instruction
stringlengths
1
84
input
stringlengths
1
85
output
stringlengths
1
83
6. The administrative expenses of the office of the CAG,
including all salaries, allowances and pensions of persons
serving in that office are charged upon the Consolidated
Fund of India. Thus, they are not subject to the vote of
Parliament.
Further, no minister can represent the CAG in Parliament (both
DUTIES AND POWERS
The Constitution (Article 149) authorises the Parliament to
prescribe the duties and powers of the CAG in relation to the
accounts of the Union and of the states and of any other authority
or body. Accordingly, the Parliament enacted the CAG’s (Duties,
Powers and Conditions of Service) act, 1971. This Act was
amended in 1976 to separate accounts from audit in the Central
government.
The duties and functions of the CAG as laid down by the
Parliament and the Constitution are:
1. He audits the accounts related to all expenditure from the
Consolidated Fund of India, consolidated fund of each state
and consolidated fund of each union territory having a
Legislative Assembly.
2. He audits all expenditure from the Contingency Fund of
India and the Public Account of India as well as the
contingency fund of each state and the public account of
each state.
3. He audits all trading, manufacturing, profit and loss
accounts, balance sheets and other subsidiary accounts
kept by any department of the Central Government and state
governments.
4. He audits the receipts and expenditure of the Centre and
each state to satisfy himself that the rules and procedures in
that behalf are designed to secure an effective check on the
assessment, collection and proper allocation of revenue.
5. He audits the receipts and expenditure of the following:
(a) All bodies and authorities substantially financed from the
Central or state revenues;
(b) Government companies; and
(c) Other corporations and bodies, when so required by
related laws.
6. He audits all transactions of the Central and state
governments related to debt, sinking funds, deposits,
advances, suspense accounts and remittance business. He
also audits receipts, stock accounts and others, with
approval of the President, or when required by the
President.
7. He audits the accounts of any other authority when
requested by the President or Governor. For example, the
audit of local bodies.
8. He advises the President with regard to prescription of the
form in which the accounts of the Centre and the states shall
be kept (Article 150).
9. He submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of the
Centre to President, who shall, in turn, place them before
both the Houses of Parliament (Article 151).
10. He submits his audit reports relating to the accounts of a
state to governor, who shall, in turn, place them before the
state legislature (Article 151).
11. He ascertains and certifies the net proceeds of any tax or
duty (Article 279). His certificate is final. The ‘net proceeds’
means the proceeds of a tax or a duty minus the cost of
collection.
12. He acts as a guide, friend and philosopher of the Public
Accounts Committee of the Parliament.
13. He compiles and maintains the accounts of state
governments. In 1976, he was relieved of his responsibilities
with regard to the compilation and maintenance of accounts
of the Central Government due to the separation of accounts
from audit, that is, departmentalisation of accounts.
The CAG submits three audit reports to the President–audit
report on appropriation accounts, audit report on finance
accounts, and audit report on public undertakings. The President
lays these reports before both the Houses of Parliament. After
this, the Public Accounts Committee examines them and reports
its findings to the Parliament.
The appropriation accounts compare the actual expenditure
with the expenditure sanctioned by the Parliament through the
ROLE
The role of CAG is to uphold the Constitution of India and the laws
of Parliament in the field of financial administration. The
accountability of the executive (i.e., council of ministers) to the
Parliament in the sphere of financial administration is secured
through audit reports of the CAG. The CAG is an agent of the
Parliament and conducts audit of expenditure on behalf of the
Parliament. Therefore, he is responsible only to the Parliament.
The CAG has more freedom with regard to audit of expenditure
than with regard to audit of receipts, stores and stock. “Whereas
in relation to expenditure he decides the scope of audit and
frames his own audit codes and manuals, he has to proceed with
the approval of the executive government in relation to rules for
the conduct of the other audits.”3a
The CAG has ‘to ascertain whether money shown in the
accounts as having been disbursed was legally available for and
applicable to the service or the purpose to which they have been
applied or charged and whether the expenditure conforms to the
authority that governs it’. In addition to this legal and regulatory
audit, the CAG can also conduct the propriety audit, that is, he
can look into the ‘wisdom, faithfulness and economy’ of
government expenditure and comment on the wastefulness and
extravagance of such expenditure. However, unlike the legal and
regulatory audit, which is obligatory on the part of the CAG, the
propriety audit is discretionary.
The secret service expenditure is a limitation on the auditing
role of the CAG. In this regard, the CAG cannot call for particulars
of expenditure incurred by the executive agencies, but has to
accept a certificate from the competent administrative authority
that the expenditure has been so incurred under his authority.
The Constitution of India visualises the CAG to be Comptroller
as well as Auditor General. However, in practice, the CAG is
fulfilling the role of an Auditor-General only and not that of a
Comptroller. In other words, ‘the CAG has no control over the
issue of money from the consolidated fund and many departments
are authorised to draw money by issuing cheques without specific
authority from the CAG, who is concerned only at the audit stage
when the expenditure has already taken place’4. In this respect,
the CAG of India differs totally from the CAG of Britain who has
powers of both Comptroller as well as Auditor General. In other
words, in Britain, the executive can draw money from the public
exchequer only with the approval of the CAG.
CAG AND CORPORATIONS
The role of CAG in the auditing of public corporations is limited.
Broadly speaking, his relationship with the public corporations falls
into the following three categories:
(i) Some corporations are audited totally and directly by the
CAG, for example, Damodar Valley Corporation, Oil and
Natural Gas Commission, Air India, Indian Airlines
Corporation, and others.
(ii) Some other corporations are audited by private professional
auditors who are appointed by the Central Government in
consultation with the CAG. If necessary, the CAG can conduct
supplementary audit. The examples are, Central Warehousing
Corporation, Industrial Finance Corporation, and others.
(iii) Some other corporations are totally subjected to private audit.
In other words, their audit is done exclusively by private
professional auditors and the CAG does not come into the
picture at all. They submit their annual reports and accounts
directly to the Parliament. Examples of such corporations are
Life Insurance Corporation of India, Reserve Bank of India,
State Bank of India, Food Corporation of India, and others.
The role of the CAG in the auditing of Government companies
is also limited. They are audited by private auditors who are
appointed by the Government on the advise of the CAG. The CAG
can also undertake supplementary audit or test audit of such
companies.
In 1968, an Audit Board was established as a part of the office
of CAG to associate outside specialists and experts to handle the
technical aspects of audit of specialised enterprises like
engineering, iron and steel, chemicals and so on. This board was
established on the recommendations of the Administrative
APPLEBY’S CRITICISM
Paul H Appleby, in his two reports on Indian Administration, was
very critical of the role of CAG and attacked the significance of his
work5. He also suggested that the CAG should be relieved of the
responsibility of audit. In other words, he recommended the
abolition of the office of CAG. His points of criticism of Indian audit
are as follows:
1. The function of the CAG in India, is in a large measure, an
inheritance from the colonial rule.
2. The CAG is today a primary cause of widespread and
paralysing unwillingness to decide and to act. Auditing has a
repressive and negative influence.
3. The Parliament has a greatly exaggerated notion of the
importance of auditing to Parliamentary responsibility, and
so has failed to define the functions of the CAG as the
Constitution contemplated it would do.
4. The CAG’s function is not really a very important one.
Auditors do not know and cannot be expected to know very
much about good administration; their prestige is highest
with others who do not know much about administration.
5. Auditors know what is auditing, which is not administration; it
is a necessary, but a highly pedestrian function with a
narrow perspective and a very limited usefulness.
6. A deputy secretary in the department knows more about the
problems in his department than the CAG and his entire
staff.
Table 51.1 Articles Related to Comptroller and Auditor-General of
India at a Glance
Article No. Subject-matter
148. Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
149. Duties and powers of the Comptroller and Auditor-
General
150. Form of accounts of the Union and of the States
151. Audit reports
NOTES AND REFERENCES
1. The Indian Audit and Accounts Department was created
during the British rule in 1753.
2. Constituent Assembly Debates, Volume VIII, p. 405.
3. In 2018, the salary of a judge of the Supreme Court had
been fixed at ₹2.50 lakh per month.
3a. Wattal, P.K., Parliamentary Financial Control in India,
Second Edition. Bombay: Minerva Book Shop, 1962, p.
235.
4. D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India,
Wadhwa, 19th Edition, 2001, p. 198.
5. The two reports are: Public Administration in India
(1953) and Re-examination of India’s Administrative
System, 1956.
52 Attorney General of India
T
he Constitution (Article 76) has provided for the office of
APPOINTMENT AND TERM
The Attorney General (AG) is appointed by the president. He must
be a person who is qualified to be appointed a judge of the
Supreme Court. In other words, he must be a citizen of India and
he must have been a judge of some high court for five years or an
advocate of some high court for ten years or an eminent jurist, in
the opinion of the president.
The term of office of the AG is not fixed by the Constitution.
Further, the Constitution does not contain the procedure and
grounds for his removal. He holds office during the pleasure of the
president. This means that he may be removed by the president
at any time. He may also quit his office by submitting his
resignation to the president. Conventionally, he resigns when the
government (council of ministers) resigns or is replaced, as he is
appointed on its advice.
DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS
As the chief law officer of the Government of India, the duties of
the AG include the following:
1. To give advice to the Government of India upon such legal
matters, which are referred to him by the president.
2. To perform such other duties of a legal character that are
assigned to him by the president.
3. To discharge the functions conferred on him by the
Constitution or any other law.
The president has assigned the following duties to the AG2 :
1. To appear on behalf of the Government of India in all cases
in the Supreme Court in which the Government of India is
concerned.
2. To represent the Government of India in any reference made
by the president to the Supreme Court under Article 143 of
the Constitution.
3. To appear (when required by the Government of India) in
any high court in any case in which the Government of India
RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS
In the performance of his official duties, the Attorney General has
the right of audience in all courts in the territory of India. Further,
he has the right to speak and to take part in the proceedings of
both the Houses of Parliament or their joint sitting and any
committee of the Parliament of which he may be named a
member, but without a right to vote. He enjoys all the privileges
and immunities that are available to a member of Parliament.
Following limitations are placed on the Attorney General in
order to avoid any complication and conflict of duty:
1. He should not advise or hold a brief against the Government
of India.
2. He should not advise or hold a brief in cases in which he is
called upon to advise or appear for the Government of India.
3. He should not defend accused persons in criminal
prosecutions without the permission of the Government of
India.
4. He should not accept appointment as a director in any
company or corporation without the permission of the
Government of India.
5. He should not advise any ministry or department of
Government of India or any statutory organization or any
public sector undertaking unless the proposal or a reference
in this regard is received through the Ministry of Law and
Justice, Department of Legal Affairs2a.
However, the Attorney General is not a fulltime counsel for the
Government. He does not fall in the category of government
SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
In addition to the AG, there are other law officers of the
Government of India. They are the solicitor general of India and
additional solicitor general of India. They assist the AG in the
fulfilment of his official responsibilities. It should be noted here that
only the office of the AG is created by the Constitution. In other
words, Article 76 does not mention about the solicitor general and
additional solicitor general.
The AG is not a member of the Central cabinet. There is a
separate law minister in the Central cabinet to look after legal
matters at the government level3 .
Table 52.1 Articles Related to Attorney-General of India at a
Glance
Article No. Subject-matter
76. Attorney-General of India
88. Rights of Attorney-General as respects the
Houses of Parliament and its Committee
105. Powers, privileges and immunities of Attorney-
General
NOTES AND REFERENCES
1. Article 76 of Chapter 1 (The Executive) in Part V (The
Union) of the Constitution deals with the office of the
Attorney General of India. This is the only Article dealing
with this office.
2. Notification No. F. 43–50C, 26 January 1950, Gazette of
India, Extraordinary, Volume VII, p. 33–34.
2a. Inserted vide G.S.R..... (E) dated 25th February, 2005.
3. During the prime ministership of Jawaharlal Nehru, a
proposal was put forward by the Central government
that the office of the Attorney General be merged with
53 Advocate General of the State
T
he Constitution (Article 165) has provided for the office of
the advocate general for the states.1 He is the highest law
officer in the state. Thus he corresponds to the Attorney
General of India.
APPOINTMENT AND TERM
The advocate general is appointed by the governor. He must be a
person who is qualified to be appointed a judge of a high court. In
other words, he must be a citizen of India and must have held a
judicial office2 for ten years or been an advocate of a high court
for ten years3 .