text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
hardwoods at low stem densities. Other sites, such as Navy Wells #23, are probably very
|
different than they were historically. This site now has a tall understory of hardwoods with a
|
very high stem density.
|
3.4.3 Herb Layer
|
The herb layer naturally has the highest diversity of plant species and a diverse array of rare
|
plant species. Like the subcanopy layer, the herb layer varies greatly between forest fragments.
|
Some sites that burned frequently and have sparse subcanopy layers have diverse herb layers.
|
Other sites with dense subcanopies that result in low light penetration and thick duff
|
accumulations have lost almost all herbaceous species. The overall herb layer in pine rockland
|
fragments has been degraded, with a loss in density and diversity.
|
3.4.4 Edges
|
Historically, edges in the pine rockland ecosystem were limited to ecotones with other habitat
|
types, especially rockland hammocks and marl prairies (see Sections 2.5 above and 3.5 below).
|
Because of forest fragmentation, all pine rockland fragments now have edges with artificial
|
communities, including lawns, agricultural fields, roads, and other vacant land. Edges create a
|
unique ecotone that can have impacts to the interior of natural sites (See Part I). Edges of pine
|
rockland fragments vary greatly in vegetation structure and composition, depending upon fire
|
history, soil disturbance, and management history. These edges typically have dense growths of
|
exotic and ruderal plant species. Abundant exotic plants include Brazilian pepper and Burma
|
reed. Initial establishment of these exotic plants on edges allows their population sizes to build in
|
disturbed soils, and then intact pine rocklands in the interior of the sites are subsequently invaded
|
due to a heavy seed rain.
|
3.5 Association with Other Habitat Types
|
As discussed in Section 2.5, pine rockland was historically associated with other habitat types,
|
especially rockland hammock and marl prairie. Today, most preserves have only a single habitat
|
type and have no natural ecotones with other habitats. Exceptions on EEL sites include Silver
|
Palm Groves, which has a small rockland hammock, and Nixon Smiley Pineland Addition,
|
which has several small marl prairies. The loss of ecotone habitat has resulted in the loss of many
|
populations of plant species restricted to the habitat, and has probably reduced the value of pine
|
rockland for some wildlife species.
|
3.6 Successional Processes Under Current Conditions
|
Because of forest fragmentation, human intervention, and a mosaic of urban lands between pine
|
rockland fragments, successional processes now differ than those discussed in Section 2.6. These
|
changes are discussed below.
|
3.6.1 Fire
|
Since pine rocklands are fire climax communities, natural fire frequency is of great importance.
|
However, fire periodicity, behavior, and intensity have all been changed on pine rockland
|
fragments. Under historical conditions, pine rockland fragments burned every three (3) to seven
|
(7) years, often in large landscape-scale, wind-driven fires. These fires were usually in the spring
|
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Page 17
|
or summer. Following fragmentation, fire periodicity has lengthened considerably at most sites.
|
Fire has been completely eliminated at some sites. This change can be attributed to two causes:
|
intentional fire suppression by people and the elimination of large scale landscape-level fires
|
because of the destruction of natural areas.
|
In addition to periodicity, fire behavior has changed. Natural fires were usually wind-driven head
|
fires that were ignited by lightning. Fires now start for a variety of reasons, including lightning,
|
arson, accident, and by prescription. Many fires, especially prescribed fires, are backing fires
|
burning into the wind. These are slow moving fires and can damage feeder roots of many plants.
|
They are typically used because they are easier to control.
|
Fire intensity has changed with the reduction in fire periodicity. Heavier fuel buildups between
|
fires result in hotter temperatures and higher flames. Intense fires can have long-lasting impacts
|
when they occur. Fires that are too intense can result in massive mortality of pines, saw
|
palmettos, understory hardwoods, and herbs. Following the fires, sites can be invaded more
|
readily by exotic pest plant species, especially natal grass, and ruderal species. Long term
|
vegetation recovery following intense fires has not been studied.
|
3.6.2 Tropical Cyclones
|
There has been much recent discussion about global warming and hurricane activity. Some argue
|
that global warming is resulting in stronger, more intense tropical cyclones (Webster et al. 2005).
|
Some, however, argue against this (Hoyos et al. 2006). Regardless of this debate, the widespread
|
changes in the overall landscape of Miami-Dade County and the changes to pine rockland
|
communities result in different effects of tropical cyclones on the pine rockland ecosystem.
|
Under natural conditions (see Section 2.6.2) hurricanes can cause mortality of some pine trees,
|
but mortality rates are fairly low in large pine rockland areas like Long Pine Key in ENP (Platt et
|
al. 2000). Outside of the national park, Hurricane Andrew in 1992 resulted in the mortality of
|
almost 100% of the pine canopy of most forest fragments. While hurricane winds killed many
|
trees, the main source of mortality was a widespread outbreak of a variety of beetles and weevils
|
in the weakened trees after the storm, including Ips species (I. calligraphis, I. avulsus, and I.
|
grandicollis), Hylobius pales, and Pachylobius picivoris (DERM 1995). This massive outbreak
|
did not occur in ENP. It has been hypothesized that the damage to urban fragments was due to
|
higher stress levels on pine trees due to decreased water levels, pollutants, fragmentation, and
|
altered fire regime (DERM 1995, Doren 1993).
|
Logging of pine trees in the 1930s and 1940s resulted in a mainly even-aged stand of pine trees
|
in most forest fragments. Most pine rockland sites before Hurricane Andrew had mature pines;
|
few sites had a varied stand age consisting of mature, sapling, and seedling trees. Once Hurricane
|
Andrew’s winds killed trees and subsequent insect outbreaks killed remaining adults, no young
|
pines were present in the subcanopy to replace the dead adults.
|
3.6.3 Human Controlled Processes
|
In some pine rockland fragments, hardwood removal has been done to either replace fire or
|
prepare a site for prescribed fire. For example, hardwoods in the pine rockland at Camp Owaissa
|
Bauer, a preserve managed by the Miami-Dade County Parks Department, were removed by
|
EEL Program, Management Plan, Part II – Pine Rockland (DRAFT) _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
Page 18
|
hand to prepare the site for prescribed fire. Timber thinning and mechanical hardwood removal
|
have not been attempted in Miami-Dade’s pine rocklands.
|
3.7 Rare Organisms
|
Despite the very small area of remaining
|
pine rockland, only a few species have been
|
documented as lost from the habitat.
|
However, many species are considered to
|
be in precarious conditions and could easily
|
be lost in the near future.
|
3.7.1 Plants
|
Pine rocklands are habitat to a large number
|
of rare organisms, including species that are
|
considered by one or more agencies and
|
organizations as Endangered, Threatened,
|
or Critically Imperiled. These plant species are now rare because of extensive habitat loss due to
|
development, fire suppression, exotic plant invasions, and poaching. The natural range of some
|
of these plant species does not extend south as far as ENP, and therefore, they only exist in pine
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.