title
stringlengths 1
115
⌀ | content
stringlengths 7
57.8k
|
|---|---|
Re: Time mag: New Orleans' White-Collar (i.e. White) Exodus
|
I think that's the plan.The city is buying up the 9th ward and making it a park zone for the next decade and most of the blacks don't have houses ,jobs or schools so are leaving for who knows where.So is the word I am getting from local residence there now.This would appear to be a prime time for whites to move in and take over. Yeah I remember seeing on CNN how they are tearing down some of the projects and replacing them with middle income housing. So in other words running out the ghetto trash and moving in civilized white people. They had a big near riot at the City Hall over it. I always thought Katrina could be a good thing for New Orleans. Like an enema. Flush out all the brown :cool: The districts that were the most hard hit were the biggest worst ghettos like the 9th ward. The nicer neighborhoods weren't as badly effected. Lots of ghetto blacks have been leaving for elsewhere like u mentioned. You're right, it could actually be a prime opportunity to save the good ole' city of New Orleans. :clink We could all move to Nola and be just like pioneers out on the frontier! Building the place back up and fighting off the natives! :D
|
Re: Time mag: New Orleans' White-Collar (i.e. White) Exodus
|
Detroit did the same thing but the TNB keeps whites out. You really can't even drive while white in Detroit. From what I hear, N.O. might be worth saving still. But you are right about Detroit. I was born and raised in south east Michigan about an hour from Detroit, and that place is GONE!! There is ZERO hope for resurrecting Detroit, it may as well have been nuked. Theres a couple blocks of downtown that has actually been fixed up pretty nice these days. But you leave that one little zone and you might as well be stepping into Liberia or Haiti, not much difference at all. I am not exaggerating. Blocks full of abandoned and burned down houses. Packs of stray ferile dogs roaming the streets. Trash everywhere, gang bangers, crack heads, winos, hookers everywhere. The place is a post apocalyptic nightmare :( This is the fate that awaits all of the rest of our country to if something isn't done about things very soon.
|
Re: If a black man saved you from death...
|
[quote=The Apple of His Eye;6119326] What would you say to them? uh..thanks? :confused:
|
Re: If a black man saved you from death...
|
[quote=The Apple of His Eye;6124098] How many black people do you guys know that you can automatically assume that this scenario isn't very probable? A ton. I'm from the Detroit area. Very familiar with the groids. Why so much concentration on preserving white nationality. Preserving the White race. Nationality doesn't mean much to me. If white people really go extinct, so will every other race. That's right, you probably couldn't survive without us. You need someone to feed you, someone to leach off of. Someone to invent new technology. Etc... But just because you loose the physical color, Race is not just skin color. I've seen plenty of Japanese and other NE Asians with skin just as White as any Caucasian. Are they racially White? :rolleyes: doesn't mean you lose the culture. Well you see the preservation of the White race itself is more important than any culture. Culture which is a product of our genetics. If you really have so little faith in your culture that you have to condense it to a physical feature, then you have no culture to preserve.[/ Race is not a social construct, society is a racial construct, culture is a product of race, a product of genetics. The Caucasian genetics must be preserved, and if you don't care if White people go extinct, then screw you and piss off you Marxist scumbag.
|
Re: Growing Herbs Indoors
|
My cousin used to do that...until the cops came and busted him:p :rofl j/k
|
Re: Latino south american/mexican/native american question..
|
If there are only 3real tribes the blacks, white, and asian. Where the hell do the latinos fit in? I know native americans are basicaly the same as asians. Does that meen people like the mexicans are decent from asians also or are latinos some hybrid of black/asian genes? Can someone better explain wtf they really are and where they fit in if there not part of the 3groups. Latino is actually a cultural term, a Latino can be of any race. That's just what they call people from Latin America regardless of their race. Some people misuse the term as a racial category. A 100% White Argentine is considered Latino just the same as a 50/50 indian/Spanish Mexican, or a mulatto from Cuba is considered Latino. It's not a racial category more of a cultural term for all people from Latin America. Mexican, is not a racial category either. The majority of Mexicans are Mestizos, they are of mixed Amerindian and White European(mostly Spanish) descent, so in other words....they're mutts. But there are also 100% pure White Mexicans and 100% purely Amerindian Mexicans. But when we think of Mexicans we think of Mestizos because they form the vast majority of the Mexican population. But with other Latin American countries it is different. For instance in Peru, Paraguay or Bolivia most of the people are Amerindians and not Mestizos. In Cuba the majority of the population is Mulatto, Black/White. So Latino is a conufusing term because some people misuse it as a racial category when it is not. For the most part, most Latinos are mutts, of mixed Amerindian/White ancestry(mestizos), Black/White(mulattos), or all of the above. But there are still millions of purely White Latinos, and also purely Amerindian and Black Latinos. Generally speaking, when we Americans think of Latinos we are thinking of bi and tri racial mongrels/mutts.
|
Re: L.A.: Black-And-Brown, And Red Blood All Over
|
From what I understand it is bordering on all out race war in LA county. It is sure to spread to every city in America, as the mestizos continue to encroach upon what the blacks perceive to be their turf ( this whole country is OUR turf ). Divide and conquer, while we grow more United every day, the blacks and mestizos will grow more divided. Even amongst themselves the Mexicans have their little norteno/sureno fueds, blacks have their blood/crip GD/Vice Lord fueds, they kill each other. How often is it you see White people killing each other?? Not very. White Americans have become so assimilated we have completely put aside all of our old fueds with each other. Irish/English English/French English/Scottish German/Polish, White Americans(real Americans) have put aside those old fueds, we are a much more cohesive race. Divide and Conquer. When the inevitable racial Civil War breaks out in years to come we will be mopping the floor with these disorganized, fueding, trespassers. I don't wish to see the situtation escalate into violence, but I think we all know that it is going to erupt into a racial Civil War at some point. I believe it is inevitable.
|
Re: A couple of thoughts:
|
[quote=Thelastholdout;6030777] Judaism is a religion. Among other things. Most of the Jews in the world are not even religious but yet they are still Jews. True, most who partake in the religion are descendants of the original Israelites, haha yeah right. They wish. The vast majority of the world's Jewish population are Ashkenazi Jews aka European Jews. They're descended from the Mongoloid Khazars and from Europeans, some of them may have a bit of actual Judean blood in them if they're lucky. The 100% pure, direct descendants of the biblical ancient Judeans of over 2,000 years ago, haw haw, yeah right. Even most modern day Italians are not pure 100% direct descendants of the ancient Romans, the ethnic Jews of today are mainly Khazar/White European mongrels and converts with absolutely no biological connection to the ancient Judeans/Israelites/Hebrews. There was a book by a Jewish Israeli professor about this very matter that was a best seller around the world and in Israel of all places! The truth about these faux Judean, Khazar/White mongrels is finally coming out and the Zionists hate it. but definitely not all. You can say that again, not even close. When someone is *only* 96 percent white, it is not practical to attempt their alienation from the WN cause if they support it totally. If someone were 4% non-White and didn't mention it we'd never even be able to tell. If they feel the need to mention it then we'll take their word for it and consider them mongrels. Why is this? Because if they were to propagate only with other white people, in keeping with their ideals, then the amount of *impure* DNA in their offspring would only be less. This dilution of any *impurities* would only continue to decrease, reaching an infinitely small amount after several generations. Therefore, having someone who's only partially white supporting your cause does not by its nature endanger it. It is a slippery slope... We can't all just start breeding left n' right with mixed breeds. In fact, alienating a potential supporter because they're not pure only serves to lessen your audience and make the *nonwhite* cause stronger, Once again, if they didn't mention it, how in the Hell would we ever know if someone was like 5% Amerindian or Turkish or Gypsy or what not? And if they mention it, then that means they identify with it and so they couldn't really be White if they identify with some small percentage of non-White DNA could they? You're either White or you're not. If someone tells me they're like 1/16 or 1/32 Cherokee, well then that's what they are, since they feel identify with it and the need to mention it then they're an indian to me:D Next, you should seriously consider anarchy as a solution that would accomodate both your side and the sides of nonwhites and anti racists. Without government Without any form of government or rules and laws at all you have absolute chaos, government and laws are the cement that keep civilization from falling apart completely. But there are racist anarchists out there. (Murdering them wouldn't be justified; we're talking strong arming them off of the property). If there was no government or law at all then who's going to stop anyone from murdering someone? It would be a madhouse I think. . . Lastly, to condemn someone based on sexual orientation is an outdated and subjective judgment that only serves to undermine the image you try to project as rational, logic utilizing people. Homosexuals produce no children and with the global population of Whites plummeting and the population of non-Whites skyrocketing we desperately need White children in this world. Homos also spread diseases like AIDS. This is because there is no objective argument for the moral depravity of consensual homosexual sex, just like there is no objective moral argument against drinking, swearing or having sex in the first place. Maybe if they keep it to themselves, within the privacy of their own homes and don't flaunt it out and about and up and down the street, making out in public and having Gay Pride parades, and promoting homosexuality like it's a cool thing and it's normal on television and such, we'd never realize they were here anyways and so wouldn't have such an issue with them.
|
Re: Russians with Crush on Sarah Palin - We Can See You Too
|
Let's see, she's white, she's pretty, and she's had 4 healthy white kids. She's not perfect, but I bet she'd at least close our borders and deport the illegals as the economy collapses. She certainly won't try to take our gun rights away. Obama will invite the third world over here to rape our sisters and daughters. So the choice is clear. 4 White kids that are part Eskimo! :p Isn't that an oxymoron? A White kid who's part Eskimo? But in other news, I've heard that the media has been calling Palin, Klondike Barbie instead of Malibu Barbie. :rofl
|
Re: How China has created a new slave empire in Africa
|
[quote=CHINA #1;5926252] And I also pride the fact that the PRC promotes Chinese phenotypes above White phenotypes. Unlike yours that promote black people over White people- Jews are not real Whites. MY people (White gentiles)do no such thing. The Jews have always been the ones who promote Blacks over Whites, always always. They just adore their pet negroes.
|
Re: How China has created a new slave empire in Africa
|
Jews and White race-traitors. But the White race traitors are just immitating the Jews, the Jews are the ones who started that Black promoting crap. Behind every famous Black musician/singer you will almost certainly find a Jewish promoter, producer and/or agent, same with all Black celebrities, and as soon as they get themselves in trouble there will be a sheister Jew lawyer there to help them out. I still can't figure if the Jews really are so in love with the Blacks or if they just do it to get back at Whitey for being so mean and anti Semitic to those poor Jews :rolleyes: White race traitors have Jewish minds. Too much talmudvision or something.
|
MODERATION
|
Hello. Well, I was placed on re-moderation back in mid February. So it has been a good 4 1/2 months now... I inquired once, and only once, as to WHY I was placed on re-moderation and I never got an answer... I do not wish to be a nuisance, that is just not my style:cool: But after nearly 5 months...I am beginning to get very sick of my posts taking hours, sometimes full days, to get through moderation. It prevents me from really being able to take part in any discussions on here. Now, I have a good idea for the Stormfront mods. An idea for a new policy. I have seen countless threads on here from people inquiring as to why they were placed on re-moderation, they usually don't seem to get an answer. So a good idea would be from now on, when users are placed on re-moderation, that the moderator who places them on re-moderation should contact them via PM and inform them as to just WHY exactly they were placed on re-moderation, and re-moderation should last for a specified number of posts. Let's say....50 good posts that don't violate any board guidelines and then you will be let off moderation. If you then again violate one of the board rules you will be on moderation for the next 100 posts. Something like this.... Then we wouldn't have to have all of these dozens of why am I on moderation and when will I be let off moderation threads cluttering up the Questions about this Board section. Now.....in the past 4 1/2 months that I have been on Re-Moderation I have probably made at least 200 posts, if not even more. As you can see from my stats I average about 7-8 a day, I post here very regularly, usually daily. And I haven't posted anything that violated any rules since I've been on re-moderation, I think I had a couple posts that didn't get past mods but I think it's because I brought up religion outside of the Theology section, but 99% of my posts since I was placed on re-moderation have gone through, although it usually takes several hours, even a full day sometimes. I think it is time I were removed from moderation so that I can participate in discussions without having to wait hours and days for my posts to show up. Also..... I demand that the moderator who put me on re-moderation in the first place tell me WHY I am on moderation. I hate it when mods won't even personally tell you it was they who put you on re-moderation and will not give you a reason as to why. So.....I demand to know which moderator it was who put me on re-moderation nearly 5 months ago and FOR WHAT REASON/S?? I think that after 4,000 posts and nearly full rep I should at least have a right to know WHO put me on re-moderation and most importantly WHY. And...if this is to be permanent. Thank you, I will patiently await a response to this thread. In the meanwhile.......I contend that I have been unjustly placed on moderation and should be taken off ASAP. If I am to be on permanent moderation for unspecified reasons I would just assume cancel my Stormfront account. But that is not something I want to do:o
|
Re: MODERATION
|
Over 24 hours later and no response. How surprising:rolleyes: Yes, it would really be nice if the moderator who put me on moderation had the common courtesy to tell me why they thought it necessary to place me on seemingly permanent moderation. Maybe there is a legitimate reason, some bad, naughty post/s I made that I am forgetting about. But in the meantime....I contend that I have been unjustly placed on seemingly permanent moderation and demand to know WHY? I mean.....if there is a legitimate reason then it's no problem. But seeing as my inquiries go unresponded to it seems to indicate that there is really no legitimate reason. Just some mod has a personal grudge against me for some reason, I cannot imagine why. I have never tried to stir up trouble on here, never, I challenge anyone to show me where and when I have tried to cause trouble......... :) Good luck with that....because I don't think I've ever done anything worse than use words like damn or hell from time to time, and I think those words are still not banned?
|
Re: MODERATION
|
Why doesn't the moderator who put me on re-moderation have the BALLS and common decency to admit to me that they put me on re-moderation and give me a reason WHY? Don't worry little man, I will not hurt you, don't be scared, I only want to know WHY? Don't have a legitimate reason? That's what I thought........;) Show me a post, any post, that I have made that would warrant permanent moderation....I DARE YOU.......:) Good luck!
|
Re: ***European Elections 2009 - News, Results, & Updates***
|
Multiculturalist morons, your time has come! http://www.artofthestate.co.uk/photos/union_jack.jpg Yes, their time is up. Globalist, multi-CULT, race-mixing, anti-British, anti-White Commie scum ask not for whom the bell tolls...it tolls for thee :cool: British Patriots, now is your time. The people have spoken! :clink
|
Re: Stay Away from Movie Theaters
|
Notorious N.I.G.? :rolleyes: http://www.patrickmoberg.com/website...n_65_600px.jpg I'm glad they shot that fat turd. He was nothing but a fat oxygen thief. He had no talent. He stole I mean sampled all of his beats/music from other people like rappers always do. Then just talked shi# over it, that's it. He was a fat, Black piece of crap. So of course...Hollywood must make him out to be some sort of hero.:rolleyes: I'm not surprised, come on now it's Jewish Hollyweird, this is what we've come to expect from them.
|
Re: Wsetern White Guy Living in E. Europe
|
Paging all WNs: if being a pure white nation is all it takes to become an advanced country, how come all Eastern European countries are poor and backward? Hellooo?? They are still recovering from nearly a century of Jewish Communism;) And I don't know of any Eastern European country that is a pure White nation. Keep your eyes on Russia, Russia is on the rise again....
|
Re: What is national animal of the western countries? Thanks.
|
I dont know if it is proper to use the term national animal here. Maybe i can raise an example. In china, the symbol is dragon. So i wonder if there are some kinds of animals in western countries . these animals have the same position as dragon. Thanks!!! Well, the national animal of the USA is the bald eagle. http://imagecache2.allposters.com/im...II-Posters.jpg http://osteros.com/eagle_american_flag.jpg
|
Re: Is white being european, or being from a select few places in Europe
|
Just wanted some opinions from different White Nationalists on the issue of European settlers to countries like Puerto Rico. The settlers to Puerto Rico were 80 percent white here are the most recent statistics 80.5% White (Spanish, French, Italian, Corsican), 8.0% Black, 0.4% Taíno, 0.2% Asian (esp. Chinese), 11% Multiracial Many other caribbean, countries such as Trinidad, and the US virgin islands were settled by Europeans. Give me your views on these people, living in America, who are from these countries, claiming to be White/European There are indeed many White Puerto Ricans, one of my best friends growing up was a White Puerto Rican. The biggest contribution to the Puerto Rican genepool by far is European, mainly Spanish. I have been to Puerto Rico once before and during my time there the majority of people I seen at least appeared to be White, maybe some or alot of them had a ni##er in the woodpile or 2 from 100 or 200 years ago and some of them may have distant Taino indian ancestry but if they do you can't tell by looking. Also, I noticed that alot of the White Puerto Ricans that I was around in PR were pretty highly racially aware and even outright racist. They talked alot of crap about the Blacks, which surprised me because I wasn't expecting that. So to me, if a Puerto Rican appears White, acts White, and says they're White then I have no choice but to take their word for it because it's not like I have the time or ability to give every single person I meet a DNA test.
|
Re: Is white being european, or being from a select few places in Europe
|
That depends if one holds the view that the spanish, most italians, greeks etc. are white to begin with. Yes, of course they are all White to begin with, what else would they be? All Europeans are White, excluding Jews, gypsies and Tatars.
|
Re: Is white being european, or being from a select few places in Europe
|
Nobody in Puerto Rico would consider someone who is 10% White to be White in a million years. If you don't look White in PR you are not considered White. I have been there and someone who looked obviously Black could never get away with saying hey guys, I look Black but I'm actually White:rofl They would not be called White, most of the White or White Puerto Ricans would probably call them a ni##er not White. At least that's what alot of them called the Blacks when I was there:D In Puerto Rico you are considered White if you look White and say you're White. But when it comes to the census info...you are whatever you choose to identify with on the census, if you're 60% White and 40% Black and you check White on the census then you show up on the census as White but in Puerto Rican society no one is going to recognize someone like this as being White. They're not that color blind down there. They're just not one droppers. They consider anyone White who appears White and identifies White and if they are actually 10% Black or something no one really cares, they don't consider that to cancel out your Whiteness. Puerto Rico definately isn't 80%pure White, no way Jose. But if you go there most of the people you will be seeing will appear White, at least they did to me, but alot of them may have distant Black ancestry, sometimes not that distant maybe 1/16 or 1/32, or some Taino blood but in Puerto Rico that is White. But then again there are plenty of purely European descended Puerto Ricans and the biggest contribution to the PR gene pool is European so it could be nearly impossible to tell the difference. Like the White Puerto Rican singer Ricky Martin, is he really 100% European? Or does he have some small percentage of Black or Taino blood? If he does I can't tell so if he says he's White then I have no choice but to believe him I guess. Alot of Puerto Ricans look as White as this.
|
Re: Is white being european, or being from a select few places in Europe
|
The non-European DNA found in Southern Spain and Portugal is basically the same as is found in Italy and Greece, it is the E3b haplotype which came from Northern Africa and is closely associated with the Berbers. E3b is THE Mediterranian Haplotype, par excellence. Below are some photographs of the Berber people of Northern Africa: As you can see, there is very little difference in the appearance of these Berbers from Morrocco and their close cousins on the opposite shore of the Mediterranean in Southern Europe. That's because unmixed Berbers are White people as far as I'm concerned. They are a White-Mediterranean race. And Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP thought so too. Usually I don't really give a crap what the NSDAP thought of anything because they also thought Slavs were not real Whites and inferior, but in the case of declaring unmixed Berbers to be White I'm in agreeance. Every Berber I've seen would fit right in in Europe, that is pure or relatively pure Berbers who are not mixed with Arab. I have an acquaintance who is an Algerian Berber but was born in Dearborn, MI and he looks as White as any European. Just because they are native to North Africa and not Europe does not mean they are non White. All Europeans are racially White but not all people who are racially White are necessarily European.
|
Re: Is white being european, or being from a select few places in Europe
|
What I see are people who are Caucasian not Negro or Oriental. The old woman is a ringer for pure-blooded German woman I knew and that little cherub she is holding looks German, too. The little girl in the middle and the family at the end could pass for Bavarian, French, etc. Again, I think the number of Caucasians on this planet have been greatly understated, especially in Hispanic countries thanks to reclassifications from what I call racial revisionists. And I believe wholeheartedly that this arbitrary one drop rule some here would have us commit to is leading to racial suicide as much as real race mixing is, because no one can say with total certainty that their line has remained 100% pure over the past thousand plus years. I agree all of the people in those photos could fit right in in Bavaria or probably any other European country aside from maybe Sweden and Norway. I grew up just outside of a small town in rural Michigan called Frankenmuth known by the nickname Little Bavaria the vast majority of the people around the area are of Bavarian descent and none of those Berbers would stand out in the crowd. I agree on the rest of the post as well. The guy in the last pic with the mustache sort of resembles my Grandfather's brother, when he was a bit younger of course, and he is verified 100%European descent.
|
Re: I am black and proud of it
|
question: i was a slave in egypt, according to my religion, and certain documentable history. how do i go to a random egyptian who had nothing to do with it and get money back? I ask because you have expertise on this area Yes, and remember, according to the afro centrists the ancient Egyptians who enslaved the Judeans were Black. So yous Jews should be demanding reparations from the Blacks. :rofl:rolleyes:
|
Re: I am black and proud of it
|
Another brilliant answer from WhiteAmericanPatriot, killing and eating each other, keep it up son, superb Black Africans are well known to have practiced cannibalism throughout history and still in the present day. The Aztecs were also cannibals, they would regularly feast on human flesh, the Spaniards were horrified by it.
|
Re: I am black and proud of it
|
But most would rather kvetch and dream up violent, unrealistic scenarios like race wars and forcibly transplanting people from their homes.:D Well...you know the Jews never in a million years thought they would get forcibly removed from Germany... Boy did they ever get a surprise! :eek: And the race war thing..we aren't going to be the ones to start it, the Blacks and Mestizos are starting it for us. In many ways it has already begun. Most White people just don't realize it.
|
Re: Proof - Euros were 1st humans in the Americas
|
Interesting.... I don't know about America. But Whites were the first to inhabit the Xinjiang region of what is present day western China. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...rn-503937.html :cool:
|
Re: Black people riot in Italy
|
Well, at least the mafiosos are finally doing something good for their country! :clink http://www.freewebs.com/augphoto/Don-Corleone.jpg
|
Re: Black people riot in Italy
|
[quote=Oh come on;5925463] Crime is ok when its white on black HELL YEA... Killing criminals, in this case...drug dealers, is not a crime at all IMO, it would be a crime not to get rid of them... It's justice. Criminals, especially Black immigrant drug pushers, should most certainly be executed. http://bestsmileys.com/dead/2.gif
|
Re: America's darkest fear: to end up like Detroit
|
If a White person walks through a Black neighborhood in Detroit(which is pretty much all of them), they will be killed or at least beaten or if they are female, raped. Hell they might even rape guys too I wouldn't put it past them haha. It's not really even a question, it is a certainty. Even if you drive through the neighborhood you will be lucky not to be dragged out of your vehicle at the red light or stop sign, or to be shot at. They attack and kill White people on sight, I'm not exaggerating. But on the other hand...downtown Detroit is actually not so bad these days, ever since the super bowl was hosted in Detroit a few years back they've fixed it up a bit. There are actually several trendy restaurants, clubs and bars downtown now and three major casinos(MGM Grand, Motor City Casino and GreekTown Casino), also Comerica Park, Jou Louis Arena and Ford Field where the Tigers, Red Wings and Lions play, and lots of White people from the suburbs hanging out. Some people like Mike Ilitch have been trying to fix the downtown up. But as for the neighborhoods..... it's looking like Mogadishu and they do assault and kill White people on sight.
|
Re: Charlton Heston Dead at 84
|
I was reading about Mr. Heston on the wikipedia just now. He seems to be a tale of two cities kind of guy, in the sixties he was as liberal as they come , he was very active in the civil rights movement. But then in the 80s it sounds like he became a completely different person, weird. Maybe he had an epiphany of sorts. Heston in the 60's.... Political activism http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...March_1963.jpg Charlton Heston (left) with Marlon Brando , James Baldwin , and Harry Belafonte at Civil Rights March 1963 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...March_1963.jpg Sydney Poitier , Harry Belafonte and Heston. In his earlier years, Heston was a liberal Democrat , campaigning for Presidential candidates Adlai Stevenson in 1956 and John F. Kennedy in 1960. A civil rights activist, he accompanied Martin Luther King Jr. during the civil rights march held in Washington, D.C. in 1963, even going so far as to wear a sign that read All Men Are Created Equal . Heston later claimed it a point of pride that he helped in the civil rights cause long before Hollywood found it fashionable, as he often says in his speeches. And...Heston in the 80's.... By the 1980s, however, Heston had begun to support more conservative positions on such issues as affirmative action and gun rights and changed his political affiliation from Democratic to Republican. He controversially praised David Duke .:clink In 1996 Charlton Heston attended the Conservative Political Action Conference , an annual gathering of conservative movement organizations. There he posed for a group photo that included Gordon Lee Baum , the founder of the Council of Conservative Citizens (CCC) and former White Citizens Council organizer.:cool:
|
Re: Charlton Heston Dead at 84
|
I love to see the number of guests we get on these kinds of threads. Come on guests, introduce yourself. We don't bite. ;) I do. grrrr :mad:
|
Re: Charlton Heston Dead at 84
|
Charlton Heston. A realWhite man has passed. May he rest in peace. He is about the last of the great White actors of he 40's, 50's and '60's. He had something in common with all of these: John Wayne Clark Gable Jimmy Stewart Henry Fonda Frank Sinatra William Holden Tyrone Power Errol Flynn Gary Cooper Steve McQueen Paul Newman All of them had BLUE eyes! Don't forget about Jimmy Cagney! And Paul Newman is half Jewish though, and self describes himself as being a Jew. Too bad. :o
|
Re: africa
|
Ohh...boo hoo hoo:( The good ole' blame Whitey for everything excuse. Mugabe has had over 20 years to straighten out Rhodesia I mean Zimbabwe. How's it going over there in Zimbabwe?;) LIBERIA and ETHIOPIA were NEVER colonized by White Europeans, never. So how are Liberia and Ethiopia doing these days?;) What about Haiti and Jamaica? Or how about Detroit and New Orleans? :rolleyes: What was sub saharan Africa like before the White man showed up in the first place? Was it paradise on Earth? Get real. Before White man arrived they were already in a perpetual state of tribal warfare, enslaving each other, living in mud and straw huts, running around naked, chucking spears at wildabeests and beating on stumps with sticks. And you know what? In much of sub saharan Black Africa that's what they are still doing! Oh, it's Whitey's fault my ass. Get real loser.
|
Re: africa
|
by the white people that forced their ancestors to America? Blacks had just as much to do with forcing your ancestors to America as Whites my confused friend. The Black tribal leaders would capture members of other tribes and SELL THEM TO White slave traders. Your own Black people captured your ancestors then sold them to the big bad White Devil. The White men weren't the ones capturing these Blacks, they were just purchasing them.
|
Re: Racist words of SF
|
Every post seems to have racist words, whats the point of useing them? They int helping our cause they int attracting people who otherwise would join. They are the reason why people still call us racist, instead of the pride we say we're all about. How can we talk about White pride on SF when a majority of people here use words that take the pride out of other races. To many WNs not all seem to still be liveing in the past. We must get rid of the hate on this site, I am a WNs who believes we must adapte to our surroundings. We need to show respect to other people who do not belong to our race. We would also like them to do the same back to us. The leaders of SF seem to not care how people represent (White nationalism) our people. They have made some strategic dessisions like the removal of the swastika. And many people complained about the swastika's removal. But what will make this site better to outsiders and many people who come on here. Would be the removal of derogatory words like ****** or spic. Those words are not helping our cause i'm sorry to say. I am not being politically correct, I am just liveing in the real world. And I know that those words are not helping us, they are one the major problems on SF. We can not call our sleves non-racist, and be about white pride if we use these words. I am just going to suggest that we WNs many who are rightfully angry at other races for their help in destroying our race, cut it out with all the ******, spic crap. We can progress our race a great deal more with out all the name calling. My question whats the point of useing them? They int helping our cause, are they ? I make a point of not saying ****** on this site, or in public, because it just doesn't sound professional. But in private I'll say ****** all I want:p Spic, what's wrong with saying spic? Spic is the proper terminology for south of the border indians and mestizo mongrels. They are officially spics. If you look up spic in the spictionary I mean dictionary you will see a spicture I mean picture of George Lopez as a prime example of what a spic looks like. Ok..so you probably won't. But they need to do that. The terms Latino and Hispanic being used to describe indians and mongrels is offensive to the real Latins which are White and real Hispanics which are White Spaniards, so the proper term for these mestizo mongrels and indians is Spics.:)
|
Re: Are we growing?
|
Not SF, but WNism in general? Maybe its just luck on my part, but lately it seems everywhere I go on the internet, theres someone expressing WN sentiments. Forums Ive frequented for years and been totally alone are getting to the point where theres a little group of us. Is anyone having similar expiriences? It sure seems like it;) I just seen flyers plastered all over the billboard at the local party store the other day advertising for the National Alliance! So good work to whoever did that :clink It seems like most working class White men I talk to have two big concerns on their mind these days, those God dam#ed Mexicans and that half breed son of a bit3h(Obama:D). I am also seeing alot of White Power graffiti appearing all over the place around here, and less wiggers. The media seems to be growing more concerned with us too that's a sure sign we're growing. I am hearing comments that are on the verge of being violently racist from people I never in a million years would've expected to hear something like that from. To make a long story short we are definately growing up where I'm at, and I'm doing my part in recruiting people to the movement everyday, and having alot of success, the fruit is ripe for the picking I tell ya! :cool:
|
Re: Is posting here a crime
|
Only in Canada! :rolleyes: Plus I would suggest you refrain from promoting violence or overthrow of government, because...I think that may land you in some trouble. :eek:
|
Re: Race Mixing It's Just Wrong
|
Race mixer I wouldn't really consider Thomas Jefferson to be a typical race mixer. He would never marry or date a black!!:eek: He did...have sexual relations with some of his female slaves...which supposedly resulted in children once or twice? But he tried to hide this from the public. Because he knew it was wrong and was no doubt embarassed and ashamed as he should be. President Jefferson had sexual relations with some of his slaves...but he would surely never have even thought of marrying a black woman! But it is to bad his careless behavior resulted in the birth of mulatto mutt bastard children on at least probably one occasion?
|
Re: Race Mixing It's Just Wrong
|
So if God put blacks and whites far apart, because they weren't supposed to mix, why did God allow them to mix then, and let people invent technology and transport to allow them to mix, and why are they mixing? Obviously the God argument is a bit weak here. They are mixing because the media promotes the idea. They try to make it look like the stylish, hip, hollywood thing to do these days. And if you think race mixing is wrong you are branded a racist oh no! And due to the end of segregation, little black boys are going to school with little white girls, they are led to believe they're all the same......they're not. Bad parenting is another cause of race mixing, I was raised right by my folks. You don't have babies with other races! I would be disowned. Maybe if I had a kid with a Mexican girl I MIGHT not be disowned because at least they have some Spanish/white blood, but black... oh definately. That is the way it should be.
|
Re: Johnny Rebel - What type of music...
|
What would you classify Johnny Rebel as? I really like the style of his music and would like to get more into it. I've read it's Cajun, but I've tried other Cajun that isn't put together as well. What are some other bands with that easy going upbeat sound? Country. But he does Cajun songs too, being that he is a genuine ragin' Cajun and all:clink But alot of Country singers have done Cajun songs. Like Hank Williams' Jambalaya(on the bayou), Johnny Paycheck did Cajun Country which is a great song. Country is more of an umbrella term for marketing convenience than a real genre anyways, there are lots of different styles that are classified under the Country/Country and Western category. Cajun music is usually marketed under the Country music category. As for other people with that sort of style. You won't be hearing much of that style in the mainstream today, mainstream just wants bubblegum cookie cutter pop music now, not real down home Country and Cajun music. But you would probably like the old classic Country and Western music and Cajun music then. Look into some old school Country and Cajun music. Lots of good ones out there.
|
Re: What are your views on Stormfront?
|
My view on Stormfront is that it's the best site on the internet by far. Stormfront rocks man! :cool:
|
Re: blacks are responsible for slavery.
|
Yes, Black tribal leaders sold the less fortunate Blacks out, just as our own rich, White elitists screwed the White working man over as well. Slavery wasn't about race it was about greed.
|
Re: 40th Anniversary of MLK Assassination
|
http://resist.com/programs/WARPhotos...ges/WAR079.jpg I hope everyone has themselves a good James Earl Ray Day. :clink
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
Please do not insult us by calling those Blacks Americans. There is no such thing as a Black Frenchman, no such thing as a Black German, a Black Englishman, and no such thing as a Black American either. Americans are White, those other people who have a little piece of social Marxist issued paper saying they're Americans are no more American than a Black with Irish citizenship is Irish.
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
maybe but you have millions of them Unfortunately:o If only George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin could see America now... a half breed negro on the verge of resting his nappy head in the White House!:eek:(they will rename it the Black House), the fore fathers of our country made it plain and clear that only WHITE men were to be American citizens, they were slave owners and unapologetic White Supremacists who believed in the superiority of the White race and inferiority of the Black race, and now we have Blacks who think they're Americans, we have negros in our government, we have a half negro about to be the President. Excuse me, I'm going to go throw up now. gag.
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
when i first started posting here my english was really bad but i think its improved alot since then. But i dont remember ever saying if i was male or not but i dont think it matter either. ANyways if you really want to know yes i am (who do you think is my display picture?) Isn't Samurai Ninja an oxymoron? Because from what I know, the Samurai and Ninja were like complete opposites, the Samurai hated the ninjas.
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
That's your personal opinion but you are not the law of the land so what you think is irrelevant to the Constitution. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. --The 14th amendment to the Consitution of the United States of America, ratified July 28, 1868. Are you familiar with the USA's original Naturalization/Immigration Act? The Naturalization Act of 1790? Which was written and signed by every one of the country's fore fathers including George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Ben Franklin? Let me familiarize you with it if not. The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103 ) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship . This law limited naturalization to aliens who were free white persons and thus left out indentured servants , slaves , free African-Americans, and later Asian Americans. The 1790 Act also limited naturalization to persons of good moral character; the law required a set period of residence in the United States prior to naturalization, specifically two years in the country and one year in the state of residence when applying for citizenship. When those requirements were met, an immigrant could file a Petition for Naturalization with any common law court of record having jurisdiction over his residence asking to be naturalized. Once convinced of the applicant’s good moral character, the court would administer an oath of allegiance to support the Constitution of the United States . The clerk of court was to make a record of these proceedings, and thereupon such person shall be considered as a citizen of the United States. Free WHITE persons, no indentured servants, no slaves, no non Whites of any kind. Bada boom, bada bing:D The intentions of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and the rest of the fore fathers of this country hold much more weight with me than any 14th ammendment which was never even properly ratified!:eek: A comprehensive list of Immigration Acts of the USA courtesy of our comrade Indo-European. https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t481792/ Those White men on Mount Rushmore were all unapologetic White Supremacists and made it well known, yes even Lincoln. Same with those White men on our currency. Blacks were purposely excluded from becoming citizens by all of the fore fathers of the USA, most of the fore fathers including Washington, Jefferson and Franklin owned Black slaves. How could a Black person ever be truly American? WHY would they want to be? This country was founded by outright White Supremacists! :eek:For Whites only!:clink
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
This is true, this is what is so great about the Constitution, it is meant to be changed whenever the people want to or need to. But until then..... that doesn't mean we will recognize it. Blacks are not Americans. Only Whites are Americans. But they can go on thinking they're Americans if they want, which I don't understand why they would want to be Americans when all of the fore founders of this country were straight out White Supremacists and slave owners who purposely excluded them from obtaining citizenship. No, the Irish didn't come here as indentured servants. Most of them just came here very poor, fleeing from the severe famine and war in Ireland. Most of them worked as cheap labor, or became gangsters unfortunately but they weren't indentured servants. Many some were, but if they were they weren't at the time they became citizens.
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
Thats pretty awesome. If a mod is reading this, I would like to have a 'Chinese Member' user title. Thanks! You don't get a Chinese Member title because you live in the US! :eek: Move to Hong Kong and then you get a title:D It would also be good if you weren't a Mao worshipping commie. All of those millions of Chinese need to stop being wimps and rise up and get rid of that commie government. Commies are not cool. But I guess it can't be worse than Capitalism:rolleyes:
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
Yep, which was even more strict than the NA of 1790 and was still restricted to free WHITE persons The United States Naturalization Act of January 29, 1795 (1 ) repealed and replaced the . The 1795 Act differed from the 1790 Act by increasing the period of required residence increased from two to five years in the , and introducing the Declaration of Intention requirement, or first papers, which created a two-step process. The Act specified that naturalized citizenship was reserved only for free white person[s]. Yep. Which was also restricted to free WHITE persons The notice time refers to how long immigrants had to wait after declaring their intent to become a citizen. The residence period refers to how long they had to live in the before they could become a citizen. The Naturalization Act is considered one of the passed contemporaneously in 1798. Like the Naturalization Act of 1790, 1795, this act also restricted citizenship to free white persons. The 14th Amendment was never properly ratified:eek: And even if it were, the intentions of the fore fathers of the US including Washington, Jefferson and Franklin mean much more to me and my Patriotic comrades than the 14th Amendment which was not properly ratified in the first place. Controversy over ratification A number of individuals argue that the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment violated of the Constitution. For instance, argues that:The Fourteenth Amendment was proposed by a rump Congress that did not include representatives and senators from most of the former Confederate states, and, had those congressmen been present, the Amendment would never have passed. Former Confederate states were counted for Article V purposes of ratification, but were not counted for Article I purposes of representation in the Congress. The ratifications of the former Confederate states were not truly free, but were coerced. For instance, many former Confederate states had their readmittance to the Union conditioned on ratifying the Fourteenth Amendment. In 1968, the Utah Supreme Court diverged from the issue in a case to express its resentment against recent decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court under the Fourteenth Amendment, and to attack the Amendment itself:In order to have 27 states ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, it was necessary to count those states which had first rejected and then under the duress of military occupation had ratified, and then also to count those states which initially ratified but subsequently rejected the proposal. To leave such dishonest counting to a fractional part of Congress is dangerous in the extreme. What is to prevent any political party having control of both houses of the Congress from refusing to seat the opposition and then without more passing a joint resolution to the effect that the Constitution is amended and that it is the duty of the Administrator of the General Services Administration to proclaim the adoption? Would the Supreme Court of the United States still say the problem was political and refuse to determine whether constitutional standards had been met? How can it be conceived in the minds of anyone that a combination of powerful states can by force of arms deny another state a right to have representation in the Congress until it has ratified an amendment which its people oppose? The Fourteenth Amendment was adopted by means almost as bad as that suggested above. The , a resolution passed by the Georgia legislature, disputed the validity of the ratification of the Amendment. But they were all Black slaves and servants living on plantations and were not American citizens, and not intended to be as you are aware of by now I'm sure. They also intended the USA to be for WHITES ONLY. Right?? Also, the 14th Amendment was not properly ratified. The Southern states were forced to accept it to be re admitted to the Union, so they were obligated because they couldn't afford to start another Civil War they had already gotten beaten bad enough the first time. The 14th Amendment is null and void to a Patriot like myself. Only Whites are truly American. If Washington, Jefferson, Jackson, Adams, Franklin etc..were here today they would never recognize a non White as an American, they would be disgraced. So how can you ever call yourself an American knowing that the men who created this country viewed you as a slave and a servant and in no way the social equal of a White man?? The answer is, you can't be American. Sorry. Your little piece of paper saying you're an American doesn't make you an American anymore than a Black Nigerian with a piece of paper saying he's French makes him a Frenchman:rolleyes: We are well aware of this. It is most unfortunate and this is why we are dedicated to the second American revolution. The White Revolution. This is no longer America. It's went too far astray from the fore father's intentions. But we are bringing America back, and you may as well begin to pack. :D Lol..equal rights...then what do you call Affirmative Action?? I call it preferential treatment based on race. Anti White racism. Equal my ass, the only way you Blacks can be equal is through race based policies such as Affirmative Action, you can only be equal if they lower the bar and practive AA. Yes, the past is gone, and the future is coming, and it's White.
|
Re: Black americans in japan
|
]...and why don't I get Chinese member title? I am biologically Chinese. Being in a different geographical location dosen't change my race:rolleyes: But you're not a Chinese citizen. You're not real Chinese unless you are a Chinese citizen. Niether Capitalism or Communism work! I am well aware of this. Stop having such a cold-war mentallity man, THAT'S not cool! The soviet union collapsed 16 years ago What cold war mentality? I said I don't think Communism could be any worse than Capitalism, does that sound like I have a bad case of the Red Scare to you:confused: Modern China isn't a true Communist nation anyhow, I don't know what the hell to call it but it surely isn't straight Communism. But whatever it is I don't like it, they still fly under the red commie flag, and they still have sweatshops all over the place I know that for sure my uncle seen them first hand on a business trip. Modern day slavery. [/quote]
|
Re: Stop buying from non-European peoples and companies
|
It seems odd that we claim to be for European ancestry, when we don't attack the slave labor and degenerate products from Asia, the Middle East, and the Americas. Paying money for products from these areas, only funds are dreaded enemies across the world, and reflect the daily hardship we face, in that our own clothing is not even nationalist. If your going to buy clothing try to buy it from your own country or another European country. Another thing is that there are a lot of mulatto around that work at stores, we should try to stop buying from companies that are controlled by Jewish and Muslim saboteurs that reap money from our pockets. There must be a limit to what we buy and take from these people's scheming hands. What are other people's thoughts, I think it would be beneficial to stop buying other countries' products. We indirectly support tyranny through clothing and services provided by the regimes. If you know of any place where I can buy products made by Whites in White countries like America and Europe, or of any major companies/corporations that are owned by non Zionist White gentiles please let me know..... :o
|
Re: White Supremacist Material, Guns Found in Illinois Bust
|
This is a good thread, but I wish people would stop parroting the MSM slur white supremacist when writing headlines for SF threads. There ought to be a rule against doing that. It's uncalled for and counter productive for us to be referring to each other as white supremacists. At least, the term should be in quotes when it's in a header. What's so bad about being a White Supremacist:confused: When you compare all of the races of man, add up all of the positive and negative attributes of each race, I think you will find that the White race comes out ahead. That is only the truth. Everyone knows it, but nobody wants to acknowledge it because it isn't Politically Correct. And like ABRAHAM LINCOLN said...so long as two races are living within the same society, by law of nature there must always be the position of superior and inferior. There is no such thing as natural equality between species, races or individuals, there are always those at the top of the food chain and those at the bottom. And I (like Abe Lincoln) would just assume the position of superior to be assigned to my own race, the White race. Nothing wrong with being a White Supremacist, IMO. It's only natural to favour your own.
|
Re: I am an Asian and I am shocked
|
I think they will go into war with Russia first just to take over the major prize of Siberia but since Russia has such a low birth rate they might as well give in to the Chinese demand!!! Quality beats Quantity my friend. :cool: One pitbull will tear apart a dozen terriers.
|
Re: Heidi Klum wants more children
|
Anybody read the Shakespeare play Othello? It's the story of a White beautiful woman married to a big Black Moor who supposedly leads White military force. In Othello there is a cunning evil character Iago, who enjoys spreading rumors, causing trouble. Iago successfully convinces Othello that his White wife, I believe her name was Desdemona was cheating on him. Same thing that enraged OJ Simpson. Othello murders his White wife in a fit of jealous rage. I think in this situation an Iago figure should be encouraged to talk to Seal. The character Othello was not supposed to be Black, just a swarthy North African Moor Arab/Berber. Shakespeare referred to him as being Black in appearance or of a Black complexion a couple times in the story but Black back then in Europe meant dark complected/swarthy, not Negroid. Like the Black Irish. Othello was never portrayed as a nijjer until the 20th century when Jewish Hollywood got involved....and now in movies and stage productions Othello tends to nearly always be portrayed as a negro. Moors were not nijjers nor was the character of Othello, dune coon yes, but not a real Black sub-saharan negro. I hate Hollywood and their BS lies and revisionism. Just like that completely out of place Black Moor in that Kevin Costner Robin Hood movie:rolleyes: In other news.....that Heidi Klum is one sick twist. That Seal critter looks like Freddy Krueger with his scarred up face, looks like he was badly scarred in a fire and he has a big gap in his teeth, as negroes so often do. What in the Hell is wrong with her?:confused: I guess models really are brainless bimbos.
|
Re: Its begun, blacks are shooting whites who display the confederate flag!
|
I wouldn't be caught dead in that shirt , no offense! I'm not caucasian , I'm White European, and so are the lot of us here. Caucasians are a mongrel people , from a mountain which consisted of dark skins. But still , the fact remains ... I'm getting tired of these things happening on a daily basis. I am so ready for something to break out , and fast!! I'm sick of waiting! (end of rant) Caucasians aren't mongrels wtf are you talking about?? Caucasians are White people. Caucasian means purely Caucasian aka White not mongrelized. Being part Caucasian does not make one a Caucasian. Only White people are Caucasian.
|
Re: An Australian question
|
From what I've seen of them...I'd have to say that Aborigines are barely even human. Saying Whites should vacate the country that they founded and built and give it back to those Aborigines is about like saying they should give control of Australia over to the kangaroos and wallabies. Same with the Amerindians, in their natural habitat they live more like animals than civilized human beings. They were living like animals when the Europeans showed up. Many of them still do live just like animals down on their reservations. They are not civilized human beings no matter how hard you wish it to be true. I don't say that to be mean and hateful and give myself some sort of superiority complex, I only say it because it is truth. http://www.oztrek.com.au/media/info/aborig.jpg Are you seriously telling me you wouldn't mind living next door to these primitives?( and that is exactly what they are lets not pretend they are as civilized as European Whites:rolleyes:). Do they really look capable of running a civilized country like Australia?:rolleyes: http://www.didjshop.com/images/Abori...layer_F450.jpg http://www.pearlbeachtravel.com/web/1eacbc1b0.jpg http://www.telegraph.co.uk/portal/gr...24/ftqi124.jpg http://www.janesoceania.com/australi...20a%20fire.jpg http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/aborigine-1.jpg Would you really like this guy to be your new neighbor? Would you like him to be the next Australian Prime Minister? http://www.tamarkin.com/gallery/edit.../Aborigine.jpg PS- That is an ironic username you have chosen. The character of Anna Karenina was a gentile. Author Leo Tolstoy was a gentile also. All of the elegance, splendor and glory of pre-Soviet, Imperial Russia which was portrayed in the book and in the numerous film versions of Anna Karenina was destroyed by your Jewish comrades. Or is that why you chose the name? A bit of ironic humour.
|
Re: An Australian question
|
White have only been able to build civilizations at the expense and exploitation of non-Whites. How do you explain Europe?:rolleyes: How did the Amerindians or Aborigines contribute to the building of American and Australian civilization? They didn't, they impeded the spread of civilization, not aided it. And all the Black slaves ever did in America was pick cotton, plow fields and clean house for some super rich, elitist, plantation owners who were only a small percentage of the American population. Also, up until 1700 the majority of slaves sent to the Americas were Irish, that's right. And they continued to use Irish slaves all the way into the 19 century, that's why the Irish used to be called White ni##ers. But no one ever wants to talk about that anymore for some reason... The truth is that without us, the White race is nothing. How do you figure? The Truth is....without us, your Black race is nothing:D Where would you be without us? Living in a mud hut, running around naked getting chased by cheetahs everyday. Wearing a bone piercing through your nose and a lip plate. Speaking in clicks. You know what the worse thing is about you Blacks? You're ungrateful, rude, ignorant, cry-babies. Or so it would seem. You have the nerve to say the White race would be nothing without non-Whites, but the fact is...without us you would be right back in the stone ages. Without us, you would be living like animals.
|
Re: An Australian question
|
White folks building America? I find it mind-boggling that some people seem to be under the delusional impression that White people have never done manual labor in the history of the world and that all White people were rich enough to own slaves and that all slaves were non-White.:rolleyes: Then why was the enslavement of West Africans necessary? Because rich, elitist plantation owners wanted free labor to work their fields and pick their cotton and clean their house. Rich, elitists who were only a tiny percentage of the American population. Believe it or not, most Whites were not rich and plowed their own fields and picked their own damn cotton and never owned a single slave in their life(gasp, shock, awe). Plus, there weren't very many slaves being used in the North if you remember correctly, and the Northern states were more developed and prosperous than the Southern states. Also, believe it or not but not all slaves in America were Black. Up until the year 1700 the main source of slaves to be used in America and the Caribbean was not West Africa, it was Ireland. After 1700 they shifted to mainly Black slaves, but Irish slaves were still used in America right up into the 1800s. Do a google search for Irish slavery, or more specifically Irish slavery in America or Irish slavery in the Caribbean. Once again White supremacists make an ignorant statement. I think what is ignorant is you thinking that all White people were rich enough to own slaves. That White people have never done hard work in the history of the world:rolleyes: And that all slaves were Black in the first place. I think it's also ignorant to believe that some Black slaves picking cotton, plowing fields and cleaning house for some rich elitists constitutes building America. Guess what, horses pulled those plows down on the rich man's, privately owned plantation, did the horses build America too? and the land was forcefully taken from Native American tribes. Actually, most of it was purchased, fair and square. The Dutch bought Manhattan for some liquor, beads and pots and pans, it isn't their fault that indians were bad businessmen. When Whites arrived in America, it was very sparsely populated. There were not that many Amerindians to begin with. Some of you people like to make it like the place was just absolutely teaming with the pesky, little red devils. They were not very numerous to begin with. North America was vastly uninhabited, plenty of room for a few White settlements. Often times, Whites would arrive and establish a settlement before they ever even seen their first redskin. Then the indians would start the fighting! They would attack the White settlements, burn them to the ground, murder, rape, and pillage. They would take babies by the ankles and swing them and smash their skulls against a wall or a tree trunk. They would scalp people. Then of course, the Whites aren't just going to sit and take that, they want revenge, so a war is started. Those little indians you people are so fond of were vicious, ruthless, brutal, two-faced, murderous savages. Ever heard the term indian giver? Yeah, well it means someone who doesn't keep their word. Someone who makes a deal and breaks it. There is a reason the term is called indian giver and not White man giver. It was the indians who wouldn't stick to their end of the bargain and follow through on their word and now you morons are making it out like it was Whites. If that were true where the hell does the term indian giver come from? Whites would purchase land from indians with some guns, horses and liquor, shake on it, pass around the peace pipe and all that, it would all be fair and square, a done deal. Then the indians would go get drunk on that same liquor, get on those same horses and take those same guns and decide to break their word and go back into the village, burn it to the ground and massacre everyone. They would collect their scalps for souvenirs and use them as currency. You morons make it out to be like they were all little innocent angels and the White folks oo they just be so evil.:rolleyes: It wasn't White people scalping, raping, smashing babies skulls, burning down villages, etc...it was indians. Our ancestors called them savages and two faced, indian givers for a damn good reason. Those red skinned savages started all of the fighting to begin with and then got their asses kicked. Now they've been crying about it for 200 years. I think after the White Revolution, we should probably just go burn their damn casinos and reservations to the ground, scalp a few of them maybe, really give them a taste of their own medicine, give them a legitimate reason to cry and complain about how EEEVIL the White folks are.:D
|
Re: An Australian question
|
I believe the best race belongs in certain countries. The best race for australia is the whites. That reminds me of something Theodore Roosevelt would say;) The most ultimately righteous of all wars is a war with savages ...it is of incalculable importance that America, Australia, and Siberia should pass out of the hands of their red, black, and yellow aboriginal owners, and become the heritage of the dominant world races. – Theodore Roosevelt, The Winning of the West: Book IV (1896) Here are some more quotes that I like from President Theodore Roosevelt... Cowardice in a race, as in an individual, is the unpardonable sin . -- Theodore Roosevelt American and Indian, Boer and Zulu, Cossack and Tartar, New Zealander and Maori, - in each case the victor, horrible though many of his deeds are, has laid deep the foundations for the future greatness of a mighty people. -- Theodore Roosevelt
|
Re: Medvedev's 70% Landslide: Russia for the Russians
|
I thought Medvedev was a Jew? It's just a rumor, no one has been able to confirm it. Look at his picture on wikipedia or something, certainly does not look Jewish, if he is it must not be 100%. I doubt if he is.
|
Re: American ethnicity?
|
I've thought about it for a while now and I was wondering if you consider white Americans an ethnicity? When the USA was founded, people like Thomas Paine wanted America to be a country of various European peoples under the banner of liberty. Considering that a lot of white Americans have an amalgam of various European ethnicities, I would say it is safe to say that a lot of white Americans can be considered a separate ethnic identity other then German, English, and so forth. I wanted to hear what other white nationalists think about the idea. We must remember that even the various European nationalities are not pure in an ethnic sense because what is French? The French gene pool is a combination of Latin, Celtic and Germanic(Frankish) ancestry, the English gene pool is mostly Germanic(Anglo-Saxon), but with Celtic, Latin/Roman and Viking admixture, the same in Italy, Spain and all throughout Europe. The different ancient European tribes got around and mixed together and overtime became what we now recognize as French, English, Italian etc... I don't see America as being any different. Over time the various European immigrant groups have generally blended together quite succesfully and formed a new White identity, nationality and hybrid ethnicity, that of the American. Generally the longer your family has been in America the more ethnically mixed you have become or in other words..the more American. There are still pockets of America in the mid west that are mostly Germanic, and ethnic communities in some of the big east coast cities that are mostly Irish or Italian or what not, but generally....Americans are a mixed bag, most Americans are a combination of several different European nationalities, the most common usually being Irish, German, English, Scottish and Italian, etc... I call this American.
|
Re: What is Wrong With Black People?
|
Why do people insist on seperating by race? Is it religious implications? Because you know Jesus was not a white man. Is it a belief of social superiority? I'm honestly curious. 1.) What makes you think Jesus was not a White man? 2.) What makes you think this Jesus guy ever existed outside of the pages of a book anyways? 3.) What makes you think I give a flying crap about this Jesus guy to begin with? 4.) Black + White = Gray. Simple really. We believe in racial separation because as hard as it may be to believe, we actually wish to preserve the racial and cultural purity of the White race, in fact, of all races, sure why not. Which is impossible to do within a multi racial, racially integrated society. 5.) What makes you think I would respect a Black man or woman? that would throw themselves at big bad Whitey's feet and beg and plead for acceptance?:rolleyes: Sorry, but I have more respect for the Blacks like Malcolm X(who was a Black Separatist by the way) who say you don't like me cause I'm Black? Then F.U.!, than some groveling little shadow of a man who would throw themselves at our feet and beg and plead for acceptance. Sorry, I just can't respect that. I doubt if you're even Black.
|
Re: Jewish group seeks to purge YouTube of anti-Semitic videos
|
The ironic thing about this is you tube and google are owned by Jews in the first place. The truth is called hate, by those who hate the truth.
|
Re: Most racist state in the nation?
|
Which state would you identify as the most racist state in the nation? The one with the most non Whites, seeing as they are the most racist people. Probably California and Texas since all of those Mestizos and Blacks out there are very racist. The states with the highest percentages of Blacks and Mestizos are the most racist, and surprisingly enough...they are the states with the highest crime rates. Go figure.
|
Re: Third Position Ideology
|
I was wondering if anyone here considers themselves a Third Positionist, and if so what would you consider the basic tenants of that ideology? Thank you and sorry about any spelling errors, using the work computer at the moment. I've always just considered third position to be a more PC nickname for Fascism. Since Fascism is neither left nor right, and at the same time both. Fascism combines different elements from both right and left to create something entirely new, the third position, the center.
|
Re: Taking back the cities, one by one
|
I agree. I don't hate cities, I just hate the way our cities have become. But you are absolutely right, our cities should be, could be? and were wonders to behold at one time in history...:( We do need to start reclaiming some territory in OUR cities. These blacks and mestizos might say ooo this is our hood but nah this whole damn country is OURS rightfully. You are right about Idaho and Montana and such being boring. Sure they are nice places, I love nature as much as anyone. But most of the young people these days are looking for the excitement of the big city not the backwoods life. We do need to start restaking our claim in the cities it's about high time ! I suggest we start with cities that are still majority white (the few there are) and cities that still have large white communities. Places like Los Angeles should be avoided like the plague, no hope for that place in my opinion. At least...not yet. White Nationalists and just white people in general should consider moving to cities like for instance: Boston, Philadelphia, West Palm Beach, Seattle, San Diego, Portland, Nashville, just to name a few. Those cities are still majority white according to statistics. And most of those cities would also make great areas to recruit more people to our cause of White Nationalism while we are at it. I believe their may yet be hope for some of our greatest or once great, cities. :clink We can't just give them away, you're right.
|
Re: Taking back the cities, one by one
|
PS- Non white infested cities are also a great place for WN's who are involved in law enforcement. You get to put lots of black and mestizo gang banging, drug dealing, pimping, scum in jail and won't be in trouble for racial profiling because there's not many whites to begin with :D The best place for a WN to operate is behind enemy lines. That's why Don Black set up shop in South Florida.
|
Re: Taking back the cities, one by one
|
There's THAT many Mexicans in Nashville? I had no idea. I know they have alot of blacks, but I thought it was still pretty white for a major American city. When I was there it was pretty nice. Just like I keep saying the blacks are the least of our priorities at this point. The Mexicans are overwhelming us and no sign of stopping. :eek: The Mexican Invasion should be our number 1 priority for the time being.
|
Re: Taking back the cities, one by one
|
Please move to New Orleans, as well! We already have a headstart with help of the hurricane. It could use people like you! I have heard alot of the blacks in Nola fled, thanks to the hurricane/flooding wiping out the ghetto neighborhoods. I have also heard more whites are actually moving 2 NO since Katrina. And parts of the city are becoming more gentrified or in other words....civilized aka white. Is this true creoleking? Or...anyone else who comes across this thread who is from NO or Loosiana. Just curious. I've never been there but always thought New Orleans seemed like it would be a great city if it wasn't overcrawling with black hood rats. :o
|
Re: Taking back the cities, one by one
|
well, down in san francisco you guys a doing a relentless job.The largest black exodus in the history of san francisco is STILL going on.it's down to about 7% black out there. Yeah to bad it's still FULL of Chinese. And most of the whites are either homos or left wing liberal race mixing socialist types. San Francisco could be such a great city to...Beautiful place, if you don't mind all of the oil and sewage in the bay. I already knew there weren't many blacks in Frisco anyways. Noob you are the black stormfronter who likes to argue and is supposedly moving to Africa right??? :rofl
|
Re: Taking back the cities, one by one
|
I was just in Detroit recently and I could see the beauty trying to wriggle out from underneath the filth on the streets. Beautiful old buildings....an art deco theater, no longer used...the Cadillac hotel...Michigan Central Station. If whites ever decided to take back Detroit, it could be among our greatest accomplishments. That is one city that needs some serious ethnic cleansing. Yep, Detroit is widely considered by architecture buffs to be home to the best Art Deco architecture anywhere in the world, even more so than NYC or Chicago. Too bad most of the old buildings are crumbling and abandoned:o Mike Ilitich and some other fat cats have actually been trying to renovate a few of them downtown. But Detroit would be the last city for whites to reclaim, Detroit, LA and probably Miami, we need to save the very worst for very last :rolleyes:
|
Re: Is sub-race real? (No Fighting Allowed in this Discussion!!)
|
Sub-races exist. I think that Whites are a sub-unit of the Caucasoid classification, actually. But it goes even deeper. In Europe, it should be Germany for Germans, Italy for Italians, etc. In America, most of us are already rather mixed. Myself, I am a German, English, Scottish, and others. Because of this, we can't divide down the lines. In America, we can only be American. America for Americans, I suppose. I agree. People do put too much emphasis on White subgroups, there are of course biological differences but the differences are usually pretty minor. There are Nordic types in Spain and southern Italy, there are Mediterranean types in Ireland and Britain. All of the old Celtic,Germanic/Nordic,Mediterranean,Slavic etc tribes really got around and all intermixed throughout Europe. So people should stop putting so much emphasis on these White subgroups and look at themselves as White Europeans. Like David Lane said: Go back 500 years or so and you have a million ancestors. A few more generations and everyone who ever trod the lands of Europe is your ancestor. Go back far enough and all Europeans and Americans, Canadians, Australians etc...of European descent are all related at some point. So we should be proud of all White/European cultures and groups. We should view ourselves as first and foremost, White. That's what WN is all about, the only true nation above all else is the White Nation, country is very important but it is secondary to the race. But each and every White/European country does have it's own unique identity, both culturally and biologically and it should definately be preserved. I would hate to see all of the Italians and Spaniards start mixing with the Scandinavians, and the Greeks and Slavics intermixing with the British. The differences biologically are very minor but still worth preserving. Each and every White nationality does need to preserve their individual purity of type. I agree with you Keiserreich, Germany for Germans, Italia for Italians, Russia for Russians etc...All of the Europeans shouldn't just go around inter marrying with people of other White-European nationalities if they can help it, I think massive inter nationality mixing would be terrible. And yes, America for Americans. The majority of Americans are mixed of usually several different White-European nationalities/ethnicities. It is rare to find Americans who are just of one White-European nationality/ethnicity. Generally the longer your family has been in America the more mixed you become. And IMO that is a good thing, we Americans have created our own new uniquely American ethnicity over time. The Irish, Germans, Scottish, English, Italians, Polish, Scandinavians etc...Have for the most part mixed together pretty well and created a new White ethnicity/nationality.....American. I think that's the way it should be. It makes the country more united. We shouldn't see ourselves as Irish, German or English we should see ourselves as Americans. But never forget where we come from and take pride in our European heritage. All Whites should take pride in all other White cultures and accomplishments. Because nationality is very important, but above all what really counts is that we are White.
|
Re: The Ancient Egyptians.
|
For the absoloute wingnut asking where the whites are in North Africa, erm, they are still there brains, red hair and blonde hair with blue eyes is not uncommmon in Morrocco, for example (hence all the Madeline McCann stories)- despite the movement of arabs and blacks into the region People who could pass as European (especially Southen Euro or Eastern) are common enough in all of north Africa I'd imagine, including Egypt. I'm sure there are plenty of modern Egyptians who would not look out of place in southern Europe. But I'll bet you won't see too many Blacks hanging around in Cairo or Alexandria;) I can't believe these people literally believe the ancient Egyptians were Blacks, it's just incredible. No credible historian would take the we wuz Egypshins crap seriously at all. None of the mummies that have been found are negroid, some even have red or blonde hair. Even liberal, Jewish Hollywood wouldn't dare portray the ancient Egyptians as Black. They'll portray the Moors as Black even though they weren't, but Egyptians? No way Jose, not even Black worshipping Hollywood would ever get away with that one. Go watch Cleopatra, Caesar and Cleopatra, the Egyptian, the Mummy and the Mummy Returns, that is what Egyptians looked like:D Not Black. You Afro centric looney tunes ought to get a real kick out of the scene in Caesar and Cleopatra where Cleopatra chases down her Black servant and starts beating him while Caesar just sits in the background chuckling, and then the Black servant goes running away screaming.:rofl Egypshins wuz Black n' shi# dogg:rolleyes: Dream on.
|
Re: White cop tasers negro nine times; negro dies
|
Possible chimp-out on the way. Better batten down the hatches if you're in Louisiana . . . This story would be getting NO national media attention if the races were reversed. But, because the perp was black, jew media lap dogs like Anderson Cooper are in a frenzy over it . . . For those who don't know, Anderson Cooper's mother is Gloria VANDERBILT by the way. :rolleyes: PS- Why all the fuss about a dead negro thug? Just one? I'm very disapponted. There are millions more to take his place.
|
Re: Klan gets good press in Russia
|
no no no friend, you have it wrong. the few racially aware americans needs to move to europe. america is lost, and we should focus on europe, it is the ancestral homelands My state is still a good 80-85% White, as are many others(Northern states), far from being a lost cause. :)
|
Re: ZOG Vs. Our 2nd Amendment Legal Rights
|
The day they try to take away our guns, is the day the fun begins. Let em' try, that's what it will take to light a fire under joe ordinary's ass. They come around this area looking to confiscate guns and they are in for a big surprise. We're ready to roll out the welcome party for em' anytime they wanna stop by. :)
|
Re: ZOG Vs. Our 2nd Amendment Legal Rights
|
They already have. In so many ways. The NRA morons will give them up more than willingly. That's exactly why I support the Gun Owners of America, NOT the NRA. The NRA have sold us out. For a long time their president was a Jewish woman from San Francisco! She just resigned from president recently not sure who it is now. NRA has been infiltrated by way to many neo-cons and jews. Screw the NRA, I encourage all WN's and anyone who supports the 2nd ammendment to support the GOA. http://www.gunowners.org/goa_logo_trans.gif The only no-compromise gun lobby in Washington. -Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) Be a real American Warrior for gun rights & freedom. Join GOA & sign up as many members as you can. Ted Nugent Rock star
|
Re: ZOG Vs. Our 2nd Amendment Legal Rights
|
Really?? You got to be kidding, you ever see what happened after katrina and all those so called bad ass cajuns were giving up their guns left and right when johnny law came knocking. So you are gonna shoot the law men who come to do nothing more than their job?? I doubt it highly, but to be smart, you might keep some weapons and ammo hid with a cheap old gun visible to give up like a good citizen. OH YES, Really. Well I don't know about those cajuns. But where I'm from we are prepared if they ever try 2 take away our firearms. We'v had this little organization known as the Michigan Militia Corps since the early 90's, it used to be well over 10,000 strong in the 90s, and it is getting big again. IF they ever do try 2 take away our guns, they are in for a full scale guerilla insurgency in Michigan at least :clink IF they ever do. http://michiganmilitia.com/SMVM/fiel...6/ONRAPPEL.jpg Our woman will even teach those gun grabbers a lesson! :D http://michiganmilitia.com/SMVM/fiel...RUTWALKER6.jpg http://michiganmilitia.com/SMVM/fiel...up_phoenix.jpg
|
Re: White Rage coming
|
Well, you'll be happy to know that there is no shortage of completely pissed off and fed up White men up here in Michigan... You can't even get a job up here, there is nothing. People are Pissed with a capital P around here and they know that neither Obama or McCain are going to improve the situation.
|
Re: White on White crimes or atrocities
|
I was just wondering if anyone had any statistics regarding white on white violent crimes such as the racial background of famous murderers? Nope. Cases in point of famous white murderers: John Wayne Gacy, He was a homo and a liberal democrat. Ted Bundy, Charles Whitman, Charlie Starkweather. None of these psychos were White Nationalists. Every race has it's nut jobs. I was also wondering if anyone personally knew any American POW survivors of the WWII Nazi concentration camps? What did those survivors have to say about their treatment within the camps? How did it affect them upon their return to America? Well, my Dad's Uncle was a POW in WW2, and he had fond memories of playing cards, drinking beer and learning to speak German from his Nazi captors.:D(true story).
|
Re: Books for non-WNs.
|
Looks like a good book, but unfortunately David Duke has such name recognition that the average person is going to say, Wait, wasn't he a KKK member? true....but he was also a former member of the House of Representatives of the state of Louisiana....and if they did take the time to read through it they would come away with a very good understanding of the jewish issue. It pretty much blows the lid off of the Zionist agenda. It's a worldwide best seller. Something funny about this book: At one time, the book was sold in the main lobby of the building of Russian State Duma (lower house of parliament).:D
|
Re: Good Horror Films
|
I don't like gory horror films. Don't get me wrong I like seeing blood and guts where it is aplicable to the story and where the extremes of the moment take the scene to that nasty place. It is more of a sicking surprize for the violence to build up. For the nasty creatues to be described rather than seen. Their misdeeds known for one's own imagination to build the disgusting and decrepit and evil facts of the horror of the event. When the concept is scarier than what you see that is what makes it great. Movies where the tension builds up are always the best. Some of my favorites are: Nosferatu The ghouls Black christmass (the original 1971 version) Misery Man Hunter Blue Velvet The Monkeys paw In the Mouth of madness Halloween The exorcist 3 Psycho Taxi Driver The stepfather Night of the living dead (1968) Angel Heart The Thing I don't know that I would consider Taxi Driver to be a horror movie myself. But Taxi Driver is a great movie! One of my all time favorites. I think alot of us here on Stormfront could really identify with DeNiro's character from TD. He's at his ends wits fed up with all of the crime in his city, and wants to do something about it. Anyone who has never seen Taxi Driver needs to rent it ASAP. As for horror movies...I've never been much of a fan myself, I don't think it's a good idea to glamourize serial killers. But I've always been partial to the old black n' white monster movies from the 30s and 40s. The original Dracula movie is great, the newer one Francis Ford Coppola did with Keanu Reeves and Anthony Hopkins was good too. I've always had a thing for vampire movies I guess. My favorite would have to be Interview With the Vampire, that's a great vampire movie. One of my favorite movies as well. Psycho and Nosferatu are great too, Southernbygrace seems to have rather good taste I would say. :clink PS- Speaking of Psycho, Rope is another good Hitchcock movie about killers, it's a very suspenseful movie, pretty unusual one too.
|
Re: Is it possible?
|
I mean South Americans, Mexicans...... Sure if they are Spanish. There are plenty of Spaniards with blonde hair and blue eyes. I've seen Cubans with these features.
|
Re: How do you expect to succeed?
|
How do you expect to succeed? Is this an interrogation? Now, now, now my curious nappy headed little friend you just can't expect us to give away all of our secrets now can you? We can't just show the opposing side the playbook. But rest assured my self styled intellectual, ghetto dwelling, inquisitive amigo...the RaHoWa is coming, and victory is ours. I'm recruiting new people to the movement almost daily, and there are thousands and thousands of others out there doing the same thing, the resistance is growing everyday. The White race will not die out with a wimper, the White Devil shall rise from his slumber. Maybe much sooner than you think. Rahowa!
|
Re: Does White Entertainment Television already exist?
|
All modern day television shows are liberalized, multi CULT, race mixing propaganda! We most certainly do need a White Entertainment Station devoid of all of this judeo race mixing, liberal, over sexualized, smutty, materialistic, shallow, multi CULT propaganda. But we can't call it WET:rolleyes: lol....hafta think of a better acronym than that. How about just White TV?? WTV. Better than WET at any rate, sounds like you need to dry off. PS- Seinfeld is/was the most RACIST televison show in history! Not a single non Jew that I can think of in that show.
|
Re: Does White Entertainment Television already exist?
|
Most television is already pro white, You mean Jew??? Not White! . We don't count any of those losers as being White, we don't want them. Especially Eminem, I just call him what he is.....Black. Yeah right, try attending a Nation of Islam or Black Panther rally, they're much much more extreme, violent, and RACIST than we could ever be. Go tell that to Obama's pastor!! haha. Around here they shoot at White people for being on da block no joke. If I was to go over yonder and take a walk through Cass Corridor(in Detroit) they'd probably take shots at me I'm serious, just for being White.:rolleyes:)
|
Re: Does White Entertainment Television already exist?
|
Michael Richards (Kramer) isn't a Jew. no shi#? I always thought he was, hm who knew. Guess it figures that he was the only one funny on that show and was the one who gave the little piece of his mind to the loud mouthed negros in the audience at his stand up routine..:rofl Look what it says about Michael Richards on the wikipedia though.....kinda interesting...33rd degree master mason... Richards is a Master Mason and also holds 33° in the Scottish Rite . He was very active in preservation of Masonic research, and in his personal life is an avid reader. Richards holds memberships in the following lodges : Riviera Lodge No. 780, Culver City–Foshay Lodge No. 467, as well as the Southern California Research Lodge. Additionally, he is also a Life Member of the Los Angeles Scottish Rite Valley and a Life Member of the Scottish Rite Research Society . [6] [7]
|
Re: Does White Entertainment Television already exist?
|
You think some Jew would actually VERBALIZE racism amongst the goyim? I knew he wasn't a Jew when he told those idiots off. I was sitting in a McDonalds in Saginaw, MI enjoying a milkshake watching CNN on the tv when they played his little uh.....racist rant...I couldn't help it I started cracking up right then n' there, Black people all around me and everything I had to walk outside before I got beat down or something. :D I was trying my best to hold back the laughter after I seen KKKramer's little tirade. It amused me what can I say.
|
Re: America
|
Yea, America was a white nation with all those injuns who they converted to christianity and mixed with, and lets not forget the negro slaves the capitalists brought in. Neither the indians or the Black slaves were ever intended to be citizens by the founding fathers. It said plain and clear in every immigration and naturalization act up until after the Civil War that only free White men of good moral standing were eligible for American citizenship. And the Constitution and Declaration of Independence only applies to American citizens, which were intended to be only free White men of good moral standing.
|
Re: America
|
Has America, overall, been a huge mistake for the white race? America before Jews? No, of course not, America upon it's founding was the most pro-White and pro-working class nation to ever exist. America after Jews? Of course, this new Amerika is an abomination. It cannot be saved, a Balkanization process is the only solution. The mixing with injuns, Who exactly was doing this mixing with indians? Maybe a few mountain men and horny, single pioneers. Most people were busy killing them. the destruction of Europe in ww1 and especially ww2, You could probably blame the ZOG and Hitler's imperialism(that's right:eek:) for that one(ww2 at least). For afterall wasn't it Hitler who was responsible for reducing half of Warsaw, London and Europe in general into rubble? So why do you overlook that and only put all of the blame on Zionist Occupied America?:confused: The founding fathers were very against America being involved in foreign wars and imperialism. Foreign wars and imperialism are unconstitutional and un-American. the blacks allowed to be equal under the crapstitution, Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Blacks are equal in any way to a White man. What are you talking about? That would be pretty odd because most of the men who wrote the constitution also owned Black slaves. Besides, both the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence only applied to American citizens and up until after the Civil War only White men were eligibile for American citizenship. And even once Negroes were granted American citizenship in the late 1860s they were still only 2nd class citizens up until the 1960s and not full Americans, they didn't have the same rights as a White man until the late 1960s. helping out jews, funding Israel, capitalism. This is all relatively modern and has nothing to do with what America was founded on, and has nothing to do with the Constitution. This is the new Amerika you're talking about. This is the ZOG. But I base this question around ww2 mostly. Americans so happily and cheerfully faught against their own best interests, and I know I am going to get they were brainwashed replies, I recall an American soldier in Germany being asked why they are fighting the Germans and saying He does not know. He did not know but still faught against his own race. :mad: Well, believe it or not people(Americans) actually trusted their government back then, and unfortunately many of them still do:rolleyes: They didn't think that good ol' Uncle Sam would tell them a lie. The Japs bombed Pearl Harbor so you can't blame them for wanting to kick the Jap's ass. I think that FDR and his cronies provoked them behind the scenes, but either way the average American at the time wouldn't have known that. If I were around back then I would've been signing up to go kill Japs too. They were told that Hitler wanted to take over the world and sterilize everyone who didn't have blonde hair and blue eyes or some ridiculous nonsense. They were told that Hitler and his lust for power and conquest were the reason that Europe was being destroyed and they had to stop him. Besides, by WW2 the ZOG was already firmly entrenched in this country. I think America a few years after the constiution, became a huge work and slavery factory for everyone, a place where all the non-whites of the world could come (give me your tired, your poor), That saying about give me your tired, poor, etc.. was only added to the base of the statue of liberty in 1912. Those words were written by a Zionist Jewess (surprise) by the name of Emma Lazarus. and become rich. Well, that is what Amerikwa is now. But that is certainly not what it was intended to be. A place jews can use to attack other white nations, like Rusisa, by the dumbed down white populace who are the only ones that fall for that flag waving patriotic garbage. You are talking about modern day Amerikwa. Not the real America. The founding fathers are all rolling in their graves at what this place has become. Seems like America is nothing but a jew tool. It is now. But that was not always the case.
|
Re: Why do you people say Ashkenazi Jews aren't white
|
How can you say that someone with blond hair, blue eyes, and white skin isn't white? I've seen octaroons(1/8 Black) with blonde hair, blue eyes and pale skin.... There are plenty of 1/16 or 1/8 indians running around the Americas with blonde hair and blue eyes.... Most Ashkenazi Jews have non-White blood to varying degrees. With some of them it is very obvious, with others it is not. Most Ashkenazi Jews are in fact predominantly White if you ask me....But that is predominantly and not fully... Most of them have Mongoloid blood from the KHAZARS, or some Black blood that they picked up via North Africa or the Mid-East.......Where do you think they get their infamous Jew-fros from?? ;) Ashkenazi Jews are a large tribe of mongrels and converts. There is really no telling just what kind of blood some of them could have running through their veins. So even if they look White, hardcore race purists will not consider them White....
|
Re: I got an idea, lets purchase a media station
|
The media truly does win elections and has the largest control over politics. You guys are always complaining about jewish control of the media, just steel the move out of their play book. Their have been many pro white billionaires, (duncan hunter oil industry) Why don't we or a pro white businessmen purchase a news station. The Jews won't let us. They have a media monopoly in this country.
|
Re: I got an idea, lets purchase a media station
|
Ted Turner and DeWest Hooker tried it. Advertising revenue is how TV and radio stations stay alive. Jews control the ad companies, which, for example, have a blacklist of radio stations they want gone. I heard this from an Air America host who's station was put off the air here due to lack of advertisers, even though the actual ratings were very competitive. Imagine owning a big company and being visited by the ADL: We notice that you are buying ads on KSOB. That station is very offensive to our community, which could be bad for some of your big contracts. We hope you will reconsider your support for that station. Have a nice day. They ran Ted Turner right out of his own company. Shylock corporate raiders went all Gordon Gecko on his gentile ass:D I believe he was quoted as saying be careful who you do business with if I am remembering correctly.
|
Re: Rednecks for Obama want to bridge yawning culture gap
|
If'n they support Balack Obama..... Then they ain't really rednecks now, are they? :cool: If you drive a Mercedes-Benz...ya might not be a Redneck. If you've never owned a hound dog or a pick-up truck...ya might not be a redneck. If you know what an hors d'oeuvre is and how to pronounce it...ya might not be a redneck. If you support Barack Obama...ya sure as Hell ain't no Redneck.:)
|
Re: Politically Correctness makes go insane
|
I once referred to this guy as an African American, he quickly scolded me, and told me that he was a black-American since his ancestors were from Jamaica, not from the African continent. All of this political correctness drives me made. Do most of you refer to African Americans as just blacks? They are Black. Black is Black I make no distinction. Political Correctness is Tyranny with a smiley face:) Can't say that..can't say this... and it just keeps getting worse. And African and Caribbean Black immigrants don't belong in this country as far as I'm concerned anyways. The only Blacks I feel have the right to be here are the descendants of the slaves because their ancestors were taken here against their will and this is the only place they have ever known. But if they can't behave themselves.......they shouldn't be here.....so I think that's probably the most of em'. :D
|
Re: Is intermingling with different white nationalities a problem ?
|
In Europe it is. Outside of Europa, like America, it's not. Not to me at least.
|
Re: The Latest Attempt To Degrade White Males Has A Lukewarm Reception
|
You know Ferrell is a Yid, right? R U sure about that? Ferrell is an Irish name if I am not mistaken. Plus, I seen him on Jay Leno once and he was talking about being Swedish, all of his sons have Swedish first names. If he is Jewish it's only partially.
|
Re: Something I agree with stormfront on - the Israel/Gaza situation
|
Rocket, Mortar, and Suicide Bomb Attacks On Israel From Gaza Can't say I blame them! Have you any idea of how those Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank are treated by the Israelis?? Israel is a very oppressive apartheid state, the worst on Earth. Those Palestinians aren't just slinging bottle rockets at them(supposedly, wouldn't be surprised if it's Mossad black-ops to give the Zionazis an excuse to continue the ethnic cleansing) for no reason! http://bbs.chinadaily.com.cn/attachm...kUAkvfZOSG.jpg
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.