instruction
stringlengths 1
84
| input
stringlengths 1
85
| output
stringlengths 1
83
|
---|---|---|
mandate. The list of Verticals is as follows:
|
1. Agriculture
|
2. Data Management & Analysis
|
3. Energy
|
4. Financial Resources
|
5. Governance & Research
|
8. Human Resource Development
|
9. Industry
|
10. Infrastructure Connectivity
|
11. Land & Water Resources
|
12. Managing Urbanisation
|
13. Natural Resources & Environment
|
14. NGO Darpan
|
15. Project Appraisal & Management Division (PAMD)
|
16. Public-Private Partnerships
|
17. Rural Development
|
18. Science & Technology
|
19. Skill Development & Employment
|
20. Social Justice & Empowerment
|
21. State Coordination and Decentralized Planning
|
22. Sustainable Development Goals
|
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
|
In carrying out the above functions, the NITI Aayog is guided by the
|
following principles8 :
|
1. Antyodaya: Prioritise service and uplift of the poor,
|
marginalised and downtrodden, as enunciated in Pandit
|
Deendayal Upadhyay’s idea of ‘Antyodaya’.
|
2. Inclusion: Empower vulnerable and marginalised sections,
|
redressing identitybased inequalities of all kinds–gender,
|
region, religion, caste or class.
|
3. Village: Integrate our villages into the development process, to
|
draw on the vitality and energy of the bedrock of our ethos,
|
culture and sustenance.
|
4. Demographic dividend: Harness our greatest asset, the people
|
of India; by focussing on their development, through education
|
and skilling, and their empowerment, through productive
|
livelihood opportunities.
|
5. People’s Participation: Transform the developmental process
|
into a people-driven one, making an awakened and
|
participative citizenry–the driver of good governance.
|
6. Governance: Nurture an open, transparent, accountable, pro-
|
active and purposeful style of governance, transitioning focus
|
from Outlay to Output to Outcome.
|
7. Sustainability: Maintain sustainability at the core of our
|
planning and developmental process, building on our ancient
|
tradition of respect for the environment.
|
Therefore, the NITI Aayog is based on the following seven pillars
|
of effective governance:
|
(i) Pro-people agenda that fulfils the aspirations of the society as
|
well as individuals.
|
(ii) Pro-active in anticipating and responding to citizen needs.
|
(iii) Participative, by involvement of citizens.
|
(iv) Empowering women in all aspects.
|
(v) Inclusion of all groups with special attention to the SCs, STs,
|
OBCs and minorities.
|
(vi) Equality of opportunity for the youth.
|
(vii) Transparency through the use of technology to make
|
Through its commitment to a cooperative federalism, promotion of
|
citizen engagement, egalitarian access to opportunity, participative
|
and adaptive governance and increasing use of technology, the NITI
|
Aayog seeks to provide a critical directional and strategic input into
|
the development process. This, along with being the incubator of
|
ideas for development, is the core mission of NITI Aayog.
|
COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM
|
The NITI Aayog has been constituted to actualize the important goal
|
of cooperative federalism and to enable good governance in India, to
|
build strong states that will make a strong nation. In a truly federal
|
state, several objectives that ought to be achieved may carry political
|
ramifications throughout the country. It is impossible for any federal
|
government to achieve the national objectives without active
|
cooperation from state governments. It is, therefore, crucial that the
|
Centre and State governments work together as equals8a.
|
The two key features or aspects of Cooperative Federalism are:
|
(i) Joint focus on the National Development Agenda by the Centr
|
and the States; and
|
(ii) Advocacy of State perspectives with Central Ministries8b.
|
In keeping with this, the NITI Aayog has been mandated the task
|
of evolving a shared vision of national development priorities, sectors
|
and strategies with the active involvement of States. These priorities
|
ought to reflect the national objectives and foster cooperative
|
federalism through structured support to States on a continuous
|
basis. The NITI Aayog ought also to help states develop
|
mechanisms to formulate credible plans at the village level and
|
aggregate these progressively at higher levels of government. The
|
aim is to progress from a stage when the Centre decided
|
development policies to a truly federal government wherein States
|
are equal stakeholders in the planning process8c.
|
The policy of the Government to involve State governments is
|
reflected in changes in the interaction processes of the NITI Aayog.
|
Consistent with its mandate, the NITI Aayog has undertaken several
|
crucial initiatives to ensure that States are equal partners in the
|
policy making and implementing process8d.
|
At the meetings of the Governing Council of NITI Aayog, the
|
Prime Minister highlighted the importance of NITI Aayog as a
|
platform to inspite cooperative federalism, stressing on the need for
|
effective center-state cooperation to advance development
|
outcomes and achieve double-digit and inclusive growth for India.
|
It is the constant endeavor of NITI Aayog to evolve a shared
|
vision of national priorities, sectors, and strategies with the active
|
planning process as well. In keeping with this, the Vice-Chairman of
|
NITI Aayog committed himself to visit all States, to develop and offer
|
a platform for resolution of inter-sectoral and inter-departmental
|
issues in order to accelerate the implementation of the development
|
agenda.
|
The NITI Aayog has also established models and programmes for
|
development of infrastructure and to reignite and establish Private-
|
Public Partnership, such as the Centre-State partnership model:
|
Development Support Services to States (DSSS); and the
|
Sustainable Action For Transforming Human Capital (SATH)
|
programme which is designed to help States improve their social
|
sector indicators by providing them technical support.
|
Further, with the aim of correcting regional development
|
imbalance, the NITI Aayog has taken special steps for regions
|
needing special attention and support, like the North Eastern States,
|
Island States and hilly Himayalan States by constituting special
|
forums to identify their specific constraints, formulating special
|
policies to ensure sustainable development takes place in these
|
regions while also protecting their abundant natural resources.
|
From the above discussion, we can summarise the various
|
manifestions of Cooperative Federalism in the working of the NITI
|
Aayog:
|
1. Meetings of Governing Council
|
2. Sub-groups of Chief Ministers on different subjects
|
3. Task Forces on specific subjects
|
4. NITI Forum for North East
|
5. Sustainable Development in the Indian Himayalan Region
|
CRITICISM
|
Hitting out at the government for its decision to restructure the
|
Planning Commission and rechristen it as “NITI Aayog”, the
|
Opposition said the move is just a “fluff” and mere “gimmickry”. They
|
also expressed their apprehension that the new body will pave the
|
way for discrimination, as “corporates will call the shots” in policy-
|
making in the country.
|
CPI(M) leader Sitaram Yechury termed the renaming of the
|
Planning Commission as aniti aur durniti (no policy and bad policy).
|
Mr. Yechury said, “just a change of nomenclature and gimmickry
|
does not serve any purpose. Let us see what the government plans
|
to do with it”.
|
“If the government wants to greet people with fluff and not
|
substance on the first day of 2015, then there is nothing more that
|
can be said... If the North Block or the Finance Ministry has a very
|
short-term view of both fiscal and monetary objective and is going to
|
be the final arbiter between the states and the Centre... it being the
|
stakeholder in the process... I am afraid, is going to discriminate
|
against the states,” Congress leader Manish Tewari said.
|
“After all, what was the Planning Commission doing? It used to
|
plan policy. So by changing the nomenclature from Planning
|
Commission to NITI Aayog what is the message this government is
|
trying to send,” Mr. Tewari said, adding that Congress’ opposition to
|
restructuring of the Planning Commission was based on “principles”.
|
“It’s not a question of fighting a war, it’s a matter of principle. The
|
Opposition Bharatiya Janata Party used to go extra lengths talking
|
about federalism and how the sanctity and sacrosanct of federalism
|
has to be maintained. And now they are going exactly the reverse,”
|
the Congress leader said.
|
Veteran CPI leader Gurudas Dasgupta said that dismantling of the
|
Planning Commission and bringing in a new body in its place will
|
lead to an unregulated economy. “It is not a change of name. The
|
Planning Commission is being abolished because they (government)
|
don’t believe in planning,” he said.
|
“The government would like to have a fullmarket economy (which
|
is) totally unregulated,” Mr. Dasgupta said adding. “If this becomes
|
inflation and create job opportunities, it will not be good for the
|
country”.9
|
“Mere change of name from Yojana Aayog to NITI is not
|
objectionable if it is coupled with real reform. Otherwise, it will be
|
purely cosmetic like earlier naming ceremonies,” Congress
|
spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi said. He said the Congress
|
would have supported constructive reform of the Planning
|
Commission. But the “alteration of identity and basic structure”, he
|
said, “is being done because of anti-Nehruvianism and anti-
|
Congression.”10
|
CPI(M) central committee member Md Selim, MP, said no
|
meaningful purpose would be served by just renaming the Planning
|
Commission. Alleging that the BJP government had decided to
|
dissolve the planning commission “to dilute the planning process”, he
|
said the government should have given more teeth to the National
|
ATTACHED OFFICES
|
There are two offices attached to the NITI Aayog. They are
|
explained below:
|
1. National Institute of Labour Economics Research and
|
Development
|
The National Institute of Labour Economics Research and
|
Development (NILERD) was formerly known as the Institute of
|
Applied Manpower Research (IAMR). It is a central autonomous
|
organization attached to the NITI Aayog. Its primary objectives are
|
research, data collection, education and training in all aspects of
|
human capital planning, human resource development, and
|
monitoring and evaluation.
|
The IAMR was established in 1962 under the Societies
|
Registration Act of 1860 as an institution that would function as a
|
clearinghouse of ideas and undertake policy research on human
|
capital development to inform perspective planning and promote
|
policy integration. The main object of the Institute is to advance
|
knowledge about the nature, characteristics and utilisation of human
|
resources through research, education and training, consultancy,
|
etc.
|
The IAMR has been renamed as NILERD in 2014. The NILERD is
|
mainly funded by grants-in-aid from the NITI Aayog (formerly
|
Planning Commission), and supplemented by its own revenue from
|
contracted research projects, and education and training activities.
|
The prime objective of NILERD has been to develop an institutional
|
framework capable of sustaining and steering a systematic applied
|
human resource planning research process.
|
Since its inception, the Institute has carved out its own trajectory
|
to achieve academic heights, and in the process, developed a range
|
of academic activities not only in the field of human resource
|
planning and development, but also in monitoring and evaluation of
|
public policies and programmes. During the past few years, the
|
Institute has exhibited remarkable dynamism in addressing the
|
issues of national priorities. The Institute has emerged as a
|
pioneering institute in providing academic training on human
|
resource planning and development for both international and
|
The Institute moved to its own campus at Narela in 2002. Narela
|
is a developing urban and institutional hub declared as a special
|
economic zone for knowledge in the National Capital Region.
|
2. Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office:
|
The need for an efficient and independent evaluation mechanism in
|
India was recognized by the planners and policy-makers right from
|
the introduction of planning process in the country and resultantly,
|
the Programme Evaluation Organization was established by the
|
Government in 1952 to carry out independent and objective impact
|
evaluation of the Central Government funded programmes.
|
The Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO) was
|
established by the Government in 2015 as an attached office of the
|
NITI Aayog by merging the erstwhile Programme Evaluation
|
Organization and the Independent Evaluation Office. The DMEO is
|
headed by the Director General who is equivalent to an Additional
|
Secretary to the Government of India. To ensure that DMEO is able
|
to function independently and effectively, it has been provided with
|
separate budgetary allocations and manpower in addition to
|
complete functional autonomy.
|
The DMEO has been mandated to actively monitor and evaluate
|
the implementation of the programmes and initiatives of the
|
Government of India, including the identification of the needed
|
resources so as to strengthen the probability of the success and
|
scope of delivery.
|
The functions of DMEO are:
|
1. Monitor the implementation of Government programmes
|
2. Help Ministries in designing TORs for evaluation studies
|
3. Monitor the implementation and progress of SDGs
|
4. Promote the spirit of Cooperative Federalism
|
5. Conduct evaluation of the Government programmes
|
At the NITI Aayog level, the programme evaluation work is being
|
looked after under the overall guidance of the Vice-Chairman, NITI
|
Aayog. In addition to the Director General, the DMEO has been
|
provided with 4 Deputy Director Generals (SAG level) to look after
|
the functional mandate in addition to the Joint Secretary (Adm. &
|
Fin.) who is to provide administrative and logistics support. The
|
Headquarter of DMEO is in NITI Aayog, New Delhi.
|
The DMEO had 15 Regional Offices known as Regional
|
Development Monitoring and Evaluation Offices (RDMEOs). Each
|
RDMEO was headed by a Director level officer. The RDMEOs
|
conducted field surveys and data/ information collection work for
|
evaluation studies, and they also played an important role in
|
promoting cooperative federalism by their interaction with the States
|
and UT administrations. However, keeping in view the changed
|
functional requirements, they were closed in 2017 and the staff were
|
ERSTWHILE PLANNING COMMISSION
|
The erstwhile Planning Commission was established in March 1950
|
by an executive resolution of the Government of India, (i.e., the
|
Union Cabinet) on the recommendation of the Advisory Planning
|
Board constituted in
|
1946, under the chairmanship of K.C. Neogi. Thus, the erstwhile
|
Planning Commission was neither a constitutional body nor a
|
statutory body. In India, it was the supreme organ of planning for
|
social and economic development.
|
Functions
|
The functions of the erstwhile Planning Commission included the
|
following:
|
1. To make an assessment of material, capital and human
|
resources of the country, and investigate the possibilities of
|
augmenting them.
|
2. To formulate a plan for the most effective and balanced
|
utilisation of the country’s resources.
|
3. To determine priorities and to define the stages in which the
|
plan should be carried out.
|
4. To indicate the factors that retard economic development.
|
5. To determine the nature of the machinery required for
|
successful implementation of the plan in each stage.
|
6. To appraise, from time to time, the progress achieved in
|
execution of the plan and to recommend necessary
|
adjustments.
|
7. To make appropriate recommendations for facilitating the
|
discharge of its duties, or on a matter referred to it for advice by
|
Central or state governments.
|
The Allocation of Business Rules had assigned the following
|
matters (in addition to the above) to the erstwhile Planning
|
Commission:
|
1. Public Co-operation in National Development
|
2. Specific programmes for area development notified from time
|
to time
|
3. Perspective Planning
|
4. Institute of Applied Manpower Research
|
6. All matters relating to National Rainfed Area Authority (NRAA)
|
Earlier, the National Informatics Centre was also under the
|
erstwhile Planning Commission. Later, it was brought under the
|
Ministry of Information Technology.
|
It should be noted that the erstwhile Planning Commission was
|
only a staff agency–an advisory body and had no executive
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.