц Ч ч Џ џ Ш ш Щ щ Ъ ъ Ы ы Ь ь Э э Ю ю Я я ́ IPA: t̪ d̪ ʈ ɖ ɟ ɡ ɢ ʡ ʔ ɸ ʃ ʒ ɕ ʑ ʂ ʐ ʝ ɣ ʁ ʕ ʜ ʢ ɦ ɱ ɳ ɲ ŋ ɴ ʋ ɹ ɻ ɰ ʙ ʀ ɾ ɽ ɫ ɬ ɮ ɺ ɭ ʎ ʟ ɥ ʍ ɧ ɓ ɗ ʄ ɠ ʛ ʘ ǀ ǃ ǂ ǁ ɨ ʉ ɯ ɪ ʏ ʊ ɘ ɵ ɤ ə ɚ ɛ ɜ ɝ ɞ ʌ ɔ ɐ ɶ ɑ ɒ ʰ ʷ ʲ ˠ ˤ ⁿ ˡ ˈ ˌ ː ˑ ̪ | 0 |
:: The part of women and Jews is absurd and irrelevant. Unless | you got a quote for it. But then it is still stupid. | 1 |
:Gah! You a sick stupid slut!! GROSS!! Shit!! Why | do you people do this anyway?! UGH!! FUCKING GROSS!! | 1 |
No, she was a promising and well known young model, and | she was murdered by a violent shitbag. She's very noteworthy | 1 |
I think this must have be a stupid question | for me to ask about in the first place. | 1 |
Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for EVERYBODY. Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries. The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them. Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites. What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would | be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries? How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem? And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this? But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white. 55 | 0 |
I will continue in removing the opinions of one book which are put there with the only intent of turning the article into a anti-Manstein pamphlet. The claims about the alleged content of Lost victories are clearly false as was already proven by quotes from Lost victories. Nobody has tried to refute that. When reviews of lost victories are put,positve reviews have to be included. Actually there are a large majority of extremely positive reviews on the book. The alleged forgeries by Manstein on the Stalingrad campaign do not exist. There was only ever a discussion in the sixties on the Eismann | mission. Nothing to do with documents,let alone forging them. Manstein had nothing to answer for. He had not ordered Stalingrad to be taken and held. Paulus had to justify that he did not even attempt to execute Mansteins order to attack towards the relief force. Mansteins advice to Hitler was much more complex than what the disputed text tries to show in an obvious attempt to attack Mansteins reputation. The over the top allegations about Mansteins involvement with killing jews and commissars are again the reflection of a particular opinion. The article has to be neutral. It certainly cannot reflect one opinion. | 0 |
Assalawalekum , My name is shafique I hate | Narendra modi he is doggie he is pig | 1 |
:::::::I have no idea why you are saying all this. Do you really think that after all the years of discussing the MHP I do not know the difference between the probability of winning by switching given the player chose door 1 and the probability of winning by switching given the player chose door 1 and the host opened door 3??? :::::::The first thing we must ask when responding to the MHP is what question does the questioner intend to ask. It is quite clear to me, from the context of the question, a column in a popular general interest magazine, that the intended question was neither of the above but that the intended question was about probability of winning by switching | given the player chose any door and the host opened door another one, which hid a goat. We know that this was indeed the intended question, so assuming the question to be about specific door numbers is perverse. :::::::Now the thing that even after all this discussion you seem not to have grasped is that, even if we take the question to be asking for the probability of winning by switching given the player chose door 1 and the host opened door 3, the difference between what you call the the way popular writers and the way that mathematical writers talk about the problem is not that different. If you really need me to explain why one more time I will. ::::::: | 0 |
My dick, and the way it slaps people | across the face. 28 June 2005 10:41 (UTC) | 1 |
" :The English first began using fingerprints in July of 1858, when Sir William Herschel, Chief Magistrate of the Hooghly district in Jungipoor, India, first used fingerprints on native contracts. On a whim, and with no thought toward personal identification, Herschel had Rajyadhar Konai, a local businessman, impress his hand print on the back of a contract. :The idea was merely "". . . to frighten [him] out of all thought of repudiating his signature."" The native was suitably impressed, and Herschel made a habit of requiring palm printsand later, simply the prints of the right Index and Middle | fingerson every contract made with the locals. Personal contact with the document, they believed, made the contract more binding than if they simply signed it. Thus, the first wide-scale, modern-day use of fingerprints was predicated, not upon scientific evidence, but upon superstitious beliefs. :As his fingerprint collection grew, however, Herschel began to note that the inked impressions could, indeed, prove or disprove identity. While his experience with fingerprinting was admittedly limited, Sir Herschel's private conviction that all fingerprints were unique to the individual, as well as permanent throughout that individual's life, inspired him to expand their use. - " | 0 |
Uh??? Also known as means... What some people may know | it as...That's why you put it down. Seriously, dude. Retarded. | 1 |
== FUCK YOU ALL == yeah,you heard me | you little fuckers, go suck your mums cock | 1 |
FUCK YOU AND YOUR BLOCK....I WILL TAKE DOWN | THE ENTIRE WIKIPUSSY SITE....YOU ADMINISTRATORS ARE GAY HOMOS | 1 |
you make me so horny, come and have sex with you! | ''' }} i don't fuck with losers, stop harassing me. | 1 |
" That's right, Terminal and non-terminal functions only handles CFL (without saying so, as many wikipedia articles do). It is mainly about parse trees and uses some unusual notation (viz. ""function"", which occurs neither nor the only source , nor in the parse tree article). Maybe a sentence that nonterminal symbols and terminal symbols correspond to interior and leaf nodes in a CFG parse tree, respectively, could be used. And the example from the picture seems more understandable (everyone who learned English grammar might have seen such a tree) than the example (which doesn't fit the previous grammar definition but uses some unexplained extensions for optionality and repetition). It could look like this (wording subject to improvements): . | Nonterminal symbols and terminal symbols correspond to interior and leaf nodes, respectively.]] As an example, consider the following context-free grammar for simple English sentences. N = { S, NP, VP, Det, N, V, ... }, Σ = { John, ball, hit, the, ... }, start symbol is S, P is as follows: S := NP VP | ... VP := V NP | ... NP := Det N | ... | John | ... N := ball | ... V := hit | ... Det := the | ... In this example, nonterminal symbols denote grammatical categories, like ""sentence"" (abbreviated by ""S""), ""noun phrase"" (""NP""), etc., while terminal symbols are English words, like ""John"", ""ball"", etc. - " | 0 |
::You're all dishonest weirdos on the English | wiki ( WHY??????!?!?!? ~ ~~ ~ | 1 |
" ==Point to Ponder== Hello Dennis, I'm not sure if you would read my reply on my 'talk' page, so I;m posting it here as well. Hope this is okay. As you can see, I'm not that Wiki-knowledgeable, apart from article-writing, which is probably why I get into trouble for doing all sorts of things I'm not supposed to ) ::Thanks for your kind words, Dennis. However, the SPI interested me not at all. I know I'm me, so that's that. No, what has caused me to leave Wikipedia is that I feel I have been bullied, there has also been attempted manipulation and threats of mass deletion of all the articles I created. Is this Wiki policy? I think not. I'm sorry, but I am not prepared to accept that. | Life' too short, I don't need it. These were Sudo's parting words to me, relating to the letter above Considering the attitude you've had with me and several other editors, I'm sorry but I'm not even going to read this. Treat people like crap and you'll be ignored, because believe it or not, people don't want to be treated like crap, no matter how ""humor'' (there it broke off). It took me a long time to write that letter - I wanted to try to explain my position. I wonder what Jimbo would think of that response? Not much, I'll warrant. I, too, have been here 6 years (or maybe 8, memory fails with age )). Anyway, I just came back to thank you for your thoughtful post. Best, Andrea " | 0 |
" {| width=""100%"" style=""background:transparent;"" {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#;border:1px solid #;-moz-border-radius:12px;-webkit-border-radius:12px;"" |style=""width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top;border:1px solid #;-moz-border-radius:10px;-webkit-border-radius:10px;padding:4px;""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#;-moz-border-radius:10px;-webkit-border-radius:10px;"" | Hello, Zwjl, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Happy editing! |} {| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#"" |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#;"" |- ! Getting started |- |style=""color:#000""| * Introduction * The five pillars of Wikipedia * | How to edit a page * Intuitive guide to Wikipedia * Guide for younger editors |- ! Finding your way around |- | style=""color:#000""| * Table of contents * Department directory |- ! Editing articles |- | style=""color:#000""| * How to develop an article * Manual of Style |- |} |style=""width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#; vertical-align:top""| {| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""2"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#"" ! | 0 |
::: You cite the late Powers' article when he became arrogant and annoyed with too extended notion of modality. Check his NGD 1980 (widely disseminated) 90-pages article 'Mode' where he completely supported the common view of modality, and in his (large) article 'Tonal types and modal categories' and (another large) one about offertories, with pretty evident attempt to reconciliate 'modal categories' with his 'tonality' (especially see his batches of analytical tables). ::: It was me who added the section 'Tonality outside common-practice period' in the current WP-page and, trust me, I invested much time in (fruitful) discussion in refining this section (see above on this Talk page). The 'tonality' in Powers' | usage (applied to thed 16th century polyphonic sacred music) has nothing to do with the most common usage of tonality (= hierarchical pitch system with tonal center as reference pitch), he translated German 'Tonart' with 'tonality' which is the shortage of English language (Russian music theory uses two different words for what an English scholar calls with one word 'tonality', but here is not a decent place to explain these complications). That's the secion is rightly located as marginal addition to the artice designed as an instance of 'encyclopedic genre'. But you don't hear me, so I don't think I should develop the evident things I outlined above once more. | 0 |
"== Copyright problem removed == Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.epru.org/about-epru/epru-history. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see ""using copyrighted works from others"" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or ""donating copyrighted materials"" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will | be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. " | 0 |
someone should try and talk to these people who are | trying to sell essays what a bunch of idiots | 1 |
== WTF == Troll! I'm the real NHRHS2010!! Quit | pretending to be me you dorky virgin loser! | 1 |
" * Nem vou responder a essas divagações duvidosas sobre o PCP se dedicar à cultura ou não, eu vou todos os anos à Festa do Avante , estou tranquilo, pelos vistos tu não estás, até te enervas e tal... O PSD e o CDS querem rever a constituição e esta foi revista no ano passado, mas ao contrário de ti não acham que Fascista seja um insulto para o antigo regime, as prioridades deles são mais objectivas, fundamentadas e concisas, resumindo, ninguém de bom senso acha que dizer Fascismo sobre o regime dos amigos do Hermano Saraiva seja uma coisa sem pés nem cabeça ou uma incorrecção teórica. TODA a gente diz, ou pelo menos já ouviu | dizer, que o regime era Fascista, e já ouviu dizer ""Fascismo nunca mais"", ou ""no tempo do Fascismo""... menos tu, não deves sair de casa há muito tempo... A palavra está lá 3 vezes, repito, 3 vezes, é um abuso! O número que tantas voltas te faz dar na cama é o seguinte: 0,00038 -> representa a relação entre o número de palavras no artigo que se escreve da seguinte forma: ""Fascist"" e o total de palavras no artigo. É um exagero, tens razão! A Constituição não é um trabalho académico? Então o que é um constitucionalista? Pesquisa sobre isso e vais ter umas surpresas. Quanto à tua relação anal com a política, recomendo-te um poema: " | 0 |
" ==Notability of National Campus and Community Radio Association== A tag has been placed on National Campus and Community Radio Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may | contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. " | 0 |
" ==Speedy deletion of Andy Holm== A tag has been placed on Andy Holm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. If you think that this notice was | placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. " | 0 |
== Hey== HI WILL FUCKING RAPE YOU AND | BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN YOU BROWN CLOWN! MUAHAAHHHA | 1 |
== wow... ur an idiot == don't do something stupid mate | shut the hell up if u don't like what people say | 1 |
what the hell is the critcism of all the shit you could | blame her for this is the best you can come up with | 1 |
because wikipédia isdfkghguigfdfgjhdfgkjdsgfatdjfhdsjhf fucking gay | and school is o | 1 |
red sox suck and the Yankees are the best | Red Sox suck and the Yankees are the best | 1 |
" September 2006 (UTC) I agree that the Daily Values article (more of a snippet, really!) should be subsumed within the Reference Daily Intake article. [Another reader] ==Add a list of values== I'm currently working on a template box with nutritional information: template:nutritionalvalue. I'm considering to add a link to this page with a more extensive list of RDA values (including age groups etc.), and maybe also the equivalents for different countries. Would this be appropriate? Are there for example copyright issues if you reproduce all the data from the official list? ==Completely meaningless== RDI/RDV is meaningless, because there are so many variables | that determine what a persons intake should be, such as their gender, weight, age, activity levels, etc. that there is no possible way to determine what an average daily intake should be. :The FDA tables give different values depending on age group and sex. If you look up the numbers, you will see that generally 25-year-old men have the highest need, and that usually these values are taken as a ""Daily value"" on nutritional labeling. Wikipedia is not a place for primary research, but if you can provide a reference that supports your concern, it could be mentioned in the article. " | 0 |
" == Distasteful pictures == Eeaugh! Isn't the decutaneated fingertip picture (Nail Torn Out.jpg) a little WP:GRATUITOUSly unpleasant? It certainly isn't in line with the principle of WP:Least astonishment: I came to find a few technical terms, not as a hardened fingernail-repair medic. I feel that several of the pictures on this article (most blatantly the fake mangled nail (Ripped_Nail_Special_Effect_22.jpg) in the ""Fashion"" subsection; inaccurate illustration, only there to shock) are not relevant to a formal WP:Encyclopedic consideration. People get extremely emotional about hands (imagine something gruesome happening to one of | yours), and so I think the threshold for including clinical pics here is higher than, say, at Lung. I already know WP:NOTCENSORED; I'm challenging under WP:IRELEV, because artificial horror is a terrible illustration of nails in fashion, and gruesome pathology is not a good leader for an general anatomy article (because the vast majority of all fingernails are not horrifically damaged). I'll tolerate Damaged_thumbnail.JPG and, okay, maybe ToeNailInjury.jpg as illustrations of ""Health and Care"", although I'd prefer an image of proper emery-board or nail-scissor use along the tasteful, relevant Daumennagel_mit_Nagelhaut_und_Niednagel.jpg. " | 0 |
== Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2014 == | You are a loser go cry in the corner | 1 |
== MITCHELL IS GAY == MITCHELL IS A GAY | HOMOSEXURAL LESBEIN FUCKER HE LOVES BOY AND COCKS | 1 |
" 99 cents for a two liter of faygo where is that at. in lansing Mi its 79 cents all day everyday.. wow you guys get taxed like crazy. and now for the icp and faygo story i found this at fellow juggalo site (http://zeara420.tripod.com/id19.html) and this is the speculation on how icp really got into using faygo as a major part of the juggalo society ""Faygo: what exactly is it? Faygo is a super cheap soda-pop beverage, whose homequarters rest in Detroit, Michigan. The Insane Clown Posse have been spraying Faygo all over the Juggalos at live shows for what seems an eternity but in reality only goes back a few years ago. I.C.P. drank the Faygo soda-pop when they | were kids because it was cheap, and there was so many different refreshing flavors and a varieties to choose from. One day at an I.C.P. concert, Violent J and Shaggy 2 Dope were doing synchronized dance steps and Shaggs fucked up, so J grabbed a two liter of Faygo and bashed it over Shaggy's head, and thus the war began. Juggalos everywhere were on stage throwing Faygo, gettin' live. And so from then on, at every Insane Clown Posse concert, Faygo is thrown all over the willing crowd, and everybody seems to enjoy it, go nuts, and have just a straight up fresh time. That is the history of how the Insane Clown Posse and Faygo cola are connected.""http://zeara420.tripod.com/id19.html " | 0 |
"::Gamespot has a special feature about it , including | the infamous ""make you his bitch"" piece . " | 1 |
" It's quite amusing to see the speed at which people are ready to label the SDA church a cult. I am willing to bet that most of the accusers have done little research about the church save for a few hysterical websites that peddle this rubbish. I'm actually a militant atheist (check my wiki contribs for proof!), but I was raised in the SDA church, and I am here to tell you that far from being a cult, they are mostly excellent human beings. Totally deluded, and wrong-headed, but no more than those of any other belief system rooted in the supernatural. Yes, they are exclusivist, but which church isn't? The very fact that numerous Christian churches exist, is proof positive that | they believe they know something the others don't. The truth is that all churches believe that they, and they alone, have the 'truth'. The term cult is actually a bit of an irregular verb anyway. I mean what distinguishes a cult from a regular religion? The number of adherents? The 'strangeness' of their views? Who decides? When I saw this debate, I was reminded of the quote: ""A cult is just a religion without any political power"". It was this general ignorance that caused Lindy and Michael Chambelain to be subjected to a kangaroo court. The simple fact is that the SDA church is almost indistinguishable from any conservative Christian denomination, except for a few very minor points of doctrinal obscurity. " | 0 |
Subsets and Splits