instruction
stringlengths 1
84
| input
stringlengths 1
85
| output
stringlengths 1
83
|
---|---|---|
commencement of polls in the first phase and half hour after the | time fixed for close of poll for the last phase in all the States and | Union Territories. |
(iii) Section 127A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: | The printing and publication of election pamphlets, posters, etc. | is governed by its provisions, which make it mandatory to bear |
on its face the names and addresses of the printer and the | publisher. | (iv) Section 171H of the Indian Penal Code: It prohibits incurring of |
expenditure on, inter alia, advertisement without the authority of | the contesting candidate. | 4. Voter Education and Participation |
There is scope for a much larger and committed partnership from | media in the crucial area of voter awareness and participation. This is | one of the most promising areas of the Election Commission-media |
relationship. | There is a gap between what the voters ‘should know’ and what | they ‘actually know’ in important areas like registration, EPIC/ identity |
proofs, Polling Station location, use of EVMs, timings of the poll, use | of money/ muscle power by candidates etc. The elector should be | well-informed when he/she goes to exercise his/ her franchise on the |
Voter education helps build an environment where values of | democracy are understood and acted upon by the population. Media | and civil society have an important role to play in fostering such an |
environment. To improve participation of all sections of the electorate, | awareness levels need to be enhanced, especially amongst the | freshly eligible youth, uneducated, residents of far-flung, inaccessible |
and remote areas, and socially and economically weaker sections of | the society. Such segments need to be reached through the Media, | apart from civil society and field based organisations. The Election |
Commission has in place a framework of engagement for | collaboration between the Commission and Media Houses/ | Organisations in this important area of voter participation. The |
Election Commission expects that the Media should volunteer to take | up this task of informing, motivating and facilitating citizens to take | part in the democratic elections. |
5. Responsibility of Government Media | In broadcast of election related news or analysis, Public Service | Broadcasters are expected to lead by example in terms of neutrality |
and objectivity, and adhere to various guidelines including their own. | The Election Commission has a fruitful arrangement with Prasar | Bharati in providing free broadcast time on All India Radio and |
Doordarshan to recognised National and State parties so as to | ensure a level playing field in elections. The political parties in this | manner can reach out to every corner of the country, even in the |
remotest parts. In addition to this, Prasar Bharati’s contribution in | spreading voter awareness and educating the public about their | voting rights and responsibilities is of great consequence to the |
inclusion of all in the electoral process. The contribution of Prasar | Bharati has come in good measure in this arena. | The Election Commission also urges PIB, DAVP, National Film |
Development Corporation, Directorate of Field Publicity, Song and | Drama Division and many other Central and State Information | Directorates/ Departments to come forward and shoulder the same |
1. Gordon Marshall, Oxford Dictionary of Sociology, First | Indian Edition, 2004, p.696. | 2. Oinam Kulabidhu, Electoral Politics in Manipur, 1980–1995 |
(Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis submitted to the Manipur | University, 1998). | 3. Stephen L. Wasby, Political Science: The Discipline and its |
Dimensions, 1972, Scientific Book Agency, Calcutta, p.308. | 4. David Robertson, The Penguin Dictionary of Politics, | Second Edition, 1993, p.485. |
5. K.R. Acharya (Ed.), Perspectives on Indian Government | and Politics, Second Edition, 1991, S. Chand & Company | Ltd., p.403. |
6. Caste in Indian Politics and Politics in India are the two | major contributions of Rajni Kothari to the study of Indian | politics. |
7. Paul R. Brass, The Politics of India Since Independence, | Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–98. | 8. Linguism means love for one’s language and hatred |
towards other languagespeaking people. | 9. ‘Charisma’ means exceptional and attractive qualities of a | leader. |
10. Paul R. Brass, The 1984 Parliamentary Elections in Uttar | Pradesh, Asian Survey, June, 1986. | 11. Handbook for Media-2014, Election Commission of India, |
75 Coalition Government | MEANING OF COALITION GOVERNMENT | The term ‘coalition’ is derived from the Latin word ‘coalitio’ which |
means ‘to grow together’. Thus, technically, coalition means the | act of uniting parts into one body or whole. Politically, coalition | means an alliance of distinct political parties. |
Coalition politics or coalition government has been defined in | the following way: | When several political parties join hands to form a government |
and exercise political power on the basis of a common agreed | programme/agenda, we can describe the system as coalition | politics or coalition government1 . |
Coalitions usually occur in modern parliaments when no single | political party can muster a majority of votes. Two or more parties, | who have enough elected members between them to form a |
majority, may then be able to agree on a common programme that | does not require too many drastic compromises with their | individual policies, and can proceed to form a government2 . |
Coalition denotes a co-operative arrangement under which | distinct political parties, or at all events members of such parties, | unite to form a government or ministry3 . |
Coalition is a direct descendant of the exigencies of multi-party | system in a democratic set-up. It is a phenomenon of a multi-party | government where a number of minority parties join hands for the |
purpose of running the government. A coalition is formed when | many splinter groups in a House agree to join hands on a | common platform by sinking their broad differences and form a |
FEATURES OF COALITION GOVERNMENT | The features or implications of coalition politics or coalition | government are very well summarised by J.C. Johari in the |
following way5 : | 1. Coalitions are formed for the sake of some reward, material | or psychic. |
2. A coalition implies the existence of at least two partners. | 3. The underlying principle of a coalition system stands on the | simple fact of temporary conjunction of specific interest. |
4. Coalition politics is not a static but a dynamic affair as | coalition players and groups dissolve and form new ones. | 5. The keynote of coalition politics is compromise, and rigid |
dogma has no place in it. | 6. A coalition government works on the basis of a minimum | programme, which may not be ideal for each partner of the |
coalition. | 7. Pragmatism and not ideology is the hallmark of coalition | politics. In making political adjustments, principles may have |
to be set aside. | 8. The purpose of a coalition adjustment is to seize power. | In our country, we have seen coalitions coming up either before |
the elections or after the elections. The pre-poll coalition is | considerably advantageous because it provides a common | platform to the parties in order to woo the electorate on the basis |
FORMATION OF COALITION GOVERNMENTS | In the first four Lok Sabha elections (1952, 1957, 1962 and 1967), | the Congress party secured the required majority to form the |
government at the Centre. Even though there was a split in the | Congress party in 1969, the minority government of Indira Gandhi | managed to continue with the outside support of the CPI, the DMK |
and other parties. Again, the Congress party won the 1971 | elections and formed a single-party government. | However, the dominant Congress party was badly defeated in |
the 1977 elections. Since then, there have been a number of | coalition governments at the Centre. The details are mentioned in | Table 75.1. |
Table 75.1 Formation of Coalition Governments at the Centre | Sl. Period Coalition Prime Partners | No. Minister |
(Party) | 1. 1977– Janata Party Morarji Desai Congress (O), | 1979 (Congress (O)) Bharatiya Jana |
Sangh, Bharatiya | Lok Dal, Socialist | Party, Congress for |
Democracy, | Chandra Shekhar | Group (former |
congressmen) and | others. | 2. 1979– Janata Party Charan Singh Janata (S) and |
1980 (Secular) (Janata(S)) Congress (U). | Congress (I) | supported from |
outside. | 3. 1989– National V.P. Singh Janata Dal, TDP, | 1990 Front (Janata Dal) DMK, AGP and |
Congress | (Socialist) BJP and | Left parties |
supported from | outside. | 4. 1990– Janata Dal Chandra Janata Dal (S) and |
1991 (Socialist) or Shekhar Janata Party. | Samajwadi (Janata Dal (S) Congress (I) | Janata Party or Samajwadi supported from |
Janata Party) outside. | 5. 1996– United Front H.D. Deve Janata Dal, CPI, | 1997 Gowda Congress (T), |
(Janata Dal) DMK, TDP, TMC, | AGP, SP and | others. Congress |
and CPM | supported from | outside. |
6. 1997– United Front I.K. Gujral Janata Dal, CPI, | 1998 (Janata Dal) TMC, SP, DMK, | AGP, TDP and |
others. Congress | supported from | outside. |
7. 1998– BJP-led A.B. Vajpayee BJP, AIADMK, | 1999 Coalition (BJP) BJD, Shiv Sena, | Lok Shakti, |
Arunachal | Congress, Samata, | Akali Dal, PMK, |
TRC and others. | TDP and | Trinamool |
Congress | supported from | outside. |
2004 Democratic (BJP) Trinamool | Alliance Congress, Shiv | (NDA) Sena, BJD, LJP, |
DMK, PMK, INLD, | MDMK, National | Conference, Akali |
Dal, RLD, AGP | and others. | 9. 2004– United Manmohan Congress, NCP, |
2009 Progressive Singh DMK, RJD, LJP, | Alliance (Congress) PMK and others. | (UPA) CPI and CPM |
supported from | outside. | 10. 2009– United Manmohan Congress, NCP, |
2014 Progressive Singh DMK, Trinamool | Alliance-II (Congress) Congress, National | (UPA-II) Conference and |
others. | 11. 2014– National Narendra Modi BJP, LJP, TDP, | 2019 Democratic (BJP) Shiv Sena, Akali |
Alliance Dal, Rashtriya Lok | (NDA) Samata Party, | Apna Dal (S) and |
others. TDP left | NDA in 2018. | 12. 2019- till National Narendra Modi BJP, Akali Dal, |
date Democratic (BJP) LJP, Shiv Sena | Alliance and others. Shiv | (NDA) Sena left NDA in |
MERITS OF COALITION GOVERNMENT | The various advantages or strengths of the coalition governments | are as follows: |
1. There is an accommodation of diverse interests in the | functioning of the government. A coalition government acts | as a channel to meet the expectations and redress the |
grievances of different groups. | 2. India is a highly diversified country. There are different | cultures, languages, castes, religions and ethnic groups, and |
all these get represented in the coalition governments. This | means that a coalition government is more representative in | nature and it better reflects the popular opinion of the |
electorate. In other words, it represents a much more | broader spectrum of public opinion than the single-party | government. |
3. A coalition government comprises different political parties | having their own ideologies or agendas. But, the | governmental policy requires the concurrence of all the |
coalition partners. Therefore, a coalition government leads to | consensus-based politics. In other words, there is | consensual decision-making in the coalition governments. |
4. Coalition politics strengthens the federal fabric of the Indian | political system. This is because a coalition government is | more sensitive and responsive to the regional demands and |
concerns than the single-party government. | 5. A coalition government reduces the tyranny of government | (despotic rule). This is due to the reduced domination of a |
single political party in the functioning of the government. All | the members of the coalition participate in the political | decision-making. In short, the decisions made are more |
DEMERITS OF COALITION GOVERNMENT | The various disadvantages or weaknesses of the coalition | governments are as follows: |
1. They are unstable or prone to instability. The difference of | opinion among the coalition partners on policy issues leads | to the collapse of the government. |
2. Leadership of the Prime Minister is a principle of | parliamentary form of government. This principle is curtailed | in a coalition government as the Prime Minister is required to |
consult the coalition partners before taking any major | decision. The critics have called them as ‘Super Prime | Ministers’ or ‘Ultra Prime Ministers’. |
3. The Steering Committee or the Co-ordination Committee of | the coalition partners acts as the ‘Super-Cabinet’, and | thereby it undermines the role and position of the cabinet in |
the functioning of the governmental machinery. | 4. There is a possibility of the smaller constituents of the | coalition government playing the role of a ‘King-maker’. They |
demand more than their strength in the Parliament. | 5. The leaders of regional parties bring in the regional factors | in the national decision-making. They pressurise the central |
executive to act on their lines; otherwise, they would | threaten to withdraw from the coalition. | 6. The size of the Council of Ministers in a coalition |
government is generally quite large. This is because the | ministry has to reflect all the constituents of the coalition. For | example, the A.B. Vajpayee ministry of 1999 had 70-plus |
ministers and it was called as ‘Jumbo Ministry’. This creates | the problem of distribution of portfolios as well as the proper | coordination among the members. |
7. The members of coalition governments do not assume | responsibility for the administrative failures and lapses. They | play blame games and thereby escape from both collective |
NOTES AND REFERENCES | 1. Ghai, K.K., Indian Government and Politics, Eighth | Edition, Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, 2012, p. 508. |
2. Robertson, D., The Penguin Dictionary of Politics, | Penguin Books, London, 1993, p. 73. | 3. Ogg, F.A., Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 2, |
New York, 1957, p. 600. | 4. Sahni, N.C., The theory of coalitions. In Sahni, N.C. | (Ed) Coalition Politics in India, Jullundur, 1971, pp. 17– |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.