patrickbdevaney/mia9 · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 6.44k
Land 2022, 11, 2182 19 of 23
Table A1. Cont.
Common Name Scientific Name Type Global Rank * State Rank **
Southern chorus
frog Pseudacris nigrita Amphibian and reptile G5 S5
Striped mud turtle Striped mud turtle Amphibian and reptile G5 S5
Swallow-tailed
kite Elanoides forficatus Bird G5 S2
Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor Bird G5 S4
White crowned
pigeon
Patagioenas
leucocephala Bird G3 S3
white ibis Eudocimus albus Bird G5 S4
Whooping crane Grus americana Bird G1 N/A
Wood stork Mycteria Americana Bird G4 S2
* NatureServe global conservation status ranks include G1 (critically imperiled), G2 (imperiled), G3 (vulnerable),
G4 (apparently secure) and G5 (secure). Especially for infraspecific taxon (subspecies or varieties), the global
conservation status are indicated by a “T-rank” following the species’ global rank, like T1, T2, T3, T4 and
T5. ** NatureServe subnational state conservation status ranks include S1 (critically imperiled), S2 (imperiled),
S3 (vulnerable), S4 (apparently secure) and S5 (secure).
Table A2. The α value for focal species in South Florida.
Common Name Weighting Dispersal Capability αValue in Zonation
(α = 2/Dispersal Capability)
American Alligator 2 15,000 0.000130
American crocodile 4 30,000 0.000067
American oystercatcher 4 5000 0.00040
Atlantic salt marsh snake 5 10,000 0.00020
Audubon’s crested caracara 4 20,000 0.00010
Bald eagle 3 10,000 0.00020
Big Cypress fox squirrel 4 5000 0.00040
Black rail 4 5000 0.00040
Black skimmer 3 5000 0.00040
Black-whiskered vireo 3 5000 0.00040
Bluetail mole skink 4 5000 0.00040
Cape Sable seaside sparrow 5 5000 0.00040
Cooper’s Hawk 3 10,000 0.00020
Eastern diamondback
rattlesnake 3 5000 0.00040
Eastern indigo snake 4 10,000 0.00020
Everglades mink 4 790 0.00253
Florida black bear 2 150,000 0.0000133
Florida bonneted bat 5 5000 0.00040
Florida burrowing owl 3 5000 0.00040
Florida grasshopper sparrow 5 5000 0.00040
Florida Key deer 5 2600 0.00077
Florida Keys mole skink 5 5000 0.00040
Florida panther 5 29,000 0.000069
Florida sandhill crane 4 15,000 0.00013
Florida scrub lizard 4 5000 0.00040
Florida scrub-jay 4 3500 0.00057
Gopher tortoise 3 4000 0.00050
Key Largo woodrat 5 5000 0.00040
Least tern 3 5000 0.00040
Limpkin 3 5000 0.00040
Little blue heron 2 10,000 0.00020
Lower Keys rabbit 5 10,000 0.00020
Land 2022, 11, 2182 20 of 23
Table A2. Cont.
Common Name Weighting Dispersal Capability αValue in Zonation
(α = 2/Dispersal Capability)
Mangrove cuckoo 3 5000 0.00040
Marsh rabbit 1 10,000 0.00020
Mottled duck 3 10,000 0.00020
Ornate diamondback
terrapin 1 10,000 0.00020
Piping plover 4 5000 0.00040
Red-cockaded woodpecker 4 8000 0.00025
Reddish egret 4 10,000 0.00020
Rice rat 4 5000 0.00040
Rim rock crowned snake 5 5000 0.00040
roseate spoonbill 4 10,000 0.00020
Roseate tern 5 5000 0.00040
Rufa red knot 4 5000 0.00040
Sand skink 3 5000 0.00040
Sherman’s fox squirrel 3 740 0.00270
Short-tailed hawk 5 10,000 0.00020
Snail kite 4 10,000 0.00020
Snowy egret 3 10,000 0.00020
Snowy plover 5 1000 0.00200
Southeastern American
kestrel 3 10,000 0.00020
Southern chorus frog 1 5000 0.00040
Striped mud turtle 1 10,000 0.00020
Swallow-tailed kite 4 10,000 0.00020
Tricolored heron 2 10,000 0.00020
White crowned pigeon 3 10,000 0.00020
white ibis 2 10,000 0.00020
Whooping crane 5 5000 0.00040
Wood stork 4 10,000 0.00020
References
1. Ahern, J. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning
and design. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 1203–1212. [CrossRef]
2. Lu, Y.; Bullock, J.M. Biodiversity conservation in a changing environment beyond 2020. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabl8162. [CrossRef]
3. Newbold, T.; Hudson, L.N.; Hill, S.L.L.; Contu, S.; Lysenko, I.; Senior, R.A.; Börger, L.; Bennett, D.J.; Choimes, A.; Collen, B.; et al.
Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 2015, 520, 45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4. Yang, R.; Cao, Y.; Hou, S.; Peng, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; Tseng, T.-H.; Yu, L.; Carver, S.; Convery, I.; et al. Cost-effective priorities
for the expansion of global terrestrial protected areas: Setting post-2020 global and national targets. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabc3436.
[CrossRef]
5. König, H.J.; Kiffner, C.; Kramer-Schadt, S.; Fürst, C.; Keuling, O.; Ford, A.T. Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world.

Land 2022, 11, 2182 19 of 23

Table A1. Cont.

Common Name Scientific Name Type Global Rank * State Rank **

Southern chorus

frog Pseudacris nigrita Amphibian and reptile G5 S5

Striped mud turtle Striped mud turtle Amphibian and reptile G5 S5

Swallow-tailed

kite Elanoides forficatus Bird G5 S2

Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor Bird G5 S4

White crowned

pigeon

Patagioenas

leucocephala Bird G3 S3

white ibis Eudocimus albus Bird G5 S4

Whooping crane Grus americana Bird G1 N/A

Wood stork Mycteria Americana Bird G4 S2

* NatureServe global conservation status ranks include G1 (critically imperiled), G2 (imperiled), G3 (vulnerable),

G4 (apparently secure) and G5 (secure). Especially for infraspecific taxon (subspecies or varieties), the global

conservation status are indicated by a “T-rank” following the species’ global rank, like T1, T2, T3, T4 and

T5. ** NatureServe subnational state conservation status ranks include S1 (critically imperiled), S2 (imperiled),

S3 (vulnerable), S4 (apparently secure) and S5 (secure).

Table A2. The α value for focal species in South Florida.

Common Name Weighting Dispersal Capability αValue in Zonation

(α = 2/Dispersal Capability)

American Alligator 2 15,000 0.000130

American crocodile 4 30,000 0.000067

American oystercatcher 4 5000 0.00040

Atlantic salt marsh snake 5 10,000 0.00020

Audubon’s crested caracara 4 20,000 0.00010

Bald eagle 3 10,000 0.00020

Big Cypress fox squirrel 4 5000 0.00040

Black rail 4 5000 0.00040

Black skimmer 3 5000 0.00040

Black-whiskered vireo 3 5000 0.00040

Bluetail mole skink 4 5000 0.00040

Cape Sable seaside sparrow 5 5000 0.00040

Cooper’s Hawk 3 10,000 0.00020

Eastern diamondback

rattlesnake 3 5000 0.00040

Eastern indigo snake 4 10,000 0.00020

Everglades mink 4 790 0.00253

Florida black bear 2 150,000 0.0000133

Florida bonneted bat 5 5000 0.00040

Florida burrowing owl 3 5000 0.00040

Florida grasshopper sparrow 5 5000 0.00040

Florida Key deer 5 2600 0.00077

Florida Keys mole skink 5 5000 0.00040

Florida panther 5 29,000 0.000069

Florida sandhill crane 4 15,000 0.00013

Florida scrub lizard 4 5000 0.00040

Florida scrub-jay 4 3500 0.00057

Gopher tortoise 3 4000 0.00050

Key Largo woodrat 5 5000 0.00040

Least tern 3 5000 0.00040

Limpkin 3 5000 0.00040

Little blue heron 2 10,000 0.00020

Lower Keys rabbit 5 10,000 0.00020

Land 2022, 11, 2182 20 of 23

Table A2. Cont.

Common Name Weighting Dispersal Capability αValue in Zonation

(α = 2/Dispersal Capability)

Mangrove cuckoo 3 5000 0.00040

Marsh rabbit 1 10,000 0.00020

Mottled duck 3 10,000 0.00020

Ornate diamondback

terrapin 1 10,000 0.00020

Piping plover 4 5000 0.00040

Red-cockaded woodpecker 4 8000 0.00025

Reddish egret 4 10,000 0.00020

Rice rat 4 5000 0.00040

Rim rock crowned snake 5 5000 0.00040

roseate spoonbill 4 10,000 0.00020

Roseate tern 5 5000 0.00040

Rufa red knot 4 5000 0.00040

Sand skink 3 5000 0.00040

Sherman’s fox squirrel 3 740 0.00270

Short-tailed hawk 5 10,000 0.00020

Snail kite 4 10,000 0.00020

Snowy egret 3 10,000 0.00020

Snowy plover 5 1000 0.00200

Southeastern American

kestrel 3 10,000 0.00020

Southern chorus frog 1 5000 0.00040

Striped mud turtle 1 10,000 0.00020

Swallow-tailed kite 4 10,000 0.00020

Tricolored heron 2 10,000 0.00020

White crowned pigeon 3 10,000 0.00020

white ibis 2 10,000 0.00020

Whooping crane 5 5000 0.00040

Wood stork 4 10,000 0.00020

References

1. Ahern, J. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning

and design. Landsc. Ecol. 2013, 28, 1203–1212. [CrossRef]

2. Lu, Y.; Bullock, J.M. Biodiversity conservation in a changing environment beyond 2020. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabl8162. [CrossRef]

3. Newbold, T.; Hudson, L.N.; Hill, S.L.L.; Contu, S.; Lysenko, I.; Senior, R.A.; Börger, L.; Bennett, D.J.; Choimes, A.; Collen, B.; et al.

Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 2015, 520, 45–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

4. Yang, R.; Cao, Y.; Hou, S.; Peng, Q.; Wang, X.; Wang, F.; Tseng, T.-H.; Yu, L.; Carver, S.; Convery, I.; et al. Cost-effective priorities

for the expansion of global terrestrial protected areas: Setting post-2020 global and national targets. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabc3436.

[CrossRef]

5. König, H.J.; Kiffner, C.; Kramer-Schadt, S.; Fürst, C.; Keuling, O.; Ford, A.T. Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world.