patrickbdevaney/mia9 · Datasets at Hugging Face

text stringlengths 0 6.44k
Conserv. Biol. 2020, 34, 786–794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Pooley, S.; Bhatia, S.; Vasava, A. Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 784–793. [CrossRef]
7. Redpath, S.M.; Young, J.; Evely, A.; Adams, W.M.; Sutherland, W.J.; Whitehouse, A.; Amar, A.; Lambert, R.A.; Linnell, J.D.C.;
Watt, A.; et al. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28, 100–109. [CrossRef]
8. Karimi, A.; Tulloch, A.I.T.; Brown, G.; Hockings, M. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority
conservation areas. Conserv. Biol. 2017, 31, 1439–1449. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Young, J.C.; Marzano, M.; White, R.M.; McCracken, D.I.; Redpath, S.M.; Carss, D.N.; Quine, C.P.; Watt, A.D. The emergence
of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: Characteristics and management strategies. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19,
3973–3990. [CrossRef]
10. Henle, K.; Alard, D.; Clitherow, J.; Cobb, P.; Firbank, L.; Kull, T.; McCracken, D.; Moritz, R.F.A.; Niemelä, J.; Rebane, M.; et al.
Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—A review. Agric. Ecosyst.
Environ. 2008, 124, 60–71. [CrossRef]
Land 2022, 11, 2182 21 of 23
11. Moilanen, A.; Wilson, K.; Possingham, H. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools; Oxford
University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009.
12. Peng, Q.; Yang, R. A Review of Conservation Conflict Research: Concepts, Research Progress and Governance Strategies. Landsc.
Archit. 2021, 28, 53–57. [CrossRef]
13. Jalkanen, J.; Toivonen, T.; Moilanen, A. Identification of ecological networks for land-use planning with spatial conservation
prioritization. Landsc. Ecol. 2020, 35, 353–371. [CrossRef]
14. Jalkanen, J.; Vierikko, K.; Moilanen, A. Spatial prioritization for urban Biodiversity Quality using biotope maps and expert
opinion. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 49, 126586. [CrossRef]
15. Kreitler, J.; Schloss, C.A.; Soong, O.; Hannah, L.; Davis, F.W. Conservation planning for offsetting the impacts of development: A
case study of biodiversity and renewable energy in the Mojave Desert. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140226. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Moilanen, A. Planning impact avoidance and biodiversity offsetting using software for spatial conservation prioritisation. Wildl.
Res. 2013, 40, 153–162. [CrossRef]
17. Gordon, A.; Simondson, D.; White, M.; Moilanen, A.; Bekessy, S.A. Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in
urban landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91, 183–194. [CrossRef]
18. Moilanen, A.; Franco, A.M.A.; Early, R.I.; Fox, R.; Wintle, B.; Thomas, C.D. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation:
Methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272, 1885–1891. [CrossRef]
19. Zhu, M.J.; Hoctor, T.S.; Volk, M.; Frank, K.I.; Zwick, P.D.; Carr, M.H.; Linhoss, A.C. Spatial conservation prioritization to conserve
biodiversity in response to sea level rise and land use change in the Matanzas River Basin, Northeast Florida. Landsc. Urban Plan.
2015, 144, 103–118. [CrossRef]
20. Bekessy, S.A.; White, M.; Gordon, A.; Moilanen, A.; Mccarthy, M.A.; Wintle, B.A. Transparent planning for biodiversity and
development in the urban fringe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 108, 140–149. [CrossRef]
21. Lehtomäki, J.; Tomppo, E.; Kuokkanen, P.; Hanski, I.; Moilanen, A. Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and
high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 2439–2449. [CrossRef]
22. Baynham-Herd, Z.; Redpath, S.; Bunnefeld, N.; Molony, T.; Keane, A. Conservation conflicts: Behavioural threats, frames, and
intervention recommendations. Biol. Conserv. 2018, 222, 180–188. [CrossRef]
23. Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L.; Childers, D.L.; Mcdonnell, M.J.; Zhou, W. Evolution and future of urban ecological science:
Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2016, 2, e01229. [CrossRef]
24. Karimi, A.; Hockings, M. A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and
management. Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 33, 691–710. [CrossRef]
25. Whitehead, A.L.; Kujala, H.; Ives, C.D.; Gordon, A.; Lentini, P.E.; Wintle, B.A.; Nicholson, E.; Raymond, C.M. Integrating
biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28, 992–1003. [CrossRef]
26. Chen, F.; Zhu, M.; Yuan, L. Urban Planning in Response to Sea Level Rise and Future Urbanization in Southern Florida. In
Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA), Singapore, 4–6 March 2022;
pp. 240–244. [CrossRef]
27. Stys, B.; Foster, T.; Fuentes, M.M.P.B.; Glazer, B.; Karish, K.; Montero, N.; Reece, J.S. Climate Change Impacts on Florida’s
Biodiversity and Ecology. In Florida’s Climate: Changes, Variations, & Impacts; Florida Climate Institute: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2017;
Chapter 12; pp. 339–389. [CrossRef]
28. Blaustein, R.J. Biodiversity hotspot: The Florida panhandle. BioScience 2008, 58, 784–790. [CrossRef]
29. Gainsbury, A.M.; Santos, E.G.; Wiederhecker, H. Does urbanization impact terrestrial vertebrate ectotherms across a biodiversity
hotspot? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155446. [CrossRef]
30. Volk, M.; Hoctor, T.; Nettles, B.; Hilsenbeck, R.; Putz, F.; Oetting, J. Florida Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Past 100 Years.
In Florida’s Climate: Changes, Variations, & Impacts; Florida Climate Institute: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2017; Chapter 2; pp. 51–82.
[CrossRef]
31. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; University of Florida Geoplan Center; 1000 Friends of Florida. Florida
2070 Summary Report. 2016. Available online: https://1000friendsofflorida.org/florida2070/table-of-contents (accessed on 25
November 2022).
32. Florida Department of Transportation. Projections of Florida Population by County, 2020–2070 Prepared for Forecasting and Trends
Office; Florida Department of Transportation: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2020.
33. Haaland, C.; van den Bosch, C.K. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A
review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 760–771. [CrossRef]
34. Carr, M.H.; Zwick, P.D. Technical Report Florida 2070: Mapping Florida’s Future–Alternative Patterns of Development in 2070.
A research project prepared by the Geoplan Center at the University of Florida for the Florida Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services & 1000 Friends of Florida. 2016. Available online: https://1000friendsofflorida.org/florida2070/wp-content/
uploads/2016/09/florida2070technicalreportfinal.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2022).
35. Kareksela, S.; Moilanen, A.; Tuominen, S.; Kotiaho, J.S. Use of Inverse Spatial Conservation Prioritization to Avoid Biological
Diversity Loss Outside Protected Areas. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27, 1294–1303. [CrossRef]
36. Poor, E.E.; Scheick, B.K.; Mullinax, J.M. Multiscale consensus habitat modeling for landscape level conservation prioritization. Sci.
Rep. 2020, 10, 17783. [CrossRef]
Land 2022, 11, 2182 22 of 23
37. Brown, M.T.; Cohen, M.J.; Bardi, E.; Ingwersen, W.W. Species diversity in the Florida Everglades, USA: A systems approach to
calculating biodiversity. Aquat. Sci. 2006, 68, 254–277. [CrossRef]
38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
39. Kremen, C.; Cameron, A.; Moilanen, A.; Phillips, S.J.; Thomas, C.D.; Beentje, H.; Dransfield, J.; Fisher, B.L.; Glaw, F.; Good, T.C.;
et al. Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science 2008, 320, 222–226.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
40. National Wildlife Refuge Association; University of Florida Center for Landscape Conservation Planning. Southwest Florida
Landscape Conservation Design; National Wildlife Refuge Association: Washington, DC, USA; University of Florida Center for
Landscape Conservation Planning: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2017.
41. Bureau of Economic and Business Research; College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida. Florida Population: Census
Summary 2020; Bureau of Economic and Business Research; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2021.
42. Bureau of Economic and Business Research; College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida. Florida Estimates of
Population 2021; Bureau of Economic and Business Research; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2022.
43. Moilanen, A.; Pouzols, F.M.; Meller, L.; Veach, V.; Arponen, A.; Leppanen, J.; Kujala, H. Zonation—User Manual. 2004. Available online: https://www.syke.fi/en-US/Research__Development/Nature/Specialist_work/Zonation_in_Finland/Zonation_
software (accessed on 25 November 2022).
44. Cristaldi, M.A.; Sarquis, J.A.; Arzamendia, V.; Bellini, G.P.; Giraudo, A.R. Human activity and climate change as determinants of
spatial prioritization for the conservation of globally threatened birds in the southern Neotropic (Santa Fe, Argentina). Biodivers.
Conserv. 2019, 28, 2531–2553. [CrossRef]
45. Endries, M.; Stys, B.; Mohr, G.; Kratimenos, G.; Langley, S.; Root, K.; Kautz, R. Wildlife Habitat Conservation Needs in Florida Updated
Recommendations for Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas; Fish and Wildlife Research Institute: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2009.
46. Rule: 68A-27.003 Florida Endangered and Threatened Species List; Prohibitions. Available online: https://www.flrules.org/
gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=RULES%20RELATING%20TO%20ENDANGERED%20OR%20THREATENED%20SPECIES&ID=
68A-27.003 (accessed on 15 November 2022).
47. Lehtomäki, J.; Moilanen, A. Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation. Environ. Model. Softw.
2013, 47, 128–137. [CrossRef]
48. Rodgers, P.D.; Pienaar, E.F. Tolerance for the Florida panther in exurban southwest Florida. J. Wildl. Manag. 2018, 82, 865–876.
[CrossRef]
49. Moilanen, A.; Runge, M.C.; Elith, J.; Tyre, A.; Carmel, Y.; Fegraus, E.; Wintle, B.A.; Burgman, M.; Ben-Haim, Y. Planning for robust

Conserv. Biol. 2020, 34, 786–794. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

6. Pooley, S.; Bhatia, S.; Vasava, A. Rethinking the study of human–wildlife coexistence. Conserv. Biol. 2021, 35, 784–793. [CrossRef]

7. Redpath, S.M.; Young, J.; Evely, A.; Adams, W.M.; Sutherland, W.J.; Whitehouse, A.; Amar, A.; Lambert, R.A.; Linnell, J.D.C.;

Watt, A.; et al. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28, 100–109. [CrossRef]

8. Karimi, A.; Tulloch, A.I.T.; Brown, G.; Hockings, M. Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority

conservation areas. Conserv. Biol. 2017, 31, 1439–1449. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

9. Young, J.C.; Marzano, M.; White, R.M.; McCracken, D.I.; Redpath, S.M.; Carss, D.N.; Quine, C.P.; Watt, A.D. The emergence

of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: Characteristics and management strategies. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19,

3973–3990. [CrossRef]

10. Henle, K.; Alard, D.; Clitherow, J.; Cobb, P.; Firbank, L.; Kull, T.; McCracken, D.; Moritz, R.F.A.; Niemelä, J.; Rebane, M.; et al.

Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe—A review. Agric. Ecosyst.

Environ. 2008, 124, 60–71. [CrossRef]

Land 2022, 11, 2182 21 of 23

11. Moilanen, A.; Wilson, K.; Possingham, H. Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools; Oxford

University Press: Oxford, UK, 2009.

12. Peng, Q.; Yang, R. A Review of Conservation Conflict Research: Concepts, Research Progress and Governance Strategies. Landsc.

Archit. 2021, 28, 53–57. [CrossRef]

13. Jalkanen, J.; Toivonen, T.; Moilanen, A. Identification of ecological networks for land-use planning with spatial conservation

prioritization. Landsc. Ecol. 2020, 35, 353–371. [CrossRef]

14. Jalkanen, J.; Vierikko, K.; Moilanen, A. Spatial prioritization for urban Biodiversity Quality using biotope maps and expert

opinion. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 49, 126586. [CrossRef]

15. Kreitler, J.; Schloss, C.A.; Soong, O.; Hannah, L.; Davis, F.W. Conservation planning for offsetting the impacts of development: A

case study of biodiversity and renewable energy in the Mojave Desert. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140226. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

16. Moilanen, A. Planning impact avoidance and biodiversity offsetting using software for spatial conservation prioritisation. Wildl.

Res. 2013, 40, 153–162. [CrossRef]

17. Gordon, A.; Simondson, D.; White, M.; Moilanen, A.; Bekessy, S.A. Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in

urban landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 91, 183–194. [CrossRef]

18. Moilanen, A.; Franco, A.M.A.; Early, R.I.; Fox, R.; Wintle, B.; Thomas, C.D. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation:

Methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 272, 1885–1891. [CrossRef]

19. Zhu, M.J.; Hoctor, T.S.; Volk, M.; Frank, K.I.; Zwick, P.D.; Carr, M.H.; Linhoss, A.C. Spatial conservation prioritization to conserve

biodiversity in response to sea level rise and land use change in the Matanzas River Basin, Northeast Florida. Landsc. Urban Plan.

2015, 144, 103–118. [CrossRef]

20. Bekessy, S.A.; White, M.; Gordon, A.; Moilanen, A.; Mccarthy, M.A.; Wintle, B.A. Transparent planning for biodiversity and

development in the urban fringe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 108, 140–149. [CrossRef]

21. Lehtomäki, J.; Tomppo, E.; Kuokkanen, P.; Hanski, I.; Moilanen, A. Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and

high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258, 2439–2449. [CrossRef]

22. Baynham-Herd, Z.; Redpath, S.; Bunnefeld, N.; Molony, T.; Keane, A. Conservation conflicts: Behavioural threats, frames, and

intervention recommendations. Biol. Conserv. 2018, 222, 180–188. [CrossRef]

23. Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L.; Childers, D.L.; Mcdonnell, M.J.; Zhou, W. Evolution and future of urban ecological science:

Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2016, 2, e01229. [CrossRef]

24. Karimi, A.; Hockings, M. A social-ecological approach to land-use conflict to inform regional and conservation planning and

management. Landsc. Ecol. 2018, 33, 691–710. [CrossRef]

25. Whitehead, A.L.; Kujala, H.; Ives, C.D.; Gordon, A.; Lentini, P.E.; Wintle, B.A.; Nicholson, E.; Raymond, C.M. Integrating

biological and social values when prioritizing places for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2014, 28, 992–1003. [CrossRef]

26. Chen, F.; Zhu, M.; Yuan, L. Urban Planning in Response to Sea Level Rise and Future Urbanization in Southern Florida. In

Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA), Singapore, 4–6 March 2022;

pp. 240–244. [CrossRef]

27. Stys, B.; Foster, T.; Fuentes, M.M.P.B.; Glazer, B.; Karish, K.; Montero, N.; Reece, J.S. Climate Change Impacts on Florida’s

Biodiversity and Ecology. In Florida’s Climate: Changes, Variations, & Impacts; Florida Climate Institute: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2017;

Chapter 12; pp. 339–389. [CrossRef]

28. Blaustein, R.J. Biodiversity hotspot: The Florida panhandle. BioScience 2008, 58, 784–790. [CrossRef]

29. Gainsbury, A.M.; Santos, E.G.; Wiederhecker, H. Does urbanization impact terrestrial vertebrate ectotherms across a biodiversity

hotspot? Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 835, 155446. [CrossRef]

30. Volk, M.; Hoctor, T.; Nettles, B.; Hilsenbeck, R.; Putz, F.; Oetting, J. Florida Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Past 100 Years.

In Florida’s Climate: Changes, Variations, & Impacts; Florida Climate Institute: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2017; Chapter 2; pp. 51–82.

[CrossRef]

31. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services; University of Florida Geoplan Center; 1000 Friends of Florida. Florida

2070 Summary Report. 2016. Available online: https://1000friendsofflorida.org/florida2070/table-of-contents (accessed on 25

November 2022).

32. Florida Department of Transportation. Projections of Florida Population by County, 2020–2070 Prepared for Forecasting and Trends

Office; Florida Department of Transportation: Tallahassee, FL, USA, 2020.

33. Haaland, C.; van den Bosch, C.K. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A

review. Urban For. Urban Green. 2015, 14, 760–771. [CrossRef]

34. Carr, M.H.; Zwick, P.D. Technical Report Florida 2070: Mapping Florida’s Future–Alternative Patterns of Development in 2070.

A research project prepared by the Geoplan Center at the University of Florida for the Florida Department of Agriculture and

Consumer Services & 1000 Friends of Florida. 2016. Available online: https://1000friendsofflorida.org/florida2070/wp-content/

uploads/2016/09/florida2070technicalreportfinal.pdf (accessed on 25 November 2022).

35. Kareksela, S.; Moilanen, A.; Tuominen, S.; Kotiaho, J.S. Use of Inverse Spatial Conservation Prioritization to Avoid Biological

Diversity Loss Outside Protected Areas. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27, 1294–1303. [CrossRef]

36. Poor, E.E.; Scheick, B.K.; Mullinax, J.M. Multiscale consensus habitat modeling for landscape level conservation prioritization. Sci.

Rep. 2020, 10, 17783. [CrossRef]

Land 2022, 11, 2182 22 of 23

37. Brown, M.T.; Cohen, M.J.; Bardi, E.; Ingwersen, W.W. Species diversity in the Florida Everglades, USA: A systems approach to

calculating biodiversity. Aquat. Sci. 2006, 68, 254–277. [CrossRef]

38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. South Florida Multi-Species Recovery Plan; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1999.

39. Kremen, C.; Cameron, A.; Moilanen, A.; Phillips, S.J.; Thomas, C.D.; Beentje, H.; Dransfield, J.; Fisher, B.L.; Glaw, F.; Good, T.C.;

et al. Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science 2008, 320, 222–226.

[CrossRef] [PubMed]

40. National Wildlife Refuge Association; University of Florida Center for Landscape Conservation Planning. Southwest Florida

Landscape Conservation Design; National Wildlife Refuge Association: Washington, DC, USA; University of Florida Center for

Landscape Conservation Planning: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2017.

41. Bureau of Economic and Business Research; College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida. Florida Population: Census

Summary 2020; Bureau of Economic and Business Research; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2021.

42. Bureau of Economic and Business Research; College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida. Florida Estimates of

Population 2021; Bureau of Economic and Business Research; University of Florida: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2022.

43. Moilanen, A.; Pouzols, F.M.; Meller, L.; Veach, V.; Arponen, A.; Leppanen, J.; Kujala, H. Zonation—User Manual. 2004. Available online: https://www.syke.fi/en-US/Research__Development/Nature/Specialist_work/Zonation_in_Finland/Zonation_

software (accessed on 25 November 2022).

44. Cristaldi, M.A.; Sarquis, J.A.; Arzamendia, V.; Bellini, G.P.; Giraudo, A.R. Human activity and climate change as determinants of

spatial prioritization for the conservation of globally threatened birds in the southern Neotropic (Santa Fe, Argentina). Biodivers.

Conserv. 2019, 28, 2531–2553. [CrossRef]

45. Endries, M.; Stys, B.; Mohr, G.; Kratimenos, G.; Langley, S.; Root, K.; Kautz, R. Wildlife Habitat Conservation Needs in Florida Updated

Recommendations for Strategic Habitat Conservation Areas; Fish and Wildlife Research Institute: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2009.

46. Rule: 68A-27.003 Florida Endangered and Threatened Species List; Prohibitions. Available online: https://www.flrules.org/

gateway/RuleNo.asp?title=RULES%20RELATING%20TO%20ENDANGERED%20OR%20THREATENED%20SPECIES&ID=

68A-27.003 (accessed on 15 November 2022).

47. Lehtomäki, J.; Moilanen, A. Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation. Environ. Model. Softw.

2013, 47, 128–137. [CrossRef]

48. Rodgers, P.D.; Pienaar, E.F. Tolerance for the Florida panther in exurban southwest Florida. J. Wildl. Manag. 2018, 82, 865–876.

[CrossRef]

49. Moilanen, A.; Runge, M.C.; Elith, J.; Tyre, A.; Carmel, Y.; Fegraus, E.; Wintle, B.A.; Burgman, M.; Ben-Haim, Y. Planning for robust