text
stringlengths
13
30k
{"texts": ["The transition to harm reduction: understanding the role of non-governmental organisations in Malaysia.", "\nThe transition of drug policy from prohibition to harm reduction has never been easy. ", "The deeply entrenched belief in prohibition shared by policy makers and religious leaders provided little room for alternatives, and change came only slowly. ", "The non-governmental organisations (NGOs) in Malaysia played a pivotal role in effecting such a change. ", "Understanding how they did so may be instructive for other similarly placed countries. ", "Data collected via reviews of published secondary sources, media reports and in-depth interviews with pioneers of harm reduction drawn from NGOs, medical practitioners and the police were analysed to construct the paper. ", "The policy change was the outcome of competition between three groups in the drug policy subsystem--the state, the Muslim religious lobby and the NGOs. ", "Developments such as the poor outcomes from the prohibition programmes and the outbreak of HIV/AIDS did not change policy but did lead to a rethink of core beliefs in the state alliance and spawned a state-NGO partnership. ", "The subsequent failure to meet the Millennium Development Goal with respect to HIV/AIDS in 2005 was seen as a failure of the Health Ministry which then led the final charge for a policy change arguing that a health crisis was imminent. ", "The NGOs played a pivotal role in this process by educating their partners in the state coalition, by drawing academics and medical practitioners into advocacy and by engaging the religious lobby (albeit with varying success). ", "They were also frontline players in implementing harm reduction programmes and successfully deflected criticisms from unconvinced Islamic groups away from the state. ", "Given their central role in the needle-syringe exchange programme, the NGOs are well positioned to convince injecting drug users to opt for voluntary medical treatment. ", "This can potentially reduce both the harm from drug use and the prevalence of it."], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "PubMed Abstracts"}, "scores": [0.00058110331883654, 0.0006912775570526719, 0.0006068702205084264, 0.0005318570765666664, 0.0005211142124608159, 0.0005352545413188636, 0.0006436285329982638, 0.000657535798382014, 0.0008900592220015824, 0.0005427203723229468, 0.001235122443176806, 0.0005396828055381775, 0.0006620961357839406], "avg_score": 0.000664486325919055, "num_sents": 13}
{"texts": ["Q:\n\nPython, not supported between instances of 'int' and 'str' error\n\nhere is my function\ndef find_short(s):\n s = s.split()\n max = len(s[0])\n for i in s:\n if len(i) <= max:\n max = i\n return max\n\n print(find_short(\"bitcoin take over the world maybe who knows perhaps\"))\n\nWhat is incorrect here?", "\n\nA:\n\nYou've forgotten to add some len to i in your for loop. ", "See my anser that corrects this error.", "\ndef find_short(s):\n s = s.split()\n if not s:\n return 0,\"\"\n max = len(s[0])\n argmax = s[0]\n for i in s:\n if len(i) <= max:\n max = len(i)\n argmax = i\n return max,argmax\n\nprint(find_short(\"bitcoin take over the world maybe who knows perhaps\"))\n(3, 'who')\n\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "StackExchange"}, "scores": [0.000984237645752728, 0.0021806787699460983, 0.002951115369796753, 0.002019144594669342], "avg_score": 0.0020337940950412303, "num_sents": 4}
{"texts": ["The present invention relates to cyclohexadiene derivatives having the formula: ##STR3## wherein R is one of C.sub.1 -C.sub.5 alkyl, R.sub.1 is methyl when R.sub.2 is hydrogen, and R.sub.1 is hydrogen when R.sub.2 is methyl, produced by the processes of our invention and novel compositions using one or more of such cyclohexadiene derivatives to augment or enhance the flavor and/or aroma of consumable materials or impart flavor and/or aroma to consumable materials.", "\nThere has been considerable work performed relating to substances which can be used to impart (modify, augment or enhance) flavors and fragrances to (or in) various consumable materials. ", "These substances are used to diminish the use of natural materials, some of which may be in short supply, and to provide more uniform properties in the finished product.", "\nSweet, hay-like, heliotropine-like, black pepper-like, woody, tobacco-like and \"Oriental\" aroma characteristics with sweet, hay-like, heliotropine-like, black pepper-like, woody, tobacco, \"Oriental\" flavor characteristics are particularly desirable for many uses in foodstuff flavorings, chewing gum flavors, toothpaste flavors, and medicinal product flavors.", "\nWarm, sweet, slightly minty, woody, natural green, herbaceous, Jasmine-like, fruity aromas are desirable in several types of perfume compositions, perfumed articles, and colognes.", "\n\"Dry black tobacco-like\" notes, spicey notes, celery-like notes, black pepper-like notes, sweet notes and Virginia tobacco-like notes prior to and on smoking in both the main stream and side stream, are desirable in tobaccos and tobacco flavors.", "\nIn the paper by Demole and Enggist, Helv. ", "Chim. ", "Acta. ", "57(Fasc. ", "7):2087-2091 (1974), compounds having the following structures have been found to be present in Burley tobacco flavor: ##STR4## None of the compounds of Demole and Enggist have properties bearing any relationship to the properties of the cyclohexadiene derivatives of the instant application."], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "USPTO Backgrounds"}, "scores": [0.0006661164225079119, 0.0005386125994846225, 0.0006293361657299101, 0.0008639386505819857, 0.0006105463253334165, 0.0008804639801383018, 0.0007095939945429564, 0.001379527384415269, 0.0010027101961895823, 0.003582495730370283, 0.0006575367879122496], "avg_score": 0.0010473525670187717, "num_sents": 11}
{"texts": ["Q:\n\nInline ifelse assignment in data.table\n\nLet the following data set be given:\nlibrary('data.table')\n\nset.seed(1234)\nDT <- data.table(x = LETTERS[1:10], y =sample(10))\nmy.rows <- sample(1:dim(DT)[1], 3)\n\nI want to add a new column to the data set such that, whenever the rows of the data set match the row numbers given by my.rows the entry is populated with, say, true, or false otherwise.", "\nI have got DT[my.rows, z:= \"true\"], which gives\nhead(DT)\n x y z\n1: A 2 NA\n2: B 6 NA\n3: C 5 true \n4: D 8 NA\n5: E 9 true \n6: F 4 NA\n\nbut I do not know how to automatically populate the else condition as well, at the same time. ", "I guess I should make use of some sort of inline ifelse but I am lacking the correct syntax.", "\n\nA:\n\nWe can compare the 'my.rows' with the sequence of row using %in% to create a logical vector and assign (:=) it to create 'z' column.", "\n DT[, z:= 1:.N %in% my.rows ]\n\nOr another option would be to create 'z' as a column of 'FALSE', using 'my.rows' as 'i', we assign the elements in 'z' that correspond to 'i' as 'TRUE'.", "\n DT[, z:= FALSE][my.rows, z:= TRUE]\n\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "StackExchange"}, "scores": [0.0006657682824879885, 0.0011984623270109296, 0.0006749391322955489, 0.0007730540819466114, 0.0008713490096852183, 0.0011576948454603553], "avg_score": 0.000890211279814442, "num_sents": 6}
{"texts": ["/*\nCopyright 2017 The Kubernetes Authors.", "\n\nLicensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the \"License\");\nyou may not use this file except in compliance with the License.", "\nYou may obtain a copy of the License at\n\n http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0\n\nUnless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software\ndistributed under the License is distributed on an \"AS IS\" BASIS,\nWITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.", "\nSee the License for the specific language governing permissions and\nlimitations under the License.", "\n*/\n\npackage csi\n\nimport (\n\t\"errors\"\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"time\"\n\n\t\"github.com/golang/glog\"\n\tapi \"k8s.io/api/core/v1\"\n\tmeta \"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1\"\n\t\"k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/types\"\n\t\"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/util/mount\"\n\t\"k8s.io/kubernetes/pkg/volume\"\n)\n\nconst (\n\tcsiPluginName = \"kubernetes.io/csi\"\n\n\t// TODO (vladimirvivien) implement a more dynamic way to discover\n\t// the unix domain socket path for each installed csi driver.", "\n\t// TODO (vladimirvivien) would be nice to name socket with a .sock extension\n\t// for consistency.", "\n\tcsiAddrTemplate = \"/var/lib/kubelet/plugins/%v/csi.sock\"\n\tcsiTimeout = 15 * time.", "Second\n\tvolNameSep = \"^\"\n\tvolDataFileName = \"vol_data.json\"\n)\n\ntype csiPlugin struct {\n\thost volume.", "VolumeHost\n}\n\n// ProbeVolumePlugins returns implemented plugins\nfunc ProbeVolumePlugins() []volume.", "VolumePlugin {\n\tp := &csiPlugin{\n\t\thost: nil,\n\t}\n\treturn []volume.", "VolumePlugin{p}\n}\n\n// volume.", "VolumePlugin methods\nvar _ volume.", "VolumePlugin = &csiPlugin{}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) Init(host volume.", "VolumeHost) error {\n\tglog.", "Info(log(\"plugin initializing...\"))\n\tp.host = host\n\treturn nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) GetPluginName() string {\n\treturn csiPluginName\n}\n\n// GetvolumeName returns a concatenated string of CSIVolumeSource.", "Driver<volNameSe>CSIVolumeSource.", "VolumeHandle\n// That string value is used in Detach() to extract driver name and volumeName.", "\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) GetVolumeName(spec *volume.", "Spec) (string, error) {\n\tcsi, err := getCSISourceFromSpec(spec)\n\tif err !", "= nil {\n\t\tglog.", "Error(log(\"plugin.", "GetVolumeName failed to extract volume source from spec: %v\", err))\n\t\treturn \"\", err\n\t}\n\n\t// return driverName<separator>volumeHandle\n\treturn fmt.", "Sprintf(\"%s%s%s\", csi.", "Driver, volNameSep, csi.", "VolumeHandle), nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) CanSupport(spec *volume.", "Spec) bool {\n\t// TODO (vladimirvivien) CanSupport should also take into account\n\t// the availability/registration of specified Driver in the volume source\n\treturn spec.", "PersistentVolume !", "= nil && spec.", "PersistentVolume.", "Spec.", "CSI !", "= nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) RequiresRemount() bool {\n\treturn false\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) NewMounter(\n\tspec *volume.", "Spec,\n\tpod *api.", "Pod,\n\t_ volume.", "VolumeOptions) (volume.", "Mounter, error) {\n\tpvSource, err := getCSISourceFromSpec(spec)\n\tif err !", "= nil {\n\t\treturn nil, err\n\t}\n\treadOnly, err := getReadOnlyFromSpec(spec)\n\tif err !", "= nil {\n\t\treturn nil, err\n\t}\n\n\t// before it is used in any paths such as socket etc\n\taddr := fmt.", "Sprintf(csiAddrTemplate, pvSource.", "Driver)\n\tglog.", "V(4).Infof(log(\"setting up mounter for [volume=%v,driver=%v]\", pvSource.", "VolumeHandle, pvSource.", "Driver))\n\tclient := newCsiDriverClient(\"unix\", addr)\n\n\tk8s := p.host.", "GetKubeClient()\n\tif k8s == nil {\n\t\tglog.", "Error(log(\"failed to get a kubernetes client\"))\n\t\treturn nil, errors.", "New(\"failed to get a Kubernetes client\")\n\t}\n\n\tmounter := &csiMountMgr{\n\t\tplugin: p,\n\t\tk8s: k8s,\n\t\tspec: spec,\n\t\tpod: pod,\n\t\tpodUID: pod.", "UID,\n\t\tdriverName: pvSource.", "Driver,\n\t\tvolumeID: pvSource.", "VolumeHandle,\n\t\tspecVolumeID: spec.", "Name(),\n\t\tcsiClient: client,\n\t\treadOnly: readOnly,\n\t}\n\treturn mounter, nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) NewUnmounter(specName string, podUID types.", "UID) (volume.", "Unmounter, error) {\n\tglog.", "V(4).Infof(log(\"setting up unmounter for [name=%v, podUID=%v]\", specName, podUID))\n\tunmounter := &csiMountMgr{\n\t\tplugin: p,\n\t\tpodUID: podUID,\n\t\tspecVolumeID: specName,\n\t}\n\treturn unmounter, nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) ConstructVolumeSpec(volumeName, mountPath string) (*volume.", "Spec, error) {\n\tglog.", "V(4).Info(log(\"plugin.", "ConstructVolumeSpec [pv.", "Name=%v, path=%v]\", volumeName, mountPath))\n\n\tvolData, err := loadVolumeData(mountPath, volDataFileName)\n\tif err !", "= nil {\n\t\tglog.", "Error(log(\"plugin.", "ConstructVolumeSpec failed loading volume data using [%s]: %v\", mountPath, err))\n\t\treturn nil, err\n\t}\n\n\tglog.", "V(4).Info(log(\"plugin.", "ConstructVolumeSpec extracted [%#v]\", volData))\n\n\tpv := &api.", "PersistentVolume{\n\t\tObjectMeta: meta.", "ObjectMeta{\n\t\t\tName: volData[volDataKey.specVolID],\n\t\t},\n\t\tSpec: api.", "PersistentVolumeSpec{\n\t\t\tPersistentVolumeSource: api.", "PersistentVolumeSource{\n\t\t\t\tCSI: &api.", "CSIPersistentVolumeSource{\n\t\t\t\t\tDriver: volData[volDataKey.driverName],\n\t\t\t\t\tVolumeHandle: volData[volDataKey.volHandle],\n\t\t\t\t},\n\t\t\t},\n\t\t},\n\t}\n\n\treturn volume.", "NewSpecFromPersistentVolume(pv, false), nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) SupportsMountOption() bool {\n\t// TODO (vladimirvivien) use CSI VolumeCapability.", "MountVolume.mount_flags\n\t// to probe for the result for this method:w\n\treturn false\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) SupportsBulkVolumeVerification() bool {\n\treturn false\n}\n\n// volume.", "AttachableVolumePlugin methods\nvar _ volume.", "AttachableVolumePlugin = &csiPlugin{}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) NewAttacher() (volume.", "Attacher, error) {\n\tk8s := p.host.", "GetKubeClient()\n\tif k8s == nil {\n\t\tglog.", "Error(log(\"unable to get kubernetes client from host\"))\n\t\treturn nil, errors.", "New(\"unable to get Kubernetes client\")\n\t}\n\n\treturn &csiAttacher{\n\t\tplugin: p,\n\t\tk8s: k8s,\n\t\twaitSleepTime: 1 * time.", "Second,\n\t}, nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) NewDetacher() (volume.", "Detacher, error) {\n\tk8s := p.host.", "GetKubeClient()\n\tif k8s == nil {\n\t\tglog.", "Error(log(\"unable to get kubernetes client from host\"))\n\t\treturn nil, errors.", "New(\"unable to get Kubernetes client\")\n\t}\n\n\treturn &csiAttacher{\n\t\tplugin: p,\n\t\tk8s: k8s,\n\t\twaitSleepTime: 1 * time.", "Second,\n\t}, nil\n}\n\nfunc (p *csiPlugin) GetDeviceMountRefs(deviceMountPath string) ([]string, error) {\n\tm := p.host.", "GetMounter(p.", "GetPluginName())\n\treturn mount.", "GetMountRefs(m, deviceMountPath)\n}\n\nfunc getCSISourceFromSpec(spec *volume.", "Spec) (*api.", "CSIPersistentVolumeSource, error) {\n\tif spec.", "PersistentVolume !", "= nil &&\n\t\tspec.", "PersistentVolume.", "Spec.", "CSI !", "= nil {\n\t\treturn spec.", "PersistentVolume.", "Spec.", "CSI, nil\n\t}\n\n\treturn nil, fmt.", "Errorf(\"CSIPersistentVolumeSource not defined in spec\")\n}\n\nfunc getReadOnlyFromSpec(spec *volume.", "Spec) (bool, error) {\n\tif spec.", "PersistentVolume !", "= nil &&\n\t\tspec.", "PersistentVolume.", "Spec.", "CSI !", "= nil {\n\t\treturn spec.", "ReadOnly, nil\n\t}\n\n\treturn false, fmt.", "Errorf(\"CSIPersistentVolumeSource not defined in spec\")\n}\n\n// log prepends log string with `kubernetes.io/csi`\nfunc log(msg string, parts ...interface{}) string {\n\treturn fmt.", "Sprintf(fmt.", "Sprintf(\"%s: %s\", csiPluginName, msg), parts...)\n}\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "Github"}, "scores": [0.0008050845353864133, 0.0005655200802721083, 0.0005397882778197527, 0.0005530848284251988, 0.0007360983872786164, 0.0008657288854010403, 0.000875231227837503, 0.0007277826662175357, 0.0008251623949036002, 0.0007839813479222357, 0.0009611258865334094, 0.0007929474813863635, 0.0008724149665795267, 0.0008490910404361784, 0.0010846772929653525, 0.0010727589251473546, 0.0006964629283174872, 0.0012588792014867067, 0.0013780435547232628, 0.0010123347165063024, 0.0008134405943565071, 0.0007909800624474883, 0.0013363740872591734, 0.000766133249271661, 0.0009832052746787667, 0.0007381716859526932, 0.017317216843366623, 0.0010174030903726816, 0.0018324281554669142, 0.0008194813854061067, 0.001029975712299347, 0.002974181203171611, 0.0007372557302005589, 0.0006980427424423397, 0.0007552051683887839, 0.001650526886805892, 0.007280139718204737, 0.001601717434823513, 0.0006725951097905636, 0.0008592653321102262, 0.0006785583100281656, 0.0009257319616153836, 0.0006490153027698398, 0.0032090339809656143, 0.002343527041375637, 0.000749636790715158, 0.000781873008236289, 0.0007613950874656439, 0.000986903440207243, 0.0007557721110060811, 0.0006688639405183494, 0.0009788833558559418, 0.000812667072750628, 0.0008159058052115142, 0.0006731180474162102, 0.0010475174058228731, 0.0010961743537336588, 0.0010123347165063024, 0.0008134405943565071, 0.0009334338246844709, 0.0006731180474162102, 0.0007491054711863399, 0.0008320211200043559, 0.0010015200823545456, 0.0008424852858297527, 0.0007579853408969939, 0.001135712256655097, 0.0013788897776976228, 0.003245869418606162, 0.0008449623128399253, 0.0007963625248521566, 0.0010546463308855891, 0.0032090339809656143, 0.002016982762143016, 0.0007290050270967185, 0.0013423700584098697, 0.000997884664684534, 0.0032090339809656143, 0.002016982762143016, 0.0007290050270967185, 0.0014461865648627281, 0.0007200614782050252, 0.0009425873286090791, 0.0010098889470100403, 0.0006828831974416971, 0.0013171108439564705, 0.017317216843366623, 0.0010174030903726816, 0.0018324281554669142, 0.0008194813854061067, 0.001029975712299347, 0.0010483099613338709, 0.0018324281554669142, 0.0008194813854061067, 0.000991918845102191, 0.0009916514391079545, 0.0014143154257908463, 0.017317216843366623, 0.0010174030903726816, 0.0018324281554669142, 0.0008194813854061067, 0.001029975712299347, 0.0010483099613338709, 0.007899443618953228, 0.0009232937009073794, 0.0008498700917698443, 0.0006368885515257716], "avg_score": 0.0016709751434293445, "num_sents": 107}
{"texts": ["[CustomMessages]\r\nIDP_FormCaption =Downloading additional files\r\nIDP_FormDescription =Please wait while Setup is downloading additional files...\r\nIDP_TotalProgress =Total progress\r\nIDP_CurrentFile =Current file\r\nIDP_File =File:\r\nIDP_Speed =Speed:\r\nIDP_Status =Status:\r\nIDP_ElapsedTime =Elapsed time:\r\nIDP_RemainingTime =Remaining time:\r\nIDP_DetailsButton =Details\r\nIDP_HideButton =Hide\r\nIDP_RetryButton =Retry\r\nIDP_IgnoreButton =Ignore\r\nIDP_KBs =KB/s\r\nIDP_MBs =MB/s\r\nIDP_X_of_X =%.2f of %.2f\r\nIDP_KB =KB\r\nIDP_MB =MB\r\nIDP_GB =GB\r\nIDP_Initializing =Initializing...\r\nIDP_GettingFileInformation=Getting file information...\r\nIDP_StartingDownload =Starting download...\r\nIDP_Connecting =Connecting...\r\nIDP_Downloading =Downloading...\r\nIDP_DownloadComplete =Download complete\r\nIDP_DownloadFailed =Download failed\r\nIDP_CannotConnect =Cannot connect\r\nIDP_CancellingDownload =Cancelling download...\r\nIDP_Unknown =Unknown\r\nIDP_DownloadCancelled =Download cancelled\r\nIDP_RetryNext =Check your connection and click 'Retry' to try downloading the files again, or click 'Next' to continue installing anyway.", "\r\nIDP_RetryCancel =Check your connection and click 'Retry' to try downloading the files again, or click 'Cancel' to terminate setup.", "\r\nIDP_FilesNotDownloaded =The following files were not downloaded:\r\nIDP_HTTPError_X =HTTP error %d\r\nIDP_400 =Bad request (400)\r\nIDP_401 =Access denied (401)\r\nIDP_404 =File not found (404)\r\nIDP_407 =Proxy authentication required (407)\r\nIDP_500 =Server internal error (500)\r\nIDP_502 =Bad gateway (502)\r\nIDP_503 =Service temporaily unavailable (503)\r\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "Github"}, "scores": [0.0022362256422638893, 0.0010094840545207262, 0.000850043841637671], "avg_score": 0.0013652511794740956, "num_sents": 3}
{"texts": ["Q:\n\nSimplifying a logical equivalence\n\nhttp://www2.ift.ulaval.ca/~dadub100/cours/H09/22257/ntsLogique.pdf\nIf you look in Annex B, I am allowed to use all laws from chapter 3 and below.", "\nhttps://imgur.com/a/vf2do\nThis is the problem itself. ", "I did not rewrite this. ", "If there are any missing brackets, this is how the problem was given to me. ", "I do not know how to prove this. ", "I can't use a truth table, I have to simplify it to an existing theorem to prove its validity.", "\nAny help is greatly appreciated!", "\n\nA:\n\nHINT\nStart out observing that:\n$$S \\equiv [\\neg (Q \\land R) \\land (R \\rightarrow Q)] \\equiv S \\Leftrightarrow$$\n$$S \\equiv S \\equiv [\\neg (Q \\land R) \\land (R \\rightarrow Q)] \\Leftrightarrow$$\n$$vrai \\equiv [\\neg (Q \\land R) \\land (R \\rightarrow Q)] \\Leftrightarrow$$\n$$[\\neg (Q \\land R) \\land (R \\rightarrow Q)]$$\nNow do a DeMorgan and an Implication to simplify this even further, and you're almost there!", "\n\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "StackExchange"}, "scores": [0.0005902821430936456, 0.0017637955024838448, 0.0006954753189347684, 0.00066742132185027, 0.0008605307666584849, 0.0006548629608005285, 0.0005690204561688006, 0.08437076956033707, 0.001995444530621171], "avg_score": 0.010240844728994287, "num_sents": 9}
{"document": "The full cost of damage in Newton Stewart, one of the areas worst affected, is still being assessed.\nRepair work is ongoing in Hawick and many roads in Peeblesshire remain badly affected by standing water.\nTrains on the west coast mainline face disruption due to damage at the Lamington Viaduct.\nMany businesses and householders were affected by flooding in Newton Stewart after the River Cree overflowed into the town.\nFirst Minister Nicola Sturgeon visited the area to inspect the damage.\nThe waters breached a retaining wall, flooding many commercial properties on Victoria Street - the main shopping thoroughfare.\nJeanette Tate, who owns the Cinnamon Cafe which was badly affected, said she could not fault the multi-agency response once the flood hit.\nHowever, she said more preventative work could have been carried out to ensure the retaining wall did not fail.\n\"It is difficult but I do think there is so much publicity for Dumfries and the Nith - and I totally appreciate that - but it is almost like we're neglected or forgotten,\" she said.\n\"That may not be true but it is perhaps my perspective over the last few days.\n\"Why were you not ready to help us a bit more when the warning and the alarm alerts had gone out?\"\nMeanwhile, a flood alert remains in place across the Borders because of the constant rain.\nPeebles was badly hit by problems, sparking calls to introduce more defences in the area.\nScottish Borders Council has put a list on its website of the roads worst affected and drivers have been urged not to ignore closure signs.\nThe Labour Party's deputy Scottish leader Alex Rowley was in Hawick on Monday to see the situation first hand.\nHe said it was important to get the flood protection plan right but backed calls to speed up the process.\n\"I was quite taken aback by the amount of damage that has been done,\" he said.\n\"Obviously it is heart-breaking for people who have been forced out of their homes and the impact on businesses.\"\nHe said it was important that \"immediate steps\" were taken to protect the areas most vulnerable and a clear timetable put in place for flood prevention plans.\nHave you been affected by flooding in Dumfries and Galloway or the Borders? Tell us about your experience of the situation and how it was handled. Email us on [email protected] or [email protected].", "summary": "Clean-up operations are continuing across the Scottish Borders and Dumfries and Galloway after flooding caused by Storm Frank.", "id": "35232142"}
{"document": "A fire alarm went off at the Holiday Inn in Hope Street at about 04:20 BST on Saturday and guests were asked to leave the hotel.\nAs they gathered outside they saw the two buses, parked side-by-side in the car park, engulfed by flames.\nOne of the tour groups is from Germany, the other from China and Taiwan. It was their first night in Northern Ireland.\nThe driver of one of the buses said many of the passengers had left personal belongings on board and these had been destroyed.\nBoth groups have organised replacement coaches and will begin their tour of the north coast later than they had planned.\nPolice have appealed for information about the attack.\nInsp David Gibson said: \"It appears as though the fire started under one of the buses before spreading to the second.\n\"While the exact cause is still under investigation, it is thought that the fire was started deliberately.\"", "summary": "Two tourist buses have been destroyed by fire in a suspected arson attack in Belfast city centre.", "id": "40143035"}
{"document": "Ferrari appeared in a position to challenge until the final laps, when the Mercedes stretched their legs to go half a second clear of the red cars.\nSebastian Vettel will start third ahead of team-mate Kimi Raikkonen.\nThe world champion subsequently escaped punishment for reversing in the pit lane, which could have seen him stripped of pole.\nBut stewards only handed Hamilton a reprimand, after governing body the FIA said \"no clear instruction was given on where he should park\".\nBelgian Stoffel Vandoorne out-qualified McLaren team-mate Jenson Button on his Formula 1 debut.\nVandoorne was 12th and Button 14th, complaining of a handling imbalance on his final lap but admitting the newcomer \"did a good job and I didn't\".\nMercedes were wary of Ferrari's pace before qualifying after Vettel and Raikkonen finished one-two in final practice, and their concerns appeared to be well founded as the red cars mixed it with the silver through most of qualifying.\nAfter the first runs, Rosberg was ahead, with Vettel and Raikkonen splitting him from Hamilton, who made a mistake at the final corner on his first lap.\nBut Hamilton saved his best for last, fastest in every sector of his final attempt, to beat Rosberg by just 0.077secs after the German had out-paced him throughout practice and in the first qualifying session.\nVettel rued a mistake at the final corner on his last lap, but the truth is that with the gap at 0.517secs to Hamilton there was nothing he could have done.\nThe gap suggests Mercedes are favourites for the race, even if Ferrari can be expected to push them.\nVettel said: \"Last year we were very strong in the race and I think we are in good shape for tomorrow. We will try to give them a hard time.\"\nVandoorne's preparations for his grand prix debut were far from ideal - he only found out he was racing on Thursday when FIA doctors declared Fernando Alonso unfit because of a broken rib sustained in his huge crash at the first race of the season in Australia two weeks ago.\nThe Belgian rookie had to fly overnight from Japan, where he had been testing in the Super Formula car he races there, and arrived in Bahrain only hours before first practice on Friday.\nHe also had a difficult final practice, missing all but the final quarter of the session because of a water leak.\nButton was quicker in the first qualifying session, but Vandoorne pipped him by 0.064secs when it mattered.\nThe 24-year-old said: \"I knew after yesterday I had quite similar pace to Jenson and I knew if I improved a little bit I could maybe challenge him and even out-qualify him and that is what has happened.\n\"Jenson is a very good benchmark for me because he is a world champion and he is well known to the team so I am very satisfied with the qualifying.\"\nButton, who was 0.5secs quicker than Vandoorne in the first session, complained of oversteer on his final run in the second: \"Q1 was what I was expecting. Q2 he did a good job and I didn't. Very, very good job. We knew how quick he was.\"\nThe controversial new elimination qualifying system was retained for this race despite teams voting at the first race in Australia to go back to the 2015 system.\nFIA president Jean Todt said earlier on Saturday that he \"felt it necessary to give new qualifying one more chance\", adding: \"We live in a world where there is too much over reaction.\"\nThe system worked on the basis of mixing up the grid a little - Force India's Sergio Perez ended up out of position in 18th place after the team miscalculated the timing of his final run, leaving him not enough time to complete it before the elimination clock timed him out.\nBut it will come in for more criticism as a result of lack of track action at the end of each session. There were three minutes at the end of the first session with no cars on the circuit, and the end of the second session was a similar damp squib.\nOnly one car - Nico Hulkenberg's Force India - was out on the track with six minutes to go. The two Williams cars did go out in the final three minutes but were already through to Q3 and so nothing was at stake.\nThe teams are meeting with Todt and F1 commercial boss Bernie Ecclestone on Sunday at noon local time to decide on what to do with qualifying for the rest of the season.\nTodt said he was \"optimistic\" they would be able to reach unanimous agreement on a change.\n\"We should listen to the people watching on TV,\" Rosberg said. \"If they are still unhappy, which I am sure they will be, we should change it.\"\nRed Bull's Daniel Ricciardo was fifth on the grid, ahead of the Williams cars of Valtteri Bottas and Felipe Massa and Force India's Nico Hulkenberg.\nRicciardo's team-mate Daniil Kvyat was eliminated during the second session - way below the team's expectation - and the Renault of Brit Jolyon Palmer only managed 19th fastest.\nGerman Mercedes protege Pascal Wehrlein managed an excellent 16th in the Manor car.\nBahrain GP qualifying results\nBahrain GP coverage details", "summary": "Lewis Hamilton stormed to pole position at the Bahrain Grand Prix ahead of Mercedes team-mate Nico Rosberg.", "id": "35951548"}
{"document": "John Edward Bates, formerly of Spalding, Lincolnshire, but now living in London, faces a total of 22 charges, including two counts of indecency with a child.\nThe 67-year-old is accused of committing the offences between March 1972 and October 1989.\nMr Bates denies all the charges.\nGrace Hale, prosecuting, told the jury that the allegations of sexual abuse were made by made by four male complainants and related to when Mr Bates was a scout leader in South Lincolnshire and Cambridgeshire.\n\"The defendant says nothing of that sort happened between himself and all these individuals. He says they are all fabricating their accounts and telling lies,\" said Mrs Hale.\nThe prosecutor claimed Mr Bates invited one 15 year old to his home offering him the chance to look at cine films made at scout camps but then showed him pornographic films.\nShe told the jury that the boy was then sexually abused leaving him confused and frightened.\nMrs Hale said: \"The complainant's recollection is that on a number of occasions sexual acts would happen with the defendant either in the defendant's car or in his cottage.\"\nShe told the jury a second boy was taken by Mr Bates for a weekend in London at the age of 13 or 14 and after visiting pubs he was later sexually abused.\nMrs Hale said two boys from the Spalding group had also made complaints of being sexually abused.\nThe jury has been told that Mr Bates was in the RAF before serving as a Lincolnshire Police officer between 1976 and 1983.\nThe trial, which is expected to last two weeks, continues.", "summary": "A former Lincolnshire Police officer carried out a series of sex attacks on boys, a jury at Lincoln Crown Court was told.", "id": "36266422"}
{"document": "Patients and staff were evacuated from Cerahpasa hospital on Wednesday after a man receiving treatment at the clinic threatened to shoot himself and others.\nOfficers were deployed to negotiate with the man, a young police officer.\nEarlier reports that the armed man had taken several people hostage proved incorrect.\nThe chief consultant of Cerahpasa hospital, Zekayi Kutlubay, who was evacuated from the facility, said that there had been \"no hostage crises\", adding that the man was \"alone in the room\".\nDr Kutlubay said that the man had been receiving psychiatric treatment for the past two years.\nHe said that the hospital had previously submitted a report stating that the man should not be permitted to carry a gun.\n\"His firearm was taken away,\" Dr Kutlubay said, adding that the gun in the officer's possession on Wednesday was not his issued firearm.\nThe incident comes amid tension in Istanbul following several attacks in crowded areas, including the deadly assault on the Reina nightclub on New Year's Eve which left 39 people dead.", "summary": "An armed man who locked himself into a room at a psychiatric hospital in Istanbul has ended his threat to kill himself, Turkish media report.", "id": "38826984"}
{"document": "Simone Favaro got the crucial try with the last move of the game, following earlier touchdowns by Chris Fusaro, Zander Fagerson and Junior Bulumakau.\nRynard Landman and Ashton Hewitt got a try in either half for the Dragons.\nGlasgow showed far superior strength in depth as they took control of a messy match in the second period.\nHome coach Gregor Townsend gave a debut to powerhouse Fijian-born Wallaby wing Taqele Naiyaravoro, and centre Alex Dunbar returned from long-term injury, while the Dragons gave first starts of the season to wing Aled Brew and hooker Elliot Dee.\nGlasgow lost hooker Pat McArthur to an early shoulder injury but took advantage of their first pressure when Rory Clegg slotted over a penalty on 12 minutes.\nIt took 24 minutes for a disjointed game to produce a try as Sarel Pretorius sniped from close range and Landman forced his way over for Jason Tovey to convert - although it was the lock's last contribution as he departed with a chest injury shortly afterwards.\nGlasgow struck back when Fusaro drove over from a rolling maul on 35 minutes for Clegg to convert.\nBut the Dragons levelled at 10-10 before half-time when Naiyaravoro was yellow-carded for an aerial tackle on Brew and Tovey slotted the easy goal.\nThe visitors could not make the most of their one-man advantage after the break as their error count cost them dearly.\nIt was Glasgow's bench experience that showed when Mike Blair's break led to a short-range score from teenage prop Fagerson, converted by Clegg.\nDebutant Favaro was the second home player to be sin-binned, on 63 minutes, but again the Warriors made light of it as replacement wing Bulumakau, a recruit from the Army, pounced to deftly hack through a bouncing ball for an opportunist try.\nThe Dragons got back within striking range with some excellent combined handling putting Hewitt over unopposed after 72 minutes.\nHowever, Favaro became sinner-turned-saint as he got on the end of another effective rolling maul to earn his side the extra point with the last move of the game, Clegg converting.\nDragons director of rugby Lyn Jones said: \"We're disappointed to have lost but our performance was a lot better [than against Leinster] and the game could have gone either way.\n\"Unfortunately too many errors behind the scrum cost us a great deal, though from where we were a fortnight ago in Dublin our workrate and desire was excellent.\n\"It was simply error count from individuals behind the scrum that cost us field position, it's not rocket science - they were correct in how they played and we had a few errors, that was the difference.\"\nGlasgow Warriors: Rory Hughes, Taqele Naiyaravoro, Alex Dunbar, Fraser Lyle, Lee Jones, Rory Clegg, Grayson Hart; Alex Allan, Pat MacArthur, Zander Fagerson, Rob Harley (capt), Scott Cummings, Hugh Blake, Chris Fusaro, Adam Ashe.\nReplacements: Fergus Scott, Jerry Yanuyanutawa, Mike Cusack, Greg Peterson, Simone Favaro, Mike Blair, Gregor Hunter, Junior Bulumakau.\nDragons: Carl Meyer, Ashton Hewitt, Ross Wardle, Adam Warren, Aled Brew, Jason Tovey, Sarel Pretorius; Boris Stankovich, Elliot Dee, Brok Harris, Nick Crosswell, Rynard Landman (capt), Lewis Evans, Nic Cudd, Ed Jackson.\nReplacements: Rhys Buckley, Phil Price, Shaun Knight, Matthew Screech, Ollie Griffiths, Luc Jones, Charlie Davies, Nick Scott.", "summary": "Defending Pro12 champions Glasgow Warriors bagged a late bonus-point victory over the Dragons despite a host of absentees and two yellow cards.", "id": "34540833"}
{"document": "Veronica Vanessa Chango-Alverez, 31, was killed and another man injured when an Audi A3 struck them in Streatham High Road at 05:30 GMT on Saturday.\nTen minutes before the crash the car was in London Road, Croydon, when a Volkswagen Passat collided with a tree.\nPolice want to trace Nathan Davis, 27, who they say has links to the Audi. The car was abandoned at the scene.\nMs Chango-Alverez died from multiple injuries, a post-mortem examination found.\nNo arrests have been made as yet, police said.\nMs Chango-Alverez was staying at her mother's home in Streatham High Road.\nShe was born in Ecuador and had lived in London for 13 years, BBC London reporter Gareth Furby said. At the time of the crash, she was on her way to work in a hotel.\nThe remains of the bus stop, which was extensively damaged in the crash, have been removed.\nFlowers have been left at the site in tribute to the victim.\nA statement from her brother Kevin Raul Chango-Alverez said: \"My family has had its heart torn out, at this Christmas time, we will never be the same again.\n\"On Friday night we were together as a family with Veronica meeting her newly born nephew and preparing for Christmas.\n\"I last saw her alive as she left to go to work on Saturday morning, but moments later I was holding her hand as she passed away in the street.\"\nDescribing the crash as \"horrific\" Det Insp Gordon Wallace, said: \"The family are devastated. The memory of this senseless death will be with them each time they leave their home.\n\"The driver fled the scene abandoning the grey Audi, which was extensively damaged.\n\"We are looking to speak to Mr Nathan Davis in relation to this collision.\"\nThe 51-year-old man injured at the bus stop remains in a critical condition in hospital while the condition of the 29-year-old driver of the Volkswagen is now stable.", "summary": "A man with links to a car that was involved in a fatal bus stop crash in south London is being sought by police.", "id": "20836172"}
{"document": "Belgian cyclist Demoitie died after a collision with a motorbike during Belgium's Gent-Wevelgem race.\nThe 25-year-old was hit by the motorbike after several riders came down in a crash as the race passed through northern France.\n\"The main issues come when cars or motorbikes have to pass the peloton and pass riders,\" Team Sky's Rowe said.\n\"That is the fundamental issue we're looking into.\n\"There's a lot of motorbikes in and around the race whether it be cameras for TV, photographers or police motorbikes.\n\"In total there's around 50 motorbikes that work on each race.\n\"We've got a riders union and we're coming together to think of a few ideas, whether we cap a speed limit on how fast they can overtake us.\n\"Say we put a 10 kilometres per hour limit on it, if we're going 50kph they're only allowed to pass us 60kph or something like that.\"\nDemoitie, who was riding for the Wanty-Gobert team, was taken to hospital in Lille but died later.\nThe sport's governing body, the UCI, said it would co-operate with all relevant authorities in an investigation into the incident.\nThe Professional Cyclists' Association (CPA) issued a statement asking what would be done to improve safety.\nDespite Demoitie's death, attitudes to road racing will stay the same says Rowe, who has been competing in Three Days of De Panne race in Belgium.\n\"As soon as that element of fear slips into your mind and you start thinking of things that could happen, that's when you're doomed to fail,\" he told BBC Wales Sport.\n\"If you start thinking about crashes and the consequences and what could potentially happen then you're never going to be at the front of the peloton and you're never going to win any races.\"\nIn a separate incident, another Belgian cyclist, Daan Myngheer, 22, died in hospital after suffering a heart attack during the first stage of the Criterium International in Corsica.", "summary": "Welsh cyclist Luke Rowe says changes to the sport must be made following the death of Antoine Demoitie.", "id": "35932467"}
{"document": "The crash happened about 07:20 GMT at the junction of the A127 and Progress Road in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex.\nThe man, who police said is aged in his 20s, was treated at the scene for a head injury and suspected multiple fractures, the ambulance service said.\nHe was airlifted to the Royal London Hospital for further treatment.\nThe Southend-bound carriageway of the A127 was closed for about six hours while police conducted their initial inquiries.\nA spokeswoman for Essex Police said it was not possible comment to further as this time as the \"investigation is now being conducted by the IPCC\".", "summary": "A jogger has been hit by an unmarked police car responding to an emergency call, leaving him with \"serious life-changing injuries\".", "id": "30358490"}
{"Country": "England", "2022-05-06": 1, "2022-05-12": 1, "2022-05-13": 1, "2022-05-15": 4, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 2, "2022-05-19": 0, "2022-05-20": 11, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 36, "2022-05-24": 14, "2022-05-25": 7, "2022-05-26": 24, "2022-05-27": 0, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 71, "2022-05-31": 11, "2022-06-01": 5, "2022-06-02": 11, "2022-06-03": 15, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 73, "2022-06-07": 18, "2022-06-08": 0, "2022-06-09": 43, "2022-06-10": 0, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 104, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 52, "2022-06-15": 0, "2022-06-16": 46, "2022-06-17": 0, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "Portugal", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 3, "2022-05-18": 11, "2022-05-19": 9, "2022-05-20": 0, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 14, "2022-05-24": 2, "2022-05-25": 10, "2022-05-26": 9, "2022-05-27": 16, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 22, "2022-05-31": 4, "2022-06-01": 19, "2022-06-02": 19, "2022-06-03": 5, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 10, "2022-06-07": 13, "2022-06-08": 25, "2022-06-09": 18, "2022-06-10": 0, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 22, "2022-06-15": 10, "2022-06-16": 0, "2022-06-17": 35, "2022-06-20": 21}
{"Country": "Spain", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 7, "2022-05-19": 0, "2022-05-20": 23, "2022-05-21": 10, "2022-05-23": 1, "2022-05-24": 4, "2022-05-25": 8, "2022-05-26": 25, "2022-05-27": 21, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 9, "2022-05-30": 8, "2022-05-31": 20, "2022-06-01": 0, "2022-06-02": 26, "2022-06-03": 19, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 17, "2022-06-07": 27, "2022-06-08": 34, "2022-06-09": 0, "2022-06-10": 16, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 38, "2022-06-15": 0, "2022-06-16": 184, "2022-06-17": 0, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "United States", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 1, "2022-05-19": 0, "2022-05-20": 1, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 0, "2022-05-24": 0, "2022-05-25": 2, "2022-05-26": 5, "2022-05-27": 3, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 2, "2022-05-30": 0, "2022-05-31": 5, "2022-06-01": 0, "2022-06-02": 4, "2022-06-03": 5, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 1, "2022-06-07": 6, "2022-06-08": 5, "2022-06-09": 5, "2022-06-10": 2, "2022-06-11": 2, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 16, "2022-06-14": 7, "2022-06-15": 12, "2022-06-16": 16, "2022-06-17": 13, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "Germany", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 0, "2022-05-19": 1, "2022-05-20": 1, "2022-05-21": 2, "2022-05-23": 2, "2022-05-24": 6, "2022-05-25": 1, "2022-05-26": 2, "2022-05-27": 6, "2022-05-28": 1, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 3, "2022-05-31": 16, "2022-06-01": 0, "2022-06-02": 17, "2022-06-03": 17, "2022-06-04": 5, "2022-06-06": 0, "2022-06-07": 27, "2022-06-08": 13, "2022-06-09": 30, "2022-06-10": 12, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 1, "2022-06-13": 25, "2022-06-14": 14, "2022-06-15": 45, "2022-06-16": 24, "2022-06-17": 82, "2022-06-20": 59}
{"Country": "Belgium", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 0, "2022-05-19": 1, "2022-05-20": 2, "2022-05-21": 1, "2022-05-23": 0, "2022-05-24": 0, "2022-05-25": 2, "2022-05-26": 0, "2022-05-27": 0, "2022-05-28": 3, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 0, "2022-05-31": 0, "2022-06-01": 5, "2022-06-02": 0, "2022-06-03": 3, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 0, "2022-06-07": 0, "2022-06-08": 8, "2022-06-09": 0, "2022-06-10": 0, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 0, "2022-06-15": 27, "2022-06-16": 0, "2022-06-17": 10, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "Sweden", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 0, "2022-05-19": 1, "2022-05-20": 0, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 0, "2022-05-24": 0, "2022-05-25": 1, "2022-05-26": 0, "2022-05-27": 0, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 1, "2022-05-31": 1, "2022-06-01": 0, "2022-06-02": 1, "2022-06-03": 0, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 0, "2022-06-07": 0, "2022-06-08": 0, "2022-06-09": 0, "2022-06-10": 1, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 0, "2022-06-15": 4, "2022-06-16": 0, "2022-06-17": 0, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "Italy", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 0, "2022-05-19": 1, "2022-05-20": 2, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 1, "2022-05-24": 1, "2022-05-25": 4, "2022-05-26": 3, "2022-05-27": 0, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 1, "2022-05-30": 0, "2022-05-31": 6, "2022-06-01": 2, "2022-06-02": 0, "2022-06-03": 1, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 6, "2022-06-07": 1, "2022-06-08": 2, "2022-06-09": 0, "2022-06-10": 1, "2022-06-11": 5, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 1, "2022-06-15": 10, "2022-06-16": 0, "2022-06-17": 23, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "Canada", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 0, "2022-05-19": 2, "2022-05-20": 3, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 10, "2022-05-24": 0, "2022-05-25": 0, "2022-05-26": 11, "2022-05-27": 0, "2022-05-28": 0, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 0, "2022-05-31": 1, "2022-06-01": 27, "2022-06-02": 23, "2022-06-03": 3, "2022-06-04": 0, "2022-06-06": 1, "2022-06-07": 20, "2022-06-08": 1, "2022-06-09": 11, "2022-06-10": 3, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 8, "2022-06-14": 34, "2022-06-15": 0, "2022-06-16": 9, "2022-06-17": 10, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"Country": "France", "2022-05-06": 0, "2022-05-12": 0, "2022-05-13": 0, "2022-05-15": 0, "2022-05-17": 0, "2022-05-18": 0, "2022-05-19": 1, "2022-05-20": 0, "2022-05-21": 0, "2022-05-23": 2, "2022-05-24": 2, "2022-05-25": 2, "2022-05-26": 0, "2022-05-27": 0, "2022-05-28": 9, "2022-05-29": 0, "2022-05-30": 1, "2022-05-31": 0, "2022-06-01": 16, "2022-06-02": 0, "2022-06-03": 18, "2022-06-04": 1, "2022-06-06": 0, "2022-06-07": 14, "2022-06-08": 0, "2022-06-09": 25, "2022-06-10": 0, "2022-06-11": 0, "2022-06-12": 0, "2022-06-13": 0, "2022-06-14": 34, "2022-06-15": 0, "2022-06-16": 58, "2022-06-17": 0, "2022-06-20": 0}
{"translation": {"en": "Verification of credentials: see Minutes", "ro": "Verificarea prerogativelor: a se vedea procesul-verbal"}}
{"id": 12188, "text": "I suppose if you like pure action... you'll find it here. I suppose if you find a gorgeous blonde designed to be screwed... find it here. I suppose if you want to find a couple of extra baddies, headed by 1-2 extra, EXTRA baddy bosses who meat a nasty end... you'll find it here.<br /><br />Overall, routine stuff, and the good guys come out on top big time under extra-ordinary circumstances.<br /><br />What I marvel most at... How the good guys armed only with pistols, can kill dozens of bad guys with machine guns who are shooting at them at point blank range... and missing. The goodies even get time to reload their pistols amid the hail of machine guns bullets.<br /><br />Ho-hum!!!", "label": 2, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 11437, "text": "Please don't waste your time. This movie rehashes the worst of Bram Stoker's Dracula (Van Helsing), Anne Rice's Vampire Lestat (rock music and silly biblical references), and Blade (high-tech toys). I really like vampire movies and novels, and there are many out there that are very good . But not this stinker. Not even the soundtrack helps it, mostly because the movie resorts to ridiculous scary classical music rather than the \"kick-ass metal\" some reported. Only a few times did I hear any metal; mostly it was tortured violins. Avoid it like garlic and crucifixes.", "label": 0, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 7684, "text": "Since \"Rugrats\"' falling from the category of good and funny cartoon series to a mediocre and indeed outright horrible fare for two year olds in the past three or four years, obviously the tyrants at Klasky-Csupo should be out of ideas. After dumbing down all of the characters, adding even stupider new ones, replacing some voices (though I like Nancy Cartwright, she is NOT Chucky Finster!), and having no sense of continuity (ex.: in a Kimi episode I watched the other day, Tommy and Chucky each got a new puppy; but it subsequent episode, the aforementioned dogs never appear), you'd think the creators could kill the show for mercy. But noooo.<br /><br />All I will say concerning this special is that it sucks! While not as horrible as the Kimi episodes, everyone is even stupider than they were, including Grandpa (my God! He used to be the best character on the show, but now, he has no real purpose). The ending is needlessly fluffy, and the only thing different between this and other crappy new episodes ('98-'01) is that the kids can interact with adults. Whoa, what fun!<br /><br />No stars at all for \"The Rugrats All Growed Up\". Klasky-Csupo, please DESTROY this show before it gets any worse.", "label": 0, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 21430, "text": "If you weren't there, then unfortunately this movie will be beyond compassion for you. Which as I say is a shame because although some of the acting is amateurish, it is meant to be for realism. Let's face it--in real life, we don't say things in an exacting or perfect way, even when we mean to. In this sense, it works. This, however, does not apply to our \"known\" actors in this film, notably Jodie Foster (born a natural). The fact that the other 3 girls are not accomplished only adds to the story--Jodie plays the glue that struggles to keep their friendship close, even with the obvious feeling of fatality. Meaning that no matter how close friends are, eventually there are some people that just fade away, no matter how you try.<br /><br />And therein is the core of the movie. It's not about partying, it's not about sexuality, but about these 4 girls and their final time as still young girls before they have to go the world alone.<br /><br />If you have ever had a friendship like that in your life, you will feel this movie--it will mean a lot to you, no matter what era it is set in, or what era you grew up in. We all knew these girls in school, or at the very least knew of them. We all knew the frustrated virgin, half wanting to hold onto childhood and half wanting desperately to grow up and thinking that will do it for her. We all knew the boy-crazy one, the fashion plate whose vanity hides her fear of the world, her fear of acceptance. We all knew the party girl, the one they whispered about, with tales of not only her sad home life but of her notorious exploits. And we all knew the \"mother figure\", the one a little more real, a little more grounded, a little more sad because she knew what would happen. Maybe you were one of those girls. Maybe, like me, you had been each one at one time or another...<br /><br />This film really captures that fragile time in life when want, needs, pressures, womanhood, childhood, the world and loneliness are all embodied in each female's head, each factor on the precipice. Which aspect do you hang on to? What do you toss over the edge, no matter how you may want to hold on? And how painful is goodbye to everything you've known? That's what this movie is--steps into womanhood while clinging onto childhood, and how damn tough it is to keep walking. If you were there, you know...and love this film, as I do. Aching and tenderly done. A fine piece of captured femininity.", "label": 3, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 19195, "text": "The plot of the story and the performance of the lead actors are very much down-to-earth! The romance between two teen-age boys on the screen was done in good taste. You can easily relate to their emotions if you are one but if you are not one, you can appreciate the kind of love the film is trying to impart.", "label": 3, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 15095, "text": "This film screened last night at Austin's Paramount theater as part of the SXSW Film Festival. We were graced with the presence of director Mike Binder and stars Adam Sandler and Don Cheadle who took audience questions after the film. It is a remarkable and powerful film about what it is like to lose yourself and begin to find your way back. The performances are phenomenal and the story manages to be both tragic and funny in a way that is all too rare. (The trailer for the film tries a little too hard to emphasize the comedic aspects.)<br /><br />This is a breakout role for Adam Sandler. While he has begun to transition to more dramatic roles with Punch-Drunk Love and Spanglish, this role is a significant step forward for him as a dramatic actor. He deserves an Oscar nomination as he continues down to transition to more dramatic roles as Tom Hanks did and Jim Carrey is also doing. In this role, he seemed to be trying to channel Dustin Hoffman in Rain Man. Although playing an autistic man is certainly very different than Sandler's traumatized character, both characters for different reasons are trapped in their own worlds of child-like isolation and confusion.<br /><br />Don Cheadle's performance is less surprising, but just as good. After Hotel Rwanda and Crash, we've come to expect remarkable nuanced performances from Cheadle. He has the qualities of sincerity and honesty that comes through in this role. But he, too, is also broken and struggling if not in the such profound ways as Sandler's character. Cheadle is struggling with difficulties in both his marriage and in his professional life as a dentist. Together the characters played by Cheadle and Sandler struggle to heal each other in the way that true friends often do (in a way that reminds me of Matt Damon and Robin Williams in Good Will Hunting). They are both searching for that part of the themselves that they have lost and trying to find again.<br /><br />Reign over Me is one of the best major studio films to be released this year. The soundtrack, which is almost another character in the plot is wonderful. The filming in the streets of New York - a city that suffered a great tragedy and has also had to heal itself - is also quite beautiful. The supporting roles by Jada Pinkett Smith, Liv Tyler, Saffron Burrows (in a very odd role), Donald Sutherland, and Mike Binder himself are all quite good.<br /><br />Writer/Director Mike Binder has really delivered a story that so many will be able to connect with on numerous levels. This is a story about grief, family, healing, male friendship, mental health, and the meaning of love. Reign over Me does not disappoint. The film is almost hypnotic as it draws you into the lives of its characters. Hollywood would have a much better reputation if it made more character-driven charming films like Reign over Me.", "label": 3, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 5954, "text": "So, I know that I voted 1 out of 10 but really this deserves no more than half of a star. I hated it. It was so stupid and unrealistic, I can't believe any of the stars signed on to make this ridiculously absurd project.<br /><br />James G. and Cathrine O'Hara were excellent in their characters and Ben Affleck and Christina Applegate were just as good too, but the story sucked and I encourage anyone who sees this in the video store to not even bother picking it up and reading the back cover, but to just walk away...I don't even want to get into what the movie is about, because it is too stupid to pontificate about.<br /><br />Don't rent this! It's horrible! Horrible!", "label": 0, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"id": 9012, "text": "It seems that the intention of the film was to show the aggressive (maffia-like) character of Russians, or at least of those Russians able to travel outside their big country; that it is too easy to rob a bank in England; and that British police is so inefficient that it cannot find the person who robbed the bank even when these subjects are leaving the country by air. In addition, Nicole Kidman and the supposed Russian colleagues spoke a language not yet identified anywhere, probably spoken by Aliens in the Ural mountains, but far to be the Russian one. So Nicole, if you really want to talk Russian, kindly go to Moscow or St. Petersburg and keep yourself busy learning Russian language grammar and its pronunciation.", "label": 2, "Generalization": "trimmed_train"}
{"text": "(CNN) -- Shelling hit areas near two key cities in eastern Ukraine on Sunday morning, intensifying fears that a ceasefire that took effect less than two days ago may be falling apart. Why is the ceasefire under strain? A variety of fighting factions in the conflict zone -- on both sides -- may not fall directly under a military chain of command. The pro-Russian rebels are mostly volunteer militias; fighting against them on the Ukrainian side are at least some far-right nationalist militias. Controlling these groups is difficult and some may have different aims, including sabotaging the truce. At this point it's been nearly impossible to figure out who's doing the firing and why. The conditions of the ceasefire agreement don't help either. The conditions are vague and at this point there doesn't seem to be an effective mechanism in place inside the conflict zone to monitor and enforce the agreement. Why can't the two sides' leaders control their forces? It's unclear if Kiev has control over all of the fighting forces in eastern Ukraine. Some of the volunteer militias fighting alongside Ukrainian soldiers are far-right nationalists who've been critical of the current government in Kiev, but they're still fighting because they feel Ukraine is under attack by Russia. And who controls the pro-Russian rebels? Is it the local commanders? Is it Russian President Vladimir Putin? None of that is clear. Which side has the most to gain from the truce? If the truce leads to good-faith negotiations and a compromise, then both sides can gain. A compromise could look like something like this: The pro-Russian region of Donbas gets autonomy and self-determination under a federalized Ukrainian government, and in return the rebels drop their demand for independence and Kiev gets to protect Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity. There are elements on both sides that don't want a compromise, and they could certainly have the potential of undermining the truce. What happens next? We wait to see if the overnight shellings and firings are an anomaly or if they're a sign of more violence and more fighting. If the ceasefire sticks, both sides have agreed to hold talks that will address the core issues and demands on both sides that are still unresolved -- including the disarming of the rebels, a guarantee of self-determination for the pro-Russian Donbas region, the fate of Russian-annexed Crimea, constitutional reform, and a solution to the humanitarian crisis in the conflict zone. Obviously if the fighting continues, all bets are off. What effect does this have on the rest of the world? What happens in the coming days will determine the next move by NATO and Western leaders. If the ceasefire falls apart, the West will likely turn up the pressure by following through with sanctions and bolstering Western forces in NATO's Baltic-member states. Moscow has already threatened to respond if that happens. The bottom line is, the conflict will escalate and so will the prospects of a regional conflict -- although at this point that seems unlikely.", "target": "Shelling in eastern Ukraine raises fears that a ceasefire may fall apart .\nReza Sayah: It's been nearly impossible to say who's doing firing and why .\nIt's unclear who has control over fighting forces on either side in east Ukraine .\nThere are elements on both sides that don't want a compromise .", "feat_id": "6d779ca2ed0bf4ce6f08bbd5e5d7223f854cc44d", "evaluation_predictions": [0, 11461, 273, 1194, 633, 828, 228, 662, 2114, 115, 7257, 7742, 124, 1342, 1039, 108, 66798, 7719, 120, 114, 49475, 120, 635, 1298, 478, 197, 228, 390, 754, 218, 129, 4255, 2971, 107, 139, 1047, 113, 109, 49475, 2158, 272, 131, 144, 225, 707, 107, 139, 1047, 127, 15129, 111, 134, 136, 491, 186, 591, 131, 144, 1334, 112, 129, 142, 957, 5661, 115, 295, 865, 109, 3775, 3570, 112, 3028, 111, 11574, 109, 2158, 107, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
{"text": "(CNN) -- Remember when oil giant BP paid billions of dollars to clean up its own mess from the 2010 Gulf oil spill? Then the company agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges and pay an unprecedented $4 billion fine for the spill. In the latest development, Wednesday, BP was essentially told to stand in the corner when it comes to winning new federal contracts -- a potentially huge blow to the company's bottom line. And it's still likely on the hook for civil penalties the federal government hopes to recover for environmental damages. So, is BP being punished enough for the deadly and destructive Deepwater Horizon spill, or too much? It depends on who you ask. This matters. BP says it supports nearly a quarter of a million American jobs and has invested $52 billion in the United States since 2007. Experts suggest punishments ranging from massive fines to banning the company from offshore drilling. However this all shakes out, it likely will send a powerful message to the industry. Families of killed rig workers react to BP settlement . First, here's what happened Wednesday: . The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said it will block BP from new government contracts due to its \"lack of business integrity\" stemming from the 2010 explosion and oil spill. It was a tragedy that killed 11 oil workers and dumped 205 million gallons of oil into the Gulf in a slow-moving, 85-day national drama that prosecutors called the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history. This month hasn't been good to BP. The decision follows the London-based company's agreement November 15 to plead guilty to criminal charges including manslaughter, obstruction of Congress and environmental violations related to the explosion and spill -- an agreement that still requires a judge's approval. What it means . Wednesday's EPA decision means BP won't be allowed to compete for new contracts, grants or other business until the company shows it meets federal business standards. As of February, BP had $9 billion in contracts to supply the U.S. government with fuel, most of it destined for military users, said Christine Tiscareno, a London-based analyst with S&P Capital IQ. Those contracts aren't affected by the EPA decision, the agency said. BP said it's already filed paperwork to get back in good graces with the EPA, said the agency is already preparing an administrative agreement to lift the suspension and highlighted what the company says it's done to rectify the situation. \"As BP's submissions to the EPA have made clear, the company has made significant enhancements since the accident,\" the company said in a statement. \"The company launched an internal investigation immediately after the accident, publicly released the results, and has been implementing all 26 of the investigation's recommendations.\" What's ahead . The next big step in the case comes in February, when a civil trial is expected to begin over the government's demand for civil damages under the Clean Water Act. That case could draw huge new fines for the company. The disaster, in addition to claiming 11 lives, caused disruption to countless residents and businesses, many of whom counted on the Gulf for their livelihoods, whether in the oil fields, fishing grounds or tourist beaches. For some, including environmentalists, the company couldn't be fined enough or spend enough money to get back on their good side. \"Well, you know, we're discussing the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history,\" said Matt Dundas, acting campaign director at the environmental group Oceana. \"The punishment needs to fit the crime.\" But, he said, the record $4 billion fine BP is expected to pay as a result of the criminal case is a tenth of the maximum it could have faced, making it small consolation to BP's harshest critics. The fine, while a record for the U.S. justice system, represents less than three months worth of profits for BP. The company reported $5.2 billion in profits in the quarter that ended September 30. Dundas is now rooting for the maximum possible verdict in the civil case -- $50 billion in fines. But he says there's only one punishment that would really get BP and other oil companies to sit up and take steps to prevent what Dundas says is the overwhelming risk of another large oil spill: being kicked out of the game entirely. \"I think a terrific minimum would be to bar them from offshore drilling,\" he said. \"That's really the only standard that's going to get oil companies to pay attention.\" The head of a trade association representing BP and other oil and gas operators in Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico said Wednesday that BP has already complied with government requirements. \"BP has done everything that the federal government has asked and more. ... This new EPA designation is another layer,\" said Chris John, president of the Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association. \"How much is enough, when the economy in America is trying to dig out of the recession, and energy ... is a very important component to getting Americans back to work?\" The EPA's decision could have a negative impact beyond BP, he said, affecting other companies in the industry who have also complied with regulators. \"The companies that operate out in the Gulf of Mexico, they can go anywhere, they're global. They can drill anywhere in the world,\" John said. \"They have chosen to come back to the Gulf in the past few years. ... This additional statement and designation by the EPA has to play into their decision of where to put their capital.\" BP didn't directly address whether it believes it has paid enough for the disaster, but noted Wednesday that it has spent $14 billion in response and cleanup costs, $1 million on restoration projects and $9 billion in compensation and expects to spend $7.8 billion more to resolve the majority of outstanding claims. Owning up . The company also pointed out it has acknowledged criminal responsibility, carried out recommendations made by investigators who studied the incident and has taken actions to strengthen safety and drilling standards that exceed federal regulations. Tiscareno, the oil analyst, said that while the costs to BP have been steep, they are bearable for the company. The big question is what happens in February, when the civil case goes to trial. Tiscareno said she expects BP, which has taken a long-term approach to recovering from the spill, will recover financially unless the civil trial nets an \"irrational\" decision. A huge verdict could pose problems for BP, Tiscareno said, but she said the government can't go too far in gutting the firm because of all the jobs and tax revenues the company provides. BP has invested $52 billion in the U.S. in the last five years, employs 23,000 U.S. residents and indirectly supports nearly 250,000 jobs, the company said Wednesday. \"The U.S. needs BP as much as BP needs the U.S.,\" Tiscareno said. CNN's Kendra Wates and Catherine E. Shoichet contributed to this report.", "target": "NEW: Trade association: \"BP has done everything that the federal government has asked\"\nTwo years after the oil spill, experts weigh in on possible punishments for BP .\nBP says it expects the temporary ban will be lifted soon .\nThe EPA says the oil giant showed a \"lack of business integrity\"", "feat_id": "70c2aa16d7564f2445e133a55ce361cac30fbf7f", "evaluation_predictions": [0, 139, 787, 5426, 4872, 4260, 243, 126, 138, 2105, 16036, 135, 177, 657, 4597, 640, 112, 203, 198, 28853, 113, 260, 4959, 194, 32885, 135, 109, 2652, 11335, 111, 762, 14567, 115, 109, 7175, 113, 3064, 107, 139, 1057, 4083, 109, 1169, 121, 936, 301, 131, 116, 2158, 112, 30995, 6020, 112, 3416, 2699, 330, 50757, 108, 24398, 113, 3108, 111, 2249, 9909, 985, 112, 109, 11335, 111, 14567, 107, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
{"text": "Adel Taarabt appeared for QPR for the first time since his public fall-out with Harry Redknapp in Monday afternoon's reserve game against Ipswich Town. The Moroccan's days at Loftus Road appeared to be numbered after his extraordinary spat with Redknapp last month. Taarabt claimed his manager never takes a training session after Redknapp had accused the midfielder of being 'three stone overweight' following the 3-2 defeat to Liverpool. VIDEO Scroll down to watch Harry Redknapp say Taarabt's camp have told blatant lies . Adel Taarabt has played just three first-team games for QPR this season after returning from loan at AC Milan . Taarabt laughed off claims by QPR manager Harry Redknapp that the midfielder was 'three stone overweight' The 25-year-old was due to play for the club's Under 21s last week, but wasn't included in the draw against Swansea. However, Taarabt came through 90 minutes in the 3-0 win against Ipswich Town as he tries to prove his fitness to his boss. The former Spurs man, who has been hampered by an ankle injury, has been limited to just three appearances for the R's this season after returning from a loan spell at AC Milan. Taarabt hit back at Redknapp during an exclusive interview with Sportsmail last month . Taarabt spent last campaign on loan at Fulham and then Serie A side AC Milan .", "target": "Moroccan played 90 minutes for Under 21s in 3-0 win against Ipswich Town .\nTaarabt has made just three first-team appearances for the R's this season .\nMidfielder was accused of being 'overweight' by manager Harry Redknapp .\nTaarabt hit back and claimed Redknapp never took training sessions .", "feat_id": "eba5df7ee07b2f73146817d6dc81c0ee83a10205", "evaluation_predictions": [0, 76969, 131, 116, 22302, 16973, 40521, 11626, 7816, 27611, 1421, 118, 109, 211, 166, 381, 169, 481, 1251, 121, 1992, 122, 2031, 5849, 1714, 43958, 9416, 289, 625, 107, 1714, 43958, 9416, 196, 6462, 11626, 7816, 27611, 113, 270, 1034, 12207, 1909, 15713, 131, 645, 109, 27825, 6714, 112, 7839, 107, 11626, 7816, 27611, 148, 1421, 188, 339, 211, 121, 13281, 727, 118, 76969, 136, 578, 244, 4319, 135, 1701, 134, 4716, 10878, 107, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
{"text": "By . Wills Robinson . PUBLISHED: . 11:14 EST, 6 March 2014 . | . UPDATED: . 12:19 EST, 6 March 2014 . Members of the feminist punk group Pussy Riot have been attacked by a gang of men inside a Russian McDonalds. Nadya Tolokonnikova and Masha Alyokhina were covered in paint while they sat and had breakfast in the city of Nizhny Novgorod. The pair, who were jailed for hooliganism in 2012, also had pepper spray, green antispetic and metal thrown in their faces during the assault. Scroll down for video . Attacked: Nadya Tolokonnikova and Masha Alyokhina were covered in paint during the assault while they sat and had breakfast in the city of Nizhny Novgorod . Distressed: The pair spoke directly into the camera after the incident . They were visiting the area to inspect a local prison with Peter Verzilov and members of NGO 'Zone of the Rights'. Tolonnikova allegedly left the restaurant with a 'cut forehead' and the group have complained to the police. She was seen getting up from her seat and clutching her face during the incident. while the gang of men continually shouted abuse. When the attack eventually stopped, one of the men held up a sign to the camera while another was seen shouting down the lens. At around 7.00 am the group barged into the fast food restaurant where the musicians and their crew were eating. Gang: They were covered in paint, antiseptic and pepper spray by the group of men . Prolonged: The gang shouted abuse while they continued to launch the liquids at the members of the feminist band . Close: One of the attackers faced up to Nadya Tolokonnikova, preparing to throw something at her . Abuse: The individuals continued to shout at the musicians while a crowd built up behind them . It is not the first time the group have been targeted by members of the public. At the start of the Sochi winter . Olympics, members of the group were whipped and tackled to the ground by Cossacks as . they sang in protest. The . band started to perform an anti-Putin song under a sign advertising the . Winter Olympics. But singer Tolokonnikova was brutally whipped . in the attack and the guitarist was left bloodied and bruised. Last month, Tolokonnikova was filmed saying the anti-government protests in Ukraine were an 'inspiation'. She was also among those arrested during protests outside a Moscow courthouse. Tolokonnikova and Alyokhina were released from seperate prisons on December 23, 2013 after the Russian State Duma approved an amnesty. Speech: An attacker spoke into a camera owned by the NGO 'Zone of the Rights' in the aftermath of the assault . Slogan: One man holds up a sign to the camera before the group leave the restaurant .", "target": "Nadya Tolokonnikova and Masha Alyokhina were also pepper sprayed .\nThe pair were in city of Nizhny Novgorod visiting a local prison .\nAlyokhina reportedly left the fast food restaurant with a 'cut forehead'", "feat_id": "a8aacd8939412cd8a44e7211f5ba3322b50cdda4", "evaluation_predictions": [0, 6286, 113, 109, 21988, 17744, 456, 881, 62794, 39304, 133, 174, 9656, 141, 114, 10171, 113, 1024, 865, 114, 3058, 41893, 107, 39794, 4518, 413, 47287, 661, 50276, 304, 111, 79911, 42168, 9164, 59641, 195, 1622, 115, 1999, 277, 157, 4199, 111, 196, 2343, 115, 109, 517, 113, 8152, 28676, 6059, 90785, 107, 139, 2188, 108, 170, 195, 33318, 118, 5124, 71034, 2675, 115, 5951, 163, 196, 4437, 4509, 108, 1190, 1857, 12269, 25402, 111, 1682, 6723, 115, 153, 4121, 333, 109, 8171, 107, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.04-56618.2006-02-16.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.ca9.04-56618", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.04-56618.2006-02-16.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14610, 14920, 2190, 14800, 14800, 14260, 1170, 3240, 14560, 14700, 14400, 14950, 14950, 14920, 14980, 14410, 14980, 14980, 15000, 14920, 14980, 14970, 14910, 14740, 14500, 15000, 14820, 14770, 8890, 14850], "label": ["is there anything to wear it on this one or have your our colloquy with you already developed what you need on this this is the attorney's fees yes or i do want to point out to you simply that", "i thought the law was that we don't have jurisdiction to review went through more warts that's true however if the amount exceeds the total amount i think the total amount is two hundred sixty one thousand dollars ", "review it yes you do yes you do", "this you know what happened there was a single home with about seven thousand dollars and what happened is that my wife dawn martin kyle made a", "motion to abandon the quantity because nothing had been done on it the property was going to be raised and she was going to be held in contempt of court because of her own failure to keep the property here so she made a", "say because it was an interim and not a final letter and say we want you to invite of what the bankruptcy appellate court said i e that there was a lot of time wasted here we want you to reconsider the interim award because it's not final yet could you do that i suspect you co", "but i was merely pointing out", "for your time ", "you thank you your honors on i stand on the tiles frustration and the trustees also been frustrated by this case i mean what is clearly evident", "is that the dead in this car will needs to claim that the property was her property in order to obtain the homestead exemption and then her husband is now representing her not about what has been", "understand yes your honor i fight i will answer your question if you just give me a brief second in bankruptcy cases there the conclusion of the case is usually done by the trustee", "filing his final report an account and which time counsel if there is counsel seeks allowance on a final basis of all fees including those that may have been issued prior as an interim award", "in this particular case are application wasn't titled interim application i believe was in title the first interim application the order that was issued by the bankruptcy court provided that it was the order granting interim ", "fees and this is interim war and it is this it is i'm sorry for cutting you off your honor it is subject to final review even though it's not interim only in the sense that it only covers a parrot and it", "statutory provision so i don't know if this matters but i suppose that at the end of this case i don't know when that will be it's been a very", "hotly litigated case could be a long time the judge says you know i worded too much money in attorney's fees in the interim feet i'm going to change my mind i'm going to cut it to fifty thousand dollars", " what would happen would be with the law firm have to disgorge sixty six thousand dollars that it had been paid that the money not get paid until the final order what happens when there's", "an interim award not appealable to the ninth circuit for one hundred sixteen and then a final award of fifty i mean what happens in real life in real life it will be disclosed because the interim award allows", "for the payment to be made and it would be discourse i would be the only remedy because and i cited in my brief it was a case that there just were three cases i mean does that sometimes happen that the", "torrie order is because it's always subject to that final reveal so are there cases where the bankruptcy court in the final award awards less than it did in the interim award because of this issue and have for one reason i don't know i didn't", "do that research on that the research i did was finding that interlock atory order is not a final order therefore the there's no jurisdiction to bankruptcy lawyers have to keep these interim wards and ", "accounts or something or is it just their problem with this courtroom is ordered to the best i understand and i haven't had this situation before i believe it is just the problem of the council so the judge tells you to", "to represent them and we always take that case it's basically taking it as a contingency case now you know i just stand that you're getting the money in the interim for cash flow purposes but it's not a final or ", "yeah and i just want to point out a couple things the first thing in my briefs on this matter when i submitted it the ninth circuit had issued i said i guess it was a published asian the cases in re strand and at the", "time that i filed the case all that i had was the case number of legal tending before this court and since then i have seen that it is published and the cite for that case is three seven five", "third eight five for ninth circuit two thousand and four and that case stands for the proposition that an interim award is not a final order and it's always subject to the final review of the bankruptcy", "looked at it and that the your case it was the trustee it's not final compensation and the compensation was reduced because there was an issue", "that needed to be further dealt with so the court granted and interim award defeat intil they dealt with the other issues and then had a final hearing so the court found that because they were an interim", "order even though it may have been brought by a final application that it was only an interim order and because it was an interim order the court didn't have jurisdiction", "it is an interim board the motion the initial application says it's interim the order approving it says it's interim and i think the case law on the ninth circuit plus the other cases that we did say it's very clear that in the interim order is not final and it is"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_04-56618_DOT_2006-02-16_DOT_mp3_00029.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "i", "s", " ", "t", "h", "e", "r", "e", " ", "a", "n", "y", "t", "h", "i", "n", "g", " ", "t", "o", " ", "w", "e", "a", "r", " ", "i", "t", " "]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.05-55072.2008-05-06.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.ca9.05-55072", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.05-55072.2008-05-06.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14920, 14740, 14860, 14920, 14970, 14800, 14740, 15000, 14890, 14830, 14650, 14890, 14970, 14980, 14770, 14580, 14980], "label": ["first of all it's found in the central part of its opinion that mr tallies independent claims against the defendants that were supposedly barred by the bar order were in fact independent claims that were not the skies in denver the contribution claims", "specifically said we have to defer to a federal court bar order which may or which even though it's on appeal or may be overturned is binding upon us now and if it's overturned the court's pacifically left open the issue of really addressing these claims that ", "not dismissed the case without prejudice in fact against one of the defendants against whom it borrowed or had not yet been issued valuation counselors and us trust the court affirmed our appeal and reinstated our case the only reason the court dismissed", "we like to get these ahead of time doesn't do you very much good to come in a boss fight it out by accident for the evening before we haven't had time to really digest this well that and i apologize the reason i don't think i'll walk", "paragraph but secondly we have never thought i think we argued in the brief that it was not the purview of the district court to make a finding of whether they're independent claims the court is empowered by statute which is the first thing they tell you in law school you know the start of the statu", "the statute says you bar future claims for contributions that's all the district court had before it mr talley was not a party before the court at the time of the borrower's his claims were not pending there this court made no the district court excuse me made no", "determination as to whether bar the state court mr talley state court claims were independent or contribution or indemnity claims or not and in fact the case was that came up in the research indicated that it was not the purview of a district", "basis to find that they were not masquerading and that was not the purview of the court on a bar order hearing the bar or hearing used the term whether defendants who are settling with plaintiffs in a federal court class action case have paid their fair share s", "they get a bargain for future contribution claims they don't get a bar against any old tort claim that's out there because to do so would allow somebody to say i want to bar all related claims and may not even have to tell people the th", "court claims that they they have the right to bring them in and say your honor these are disguised contribution claims they never did that even in the state court appeal they never did that all they did was show the court the bar order that says mr ", "claims nobody has made any analysis except in the case of valuation counselors and us trust whether mr tallies claims are independent non contribution claims and when the court made that", "determination did in fact found that they were not contributions are going to the claims but those were never before this court the district court never even heard that or analyzed that issue he had nothing before him except labels now the court", "the question i would ask you is is is that the party who was attempting to save my claims are not barred by the bar order not barred by the bar order isn't the obligation on him to put sufficient facts forward that the court can make that determination not of the", "those but he doesn't make the determination of what's being masqueraded that's up to the defendants to say we have a bar to judge now analyze that in the state court all they get is a border which bars contribution claims it doesn't make a determination as to every", "before in the san diego accords which are saying looks at it let's suppose that the state court errors and really does give a pass to pursuing those claims even though they", "think this is fair so we're going to let we're going to construe it this these claims that are being made here are not being are not barred even though if this were fairly good a gated fairly", "and someone has to make that factual determination and that's the court where the factual issues are pending which is the state court in that situation your honor invision a court and they latently violates that as a matter of clear fact and law the federal court doesn't"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_05-55072_DOT_2008-05-06_DOT_mp3_00016.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "f", "i", "r", "s", "t", " ", "o", "f", " ", "a", "l", "l", " ", "i", "t", "'"]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2016-2723.2018-01-09.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2016-2723", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2016-2723.2018-01-09.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14530, 14770, 13510, 14520, 14230, 14950, 14830, 14910, 14380, 14970, 13690, 14650, 14111, 14830, 14620, 8410, 14800, 14940, 14950, 3030, 14710, 14880, 14230, 14700, 13330, 14380, 14350, 14890, 14080, 14920, 14620, 14890, 14520, 14920, 14940, 14800, 14440, 14160, 1500, 14940, 14520, 14950, 14980, 14700, 13870, 14980, 14680, 2850, 14880, 14700, 14830], "label": ["points out the courts reverse the ruling of the patent trials held or ruling that are certain kinds of our patents were invalid in view of the goldstein reference we do so both on the merits and based on procedural violation occurred before the board which violated ", "process rights under the administrative procedure act i'd like to focus my argument today on three points first a quick let me ask you just as a housekeeping matter i'm correct that you're only appealing to dependent claims that", "strike or allow us to find out depends on how you look at it i mean there is some confusion here about the use of terminology in my tractor and my contact but the concept that was describe", "right i assume you meant correct i actually don't because an eye contact sensor doesn't do that and the thing is all i track of sensors even ones that they long since disclaimed would do that", "being sensed absolutely so in that sense yes but that was certainly not enabled why didn't queens dispute the sensing eye contact issue at its first chance in the pet nor her response in the", "have never seen a denial of an institution based on enablement argument because what with the board do are we would raise the argument samsung would have an opportunity response there wouldn't be kind of this for some develop", "obviousness to show that you know that there are certain elements here that were simply not met as opposed to an ailment and we also knew that we were going to get different arguments in our response after institution which is you know that's just the way it's set", "up so you don't want to make the exact same arguments in those two briefs or you're probably going to be in trouble who want to make the argument they were in poems on this or i absolutely agree they were entitled to response and what the board ultimately ", "that goldstein described i contact that is contact looking at the screen or not looking at the screen and that that was enabled by various other references for example if you look at a thirty", "issue right we were not allowed to do anything other than argue against these references we're not allowed to submit it acts for decoration explaining not understanding what's wrong here i mean the yellow skin describes i contact with the people looking at the screen or", "perhaps done by people who are super skilled in the art in a lab i think they're somewhere over in europe i don't understand how that could enable somebody looking at the patent to do it you know if you one thing if it said go to the smart", "prototype it was published here it was done this i don't think that's consumedly make a enablement argument based on something where there's not even a date it's not even", "there and we were not allowed to do it so i'm sitting here i'm arguing with you judge i can based on incomplete record i didn't go back to my expert you know it's one hundred thousand dollars having him draft day ", "distinction between i contact sensors and i trackers claim one doesn't limit how quote the device determines whether the user is looking my reading of", "and claim one isn't challenged on appeal they both would be covered by claim one but i tracker like true eye tracking is not enabled on the seller fun fact sampson totally disclaimed that before the board in fact said no no we never even", "tracking in or on a cellular phone at that time which is why in reply they switched my contacts sensing choir's less power", "and i see that i am now into my rebuttal time you know from the question well i'm troubled by the argument that queens makes regarding what it says is the effective denial of queens", "that they would deny that one of the keys or they were like these observations i toss out they do not substitute for the ability to spy argument and evidence including expert decorations and the reason for that is if i'm able to argue as an attorney against sixty ", "declaration sixty five new pieces of evidence i can argue that's all they were that can be dismissed simply attorney argumentation and you're in a position where i've been today that i'm simply arguing from our patents attempting to explain why we think this was", "wrong because we were not able to put any of this evidence in the re", "sensing technology to sense i contact the goldstein uses queen's experts also admitted other facts from its initial from their initial expert declarations that her queens case and so having passed on that initial opportunity ", "evidence on those issues the board correctly denied queens a second chance to do so i'd like to spend most of my time showing that they did have notice of the relevant issues pending of course other questions from the court but before i do that i think", "it's worth noting what the board did give queens as the court pointed out queen's goddess or reply where they could make whatever argument they wanted they were allowed to cross examine our reply x for seven hours and during that time they could have introduced whatever impeachment", "were our theories i contact not tracking but then there are some additional dependent claims in their patent that are narrow specifically to just i contact and so we said goldstein disclose that and so that the the onus would have been on", "them in the patent owner response to challenge that disclosure and bolt in and they didn't do it and so now and you know there was a strategic reason for them to do it i mean whatever the reason they were", "expert you relied on before he filed you know sixty five or sixty eight corp i can't remember what and then he also attached or you attached sixty five new pieces of wire are", "that's a lot that's a lot of new evidence in a reply pretty almost no declaration by a whole new expert not using the expert you've used before and then sixty five or sixty new pieces of prior art for the board to look at", "part of all i p r until you introduce in the reply so a couple things there were a couple different issues that kyra went to the first was kind of further discussion of goldstein this was the sentry high contact and that was something they certainly could have", "as we put that in the petition and yes we put in a new expert's kind of elaborate on that but it was the same theory that was in the petition and they i think made a strategic decision not to have their experts address it because they were worried about calling the name one of their own", "explicitly something like on time but the other stuff these were expert these were issues that they're experts actually injected into perceiving about the state of the prior art for example and what the keep abilities of cellular devices were at the time and for that", "things that they could have anticipated because they injected the issue into the proceeding and if they were going to do that their experts had a responsibility to address all the prior art that was out there instead there was all deception is out there but that wasn't part of", "what you're telling me we get this straight you're telling me that their expert had an obligation to go through all prior art in existence and address all of it even though you had relied on ", "expert testimony about that right correct and you were responding to the right the question is whether they should get a reply to that since they had the opportunity to address the enablement question when they raised for the first time in their response ", "someone would normally get in the form of a reply were they given all the same protection someone else reply would get i think so because they don't have your hypothetical example suppose this is obvious that you have the burden on obvious", "ess if you are the person challenging the patent you put out your premise face a case in obviousness now suppose the patentee comes along and introduces responsive evidence in your reply are you allowed", "actually now the product wasn't commercially successful and you know you said the sales were two hundred million actually there were fifty nine i think there is i think there's an ability to to call them on some of the representations they make and reply and i think you know they have an obligation to be", "point was impertinent person who has the burden of going forward initially them on this enablement issue so they really stand like in the same shoes you did or not you would on obviousness erotically right so if ", "obviousness you present all of your arguments that they were present up position if you then reply i get a chance to respond with new evidence responsive to their opposition and why shouldn't they get a chance to reply to respond with new evidence", "responsive to your opposition", "i think ultimately you want one standard for you but a different standard for them when they have the burden on the issue i mean throughout your brief you made it clear to me they have the burden on this issue no i mean we have the burden of proof along enablement the burden of production the", "burden of proof and so i think as in the obviousness context the party with the burden of proof is the party the typically gets the last word i think the board would have discretion to say looking at the particular facts that", "yes or no will give you expert testimony but here i don't think the board of use that discretion because ultimately all we did in reply was just put in evidence that was responsive to that and in the corrected some of the misstatements by their experts that had their experts done a more", "cited and other paper on at that actually told a different story about it and they didn't object to the province of that paper you know they now say oh it's published we don't know what it was from they never objected to the authenticity below and actually if they were interested in", "foundation that so in last there are further questions on the procedure i could speak briefly to the merits and there we just think it's really substantial evidence question on both issues i mean that there's two", "to see exactly where the glint in the eyes is and then figure out based on the shape of that glint where i am looking reisa from looking at her the current looks different over there it's just a computation requires calibration requires a fixed environment what are", "moment was that if i'm looking at you judge like you can see my pupils and you can see the glint in my eye is inside the people's just a direct line and you eliminate the need for all of that she will measure computation we disclose", "people the pupil the glint in the camera all lines on the access indicating that the user is looking at the camera and hence my contact is detected that's something very different goals he does not disclose that so we didn't rise and fall ", "notice issue we heard a lot of argument about there were clue", "with more than clues are required as whether or not they're looking at i context it's a no no no you're stating your opposing counsel is argument he said clueless and he said also direct information but that is absolutely incorrect and i", "rely on styles for those three this court in the american case it came out i think about eight or nine months ago i said that's not enough you've got to raise this specifically with these claims if they said this is an eye tracking sensor", "because they say it's like tracking sensor well i mean if you look at one ninety four in the middle of the bases close all skin disposals a hardware sensor in and on the device was sensing attention of the was or specifically toward the device that"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00041.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00042.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00043.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00044.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00045.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00046.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00047.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00048.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00049.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2016-2723_DOT_2018-01-09_DOT_mp3_00050.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "p", "o", "i", "n", "t", "s", " ", "o", "u", "t", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "c", "o", "u", "r", "t", "s", " ", "r", "e", "v", "e", "r", "s", "e", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "r", "u", "l", "i", "n", "g", " ", "o", "f", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "p", "a"]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2014-1394.2016-02-04.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2014-1394", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2014-1394.2016-02-04.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [13680, 14980, 14740, 14800, 14800, 14890, 14770, 14760, 14830, 14880, 14970, 14830, 14950, 14890, 15000, 14980, 14920, 14700, 14540, 14560, 14740, 14950, 14590, 14860, 14940, 14620, 14770, 14970, 14290, 14801, 14920, 14800, 14830, 14590, 14830, 15000, 14800, 14530, 14710, 14590, 10560, 14620, 14800, 14860, 14860, 14740, 14740, 14950, 14830, 14830, 14860, 14920, 14850, 14470, 14650, 14950, 14350, 14800, 14880, 14410, 14470, 14020, 14530, 14740], "label": ["thank you your honor may please the court tom schmidt on behalf of the retailer defendants kmart an artist and finger fast this case against the retailer defendants was exceptionally weak from the start and only weakened as the case progresse", "no laws that's true your honor we think that was a clear error of judgment abuse of discretion is deferential to be sure but it's not doesn't mean a case is unreviewable and in fact since time mark this court has reversed district courts exceptional case determinations in", "opposing party has tonight we just opposed state petition is opposing the state just in the basis for when you turn your honor not not alone we think that the strongest bases are first of all the what we think of the frivolous claim construction", "position that they adopted and then not giving up the case when it would have been reasonable to do your honors opinion in a long we think is most directly on point there your honor said of course abuse of discretion it is a differential standard but there is a threshold below which you claim", "was hardly any argument even in support of it i think there was a single sentence in in their opposition to several judgement which just said it was a jury issue that pointing to any any evidence and even on the merits had they developed it more it would have been we just well because it basically", "one of the key limitations of the patent which was the claim fourteen of the patent which was the manner in which the side rails of the of the slides perform so we think again you know in the mind run of cases it's not going to be appropriate to reverse but there is a threshold below which it isn't reasonable enough", "that it is appropriate and we think this this case is below the threshold and so maybe i could just talk about my claim fourteen for a moment and that and the claim construction dispute to keep the dispute just to refresh your memory", "what's the meaning of the word baffle and the question was whether the apple had to be entirely inside the body of the flight of the slide or could be partially external and there's nothing in the claim language that directs you that answers that question we think there is your honor because what the claim", "garbled that a little bit the idea is it has to interconnect the base in the upper surface so it can't be part of the upper surface and and i would point your honor to the specification so that the patent itself is is that the end of the open", "languages that apple has to interconnect the base and the upper surface it cannot include that part which itself is labeled the upper surface and it's just not almost every case comes before us as it has a difference of opinion on cl", "is such a case that the claim language interconnecting the bass in the upper surface of the claim language also requires the battles to perform a specific structural function which is maintaining the inflatable body in which shape and only the internal part of", "week playing construction position and enough to render the case exceptional now after and after this report's martin ruling of the we continue to oppose summary judgment as we discussed without a viable infringement there in fact its own expert conceded", "trial and moved to move to dismiss only two weeks before after a lot of expensive preparation it happened the case was actually dismissed one week before trial but after motions eliminated been filed and we think that the factor that weighs in favor of the case being exceptional again one", "the lanham act side of the case the only i want to say there is just that there were a number of standards percolating in the courts the fields for the lanham act standing at the time this case was filed and we think the fact that that view was claim to standing still so clearly under all three and even under the supreme", "in which judge she tried to process on the panel reminded us that there are two species really an abuse of discretion one where there's a clear air of law or error of law that's been conceded didn't happen here and the second where there's been a clearly erroneous assessment", "honor i really want to correct what is a misleading presentation in the reply brief and earlier today about how that came up that you have to understand that the retailer defendants did not move for summary judgment based on this baffles limitation", "entirely inside they did not raise this issue at all in their summary judgment papers wal mart released it in their claim construction brief so we responded to summary judgment we argued against the seven or eight arguments that the retailers made", "and we won every single one of those arguments once the court's claim construction came out in july now that wal mart has prevailed on a claim construction position adding this limitation entirely inside", "quit once but it wasn't perfunctory or baseless it was a five page affidavit by an expert explaining how the drawing was in the patent when the court construe them really matched the walmart product and it was done family products the same", "products that they're selling so there's no difference and there was a four page argument in the brief not the judge didn't want but there was nothing wrong with raising it and we also have to keep in mind the timing here this all happened within a couple of months so we", "asserted doctor of grievance against the party that raised this issue we lost the issue and the claim fourteen is over by november seventh in their case december third wal mart is within a couple of months of claim construction or so really a standard way to", "end i mean this is the rules of the scrap says cost should be awarded bottom line in this case you didn't have to pay any costs doesn't that seem to be contrary to the", "directive no your honor here's why i absolutely do retailers as the prevailing parties were entitled to costs but they have to make a showing that they incurred costs and paid cos that's", "that's true for anybody right they did not make that shilling they put in a bill of cost that shows every cost that was there was incurred by manley who's the losing part this is all the appendix i've i've", "standard the judge supported looked at and said there's no showing here that the retailer to sentence incur costs and pay costs these are managed costs you have to apportion them and the district judge affirmed that and", "ok and the fallback position is given a program to share costs well that would be fine if they had incurred or paid any costs and made a showing to the district court of that they did not do that had the authority that they cite is situations where insurance company", "an outside party pays for the defendant's costs of course in that situation the defendant still gets to recover those costs here the losing part of the mandate paid for those costs and they've made no showing that they incur cost", "so that's the threshold before you get costs yes as a as a as a matter of law as a prevailing party are they entitled to costs yes they are did they make a showing that they've heard costs and paid costs no they did not they put", "in bills that manly paid their address to ma'am and the bill of cost i was very clear in the district in minnesota it's as if you've got multiple parties on one side winners and losers you have to support you have to make some showing", "and it also is clear that says right in the bill of cost and this makes sense we can't award costs more than once we only award one set of possible a judge award seven hundred thousand dollars to my client the viva because we won the ", "judgment against manly and were awarded attorneys fees and costs for man's conduct in the case so that's that's the constitution hasn't been any show and there's no authority anywhere that a defendant who's a winning party can", "recover cost paid by the losing party if i could turn back to the standard of you i didn't want to lose the point i thought was persuasive so what we have here is there is no showing of", "you're on the server familiar but that's not appropriate under higher but to take it a step further the court's judgment has to be so it came to speed right or wrong has to be so wrong that's abuse of her discretion if we look at claim fourteen which ", "really the focus of the argument this was the standard claim construction argument that we see in most patent cases the patent t my client a viva argue that the word baffle should be given ", "ordinary meaning as a check between the upper surface of the lower surface to keep the product in its wedge shape we argue that based on philips the court's precedent and dictionary definitions wal mart are not these retailers they didn't think of", "this wal mart said judge what you should do is you should add a limitation to something and you add a limitation it says that baffles got to be entirely inside the inflatable body now the argument is made", "in this court that our position was objective we base was because their claim language required that to be that baffle to be entirely inside the inflatable body and that's just that's that it just doesn't follow the judge", "reasoned and the question is do we have an argument that it's not questions about whether you're right or wrong but the judge reason that this side baffled d could not be a baffle because it was", "partly out externally and the judge said well that doesn't attach the base to the upper surface of the upper surface see well that just doesn't live simply fall that's not correct the baffle", "d is attached to upper surface the at the side it's supporting the wedge shape by being attached to the side the other problem with councils argument is if north claim fourteen claim fourteen says that you", "raise the side baffle and the side wall to form a psych rail and the language when we get to the right exactly", "so you raise the side baffle you raise the sidewalk to make the side rail such that the upper surface comprises a pair of cyberattacks so now this is the upper surface two so our", "argument which seems to me to be a reasonable ordinary argument is that baffle the whole say can the side baffle connex the summers of a z and this upper surface a and it's doing what it's supposed to in the claim the claim", "required showing make and then the other argument that was made in the briefing not really addressed here is we're fighting about what the drawings mean and i would just remind the court that if your audience and your colleagues have many times cautioned us to be careful about the", "drawings they're not meant to be exact precise depictions of space or dimension but we think if we try to put in the papers the drugs actually supported us they think they support them you know and i think that's a fair grounds for argument but", "the one thing that is clear in the law is a drawing of a single body that is not enough to read in a new imitation into that so that's really that's really pushing for t v and i wanted to address the commentary about claims", "slides and makes an obvious argument that you combine those two pictures together and you've got obviously this problem that should have been so clearly us that we never should've brought the case in the first place that argument was not made to the", "district court it was not made on summary judgment it was not made in the feet petition it has never been presented to the district court and in the reply brief the assertion is made that well we didn't have to really say all", "this in the in the feed petition because the judge knew all this already that's a false statement you need to understand that's not true the judge had never been presented with that evidence and never looked at those drawings", " title to go to trial on claims eighteen nineteen we had an interim decision from the patent office that was not favorable but we still have the right to appeal so we had a choice to me and after the summary judgment ruling out playing fourteen we immediately ", "be reached up to walmart and over the course of a very short time few weeks settled while they are not here today we attempted the same process with these retailers who are represented by the same counsel that represented manly", "the party and its with sanctions to have a default judgment of over a million dollars for litigation is comped and our counsel of eva's counsel tried to approach the retailers knowing that there is no way that they could ever", "settle the case would make they've had to go direct to the retailers and that was rebuffed it didn't work and so prevention late after this all happened all of them a few weeks of either drop the case now there's kind of a fundamental inconsistency", "that runs throughout the entire papers this is supposed to be some terrible thing that we put these retailers through for a month or two three get ready for trial instead of dropping it you know sort of immediately after playing fourteen was", "dismissed because planes eighteen and nineteen weren't worth as much well if that's the case then why didn't they ever put in any evidence that they had sales that would have been easy to do and why what", "it would really be spending money to get ready for trial if they had no infringement liability because they had made any sense it doesn't make any sense it's just a would need to drag this case out and make it harder for my client who's", "sells waterslides manly sells waters it's the retailers are falsely advertising manley's waterslides in their stores because the false advertising is the pictures of the depictions of the products the retailers are falsely", "advertising manley's waterslides on their websites again depicting their water supply side by side with our ours is that the retailers actions have more power than manage their actions obviously because", "had a reasonable argument we were a competitor we didn't sell very much because we were being destroyed by their false advertising as the district court itself we've the last argument that they make in the reply brief is well you didn't really have any damages", "the insurer happens to be a codefendant rather than some other third party so we don't think that the persuasive basis to deny cause i want to briefly address the file history i think perhaps", "an orthodontist in the eighth circuit said no there's no preventing standing here you cannot sue the yellow book the yellow book is just the medium of the false advertisement is not the perpetrator of the false advertisement and that's exactly true age and we have here the retailers are not the perpetrator of false", "of the retailers doing anything to put themselves and implicitly with mandatory that we think there is clearly no basis for standing the last thing i just want to say is high mark of course is the differential standard of use discretion but we think", "is a two way street on the one hand and to this court ought to be deferential but on the other hand it behooves district courts to provide some explanation and some and some reasoning to support their conclusions and we think we think the district court simply never", "explained why the claim construction position here was not for those never can never explain why it was reasonable to persist as long as as if you did never explain why you could have had a reasonable basis to think it had standing we think because the district courts"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00041.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00042.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00043.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00044.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00045.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00046.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00047.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00048.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00049.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00050.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00051.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00052.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00053.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00054.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00055.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00056.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00057.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00058.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00059.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00060.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00061.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00062.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2014-1394_DOT_2016-02-04_DOT_mp3_00063.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "t", "h", "a", "n", "k", " ", "y", "o", "u", " ", "y", "o", "u", "r", " ", "h", "o", "n", "o", "r", " ", "m", "a", "y", " ", "p", "l", "e", "a", "s", "e", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "c", "o", "u", "r", "t", " ", "t", "o", "m", " ", "s", "c", "h", "m", "i", "d", "t", " ", "o", "n", " ", "b", "e", "h", "a", "l", "f"]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2020-1134.2020-11-03.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2020-1134", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.2020-1134.2020-11-03.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14860, 14830, 14530, 14880, 14890, 14950, 14470, 14790, 14860, 14740, 13950, 14260, 14850, 14890, 14530, 14740, 14770, 14440, 14680, 14940, 3600, 14830, 14650, 14770, 14580, 14319, 14770, 14740, 13470, 14890, 14860, 6720, 14730, 2880, 14980, 14800, 14730, 14860, 14770, 14740, 14760, 14980, 14980], "label": ["thank you very much thank you very much your honor may please the court kind of carpenter appearing on behalf of mr kevin george the error of the veterans court in this case was its reliance upon this court's decision in jordan although this court's", "decision in jordan was based upon a change in the law this court's decision in jordan does not apply to this court's decision controls and there was no change in the law as a result of this court's decision and wagner", "the a v does not apply either your honor because the wagner case does not represent a change in the law the jordan case does represent a case of a change in the law and if mr george's allegation of", "said and that it was so such a clear understanding the law that it was the true state of the law at the time of the initial decision do i understand that correctly y", "done i think you simply recognize it for what it is as this court did in jordan this court recognizes that the v a s general counsel had corrected the mistake in interpretation made by", "the secretary when he promulgated that regulation he issued a presidential opinion which invalidated that regulation because the secretary's interpretation was in direct conflict with the plain and an a", "analysis of what it was that the statute said and if the statute was as this statute is so unquestionably plain on its face that there were two", "specific requirements imposed by congress upon the secretary before the presumption of soundness could be rebutted then the interpretation or the plain language", "of the statute controls and supersedes any interpretation that would have been made by the secretary to the contrary but i would also suggest your honor that your concern is is i don't wan", "founded but but less likely to come up in the future simply because the facts of this case are such that we have a judicial interpretation", "unquote the initial interpretation of section one hundred and eleven and so therefore our court treated that regulation as an official interpretation", "resulted in denying mr jordan a cue claim in that instance because changes in interpretation of the law are outside the scope of what can be considered a valid claim", "honor i agree with everything that you said i simply differentiate that the interpretation that was made by the secretary in his regulation was the", "the that was the regulation for v a q rather than b v a q which was discussed in da v and then was found to be a valid regulation based", "upon that change in the language the question here mr mr carpenter again quite follow what you said and i want to make sure i do understand what you're saying are you saying that there is some kind of", "same oh yes they are your honor and they are to be applied the same way what i am saying is is that the prohibition that exists in those two regulations about change in the", "law applies when you attempt to make an allegation of q as was done in jordan based upon that change in the law that is not what mr george's allegation of ", "it be imputed to have been as the veterans court did mr george's allegation of q was based soley upon the failure of the", "between really bad interpretations of the statute and then fair but ultimately deemed incorrect interpretations of the statute all we said there was there that regulation that the v a had", "a change in interpretation of that stature and in jordan we said you cannot get a q through that change in interpretation and in fact as i understand the", "where you want to get to under these circumstances", "honor i think that the my response is to part st i would respectfully disagree with the characterization of what happened in jordan and jordan really wasn't about what happened in one thousand one hundred and eleven jordan was soley about what happened with the", "regulation itself the only issue the only allegation is q and that was that the regulation one invalidated it that invalidation was retrospectively the court in jordan didn't pass at all", "ignored the nd half of the statute in fact if you look at the ratings decision at issue here it's clear that they didn't apply the statute at all they required as an int of stablish ing in service aggregation which is not", "a new cause of action it creates a new entitlement benefits and that's clearly not what happened here one thousand one hundred and eleven has not changed and wagner's interpretation of it although in our opinion is not entirely relevant to the", "it won't apply to cases where the judgment final judgment has been entered so i hope you understand the important question which is really that should should we have to look for express intent from congress in a", "decision then you know that would be a change of interpretation so i don't think it's i don't think we need to look for explicit intent from congress here ", "stated that that there was an initial interpretation and so by guys decision on the interpretation of one thousand one hundred and eleven must be considered a change in interpretation in light of", "d the court in this case acknowledged that new interpretations of law only have retroactive effect on decisions open on direct review and do not apply in the context of ", "specific changing in law but i don't think that's a reference to that militia says that the provisions of the section that is cu", "the secretary and the board issued the decisions and martin and george and that valid binding regulation controls the decisions in those cases and a later different", "honor there are a couple of places in the decision a", "this court and enjoys also acknowledged that where the regulations in place at the time of the original decision imposed a different rule does not apply and ", "and saying that there was a change in ", "i think there is also arguably distinguishes between sort of the the regular regulatory interpretation versus the statutory interpretation but the court in", "regulatory interpretation of the law in contrasted with a regulatory interpretation of just one last quick question i'm just wondering if you're aware of any other", "another traditional interpretation of the statute can get retroactively applied to final judgment i don't know if it's something like it could be anything social security benefits criminal law an", "congress created a remedial statute there is no reason that the intent of congress should be abrogated by the dispute that has been created by the ", "of a change in interpretation does not to say that a change in interpretation is not a bar is but the question here goes to whether or not the allegation of q", "made exclusively upon the statute can be impeded from being successful because of an action taken by the v a s general counsel to correct a clear mistake by the secretary in writing a", "regulation that directly contradicted the plain meaning of the statute as interpreted by this court in wagner and as a result the remedial effect of the intent of congress", "needs to be acknowledged and this court needs to reject the impediments to allowing for the remedy of the collateral attack when there is as in this case a decision made ", "didn't apply the regulation and the government suggests that somehow the regulation applied even though the board never relied upon the regulation the board in fact attempted the rely upon a different statute a statute that"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00041.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_2020-1134_DOT_2020-11-03_DOT_mp3_00042.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "t", "h", "a", "n", "k", " ", "y", "o", "u", " ", "v", "e", "r", "y", " ", "m", "u", "c", "h", " ", "t", "h", "a", "n", "k", " ", "y", "o", "u", " ", "v", "e", "r", "y", " ", "m", "u", "c", "h", " ", "y", "o"]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.14-72087.2017-06-09.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.ca9.14-72087", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.14-72087.2017-06-09.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14890, 14320, 13450, 14890, 14940, 14979, 14040, 14920, 14740, 5610, 14710, 14590, 14610, 14740, 14770, 14970, 14921, 14620, 14980, 14530, 14760, 14830, 14620, 14830, 14800, 14560, 14890, 14440, 14880, 14770, 14530, 14560, 14640, 14920, 14910, 3120, 14880, 14670, 14980, 14670, 13570, 14350], "label": ["that occurred to him which he asserted was by the police and his wife was told also that the police were involved in double slaying they knocked on the door and they said it's the police", "said that they weren't police the question is what does he mean by that when he says that because he does say several other times in his testimony that they were police and then they threaten him when they tell him not to call the police", "ever says that this was a ruse to get me in the door i think other people said that for him because in several other places previously when he was talking to integration officers and in his testimony he says ", "that they were police and also by the by the way that he expresses himself in the simple ways that he does it it appears very well mean that he said they were police because they weren't wearing police", "uniforms not the fact that they were actually police any case they were in league with the police that's accept on the record and so i mean that's that's as far as i really think counted on ", "any case and we know that they were in league with the police on his wife's of that they will leave with the police and that's what he told the immigration judge and the immigration officers that don't call the police because we're all part of this together so", "comes to court there's a mexican case that finds that returning to your being afraid to return to your country after coming to the united states is not a particular social ", "bark and the immediate g and other cases and the circuit as well to remove that either except now that what happens in mexico isn't true for guatemala because we have to look at", "saying again what might be true in one country is not true another mexico isn't one of the case should be right reminded back to the board and a minimum so that and then of course to the immigration judge to to make a new", "returned from the united states in are there by perceive", "does the trouble in this case is all that all this new stuff about the country particular all came about after his case and evolution so he didn't make that showing he did not", "met please the court my name is kate alabama i'm here for the government today and i'm of course prepared to answer any questions about the case that you have including the asylum claim but i what i'd like to start with the cat claim i thought that would be more", "important to cover with some thoroughness the reg provides for protection for applicants under the torture convention when future torture is more likely than not and numerous factors go into making that determination", "including most importantly the past torture under the applicable regulation the petitioner bears the burden of proof and factual findings by the agency must be upheld unless a contrary conclusion is compelled so to be", "torture there must either be state action or there must be acquiescence by the state and the most important point i'd like to make today is that this is not a state actor case we call this the", "relocation issue is the way that we would look at it but the i g did reach the issue and unfortunately we didn't present that issue that came that issue in our brief we would be happy to address it", "and supplemental briefing but we don't think we need to because we think that the board decision is good based on the on the holding that there's no state action and there's there's no showing of acquiescence right so i guess again i gather your position is there's", "misallocation of bird well i think that the i'm not sure it's relevant because actually the i j a found that on the relocation issue based on what was in the record that ", "misplaced in this case and a lot of maldonado if it if it were that doesn't necessarily mean you lose but but i i'm just trying to get through the threshold question and then you can argue why it doesn't matter i understand your honor and i'm hesitant to say that ", "findings on the relocation says you are good that they were subsided by the board's opinion because in the last statement in the last for the foregoing reasons and those articulated by the", "immigration judge in her decision we affirm the immigration judge's decision so i think that our position is that that does subsume the relocation finding that doesn't then get to your question about whether or not the i j a mistakenly press", "whatever stand that but but it depends on through what lens you look at the evidence and where you place the burden so that's why i'm asking so i think that even even if you look at it from the standpoint of", "the government's burden the there was evidence of record that the family successfully relocated i understand that i just don't think you've ever answered my first question to ", "that there is mixed country condition evidence including the state department reports and the newspaper article i don't think it was left off i think that what that substantial evidence standard applies here and that the", "agency found that there wasn't enough evidence in in you know the country commission reports or the newspaper articles to show they acquiesced and i think that that that that's certainly a supportable ", "the case that when a police corruption is a problem the government continues to prosecute corruption but that doesn't deal with all the evidence of for the extraordinary levels of", "violence the fact that the police aren't in forcing you know essentially and out of forcing a war and that kidnappings are a problem both and immoral parts of the country as well as as and guatemala", "city and that's what all that the all that said about it is here the country background information in the case of our police corruption is a problem the government continues to prosecute it is that a sufficiently adequate", "bottom line is that the state department reports as is usually the case are mixed and while there might be some evidence of corruption there's also some evidence of prosecution so i think that where there is", "mixed evidence like this i mean there have been cases where the court has said that like for instance in madrigal that there's has been a showing of possible that acquiescence you could", "show acquiescence but in that case there was specifically in the facts in the underlying facts some sort of associate sumps some allegation that there was a status of the applicant that", "related to the corruption these were former military officers in this case we don't have this this applicant doesn't have any sort of special special or particular status that would make this more of a ", "that more likely where there would be corruption so i think that the bottom line is he hasn't shown state action and he hasn't shown acquiescence he hasn't met that burden of proof and without that he can't succeed without", "particular social group i we do there are cases that i can provide to this court afterwards there's an unreported case from two thousand and ten where returning home olens from the united states who were", "i just got an e mail from colleagues saying that we should rely generally on the law to come into court and there is something that you didn't know that you knew you would talk about and you didn't have the courtesy to provide opposing", "before you open your mouth in court and raise something like this", "it was that attacked him and the citations are to the record to settle that he maintained in this testimony before the immigration judge walk in the door and he ", "thought they were police in his way of articulating things very well could be i can't overly read his mind but he said they wouldn't look like police when he opened the door even though they said they were police but he ", "continued while they were in the house that they said that they were the police and there's a state actor there and his wife also said that they told him that they were in cahoots with the police don't bother going to the police so we have more sta", "or in cooperation with the group yeah gallagher you know i know that's that was part of your argument but i don't you know just because somebody identifies themselves as a state actor doesn't make a mistake a state actor for the purposes of immigration you know when you're dealing with a", " we're stuck with how the police behave and what goes on there and any case i think the court also has a letter that says that when you're when you're dealing with this ", "with the police the fact that the the board that's said that if the police are in effect of that's one thing but if it's a rogue policeman and these gentlemen assuming they were police were real policem"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_14-72087_DOT_2017-06-09_DOT_mp3_00041.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "t", "h", "a", "t", " ", "o", "c", "c", "u", "r", "r", "e", "d", " ", "t", "o", " ", "h", "i", "m", " ", "w", "h", "i", "c", "h", " ", "h", "e", " ", "a", "s", "s", "e", "r", "t", "e", "d", " ", "w", "a"]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.15-70665.2016-12-06.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.ca9.15-70665", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.ca9.15-70665.2016-12-06.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14550, 14620, 14730, 14770, 14530, 14590, 14130, 14890, 14560, 14910, 14590, 14560, 14890, 14760, 14860, 14500, 14920, 14760, 14650, 14200, 14910, 14170, 14500, 14320, 14670, 12460, 14980, 14620, 14770, 14650, 14950, 14830, 14940, 14950, 14920, 13680, 14650, 14890, 13600, 14910, 14321, 14980, 14890, 14830, 4000, 14800, 14190, 14580, 14680, 14680, 14910, 14980, 14920, 14160, 14620, 14770, 14890, 14440, 13470, 14850, 14770, 10920, 14770, 14470, 14980, 14530, 14910, 14890, 14830, 14700, 14980, 14800, 14830, 14830, 14940, 14950, 13690], "label": ["morning your honor said robbins on the lawyer for the taxpayers this case is about the taxpayer's right to a fair trial a tax court we maintained he fair trial", "but they did miss chen had nothing to do with with after the criminal proceeding after the criminal proceeding she had lots to do with coming up and with the numbers and that the numbers not that i mean she's the one that she's the one that came up with the original numbers and correct", "just tell me after the criminal trial and after the criminal matter not trial but the criminal proceedings it was all agreed that there was a diff they owe taxes and they agreed to a fraudulent penalty and what not but then mounts had to be", "determined yes correct yes ok and goes back to the i r s yes and somebody makes that determination the determination had previously been made in the context of the criminal case no no no not not just ", "just who after it went back after the criminal proceeding and they came up with the new amount who did the numbers on the deficiency came from ultimately helen chan ", "ok she was building off of a fairly substantial effort that predated her and yet when the case right there was a lot went into the criminal prosecution ok but she came up with the numbers that were in that deficiency of the numbers on the notice", "deficiency were put on there by helen chance so i thought when she testified that what was happening was that she was relating how she went about coming up with that those numbers that was what the", "was yes but if you look at the record that is not what she did when i say that when you say the story you talk about the argument i'm your in the money motion yes as well as the arguments made by the government ", "somebody had to explain to tax court judge how they came up with with the numbers no they don't in that context is that with the net worth number of numbers on the deficiency notice", "yes and they could prevail yes news to me no it's the way it works but here they elected to rebut what we put on with their own data but let me get back to my original point this is i'm going to hit", "this because this is important helen chan went way beyond talking about what she did to come up with the numbers on the deficiency noticed and we can see it we've got the proof right here in the record keep in mind i hope everyone has caught this that the", "government's theme is all she did was talk about what she did to come up with the numbers on the notice of deficiency that was it nothing else not true true that's the way the tax judge related but ", "helen chance deficiency number from one nine hundred ninety eight sixty four thousand dollars she changed it during the course of time after the notice of deficient strength she kept grinding the", "well that's the those arguments are particularly related to you know whether whether or not delbert was violated right those arguments show that she is operating as an expert", "during her trial testimony but what he's saying is there were they would have been permissible she were qualified that's absolutely all right if you say that then and she wasn't qualified you have to show prejudice that well i ho", "by shown that in the prejudice is what the prejudice is seen when you look at what happens in a typical tax court case if i may give thirty seconds summary i thought the pose would be she's not", "qualified you know the prejudice is the taxpayer is the pride of a series of him very important procedural things that he could take advantage of to help him in his case just like any other case with an expert", "absolute word yes that procedural that's my point that's the whole point of this case i know that but that the point i'm getting at for that was while i did so don't have to show prejudice from that violation so i think the prejudice is manifest by the by the fact that we did", "going to the qualifications of shown well when you depose them you go not only to qualifications you go to the substance of their analysis we did not have an opportunity a pretrial opportunity to depose that expert on the", "substance of her analysis we did not have an opportunity to get a written report which is huge tax court is unique in that regard as far as i know and that and that the respect ", " within thirty days of trial and most importantly it becomes the direct testimony of the expert it just goes in bone that's direct testimony in the taxpayer gets an opportunity to cross or if the taxpayer puts the expert", "and substance i would assume had she been forced to write every pore it would have tracked what she alternately said so yes but now obviously you had an opportunity to cross examine but i suppose", "court there's discovery i mean did you get her working papers before we had all the paper had all her papers so you knew what she'd i didn't know what she was going to say no no no but you had her records and the way she did when she worked up the", "be an expert is a summary well you knew she was going to be testifying i'd had no no reason to think you should have done the numbers i had no reason to think they would go back on their word and there's nothing i wonder did you have to get the tax court judge's approval to take her", "deposition what i have had to i could done in my stipulation you can do it it's not a big deal is the government usually cooperate no matter but there's no reason to do it she's not an", "expert why do i want to talk to her she's not a witness she has no historical connection that you know that all caller is a witness yeah they said they're going to cause a summary witness a one thousand and six summary witness which she clearly was not", "i soon at a certain point maybe before she was in color early in her testimony you you you made some kind of objection right away yes sir ok now what was the response", "nuisance objecting at least periodically because it was totally improper as far as i was concerned i'm entitled to the rules being followed we didn't get it and i want to i can beat this case in a fair fight when i was shot at ", "court hearing directly from the commissioner of internal revenue as is obvious in this case frank worth pled guilty to intentionally under reporting his single you don't have to go into that we want to know you did this dispute", "opinion i'm sorry to have i think did that turn out to be true that the tech court judge did not permit this witness to testify to any opinions whenever during her testimony", "legitimate objection that she was straying into opinion territory that pat's court reminded her and basically that the the critical thing to understand here is that there's a different though the answer is than say yes or", "not she did not she explained what she did and the tax court can take it or leave it the tax court is itself an expert on tax law and the distinction between a criminal tax prosecution", "and the deficiencies proceeding in the tax court is that specialized knowledge which is the category of testimony referred to again section seven a one for of the federal rules for lay testimony so you cannot", "thing than specialized knowledge and the specialized tax court where the judges themselves have specialized knowledge and judge lab or there's credentials around packable they're available publicly on the ", "its website he knows very well the difference between the criminal rules and the civil tax rolls because he was the tax assistant to the solicitor general of the united states and in", "the tax court judges have been reversed on occasion but by my point is that the baseline for specialized knowledge in the task court is way above the heads of a the civil jury and when", "here he admitted the revenue agents testimony purely to explain what she did not for the truth not for an expert opinion on whether the methodology was correct but just presented the information so that", "method was appropriate that's all within the province of the the tax court to the son she presented her asked him at and the task or can take it or leave it task or can accept the taxpayer's number or the commissioner's number or", "come up with something in between but he says you could have just presented your case by offering the notice of deficiency and and rested that right i think that would be a risky litigation s", "the commissioner has to present something because of that specialized burden of production and in this case when the commissioner had to put yet to present some evidence to show that you were relying on the net worth than that it was a proper this was a", "proper case to rely on the net worth method in the blank missioners you the tax court may disagree right but that was your position that's how you calculated the deficiency and you said we did that because this is an un report there", "mean is that is a net worth method reflected on the deficiency notice not on its face but all of the information the spreadsheets the summaries the foundational documents were provided at least a year and", "a half possibly two years in advance of the time now there were specific tax payer to relax parents representative and he found a status report in july of two thousand and eleven which is more than two years before the trial indicated that he had received a huge", "requires the parties to it's sort of a settlement procedure to get together and figure out what they can agree on and then to narrow the issue so that only they legitimately just speeded items ", "postponed but just her name was on the witness list is that what you're saying nothing else about ", "worth position or not yes that that was revealed that she would be the representative of the commissioner to explain the deficiency number ", "that so it's possible maybe the taxpayer was never informed that this witness would be testifying to the commissioners network calculations and bottom line i can tell you generally what happens when there's a deficiency", "determination and then to send out there's an administrative procedure that can be followed where the taxpayer are faced represented by counsel the taxpayer is representative can communicate directly with the revenue agent to at that level try to resolve the", "issues and then there are then that the case could go to the i r s office of the peals which is another sort of settlement resolution opportunity and then the task or trial is sort of the the taxpayers put up or shut up moment to", "present his own evidence because all of this evidence you have to remember is within his personal knowledge well they don't know the evidence you know how the commissioner gets to the net worth calculation is not within the taxpayers", "worth but obviously you can come up with a different number i stand corrected your honor the tax payer's person has personal knowledge of his actual income during the period and what happens is the tax court is", "taxpayer told about you know the commission it was net worth calculations before you get into court all of those spreadsheets which show the allocation show the treatment of everything were produced ", "yes there are there is no surprise spreadsheets presented at the trial and that's produced a profit hole long before trial in this case possibly as long as two", "years before this trial definitely within about a year and a half before and are those disclosed figures you know substantially what that what this expert testified to in court", "trial yes and where there were changes there were some minor changes which which were identified at the very beginning of the trial and all of the changes were based on refinements from", "is an i r s employee who was a slow motion just a revenue agent that which is yes she's a revenue agent but she had no other job description while she had i mean that her job description is", "and the record at the beginning of her testimony but what her role was in this particular case was she was assigned after the conclusion of the criminal case and there was a plea agreement in which frank worth agreed to cooperate", "with the i r s and the civil examination of his tax liabilities not to challenge the evidence gathered in the criminal investigation not to challenge its use in that civil investigation she was assigned at that", "point to do the math for the commissioner we had it and mission that the returns were incorrect that income from white sands was not reported accurately", "and frank worth was on notice at that time that a similar civil exam is proceeding what's not in the record in this case in the civil area is what happened between so the thirty day", "letter period which is a notice the taxpayer that even precedes the notice of deficiency that alerts the taxpayer that this is coming and it's an opportunity that sort of resolve things before you even get the notice of deficiency point and then", "what she did was very straightforward there are no numbers to add up i was it will fall on very easily all right thank you thank you", "didn't just sit there and say there was nothing we wheeled up two hundred thousand secondly beam there was a question from one of your honor's about whether any of the objections were were sustained", "i can't remember a single one if it was it was collateral it wasn't what we're talking about here they were all over", "the the net worth from that well i guess we're past that i think you've got to be an expert to do a net worth math and i'm sorry there's nobody in this room that can do one without special training i", "can't even do it i've been working on this stuff for thirty eight year the revenue agents are received at special train sure you know they know how to do yeah that helen chant could do it if she were here that's because she's an expert and net worth it doesn't necessarily mean she's always an", "expert when she's testifying she is in this case i think that's pretty apparent the question is what she wasn't they didn't follow the procedures that there was any prejudice here because apparently she had all the ", "prejudice comes from not being able well first of all they represented to us to answer again one of the questions they were there the government represented to us that she was not testifying as an expert that was quite clear you've heard that again right here she's", "not an expert don't worry about it ok that's a big deal as a huge deal and so i didn't know she non experts want what she going to do put in some reschedules no problem i probably", "i was deprived of the identity of the substance of her testimony i was deprived of her identified as an expert i was deprived of the opportunity to depose her as an expert but most importantly", "i didn't get my hands on her written report which was her direct testimony i would have their direct testimony a minimum of thirty days before trial imagine how useful that would be have thirty days to prepare your cross examination", "have thirty days and look have your own exit you know i don't i don't hear you saying is that i would have hired my own expert based on all of this on my own expert would have done this this and this absolutely if i'm faced with an expert right now but you haven't said that at all you have", "you say you say well i would have done i would have had the availability of her deposition i would have been a lot happier report i'm saying now but you don't so you've never said we've been i've been listening to you very carefully are all morning you've never said well i'm going to go out i would have gone out and taken that", "information i would have gone out and i would have hired my own expert my own expert would have said this this and this about her test i would i don't know specifically whether i would have done that because i haven't seen we haven't said haven't seen her report but have all seen having seen her", "report i may well have done that clearly that's one of the reasons you want to see the report now if a report so lame i could rip it up on my own i would need to do that mr robinson the man who related question oh i don't want", "my question is is it customary in a net worth case for the government to french a written report on the net worth case of their revenue agent then what if it's not customary", "why is that they i can't answer that you know because it's too much trouble and they get away with it well it this must have been raised before i mean this just me to your point "], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00041.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00042.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00043.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00044.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00045.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00046.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00047.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00048.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00049.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00050.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00051.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00052.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00053.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00054.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00055.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00056.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00057.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00058.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00059.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00060.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00061.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00062.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00063.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00064.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00065.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00066.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00067.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00068.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00069.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00070.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00071.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00072.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00073.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00074.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00075.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_ca9_DOT_15-70665_DOT_2016-12-06_DOT_mp3_00076.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "m", "o", "r", "n", "i", "n", "g", " ", "y", "o", "u", "r", " ", "h", "o", "n", "o", "r", " ", "s", "a", "i", "d", " ", "r", "o", "b", "b", "i", "n", "s", " ", "o", "n", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "l", "a", "w", "y", "e", "r", " ", "f", "o", "r", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "t", "a", "x", "p", "a", "y", "e", "r", "s", " ", ".", " ", "t", "h", "i", "s", " ", "c", "a", "s", "e", " "]}}
{"audio_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.A-13-717.2014-07-09.mp3", "identifier": "gov.uscourts.cafc.A-13-717", "text_document_id": "gov.uscourts.cafc.A-13-717.2014-07-09.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14770, 14590, 14070, 14920, 14920, 14920, 14770, 14970, 14920, 14920, 14950, 14950, 14980, 13900, 14980, 14020, 14950, 14950, 14820, 14680, 14740, 14460, 14950, 14670, 14710, 14950, 14860, 14490, 14910, 14950, 14830, 14620, 14980, 14440, 14760, 14830, 14920, 14770, 14850, 14620, 14950, 14740, 14850, 14680, 14250, 14440, 14410, 14880, 14320, 14740, 14920, 14910, 14830, 14760, 14980, 14980, 14200, 14860, 14980, 14860, 14640, 14950, 14590, 14910, 14410], "label": ["for this court to overturn that funny especially given the owner standard of review it must surmount but the jury never had a fair opportunity to consider the southern ninety six patent because it just records clean constructions fundamentally", "compromised the case that the cells are allowed to present to the germs let me understand exactly what you're arguing and that relates to the out general verdict rule yes i understand what that concept means ", "presupposes that to the extent that we would have erm any of the limitations you would have a good faith ability to argue from love that that those limitations are satisfied", "the court would have to send it back for a new trial because it's possible that the jury found that after self satisfied the two other women titian's two other terms even if construed by the district court me give you an example", "jury could not have found i mean really i think what their position is asking this court to do is to invade the province of the jury because we have a general finding of non infringement but but it is nevertheless quite possible that the jury agreed with us on to t", "three terms that simply disagreed with the third and if this court were to set aside one of those terms then i think you have to send it back because the standard under the teller facts capital cases this court has to be able to conclude that the jury", "necessary would have reached the same result and the jury in the court can't do that unless it were to find that there was no possible evidence on which the jury could have found and again looking at the evidence here there was substantial test with the whole", "destination address limitation sure and that is to i mean if if we if we agree with the district court on that claim construction is there any question at all ", "destination address and it's the machine key that actually tells you not only what the second computer is what you're trying to connect with but how to find that and that's that's a destination does now we think the district court's interpretation of that was wrong", "the the the claim says destination address it doesn't say network address so that literally the term is wrong and this and that that destroyed but if we if we agree with that just report", "was mad even if construed by the district court and there was overwhelming evidence presented by dr tiller x our expert that the destination address limitation was in that now the other claim term of another claim component that we've challenge is just a court step ordered requirement", "read brief or it argues that the server must communicate the second computer before the session key is generated now i think that that rigid step order requirement is problematic both because of the court's general rules you", "it showed that under the district court's rigid claimed order of requirement you had to run the bases you had to go to first the second to third and then who wears the expert argue that s s o's position was that the runner could go from home base to second base or then the third base and all around ", "can imagine and that demonstrative in a complex pattern case like this might resonate with the german and i think if the court agrees that the step order requirement was erroneous then i think that that tees up perfectly the general", "any one of this step that we think what accurately described and said there is no evidence that that that status is cracked right and i think if you could find it there was no evidence but i don't think you could fairly find that bec", "again dr keller expert testified that we didn't need the step or the requirement each of the steps at least under the doctrine of equivalence so i think if the court agrees that the step order itself wasn't imposed then you have to find th", "term is erroneous you'd have to i think you'd have to find prejudice against a king in a baseball diamond demonstrative which was shown to the jury you'd have to find prejudice and then the only question is the application of the general verdict will now on intercept and i think that there are two problems", "with the district court's claim construction one is the importation of the shim requirement which is not found in the claim language but the other is the importation of the diverting requirement the claim says intercepted and notably does not say diverting", "even though other claims do and i think if you look at the figure three in the pattern which is on page one of four of the attendant of the blue brief you can see that on the number two arrows forty and forty one", "if you go into the phone discussion of those arrows in the specification which is on page one thirteen lines forty seven to fifty six what you'll find is he arrow forty number forty which goes from the", "peer applications box down to the chin that's defined as intercepting which defense cation says hooking or intercept it which is perfectly consistent with s s l to interpretation of it to be receiving from one software module that which concerns", "well as i don't think it would i mean if it then the question would be whether or not we've met that shim apartment but again you get back to this problem that it's possible that situates argue the case and it's experts argue the case that to meet the", "intercepting term we had to show that diverting and shinned so it's possible that the jury said they haven't shown diverting even though they have shown that the wind sock which was an argument a trial for expert was actually a membership limitation and so that's it that's why i think", "under our claim constructions their central argument is that as long as this court can find that there is some evidence to support their inter the for the jury to reach an finding that the limitations were not met then the courthouse to reject their motion that's a j", "l standard it's not a new trial standard this court's new trial standard in console flex and rise and i'm quoting from thirteen twenty eight on page thirty twenty eight of toll flex the court can affirm only if there is substantial evidence supporting the verdict", "the court just can't do that on the record here because you have a general finding of non infringement and it's it's perfectly possible that the jury could have found that two of the claim terms were met that we had met a burden on them but", "but one of them was not it's the district court's claim construction we don't know which one that was it could have found that it could have found more helpful it as a self but i think that's why this case is teed up so nicely under the general verdict or news far as i", "can tell i think that the position that the general verdict rule would apply here which would seem to come very close to a situation an argument that this is a patent specific rule that this court hasn't adopted that board has applied the general", "having stated all the problems facing you place to see if your honor understand that i can't address everything in fifteen minutes or try to get right to the point first on the seven nine six patent in this case we have a thorough and well reasoned opinion from judge rewarding experience", "of destination addresses just being an identifier for a desired location is clearly wrong judge ward's construction is clearly correct the claims talks to typically in our limited to communications between computers on an open network so we're inherently talking", "about computer network communications that is as a person we're in the skilled new york in the patent would understand are a draft they have addresses they communicate between computers by address thing data that travels between the computers ", "because if you look at the rise in the services case you didn't even address whether one of the constructions was wrong because there was substantial evidence in the record to support and not infringement on the other claims instructions and", "clearly here we have more than substantial evidence to support the verdict we submit that no reasonable jury could find that a meeting id and a session id are a destination address as construed by the court which if you ", "find that know it let's say you re mandate the court's opinion say we don't remain and it's a waste of time that the jury's going to reach the same verdict we don't remember and you've even when you see there is an error in construction you look at the record to see whether the waste of time ", "basically apply the same all standards say no reasonable jury could say current but i'm right and so what i'm saying is on this record on this trial record no reasonable jury could conclude that the meeting id the session id or the machine name are the", "network address of a computer server there is no there is no evidence of the support that the cigar points to the fact that the judge at the end of the trial allowed the issue to go to the jury over are with the first in ", "ma and then we submitted a written j mark but the judge never actually ruled on the written jumala he just allowed it to go to the jury call it a pocket veto ever but we have no analysis from analysis from him of the evidence in the two well the evidence in the trial is in our", "briefs and recites how in fact we operate fundamentally differently from what's claimed our go to product never know the actual destination address of the computer they're trying to talk to because we're always talking through an intermediary serv", "all we do is send messages to the server we don't know that destination address of the second client computer so no reasonable jury could find that their expert dr kelly merely said oh it identifies the meeting the machine ", "identifies the computer he never said it is in fact a network address and it is not and i submit the record is very clear on that from that it flows it if there is no destination address if they can't win on destination address they", "can't win on the phrase quote intercepting a destination address regardless of how you interpret the word intercepting i agree that a shame is required i submit that judge ward was correct in", "or diverting so those things should be affirmed but if the thing they accuse of being a destination address is not a destination address we can't in french a matter how you do intercept thing and likewise the step order becomes irrelevant because ", "can't infringe a step order or a lack of a step or you just don't infringe so destination address we submit is the way through the we don't have to go into a lengthy discussion the general verdict will we have the facts we have the correct playing the destruction", "awarded there was a similar case which we cite in which the court said well maybe there should have been a prevailing partner but it was within the court's discretion to deny seize and in that case we've really more or less argued that it's within the court's scr", "here regardless of whether or not there should be a prevailing party because we actually won the bigger patent and they they won the little one but yes they did get some relief we also got really so i don't know if that answers your question ", "intercepting oh so with respect to the case law i wanted to just point again to variety in services and the ecolab case where this court was clear that the burden is on them to prove ", "they're only argued for prejudices to say oh well the judge should have adopted our construction and under our construction we're president of a never say that we have met our burden under ecolab of showing that there is not harmless and they don't try to do", "so your honor again here if this had been briefed we would have gone into it if they had tried to argue that but when soccer is clearly should win second shelf as shown in the patent figure to as being part of the prior art it's not a shim and it didn't function as a shim in our devices", "because as we say we're fundamentally different since we're always designed to connect to the server and communicate only with the server we never have to intercept anything all of our data flows down the stack exactly as it's supposed to without any", "intercepting any subverting it's designed to go to our server it goes to our server and so there is no basis for saying under intercepting in this record which we explain our facts in detail an introduction there's no basis for finding th", "but regardless of whether that's the case the issues were close enough and the evidence was disputed between experts about that clearly our defenses were reasonable recently judge she came up with a decision in april from ", "eight discloses the mutual up medication we point to it you have the documents in front of you you can look at them you can see that from the specification of the patent so the applications layer is defined as being what's above the t", "yes i believe i have it i'm not i don't know the answer the question but i believe it is still been over and in that it is a question reasonless is positive is a question of law what would a reason of personal what would a", "reasonable person have the side of the judge in his opinion never actually analyze that issue what is reasonable or not he didn't look at our evidence weigh it against their evidence he didn't do the analysis that you have done in your opinion it's so you're saying", "them directed verdict and that's because he recognized that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to reach either conclusion and there's no reason for this court to wade in there and no basis to find that there was no evidence for the jury to reach a concrete solution possible evidence", "he analyzed the issues second to just the core properly concluded that this was not even a close call there are two issues on this first is whether we meant the encrypted file or limitation the whole point of the communications here is to encrypt and here", "the defense didn't carry the day but that's not the standard that's not the issue but i think it was whether the defense was reasonable you're right your honor but i think that just a court absolutely did look at that in pages ninety five to ninety", "fact the judge skill straps finding here after sitting through the whole trial considering that means that this wasn't even a close call the last thing i would say is i don't think the court needs to reach that issue here because we when even under the de novo standard because these ", "applied the wrong analysis in the it was over and over you lost your defenses are all reasonable there wasn't a balance analysis of the evidence on both sides and he was also persuaded heavily by the fact that after the trial even though the", "patent office had of rejected these claims for a while based on our art after the trial they were rejected finally by the patent office i mean the the claims survived but also this subjective willfulness fails in any way because", "of this huge gap between their proof that they had to prove by clear and convincing evidence that we were reckless but there was no evidence that anyone involved with the accused products actually knew of the patents or had any reason to investigate them ", "accurately reported in the breach and i urge the court to look at the record citations that have been cited and confirm that they actually say what they say they say in their briefs but with respect to", "encrypt files here this is a situation where the court's construction as explained in detail by judge ward through the distinction based on the claim language between encrypting packets and ", "cobbled together as part of as their evidence of a photo of a document here where there's a little padlock that says encryption will merely encrypting data is not encrypted files based on what the court itself", "said the claim construction means are witnesses testified mr murtha who was the engineer on the product that we encrypt at the packet level the file and our expert testified that we do not nee"], "name": ["gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00041.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00042.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00043.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00044.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00045.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00046.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00047.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00048.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00049.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00050.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00051.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00052.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00053.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00054.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00055.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00056.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00057.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00058.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00059.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00060.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00061.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00062.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00063.flac", "gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717/gov_DOT_uscourts_DOT_cafc_DOT_A-13-717_DOT_2014-07-09_DOT_mp3_00064.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "f", "o", "r", " ", "t", "h", "i", "s", " ", "c", "o", "u", "r", "t", " ", "t", "o", " ", "o", "v", "e", "r", "t", "u", "r", "n", " ", "t", "h", "a", "t", " ", "f", "u", "n", "n", "y", " ", "e", "s", "p", "e", "c", "i", "a", "l", "l", "y", " ", "g", "i", "v", "e", "n", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "o", "w", "n", "e", "r"]}}
{"audio_document_id": "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy.mp3", "identifier": "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy", "text_document_id": "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy.asr.srt", "training_data": {"duration_ms": [14310, 14500, 14650, 10320, 14230, 13440, 14710, 14950, 14800, 14430, 14790, 14260, 14890, 13960, 13750, 14650, 14620, 13840, 9090, 1710, 14620, 14860, 14850, 13240, 14890, 9480, 4710, 14560, 13570, 14670, 14860, 14800, 14770, 2460, 14590, 14920, 14830, 14860, 14640, 14770, 13540, 14680, 14500, 8310], "label": ["self defense has the right as well as the responsibility of every american citizen", "no matter who he is or what his background or attitude sometimes he can protect himself as an individual but more often he must do it as a member of a group military", "organization is simply a means to accomplish that and efficiently the basic purpose of professional authority in the us navy therefore is to enable each man as part of a combination of man", "to defend himself and his country more effectively than he could through his own efforts ", "what is required of the commissioned officer carrying out the functions of authority in the naval service technical knowledge obviously basic but because the officer doesn't work with machines ", "he needs something the ability to get people to work together toward common objectives he needs to be a leader what does leadership make one thin", "all successful commander let's see what kind of man they were impulsive delivering religious forceful mike ", "scholarly decisive humorist and he was he asked a shy aggressive each was different in his own way what", "did they have in common one thing for sure they got the job done and since the job required men they got men to do the job and they got them to", "do it better in getting men to do jobs that are women recognized two essential requirement first the men must be able to do the job in this", "imam is like the machines he uses the better designed the machine the better it does its job the better a man's natural ability skill training and experience the better he can do his job", "if he wants to second then men must want to do the job like machines they need forces that can drive them to use their abilities to think to work", "those to get the job done forces that drive us all to learn and to do what we must to get what we need men like machines are driven but they're", "the similarity and while any particular machine is driven by the one kind of power for which it was designed human beings are driven by a multitude of motivating force", "others want to serve all driven by this human motive power all seeking satisfaction for their special needs and aspirations some successfully", "personality is the sum nation of all he has then all he now is and all he ever hopes to be is total ingredients for living and doing a job", "are and how they are integrated what kind of personality they produce will all have some bearing on the manner in which the individual can make an adjustment to the ever", "changing circumstances and requirements of life to the environment in which he lives and vironment doesn't mean merely a farm in new england", "or a carrier at sea it means all of the circumstances to which the individual must react", "some make no difference", "complex working or fighting equipment a sick family and over solicitous mother or even a difficult senior officer these unfavorable", "circumstances are stressed everybody is constantly seeking a reduction in the tensions caused by the stress and when a man succeeds in reducing tensions when he", "gets what he needs or is satisfied with what he gets when he can handle the uncomfortable stresses he meets he is emotionally balanced adjusted the way ", "man's personality is able to adjust to the ever changing stress in his life minute to minute hour to our day to day is the real measure of his emotional", "if he cannot handle presses of his environment he is emotionally out of balance maladjusted all of us at times show evidence of maladjustment to some", "degree in the form of minor failures depression errors of judgment inefficiency", "irritation and other deviations from ideal behav", "we all fling between adjustment and maladjusted at any point short of complete success we may give up reasonable attempts to adjust and resort to the", "unreasonable that might occur as a result of the environmental stresses becoming too tough for the personality or the personality becoming too weak for the environmental stress", "when the battle of adjustment becomes really tough we are frustrated and naturally try to escape but since physical flight is in most cases impossible we may seek a scape", "alcoholism in such flight reactions the personalities suffer or frustration may result in the fight reaction the", "environment is made to suffer such reactions are seen in irritability and in the structed behavior sometimes", "it is possible to have a mixture of both the fight and the flight reaction such as a publisher strong hand in the navy as anywhere else the fight reaction can also", "take the form of actual criminal", "irresponsible actions of any kind inevitably involve the professional interest not only of the line officer but also of the medical officer because although disciplinary problems out a line officers responsibility", "the medical officer can help prevent bad behavior and it's so bad behavior is a symptom of unsuccessful attempts to adjust to the naval and virus but you've got to realize", "furthermore in the navy a man whose needs are frustrated can resign or change his job he can gracefully escape a maladjusted sailor must either stick it out ", "psychological support both for the officer and for the men under his command military discipline itself is a primary support because it enables the individual to", "fit into an orderly system being a member of an organized group belonging sharing the responsibilities and privileges of military life offers a basis for emotional", "stability to every man and the junior officer can give his man even further psychological support by recognizing them as individuals by trying to understand the", "but the officer who ignores his man's driving needs and problems of adjustment is ignoring his own self interest on satisfied ", "an inefficient performance of duty the common denominator in all our successful naval leaders has been they got the job done", "if you are going to be a successful naval leader your men must want to do the job they will if they achieve healthy emotional balance you can help", "achieve this balance by your understanding of the adjustments necessary within the naval "], "name": ["preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00000.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00001.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00002.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00003.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00004.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00005.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00006.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00007.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00008.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00009.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00010.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00011.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00012.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00013.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00014.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00015.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00016.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00017.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00018.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00019.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00020.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00021.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00022.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00023.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00024.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00025.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00026.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00027.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00028.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00029.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00030.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00031.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00032.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00033.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00034.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00035.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00036.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00037.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00038.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00039.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00040.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00041.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00042.flac", "preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy/preventive_psychiatry_in_the_navy_DOT_mp3_00043.flac"], "raw_label": ["[", "s", "e", "l", "f", " ", "d", "e", "f", "e", "n", "s", "e", " ", "h", "a", "s", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "r", "i", "g", "h", "t", " ", "a", "s", " ", "w", "e", "l", "l", " ", "a", "s", " ", "t", "h", "e", " ", "r"]}}
{"Unnamed: 0": 0, "id": 52701, "abstract": "To describe the impact of chronic, inflammatory arthritis on parenting and to develop a conceptual framework for subsequent study of mothering.\nA qualitative, grounded theory design guided data collection and analysis. In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 12 women with either rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus who were mothers of at least 1 child living at home. Transcripts were analyzed using a systematic approach of coding and forming concepts and key categories to construct an explanatory framework. Peer checking and member checking enhanced analytical rigor.\nAnalysis of participants' experiences resulted in 4 interrelated categories describing the impact of arthritis on their role as mothers: participation in mothering tasks, best described as \"sometimes I can, sometimes I can't\"; different types and levels of support from others; the influence of the mother's arthritis on the family; and the challenge of balancing energy and fatigue. Individuals' arthritis story, life stage, their children's developmental stage, and daily routine described the context in which mothers experienced elements of each of the 4 main categories.", "conclusion": "Inflammatory arthritis has a dramatic impact on the experience of motherhood, with both positive and negative influences. The perspectives shared by study participants may inform practice regarding problem identification and adaptive strategies, and the explanatory model generated from the data proposes hypotheses for further study."}
{"Unnamed: 0": 5, "id": 2670, "abstract": "Synovial inflammation is one of the most characteristic events in different types of arthritis, including Osteoarthritis (OA). Emerging evidence also suggests the involvement of lipids in the regulation of inflammatory processes. The aim of this study was to elucidate the heterogeneity and spatial distribution of lipids in the OA synovial membrane and explore their putative involvement in inflammation.\nThe abundance and distribution of lipids were examined in human synovial membranes. To this end, histological cuts from this tissue were analysed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization - mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI). The lipidomic profile of OA synovium was characterized and compared with healthy and other forms of inflammatory arthropathies as Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) using principal component analysis and discriminant analysis methods. Lipid identification was undertaken by tandem MS analyses and database queries.\nOur results reveal differential and characteristic lipidomic profiles between OA and control samples. Specifically, we unveiled that OA synovium presents elevated levels of phosphatidylcholines, fatty acids and lysophosphatidic acids and lower levels of lysophosphatidylcholines compared to control tissues. The spatial distribution of particular glycerophospholipids was also correlated with hypertrophic, inflamed or vascularized synovial areas. Compared with other inflammatory arthritis, the OA tissue showed lower amounts of phosphatidylethanolamine-based plasmalogens.", "conclusion": "This study provides a novel insight into the lipid profiles of synovial membrane and differences in abundance between OA and control tissues. The lipidomic alterations improves understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of OA and may be important for its diagnosis."}
{"Unnamed: 0": 6, "id": 33681, "abstract": "To evaluate whether lifetime suicidal ideation with intention to act and/or suicidal behaviors reported at baseline predict risk of prospectively reporting suicidal behavior during subsequent study participation.\nData from studies using the electronic Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS) to prospectively monitor suicidal ideation and behaviors between September 2009 and May 2011 were analyzed. Studies included patients with major depressive disorder, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, epilepsy, and fibromyalgia. Records for 35,224 eC-SSRS assessments were extracted. Incomplete assessments and eC-SSRS records from patients missing a baseline assessment or with no prospective follow-up assessments were excluded. Baseline lifetime eC-SSRS reports were categorized as negative (no lifetime ideation with intent to act or prior suicidal behavior) or positive (lifetime ideation with intent to act but no prior behavior, no ideation with intent to act but prior behavior, or both lifetime ideation with intent and prior behavior).\n3,776 patients completed a baseline and 1 or more follow-up assessments. The mean follow-up period was 64 days. Of patients with negative lifetime reports, 2.4% subsequently reported suicidal behavior during study participation, compared to 12.0% of patients with lifetime ideation with intent only (OR = 5.55; 95% CI, 2.65-11.59), 9.6% of patients with lifetime behavior only (OR = 4.33; 95% CI, 2.94-6.39), and 18.3% of patients with both (OR = 9.13; 95% CI, 6.47-12.88). Sensitivity and specificity of positive reports for identifying suicidal behaviors were 0.67 and 0.76, respectively.", "conclusion": "Patients reporting lifetime suicidal ideation with intent to act and/or prior suicidal behavior at baseline are 4 to 9 times more likely to prospectively report suicidal behavior during study participation."}
{"Unnamed: 0": 7, "id": 54489, "abstract": "To investigate whether disease control can be achieved in early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by treatment with methotrexate and intraarticular betamethasone, and whether the addition of cyclosporine to the regimen has any additional effect.\nPatients (n = 160) were randomized to receive methotrexate 7.5 mg/week plus cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg of body weight/day (combination therapy) or methotrexate plus placebo-cyclosporine (monotherapy). At weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 and every 4 weeks thereafter, betamethasone was injected into swollen joints (maximum 4 joints or 4 ml per visit). Beginning at week 8, if synovitis was present, the methotrexate dosage was increased stepwise up to 20 mg/week, with a subsequent stepwise increase in the cyclosporine or placebo-cyclosporine dosage up to 4 mg/kg.\nAt 52 weeks, 20% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) was achieved in 85% of the combination therapy group versus 68% of the monotherapy group (P = 0.02). The median individual overall ACR response (ACR-N) in the 2 groups was 80.0% (interquartile range 40.1-91.8%) and 54.5% (interquartile range 2.4-87.8%), respectively (P = 0.025). At 48 and 52 weeks, ACR remission criteria were met in 35% of the combination therapy group and 28% of the monotherapy group. Progression in the Larsen score at 52 weeks was -0.2 +/- 6.5 and 0.4 +/- 6.9 (mean +/- SD) in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively. Serum creatinine levels increased by 7%, and hypertrichosis was more prevalent, in the combination therapy group.", "conclusion": "Combined treatment with methotrexate and intraarticular glucocorticoid showed excellent disease control and stopped the progression of erosions in patients with early active RA, who had a poor prognosis. Addition of cyclosporine improved the ACR20 and ACR-N responses, whereas the ACR50 and ACR70 responses, remission rates, and radiographic changes did not differ between the 2 study groups."}
{"Unnamed: 0": 8, "id": 52531, "abstract": "Electrogustometry is used as a measurement of taste perception. The prevailing theory is that the anodal current delivered to the tongue mucosa stimulates the sour taste receptors, but this is not universally accepted. Our aim was to evaluate to what extent electrogustometry relates to an ability to detect sour taste--rather than sweet, salt, or bitter.\nWe compared automated electrogustometric thresholds with visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings of various tastant solutions in 114 subjects. The whole mouth, and each side of the tongue were tested separately. VAS scores from the strongest set of solutions, and the lowest electrogustometry thresholds for each location were used for statistics.\nThere was a significant correlation between electrogustometry threshold and the whole mouth perception of the salt taste solution. Electrogustometry correlated significantly but weakly for all taste qualities when testing was confined to left and right oral tongue. The positive predictive values of electrogustometry were no better in relation to sour taste perception than to the other taste qualities.", "conclusion": "Our results do not support the theory that electrogustometry is mediated by sour taste receptors or even that it reflects the sour taste quality. We postulate that electrogustometry measures a function of taste perception, which is different from that induced by chemical stimuli."}
{"Unnamed: 0": 0, "repository_name": "getsentry/libsourcemap", "func_path_in_repository": "libsourcemap/highlevel.py", "func_name": "View.get_original_function_name", "whole_func_string": "def get_original_function_name(self, line, col, minified_name,\n minified_source):\n \"\"\"Given a token location and a minified function name and the\n minified source file this returns the original function name if it\n can be found of the minified function in scope.\n \"\"\"\n # Silently ignore underflows\n if line < 0 or col < 0:\n return None\n minified_name = minified_name.encode('utf-8')\n sout = _ffi.new('const char **')\n try:\n slen = rustcall(_lib.lsm_view_get_original_function_name,\n self._get_ptr(), line, col, minified_name,\n minified_source, sout)\n if slen > 0:\n return _ffi.unpack(sout[0], slen).decode('utf-8', 'replace')\n except SourceMapError:\n # In some rare cases the library is/was known to panic. We do\n # not want to report this upwards (this happens on slicing\n # out of range on older rust versions in the rust-sourcemap\n # library)\n pass", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def get_original_function_name(self, line, col, minified_name,\n minified_source):\n \"\"\"Given a token location and a minified function name and the\n minified source file this returns the original function name if it\n can be found of the minified function in scope.\n \"\"\"\n # Silently ignore underflows\n if line < 0 or col < 0:\n return None\n minified_name = minified_name.encode('utf-8')\n sout = _ffi.new('const char **')\n try:\n slen = rustcall(_lib.lsm_view_get_original_function_name,\n self._get_ptr(), line, col, minified_name,\n minified_source, sout)\n if slen > 0:\n return _ffi.unpack(sout[0], slen).decode('utf-8', 'replace')\n except SourceMapError:\n # In some rare cases the library is/was known to panic. We do\n # not want to report this upwards (this happens on slicing\n # out of range on older rust versions in the rust-sourcemap\n # library)\n pass", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'get_original_function_name', '(', 'self', ',', 'line', ',', 'col', ',', 'minified_name', ',', 'minified_source', ')', ':', '# Silently ignore underflows', 'if', 'line', '<', '0', 'or', 'col', '<', '0', ':', 'return', 'None', 'minified_name', '=', 'minified_name', '.', 'encode', '(', \"'utf-8'\", ')', 'sout', '=', '_ffi', '.', 'new', '(', \"'const char **'\", ')', 'try', ':', 'slen', '=', 'rustcall', '(', '_lib', '.', 'lsm_view_get_original_function_name', ',', 'self', '.', '_get_ptr', '(', ')', ',', 'line', ',', 'col', ',', 'minified_name', ',', 'minified_source', ',', 'sout', ')', 'if', 'slen', '>', '0', ':', 'return', '_ffi', '.', 'unpack', '(', 'sout', '[', '0', ']', ',', 'slen', ')', '.', 'decode', '(', \"'utf-8'\", ',', \"'replace'\", ')', 'except', 'SourceMapError', ':', '# In some rare cases the library is/was known to panic. We do', '# not want to report this upwards (this happens on slicing', '# out of range on older rust versions in the rust-sourcemap', '# library)', 'pass']", "func_documentation_string": "Given a token location and a minified function name and the\n minified source file this returns the original function name if it\n can be found of the minified function in scope.", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Given', 'a', 'token', 'location', 'and', 'a', 'minified', 'function', 'name', 'and', 'the', 'minified', 'source', 'file', 'this', 'returns', 'the', 'original', 'function', 'name', 'if', 'it', 'can', 'be', 'found', 'of', 'the', 'minified', 'function', 'in', 'scope', '.']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/getsentry/libsourcemap/blob/94b5a34814fafee9dc23da8ec0ccca77f30e3370/libsourcemap/highlevel.py#L163-L185"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 1, "repository_name": "brocade/pynos", "func_path_in_repository": "pynos/versions/ver_7/ver_7_1_0/yang/brocade_mac_address_table.py", "func_name": "brocade_mac_address_table.get_mac_address_table_input_request_type_get_interface_based_request_mac_type", "whole_func_string": "def get_mac_address_table_input_request_type_get_interface_based_request_mac_type(self, **kwargs):\n \"\"\"Auto Generated Code\n \"\"\"\n config = ET.Element(\"config\")\n get_mac_address_table = ET.Element(\"get_mac_address_table\")\n config = get_mac_address_table\n input = ET.SubElement(get_mac_address_table, \"input\")\n request_type = ET.SubElement(input, \"request-type\")\n get_interface_based_request = ET.SubElement(request_type, \"get-interface-based-request\")\n mac_type = ET.SubElement(get_interface_based_request, \"mac-type\")\n mac_type.text = kwargs.pop('mac_type')\n\n callback = kwargs.pop('callback', self._callback)\n return callback(config)", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def get_mac_address_table_input_request_type_get_interface_based_request_mac_type(self, **kwargs):\n \"\"\"Auto Generated Code\n \"\"\"\n config = ET.Element(\"config\")\n get_mac_address_table = ET.Element(\"get_mac_address_table\")\n config = get_mac_address_table\n input = ET.SubElement(get_mac_address_table, \"input\")\n request_type = ET.SubElement(input, \"request-type\")\n get_interface_based_request = ET.SubElement(request_type, \"get-interface-based-request\")\n mac_type = ET.SubElement(get_interface_based_request, \"mac-type\")\n mac_type.text = kwargs.pop('mac_type')\n\n callback = kwargs.pop('callback', self._callback)\n return callback(config)", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'get_mac_address_table_input_request_type_get_interface_based_request_mac_type', '(', 'self', ',', '*', '*', 'kwargs', ')', ':', 'config', '=', 'ET', '.', 'Element', '(', '\"config\"', ')', 'get_mac_address_table', '=', 'ET', '.', 'Element', '(', '\"get_mac_address_table\"', ')', 'config', '=', 'get_mac_address_table', 'input', '=', 'ET', '.', 'SubElement', '(', 'get_mac_address_table', ',', '\"input\"', ')', 'request_type', '=', 'ET', '.', 'SubElement', '(', 'input', ',', '\"request-type\"', ')', 'get_interface_based_request', '=', 'ET', '.', 'SubElement', '(', 'request_type', ',', '\"get-interface-based-request\"', ')', 'mac_type', '=', 'ET', '.', 'SubElement', '(', 'get_interface_based_request', ',', '\"mac-type\"', ')', 'mac_type', '.', 'text', '=', 'kwargs', '.', 'pop', '(', \"'mac_type'\", ')', 'callback', '=', 'kwargs', '.', 'pop', '(', \"'callback'\", ',', 'self', '.', '_callback', ')', 'return', 'callback', '(', 'config', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Auto Generated Code", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Auto', 'Generated', 'Code']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/brocade/pynos/blob/bd8a34e98f322de3fc06750827d8bbc3a0c00380/pynos/versions/ver_7/ver_7_1_0/yang/brocade_mac_address_table.py#L297-L310"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 2, "repository_name": "nicolargo/glances", "func_path_in_repository": "glances/plugins/glances_memswap.py", "func_name": "Plugin.update_views", "whole_func_string": "def update_views(self):\n \"\"\"Update stats views.\"\"\"\n # Call the father's method\n super(Plugin, self).update_views()\n\n # Add specifics informations\n # Alert and log\n self.views['used']['decoration'] = self.get_alert_log(self.stats['used'], maximum=self.stats['total'])", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def update_views(self):\n \"\"\"Update stats views.\"\"\"\n # Call the father's method\n super(Plugin, self).update_views()\n\n # Add specifics informations\n # Alert and log\n self.views['used']['decoration'] = self.get_alert_log(self.stats['used'], maximum=self.stats['total'])", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'update_views', '(', 'self', ')', ':', \"# Call the father's method\", 'super', '(', 'Plugin', ',', 'self', ')', '.', 'update_views', '(', ')', '# Add specifics informations', '# Alert and log', 'self', '.', 'views', '[', \"'used'\", ']', '[', \"'decoration'\", ']', '=', 'self', '.', 'get_alert_log', '(', 'self', '.', 'stats', '[', \"'used'\", ']', ',', 'maximum', '=', 'self', '.', 'stats', '[', \"'total'\", ']', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Update stats views.", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Update', 'stats', 'views', '.']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/nicolargo/glances/blob/5bd4d587a736e0d2b03170b56926841d2a3eb7ee/glances/plugins/glances_memswap.py#L130-L137"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 3, "repository_name": "DLR-RM/RAFCON", "func_path_in_repository": "source/rafcon/gui/helpers/meta_data.py", "func_name": "contains_geometric_info", "whole_func_string": "def contains_geometric_info(var):\n \"\"\" Check whether the passed variable is a tuple with two floats or integers \"\"\"\n return isinstance(var, tuple) and len(var) == 2 and all(isinstance(val, (int, float)) for val in var)", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def contains_geometric_info(var):\n \"\"\" Check whether the passed variable is a tuple with two floats or integers \"\"\"\n return isinstance(var, tuple) and len(var) == 2 and all(isinstance(val, (int, float)) for val in var)", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'contains_geometric_info', '(', 'var', ')', ':', 'return', 'isinstance', '(', 'var', ',', 'tuple', ')', 'and', 'len', '(', 'var', ')', '==', '2', 'and', 'all', '(', 'isinstance', '(', 'val', ',', '(', 'int', ',', 'float', ')', ')', 'for', 'val', 'in', 'var', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Check whether the passed variable is a tuple with two floats or integers", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Check', 'whether', 'the', 'passed', 'variable', 'is', 'a', 'tuple', 'with', 'two', 'floats', 'or', 'integers']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/DLR-RM/RAFCON/blob/24942ef1a904531f49ab8830a1dbb604441be498/source/rafcon/gui/helpers/meta_data.py#L55-L57"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 4, "repository_name": "ejeschke/ginga", "func_path_in_repository": "ginga/gtk3w/ImageViewGtk.py", "func_name": "ImageViewGtk.save_plain_image_as_file", "whole_func_string": "def save_plain_image_as_file(self, filepath, format='png', quality=90):\n \"\"\"Used for generating thumbnails. Does not include overlaid\n graphics.\n \"\"\"\n pixbuf = self.get_plain_image_as_pixbuf()\n options, values = [], []\n if format == 'jpeg':\n options.append('quality')\n values.append(str(quality))\n pixbuf.savev(filepath, format, options, values)", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def save_plain_image_as_file(self, filepath, format='png', quality=90):\n \"\"\"Used for generating thumbnails. Does not include overlaid\n graphics.\n \"\"\"\n pixbuf = self.get_plain_image_as_pixbuf()\n options, values = [], []\n if format == 'jpeg':\n options.append('quality')\n values.append(str(quality))\n pixbuf.savev(filepath, format, options, values)", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'save_plain_image_as_file', '(', 'self', ',', 'filepath', ',', 'format', '=', \"'png'\", ',', 'quality', '=', '90', ')', ':', 'pixbuf', '=', 'self', '.', 'get_plain_image_as_pixbuf', '(', ')', 'options', ',', 'values', '=', '[', ']', ',', '[', ']', 'if', 'format', '==', \"'jpeg'\", ':', 'options', '.', 'append', '(', \"'quality'\", ')', 'values', '.', 'append', '(', 'str', '(', 'quality', ')', ')', 'pixbuf', '.', 'savev', '(', 'filepath', ',', 'format', ',', 'options', ',', 'values', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Used for generating thumbnails. Does not include overlaid\n graphics.", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Used', 'for', 'generating', 'thumbnails', '.', 'Does', 'not', 'include', 'overlaid', 'graphics', '.']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/ejeschke/ginga/blob/a78c893ec6f37a837de851947e9bb4625c597915/ginga/gtk3w/ImageViewGtk.py#L75-L84"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 5, "repository_name": "poppy-project/pypot", "func_path_in_repository": "pypot/vrep/remoteApiBindings/vrep.py", "func_name": "simxClearFloatSignal", "whole_func_string": "def simxClearFloatSignal(clientID, signalName, operationMode):\n '''\n Please have a look at the function description/documentation in the V-REP user manual\n '''\n\n if (sys.version_info[0] == 3) and (type(signalName) is str):\n signalName=signalName.encode('utf-8')\n return c_ClearFloatSignal(clientID, signalName, operationMode)", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def simxClearFloatSignal(clientID, signalName, operationMode):\n '''\n Please have a look at the function description/documentation in the V-REP user manual\n '''\n\n if (sys.version_info[0] == 3) and (type(signalName) is str):\n signalName=signalName.encode('utf-8')\n return c_ClearFloatSignal(clientID, signalName, operationMode)", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'simxClearFloatSignal', '(', 'clientID', ',', 'signalName', ',', 'operationMode', ')', ':', 'if', '(', 'sys', '.', 'version_info', '[', '0', ']', '==', '3', ')', 'and', '(', 'type', '(', 'signalName', ')', 'is', 'str', ')', ':', 'signalName', '=', 'signalName', '.', 'encode', '(', \"'utf-8'\", ')', 'return', 'c_ClearFloatSignal', '(', 'clientID', ',', 'signalName', ',', 'operationMode', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Please have a look at the function description/documentation in the V-REP user manual", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Please', 'have', 'a', 'look', 'at', 'the', 'function', 'description', '/', 'documentation', 'in', 'the', 'V', '-', 'REP', 'user', 'manual']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/poppy-project/pypot/blob/d9c6551bbc87d45d9d1f0bc15e35b616d0002afd/pypot/vrep/remoteApiBindings/vrep.py#L900-L907"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 6, "repository_name": "cloudify-cosmo/repex", "func_path_in_repository": "repex.py", "func_name": "Repex.find_matches", "whole_func_string": "def find_matches(self, content, file_to_handle):\n \"\"\"Find all matches of an expression in a file\n \"\"\"\n # look for all match groups in the content\n groups = [match.groupdict() for match in\n self.match_expression.finditer(content)]\n # filter out content not in the matchgroup\n matches = [group['matchgroup'] for group in groups\n if group.get('matchgroup')]\n\n logger.info('Found %s matches in %s', len(matches), file_to_handle)\n # We only need the unique strings found as we'll be replacing each\n # of them. No need to replace the ones already replaced.\n return list(set(matches))", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def find_matches(self, content, file_to_handle):\n \"\"\"Find all matches of an expression in a file\n \"\"\"\n # look for all match groups in the content\n groups = [match.groupdict() for match in\n self.match_expression.finditer(content)]\n # filter out content not in the matchgroup\n matches = [group['matchgroup'] for group in groups\n if group.get('matchgroup')]\n\n logger.info('Found %s matches in %s', len(matches), file_to_handle)\n # We only need the unique strings found as we'll be replacing each\n # of them. No need to replace the ones already replaced.\n return list(set(matches))", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'find_matches', '(', 'self', ',', 'content', ',', 'file_to_handle', ')', ':', '# look for all match groups in the content', 'groups', '=', '[', 'match', '.', 'groupdict', '(', ')', 'for', 'match', 'in', 'self', '.', 'match_expression', '.', 'finditer', '(', 'content', ')', ']', '# filter out content not in the matchgroup', 'matches', '=', '[', 'group', '[', \"'matchgroup'\", ']', 'for', 'group', 'in', 'groups', 'if', 'group', '.', 'get', '(', \"'matchgroup'\", ')', ']', 'logger', '.', 'info', '(', \"'Found %s matches in %s'\", ',', 'len', '(', 'matches', ')', ',', 'file_to_handle', ')', \"# We only need the unique strings found as we'll be replacing each\", '# of them. No need to replace the ones already replaced.', 'return', 'list', '(', 'set', '(', 'matches', ')', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Find all matches of an expression in a file", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Find', 'all', 'matches', 'of', 'an', 'expression', 'in', 'a', 'file']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/cloudify-cosmo/repex/blob/589e442857fa4a99fa88670d7df1a72f983bbd28/repex.py#L605-L618"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 7, "repository_name": "mariocj89/github-token", "func_path_in_repository": "github_token/__init__.py", "func_name": "TokenFactory.create", "whole_func_string": "def create(self):\n \"\"\"Creates a token\n\n It uses the app_name as the notes and the scopes are\n the permissions required by the application. See those\n in github when configuring an app token\n\n Raises a TFARequired if a two factor is required after\n the atempt to create it without having call tfa before\n \"\"\"\n headers = dict()\n if self.tfa_token:\n headers[\"X-GitHub-OTP\"] = self.tfa_token\n token_name = self.app_name + platform.node() # node specific in case the user has multiple hosts\n payload = dict(note=token_name, scopes=self.scopes)\n response = requests.post(\n self.api_url + \"authorizations\", auth=(self.user, self.password),\n headers=headers, json=payload\n )\n\n if response.status_code == 401 and \"required\" in response.headers.get(\"X-GitHub-OTP\", \"\"):\n raise TFARequired(\"TFA required for the user\")\n if response.status_code == 422:\n raise AlreadyExistsError(\"APP already exists. Please delete {} token\".format(token_name))\n if response.status_code == 401:\n raise BadPassword(\"Bad User/Password\")\n response.raise_for_status()\n return response.json()[\"token\"]", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def create(self):\n \"\"\"Creates a token\n\n It uses the app_name as the notes and the scopes are\n the permissions required by the application. See those\n in github when configuring an app token\n\n Raises a TFARequired if a two factor is required after\n the atempt to create it without having call tfa before\n \"\"\"\n headers = dict()\n if self.tfa_token:\n headers[\"X-GitHub-OTP\"] = self.tfa_token\n token_name = self.app_name + platform.node() # node specific in case the user has multiple hosts\n payload = dict(note=token_name, scopes=self.scopes)\n response = requests.post(\n self.api_url + \"authorizations\", auth=(self.user, self.password),\n headers=headers, json=payload\n )\n\n if response.status_code == 401 and \"required\" in response.headers.get(\"X-GitHub-OTP\", \"\"):\n raise TFARequired(\"TFA required for the user\")\n if response.status_code == 422:\n raise AlreadyExistsError(\"APP already exists. Please delete {} token\".format(token_name))\n if response.status_code == 401:\n raise BadPassword(\"Bad User/Password\")\n response.raise_for_status()\n return response.json()[\"token\"]", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'create', '(', 'self', ')', ':', 'headers', '=', 'dict', '(', ')', 'if', 'self', '.', 'tfa_token', ':', 'headers', '[', '\"X-GitHub-OTP\"', ']', '=', 'self', '.', 'tfa_token', 'token_name', '=', 'self', '.', 'app_name', '+', 'platform', '.', 'node', '(', ')', '# node specific in case the user has multiple hosts', 'payload', '=', 'dict', '(', 'note', '=', 'token_name', ',', 'scopes', '=', 'self', '.', 'scopes', ')', 'response', '=', 'requests', '.', 'post', '(', 'self', '.', 'api_url', '+', '\"authorizations\"', ',', 'auth', '=', '(', 'self', '.', 'user', ',', 'self', '.', 'password', ')', ',', 'headers', '=', 'headers', ',', 'json', '=', 'payload', ')', 'if', 'response', '.', 'status_code', '==', '401', 'and', '\"required\"', 'in', 'response', '.', 'headers', '.', 'get', '(', '\"X-GitHub-OTP\"', ',', '\"\"', ')', ':', 'raise', 'TFARequired', '(', '\"TFA required for the user\"', ')', 'if', 'response', '.', 'status_code', '==', '422', ':', 'raise', 'AlreadyExistsError', '(', '\"APP already exists. Please delete {} token\"', '.', 'format', '(', 'token_name', ')', ')', 'if', 'response', '.', 'status_code', '==', '401', ':', 'raise', 'BadPassword', '(', '\"Bad User/Password\"', ')', 'response', '.', 'raise_for_status', '(', ')', 'return', 'response', '.', 'json', '(', ')', '[', '\"token\"', ']']", "func_documentation_string": "Creates a token\n\n It uses the app_name as the notes and the scopes are\n the permissions required by the application. See those\n in github when configuring an app token\n\n Raises a TFARequired if a two factor is required after\n the atempt to create it without having call tfa before", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Creates', 'a', 'token']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/mariocj89/github-token/blob/8ca85fa51a52aef94cfb4f851eb229ee500bc28f/github_token/__init__.py#L81-L108"}
{"Unnamed: 0": 8, "repository_name": "brycedrennan/eulerian-magnification", "func_path_in_repository": "eulerian_magnification/base.py", "func_name": "combine_pyramid_and_save", "whole_func_string": "def combine_pyramid_and_save(g_video, orig_video, enlarge_multiple, fps, save_filename='media/output.avi'):\n \"\"\"Combine a gaussian video representation with the original and save to file\"\"\"\n width, height = get_frame_dimensions(orig_video[0])\n fourcc = cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*'MJPG')\n print(\"Outputting to %s\" % save_filename)\n writer = cv2.VideoWriter(save_filename, fourcc, fps, (width, height), 1)\n for x in range(0, g_video.shape[0]):\n img = np.ndarray(shape=g_video[x].shape, dtype='float')\n img[:] = g_video[x]\n for i in range(enlarge_multiple):\n img = cv2.pyrUp(img)\n\n img[:height, :width] = img[:height, :width] + orig_video[x]\n res = cv2.convertScaleAbs(img[:height, :width])\n writer.write(res)", "language": "python", "func_code_string": "def combine_pyramid_and_save(g_video, orig_video, enlarge_multiple, fps, save_filename='media/output.avi'):\n \"\"\"Combine a gaussian video representation with the original and save to file\"\"\"\n width, height = get_frame_dimensions(orig_video[0])\n fourcc = cv2.VideoWriter_fourcc(*'MJPG')\n print(\"Outputting to %s\" % save_filename)\n writer = cv2.VideoWriter(save_filename, fourcc, fps, (width, height), 1)\n for x in range(0, g_video.shape[0]):\n img = np.ndarray(shape=g_video[x].shape, dtype='float')\n img[:] = g_video[x]\n for i in range(enlarge_multiple):\n img = cv2.pyrUp(img)\n\n img[:height, :width] = img[:height, :width] + orig_video[x]\n res = cv2.convertScaleAbs(img[:height, :width])\n writer.write(res)", "func_code_tokens": "['def', 'combine_pyramid_and_save', '(', 'g_video', ',', 'orig_video', ',', 'enlarge_multiple', ',', 'fps', ',', 'save_filename', '=', \"'media/output.avi'\", ')', ':', 'width', ',', 'height', '=', 'get_frame_dimensions', '(', 'orig_video', '[', '0', ']', ')', 'fourcc', '=', 'cv2', '.', 'VideoWriter_fourcc', '(', '*', \"'MJPG'\", ')', 'print', '(', '\"Outputting to %s\"', '%', 'save_filename', ')', 'writer', '=', 'cv2', '.', 'VideoWriter', '(', 'save_filename', ',', 'fourcc', ',', 'fps', ',', '(', 'width', ',', 'height', ')', ',', '1', ')', 'for', 'x', 'in', 'range', '(', '0', ',', 'g_video', '.', 'shape', '[', '0', ']', ')', ':', 'img', '=', 'np', '.', 'ndarray', '(', 'shape', '=', 'g_video', '[', 'x', ']', '.', 'shape', ',', 'dtype', '=', \"'float'\", ')', 'img', '[', ':', ']', '=', 'g_video', '[', 'x', ']', 'for', 'i', 'in', 'range', '(', 'enlarge_multiple', ')', ':', 'img', '=', 'cv2', '.', 'pyrUp', '(', 'img', ')', 'img', '[', ':', 'height', ',', ':', 'width', ']', '=', 'img', '[', ':', 'height', ',', ':', 'width', ']', '+', 'orig_video', '[', 'x', ']', 'res', '=', 'cv2', '.', 'convertScaleAbs', '(', 'img', '[', ':', 'height', ',', ':', 'width', ']', ')', 'writer', '.', 'write', '(', 'res', ')']", "func_documentation_string": "Combine a gaussian video representation with the original and save to file", "func_documentation_tokens": "['Combine', 'a', 'gaussian', 'video', 'representation', 'with', 'the', 'original', 'and', 'save', 'to', 'file']", "split_name": "train", "func_code_url": "https://github.com/brycedrennan/eulerian-magnification/blob/9ae0651fe3334176300d183f8240ad36d77759a9/eulerian_magnification/base.py#L108-L122"}
{"text": "\"Orange Is the New Black\" star Yael Stone is renouncing her U.S. green card to return to her native Australia in order to fight climate change.", "news_link": "https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/australian-actress-yael-stone-giving-up-green-card-fight-climate-change", "outlet": "Fox News", "topic": "environment", "type": "right", "label": 0, "label_opinion": "Entirely factual", "biased_words": "[]"}
{"text": "\"We have one beautiful law,\" Trump recently said in his characteristically bizarre syntax and diction, repeating the word \"beautiful.\"", "news_link": "https://www.alternet.org/2020/06/law-and-order-is-a-debased-concept-used-to-cover-up-right-wing-crime-and-depravity-heres-why/", "outlet": "Alternet", "topic": "gun control", "type": "left", "label": 1, "label_opinion": "Somewhat factual but also opinionated", "biased_words": "['bizarre', 'characteristically']"}
{"texts": ["This invention relates to a three-ring binder having an actuating crank.", "\nMany modem ring binder mechanisms have actuating levers for opening and closing two, three or more rings. ", "In some such devices, the levers also lock the rings closed. ", "The typical arrangement is to attach the bottoms of the ring halves to hinged plates confined between the edges of an arcuate metal housing which provides a toggling action as the plates snap between open and closed positions.", "\nOther devices have been proposed in which the rings are opened and/or closed by a cam-type mechanism. ", "Prior such constructions are seen in U.S. Pat. ", "Nos. ", "778,910, 2,494,898, 2,789,561, and 2,894,513. ", "U.S. Pat. ", "No. ", "778,910 discloses a two-ring binder which is opened by lifting the end of a lever which depresses a crank whose ends are the movable ends of the two rings. ", "It would be advantageous to have a three-ring mechanism of the crank-actuated type.", "\nAn object of the invention is to improve the operation of a crank-operated ring binder having three or more rings.", "\nThese and other objects are attained by a three-ring binder having a support plate, and at least three rings, each comprising a movable segment pivotally attached to the support plate and an immovable segment affixed to said support plate, and a mechanism for moving the rings between an open position and a closed and locked position. ", "The mechanism includes a crank pivotally supported on the support plate for oscillation about a longitudinal axis. ", "The crank has plural throws offset from the longitudinal axis. ", "The movable ring segments are integrally attached to said crank. ", "A leaf spring biases the crank toward a rings-closed position, and a manually operable lever moves the crank toward a rings-open position. ", "The lever is pivotally mounted on said support plate and depresses the throw, moving the crank towards its rings-closed position, as the lever is depressed."], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "USPTO Backgrounds"}, "scores": [0.0009389329352416098, 0.0007238934631459415, 0.0007513005984947085, 0.00102702877484262, 0.0006353480857796967, 0.0010211567860096693, 0.0008321290370076895, 0.000819933251477778, 0.0010888095712289214, 0.0013787426287308335, 0.0008504469296894968, 0.0006559147732332349, 0.0008225489291362464, 0.000652024638839066, 0.0006664380780421197, 0.0006587872048839927, 0.000823700800538063, 0.0008741981582716107, 0.0009623587829992175], "avg_score": 0.000851773338294343, "num_sents": 19}
{"texts": ["Q:\n\nHigh speed steering & wheel vibration\n\nFirst post and I'm flummoxed. ", "I have an 2009 Lexus RX350 AWD. ", "At speeds of 70-75 one can feel the steering wheel vibrate fast. ", "At 80mph(for testing purposes) it largely disappears. ", "Back down to 65 the vibration in the steering dissapates greatly but one can still feel the front wheels shake. ", "\nI've done the following:\nNew tires. ", "I had them rebalanced three times. ", "A fourth time at an independent shop. ", "No improvement. ", "Went back to the original store and had them put on two new front tires on the off chance it might be a bad set of tires. ", "Had them road force balance them too. ", "No improvements.", "\nReplaced rotors, brakes, entire front strut assembly along with lower ball joints. ", "Also replaced steering column.", "\nAlignment done after that.", "\nTook it for a drive today and no improvement. ", "Full disclosure: My mechanic at the outset said I didn't need new ball joint or struts as the whole suspension looked new almost. ", "\nSo I'm stuck as he is too. ", "Not sure what to do without throwing money at this problem. ", "Did the 12-6 & 9-3 tire test and the wheels don't jiggle or move at all.", "\nCould it be a bad set of rotors? ", "This didn't happen while I had my old tires & rotors on them prior to replacement.", "\nAny ideas? ", "Thanks.", "\n\nA:\n\nHave you tried swapping the front and rear wheels, you could have one slightly bent wheel.", "\n\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "StackExchange"}, "scores": [0.0005743143847212195, 0.0009009366622194648, 0.0006376106757670641, 0.0007101795054040849, 0.0007927831029519439, 0.0006967360968701541, 0.0006334875943139195, 0.0006245959084481001, 0.0008068117895163596, 0.0027342920657247305, 0.0007759816362522542, 0.0007739330176264048, 0.0007745782495476305, 0.0006695121992379427, 0.0006269800942391157, 0.0006270219455473125, 0.0005943728610873222, 0.0017573803197592497, 0.0028741853311657906, 0.0008267179364338517, 0.0009625187376514077, 0.0006593287107534707, 0.000795641215518117, 0.0006075192359276116, 0.0007665327866561711, 0.001994825666770339], "avg_score": 0.0009691837588504243, "num_sents": 26}
{"texts": ["Q:\n\nEmacs: Is it possible to expand/collapse single chapters?", "\n\nIn Emacs + org-mode it is possible to collapse the whole text, expand all the subtitles and all the text with SHIFT+TAB.", "\nIs it possible to expand/collapse single chapters?", "\n\nA:\n\nYes, just omit the Shift and use Tab only.", "\n\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "StackExchange"}, "scores": [0.0007834462448954582, 0.000672578695230186, 0.0007903192890807986, 0.0006570337573066354, 0.001994825666770339], "avg_score": 0.0009796407306566835, "num_sents": 5}
{"texts": ["In an earlier thread, as a Rams fan, I expressed concern with the Rams selection of Brockers because LSU players seem to underwhelm in the NFL. ", "Below is a list of LSU players who are on, or will be on, NFL rosters.", "\n\nMcClure has been a good center for the Falcons; Peterson has loads of potential as he is already one of the best return men; Landry has been solid, but only 4 career ints????; ", "Henderson has been a consistent deep threat for the Saints; while Bowe is a stud. ", "But overall, LSU players have not exactly set the NFL on fire. ", "I think the only player who receives consistent pro bowl recognition is Bowe, while Peterson may warrant that type of attention sooner rather than later.", "\n\nNow let's take a school such as Boston College, who has spent the last few years near the bottom of the weak ACC.", "\n\nI don't think it's just LSU, it's alot of big college programs. ", "USC, Texas, Florida, they seem to produce lots of busts. ", "Talented teams mask alot of individual flaws that prospects might have. ", "For example Brockers, it didn't seem to matter if he didn't push the pocket or have any pass rush moves because he's playing next to two stud pass-rushers. ", "I'm not saying he's going to bust although he wasn't my favorite prospect but at the end of the day his weakness doesn't hurt LSU as much as it would a team that didn't also have Mingo and Montgomery, therefore making everyone look better. ", "It's not that teams should just avoid these guys from powerhouse programs because that would be stupid, but I think you need to take a harder look at their flaws than you would a kid from a smaller school.", "\n\nI don't think it looks that out of the ordinary. ", "And a perfectly reasonable explanation is that high-profile schools may be more complete teams in the first place, and have great coaching to develop their players, and are more heavily scouted by NFL teams, and thus have more mediocre-to-decent roster-filler types that make the NFL, where similar guys from smaller schools may not have the kind of experience, development, coaching, and exposure that those from the big schools do.", "\n\nI don't think it's just LSU, it's alot of big college programs. ", "USC, Texas, Florida, they seem to produce lots of busts. ", "Talented teams mask alot of individual flaws that prospects might have. ", "For example Brockers, it didn't seem to matter if he didn't push the pocket or have any pass rush moves because he's playing next to two stud pass-rushers. ", "I'm not saying he's going to bust although he wasn't my favorite prospect but at the end of the day his weakness doesn't hurt LSU as much as it would a team that didn't also have Mingo and Montgomery, therefore making everyone look better. ", "It's not that teams should just avoid these guys from powerhouse programs because that would be stupid, but I think you need to take a harder look at their flaws than you would a kid from a smaller school.", "\n\nValid point. ", "But USC, Texas and Florida have produced some studs as well. ", "Troy Palomala (sp?), ", "Ryan Khalil, Clay Matthews, Brian Cushing for USC; Casey Hampton, Jamaal Charles, Jermicheal Finley, Brian Orakpo, and Earl Thomas for Texas; the Pouncy's, Dunlap, Hernandez, and Percy Harvin for Florida. ", "Granted, these schools had their share of disappointments and busts, they also appear to have more success at the pro level than LSU (though one could make a argument that Florida players are somewhat disappointing).", "\n\nTwo future Hall of Famers (Lewis and Reed), another who is well on his way (Andre Johnson), one who has Hall of Fame numbers (Reggie Wayne), one of the best running backs in the league (Frank Gore), and Pro Bowlers at one time or another such as McKinnie, Vilma, Graham, Wilfork, Rolle, Myers, Moss, Hester, and McGahee - as well as a plethora of others who are very good NFL players.", "\n\nI don't want to get too much into it, but LSU wasn't a powerhouse program in the 90s, and Miami was in the 90s and early 00s.", "\n\nLSU has, really in just the past decade or so became a national powerhouse. ", "Give LSU some time and I'm sure there list will look almost as impressive as Miami.", "\n\nMiami was producing stars at nearly every level (although it's amazing QB and O-Line never seemed to develop much) while LSU really just seems to produce DT's, DB's, a few WR's and some odd ones here and there/\n\nI don't want to get too much into it, but LSU wasn't a powerhouse program in the 90s, and Miami was in the 90s and early 00s.", "\n\nLSU has, really in just the past decade or so became a national powerhouse. ", "Give LSU some time and I'm sure there list will look almost as impressive as Miami.", "\n\nMiami was producing stars at nearly every level (although it's amazing QB and O-Line never seemed to develop much) while LSU really just seems to produce DT's, DB's, a few WR's and some odd ones here and there/\n\nGood point regarding quarterbacks. ", "Other than Kelly and perhaps Kosar, Miami never really produced top flight qbs. ", "Yeah, Testeverde played for decades, but never was the player many thought he would be.", "\n\nEven as of late, Miami has produced good players. ", "Olsen, Graham, Beason, Winston, Phillips, Shields, Franklin, and Campbell.", "\n\nLSU has not really produced too many DTs, though they have had a few good db's (Peterson and Landry being two of the better ones).", "\n\nYou may be onto something as far as LSU lacking in the pro department due to their lack of past success....look at Alabama. ", "They are not exactly supplying the NFL with Pro Bowlers. ", "Just five or six years ago, they were dismal.", "\n\nGood point regarding quarterbacks. ", "Other than Kelly and perhaps Kosar, Miami never really produced top flight qbs. ", "Yeah, Testeverde played for decades, but never was the player many thought he would be.", "\n\nLSU has not really produced too many DTs, though they have had a few good db's (Peterson and Landry being two of the better ones).", "\n\nYeah I was talking the second life of Miami football, from the 90s-2000s they havent produced any QBs.", "\n\nit's true. ", "I hate this program actually, and am still fairly bitter about buster davis and jacob hester being not just awful, but really pretty pathetic to the extent that you never thought they were even trying hard. ", "Hester actually is still on the Bolt roster despite being a fullback that takes away from the running game's potency, although will be a special teamer/backup to McClain this year.", "\n\nWe also have Scafe and Lee in camp, AJ Smith loves LSU like i loved that girl in high school who did meth, until she literally got a facial scar from a car crash. ", "Man that was insaaaane. ", "waht an apt metaphor.", "\n\nMiami has obviously produced some great pros (or at least they used to) but half the players on that Miami list absolutely suck, or are barely rosterable players.", "\n\nIt's hard to give Miami credit for \"producing\" solid pros lately because even though some of them turned out to be solid pros, they it's only because of the coaching they got once in the NFL. ", "They were raw as a turnip leaving Miami and the program did absolutely nothing to develope these players.", "\n\nA lot of the best pros that Bama produced over the years are recently retired like Chris Samuels, Shaun Alexander, etc... or were tragically killed in car accidents like Derrick Thomas was.", "\n\nAlabama has produced some of the best pros that the NFL has ever had if you go back a little... guys like Ozzie Newsome, John Hannah, Dwight Stephenson, Joe Namath, Bart Starr, Kenny Stabler, etc.", "\n\nThe more draft picks a program produces, the higher the bust percentage increases. ", "Likewise, so does the odds of produces average pros.", "\n\nAs great as Miami was in the 90's and 2000's, look at all the 1st round busts... Yatil Green, Mike Rumph, Phillip Buchanon, Jerome McDougle, Damione Lewis, William Joseph, etc. ", "Dan Morgan was a nice player but made of glass.", "\n\nRemember Randall Hill?", "\n\nYou have to produce a lot of average pros in order to produce a lot of great ones.", "\n\nTwo future Hall of Famers (Lewis and Reed), another who is well on his way (Andre Johnson), one who has Hall of Fame numbers (Reggie Wayne), one of the best running backs in the league (Frank Gore), and Pro Bowlers at one time or another such as McKinnie, Vilma, Graham, Wilfork, Rolle, Myers, Moss, Hester, and McGahee - as well as a plethora of others who are very good NFL players.", "\n\nThose great Miami teams from the late 90s to the start of the last decade also featured Clinton Portis, Edge James, Jeremy Shockey and the late great Sean Taylor.", "\n\nGo back a bit further and you'll find Warren Sapp, Michael Irvin, Cortez Kennedy, Russell Maryland, the Blades brothers and Jerome Brown (RIP). ", "Even long before the Hurricanes became a powerhouse in the 80s they still produced two HOF Raiders legends in Ted Hendricks and Jim Otto.", "\n\nI hate the LSU program for this reason. ", "There is just a lack of good-great players that come out of it. ", "Someone mentioned that it is a problem with many of the bigger schools, and that may be true. ", "A program like LSU gets a lot of hype because they have been so good the past decade, and I feel that causes people to \"fall in love\" with certain players even if they aren't that good.", "\n\nI'm going to throw out a 'correlation does not imply causation' worry here. ", "There are only so many productive NFL players at a given time. ", "Right now, LSU hasn't produced as many as they could have. ", "I think guys like Brockers, Claiborne and Randle will help change this trend.", "\n\nJust glancing over the list those guys right there were/are pretty darn good players in the NFL - most of them pro bowl or at least pro bowl quality. ", "There are a bunch of other guys on that list who are established starters in the league even if they aren't pro bowlers or stars. ", "I'm pretty positive Morris Claiborne is going to be really good as well.", "\n\nSure LSU has had a fair share of high pick busts, but so does every other school who produces that large of a volume of top picks (look at USC, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Georgia, Florida State, etc.)", "\n\nIt's been covered pretty well but when you're on a top team you get more exposure, hence guys at LSU that would've been 2nd-3rd rounders elsewhere going in round 1, same for 4th-5th rounders getting pushed up, etc\n\nBoston College is in the dumpster now but they were a very consistent, if unexciting, 8-9 win team for a very long time (save the one year with Matt Ryan where they peaked at #2 overall). ", "They get no exposure being in a pro sports town with a small fanbase\n\nMiami has obviously produced some great pros (or at least they used to) but half the players on that Miami list absolutely suck, or are barely rosterable players.", "\n\nIt's hard to give Miami credit for \"producing\" solid pros lately because even though some of them turned out to be solid pros, they it's only because of the coaching they got once in the NFL. ", "They were raw as a turnip leaving Miami and the program did absolutely nothing to develope these players."], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "Pile-CC"}, "scores": [0.0005926433368586004, 0.0006764375721104443, 0.0006425884203054011, 0.004895541816949844, 0.0075116585940122604, 0.0006605878588743508, 0.005780588369816542, 0.0007850297843106091, 0.0009390447521582246, 0.0008311138371936977, 0.002082852879539132, 0.0011553455842658877, 0.03626420348882675, 0.0007531887968070805, 0.0007055837195366621, 0.0007850297843106091, 0.0009390447521582246, 0.0008311138371936977, 0.002082852879539132, 0.0011553455842658877, 0.03626420348882675, 0.0006758341332897544, 0.0006059844745323062, 0.0006812178180553019, 0.0007990059093572199, 0.0006980716716498137, 0.0007835171418264508, 0.0006194054731167853, 0.000607887574005872, 0.0005860038800165057, 0.0006559473113156855, 0.000607887574005872, 0.0005860038800165057, 0.0007039757911115885, 0.0008080197731032968, 0.00110248988494277, 0.0006239443900994956, 0.0005913833738304675, 0.0006556813605129719, 0.0007137854699976742, 0.0008437334327027202, 0.0010700301500037313, 0.0013301963917911053, 0.0008080197731032968, 0.00110248988494277, 0.0006556813605129719, 0.0006185748497955501, 0.0007715645479038358, 0.04824451357126236, 0.0007999330409802496, 0.010069137439131737, 0.009491359815001488, 0.0026962815318256617, 0.2382190078496933, 0.0006429110071621835, 0.05790852755308151, 0.001120997010730207, 0.0007862183265388012, 0.0006957016885280609, 0.0008160084253177047, 0.0007633803179487586, 0.002589925890788436, 0.0007158768712542951, 0.0007343674078583717, 0.0007835171418264508, 0.0006104989442974329, 0.0010068268748000264, 0.0006517214933410287, 0.04945647716522217, 0.0007669557235203683, 0.0005932901403866708, 0.0007069915300235152, 0.000750933715607971, 0.0007582678226754069, 0.0007076270994730294, 0.0006161544588394463, 0.010029679164290428, 0.000815221865195781, 0.000554204685613513, 0.0006428395281545818, 0.0008473250782117248, 0.24828322231769562, 0.0006429110071621835, 0.05790852755308151], "avg_score": 0.01047699616035624, "num_sents": 84}
{"texts": ["Guibemantis punctatus\n\nGuibemantis punctatus is a species of frog in the family Mantellidae.", "\nIt is endemic to Madagascar.", "\nIts natural habitats are subtropical or tropical moist lowland forests, subtropical or tropical moist montane forests, and heavily degraded former forest.", "\nIt is threatened by habitat loss.", "\n\nSources\n Nussbaum, R., Vallan, D. & Raxworthy, C. 2004. ", " Mantidactylus punctatus. ", " 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. ", " Downloaded on 23 July 2007.", "\n\nCategory:Mantellidae\nCategory:Endemic frogs of Madagascar\nCategory:Taxonomy articles created by Polbot\nCategory:Amphibians described in 1979"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "Wikipedia (en)"}, "scores": [0.013929396867752075, 0.000633806106634438, 0.0006520174792967737, 0.001003559329546988, 0.0006618226179853082, 0.0034843645989894867, 0.0007976312772370875, 0.0006130598485469818, 0.0006438451819121838], "avg_score": 0.002491055923100147, "num_sents": 9}
{"filepath": "05bit/django-smarter/example/example/settings.py", "license": "bsd-3-clause"}
{"filepath": "05bit/django-smarter/example/example/wsgi.py", "license": "bsd-3-clause"}
{"filepath": "05bit/django-smarter/example/pages/smarter_views.py", "license": "bsd-3-clause"}
{"filepath": "0k/shyaml/shyaml.py", "license": "bsd-2-clause"}
{"filepath": "0rpc/zerorpc-python/tests/test_buffered_channel.py", "license": "mit"}
{"filepath": "0rpc/zerorpc-python/tests/test_pubpush.py", "license": "mit"}
{"filepath": "0rpc/zerorpc-python/tests/test_reqstream.py", "license": "mit"}
{"filepath": "0rpc/zerorpc-python/tests/test_server.py", "license": "mit"}
{"filepath": "0rpc/zerorpc-python/zerorpc/context.py", "license": "mit"}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000009", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["582065", "215991", "330224", "156192", "365429", "793328", "159880", "295336", "265151", "396367", "194157", "650265", "389650", "828168", "486415", "355952", "310819", "206213", "332723", "160640", "415716", "381190", "684534", "388721", "362882", "396188", "826189", "81329", "10738", "243226", "550149", "219807", "790461", "360200", "156167", "93519", "733601", "582221", "742644", "390352", "84207", "401138", "756863", "211072", "361553", "185857", "735768", "789957", "652773", "306850", "335053", "209266", "285925", "53213", "291129", "160680", "780034", "654264", "198217", "79463", "661977", "285625", "306580", "285262"], "scores": [1.2884552478790283, 1.3063839673995972, 1.3088479042053223, 1.3099493980407715, 1.311320424079895, 1.3171167373657227, 1.3206794261932373, 1.3214166164398193, 1.3253061771392822, 1.3270151615142822, 1.3289161920547485, 1.3292315006256104, 1.3332812786102295, 1.3353099822998047, 1.3364341259002686, 1.3382376432418823, 1.33876371383667, 1.3390145301818848, 1.3391145467758179, 1.3403711318969727, 1.3404855728149414, 1.34225594997406, 1.3433469533920288, 1.3449833393096924, 1.3470028638839722, 1.3476811647415161, 1.3477017879486084, 1.3486435413360596, 1.3487097024917603, 1.349446415901184, 1.3502604961395264, 1.350547194480896, 1.3505566120147705, 1.3507425785064697, 1.351544737815857, 1.3516392707824707, 1.3530492782592773, 1.3541287183761597, 1.3546342849731445, 1.3551199436187744, 1.3556945323944092, 1.3560845851898193, 1.3583111763000488, 1.3586156368255615, 1.36007559299469, 1.360088586807251, 1.3605965375900269, 1.3610832691192627, 1.361412525177002, 1.361889362335205, 1.3620247840881348, 1.3623738288879395, 1.363582968711853, 1.363997459411621, 1.3641384840011597, 1.3650097846984863, 1.3652701377868652, 1.365654706954956, 1.3657572269439697, 1.3658015727996826, 1.3658329248428345, 1.3661319017410278, 1.3667577505111694, 1.3668169975280762]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000025", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["534527", "176975", "501256", "668440", "345987", "102548", "779419", "828688", "507187", "583789", "209186", "438371", "460767", "508980", "124052", "317502", "360951", "248812", "638453", "630721", "813920", "26541", "772252", "53685", "300919", "581808", "459876", "766647", "153283", "619531", "696996", "247871", "616658", "614780", "506448", "168830", "558937", "176005", "186109", "207138", "592657", "799834", "360765", "523512", "417043", "129953", "362168", "488396", "535782", "310684", "791543", "90571", "475888", "354657", "221180", "624394", "102794", "551821", "46296", "550168", "448418", "598606", "270952", "465038"], "scores": [1.2661043405532837, 1.2704639434814453, 1.2708475589752197, 1.2720515727996826, 1.273223876953125, 1.2755937576293945, 1.276221513748169, 1.2770389318466187, 1.2772921323776245, 1.2781078815460205, 1.2781802415847778, 1.2783933877944946, 1.2796344757080078, 1.2805325984954834, 1.2809730768203735, 1.2818338871002197, 1.2824445962905884, 1.2828271389007568, 1.2833843231201172, 1.2836670875549316, 1.2837705612182617, 1.2840067148208618, 1.2840187549591064, 1.2843711376190186, 1.285168170928955, 1.2857258319854736, 1.2858483791351318, 1.285884141921997, 1.2861251831054688, 1.2868375778198242, 1.2871198654174805, 1.287183165550232, 1.2871843576431274, 1.2875932455062866, 1.287761926651001, 1.2877776622772217, 1.2880277633666992, 1.28804612159729, 1.288135290145874, 1.2881410121917725, 1.2882357835769653, 1.2884026765823364, 1.2886468172073364, 1.2891452312469482, 1.289926528930664, 1.28997802734375, 1.290113091468811, 1.2903316020965576, 1.2904102802276611, 1.2905622720718384, 1.2909348011016846, 1.2911640405654907, 1.2913389205932617, 1.2915642261505127, 1.2918239831924438, 1.292011022567749, 1.2920713424682617, 1.292531132698059, 1.2926645278930664, 1.2927228212356567, 1.2929155826568604, 1.293004035949707, 1.2932122945785522, 1.293562650680542]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000030", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["634544", "75648", "648703", "702428", "825937", "579199", "665895", "510285", "656816", "113864", "380990", "210046", "20312", "636000", "491090", "631446", "108590", "143126", "518801", "777378", "325470", "167529", "538485", "695774", "242908", "56484", "658710", "725044", "84759", "606955", "170844", "214661", "151430", "121715", "701216", "171718", "533233", "767222", "363880", "800438", "352371", "749754", "403356", "184923", "603376", "50292", "476288", "329344", "110693", "604123", "676319", "307134", "808556", "20858", "277656", "820786", "65172", "18479", "964", "404109", "634785", "803024", "766336", "215217"], "scores": [1.3028939962387085, 1.3226580619812012, 1.3286895751953125, 1.3289709091186523, 1.333465576171875, 1.3344395160675049, 1.334511637687683, 1.3384711742401123, 1.3391828536987305, 1.3421803712844849, 1.342660903930664, 1.3435206413269043, 1.3441386222839355, 1.345314860343933, 1.3458170890808105, 1.3463172912597656, 1.346458077430725, 1.3464818000793457, 1.347360610961914, 1.3476113080978394, 1.3483507633209229, 1.3505847454071045, 1.3509471416473389, 1.3514668941497803, 1.352384328842163, 1.3525686264038086, 1.3526320457458496, 1.3528629541397095, 1.353197455406189, 1.353243112564087, 1.3536403179168701, 1.3542197942733765, 1.354602575302124, 1.354935884475708, 1.3549541234970093, 1.3566479682922363, 1.3570570945739746, 1.357654333114624, 1.3578823804855347, 1.3590433597564697, 1.3594963550567627, 1.359966516494751, 1.3611036539077759, 1.3611128330230713, 1.3612042665481567, 1.3615621328353882, 1.3619661331176758, 1.3620319366455078, 1.3620675802230835, 1.362444519996643, 1.3628146648406982, 1.363154649734497, 1.3633878231048584, 1.3633968830108643, 1.3634437322616577, 1.363490343093872, 1.363499641418457, 1.3635646104812622, 1.3638017177581787, 1.3641160726547241, 1.3641754388809204, 1.3642933368682861, 1.3645977973937988, 1.3651471138000488]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000034", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["324276", "106746", "747796", "25131", "308760", "118382", "273138", "288955", "9154", "43794", "667110", "31156", "795558", "595854", "519142", "629167", "402710", "498505", "805879", "374733", "188364", "817480", "766285", "808183", "587268", "19791", "403382", "546381", "8912", "69402", "523715", "220571", "469687", "89324", "197191", "265611", "31476", "425892", "423231", "615681", "223857", "796821", "424230", "242512", "240196", "731223", "271895", "298259", "141369", "8048", "762371", "557870", "379121", "773823", "251571", "281937", "534322", "261740", "3146", "554079", "381728", "699197", "49001", "403646"], "scores": [1.2632079124450684, 1.275144100189209, 1.27689790725708, 1.2807000875473022, 1.2966054677963257, 1.3058629035949707, 1.3072515726089478, 1.309650182723999, 1.3113210201263428, 1.311659812927246, 1.3140383958816528, 1.314652681350708, 1.3148140907287598, 1.3149867057800293, 1.3153507709503174, 1.315711259841919, 1.3166981935501099, 1.317467451095581, 1.3185851573944092, 1.3188397884368896, 1.3211438655853271, 1.3211438655853271, 1.321802020072937, 1.3231438398361206, 1.3232665061950684, 1.3242141008377075, 1.3242552280426025, 1.3248052597045898, 1.3248794078826904, 1.3252854347229004, 1.3254306316375732, 1.325645923614502, 1.3259787559509277, 1.3259854316711426, 1.3268177509307861, 1.3271903991699219, 1.3273494243621826, 1.3273935317993164, 1.3274959325790405, 1.327651023864746, 1.327796220779419, 1.328201174736023, 1.3282866477966309, 1.3286774158477783, 1.3294005393981934, 1.329838752746582, 1.3300294876098633, 1.3300879001617432, 1.330188512802124, 1.33036470413208, 1.330806016921997, 1.3312737941741943, 1.3316917419433594, 1.3317923545837402, 1.3318253755569458, 1.3320281505584717, 1.3322603702545166, 1.3324253559112549, 1.3325767517089844, 1.3327175378799438, 1.3329603672027588, 1.3329815864562988, 1.3331704139709473, 1.333237886428833]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000036", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["556653", "556899", "475504", "137277", "504461", "744620", "559824", "98339", "358120", "302699", "498365", "519700", "596219", "290139", "810796", "176335", "612904", "93800", "138735", "185009", "727576", "574269", "582643", "165442", "395214", "606781", "154", "1366", "152510", "52", "358757", "358099", "11412", "304091", "287128", "87791", "219638", "289065", "761931", "743762", "34428", "113865", "519979", "552549", "42927", "407706", "739541", "692978", "133448", "536100", "177007", "5908", "590597", "740930", "731524", "710604", "148992", "516199", "282955", "108786", "494286", "734756", "326410", "773977"], "scores": [1.2455265522003174, 1.2763911485671997, 1.310253381729126, 1.3115888833999634, 1.3122107982635498, 1.3129743337631226, 1.3142189979553223, 1.3216395378112793, 1.3239270448684692, 1.3268076181411743, 1.327538251876831, 1.329742431640625, 1.3312878608703613, 1.3332716226577759, 1.3335440158843994, 1.3337409496307373, 1.3388992547988892, 1.339381217956543, 1.3396040201187134, 1.3435287475585938, 1.3437293767929077, 1.3446288108825684, 1.3446669578552246, 1.3448528051376343, 1.3452260494232178, 1.345529317855835, 1.3458530902862549, 1.3463690280914307, 1.3465919494628906, 1.3478635549545288, 1.347869634628296, 1.3478929996490479, 1.3483015298843384, 1.3484536409378052, 1.3485221862792969, 1.3494585752487183, 1.3500562906265259, 1.3506412506103516, 1.3511542081832886, 1.3513908386230469, 1.3514487743377686, 1.3515366315841675, 1.3517926931381226, 1.3521699905395508, 1.352400302886963, 1.3524789810180664, 1.3526771068572998, 1.3529728651046753, 1.353013038635254, 1.353289008140564, 1.3534682989120483, 1.3544929027557373, 1.354668140411377, 1.3553850650787354, 1.3555830717086792, 1.3565558195114136, 1.3567936420440674, 1.3568612337112427, 1.3569633960723877, 1.3569722175598145, 1.357534408569336, 1.3575414419174194, 1.3577262163162231, 1.359050989151001]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000049", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["420448", "426370", "755695", "435478", "170205", "671269", "220252", "227586", "109203", "764279", "708588", "712536", "762473", "311421", "648030", "190621", "569721", "312288", "323319", "336117", "357460", "733771", "113412", "50915", "813502", "223504", "288317", "158871", "135540", "772403", "197302", "217191", "228734", "310896", "312984", "180897", "311202", "70859", "826483", "376029", "643706", "735435", "517444", "375570", "343898", "157011", "506128", "319110", "743072", "541479", "353029", "671793", "455063", "785888", "95539", "814987", "751674", "533241", "483261", "504556", "546665", "199719", "577231", "620602"], "scores": [1.3301100730895996, 1.3382487297058105, 1.3412833213806152, 1.3486576080322266, 1.349642038345337, 1.3534417152404785, 1.3564727306365967, 1.3573708534240723, 1.3576948642730713, 1.3586969375610352, 1.3654427528381348, 1.3655238151550293, 1.36579430103302, 1.3663164377212524, 1.3669912815093994, 1.367233395576477, 1.36946702003479, 1.3699092864990234, 1.3708029985427856, 1.370854139328003, 1.3720450401306152, 1.3730359077453613, 1.373281717300415, 1.373610258102417, 1.37470281124115, 1.3762673139572144, 1.3765459060668945, 1.3766889572143555, 1.377941370010376, 1.3784477710723877, 1.3785442113876343, 1.3786169290542603, 1.3787047863006592, 1.3790020942687988, 1.3790396451950073, 1.3799529075622559, 1.3802584409713745, 1.3810019493103027, 1.3816430568695068, 1.3819314241409302, 1.3824760913848877, 1.382495641708374, 1.3825082778930664, 1.3825452327728271, 1.382602334022522, 1.3831158876419067, 1.383199691772461, 1.383520483970642, 1.3837684392929077, 1.3845887184143066, 1.3854014873504639, 1.3861383199691772, 1.3864670991897583, 1.3865482807159424, 1.3870635032653809, 1.3876941204071045, 1.3876943588256836, 1.3880305290222168, 1.3880537748336792, 1.3882163763046265, 1.3882501125335693, 1.3885420560836792, 1.388659954071045, 1.3888444900512695]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000061", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["461217", "624196", "208444", "178492", "789996", "641826", "638016", "388449", "245958", "170184", "588000", "166435", "102849", "157813", "131410", "759102", "113053", "186060", "51846", "444940", "165221", "117757", "739918", "375053", "796751", "614356", "299236", "378523", "746288", "495546", "736474", "329144", "240792", "176773", "297949", "316110", "637959", "742366", "257806", "755921", "20060", "119593", "104731", "514909", "101188", "127969", "179449", "455584", "486763", "101955", "744046", "591266", "85065", "617326", "378489", "28798", "153356", "79171", "519538", "619756", "652390", "397308", "753779", "708331"], "scores": [1.3039182424545288, 1.309073567390442, 1.3106297254562378, 1.3110103607177734, 1.3128304481506348, 1.315749168395996, 1.3231391906738281, 1.3236981630325317, 1.3247926235198975, 1.329176902770996, 1.3308494091033936, 1.3331378698349, 1.334326148033142, 1.3345677852630615, 1.3360552787780762, 1.3363654613494873, 1.3377357721328735, 1.3382034301757812, 1.3388488292694092, 1.3390164375305176, 1.339721918106079, 1.3405190706253052, 1.341900110244751, 1.3459155559539795, 1.3468142747879028, 1.3473658561706543, 1.3515574932098389, 1.3520026206970215, 1.3520500659942627, 1.3527626991271973, 1.3529810905456543, 1.354210615158081, 1.3545695543289185, 1.3550145626068115, 1.3554260730743408, 1.3554713726043701, 1.3558158874511719, 1.357409954071045, 1.3579506874084473, 1.3590891361236572, 1.3619797229766846, 1.3625555038452148, 1.3627583980560303, 1.3635406494140625, 1.3637927770614624, 1.3646998405456543, 1.3669722080230713, 1.3678779602050781, 1.3691151142120361, 1.369804859161377, 1.3699853420257568, 1.3712995052337646, 1.3715338706970215, 1.372525691986084, 1.3727633953094482, 1.3732879161834717, 1.3733301162719727, 1.3742952346801758, 1.3756842613220215, 1.3759130239486694, 1.3767385482788086, 1.3773125410079956, 1.3777824640274048, 1.3786957263946533]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000064", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["40648", "34183", "680044", "470150", "143776", "103613", "677710", "630694", "132239", "113938", "810723", "102425", "339926", "213967", "467168", "670402", "237004", "698294", "559313", "104690", "459057", "242491", "696836", "143206", "475460", "695852", "98818", "22612", "758977", "131777", "40333", "121955", "705143", "157033", "70151", "644795", "128308", "270260", "473093", "566033", "346571", "161795", "593033", "459597", "710807", "563876", "290407", "262010", "818153", "164447", "5255", "27955", "482290", "79387", "462793", "586227", "36759", "718445", "206752", "189076", "598117", "451362", "434222", "28300"], "scores": [1.249140977859497, 1.2598676681518555, 1.2653179168701172, 1.273016333580017, 1.2748874425888062, 1.277044415473938, 1.2789644002914429, 1.280686855316162, 1.28248929977417, 1.284339427947998, 1.2872761487960815, 1.2876425981521606, 1.2950235605239868, 1.2975953817367554, 1.2983052730560303, 1.301156997680664, 1.3025856018066406, 1.3029170036315918, 1.304098129272461, 1.3050566911697388, 1.3050928115844727, 1.305708408355713, 1.307482361793518, 1.308119773864746, 1.3092740774154663, 1.310002326965332, 1.3108729124069214, 1.3114027976989746, 1.3128392696380615, 1.3131569623947144, 1.3132776021957397, 1.3148118257522583, 1.3148322105407715, 1.3156206607818604, 1.315704345703125, 1.3159478902816772, 1.3160614967346191, 1.3163330554962158, 1.3174936771392822, 1.3183941841125488, 1.3184411525726318, 1.3184928894042969, 1.3195003271102905, 1.320530891418457, 1.3206685781478882, 1.3211050033569336, 1.3211442232131958, 1.3215994834899902, 1.3217538595199585, 1.3220877647399902, 1.3233060836791992, 1.3233956098556519, 1.3243284225463867, 1.3245553970336914, 1.3247536420822144, 1.325488805770874, 1.3256261348724365, 1.3258991241455078, 1.3259094953536987, 1.3262379169464111, 1.3264377117156982, 1.326446533203125, 1.3268814086914062, 1.3270293474197388]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000071", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["590391", "85679", "463823", "293603", "9193", "502757", "521651", "765175", "328464", "146985", "746994", "474964", "586793", "551690", "781740", "162296", "574574", "445076", "819886", "514203", "611687", "344593", "491324", "197566", "499373", "277122", "270824", "268352", "151028", "437586", "804016", "159221", "692069", "755730", "503464", "435933", "672681", "752065", "239362", "546674", "275190", "503588", "313461", "58229", "340924", "824428", "541848", "680164", "155609", "494939", "676115", "755520", "84682", "358468", "790198", "454964", "136762", "354358", "36978", "556855", "803678", "249619", "522626", "156994"], "scores": [1.3883346319198608, 1.3976781368255615, 1.39847731590271, 1.402411937713623, 1.4034432172775269, 1.4078559875488281, 1.4101030826568604, 1.415566325187683, 1.4157824516296387, 1.4163968563079834, 1.4167025089263916, 1.4171488285064697, 1.4174261093139648, 1.4181675910949707, 1.418772578239441, 1.4191224575042725, 1.4194130897521973, 1.4201946258544922, 1.4204328060150146, 1.4205043315887451, 1.4210560321807861, 1.421372413635254, 1.4216725826263428, 1.4219540357589722, 1.4220219850540161, 1.422426462173462, 1.4225002527236938, 1.422874093055725, 1.4241831302642822, 1.4247047901153564, 1.4247186183929443, 1.4249942302703857, 1.4252820014953613, 1.4254705905914307, 1.4255058765411377, 1.4257922172546387, 1.425933837890625, 1.4265398979187012, 1.4265940189361572, 1.426675796508789, 1.4267942905426025, 1.426912546157837, 1.4274792671203613, 1.428155779838562, 1.428178310394287, 1.4281861782073975, 1.4283647537231445, 1.4285261631011963, 1.4286127090454102, 1.4290025234222412, 1.4290413856506348, 1.4291284084320068, 1.4291822910308838, 1.429194450378418, 1.4292426109313965, 1.4294607639312744, 1.4296488761901855, 1.429685354232788, 1.4298064708709717, 1.429847002029419, 1.4300485849380493, 1.4300636053085327, 1.4302699565887451, 1.430478811264038]}
{"image id": "COCO_train2014_000000000072", "source dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_train_2014_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "target dataset": "carlosejimenez/mscoco_2014_train_captions_openai_clip-vit-base-patch32", "retrieved examples": ["777137", "196783", "290647", "161251", "310096", "313276", "264626", "590027", "514392", "55336", "600131", "52302", "166033", "310684", "245512", "619531", "319061", "107749", "267800", "21789", "496421", "489090", "558937", "592657", "306482", "85934", "243508", "641894", "739449", "476141", "266095", "77667", "307557", "755098", "401457", "583210", "820923", "85445", "761548", "714746", "260591", "29877", "157844", "473630", "460104", "264119", "304616", "572768", "161517", "598766", "368891", "294762", "255904", "386804", "513624", "521124", "23910", "125979", "257381", "699084", "501256", "553789", "360663", "360765"], "scores": [1.3147164583206177, 1.3249201774597168, 1.3266935348510742, 1.327178955078125, 1.3278048038482666, 1.3286381959915161, 1.3296146392822266, 1.3298320770263672, 1.33101224899292, 1.3319778442382812, 1.3327882289886475, 1.3333580493927002, 1.3339641094207764, 1.334998369216919, 1.3364753723144531, 1.3364989757537842, 1.3372654914855957, 1.3375332355499268, 1.3376357555389404, 1.3382644653320312, 1.3385567665100098, 1.339188814163208, 1.3399981260299683, 1.341151237487793, 1.341158151626587, 1.3412926197052002, 1.3413612842559814, 1.3421037197113037, 1.3423973321914673, 1.3424103260040283, 1.3428974151611328, 1.3430500030517578, 1.343410611152649, 1.3436901569366455, 1.343719244003296, 1.343828558921814, 1.3450396060943604, 1.3450615406036377, 1.345467448234558, 1.3456923961639404, 1.3460581302642822, 1.3460766077041626, 1.3461289405822754, 1.3462073802947998, 1.3463528156280518, 1.346524715423584, 1.3466064929962158, 1.3468952178955078, 1.3469396829605103, 1.3472089767456055, 1.3475186824798584, 1.3477416038513184, 1.3479808568954468, 1.3480291366577148, 1.34820556640625, 1.3482083082199097, 1.3486729860305786, 1.349092960357666, 1.3491170406341553, 1.349288821220398, 1.34977126121521, 1.3498010635375977, 1.3498878479003906, 1.3500111103057861]}
{"source": "Afterall there will be an endless battle between the technology and human mentality.", "output": "After all, there will be an endless battle between the technology and human mentality.", "grammer": [3, 4, 3, 4, 3], "fluency": [3, 4, 3, 4, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 4, 4, 3], "system": "lstm,cnn", "ave_g": 3.4, "ave_f": 3.4, "ave_m": 3.6}
{"source": "In addition, the national defense will be endangered if this tracking proposal is launched.", "output": "In addition, the national defense will be endangered if this tracking proposal is launched.", "grammer": [4, 4, 4, 4, 4], "fluency": [4, 4, 4, 4, 4], "meaning": [4, 4, 4, 4, 4], "system": "smt,copy-net,transformer,cnn", "ave_g": 4.0, "ave_f": 4.0, "ave_m": 4.0}
{"source": "Rising life expectancies can be a challenge.", "output": "Rising life expectancy can be a challenge.", "grammer": [3, 4, 4, 4, 3], "fluency": [4, 4, 4, 4, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 3, 4, 3], "system": "copy-net", "ave_g": 3.6, "ave_f": 3.8, "ave_m": 3.4}
{"source": "People in current era are described as demanding or having high level of life expectancies in another word.", "output": "People in the current era are described as demanding or having high standard of life expectancies in another word.", "grammer": [3, 4, 2, 3, 2], "fluency": [2, 4, 2, 2, 2], "meaning": [2, 4, 3, 4, 2], "system": "lstm", "ave_g": 2.8, "ave_f": 2.4, "ave_m": 3.0}
{"source": "The surveillance is a useful method to keep society's safe, but also kills the privacy of people in some degree.", "output": "Surveillance is a useful method to keep society safe, but also kills the privacy of people in some degree.", "grammer": [3, 4, 3, 3, 3], "fluency": [3, 4, 2, 3, 3], "meaning": [2, 4, 2, 4, 3], "system": "cnn", "ave_g": 3.2, "ave_f": 3.0, "ave_m": 3.0}
{"source": "And once this happens, privacy does not exist any more and people's life is under great threaten.", "output": "And once this happens, privacy does not exist any more and people's lives are under great threat.", "grammer": [4, 4, 4, 4, 3], "fluency": [4, 4, 4, 4, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 1, 4, 3], "system": "copy-net,transformer,cnn", "ave_g": 3.8, "ave_f": 3.8, "ave_m": 3.0}
{"source": "The high accuracy in utilizing surveillance technology eliminates the amount of disagreements among people.", "output": "The high accuracy in utilizing surveillance technology eliminates the amount of disagreements among people.", "grammer": [3, 4, 3, 4, 3], "fluency": [2, 4, 3, 4, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 4, 4, 3], "system": "smt,lstm,copy-net,cnn", "ave_g": 3.4, "ave_f": 3.2, "ave_m": 3.6}
{"source": "So the rising life expectancies can be regarded as a proof of what we have made to combat for ourselves.", "output": "So the rising life expectancy can be regarded as proof of what we have made to combat for ourselves.", "grammer": [3, 3, 2, 2, 4], "fluency": [2, 3, 2, 2, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 3, 4, 3], "system": "lstm,copy-net,cnn", "ave_g": 2.8, "ave_f": 2.4, "ave_m": 3.4}
{"source": "This would result in decrease in birth rate of a country which is a very serious problem,especially in more developed countries as the population has already reached a minimum.", "output": "This would result in a decrease in the birth rate of a country which is a very serious problem,especially in more developed countries as the population has already reached a minimum.", "grammer": [2, 4, 4, 4, 3], "fluency": [1, 4, 4, 4, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 3, 4, 3], "system": "transformer", "ave_g": 3.4, "ave_f": 3.2, "ave_m": 3.4}
{"source": "Even if the safety is the most important thing to consider in normal life, many people still want to keep their privacy in spite of existing some potential danger.", "output": "Even if the safety is the most important thing to consider in normal life, many people still want to keep their privacy in spite of existing some potential danger.", "grammer": [3, 3, 2, 2, 3], "fluency": [2, 3, 2, 2, 3], "meaning": [3, 4, 4, 4, 3], "system": "smt", "ave_g": 2.6, "ave_f": 2.4, "ave_m": 3.6}
{"texts": ["Q:\n\nSquid reverse proxy with optional SSL\n\nI'm trying to set up squid as a load-balancing reverse-proxy, and I'm having a bit of trouble with the SSL. ", "One of the site's applications checks to see if a site is loaded over SSL, and behaves differently if that is the case, so I need SSL connections to be proxied over SSL, and non-SSL connections to be proxied without it.", "\nRight now, the squid server accepts connections over HTTP and HTTPS, but it only makes connections over HTTP to the upstream servers.", "\nThe interesting part of my squid configuration looks like this:\nhttp_port 80 vhost vport\nhttps_port 443 vhost vport cert=/etc/cert.pem key=/etc/cert.key\ncache_peer 10.0.0.10 parent 80 0 originserver round-robin\ncache_peer 10.0.0.11 parent 80 0 originserver round-robin\n\nIs there a simple way to tell it to proxy the SSL connections upstream over SSL, while leaving the others alone?", "\n\nA:\n\nUPDATE (actually tried this from my squid...):\nacl is_ssl port 443\nhttps_port 443 cert=<yourcert> key=<yourkey> accel name=site_ssl defaultsite=<y\\\nour_external_site>\ncache_peer <your_internal_ssl> parent 443 0 no-query originserver ssl sslflags=\\\nDONT_VERIFY_PEER name=site_ssl\ncache_peer_access site_ssl allow is_ssl\ncache_peer_access site_ssl deny !", "is_ssl\n\nacl nonssl port 80\nhttp_port 80 accel defaultsite=<your_external_site> name=site_nonssl\ncache_peer <your_internal_nonssl> parent 80 0 no-query name=site_nonssl origins\\\nerver\ncache_peer_access site_nonssl allow nonssl\ncache_peer_access site_nonssl deny !", "is_nonssl\n\nORIGINAL ANSWER BELOW HERE:\nyou want something like \ncache_peer 10.0.0.11 parent 443 0 no-query originserver ssl sslflags=DONT_VERIFY_PEER name=site_ssl\nacl sites_server_3 dstdomain site_ssl\ncache_peer_access site_ssl allow ssl_servers\nhttp_access allow ssl_servers\n\n"], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "StackExchange"}, "scores": [0.0009455487597733736, 0.0006038566934876144, 0.0006806636229157448, 0.0009910997468978167, 0.01396208256483078, 0.011904271319508553, 0.0034604358952492476], "avg_score": 0.004649708371809018, "num_sents": 7}
{"texts": ["[Decanoic acid, new precursor for in vitro biosynthesis of oleic acid by a plant subcellular fraction].", "\nVarious membraneous fractions prepared from a cauliflower homogenate synthesize radioactive oleic acid when they are incubated in a 14C-decanolate solution. ", "The more active fraction is formed of vesicles sedimenting at 30,000 g x 20 mn (heavy microsomes). ", "The labelled precursor is transformed by this fraction mainly into oleic acid and hydroxyacids. ", "ATP, NADPH, CoA and oxygen are required for these reactions. ", "Labelled fatty acids, longer than lauric and (i.e. 14C-myristic, 14C-palmitic and 14C-stearic acids) are not transformed into oleic acid by the subcellular fraction studied in this paper."], "meta": {"pile_set_name": "PubMed Abstracts"}, "scores": [0.0007726195617578924, 0.0011323963990435004, 0.0007007421809248626, 0.0015637492761015892, 0.0006118602468632162, 0.0008242688491009176], "avg_score": 0.000934272752298663, "num_sents": 6}