arg_1
stringlengths 4
5.08k
| round_1
float64 2
8
⌀ | ann_1
float64 1
2
⌀ | arg_2
stringlengths 8
2.19k
| round_2
float64 1
7
⌀ | ann_2
float64 1
2
⌀ | annotation_name
stringclasses 131
values | is_attacks
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
You have Principle-agent problem on page 3 and Problem-Agent (Agent with capitalized “A”) on page 4.
| null | null |
Also, I believe that figure 2 needs some more explanation.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_boyarkin
| 0 |
page 4: you said “this type of incentives… (p.136)…” after “(p.136)", you need a comma.
| null | null |
Then, it is followed by the model discussion, conclusion and future work.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_boyarkin
| 0 |
However, again, there is not sufficient amount of explanation/elaboration on how your version of the CIRA is connected to the original model.
| null | null |
I have tried to accomodate your comments to the best of my ability.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_boyarkin
| 0 |
From this point of view, this study can have a significant implication/application in the literature.
| null | null |
I have tried to accomodate your comments to the best of my ability.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_boyarkin
| 0 |
This should change to “to manage the risk of human factors or to risk management of human factors”.
| null | null |
page 4: you said “this type of incentives… (p.136)…” after “(p.136)", you need a comma.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_boyarkin
| 0 |
Also, you have to say “these types of incentives” as a plural version based on your used verb that is plural.
| null | null |
R4 You did a good job explaining your case study.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_makarova
| 0 |
The CIRA does appear to be a useful and interesting tool for assessing risk, with particular regard to incentive structures.
| null | null |
From this point of view, this study can have a significant implication/application in the literature.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_makarova
| 0 |
Based on what I see and get from reading your paper, the CIRA methodology is not the framework that you proposed.
| null | null |
You did cite a reference in this regard, but you may need to briefly explain it.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_makarova
| 0 |
This should change to “to manage the risk of human factors or to risk management of human factors”.
| null | null |
On page 2 in the introduction the authors claim to apply CIRA to research questions such as finding the root cause of an incident of misconduct in peer review, as well as other potential risks inherent in the process.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_makarova
| 0 |
I suggest that you review the whole paper again and edit it as needed.
| null | null |
You have some examples of what has been done in the area of peer review process and the risk analysis of such a process.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_makarova
| 0 |
page 3, paragraph 5) while in other places, you said “peer-review”; hyphenated (e.g.
| null | null |
This does not look professional in scientific papers.
| null | null |
admsci5030125_makarova
| 0 |
Thank you very much for your helpful commentary!
| null | null |
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response This is a significantly improved version of the manuscript.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
This is unclear in the paper - a methodology chapter/discussion is needed.
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 3 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Second, the board-manager relationship is only a small part of the research on nonprofit boards, which in turn is the major focus of nonprofit governance research (Cornforth, 2012; Renz and Andersson, 2014).
| null | null |
To address these subtlies see: Turnbull (2002) A New Way to Govern Cornforth (2004) The Governance of Associations and Mutuals: A Paradox Perspective Ridley-Duff (2007) Communitarian Perspectives on Social Enterprise
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
In the social economy (associations, mutuals and cooperatives) the legal structures and accountabilities are different (and are captured well in the paper).
| null | null |
For example, the third sector itself can be seen as diverse with philanthropic, mutual, cooperative and association sub-sectors.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
- Figure 1 text overwrite part of the figure, and there should be comments on how this is different from a general structure for a private sector company (if you look at stakeholders as shareholders).
| null | null |
As such, applying the idea of the Ostrom design principles to nonprofit governance and illustrating this with a case study may more clearly show the contribution of the manuscript to the current literature.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Just as the wealthy entrepreneur seeks to control the private enterprise through shareholdings, so the wealthy philanthropist seeks to control the non-profit enterprise through trust law.
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 4 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Certainly, some description of the process by which the case study was developed (sources used, data collection techniquies, analysis techniques) are needed to be publishable.
| null | null |
These issues, and the second one in particular, points towards unclear research methodology.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
A sectoral comparison of wage levels and wage inequality in human services industries.
| null | null |
These apply in both cases because funding is sought from wealthy providers with the power to frame laws that require their investees to use the money for the purposes stimpulated by them.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
The comments at the start of the literature review might apply to foundations and charities, but are less true of association and mutuals (let alone cooperatives).
| null | null |
First, the principal-agent approach is only one of theoretical perspectives used to analyze nonprofit governance (Cornforth, 2004; Renz and Andersson, 2014).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
- Figure 1 text overwrite part of the figure, and there should be comments on how this is different from a general structure for a private sector company (if you look at stakeholders as shareholders).
| null | null |
The text itself is now almost finished, I only have a few minor comments: -
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions.
| null | null |
Your choices may be OK in given circumstances, but how do you argue for these choices here?
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
This is unclear in the paper - a methodology chapter/discussion is needed.
| null | null |
- the case description and analysis is based only on media accounts - no actual first hand information to inform the analysis.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
R3 These issues, and the second one in particular, points towards unclear research methodology.
| null | null |
- Figure 1 text overwrite part of the figure, and there should be comments on how this is different from a general structure for a private sector company (if you look at stakeholders as shareholders).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
The writing is good, there is a sound development of the theory, and some well drawn conclusions.
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 4 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Minor issues (details really): - Wrong reference number on page 4, line 14: should be 15.
| null | null |
In the abstract, the author also states that the over-reliance on the principal-agent model introduces two challenges.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Certainly, some description of the process by which the case study was developed (sources used, data collection techniquies, analysis techniques) are needed to be publishable.
| null | null |
COMMENT #4: The comments added in the beginning of Chapter 3 on methodology are important and improves the text a lot.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
R3 These issues, and the second one in particular, points towards unclear research methodology.
| null | null |
The text itself is now almost finished, I only have a few minor comments: - The literature part is improved by changing the headline, putting it in the right setting.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Furthermore, given that the world of third sector organizations is very rich and heterogeneous, one should be careful by discussing third sector organizations in general, especially since the case study seems to focus on co-operative enterprises.
| null | null |
However, I cannot see how chapter 2.2. is a sub-theme under the Ostrom Principles?
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Your comments have made this paper significantly better.
| null | null |
The author openly acknowledges that the basis for a complete picture is lacking.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
R12 The author is mixing up several concepts and ignore the abundant literature on governance in nonprofits not dealing with the agency theory.
| null | null |
The abstract of the manuscript mentions that dominant modes of third sector organizational governance adhere to a narrow principal-agent orientation.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions.
| null | null |
A sectoral comparison of wage levels and wage inequality in human services industries.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
I do not agree with the author for several reasons.
| null | null |
Secondly, I just can't agree that third sector governance is derived from for-profit principles.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
The abstract of the manuscript mentions that dominant modes of third sector organizational governance adhere to a narrow principal-agent orientation.
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 1 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
I do not agree with the author for several reasons.
| null | null |
Your comments have made this paper significantly better.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Is there a way to interview members who participated in action (or access sources written by them)?
| null | null |
However, there are subtleties in the literature that need considering, and also the methodology (which is extremely weak).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Associations, mutuals and cooperatives, however, are not dependent on the patronage of the rich, but the patronage of the many, and their mass member legal R9 structures and accountability mechanisms reflect this.
| null | null |
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40(4): 608-633.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
It is good to see the author is open for suggestions from reviewers.
| null | null |
Cornforth (2004) has already analyzed the governance of co-operatives from multiple theoretical R5 perspectives.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(3): 431-451.
| null | null |
In addition, a more extensive literature review and comparison with previous principal-agent literature and stakeholder governance models (especially Van Puyvelde et al., 2012 and Coule, 2015) may give the manuscript a more solid theoretical foundation.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
I still have doubts about the basis for conclusion and generalization of findings.
| null | null |
First, the principal-agent approach is only one of theoretical perspectives used to analyze nonprofit governance (Cornforth, 2004; Renz and Andersson, 2014).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Given the inclusion of Coule's paper, I would have already expected more sensitivity to divisions unitary and pluralist theories of governance but by reviting this (and reading Turnbull's Cornforth's and Ridley-Duff's precursor to Coule's work), this should be adequately addressed.
| null | null |
THEORISATION Lastly, the discussion and conclusions need to stick to contributions to theory / research practice and refrain from commenting on wider issues without adequate justification.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
I do not agree with the author for several reasons.
| null | null |
Is there a way to interview members who participated in action (or access sources written by them)?
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
COMMENT #6: Low on page 16: "The ownership becomes absentee, ..." This is in the case of co-operative?
| null | null |
This paper communicated a nice research idea, but I find it too superficial in its approach.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
The conceptual framework is not clearly presented and I do not see what are the contributions except some free statements at the end not really related to the analysis.
| null | null |
Given the aforementioned comments, I would advise the author to revise the paper by focusing on the governance of nonprofit associations / co-operatives.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Associations, mutuals and cooperatives, however, are not dependent on the patronage of the rich, but the patronage of the many, and their mass member legal R9 structures and accountability mechanisms reflect this.
| null | null |
However, the credibility of the R11 paper and findings would be enormously enhanced is some primary interview data could be collected and presented.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
I would not have thought of this as a major issue unless Evers and Laville (2004) The third sector in Europe, Edward Elgar, spesifically discuss whether cooperations are defined within or outside the third sector.
| null | null |
The text itself is now almost finished, I only have a few minor comments: - The literature part is improved by changing the headline, putting it in the right setting.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Certainly, some description of the process by which the case study was developed (sources used, data collection techniquies, analysis techniques) are needed to be publishable.
| null | null |
The governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
(2012) and the idea that is necessary to capture the broader stakeholder environment in a democratic way is also not new (Coule, 2015).
| null | null |
This is unclear in the paper - a methodology chapter/discussion is needed.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_devetyaro
| 0 |
Nonprofit Management & Leadership 12(4): 429 -450.
| null | null |
Minor issues (details really): - Wrong reference number on page 4, line 14: should be 15.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
It is good to see the author is open for suggestions from reviewers.
| null | null |
However, I cannot see how chapter 2.2. is a sub-theme under the Ostrom Principles?
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
The board as a monitor of organizational activity: the applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards.
| null | null |
Furthermore, attempts have already been made to broaden the principal-agent approach in nonprofit organizations (Ben-Ner et al., 2012; Van Puyvelde et al., 2012, Coule, 2015), leading me to the question what this manuscript actually adds to the literature.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
The use of media sources, while not ideal, might be adequate if the author(s) can show systematic and comprehensive collection of them.
| null | null |
The author openly acknowledges that the basis for a complete picture is lacking.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Minor issues (details really): - Wrong reference number on page 4, line 14: should be 15.
| null | null |
The author openly acknowledges that the basis for a complete picture is lacking.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
- Figure 1 text overwrite part of the figure, and there should be comments on how this is different from a general structure for a private sector company (if you look at stakeholders as shareholders).
| null | null |
R12 The author is mixing up several concepts and ignore the abundant literature on governance in nonprofits not dealing with the agency theory.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
There is, however, some common practices, but not for the reasons described.
| null | null |
Associations, mutuals and cooperatives, however, are not dependent on the patronage of the rich, but the patronage of the many, and their mass member legal R9 structures and accountability mechanisms reflect this.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
I still have doubts about the basis for conclusion and generalization of findings.
| null | null |
I believe that this then addresses the issues that fall in line with your critiques about the theoretical foundation.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
It is very similar to the nonprofit governance model of Van Puyvelde et al.
| null | null |
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: and Author Response This is a significantly improved version of the manuscript.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
COMMENT #6: Low on page 16: "The ownership becomes absentee, ..." This is in the case of co-operative?
| null | null |
LITERATURE R10 The characterisation of third sector governance is too crude.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
- USA context concerning cooperatives (upper half page 10) should be highlighted even more for readers to be able to compare to their own context (for instance in Europe)
| null | null |
Stick to commenting on the usefulness and value of ODPs, and draw out any theoretical contributions regarding the design principles themselves, or their value as a theoretical perspective for governance research.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
A sectoral comparison of wage levels and wage inequality in human services industries.
| null | null |
In both cases, Principle-Agent assumptions apply, but not because both are based on for-profit assumptions.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Thank you very much for your helpful commentary!
| null | null |
Round 1: and Author Response The basic premise of this article is good: the application of Ostrom's design principles as a way of analysing / evaluating governance in third sector organisations is quite innovative, particularly combined with a discussion of third sector / cooperative governance principles.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Furthermore, given that the world of third sector organizations is very rich and heterogeneous, one should be careful by discussing third sector organizations in general, especially since the case study seems to focus on co-operative enterprises.
| null | null |
The disadvantages of a too narrow principal-agent approach have been acknowledged in previous studies (Miller, 2002).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Some well grounded comments on their use in other governance research are merited right at the end.
| null | null |
I also have problems with the depth of the discussion, and I feel the conclusion does not match the promises of the abstract.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
I think it needs linking back to the findings more clearly and to be elaborated and slightly more length (cut some literature if needed to stay within the word length limits).
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 1 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Second, I note in the paper that I am not making the claim that the co-operative model is part of the third sector.
| null | null |
However, a solid foundation for this argument is missing.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
The disadvantages of a too narrow principal-agent approach have been acknowledged in previous studies (Miller, 2002).
| null | null |
I think it needs linking back to the findings more clearly and to be elaborated and slightly more length (cut some literature if needed to stay within the word length limits).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Stick to commenting on the usefulness and value of ODPs, and draw out any theoretical contributions regarding the design principles themselves, or their value as a theoretical perspective for governance research.
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 4 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
- The comments added in the beginning of Chapter 3 on methodology are important and improves the text a lot.
| null | null |
- Figure 1 text overwrite part of the figure, and there should be comments on how this is different from a general structure for a private sector company (if you look at stakeholders as shareholders).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Voluntas 22:566–586 R6 Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 2 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
Given the inclusion of Coule's paper, I would have already expected more sensitivity to divisions unitary and pluralist theories of governance but by reviting this (and reading Turnbull's Cornforth's and Ridley-Duff's precursor to Coule's work), this should be adequately addressed.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
First, the principal-agent approach is only one of theoretical perspectives used to analyze nonprofit governance (Cornforth, 2004; Renz and Andersson, 2014).
| null | null |
R7 I am also not convinced by the definition of co-operatives mentioned in the paper.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Given the case study, I would focus on the governance of co-operatives (Cornforth, 2004).
| null | null |
As such, applying the idea of the Ostrom design principles to nonprofit governance and illustrating this with a case study may more clearly show the contribution of the manuscript to the current literature.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
This is unclear in the paper - a methodology chapter/discussion is needed.
| null | null |
- The cooperative firm removes adversarial aspects of market contracting (page 11) - what adversarial aspects?
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
This is unclear in the paper - a methodology chapter/discussion is needed.
| null | null |
The abstract of the manuscript mentions that dominant modes of third sector organizational governance adhere to a narrow principal-agent orientation.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Given the case study, I would focus on the governance of co-operatives (Cornforth, 2004).
| null | null |
R8 Note that the paper no longer claims this to be a case study, and instead positions itself as a discussion paper, performing a secondary archival analysis of media accounts.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
), Nonprofit Governance: Innovative Perspectives and Approaches.
| null | null |
I do not understand the purpose of the paper.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Voluntas 22:566–586 R6 Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 2 I copied and pasted the reviewer commentary, below.
| null | null |
R12 The author is mixing up several concepts and ignore the abundant literature on governance in nonprofits not dealing with the agency theory.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
Stick to commenting on the usefulness and value of ODPs, and draw out any theoretical contributions regarding the design principles themselves, or their value as a theoretical perspective for governance research.
| null | null |
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41(3): 431-451.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
However, I cannot see how chapter 2.2. is a sub-theme under the Ostrom Principles?
| null | null |
I think it needs linking back to the findings more clearly and to be elaborated and slightly more length (cut some literature if needed to stay within the word length limits).
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
The basic premise of this article is good: the application of Ostrom's design principles as a way of analysing / evaluating governance in third sector organisations is quite innovative, particularly combined with a discussion of third sector / cooperative governance principles.
| null | null |
Cornforth (2004) has already analyzed the governance of co-operatives from multiple theoretical perspectives.
| null | null |
admsci5030148_makarova
| 0 |
The authors conclude that they found ‘consistent combinations of the types of national policies, local clusters, and cluster management’.
| null | null |
Timing and content suggest that French national policies may well have been inspired by the German BioRegio contest.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
The relevance of the information presented here for the following discussion and conclusion remain far from clear.
| null | null |
• Page 10, line 19 – ‘several cluster policies’: I would address this family of related programmes as one policy rather than many.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
Given the conceptual framework outlined in figure 1, one might also wonder why national policymakers, i.e.
| null | null |
(…) A conceptual and/or theoretical perspective is needed to shed light at the differences found.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
in terms of the role of the state versus private initiative, governance traditions and philosophies, centralist vs. federal set-up.
| null | null |
As a consequence, I can now recommend the paper for publication with minor corrections, including some language editing.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
‘Public research-led cluster’ might be more to the point, as it appears difficult to judge if these are more or less ‘intellectual’ than other forms of clusters.
| null | null |
When outlining their research methodology, the authors should state precisely how many interviews they conducted.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
Section 4: The presentation of the six case studies is very systematic and clear.
| null | null |
Broad Comments The paper fills an important research deficit by focusing on the interdependence between national cluster policy programmes and their implementation by cluster management on the ground.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
Since Japan, France and Germany are all classified as co-ordinated market economies in the original VoC concept, more nuanced differentiations of capitalisms – or other institutional frameworks – might be recommended for the paper.
| null | null |
Second Round of Evaluation Round 2: The paper now looks but
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
KIESE, M., 2013: Regional cluster policies in Germany – A multi-level governance perspective on policy learning.
| null | null |
The performance of clusters is also affected by many exogenous influences not captured in the simple model.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
o P. 22: “differences might be attributed to those in innovation systems as basic conditions of clusters.” This is central, so the discussion should be summarised in the conclusions, preferably R15 taking up the three hypotheses: To what extent and how can differences in cluster policies and cluster management be linked to differences in national systems of innovation?
| null | null |
Broad Comments • However, the conceptual framework appears simplistic, technocratic and static, and it is not sufficiently rooted in literature as evident from the scarcity of references in section 2.2.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
• Section 2 contains a number of “expectations”, which could be flagged out and numbered as hypotheses.
| null | null |
The performance of clusters is also affected by many exogenous influences not captured in the simple model.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
As a consequence, I can now recommend the paper for publication with minor corrections, including some language editing.
| null | null |
; BOSCHMA, R.; COOKE, P., 2011: Constructing regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
Also sound profiling of the different cluster programs and initiatives.
| null | null |
R2 Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 1 We are very grateful for your valuable comments and suggestions, which help improve our manuscript significantly.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
KOSCHATZKY, K., 2000: A river is a river – Cross-border networking between Alsace and Baden.
| null | null |
We provided minor corrections to our manuscript based on the following comments.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
KIESE, M., 2013: Regional cluster policies in Germany – A multi-level governance perspective on policy learning.
| null | null |
R14 Round 2: I wish to congratulate the authors for their careful and thoughtful revision.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
We tried to consider the comments and suggestions as far as possible in revising our manuscript.
| null | null |
In sum, I recommend that the paper be reconsidered after a major revision.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
• The authors focus on what they call ‘intellectual clusters’, a term that appears 21 times throughout the paper although I cannot recall having ever seen it in a decade or so of studying clusters and cluster policies.
| null | null |
There are also existing reviews of cluster policies in Europe that should be considered (Clusters are Individuals, 2012, BMWi; VDI/VDE; Dasti).
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
As Kiese (2009) showed for three European Countries including Germany and France, these differences leave an imprint on the design and implementation of national cluster policies.
| null | null |
The varieties of capitalism (VoC) concept developed by HALL/SOSKICE (2011) may be a suitable concept here, as it has been applied to cluster policies in the U.S. and Germany by STERNBERG ET AL.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
When outlining their research methodology, the authors should state precisely how many interviews they conducted.
| null | null |
1992: National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
Round 2: Author Response to Reviewer 2 I wish to congratulate the authors for their careful and thoughtful revision.
| null | null |
Since this may be managed by the editorial office, I do not see the need for another review.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
• Furthermore, ‘initial conditions’ fail to capture the complexity of clusters if they are reduced to a dichotomy of private vs. public sector dominance.
| null | null |
Round 1: Author Response to Reviewer 2 We are very grateful for your detailed, insightful comments and suggestions, which help improve our manuscript significantly.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
R10 · Section 4: The presentation of the six case studies is very systematic and clear.
| null | null |
• Page 15, line 27: Repetition – the IZB incubator was already mentioned on line 9.
| null | null |
admsci5040213_boyarkin
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.