Chapter
stringclasses
18 values
sentence_range
stringlengths
3
9
Text
stringlengths
7
7.34k
9
439-442
Note that the formula is true for a concave lens also In that case R1is negative, R 2 positive and therefore, f is negative FIGURE 9 16 (a) The position of object, and the image formed by a double convex lens, (b) Refraction at the first spherical surface and (c) Refraction at the second spherical surface
9
440-443
In that case R1is negative, R 2 positive and therefore, f is negative FIGURE 9 16 (a) The position of object, and the image formed by a double convex lens, (b) Refraction at the first spherical surface and (c) Refraction at the second spherical surface * Note that now the refractive index of the medium on the right side of ADC is n1 while on its left it is n2
9
441-444
FIGURE 9 16 (a) The position of object, and the image formed by a double convex lens, (b) Refraction at the first spherical surface and (c) Refraction at the second spherical surface * Note that now the refractive index of the medium on the right side of ADC is n1 while on its left it is n2 Further DI1 is negative as the distance is measured against the direction of incident light
9
442-445
16 (a) The position of object, and the image formed by a double convex lens, (b) Refraction at the first spherical surface and (c) Refraction at the second spherical surface * Note that now the refractive index of the medium on the right side of ADC is n1 while on its left it is n2 Further DI1 is negative as the distance is measured against the direction of incident light Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 235 From Eqs
9
443-446
* Note that now the refractive index of the medium on the right side of ADC is n1 while on its left it is n2 Further DI1 is negative as the distance is measured against the direction of incident light Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 235 From Eqs (9
9
444-447
Further DI1 is negative as the distance is measured against the direction of incident light Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 235 From Eqs (9 19) and (9
9
445-448
Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 235 From Eqs (9 19) and (9 20), we get 1 1 1 OB DI n n fn + = (9
9
446-449
(9 19) and (9 20), we get 1 1 1 OB DI n n fn + = (9 22) Again, in the thin lens approximation, B and D are both close to the optical centre of the lens
9
447-450
19) and (9 20), we get 1 1 1 OB DI n n fn + = (9 22) Again, in the thin lens approximation, B and D are both close to the optical centre of the lens Applying the sign convention, BO = – u, DI = +v, we get 1 1 1 v u f − = (9
9
448-451
20), we get 1 1 1 OB DI n n fn + = (9 22) Again, in the thin lens approximation, B and D are both close to the optical centre of the lens Applying the sign convention, BO = – u, DI = +v, we get 1 1 1 v u f − = (9 23) Equation (9
9
449-452
22) Again, in the thin lens approximation, B and D are both close to the optical centre of the lens Applying the sign convention, BO = – u, DI = +v, we get 1 1 1 v u f − = (9 23) Equation (9 23) is the familiar thin lens formula
9
450-453
Applying the sign convention, BO = – u, DI = +v, we get 1 1 1 v u f − = (9 23) Equation (9 23) is the familiar thin lens formula Though we derived it for a real image formed by a convex lens, the formula is valid for both convex as well as concave lenses and for both real and virtual images
9
451-454
23) Equation (9 23) is the familiar thin lens formula Though we derived it for a real image formed by a convex lens, the formula is valid for both convex as well as concave lenses and for both real and virtual images It is worth mentioning that the two foci, F and F¢, of a double convex or concave lens are equidistant from the optical centre
9
452-455
23) is the familiar thin lens formula Though we derived it for a real image formed by a convex lens, the formula is valid for both convex as well as concave lenses and for both real and virtual images It is worth mentioning that the two foci, F and F¢, of a double convex or concave lens are equidistant from the optical centre The focus on the side of the (original) source of light is called the first focal point, whereas the other is called the second focal point
9
453-456
Though we derived it for a real image formed by a convex lens, the formula is valid for both convex as well as concave lenses and for both real and virtual images It is worth mentioning that the two foci, F and F¢, of a double convex or concave lens are equidistant from the optical centre The focus on the side of the (original) source of light is called the first focal point, whereas the other is called the second focal point To find the image of an object by a lens, we can, in principle, take any two rays emanating from a point on an object; trace their paths using the laws of refraction and find the point where the refracted rays meet (or appear to meet)
9
454-457
It is worth mentioning that the two foci, F and F¢, of a double convex or concave lens are equidistant from the optical centre The focus on the side of the (original) source of light is called the first focal point, whereas the other is called the second focal point To find the image of an object by a lens, we can, in principle, take any two rays emanating from a point on an object; trace their paths using the laws of refraction and find the point where the refracted rays meet (or appear to meet) In practice, however, it is convenient to choose any two of the following rays: (i) A ray emanating from the object parallel to the principal axis of the lens after refraction passes through the second principal focus F¢ (in a convex lens) or appears to diverge (in a concave lens) from the first principal focus F
9
455-458
The focus on the side of the (original) source of light is called the first focal point, whereas the other is called the second focal point To find the image of an object by a lens, we can, in principle, take any two rays emanating from a point on an object; trace their paths using the laws of refraction and find the point where the refracted rays meet (or appear to meet) In practice, however, it is convenient to choose any two of the following rays: (i) A ray emanating from the object parallel to the principal axis of the lens after refraction passes through the second principal focus F¢ (in a convex lens) or appears to diverge (in a concave lens) from the first principal focus F (ii) A ray of light, passing through the optical centre of the lens, emerges without any deviation after refraction
9
456-459
To find the image of an object by a lens, we can, in principle, take any two rays emanating from a point on an object; trace their paths using the laws of refraction and find the point where the refracted rays meet (or appear to meet) In practice, however, it is convenient to choose any two of the following rays: (i) A ray emanating from the object parallel to the principal axis of the lens after refraction passes through the second principal focus F¢ (in a convex lens) or appears to diverge (in a concave lens) from the first principal focus F (ii) A ray of light, passing through the optical centre of the lens, emerges without any deviation after refraction (iii) (a) A ray of light passing through the first principal focus of a convex lens [Fig
9
457-460
In practice, however, it is convenient to choose any two of the following rays: (i) A ray emanating from the object parallel to the principal axis of the lens after refraction passes through the second principal focus F¢ (in a convex lens) or appears to diverge (in a concave lens) from the first principal focus F (ii) A ray of light, passing through the optical centre of the lens, emerges without any deviation after refraction (iii) (a) A ray of light passing through the first principal focus of a convex lens [Fig 9
9
458-461
(ii) A ray of light, passing through the optical centre of the lens, emerges without any deviation after refraction (iii) (a) A ray of light passing through the first principal focus of a convex lens [Fig 9 17(a)] emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction
9
459-462
(iii) (a) A ray of light passing through the first principal focus of a convex lens [Fig 9 17(a)] emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction (b) A ray of light incident on a concave lens appearing to meet the principal axis at second focus point emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction [Fig
9
460-463
9 17(a)] emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction (b) A ray of light incident on a concave lens appearing to meet the principal axis at second focus point emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction [Fig 9
9
461-464
17(a)] emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction (b) A ray of light incident on a concave lens appearing to meet the principal axis at second focus point emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction [Fig 9 17(b)]
9
462-465
(b) A ray of light incident on a concave lens appearing to meet the principal axis at second focus point emerges parallel to the principal axis after refraction [Fig 9 17(b)] Figures 9
9
463-466
9 17(b)] Figures 9 17(a) and (b) illustrate these rules for a convex and a concave lens, respectively
9
464-467
17(b)] Figures 9 17(a) and (b) illustrate these rules for a convex and a concave lens, respectively You should practice drawing similar ray diagrams for different positions of the object with respect to the lens and also verify that the lens formula, Eq
9
465-468
Figures 9 17(a) and (b) illustrate these rules for a convex and a concave lens, respectively You should practice drawing similar ray diagrams for different positions of the object with respect to the lens and also verify that the lens formula, Eq (9
9
466-469
17(a) and (b) illustrate these rules for a convex and a concave lens, respectively You should practice drawing similar ray diagrams for different positions of the object with respect to the lens and also verify that the lens formula, Eq (9 23), holds good for all cases
9
467-470
You should practice drawing similar ray diagrams for different positions of the object with respect to the lens and also verify that the lens formula, Eq (9 23), holds good for all cases Here again it must be remembered that each point on an object gives out infinite number of rays
9
468-471
(9 23), holds good for all cases Here again it must be remembered that each point on an object gives out infinite number of rays All these rays will pass through the same image point after refraction at the lens
9
469-472
23), holds good for all cases Here again it must be remembered that each point on an object gives out infinite number of rays All these rays will pass through the same image point after refraction at the lens Magnification (m) produced by a lens is defined, like that for a mirror, as the ratio of the size of the image to that of the object
9
470-473
Here again it must be remembered that each point on an object gives out infinite number of rays All these rays will pass through the same image point after refraction at the lens Magnification (m) produced by a lens is defined, like that for a mirror, as the ratio of the size of the image to that of the object Proceeding FIGURE 9
9
471-474
All these rays will pass through the same image point after refraction at the lens Magnification (m) produced by a lens is defined, like that for a mirror, as the ratio of the size of the image to that of the object Proceeding FIGURE 9 17 Tracing rays through (a) convex lens (b) concave lens
9
472-475
Magnification (m) produced by a lens is defined, like that for a mirror, as the ratio of the size of the image to that of the object Proceeding FIGURE 9 17 Tracing rays through (a) convex lens (b) concave lens Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 236 EXAMPLE 9
9
473-476
Proceeding FIGURE 9 17 Tracing rays through (a) convex lens (b) concave lens Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 236 EXAMPLE 9 6 in the same way as for spherical mirrors, it is easily seen that for a lens m = h h ′ = uv (9
9
474-477
17 Tracing rays through (a) convex lens (b) concave lens Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 236 EXAMPLE 9 6 in the same way as for spherical mirrors, it is easily seen that for a lens m = h h ′ = uv (9 24) When we apply the sign convention, we see that, for erect (and virtual) image formed by a convex or concave lens, m is positive, while for an inverted (and real) image, m is negative
9
475-478
Rationalised 2023-24 Physics 236 EXAMPLE 9 6 in the same way as for spherical mirrors, it is easily seen that for a lens m = h h ′ = uv (9 24) When we apply the sign convention, we see that, for erect (and virtual) image formed by a convex or concave lens, m is positive, while for an inverted (and real) image, m is negative Example 9
9
476-479
6 in the same way as for spherical mirrors, it is easily seen that for a lens m = h h ′ = uv (9 24) When we apply the sign convention, we see that, for erect (and virtual) image formed by a convex or concave lens, m is positive, while for an inverted (and real) image, m is negative Example 9 6 A magician during a show makes a glass lens with n = 1
9
477-480
24) When we apply the sign convention, we see that, for erect (and virtual) image formed by a convex or concave lens, m is positive, while for an inverted (and real) image, m is negative Example 9 6 A magician during a show makes a glass lens with n = 1 47 disappear in a trough of liquid
9
478-481
Example 9 6 A magician during a show makes a glass lens with n = 1 47 disappear in a trough of liquid What is the refractive index of the liquid
9
479-482
6 A magician during a show makes a glass lens with n = 1 47 disappear in a trough of liquid What is the refractive index of the liquid Could the liquid be water
9
480-483
47 disappear in a trough of liquid What is the refractive index of the liquid Could the liquid be water Solution The refractive index of the liquid must be equal to 1
9
481-484
What is the refractive index of the liquid Could the liquid be water Solution The refractive index of the liquid must be equal to 1 47 in order to make the lens disappear
9
482-485
Could the liquid be water Solution The refractive index of the liquid must be equal to 1 47 in order to make the lens disappear This means n1 = n2
9
483-486
Solution The refractive index of the liquid must be equal to 1 47 in order to make the lens disappear This means n1 = n2 This gives 1/f =0 or f ® ¥
9
484-487
47 in order to make the lens disappear This means n1 = n2 This gives 1/f =0 or f ® ¥ The lens in the liquid will act like a plane sheet of glass
9
485-488
This means n1 = n2 This gives 1/f =0 or f ® ¥ The lens in the liquid will act like a plane sheet of glass No, the liquid is not water
9
486-489
This gives 1/f =0 or f ® ¥ The lens in the liquid will act like a plane sheet of glass No, the liquid is not water It could be glycerine
9
487-490
The lens in the liquid will act like a plane sheet of glass No, the liquid is not water It could be glycerine FIGURE 9
9
488-491
No, the liquid is not water It could be glycerine FIGURE 9 18 Power of a lens
9
489-492
It could be glycerine FIGURE 9 18 Power of a lens 9
9
490-493
FIGURE 9 18 Power of a lens 9 5
9
491-494
18 Power of a lens 9 5 3 Power of a lens Power of a lens is a measure of the convergence or divergence, which a lens introduces in the light falling on it
9
492-495
9 5 3 Power of a lens Power of a lens is a measure of the convergence or divergence, which a lens introduces in the light falling on it Clearly, a lens of shorter focal length bends the incident light more, while converging it in case of a convex lens and diverging it in case of a concave lens
9
493-496
5 3 Power of a lens Power of a lens is a measure of the convergence or divergence, which a lens introduces in the light falling on it Clearly, a lens of shorter focal length bends the incident light more, while converging it in case of a convex lens and diverging it in case of a concave lens The power P of a lens is defined as the tangent of the angle by which it converges or diverges a beam of light parallel to the principal axis falling at unit distance from the optical centre (Fig
9
494-497
3 Power of a lens Power of a lens is a measure of the convergence or divergence, which a lens introduces in the light falling on it Clearly, a lens of shorter focal length bends the incident light more, while converging it in case of a convex lens and diverging it in case of a concave lens The power P of a lens is defined as the tangent of the angle by which it converges or diverges a beam of light parallel to the principal axis falling at unit distance from the optical centre (Fig 9
9
495-498
Clearly, a lens of shorter focal length bends the incident light more, while converging it in case of a convex lens and diverging it in case of a concave lens The power P of a lens is defined as the tangent of the angle by which it converges or diverges a beam of light parallel to the principal axis falling at unit distance from the optical centre (Fig 9 18)
9
496-499
The power P of a lens is defined as the tangent of the angle by which it converges or diverges a beam of light parallel to the principal axis falling at unit distance from the optical centre (Fig 9 18) tan ; , tan δ δ = = = fh h f if 1 1 or δ =f1 for small value of d
9
497-500
9 18) tan ; , tan δ δ = = = fh h f if 1 1 or δ =f1 for small value of d Thus, P = f1 (9
9
498-501
18) tan ; , tan δ δ = = = fh h f if 1 1 or δ =f1 for small value of d Thus, P = f1 (9 25) The SI unit for power of a lens is dioptre (D): 1D = 1m–1
9
499-502
tan ; , tan δ δ = = = fh h f if 1 1 or δ =f1 for small value of d Thus, P = f1 (9 25) The SI unit for power of a lens is dioptre (D): 1D = 1m–1 The power of a lens of focal length of 1 metre is one dioptre
9
500-503
Thus, P = f1 (9 25) The SI unit for power of a lens is dioptre (D): 1D = 1m–1 The power of a lens of focal length of 1 metre is one dioptre Power of a lens is positive for a converging lens and negative for a diverging lens
9
501-504
25) The SI unit for power of a lens is dioptre (D): 1D = 1m–1 The power of a lens of focal length of 1 metre is one dioptre Power of a lens is positive for a converging lens and negative for a diverging lens Thus, when an optician prescribes a corrective lens of power + 2
9
502-505
The power of a lens of focal length of 1 metre is one dioptre Power of a lens is positive for a converging lens and negative for a diverging lens Thus, when an optician prescribes a corrective lens of power + 2 5 D, the required lens is a convex lens of focal length + 40 cm
9
503-506
Power of a lens is positive for a converging lens and negative for a diverging lens Thus, when an optician prescribes a corrective lens of power + 2 5 D, the required lens is a convex lens of focal length + 40 cm A lens of power of – 4
9
504-507
Thus, when an optician prescribes a corrective lens of power + 2 5 D, the required lens is a convex lens of focal length + 40 cm A lens of power of – 4 0 D means a concave lens of focal length – 25 cm
9
505-508
5 D, the required lens is a convex lens of focal length + 40 cm A lens of power of – 4 0 D means a concave lens of focal length – 25 cm Example 9
9
506-509
A lens of power of – 4 0 D means a concave lens of focal length – 25 cm Example 9 7 (i) If f = 0
9
507-510
0 D means a concave lens of focal length – 25 cm Example 9 7 (i) If f = 0 5 m for a glass lens, what is the power of the lens
9
508-511
Example 9 7 (i) If f = 0 5 m for a glass lens, what is the power of the lens (ii) The radii of curvature of the faces of a double convex lens are 10 cm and 15 cm
9
509-512
7 (i) If f = 0 5 m for a glass lens, what is the power of the lens (ii) The radii of curvature of the faces of a double convex lens are 10 cm and 15 cm Its focal length is 12 cm
9
510-513
5 m for a glass lens, what is the power of the lens (ii) The radii of curvature of the faces of a double convex lens are 10 cm and 15 cm Its focal length is 12 cm What is the refractive index of glass
9
511-514
(ii) The radii of curvature of the faces of a double convex lens are 10 cm and 15 cm Its focal length is 12 cm What is the refractive index of glass (iii) A convex lens has 20 cm focal length in air
9
512-515
Its focal length is 12 cm What is the refractive index of glass (iii) A convex lens has 20 cm focal length in air What is focal length in water
9
513-516
What is the refractive index of glass (iii) A convex lens has 20 cm focal length in air What is focal length in water (Refractive index of air-water = 1
9
514-517
(iii) A convex lens has 20 cm focal length in air What is focal length in water (Refractive index of air-water = 1 33, refractive index for air-glass = 1
9
515-518
What is focal length in water (Refractive index of air-water = 1 33, refractive index for air-glass = 1 5
9
516-519
(Refractive index of air-water = 1 33, refractive index for air-glass = 1 5 ) EXAMPLE 9
9
517-520
33, refractive index for air-glass = 1 5 ) EXAMPLE 9 7 Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 237 Solution (i) Power = +2 dioptre
9
518-521
5 ) EXAMPLE 9 7 Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 237 Solution (i) Power = +2 dioptre (ii) Here, we have f = +12 cm, R1 = +10 cm, R2 = –15 cm
9
519-522
) EXAMPLE 9 7 Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 237 Solution (i) Power = +2 dioptre (ii) Here, we have f = +12 cm, R1 = +10 cm, R2 = –15 cm Refractive index of air is taken as unity
9
520-523
7 Rationalised 2023-24 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments 237 Solution (i) Power = +2 dioptre (ii) Here, we have f = +12 cm, R1 = +10 cm, R2 = –15 cm Refractive index of air is taken as unity We use the lens formula of Eq
9
521-524
(ii) Here, we have f = +12 cm, R1 = +10 cm, R2 = –15 cm Refractive index of air is taken as unity We use the lens formula of Eq (9
9
522-525
Refractive index of air is taken as unity We use the lens formula of Eq (9 22)
9
523-526
We use the lens formula of Eq (9 22) The sign convention has to be applied for f, R1 and R2
9
524-527
(9 22) The sign convention has to be applied for f, R1 and R2 Substituting the values, we have 1 12 1 1 10 1 15 = − − −   ( ) n This gives n = 1
9
525-528
22) The sign convention has to be applied for f, R1 and R2 Substituting the values, we have 1 12 1 1 10 1 15 = − − −   ( ) n This gives n = 1 5
9
526-529
The sign convention has to be applied for f, R1 and R2 Substituting the values, we have 1 12 1 1 10 1 15 = − − −   ( ) n This gives n = 1 5 (iii) For a glass lens in air, n2 = 1
9
527-530
Substituting the values, we have 1 12 1 1 10 1 15 = − − −   ( ) n This gives n = 1 5 (iii) For a glass lens in air, n2 = 1 5, n1 = 1, f = +20 cm
9
528-531
5 (iii) For a glass lens in air, n2 = 1 5, n1 = 1, f = +20 cm Hence, the lens formula gives 1 20 0 5 1 1 1 2 = −    
9
529-532
(iii) For a glass lens in air, n2 = 1 5, n1 = 1, f = +20 cm Hence, the lens formula gives 1 20 0 5 1 1 1 2 = −     R R For the same glass lens in water, n2 = 1
9
530-533
5, n1 = 1, f = +20 cm Hence, the lens formula gives 1 20 0 5 1 1 1 2 = −     R R For the same glass lens in water, n2 = 1 5, n1 = 1
9
531-534
Hence, the lens formula gives 1 20 0 5 1 1 1 2 = −     R R For the same glass lens in water, n2 = 1 5, n1 = 1 33
9
532-535
R R For the same glass lens in water, n2 = 1 5, n1 = 1 33 Therefore, 1 33 1 5 1 33 1 1 1 2
9
533-536
5, n1 = 1 33 Therefore, 1 33 1 5 1 33 1 1 1 2 (
9
534-537
33 Therefore, 1 33 1 5 1 33 1 1 1 2 ( ) f R R = − −     (9
9
535-538
Therefore, 1 33 1 5 1 33 1 1 1 2 ( ) f R R = − −     (9 26) Combining these two equations, we find f = + 78
9
536-539
( ) f R R = − −     (9 26) Combining these two equations, we find f = + 78 2 cm
9
537-540
) f R R = − −     (9 26) Combining these two equations, we find f = + 78 2 cm 9
9
538-541
26) Combining these two equations, we find f = + 78 2 cm 9 5