labels
class label 2
classes | premise
stringlengths 0
563k
| hypothesis
stringlengths 18
65
| task
stringlengths 3
43
|
|---|---|---|---|
2contradiction
| Started off a hot mess, but he ended the game with a great shot! @ Boys & Girls Clubs of… | This example is ☀. | tweet_eval/emoji |
0entailment
| But we'll get to that in a minute.
it pays to remember just how the debt ceiling actually works. | This example is first,. | discovery/discovery |
2contradiction
| well i have a twenty-one year old daughter in college there | This example is Wh-Question. | pragmeval/switchboard |
0entailment
| but then using you know prosody information to better you know segment endpoint. | This example is Expansions of y/n Answers. | pragmeval/mrda |
2contradiction
| as long as they continue to offer tickets for miles, airlines should not be encouraged to treat passengers using those tickets as second-class when it comes to bumping. | This example is experiential. | pragmeval/verifiability |
0entailment
| isis leader abu bakr al-baghdadi was killed by an u.s. airstrike
rumors of isis leader's death debunked | This example is against. | pragmeval/emergent |
2contradiction
| zurbarán 's cycle of jacob and his sons has been on display in the long room at auckland castle for over 250 years .
it is the only cycle to be preserved in purpose-built surroundings in the uk , and one of very few of its kind in the world . | This example is no_relation. | pragmeval/gum |
0entailment
| "and ""summerfolk is a lawn party of russian yuppies engaged in an exhausting ideological fight to the finish between the allrightniks and the reformers"
along the way there also are lots of romantic dalliances | This example is Conjunction. | pragmeval/pdtb |
0entailment
| would you trade another sheep for another wood?
no | This example is Question_answer_pair. | pragmeval/stac |
0entailment
| revisionist history by gays is still revisionist history. while aids can be spread through heterosexual sex, i stated that it was homosexual sex that put aids over the critical mass needed to perpetuate and spread. deny that. emoticonxcensored
"so aids is the fault of ""the gays""?emoticonxrolleyes lol it's been a long time, jp." | This example is sarc. | pragmeval/sarcasm |
2contradiction
| -lrb- laughs -rrb- | This example is Positive. | silicone/sem |
2contradiction
| i've rang this number oh for thousands of times over the years | This example is init. | silicone/oasis |
2contradiction
| We can go into detail | This example is positive. | silicone/meld_s |
0entailment
| We can go into detail | This example is neutral. | silicone/meld_e |
2contradiction
| yeah just keep below | This example is align. | silicone/maptask |
2contradiction
| well , rest assured that you can count on us to be here for the long run , please sit down . coffee ? | This example is surprise. | silicone/dyda_e |
2contradiction
| well , rest assured that you can count on us to be here for the long run , please sit down . coffee ? | This example is inform. | silicone/dyda_da |
0entailment
| Whose is it? | This example is sur. | silicone/iemocap |
2contradiction
| 329 U.S. 211
67 S.Ct. 224
91 L.Ed. 196
FISWICK et al.v.UNITED STATES.
No. 51.
Dec. 9, 1946.
Argued Nov. 19, 20, 1946.
[Syllabus from pages 211-213 intentionally omitted]
Frederick M. P. Pearse, of Washington, D.C., for petitioners.
Leon Ulman, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.
1
The Alien Registration Act of 1940, 54 Stat. 670, 8 U.S.C. § 451 et seq., 8 U.S.C.A. § 451 et seq., required aliens, with certain exceptions, to register pursuant to regulations of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization.1 Among the disclosures required was whether during the preceding five years th alien had been 'affiliated with or active in (a member of, official of, a worker for) organizations, devoted in whole or in part to influencing or furthering the political activities, public relations, or public policy of a foreign government.'2
2
Petitioners are German nationals who registered under the Act, the last of the three, Mayer, registering on December 23, 1940. Each stated when he registered that he was not affiliated with or active in such an organization. Each failed to disclose in answer to another question pertaining to 'memberships or activities in clubs, organizations, or societies' that he was in any way connected with the Nazi party. They were indicted in 1944 with 28 others for conspiring to defraud the United States in the exercise of its governmental functions (see Curley v. United States, 1 Cir., 130 F. 1, 4) in violation of § 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C. § 88, 18 U.S.C.A. § 88.
3
The indictment charges that petitioners continuously between September 1, 1939, and the date the indictment was returned, September 13, 1944, conspired with each other and with Draeger, the German consul in New York City and leader of the Nazi party in this country, with Draeger's secretary, Vogel, and with other representatives of the Third Reich, to defraud the United States by concealing and misrepresenting their membership in the Nazi party. It charges that since 1933 the Nazi party was devoted to furthering the political activities and policy of the German Reich in this country, that each petitioner during the five years prior to his registration was a member of that party, that Draeger and Vogel directed petitioners in registering under the Act to conceal and falsify their connection with the Nazi party, that petitioners followed such directions, that after their registration they continued from day to day to misrepresent to the government their connection with and activities in the Nazi party. The indictment alleges that as a means of accomplishing the conspiracy the petitioners appeared for registration and in registering falsely failed to disclose their connection with and activities in the Nazi party. The indictment sets forth 40 overt acts. Many related to instructions given by Draeger and Vogel to various defendants from September to December 1940, in connection with their registration. Others related to the registering by petitioners in November and December, 1940. The last over act alleged to have been committed by any of petitioners was the filing by Mayer of his registration statement on December 23, 1940.
4
Of the 31 indicted, only the three petitioners were convicted after a jury trial.3 Fiswick and Rudolph were sentenced to imprisonment for 18 months each. Mayer was sentenced to imprisonment for a year and a day. The judgments of conviction were affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, one judge dissenting. 3 Cir., 153 F.2d 176. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted because the rulings of the lower courts on the continuing nature of the conspiracy were apparently in conflict with decisions of this Court. See United States v. Irvine, 98 U.S. 450, 25 L.Ed. 193; United States v. Kissel, 218 U.S. 601, 31 S.Ct. 124, 54 L.Ed. 1168.
5
First. The nature and duration of the conspiracy assumed great importance at the trial for the following reason. Each petitioner after he was apprehended made damaging statements to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Mayer, in November, 1943, stated that he had applied for membership in the Nazi party and had not disclosed the fact because Vogel told him not to. Fiswick's statement made in April, 1944, was to the same effect. Rudolph made substantially the same admissions in November, 1943 and then in September, 1944, retracted them insofar as he had said that in registering under the Act and in failing to disclose his Nazi party affiliation he had followed instructions. His later reason for non-disclosure was his asserted desire to protect his family. Each of these statements was admitted at the trial. At first, each was admitted only as against the maker. At the close of the government's case, however, the District Court ruled that each of these statements was admissible against each of the other coconspirators. It so charged the jury. Later the jury returned to the courtroom for further instructions. One of the questions on which the foreman stated that they desired instruction related to that part of the charge 'where you said something about all of the defendants were bound by the act of one or something, something as a group, and the other said the individuals.' The judge then repeated that the admissions of each were admissible against all provided there was a conspiracy and they were all in it.
6
The Solicitor General now rightly concedes that that ruling was erroneous. Though the result of a conspiracy may be continuing, the conspiracy does not thereby become a continuing one. See United States v. Irvine, supra. Continuity of action to produce the unlawful result, or as stated in United States v. Kissel, supra, page 607 of 218 U.S., at page 126 of 31 S.Ct., 54 L.Ed. 1168, 'continuous co-operation of the conspirators to keep it up' is necessary. A conspiracy is a partnership in crime. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150, 253, 60 S.Ct. 811, 858, 84 L.Ed. 1129. Under § 37 of the Criminal Code, the basis of the present indictment, an overt act is necessary to complete the offense.4 The statute of limitations, unless suspended,5 runs from the last overt act during the existence of the conspiracy. Brown v. Elliott, 225 U.S. 392, 401, 32 S.Ct. 812, 815, 56 L.Ed. 1136. The overt acts averred and proved may thus mark the duration, as well as the scope, of the conspiracy.
7
In this case the last overt act, as we have noted, was the filing by Mayer of his registration statement on December 23, 1940. That act was adequate as an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy to make a false return. But there is difficulty in also making it serve the function of an overt act in furtherance of a conspiracy to conceal from 1940 to 1944 the fact that false returns had been made. All continuity of action ended with the last overt act in December, 1940. There was no overt act of concealment which followed the act of making false statements. If the latter is permitting to do double duty, then a continuing result becomes a continuing conspiracy. If, as we think, the conspiracy charged and proved did not extend beyond the date of the last overt act, the admissions of each petitioner were improperly employed against the others. While the act of one partner in crime is admissible against the others where it is in furtherance of the criminal undertaking, Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, and ca es cited, all such responsibility is at an end when the conspiracy ends. Logan v. United States, 144 U.S. 263, 309, 12 S.Ct. 617, 632, 36 L.Ed. 429; Brown v. United States, 150 U.S. 93, 98, 14 S.Ct. 37, 39, 37 L.Ed. 1010. Moreover, confession or admission by one coconspirator after he has been apprehended is not in any sense a furtherance of the criminal enterprise. It is rather a frustration of it. If, as the Circuit Court of Appeals thought, the maintenance of the plot to deceive the government was the objective of this conspiracy, the admissions made to the officers ended it. So far as each conspirator who confessed was concerned, the plot was then terminated. He thereupon ceased to act in the role of a conspirator. His admissions were therefore not admissible against his erstwhile fellow-conspirators. Gambino v. United States, 3 Cir., 108 F.2d 140, 142, 143.
8
It is earnestly argued, however, that the error was harmless. The 'harmless error' statute, Judicial Code, § 269, 28 U.S.C. § 391, 28 U.S.C.A. § 391, provides that 'On the hearing of any appeal, certiorari, * * * or motion for a new trial, in any case, civil or criminal, the court shall give judgment after an examination of the entire record before the court, without regard to technical errors, defects, or exceptions which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.' We have recently reviewed the history of this statute and the function it was designed to serve in criminal cases. Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 66 S.Ct. 1239. The Court there stated, page 1248 of 66 S.Ct.: 'If, when all is said and done, the conviction is sure that the error did not influence the jury, or had but very slight effect, the verdict and the judgment should stand, except perhaps where the departure is from a constitutional norm or a specific command of Congress. * * * But if one cannot say, with fair assurance, after pondering all that happened without stripping the erroneous action from the whole, that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error, it is impossible to conclude that substantial rights were not affected. The inquiry cannot be merely whether there was enough to support the result, apart from the phase affected by the error. It is rather, even so, whether the error itself had substantial influence. If so, or if one is left in grave doubt, the conviction cannot stand.'
9
We cannot say with fair assurance in this case that the jury was not substantially swayed by the use of these admissions against all petitioners. It is not enough to say that there may be a strong case made out against each petitioner. The indictment charges a conspiracy, not the substantive crime of falsely registering. The evidence that petitioners conspired with each other and with Draeger, Vogel, and others, is not strong. Though we assume there was enough evidence to go to the jury on the existence of that conspiracy, the case was one which a prosecutor would be anxious to bolster.
10
The prosecutor's case, apart from the admissions, may be briefly summarized. Draeger and Vogel were active in the affairs of the Nazi party in this country. Their stenographer, a government witness, testified that applications for membership in the party were received at their office. Dues were paid there. A car file of members of the party and of applicants for membership was kept there. The name of each petitioner was on the list. A letter was sent to all on the list in August or September, 1940, over Draeger's signature, requesting them to discuss a matter with Draeger. Those who appeared in response to the letter were told to conceal their Nazi party membership or affiliation when they registered under the Act. Another witness for the government—a defendant in the case who was granted a severance—also testified that Vogel gave instructions to party members not to disclose their affiliation with the Nazi party. And a clerk in Draeger's office testified for the government that the party members who came to the cons late were told to say in their registration statement that they were members of an innocuous sounding association of German nationals. There was no evidence that petitioners came to the consulate seeking advice. There was no direct evidence that petitioners had received the instructions from the consulate to conceal their party membership. There was no direct evidence that petitioners came to the consulate in response to the letter which was sent. They were not identified as being with any group which called there. There was no evidence that they conferred with Draeger or Vogel or with each other.
11
The Solicitor General states with commendable candor that in this state of the proof it was manifestly important for the prosecutor 'to bring into the case against petitioners evidence of a character that might better convince the jury that when each failed to reveal his Party connection in registering he had done so upon Party instructions, and, hence, that he was a member of the conspiracy.' The admissions served that purpose. They supplied the first direct evidence that petitioners acted pursuant to the instructions of the consulate. It is true, as respondent emphasizes, that none of these admissions implicates any petitioner except the maker. But since, if there was a conspiracy, Draeger and Vogel were its hub, evidence which brought each petitioner into the circle was the only evidence which cemented them together in the illegal project. And when the jury was told that the admissions of one, though not implicating the others, might be used against all, the element of concert of action was strongly bolstered, if not added. Without the admissions the jury might well have concluded that there were three separate conspiracies, not one. Cf. Kotteakos v. United States, supra. With the admissions the charge of conspiracy received powerful reinforcement. And the charge that each petitioner conspired with the others became appreciably stronger, not from what he said but from what the other two said. We therefore cannot say with any confidence that the error in admitting each of these statements against the other petitioners did not influence the jury or had only a slight effect. Indeed, the admissions may well have been crucial. The admissions apparently became of considerable importance in the deliberations of the jury, for, as we have noted, they asked for clarification of the instructions on that point. And the admissions so strongly bolstered a weak case that it is impossible for us to conclude the error can be disregarded under the 'harmless error' statute. The use made of the admissions at the trial constituted reversible error.
12
Second. A further question remains. As we have noted, Fiswick was sentenced to imprisonment for 18 months. No fine was imposed. It now appears that he has served his sentence. Accordingly, it is suggested that the cause is moot and that the writ of certiorari should be dismissed as to him. We followed that procedure in St. Pierre v. United States, 319 U.S. 41, 42, 63 S.Ct. 910, 911, 87 L.Ed. 1199, saying that since the sentence had been served, 'there was no longer a subject matter on which the judgment of this Court could operate.' We added, however, that the petitioner had not shown that 'under either state or federal law further penalties or disabilities can be imposed on him as a result of the judgment which has now been satisfied.' At page 43 of 319 U.S., at page 911 of 63 S.Ct., 87 L.Ed. 1199.
13
The situation here is different. Fiswick is an alien. An alien sentenced to imprisonment for one year or more 'because of conviction in this country of any crime involving moral turpitude' is, unless pardoned, subject to deportation if the crime was committed within five years after the alien's entry into the United States. 39 Stat. 874, 889, 8 U.S.C. § 155, 8 U.S.C.A. § 155. The conspiracy with which Fiswick is charged was formed and executed within that five year period, as his last entry was in 1937. The conspiracy of whic he was convicted was one to impede the government in one of its lawful functions, to prevent it from obtaining information which the Executive and Congress deemed vital to our internal security, to conceal by fraud, deceit, and perjury6 the ramifications of an organization in our midst bent on our undoing. We need not determine in this collateral way whether conviction for such a crime would involve 'moral turpitude' within the meaning of the deportation laws.7 But the judgment, if undisturbed, stands as unimpeachable evidence that Fiswick committed the crime charged. The hazards of deportation because of that fact are real.8 To leave him to defend a deportation order on the ground that the crime of which he was convicted did not involve 'moral turpitude' is to add to his burdens by depriving him of his best defense—that he was not properly convicted.
14
Moreover, other disabilities or burdens may flow from the judgment, improperly obtained, if we dismiss this cases as moot and let the conviction stand. If Fiswick seeks naturalization, he must establish that during the five years immediately preceding the date of filing his petition for naturalization he 'has been and still is a person of good moral character.' 54 Stat. 1137, 1142, 8 U.S.C. § 707(a)(3), 8 U.S.C.A. § 707(a)(3). An outstanding judgment of conviction for this crime stands as ominous proof that he did what was charged and puts beyond his reach any showing of ameliorating circumstances or explanatory matter that might remove part or all of the curse. And even though he succeeded in being naturalized, he would, unless pardoned, carry through life the disability of a felon;9 and by reason of that fact he might lose certain civil rights.10 Thus Fiswick has a substantial stake in the judgment of conviction which survives the satisfaction of the sentence imposed on him. In no practical sense, therefore, can Fiswick's case be said to be moot.
15
It is said however, that having served his sentence, Fiswick may not be resentenced on a new trial and that if his conviction is reversed, he thereby escapes deportation. The argument is that he thwarts the deportation policy by electing to serve his sentence. We cannot assume, however, that Fiswick is guilty of the conspiracy charged. He was not accorded the trial to which he is entitled under our system of government. The conviction which e suffered was not in accordance with law. The errors in the trial impeach the conviction; and he must stand in the position of any man who has been accused of a crime but not yet shown to have committed it. To dismiss his case as moot would permit the government to compound its error at Fiswick's expense. That course does not comport with our standards of law enforcement.
16
Reversed.
1
See 5 Fed.Reg. 2836 for the regulations.
2
Regulations, supra, note 1, § 29.4(1)(15).
3
Six entered pleas of guilty. There was a dismissal as to one, a severance as to 14. Ten were tried. The jury acquitted three and disagreed as to the other four.
4
At common law it was not necessary to aver or prove an overt act. See Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347, 359, 32 S.Ct. 793, 799, 56 L.Ed. 1114, Ann.Cas.1914A, 614. The same is true under the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1—7, 15 note. Nash v. United States, 229 U.S. 373, 378, 33 S.Ct. 780, 782, 57 L.Ed. 1232; United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., supra, at page 252 of 310 U.S., at page 857 of 60 S.Ct., 84 L.Ed. 1129. But § 37 of the Criminal Code requires not only an agreement to do the unlawful act but also the doing of 'any act to effect the object of the conspiracy'. See Hyde v. United States, supra, at page 359, of 225 U.S., at page 799 of 32 S.Ct., 56 L.Ed. 1114, Ann.Cas.1914A, 614.
5
See, for example, § 1 of the Act of August 24, 1942, 56 Stat. 747, 18 U.S.C.Supp. II, § 590a, as amended by § 19(b) of the Act of July 1, 1944, 58 Stat. 649, 667, 18 U.S.C.Supp. IV, § 590a, 18 U.S.C.A. § 590a.
6
The registration statements required by the Act were sworn statements. Regulations, supra note 1, § 29.4(g), (j).
7
Convictions for perjury, Kaneda v. United States, 9 Cir., 278 F. 694, for frauds on the revenues, Guarneri v. Kessler, 5 Cir., 98 F.2d 580, United States ex rel. Berlandi v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 113 F.2d 429, for frauds with respect to property, United States ex rel. Medich v. Burmaster, 8 Cir., 24 F.2d 57, have been held by the lower courts to meet that test. And counterfeiting was so classified by the Court in United States ex rel. Volpe v. Smith, 289 U.S. 422, 53 S.Ct. 665, 77 L.Ed. 1298. As to deportation for violations of the Alien Registration Act of 1940 see § 20(b)(4) and (5). See also Alien Enemy Act of 1798, Rev.Stat. §§ 4067—4070, as amended 40 Stat. 531, 50 U.S.C. §§ 21 24, 50 U.S.C.A. §§ 21—24; Presidential Proclamation No. 2655, 10 Fed.Reg. 8947.
8
Although deportation is not technically a criminal punishment, it may visit great hardship on the alien. Bridges v. Wixon, 326 U.S. 135, 147, 65 S.Ct. 1443, 1449, 89 L.Ed. 2103. As stated by the Court, speaking through Mr. Justice Brandeis, in Ng Fung Ho. v. White, 259 U.S. 276, 284, 42 S.Ct. 492, 495, 66 L.Ed. 938, deportation may result in the loss 'of all that makes life worth living.'
9
'All offenses which may be punished by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, shall be deemed felonies.' Criminal Code § 335, 18 U.S.C. § 541, 18 U.S.C.A. § 541.
10
Thus Mo.R.S.A. § 4561 renders such person incompetent to serve on a jury and forever disqualifies him from voting or holding office, unless pardoned.
| This example is 12. | lex_glue/scotus |
0entailment
| Effective October 3, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), the Company hereby employs Executive, and Executive hereby accepts such employment, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. | This example is Employment. | lex_glue/ledgar |
2contradiction
| ยาม เย็น กับ สาม คน กลายเป็น มากขึ้น และ น่ารำคาญ มากขึ้น สำหรับ เธอ สำหรับ เขา และ สำหรับ เก้าอี้ ซึ่ง แสดงให้เห็น ถึง ความไม่พอใจ ของ มัน ด้วย การ คลาย คันโยก สำหรับ การ ปรับ ความสูง | This example is tr. | language-identification |
2contradiction
| One of the most beautiful movies ever made in ex Yu.Story is very familiar to people in ex Yul because generation after war used to live in the same way.People in the west cant imagine how political situation in our country affect people.The plot is in the 50",When Josip Broz Tito said no to the SSSR and politbiro and because of that our borders becomes open for western influence.But,in a country were people didn't had much money jeans was only ideal and friendship was everything.The friendship between for young people an a girl was so strong that after 40 years of their emigration from Yu is still alive.They get together after all this years on Ester"s funeral and they start to remember of their childhood,before their went to the emigration and become successful people. | This example is neg. | imdb |
0entailment
| take care of my cat offers a refreshingly different slice of asian cinema . | This example is pos. | rotten_tomatoes |
0entailment
| Palace brawl When lines break down, there #39;s chaos So now, the second wave of reaction has set in to last Friday night #39;s Pistons-Pacers-Fans brawl at the Palace. At first, the reaction was shock, dismay, outrage. | This example is Sports. | ag_news |
2contradiction
| There's Hawaiian food, and then there's Hawaiian food. My introduction to such fare was in Hawaii, many years ago. First was the inevitable luau which, although touristy, nonetheless introduced me to such foods as kalua pig, lomi lomi salmon, and taro. Next came the \"traditional\" restaurant. \"Traditional\" is in quotes because I'm not quite sure what tradition was being followed, but it was an attempt to offer some of the foods eaten by Hawaiians in the not too distant past, and even into the present. I got my first taste of poi, which by the way is actually pretty good as a foil to the salty foods often served. I then moved to a locals restaurant that served many of the same dishes, and fell in love with haupia, which when properly prepared is coconut heaven and when poorly prepared is coconut jello. Lastly, I was introduced to the then new Pacific Rim (aka Asian fusion) cuisine.\n\nAloha Kitchen isn't like any of those places. \n\nThe menu is representative of what is sometimes called local Hawaiian food, and caters to the large local Hawaiian community that has taken root in Las Vegas. The food is an amalgam of Pacific Rim cuisines. It is cheap and filling. A typical meal is the mix plate, consisting of two scoops of white rice, a scoop of macaroni salad, and one or more items such as kalua pork, chicken katsu, and pork lau lau. Spam is also a mainstay (spam sushi!), or try the loco moco (bed of rice, hamburger patty, eggs sunny side up, and a big ladle of brown gravy). Health food lovers need not apply.\n\nLike most such restaurants, Aloha Kitchen is very plain, and very inexpensive. The Maryland Parkway location is near UNLV, and feels like a typical university hole-in-the-wall place. Order at the counter, take a seat, and your meal will be brought to you.\n\nMeal #1: I had never had a loco moco before, and decided to give it a try. Loco Moco is a bowl of steamed rice, with a fried hamburger patty on top, followed by a generous portion of brown gravy, and a couple of sunny side up eggs. The rice was bland, the gravy was bland, the hamburger was bland. Once is enough!\n\nMeal #2: I decided to try a typical meal - one of the many mix plate combinations. In this case it consisted of kalua pork, chicken katsu, and of course rice and macaroni salad. The kalua pork was salty but flavorful, good in combination with the bland rice. The real winner was chicken katsu, a kind of Japanese fried chicken with a sweet barbecue sauce on top.\n\nMeal #3: I got the local plate: chicken, beef, Spam musubi, macaroni salad, and rice, all for the bargain price of $6.99. The beef consisted of thin small slices of beef with a sweet barbecue sauce, on top of sprouts of some sort. On top of the beef was a thin piece of chicken, skin on, sauted until the skin was crisp. Both were very good. Next, Spam musubi; I had to try it. There were two pieces. Each pieced consisted of a thin slice of Spam (about 3\" x 1.5\" x 1/8\"), fried until crisp, on top of a thick layer of warm rice with barbecue sauce, wrapped in a large sheet of seaweed. It wasn't as weird as I expected, although the seaweed was too chewy. I'd give it a mild thumbs up.\n\n\n\nThis kind of food isn't fancy; it's heavy on the fat, heavy on the carbs. I love it! Aloha Kitchen serves a decent representation of the stuff. I have a feeling there must be better versions out there, but this one is pretty good. | This example is 1 star. | yelp_review_full/yelp_review_full |
2contradiction
| In addition , the contract includes modification of the effluent treatment plant at Follum . | This example is positive. | financial_phrasebank/sentences_allagree |
2contradiction
| to hide the orb of truth--and every throne | This example is positive. | poem_sentiment |
0entailment
| James Jim Jordan (May 26 1925-October 14 1999) was an American basketball player.He played collegiately for the University of North Carolina from 1944 to 1946. Although he originally attended Mount St. Mary's University where he was the team's leading scorer the U.S. Navy transferred him to the ROTC in Chapel Hill. Soon after arriving at UNC Jordan became one of the best players on the team. | This example is Athlete. | dbpedia_14/dbpedia_14 |
2contradiction
| I've been using this kettle now for about 3 years. Since day 1 it has dribbled down the front whenever you pour out of it leaving a puddle under the cup you're pouring into. Now I've notice that the bottom of the spout (on the outside) is rusting! That and the plastic spout cover hasn't held up to the heat of the stove top, its actually started to deform from heat. You can find much better tea kettles for the money. And if you buy this one in a few years you'll have to. | This example is positive. | amazon_polarity/amazon_polarity |
0entailment
| I have green eyes as well , but mine have a blue ring around the outside . | This example is noHate. | hate_speech18 |
0entailment
| Its normally hot mail. Com you see!
| This example is ham. | sms_spam |
2contradiction
| " We could be separated " : Immigrants , families react after Trump <administration/> ends protected status : circus :
" We could be separated " : <Immigrants/> , families react after Trump administration ends protected status : Condiments : | This example is equal. | humicroedit/subtask-2 |
0entailment
| Which restaurant is the cheapest, Shake Shack or Five Guys ? | This example is ComparePlaces. | snips_built_in_intents |
0entailment
| @LuckyL3FT @najmaaa_ali yellow bone be oh so easy wit da name callin b | This example is neither. | hate_speech_offensive |
2contradiction
| who loves stargate?
who loves sg1 and atlantis? i love them both. | This example is Business & Finance. | yahoo_answers_topics |
0entailment
| Jemele Hill in September 2016. Jemele Hill, the outspoken host of ESPN’s 6:00 p.m. SportsCenter, called President Donald Trump a “white supremacist” on Twitter. ESPN later posted a statement, saying her comments “do not represent the position of ESPN” and she knows her comment was “inappropriate.” The White House called Hill’s comments a “fireable offense.” The 41-year-old Hill has been hosting the 6:00 edition of SportsCenter, dubbed SC6 with Michael Smith since February. Hill and Smith previously co-hosted Numbers Never Lie and His & Hers before they were promoted to the flagship show. You can follow Hill on Twitter. Here’s what you need to know about Hill’s politics and her latest brush with controversy. Hill’s tweet about Trump was posted late on September 11 after she retweeted a The Hill article about musician Kid Rock, who has been teasing a run for Michigan Senator after launching KidRockforSenate.com in July. The article is about Rock’s long Facebook post about the “extreme left.” ““Pretty funny how scared I have them all and their only agenda is to try and label people / me racist who do not agree or cower to them,” Rock wrote. “He loves black people so much that he pandered to racists by using a flag that unquestionably stands for dehumanizing black people,” Hill wrote, referring to the singer’s use of the Confederate Battle flag. After a back-and-forth with other Twitter users, Hill wrote, “Donald Trump is a white supremacist who has largely surrounded himself w/ other white supremacists.” Hill also tweeted other messages about Trump. “He is unqualified and unfit to be president. He is not a leader. And if he were not white, he never would have been elected. He has surrounded himself with white supremacists — no they are not “alt right” — and you want me to believe he isn’t a white supremacist?” She went on, “Trump is the most ignorant, offensive president of my lifetime. His rise is a direct result of white supremacy. Period. The height of white privilege is being able to ignore his white supremacy, because it’s of no threat to you. Well, it’s a threat to me.” “Donald Trump is a bigot. Glad you could live with voting for him. I couldn’t, because I cared about more than just myself,” she wrote. After the tweet gained attention in the conservative media, ESPN issued a statement. “The comments on Twitter from Jemele Hill regarding the President do not represent the position of ESPN,” the statement reads. “We have addressed this with Jemele and she recognizes her actions were inappropriate.” Hill has continued to Tweet, but on other subjects. Hill has made her politics clear on her Twitter page. She has a tweet with photos of her 2015 and 2016 visits to the White House to meet President Barack Obama pinned to her page. Twitter users frequently complain to her, and she typically responds. In January 2016, ESPN issued a memo to employees to avoid making political comments. Since then, Sage Steele lost a hosting position after writing that she was sad to see the “joy” in the faces of anti-Trump protesters. Curt Schilling was famously fired in April 2016 for an offensive post about transgender people. After the Pulse nightclub shootings in Orlando in June 2016, when a man killed 49 people inside a gay nightclub, Hill wrote, “So in a country where we have done everything possible to undermine the LGBTQ community, we are suddenly lecturing Islam on homophobia. Oh.” Forbes asked ESPN PR why Hill wasn’t fired after that message. A spokesperson told the magazine that Hill’s statement wasn’t a violation of the 2016 memo. ESPN has been dealing with subscriber losses for some time, and its apparent liberal slant on politics has taken the blame in the media. Conservatives point to Schilling’s firing and Caitlyn Jenner receiving the Arthur Ashe courage award in 2015 as examples. Not firing Hill for her comments will certainly not help. SportCenter‘s Linda Cohn also admitted that politics are hurting ESPN. During a conference in June, Hill defended the coverage of political topics, noting that the athletes they cover have made it difficult to avoid politics. “I just hadn’t noticed the correlation between us being called more liberal as you see more women in a position on our network… as you see more ethnic diversity, then all of a sudden ESPN is too liberal. So I wonder, when people say that, what they’re really saying,” Hill said, reports Yahoo News. “The other part of it is that we’re journalists, and people have to understand, these uncomfortable political conversations… the athletes are dragging us here.” Hill continued, noting that they never asked Colin Kaepernick to kneel during the national anthem and they didn’t expect Gregg Popovich to go off on Donald Trump during press conferences. “You have athletes saying they’re going to the White House, not going to the White House, that’s all sports news,” Hill continued. “It didn’t just start with this generation of athletes, it’s always been that way. Sometimes when I hear a viewer say they don’t want their politics mixed with sports, I say, ‘What did you think about Muhammad Ali?’ And then all of a sudden it’s glowing praise.” Hill made similar comments in an interview with Newsday. “Whether we want to discuss it or not, athletes are dragging us into these conversations,” Hill said in January. “It’s not that Mike and I wake up one day and say, ‘Hey, today we’re going to be MSNBC.’ It’s usually based off a news story that is relevant to sports.” Hill has been at ESPN since 2006, when she joined EPSN.com as a columnist. Over time, she began appearing on ESPN TV shows, including First Take, Outside the Lines and others. A short time after she was hired, she spoke with the Columbia Journalism Review about being a young, black female journalist and the reaction you get when you write about race. “Any time you write about race, people get incensed,” Hill said in 2006. “I recently wrote a column saying that there is just as much evidence against Lance Armstrong as there is [against] Barry Bonds, and part of the reason there is this extraordinary benefit of the doubt extended to Lance is because he’s white. That’s not the overwhelming reason, mind you. Just a factor in the whole equation. I got a ton of mail about that one, even though I posed the racial element in the next-to-last graf of the column.” In 2011, she started the His & Hers podcast with Michael Smith, which soon replaced Smith’s Numbers Never Lie in 2013. They continued hosting the show until they moved to SportsCenter. Their part of the show is known as SC6 With Michael And Jemele. The Los Angeles Times reported in March that Smith and Hill signed new contracts, even as ESPN had its massive lay-off earlier this year. Hill told Dan Patrick that their contracts weren’t up for another year when they were approached to host SC6. “The fact that they asked us to do this, that’s a key part of it. This was not our plan. We were about a year out from our contract being up,” Hill said in January. “We knew that they liked us and wanted us to keep doing our thing. We were of the mentality that we were just going to be His and Hers. And what were things that were needed to improve that? And the way it just kind of happened caught us by surprise.” In 2008, Hill had her first brush with controversy at ESPN. The Detroit native compared rooting for the Boston Celtics instead of the Pistons to “saying Hitler was a victim.” “Rooting for the Celtics is like saying Hitler was a victim. It’s like hoping Gorbachev would get to the blinking red button before Reagan. Deserving or not, I still hate the Celtics,” Hill wrote. Hill was suspended for a week and the statement was taken out of her column. She also wrote an apology. However, this was actually just the start of another controversy, as ESPN’s Lou Holtz made a similar remark later that year. He apologized too, but wasn’t suspended. In an interview with Deadspin, Hill shrugged it off. “Many have said that ESPN treated me unfairly. The 64,000 question: How do I really feel? My initial answer is a story, or rather, a moment,” she told Deadspin in 2008. “A couple years ago, I was visiting the Poynter Institute, one of the foremost journalism think tanks in the country, and I sat in on a session taught by one of my favorite columnist and people, the Washington Post’s Sally Jenkins. A student asked her if she ever got upset when other writers rewarded — particularly if she knew they weren’t as good. And Sally said — and I’m paraphrasing here — that she always prided herself on keeping her eyes on her own career. That’s my answer. That’s how I feel.” | This example is true. | hyperpartisan_news |
0entailment
| We will show that this intrinsic object representation has some interesting properties and based on which the newly derived [[ dynamical model ]] makes << particle-filter style tracker >> more robust and reliable . | This example is USED-FOR. | sciie |
0entailment
| The formalization of DLRs provided by Meurers ( 1995 ) defines a formal lexical rule specification language and provides a semantics for that language in two steps : A rewrite system enriches the lexical rule specification into a fully explicit description of the kind shown in Figure 1 . | This example is Background. | citation_intent |
0entailment
| Currently, with advances in radiotherapeutic, chemotherapeutic, and surgical techniques, limb-salvage surgery has become an accepted treatment [2–9]. | This example is background. | scicite |
2contradiction
| Says New Jersey Devils managing partner Jeff Vanderbeek took us into arbitration. | This example is half-true. | liar |
0entailment
| refinery
peacekeeper | This example is false. | lexical_relation_classification/K&H+N |
2contradiction
| lease
rent | This example is PART_OF. | lexical_relation_classification/CogALexV |
0entailment
| cypress
evergreen | This example is hyper. | lexical_relation_classification/BLESS |
2contradiction
| instrument
modest | This example is HYPER. | lexical_relation_classification/ROOT09 |
2contradiction
| toy
real | This example is HasA. | lexical_relation_classification/EVALution |
0entailment
| "WASHINGTON -- Sales of new single-family homes fell 8.1% in August to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 569,000, the lowest pace in a year. Analysts predicted they could drop further in coming months.</br></br>The August decline followed a revised 2.2% decrease in July to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 619,000, the Commerce Department reported. The department originally had said sales of new single-family homes were unchanged in July.</br></br>The decrease is ""in line with expectations for what I think is a moderate decline in construction and new and existing home sales,"" said Mark Riedy, executive vice president of the Mortgage Bankers Association of America. ""I think we're near the bottom of the decline.""</br></br>While Mr. Riedy and several other economists expect new-home sales to drop modestly through year-end, they disagree about next year's outlook because of uncertainty about the mortgage interest-rate picture. New-home sales should total about 665,000 for all 1984, up from 623,000 last year, Mr. Riedy forecast, saying that next year they ""may be a little higher"" or the same.</br></br>Future new home-sales activity depends on interest rates, and ""I don't see much promise of them falling enough"" to spark a resurgence of demand, said James Christian, chief economist of the U.S. League of Savings Institutions. Similarly, Michael Carliner, a senior economist at Chase Econometrics, sees new-home sales dropping to a rate of 590,000 next year from his projected 625,000-unit rate this year, saying there will be ""a small surge"" in mortgage rates in 1985." | This example is yes. | crowdflower/economic-news |
2contradiction
| Check out some shots from yesterday's reenactment of Gen. Washington's historic Delaware Crossing! http://bit.ly/1xkzstK | This example is constituency. | crowdflower/political-media-audience |
0entailment
| Check out some shots from yesterday's reenactment of Gen. Washington's historic Delaware Crossing! http://bit.ly/1xkzstK | This example is personal. | crowdflower/political-media-message |
0entailment
| @yayamartinez dude i am so sorry!!!!! I never got that number for you my fail i just remembered | This example is worry. | crowdflower/text_emotion |
0entailment
| "@SouthwestAir I notice that there are separate buttons for ""guitar"" and actual ""music"" in this pic. Some bands should take note of this." | This example is neutral. | crowdflower/airline-sentiment |
0entailment
| Libtard Dylan Ratigan explains why massive snow in DC is PROOF of Global Warming http://bit.ly/aLICxl #cbiz #teaparty #tcot #ocra #sgp #912 | This example is No. | crowdflower/tweet_global_warming |
0entailment
| RT @mention NY Times: German Chancellor Merkel white washes her abrupt, politically expedient U-turn on #nuclear energy. {link} | This example is Neutral / author is just sharing information. | crowdflower/sentiment_nuclear_power |
2contradiction
| Our partnership with the IFRC & Red Crescent Society of Cote DÛªIvoire focuses on investments in water, food security and emergency relief. | This example is Action. | crowdflower/corporate-messaging |
2contradiction
| Check out some shots from yesterday's reenactment of Gen. Washington's historic Delaware Crossing! http://bit.ly/1xkzstK | This example is partisan. | crowdflower/political-media-bias |
0entailment
| AITA fir not wanting to get the same haircut as my daughter to make her feel better. | So, my 14yo daughter's hair was very damaged. This was a result of her not taking proper care of her hair. On top of that she even has lice from somewhere. So I had no other option but to get her hair cut short into a short pixie cut. I know it sucks and she hates it but there is nothing much I can do about that. But she's pretty depressed and not talking to any of us. My husband thinks that I should get the same haircut as my daughter got to make her feel better. I refused and they think I'm an asshole. AITA? Edit: Some of you assume that I dragged her to a salon or something. No. She agreed to this. Her hair was very damaged. And damaged hair doesn't look good. She told me that she's just mad because it doesn't look that good. She got a wig too. This is not some punishment or anything along those lines. | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/commonsense |
0entailment
| Aren't you supposed to buy your son some new shoes? | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/deontology |
0entailment
| I normally give my mailman a bottle of water when he passes by on hot days but I didn't today because he brought his own bottle of water | This example is unacceptable. | ethics/justice |
0entailment
| My son lied to me, but I said it was okay pretty quick.
ambition | This example is acceptable. | ethics/virtue |
2contradiction
| no don't be confused i knowweverything is so confusing ugh ok ok i have to go now | This example is happy. | emo/emo2019 |
0entailment
| just followed a drunk to his car, watched him get in and immediately wreck, called cops and he's off to jail. #dui #donteventryit #madd | This example is no-hate-speech. | tweets_hate_speech_detection |
0entailment
| posted by Heather Ann | urlLink 8:40 AM | This example is female. | blog_authorship_corpus/gender |
0entailment
| posted by Heather Ann | urlLink 8:40 AM | This example is Pisces. | blog_authorship_corpus/horoscope |
2contradiction
| posted by Heather Ann | urlLink 8:40 AM | This example is Religion. | blog_authorship_corpus/job |
0entailment
| What do men think about women with short hair? | This example is judgmental. | open_question_type |
0entailment
| Poor test results for heart drugs | This example is false. | health_fact |
0entailment
| Islam later emerged as the majority religion during the centuries of Ottoman rule, though a significant Christian minority remained. How long has a significant Christian minority remained? a billion years | This example is no. | mc_taco |
0entailment
| The psychotic reaction was thought to be due to steroid therapy since no other causes could explain the psychotic reaction. | This example is Not-Related. | ade_corpus_v2/Ade_corpus_v2_classification |
2contradiction
| X wants to know what activities Y likes to do during weekends. Have you been to the cinema lately?
There hasn't been anything worth seeing. | This example is In the middle, neither yes nor no. | circa |
0entailment
| you get a wider range of thoughts and points of view that will open up your mind to more ways of fixing this problem.
| This example is Effective. | EffectiveFeedbackStudentWriting |
2contradiction
| general point : In practice, this window proved slightly longer; but the general point was alarmingly demonstrated in the U-2 Crisis of 1960. :
basic fact : In practice, this window proved slightly longer; but the basic fact was alarmingly demonstrated in the U-2 Crisis of 1960. : | This example is negative. | phrase_similarity |
0entailment
| A new study has found that protein and not sugar activates the cells responsible for keeping us awake and burning calories.
Physiological mixtures of AAs electrically excited orx/hcrt cells through a dual mechanism involving inhibition of K(ATP) channels and activation of system-A amino acid transporters. | This example is same. | scientific-exaggeration-detection |
0entailment
| Mary has a cat that she loves to play with. Sometimes she drags the cat toy across the floor so the cat can chase it. When she drags the cat toy across the play room floor it goes quite a far distance. When she drags it across the rumpus room floor it barely moves at all. This means the _____ is more smooth (A) play room floor (B) rumpus room floor | This example is A. | quarel |
0entailment
| Steve Coogan starred in The Look of Love.
Stephen John Coogan -LRB- born 14 October 1965 -RRB- is an Irish-English actor , stand-up comedian , impressionist , screenwriter , and producer .. He began his career in the 1980s , working as a voice artist on the satirical puppet show Spitting Image and providing voiceovers for television advertisements .. voice artist. voice artist. satirical. satirical. Spitting Image. Spitting Image. In the early 1990s , he began creating original comic characters , leading him to win the Perrier Award at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe .. Perrier Award. Edinburgh Comedy Awards. Edinburgh Festival Fringe. Edinburgh Festival Fringe. In 1999 , he co-founded the production company Baby Cow Productions .. Baby Cow Productions. Baby Cow Productions. While working with Armando Iannucci on On the Hour and The Day Today , Coogan created his most developed and popular character : Alan Partridge , a socially awkward and politically incorrect regional media personality .. Armando Iannucci. Armando Iannucci. On the Hour. On the Hour. The Day Today. The Day Today. Alan Partridge. Alan Partridge. politically incorrect. politically incorrect. He featured in several television series , which earned him three BAFTA nominations and two wins for Best Comedy Performance .. BAFTA. BAFTA. Best Comedy Performance. British Academy Television Award for Best Comedy Performance. A feature-length film , Alan Partridge : Alpha Papa , was released in 2013 , and opened at number one at the British box office .. Alan Partridge. Alan Partridge. box office. box office. Coogan grew in prominence within the film industry in 2002 , after starring in The Parole Officer and 24 Hour Party People .. The Parole Officer. The Parole Officer. 24 Hour Party People. 24 Hour Party People. He portrayed Phileas Fogg in the 2004 remake Around the World in 80 Days and co-starred in The Other Guys , Tropic Thunder , In the Loop , Hamlet 2 , Our Idiot Brother , Ruby Sparks and the Night at the Museum films , as well as collaborating with Rob Brydon in The Trip and A Cock and Bull Story .. Phileas Fogg. Phileas Fogg. Around the World in 80 Days. Around the World in 80 Days ( 2004 film ). The Other Guys. The Other Guys. Tropic Thunder. Tropic Thunder. In the Loop. In the Loop ( film ). Hamlet 2. Hamlet 2. Our Idiot Brother. Our Idiot Brother. Ruby Sparks. Ruby Sparks. Night at the Museum. Night at the Museum ( film series ). Rob Brydon. Rob Brydon. The Trip. The Trip ( 2010 film ). A Cock and Bull Story. A Cock and Bull Story. He was also a voice actor in the animated comedy films Despicable Me 2 and its prequel Minions , and played Hades in Percy Jackson & the Olympians : The Lightning Thief .. comedy. comedy film. Despicable Me 2. Despicable Me 2. Minions. Minions ( film ). Hades. Hades. Coogan has also branched out into more dramatic roles , with What Maisie Knew , and portrayed Paul Raymond in the biopic The Look of Love .. What Maisie Knew. What Maisie Knew ( film ). Paul Raymond. Paul Raymond ( publisher ). biopic. Biographical film. The Look of Love. The Look of Love ( film ). He co-wrote , produced , and starred in the film adaptation Philomena , which earned him a Golden Globe and BAFTA nomination , and two Academy Award nominations -LRB- for Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Picture -RRB- .. BAFTA. BAFTA. Philomena. Philomena ( film ). Golden Globe. Golden Globe Award. Academy Award. Academy Award. Best Adapted Screenplay. Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay. Best Picture. Academy Award for Best Picture. He has been cast in the lead role for the ABC television pilot Doubt and the Showtime drama Happyish .. ABC. American Broadcasting Company. Showtime. Showtime ( TV network ). On 22 November 2011 , Coogan , along with Hugh Grant , gave evidence to the Leveson Inquiry on phone hacking , favouring regulation of the press .. Hugh Grant. Hugh Grant. Leveson Inquiry. Leveson Inquiry. phone hacking. phone hacking | This example is related. | fever-evidence-related/mwong--fever-related |
2contradiction
| Organisms use <mask> different classes of redox centers in enzymes. | This example is eight. | numer_sense |
2contradiction
| The delivery and learning process was well done and fast based on my experience with the brand - but the new electronic will take many hours of "play time" to fully explore. | This example is negative. | dynasent/dynabench.dynasent.r1.all/r1 |
0entailment
| Oh and yea, those 50 cent wings are some of the best in Phoenix, they will burn your mouth and makes you want to bury your tongue in a glass of ice cube for an hour, try them! | This example is positive. | dynasent/dynabench.dynasent.r2.all/r2 |
0entailment
| The solute was placed inside a beaker and 5 mL of the <e1>solvent</e1> was pipetted into a 25 mL glass <e2>flask</e2> for each trial. | This example is Entity-Destination(e1,e2). | sem_eval_2010_task_8 |
2contradiction
| what color space should i use
For example, Adobe RGB and sRGB are two different absolute color spaces , both based on the RGB model. | This example is True. | wiki_qa |
2contradiction
| Suppose Jerome got a surprise delivery. The thing delivered was a Puerto Rican crested toad or a cupcake. The thing delivered to Jerome definitely isn't a creature. True or False: a cupcake was delivered to Jerome. | This example is False. | cycic_classification |
2contradiction
| Male cardinals are red. | This example is no. | commonsense_qa_2.0 |
0entailment
| IN WHAT FUCKING STATE OF MIND WAS HE IN TO EVEN THINK THAT THIS COULD WORK WHAT THE FUCK | This example is nothate. | dynahate |
0entailment
| In his first year as mayor, Medill received very little legislative resistance from the Chicago City Council. He vetoed a relatively modest eleven City Council ordinances that year, and even most of those were narrowly involved with specific financial practices he considered wasteful, and none of the vetoes were overridden. He used his new powers to appoint the members of the newly constituted Chicago Board of Education and the commissioners of its constituted public library. His appointments were approved unanimously by the City Council.
Would a reader generally expect that ten or more vetoes had been issued by a mayor of Chicago in any significant number of the years leading up to Medill's election? | This example is YES. | CONDAQA |
0entailment
| Tl;Dr at the end
This happened a few years ago, but it still bothers me to this day,so i kinda want to know if im the asshole here, (sorry about my spelling) for some backstory :
It was Thursday and we were at class, we had finished all our lessons, so we had nothing to do, our teacher told us we can do whatever we want, so a friend of mine brings out his phone and opens a "" horror"" game that functions like a prank, here's how it works: you ask the app a personal question and it knows the answer, now the app knows the answer because the person who downloaded the app is able to make the question and the answer.
So he decides to prank all of our classmates, he starts with me but I already knew the app and so did everyone else, except for one guy, so we go up to him, try to scare him with questions like: who's right next to me? What's this guy's name? What's that guys name? The app answered correctly for each one, he was still pretty confident the app is fake, but one thing that made the guy a bit scared was when my friend gave him the phone, told him he could ask whatever he wanted but me and my friend already had a plan that surprisingly worked, my friend would write answers and I would stay next to the guy and tell him he could ask the app my questions, and he did, he was now convinced the app was some kind of ghost trying to communicate.
He was religious and believed in ghosts, he also believed ghosts could murder whoever they want
This is where I thought of an idea
I started telling him fake stories about how if you ask this app more than 3 questions it would go after you and your family, he started being worried, then my friend, who overheard us, decided he would make the answers threats towards this guy's family.
So now, me and my friend, intentionally go sit next to him, and we ask the app a few questions, we read the answers loudly so he can overhear us.
At this point, he started trembling, tears started forming in his eyes, and he just loudly started crying, we started telling him it was fake, but he refused to believe us because he thought we were trying to calm him down.
Our teacher heard the cry, and was dead worried, she asked us what was going on
Luckily our teacher was very open so we just told her everything, she then tried to calm him down but it was no use, he just kept on crying for half an hour saying things like "I don't want my mother to die" or "they can take me but not my family"
We never thought it would get this far, we even thought he was just pretending he was scared (cause sometimes the app would just not answer at all) half of our classmates were saying that we took it way too far. So AITA??
TL;DR : some guy believed that ghosts exist and could go after people, we intentionally prank him with an app, he believes it and ends up crying
| This example is WRONG. | scruples |
0entailment
| PersonX buys a home As a result, PersonX wants to decorate
PersonX is an interior decorator. | This example is strengthener. | defeasible-nli/atomic |
0entailment
| A man in glasses, a t-shirt and shorts stands in a kitchen and cuts a tomato on top of a cutting board that rests on a kitchen table with a green tablecloth. A chief preparing a meal inside of an open kitchen that has tomato in it.
The kitchen is huge and has an eight-top stove. | This example is strengthener. | defeasible-nli/snli |
2contradiction
| Every clown avoids every guard.
No spy is an entrepreneur.
Every chef is a historian.
No journalist is an acrobat.
No potter is a journalist.
Every historian hunts every acrobat.
Every spy is an astronaut.
Some sailor is a plumber.
No journalist is a singer.
No sailor is an entrepreneur.
Every potter is an athlete.
No sailor is a historian.
Every journalist is a sailor.
Some sailor is an athlete.
No singer is a sailor.
Some singer is not a clown.
Every sailor avoids every singer.
No guard is a singer.
Some architect is not a historian.
Some guard liberates no journalist.
No entrepreneur is a chef.
Every spy is a chef.
Every architect is a clown.
Some entrepreneur is an athlete.
Some architect hunts every astronaut.
No entrepreneur liberates any manager.
Every plumber is a spy.
No acrobat is a potter.
| This example is consistent. | natural-language-satisfiability |
0entailment
| The project has been continuing without any pauses, postpones or suspensions, and the military have not forgotten about it.
The project has been put on hold, but the military have not forgotten about it. | This example is Contradiction. | FLUTE |
2contradiction
| Can Hulk's alter ego explain atomic events? | This example is True. | strategy-qa |
2contradiction
| All eels are fish. No fish are plants. A thing is either a plant or animal. Nothing that breathes is paper. All animals breathe. If a sea eel is either an eel or a plant, then a sea eel is an eel or an animal.
Sea eel breathes or is a paper. | This example is Unknown. | folio |
2contradiction
| When global business progress, cash-flow management becomes more comfortable.
World Trade Organization work towards the facilitation and growth of international trade. | This example is no. | avicenna |
2contradiction
| People play Immersion game as a contact sport. | This example is true. | CREAK |
2contradiction
| There are two blocks. We call them A and B. Block A is below B. Block A has a big blue square and a medium yellow square. The medium yellow square is touching the right edge of this block. The big blue square is far from the medium yellow square. Block B contains one medium yellow triangle, one small yellow circle and one medium blue circle. The medium yellow triangle is to the right of and below the medium blue circle. The small yellow circle is to the right of and near to the medium blue circle.
Is the blue square that is far from a square which is touching the right edge of a block , below all medium yellow shapes that are below a medium circle? | This example is Yes. | spartqa-yn |
0entailment
| Enrique has visited only thirteen people
Enrique has visited Jimmy, Salvador, Andre, Jay, Johnnie, Warren, Jimmie, Louis, Alvin, Mitchell, Bill, Micheal, Michael and Jerome | This example is contradiction. | clcd-english |
2contradiction
| Is it made of plastic?
borax | This example is False. | twentyquestions |
2contradiction
| The performances were awful, the costumes delivered a generic feeling for the period and being a Victorian Living Historian, I was unimpressed with the accuracy of weaponry and attention to detail.<br /><br />I wouldn't say you need any knowledge of the Kelly saga to stay with the flow of this movie but to comprehend the happenings and attitudes of the time you will require a bit of basic historical knowledge. Do not expect, as some rather silly people do, any of the characters to have the Auzzie accent as we know it, it was, at that time, a country during infancy.<br /><br />OK, the story had some elements of fiction but these detracted form a wider following of the film. Gregor Jordan said in the extra feature on the DVD that he wanted his movie to 'inspire an interest', and that is the opposite of what happened with me so this movie gets the thumbs down here.<br /><br />See it and you WILL be sorry | This example is Positive. | counterfactually-augmented-imdb |
0entailment
| do good samaritan laws protect those who are injured at an accident? | This example is True. | boolq-natural-perturbations |
0entailment
| Why do black people like basketball? Because they can shoot, steal and drive. | This example is implicit_hate. | implicit-hate-stg1 |
2contradiction
| Gary is strong. Gary is high. Harry is little. Harry is short. Fiona is quiet. Charlie is sad. Charlie is rough. If someone is not big then they are sad. If someone is not bad then they are smart. If someone is quiet then they are wealthy. If someone is wealthy and not poor then they are nice. If someone is sad and not big then they are dull. If someone is little and short then they are poor. If someone is poor and not wealthy then they are rough. All smart people are kind.
Fiona is nice. | This example is False. | PARARULE-Plus |
0entailment
| I asked the participant if they were a US citizen or a Green Card holder.
I asked the participant if they were either a US citizen or a Green Card holder, or neither. | This example is False. | ambient |
0entailment
| While you go to the grocery store before getting lunch, you need a grocery store cart to carry it all. | This example is True. | I2D2 |
Subsets and Splits
No saved queries yet
Save your SQL queries to embed, download, and access them later. Queries will appear here once saved.