text
stringlengths 0
6.44k
|
---|
fishing, and snorkeling (Donahue et al. 2008). An |
examination of potential tourism impacts to 19 of |
Florida’s neighboring countries in the Caribbean (where |
tourism contributes 14% to gross domestic product) |
showed that 29–60% of coastal tourist resort destinations are likely to be partially or fully inundated with 1 m |
of SLR, and losses greater than 50% in five of these |
countries (Scott et al. 2012). In Florida, in one year alone, |
state, local, and federal sources spent $105 million for 19 |
beach renourishment projects because of their importance to the tourism industry, a cost that is likely to grow |
with SLR (Klein and Osleeb 2010). |
Before 2012, many government agencies entrusted |
with the protection of natural resources either were not |
developing or not implementing climate adaptation |
plans (Archie et al. 2012). Mozumder et al. (2011) |
surveyed personnel from federal and state agencies, |
nongovernmental organizations, and other relevant |
experts in the Florida Keys on climate change and its |
impacts and found that respondents felt they were |
making decisions without formal adaptation plans, with |
a lack of information, and without appropriate institutional frameworks in place to address increasing |
environmental damage from climate change. Since then, |
Florida has been proactive about climate adaptation |
planning, particularly with respect to coastal flooding |
and SLR. Florida has created ‘‘adaptation action areas’’ |
[Community Planning Act, Florida Statues Section |
163.3164(1)] in cities and counties throughout the state |
that are threatened by high water events and are |
hydrologically connected to coastal waters with the goal |
of prioritizing funding for infrastructure and adaptation |
planning for coastal flooding. The Florida Fish and |
Wildlife Conservation Commission (2016) also released |
a guide for the conservation and management of |
Florida’s species, habitats, and ecosystems given predicted impacts from climate change. Depending on how |
Florida moves forward with implementation of these |
adaptation strategies that include protecting natural |
habitats in its coastal regions, planned actions could |
have major implications not only for natural resources |
conservation but also for storm surge and flood |
protection into the future (Geselbracht et al. 2015; |
Romanach et al. 2018). Although Florida may be farther ˜ |
along than most, a study of adaptation plans from other |
developed countries highlights shortcomings with preparedness for climate change and minimal plans to |
implement management actions to reduce vulnerability |
and suggests integrating adaptation planning as an |
integral part of urban planning (Preston et al. 2011). |
Understanding the future effects of urbanization and |
SLR on conservation targets is important to aid in |
conservation planning. Not only are urbanization and |
SLR affecting land use and conservation planning |
globally, they are also expected to increase in the future |
(Nicholls and Cazenave 2010; Wang et al. 2012). |
Information on the potential extent of future urbanization and SLR can benefit decision makers to help them |
effectively manage species and habitats of conservation |
concern. |
Supplemental Material |
Please note: The Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management |
is not responsible for the content or functionality of any |
supplemental material. Queries should be directed to the |
corresponding author for the article. |
Reference S1. Donahue S, Acosta A, Akins L, Ault J, |
Bohnsack J, Boyer J, Callahan M, Causey B, Cox C, |
Delaney J, Delgado G, Edwards K, Garrett G, Keller B, |
Kellison GT, Leeworthy VR, MacLaughlin L, McClenachan |
L, Miller MW, Miller SL, Ritchie K, Rohmann S, Santavy D, |
Pattengill-Semmens C, Sniffen B, Werndli S, Williams DE. |
2008. The state of coral reef ecosystems of the Florida |
Keys. Pages 161–415 in Waddell JE, Clarke AM, editors. |
The state of coral reef ecosystems of the United States |
and Pacific Freely Associated States: 2008. NOAA |
Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 73, NOAA/NCCOS |
Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment’s Biogeography Team, Silver Spring, Maryland. |
Found at DOI: https://doi.org/10.3996/092019-JFWM076.S1 (3.89 MB PDF); also available at https://pdfs. |
semanticscholar.org/839b/04d38c556f159392ba59eeb91 |
ffdeea31c9b.pdf. |
Archived Material |
Please note: The Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management |
is not responsible for the content or functionality of any |
archived material. Queries should be directed to the |
corresponding author for the article. |
To cite this archived material, please cite both the |
journal article (formatting found in the Abstract section of |
this article) and the following recommended format for the |
archived material. |
Data A1. Spatial data layer of the High Pine and Scrub |
Priority Resource from the Peninsular Florida Landscape |
Conservation Cooperative, clipped to areas of Priority 1 |
and 2 from the Critical Land and Waters Identification |
Project 4.0 Aggregated Priorities model. |
Impacts of Urbanization and Sea Level Rise S.S. Romanach et al. ˜ |
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management | www.fwspubs.org June 2020 | Volume 11 | Issue 1 | 181 |
Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfwm/article-pdf/11/1/174/3103287/i1944-687x-11-1-174.pdf by guest on 29 February 2024 |
Archived by Peninsular Florida Landscape Conservation Cooperative: https://flcpa.databasin.org/datasets/ |
cf49e64adaad4ccb946c040e0547bfc6 |
Data A2. Spatial data layer of the Coastal Uplands |
Priority Resource for the Peninsular Florida Landscape |
Conservation Cooperative, clipped to areas of Priority 1 |
and 2 from the Critical Land and Waters Identification |
Project 4.0 Aggregated Priorities model. |
Archived by Peninsular Florida Landscape Conservation Cooperative: https://flcpa.databasin.org/datasets/ |
fcd700e01ea2404ca75ed75dae940188 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.