arg_1
stringlengths 4
5.08k
| round_1
float64 2
8
⌀ | ann_1
float64 1
2
⌀ | arg_2
stringlengths 8
2.19k
| round_2
float64 1
7
⌀ | ann_2
float64 1
2
⌀ | annotation_name
stringclasses 131
values | is_attacks
int64 0
1
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
The paper deals with an interesting topic and totally up to date to provide farmers with solutions for free farrowing (which in Europe may become mandatory under The End of the Cage Age initiative).
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
There are only minor comments with very specific issues:
| null | null |
The following changes could improve the quality of the paper.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
There are only minor comments with very specific issues:
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
As mentioned earlier, we did not have resources t continue the data collection within the time period we had.
| null | null |
However, it would be more elegant to have more batches.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Author Response Figure 1 was missed from the last MS.
| null | null |
The writing and data presenting need to be improved.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
The paper deals with an interesting topic and totally up to date to provide farmers with solutions for free farrowing (which in Europe may become mandatory under The End of the Cage Age initiative).
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
The paper deals with an interesting topic and totally up to date to provide farmers with solutions for free farrowing (which in Europe may become mandatory under The End of the Cage Age initiative).
| null | null |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
The reviewer is completely right in adressing this point.
| null | null |
The paper is clearly written, with nice figures and with a discussion supported by the results obtained.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Andersen and Marko have analyzed the design of farrowing pens and present the first production results of the “SowComfort farrowing pen”.
| null | null |
The writing and data presenting need to be improved.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
There are only minor comments with very specific issues:
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
The reviewer is completely right in adressing this point.
| null | null |
The paper is clearly written, with nice figures and with a discussion supported by the results obtained.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Author Response Figure 1 was missed from the last MS.
| null | null |
The reviewer is completely right in adressing this point.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
The paper deals with an interesting topic and totally up to date to provide farmers with solutions for free farrowing (which in Europe may become mandatory under The End of the Cage Age initiative).
| null | null |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Finally, thank you for being so patient with our manuscript
| null | null |
Andersen and Marko have analyzed the design of farrowing pens and present the first production results of the “SowComfort farrowing pen”.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
The paper deals with an interesting topic and totally up to date to provide farmers with solutions for free farrowing (which in Europe may become mandatory under The End of the Cage Age initiative).
| null | null |
As mentioned earlier, we did not have resources t continue the data collection within the time period we had.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Andersen and Marko have analyzed the design of farrowing pens and present the first production results of the “SowComfort farrowing pen”.
| null | null |
The paper is clearly written, with nice figures and with a discussion supported by the results obtained.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
The writing and data presenting need to be improved.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
As mentioned earlier, we did not have resources t continue the data collection within the time period we had.
| null | null |
As mentioned earlier, we did not have resources t continue the data collection within the time period we had.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
There are only minor comments with very specific issues:
| null | null |
The following changes could improve the quality of the paper.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Andersen and Marko have analyzed the design of farrowing pens and present the first production results of the “SowComfort farrowing pen”.
| null | null |
The reviewer is completely right in adressing this point.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
Author Response Figure 1 was missed from the last MS.
| null | null |
The paper is clearly written, with nice figures and with a discussion supported by the results obtained.
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
This was unfortunately not possible in the present iinnovation project.
| null | null |
The paper deals with an interesting topic and totally up to date to provide farmers with solutions for free farrowing (which in Europe may become mandatory under The End of the Cage Age initiative).
| null | null |
agriculture12060868_makarova
| 0 |
line 115: Did one repetition mean one plant?line 130: How many fruits were used as a sample of representative fruits?
| null | null |
Author Response Dear Reviewer We would like to thank You for your attention to our work and for carefully reading our manuscript.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
It presents interesting original results on the assessment of the diversity existing for the sweet pepper local variety ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’.
| null | null |
Changes in respect to the previous version are in track changes.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
There are just a few minor comments: lines 102 and 113: Were the seeds collected in 2000 and sown in 2021?
| null | null |
2) In figure 3: why CP cultivars in purple lines are clustered with CC and MG in green?
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
It presents interesting original results on the assessment of the diversity existing for the sweet pepper local variety ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’.
| null | null |
Author Response Dear Reviewer We would like to thank You for your attention to our work and for carefully reading our manuscript.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
Additional corrections through the text have been done.
| null | null |
See the attachment Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
#Answer: Again, we would like to thank You for your attention and for carefully reading the manuscript.
| null | null |
We also thank you for the positive and encouraging comment.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
See the attachment Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
| null | null |
Line 245: would be better to show the value of each agronomic trait mentioned here
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
Tripodi et al., seeks to set a basis of authenticity of ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’ sweet pepper by using a combinatory approach of biochemical, genetic, and agronomic markers/traits.
| null | null |
There are just a few minor comments: lines 102 and 113: Were the seeds collected in 2000 and sown in 2021?
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
Author Response Dear Reviewer We would like to thank You for your attention to our work and for carefully reading our manuscript.
| null | null |
line 135: How many fruits were used as a bulk of representative fruits?
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
We have carefully considered comments and thoughtful suggestions, revising the manuscript accordingly.
| null | null |
This work is quite interesting and is well-written.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
We have carefully considered comments and thoughtful suggestions, revising the manuscript accordingly.
| null | null |
Changes in respect to the previous version are in track changes.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
There are just a few minor comments: lines 102 and 113: Were the seeds collected in 2000 and sown in 2021?
| null | null |
It presents interesting original results on the assessment of the diversity existing for the sweet pepper local variety ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_makarova
| 0 |
Below point by point response to concerns Reviewer 2 Tripodi et al., seeks to set a basis of authenticity of ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’ sweet pepper by using a combinatory approach of biochemical, genetic, and agronomic markers/traits.
| null | null |
Changes in respect to the previous version are in track changes.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
See the attachment Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
| null | null |
Below point by point response to concerns Reviewer 2 Tripodi et al., seeks to set a basis of authenticity of ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’ sweet pepper by using a combinatory approach of biochemical, genetic, and agronomic markers/traits.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
This work is quite interesting and is well-written.
| null | null |
This work is quite interesting and is well-written.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
It presents interesting original results on the assessment of the diversity existing for the sweet pepper local variety ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’.
| null | null |
See the attachment Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
There are just a few minor comments: lines 102 and 113: Were the seeds collected in 2000 and sown in 2021?
| null | null |
Tripodi et al., seeks to set a basis of authenticity of ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’ sweet pepper by using a combinatory approach of biochemical, genetic, and agronomic markers/traits.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
#Answer: Again, we would like to thank You for your attention and for carefully reading the manuscript.
| null | null |
The results are described and discussed in detail.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
1) The introduction part is a bit long, although it states the importance of this local variety of sweet pepper and of tracing its origin.
| null | null |
It presents interesting original results on the assessment of the diversity existing for the sweet pepper local variety ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
There are just a few minor comments: lines 102 and 113: Were the seeds collected in 2000 and sown in 2021?
| null | null |
line 115: Did one repetition mean one plant?line 130: How many fruits were used as a sample of representative fruits?
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
See the attachment Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
| null | null |
See the attachment Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
#Answer: Again, we would like to thank You for your attention and for carefully reading the manuscript.
| null | null |
Author Response Dear Reviewer We would like to thank You for your attention to our work and for carefully reading our manuscript.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
This work is quite interesting and is well-written.
| null | null |
Below point by point response to concerns Reviewer 2 Tripodi et al., seeks to set a basis of authenticity of ‘Peperone Cornetto di Pontecorvo’ sweet pepper by using a combinatory approach of biochemical, genetic, and agronomic markers/traits.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
We hope that these revisions successfully address the raised concerns, remaining available for any other requests regarding the manuscript.
| null | null |
We hope that these revisions successfully address the raised concerns, remaining available for any other requests regarding the manuscript.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
Author Response Dear Reviewer We would like to thank You for your attention to our work and for carefully reading our manuscript.
| null | null |
#Answer: Again, we would like to thank You for your attention and for carefully reading the manuscript.
| null | null |
agronomy12061433_perova
| 0 |
It is perfectly feasible that some owners did not leave their homes because they were for example, ill, but they did so during the pandemic.
| null | null |
We have addressed your comments and responded in the attached file.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
L22 and elsewhere: dogs’ “leaving time” or “leaving hours” I think this expression is misleading because it is not the dogs that have left home, but the owners.
| null | null |
According to the authors, the main finding is that dogs whose leaving time reduced the most during the lockdown were most at risk of developing new SRBs.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Aa little more mention of issues of SRBs from owner perspective (e.g.
| null | null |
half of the dogs from the SRB group moved to the Clear group in October.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
There would be evidence for some behaviors, such as destructive behavior or defecation, but how would owners know about pacing or tail-chasing?
| null | null |
Line 131: There was an error with referencing wanted to flag.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
I do think this is of interest to a range of stakeholders.
| null | null |
Line 96-97- some more detail on the findings of these various surveys would be beneficial similarly to Bowen's study, just so provide a clear background/discussion of literature setting scene for your study.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
You note that the pseudo-R2 was small but I think you could go into more details and note the possibility that it was unrelated too.
| null | null |
This information might be presented in your other paper, but it would be good to include this basic information here as well, so readers can better understand your methods and findings.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Materials and Methods: Line 151: how was the criterion of “at least 5 minutes” chosen?
| null | null |
The sample size is good, and the results are interesting.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
If other people were present, did all of them have to be away or just the dog’s owner?
| null | null |
However, I don't think the figures were referred to in the text (unless that was the errors highlighted below?)
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
I hope this review helps – thank you for the opportunity.
| null | null |
According to the authors, the main finding is that dogs whose leaving time reduced the most during the lockdown were most at risk of developing new SRBs.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Author Response Our replies to these comments are given in italics below each comment.
| null | null |
Impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on management of pet dogs in the UK.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Larger issues: I would like to see the authors address a few different angles in the discussion 1.
| null | null |
Line 382-384 „To our knowledge, this is the first empirical evidence to show a link between changes in dogs’ leaving routines and risk of SRBs.” The authors take priority in the empirical demonstration of changes in dogs when the routine of the day is disturbed.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Study periods: It may be useful to spell out a little more here why these survey periods were chosen here, this is covered elsewhere but think could be made clearer here and earlier.
| null | null |
The whole section is not relevant to the main question.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on management of pet dogs in the UK.
| null | null |
noise complaints and issues with housing; property damage; decline of human-pet bond) could be beneficial (line 56-57).
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
As I wrote in the previous manuscript review: “Impact of changes in time left alone on separation-related behaviour in UK pet dogs” is one more paper on the behavior of dogs in the COVID-19 pandemic developed in the last two years.
| null | null |
This is a well written and clear manuscript which would be of interest to academics, practitioners and dog owners.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
There would be evidence for some behaviors, such as destructive behavior or defecation, but how would owners know about pacing or tail-chasing?
| null | null |
We have addressed your comments and responded in the attached file.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
The article, “Impact of Changes in Owner Leaving Pattern on Separation-Related Behaviour in Pet Dogs in the UK” investigated whether the prevalence of SRB in dogs changed with changes in dog management during and after COVID lockdowns.
| null | null |
I would suggest highlighting and discussing this outcome more.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
The sample size is good, and the results are interesting.
| null | null |
This comparison seems essential—if some dogs gets worse but some get better, than the argument that changes due to COVID might bring about new SRB becomes weaker.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on management of pet dogs in the UK.
| null | null |
Discussion: The results are appropriately discussed though perhaps more discussion about further study would be beneficial.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Line 29: change “dogs whose leaving hours reduce most” to “dogs whose time left alone decreased most” Thank you, this edit has been applied.
| null | null |
Seems a comparison between SRB- (baseline) → SRB + (post lockdown) and SRB + (baseline) → SRB- (post lockdown) dogs is critical and missing.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
The authors gathered data (via owner surveys) about the same dogs before the pandemic, at the beginning of the pandemic and approx.
| null | null |
It may be beneficial to make it clear why cut off of 'at least 5 mins' was used, e.g justification for this/why this time duration used.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Can you address the dogs that improved between Feb and Oct?
| null | null |
Conclusions: I believe Animals requires a Conclusions section.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
L127-137 The dates of data collections have been already mentioned in L121-126, so there is no need for repeating them.
| null | null |
Results: These were generally well-detailed with clear layout considering scope of results.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
L127-137 The dates of data collections have been already mentioned in L121-126, so there is no need for repeating them.
| null | null |
P6 L176 I am assuming you excluded dogs that were not left alone in February (or were there none?)
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
My only suggestion is that making it clear why February and October were chosen as survey-points may be beneficial.
| null | null |
Results: These were generally well-detailed with clear layout considering scope of results.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Line 366-369= I'm not sure it's totally fair to interpret this (the dog not always bringing toy when greeting them) as an anthropomorphic interpretation on the part of the owner- the anthropomorphic interpretation seems to be from authors of manuscript not owner?
| null | null |
But this is the opinion of a person using English as a second language.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 219(4), 460-466.
| null | null |
Can you address the dogs that improved between Feb and Oct?
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
P6 L176 I am assuming you excluded dogs that were not left alone in February (or were there none?)
| null | null |
This is a well written and clear manuscript which would be of interest to academics, practitioners and dog owners.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Manuscript has been slightly improved, but my comments were not included.
| null | null |
Can you address the dogs that improved between Feb and Oct?
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
However, the authors do not focus on this result and do not explain this finding.
| null | null |
The authors have hardly studied all the publications on how dogs behave when daily routines were changed, so the term "first study" is exaggerated.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
We have addressed your comments and responded in the attached file.
| null | null |
It seems that the authors of this study have already tackled this topic exhaustively in their previous articles
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Here are some suggestions that can be made throughout the paper:
| null | null |
In other words, 1407/1807 (78%) of dogs were clear of SRB in February and 90.1% in October.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
L127-137 The dates of data collections have been already mentioned in L121-126, so there is no need for repeating them.
| null | null |
Minor issues: Line 35: insert “of” after 9.9%
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Risk factors and behaviors associated with separation anxiety in dogs.
| null | null |
It seems that the authors of this study have already tackled this topic exhaustively in their previous articles
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
That dogs showing SRB prior to lockdown were more likely to show it after.
| null | null |
This is a well written and clear manuscript which would be of interest to academics, practitioners and dog owners.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Therefore, the detailed description of the pandemic is unnecessary and could be moved to the Supplemental material, together with Figure
| null | null |
Introduction: This is clear and in general provides a good background to the topic (bar a couple of points where more expansion would be beneficial).
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
When looking at SRB status in October, of 1,187 dogs who were left alone in October, 117 (9.9%) were reported to have shown at least one SRB”.
| null | null |
It may be beneficial to make it clear why cut off of 'at least 5 mins' was used, e.g justification for this/why this time duration used.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Author Response Thank you for your time in reviewing this manuscript and for your constructive, helpful feedback.
| null | null |
The authors examined how separation-related behaviors in pet dogs changed in relation to time spent away from home by UK owners in February 2020 (pre-pandemic), May-July 2020 (first lockdown during the pandemic), and October-November 2020 (local tier-system for restrictions; follow-up).
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
This is good news, and it is unclear for me why is it reported as bad news.
| null | null |
(*Christley, R.M.; Murray, J.K.; Anderson, K.L.; Buckland, E.L.; Casey, R.A.; Harvey, N.D.; Harris, L.; Holland, K.E.; McMillan, 523 K.M.; Mead, R.; et al.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Some more detail on the application of the findings to practitioners/owners would be beneficial.
| null | null |
Animals 2021, 11, 5, 524 doi:10.3390/ani11010005; *Holland, K.E.; Owczarczak-Garstecka, S.C.; Anderson, K.L.; Casey, R.A.; Christley, R.M.; Harris, L.; McMillan, K.M.; Mead, 529 R.; Murray, J.K.; Samet, L.; et al.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
I have minor comments below and a few larger comments:
| null | null |
The sample size is good, and the results are interesting.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Line 382-384 „To our knowledge, this is the first empirical evidence to show a link between changes in dogs’ leaving routines and risk of SRBs.” The authors take priority in the empirical demonstration of changes in dogs when the routine of the day is disturbed.
| null | null |
Line 30: change “leaving hours increase again” to “time left alone increased again” Thank you, this edit has been applied.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
“More Attention than Usual”: A Thematic Analysis of Dog Ownership Experiences in the 530 UK during the First COVID-19 Lockdown. Anim. 2021, Vol. 11, Page 240 2021, 11, 240, doi:10.3390/ANI11010240).
| null | null |
L314 Table 2: bold is not used here although it was used in Table 1
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Author Response Thank you for your time in reviewing this manuscript and for your constructive, helpful feedback.
| null | null |
Discussion: The results are appropriately discussed though perhaps more discussion about further study would be beneficial.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
This Figure should be moved to the Supplement material as it tells nothing about the dogs’ behaviour.
| null | null |
The sample size is good, and the results are interesting.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Introduction: This is clear and in general provides a good background to the topic (bar a couple of points where more expansion would be beneficial).
| null | null |
Line 461: change “onto” to “on to” Thank you, we’ve corrected the typo.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Seems a comparison between SRB- (baseline) → SRB + (post lockdown) and SRB + (baseline) → SRB- (post lockdown) dogs is critical and missing.
| null | null |
However, an explanation would be useful for those readers who are not familiar with this type of depicting.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
The sample size is good, and the results are interesting.
| null | null |
But the questionnaire only asked how long the dogs had been alone and what they were doing during this time.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
This is a great figure, thank you for including it.
| null | null |
Author Response Thank you for your time in reviewing this manuscript and for your constructive, helpful feedback.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
It seems that the authors of this study have already tackled this topic exhaustively in their previous articles
| null | null |
The article, “Impact of Changes in Owner Leaving Pattern on Separation-Related Behaviour in Pet Dogs in the UK” investigated whether the prevalence of SRB in dogs changed with changes in dog management during and after COVID lockdowns.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
L148 Please explain why a periof of 7 days were asked to be reported
| null | null |
My main question when reading this section concerned how owners would know that certain separation-related behaviors occurred when they were away?
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Line 214: if possible (might not be possible if this was how it was phrased in the survey), change “different to before” to “different from before”
| null | null |
Figure 1- Perhaps just double-check this is referred to in the text.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
I do think this is of interest to a range of stakeholders.
| null | null |
The article is generally well-written, the topic is timely, important, and interesting from a dog welfare aspect.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Author Response Our replies to these comments are given in italics below each comment.
| null | null |
The article is generally well-written, the topic is timely, important, and interesting from a dog welfare aspect.
| null | null |
ani12040482_perova
| 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.